Global Waste

Management Outlook
Summary for Decision-Makers
United Nations Environment Programme
THE FACTS The waste heap
Municipal solid waste per capita increases with income level 2 billion
tonnes per year
1 000
of municipal solid waste
800
Kg per capita per year

600
7-10 billion tonnes
of ‘urban’ solid waste
400 from households, commerce,
industry and construction
200

0 Worldwide quantities
200

Low
1 000 10 000

Lower-middle Upper-middle High

100 000
increasing
Income Level (Gross National Income per capita (USD))

Note: Data for selected countries

Lower income cities
in Africa and Asia will double
Developing countries their municipal solid waste
• Population continues to grow generation within 15-20 years
• Waste per capita is rising as economies develop
• Migration from rural to urban areas continues
• Number and size of cities increases

Developed countries
• Per capita rates doubled 1970-2000
• Rates stabilised since 2005
• 50% of total worldwide waste in 2012
City population >10M

Globalisation results in industrial 1970

additional in 1990
and hazardous waste generation additional in 2014
shifting to developing countries additional in 2030
2030 41 megacities
32 in developing countries

Solid waste management is an essential utility service

Waste collection coverage Developing countries have made
significant progress since the 1990s,
100 when average collection coverage
was around 50%
80

%
60 2 billion people
40
without access to
solid waste collection
20

0
1 000 10 000 100 000 Public health priority
Low Lower-middle Upper-middle High
Extending municipal solid waste collection
Income Level (USD) to 100% of the urban population
Note: 2012 data for selected cities
 Costs and benefits of waste management
The costs of inaction
Public health impacts of uncollected waste
• Gastrointestinal and respiratory infections, particularly in children
• Blocked drains aggravate floods and spread infectious disease
Environmental impacts of open dumping and burning
• Severe land pollution and freshwater, groundwater and sea pollution
• Local air pollution and climate change
Costs to society exceed the financial Proper waste management makes
costs per capita of proper waste management economic sense but still has a financial cost
by a factor of 5-10 • A ffordability is a major challenge in developing countries
• Health care • Even the poorest will pay something when they can see
• Lost productivity the benefits of a clean and healthy community
• Flood damage • Raising finance for investment in modern facilities
• Damage to businesses and tourism continues to be a challenge in all countries

Opportunities to reduce waste management costs and investment needs

3Rs (reduce, reuse, recycle) cut the investment needed in sound treatment and disposal facilities

Potential to build on existing recycling rates Waste reduction

80 • Making less that goes to waste
saves business money on raw material,
%
60
energy and labour costs
• Estimated savings to business
40
worldwide: hundreds of $ billion per year
20
Reuse and recycling
0
200 1 000 10 000 100 000
• Developing countries often achieve
good rates through the informal sector
Low Lower-middle Upper-middle High
• Developed countries have rebuilt
Income Level (USD) rates in the last 20-30 years
Note: 2012 data for selected cities

Developing countries have made Controlled disposal rate

significant progress since the 1990s,
when controlled disposal rates
were often 0% 96 100
100

3 billion people 80
68
lack access to controlled
60
%
waste disposal facilities 40 35
20

Environmental priority 0

Low Lower-middle Upper-middle High

Achieve 100% controlled disposal
Eliminate open dumping and burning Income Level (USD)

Note: 2012 data for selected cities

THE SOLUTIONS What needs to be done?
Four groups of actions are to be taken, but not in sequential steps. One cannot afford to wait until one problem is ‘solved’
before beginning to address the next. However it is not possible to do everything and reach very high standards at once,
particularly when resources are limited – the developed countries have evolved their current, sophisticated waste management
systems via a series of intermediate steps over 30-50 years.

Bring wastes under control

Ensure access for all Deal with the hazardous
to basic waste services substances in wastes

Stop uncontrolled Bring hazardous

dumping and burning wastes under control

• Extend affordable collection services • Separate hazardous waste, and in

to all in society, irrespective of particular hazardous healthcare
income level waste, from other waste at source
• Ensure the controlled disposal • Manage them separately in
of all waste as a necessary first step environmentally sound facilities
towards environmental protection
• Need a holistic approach to
managing all residuals, as pollution
controls concentrate contaminants
from air emissions and wastewater
into (often hazardous) waste

Focus on waste prevention Focus on the

‘feedback loops’

• Reducing waste improves resource • Maximize recycling

security, improves well-being and saves
everyone money • In low-income countries, integrate
existing small-scale entrepreneurial
• Design out waste and hazardous recycling within mainstream waste
waste management
• Maximize repair, reuse and remanufacture • Develop environmentally sound
energy recovery facilities and landfills
• Keep materials separate/segregate waste for residual waste that cannot be
at source to minimize contamination and sustainably recycled
facilitate reuse and recycling

Tackle the problem Close a clean

at the source material cycle
Move from a linear to a circular economy

The next appropriate actions will vary depending

on the local situation and the current baseline
 How to do it?
A major focus of the GWMO is on the ‘governance’ factors required to make waste management happen in practice. A ‘toolkit’
has been developed to help select a suitable set of actions. The aim is to facilitate taking the next appropriate steps in
developing (your own) specific waste management system at the national or local level.

Embed within working practices monitoring and evaluation,

measuring progress, learning from experience, knowing what
works, drawing lessons and accumulating local knowledge

Responsibilities
and partnerships
•  Ensure equal access for all to affordable
services
•  Work together to establish clear strategic goals
through public participation
Proactive policies
•  Secure political commitment to those goals – and sound institutions
safeguard continuity beyond political terms of office •  A basket of policy instruments, including
•  Ensure waste generators know what is required of direct legislation, economic and social instruments
them – facilitate required changes in behaviour •  A national waste framework law in place and
•  Establish mutually beneficial partnerships to enforced
deliver effective and sustainable services •  Each government body knows its responsibilities and
•  Include the community and informal duties – gaps and overlaps are avoided
sectors within an integrated system in the •  A well-resourced Waste Department, with the appropriate
city level of authority and autonomy
•  A well-resourced environmental regulator, with
sufficient authority to enforce regulations in a consistent
and effective manner
•  An agreed, long-term waste and resource
management strategy, to provide a
long-term, stable framework for
investment in infrastructure

Money matters
•  Know your costs and the revenues
available
•  Someone has to pay. Find the appropriate
financing model and sources of funding for
investment. There is no ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ answer – Data revolution
each local situation is different
•  Larger waste generators should pay the economic •  Urgently improve the availability
cost of sound management of their own waste and reliability of waste and resource
•  Ensure disposal is priced: provides an incentive for management data
the 3Rs •  Take advantage of investment in new services
•  Aim to increase cost recovery gradually – and facilities to institute routine collection of data
support those who cannot afford to pay •  Build reliable databases on waste and resource
•  Consider transferring (some) costs management
of managing end-of-life products •  Benchmark performance of your city’s municipal
from the municipality to the solid waste management system using available
‘producer’ indicators and highlight areas for improvement
•  Be transparent – make waste generation
and monitoring data available online

Select tailor-made financing and governance models

which are transparent, suit the local custom and tradition
and support the service that fits customers’ needs
CALL FOR ACTION Sustainability

Waste management has strong linkages to a range of other global challenges: health,
climate change, poverty reduction, food and resource security, sustainable production
and consumption. The political case for action can be significantly strengthened when
waste management is viewed as an entry point to address a range of sustainable
development issues, many of which are difficult to tackle.

Climate change

Potential impact of improved waste

management on reducing GHG Diversion from disposal of
emissions across the economy: 15-20% biodegradable wastes prevents
emissions of methane, a powerful
greenhouse gas (GHG)
Prevention of the 1.3 billion tonnes
of food waste generated per annum Reduction, reuse and recycling
enough to feed all the undernourished people all displace virgin materials
in the world twice over, could save and products, and the GHG
9% of total worldwide GHG emissions emissions in their manufacture

A clean city A successful city

• 
Where the solid waste • A healthy, pleasant and safe
management service works place to live
well • A good place to do business
• 
A holistic approach is taken and visit as a tourist
to managing all residuals • Fosters a sense of
community and belonging

Good governance
• 
The cleanliness of the city
can be used as a proxy
indicator of good governance

Enterprise and creating sustainable livelihoods

‘Waste to wealth’ projects in Africa have demonstrated 15-20 million people
that new waste services can be used as a catalyst for working in the small-scale
sustainable livelihoods and economic development in entrepreneurial ‘informal’ waste
poor neighbourhoods of some of the world’s poorest cities sector worldwide
2000-2010 in Europe Estimate of worldwide potential
employment in waste and for new jobs in the circular
resource management doubled: > 2 million economy: 9 to 25 million
 Priority action
Waste management is a global as well as a national and a local issue.
Addressing waste management as a global priority will facilitate meeting the Post-2015 Development Agenda.
The Global Waste Management Goals are already explicit or implicit within the Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs).

GLOBAL WASTE MANAGEMENT GOALS RELATED SDGs

W.1 Access for all to adequate, safe and affordable solid 3 – Health for all 11 – Safe cities
waste collection services
Ensure 3 – Health for all 6 – Clean water and
sanitation
by 2020 11 – Safe cities
W.2 Stop uncontrolled dumping, open burning 12 – Sustainable 14 – Marine resources
consumption and 15 – Terrestrial
production (SCP) ecosystems

W.3 Achieve sustainable and environmentally sound 12.4 – Managing all 7 – Access to energy
waste
management of all waste, particularly hazardous waste
13 – Climate change

W.4 Substantially reduce waste generation through 12.5 – The 3Rs 1 – End poverty
Ensure prevention and the 3Rs (reduce, reuse, recycle) and 8 – Growth & 9 – Sustainable
by 2030 thereby create green jobs employment industry

W.5 Halve per capita global food waste at the retail and 12.3 – Food waste 2 – End hunger; food
security
consumer levels and reduce food losses in the supply
chain

A GLOBAL CALL TO ACTION

Focus on developing countries
• Mobilize international aid and environmental and climate funds to assist the poorest countries. Increase the level of funding
on waste management by a factor of 10, from the 0.3% achieved since 2000 to an average of 3% of total international aid
funding in the period from 2015 to 2030.
• As an initial step, aim to:
– achieve 100% collection coverage in all cities with a population more than 1 million,
– eliminate open burning of municipal solid wastes and similar wastes, and
– close large open dumps, replacing them with controlled disposal facilities. 
• Develop a holistic approach to managing all residuals. In particular develop the integration of sanitation and solid waste
management services.
• Build on existing recycling systems while eliminating hazardous resource recovery practices as a means to achieve
sustainable livelihoods and reduce costs for the cities.
• Manage hazardous wastes safely. Enforce, and adequately finance domestic enforcement of, the Basel Convention and
ensure that sound facilities are available within developing countries for their own wastes.
• Promote producer responsibility programmes to ensure that international companies take more responsibility for waste
management associated with their products and wastes in developing countries.
• Establish/strengthen wide-reaching capacity development programmes for administrative, technical and business sectors.
Involve developed country cities through twinning and promote collaboration.

Focus on all countries

All countries still have some way to go to meet the 2030 goals:
• Improve access to financing for sound waste management facilities and operations.
• Reduce waste at source, engage citizens, industries and other stakeholders – move
from linear waste management to the circular economy.
• Improve substantially the availability and reliability of waste and resource management
data – if you don’t measure it, you can’t manage it.
 Global Waste Management Outlook (GWMO)
Waste management is a key utility service and a critical element of the
infrastructure underpinning society, but it is often not recognized as such. This
Global Waste Management Outlook (GWMO) has been prepared as a follow-up
to the Rio+20 summit and as a response to UNEP Governing Council decision
GC 27/12:
‘to develop a global outlook of challenges, trends and policies in relation to
waste prevention, minimization and management […] to provide guidance for
national policy planning’. 
The GWMO is the result of two years’ work (by UNEP and ISWA) and provides
an important and timely status report and call for action to the international
community. The costs of inaction – the public health and environmental damage
costs of uncontrolled disposal and open burning – are far in excess of the costs
of sound waste management. Significant progress has been made over recent
decades, but 2 to 3 billion people, often in the least developed countries, still lack
access to regular waste collection and/or controlled disposal services for municipal
solid waste. This is a global public health priority requiring a coordinated approach,
rather than just a national or local problem. Developed countries have also made
good progress in increasing recycling rates and stabilizing waste growth – but there
is still much to be done across the world in making the transition from ‘end-of-pipe’
waste management in a linear economy, to integrated and sustainable resource
and waste management in a circular economy.
The technologies required to overcome the challenge of providing sound waste
management are largely already available, and have been much written about. The
GWMO has chosen rather to focus primarily on the ‘governance’ issues which need to
be addressed to establish a sustainable solution – including the regulatory and other
policy instruments, the partnerships and, crucially, the financing arrangements –
and to provide a ‘toolkit’ to be used in developing a solution appropriate to the local
situation. The text is accompanied by 15 Topic Sheets addressing specific issues and
70 illustrative cases, including eight in-depth case studies.

The full GWMO report can be accessed at:

http://www.unep.org/ietc/OurWork/WasteManagement/GWMO

Acknowledgements:
Editor-in-Chief: David C. Wilson
Authors: David C. Wilson, Ljiljana Rodic, Prasad Modak, Reka Soos, Ainhoa Carpintero,
Costas Velis, Mona Iyer, Otto Simonett
Project Coordinators: Ainhoa Carpintero, Kata Tisza and Rachael Williams Gaul
Supervisors: Surendra Shrestha, Surya Chandak, David Newman, Hermann Koller

Cover illustration: High Moon

Design and layout: UNESCO

International Environmental Technology Centre (IETC) International Solid Waste Association (ISWA)
Division of Industry, Technology and Economics, UNEP General Secretariat
2-110, Ryokuchi koen, Tsurumi-ku, Osaka, 538-0036, Japan Auerspergstrasse 15/41, 1080 Vienna, Austria
Tel: +81 6 6915 4581 Fax: +81 6 6915 0304 Tel: +43 1 2536 001 Fax: +43 1 253 600199
E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.unep.org/ietc E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.iswa.org