COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL

This school level Comprehensive School Safety Monitoring Tool is aligned with the Sendai Framework for DRR (SFDRR) and the global Comprehensive Schoo
signatory to the SFDRR, the Philippine Government is expected to report to the UNISDR its accomplishment in implementing the SFDRR. In line with this, the
Management (DRRM)/School Safety to the National DRRM Council (NDRRMC) as a member of the said council, and in accordance to RA 10121 (Philippine D

This school level Comprehensive School Safety Monitoring Tool aims to:
1) establish the baseline with respect to the implementation of the 3 pillars of DepEd's Comprehensive DRRM in Education Framework (DO 37, s 2015);
2) Set the school's DRRM targets for 3 years, based on the baseline;
3) Track the annual progress of the school with respect to its targets.

This is primarily for the use of the School DRRM Team whose members are expected to facilitate the completion of this monitoring tool. The Head of the SDRR
Coordinator. The Division DRR Coordinator is expected to orient the SDRRM Team on how this tool is going to be filled-up, monitor the completion of schools
and consolidate the results of all schools using the template also provided by the DRRMS Central Office. The consolidated results shall be submitted by the D
in of the current school year.

The 1st column indicates the particular Priority for Action in the SFDRR that are related to the Targets of the global CSSF in the 2nd column. The 3rd column in
The school level DepEd indicators are based on the Department's Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) policies and the School DRRM Manual (
Supporting evidences, such as documents, should be provided by the School DRRM Team to the Division DRRM Coordinator. The 5th column sets the targets
annual basis to indicate progress against the targets set for 3 years.

Name of Head/Focal Person of School DRRM Team:

School ID:
Name of Division DRRM Coordinator:
Date the Division DRRM Coordinator Oriented the SDRRM Team:
ENABLING ENVIRONMENT
Related Global Comprehensive School 
Sendai  Safety (CSS) TARGET AREAS
Framework for  DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS
DRR (SFDRR) (Based on DepEd’s  DRRM Policies and School DRRM Manual)
Priorities

Priority for Legal Frameworks & 1
Action 2 Policies
Priority for  Organizational 2
Action 2 arrangements, leadership, and  3
coordination for risk
reduction and resilience

Integration of risk reduction and  4
resilience into education sector 
strategies, policies and plans
Priority for 
Action 1 5
6
7
Priority for  Funding for risk reduction and  8
Action 3 resilience of education sector
9

10

ENABLING ENVIRONMENT
Related Global Comprehensive School 
Sendai  Safety (CSS) TARGET AREAS
Framework for  DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS
DRR (SFDRR) (Based on DepEd’s  DRRM Policies and School DRRM Manual)
Priorities

11

12
Priority for 
Child-centered Risk Assessment
Action 1
Priority for 
Child-centered Risk Assessment
Action 1 13

14

15

Priority for Monitoring and Evaluation 16
Action 3

Name and Signature of School Head:

Date Signed and Approved:

ORING TOOL
Monitoring Tool is aligned with the Sendai Framework for DRR (SFDRR) and the global Comprehensive School Safety Framework (CSSF) developed by the UN Internationa
ment is expected to report to the UNISDR its accomplishment in implementing the SFDRR. In line with this, the Department of Education is required to report its accomplishm
onal DRRM Council (NDRRMC) as a member of the said council, and in accordance to RA 10121 (Philippine DRRM Act of 2010) which reflects the country's commitment to t

Monitoring Tool aims to:

lementation of the 3 pillars of DepEd's Comprehensive DRRM in Education Framework (DO 37, s 2015);
ased on the baseline;
respect to its targets.

M Team whose members are expected to facilitate the completion of this monitoring tool. The Head of the SDRRM Team shall submit the completed forms with the signature o
expected to orient the SDRRM Team on how this tool is going to be filled-up, monitor the completion of schools
he template also provided by the DRRMS Central Office. The consolidated results shall be submitted by the Division DRRM Coordinator to the DRRMS Central Office

or Action in the SFDRR that are related to the Targets of the global CSSF in the 2nd column. The 3rd column indicates DepEd's Comprehensive School Safety indicators at th
n the Department's Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) policies and the School DRRM Manual (SDRRM). The 4th column sets the baseline of the school with
uld be provided by the School DRRM Team to the Division DRRM Coordinator. The 5th column sets the targets/plans of the school based on its baseline. The remaining colum
rgets set for 3 years.

Name of School:

DRRM Team:
ENABLING ENVIRONMENT

DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS BASELINE 
(Based on DepEd’s  DRRM Policies and School DRRM Manual) (2017)

YES NO
Adopted/Adapted/localized existing policies relating to DRRM in
education/school safety
Designated School DRRM Focal Person
Formed School DRRM Team, consisting of personnel from different offices; with defined
membership and roles and
responsibilities/functions

Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes CCA and EiE measures,
covering risk assessment, risk reduction, and
rehabilitation and recovery

Students participated in the planning process

Integrated DRRM into the School Improvement Plan (SIP)
100% completion of DRR related questions in the EMIS/EBEIS
Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget
Funding sources for interventions in the aftermath of a disaster or
emergency exist and can easily be tapped.
School has partnerships that could be tapped to support its DRRM
programs and activities, including those after a disaster
ENABLING ENVIRONMENT

DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS BASELINE 
(Based on DepEd’s  DRRM Policies and School DRRM Manual) (2017)

Conducted student-led school watching and hazard mapping (DO 23

s 2015)
Incorporated results of student-led school watching and hazard
mapping in the School DRRM Plan and SIP
Linked student-led school watching and hazard mapping with the
community hazard maps of LGUs provided by DOST
School Planning Team have linked the community hazard maps with
education data to better understand the school’s risk
School submitted Rapid Assessment of Damage Report (RADAR) to the DRRMS
Central Office, within 72 hours after the onslaught of
a hazard in the area

Data collection and consolidation of programs and activities on DRRM, covering the 3
Pillars, to monitor results and impact exist
chool Safety Framework (CSSF) developed by the UN International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR). As a
the Department of Education is required to report its accomplishment in implementing Disaster Risk Reduction and
ne DRRM Act of 2010) which reflects the country's commitment to the SFDRR.

DRRM Team shall submit the completed forms with the signature of he School Head to the Division DRRM
ols
e Division DRRM Coordinator to the DRRMS Central Office

n indicates DepEd's Comprehensive School Safety indicators at the school level that are related to columns 1 and 2.
ual (SDRRM). The 4th column sets the baseline of the school with respect to DepEd's indicators in the 3rd column.
gets/plans of the school based on its baseline. The remaining columns will be accomplished by the school on an

Designation:

Municipality/City:
Division/Region:

PROGRESS  PROGRESS  PROGRESS 

TARGETS/ PLANS (2018-2020)
(2018) (2019) (2020)

PROGRESS  PROGRESS  PROGRESS 

TARGETS/ PLANS (2018-2020)
(2018) (2019) (2020)
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
PILLAR 1: SAFE LEARNING FACILITIES

Related Global Comprehensive School 
Sendai  Safety (CSS) TARGETS
DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS
Framework for 
(Based on DepEd’s  DRRM Policies and School DRRM Manual)
DRR (SFDRR)
Priorities
Existing schools are being made safer, systematically

Assessment and prioritization for  1
retrofiting and replacement of 
unsafe schools

Priority for 
Action 1
2

Resources and Plan to address  4
unsafe school buildings
Priority for  5
Action 3
6

Priority for  Maintenance to increase safety and  9
Action 3 protection of investments in schools

10

Planning for limited use of schools  11
as evacuation centers, during the 
school year

Priority for  12
Action 4

Every new school built is safe
Priority for  Guidance and regulations for safe  13
Action 2 school construction

Priority for  Monitoring of safe school site  14
Action 2 selection, design and construction

Name and Signature of School Head:

Date Signed and Approved:

COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
 PILLAR 2: DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT
Related Global Comprehensive School 
Sendai  Safety (CSS) TARGETS
Framework for  DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS
DRR (SFDRR) (Based on DepEd’s  DRRM Policies and School DRRM Manual)
Priorities

4
Existence of national and sub-
national plans for preparedness and 
Priority for  5
response, educational continuity, 
Action 4
and protection of education sector 
investments
6

9
10

Annual review of school disaster  11
risk reduction and management 
measures (e.g. as part of school-
12
Priority for  based management and/or school 
Action 4 improvement)

13

Conduct of regular simulation drill, 
at all levels, to practice response 
preparedness and to review  14
response plans (i.e.
Contingency Plan)

Priority for 
15
Action 4

16
17
18

PILLAR 2: DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT
Related Global Comprehensive School 
Sendai  Safety (CSS) TARGETS
Framework for  DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS
DRR (SFDRR) (Based on DepEd’s  DRRM Policies and School DRRM Manual)
Priorities

Needs assessment, strategy, and  19
implementation plan to develop staff 
and student capacity for 
20
participation in school based DRRM
Priority for 
Action 3 21
 implementation plan to develop staff 
and student capacity for 
participation in school based DRRM
Priority for 
Action 3

22

Name and Signature of School Head:

Date Signed and Approved:
RING TOOL
PILLAR 1: SAFE LEARNING FACILITIES

DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS BASELINE 
(Based on DepEd’s  DRRM Policies and School DRRM Manual) (2017)

ematically NO.

# of school buildings that has been inventoried

# of school buildings with risk assessment

# of unsafe school buildings identified

YES NO
Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school building
construction exist
Financial resources are allocated for completion of needed action to
address unsafe school buildings within a specified period
# of unsafe school buildings with appropriate action undertaken by
the School Head (e.g. upgraded, retrofitted, non-usage, etc.)
Conducted regular school inspection and maintenance of facilities
conducted (state how often)
Undertaken regular repair of minor classroom (including facilities)
damages
Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined, documented
and assigned
School Heads have allotted budget for routine maintenance of school facilities for safety
and to protect investments, with
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level

School Heads have identified those schools that are expected to be

used as temporary evacuation centers for disasters

School Heads are clear with the roles and functions of the school in camp management
vis-à-vis the LGU and DSWD as per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, series of 2013
"Guidelines on Evacuation Center Coordination and Management" and RA 10821
"Children's Emergency Relief and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR

Guidance and regulations on the following are followed:

safe school site selection
resilient design, and
resilient construction
New school construction is monitored for compliance with:
safe school site selection
safe school design
safe school construction

RING TOOL
 PILLAR 2: DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT

DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS BASELINE 
(Based on DepEd’s  DRRM Policies and School DRRM Manual) (2017)

YES NO
School has a Contingency Plan, i.e. Preparedness Plan turned into response actions
when a disaster strikes (This could be a separate section/chapter in the DRRM Plan)

School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid kit in every
instructional classroom
School has at least 2 necessary and functioning equipment, in case of a disaster (e.g.
fire extinguisher, handheld/base radio, generator,
etc.)

School has pre-identified spaces for putting up Temporary Learning spaces/Shelters in

the aftermath of a disaster
School has ready resumption strategies and alternative delivery
modes to ensure education continuity
School has ensured that students completed the Family Earthquake Prepareness Plan;
and school has reported completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office

School has established a school personnel tracking system/protocol

in the event of a disaster
School has trained personnel to administer first aid to students and
personnel
School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and students
School has trained teachers and other personnel who could provide
psychosocial support to students
School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are reviewed
annually
Conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure school safety and
preparedness measures are in place as per DO
Students, teachers, parents and other stakeholders participated in Brigada Eskwela

School has established functional early warning system to inform students and
personnel of hazards and emergencies (protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC),
considering national and LGU
warning systems and protocols

School conducted regular hazard-specific drills (at least 3 hazards)

with participation of stakeholders (BFP, Medic, LGUs, NGOs, community, PTA, alumni,
and others)

# of students who participated in the drills

School has an evacuation plan and procedures
School has a student-family reunification plan that is clearly
disseminated to students, teachers and parents
PILLAR 2: DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT

DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS BASELINE 
(Based on DepEd’s  DRRM Policies and School DRRM Manual) (2017)

School Head has received DRRM training from division or region or

partners
School DRRM Team has received DRRM training from division or region or partners
(indicate how many)
School has conducted awareness and capacity building for families
and learners
School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EiE activities of the
LGU
ES

PROGRESS  PROGRESS  PROGRESS 

TARGETS/ PLANS (2018-2020)
(2018) (2019) (2020)
ENT

PROGRESS  PROGRESS  PROGRESS 

TARGETS/ PLANS (2018-2020)
(2018) (2019) (2020)

ENT

PROGRESS  PROGRESS  PROGRESS 

TARGETS/ PLANS (2018-2020)
(2018) (2019) (2020)
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
PILLAR 3: RISK REDUCTION AND RESILIENCE E

Related Global Comprehensive School 
Sendai  Safety (CSS) TARGETS
DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS
Framework for 
(Based on DepEd’s  DRRM Policies and School DRRM Manual)
DRR (SFDRR)
Priorities
Integration of common risk  1
reduction and resilience messages 
in the curriculum

Priority for 
Action 3

Priority for  Intergration of risk reduction and  4
Action 3 resilience in extra-curricular 
activities

Priority for  Capacity building for and personnel  5
Action 3 on risk reduction and resilience 
education
6

Priority for Monitoring and Evaluation 9
Action 3

Name and Signature of School Head:

Date Signed and Approved:

RING TOOL
PILLAR 3: RISK REDUCTION AND RESILIENCE EDUCATION

DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS BASELINE 
(Based on DepEd’s  DRRM Policies and School DRRM Manual) (2017)

School has integrated key DRR and CCA concepts in the curriculum YES NO
based on the National Curriculum Guide

Year when DRR and CCA integration in the curriculum started

Grade levels and subjects where DRR and CCA been integrated
Skills and competencies of students are assessed through YES NO
measurable learning and risk reduction (RR) outcomes

Percentage of students actively participating in various DRRM/CCA/EiE activities

School has a DRRM capacity building plan for teachers and school personnel YES NO

Number personnel trained on DRRM and/or CCA YES NO

Schoo has available and accessible quality and up-to-date DRRM YES NO
materials

Presence of DRRM corner, with updated IEC materials posted in it, YES NO
in every classroom

School carries out monitoring and evaluation to assess sustainable YES NO

implementation
UCATION

PROGRESS  PROGRESS  PROGRESS 

TARGETS/ PLANS (2018-2020)
(2018) (2019) (2020)