(Chapter 07) OFDM - Theory PDF
(Chapter 07) OFDM - Theory PDF
(Chapter 07) OFDM - Theory PDF
-1-
OFDM - Principles
v Contents
Ø Introduction: Concept
Ø OFDM System
Ø OFDMA
Ø OFDM System design
Ø Single Carrier (SC) FDE
Ø Summary
-2-
Introduction to OFDM
-3-
Introduction to OFDM
-4-
Introduction to OFDM
-5-
Introduction to OFDM
Ø Simple equalization
§ Frequency-selective fading channel è a large number of flat fading subchannels
§ Simple equalization method is applicable ( zero forcing equalizer with single tap )
-6-
Introduction to OFDM
BPF
ejw1 e-jw1
BPF
input output
S/P P/S
sequence ejw2 e-jw2 sequence
....
....
BPF
ejwN e-jwN
Ø Problem
§ Need for a large number of oscillator or frequency synthesizer proportional to the number
of subcarriers
§ Receiver also requires the same number of bandpass filters as the subcarriers
-7-
Introduction to OFDM
Ø Another problem
§ Inefficient use of available spectrum
Ø Solution
§ Overlapping multi-carrier modulation technique
11 0
-1
4
1
10 0
0 90 180 270 360
-1 0
11100100‥‥ S/P P/S 0 90 180 270 360
1
01 0
0
00 0 90 180 270 360
-1
-9-
Introduction to OFDM
GI GI
GI GI
GI GI
Delay spread
No ISI
FFT window
- 10 -
Introduction to OFDM
Subcarrier 1
Subcarrier 2
Subcarrier 3
- 11 -
Introduction to OFDM
v Advantage of OFDM
Ø Spectral efficiency
§ Orthogonal subcarriers are spaced 1/T apart and overlap in frequency domain
§ ADC/DAC pair
0.4
Ø Mitigation of ISI
0.2
(Guard interval) -6 -4 -2 0 2
Normalized Frequency (fT) --->
4 6
- 12 -
Introduction to OFDM
v Disadvantage
Ø Capacity and power loss due to guard interval
§ Guard Interval should be about two to four times the rms delay spread
- 13 -
OFDM Signal Model
v OFDM signal
Ø Transmission
N / 2-1
ì ü
s (t ) = Re íexp( j 2p f c t ) ´ å X k exp [ j 2p ( f k t ) ]ý
î k =N / 2 þ
§ fc : carrier frequency, Ts : symbol duration, Xk : k-th complex symbol
1 N -1
x(n) = å X k exp[ j 2p (kn / N )]
N k =0
- 14 -
OFDM Signal Model
-1 a -1
Serial to Parallel
Parallel to Serial
Serial to Parallel
Parallel to Serial
1 1
b s (t )
Modualtion IFFT FFT Demodualtion
1 1
{ ,1,0,0,1, } { , -1,1,1,-1, } c { , -1,1,1,-1, } { ,1,0,0,1, }
-1 -1
d
-1 1 1 -1
0
a=0
b=-2
c=0
parallel d=2
to d
∑ series
c s (t )
a
T
b
T
T
- 15 -
OFDM Signal Model
0 1
P/S Converter
S/P Converter
0 0
S(t)
IFFT FFT
0100 1101 1 1
0 1
0
0
S(t)
parallel to series 0 T
T
- 16 -
OFDM Signal Model
0.15
Data symbol : 200
Guard band : 56
0.1
Guard interval : 64
0.05
-0.05
-0.1
-0.15
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
- 17 -
OFDM Signal Model
s1 r1
xk guard yk
interval
x1 y1
n(t)
...
bit stream S/P IFFT Channel rn FFT P/S bit stream
xN sN+G rN+G yN
- 18 -
OFDM Signal Model
b bits X0 x0
Serial-to- X1 x1 Parallel Guard D/A
Serial Data Signal Up
Parallel IFFT -to-Serial Interval &
...
...
...
Input Mapper Converter
Converter Converter Insertion LPF
XN-1 xN-1
Channel
Z0 z0
Parallel Z1 z1 Serial-to Guard LPF
Serial Data Signal Down
-to-Serial Equalizer FFT -Parallel Interval &
...
...
...
...
output Mapper Converter
Converter Converter Removal A/D
ZN-1 zN-1
- 19 -
OFDM Signal Model
- 20 -
OFDM Signal Model
- 21 -
OFDM Signal Design - Pilot Subcarrier
Ø Continual pilots
§ Fixed (frequency) location in every OFDM symbol
Ø Scattered pilots
§ Variable (frequency) location in every OFDM symbol (periodical shift)
- 22 -
OFDM Signal Design - Pilot Subcarrier
Nf
Nt
Fig. Pilot design in time and frequency (rectangular scatter pattern of pilot case)
- 23 -
OFDM Signal Model
Ø Spacing between pilots and the number of pilots are pre-determined based on the
maximum multipath delay
§ If the maximum multipath delay increases, then, pilot spacing N f (inside a symbol, in
frequency domain) must be reduced
- 24 -
OFDM Signal Spectrum with Pilot
frequency
index
0 N-1
Boosted pilot
Data <Scattered pilots In DVB-T>
- 25 -
OFDM Signal Spectrum
- 26 -
OFDM Signal - PAPR
-2
Ø PAPR [dB] -4
sin(wt)
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
-2
-4 sin(2wt)
▪ PAPR of each subcarrier (sinusoid) 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
4
– Average power: ½ 2
0
– Peak power: 1 -2
-4 sin(3wt)
– PAPR: 3 dB 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
– Average power: 2 -2
sin(4wt)
-4
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
– Peak power: 10.43
4
– PAPR: 7.2 dB 2
-2 sum
-4
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
- 28 -
PAPR Reduction Algorithm
- 29 -
OFDM System Design
- 30 -
OFDM System Design
- 31 -
OFDM System Design
1 N
R = bf s f sub = W= = NRsym = f s
Tsym Tsym
- 32 -
OFDM System Design
§ In this case, useful symbol includes N subcarrier signal (=# of useful samples)
1 W 1 W
f sub = = Note : f sub ¹ , f sub ¹
Tu N Tsym N (1 + TG / TU )
§ Bandwidth
æ T ö 1 N
W = # of samples / sec = N × ç1 + G ÷ × = = f sub × N
è Tu ø T Tu
- 33 -
OFDM System Design
- 34 -
Design of OFDM system
Ø Burst Mode
§ Wireless LAN è HIPERLAN/2, IEEE 802.11a, Wireless MAN è IEEE 802.16a/d/e
- 35 -
OFDMA
v OFDMA
Ø Allocation of subcarriers to multiple SSs (Subscriber Stations) in an OFDM symbol time:
★ named as OFDMA since OFDM already contains -M, meaning multiplexing. But
in case of Forward Link, OFDMA is mis-leading and actually is OFDM-ultiplexing.
Ø Group of M subcarriers as a unit of allocation → Subchannel
Ø The same scheme can be equally applied in both Forward and Reverse Channel
Ø Is effective in inter-cell interference mitigation by interference averaging betw. cells
Ø Soft handover between cells is possible and is quite effective
Ø The example in this section is that of Wi-Bro system
v Subchannelization Method 1 : Diversity subchannels
Ø Feedforward method: can result in statistically similar channel qualities for all users (as
the channel quality will be averaged in time between users)
Ø Specific subcarrier allocation dynamically changes in time
Ø More popular than Method 2
- 36 -
OFDMA
- 37 -
OFDMA
- 38 -
SC-FDE System
v Conventional SC-TDE
t 1st path signal
Σ
→ relatively longer multi-path delay
Algorithm for coefficient adjustment
fading channel
→ High complexity Σ
- 39 -
SC-FDE System
- 40 -
OFDM vs SC-FDE
v Disadvantage of OFDM
Ø High PAPR : non-linearity of amplifier → signal distortion
§ Not suitable for uplink transmission (need for low power)
- 41 -
OFDM vs SC-FDE
v Advantage of SC-FDE
Ø Low PAPR
§ Time-domain symbol mapping & Time-domain transmission by single carrier
§ Beneficial for power savings through smaller Transmitter Power Amp backoff
Ø Better BER performance than OFDM (in some channel conditions, Ref.below)
§ In case of low-order modulation (BPSK, QPSK) and high code rate
§ Beneficial for power savings (low Power Amplifier Backoff)
§ (In linear and AWGN channel, SC-FDE and OFDM have the same BER)
Ø Insensitivity to frequency selectivity
§ Low SNR of several subcarrier → dispersion in time domain → not much BER
degradation
Ø Similar complexity to OFDM
§ same process (FFT/IFFT, frequency-domain equalization)
- 42 -
OFDM vs SC-FDE
v Disadvantage of SC-FDE
Ø Lower transmission efficiency (capacity) than OFDM
§ This trend is more pronounced as signal adds many control schemes (Preamble, Sync
words, Channelization functions, etc.)
- 43 -
OFDM vs SC-FDE
v Comparison of transceiver
- 44 -
3GPP LTE UL SC-FDMA
§ UL : 50Mbps
- 45 -
3GPP LTE UL SC-FDMA
v SC-FDMA
Ø Combination of SC-FDE (Frequency Domain Equalization) and FDMA
Ø Various transmission structure is considered for UE (User Equipment)
assignment in 3GPP TR 25.814 UL physical layer
Sub-carrier CP
DFT Mapping IFFT insertion
NTX symbols
Size-NFFT
Size-NTX
- 46 -
3GPP LTE UL SC-FDMA
- 47 -
Comparison: OFDM vs. QAM
OFDM QAM
▪ Immune to Time Domain Impulse interference ▪ Immune to Frequency Domain Impulse (tone
▪ Vulnerable to Frequency Domain Impulse interference)
(tone interference) ▪ Vulnerable to Time Domain Impulse interference
▪ BW efficiency: In unfiltered state, MCM is max. 2 times as efficient as SCM, but since MCM requires GI
(a loss), and SCM can adopt Nyquist filtering (a gain), the net result is similar.
- 48 -
References
v References
Ø Van Nees and Ramjee Prasad, OFDM for Wireless Multimedia
Communications, Artech House 2000.
Ø Andrea Goldsmith, Wireless Communications, Cambridge University Press
2005, Chapter 12.
Ø Andrea Molisch, Wireless Communications, Cambridge University Press 2005,
Chapter 19.
- 49 -
Questions for Self Study
- 50 -