INTRODUCTION

The Concept of Mind in Indian and Western Philosophy

(A) Mind in Indian philosophy

(i) Vedas
The main emphasis in the Vedas is on the recitation of mantras, prayers and
performing the rituals to propitiate the many gods. There is no clear notion of mind
and it is almost used as synonym to consciousness. The concept of mind is
enunciated through many terms such as awareness (sanjna), comprehension
(ajnanam), understanding (vijnanam), insight (drsti), resolution (dhrtih), reflection
(manas), impulse (jut), will (sankalpa).1 The transition from the Brahmana literature
to the Upanishads is characterized by the transmission of values from rites and rituals
to knowledge and meditation, from faith to reason and from objectivity to
subjectivity.2 Thereafter, in the later Indian philosophical thought the notion of mind
is brought into the nucleus of philosophical dialogue.

(ii) Upanishads
In the Upanishads the words used for mind are manas, prajna, sankalpa and
citta. The quintessence of mind is not consciousness but it is a subtle form of matter
and like the body it is made of matter. The eaten food is sorted into three kinds after
digestion. The grossest part becomes faeces; the middle component becomes flesh;
the subtle ingredient becomes the mind.3 In the earlier Upanishads, no separate
categorization of mental functions is given but in the Paingala Upanishad, the
hierarchy of mental functions is expressed as, the five sense organs and the five
motor organs; perceiving mind (manas), which coordinates the organs of perception;
intellect (buddhi) the higher organ of thought which discriminates the self-ego
(ahamkara); the subconscious mind (citta), the storehouse of past impressions.4
The mind is also said to be two-fold, that is pure and impure. The impure mind is
driven by desire and volition; the pure mind is devoid of desire. The mind alone is
the cause of bondage and liberation to humans. Attached to objects it leads to
bondage and freed from objects it leads to liberation. The mind should always be

1
made devoid of objects by the seeker of liberation, since the liberation of the mind
devoid of objects is desirable. When the mind, freed from the contact with objects
and confined in the heart, reaches being, then that is the supreme state.
When the five organs of perception become still, together with the mind,
and the intellect ceases to be active; that is called the highest state.5
This firm holding back of the senses is what is known as yoga.6
The nervous system of the body provides the channels through which the mind
travels; the direction in which it moves is determined by its desires and tendencies.
When the mind becomes pure and desireless it takes the upward course and at the
time of departing passes out through the imperceptible opening at the crown of the
head; but as long as it remains full of desires, its course is downward towards the
realms where those desires can be satisfied.
There are a hundred and one nerves of the heart. One of them penetrates the center of
the head. Going upward through it, one attains immortality. The other hundred
nerves lead to different worlds.7

(iii) Schools of Indian Philosophy

The systems of Indian philosophy are divided into two broad classes namely,
orthodox (vedic) and hetrodox (non-vedic). Under the orthodox, there are six schools
namely, Nyaya, Vaisesika, Samkhya, Yoga, Mimansa and Vedanta. Under the
hetrodox, there are three schools namely, Carvaka, Buddhism and Jainism.
The Nyaya and Vaisesika schools, founded by Gautama and Kanada
respectively, though diverse in their origin and early development, were
amalgamated later on into one syncretic school known as Nyaya-Vaisesika system.
Nyaya is primarily concerned with the conditions of correct thinking and means of
acquiring true knowledge of reality; and the Vaisesika system formulates its
ontological structure on the basis of seven substances (padarthas) namely, dravya,
guna, karma, samanya, visesa, samavaya and abhava.
The Samkhya is a philosophy of dualistic realism, attributed to the sage
Kapila. It admits two ultimate realities namely, purusa and prakrti, which are
independent of each other in respect of their existence. Purusa is conscious, inactive
and immutable while the prakrti is unconscious, active and mutable. There are

2
different purusas or individual selves related to different bodies. Prakrti is composed
of sattva, rajas and tamas gunas, which are finer than atoms and modified into all
physical, biological and psychical entities. Samkhya rejects the notion of God as the
creator of the world. The Yoga system, founded by Patanjali, is closely allied to the
Samkhya. It mostly accepts the epistemology and the metaphysics of the Samkhya,
but admits also the existence of God. The special feature of this system is the wide-
ranging treatment of the yoga, which consists in the cessation of all mental functions.
The Mimansa school, founded by Jaimini, lays stress on the performance of
duties as enshrined in the Vedas. It holds that individual souls can attain liberation by
action and knowledge. There are two schools of Mimansa founded by Prabhakar and
Kumarila. Both the schools admit self-validity of knowledge, eternity of the Vedas
and eternity of sounds and reject the concept of God as the creator of the world and
the composor of the Vedas. But there are essential differences between the two
schools in connection with their epistemology and ontology. Prabhakar school of
Mimansa admits five pramanas namely, perception, inference, comparison,
testimony and postulation; while the Kumarila school adds non-perception and thus
admits six pramanas. In connection with the ontology, Prabhakar recognizes the
categories of substance, quality, action, generality, inherence, force and similarity
and rejects the categories of particularity and non-existence. Kumarila admits the
categories of substance, quality, action, generality and non-existence and rejects the
categories of particularity and inherence as well as the categories of force and
similarity recognized by Prabhakara.
The Vedanta school deals with the nature and knowledge of Brahman. The
teachings of the Upanishads are systematized in Brahma-sutra of Badarayna.
Subsequent writers have written commentaries on these sutras. As a result of the
interpretation of the sutras by different scholars, there arose two main schools of
Vedanta system namely the Advaita Vedanta school founded by Shankaracharya and
the Visistadvaita Vedanta school founded by Ramanuja. Shankaracharya denies
duality and regards the indeterminate Brahman as the ontological reality; and God,
the individual souls and the world as phenomenal appearances, which have only
empirical reality. Ramanuja identifies Brahman with God (Isvara) and regards Him

3
as the creator, preserver and destroyer of the world and the dispenser of the law of
karma. He regards that within God there are many other realities. Creation of the
world and the objects created are all as real as God. It is, therefore, not unqualified
monism (advaita), but a monism of the one qualified by the presence of many parts
(visistadvaita).
Among the three hetrodox schools, the Carvakas are materialists and do not
recognize the reality of the soul and God. The Buddhists are phenomenalists and
accept the reality of phenomena, change and impermanence. There are four schools
of Buddhism, namely, the Vaibhyasikas, the Sautrantikas, the Yogicaras and the
Madhyamikas. The first two believe in the reality of external objects. The former
advocates direct realism, and asserts that external objects are directly perceived,
while the latter advocates indirect realism, and maintains that external objects are
inferred from their ideas in the mind. The Yogicaras are subjective idealists. They
hold that there are external objects; they are nothing but cognitions of the percipient
mind, which itself is a stream of consciousness. The Madyamikas hold that there are
neither external objects nor internal cognitions. These are mere appearances; the
reality is essenceless, predicateless, undefinable and incomprehensible. The Jainas
are dualists; they believe in the reality of souls (jiva) and non-souls (ajiva). They do
not believe in God as the creator of the world. Reality is not merely many, but
manifold. The Jainas do not ascribe to the logic of pure identity or difference, but
accept a disjunction of all modes.

(a) Orthodox Schools

(i) Nyaya School
According to Nyaya School, man consists of atman (soul), manas (mind)
indriyas (sense organs) and sarira (body). Each of these has a distinct function to
perform.8
• Sarira :
It is made of material particles of the five elements. It is a composite structure,
which is changing, growing and is apt to disintegrate and ultimately destroyed. It is a

4
base for sense organs; a means for the soul to come into contact with the external
objects.

• Indriyas:
These are the specific organs for specific kinds of knowledge of objects and for
specific kinds of activities. They are located in the specific place of the body. There
are two kinds of indriyas viz. jnanindriyas (organs of knowledge) and karmindriyas
(organs of action). The objects and activities performed by these sense organs and
motor organs are as follows:
Jnanindriyas Activities
1.Stotra (ear) Sabada (Sound)
2.Tyak (skin) Sparsa (touch)
3.Caksu (eye) Rupa (form)
4.Rasna (tongue) Rasa (taste)
5.Chrana (nose) Gandha (smell)
6.Manas (mind) Antarvisaya (internal feelings)
Karmindriyas Activities
1.Pani (hand) Grahana (grasping)
2.Pada (feet) Gamana (movement)
3.Vak (organs of speech) Vacana (speaking)
4.Upastha (sexual organ) Ananda (enjoyment)
5.Payu (anus) Visarjana (excretion)9

• Manas :
It is an organ for attaining knowledge. It gets the report of the sense organs and
carries it to the atman (soul). It also apprehends the internal states of pleasure, pain
etc. It is atomic in size and is one in each body. If the mind were possessed of
magnitude it could come in contact with many senses at a time. Since this is not
possible the mind is an atom.10 Manas is also an organ of attention and it attends to
one thing at a time in quick succession giving rise to a stream of thought or attention,
which appears to be one continuous act of attention or stream of consciousness.

5
• Atman:
It is the real knower, feeler and actor behind the mechanism of mind, senses and
body. These are mere instruments for the atman. Whereas the mind is anu (atomic)
in size, the atman is vibhu and nitya (unlimited in space and time). Although the
atman is capable of knowing, feeling and acting, it cannot do so without the means
or instruments of mind, sense organs and body.

(ii) Vaisesika School

Human being consists of body, sense organs of knowledge and of action,
manas (mind) and atman (soul). The minds and souls are infinite in number and
eternal in existence. Each soul in the worldly existence has association with a mind,
which acts as the instrument of knowledge, feeling and action. The mind connects
the soul with the sense organs of knowledge and through them with the objects of
knowledge.
The soul is a substance with certain generic and specific qualities. Its generic
qualities (the qualities it shares with other substances) are number, distinctness,
magnitude, conjunction and disjunction. It is conjoined with manas and due to this
conjunction it exercises many qualities such as cognition, pleasure and pain.
Consciousness is an unintended (not essential) quality of the soul. It is acquired from
its concurrence with mind and it does not exist or function in sleep, trance and
moksha (state of liberation). The explicit qualities of the soul are knowledge,
pleasure, pain, desire, aversion, volition, merit (dharma), demerit (adharma) and
impressions (samskaras). These qualities distinguish it from other substances.

• Manas (mind, the inner sense)

Manas is an apparatus for getting knowledge of what takes place in the soul.
It is, therefore, the sense through which introspection of inner states is possible and
hence it is called the inner sense (antarindriya). Mind is also the medium through
which the impressions of the outer senses reach the soul. It is also the intermediate
through which the will acts on the organs of action. Mind is different in different
Jivas (individual souls). It is nitya and vibhu (imperishable and all-pervading) like

6
the soul. It is atomic in extent but not physical like the atoms of the four kinds of
physical substances. Mind has no other special characteristic except of serving as a
medium between the senses and the soul. The two other characteristics of mind are:
(i) It can quickly take up impressions from one thing to another.
(ii) It goes with each soul while leaving a body for rebirth but it does not
accompany the mukta atman (liberated soul).
Therefore, according to Vaisesika, mind is a substance. It is one of the nine
dravyas or substances having various qualities and is regarded as an internal organ
and is one in each body. It is immaterial, atomic, unconscious and capable of action
or movement. Perception of external objects takes place with the help of the mind.
Cognition, pleasure, pain, desire, aversion and volitions are perceived through mind.
Mind is the internal organ through which the soul recollects, doubts and dreams.11

(iii) Samkhya School

According to this school, there are twenty- five principles of evolution, which
in the order of the cosmological process of evolution are as follows:

1. Prakriti or Pradhana:
It is the elemental or root cause of everything belonging to the objective
world of changing phenomena. The principle is characterised by a state of
stability of the three gunas (sativa, rajas and tamas). The disturbance of this state
means creation in the sense of evolution of other order of being out of it. The
following evolutes come out of it, which themselves gives rise to others.

2. Mahat:
The cosmic intelligence, which is the first manifestation of the Pradhana.

3. Ahamkara:
The second manifest, arising out of the mahat. It is principle of cosmic 'I' ness
(egotism).

4-8. Tanmatra:
The five basic elements, that manifest in order, arising out of the cosmic
ahamkara.

7
Vikrti:
Under this category come the sixteen (9-24) classes of things (technically called
gunas) which do not give rise to the evolution of any fresh orders of being.

9-13. Jnanindriyas:
The five external senses of knowledge.

14-18. Karmindriyas:
The five instruments or organs of action.

19. Manas:
The inner sense (mind in a narrow sense) partaking in the nature of the above two.
These eleven indriyas (instruments of knowledge and action) arise out of the
ahamkara.

20-24. Maha-bhutas:
The five elements arising out of their respective basic principles: the tanmatras.

25. Purusa:
It is neither the cause (prakrti) nor the effect (vikrti) of any thing.12
According to the Samkhya School, purusa (spirit) is of two kinds, the freed
(mukta) and the unfreed or in bondage (baddha). The former is pure consciousness
and so it has no other adjunct to identify with. The baddha is made up of cit
(consciousness), which is the inner self and the body to which the consciousness is
attached. The body consists of two sheaths:
1. The subtle body (suksma - sarira).
2. The gross body (sthula - sarira), which is derived from the parents and
with which, the former remains united during life.
The subtle body is split into two:
1. The inner body (linga-sarira), consisting of intellect (buddhi), ego
(ahamkara), senses of knowledge and actions (indriyas) and the basic
elements (tanmatras).

8
 2. The outer body (adhistan-sarira), which is formed of the five elements
(mahabhutas) in their subtle conditions arising immediately out of the five
tanmatras.13
The inner body cannot exist without the support of the outer. The subtle body
is created at the beginning of the manifestation of the pradhana, its movements are
not thwarted by anything i.e. it is capable of entering anywhere on account of its
subtlelity: it is permanent (nitya) so long as the changing universe continues i.e. so
long as the universe does not lapse into the pradhana at the time of mahapralaya
(the great dissolution). It is made up of buddhi, ahamkara, manas, indriyas and
tanmatras; it dissolves into the pradhana at the time of mahapralaya, or the
constituents of it merge into their causal condition; it is by itself incapable of giving
the purusa any enjoyment of the fruits of past karma. For this purpose it needs a
gross body; and so it moves from body to body with the dispositions acquired by
one's good or bad karmas. The Purusa - the ultimate self behind every individual - is
pure consciousness, which is unchanging and is active witness (drista) of all the
changes in body and mind - is the core of the personality of individual.
The psychology of Samkhya falls under two heads: (a) Instruments of
knowledge and (b) functions of each instrument.
The instruments of knowledge are antahkarna consisting of intellect
(buddhi), ego (ahamkara), the inner sense (manas) and the five external senses of
ear, skin, eye, tongue and nose. The first three are inner instruments of knowledge
because they are situated inside the body and five are outer senses as they are on the
surface of the body and are turned outward. The distinctive function of buddhi is
ascertainment or determination of the true nature of everything. The distinctive
function of ahamkara is to refer to the self (egotism) as for instance ' I am doing this
or feeling this'. The function of manas is said to be samkalpa. There are two
meanings of samkalpa. The manas confirms to the nature of a sense of knowledge
(budhindriya) and that of an organ of action (karmendriya) being involved in the
functions of both. The function of manas is vikalpa- i.e. doubt about the nature of an
object - whether it is this or that. In connection with the latter, the function of manas
is samkalpa i.e. desire to do something. The function of the senses of knowledge

9
(budhindriya) is to get knowledge of an object. It is mere acquaintance with their
appropriate objects. The more definite and articulate knowledge of the objects,
involving that of their name, class etc. is regarding as being due to buddhi (intellect)
after the manas has performed its function of doubting.14

(iv) Yoga School

Yoga is predominantly a psychological philosophy. It is a science of mental
discipline for attaining the highest state (samadhi). The ultimate aim of Yoga is
complete freedom from the mind and its modifications (vrittis). Therefore, a
thorough and critical study of mind has been undertaken in Yoga. It is necessary to
know the nature, structure and function of mind in order to be free from the clutches
of the mind. 15
Mind is called citta in Yoga Philosophy. The word citta is derived from the
root cit, which means 'to know'. Citta is used in the Yoga system to mean the entire
knowing mechanism. Citta has three chief aspects with distinct functions to perform
namely manas, ahamkara and buddhi.

• Buddhi:
It is the capacity for illumination, determination and certainty. It is the source of
virtue, non-attachment and wisdom. It manifests itself through determination and
resolution in thought and action, formation and retention of concept and
generalization. It is the last to act in all cognitional, affectional and volitional
processes of ahamkara, manas and indriyas. When the manas is registering the
objects of thought, it is the buddhi that discriminates, determines and recognizes.

• Ahamkara:
In this aspect of 'citta' the personal consciousness realizes itself as a particular
'I'- experiences. It is an ego principle. It arrogates to itself the experiences held by
the manas and passes it on to buddhi to be determined. It is the conscious subject
of all psychological experiences.

10
• Manas:
It is the directing power behind all actions. It posseses the capacity of
attention, selection etc; it synthesizes the discrete manifold of the sensations. It
can perceive but cannot conceive, as does buddhi.16
These there aspects constitute the mind (citta) as a whole. Samkhya and Yoga
are regarded as allied systems as there is no fundamental difference in their
respective positions regarding logic, ontology, ethics, and psychology. As regards
purusa, the Samkhya admits only individual finite spirits (jivatmanah) where as Yoga
recognizes also the existence of a Divine Spirit (Isvara) apart from the individual
purusas, which is not at all mentioned in Samkhya.

(v) Mimamsa School

Man consists of a physical body (sarira), sense organs (indriyas), mind (manas),
consciousness (jnana) and soul (atman). Each of these constituents has a distinct
function to perform, which is done under the influence of apurva, an unseen force
generated by past acts of dharma (virtue) and adharma (vice). The functions of body
and sense organs are more or less same according to all the six systems of Indian
thought.

• Manas (Mind):
It is an internal organ through which the apprehensions of the sense organs (about
external objects) and also pleasure, pain, cognition and other qualities of the self
(internal) are perceived. The mind is not atomic (anu) in dimension as the Nyaya-
Vaisesika maintains. It is also not quick in motion. It is all pervasive (vibhu) and
motionless (aspandam). It is an intangible substance, which is neither an effect nor
cause of anything else. Although all-pervading, it is limited by the body. It serves as
an organ of internal perception. It functions in conjunction with the self, which is
also all-pervading.

• Atman (soul):
It is an eternal, immaterial substance, which is all pervading. It is distinct from
body, sense organs and cognitions. It transmigrates from body to body. It is the

11
knower (jnata) active agent (karta) and enjoyer (bhokta). Cognition, pleasure, pain,
desire, aversion, volitions, impressions, merit and demerit (jnana, sukha, dukha
iccha, prayatna, roga, dvesa, sanskara, dharama and adharma) are the
modifications of the soul. Although the soul is eternal, the modifications of the soul
are not. During sleep, these modes do not take place. There is no cognition in deep
sleep. What is regarded, as pleasure of sleep is mere absence of pain. The soul is not
cognized by any other means but only by itself. It is an object of 'I' consciousness,
which refers to its bare existence.

• Perception:
The soul comes in contact with manas which is the internal organ and the manas
comes in contact with the sense organs and the sense organs come in proper contact
with real external objects. Supervised by the manas the external sense organs
produce perceptions of sound, touch, colour, taste and odour (sabda, sparsa, rupa,
rasa and gandha). Manas produces perception of the qualities of the self namely
cognition, pleasure, pain, desire, aversion and volition (jnana, sukha, dukha, raga,
dvesa, prayatna).17

(vi) Vedanta School

Man is a composite structure consisting of soul (atman), which is the same in
all individuals and in the cosmos. It is called atman in the individual and
Paramatman or Brahman in the cosmos. This Universal Atman is reflected in or
limited by the bodily mechanism of each individual and is called jiva, which for the
time being assumes an identity and separateness for itself. The bodily mechanism of
the individual, as well as that of the cosmos, consists of individual ignorance
(avidya), which is a part of the cosmic ignorance (mula avidya or maya).
Antahkarana, the internal organ (mind) consists of the four aspects or parts of
the mind namely: buddhi (intellect), ahankara (ego), citta (storehouse of past
impressions) and manas (organ of attention). 18
Panca Pranas (five vital airs).
Panca JnanaIndriyas (five organs of knowledge: ear, skin, eye, tongue and nose).

12
Panca Karmindriyas (five organs of action: mouth, hands, feet, sex organ and the
organ of excretion).

• Sthula Sarira (physical body) made of physical elements.

These constituents of human personality are organized in the form of three
bodies: karma (causal) suksma (subtle) and sthula (gross).

• Karma Sarira
It is constituted by the avidya (the finest layer of avidya), which contains all
the past sanskaras (impressions) of the individual ever since he assumed
individuality.

• Suksma Sarira
It is constituted by the four-fold mental principles, five pranas (vital airs),
pancajnanindriyas and pancakarmindriyas.

Sthula Sarira
It is made of five gross elements akasa (ether), vayu (air), agni (fire), jala
(water) and prithvi (earth).19
There is another way of looking at the principles composing the personality
of man. It is that of concealing or veiling the consciousness and bliss of the soul.
From this point of view they are called kosas (sheaths). All the constituents are
grouped under five kosas:

• Anandamaya Kosa:
It is the finest and purest layer of avidya through which the inherent bliss of the
atman is reflected.

• Vijnanamaya Kosa:
It is the organ of buddhi, which exercises judgement and determination in
connection with the external world.

13
• Manomaya Kosa.
It is constituted by the sense organs of knowledge and the manas. Its function is to
be conscientious to the world. It is very fickle in nature and so the light of
consciousness and joy of the soul are not reflected through it.

• Pranamaya Kosa:
It is constituted of the organs of action and the five vital airs, which regulate and
control the physiological functions of the body. They are always active, being
constituted by the active principle (rajas) of the nature.

• Annamaya Kosa:
It is constituted of the physical body made of gross elements. It is pervaded by the
heavy principle (tamas) of the nature.20
The kosas are related to the three bodies: the anandamaya kosa is the same as
the karama sarira; the suksma sarira is formed by the vijnanamaya kosa, the
manomaya kosa and the pranamaya kosa and the annamaya kosa is the same as the
sthula sarira (gross body).
With this mechanism the jivatma or the individual self enjoys the objects of
the world and undergoes through the various states of experience. There are three
levels of objective experience and a fourth level above and beyond them. These four
states of experience are jagrat (waking), swapna (dream), susupti (deep sleep) and
turiya (the fourth state).

(b) Hetrodox Schools

(i) Carvaka School
This is the one and only materialistic school of Indian philosophy. According
to it, mind is a by-product of body and consciousness is the end result of mind. At
death the body disintegrates and so does the mind and consciousness. The five sense
organs constitute the body and the body is made of four elements viz. fire, air, earth
and water. All knowledge is acquired from these organs only. Mind is not an organ
of knowledge but it only regulates the sensations, which, in turn, lead to perceptions.

14
The continuity of perceptions, give rise to a false impression of a permanent
substance called mind.
According to Carvaka philosophy, life originates from the coming together of
atoms but it has no purpose nor is there any design behind the creation of life. The
world is a meaningless dance of atoms. Death also has no meaning. It is only the
disintegration of atoms. Therefore there is no reason to rejoice at birth and to lament
at death. The wise man is he who leaves all tensions and eats, drinks and makes
merry. Carvaka denies the belief in the existence of God and held that this type of
belief is the figment of imagination of foolish people. They also refute the law of
karma as well as the underlying principles of Indian philosophy such as immortality
of soul, rebirth and moksha.

(ii) Buddhism
Buddhism believes in the doctrine of anatma-vada (no-self), according to
which there is nothing permanent in the physical or mental realms. There is no
permanent, enduring or unitary substance either in the physical or mental world. The
personality of the human being is a collection of several aggregates. It is in perpetual
flux, nothing remaining the same in successive moments. Its contents change from
moment to moment and it undergoes through birth, death and rebirth like a flowing
river. There is continuity but no identity.21 The personality of a human being is an
aggregate of five components called skandhas:

• Rupa:
It comprises of physical body including sense organs.

• Vedana:
It comprises of three kinds of feelings of pleasure, pain and natural feelings.

• Samjna:
It includes perceptions of objects, which have names. It includes all our articulate
knowledge of objects.

15
• Samskara:
It includes all mental states, which involve previous experience and
memory and all kinds of instinctive activities and sentiments.

• Vijnana:
It includes all kinds of awareness of objects and self-awareness.22
Although there is no permanent entity or self, yet Buddhism believes in the law
of karma. Along with the law of causation, the law of karma governs life. Every man
is free to act in whatever way he likes, but is bound to undergo the necessary
consequences of his actions. Who undergoes the consequences of actions when there
is nothing in the human personality that endures? The answer is that it is the
empirical self that acts at one stage and it is the same continuing and developing
empirical personality that undergoes the consequences at another stage. The last
mental act of a dying person ceases to be and transmits its causal energy to the first
mental act in life-cell in some embryo. It is like one lamp kindling another and
starting a new flame which is nothing but a continuity of ever changing flames.
William James similarly believes in continuity of thoughts and each succeeding
thought inheriting all the legacies of the preceding thought.23
The law of causation operates in the world as well as in life. There is a twelve-
linked chain of causation operating in life and moving it like a wheel covering the
past, present and future lives (Bhava-Chakra). The twelve links of life are:
1. Avidya (ignorance).
2. Samskara (dispositions).
3. Vijnana (Consciousness).
4. Namarupa (name and form of mind-body).
5. Sadayatana (six sense organs).
6. Sparsa (contact).
7. Vedana (feeling).
8. Trisna (thirst).
9. Upadana (grasping).
10. Bhava (becoming).

16
 11. Jati (birth).
12. Jaramarana (old age and death).
The first two links of the chain pertain to the past life, the next seven to the
present life and the last three to the future life. Prof.J.N. Sinha explains the twelve-
linked chain of causation like this:
Ignorance is the root cause of suffering. It is a false sense of individuality. It
is a misconception of a series of transient phenomena as a permanent entity.
It generates dispositions. The dispositions of ignorance in the past life
produce an initial consciousness in the embryo. This consciousness generates
a new mind-body complex. The mind-body complex produces the five
external sense organs and the internal sense organ of mind. These produce
sense-contact with sensible objects. The sense-contact produces feeling due
to sense experience. The feeling produces thirst and thirst produces grasping
or clinging to objects. Grasping produces becoming or will-to-be-born. The
will-to-be-born in the present life produces rebirth in the future life. Rebirth
produces old age and death. The cycle of birth-death and rebirth moves in
this manner.24

(iii) Jainism
The Jainas attribute all mental activities such as cognition, affection and
conation to the self or Jiva (soul). Manas (mind) has only a limited function to
perform. The soul is a permanent principle of consciousness. It is not a material
entity but an immaterial or spiritual substance different from and independent of the
body and brain. It is an agent of all mental activities and is directly experienced as
the 'I' in all such activities as 'I know', 'I do' and 'I feel'. It is the source of all mental
activities and consciousness is its essential quality.
According to Jainism, the word jiva literally means that which lives. It is
something quite different from the unconscious and inert matter (ajiva) of which all
the objects of the physical world are composed. The jivas are infinite in number.
Potentially all jivas are capable of infinite knowledge, infinite perception, infinite
power and infinite bliss. But on account of their being tainted with the jada, non-
living matter (pudgala), the jivas have their inherent powers obscured. The jivas

17
associated with various kinds of matter live in the mundane world and suffer from
various afflictions of the world and undergo repeated births and deaths determined
by the law of karma. The jivas identify themselves with the physical bodies and
exercise their functions as limited and conditioned by the nature and constitution of
their bodies.
As an instrument of knowledge the body has the five senses and a manas. Each
sense organ apprehends specific objects while manas cognizes all objects of all the
senses. Therefore, manas should not be regarded like other senses. It is an internal
instrument, which helps the soul in cognizing the objects of all the senses and the
internal states such as pleasures, pain etc.
All sense perception is the result of the contact between a sense organ and its
object. The Jainas, unlike the Samkhya and Vedanta schools, do not hold that the
mind move out to the objects in the form of modifications (vritti) to take the form of
objects to cognize them but on the other hand hold that the objects themselves come
in contact with the senses. The mind does not come in direct contact with its object.
It cognizes those objects (external), which are already perceived by the senses. In
addition, the manas (mind) cognizes the internal activities and modifications such as
pleasure, pain, love, aversion, recognition etc., which are performed by mind itself.25
From the above study it is clear that mind and the questions relating to mind
occupy a central place in Indian philosophy, especially in the Samkhya-Yoga system
of thought. Although mind is an evolute and is formed at a later stage of evolution,
yet in the life of human beings it holds a central place. It must be understood and
controlled if the human being has to reach at a stage where truth or the Ultimate
Reality is to be experienced.
(B) Mind in Western Philosophy
In the Western philosophy, mind is defined in different ways by different schools
of thought. According to the philosophy of Materialism only physical matter exists
and mind is a spin-off of matter. This view is known as Epiphenomenalism. Matter is
the real substance and mind is only a 'glow' or shadow of matter that appears under
some conditions. The school of materialism thus gets rid of mind as a primary
reality. The philosophy of Idealism defines mind as an independent and immaterial

18
reality. This view is known as Psychical Monism; it denies the existence of matter
and reduces it to secondary importance and holds mind to be the primary reality.
According to Paul Brunton:
Remove mind from the picture of the world and we remove space and
time from it; we knock the bottom out of it. The world exists for some
mind or it cannot exist at all. For every object seen there must exist a seer.
In other words, whatever is known is known by some mind.26
According to the philosophy of Neutral Monism, whatever exists in nature is
neither material nor mental but some neutral substance out of which both material
and mental substances are formed. Every human being consists of two different
substances namely mind and body. Mind is defined as a substance, which has no
spatial location. It is referred to as the locus or centre or owner of thoughts, feelings
and sense-experiences. On the other hand, body is the locus of all the physiological
changes.

(I) Mind as Material

The basic contention of materialism is that nothing exists but matter. This
view is found in early Greek philosophy. Thales, considered to be the first
philosopher in western tradition, held that all things are composed of water in some
forms or another. Philosophers, who followed Thales, replaced water by air, fire and
earth. Another philosopher Anaxagorus introduced the new notion nous (mind),
which arranged all other things in their proper order, started them in motion and
controls them. He spoke of mind as ‘the finest and purest of all things’. He did not
consider mind as immaterial stuff but rather as a very special kind of material stuff.
But it Lecicippus of Miletus and his follower Democritus in the 5th century B.C. that
materialism was given a concrete statement. According to them, reality consists
solely of an infinite number of atoms, having shape, size and impenetrability as the
essential qualities and moving through an empty space. The shape, size, location and
movement of these atoms make up all the qualities, relations and other features of the
universe. Such phenomena as sensations, perceptions and thoughts consist in the
various qualities and relations of the atoms.27

19
 A vital question remains concerning the actual account to be given of
phenomena such as sensations, perceptions, emotions, memories, thoughts and
intentions. The most prominent views regarding these are Eliminative Materialism,
Behaviourism and Identity Theory.

(a) Eliminative Materialism

According to this view there are no such things as sensations, perceptions and
emotions. Even if these have existence, they are only complex forms of matter in
motion. The philosophers may have used terms referring to such things but it should
be kept in mind that no extra entities are being postulated over and above the
physical entities. The main claim of Eliminative Materialism is that the common
sense understanding of the mind is false and that certain classes of mental states that
most people believe in do not exist. No coherent neural basis is found for many
everyday psychological concepts such as belief, desire etc. since they are poorly
defined. The psychological concepts of behaviour and experience are judged by
reducing these to the biological level.

(b) Behaviourism
According to this view all terms relating to mental entities refer to the
behaviour or actions of a being. That is, to feel pain is to groan, writhe and so on or
to be inclined towards such behaviour. To desire food is to engage in eating the food
if it is present and to look for it in the absence of food or to be disposed towards such
behaviour and so also with all the states and activities that are called mental.
Behaviourism is a logical process to the effect that the meanings of the words
referring to the mind, its mental states and activities are analyzed in behavioural
terms and every mental term is identical in meaning with some behavioural term It
maintains that behaviour can be described scientifically without resorting either to
internal psychological events or to hypothetical constructs such as the mind. There
are no philosophical differences between publicly observable processes (such as
actions) and privately observable processes (such as thinking and feeling).28

20
(c) Identity Theory of Mind
Identity theory or Mind-Brain identity theory is a theory, which asserts that
mental states are types one and the same to the physical events in the brain. In other
words mental events are identical with specific physical event types in the brain. It
does not hold that the mind is identical to the brain. Identifying brain and mind is a
matter of identifying processes and states of the mind and brain. Consider an
experience of pain or of seeing something or of having a mental image. The identity
theory is to the effect that these experiences just are brain processes and not merely
correlated with brain processes.

(II) Mind as Immaterial

Plato was the first western philosopher to declare that mind is an immaterial
entity, separate and distinct from the body and able to exist without it. Plato held that
the mind (psyche) is incharge of the body and directs its movements.29 Plato believed
in the subsistence of both material entities and immaterial entities. The most
definitive statement of dualism is found in the philosophy of Descartes according to
whom mind and matter are two separate and distinct sorts of substances, absolutely
opposed in their natures and each capable of existing entirely independent of the
other. The chief notion in Descartes was the primacy of consciousness, that is, the
mind knows itself more immediately and directly than it can know anything else.
Mind knows external world i.e. matter only through the impressions of the external
world upon the it in the form of sensation and perception. To Descartes all
philosophy begins with the individual mind and he makes his first argument in the
words ‘I think, therefore I am’ (cogito ergo sum). Some of the philosophers, who
held mind to be immaterial, did not favour the dualist approach as it adds to various
difficulties in explaining the relations between mind and body (matter). One of such
philosophers was Berkeley who held that everything that exists is mental, of the stuff
that dreams are made of and there is no such thing as material. There can be two
variations of such view. One is that the reality consists of one vast all-encompassing
mind and the other is that the reality consists of plurality of minds. The former view

21
is called Absolute Idealism and the latter view, held by Berkeley, is called Subjective
Idealism.30
Immanuel Kant and other German philosophers such as Fichte, Schilling and
Hegel has emphasized on the philosophy of Absolute Idealism. The English
philosopher Bradley denied that plurality of minds exists and held that there is only
one Infinite Mind that holds all of existence within it.

(III) Neutral Monism

Another view is that neither the mental nor the physical is really fundamental.
Each is an aspect of some underlying reality that is neither mental nor physical but
neutral between them. This view denies that the mental and the physical are two
essentially different things. Neutral monism claims that the universe consists of only
one kind of stuff in the form of neutral elements that are in themselves neither mental
nor physical. These neutral elements are like sensory experiences; they might have
the properties of colour and shape, just as those properties are experienced. But these
shaped and coloured elements do not exist in a mind considered as a substantial
entity. The neutral elements exist, and the mind is constituted by some subset of
them which can also be seen to constitute a set of empirical observations of the
objects in the world. In fact this, is just a matter of grouping the neutral elements in
one way or another, according to a physical or a psychological perspective. One such
philosopher who held such views was Spinoza. According to him, God is the
underlying substance, which encompassed all of reality, and the mental and material
are only the attributes of God. Neither is mind material nor is matter mental. There
are not two entities but only one and that entity is God and matter and mind are its
two aspects through which it manifests itself. Spinoza says:
The body cannot determine the mind to think, nor the mind determine the
body to remain in motion or at rest for the reason that the decision of the
mind and the desire and determination of the body are one and the same
thing.31
David Hume and A.J. Ayer have given a different approach. According to
them, there are a number of particular entities which they call ‘experiences’. Some of
these experiences go to make up minds when they are related in certain ways such as

22
by the laws of association and memory and some go to make up bodies when the
entities are related in other ways such as by the laws of perception. Hence mind is
conceived to be just the collection of person's experiences and a physical object is
just the collection of experiences that a person can have of it.

(IV) Views of Contemporary Philosophers

(a) Linguistic Philosophers
The Linguistic philosophers hold that the difference between mind and body
lies in two different kinds of language or conceptual systems. One is the physicality
conceptual language with its spatio-temporal terms, and the other is the person-talk
with its reference to norms for assessing the rationality, moral responsibility and
ethical value of human actions. Gilbert Ryle says:
It is perfectly proper to say, in one logical tone of voice, that there exist
minds and to say, in another logical tone of voice, that there exist bodies.
These expressions do not indicate different species of existence; they indicate
two different senses of existence.32
According to Gilbert Ryle, capacity or potentiality is a mythical entity; when
glass is said to be brittle, it does not imply that there is present mysterious inner
potentiality for breaking it, it only means that when some conditions are present
glass breaks. Similarly, dispositional words like intelligent, rational etc. do not imply
that any disposition or capacity is present in anyone, but only that under certain
conditions one acts in particular ways. Therefore, the dispositional categories can be
replaced by the occurrent, signifying present qualities. A present mental quality is
not any secret property but signifies some activity. To say one is conscious, alert and
so on means one is acting or behaving in particular observed ways. Conscious
activities like thinking, feeling and willing do not imply secret operations, but are
those very unconcealed acts performed in those particular ways.
Ryle reduces the dispositions to observed outer activities, and thus avoids
terms implying inner, mental phenomena. Often it is thought necessary to suppose
mental acts as the causes of explicit acts. As thinking is the cause of doing a
thoughtful action; the feeling of joy or anger produces joyful or angry behaviour; and
that willing is the cause of voluntary actions. Ryle points out the difficulties of such

23
a theory. For example it cannot be explained how a conscious internal act can
produce a totally different, unconscious explicit effect. There is also no evidence to
show that the outer act is preceded by another inner act. Moreover, if it is supposed
the necessity of a precedent mental act as the cause of the outer act, then it is
necessary to think of a second mental act as the cause of the first one, and so on ad
infinitum. So the supposition of inner mental causes for explaining the outer acts is
avoidable.

(b) Pragmatism
Pragmatism also breaks away from the conventional psychology, which is
based on the supposition of mind being a permanent substance. According to
William James, the study of mind should be undertaken in an empirical way in the
light of new discoveries in the field of biology and physiology. Mind thus becomes a
name for human experience that is changing and growing along with the duration of
time. Experience does not mean the experience of simple sensations, which are
externally related by certain laws of association, but experience is a stream of
continuous consciousness and sensations are but the bits chosen and abstracted by
the mind out of this stream in the interest of life. Mind is not a passive tabula rasa,
but basically active and selective, the different phases of the mind being nothing but
the efforts of the individual organism to defend the various interests of life in its
struggle for existence. The fundamental character of mind is will and not passive
thought, action and not cognition. Perceiving is not representing or copying reality,
but rather responding to and reacting on reality, which also is changing and changed
by mind.33

(c) Existentialism and Phenomenology

The Existentalist and Phenomenological philosophers have also advanced the
views similar to Linguistic philosophers. Their views are not supported by linguistic
considerations but by general observations of man's condition as a being in the
world. He has a body, which he experiences and which in turn, affects his
experiences. But man is also a being who changes himself through the decision he
makes, who determines values; who lives his life according to these values but who

24
in the end can also go against his values and even end his life by choice. These
philosophers deny the primacy of ‘essence’ to ‘existence’. By essence is meant the
inbuilt universal nature (e.g. rationality or humanity) common to all individuals or
particular instances of a class (e.g. Ram, Sham). Existence relates to the actual being
of the individual. Essence is a universal, a possibility, and existence is particular, an
individual, an authenticity belonging to a specific place and time. Essence is only
imaginable but existence can be grasped by one’s own immediate experience. They
attach the greatest value to the individual rather than the universal, and more
particularly to the consciousness as privately experienced and felt rather than to the
academic concept of mind as substance.

(d) Functionalism
This is a theory of the mind in the modern philosophy developed as an
alternative to identity theory of mind and behaviourism. The central idea of this
theory is that mental states (beliefs, desires, etc.) are constituted solely by their
practical role. Functionalism stresses that what makes something a mental state of a
particular type, does not depend on its internal constitution, but rather on the way it
functions, or the role it plays in the system of which it is a part. This doctrine is
embedded in Aristotle’s conception of the soul. It has past history in Hobbes’s
conception of the mind as ‘calculating machine’. In contrast to Plato’s principle that
soul can exist apart from the body, Aristotle held that the human soul is the form of a
natural, organized human body. Their sets of powers or capacities enable it to
express its essential whatness, which for Aristotle is a matter of satisfying the
function or purpose that defines it as the kind of thing it is’.34
To conclude, we can say that mind being a constituent part of human being,
has a vital role in the development of human personality. It has been defined in
various ways by different trends of thoughts in the Indian as well as in the western
philosophy. Since the main emphasis of Indian philosophy has been on the
realization of Ultimate Reality within the innermost deapths one’s own self, the
attempts are make it possible by understanding the nature of mental modifications
and by recommending the ways for their cessation.

25
 REFERENCES

1. Shashi Bala, Man: Being and Meaning, p. 39.

2. Raghunath Safaya, Indian Psychology, p. 47.
3. Chandogya Upanishad, VII, 5-6.
4. Paingala Upanishad, II, 5-6.
5. Katha Upanishad, VI, 10.
6. Ibid., VI, 11.
7. Ibid., VI, 16.
8. Gotama, Nyaya Darsana, I, 2, 11.
9. J.P. Atreya, Mind and its Function in Indian Thought, p.64.
10. S. C. Vidyabhusana, Nyaya Darsana of Gotama, p. 270.
11. J.P. Atreya, op. cit., p.54.
12. Swami S.P.Saraswati, Patanjali Raja Yoga, p.13.
13. Ibid., p.12.
14. Swami S.P.Saraswati, op.cit., p.24
15. S.N. Dasgupta, Yoga Philosophy in Relation to Other Systems of Indian Thought,
p. 260.
16.
17. S. Radhakrishnan, History of Philosophy, Eastern and Western, p. 264.
18. Ibid., p.287.
19. Swami S.P.Saraswati, op.cit., p.12.
20. Ibid., p.13.
21. J.P. Atreya, op.cit., p.19.
22. Ibid., p.10.
23. Ibid., p.13.
24. J.N. Sinha, History of Indian Philosophy, Vol.2, p. 290.
25. J.P. Atreya, op. cit., p.33.
26. Paul Brunton, The Hidden Teaching Beyond Yoga, p.265.
27. The New Encyclopaedia Britannica, p.16.
28. Ibid., p.17.
29. Ibid., p.158.
30. Ibid., p.19.
31. Spinoza, Ethics, III, 2.
32. Gilbert Ryle, The Concept of Mind, p.23.
33. William James, Principles of Psychology, pp.220-40.
34. Aristotle, De Anima, II, 1.

26