STRUCTURAL DESIGN CALCULATION REPORT

PROJECT
2-STORYED RC RESIDENCE

CLIENT
------------------

APRIL, 2019

BLOCK NO.
LOT NO.
DOCUMENT NO.
REV. NO.
 

 
 

A Issued for
Approval S.H.A - -
REV Description Prep'd Chk'd App'd Date

TITLE
STRUCTURAL DESIGN CALCULATION

LOC. NO.: PROJECT NO.: DOCUMENT NO.: REV. NO.:

 DATA PREPARATION, MODELLING, ANALYSIS AND DESING OF
2-STORYED RC RESIDENCE PROJECT

1. Configuration of Proposed Building

2-STORYED RC RESIDENCE PROJECT Building is designed according to
ACI318-05 and AISC LRFD-05 code for structural member and IBC-06 code
for seismic and wind load analysis. Proposed building is located in
seismic zone III. The building is design as Intermediate moment
resisting frame (IMRF).
The profile of this structural model is listed as follow:
Type of structure : Two-storyed RC building
Type of occupancy: Residential
Shape of building : Rectangular
Location : Seismic zone III
Area of building : Width = 44 ft
Length = 52 ft
Height of building: Typical story height = 11 ft
Bottom story height = 12 ft
Overall height = 33 ft

2. Material Properties of Proposed Building

Material properties used for the proposed structure are as
follows:
(1) Analysis property data
Modulus of elasticity = 29 × 106 psi
Poisson's ratio = 0.3
Coefficient of thermal expansion = 6.5 × 10–6 in/in per
degree F
(2) Design property data
Bending reinforcement yield stress (fy) = 50,000 psi
Shear reinforcement yield stress (fys) = 50,000 psi
Concrete cylinder strength (fcʹ) = 3,000 psi
Ultimate stress of steel (Fu) = 58,000 psi
Yield stress of steel (Fy) = 36,000 psi
ASSUME Bearing capacity of soil at (- 10’-0’’) = 1 TSF
 2

3. Required Data for Loading

The applied loads are gravity loads (dead loads, superimposed
dead loads, live loads) and lateral loads (wind loads).

3.1. Dead Load

Dead load is a fixed position service load, so called because it
acts continuously toward the earth when the structure is in service.
Dead load consists of the structural frame’s own weight and other
loads that are permanently attached to the frame.
Required data for dead loads are as follows:
Unit weight of concrete = 150 pcf
9 in thick brick wall weight = 100 psf
4.5 in thick brick wall weight = 55 psf
Superimposed dead load = 20 psf

3.2. Live Load

Live load is load that may change in magnitude and location.
Live load may be either static or they may have a dynamic effect. Live
loads that move under their own
power, such as people, trucks, vehicles are said to be moving loads.
Required data for live loads are as follows:
Live load on residential = 40 psf
Live load on stair = 100 psf
Live load on lobby = 100 psf
Live load on roof = 20 psf
Unit weight of water = 62.4 pcf

3.3. Wind Load

Every building or structure and every portion thereof shall be
designed and constructed to resist the wind effect. The force exerted
by winds on buildings increase dramatically with the increase in
building heights. On any typical building of rectangular plan and
elevation, wind exert pressure on the windward side and suction on
the leeward side, as well as either uplift or downward pressure on
 3

the roof. The wind pressure on a structure depends on the wind

velocity, height, exposure, and dynamic response of the structure.
Required Data in designing for wind load are as follows:
Exposure type = Type B
Windward wall pressure coefficient = 0.8
Leeward wall pressure coefficient = 0.5
Basic wind speed = 80 mph
Overall height = 33 ft
Effective width = 80 ft
Effective length = 150 ft
Method used = Normal Force Method
Importance factor = 1.0

3.4. Earthquake Load

Potentially damaging ground movements produced by the sudden
release of energy along faults in the earth’s crust is called
Earthquake. The application to structural motions caused by earthquake
ground shaking is demonstrated. Earthquake load consists of the
inertial forces of building mass that result from the shaking of its
foundation by a seismic disturbance.
Required data for seismic loads are as follows:
Seismic zone = III
Frame type = IMRF
Site Class = B
Ss = 1.32
S1 = 0.53
I = 1.0
Ct = 0.028
R = 5.5

4. Modelling of the Proposed Building

 4

5. Static Analysis of the Proposed Building

ETABS v9.7.1 File:STRUCTURE F Units:Kip-in April 19, 2019 20:47 PAGE
1
A U T O S E I S M I C U B C 9 7
Case: QX
AUTO SEISMIC INPUT DATA
Direction: X
Typical Eccentricity = 5%
Eccentricity Overrides: No
Period Calculation: Program Calculated
Ct = 0.035 (in feet units)
 5

Top Story: R TOP

Bottom Story: GF
R = 5.5
I = 1
hn = 372.000 (Building Height)
Soil Profile Type = SD
Z = 0.3
Ca = 0.3600
Cv = 0.5400
AUTO SEISMIC CALCULATION FORMULAS
Ta = Ct (hn^(3/4))
If Z >= 0.35 (Zone 4) then: If Tetabs <= 1.30 Ta then T = Tetabs,
else T = 1.30 Ta
If Z < 0.35 (Zone 1, 2 or 3) then: If Tetabs <= 1.40 Ta then T =
Tetabs, else T = 1.40 Ta
V = (Cv I W) / (R T) (Eqn. 1)
V <= 2.5 Ca I W / R (Eqn. 2)
V >= 0.11 Ca I W (Eqn. 3)
If T <= 0.7 sec, then Ft = 0
If T > 0.7 sec, then Ft = 0.07 T V <= 0.25 V
AUTO SEISMIC CALCULATION RESULTS
Ta = 0.4598 sec
T Used = 0.6438 sec
W Used = 443.60
V (Eqn 1) = 0.1525W
V (Eqn 2) = 0.1636W
V (Eqn 3) = 0.0396W
V (Eqn 4) = 0.0698W
V Used = 0.1525W = 67.66
Ft Used = 0.00
AUTO SEISMIC STORY FORCES
STORY FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
R TOP (Forces reported at X = 0.0000, Y = 0.0000, Z = 444.0000)
6.84 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 -2313.597
RF (Forces reported at X = 0.0000, Y = 0.0000, Z = 348.0000)
38.20 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 -10590.490
1F (Forces reported at X = 0.0000, Y = 0.0000, Z = 216.0000)
22.61 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 -6315.039
GF (Forces reported at X = 0.0000, Y = 0.0000, Z = 72.0000)

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000

ETABS v9.7.1 File:STRUCTURE F Units:Kip-in April 19, 2019 20:47 PAGE

5
A U T O S E I S M I C U B C 9 7
Case: QY
AUTO SEISMIC INPUT DATA
Direction: Y
Typical Eccentricity = 5%
Eccentricity Overrides: No
Period Calculation: Program Calculated
Ct = 0.035 (in feet units)
Top Story: R TOP
 6

Bottom Story: GF
R = 5.5
I = 1
hn = 372.000 (Building Height)
Soil Profile Type = SD
Z = 0.3
Ca = 0.3600
Cv = 0.5400
AUTO SEISMIC CALCULATION FORMULAS
Ta = Ct (hn^(3/4))
If Z >= 0.35 (Zone 4) then: If Tetabs <= 1.30 Ta then T = Tetabs,
else T = 1.30 Ta
If Z < 0.35 (Zone 1, 2 or 3) then: If Tetabs <= 1.40 Ta then T =
Tetabs, else T = 1.40 Ta
V = (Cv I W) / (R T) (Eqn. 1)
V <= 2.5 Ca I W / R (Eqn. 2)
V >= 0.11 Ca I W (Eqn. 3)
If T <= 0.7 sec, then Ft = 0
If T > 0.7 sec, then Ft = 0.07 T V <= 0.25 V
AUTO SEISMIC CALCULATION RESULTS
Ta = 0.4598 sec
T Used = 0.6438 sec
W Used = 443.60
V (Eqn 1) = 0.1525W
V (Eqn 2) = 0.1636W
V (Eqn 3) = 0.0396W
V (Eqn 4) = 0.0698W
V Used = 0.1525W = 67.66
Ft Used = 0.00
AUTO SEISMIC STORY FORCES
STORY FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
R TOP (Forces reported at X = 0.0000, Y = 0.0000, Z = 444.0000)
0.00 6.84 0.00 0.000 0.000 1354.307
RF (Forces reported at X = 0.0000, Y = 0.0000, Z = 348.0000)
0.00 38.20 0.00 0.000 0.000 10803.391
1F (Forces reported at X = 0.0000, Y = 0.0000, Z = 216.0000)
0.00 22.61 0.00 0.000 0.000 6664.294
GF (Forces reported at X = 0.0000, Y = 0.0000, Z = 72.0000)
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000
Program ETABS Version 9.6.0.0
File:Structure F.LOG

B E G I N A N A L Y S I S
2019/04/19 20:45:06

MAXIMUM MEMORY BLOCK SIZE (BYTES) = 64.000 MB

E L E M E N T F O R M A T I O N
20:45:06

NUMBER OF JOINT ELEMENTS FORMED = 616

NUMBER OF SPRING ELEMENTS FORMED = 156
 7

NUMBER OF FRAME ELEMENTS FORMED = 554

NUMBER OF SHELL ELEMENTS FORMED = 416

E Q U A T I O N S O L U T I O N
20:45:07

TOTAL NUMBER OF EQUILIBRIUM EQUATIONS = 3688

APPROXIMATE "EFFECTIVE" BAND WIDTH = 235

NUMBER OF EQUATION STORAGE BLOCKS = 1

MAXIMUM BLOCK SIZE (8-BYTE TERMS) = 842596
SIZE OF STIFFNESS FILE(S) (BYTES) = 6.443 MB

NUMBER OF EQUATIONS TO SOLVE = 3688

NUMBER OF STATIC LOAD CASES = 6
NUMBER OF ACCELERATION LOADS = 6
NUMBER OF NONLINEAR DEFORMATION LOADS = 0

J O I N T O U T P U T
20:45:07

G L O B A L F O R C E B A L A N C E R E L A T I V E E R R O
R S

PERCENT FORCE AND MOMENT ERROR AT THE ORIGIN, IN GLOBAL COORDINATES

LOAD FX FY FZ MX MY
MZ
DEAD 6.16E-11 2.08E-12 2.74E-08 1.19E-08 1.73E-08
5.42E-11
LIVE 2.96E-10 3.62E-12 2.62E-08 1.19E-08 1.80E-08
2.62E-10
SD 2.13E-10 7.20E-12 2.63E-08 1.25E-08 1.74E-08
1.87E-10
QX 8.27E-09 1.13E-10 1.57E-09 3.66E-09 3.88E-08
8.59E-09
QY 1.25E-10 2.54E-10 2.14E-08 1.30E-08 2.14E-08
1.91E-10
TRIBUTAR 2.00E-10 3.89E-12 2.64E-08 1.19E-08 1.75E-08
1.76E-10

E L E M E N T J O I N T - F O R C E O U T P U T
20:45:08

NUMBER OF JOINT ELEMENTS SAVED = 616

NUMBER OF FRAME ELEMENTS SAVED = 554
NUMBER OF SHELL ELEMENTS SAVED = 416
NUMBER OF SPRING ELEMENTS SAVED = 156
 8

E L E M E N T O U T P U T
20:45:08

A N A L Y S I S C O M P L E T E
2019/04/19 20:45:08

Program ETABS Version 9.6.0.0

File:Structure F.LOG

B E G I N A N A L Y S I S
2019/04/19 20:45:09

MAXIMUM MEMORY BLOCK SIZE (BYTES) = 64.000 MB

E L E M E N T F O R M A T I O N
20:45:09

NUMBER OF JOINT ELEMENTS FORMED = 616

NUMBER OF SPRING ELEMENTS FORMED = 156

L O A D R E - S O L U T I O N
20:45:10

NUMBER OF STATIC LOAD CASES = 6

E L E M E N T J O I N T - F O R C E O U T P U T
20:45:10

NUMBER OF JOINT ELEMENTS SAVED = 616

NUMBER OF FRAME ELEMENTS SAVED = 554
NUMBER OF SHELL ELEMENTS SAVED = 416
NUMBER OF SPRING ELEMENTS SAVED = 156

A N A L Y S I S C O M P L E T E
2019/04/19 20:45:10
9
10
 11

6. Load Combinations
The design load combinations are the various combinations of
the load cases for which the structure needs to be checked. For
ACI318-05 and IBC-06 code, if a structure is subjected to dead load
(DL), superimposed dead load (SD), live load (LL), wind load (W),
and earthquake load (EQ), considering that wind and earthquake forces
are reversible.
Design load combinations for proposed structure are as follows:
(1) 1.4DL + 1.4SD
(2) 1.4DL + 1.4SD + 1.7LL
(3) 1.2DL + 1.2SD + LL + 1.6WX
(4) 1.2DL + 1.2SD + LL ‒ 1.6WX
 12

(5) 1.2DL + 1.2SD + LL + 1.6WY

(6) 1.2DL + 1.2SD + LL ‒ 1.6WY
(7) 1.2DL + 1.2SD + 0.8WX
(8) 1.2DL + 1.2SD ‒ 0.8WX
(9) 1.2DL + 1.2SD + 0.8WY
(10) 1.2DL + 1.2SD ‒ 0.8WY
(11) 0.9DL + 0.9SD + 1.6WX
(12) 0.9DL + 0.9SD ‒ 1.6WX
(13) 0.9DL + 0.9SD + 1.6WY
(14) 0.9DL + 0.9SD ‒ 1.6WY
(15) 1.2DL + 1.2SD + LL + EQX
(16) 1.2DL + 1.2SD + LL ‒ EQX
(17) 1.2DL + 1.2SD + LL + EQY
(18) 1.2DL + 1.2SD + LL ‒ EQY
(19) 1.2DL + 1.2SD + EQX
(20) 1.2DL + 1.2SD ‒ EQX
(21) 1.2DL + 1.2SD + EQY
(22) 1.2DL + 1.2SD ‒ EQY
(23) 0.9DL + 0.9SD + EQX
(24) 0.9DL + 0.9SD ‒ EQX
(25) 0.9DL + 0.9SD + EQY
(26) 0.9DL + 0.9SD ‒ EQY

where,
DL = dead load
LL = live load
WX = wind force in X-direction
WY = wind force in Y-direction
EQX = earthquake force in X-direction
EQY = earthquake force in Y-direction.
 13

7. Static Design Sections of Superstructure

C O N C R E T E C O D E P R E F E R E N C E S

Code : ACI 318-05/IBC 2003

C O N C R E T E C O D E P R E F E R E N C E S
Consider Minimum Eccentricity : Yes
Number of Interaction Curves : 24
Number of Interaction Points : 11
Pattern Live Load Factor : 0.750
Utilization Factor Limit : 0.950

Phi (Tension Controlled) : 0.900

Phi (Comp. Controlled Tied) : 0.650
Phi (Comp. Controlled Spiral) : 0.700
Phi (Shear and/or Torsion) : 0.750
 14

Phi (Shear Seismic) : 0.600

Phi (Shear Joint) : 0.850

M A T E R I A L D E S I G N D A T A F O R C O N C R E T E
M A T E R I A L S

MATERIAL LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE REBAR REBAR LIGHTWT

NAME CONCRETE FC FY FYS REDUC FACT

CONC No 3.000 40.000 40.000 N/A

ETABS v9.7.1 File:MULTI1 Units:Kip-in 2019 10:51 PAGE 4

C O N C R E T E C O L U M N STATIC DESIGN SECTION D A T A

SECTION MAT COLUMN COLUMN REBAR CONCRETE BAR CORNER

LABEL LABEL DEPTH WIDTH PATTERN COVER SIZE BAR SIZE

C10X10 CONC 10.000 10.000 RR-3-3 2.000 #7 #7

C12X12 CONC 12.000 12.000 RR-3-3 2.000 #7 #7

ETABS v9.7.1 File:MULTI1 Units:Kip-in , 2019 10:51 PAGE 5

C O N C R E T E B E A M STATIC DESIGN SECTION D A T A

SECTION MAT BEAM BEAM TOP BOTTOM

LABEL LABEL DEPTH WIDTH COVER COVER
B10X10 CONC 10.000 10.000 2.000 2.000
B10X12 CONC 14.000 10.000 1.400 1.400

RC TWO-WAY SLAB DESIGN (ACI318-05)

 15

lx x

½ Column strip
Middle strip
ly

½ Column strip
½ Column strip Middle strip ½ Column strip

TWO-WAY SLAB PANEL

Slab definition
Slab thickness; h = 5.00 in

Span along x - dir; lx = 15.000 ft

Span along y - dir; ly = 15.000 ft

Long span to Short span ratio less than 2, hence two-way slab.
Clear cover to positive reinforcement; cc = 0.75 in

Clear cover to negative reinforcement; c’c = 0.75 in

Effective flanged beam section

Flange width; bf = 10.000 in

Beam depth; hb = 12.000 in

Beam width; bw = 10.000 in

Materials
Specified compressive strength of concrete; f’c = 3000 psi

Specified yield strength of reinforcement; fy = 40000 psi

Modulus of elasticity; ESACI = 29000000psi

Concrete type; Normal weight

Concrete modification factor;  = 1.00

 16

Loads
Total factored ultimate load on slab; wu = 200.000 psf

Check for the depth of slab provided

Clear span x – dir – cl. 13.6.2.5; lnx = max(0.65  lx, (lx – bw/2 – bw/2)) = 14.167 ft

Clear span y – dir – cl. 13.6.2.5; lny = max(0.65  ly, (ly – bw/2 – bw/2)) = 14.167 ft

Ratio;  = max(lnx, lny) / min(lnx, lny) = 1.000

Moment of inertia of beam; Ib = 1440.000 in4

Moment of inertia of slab along x – axis; Isx = in4

Moment of inertia of slab along y – axis; Isy = 1875.000 in4

Flexural stiffness ratio along x – axis; fx = Ib / Isx = 0.768

Flexural stiffness ratio along y – axis; fy = Ib / Isy = 0.768

Average flexural stiffness ratio; fm = ( fx × 2 + fy × 2 ) / 4 = 0.768

Minimum depth required – cl. 9.5.3; hmin = 5.000 in

PASS - Slab thickness provided is sufficient for deflection
Moment computation ( x – direction)
Width of column strip (half) – cl. 13.2.1; lcol_stp = min( 0.25 × lx, 0.25 × ly ) = 3.750 ft

Width of middle strip – cl. 13.2.2; lmid_stp_x = ly – 2 × lcol_stp = 7.500 ft

Factored moment - eqn. 13-4; Mox = wu × ly × lnx2 / 8 = 75.260 kip_ft

Moment distribution for interior panel – cl. 13.6.3.2; M’ux = 0.65 × Mox = 48.919 kip_ft

Mux = 0.35 × Mox = 26.341 kip_ft

Moment distribution in column and middle strips:

ly / lx = 1.00

fx × ly / lx = 0.77

Moment distribution factors; fx_neg = 0.75

fx_pos = 0.72

Total column strip design moments; M’x_col_stp = fx_neg × M’ux = 36.689 kip_ft

Mx_col_stp = fx_pos × Mux = 18.839 kip_ft

Column strip beam moments; M’x_beam = 23.951 kip_ft

Mx_beam = 12.298 kip_ft

Column strip slab moments; M’x_slab = M’x_col_stp – M’x_beam = 12.739 kip_ft

Mx_slab = Mx_col_stp - Mx_beam = 6.541 kip_ft

Total middle strip design moments; M’x_mid_stp = (1 - fx_neg) × M’ux = 12.230 kip_ft

Mx_mid_stp = (1 - fx_pos) × Mux = 7.502 kip_ft

Required flexural nominal strength in column strip per 12 in width of slab;

 17

M’nx_col = M’x_slab / ( 0.9 × (2 × lcol_stp – bf)) = 2.123

kip_ft/ft

Mnx_col = Mx_slab / ( 0.9 × (2 × lcol_stp – bf)) = 1.090 kip_ft/ft

Required flexural nominal strength in middle strip per 12 in width of slab;

M’nx_mid = M’x_mid_stp / (0.9 × lmid_stp_x) = 1.812 kip_ft/ft

Mnx_mid = Mx_mid_stp / (0.9 × lmid_stp_x) = 1.111 kip_ft/ft

Moment computation ( y – direction)

Width of column strip (half) – cl. 13.2.1; lcol_stp = min( 0.25 × lx, 0.25 × ly) = 3.750 ft

Width of middle strip – cl. 13.2.2; lmid_stp_y = lx – 2 ×lcol_stp = 7.500 ft

Factored moment - eqn. 13-4; Moy = wu × lx × lny2 / 8 = 75.260 kip_ft

Moment distribution for interior panel – cl. 13.6.3.2; M’uy = 0.65 × Moy = 48.919 kip_ft

Muy = 0.35 × Moy = 26.341 kip_ft

Moment distribution in column and middle strips:

lx / ly = 1.00

fy × lx / ly = 0.77

Moment distribution factors; fy_neg = 0.75

fy_pos = 0.72

Total column strip design moment; M’y_col_stp = fy_neg × M’uy = 36.689 kip_ft

My_col_stp = fy_pos × Muy = 18.839 kip_ft

Column strip beam moment; M’y_beam = 23.951 kip_ft

My_beam = 12.298 kip_ft

Column strip slab moment; M’y_slab = M’y_col_stp – M’y_beam = 12.739 kip_ft

My_slab = My_col_stp – My_beam = 6.541 kip_ft

Total middle strip design moment; M’y_mid_stp = (1 - fy_neg) × M’uy = 12.230 kip_ft

My_mid_stp = (1 - fy_pos) × Muy = 7.502 kip_ft

Required flexural nominal strength in column strip per 12 in width of slab;

M’ny_col = M’y_slab / ( 0.9 × (2 × lcol_stp – bf)) = 2.123

kip_ft/ft

Mny_col = My_slab / ( 0.9 × (2 × lcol_stp – bf)) = 1.090 kip_ft/ft

Required flexural nominal strength in middle strip per 12 in width of slab;

M’ny_mid = M’y_mid_stp / (0.9 × lmid_stp_y) = 1.812 kip_ft/ft

Mny_mid = My_mid_stp / (0.9 × lmid_stp_y) = 1.111 kip_ft/ft

Reinforcement calculations
Stress block depth factor; 1 = 0.85
 18

Reinforcement percentage at strain of 0.004; b = 0.85  1  f’c / fy  (0.003 / (0.003 + 0.004)) =

0.023
Maximum reinforcement percentage; max = b = 0.023

Minimum area of steel required; Amin = min  h = 0.12 in2/ft

Maximum allowable spacing – cl. 13.3.2; smax = min (2 × h, 18 in) = 10.0 in

Column strip (x – direction)

Negative Reinforcement:

Depth to negative steel; d’x_col = h – c’c – D’col_x / 2 = 4.00 in

Flexural resistance factor; R’ux_col = M’nx_col / d’x_col2 = 0.133 ksi

Reinforcement required; ’reqx_col =0.85f’c/fy×[1–(abs(1–2×R’ux_col /(0.85×f’c)))]=

0.00341
Outer compression steel not required
Area of tension steel required; A’sx_req_col = ’reqx_col × d’x_col = 0.164 in2/ft

Maximum area of tension steel; A’sx_max_col = max × d’x_col = 1.115 in2/ft

Reinforcement provided (negative), No. 4 @ 6.0 in centers
Area of tension steel provided; A’sx_col = 0.393 in2/ft
PASS - Area of steel provided is OK
Actual tensile bar spacing provided; s’x_col = 6.0 in
PASS - Spacing of bars less than allowable
Positive reinforcement

Depth to positive steel; dx_col = h – cc - Dcol_x / 2 = 4.00 in

Flexural resistance factor; Rux_col = Mnx_col / dx_col2 = 0.068 ksi

Reinforcement required; reqx_col =0.85f’c/fy×[1–(abs(1–2×Rux_ col/(0.85×f’c)))] =

0.00173
Outer compression steel not required
Area of tension steel required; Asx_req_col = reqx_col × dx_col = 0.083 in2/ft

Maximum area of tension steel; Asx_max_col = max × dx_col = 1.115 in2/ft

Reinforcement provided (positive), No. 4 @ 6.0 in centers
Area of tension steel provided; Asx_col= 0.393 in2/ft
PASS - Area of steel provided is OK
Actual tensile bar spacing provided; sx_col = 6.0 in
PASS - Spacing of bars less than allowable
Middle strip (x – direction)
Negative Reinforcement:

Depth to negative steel; d’x_mid = h – c’c – D’mid_x / 2 = 4.00 in

Flexural resistance factor; R’ux_mid = M’nx_mid / d’x_mid2 = 0.113 ksi

Reinforcement required; ’reqx_mid = 0.85f’c/fy×[1–(abs(1–2×R’ux_mid/(0.85×f’c)))]

=0.00290
 19

Outer compression steel not required

Area of tension steel required; A’sx_req_mid = ’reqx_mid × d’x_mid = 0.139 in2/ft

Maximum area of tension steel; A’sx_max_mid = max × d’x_mid = 1.115 in2/ft

Reinforcement provided (negative), No. 4 @ 6.0 in centers
Area of tension steel provided; A’sx_mid = 0.393 in2/ft
PASS - Area of steel provided is OK
Actual tensile bar spacing provided; s’x_mid = 6.0 in
PASS - Spacing of bars less than allowable
Positive reinforcement

Depth to positive steel; dx_mid = h – cc - Dmid_x / 2 = 4.00 in

Flexural resistance factor; Rux_mid = Mnx_mid / ( dx_mid2) = 0.069 ksi

Reinforcement required; reqx_mid = 0.85  f’c/fy×[1–(abs(1–2×Rux_mid/(0.85×f’c)))]

=0.00176
Outer compression steel not required
Area of tension steel required; Asx_req_mid = reqx_mid × dx_mid = 0.085 in2/ft

Maximum area of tension steel; Asx_max_mid = max × dx_mid = 1.115 in2/ft

Reinforcement provided (positive), No. 4 @ 6.0 in centers
Area of tension steel provided; Asx_mid= 0.393 in2/ft
PASS - Area of steel provided is OK
Actual tensile bar spacing provided; sx_mid = 6.0 in
PASS - Spacing of bars less than allowable
Column strip (y – direction)
Negative Reinforcement:

Depth to negative steel; d’y_col = h – c’c – D’col_x - D’col_y / 2 = 3.50 in

Flexural resistance factor; R’uy_col = M’ny_col / d’y_col2 = 0.173 ksi

Reinforcement required; ’reqy_col =0.85f’c/fy× [1 –(abs(1–2×R’uy_col/(0.85×f’c)))]=

0.00449
Outer compression steel not required
Area of tension steel required; A’sy_req_col = ’reqy_col × d’y_col = 0.189 in2/ft

Maximum area of tension steel; A’sy_max_col = max × d’y_col = 0.975 in2/ft

Reinforcement provided (negative), No. 4 @ 6.0 in centers
Area of tension steel provided; A’sy_col = 0.393 in2/ft
PASS - Area of steel provided is OK
Actual tensile bar spacing provided; s’y_col = 6.0 in
PASS - Spacing of bars less than allowable
Positive reinforcement

Depth to positive steel; dy_col = h – cc - Dcol_x - Dcol_y / 2 = 3.50 in

Flexural resistance factor; Ruy_col = Mny_col / dy_col2 = 0.089 ksi

 20

Reinforcement required; reqy_col =0.85f’c/fy×[1–(abs(1–2×Ruy_col/(0.85 × f’c)))] =

0.00227
Outer compression steel not required
Area of tension steel required; Asy_req_col = reqy_col × dy_col = 0.095 in2/ft

Maximum area of tension steel; Asy_max_col = max × dy_col = 0.975 in2/ft

Reinforcement provided (positive), No. 4 @ 6.0 in centers
Area of tension steel provided; Asy_col= 0.393 in2/ft
PASS - Area of steel provided is OK
Actual tensile bar spacing provided; sy_col = 6.0 in
PASS - Spacing of bars less than allowable
Middle strip (y – direction)
Negative Reinforcement:

Depth to negative steel; d’y_mid = h – c’c – D’mid_x - D’mid_y / 2 = 3.50 in

Flexural resistance factor; R’uy_mid = M’ny_mid / d’y_mid2 = 0.148 ksi

Reinforcement required; ’reqy_mid = 0.85f’c/fy×[1–(abs(1–2×R’uy_mid/(0.85×f’c)))]

=0.00381
Outer compression steel not required
Area of tension steel required; A’sy_req_mid = ’reqy_mid × d’y_mid = 0.160 in2/ft

Maximum area of tension steel; A’sy_max_mid = max × d’y_mid = 0.975 in2/ft

Reinforcement provided (negative), No. 4 @ 6.0 in centers
Area of tension steel provided; A’sy_mid = 0.393 in2/ft
PASS - Area of steel provided is OK
Actual tensile bar spacing provided; s’y_mid = 6.0 in
PASS - Spacing of bars less than allowable
Positive reinforcement

Depth to positive steel; dy_mid = h – cc - Dmid_x - Dmid_y / 2 = 3.50 in

Flexural resistance factor; Ruy_mid = Mny_mid / dy_mid2 = 0.091 ksi

Reinforcement required; reqy_mid = 0.85  f’c/fy×[1–(abs(1–2×Ruy_mid/(0.85×f’c)))]

=0.00231
Outer compression steel not required
Area of tension steel required; Asy_req_mid = reqy_mid × dy_mid = 0.097 in2/ft

Maximum area of tension steel; Asy_max_mid = max × dy_mid = 0.975 in2/ft

Reinforcement provided, No. (positive) 4 @ 6.0 in centers
Area of tension steel provided; Asy_mid= 0.393 in2/ft
PASS - Area of steel provided is OK
Actual tensile bar spacing provided; sy_mid = 6.0 in
PASS - Spacing of bars less than allowable
 21

Distribution reinforcement - (for shrinkage and temperature)

Minimum ratio of distribution reinforcement; t =0.0020

Minimum area of distribution reinforcement required; At_req = t × h = 0.120 in2/ft

Maximum allowable spacing of bars; smax_t = min ( 5 × h, 18 in) = 18.000 in

Distribution steel provided , No. 4 @ 6.0 in centers
Distribution reinforcement provided; At_prov = 0.393 in2/ft
PASS - Area of inner steel provided (Distribution) OK
Actual bar spacing provided; st = 6.000 in
PASS - Spacing of distribution bars is less than allowable
Check for shear
Shear capacity of the slab(along long beam); Vu = wu × ( lx/2 – bw/2 - dx_mid) ×1ft= 1.350 kips

Design shear strength of slab; Vc = 0.75 × 2 ×   (f’c × 1 psi) × 1 ft × dx_mid = 3.944

kips
PASS - One-way shear capacity
Check for clear cover (ACI 318 cl. 7.7.1)
Permissible min nominal cover to all reinforcement; cmin = 0.75 in

Clear cover to tension reinforcement (negative); cc_neg =0.750 in

PASS - Cover to steel resisting hogging exceeds allowable minimum cover
Clear cover to tension reinforcement (positive); cc_pos = 0.750 in
PASS - Cover to steel resisting sagging exceeds allowable minimum cover
Schematic reinforcement distribution.
y

lx x
½ Column strip

A'sy_col
Asx_col A'sx_col

Asy_mid
Middle strip
ly

Asx_mid A'sx_mid
Asy_col
½ Column strip

A'sy_mid

½ Column strip Middle strip ½ Column strip

TWO-WAY SLAB PANEL Legend -

Top reinf.
(Reinforcement layout)
Bottom reinf.
22
23
24
 25

8. Static Design Sections of Substructure

FOUNDATION ANALYSIS & DESIGN (ACI318)

In accordance with ACI318-14

FOOTING ANALYSIS
Length of foundation; Lx = 12 ft

Width of foundation; Ly = 6 ft

Foundation area; A = Lx  Ly = 72 ft2

Depth of foundation; h = 12 in

Depth of soil over foundation; hsoil = 48 in

Density of concrete; conc = 150.0 lb/ft3

 26

Column no.1 details

Length of column; lx1 = 12.00 in

Width of column; ly1 = 12.00 in

position in x-axis; x1 = 30.00 in

position in y-axis; y1 = 36.00 in

Column no.2 details

Length of column; lx2 = 12.00 in

Width of column; ly2 = 12.00 in

position in x-axis; x2 = 114.00 in

position in y-axis; y2 = 36.00 in

Soil properties
Gross allowable bearing pressure; qallow_Gross = 2 ksf
Density of soil; soil = 120.0 lb/ft3
Angle of internal friction; b = 30.0 deg
Design base friction angle; bb = 30.0 deg
Coefficient of base friction; tan(bb) = 0.577
Foundation loads
Dead surcharge load; FDsur = 35 psf

Live surcharge load; FLsur = 60 psf

Self weight; Fswt = h  conc = 150 psf

Soil weight; Fsoil = hsoil  soil = 480 psf

Column no.1 loads

Dead load in z; FDz1 = 18.0 kips
 27

Live load in z; FLz1 = 11.0 kips

Column no.2 loads

Dead load in z; FDz2 = 16.0 kips

Live load in z; FLz2 = 10.0 kips

Footing analysis for soil and stability

Load combinations per ASCE 7-16
1.0D (0.593)

1.0D + 1.0L (0.781)

1.0D + 1.0Lr (0.593)

1.0D + 1.0S (0.593)

1.0D + 0.75L + 0.75Lr (0.734)

1.0D + 0.75L + 0.75S (0.734)

Combination 2 results: 1.0D + 1.0L

Forces on foundation
Force in z-axis; Fdz = D  A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) + L  A  FLsur + D 

FDz1 + L  FLz1 + D  FDz2 + L  FLz2 = 107.2 kips

Moments on foundation
Moment in x-axis, about x is 0; Mdx = D  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur)  Lx / 2) + L  A 

FLsur  Lx / 2 + D  (FDz1  x1) + L  (FLz1  x1) + D 

(FDz2  x2) + L  (FLz2  x2) = 632.7 kip_ft

Moment in y-axis, about y is 0; Mdy = D  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur)  Ly / 2) + L  A 

FLsur  Ly / 2 + D  (FDz1  y1) + L  (FLz1  y1) + D 

(FDz2  y2) + L  (FLz2  y2) = 321.6 kip_ft

Uplift verification
Vertical force; Fdz = 107.2 kips
PASS - Foundation is not subject to uplift
Bearing resistance
Eccentricity of base reaction
Eccentricity of base reaction in x-axis; edx = Mdx / Fdz - Lx / 2 = -1.175 in

Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis; edy = Mdy / Fdz - Ly / 2 = 0 in

Pad base pressures

q1 = Fdz  (1 - 6  edx / Lx - 6  edy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) = 1.562

ksf

q2 = Fdz  (1 - 6  edx / Lx + 6  edy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) =

1.562 ksf
 28

q3 = Fdz  (1 + 6  edx / Lx - 6  edy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) =

1.416 ksf

q4 = Fdz  (1 + 6  edx / Lx + 6  edy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) =

1.416 ksf

Minimum base pressure; qmin = min(q1,q2,q3,q4) = 1.416 ksf

Maximum base pressure; qmax = max(q1,q2,q3,q4) = 1.562 ksf

Allowable bearing capacity

Allowable bearing capacity; qallow = qallow_Gross = 2 ksf
qmax / qallow = 0.781
PASS - Allowable bearing capacity exceeds design base pressure

FOOTING DESIGN (ACI318)

In accordance with ACI318-14
Material details
Compressive strength of concrete; f’c = 3000 psi

Yield strength of reinforcement; fy = 60000 psi

Cover to reinforcement; cnom = 3 in

Concrete type; Normal weight

Concrete modification factor;  = 1.00

Column type; Concrete

Analysis and design of concrete footing

Load combinations per ASCE 7-16
1.4D (0.205)

1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5Lr (0.322)

1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5S (0.322)

1.2D + 1.0L + 1.6Lr (0.267)

1.2D + 1.0L + 1.6S (0.267)

Combination 2 results: 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5Lr

Forces on foundation
Ultimate force in z-axis; Fuz = D  A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) + L  A  FLsur + D 

FDz1 + L  FLz1 + D  FDz2 + L  FLz2 = 138.8 kips

Moments on foundation
Ultimate moment in x-axis, about x is 0; Mux = D  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur)  Lx / 2) + L  A 

FLsur  Lx / 2 + D  (FDz1  x1) + L  (FLz1  x1) + D 

(FDz2  x2) + L  (FLz2  x2) = 818.6 kip_ft

 29

Ultimate moment in y-axis, about y is 0; Muy = D  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur)  Ly / 2) + L  A 

FLsur  Ly / 2 + D  (FDz1  y1) + L  (FLz1  y1) + D 

(FDz2  y2) + L  (FLz2  y2) = 416.3 kip_ft

Eccentricity of base reaction

Eccentricity of base reaction in x-axis; eux = Mux / Fuz - Lx / 2 = -1.211 in

Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis; euy = Muy / Fuz - Ly / 2 = 0 in

Pad base pressures

qu1 = Fuz  (1 - 6  eux / Lx - 6  euy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) =

2.025 ksf

qu2 = Fuz  (1 - 6  eux / Lx + 6  euy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) =

2.025 ksf

qu3 = Fuz  (1 + 6  eux / Lx - 6  euy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) = 1.83

ksf

qu4 = Fuz  (1 + 6  eux / Lx + 6  euy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) =

1.83 ksf

Minimum ultimate base pressure; qumin = min(qu1,qu2,qu3,qu4) = 1.83 ksf

Maximum ultimate base pressure; qumax = max(qu1,qu2,qu3,qu4) = 2.025 ksf

Shear diagram, x axis (kips)

Moment diagram, x axis (kip_ft)

Moment design, x direction, positive moment

Ultimate bending moment; Mu.x.max = 13.433 kip_ft

Tension reinforcement provided; 6 No.6 bottom bars (13.0 in c/c)

Area of tension reinforcement provided; Asx.bot.prov = 2.64 in2

Minimum area of reinforcement (8.6.1.1); As.min = 0.0018  Ly  h = 1.555 in2

PASS - Area of reinforcement provided exceeds minimum
Maximum spacing of reinforcement (8.7.2.2); smax = min(2  h, 18 in) = 18 in
 30

PASS - Maximum permissible reinforcement spacing exceeds actual spacing

Depth to tension reinforcement; d = h - cnom - y.bot - x.bot / 2 = 7.875 in

Depth of compression block; a = Asx.bot.prov  fy / (0.85  f'c  Ly) = 0.863 in

Neutral axis factor; 1 = 0.85

Depth to neutral axis; c = a / 1 = 1.015 in

Strain in tensile reinforcement (8.3.3.1); t = 0.003  d / c - 0.003 = 0.02028

PASS - Tensile strain exceeds minimum required, 0.004
Nominal moment capacity; Mn = Asx.bot.prov  fy  (d - a / 2) = 98.256 kip_ft

Flexural strength reduction factor; f = min(max(0.65 + (t - 0.002)  (250 / 3), 0.65), 0.9) =
0.900
Design moment capacity; Mn = f  Mn = 88.43 kip_ft

Mu.x.max / Mn = 0.152

PASS - Design moment capacity exceeds ultimate moment load
Moment design, x direction, negative moment
Ultimate bending moment; Mu.x.min = -18.605 kip_ft

Tension reinforcement provided; 6 No.6 top bars (13.0 in c/c)

Area of tension reinforcement provided; Asx.top.prov = 2.64 in2

Minimum area of reinforcement (8.6.1.1); As.min = 0.0018  Ly  h = 1.555 in2

PASS - Area of reinforcement provided exceeds minimum
Maximum spacing of reinforcement (8.7.2.2); smax = min(2  h, 18 in) = 18 in
PASS - Maximum permissible reinforcement spacing exceeds actual spacing
Depth to tension reinforcement; d = h - cnom - x.top / 2 = 8.625 in

Depth of compression block; a = Asx.top.prov  fy / (0.85  f'c  Ly) = 0.863 in

Neutral axis factor; 1 = 0.85

Depth to neutral axis; c = a / 1 = 1.015 in

Strain in tensile reinforcement (8.3.3.1); t = 0.003  d / c - 0.003 = 0.02249

PASS - Tensile strain exceeds minimum required, 0.004
Nominal moment capacity; Mn = Asx.top.prov  fy  (d - a / 2) = 108.156 kip_ft

Flexural strength reduction factor; f = min(max(0.65 + (t - 0.002)  (250 / 3), 0.65), 0.9) =
0.900
Design moment capacity; Mn = f  Mn = 97.34 kip_ft

abs(Mu.x.min) / Mn = 0.191

PASS - Design moment capacity exceeds ultimate moment load
One-way shear design, x direction
Ultimate shear force; Vu.x = 15.048 kips

Depth to reinforcement; dv = min(h - cnom - x.bot / 2,h - cnom - x.top / 2) = 8.625 in

Shear strength reduction factor; v = 0.75

 31

Nominal shear capacity (Eq. 22.5.5.1); Vn = 2    (f'c  1 psi)  Ly  dv = 68.027 kips

Design shear capacity; Vn = v  Vn = 51.02 kips

Vu.x / Vn = 0.295

PASS - Design shear capacity exceeds ultimate shear load
Shear diagram, y axis (kips)

Moment diagram, y axis (kip_ft)

38.7

0 0

55.8

Moment design, y direction, positive moment

Ultimate bending moment; Mu.y.max = 38.75 kip_ft

Tension reinforcement provided; 9 No.6 bottom bars (17.1 in c/c)

Area of tension reinforcement provided; Asy.bot.prov = 3.96 in2

Minimum area of reinforcement (8.6.1.1); As.min = 0.0018  Lx  h = 3.11 in2

PASS - Area of reinforcement provided exceeds minimum
Maximum spacing of reinforcement (8.7.2.2); smax = min(2  h, 18 in) = 18 in
PASS - Maximum permissible reinforcement spacing exceeds actual spacing
Depth to tension reinforcement; d = h - cnom - y.bot / 2 = 8.625 in

Depth of compression block; a = Asy.bot.prov  fy / (0.85  f'c  Lx) = 0.647 in

Neutral axis factor; 1 = 0.85

Depth to neutral axis; c = a / 1 = 0.761 in

Strain in tensile reinforcement (8.3.3.1); t = 0.003  d / c - 0.003 = 0.03099

PASS - Tensile strain exceeds minimum required, 0.004
Nominal moment capacity; Mn = Asy.bot.prov  fy  (d - a / 2) = 164.369 kip_ft

Flexural strength reduction factor; f = min(max(0.65 + (t - 0.002)  (250 / 3), 0.65), 0.9) =
0.900
Design moment capacity; Mn = f  Mn = 147.932 kip_ft

Mu.y.max / Mn = 0.262

PASS - Design moment capacity exceeds ultimate moment load
 32

One-way shear design, y direction

Ultimate shear force; Vu.y = 22.863 kips

Depth to reinforcement; dv = h - cnom - x.bot - y.bot / 2 = 7.875 in

Shear strength reduction factor; v = 0.75

Nominal shear capacity (Eq. 22.5.5.1); Vn = 2    (f'c  1 psi)  Lx  dv = 124.223 kips

Design shear capacity; Vn = v  Vn = 93.168 kips

Vu.y / Vn = 0.245

PASS - Design shear capacity exceeds ultimate shear load
Two-way shear design at column 1
Depth to reinforcement; dv2 = 8.25 in

Shear perimeter length (22.6.4); lxp = 20.250 in

Shear perimeter width (22.6.4); lyp = 20.250 in

Shear perimeter (22.6.4); bo = 2  (lx1 + dv2) + 2  (ly1 + dv2) = 81.000 in

Shear area; Ap = lx,perim  ly,perim = 410.063 in2

Surcharge loaded area; Asur = Ap - lx1  ly1 = 266.063 in2

Ultimate bearing pressure at center of shear area; qup.avg = 1.984 ksf

Ultimate shear load; Fup = D  FDz1 + L  FLz1 + D  Ap  Fswt + D  Asur 

Fsoil + D  Asur  FDsur + L  Asur  FLsur - qup.avg  Ap =

35.382 kips

Ultimate shear stress from vertical load; vug = max(Fup / (bo  dv2),0 psi) = 52.947 psi

Column geometry factor (Table 22.6.5.2);  = ly1 / lx1 = 1.00

Column location factor (22.6.5.3); s =40

Concrete shear strength (22.6.5.2); vcpa = (2 + 4 / )    (f'c  1 psi) = 328.634 psi

vcpb = (s  dv2 / bo + 2)    (f'c  1 psi) = 332.691 psi

vcpc = 4    (f'c  1 psi) = 219.089 psi

vcp = min(vcpa,vcpb,vcpc) = 219.089 psi

Shear strength reduction factor; v = 0.75

Nominal shear stress capacity (Eq. 22.6.1.2); vn = vcp = 219.089 psi

Design shear stress capacity (8.5.1.1(d)); vn = v  vn = 164.317 psi

vug / vn = 0.322

PASS - Design shear stress capacity exceeds ultimate shear stress load
Two-way shear design at column 2
Depth to reinforcement; dv2 = 8.25 in

Shear perimeter length (22.6.4); lxp = 20.250 in

Shear perimeter width (22.6.4); lyp = 20.250 in

 33

Shear perimeter (22.6.4); bo = 2  (lx2 + dv2) + 2  (ly2 + dv2) = 81.000 in

Shear area; Ap = lx,perim  ly,perim = 410.063 in2

Surcharge loaded area; Asur = Ap - lx2  ly2 = 266.063 in2

Ultimate bearing pressure at center of shear area; qup.avg = 1.871 ksf

Ultimate shear load; Fup = D  FDz2 + L  FLz2 + D  Ap  Fswt + D  Asur 

Fsoil + D  Asur  FDsur + L  Asur  FLsur - qup.avg  Ap =

31.705 kips

Ultimate shear stress from vertical load; vug = max(Fup / (bo  dv2),0 psi) = 47.445 psi

Column geometry factor (Table 22.6.5.2);  = ly2 / lx2 = 1.00

Column location factor (22.6.5.3); s =40

Concrete shear strength (22.6.5.2); vcpa = (2 + 4 / )    (f'c  1 psi) = 328.634 psi

vcpb = (s  dv2 / bo + 2)    (f'c  1 psi) = 332.691 psi

vcpc = 4    (f'c  1 psi) = 219.089 psi

vcp = min(vcpa,vcpb,vcpc) = 219.089 psi

Shear strength reduction factor; v = 0.75

Nominal shear stress capacity (Eq. 22.6.1.2); vn = vcp = 219.089 psi

Design shear stress capacity (8.5.1.1(d)); vn = v  vn = 164.317 psi

vug / vn = 0.289

PASS - Design shear stress capacity exceeds ultimate shear stress load
Note: Two-way shear is not calculated for columns that may share a shear perimeter with another
column. This may need to be calculated conditionally by the engineer.

 
 34

FOUNDATION ANALYSIS & DESIGN (ACI318)

In accordance with ACI318-14

FOOTING ANALYSIS
Length of foundation; Lx = 8.5 ft

Width of foundation; Ly = 5 ft

Foundation area; A = Lx  Ly = 42.5 ft2

Depth of foundation; h = 12 in

Depth of soil over foundation; hsoil = 48 in

Density of concrete; conc = 150.0 lb/ft3

Column no.1 details

Length of column; lx1 = 12.00 in

Width of column; ly1 = 12.00 in

position in x-axis; x1 = 24.00 in

position in y-axis; y1 = 30.00 in

Column no.2 details

Length of column; lx2 = 12.00 in

Width of column; ly2 = 12.00 in

position in x-axis; x2 = 78.00 in

position in y-axis; y2 = 30.00 in

Soil properties
Gross allowable bearing pressure; qallow_Gross = 2 ksf
 35

Density of soil; soil = 120.0 lb/ft3

Angle of internal friction; b = 30.0 deg
Design base friction angle; bb = 30.0 deg
Coefficient of base friction; tan(bb) = 0.577
Foundation loads
Dead surcharge load; FDsur = 35 psf

Live surcharge load; FLsur = 60 psf

Self weight; Fswt = h  conc = 150 psf

Soil weight; Fsoil = hsoil  soil = 480 psf

Column no.1 loads

Dead load in z; FDz1 = 15.0 kips

Live load in z; FLz1 = 8.0 kips

Column no.2 loads

Dead load in z; FDz2 = 14.0 kips

Live load in z; FLz2 = 8.0 kips

Footing analysis for soil and stability

Load combinations per ASCE 7-16
1.0D (0.692)

1.0D + 1.0L (0.911)

1.0D + 1.0Lr (0.692)

1.0D + 1.0S (0.692)

1.0D + 0.75L + 0.75Lr (0.856)

1.0D + 0.75L + 0.75S (0.856)

Combination 2 results: 1.0D + 1.0L

Forces on foundation
Force in z-axis; Fdz = D  A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) + L  A  FLsur + D 

FDz1 + L  FLz1 + D  FDz2 + L  FLz2 = 75.8 kips

Moments on foundation
Moment in x-axis, about x is 0; Mdx = D  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur)  Lx / 2) + L  A 

FLsur  Lx / 2 + D  (FDz1  x1) + L  (FLz1  x1) + D 

(FDz2  x2) + L  (FLz2  x2) = 320.0 kip_ft

Moment in y-axis, about y is 0; Mdy = D  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur)  Ly / 2) + L  A 

FLsur  Ly / 2 + D  (FDz1  y1) + L  (FLz1  y1) + D 

(FDz2  y2) + L  (FLz2  y2) = 189.5 kip_ft

Uplift verification
Vertical force; Fdz = 75.812 kips
 36

PASS - Foundation is not subject to uplift

Bearing resistance
Eccentricity of base reaction
Eccentricity of base reaction in x-axis; edx = Mdx / Fdz - Lx / 2 = -0.356 in

Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis; edy = Mdy / Fdz - Ly / 2 = 0 in

Pad base pressures

q1 = Fdz  (1 - 6  edx / Lx - 6  edy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) = 1.821

ksf

q2 = Fdz  (1 - 6  edx / Lx + 6  edy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) =

1.821 ksf

q3 = Fdz  (1 + 6  edx / Lx - 6  edy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) =

1.746 ksf

q4 = Fdz  (1 + 6  edx / Lx + 6  edy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) =

1.746 ksf

Minimum base pressure; qmin = min(q1,q2,q3,q4) = 1.746 ksf

Maximum base pressure; qmax = max(q1,q2,q3,q4) = 1.821 ksf

Allowable bearing capacity

Allowable bearing capacity; qallow = qallow_Gross = 2 ksf
qmax / qallow = 0.911
PASS - Allowable bearing capacity exceeds design base pressure

FOOTING DESIGN (ACI318)

In accordance with ACI318-14
Material details
Compressive strength of concrete; f’c = 3000 psi

Yield strength of reinforcement; fy = 60000 psi

Cover to reinforcement; cnom = 3 in

Concrete type; Normal weight

Concrete modification factor;  = 1.00

Column type; Concrete

Analysis and design of concrete footing

Load combinations per ASCE 7-16
1.4D (0.165)

1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5Lr (0.246)

1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5S (0.246)

1.2D + 1.0L + 1.6Lr (0.207)

1.2D + 1.0L + 1.6S (0.207)

 37

Combination 2 results: 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5Lr

Forces on foundation
Ultimate force in z-axis; Fuz = D  A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) + L  A  FLsur + D 

FDz1 + L  FLz1 + D  FDz2 + L  FLz2 = 98.4 kips

Moments on foundation
Ultimate moment in x-axis, about x is 0; Mux = D  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur)  Lx / 2) + L  A 

FLsur  Lx / 2 + D  (FDz1  x1) + L  (FLz1  x1) + D 

(FDz2  x2) + L  (FLz2  x2) = 415.5 kip_ft

Ultimate moment in y-axis, about y is 0; Muy = D  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur)  Ly / 2) + L  A 

FLsur  Ly / 2 + D  (FDz1  y1) + L  (FLz1  y1) + D 

(FDz2  y2) + L  (FLz2  y2) = 246.0 kip_ft

Eccentricity of base reaction

Eccentricity of base reaction in x-axis; eux = Mux / Fuz - Lx / 2 = -0.329 in

Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis; euy = Muy / Fuz - Ly / 2 = 0 in

Pad base pressures

qu1 = Fuz  (1 - 6  eux / Lx - 6  euy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) = 2.36

ksf

qu2 = Fuz  (1 - 6  eux / Lx + 6  euy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) = 2.36

ksf

qu3 = Fuz  (1 + 6  eux / Lx - 6  euy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) = 2.27

ksf

qu4 = Fuz  (1 + 6  eux / Lx + 6  euy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) =

2.27 ksf

Minimum ultimate base pressure; qumin = min(qu1,qu2,qu3,qu4) = 2.27 ksf

Maximum ultimate base pressure; qumax = max(qu1,qu2,qu3,qu4) = 2.36 ksf

Shear diagram, x axis (kips)

 38

Moment diagram, x axis (kip_ft)

Moment design, x direction, positive moment

Ultimate bending moment; Mu.x.max = 8.213 kip_ft

Tension reinforcement provided; 6 No.6 bottom bars (10.6 in c/c)

Area of tension reinforcement provided; Asx.bot.prov = 2.64 in2

Minimum area of reinforcement (8.6.1.1); As.min = 0.0018  Ly  h = 1.296 in2

PASS - Area of reinforcement provided exceeds minimum
Maximum spacing of reinforcement (8.7.2.2); smax = min(2  h, 18 in) = 18 in
PASS - Maximum permissible reinforcement spacing exceeds actual spacing
Depth to tension reinforcement; d = h - cnom - y.bot - x.bot / 2 = 7.875 in

Depth of compression block; a = Asx.bot.prov  fy / (0.85  f'c  Ly) = 1.035 in

Neutral axis factor; 1 = 0.85

Depth to neutral axis; c = a / 1 = 1.218 in

Strain in tensile reinforcement (8.3.3.1); t = 0.003  d / c - 0.003 = 0.01640

PASS - Tensile strain exceeds minimum required, 0.004
Nominal moment capacity; Mn = Asx.bot.prov  fy  (d - a / 2) = 97.117 kip_ft

Flexural strength reduction factor; f = min(max(0.65 + (t - 0.002)  (250 / 3), 0.65), 0.9) =
0.900
Design moment capacity; Mn = f  Mn = 87.405 kip_ft

Mu.x.max / Mn = 0.094

PASS - Design moment capacity exceeds ultimate moment load
Moment design, x direction, negative moment
Ultimate bending moment; Mu.x.min = -3.776 kip_ft

Tension reinforcement provided; 6 No.6 top bars (10.6 in c/c)

Area of tension reinforcement provided; Asx.top.prov = 2.64 in2

Minimum area of reinforcement (8.6.1.1); As.min = 0.0018  Ly  h = 1.296 in2

PASS - Area of reinforcement provided exceeds minimum
Maximum spacing of reinforcement (8.7.2.2); smax = min(2  h, 18 in) = 18 in
PASS - Maximum permissible reinforcement spacing exceeds actual spacing
Depth to tension reinforcement; d = h - cnom - x.top / 2 = 8.625 in

Depth of compression block; a = Asx.top.prov  fy / (0.85  f'c  Ly) = 1.035 in

Neutral axis factor; 1 = 0.85

 39

Depth to neutral axis; c = a / 1 = 1.218 in

Strain in tensile reinforcement (8.3.3.1); t = 0.003  d / c - 0.003 = 0.01824

PASS - Tensile strain exceeds minimum required, 0.004
Nominal moment capacity; Mn = Asx.top.prov  fy  (d - a / 2) = 107.017 kip_ft

Flexural strength reduction factor; f = min(max(0.65 + (t - 0.002)  (250 / 3), 0.65), 0.9) =
0.900
Design moment capacity; Mn = f  Mn = 96.315 kip_ft

abs(Mu.x.min) / Mn = 0.039

PASS - Design moment capacity exceeds ultimate moment load
One-way shear design, x direction
Ultimate shear force; Vu.x = 7.927 kips

Depth to reinforcement; dv = min(h - cnom - x.bot / 2,h - cnom - x.top / 2) = 8.625 in

Shear strength reduction factor; v = 0.75

Nominal shear capacity (Eq. 22.5.5.1); Vn = 2    (f'c  1 psi)  Ly  dv = 56.689 kips

Design shear capacity; Vn = v  Vn = 42.517 kips

Vu.x / Vn = 0.186

PASS - Design shear capacity exceeds ultimate shear load
Shear diagram, y axis (kips)

Moment diagram, y axis (kip_ft)

Moment design, y direction, positive moment

Ultimate bending moment; Mu.y.max = 24.16 kip_ft

Tension reinforcement provided; 9 No.6 bottom bars (11.9 in c/c)

Area of tension reinforcement provided; Asy.bot.prov = 3.96 in2

Minimum area of reinforcement (8.6.1.1); As.min = 0.0018  Lx  h = 2.203 in2

PASS - Area of reinforcement provided exceeds minimum
Maximum spacing of reinforcement (8.7.2.2); smax = min(2  h, 18 in) = 18 in
PASS - Maximum permissible reinforcement spacing exceeds actual spacing
 40

Depth to tension reinforcement; d = h - cnom - y.bot / 2 = 8.625 in

Depth of compression block; a = Asy.bot.prov  fy / (0.85  f'c  Lx) = 0.913 in

Neutral axis factor; 1 = 0.85

Depth to neutral axis; c = a / 1 = 1.075 in

Strain in tensile reinforcement (8.3.3.1); t = 0.003  d / c - 0.003 = 0.02108

PASS - Tensile strain exceeds minimum required, 0.004
Nominal moment capacity; Mn = Asy.bot.prov  fy  (d - a / 2) = 161.731 kip_ft

Flexural strength reduction factor; f = min(max(0.65 + (t - 0.002)  (250 / 3), 0.65), 0.9) =
0.900
Design moment capacity; Mn = f  Mn = 145.558 kip_ft

Mu.y.max / Mn = 0.166

PASS - Design moment capacity exceeds ultimate moment load
One-way shear design, y direction
Ultimate shear force; Vu.y = 16.232 kips

Depth to reinforcement; dv = h - cnom - x.bot - y.bot / 2 = 7.875 in

Shear strength reduction factor; v = 0.75

Nominal shear capacity (Eq. 22.5.5.1); Vn = 2    (f'c  1 psi)  Lx  dv = 87.992 kips

Design shear capacity; Vn = v  Vn = 65.994 kips

Vu.y / Vn = 0.246

PASS - Design shear capacity exceeds ultimate shear load
Two-way shear design at column 1
Depth to reinforcement; dv2 = 8.25 in

Shear perimeter length (22.6.4); lxp = 20.250 in

Shear perimeter width (22.6.4); lyp = 20.250 in

Shear perimeter (22.6.4); bo = 2  (lx1 + dv2) + 2  (ly1 + dv2) = 81.000 in

Shear area; Ap = lx,perim  ly,perim = 410.062 in2

Surcharge loaded area; Asur = Ap - lx1  ly1 = 266.062 in2

Ultimate bearing pressure at center of shear area; qup.avg = 2.339 ksf

Ultimate shear load; Fup = D  FDz1 + L  FLz1 + D  Ap  Fswt + D  Asur 

Fsoil + D  Asur  FDsur + L  Asur  FLsur - qup.avg  Ap =

25.971 kips

Ultimate shear stress from vertical load; vug = max(Fup / (bo  dv2),0 psi) = 38.865 psi

Column geometry factor (Table 22.6.5.2);  = ly1 / lx1 = 1.00

Column location factor (22.6.5.3); s =40

Concrete shear strength (22.6.5.2); vcpa = (2 + 4 / )    (f'c  1 psi) = 328.634 psi

vcpb = (s  dv2 / bo + 2)    (f'c  1 psi) = 332.691 psi

 41

vcpc = 4    (f'c  1 psi) = 219.089 psi

vcp = min(vcpa,vcpb,vcpc) = 219.089 psi

Shear strength reduction factor; v = 0.75

Nominal shear stress capacity (Eq. 22.6.1.2); vn = vcp = 219.089 psi

Design shear stress capacity (8.5.1.1(d)); vn = v  vn = 164.317 psi

vug / vn = 0.237

PASS - Design shear stress capacity exceeds ultimate shear stress load
Two-way shear design at column 2
Depth to reinforcement; dv2 = 8.25 in

Shear perimeter length (22.6.4); lxp = 20.250 in

Shear perimeter width (22.6.4); lyp = 20.250 in

Shear perimeter (22.6.4); bo = 2  (lx2 + dv2) + 2  (ly2 + dv2) = 81.000 in

Shear area; Ap = lx,perim  ly,perim = 410.063 in2

Surcharge loaded area; Asur = Ap - lx2  ly2 = 266.063 in2

Ultimate bearing pressure at center of shear area; qup.avg = 2.291 ksf

Ultimate shear load; Fup = D  FDz2 + L  FLz2 + D  Ap  Fswt + D  Asur 

Fsoil + D  Asur  FDsur + L  Asur  FLsur - qup.avg  Ap =

24.907 kips

Ultimate shear stress from vertical load; vug = max(Fup / (bo  dv2),0 psi) = 37.271 psi

Column geometry factor (Table 22.6.5.2);  = ly2 / lx2 = 1.00

Column location factor (22.6.5.3); s =40

Concrete shear strength (22.6.5.2); vcpa = (2 + 4 / )    (f'c  1 psi) = 328.634 psi

vcpb = (s  dv2 / bo + 2)    (f'c  1 psi) = 332.691 psi

vcpc = 4    (f'c  1 psi) = 219.089 psi

vcp = min(vcpa,vcpb,vcpc) = 219.089 psi

Shear strength reduction factor; v = 0.75

Nominal shear stress capacity (Eq. 22.6.1.2); vn = vcp = 219.089 psi

Design shear stress capacity (8.5.1.1(d)); vn = v  vn = 164.317 psi

vug / vn = 0.227

PASS - Design shear stress capacity exceeds ultimate shear stress load
Note: Two-way shear is not calculated for columns that may share a shear perimeter with another
column. This may need to be calculated conditionally by the engineer.
 42

FOUNDATION ANALYSIS & DESIGN (ACI318)

In accordance with ACI318-14

FOOTING ANALYSIS
Length of foundation; Lx = 6.5 ft

Width of foundation; Ly = 6.5 ft

Foundation area; A = Lx  Ly = 42.25 ft2

Depth of foundation; h = 12 in

Depth of soil over foundation; hsoil = 48 in

Density of concrete; conc = 150.0 lb/ft3

 43

Column no.1 details

Length of column; lx1 = 12.00 in

Width of column; ly1 = 12.00 in

position in x-axis; x1 = 39.00 in

position in y-axis; y1 = 39.00 in

Soil properties
Gross allowable bearing pressure; qallow_Gross = 2 ksf
Density of soil; soil = 120.0 lb/ft3
Angle of internal friction; b = 30.0 deg
Design base friction angle; bb = 30.0 deg
Coefficient of base friction; tan(bb) = 0.577
Design wall friction angle; b = 15.0 deg

Horizontal acceleration factor; Kh = 0.4

Vertical acceleration factor; Kv = 0

Acceleration coefficient;  = atan(Kh / (1 - Kv)) = 21.801

Passive pressure coefficient (Coulomb); KP = sin(90 - b)2 / (sin(90 + b)  [1 - [sin(b + b) 

sin(b) / (sin(90 + b))]]2) = 4.977

Passive dynamic pressure coefficient (M-O); KPE = 0 = 0

Foundation loads
Dead surcharge load; FDsur = 20 psf

Live surcharge load; FLsur = 40 psf

Self weight; Fswt = h  conc = 150 psf

 44

Soil weight; Fsoil = hsoil  soil = 480 psf

Column no.1 loads

Dead load in z; FDz1 = 35.0 kips

Live load in z; FLz1 = 20.0 kips

Seismic load in x; FEx1 = 3.0 kips

Footing analysis for soil and stability

Load combinations per ASCE 7-16
1.0D (0.739)

1.0D + 1.0L (0.996)

Combination 2 results: 1.0D + 1.0L

Forces on foundation
Force in z-axis; Fdz = D  A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) + L  A  FLsur + D 

FDz1 + L  FLz1 = 84.2 kips

Moments on foundation
Moment in x-axis, about x is 0; Mdx = D  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur)  Lx / 2) + L  A 

FLsur  Lx / 2 + D  (FDz1  x1) + L  (FLz1  x1) = 273.5

kip_ft

Moment in y-axis, about y is 0; Mdy = D  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur)  Ly / 2) + L  A 

FLsur  Ly / 2 + D  (FDz1  y1) + L  (FLz1  y1) = 273.5

kip_ft

Uplift verification
Vertical force; Fdz = 84.153 kips
PASS - Foundation is not subject to uplift
Bearing resistance
Eccentricity of base reaction
Eccentricity of base reaction in x-axis; edx = Mdx / Fdz - Lx / 2 = 0 in

Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis; edy = Mdy / Fdz - Ly / 2 = 0 in

Pad base pressures

q1 = Fdz  (1 - 6  edx / Lx - 6  edy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) = 1.992

ksf

q2 = Fdz  (1 - 6  edx / Lx + 6  edy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) =

1.992 ksf

q3 = Fdz  (1 + 6  edx / Lx - 6  edy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) =

1.992 ksf

q4 = Fdz  (1 + 6  edx / Lx + 6  edy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) =

1.992 ksf
 45

Minimum base pressure; qmin = min(q1,q2,q3,q4) = 1.992 ksf

Maximum base pressure; qmax = max(q1,q2,q3,q4) = 1.992 ksf

Allowable bearing capacity

Allowable bearing capacity; qallow = qallow_Gross = 2 ksf
qmax / qallow = 0.996
PASS - Allowable bearing capacity exceeds design base pressure

FOOTING DESIGN (ACI318)

In accordance with ACI318-14
Material details
Compressive strength of concrete; f’c = 4000 psi

Yield strength of reinforcement; fy = 60000 psi

Cover to reinforcement; cnom = 3 in

Concrete type; Normal weight

Concrete modification factor;  = 1.00

Column type; Concrete

Analysis and design of concrete footing

Load combinations per ASCE 7-16
1.4D (0.347)

1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5Lr (0.527)

Combination 2 results: 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5Lr

Forces on foundation
Ultimate force in z-axis; Fuz = D  A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) + L  A  FLsur + D 

FDz1 + L  FLz1 = 109.7 kips

Moments on foundation
Ultimate moment in x-axis, about x is 0; Mux = D  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur)  Lx / 2) + L  A 

FLsur  Lx / 2 + D  (FDz1  x1) + L  (FLz1  x1) = 356.4

kip_ft

Ultimate moment in y-axis, about y is 0; Muy = D  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur)  Ly / 2) + L  A 

FLsur  Ly / 2 + D  (FDz1  y1) + L  (FLz1  y1) = 356.4

kip_ft

Eccentricity of base reaction

Eccentricity of base reaction in x-axis; eux = Mux / Fuz - Lx / 2 = 0 in

Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis; euy = Muy / Fuz - Ly / 2 = 0 in

Pad base pressures

qu1 = Fuz  (1 - 6  eux / Lx - 6  euy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) =

2.595 ksf
 46

qu2 = Fuz  (1 - 6  eux / Lx + 6  euy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) =

2.595 ksf

qu3 = Fuz  (1 + 6  eux / Lx - 6  euy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) =

2.595 ksf

qu4 = Fuz  (1 + 6  eux / Lx + 6  euy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) =

2.595 ksf

Minimum ultimate base pressure; qumin = min(qu1,qu2,qu3,qu4) = 2.595 ksf

Maximum ultimate base pressure; qumax = max(qu1,qu2,qu3,qu4) = 2.595 ksf

Shear diagram, x axis (kips)

Moment diagram, x axis (kip_ft)

43.0

0 0

60.1

Moment design, x direction, positive moment

Ultimate bending moment; Mu.x.max = 43.048 kip_ft

Tension reinforcement provided; 7 No.5 bottom bars (11.8 in c/c)

Area of tension reinforcement provided; Asx.bot.prov = 2.17 in2

Minimum area of reinforcement (8.6.1.1); As.min = 0.0018  Ly  h = 1.685 in2

PASS - Area of reinforcement provided exceeds minimum
Maximum spacing of reinforcement (8.7.2.2); smax = min(2  h, 18 in) = 18 in
PASS - Maximum permissible reinforcement spacing exceeds actual spacing
Depth to tension reinforcement; d = h - cnom - x.bot / 2 = 8.688 in

Depth of compression block; a = Asx.bot.prov  fy / (0.85  f'c  Ly) = 0.491 in

Neutral axis factor; 1 = 0.85

Depth to neutral axis; c = a / 1 = 0.578 in

Strain in tensile reinforcement (8.3.3.1); t = 0.003  d / c - 0.003 = 0.04212

PASS - Tensile strain exceeds minimum required, 0.004
Nominal moment capacity; Mn = Asx.bot.prov  fy  (d - a / 2) = 91.596 kip_ft
 47

Flexural strength reduction factor; f = min(max(0.65 + (t - 0.002)  (250 / 3), 0.65), 0.9) =
0.900
Design moment capacity; Mn = f  Mn = 82.436 kip_ft

Mu.x.max / Mn = 0.522

PASS - Design moment capacity exceeds ultimate moment load
One-way shear design, x direction
Ultimate shear force; Vu.x = 23.659 kips

Depth to reinforcement; dv = h - cnom - x.bot / 2 = 8.688 in

Shear strength reduction factor; v = 0.75

Nominal shear capacity (Eq. 22.5.5.1); Vn = 2    (f'c  1 psi)  Ly  dv = 85.714 kips

Design shear capacity; Vn = v  Vn = 64.285 kips

Vu.x / Vn = 0.368

PASS - Design shear capacity exceeds ultimate shear load
Shear diagram, y axis (kips)

Moment diagram, y axis (kip_ft)

43.0

0 0

60.1

Moment design, y direction, positive moment

Ultimate bending moment; Mu.y.max = 43.048 kip_ft

Tension reinforcement provided; 8 No.5 bottom bars (10.1 in c/c)

Area of tension reinforcement provided; Asy.bot.prov = 2.48 in2

Minimum area of reinforcement (8.6.1.1); As.min = 0.0018  Lx  h = 1.685 in2

PASS - Area of reinforcement provided exceeds minimum
Maximum spacing of reinforcement (8.7.2.2); smax = min(2  h, 18 in) = 18 in
PASS - Maximum permissible reinforcement spacing exceeds actual spacing
Depth to tension reinforcement; d = h - cnom - x.bot - y.bot / 2 = 8.063 in

Depth of compression block; a = Asy.bot.prov  fy / (0.85  f'c  Lx) = 0.561 in

Neutral axis factor; 1 = 0.85

 48

Depth to neutral axis; c = a / 1 = 0.660 in

Strain in tensile reinforcement (8.3.3.1); t = 0.003  d / c - 0.003 = 0.03364

PASS - Tensile strain exceeds minimum required, 0.004
Nominal moment capacity; Mn = Asy.bot.prov  fy  (d - a / 2) = 96.496 kip_ft

Flexural strength reduction factor; f = min(max(0.65 + (t - 0.002)  (250 / 3), 0.65), 0.9) =
0.900
Design moment capacity; Mn = f  Mn = 86.847 kip_ft

Mu.y.max / Mn = 0.496

PASS - Design moment capacity exceeds ultimate moment load
One-way shear design, y direction
Ultimate shear force; Vu.y = 23.659 kips

Depth to reinforcement; dv = h - cnom - x.bot - y.bot / 2 = 8.063 in

Shear strength reduction factor; v = 0.75

Nominal shear capacity (Eq. 22.5.5.1); Vn = 2    (f'c  1 psi)  Lx  dv = 79.547 kips

Design shear capacity; Vn = v  Vn = 59.66 kips

Vu.y / Vn = 0.397

PASS - Design shear capacity exceeds ultimate shear load
Two-way shear design at column 1
Depth to reinforcement; dv2 = 8.375 in

Shear perimeter length (22.6.4); lxp = 20.375 in

Shear perimeter width (22.6.4); lyp = 20.375 in

Shear perimeter (22.6.4); bo = 2  (lx1 + dv2) + 2  (ly1 + dv2) = 81.500 in

Shear area; Ap = lx,perim  ly,perim = 415.141 in2

Surcharge loaded area; Asur = Ap - lx1  ly1 = 271.141 in2

Ultimate bearing pressure at center of shear area; qup.avg = 2.595 ksf

Ultimate shear load; Fup = D  FDz1 + L  FLz1 + D  Ap  Fswt + D  Asur 

Fsoil + D  Asur  FDsur + L  Asur  FLsur - qup.avg  Ap =

68.287 kips

Ultimate shear stress from vertical load; vug = max(Fup / (bo  dv2),0 psi) = 100.044 psi

Column geometry factor (Table 22.6.5.2);  = ly1 / lx1 = 1.00

Column location factor (22.6.5.3); s =40

Concrete shear strength (22.6.5.2); vcpa = (2 + 4 / )    (f'c  1 psi) = 379.473 psi

vcpb = (s  dv2 / bo + 2)    (f'c  1 psi) = 386.457 psi

vcpc = 4    (f'c  1 psi) = 252.982 psi

vcp = min(vcpa,vcpb,vcpc) = 252.982 psi

Shear strength reduction factor; v = 0.75

 49

Nominal shear stress capacity (Eq. 22.6.1.2); vn = vcp = 252.982 psi

Design shear stress capacity (8.5.1.1(d)); vn = v  vn = 189.737 psi

vug / vn = 0.527

PASS - Design shear stress capacity exceeds ultimate shear stress load