Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 35 views

    Difference Between Non-Indexed and Indexed Table: Elapsed: 00:11:33.29

    Uploaded by

    methukupally
    1) The document demonstrates the difference in performance between a non-indexed table and indexed table for a SELECT statement. 2) A SELECT statement using a full table scan on a non-indexed table took 00:11:33.29 to execute. Using an index scan on an indexed table, the same SELECT statement took only 00:00:01.61 to execute. 3) There was a significant performance improvement of over 11 minutes by using an index to satisfy the SELECT statement versus a full table scan.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Difference Between Non-Indexed and Indexed Table: Elapsed: 00:11:33.29

    Uploaded by

    methukupally
    35 views4 pages
    1) The document demonstrates the difference in performance between a non-indexed table and indexed table for a SELECT statement. 2) A SELECT statement using a full table scan on a non-indexed table took 00:11:33.29 to execute. Using an index scan on an indexed table, the same SELECT statement took only 00:00:01.61 to execute. 3) There was a significant performance improvement of over 11 minutes by using an index to satisfy the SELECT statement versus a full table scan.

    Original Description:

    oracle

    Original Title

    Index

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) The document demonstrates the difference in performance between a non-indexed table and indexed table for a SELECT statement. 2) A SELECT statement using a full table scan on a non-indexed table took 00:11:33.29 to execute. Using an index scan on an indexed table, the same SELECT statement took only 00:00:01.61 to execute. 3) There was a significant performance improvement of over 11 minutes by using an index to satisfy the SELECT statement versus a full table scan.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    35 views4 pages

    Difference Between Non-Indexed and Indexed Table: Elapsed: 00:11:33.29

    Uploaded by

    methukupally
    1) The document demonstrates the difference in performance between a non-indexed table and indexed table for a SELECT statement. 2) A SELECT statement using a full table scan on a non-indexed table took 00:11:33.29 to execute. Using an index scan on an indexed table, the same SELECT statement took only 00:00:01.61 to execute. 3) There was a significant performance improvement of over 11 minutes by using an index to satisfy the SELECT statement versus a full table scan.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NON-INDEXED AND INDEXED TABLE

    ############################################################################################

    SCOTT>>select systimestamp from dual;

    SYSTIMESTAMP
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    13-JAN-11 12.26.30.640314 PM +05:30

    SCOTT>>set autotrace on
    SCOTT>>set timing on
    SCOTT>>desc emp
    Name Null? Type
    ----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
    EMPNO NOT NULL NUMBER(38)
    ENAME VARCHAR2(10)
    JOB VARCHAR2(9)
    MGR NUMBER(4)
    HIREDATE DATE
    SAL NUMBER(7,2)
    COMM NUMBER(7,2)
    DEPTNO NUMBER(2)

    SCOTT>>desc dept
    Name Null? Type
    ----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
    DEPTNO NUMBER(2)
    DNAME VARCHAR2(14)
    LOC VARCHAR2(13)

    SCOTT>>select a.empno,a.ename,a.job,a.hiredate,a.sal,a.deptno,b.dname,b.loc
    2 from emp a,dept b
    3 where a.deptno=b.deptno
    4* and a.empno=(select max(empno) from emp)

    EMPNO ENAME JOB HIREDATE SAL DEPTNO DNAME LOC


    ---------- -------- ------- ----------- ------ ------- ------------ ----------
    92034659 MILLER CLERK 23-JAN-82 1300 10 ACCOUNTING NEW YORK

    ##############################################
    # Elapsed: 00:11:33.29 #
    ##############################################
    Execution Plan
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    Plan hash value: 3269051146

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 91 | 307K (1)| 01:01:26 |
    |* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 91 | 153K (1)| 00:30:44 |
    |* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | EMP | 1 | 61 | 153K (1)| 00:30:44 |
    | 3 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 13 | | |
    | 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP | 77M| 957M| 153K (1)| 00:30:42 |
    | 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | DEPT | 4 | 120 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):


    ---------------------------------------------------

    1 - access("A"."DEPTNO"="B"."DEPTNO")
    2 - filter("A"."EMPNO"= (SELECT MAX("EMPNO") FROM "EMP" "EMP"))

    Note
    -----
    - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)

    Statistics
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    292 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    2254721 consistent gets
    1127491 physical reads
    0 redo size
    880 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    415 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    0 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    1 rows processed

    SCOTT>>create index ind_empno on emp(empno);

    Index created.

    ##############################################
    # Elapsed: 00:07:41.14 #
    ##############################################
    SCOTT>>conn / as sysdba
    Connected.
    SYS>>alter system flush buffer_cache;

    System altered.

    Elapsed: 00:00:00.56
    SYS>>alter system flush shared_pool;

    System altered.

    Elapsed: 00:00:03.98
    SYS>>conn scott/tiger
    Connected.
    SCOTT>>set autotrace on
    SCOTT>>set timing on
    SCOTT>>select a.empno,a.ename,a.job,a.hiredate,a.sal,a.deptno,b.dname,b.loc
    2 from emp a,dept b
    3 where a.deptno=b.deptno
    4 and a.empno=(select max(empno) from emp);

    EMPNO ENAME JOB HIREDATE SAL DEPTNO DNAME LOC


    ---------- ------- ------ ---------- ------ ------- ----------- ----------
    92034659 MILLER CLERK 23-JAN-82 1300 10 ACCOUNTING NEW YORK

    #############################################
    # Elapsed: 00:00:01.61 #
    #############################################
    Execution Plan
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    Plan hash value: 1735671770

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU) Time |

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 91 | 2273 (1)| 00:00:28 |

    |* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 91 | 2270 (1)| 00:00:28 |

    | 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| EMP | 1 | 61 | 2268 (1)| 00:00:28 |

    |* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IND_EMPNO | 308K| | 7 (58)| 00:00:01 |

    | 4 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 13 | | |

    | 5 | INDEX FULL SCAN (MIN/MAX) | IND_EMPNO | 1 | 13 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |

    | 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | DEPT | 4 | 120 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):


    ---------------------------------------------------

    1 - access("A"."DEPTNO"="B"."DEPTNO")
    3 - access("A"."EMPNO"= (SELECT MAX("EMPNO") FROM "EMP" "EMP"))

    Note
    -----
    - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)

    Statistics
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    698 recursive calls
    0 db block gets
    233 consistent gets
    170 physical reads
    0 redo size
    880 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    415 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    11 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    1 rows processed

    SCOTT>>spool off

    OBSERVATION : SELECT STATEMENT EXECUTED ON


    NON-INDEXED TABLE AND INDEXED TABLE.

    TIME ELAPSED FOR SELECT STATEMENT WHEN USING

    FULL TABLE SCAN : 00:11:33.29

    INDEX SCAN : 00:00:01.61

    DIFFERENCE : 11m 32s

    TIP : INDEX SCAN WILL IMPROVE THE PERFORMANCE OF A


    SELECT STATEMENT.

    You might also like