EC204 Topic 1 - Consumer Theory PDF
EC204 Topic 1 - Consumer Theory PDF
EC204
Economics 2
University of Warwick
Department of Economics
2017-2018
Part 1: Microeconomics
Welcome!!
1
18/09/2017
Welcome!!
EC204
− Follows on from EC107
− Some of you may have done EC106
− Some of you may have done neither
− Assumes mathematical skills from EC120
or equivalent
Don't panic about the maths
− It combines a graphical, mathematical and
intuitive approach
Resources
The Microeconomics Syllabus
The website
Lectures
Class and Class Tutors
Textbooks
Online resources
HowCloud Forum
2
18/09/2017
Organisation
20 x 1 hour lectures (term 1)
− Wednesday 12 – 1pm in L3
− Thursday 3 – 4pm in OC0.03
20 x 1 hour lectures (term 2)
− Monday 1 – 2pm in L3
− Thursday 2 – 3pm in L3
16 x 1 hour classes (weeks 3-10 and 17-24)
− You may NOT switch to another group
without the permission of the UG office
− Your class tutor does NOT have permission to
allow you to switch groups
Assessment
Essay (one micro and one macro)
− Each essay is worth 10%
− 2000 word limit and online submission
− Further details will be made available by
week 6 for the microeconomics essay
Exam (worth 80%)
− Format is the same as last year (note a
new lecturer for macro
− Short and long answer questions
− Past papers are available online
3
18/09/2017
Module Aims
Develop analysis which combines
mathematical, graphical and intuitive skills
Teach theoretical concepts and analytical
tools
Understand how theoretical concepts can be
applied to various economic situations
Develop critical analysis skills and an ability
to question rational economic thought
Understand the policy implications of
microeconomic theory
Microeconomics Textbooks
'Intermediate Microeconomics' by Varian, (WW
Norton, 8th edition)
− More technical
4
18/09/2017
Topics
Consumer Theory
Choice under uncertainty
Competition, Firm Behaviour and Oligopoly
General Equilibrium
Market Failure
Final thoughts
I don’t like reciting textbooks in lectures…
Some say the course moves too quickly,
others say it moves too slowly!
Some say there's too much maths, others
say there's not enough maths!
Some say it's too difficult, others say it's too
easy!
You are a heterogeneous group
− Please make use of all the resources
− There are resources to suit everyone
5
18/09/2017
EC204: Topic 1
Consumer Theory
Varian Chapters 1 – 10 and 14
11
Consumer Theory
12
6
18/09/2017
/ /
, =
14
7
18/09/2017
Trousers
15
Budget constraints(V2)
For a given income and given prices, we can
construct a budget constraint.
Number
of skirts
20
B The bundle of skirts and
tops that lies on AB is
the set of bundles that
leaves the consumer
C with no unspent
10
income. This is the
D
6 'budget constraint'.
A
16
5 7 10 Number of tops
8
18/09/2017
Books 17
9
18/09/2017
Perfect Substitutes
Consider two goods that a consumer cannot tell apart – like
Coke and Pepsi
Pepsi Indifference curves for perfect
substitutes are linear – with the
same MRS at every bundle.
19
Perfect Complements
Two goods that must be consumed together.
10
18/09/2017
Cobb-Douglas
U(x1, x2) = x1γ x2δ Where γ > 0 and δ > 0.
Cobb-Douglas
We can transform a C-D utility function without
changing the shape of the indifference curves
Consider u(x1, x2) = x1γ x2δ
Take to the power 1
( γ + δ )
11
18/09/2017
Cobb-Douglas
U(x1, x2) = x1αx21-α where 0 < α < 1
How do we calculate
the MRS?
23
Monotonic transformation
Applying monotonic transformations to a utility
function creates a new function with the same
preferences
− Transforms a set of numbers into another set,
while preserving the order
Consider a utility function , ,…, .
Some examples of monotonic transformations:
log( , ,…, ) exp , ,…,
, ,…, + ( ( , ,…, ))
, ,…, n , ,…,
24
12
18/09/2017
Utility Functions
Consider U(x1, x2) = x12x22
− We can find optimal quantity demanded if we
know Y and P.
26
13
18/09/2017
Utility Maximisation
Say last unit of X1 gives 3 times as much utility as last
unit of X2, yet X1 only costs twice as much as X2.
Increase utility by consuming more X1 and less X2.
This causes MUX1 ↓ and MUX2 ↑ until: =
e
Px1 MUx1
=
Px 2 MUx 2
M/PX1 X1
28
14
18/09/2017
Optimising mathematically:
The Primal
In trying to do the best she can given her
circumstances, a consumer
− Chooses a bundle (x1, x2)
To maximise utility u(x1, x2)
− Subject to the budget constraint
An example
15
18/09/2017
An example continued
What are x1 and x2 if my tastes are given by:
− u(x1, x2) = x12x22.
− P1 = 20; P2 = 10 and Y = 200.
Or:
− u(x1, x2) = x14x24.
− P1 = 20; P2 = 10 and Y = 200.
Corner Solutions
If optimal choice involves
Food
consuming both goods, the
tangency condition must hold.
16
18/09/2017
Non-convexity
A tangency is necessary for
Food
optimality, but not sufficient unless
preferences are convex.
Clothes
Revealed Preferences
Assume optimising consumer chooses (X1, X2)
over (Y1, Y2)
P1X1 + P2X2 = M and P1Y1 + P2Y2 ≤ M
X2
>> P1X1 + P2X2 ≥ P1Y1 + P2Y2
17
18/09/2017
36
18
18/09/2017
Homothetic tastes
Homothetic tastes
Tastes for which the MRS depends only on the
relative quantity of each good in the bundle
19
18/09/2017
Quasilinear tastes
Indifference curves are vertically shifted
versions of one indifference curve
Tastes are linear in one good (x2), but may not
be linear in the other good (x1).
∂ u /∂ x1 dv
U(x1, x2) = v(x1) + x2 >> MRS = = dx1
∂ u / ∂ x2
39
− The MRS is a function of x1, but not x2
• At A, MRS = -1: we
will trade $1 for 1 can
of coke.
• At B, will we value the
50th can the same as
the 25th?
• More likely that the 25th
can is valued the same
regardless of how
much in other
consumption we
undertake
20
18/09/2017
Normal Goods
Units of good Y
(a)
O
Units of good X
21
18/09/2017
Units of good Y
Inferior Goods
O Units of good X
Income-consumption
curve
Good X
Income (£)
Engel curve
Good X
22
18/09/2017
The Dual
23
18/09/2017
Solve for:
Utility at original consumption bundle is:
47
24
18/09/2017
X2’
BL2
X2’’
50
25
18/09/2017
Solve for:
52
26
18/09/2017
= +λ −
= + λ( − )
27
18/09/2017
Slutsky
The Slutsky substitution effect keeps purchasing
power (not utility) constant
We find the change in income needed to make
the original bundle affordable after the price
change
This gives us the Slutsky Demand curve
28
18/09/2017
X2’
BL2
X1’ BL1 x1
Slutsky Substitution
Use previous example to compare Slutsky:
We know original bundle is x1 = 5; x2 = 10
How much money does consumer need to buy
(5, 10) at new P1?
This requires us to find how by much income
must change
M = P1 x1 + P2 x 2
M ' = P1' x1 + P2 x 2
M ' − M = P1 ' x1 − P1 x1 = x1 ∆ P1 = 5.(10 − 20) = −50 58
29
18/09/2017
Using x1 = M / ( P1 + P2 )
x1 = 7 .5; x 2 = 7 .5
Slutsky Identity
Total effect is
Substitution : ∆ x1s = x1 ( P1' , m ' ) − x1 (P1 , m )
Income : ∆ x1n = x1 ( P1' , m ) − x1 (P1' , m ' )
Total : ∆ x1 = [ x1 (P1' , m ) − x1 ( P1 , m )] = ∆ x1s + ∆ x1n
To express as rates of change, define ∆ x 1m as −∆x1n
>>> ∆x1 = ∆x1s − ∆x1m
Divide each side by ∆ P1
∆ x1 ∆ x 1s ∆ x 1m
= −
∆ P1 ∆ P1 ∆ P1
60
30
18/09/2017
Slutsky Identity
Recall from substitution effect: ∆M = x1∆P1
∆M
∆ P1 =
x1
Replace denominator in term 3 of Slutsky:
∆ x1 ∆ x 1s ∆ x 1m
= − x1
∆ P1 ∆ P1 ∆ M
1. Rate of change of x 1 following change in P 1 , holding M
fixed (total effect)
2. Rate of change in x 1 as P 1 changes, adjusting M to keep
old bundle affordable (substitution effect)
3. Rate of change of x1, holding prices fixed and adjusting M61
(income effect)
The Hicksian
substitution effect in
green and the Slutsky
substitution effect in
red.
62
31
18/09/2017
A comparison: Normal
goods
DM = Marshallian or
own price demand
curve
DH = Hicksian
Demand Curve
(keeps utility constant)
DS = Slutsky Demand
Curve (keep
purchasing power
constant)
Changes in welfare(V14)
64
32
18/09/2017
Compensating variation
You are already familiar with this idea
How much money would the government have to
give the consumer after the price change to
make him just as well off as he was before the
price change?
− How much extra income is needed to
compensate for the price change?
− How far should we shift the new budget line so
that it is just tangential to the original
indifference curve?
65
Equivalent Variation
33
18/09/2017
Compensating Variation
x"1 x'"
1 x'1 x1 67
Equivalent Variation
p1= p1’ p2 is fixed.
x2 p1= p1”
m1 = p'1x'1 + p 2x'2
= p"1x"1 + p 2x"2
x"2
m2 = p'1x'" '"
1 + p 2x 2
x'2
x "' u1
2
u2 EV = m1 - m2.
x"1 x'"
1 x'1 x1 68
34
18/09/2017
Applications
69
Government policy
What's the best option?
A subsidy on good x1 or a
direct income subsidy?
Which gives the individual a
higher level of utility?
70
35
18/09/2017
72
36
18/09/2017
Self-study questions
Identify the assumptions we make in consumer theory.
Explain the equi-marginal principle in words and algebra.
Draw an indifference map showing (a) perfect substitutes
(b) perfect complements and (c) Cobb-Douglas
preferences.
What is the difference between quasilinear and
homothetic tastes?
Are tastes for (a) perfect substitutes (b) perfect
complements (i) homothetic and (ii) quasilinear?
How would you draw an indifference map for an
individual whose consumption of good x2 (measured on
the vertical axis) is non-essential? 73
Self-study questions
If you hold a voucher that gives you 50% off the first 6
units of a good (that is normally £20) and your income is
£200, what will your budget constraint look like?
What happens if the voucher gives you 50% off all units
after the first 6 units are bought?
What will be the budget constraint if income = £200, P1 =
20 and P2 = 10?
Explain the difference between utility maximisation and
expenditure minimisation.
What is the difference between the Slutsky and Hicksian
substitution effect? Illustrate both the Slutsky and
Hicksian substitution and income effects on a diagram.
74
37
18/09/2017
Self-study questions
What is meant by a compensated demand curve? Show
how a compensated and uncompensated demand curve
can be derived.
What is the difference between compensating and
equivalent variation? Which will generally give you the
biggest result?
Why, under quasilinear preferences, will the change in
consumer surplus, compensating and equivalent
variation all give the same change in welfare?
Illustrate the income and substitution effects following an
increase in income tax on an individual's decision to work
more or less.
In the Winter Fuel Payments case explain the income 75
and substitution effects.
38