Quality Manual For Hydraulically Bound Mixtures PDF
Quality Manual For Hydraulically Bound Mixtures PDF
Quality Manual For Hydraulically Bound Mixtures PDF
Document reference: WRAP, 2009, Quality manual for hydraulically bound mixtures: Notes for guidance. (WRAP Project
MRF106). Report prepared by J Edwards, J Kennedy and P Edwards. Banbury, WRAP
Written by: J Edwards (Scott Wilson Ltd), J Kennedy (JK Pavement Consulting Ltd) and
P Edwards (Lafarge A&C UK)
Front cover photography: Mobile mixing plant producing HBM on construction site (courtesy of The Independent Stabilising Company Ltd).
WRAP and Scott Wilson Ltd believe the content of this report to be correct as at the date of writing. However, factors such as prices, levels of recycled content and
regulatory requirements are subject to change and users of the report should check with their suppliers to confirm the current situation. In addition, care should be taken
in using any of the cost information provided as it is based upon numerous project-specific assumptions (such as scale, location, tender context, etc.).
The report does not claim to be exhaustive, nor does it claim to cover all relevant products and specifications available on the market. While steps have been taken to
ensure accuracy, WRAP cannot accept responsibility or be held liable to any person for any loss or damage arising out of or in connection with this information being
inaccurate, incomplete or misleading. It is the responsibility of the potential user of a material or product to consult with the supplier or manufacturer and ascertain
whether a particular product will satisfy their specific requirements. The listing or featuring of a particular product or company does not constitute an endorsement by
WRAP and WRAP cannot guarantee the performance of individual products or materials. This material is copyrighted. It may be reproduced free of charge subject to the
material being accurate and not used in a misleading context. The source of the material must be identified and the copyright status acknowledged. This material must
not be used to endorse or used to suggest WRAP’s endorsement of a commercial product or service. For more detail, please refer to WRAP’s Terms & Conditions on its
web site: www.wrap.org.uk
Contents
1.0 Stage 1: HBM selection............................................................................................................... 5
2.0 Stage 2: Constituent selection ................................................................................................... 6
3.0 Stage 3: HBM design................................................................................................................... 7
4.0 Stage 4: HBM production............................................................................................................ 8
4.1 Stage 4a: Aggregate processing ...........................................................................................9
5.0 Stage 5: HBM storage ............................................................................................................... 10
6.0 Stage 6: HBM application ......................................................................................................... 11
Appendix A: Tables to aid HBM selection ............................................................................................. 12
Appendix B: HBM properties................................................................................................................. 14
Figures
Figure 1: Overview of the process for producing an HBM ...............................................................................4
Figure 2: HBM production ...........................................................................................................................8
Figure 3: Soil and aggregate process options depending on source.................................................................9
Tables
Table 1: Suggested HBM production choices .................................................................................................8
HBMs are versatile products which offer benefits in the efficient use of materials; including the potential to
increase the value of the material being recycled (up-cycling), and the ability to consume a range of feedstocks -
including soils and aggregates. HBMs can be designed for almost all projects and applications, and to utilise
locally available, cost effective constituents. The importance of HBM design highlights that HBM production is only
one stage within the overall production process of an HBM (Figure 1). The Sections of this manual outline the
stages of the overall production process, with detailed guidance contained in Appendices.
Quality assurance of HBMs is achieved by initial development of a robust mixture design, which ensures that the
HBM is fit for purpose, and the subsequent application of production control, suitable storage and accompanying
guidance/training for the application. It is the responsibility of the producer to demonstrate that the HBM has
been produced in a consistent manner using necessary process controls. A template quality management
scheme1, based upon the factory production control requirements of BS EN 14227 and incorporating the
principles of the WRAP Quality Protocol for the production of aggregate from inert waste2 is also available from
the WRAP website.
HBM selection will depend on the specification for use, the vicinity and availability of constituents to be exploited,
and other market factors.
Test aggregate or soil in accordance with BS EN 13242 and declare property classes.
Recycled aggregate must conform to the WRAP Quality Protocol1
Ensure the material is suitably protected from the elements to maintain optimum water content and used within the
product shelf life (only applicable to HBMs that have a shelf life).
The product should be used within the recommended shelf life and installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s
recommendations or appropriate specification.
1
WRAP, 2009, Template quality management scheme for the production of a hydraulically bound mixture (WRAP project MRF
106). Report prepared by J Edwards. Banbury, WRAP. Available on line via www.wrap.org.uk
2
WRAP. 2005. The Quality Protocol for the production of aggregates from inert waste. Available on line via
www.aggregain.org.uk/quality/quality_protocols/
All recycled aggregates must be recovered in accordance with the WRAP Quality Protocol2.
Suitability of HBM for a specific application is generally based on mechanical performance (typically compressive
strength but also tensile strength and elastic modulus) and durability requirements. These requirements are
defined in specifications such as:
BS ENs (see the Table of standards);
Manual of contract documents for highway works3 (MCHW);
Specification for the reinstatement of openings in highways4 (SROH).
The tables contained in Appendix A have been developed to help with the selection of mixture type. They should
enable the HBM selection to be made taking into account what has been specified or what is being targeted and
relating this to the local availability of binders, binder constituents, aggregates and soils.
3
Highways Agency, 2009, Manual of contract documents for highway works. Volume 1, Specification for highway works. The
Stationery Office. Available on line via www.standardsforhighways.co.uk/mchw/vol1/index.htm
4
Highway Authorities and Utilities Committee, 2002, Specification for the reinstatement of openings in highways, Second
edition. Available on line via www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/network/local/streetworks/cop/roo
This stage determines the properties of the aggregate which the producer wishes to exploit, or it covers the
selection of the aggregate or soil to meet the requirements of the HBM type selected in Stage 1.
Provided it complies with the selected property classes from BS EN 13242, the aggregate can be natural,
manufactured (also known as secondary) or recycled material, or a combination of these types. To achieve the
desired properties, the aggregate may have to be processed and, in the case of aggregate recycled from inert
waste, recovered in accordance with the WRAP Quality Protocol2.
Since grading is usually specified for the different HBM types, the main aggregate properties for consideration
include particle shape and hardness. These, together with the overall HBM grading, are the relevant properties to
control long term performance. They are also relevant in the case of short term performance, such as the ability
to withstand immediate traffic. However, to understand this short term performance aspect it is usually better to
examine the character of the total mixture using the immediate bearing index test, standardised in
BS EN 13286-47 and discussed in Stage 3.
Particle hardness has a significant bearing on the strength that can be achieved by the HBM and may affect the
potential market or specification to be satisfied. For example, irrespective of binder content, the strength of HBM
made with soft chalk aggregate is a function of the strength of the chalk particles and will be limited to a
maximum compressive strength class of C3/4. Thus, it would be prudent to examine issues related to aggregate
strength when considering the HBM type in Stage 1, where using a particular type of aggregate is more important
to the HBM producer than the targeted market or exact HBM type.
Aggregate particle shape and hardness classes are found in the aggregate standard, BS EN 13242. The relevant
classes should be selected / determined for the intended HBM application.
In addition, fines quality, chemical properties and physical impurities will need examination in relation to
volumetric stability and durability although, as with immediate traffickability, these are better considered by
examining the mixture (as discussed in Stage 3) and are further discussed in Appendix B. The available methods
for the determination of laboratory mechanical performance (such as compressive and tensile strength) which
have a significant bearing on long term performance are also discussed in Appendix B.
Use BS EN 13242 (if applicable) and state the ‘no-requirement’ class where appropriate, declare aggregate
properties including: particle shape; hardness; fines content / nature; impurities and sulfates.
Recover recycled aggregates in accordance with the WRAP Quality Protocol.
This stage covers the design process to achieve mixture properties such as:
strength;
durability;
range of suitable water content for installation;
volumetric stability; and
immediate use / traffickability.
If complying with a specification / design, the strength will be specified as a strength class (described in
Appendix B). For example:
HD26/065 requires, depending on pavement layer thickness, HBM with strength classes of at least C8/10,
C9/12, or T3.
the SROH4 requires minimum strength classes C1.5/2 or C3/4 and a maximum strength class C8/10.
If not working to a specification, the producer has to choose the strength class that they wish to offer. This will
depend on the constituents available and/or markets they wish to exploit. In this case, the producer may require
expert assistance to match binder content & strength with design issues, volume stability (ability to resist internal
disruption/expansion) and durability (water and frost resistance) requirements. Where immediate use / overlaying
/ trafficking are required, the capabilities of the fresh mixture will also need examination. Where storage either at
the production facility or elsewhere is anticipated, the properties relevant to time of actual use will need
determination. All these aspects are also discussed in Appendix B.
The effective completion of this Stage requires laboratory mixture design testing (on which guidance can be
found in the MCHW3 and in other industry guidance6,7). This testing will determine the necessary constituent
proportions, which, in accordance with BS EN 14227, will need to be declared.
5
Highways Agency, Design manual for roads and bridges, pavement foundation design. Volume 7 Section 2 Part 3 (HD 26/06),
The Stationery Office.
6
Kennedy J, 2006, Hydraulically bound mixtures for pavements. Performance, behaviour, materials, mixture design,
construction, control testing. CCIP-009, BCA and Concrete Centre.
7
Fly ash in highways construction, Datasheet 6.0 – 6.4, UK Quality Ash Association. Available on line at www.ukqaa.org.uk
Whether batching by mass or volume, factory production control should be exercised to demonstrate the
production of a quality and consistent product. Recommendations for a production control system are given in the
annex of BS EN 14227. The annex states that the producer should establish and maintain their policy and
procedures for production control in a quality manual that includes:
the producer’s organisational structure relating to quality;
control of constituents (including water) and mixtures;
process control, calibration and maintenance;
requirements for the handling and storage of the mixture when appropriate;
inspection, calibration and control of the measuring equipment in the process, and laboratory testing
equipment for the mixture; and
procedures for handling non conforming mixtures.
A template quality management scheme for HBM production is also available from WRAP.
Aggregates derived from inert waste must be recovered in accordance with the WRAP Quality Protocol2, and
manufactured or other industrial waste in accordance with the relevant Protocol8 or recovery procedure. Recycled
aggregates, including recycled trench arisings, can produce HBMs which comply with either BS EN 14227-1 to 3
and 5 (for aggregate mixtures) or BS EN 14227-10 to 14 (for treated soils).
In the case of BS EN 14227-10 to 14 (for treated soils), the soil may be used ‘as found’ with no intention (or the
need in most instances) to classify in accordance with BS EN 13242 (aggregates for HBMs). Alternatively, the soil
may undergo processing to meet the requirements of BS EN 13242.
Recover in
Wash, accordance with the Recover in accordance
screen, WRAP Quality with the appropriate
blend as Protocol for inert Protocol8 or procedure.
appropriate. waste2.
Use as found
to BS EN Crush, screen, blend as appropriate.
14227 Parts
10 to 14
Classify to BS EN 13242 (or BS EN 14227-4 in the case of fly ash)
8
Waste Protocols Project, Environment Agency. Last Accessed February 2009 at http://www.environment-
agency.gov.uk/business/topics/waste/32154.aspx
Where a HBM is to be stored, it is imperative that the producer has laboratory evidence of the performance
properties relevant to the time of use and that these are quoted for design purposes. In addition, samples for
compliance specimens and testing should be taken at the time of use.
Whether it is the producer or the purchaser that finds storage is necessary, the HBM should be stored under
cover and protected from wind and rain to prevent loss or gain of moisture, and protected from extreme
temperature changes to prevent deterioration.
Care should be taken to prevent segregation which can occur when a HBM is loaded on top of a conical stockpile
or in one large dump from a truck; under these circumstances the larger aggregate sizes tend to roll to the
outside and bottom. Further mixing may be required prior to placement to compensate for segregation during
storage and/or transportation.
It is good practice for the producer to provide recommendations on the installation of their HBM in different
applications to enable contractors to achieve optimum performance from the product. Recommendations may
include:
setting times;
strength development;
shelf life and storage methods;
affect of storage on properties such as strength and long term performance;
methods of laying, compaction and protection;
weather implications during installation, and in the short term;
design advice for particular applications;
site control methods and tests; and
immediate traffickability.
Table A2: Types and designation of HBM covered by BS EN 14227 Parts 1 to 3 and 5
BS EN 14227- BS EN 14227- BS EN 14227- BS EN 14227-
Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 5
Type of mixture Cement bound Hydraulic road
Slag bound Fly ash bound
granular binder bound
mixtures mixtures
mixtures mixtures
Graded slag mixtures without
SBM A1 – A5
specified binder requirements
31.5 mm wide graded mixture
CBGM A
(includes sand mixtures)
31.5 mm well graded mixtures CBGM B SBM B1 FABM 1 HRBBM 1
0/20, 0/14 and 0/10 mm well
CBGM C SBM B2 FABM 2 0/20, HRBBM 2 0/20,
graded mixtures with compacity
0/20, 0/14, 0/10 0/20, 0/14, 0/10 0/14, 0/10 0/14, 0/10
requirement
Sand mixtures with Immediate
SBM B3 FABM 3 HRBBM 3
Bearing Index (IBI) requirement
Mixtures with declared grading
and other properties if SBM B4 FABM 4 HRBBM 4
appropriate
Treated fly ash mixture FABM 5
For the mixtures above, the quality of the aggregate used is at the discretion of the specifier / user / producer.
Since grading is specified in the relevant mixture clause, the main aggregate properties for consideration include
particle shape and hardness. These, together with grading are relevant properties for immediate traffickability.
These properties and their classes are found in the aggregate standard BS EN 13242. In addition, fines quality
and chemical and physical impurities may need consideration in relation to volumetric stability and durability
(although these are better considered by examining the HBM).
Note that soil mixtures are specified in BS EN 14227 Parts 10 to 14.
Rc classes are designated Cxx/yy and range from C0.4/0.5 to C27/36. The first number in the notation - xx - is the
minimum compressive strength of cylinders with height/diameter (or slenderness) ratios of 2. The second number
- yy - is the minimum strength of cubes or cylinders with slenderness ratio of 1. It is important that the full
notation is always used since, if a single value is used, it will not be clear which notation it relates to.
The strength classes are slightly different for the CBGM standard compared to the other mixture standards. Those
numerically close can be deemed equivalent. Thus C8/10 for CBGM can be considered equivalent to C9/12 for
FABM.
When using the CBGM standard, it should be recognised that the notation relates to minimum characteristic
strength at 28 days using 20°C curing. In the case of the other HBM standards, the notation relates to the
minimum strength of the mixture using curing conditions and age of testing as specified in the country of use. For
example, in the MCHW3, the notation has been chosen to relate to the minimum average strength of groups of 5
specimens tested at 28 days, using 40°C curing with non-cement mixtures and 20°C with cement based mixtures,
with no individual test result being less than 85% of the characteristic strength.
The RtE classes are designated Tsuffix. The suffix ranges from 0 to 5 with performance increasing as the number
increases. In the classification, Rt refers to strength measured in direct tension. Rt can be deduced from the
indirect tensile strength (Rit) using the relationship Rt = 0.8Rit.
CBR classes are designated CBRxx/yyThe first number in the notation - xx - designates the immediate CBR (either
30 or 50) and second number - yy - the percentage change in CBR value after 28 days (either 25, 35 or 50%).
Thus, for mechanical performance purposes, the range of CBR values at 28 days will be 40 to 75.
With respect to the long term properties of volumetric stability and durability, it is possible (using aggregate
property categories from in BS EN 13242) to specify the aggregate requirements to avoid problems in this area.
However, since it is the final mixture rather than the aggregate that ultimately determines volumetric stability and
durability, it can be argued that tests on the hardened mixture are more appropriate than restrictions on the
aggregate. These mixture tests are not included in the European standards so it is recommended that the
specifier / user / producer includes relevant testing either at set up or in the project specification.
Evaluation of volumetric stability of the HBM, is normally carried out by comparing the strength of specimens
after immersion in water to the strength of non immersed specimens. Experience has found that the volumetric
stability of the HBM will be satisfactory if the loss of strength does not exceed 80%. Clause 880 in the MCHW3
describes how testing and evaluation should be carried out. This immersion comparison also checks the durability
of the hardened HBM to water.
In terms of durability to frost and, in particular, resistance to frost heave, usually HBMs can be assumed to resist
frost heave if the compressive strength of specimens with a slenderness ratio of 1 exceeds 2 or 2.5 MPa. In the
case of an HBM that will never meet this level of compressive strength (for example, some treated clays), an
indirect tensile strength in excess of 0.2 or 0.25 MPa has been found satisfactory.
The various methods of specimen manufacture are covered by BS EN 13286 Parts 50 to 53, to accommodate the
different shapes and density of specimens. Each method of manufacture will yield a different strength; hence, it
is important that the specifier / user / producer specifies what is required. Common UK practice is:
for Rc classification, either cylindrical or cubic specimens compacted to refusal by a vibrating hammer;
for RtE classification, cylindrical specimens compacted to refusal by vibrating hammer;
CBR classification is rarely used.
Short term concerns of immediate use or traffickability are normally addressed by ensuring that the HBM is well
graded, that the aggregate is hard, and it consists of at least 50% crushed particles. Alternatively, or for other
HBM where these aggregate factors do not apply, the Immediate Bearing Index (IBI) of the mixture may be
declared. A range of IBI values for immediate trafficking of a variety of treated soils and mixtures is given in
industry guidance10,11.
The capability to withstand trafficking without detriment to long term performance can be checked by using a
pneumatic tyred roller (PTR) for finishing rolling. Provided there is a load of at least 3 tonnes on each pneumatic
tyre and the deformation without stress cracks under the tyre is less than approximately 10 mm after at least 10
passes of the roller, the HBM layer can usually be considered to be able to support immediate traffic.
Mixture design advice can be found in the MCHW3 and other industry guidance6,7.
9
Highways Agency’s Interim advice note 73/09 Design guidance for road pavement foundations (Draft HD25), The Stationery
Office. Available on line at www.standardsforhighways.co.uk/ians/index.htm.
10
Britpave. Stabilised soils as subbase or base for roads and other pavements. Technical data sheet. Available on line at
www.soilstabilisation.org.uk/assets/pdf/stabilised_soils.pdf.
11
Britpave. Immediate trafficking of cement bound materials. Technical report. Available on line at
www.soilstabilisation.org.uk/assets/pdf/5413%20CBM%20Traffic.pdf.