Multimodal Image Fusion Techniques For Medical Images Using Wavelets
Multimodal Image Fusion Techniques For Medical Images Using Wavelets
3, March 2014
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
Abstract- Image fusion has become crucial part of medical diagnosis. This paper gives introduction to image
fusion methods based on wavelet transform. Fusion of CT scanned images and MRI images using multi
resolution wavelet transform with necessary preprocessing of it is proposed. It also compares the performance of
the various types of wavelet basis families used and the different fusion rules used to fuse the approximation and
detail wavelet coefficients.
Index Terms- Image Fusion, Discrete Wavelet Transforms, CT, MRI, multimodal medical Image fusion,
Medical imaging, Fusion performance metrics, entropy, Mean Square Error, Peak Signal to Noise Ratio
310
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.2, No.3, March 2014
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
The Haar, Daubechies, Symlets and Coiflets are hence are needed to be registered before they are
compactly supported orthogonal wavelets. These fused.
wavelets along with Meyer wavelets are capable of
perfect reconstruction. The Meyer, Morlet and 3.1.2. Image Resizing
Mexican Hat wavelets are symmetric in shape. The
wavelets are chosen based on their shape and their Also the sizes of the images might vary so before
ability to analyze the signal in a particular application. fusion, the images are needed to be resized so that
The Discrete Wavelet Transform has the property both the images are of the same size. This is done by
that the spatial resolution is small in low-frequency interpolating the smaller size image by rows and
bands but large in high-frequency bands. This is columns duplication.
because the scaling function is treated as a low pass
filter and the mother wavelet as high pass filter in 3.1.3 Image Enhancement
DWT implementation. [4]
The wavelet transform decomposes the image into If both or any of the images are not of grayscale then
low-high, high-low, high-high spatial frequency bands it is desired that it is converted to grayscale. The next
at different scales and the low-low band at the step which follows this is equalization of the
coarsest scale which is shown in figure 1(a). The low- histograms of the images so that the contrast of the
low image has the smallest spatial resolution and image is enhanced and that both the images have
represents the approximation information of the similar range of values for wavelet coefficients.
original image. The other sub-images, on the contrary
show the detailed information of the original image. 3.2 Image Fusion Algorithm
There are different levels of decomposition which The steps in the algorithm for image fusion using
are shown in Figure 1. After one level of DWT as shown in Figure 2 are as follows:
decomposition, there will be four frequency bands, as (1) Read the input images (MRI & CT Scanned).
listed above. The next level decomposition is just (2) Resample and register both these images.
applied to the LL band of the current decomposition (3) Apply 2D-discrete wavelet transform to these
stage, which forms a recursive decomposition images which decompose it into four sub-bands
procedure. Thus, N-level decomposition will finally (LL, LH, HL and HH).
have 3N+1 different frequency bands, which include (4) The Wavelet coefficients obtained from both the
3N high frequency bands and just one LL frequency images are fused using the rules for fusion.
band. [12] (5) The final fused image is reconstructed by applying
inverse discrete wavelet transform to fused image.
311
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.2, No.3, March 2014
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
4.1. Entropy:
Entropy measures the information quantity contained
in an image. [7][11] Higher entropy value of the fused Fig. 4.e. Mean-Mean Fused image Fig. 4.f. Lin-Lin Fused image
image indicates presence of more information and
improvement in fused image. If L is the total of grey
levels and p= {p0, p1,…..,pL-1} is the probability
distribution of each level, Entropy is defined as,
312
International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, Vol.2, No.3, March 2014
E-ISSN: 2321-9637
The synthesized images are shown in Figure 4. The Engineering Research March. 2013, Vol. 2 Iss. 1,
figures 4.a, b show the input CT scanned image and PP. 30-36
MRI scanned image respectively. [3] Chetan K. Solanki, Narendra M. Patel, Pixel
Fig. 4.c,d,e,f show synthesized image having fused based and Wavelet based Image fusion Methods
the both approximation and detail coefficients using with their Comparative Study, National
maximum fusion rule, minimum fusion rule, mean Conference on Recent Trends in Engineering &
fusion rule, linear fusion rule respectively. Whereas Technology, May 2011
Figures 4.g,h, show image fused by using minimum [4] Deepak Kumar Sahu, M.P. Parsai, Different
and linear fusion rule for approximation coefficients Image Fusion Techniques-Critical Review,
respectively and maximum fusion rule for detail International Journal of Modern Engineering
coefficients. Figure 4. i,j,k,l show combinations of Research (IJMER) www.ijmer.com Vol. 2, Issue.
up_down and down_up fusion rules. 5, Sep.-Oct. 2012 pp-4298-4301
The results obtained for entropy are displayed in the [5] Firooz Sadjadi, Comparative Image Fusion
table 1. Analysis,
Table 1 Image Fusion rules and corresponding Entropy.
[6] Hui Li, B.S. Manjunath and Sanjit K. Mitra,
Multi-sensor Image fusion using the Wavelet
Fusion Rule Entropy Transform.
(bits) [7] Kokare Swati, Premanand Kadbe, Biomedical
Original CT Scanned image 6.3070 Image Fusion Using Wavelet And Curvelet
Original MRI Scanned image 5.6294 Transform, IJERT,Vol. 2 Issue 5, May – 2013
Max-Max Fused image 7.1072 [8] R.J.Sapkal, S.M.Kulkarni, Image Fusion based on
Min-Min Fused Image 6.4442 Wavelet Transform for Medical Application,
Mean-Mean Fused image 6.9795 IJERA, Vol. 2, Issue 5, September- October
Linear-Linear Fused image 6.9849 2012, pp.624-627
Min-Max Fused image 6.6570 [9] Shih-Gu Huang, “Wavelet for Image Fusion”
Lin-Max Fused image 7.0746 [10] Suresh Padala Fusion of CT and MRI Scanned
Down_Up-Down_Up Fused image 7.0227 Medical Images Using Image Processing.
Down_Up-Up_Down Fused image 7.0378 [11] Wenzhong Shi, Chang Qing Zhu, Yan Tian, Janet
Up_Down Down_Up Fused image 7.0378 Nichol, Wavelet-based image fusion and quality
Up_Down- Up_Down Fused 7.1133 assessment, International Journal of Applied
image Earth Observation and Geoinformation 6 (2005)
241–251
[12] Yong Yang, Dong Sun Park, and Shuying Huang,
6. CONCLUSION:
Medical Image Fusion via an Effective Wavelet
The synthesized image has the merits of both CT & based Approach.
MRI scanned images. In this paper, the comparison of
various fusion rules to fuse wavelet coefficients in the
image fusion process is carried out. In this paper, 10
kinds of wavelet-based fusion methods are compared.
The Entropy (EN) has been used as image fusion
evaluation criterion for quantitative analysis of image
fusion results. The Matlab fusion results indicate that
the fusion methods produced higher entropy, the
highest being produced by Up_Down- Up_Down
technique. The comparative analysis of image fusion
techniques allows in selecting the best fusion method
and therefore one can obtain better visualization of the
fused image.
REFERENCES
313