Reading Response 1
Reading Response 1
Reading Response 1
Professor Brody
ENGL 301
11 February 2019
The article of “Loot or Find: Fact or Frame?” by Cheryl I. Harris and Devon W. Carbado
explains the media coverage of the aftermath of the devastating hurricane Katrina crashes into
New Orleans. With the same images provided in the article of people holding food, the use of
terminologies to describe the photos are completely contradicting each other based on the person
present in the photo. The term “loot” is used for the second image showed in the article, and the
word “find” is used for two white people in the first image. The authors introduce the idea of the
Color-Blind Frame in that it explains, “most share the idea that we interpret events through
frames – interpretational structures that, consciously and unconsciously, shape what we see and
how we see it” (Harris and Carbado, 622). For example, the photographer, Chris Graythen’s
selection choice when choosing the photo that fits in his frame of reference that white people do
not steal goods from stores, and the people of color is more likely to steal foods while the store is
not being attended. When the facts do not qualify perfectly when the frame of reference that one
has for an event, they are simply being ignored, or extra information is being used to satisfy the
expectations one has (Harris and Carbado, 628). The frames that many people see associate black
The idea of the frame of reference by Harris and Carbado also illustrates the “Theories
and Constructs of Race” by Holtzman and Sharpe. In both articles, the authors agree that the
perspective that people have toward racism is due to the lack of law and order. Holtzman and
Mai 2
Sharpe argue that race is constructed socially, culturally, politically, and economically, and not
ethnicity or the country of their origins (Holtzman and Sharpe, 603). The concept of whiteness
that the society is infused with means privileges, separating the vulnerabilities and minorities,
and sometimes enforces with power and violence. The connection of black to criminality and
dangerous leads the governmental reluctance in responding to the disaster of hurricane Katrina
In addition to Holtzman and Sharpe’s theories on race, the authors believe that the
modern society is a post-racial society where youths are becoming friends, rather than
discriminating each other based on the color of one’s skin. Even outside of the frame of
reference constructed under the government institutions, such as, education, employment,
healthcare system, housing, bank, and criminal justice, discrimination based on race and
ethnicity has become a social norm of what it means to be American, Holtzman and Sharpe
argue. Racism has become an idea of the social norms that is now a part of jokes, slurs, and other
racial stereotypes that has been accepted by the society. The unconscious belief on one being
better than the other is not strange because the society values one character over the other.
A counter argument that Harris and Carbado offer in contrast to mainstream media
depictions of race is that “most whites were able to see black people as victims” (Harris and
Carbado, 626). Unlike the media idea that blacks are not victims, but criminals based on the
usage of words like “loot,” many white people accept that blacks are victims of the destructive
hurricane Katrina. According to Harris and Carbado, black people are not only victims of the
natural disaster, but more importantly, they are victims of the bureaucracy that occur in the city
of the New Orleans that has great influence in the mainstream media.
Mai 3
Works Cited
Harris, Cheryl I. and Carbado, Devon W. “Loot or Find: Fact or Frame.” Created Equal.
Holtzman, Linda, and Leon Sharpe. “Theories and Constructs of Race.” Enron: What Caused the
webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3A8lySAn4dWK8J%3Aprofspace.co
m%2Fdownload%2Fae415560c4b621a4a98bcb0a2b726804%2B&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk
&gl=u