ISO 90012015 Vs Six Sigma A Comparison en
ISO 90012015 Vs Six Sigma A Comparison en
ISO 90012015 Vs Six Sigma A Comparison en
Six Sigma:
A comparison
Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................3
Understanding the basics of ISO 9001:2015 and Six Sigma .....................................................................3
Main differences between ISO 9001:2015 and Six Sigma .......................................................................4
Process approach in ISO 9001:2015 and Six Sigma .................................................................................6
Mapping of the ISO 9001:2015 clauses with the DMAIC roadmap phases..............................................8
ISO 9001:2015 & Six Sigma linkages .......................................................................................................9
Combining ISO 9001:2015 with Six Sigma ...............................................................................................11
Useful resources ...................................................................................................................................11
References............................................................................................................................................12
About the author..................................................................................................................................12
Any organization – regardless of its size, sector, or industry – can use ISO 9001 to create a quality system
that will ensure not only customer satisfaction, but continual improvement as well. In addition, many
companies require their suppliers to be certified in ISO 9001, so it can also be seen by the company as an
opportunity to open to new marketplaces.
Customer focus, top management involvement, a process approach, and continual improvement are the
main quality principles found in ISO 9001.
Six Sigma was developed by Motorola in the late 1980s when they were having trouble meeting the
quality targets for their products. Since then, Six Sigma has become one of the most widely used
methodologies for improvement and has been broadly implemented in all kinds of industries and sectors.
This initiative is carried out firstly, by identifying the causes of variation in organizations and secondly, by
eliminating those causes. Six Sigma methodology is used in many organizations that seek to reach a
systematic, highly disciplined, profit-driven, and structured framework within all business operations. The
initiative uses specific tools, methods, analysis, techniques, statistical tests, and templates to achieve the
continual improvement of the processes within the organization. Also, it requires a strong leadership
commitment that will ensure its implementation success, as well as the existence of a role structure
known as a “belt system,” which has different levels of responsibilities, competence, and qualifications.
Below you can find a table showing the main differences between ISO 9001:2015 and Six Sigma.
Documentation Some mandatory documented The initiative does not prescribe any
information is required to be mandatory documentation.
maintained (documents) and
retained (records).
Major Limitations There are no financial Availability of a considerable
requirements related to increasing amount of data to carry out some
the organization´s profits. methods and tools. In addition,
there are some statistical
assumptions that are not justified
very well.
Although the initiative is very good
for competing on cost, improving
margins, improving physical
productivity, and improving
efficiency, it is bad for competition
based on service / customization or
innovation / design.
For more information, see: ISO 9001 vs. Six Sigma: How they compare and how they are different.
In ISO 9001, the PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle is used. This approach is not one of the standard
requirements, but it is promoted by ISO 9001. The cycle is a dynamic process approach that consists of
planning, implementing, controlling, and continual improvement of company processes. It can be applied
to every process, from management review to product realization, and the organization can decide to
apply this cycle to the main process, to smaller processes, or to a group of processes.
Requirements contained in the different clauses of ISO 9001:2015 can be linked to each phase of the
PDCA cycle, as shown in Figure 1.
PLAN DO
ACT CHECK
•Improvement •Performance
(10) evaluation (9)
• Determine a plan for data collection of the core business process involved.
• Use several sources of data collection to identify defects and metrics.
MEASURE • Compare with customer satisfaction outcomes to determine deficiencies.
Figure 2: DMAIC Phases description (adapted from Graeme Knowles (2011) “Six Sigma”)
Below you can learn how each phase of the DMAIC roadmap in Six Sigma aligns to each phase of the PDCA
cycle in ISO 9001:
DEFINE
MEASURE PLAN
ANALYSE
DO
IMPROVE
CHECK
CONTROL ACT
The “Plan” phase in the PDCA cycle of ISO 9001, which corresponds to Clause 4 (Context of the
organization), Clause 5 (Leadership), and Clause 6 (Planning), is aligned with the phases of defining,
measuring, and analyzing in the DMAIC roadmap.
The “Do” phase, which includes Clause 7 (Support) and Clause 8 (Operations), and the “Check” phase,
which covers Clause 9 (Performance evaluation) in the PDCA cycle used in ISO 9001, are linked to the
phase of improving in the DMAIC roadmap.
The “Act” phase, which corresponds to Clause 10 (Improvement) in the PDCA cycle is related to the phase
of controlling in the DMAIC roadmap.
This table demonstrates the practicality of using several tools and methods of Six Sigma in ISO 9001:2015.
In fact, some of the tools mentioned in the table, such as the FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis)
and SWOT analysis, are widely applied by many people who ignore the existence of the Six Sigma
initiative.
These days, customer needs and expectations are changing in the marketplace. Customers look for quality
products that are tailored to their expectations at affordable prices. Organizations must adapt to this
relatively new situation by creating production systems that are sustainable, but also that can be trusted.
Combining ISO 9001 and Six Sigma provides the company with the elements needed to achieve continual
improvement in a reliable and sustainable system.
Integrating ISO 9001 and Six Sigma can bring many benefits to organizations. It has been proven that their
combination helps to cut companies’ bottom-line costs, helping them to become more profitable, but
also more productive and competitive in the market.
Additionally, decision making in the Quality Management System will be enhanced when using both ISO
9001 and Six Sigma. This is because Six Sigma use analysis tools and techniques that contribute to
analyzing available data and information in a structured way.
On the other hand, implementing both systems independently can be a waste of time, because the overall
objectives of each system are the same. Benefits will be greater when aligning both systems, resulting in
important savings for the organization and significant improvements in its business management.
Useful resources
These online materials will help you with your ISO 9001:2015 implementation:
Graeme Knowles (2011) “Six Sigma”, Graeme Knowles & Ventus Publishing ApS.
Muhammad Nauman, Tahir Ali (2015) “Integration of Six Sigma and ISO 9001 Quality Management
System. Case Study: Wire Manufacturing Industry Ltd.” Master of Science in Management, Economics
and Industrial Engineering. Politecnico di Milano.
Pedro Marques, Jose Requeijo, Pedro Saraiva, Francisco Frazao-Guerreiro (2013) “Integrating Six Sigma
with ISO 9001” International Journal of Lean Six Sigma.