Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
Division of Zamboanga Del Norte
GUTALAC CENTRAL SCHOOL

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: RICHARD S. BAID Name of Rater: EMMA LINDA E. ORCULLO
Position: TEACHER III Position: MASTER TEACHER I
School / Division GUTALAC CENTRAL SCHOOL Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2018 - 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING
EVALUATION

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Results
Poor
QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Showed knowledge Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge Showed knowledge of No acceptable
Education Knowledge and of content within and March 2019 of content and its content and its of content and its content and its evidence was
4 4 4
Services Pedagogy across curriculum integration within integration within and integration within integration within and shown
teaching areas. and across subject across subject areas as and across subject across subject
areas as shown shown inMOV1witha areas as shown in areas as shown in
inMOV1witha rating rating of 6 MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a 4
of 7 of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted any 1 No

lessons using MOV using MOV 1 and using MOV 1 and of the given MOV acceptable
1 and supported by supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 evidence was
any 1 of the other other given MOV of the other given shown
given MOV MOV
4

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic 2. Used a range of June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Showed knowledge Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge Showed knowledge of No acceptable
Education teaching strategies March 2019 of content and its content and its of content and its content and its evidence was
4 4 4
Services that enhance learner integration within integration within and integration within integration within and shown
achievement in and across subject across subject areas as and across subject across subject
literacy and areas as shown shown inMOV1witha areas as shown in areas as shown in
numeracy skills. inMOV1witha rating rating of 6 MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a 4
of 7 of 5 rating of 4

Efficiency Facilitated using Facilitated using different Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable
different teaching teaching strategies that different teaching different teaching evidence was
strategies that promote reading, writing strategies that strategies that promote shown
promote reading, and/or numeracy skills as promote reading, reading, writing
writing and/or shown in MOV 1 with a writing and/or and/or numeracy skills
numeracy skills as rating of 6 numeracy skills as as shown in MOV 1
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 4 4
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 5

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(1)

Basic 3. Applied a range of June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Used different Used different teaching Used different Used different teaching No acceptable
Education teaching strategies to March 2019 teaching strategies strategies that develop teaching strategies strategies that develop evidence was
4 3 3.5
Services develop critical and that develop critical critical and creative that develop critical critical and creative shown
creative thinking, as and creative thinking and/or other and creative thinking thinking and/or
well as other higher- thinking and/or HOTS as shown in MOV and/or other HOTS other HOTS as
order thinking skills. other HOTS as 1 with a rating of 6 as shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 4
shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5 1 with a rating
with a rating of 7 of 4
 Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons as Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 No acceptable
lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 and as evidenced by lesson as evidenced evidence was
evidenced by MOV supported by any1 of the MOV 1 and by any 1of the given shown
1 and supported by other given MOV supported by any MOV
any1ofthe other 1of the other given 3
given MOV MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable 4 4 4
Education Environment classroom March 2019 management management management management evidence was
Services and Diversity structure to engage strategies that strategies that engage strategies that strategies that shown
of Learners learners, engage learners learners in engage learners in engage learners in
individually or in in activities/tasks activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks 4
groups, in as shown in MOV shown in MOV1witha shown in MOV 1 as shown in
meaningful 1 with a rating of rating of 6 with a rating of 5 MOV 1with a
exploration, 7 rating of 4
discovery and
hands-on activities Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
within a range of 4 lessons supported by MOV 1 lessons as lesson supported by evidence was
physical learning supported by and any 1 of the other evidenced by any of the shown
environments. MOV 1 and any 1 acceptable MOV MOV 1 and acceptable
of the other supported by any MOV 4
acceptable MOV 1of the other given
MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic 5. Managed June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Applied teacher Used classroom Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable 4 4 4
Education learner behavior March 2019 management management management management evidence was
Services constructively by strategies of strategies that engage strategies of strategies of learner shown
applying positive learner behavior learners in learner behavior behavior that
and non-violent that promote activities/tasks as that promote promote
discipline to ensure positive and non- shown in MOV1witha positive and non- positive and
4
learning- focused violent discipline rating of 6 violent discipline non-violent
environments. as shown in MOV as shown in MOV discipline as
submitted with a submitted with a shown in MOV
rating of 7 rating of 5 submitted with a
rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted at least 4 of Submitted at least Submitted any 1 No acceptable
4 of the given the given strategies as 4 of the given of the given evidence was
strategies as observed in 3 lessons strategies as strategies as shown
observed in at observed in 2 observed in only 1 4
least 4 lessons lessons lesson

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic 6. Used June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Applied Applied differentiated Applied Applied No acceptable 3 3 3
Education differentiated, March 2019 differentiated teaching strategies to differentiated differentiated evidence was
Services developmentally teaching address learner teaching teaching strategies shown
appropriate strategies to diversity as shown in strategies to to address learner
learning address learner MOV 1 with a rating of address learner diversity as
experiences to diversity as 6 diversity as shown shown in MOV 3
address learners’ shown in MOV 1 in MOV 1 with a 1 with a rating
gender, needs, with a rating of 7 rating of 5 of 4
strengths, interests
and experiences.
 and experiences.

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 at No acceptable

4 differentiated differentiated teaching differentiated least 4 lessons as evidence was
teaching strategies in at least 2 teaching observed in 3 shown
strategies in at lessons as evidenced strategies in 2 lessons as observed
least 2 lessons as by MOV 1 and lessons as in 2 lessons
evidenced by supported by evidenced by observed in only 1
MOV 1 and any1ofthe other MOV 1 and lesson differentiated
supported by any acceptable MOV supported by teaching strategy in 3
1 of the other any1ofthe other only 1 lesson as
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV evidently shown in
any 1 of the
acceptable MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable 4 4 4
Education and Planning managed and March 2019 implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was
Services implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown
developmentally sequenced sequenced teaching sequenced sequenced teaching
sequenced teaching and and learning process teaching and and
teaching and learning process as shown in MOV 1 learning process learning 4
learning processes as shown in MOV with a rating of 6 as shown in MOV process as shown in
to meet curriculum 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating
requirements and 7 of 4
varied teaching
contexts.

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

4 developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was
developmentally sequenced teaching sequenced sequenced teaching shown
sequenced and learning process teaching and and learning
teaching and as evidently shown in learning process process as
learning process MOV 1 and supported as evidently evidently shown
4
as evidently by any 1 of the other shown in MOV 1 in any 1 of the
shown in MOV 1 given MOV and supported by given MOV
and supported by any 1 of the other
any 1 of the other given MOV
given MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic 8. Participated in June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently participated Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable 4 4 4
Education collegial March 2019 participated in in LACs/FGDs/ participated in in LAC/FGD/ evidence was
Services discussions that LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss shown
use teacher and meetings to teacher/learner meetings to teacher/learner
learner feedback to discuss feedback to enrich discuss feedback to
enrich teaching teacher/learner instruction as shown in teacher/learner enrich 4
practice. feedback to the MOV submitted feedback to enrich instruction as
enrich instruction instruction as shown in the
as shown in the shown in the MOV MOV submitted
MOV submitted submitted

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable

least 4 LACs/FGDs/ meetings LACs/FGDs/ LAC/FGD/ in any 1 evidence was
LACs/FGDs/ as evidently shown in meetings as of the given MOV shown
meetings as any 1 of the given evidently shown in 4
evidently shown MOV any 1 of the given
in any 1 of the MOV
given MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic 9. Selected, June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Developed and Developed and used Developed and Developed and No acceptable 5 5 5
Education developed, March 2019 used varied varied teaching and used varied used varied teaching evidence was
Services organized and teaching and learning resources, teaching and and learning shown
used appropriate learning including ICT, to learning resources,
teaching and resources, address learning goals resources, including ICT, to
learning resources, including ICT, to as shown in including ICT, to address 5
including ICT, to address learning MOV1witha rating of 6 address learning learning goals
address learning goals as shown in goals as shown in as shown in
goals. MOV1witha rating MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
of 7 rating of 5 rating of 4
 Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 Submitted any No acceptable
4 varied teaching teaching and learning varied teaching teaching and evidence was
and learning resources, including and learning learning resource, shown
resources, ICT, as evidently resources, including ICT,
including ICT, as shown in MOV 1 and including ICT, as as evidently
evidently shown supported by any 1 of evidently shown in shown in any of
5
in MOV 1 and the acceptable MOV MOV 1 and the acceptable
supported by any supported by any MOV
1 of the 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic 4. 10. Designed, June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Designed, Designed, selected, Designed, Designed, selected, No acceptable 4 3 3.5
Education Assessment selected, March 2019 selected, organized and used selected, organized and used evidence was
Services and Reporting organized and organized and diagnostic, formative organized and diagnostic, formative shown
used diagnostic, used diagnostic, and summative used diagnostic, and summative
formative and formative and assessment strategies formative and assessment
summative summative consistent with summative strategies consistent
assessment assessment curriculum assessment with curriculum
strategies strategies requirements as strategies requirements as
consistent with consistent with shown in MOV 1 with a consistent with shown in MOV 1 4
curriculum curriculum rating of 6 curriculum with a rating of
requirements. requirements as requirements as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

4 varied assessment tools as varied assessment tool as evidence was
assessment tools evidently shown assessment tools evidently shown in shown
as evidently inany1ofthe as evidently any of the 3
shown acceptable MOV shown in acceptable
inany1ofthe any1ofthe MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic 11. Monitored and June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently monitored Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable 4 4 4 4
Education evaluated learner March 2019 monitored and and evaluated learner monitored and and evaluated evidence was
Services progress and evaluated learner progress and evaluated learner learner progress and shown
achievement using progress and achievement using progress and achievement
learner attainment achievement learner attainment achievement using learner
data. using learner data as shown in the using learner attainment data
attainment data MOV submitted attainment data as as shown in the 4
as shown in the shown in the MOV MOV submitted
MOV submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable

combination of at combination of 3 of the combination of 2 acceptable MOV evidence was
least 4 of the acceptable MOV of the acceptable shown 4
acceptable MOV MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
were distributed distributed across 3 were distributed the given MOV evidence was
across 4 quarters quarters across 2 quarters shown 4

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic 12. Communicated June 2018 to 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable 4 4 4 4
Education promptly and March 2019 showed prompt prompt and clear showed prompt prompt and clear evidence was
Services clearly the learners’ and clear communication of the and clear communication of shown
needs, progress communication of learners’ needs, communication of the learners’
and achievement the learners’ progress and the learners’ needs, progress
to key needs, progress achievement to key needs, progress and
stakeholders, and achievement stakeholders, including and achievement achievement to
including to key parents/ guardians as to key key
parents/guardians. stakeholders, shown in the MOV stakeholders, stakeholders,
including parents/ submitted including parents/ including 4
guardians as guardians as parents/
shown in the shown in the MOV guardians as
MOV submitted submitted shown in the
MOV submitted
 Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 No acceptable
combination of at combination of 3 of the combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was
least 4 of the acceptable MOV of the acceptable shown 4
acceptable MOV MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV Submitted any 1
were distributed distributed across 3 were distributed of the given MOV
across 4 quarters quarters across 2 quarters 4

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Very Satisfactory (4) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(1)
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed June 2018 to 10.00% Quality Consistently Frequently performed Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable 5 5 5
Education various related March 2019 performed various related performed various various related evidence was
Services works/activities that various related work/activities that related work/activities that shown
contribute to the work/activities contribute to the work/activities that contribute
teaching-learning that contribute to teaching learning contribute to the to the teaching
process. the teaching process as shown in teaching learning learning process as
learning process the MOV submitted process as shown shown in the MOV 5
as shown in the in the MOV submitted
MOV submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 different Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

4 different kinds kinds of acceptable different kinds of the acceptable MOV evidence was
of acceptable MOV acceptable MOV shown 5
MOV
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING Very Satisfactory

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING

4.500 -5.000 Outstanding

3.500- 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor
EMMA LINDA E. ORCULLO RICHARD S. BAID JAIME T. TIMOSA
Rater Ratee Approving Authority
A LINDA E. ORCULLO
TER TEACHER I

FILLED OUT DURING

EVALUATION

Score

0.300
Score

0.300

Score

0.263
Score

0.300

Score
0.300

Score

0.225
Score

0.300
Score

0.300

Score

0.375
Score

0.263
Score

0.300

Score

0.300
 Score

0.500

4.025
Very Satisfactory
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
Division of Zamboanga Del Norte
GUTALAC CENTRAL SCHOOL
Poblacion, Gutalac, Zamboanga del Norte

ANNOTATION TEMPLATE
OBJECTIVES Means of Verification Description of the MOV Pres
1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating
sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about knowledge of content within
and across curriculum teaching areas

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed

highlighting integration of content
✘ knowledge within and across subject areas

1. Applied knowledge of
content within and across 3. Instructional materials highlighting
curriculum teaching areas. mastery of content and its integration in
other subject areas

4. Performance tasks/test material(s)

highlighting integration of content
knowledge within and across subject areas

5. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about teaching strategies that
enhance learner achievement in literacy
and numeracy skills

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in

teaching highlighting learner-centered
2. Used a range of teaching strategies that promote literacy and/or
strategies that enhance numeracy skills
learner achievement in
literacy and numeracy skills. 3. Instructional materials highlighting
learner-centered strategies that promote
literacy and/or numeracy skills
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used
in teaching
 5. Results of assessment used in teaching

6. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about teaching strategies to develop
critical and creative thinking, as well as
other higher-order thinking skills

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in

3. Applied a range of teaching highlighting different teaching
teaching strategies to strategies that develop critical and
develop critical and creative creative thinking and/or other HOTS
thinking, as well as other
higher- order thinking skills. 3. Instructional materials highlighting
different teaching strategies that develop
critical and creative thinking and/or other
HOTS
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used
in demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used in teaching

6. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

4. Managed classroom sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
structure to engage learners, form about managing classroom structure
individually or in groups, in that engages learners in various activities
meaningful exploration,
discovery and hands-on
activities within a range of 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting
physical learning various classroom management strategies
environments. that engage learners in activities/tasks in
different physical learning environments
3. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about teacher management of
learner behavior using the following
strategies:
1. Providing motivation d provide
annotations)

5. Managed learner behavior

constructively by applying
positive and non-violent
 2. Praising the learners/Giving
5. Managed learner behavior positive feedback
constructively by applying
positive and non-violent 3. Setting house rules/guidelines
discipline to ensure learning- 4. Ensuring learners’ active
focused environments. participation
5. Allowing learners to express
their ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal opportunities to
learners
7. Encouraging learners to ask
questions
8. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about using differentiated,
developmentally appropriate learning
experiences

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs developed

6. Used differentiated, highlighting differentiation in content,
product, process, learning environment or
developmentally appropriate others according to learners’ gender,
learning experiences to needs, strengths, interests and
address learners’ gender, experiences
needs, strengths, interests
and experiences.
3. Instructional materials developed
highlighting differentiation in content,
product, process, learning environment or
others according to learners’ gender,
needs, strengths, interests and
experiences

4. Others (Please specify and provide annota

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about using developmentally
sequenced teaching and learning process
7. Planned, managed and
implemented 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
developmentally sequenced highlighting developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning instruction that meet curriculum goals and
processes to meet varied teaching contexts
curriculum requirements and
varied teaching contexts.
 implemented
developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning
processes to meet
curriculum requirements and 3. Instructional materials used to
varied teaching contexts. implement developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning process to meet
curriculum requirements and varied
teaching contexts.
4. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

1. Personal notes of teachers on

LACs/FGDs/meetings with proof of
attendance
8. Participated in collegial
discussions that use teacher
and learner feedback to 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of
enrich teaching practice. teacher and learner feedback to enrich
teaching practice with proof of attendance

3. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about using appropriate teaching
and learning resources, including ICT
Examples:
 Activity sheets/task
sheets/work sheets
9. Selected, developed,  PowerPoint presentations
organized and used
 Video clips
appropriate teaching and
learning resources, including  Module
ICT, to address learning
goals.  SIMs-Strategic Intervention
Materials

 Others
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs with
appropriate instructional materials
appended

3. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

sheet and/or inter-observer agreement
form about using diagnostic, formative
and summative assessment strategies
2. Prepared lesson plans/modified DLLs
highlighting appropriate use of formative
assessment strategies

10. Designed, selected,

 3. Developed diagnostic tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by
10. Designed, selected, superior;
organized and used (b) with sample accomplished
diagnostic, formative and questionnaire/answer sheets
summative assessment
strategies consistent with 4. Developed summative tests:
curriculum requirements. (a) with TOS reviewed by
superior;
(b) with sample accomplished
questionnaire/answer sheets
5. Developed performance tasks:
(a) with rubrics reviewed by
superior;
(b) with sample accomplished
rubrics

6. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)

1. Compilation of a learner’s written work

with summary of results and with
signature of parents

2. Formative/summative assessment tools

11. Monitored and evaluated with TOS and frequency of errors with
learner progress and identified least mastered skills
achievement using learner
attainment data. 3. Class records/grading sheets
4. Lesson plans/modified DLLs showing
index of mastery
5. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

1. At least 3 samples of corrected test

papers of the same 3 learners in the same
learning area with parents’ or guardians’
signature and date of receipt

2. Minutes of PTA meetings or Parent-

Teacher conferences in all quarters with
12. Communicated promptly proof of parents’/guardians’ attendance
and clearly the learners’
needs, progress and 3. Report cards with parent’s or guardian’s
achievement to key signature in all quarters supported by
stakeholders, including minutes of meeting
parents/guardians. 4. Communication with parents/
guardians using various modalities
5. Anecdotal record showing entries per
quarter
 6. Other documents showing learners’
needs, progress and achievement
submitted to other stakeholders
1. Certificate of Recognition or
Participation

2. Certificate of Training

3. Certificate of Speakership

4. Committee involvement

13. Performed various 5. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities

related works/activities that
contribute to the teaching- 6. Book or Journal Authorship/
learning process. Coauthorship/Contributorship

7. Coordinatorship/Chairpersons hip

8. Coaching and mentoring learners in

competitions

9. Mentoring pre-service/inservice
teachers

10. Others (Please specify and provide anno

 ines Appendix M
tion
eninsula
el Norte
L SCHOOL
ga del Norte

EMPLATE
n of the MOV Presented Annotations
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region IX, Zamboanga Peninsula
Division of Zamboanga Del Norte
GUTALAC CENTRAL SCHOOL
Poblacion, Gutalac, Zamboanga del Norte

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: EMMA LINDA E. ORCULLO Name of Rater: JAIME T. TIMOSA
Position: Master Teacher - I Position: School Principal - II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Gutalac Central School Date of Review: April 5, 2019
Rating Period: SY 2018 - 2019
TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Results
Very Satisfactory Poor
QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 1. Content 1. Modeled effective June 2018 7.50% Quality Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective No acceptable
Education Knowledge and application of to March application of application of application of application of content evidence was
4 4 4
Services Pedagogy content knowledge 2019 content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge knowledge within and shown
within and across within and across within and across within and across across curriculum
curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching teaching areas as
areas. areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in shown in MOV1 with a
MOV1 with a rating MOV1 with a rating MOV1 with a rating rating of 5
of 8 of 7 of 6

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lessons as No

lessons as as evidenced by lessons as evidenced by MOV 1 acceptable
evidenced by MOV MOV 1 from evidenced by MOV from colleagues and evidence was
1 and supported by colleagues and 1 from colleagues supported by any 1 of shown
any 1 of the other supported by any 1 and supported by the other given MOV
given MOV of the other given any 1 of the other
MOV given MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 2. Collaborated with June 2018 7.50% Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action Proposed-action No acceptable
Education colleagues in the to March completed and completed action research with research with evidence was
4 4 4 4
Services conduct and 2019 disseminated action research with colleagues. colleagues shown
application of research with colleagues.
research to enrich colleagues.
knowledge of
content and
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 MOV No acceptable
pedagogy.
of the given MOV the acceptable MOV MOV evidence was
shown

Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the Proposed the research No acceptable
research report research report research report report within the rating evidence was
within the rating within the rating within the rating period shown
period period period

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (1)

Basic 3. Developed and June 2018 7.50% Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated effective No acceptable
Education applied effective to March effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching teaching strategies to evidence was
4 4 4
Services teaching strategies 2019 strategies to strategies to strategies to promote critical and shown
to promote critical promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and creative thinking as
and creative creative thinking as creative thinking as creative thinking as well as other HOTS as
thinking, as well as well as other HOTS well as other HOTS well as other HOTS shown in MOV 1 with a
other higher- order as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 rating of 5
thinking skills. with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6

Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 Submitted 1 or more No acceptable

more lessons as as evidenced by lessons as lessons as evidenced evidence was
evidenced by MOV MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV by MOV 1 and shown
1 and supported by supported by any 1 1 and supported by supported by any 1 of
any 1 of the other of the other given any 1 of the other the other given MOV
given MOV MOV given MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Results
 Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Work with June 2018 7.50% Quality Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and shared No acceptable 4 4 4
Education Environment colleagues to to March shared effective shared effective shared effective effective classroom evidence was
Services and Diversity model and share 2019 classroom classroom classroom management shown
of Learners effective management management management strategies that
techniques in the strategies that strategies that strategies that engage learners in
management of engage learners engage learners engage learners activities/tasks done
the classroom in activities/tasks in activities/tasks in activities/tasks in different physical
structure to done in different done in different done in different learning
engage learners, physical learning physical learning physical learning environments as
individually or in environments as environments as environments as shown in MOV 1
groups, in shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 5
meaningful with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
exploration,
discovery and Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
hands-on 4 lessons lessons supported lessons as lesson supported by evidence was
activities within a supported by by MOV 1 and evidenced by any of the shown
range of physical MOV 1 and any 1 any 1 of the other MOV 1 and acceptable
learning of the other acceptable MOV supported by any MOV
environments. acceptable MOV 1of the other
given MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA Results
 Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 5. Exibited June 2018 7.50% Quality Exibited effective Exibited effective Exibited effective Exibited effective No acceptable 4 4 4
Education effective and to March and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive evidence was
Services constructive 2019 behavior behavior behavior behavior shown
behavior management management management management skills
management skills by applying skills by applying skills by applying by applying positive
skills by applying positive and non- positive and non- positive and non- and non-violent
positive and non- violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline discipline to ensure
violent discipline to ensure to ensure to ensure learning- focused
to ensure learning- focused learning- focused learning- focused environments. as
learning- focused environments. as environments. as environments. as shown in MOV
environments. shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV submitted with a
submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a rating of 5
rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6

Efficiency Applied atleast 7 Applied atleast 7 Applied atleast 7 Applied atleast 7 of No acceptable
of the given of the given of the given the given strategies evidence was
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in 1 shown
observed in at observed in 3 observed in 2 lesson
least 4 lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 6. Worked with June 2018 7.50% Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No acceptable 3 3 3
Education colleagues to to March colleagues atleast colleagues atleast colleagues colleagues but no evidence was
Services share 2019 in the in the school level atleast in the evidence of sharing shown
differentiated, district/cluster to share lesson department/grade with others
developmentally level to share level to share
appropriate lesson lesson
learning
experiences to Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted at Submitted at least 1 No acceptable
address learners’ 1 lesson as 1 lesson as least 1 lesson as lesson as evidenced evidence was
gender, needs, evidently shown evidently shown in evidently shown by either MOV 2 or 3 shown
strengths, in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and but no evidence of
interests and supported by any supported by any supported by any sharing with others
experiences. 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Develop and June 2018 7.50% Quality Develop and Develop and Develop and Develop and applied No acceptable 4 4 4
Education and Planning applied effective to March applied effective applied effective applied effective effective strategies evidence was
Services strategies in the 2019 strategies in the strategies in the strategies in the in the planning and shown
planning and planning and planning and planning and management
management of management management management developmentally
developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally sequenced teaching
sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced and learning process
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and as shown in MOV 1
learning learning process learning process learning process with a rating of 5
processes to as shown in MOV as shown in MOV as shown in MOV
meet curriculum 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 7 1 with a rating of
requirements and 8 6
varied teaching
contexts. Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
4 lessons as lessons as lesson as as evidence by any evidence was
evidence by evidence by MOV evidence by 1 of the acceptable shown
MOV 1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and MOV 1 and 2 and MOV
supported by any supported by any supported by any
1 of the 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 8. Review with June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently led Frequently led Occasionally led Rarely led No acceptable 3 3 3
Education colleagues, to March collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative reviews evidence was
Services teacher and 2019 reviews of reviews of reviews of of teacher/learner shown
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback as
to plan, facilitate feedback as feedback as feedback as evidenced by the
and enrich evidenced by the evidenced by the evidenced by the MOV submitted
teaching practice. MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative review evidence was
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of of teacher and shown
and learner and learner teacher and learner feedback as
feedback as feedback as learner feedback evidently shown in
evidently shown evidently shown in as evidently any of the
in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 acceptable MOV
supported by any supported by any and supported by
1 of the 1 of the any 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 9. Advised and June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely advised No acceptable 4 4 4
Education guided colleagues to March advised advised advised colleagues in the evidence was
Services in the selection, 2019 colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the selection, shown
organization, selection, selection, selection, organization,
development and organization, organization, organization, development and
use of appropriate development and development and development and appropriate use of
teaching and appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use teaching and
learning teaching and teaching and of teaching and learning resources
resources, learning learning resources learning as shown in the
including ICT, to resources as as shown in the resources as MOV submitted
address specific shown in the MOV submitted shown in the
learning goals. MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable

4 teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
learning learning resources learning learning resource as shown
resources as as evidenced by resources as evidenced by any of
evidenced by at at least 1 of the evidenced by at the acceptable MOV
least 1 of the acceptable MOV least 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 4. 10. Worked June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely reviewed No acceptable 3 3 3
Education Assessment collaboratively to March reviewed reviewed reviewed collaboratively evidence was
Services and Reporting with colleagues to 2019 collaboratively collaboratively collaborativel y assessment tools shown
review the design, assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools with colleagues as
selection, with colleagues with colleagues as with colleagues shown in the MOV
organization and as shown in the shown in the MOV as shown in the submitted
use of a range of MOV submitted submitted MOV submitted
effective
diagnostic, Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable
formative and 4 assessment assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was
summative tools as evidently as evidently as evidently evidently shown in shown
assessment shown in any of shown in any of shown in any of any of the
strategies the acceptable the acceptable the acceptable acceptable MOV
consistent with MOV MOV MOV
curriculum Timeliness
requirements.
Performance Indicators Rating
Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 11. Interpreted June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely collaborated No acceptable 4 4 4
Education collaboratively to March collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with with colleagues in evidence was
Services monitoring and 2019 colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the the interpretation of shown
evaluation interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of assessment data as
strategies of assessment data assessment data assessment data shown in the MOV
attainment data to as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the submitted
support learner MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
progress and
achievement. Efficiency Submitted at least Submitted at least Submitted at Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
2 different types 3 of the same kind least 2 of the the MOV evidence was
of MOV of MOV same kind of MO shown
Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 12. Applied skills June 2018 7.50% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely applied skills No acceptable 3 3 3
Education in the effective to March applied skills in applied skills in applied skills in in the effective evidence was
Services communication of 2019 the effective the effective the effective communicatio n of shown
learner needs, communication of communicatio n of communicatio n learner needs and
progress and learner needs and learner needs and of learner needs progress to parents/
achievement to progress to progress to and progress to guardians as shown
key stakeholders, parents/ parents/ parents/ in the MOV
including guardians as guardians as guardians as submitted
parents/guardians shown in the shown in the MOV shown in the
. MOV submitted submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted 4 of Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable

the acceptable MOV MOV MOV evidence was
MOV shown
Timeliness

Performance Indicators Rating

Weight Actual
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Very Satisfactory Poor
per KRA QET Outstanding (5) Satisfactory (3) Unsatisfactory (2) Results Q E T Ave
(4) (1)
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed June 2018 10.00% Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No acceptable 5 5 5
Education various to March performed performed performed performed evidence was
Services related 2019 special tasks special tasks special tasks special tasks shown
works/activities and/or and/or and/or and/or
that contribute to assignments assignments assignments assignments
the as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
teaching-learning the MOV the MOV the MOV the MOV
process. submitted submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable

least 4 different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable MOV evidence was
different kinds acceptable MOV acceptable MOV shown
of acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING VERY SATISFACTORY

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING

4.500 -5.000 Outstanding

3.500- 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 Poor

JAIME T. TIMOSA EMMA LINDA E. ORCULLO JULIA R. OIDI

Rater Ratee Approving Authority
A
- II

URING EVALUATION

Score

0.3
Score

0.3

Score

0.3

Score
Score

0.3

Score
Score

0.3

Score
0.225

Score
0.3

Score
0.225

Score
0.3

Score
0.225

Score

0.3

Score
0.225

Score
 0.5

3.8
ERY SATISFACTORY
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
Division of Sultan Kudarat
GUTALAC CENTRAL SCHOOL
Poblacion I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat

ANNOTATION TEMPLATE
OBJECTIVES Means of Verification Description of the MOV Pres

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

✘
sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
about effective applications of content
knowledge within and across curriculum
teaching areas

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in

demonstration teaching highlighting
integration of content knowledge within and
across subject areas

3. Instructional materials developed

1. Modeled effective highlighting effective application of content
application of content knowledge within and across subject areas
knowledge within and
across curriculum 4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used
teaching areas. in demonstration teaching highlighting
integration of content knowledge within and
across subject areas

5. Results of assessment used in

demonstration teaching highlighting mastery
of lessons learned

6. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)

1. Copy of the research proposal focused on

enriching knowledge of content and
pedagogy

2. Proof of participation and/or contribution

to a collaborative research (e.g. e-mail,
actual output submitted, terms of reference,
etc.)
2. Collaborated with
colleagues in the conduct
and application of
 2. Collaborated with
colleagues in the conduct 3. Certified completed collaborative research
and application of focused on enriching knowledge of content
and pedagogy
research to enrich
knowledge of content and
pedagogy. 4. Proof of dissemination of research
findings with colleagues

5. Proof of utilization of research findings

6. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
about using effective teaching strategies to
promote critical and creative teaching, as
well as other higher-order thinking skills

2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in

demonstration teaching highlighting
different teaching strategies that develop
3. Developed and applied critical and creative thinking and/or other
HOTS
effective teaching
strategies to promote
critical and creative 3. Instructional materials highlighting
thinking, as well as other different teaching strategies that develop
higher- order thinking critical and creative thinking, and/or other
skills. HOTS

4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used

in demonstration teaching

5. Results of assessment used in the

demonstration teaching

6. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
about sharing effective techniques in the
management of classroom structure
4. Work with colleagues
to model and share
effective techniques in the
management of the
classroom structure to
4. Work with colleagues
to model and share
effective techniques in the 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
management of the demonstration teaching highlighting
effective classroom management strategies
classroom structure to that engage learners in activities/tasks in
engage learners, different physical learning environments
individually or in groups,
in meaningful exploration,
discovery and hands-on 3. Minutes of LAC highlighting the sharing
activities within a range of on effective classroom management
physical learning techniques
environments.
4. Instructional materials used in
demonstration teaching

5. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)

Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
about effective teacher management of
learner behavior using the following
strategies:

1. Providing motivation

2. Praising the learners/Giving

positive feedback
5. Exibited effective and
constructive behavior
management skills by 3. Setting house rules/guidelines
applying positive and
non-violent discipline to
ensure learning- focused 4. Ensuring learners’ active
participation
environments.
5. Allowing learners to express their
ideas/opinions

6. Giving equal opportunities to

learners

7. Encouraging learners to ask

questions

8. Others (Please specify and

provide annotations)
 1. Minutes of LAC session/s, highlighting
one’s sharing of strategies on differentiated
and developmentally appropriate
opportunities to address learners’
differences

6. Worked with
colleagues to share 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting
differentiated, strategies on differentiated and
developmentally-appropriate opportunities
developmentally to address learners’ differences
appropriate learning
experiences to address
learners’ gender, needs,
strengths, interests and ✘
3. Corresponding instructional materials
experiences. showing differentiated and developmentally-
appropriate opportunities to address
learners’ differences

4. Others (e.g. testimonial, write-up from

colleagues of the lessons/insights gained
from the Master Teacher's sharing)

1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating

sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
about using effective strategies in
implementing developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning process

2. Results of learners’ assessment during

7. Develop and applied the actual teaching
effective strategies in the
planning and 3. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
management of demonstration teaching highlighting
developmentally developmentally sequenced teaching-
learning process
sequenced teaching and
learning processes to
meet curriculum
4. Instructional materials showing effective
requirements and varied strategies in developmentally sequenced
teaching contexts. teaching and learning process

5. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in

demonstration teaching

6. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)
 1. Implemented LAC/FGD Plan
8. Review with
colleagues, teacher and 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of
learner feedback to plan, teacher and learner feedback to enrich
facilitate and enrich teaching practice with proof of attendance
teaching practice.
3. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

1. Teaching and learning resources

developed by colleagues and critiqued on
their alignment to learning goals
9. Advised and guided
colleagues in the
selection, organization, 2. Lesson plans by colleagues critiqued in
development and use of ✘ terms of the alignment of the teaching and
appropriate teaching and learning resources to the indicated learning
goals and appropriateness to the target
learning resources, learners
including ICT, to address
specific learning goals.
3. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

1. Any proof of collaborative review if the

test is designed based on its purpose (e.g.
diagnostic, formative and summative)

2. Any proof of collaborative review of the

10. Worked alignment of the test with the curriculum
collaboratively with
colleagues to review the
design, selection,
organization and use of a 2.1. formative test attached to a
range of effective lesson plan
diagnostic, formative and
summative assessment
strategies consistent with 2.2. summative assessment with
curriculum requirements. TOS

2.3. diagnostic test with its TOS

3. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)
1. Collaborative interpretation of the index
of mastery obtained from 1 class
11. Interpreted
collaboratively monitoring
and evaluation strategies
of attainment data to
support learner progress
11. Interpreted 2. Collaborative interpretation of item
collaboratively monitoring analysis of quarterly examinations
and evaluation strategies
of attainment data to 3. Collaborative interpretation of results of
support learner progress performance assessment
and achievement.
4. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

1. Sample agreement for learners at risk

signed by parents and corresponding
evidence of improvement

2. Record of dialogue and/or parent-teacher

conferences and corresponding evidence of
improvement

3. Anecdotal record communicated to and

signed by the learners and/or parents with
corresponding evidence of improvement

4. Sample of learners' test results signed by

parents and corresponding evidence of
improvement
12. Applied skills in the
effective communication
of learner needs, 5. Sample of accomplished rubrics given for
progress and performance task and corresponding
evidence of improvement
achievement to key
stakeholders, including
parents/guardians. 6. Attendance sheet/minutes of parent-
teacher conference

7. Signed report cards of students at risk

with corresponding evidence of
improvement

8. Correspondence notebook/letters/proof
of communication using other modalities
(e.g. email, SMS, etc.) and corresponding
evidence of improvement

9. Learners’ performance record

10. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)

1. Served as reliever of classes in the

absence of teachers
 2. Served as OIC in the absence of the
principal

3. Represented the principal in meetings and

conferences

4. Observed classes of Teachers I-III

5. Assisted the school selection committee in

the evaluation of credentials when hiring or
promoting teachers

6. Certificate of Recognition or Participation

7. Certificate of Training
13. Performed various
related works/activities
that contribute to the 8. Certificate of Speakership
teaching-learning
process.
9. Committee involvement

10. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities

11. Book or Journal

Authorship/Coauthorship/Contributorship

12. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship

13. Coaching and mentoring learners in

competitions

14. Mentoring pre-service/in-service

teachers

15. Others (Please specify and provide

annotations)
ppines Appendix M
cation

udarat
AL SCHOOL
an Kudarat

EMPLATE
n of the MOV Presented Annotations
 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
Division of Sultan Kudarat
Salaman Central Elementary Scho
Poblacion I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS OF THE IPCRF (IP

Action Plan (Recommended Devel
Strengths Development Needs
Intervention)
A. Teaching Competencies (PPST)

B. Core Behavioral Competencies (DepEd)

Feedback:

RATEE
ublic of the Philippines
partment of Education
Region XII
sion of Sultan Kudarat
tral Elementary School
n I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat

T PLANS OF THE IPCRF (IPCRF-DP)

Action Plan (Recommended Developmental
Timeline Resources Needed
Intervention)

RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region XII
Division of Sultan Kudarat
Salaman Central Elementary Sc
Poblacion I, Lebak, Sultan Kudarat

PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND COACHING

DATE CRITICAL INCIDENCE DESCRIPTION OUTPUT

RATEE RATER
 ippines
ucation

Kudarat
mentary School
tan Kudarat

AND COACHING FORM

SIGNATURE
T IMPACT ON JOB/ACTION PLAN
(RATER/RATEE)

RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY