Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Proof: This proof is surprisingly easy. It just uses the definition of derivatives and
the following properties of the integral:
𝑏
1. If f is continuous on [a, b], then ∫𝑎 𝑓 exists.
Property (1) assures us that g is well defined provided that h < b − x. Property (2)
allows us to simplify the numerator, since it implies that
𝑥+ℎ 𝑥 𝑥+ℎ
g (x + h) − g(x) = ∫𝑎 𝑓 − ∫𝑎 𝑓= ∫𝑥 𝑓. (1)
This is already great, since we only need to worry about f over the small interval [x,
x + h]. A picture is helpful here, but I don’t have time to include one in these notes.
Now recall the definition of a limit. We have to show that given any ϵ > 0, there is a
δ > 0 such that
𝑔(𝑥+ℎ)−𝑔(𝑥)
| − 𝑓(𝑥)| ˂ ϵ (2)
ℎ
whenever 0 < h < δ. This is where we use the continuity of f at x. We know from
this that there is a δ such that |f (x′) − f(x)| < ϵ whenever |x′ − x| < δ. This means that
Applications:
The FTC as a reversal of the derivative process:
𝑥
The function F(x)= ∫𝑎 𝑓 (𝑡)𝑑𝑡 is often called an accumulation function because it
represents the accumulation of signed area (positive or negative) under the curve.
The Fundamental Theorem implies that the process of finding an accumulation
formula is the reverse of the process of finding a derivative. For this reason, the
𝑏
function F(x)= ∫𝑎 𝑓 dt is an antiderivative of the function f with a fixed lower limit
a.
Antidifferentiation can be thought of as the process of starting with a known
rate-of-change function and developing the quantity function. The slope graph of an
accumulation function graph is the original graph, but with a different input variable.
Figure 1.1 depicts the transformation of the representations of an original
function into an accumulation function and again back to the original function.
Figure 1.1: Conversion of graphs. Transformation of a function to an accumulation function and
back to the original function.
Example 1: Find
𝟑𝝅
𝟐
∫ 𝒔𝒊𝒏 𝜽 𝒅𝜽.
𝝅
𝟐
Solution:
We already know this integral is 0 by the previous set of notes. But let’s compute
this using the First Fundamental Theorem. First, we need to find an antiderivative of
sin θ. But
∫ sin θ dθ = − cos θ + C,
so, we’ll use F(θ) = − cos θ in the fundamental theorem. (The fundamental theorem
only requires that we find some antiderivative, not the most general antiderivative,
so we don’t need to use the +C.) So,
3𝜋
2 3𝜋 𝜋
∫ 𝑠𝑖𝑛 𝜃 𝑑𝜃 . = F ( 2 ) − F (2 )
𝜋
2
3𝜋 𝜋
= − cos ( ) − (− cos ( ))
2 2
= −0 + 0 = 0,
consistent with the answer we obtained in the last set of notes.
We make two comments on the above example. First, what if we used a different
antiderivative? Could that have changed our answer? Fortunately, the answer is no.
The most general antiderivative is F(θ) = − cos θ + C, so if we used this, we would
have had
3𝜋
2 3𝜋 𝜋
∫ 𝑠𝑖𝑛 𝜃 𝑑𝜃 = F ( 2 ) − F ( 2 )
𝜋
2
3𝜋 𝜋
= − cos ( )+C − (− cos ( ) +C)
2 2
= −0+ C + 0− C
= 0,
The C’s will always cancel off like this, so we don’t need the +C when computing
definite integrals. Second, we will find it convenient to write
Example 2: Find
𝟒
𝟏
∫ 𝒅𝒙
𝟏 √𝒙
Solution:
First, we find an antiderivative:
1 1⁄
∫ dx = ∫ 𝑥 − 2 dx
√𝑥
1⁄
= 2𝑥 2+ C.
We’ll use 2√𝑥 as our antiderivative. Thus
4 1 4
∫1 𝑑𝑥 = 2√𝑥|1
√𝑥
= 2√4 – 2√1
=4–2
=2