Mqa Presentation Report
Mqa Presentation Report
Then, the statistics on the casting defects and the composition mentioned within the case 750
device casing level was collected. With regard to these facts, Pareto Shift the graph shown in
Figure 3 drawn. As proven, play the basic casting and oval defects Roles in the production of
defective stage casing additives. Castings of casing level Furnished by a sister agency of Paris
Saint-Germain. Thus, in the attitude of employees of the sister The institution becomes almost
aware of the defects of casting in the casing stage Turned to a request for action to triumph over
those casting defects. Then, the oval changed to the selected As, the filter defect to overcome the
identical through the implementation of the DMAIC section. Subsequently, the proven project
constitution was developed in Table 1. As shown, the occurrence The oval shape was determined
after forming a casing level because the task was a hassle.
3 Measure:
The ovality of the stage casing is measured with the use of a dial gauge indicator. As it will have
pressed inside the casing. If there is no ovality the movement of the needle is in the clockwise
direction. But if there is ovality, then needle will move in anti-clockwise direction. So, we used
dial indicator to check ovality in the bore.
Defects per unit (DPU)= Total number of stage casing units rejected /Total number of stage
casing units inspected
31 /750 =0.0413
Defects per opportunity (DPO) =DPU /O
DPO =0.0413 5 /0.00827
Change the table Six Sigma, discovered that Sigma appreciates Versus 8,266.67 DPMO on account
of the creation of phase encapsulation units in exploration Being an account here is 3.90. Since
then, this estimate is calm under 6 Sigma, it was remarkable. That open doors exist to improve the
level of Sigma by overcoming submission in submission Organization of packaging units. In line
with this perception, as referred to earlier, the exploration is underway Announced here, efforts
have been made to defeat the oval in the creation of the packaging stage Alone.
4 ANALYSE PHASE:
After the measure phase the time is to analyses the data, that causes of ovality can be determined.
Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is used and the following chart has been developed. The
table of FMEA that is produced during this analysis is:
Figure 1: FMEA
It can be seen in the above figure that the most important effect causing the ovality is highest risk
priority number RPN-252. It is used to observe the cause of ovality that the quality level of six
sigma’s can be enhance. Several observations are made and doing each observation the stage
casing pass through machining. The interview of the machine operator also conducted and ask
about causes that lead to the failure. The information is gathered in the form of chart which is given
below:
Figure 2: Cause and effect diagram
As it can be seen in the above cause and effect diagram that there are number of factors that are
causing g the ovality but there are some factored that are really7 important ones and has to be
eliminated. These factors are:
i. Chuck holding pressure
ii. Tool wear
iii. High depth of cut
As the causes are identified six sigma calculation as presented follow to check the quality.
Total defective pieces =31
Total number of rejected units with the mark of ovality= 5
Defective units without ovality=31-5
=26
Hence,
Hence, by following the improvement process the quality level of six sigmas can be improved
from 3.90 to 3.97
5 Improve Phase:
After that analysis phase the main cause of ovality is indicated that it is occur when the major and
minor axis emanate after the machining. The reasons behind these are high clutch pressure, uneven
feed and tool life. All three reasons are considered in the factorial experimentation. Again the stage
casing is being produced by machining by changing the three parameters and the following
experimental table is obtained:
Table 1: FOC table:
The least ovality occur during the experiment number 1 and 2, as it can be seen in table 0.01mm.
So, these parameters have to be remained constant expect the tool wear. The following table is
constructed including these 1 and 2 experiments:
Table 2:Values of factors and levels indicated in these experiments to get least ovality
The standard devices will be designed to prevent the ovality instead of machining the stage casing.
One of the step is to use the three jaw chuck over limited length of 5mm. Operators think that the
high pressure will prevent the piece from slipping but it causes some unevenness stresses. A new
attachment was designed to control the pressure which is shown in the following figure.
Figure 3: Attachment of fixture without stage casing
6 Control phase:
To implement the control phase, the most important thing to be insured are the implementation
suggestions and sustain the process. It is the responsibility of the supervisor to instruct the team
and then insure that the process is going according to standards. Also, special inspection room will
be made as per name NDT which will check the faulty casing. Also, a separate room will be created
for the bin of faulty casting.
7 Conclusions:
The Six Sigma approach included two main activities. One is the implementation. Project to solve
quality failure by applying DMAIC phases. Another activity is to establish a training infrastructure
for the belt through recruitment. The labels are Hero, Black Belt, Black Belt and Green Belt. It
was the process of establishing a belt-based training infrastructure. Consume a lot of money in
organizations during the implementation of Six Sigma projects. This created the impression that
Six Sigma is a costly and uneconomic approach. To carry out in small and medium manufacturing
enterprises to achieve. Continuous improvement of quality.