Readings in Information Visualization Using Vision
Readings in Information Visualization Using Vision
net/publication/220691172
CITATIONS READS
1,987 10,543
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Stuart K. Card on 25 January 2014.
As this 15-year period draws to a close, there is a need for collecting together the results
to date, organizing them, understanding the essence of this field, and providing materials
for teaching. In the next period, information visualization will pass out of the realm of an
exotic research specialty and into mainstream of user interface application design.” (xiii)
“The power of the unaided mind is highly overrated. Without external aids, memory,
thought, and reasoning are all constrained. But human intelligence is highly flexible
and adaptable, superb at inventing procedures and objects that overcome its own
limits. The real powers come from devising external aids: it is things that make us
smart” (Norman, 1993, p.43) (1)
But then direct computational devises themselves become a component of an even more
powerful visually based system. (3)
As our brief examination illustrates, visual artifacts aid thought; in fact, they are
completely entwined with cognition action.
Visualization dates as an organized subfield from the NSF report Visualization in Scientific
Computing (McCormick and DeFanti, 1987). There it is conceived as a tool to permit
handling large sets of scientific data and to enhance science’s ability to see phenomena in
the data. Although it is not a necessity of the original conception, scientific visualization
tends to be based on physical data—the human body, the earth, molecules and other. (6)
There is a great deal of such abstract information in the contemporary world, and its
mass and complexity are a problem, motivating attempts to extend visualization into the
realm of the abstract. (7)
Knowledge crystallization involves getting insight about data relative to some task. This
usually requires finding some representation (schema) for the data that is efficient for the
task.
There appears to be a general principle of Selective Omission of Information at work in all
biological information processing systems. The sensory organs simplify and organize their
inputs, supplying the higher processing centers with aggregated forms of information
which, to a considerable extent, predetermine the patterned structures that the higher
centers can detect. The higher centers in their turn reduce the quantity of information
which will be processed at later stages by further organization of the partly processed
information into more abstract and universal forms. (Resnikoff, 1987, p.19) (11)
Data Transformation map Raw Data, that is, data in some idiosyncratic format, into Data
Tables, relational descriptions of data extended to include metadata. Visual Mappings
transform Data Tables into Visual Structures, structures that combine spatial substrates,
marks, and graphical properties. Finally, View Transformations create Views of the Visual
Structures by specifying graphical parameters such as position, scaling,, and clipping.
User interaction controls parameters of these transformations, restricting the view to
certain data ranges, for example, or changing the nature of the transformation. The
visualizations and their controls are used in service of some task. (17)
4. Approach
An expressiveness criterion, which is derived from precise language definition, is
associated with each graphical language. A graphical language can be used to present
some information when it includes a graphical sentence that expresses exactly the imput
information, that is all the information and only the information. Expressing additional
information is potentially dangerous because it may not be correct. (69)
5. Expressivness
All communication is based on the fact that the participants share conventions that
determine how messages are constructed and interpreted. For graphical communication
these conventions indicate how arrangements of graphical objects encode information.
A set of facts is expressible in a language if it contains a sentence that
1.- encodes all the facts in the set,
2.- encodes only the facts in the set. (70)
6. Effectiveness
Given two graphical languages that express some information, the obvious question is
which language involves a design that specifies the more effective presentation.
…unlike expressiveness, which only depends on the syntax and semantics of the
graphical language, effectiveness also depends on the capabilities of the perceiver.
7. Composition
Expressiveness and effectiveness criteria, which were described in the previous two
sections, are not very useful without a method for generating alternative designs. (74)
In 4D information animation applications, the success of the graphics visual design (i.e. the
shapes, layout, colors) is critical to the success of the application. Graphical elements
need to be carefully selected and arranged to reveal data and relationships. Poor
graphics design will obscure the data and its meanings. The visual design simply needs to
be perfect. Users must see the message and not the medium.
Edward Tufte articulates this discipline best. According to Tufte, excellence in graphics
consists of complex ideas communicated with clarity, precision, and efficiency. Graphical
displays should induce the viewer to think about the substance, present many numbers in
a small space, make large data sets coherent, encourage the eye to compare different
pieces of data, reveal the data at several levels of detail, from a broad overview to the fine
structure.
This chapter returns to the central topic of this book: using vision to think. In particular, the
focus is on developing theoretical and engineering principles for the design of effective
visualizations.
Moving from information foraging to sense making, we have Pirolli and Rao’s paper
(1996). Sense making basically requires building schema or description into which many
pieces of information fit (Russel et al., 1993), that is, providing a compact description of
some set of phenomena. (580)
. The point of view is primarily cognitive, including the use of the term externalization rather
than visualization to indicate the cognitive role of interactive visual representations. (581)
The first dimension, representation, divides data into value and structure. The second
dimension, interactivity, ranges from direct manipulation to indirect manipulation. This
leads to the final axis of the taxonomy based on Draper’s observation that input and output
can reference each other. These input and output relations form the basis of a more
detailed discussion of the various user actions that must be supported by a visualization.
(581)
CONCLUSIONS
Information Visualization
Robert Spence
ACM Press Essex: England 2001
Visualization is a process of forming mental model of data, thereby gaining inside into that
data....I concentrate on the acquisition of insight through the identification of patterns and
other features of a display. (xiii)
Issues
Selection; representation; presentation; scale and dimensionality; rearrangement,
interaction and exploration; externalization; mental models; invention, experience and skill.
(9-12)
Anyone who has seen, and specially used, a highly responsive interactive visualization
tool will be struck by two features. First, that a mere rearrengement of how the data is
displayed can lead to a surprising degree of additional insight into that data. Second, that
the very property of interactivity can considerably enhance that tool’s effectiveness,
especially if the computer’s response follows a user’s action virtually immediately, say
within a fraction of a second. (14)
ENVISIONING INFORMATION
Edward R. Tufte
To envision information—and what bright and splendid visions can result—is to work at the
intersection of image, word, number, art. (9)
To speak of statistics as the study of variation also serves to emphasize the contrast
between the aim of modern statisticians and those of their predecessors. (22)
Micro/Macro designs enforce both local and global comparisons and, at the same time,
avoid the disruption of context switching. All told, exactly what is needed for reasoning
about information.
High-density design also allow viewers to select, to narrate, to recast and personalize data
for their own uses. Thus control of information is given over to viewers, not to editors
designers, or decorators. (50)
The concept that “the simpler the form of a letter the simpler its reading” was an obsession
of beginning constructivism. It became something like a dogma, and is still followed by
“modernistic” typographers.
The notion proved to be wrong, because in reading we do not read letters but words,
words as a whole, as a “word picture”. Ophthalmology has disclosed that the more the
letters are differentiated from each other, the easier is the reading. (51)
Confusion and clutter failures of design, not attributes of information. And so to point is to
find design strategies that reveal and detail and complexity—rather than to fault the data
for an excess of complication. Or, worse, to fault viewers for a lack of understanding.
Among the most powerful devices for reducing noise and enriching the content of displays
is the technique of layering and separation, visually stratifying various aspects of the data.
Effective layering of information is often difficult; for every excellent performance, a
hundred clunky spaces arise. An omnipresent, yet subtle, design issue is involved: the
various elements collected together on flatland interact , creating non-information patterns
and texture simply through their combined presence. Joseph Albers described this visual
effect as 1 + 1 = 3. (53)
4. Small Multiples
At work in this fine Swiss mountain map are the fundamental uses of color in information
design: to label (color as noun), to measure (color as quantity), to represent or imitate
reality(color as representation), and to enliven or decorate
VISUAL EXPLANATIONS
Eduard R. Tufte
Many of our examples suggest that clarity and excellence in thinking is very much like
clarity and excellence in the display of data. When principles of design replicate principles
of thought, the act of arranging information becomes an act of insight. (9)
..The idea is to make designs that enhance the richness, complexity, resolution,
dimensionality, and clarity of the content. By extending the visual capacities of paper,
video, and computer screen, we are able to extend the depth of our own knowledge and
experience. (9)
Modern scientific graphics were now in place; the two-dimensional plane was quantified,
available for measured data. Used with fitted models, graphics could describe and
characterize relations between variables—thus displaying the essential evidence
necessary for establishing cause and effect. (16)
…More generally, when scientific images become dequantified, the language of analysis
may drift toward credulous descriptions of form, pattern, and configuration—rather than
answers to the questions How many? How often? Where? How much? At what rate?. (23)
Once again Jonson’s Principle: these problems are more than just poor design, for a lack
of visual clarity in arranging evidence is a sign of lack of intellectual clarity in reasoning
about evidence. (48)
…Reliable knowledge grows from evidence that is collected, analyzed, and displayed with
some good comparisons in view. (52)
…Failure to think clearly about the analysis and presentation of evidence opens the door
for all sorts of political and other mischief to operate in making decisions. (52)
: if displays of data are to be truthful and revealing, then the design logic of the display
must reflect the intellectual logic of the analysis:
Visual representations of evidence should be governed by principles of reasoning about
quantitative evidence. For information displays, design reasoning must correspond to
scientific reasoning. Clear and precise seeing becomes as one with clear and precise
thinking. (53)
Parallelism connects visual elements. Connections are built among images by position,
orientation, overlap, synchronization, and similarities in context. Parallelism grows from a
common viewpoint that relates like to like. Congruity of structure across multiple images
gives the eye a context for assessing data variation. Parallelism is not simply a matter of
design arrangements, for the perceiving mind itself actively works to detect and indeed to
generate links, clusters, and matches among assorted visual elements. (82)
Multiple images reveal repetition and change, pattern and surprise—the defining elements
in the idea of information. (105)
Since many slices of information are displayed within the eyespan, alert viewers may be
able to detect contrasts and correspondences at a glance—uninterrupted visual
reasoning. (112)
Colin Ware
Visualization meant constructing a visual image in the mind. But now it has come to
mean something like a graphical representation of data or concepts. From an internal
construct of the mind to an external artifact supporting decision making. (1)
Critical Question
How best to transform the data into something that people can understand for optimal
decision making. (4)
Sensory aspects of visualizations derive their expressive power from being well designed
to stimulate the visual sensory system. In contrast, arbitrary, conventional aspects of
visualization derive their power from how they will be learned.
The distinction between the sensory and social aspects of the symbols used in
visualization also has practical consequences in terms of research methodology. It is not
worth expending a huge effort carrying out intricate and highly focused experiments to
study something that is only this year’s fashion. Howeever, if we can develop
generalizations that apply to large clasases of visual representations, and for a long time,
the effort is worthwhile. (13)
For the visualization designer, training in art and design is at least useful as training in
perceptual psychology. For those who wish to do good design, the study of design by
example is generally most appropiate. But the science of visualization can inform the
process by providing a scientific basis for design rules, and it can suggest new design
ideas and methods for sipalying data that heve not been thought of before. Ultimately, our
goal should be to create a new set of conventions for information visualization designed to
be optimal based on sound perceptual principles. (21, 22).
Gibson’s Affordance Theory
Beyond the visual stages, the visual object identification process interfaces with the verbal
linguistic subsystems of the brain so that words can be connected to images. The
perception-for-action subsytem interfaces with the motor systems that control muscle
movements. (25, 26)
Bertin 1977 Data values and data structures. A more modern way of expressing this idea
is to divide data into entities and relationships.
Entities are the objects we wish to visualize; relations define the structures and
patterns that relate entities to one another. We can also talk about the attributes of
an entity or a relationship. Concepts of entity, relationship and attribute have a long
history in database design and more recently in systems modeling.
Attribute Quality
It is useful to describe data visualization methods in light of the quality of
attributes they are capable of conveying. A useful way of considering the quality of data
is the taxonomy of number scales defined by Stevens 1946.
Definiciones
Data Transformation map Raw Data, that is, data in some idiosyncratic format, into Data
Tables, relational descriptions of data extended to include metadata. Visual Mappings
transform Data Tables into Visual Structures, structures that combine spatial substrates,
marks, and graphical properties. Finally, View Transformations create Views of the Visual
Structures by specifying graphical parameters such as position, scaling,, and clipping.
User interaction controls parameters of these transformations, restricting the view to
certain data ranges, for example, or changing the nature of the transformation. The
visualizations and their controls are used in service of some task. (17)
Visualization meant constructing a visual image in the mind. But now it has come to mean
something like a graphical representation of data or concepts. From an internal construct
of the mind to an external artifact supporting decision making. (1)
Critical Question
How best to transform the data into something that people can understand for optimal
decision making. (4)