From The Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison
From The Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison
From The Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison
P H O T O S Y N T H E S I S AND R E S P I R A T I O N BY C H L O R E L L A
BY EDWARD LUNG YUAN AND FARRINGTON DANIELS
(From the Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison)
(Received for publication, March 14, 1955)
]EXPEI~NTAL
The apparatus used in this study was essentially the same as that described in a
previous report (6). A carbon dioxide infrared gas analyzer was used to follow the
exchange of carbon dioxide gas. The magnetic, oxygen meter was not used because
the addition of liquid solutions of the inhibitor caused unstable readings. The rate of
change of carbon dioxide gas was recorded on an automatic Brown recorder.
The reaction vessel had a liquid volume of 70 ml. The volume of the circulating
system was 125 ml. The solution containing the inhibitor was added to the Chlordla
suspension by means of a burette fitted to the reaction vessel. Equilibrium between
gas and liquid was usually established within 3 minutes after each addition of the
inhibitor solution. All experiments were carried out at room temperature, 20--23°C.
The light source was a mercury AH-6 lamp. Monochromatic beams of light at
5460 A and 4360 A, were obtained by means of interference filters supplied by the
527
J. GIr2¢.PmtsloL., 1956, Vol. 39, No. 4
Baird Associates, and Co. The light intensity varied from 1.0 X 10- s einstein per
cm3 per minute to 5.0 X 10-8 einstein per cm3 per minute (I einstein = 6.02 X 10t*
photons).
The culture used was a strain of algae, Chlordla pyrenoidosa, maintained in pure
culture by the Botany Department of the University of Wisconsin. The culturing of
algae has been described in a previous paper (6). About 300 to 700 microliters of the
freshly cultured cells were suspended in 20 ml. of culture medium, at pH about 5.0.
The suspension was saturated with 2 per cent carbon dioxide in air. The absorption
of incident light by the algal cells was generally more than 70 per cent.
The addition of the inhibitor solution was carried out by means of a 10 ml. burette.
During each experiment, the normal rates of respiration in the dark and photosynthe-
sis in the light were measured. A small measured amount of the inhibitor solution was
then introduced through the burette, and rates of respiration and photosynthesis were
TABLE I
Effects of KCN on Respiration
Respiration (changes in
Experiment No. KCNconcentration micromoles COt per 10 rain.) Percentage chsnge in
resplrstion
Normal With KCN
molcr/liler
4.4 X 10-5 2.38 2.40 +1.3
5.5 X 10-6 1.11 1.14 +2.9
7.7 X 10-5 2.38 2.44 +2.7
11.0 X 10-5 1.35 1.91 +41.2
16.5 X 10-5 1.11 1.37 +22.9
22.0 × 10- 5 1.35 1.59 +17.7
27.5 X 10-5 1.11 1.03 --7.2
31.8 X 10-5 2.34 2.39 +2.0
45.0 X 10-5 2.34 2.04 --12.5
63.6 X 10-5 2.34 1.91 --19.7
again recorded at the same light intensity. Calculations were made directly from the
readings on the recording chart.
RESULTS
fect of cyanide. The light intensities used in these experiments were about 1.0 X
l0 s einstein per cm3 per minute.
The effects of potassium cyanide on respiration and photosynthesis by
Chlordla come immediately after its addition. Respiration is stimulated at
small concentrations of KCN (10 X 10-5 moles per liter), and is only slightly
inhibited at high concentrations of KCN. The rate of photosynthesis is strongly
inhibited by the addition of KCN.
The inhibition of photosynthesis by cyanide is only effective above the
compensation point--the intensity of light at which photosynthesis is enough
to just balance respiration. In weak light where measurements are made under
the compensation point, and respiration is greater than photosynthesis, no
inhibition of photosynthesis is observed.
TABLE II
Effects of KCN on Photosynthesis
Photosynthesis (changes in
micromoles COJ per 10 rain.) Percentage change~lln
Experiment No. KCN concentration photosynthesis
Normal With KCN
moles/littr
4.4 X 100 s 6.25 5.70 --9.0
5.5 × 10°5 4.64 3.49 --24.6
7.7 X 100 6 6.25 5.58 -10.7
11.0 X 100 s 5.79 4.34 --30.0
16.5 X 10- s 4.64 2.20 --52.5
22.0 X 100 s 5.79 3.28 --43.3
27.5 X 100 s 4.64 1.59 --65.7
31.8 × 10 -6 6.83 2.96 --56.5
45.0 X i0-~ 6.83 1.96 -71.0
63.6 X i0-s 6.83 1.91 -72.0
TABLE I I I
Effects of Sodium Azlde on Respiration
Respirstion (changesin
ExperimentNo. NaNI concentration micromoles CO=per 10 mln.) Percentage change in
resplr&tion
Normal With NaN,
motes/llter
1 . 6 X 10-s 2.07 2.75 +33.0
3.6 X 10- 6 2.07 2.96 +43.O
5.9 X 10- e 2.07 2.83 +36.0
6.6 X 10- 0 2.54 3.43 +35.0
7.9 X 10- s 3.02 3.74 +23.7
10.5 X 10-* 3.02 3.15 +4.2
19.6 X 10-* 2.54 2.45 --4.0
35.0 X 10-* 2.54 2.04 --20.0
45.9 X 10-* 2.54 2.00 --21.3
TABLE IV
Effects of Sodium Anide on Photosynthesis
Photosynthesis (chaaigesin
Experiment No. NaNs concentration mieromolesC02 per 10 rain.) Percentage clmnge in
photosynthesis
Normal With NaN,
moles/liter
1.6 X 10-6 5.20 4.83 --7.0
3.6 X 10-6 5.20 3.67 -29.4
5.9 X 10- e 5.20 2.88 -41.5
6.6 X 10-6 6.28 3.13 -50.0
7.9 X 10-6 5.96 3.02 --49.4
10.5 X 10.6 5.96 2.10 -64.9
19.6 X 10-6 6.28 1.54 --75.6
35.0 X 10- s 6.28 0.19 -97.0
45.9 X 10- e 6.28 0.00 -100.0
S h i b a t a a n d Y a k u s h i j i (7), a n d N a k a m u r a (8) r e p o r t e d t h a t t h e h y d r o x y l -
a m i n e - s e n s i t i v e e n z y m e p a r t i c i p a t e s o n l y i n t h e o x y g e n - l i b e r a t i n g s t a g e of t h e
p h o t o s y n t h e t i c process. T h e r e s u l t s a r e s u m m a r i z e d in T a b l e s V a n d V I . T h e
l i g h t i n t e n s i t i e s u s e d i n t h e s e e x p e r i m e n t s w e r e a b o u t 1.0 X l 0 s e i n s t e i n p e r
cm3 per minute.
H y d r o x y l a m i n e causes n o s t i m u l a t i o n of r e s p i r a t i o n . T h e r e is also n o large
EDWARD LUNG YUAN AND I~A~J:NGTON DANIELS 531
i n h i b i t i o n of r e s p i r a t i o n a t h i g h e r c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of h y d r o x y l a m i n e . T h e
e2tect o n p h o t o s y n t h e s i s is of t h e s a m e m a g n i t u d e a s t h a t of p o t a s s i u m c y -
TABLE V
Effects of Hydroxylamine on Respiration
Respiration (changes in
micromoles COs per l0 rain.) Percentag[e change in
Experiment No. NH=OH concentration resptration
Normal With NH=OH
mol~/U~r
1 3.0 X 10-s 3.25 3.12 --3.9
1 5.9 X 10-5 3.25 2.78 --14.2
1 8 . 9 X 10 -6 3.25 2.07 --36.2
2 11.8 X 10-6 2.37 2.04 --14.1
3 14.8 X 10- 5 1.81 1.49 --17.5
2 17.7 X 10- 6 2.37 2.00 --15.4
3 20.7 X 10-s 1.81 1.53 --15.8
2 23.6 X 10- 6 2.37 2.15 --9.4
3 26.6 X 10- 5 1.81 1.40 --22.8
4 29.6 X 10- 5 2.23 2.15 --3.6
4 35.5 X 10- ~ 2.23 2.11 --5.0
4 41.5 X 10- ~ 2.23 1.64 --25.7
TABLE VI
Effevts of Hydroxylamine on Photosynthesis
Photosynthesis (changesin
NH20H concentration micromoles CO= per I0 min.) Percentage chan~e in
F~perlment No. photosynthems
Normal With NHs0H
moles~liter
3.0 X 10-5 5.87 6.04 +3.3
5.9 X 10-5 5.87 5.84 0.0
8.9 X 10-6 5.87 4.77 --18.5
11.8 X 10- ~ 5.20 4.88 --6.4
14.8 X 10-6 4.99 3.95 --20.8
17.7 X 10-6 5.20 3.65 --30.0
20.7 X 10- b 4.99 2.84 --43.0
23.6 X 10- 6 5.20 2.99 --45.6
26.6 × 10- s 4.99 2.59 --48.0
29.6 X 10-5 4.49 2.57 --42.5
35.5 X 10-6 4.49 2.04 --56.7
41.5 X 10-s 4.49 1.70 --62.1
a n i d e . T h e r e s i d u a l p h o t o s y n t h e s i s b e l o w t h e c o m p e n s a t i o n p o i n t is n o t in-
h i b i t e d , u n l e s s v e r y h i g h l i g h t i n t e n s i t y is used.
A d e l a y i n t h e a c t i o n of i n h i b i t i o n is o b s e r v e d o n t h e a d d i t i o n of h y d r o x y l -
a m i n e h y d r o g e n chloride. A s m u c h as 20 m i n u t e s w a s r e q u i r e d i n s o m e cases
before the steady rate was reached.
532 v o x s o ~ s :FOR PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND RESPIRATION
Inhibition by Dinitrophenol.--
D i n i t r o p h e n 0 1 is k n o w n t o a f f e c t b o t h p h o t o s y n t h e s i s a n d r e s p i r a t i o n . I t i s
thought to act on enzymatically active proteins. Catalytically active protein
TABLE VII
Effects of Dinitrophenol on Respiration
Respiration (clmnges in
micromoles COs per 10 rain.) Percentage change in
Experiment No. DNP concentration respiration
Normal With DNP
moles/liter
1 1.9 X 10- 6 4.85 5.41 +11.8
2 3.8 X 10- s 3.56 4.40 +23.2
3 5.7 X 10- 5 4.17 5.05 +21.4
1 7.6 X 10-6 4.85 6.20 +27.9
3 9.5 X 10- 5 4.17 5.00 +20.2
1 17.1 X 10-6 4.85 5.10 +5.3
4 19.0 X 10-6 9.65 8.10 --15.8
5 28.5 X 10-6 9.25 5.96 --35.5
4 38.0 X 10-6 9.65 4.55 --53.0
4 57.0 X 10-6 9.65 3.81 --60.5
6 66.5 X 10-5 9.89 3.78 --62.1
TABLE VIII
Effect of Dinitrophenot on Photosynthesis
Photosynthesis (changes in
micromoles COt per 10 rain.) Percentage clmn~e in
Experiment No. DNP concentration photosynthesis
Normal With DNP
molesfliter
1.9 X 10-6 8.79 8.34 --4.9
3.8 X 10-5 6.61 6.37 --4.1
5.7 X 10-5 7.55 7.38 --2.3
7.6 X 10-6 8.79 8.21 --6.4
9.5 X 10-5 7.55 7.31 --3.0
17.1 X 10-6 8.79 7.62 --13.1
19.0 X 10-6 20.30 6.90 --66.0
28.5 X 10- 5 19.75 4.42 --77.0
38.0 X 10-6 20.30 3.01 --85.5
57.0 X 10-6 20.30 2.63 --87.1
66.5 X 10- 5 19.00 3.78 --81.0
m a y b e u s e d t o t r a n s f e r h y d r o g e n a t o m s ; t h e r e f o r e , t h e i n h i b i t i o n effect of
d i n i t r o p h e n o l o n p h o t o s y n t h e s i s p r o b a b l y arises f r o m i n h i b i t i o n of t h e t r a n s -
fer of h y d r o g e n a t o m s f r o m a n i n t e r m e d i a r y r e d u c t i o n p r o d u c t to c a r b o n
dioxide.
T h e r e s u l t s a r e s u m m a r i z e d in T a b l e s V I I a n d V I I I . T h e l i g h t i n t e n s i t i e s
EDWARD L U N G YUAI~ AI~D F A R R I N G T O N DANIELS 533
used in Experiments 1 to 3 were about 1.0 X 10-8 einstein per cm3 per min-
ute, and in Experiments 4 to 6, about 5.0 X 10-s einstein per cm.~ per min-
ute.
The effects of dinitrophenol on the rates of respiration and photosynthesis
in CM~rell~ are quite different from those of the previous inhibitors. The rate
of respiration is stimulated at low concentrations, but decreases sharply when
the concentration of dinitrophenol reaches 10 X 10- 5 moles per liter. The
inhibition of respiration seems to level off near --60 per cent. The rate of
photosynthesis, on the other hand, is not affected until dinitrophenol concen-
tration reaches about 10 X 10- 5 moles per liter. Then, with increasing dinitro-
phenol concentration, the rate of photosynthesis decreases rapidly. Although
the curve seems to level off near 90 per cent inhibition, complete inhibition of
photosynthesis, even below the compensation point, can undoubtedly be
obtained at high concentrations of dinitrophenol.
A delay of about 10 minutes in the rates of respiration and photosynthesis
was also observed in the action of dinitrophenol.
It has been suggested that dinitrophenol affects the rates of respiration and
photosynthesis b y reversibly inhibiting the coupling of phosphorylation. In
the process, it apparently replaces inorganic phosphate, which is a necessary
component of the system. Our results, however, do not fully agree with this
suggestion. Although respiration is stimulated considerably at low concen-
trations of dinitrophenol, the rate of photosynthesis does not seem to be af-
fected at this low concentration. When the rate of photosynthesis is decreasing
sharply at a dinitrophenol concentration of about 10 X 10-5 moles per liter,
the rate of respiration is decreasing sharply, too. Should the reversible inhi-
bition of the coupling of phosphorylation be true, the maximum decrease in the
rate of photosynthesis should occur at maximum stimulation of respiration.
DISCUSSION
The data presented in the previous sections are the results of at least three
experiments on each inhibitor. During the measurements for each inhibitor,
the concentration and age of the Chlorell~ cells were kept approximately the
same in order to obtain nearly constant respiration rates. In the study of
photosynthesis, about the same amount of light intensity was used in all the
experiments. High light intensity was introduced only when needed to reveal
the maximum amount of inhibition, as in the experiments with dinltrophenol.
Usually, the light intensity was one to three times that required for respira-
tion compensation.
Quantitative measurements of the effects of different inhibitors on photo-
synthesis and respiration are difficult. Furthermore, it is not possible to deter-
mine normal respiration rates for the correction of photosynthesis rates, after
the inhibitor has been added. The accuracy is not limited by instrumentation,
but mainly by the condition and concentration of the algal suspension. It is
534 POISONS FOR PHOTOSYNTKESIS AND RESPIRATION
difficult tO have algal suspensions in different experiments with the same con-
centrations of cells and the same respiration rates. The results presented here,
however, are self-consistent and give definite information concerning the
effects of each inhibitor.
The intermediate steps in photosynthesis and in respiration are complicated
and they include several enzymatic reactions. The amounts of inhibiting and
accelerating materials added are so small that the effects which they produce
must involve catalytic agents such as enzymes. These effects are shown to be
quite specific and since they often are not the same for photosynthesis and
respiration, it is hoped that it may be possible eventually to contribute to our
understanding of these phenomena and to distinguish between the mecha-
nisms which are common to both and the steps which involve photosynthesis
alone or respiration alone.
SUMMARY
The authors are grateful to the Research Committee of the Graduate School of the
University of Wisconsin for the support of this research, with funds from the Wisconsin
Alumni Research Foundation.
REFERENCES
1. Warburg, 0., Biochem. Z., 1920, 103, 188.
2. Gaffron, H., Biol. Zentr., 1939, 59, 302.
3. Gaffron, H., J. Gen. -Physiol., 1942, 9.6, 195, 241.
4. Gaffron, H., J. Gen. Physiol., 1945, 9.8, 259, 269.
5. Greenfield, S. S., Am. J. Bot., 1942, 29, 121.
6. Yuan, E. L., Evans, R. W., and Daniels, F., Biochim. et Biophysic. Acta, 1955, 17,
185.
7. Shibata, K., and Yakushiji, E., Naturwissensckaflen, 1933, 21, 267.
8. Nakamura, H., Acta Phytochim., Japan, 1939, 10, 271, 343.