Satire and Social Reformation
Satire and Social Reformation
Satire and Social Reformation
and injustices of the modern world have become an inescapable weight individuals must carry;
however, though some succumb to the weight of this burden, many have found a way to
lighten the load by viewing these problems through rose-colored satirical glasses. This practice
dates back to the eighteenth century, where it was used as a vehicle not only to comprehend
societal injustices, but ignite social reform. This essay intends to analyze the satirical
components of Swift’s A Modest Proposal and Voltaire’s Candide to convey the many ways in
During a time period characterized by social reformation, satire became the greatest
weapon to draw “attention to the vast contradictions between morals and manners, intentions
and actions, and, more generally, between Enlightenment aspirations and contemporary
degradation” (Fiero 159). Resulting from the inevitable dissension arousing from changes in
society, many took to the form of sarcastic comedy to alleviate some of the strain surrounding
Jonathan Swift was the premier British satirist of the eighteenth century, famous for his
distain for humanity, using irony to highlight the shortcomings of society. As a result of his use
of irony, Swift’s work was often controversial, for much of what he said often meant the exact
opposite. In Swift’s famous satire, A Modest Proposal, Swift introduced the notion of breeding
and butchering Irish children as a food source to highlight the inability of poor men during this
time period to feed their families. Swift proposes this idea through the use of logic and science,
thus drawing a comparison to the politicians and officials who sought to relieve these
conditions with calculations, instead of considering the actual human components of the
problem. Swift’s uses the perspective of a concerned citizen to create a sense of familiarity
between himself and the readers. However, quickly into the essay, the reader begins to
understand that there is little rationality behind the proposal after all. As the essay progresses,
Swift’s “position” as a concerned and sensible countryman is unwavering, despite the insanity
of his suggestion. He presents the argument in a way that would undoubtedly solve the
destitute conditions many individuals were experiencing, without any acknowledgment of the
outrageous nature of his idea. The irony used in this famous satire is undeniable, for it is blatant
displayed in the title. Swift’s proposal is anything but modest, therefore, it is already
abundantly clear that this essay is not to be taken literally, but riddled with underlying meaning
to illustrate the unfair conditions of society. Demonstrated through his “rational” composure,
Swift employs the idea that these level-headed qualities and outlooks can become catastrophic
when taken to the extreme; a notion many in today’s society would resonate with.
Swift’s satirical influence spread large, reaching other countries throughout the
eighteen hundreds, especially inspiring many French philosophes, including the leading
intellectual of French society, Francois-Marie Arouet, also known as Voltaire. Unlike Swift,
however, Voltaire did not attack humanity itself but went after political institutions and bigotry
as a whole. “In his writings, he championed freedom of thought and expression; he attacked
bigotry as man-made evil, and injustice as institutional evil”, thus making his work so notable
and applicable to the society in which he lived (Fiero 161). The tale of Candide documents a the
exploits of an innocent young man whose life is tainted by a series of unfortunate occurrences
to illustrate the naivety of many individuals in society. Prior to enduring these misadventures,
Candide has an overall positive outlook on life, living by the mantra “this is the best of all
possible worlds”; however, upon experiencing tragedies such as war, the manipulated use of
religion by self-righteous individuals, human greed and the unpredictability of nature, his once
optimistic outlook became dim. This allows reader’s to understand that many in this time were
ignorant of the true state of society, insinuating they lived in a “what they don’t know won’t
hurt them” state of mind. This satire “addresses the age-old question of how evil can exist in a
universe created and governed by the forces of good” (Fiero 162). Voltaire utilizes the boy’s
comically unfortunate experiences the portray this, but also to acknowledge an answer to the
the end of his days, Voltaire urges readers to comprehend that human reason can combat evil.
“This metaphor for achieving personal satisfaction in a hostile world relieves the otherwise
Though similar in their quest to identify humanities influence on the unjust conditions of
society, these two works vary greatly in their linguistic style. While Swift employs a ironic,
rational approach to convey the preposterous actions taken by society, Voltaire utilizes
overstated irony to illustrate his point. Voltaire mocks the significance of issues like war and
some instances, blessings to that individual. These works were both instrumental in
enlightenment, for they helped people in society to understand the issues at hand.
Dating back far in history, many have always found a way to cope with overwhelming
experiences and concepts through the use of humor. Sarcasm and irony have provided comic
relief for individuals, while still allowing them to understand the true message at hand. It is
because of the works of men like Swift and Voltaire that the boundaries and confinements for
writers today are so flexible. Their abilities to relate social situations to comedy softened the
Fiero, Gloria. Humanistic Tradition: the Early Modern World to the Present. Mcgraw-Hill
Education, 2015.