Hazardous Waste Impacts PDF
Hazardous Waste Impacts PDF
Hazardous Waste Impacts PDF
IMPACT PROFILES
Final report
Prepared for:
The Department of the Environment
Prepared by:
Ascend Waste and Environment Pty Ltd
Project Number:
Project # 15001AG
The health and environmental impacts of hazardous wastes
Project # 15001AG
Date: 7 June 2015
This report has been prepared for The Department of the Environment in accordance with the terms and
conditions of appointment dated 6 January 2015, and is based on the assumptions and exclusions set out in our
scope of work. The report must not be reproduced in whole or in part except with the prior consent of Ascend
Waste and Environment Pty Ltd and subject to inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source.
Whilst reasonable attempts have been made to ensure that the contents of this report are accurate and complete
at the time of writing, Ascend Waste and Environment Pty Ltd cannot accept any responsibility for any use of or
reliance on the contents of this report by any third party.
© Ascend Waste and Environment Pty Ltd
1 Introduction 5
List of Appendices
Controlled Waste that falls under the control of the Controlled Waste National Environment
Waste Protection Measure. Generally equivalent to hazardous waste, although definitional
differences of the latter exist across jurisdictions
Controlled National Environment Protection (Movement of Controlled Waste between States and
Waste NEPM Territories) Measure.
e-waste Electrical and electronic equipment that has reached the end of its functional life. For
the purposes of the scheme, this includes televisions and computers and their
peripheral components
Interstate data Data collected about hazardous waste generated in one jurisdiction and treated in
another, through cross-border transport under the Controlled Waste NEPM
Intrastate data Data collected about hazardous waste generated, transported and treated within the
one jurisdiction
NEPM National Environment Protection (Movement of Controlled Waste between States and
Territories) Measure 1998
NEPM codes Alphanumeric codes, in the format A123, that are used to describe waste types under
the Controlled Waste NEPM
Tracking Jurisdiction-based hazardous waste tracking systems, which are in place in New
system South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia and Victoria. These
tracking systems can be either online, paper-based, or a combination of both these
mechanisms.
Tracked data Hazardous waste collected under the arrangements of a tracking system
Treatment Treatment of waste is the removal, reduction or immobilisation of a hazardous
characteristic to enable the waste to be reused, recycled, sent to an Energy from
Waste facility or disposed.
Waste (For data collation purposes) is materials or products that are unwanted or have been
discarded, rejected or abandoned. Waste includes materials or products that are
recycled, converted to energy, or disposed. Materials and products that are reused
(for their original or another purpose without reprocessing) are not solid waste
because they remain in use.
Waste arisings Hazardous waste is said to ‘arise’ when it causes demand for processing, storage,
treatment or disposal infrastructure.
Waste Code Three-digit code typically used by jurisdictions to describe NEPM-listed wastes.
These are also referred to as ’NEPM codes’ although it is noted that the actual codes
do not appear in the NEPM itself.
Waste fate Refers to the destination of the waste within the set of defined end points. It includes
reuse, treatment, recycling, energy recovery, and disposal. Waste transfer and
storage should not generally considered as a waste fate. The term fate does not infer
that the waste material is destroyed or lost.
Y-code The Basel Convention’s waste coding or classification system which encompasses 47
wastes (Y1 – Y47).
Y+8 A term introduced to describe those wastes that are reported in controlled waste
tracking in Australia, but do not have a logical conversion in Y code terms, so have
been reported to Basel as 8 new codes: ‘Y+8’ 1-8.
The Australian Government is obliged to submit an annual report to the Basel Secretariat
containing the tonnages of hazardous wastes generated in the country each calendar year.
The data must be reported using the Basel Convention’s classification system known as Y-
codes. State and territory governments collect this data as part of their regulatory role in
managing hazardous waste and its potential for impact on the environment and human
health, and use their own classification systems, which are based on those adopted
nationally under the National Environment Protection (Movement of Controlled Waste
between States and Territories) Measure (Controlled Waste NEPM), referred to in this report
as ‘NEPM codes’.
A NEPM code to Basel Y-code conversion list is provided in Appendix A, while a Basel Y-
code to NEPM code conversion is shown at Appendix B.
Impact profiles cover Y codes 1-45, and exclude Y46 (waste collected from households),
Y47 (residues from the incineration of household waste) and Y14 (waste chemical
substances arising from research and development or teaching activities, including those
which are not identified and/or are new and whose effects on human health and/or the
environment are not known). Of the additional eight wastes Australia reports to Basel (the so
called ‘Y+8’), three of these (waste containers, contaminated soils and contaminated
sludges) have also been excluded because they, like Y14, are not hazard-specific so could
have a range of impacts, and would be covered by other wastes in the list.
An important feature of each profile is a relative measure of hazard, called hazard score,
described by a colour-coded bar graphic and numeric score from 0 to 6. This provides a
comparative sense of the severity of hazard posed by each waste. The method used in
compiling hazard scores is described in Appendix C.
As an adjunct to the profiles catalogue, section 2 presents a brief report discussing those
wastes considered to pose significant risks in the Australian context, through either their
inherent hazard, the management challenges they pose or the sheer volume in which they
are produced in each year.
Figure 1 provides an infographic of wastes, in this case as NEPM codes (because some Y
codes cover multiple NEPM codes with different tonnage arisings and hazards). Each
waste’s hazard score is displayed alongside the 2013 tonnage. This allows quick
identification of the most significant volume contributors on the left and the most significant
hazard contributors on the right.
In hazard score terms, the top 10-12 wastes exhibit hazard characteristics of biohazard
(clinical and related waste), chromium-based toxicity/ eco-toxicity (wood preserving
chemicals and hexavalent chromium compounds), explosivity, or persistent (mainly chronic)
debilitative impacts widely in the environment as well as to human health (dioxins and
furans, pesticides, PCBs and other halogenated organic compounds). Looked at in pure
volume terms, the top 10-12 wastes are completely different, and dominated by biosolids
and contaminated soils (the latter is not listed in Figure 1, since no hazard score was
possible).
Putting biosolids and soils to one side, the remaining top ten wastes (by tonnage of arisings
in 2013) were:
1. Asbestos (790kt)
2. Grease trap waste (557kt)
3. Tyres (435kt)
4. Oily waters (416kt)
5. Alkali wastes (351kt)
6. Animal effluent and residues (342kt)
7. Waste oils (240kt)
8. Zinc compounds (211kt)
9. Lead compounds (133kt)
10. Non-toxic salts (91kt).
All wastes in this report are inherently hazardous, at least at some level. Tonnage is
important in prioritising the potential for impact because, in a simplistic sense, as quantity
increases the potential for exposure to hazards (across the population), and therefore risk
also increases. However, from the above list there are a number of wastes that probably
don’t deserve ‘high priority’ status from a risk of impact perspective: very large tonnage/ low
hazard wastes like animal effluent (K100), grease trap (K110) and tyres (T140); while D230
is unique in that its large volumes comes from a very small number of very specific sources,
which limits the potential for exposure.
1. Asbestos
2. Waste oil
3. Alkali wastes
4. Lead waste
5. Clinical and related wastes
6. Contaminated soils
7. Spent pot liner (SPL) waste
8. ‘Contaminated’ biosolids
9. Non-toxic salts [Coal seam gas (CSG) waste]
10. Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) waste.
These are described below with reference to their respective Basel and NEPM codes in
parentheses).
Asbestos is one of the largest flows of hazardous waste in Australia, making up 11% of
national hazardous waste arisings and posing significant health risks. There is no evidence
to suggest the supply of waste asbestos is peaking or slowing.
The risks posed by asbestos are predominantly related to human health. Asbestos only
poses a risk to health when asbestos fibres are breathed in. Inhaling asbestos fibres may
cause asbestos-related disease and death. When asbestos fibres are breathed in, they can
lodge in lung tissue and cause inflammation, scarring and some more serious asbestos-
related diseases, which usually take many years, if not decades, to develop. The four major
asbestos-related diseases, in increasing order of severity, are: pleural plaques, asbestosis,
lung cancer and mesothelioma.
From the 1950s to the 1970s the most refined form of brown and blue asbestos was pumped
into the roof cavities of more than 1,000 Canberra and NSW homes as insulation. Loose raw
asbestos was touted as cheap and effective insulation. The product was called Asbestosfluf,
and the company that installed it became known as Mr Fluffy. Despite an extensive
Commonwealth Government asbestos removal program in the 1980s, in recent years
twenty-seven Canberra families have had to leave their homes, which have been deemed
unsafe to live in,. Recent assessment reports show that if there are fine cracks around
cornices or halls, ceiling fibres are being released into living areas and potential onto
clothing via cracks in wardrobes.
Waste mineral oils are used lubricating oils that come from industrial and domestic vehicle
engines and machinery, and can be reclaimed or recovered and recycled for other uses.
Tracking data suggests that about 3.5% of national hazardous waste volume is waste oil. Oil
waste arisings continue to grow, almost doubling in the last 5 years, with some of this growth
possibly due to metal and petroleum-based mining activities, which are significant industrial
engine users.
Impacts from oils are mostly to the environment. Oil spills at sea have occurred historically
with catastrophic impacts on local ecosystems. The infamous Exxon Valdez oil tanker
incident in Alaska in 1989 was shocking in terms of both its scale and its impact. Immediate
effects were the deaths of over 100,000 birds and mammals and 16,000 – 21,000 gallons
were estimated to still remain on surrounding beaches as recently as 2014, 25 years later.
In March 2009 large quantities of fuel oil, other fuel and ammonium nitrate spilled from the
MV Pacific Adventurer into the Coral Sea, north of Moreton Bay, Queensland, during
Cyclone Hamish. Over the following days, the spill washed ashore along 60 km of coastline
encompassing the Sunshine Coast, Moreton Bay, Bribie Island and Moreton Island.
Queensland Premier Anna Bligh described the spill as "worst environmental disaster
Queensland has ever seen". It took over 1,425 people 16 months to clean up the affected
areas at a total cost of $4 million.
The Product Stewardship for Oil Program was introduced by the Australian Government in
2001. The arrangements comprise a levy-benefit system, where an 8.5 cents per litre levy on
Alkali or alkaline wastes, otherwise known as basic solutions or bases in solid form, are
produced in significant quantities from coal seam gas (CSG) extraction in Queensland,
cement and lime kilns around Australia, aluminium smelting and as a surface cleaner/
degreaser in a range of industries as diverse as metal coating and finishing to fast food.
The main impacts of alkalis are to human health, felt acutely as a result of exposure to
concentrated solutions. Exposure can result in severe burns to the skin, mouth, throat or
eyes depending on the exposed area.
This waste is moderately significant nationally, at around 5% of all hazardous waste arising
in 2013, with 64% of it coming from Queensland. Since about 2009 there has been
exponential growth in Queensland arisings which, given a similar trend for non-toxic salts
(the primary classification for CSG waste), is likely to be reflective of the rise of the CSG
extraction industry in Queensland. The CSG industry produces around 95% of alkali waste in
Queensland.
The main waste concern from CSG extraction is liquid, solid or sludge salt/ brine waste,
discussed under ‘9. Non-toxic salts’ below. However, 95% of the Queensland-generated
alkali wastes are actually produced by the CSG industry, which equates to over 200,000
tonnes, which is about 4 times Queensland’s total non-toxic salts arisings. This discrepancy
is discussed further in ‘9’ below.
A significant component of lead waste in Australia is from lead acid batteries. Leaded glass
is another wastestream that has emerged from the e-waste recycling industry, where
cathode ray television/ monitor (CRT) glass contains large quantities of lead.
Lead waste generation in Australia is significant and growing. In 2013 lead waste made up
around 2% of all hazardous waste generated. While lead acid battery recycling infrastructure
has grown substantially in Australia in recent years, environmentally sound and cost-
1
Byron, N, Aither (2013), for the Department of the Environment. Third independent review of the Product
Stewardship (Oil) Act 2000 Final Report. Accessed on 29 May 102015 from:
http://www.environment.gov.au/resource/third-independent-review- product-stewardship-oil-act-2000
Clinical and related wastes arise from medical, nursing, dental, veterinary, laboratory,
pharmaceutical, podiatry, tattooing, body piercing, brothels, emergency services, blood
banks, mortuary practices and other similar practices, and wastes generated in healthcare
facilities or other facilities during the investigation or treatment of patients or research
projects, which have the potential to cause disease, injury, or public offence.
Other wastes are also generated within health care settings. Waste pharmaceuticals, drugs
and medicines are waste pharmaceutical products that have: passed their recommended
shelf life; been discarded as off-specification batches; been returned by patients or
discarded. These wastes are often generated directly from pharmacies, hospitals, medical
centres and hospital dispensaries. A particularly notable pharmaceutical waste is waste
cytotoxic drugs, or waste (including sharps) contaminated by cytotoxic drugs. A cytotoxic
drug has carcinogenic (cancer-causing), mutagenic (increase mutations of genetic material)
or teratogenic (birth defect) potential, and is commonly used in the treatment of cancer.
At around 1% of all hazardous waste in Australia, they are notable in volume terms. When
combined with the extreme nature of their hazard, any discussion of priority hazardous
wastes from a risk perspective must include them.
The hazardous nature of clinical waste is due to the presence of infectious agents and/or the
presence of used sharps (for example, needles). Clinical waste should always be assumed
to potentially contain a variety of pathogenic microorganisms, because the presence or
absence of pathogens cannot be determined at the time the waste is produced. Pathogens
in clinical waste that is not well managed may enter the human body through the skin, by
inhalation or by ingestion.
Apart from fear of health hazards, the community is sensitive to the visual impact of this
waste, particularly recognisable human body parts. In some other cultures, religious beliefs
require human body parts to be returned to a patient’s family and buried in cemeteries.
Health-care workers are particularly vulnerable to needle stick injury, through accidental
puncture of the skin for the use, handling or disposal of sharps.
Australian states and territories tightly regulate the management of biohazardous wastes.
However, because of the distributed nature of health care facilities and workers in Australia,
and the consequences of poor handling of this waste are high, clinical or biohazardous
waste as a constant source of human health risk.
As discussed above, contaminated soils are not covered in these profiles because their
collectively variable hazards make discussing specific impacts impossible. However,
produced at approximately 1.4Mt annually, they are impossible to ignore.
Their key potential impact is to the environment, and these profiles reference many
instances of historical soil contamination that has had major consequences, and clean costs.
Such examples are discussed in the “Has anything happened before in Australia?” section of
the following profiles: Y5/ H170, Y6/ G160, Y11/ J160, Y27/ D170, Y29/ D120, Y31/ D220,
Y33/ A130, Y34/ B100, Y36/ N220, Y41/ G150, Y42/ G110 and Y43/44/ M170/180.
Spent pot lining (SPL) is a waste material generated from aluminium smelters, of which there
are five in Australia. Aluminium smelting takes place in electrolytic cells that are known as
pots. During the operation of the cell, substances, including aluminium and fluorides, are
absorbed into the cell lining. After some years of operation, the pot lining fails and is
removed. The removed material is SPL, a hazardous waste due to:
• the presence of fluoride and cyanide compounds that are leachable in water
• its corrosiveness – it exhibits high pH due to the presence of alkali metals and oxides
• its reactivity with water - producing inflammable, toxic and explosive gases. This last
hazard in particular makes it difficult to handle and treat
Apart from the major human health hazard posed, the presence of fluorine in particular
means that this waste has the potential for long-term toxic effects on the environment
(fluorine is highly persistent) if poorly managed.
SPL does appear in waste tracking systems, variously as D300 (non-toxic salts), N205
(residues from industrial treatment and disposal operations) or, probably its most accurate
classification, D110/ Y32 (inorganic fluorine compounds) as it appears in these profiles. This
waste stream is likely to diminish over time - the tightening economics of the aluminium
smelting industry in Australia have recently closed two smelters. But the primary issue,
combined with the risk of human health and environmental impact, is the scale of long-term
industry stockpiles – estimated to be in the order of 900,000 tonnes – sufficient to more than
half fill the Melbourne Cricket Ground.
8. ‘Contaminated’ biosolids
Biosolids are a product of sewage sludge (the sludge collected from wastewater treatment)
once it has undergone further treatment to reduce disease causing pathogens and volatile
organic matter, producing a stabilised product. Biosolids have significant potential for
beneficial reuse, which currently occurs throughout Australia. Suitable quality biosolids can
be applied as a fertiliser to improve and maintain productive soils and stimulate plant growth.
They are not a controlled waste under the NEPM, nor are they assigned a Basel Y code, and
consequently are not tracked in most jurisdictions, causing them historically to be ‘invisible’
in national hazardous waste estimates. At almost 1.5Mt nationally in 2013, biosolids take a
lot of ‘hiding’, so they were included in Australia’s annual hazardous waste reporting to the
Basel Convention from 2012 onwards under Y18/ N205 Residues arising from industrial
waste treatment/disposal operations, along with other wastes that are reported to tracking
systems under this category.
While not typically considered as hazardous waste, or even waste at all by some, it is widely
accepted that some biosolids – particularly those generated in treatment plants servicing
industrial areas – are contaminated with heavy metals at levels exceeding criteria set to
Noting that a hazard risk versus resource value tension exists for biosolids, the application of
state-based biosolids guideline chemical contaminant concentration levels should ensure
that beneficial reuse applications match the quality of the biosolids in a ‘fit for purpose’ way.
Apart from the scale of the waste stream – the largest of all reported to Basel – an emerging
problem is the reality that many biosolids guidelines applied by states and territories have
inadequate coverage of hazardous chemicals. For example Western Australian and South
Australian guidelines, do not consider arsenic, mercury or lead, although these are the
heavy metals within much of Victoria’s historical Western Treatment Plant biosolids stockpile
that exceed hazardous waste concentration thresholds.
A bigger issue is the potential presence of chemicals only relatively recently determined to
be an environmental concern, such as the new Stockholm Convention listings of POPs,
which are known to be present in biosolids. Should these chemicals be present at levels high
enough to cause concern, legislative change is foreseeable that could lead to a quite
different set of biosolids management requirements in the near future.
Emerging wastes
Coal seam gas (CSG) waste and persistent organic pollutants (POPs) waste are two
looming waste issues. The former has emerged in the last decade and is growing at
unprecedented rates. The latter is waiting on the regulatory near-horizon.
Coal seam gas (CSG) mining occurs predominantly in Queensland and to a lesser extent in
NSW. Consequently, approximately 80% of CSG-based waste is generated in Queensland,
in the Bowen and Surat Basins. These wastes are nominally captured in waste tracking
systems as D300 non-toxic salts.
The CSG extraction process produces a range of wastes, but salty/ brine wastes are of most
concern. CSG wastes are produced in very large tonnages and they are a difficult problem
for the waste industry, which often relies on landfill. Water penetrating a landfill will mobilise
any stored salt in the leachate stream, which creates a major environmental risk of
groundwater infiltration and subsequent contamination of aquifers, especially given the
volumes to be managed.
The alkali wastes discussion in ‘3’ above notes that the Queensland CSG industry alone
produces alkali waste at a rate that is over 4 times the state’s non-toxic salts figure, This
could be an issue of coding the same waste in two different ways, since salt wastes from
CSG extraction may be alkaline. Regardless, given the large known onsite storages of CSG
waste, which don’t make their way onto national arisings figures (because they haven’t hit
the tracking system), the CSG industry currently and even more so in the future has an
environmental management issue of unprecedented scale.
Referred to in the profile for Y45/ M160 Organohalogen compounds other than substances
referred to in this list, POPs waste also shared a commonality with other waste types such
as chlorophenols (Y39), halogenated solvents (Y41), dioxins and furans (Y43 and Y44),
PCB-like compounds (Y10) and organochlorine pesticides (within Y4), due to the
halogenated elements (typically fluorine, chlorine or bromine) in their structure.
POPs are hazardous and environmentally persistent substances which can be transported
between countries by the earth's oceans and atmosphere. POPs accumulate in living
organisms and have been traced in the fatty tissues of humans and other animals. While
impacts vary with each individual chemical species, human health effects tend to be chronic
– some POPS are possible human carcinogens. Generally speaking, their environmental
impact is of equivalent or greater concern - the PBDEs, PFOS and HBCD all demonstrate
significant aquatic toxicity, persistence in the environment and tend towards biomagnification
(increasing accumulation along the food chain). There is general international agreement
that they require global action to reduce their impact on humans and the environment.
Banned since 2004, PBDEs have been historically added at percentage levels to plastics in
a range of products including electrical and electronic equipment (EEE), furniture upholstery,
automobile interiors, mattresses and carpet underlay. HBCD has been added to extruded
and expanded polystyrene foams used in building insulation and PFOS, a fluorinated
surfactant, has been primarily as a dispersant in firefighting foams.
These substances, when present in wastes such as end of life products presenting for
disposal, are not technically regarded as hazardous wastes in Australia at present. E-waste
is a good example of such a potentially PBDE-containing waste. This is because Australia is
still undertaking its assessment processes to determine whether to ratify these new additions
to the Stockholm Convention.
Another waste, one that was in the initial 12 listed under the Stockholm Convention, is
hexachlorobenzene (HCB), a substantial and intractable stored quantity of which has been
under close management by Orica at its Port Botany site for the last couple of decades. It
has been long understood that existing Australian infrastructure for halogenated chemical
treatment is inadequate for dealing with the Orica HCB waste, not to mention how it would
cope with a new, related wastestream.
Lastly, as recently as May 2015, there were three more additions to the Convention –
polychlorinated napthalenes, hexachlorobutadiene and pentachlorophenol. While ratification
assessment processes for countries like Australia are lengthy and their ultimate decisions
uncertain, indications are that POPs-containing wastes are an emerging consideration for
Australian waste policymakers and waste managers alike, particularly given local limitations
that currently exist in POPs-specific treatment infrastructure.
Hazardous wastes have been regulated by state and territory governments in Australia for
decades, leading to strong controls around licensing of facility operations that generate
these wastes as well as those that treat, dispose or otherwise handle them. A deeper
knowledge of what specific hazardous wastes are produced in Australia, from what sources
they arise, which management pathways and fates they go to and what their human health
and environmental impacts or consequences could be, pertinent to Australia, is only more
recently growing. As information and data is being built upon through various co-operative
Australian Government/ State and Territory Government projects, more co-operative
management of national-scale issues is likely to occur.
The health and environmental impact profiles developed in this report contribute to a deeper,
richer, more current and more broadly accessible understanding of hazardous wastes and
their impacts in Australia.
Where does it Healthcare and related facilities such as those described under
Main sources
come from? ‘Description of the waste’.
In the year 2000, sharps injuries to health-care workers worldwide were estimated to have
caused about 66 000 hepatitis B, 16 000 hepatitis C and 200–5000 HIV infections among
Workplace 1
health-care workers . It is estimated that more than two million health-care workers are
health & safety 1
exposed to needle stick injuries with infected sharps every year . Sharps and needle stick
impacts
injury incidents in Australia are estimated to affect at least 18,000 healthcare workers each
2
year .
The risk of a sharps injury among patients and the public is much lower, particularly in
Australia, as there are tight controls around proper handling, storage, transport and
treatment of infectious clinical waste.
But globally, because the amount of waste produced is growing faster than the
Population
infrastructure to deal with it, it is thought that at least half the world’s population is at risk
scale impacts
from environmental, occupational or public-health exposure to poor clinical waste
3
management .
Members of the public can be exposed to used syringes (waste) from careless discarding
practices of intravenous drug users.
Potential Overview The major hazard from clinical waste is impact to human health.
Chronic
N/A
ecotoxicity
Persistence N/A
Bioaccumulation N/A
Where are the Generation Transport Storage Treatment Recovery Final disposal
risks of impacts
most likely? High Moderate Moderate Medium N/A Low
Clinical waste in Australia is handled in a way that constrains the highest risk of impact (to
human health) to those closest to handling the waste at the point of generation and onsite
management in the health care industry.
Needle stick injuries occur in Australia at low relative frequency to the number of sharps
Has anything handled in the health care system but, overall, the estimate of 18,000 needle stick injury
2
happened incidents per year (in Australian health care) is unacceptably high.
before in From time to time there are reports in the media of people standing on discarded
Australia? hypodermic syringe needles in public places like beaches and parks.
4
The Syringe Tide was an environmental disaster during 1987-88 in New Jersey and New
York (USA) where significant amounts of medical waste, including hypodermic syringes,
and raw garbage washed up onto beaches on the Jersey Shore, in New York City, and on
Long Island.
References 1. Prüss-Üstün A, Rapiti E, Hutin Y (2005). Estimating the global burden of disease
attributable to contaminated sharps injuries among health care workers. American Journal
(0 – 6) >5.0
Physical/ Solid tablets, powdered solids, liquid medicines or solid and liquid
chemical chemical or physical process wastes.
description
In the workplace, occupational exposure may occur where control measures fail or are not
Workplace in place. Exposure may be through skin contact, skin absorption and inhalation of aerosols
health & safety and drug particles resulting from the following activities:
impacts - drug preparation
- handling waste
Chronic
N/A
ecotoxicity
Persistence N/A
Bioaccumulation N/A
References 1. World Health Organization (2013). Safe management of wastes from health-care
nd
activities, edited by Y. Chartier et al, 2 Edition. Accessed March 12, 2015 from:
Cytotoxic drugs are therapeutic agents intended for, but not limited
to, the treatment of cancer. These drugs are known to be highly toxic
to cells, mainly through their action on cell reproduction. Many have
proved to be carcinogens, mutagens or teratogens. Consequently
waste containing these substances has the potential for extreme
health impact.
Other drugs and medicines have the potential to cause harm to
genetic material, cause birth defects or induce acute or chronic
conditions of toxicity or poisoning, if taken outside medically
supervised circumstances or inadvertently handled.
Overview
Often drug packaging may be absent or damaged, making
Potential health
identification of the underlying drug difficult. This is why waste
impacts
pharmaceuticals must be assumed to pose the highest carcinogenic,
mutagenic or toxic potential, and handled with the utmost caution.
An additional health impact is in the form of air pollution, from
emissions of pollutants as constituents of flue gases from the
incineration of clinical waste. It is noted however that stringent
emission standards apply to operators of these incinerators by
environmental regulators, through the use of advanced pollution
control equipment.
In the workplace, occupational exposure may occur where control measures fail or are not
in place. Exposure may be through skin contact, skin absorption, inhalation of aerosols and
drug particles, ingestion and needle stick injuries resulting from the following activities:
- drug preparation
- drug administration
- handling patient waste
Workplace
- transport and waste disposal, or
health & safety
impacts - spills.
Sharps and needle stick injury incidents in Australia are estimated to affect at least 18,000
1
healthcare workers each year .
Similarly, waste management staff working in or servicing health care environments are
prone to such accidental exposures, particularly if there has been breaches in
containerisation protocols or damage to such containment between generation and
handling by the waste manager.
The risk of a sharps injury among patients and the public is much lower, particularly in
Australia, as there are tight controls around proper handling, storage, transport and
treatment of infectious clinical waste.
Population
Collection, transport and treatment of waste pharmaceuticals, drugs and medicines in
scale impacts
Australia is strictly controlled and regulated, with destruction by incineration the only
allowable treatment option. Exposure pathways for the general public are extremely
limited.
Chronic
N/A
ecotoxicity
Persistence N/A
Bioaccumulation N/A
Where are the Generation Transport Storage Treatment Recovery Final disposal
risks of impacts
most likely? High Moderate Moderate Medium N/A N/A
Needle stick injuries occur in Australia at low relative frequency to the number of sharps
handled in the health care system but, overall, the estimate of 18,000 needle stick injury
2
incidents per year (in Australian health care) is unacceptably high.
Has anything Public incidents of exposure to waste pharmaceuticals, drugs or medicines in Australia, are
happened typically through individual cases of needle-stick injury from standing on hypodermic
before in syringes in public places, discarded carelessly by needle users.
Australia? In June 2000, six children were diagnosed with a mild form of smallpox (vaccinia virus)
after having played with glass ampoules containing expired smallpox vaccine at a garbage
3
dump in Vladivostok (Russia) . Although the infections were not life-threatening, the
vaccine ampoules should have been treated before being discarded.
Physical/ Most wastes in liquid form except for vegetable waste. Pesticide wastes
chemical can be due to historical activities where the active ingredients may be
description mixed or perhaps unknown, due to weathered container labelling.
Substances or wastes which, if they are inhaled
H11: Toxic (delayed or ingested or if they penetrate the skin, may
Primary hazard
or chronic) involve delayed or chronic effects, including
carcinogenicity.
Substances or wastes which if released present
or may present immediate or delayed adverse
Secondary
H12: Ecotoxic impacts to the environment by means of
hazard
bioaccumulation and/or toxic effects upon biotic
systems.
Other hazard(s) N/A N/A
Why is it
hazardous? Over 8,000 pesticide and veterinary products
have been registered for use in Australian
agriculture, horticulture, livestock, forestry,
commercial premises, parks, homes and
1
gardens .
Main likely chemical contaminants
Historical pesticides used in Australia were
2
various organochlorine (OC) and
organophosphate (OP) pesticides (see Y37),
the former banned in the late 1980’s but still an
issue due to their persistence and
A number of international studies have found higher incidence and mortality rates from
specific cancers among people occupationally exposed to pesticides, including farmers and
4 5, 6 7
pesticide applicators , pesticide manufacturing workers , golf course superintendents
8
and market gardeners or orchardists . There is, however, no increase in the incidence or
9
Workplace mortality of these cancers among pest control workers (e.g. exterminators) .
health & It is not clear if pesticides are responsible for these elevated incidence rates, because
safety workers in these sectors are also exposed to a range of other potential carcinogens, such as
impacts diesel exhaust, solvents, metals, grain dusts, zoonotic (transmissible from animals to
humans) viruses and ultraviolet radiation, all of which could confound the relationship
between pesticides and cancer.
In addition, a study in Western Australia found that 78% of farm jobs have “no likelihood of
10
pesticide exposure” .
People can be exposed to pesticides that seep into the water supply or food chain, persisting
for a long time in the environment. The persistent, residual and bioaccumulative nature of
such compounds enables them to be measured in the human body, in blood and breast milk.
The organochlorine DDT (possible carcinogen) has been extensively studied as a risk factor
Population
for breast cancer. It is banned in Australia and other parts of the world, but in the 1940s and
scale 11
1950s, it was heavily used as an insecticide. Most epidemiological studies do not support a
impacts
conclusive link between DDT and cancer although there is some evidence that exposure in
12
early life or adolescence could increase the longer-term risk of breast cancer
Epidemiological studies have similarly not supported a link between organochlorine
13
pesticides in general and breast cancer .
Where are
Generation Transport Storage Treatment Recovery Final disposal
the risks of
impacts most
likely? High Medium Medium Moderate N/A Low
Historical disposal of pesticide containers and wastes throughout rural Australia has left a
legacy of sites contaminated with a wide variety of pesticides. Below are three examples of
Has anything 14
impacts from pesticide use in Australia.
happened
Organochlorine pesticides in export beef
before in
Australia? A number of pesticide residue violations were identified in Australian beef product exported
to the USA in May 1987. The pesticides involved were the organochlorines, dieldrin and
heptachlor. The problems were caused by animals grazing contaminated pasture, ingesting
1. Immig J. WWF-Australia and National Toxics Network (2010). A list of Australia’s most
dangerous pesticides. Accessed April 10, 2015 from:
http://awsassets.wwf.org.au/downloads/fs025_a_list_of_australias_most_
dangerous_pesticides_1jul10.pdf
2. Organochlorine pesticides typically include: aldrin, hexachlorobenzene, alpha BHC, beta
BHC, gamma BHC (lindane), delta BHC, chlordane, DDT, DDD, DDE, dieldrin, endrin, endrin
aldehyde, heptachlor, heptachlor epoxide, methoxychlor and endosulfan (includes
endosulfan I, endosulfan II and endosulfan sulphate)
3. Cancer Council Australia. Position statement – pesticide and cancer. Accessed April 10,
2015 from:
http://wiki.cancer.org.au/policy/Position_statement_-_Pesticides_and_cancer#
Appendix_1._Overview_of_pesticide_carcinogenicity_classifications
4. Weichenthal S, Moase C, Chan P. A review of pesticide exposure and cancer incidence in
the Agricultural Health Study cohort. Environ Health Perspect 2010 Aug; 118(8):1117-25.
[Abstract available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20444670]
5. Van Maele-Fabry G, Duhayon S, Lison D. A systematic review of myeloid leukemias and
occupational pesticide exposure. Cancer Causes Control 2007 Jun;18(5):457-78 [Abstract
available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17443416].
References 6. Van Maele-Fabry G, Duhayon S, Mertens C, Lison D. Risk of leukaemia among pesticide
manufacturing workers: a review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Environ Res 2008
Jan;106(1):121-37 [Abstract available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18028905].
7. Kross BC, Burmeister LF, Ogilvie LK, Fuortes LJ, Fu CM. Proportionate mortality study of
golf course superintendents. Am J Ind Med 1996 May;29(5):501-6 [Abstract available at
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8732923].
8. Littorin M, Attewell R, Skerfving S, Horstmann V, Möller T. Mortality and tumour morbidity
among Swedish market gardeners and orchardists. Int Arch Occup Environ Health
1993;65(3):163-9 [Abstract available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8282414].
9. MacFarlane E, Benke G, Del Monaco A, Sim MR. Cancer incidence and mortality in a
historical cohort of Australian pest control workers. Occup Environ Med 2009
Dec;66(12):818-23 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19553229].
10. MacFarlane E, Glass D, Fritschi L. Is farm-related job title an adequate surrogate for
pesticide exposure in occupational cancer epidemiology? Occup Environ Med 2009
Aug;66(8):497-501 [Abstract available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19221114].
11. Australian Rural Health Research Collaboration, Beard J. DDT and human health. Sci
Total Environ 2006 Feb 15;355(1-3):78-89 [Abstract available at
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15894351]
12. Cohn BA, Wolff MS, Cirillo PM, Sholtz RI. DDT and breast cancer in young women: new
* Hazard score of >5.0 based on dieldrin, an organochlorine pesticide used up until the
1990s. This waste category is highly variable in hazard, because of the enormous number of
active ingredients that may be present. It would be expected that the majority of wastes in
this category arise from current-day product applications, which would generally have much
lower hazard potential. However there are still selected applications of very hazardous
pesticides in the present day, as well as limited occurrences of old stocks or contaminated
materials from past pesticide use.
Where does it Wood product manufacturing and other CCA timber preservation
Main sources
come from? processes.
(% of national
Includes CCA chemical wastes – does not include
tonnes in 2013) 0.01%
How much is intact CCA treated timber
generated in
TOTAL: 570 ACT: 0 NSW: 9
Australia?
Waste arising in
NT: 0 Qld: 206 SA: 304
2013 (tonnes)
Tas: 0 Vic: 31 WA: 20
Reproductive High: Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child and may
toxicity cause genetic defects.
There has been ongoing media and public interest in the use of CCA-treated timber and
the possible health risks it may present, particularly when used in settings where children
may be exposed. Published results of scientific studies indicate that copper, chromium and
arsenic slowly leach from CCA-treated timber products. All three metals pose a risk to
human health and the environment.
Population The Commonwealth Government body which registers chemicals for use, the Australian
scale impacts Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA), has released a draft report for
public comment reviewing the risk CCA-treated timber poses to the community. The
review found that at this stage it has insufficient information to be satisfied that continued
use of CCA treated timber is safe when used in the manufacture of structures where the
general community are likely to come in frequent close contact. As a result the APVMA is
proposing that such use no longer be permitted.
Where are the Generation Transport Storage Treatment Recovery Final disposal
risks of impacts
most likely? High Moderate Moderate Moderate N/A Low
A wood treatment plant using the Copper Chrome Arsenic process operated in Armidale,
NSW from approximately 1968 - 1980. Armidale papers had carried numerous reports of
spills and accidents at the site during its operation. The land was rezoned and developed
as a housing estate in the late 1980's. Onsite contamination of creosote was discovered
Has anything
during excavation activities for foundations of the first buildings, and follow up soil testing
happened
detected levels of arsenic up to 3800 ppm, chromium at 1950 ppm and copper at 1000
before in 3
ppm, plus very high levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
Australia?
The developer successfully sued the Council for breaching its duty of care in approving the
4
development of the land and was awarded $1,479,576 in damages and interest. This, and
other high profile cases of contaminated land in NSW, triggered new laws such as the
Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 (NSW).
1. Environment Protection Authority South Australia (July 2008). Report on CCA treated
timber in South Australia. Accessed March 15, 2015 from:
http://www.epa.sa.gov.au/xstd_files/Waste/Report/cca.pdf
2. Environment Protection Authority South Australia (November 2004). Guideline 572/04:
Copper chromated arsenate (CCA) timber waste – storage and management. Accessed
March 15, 2015 from: http://www.epa.sa.gov.au/xstd_files/Waste/Guideline/guide_cca.pdf
3. Parliament of New South Wales, Hansard transcript 15 November 1991. Accessed
March 15, 2015 from:
http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/hansart.nsf/V3Key/LA19911115029
4. McGrath C, Mending holes in the green safety net. Precedent, Issue 113, November/
December 2012. .Accessed March 15, 2015 from:
http://envlaw.com.au/wp-content/uploads/green_safety_net.pdf
References 5. Environment Protection Authority New South Wales. Questions and answers on the
wood preservation industry. Accessed March 15, 2015 from:
http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/licensing/qaswood.htm#1
6. Beder S (2003). Timber Leachates Prompt Preservative Review. Engineers Australia
75(6), June 2003, pp. 32-4. Accessed March 15, 2015 from:
https://www.uow.edu.au/~sharonb/cca.html
7. Website, accessed March 15, 2015 from:
http://baddevelopers.nfshost.com/Docs/treatedtimber.htm#Treatment
8. Australian Government Department of the Environment. National Pollutant Inventory
Fact Sheet – Chromium VI compounds. Accessed March 14, 2015 from:
http://www.npi.gov.au/resource/chromium-vi-compounds
9. National Environment Protection Council (1999). National Pollutant Inventory Technical
Advisory Panel Final Report.
(0 – 6) 3.9 – 4.9
Organic solvents are simply liquid organic chemicals that have the
ability to dissolve other substances. This usually assists their role in
an industrial application, such as cleaning and degreasing.
Solvents have three principal areas of use; as cleaning agents, as a
raw material or feedstock in the production and manufacture of other
substances, and as a carrying and/or dispersion medium in chemical
synthetic processes.
Description of Wastes deriving from solvents and their use may be either:
the waste
• relatively clean, derived from cleaning and washing processes
• inclusive of other reaction products and by products – from
synthesis/manufacture of other substances
• highly aqueous wastes, from chemical processes, washing and
extractions or
• be present as sludges from manufacturing by products, recycling
What is it?
residues and residues from cleaning processes.
Workplace
Inhalation is usually the most significant route of entry by which organic solvents enter the
health & safety
human body at work. Poor hygiene practices could result in skin absorption.
impacts
Most non-industrial applications of benzene, a natural constituent of crude oil and one of
the most elementary petrochemicals, have been limited by benzene’s carcinogenicity.
However, significant primary exposure occurs routinely in everyday activities, particularly
relating to petrol (gasoline) or other fossil fuel use. These include petrol vapour exposure
Population at fuel outlets, burning coal and oil, motor vehicle exhaust, cigarette smoke, wood burning
scale impacts fires, some adhesives and low concentrations in ambient air from all of these sources.
Population exposure studies from any particular exposure pathway have proved difficult to
ascribe health effects to a particular source/ activity due to the range of confounding
variables. However, epidemiologic studies provide clear evidence of a causal association
between exposure to benzene and a number of forms of leukaemia.
Persistence Low.
Bioaccumulation Low.
Where are the Generation Transport Storage Treatment Recovery Final disposal
risks of impacts
most likely? High Medium Medium Moderate High Low
Has anything The contaminated site industry in Australia, in terms of identification, testing, classifying
1. UNEP (2002). Basel Convention. Technical Guidelines on Hazardous Waste from the
Production and Use of Organic Solvents (Y6). Accessed March 21, 2015 from:
http://www.basel.int/Portals/4/Basel%20Convention/docs/meetings/sbc/
workdoc/old%20docs/tech-y6.pdf
2. Shell Trading International Ltd (2011). Naphtha (petroleum), solvent-refined light
Material Safety Data Sheet. Accessed March 21, 2015 from:
http://www.shell.com/content/dam/shell-new/local/corporate/trading-shipping/downloads
References /msds/in-country/uk-stasco/mogas-naphtha-petroleum-solvent-refined-light-cas-64741-
84-0---stil---en.pdf
3. National Occupational Health and Safety Commission (1990). Australian Government.
Industrial Organic Solvents. Accessed March 21, 2015 from:
http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/SWA/about/Publications/Documents/157/
IndustrialOrganicSolvents_1990_PDF.pdf
4. US EPA. TEACH Chemical Summary – Benzene. Accessed March 21, 2015 from:
http://www.epa.gov/teach/chem_summ/BENZ_summary.pdf
Reproductive
Cyanides do not exhibit reproductive toxicity.
toxicity
Workplace This process is no longer used in Australia so there are no implications for human or
health & safety environmental health. Other processes using cyanides, such as electroplating or gold
impacts recovery may cause exposure to cyanides.
Population This process is no longer used in Australia so there are no implications for human or
scale impacts environmental health but other uses of cyanide may cause such impacts.
Where are the Generation Transport Storage Treatment Recovery Final disposal
risks of impacts
most likely? High Medium Medium Moderate N/A Low
Has anything
No incidents reported in recent years.
happened
Industry –
systematic Past users were well-versed in safe handling of cyanides.
controls
What control
Industry – Since the process is no longer used in Australia there are no specific
measures are in
exposure controls. Controls exist for other uses of cyanide such as in
place to
controls electroplating and gold recovery.
manage risks
posed by this
waste? Government Workplace regulatory levels are in place.
1 G.E. Totten, ed., Steel Heat Treatment: metallurgy and technologies (Boca Raton,
nd
Florida, 2007), 2 ed.
2. Cyanide – information on handling, storage and first aid (2014):
www.commerce.wa.gov.au/publications/cyanide-information-storage-handling-and-first-
References aid.
3. S.P. Ayodeji, T.E. Aboye and S.O. Olanrewaju, Investigation of Surface Hardness of
Steels in Cyanide Salt Bath Heat Treatment Process, Proceedings of the International
MultiConferenceof Engineers and Computer Scientists 2011Vol II, IMECS 2011.
Waste mineral oils are used lubricating oils come from industrial and
Description of
domestic vehicle engines and machinery, and can be reclaimed or
the waste
recovered and recycled for other uses.
Predominantly liquid
What is it?
but also includes oily
Waste form rags (solid) and
contaminated
greases.
Physical/
Liquid, black and viscous material with, petroleum odour. May
chemical
present as solids in the form of oily rags or used oil filters.
description
2013 (tonnes) Australia’s Basel 2013 report. These numbers appear to be an underestimate, in part
due to regulatory exemption from tracking in NSW and potential exemption in Victoria,
but also due to the fact that Tas, NT and ACT have no tracking system and rely on
Controlled Waste NEPM data. No reliable data is available for Tasmania, given its
exports of oils are very low and expected to be dwarfed by management options within
Tasmania.
Reproductive High: Repeated exposure may impair fertility or cause harm to the
toxicity unborn child.
Common exposure risk to workers involved in motor vehicle or other mechanical repairs,
Workplace machine shops and maintenance of industrial machinery. Inhalation is a significant route of
health & safety entry into the body at work, most likely to contribute to chronic impacts. Skin contact is a
impacts more likely form of entry for acute effects - poor hygiene practices could result in skin
absorption.
Chronic High: Can destroy future and existing food supplies, breeding
ecotoxicity animals and habitats.
Where are the Generation Transport Storage Treatment Recovery Final disposal
risks of impacts
most likely? High Medium Medium Moderate N/A Low
Spills of oils can occur on a scale varying from a vehicle or truck sized accident or spill
incident, all the way through to oil tanker spills at sea. In either case the environmental
damage that can result is due to oil’s immiscibility with water, and its consequent tendency
to spread across large distances by blanketing the surface of waterways.
While there have been no oil spill environmental disasters of the scale of the Exxon
Valdez, Australia has a large oil industry and there have been several large oil spills.
3
Has anything Three examples are described here.
happened Kirki oil tanker spill (WA, 1991)
before in
On 21 July 1991, the Greek tanker Kirki lost its bow off the coast of Western Australia
Australia?
(WA). During the incident and the subsequent tow of the tanker to a safe haven some
17,280 tonnes of light crude was lost. Serious pollution of the West Australian coast was
avoided due to the dual combination of severe weather conditions and the effects of the
Leeuwin Current in dispersing the 7,900 tonnes of oil lost during the initial stages of the
spill off Cervantes and Jurien Bay.
The response to the Kirki spill involved in excess of 100 experts in salvage, pollution
clean-up and emergency response. In addition, to supplement existing stockpiles,
What control
measures are in
place to
manage risks Potential industrial sources of these wastes have strict emissions
Industry –
posed by this control equipment, site engineering and contingency plans in place.
exposure
waste? Additionally at-risk workers wear appropriate personal protective
controls
equipment (PPE), relating to inhalation of oil mists and skin contact.
Cars, trucks, farm machines and boats all need regular lubricating oil
changes. It takes only one litre of oil to contaminate one million litres
of water and a single automotive oil change produces 4 to 5 litres of
used oil.
Community
By pouring your used oil back into an empty oil container and taking
it to your local used oil facility for recycling (which can be located by
contacting your local council), you are helping to conserve a
valuable resource and protect the environment.
1. Graham, S (2003). Environmental Effects of Exxon Valdez Spill Still Being Felt.
Scientific American.
2. PBS Newshour article, March 24, 2014. 25 years later, scientists still spot traces of oil
from Exxon Valdez spill. Accessed 23 April, 2015 from:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/25-years-later-scientists-remember-exxon-valdez-
spill/#the-rundown
3. Australian Government, Australian Maritime Safety Authority. Major historical incidents.
References Accessed 23 April, 2015 from:
https://www.amsa.gov.au/environment/major-historical-incidents/
4. Farrington, J and McDowell, J. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. Mixing Oil and
Water: Tracking the sources and impacts of oil pollution in the marine environment.
Oceanus Magazine, Vol. 43, No.1, November 2004. Accessed 23 April 2015 from:
http://www.whoi.edu/oceanus/feature/mixing-oil-and-water
5. 'Used oil' MSDS: Accessed 23 April 2015 from:
http://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/asp/pdf/06_0022_response_to_submissions_part_2.pdf
This category describes the core waste Y8 (waste oils) in the context
of mixtures with water, which may result in high water content with
residual levels of oil contamination and mixtures of hydrocarbon
materials and water (oily water), or mixtures of same that have
formed an emulsion – oil droplets dispersed (but not dissolved) in
Description of water (the continuous phase).
the waste
This category describes oil contents in water up to a maximum of
50% oil and typically substantially below this.
What is it? Wastes include truck and vehicle washwaters, skimmer and
interceptor waters, vehicle coolant waters and potentially shipping
bilge water.
Reproductive High: Repeated exposure may impair fertility or cause harm to the
toxicity unborn child.
Common exposure risk to workers involved in motor vehicle or other mechanical repairs,
Workplace
machine shops and maintenance of industrial machinery. Skin contact is a likely form of
health & safety
entry for acute effects - poor hygiene practices could result in skin absorption of
impacts
contaminants in water.
Chronic High: Can destroy future and existing food supplies, breeding
ecotoxicity animals and habitats.
Where are the Generation Transport Storage Treatment Recovery Final disposal
risks of impacts
most likely? High Medium Medium Moderate N/A Low
No oily water incidents identified in Australia, but diffuse pollution of waterways with oil/
Has anything
water mixtures occurs every day, through stormwater run-off that includes millions of oil
happened
drips and leaks from vehicles, unburnt fuels in engine exhausts washed out of the
before in
atmosphere in rain and leaked fuel-contaminated waters from outboard engines of small
Australia?
boats and pleasure craft.
1. Farrington, J and McDowell, J. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. Mixing Oil and
Water: Tracking the sources and impacts of oil pollution in the marine environment.
Oceanus Magazine, Vol. 43, No.1, November 2004. Accessed 23 April 2015 from:
http://www.whoi.edu/oceanus/feature/mixing-oil-and-water
2. 'Used oil' MSDS: Accessed 23 April 2015 from:
References http://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/asp/pdf/06_0022_response_to_submissions_part_2.pdf
3. Australian Government. Water for the Future. Water Treatment and Reuse. Accessed
24 April 2015 from:
http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/73c2bfb0-2879-4915-b744-
90d7169cc192/files/weo-water-treatment-and-reuse.pdf
Physical/
High boiling point dilute solution of the chlorinated substances in
chemical
paraffin oil.
description
Where does it The waste was generated in the electricity industry where PCBs
Main sources
come from? were used as insulating and heat-conducting fluids in transformers
Potential health Acute toxicity Low: PCBs can produce skin pigmentation and affect liver function.
impacts
High: May cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated
Chronic toxicity
exposure.
Reproductive
Low – medium: Possible reproductive toxin.
toxicity
Workplace
health & safety Personal protective equipment required.
impacts
Release to the environment before the impact of bans on the use of PCBs and the
Has anything
implementation of the PCB Management Plan have resulted in very low level
happened
contamination of the environment and contributions to the chemical body burden of
before in
Australians. The substance has a long half-life and so concentrations are decreasing
Australia?
slowly.
Industry –
Personal protective equipment and waste-handling by licensed
What control exposure
companies.
measures are controls
in place to PCBs are listed under the Stockholm Convention on persistent
manage risks organic pollutants, to which Australia is a signatory. States and
posed by this Government
territories control the tracking and reporting of PCB waste under
waste? auspices of the national PCB Management Plan (1996).
Acute toxicity Low: Phenols present in the mixture can cause skin irritation.
Reproductive
Low: There is no evidence of reproductive toxicity.
toxicity
Workplace
health & safety Personal protective equipment.
impacts
Population
No widespread impacts
scale impacts
Extreme: The PAHs are persistent and only slowly degraded in the
Persistence
environment.
Sites in Australia where town gas was produced from coal have been heavily
Has anything
contaminated by tarry matter. During remediation of the sites the tarry matter containing
happened
PAHs and heavy metals was removed to secure landfills. A recent example (2012-2014)
before in
is remediation of the site of the Toowoomba, Qld, gasworks
Australia?
(www.thiess.com.au/projects/toowoomba-gasworks-remediation-project/detail.
Industry –
No systematic controls of industrial management of tarry wastes
systematic
have been identified.
controls
What control Industry – Appropriate PPE is used by workers in the sampling, removal and
measures are exposure remediation of sites contaminated with tarry residue waste.
in place to controls
manage risks
State and territory environment agencies require residues destined
posed by this
Government for secure landfill as hazardous waste to be solidified and to meet
waste?
specifications for content and leachability of hazardous components.
The tarry materials are industrial wastes that the community is not
Community
normally exposed to.
1. Management of Coal Tar Waste and Coal Tar Contaminated Soils and Sediment (2002):
www.dec.ny.gov/regulations/2594.html.
2. Information for the Investigation of Former Gasworks Sites (Department of Environment
References and Conservation, NSW, 2005):
www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/clm/gasworks05237.pdf.
3. Australian Oil Recyclers Association: http://aora.asn.au/index.php.
Workplace Where solvents other than water are involved there is a need for good workplace
health & safety ventilation, system closed to the maximum extent, and availability of personal protective
impacts equipment where waste must be dealt with.
Population There are no population-wide risks arising from the production formulation and use of
scale impacts these industrial products.
Has anything
happened No major incidents have been reported. Risks to human health and the environment from
before in these industrial products are very low.
Australia?
Workplace
The main substances of concern for industrial health and safety are styrene, methyl
health & safety
methacrylates and isocyanates (see Y+3 Other Organic Chemicals).
impacts
Population Broader impacts of additives may come about by release of these substances and plastics
scale impacts containing them to the environment and subsequent uptake by food species.
Has anything
happened No specific incidents are known. See Y+3 Other organic chemicals for a spill of ethyl
before in acrylate, a related compound.
Australia?
What control The amenity and toxicity hazards of reactive monomeric substances
Industry –
measures are are recognized in industry and subject to workplace controls. Where
systematic
in place to flammable solvents are involved in production of glues and
controls
manage risks adhesives appropriate precautions need to be taken.
How is it Wastes are mostly contained within the industries themselves and
Main fates
managed? destroyed under controlled conditions.
Workplace
Protection against dust is essential, particularly because of this category’s explosivity,
health & safety
although these chemicals are usually handled in solution.
impacts
Population There are no population-scale impacts because exposure to sodium chlorate is confined to
scale impacts industrial settings.
Has anything
No incidents involving sodium chlorate are known in Australia. However, the Bali bombing
happened
in 2002 involved potassium chlorate, probably diverted illegally from safety match
before in
production (an industry not replicated in Australia).
Australia?
1. www.nationalsecurity.gov.au/ChemicalSecurity/Pages/default.aspx.
2. Explosives and fireworks – example of state regulations and guidance:
References www.dmp.wa.gov.au/6684.aspx.
3. Sodium chlorate: http://www.hillbrothers.com/msds/pdf/n/sodium-chlorate.pdf
Reproductive
Photographic chemicals do not exhibit reproductive toxicity.
toxicity
Workplace
In the workplace these photographic processes are carried out in closed systems so
health & safety
exposure is minimal and would only occur during charging and cleaning equipment.
impacts
Mild hazards exist for photographic enthusiasts who do not take steps to protect
Population
themselves by, for example, wearing water-resistant gloves while handling solutions and
scale impacts
damp papers.
Potential Thiosulfates are toxic to a wide range of organisms, and silver ions
Overview
environment can cause irritation of tissues. Because silver is valuable it is
Chronic High: Only silver poses a chronic hazard, since other photographic
ecotoxicity chemical substances have short half-lives in the environment.
Has anything
happened
No incidents involving photographic chemicals have been reported.
before in
Australia?
Industry –
A number of companies in Australia collect X-ray films and destroy
exposure
What control them using a thermal process that allows recovery of silver.
controls
measures are
in place to State and local governments encourage and assist with collection of
Government
manage risks X-ray films.
posed by this
waste?
Community Community groups such as Scouts collect X-ray films for disposal.
1. Http://recyclingnearyou.com.au/xray/.
2. C. Swedlund and E.Y. Swedlund, Photography, a handbook of history, materials and
nd
processes (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 2 ed., 1981.
References
3. Photographic Industry (OECD Emission Scenario Document) 2004. DOI:
10.1787/9789264221222-en.
4. Ilford Photo. MSDSs for various Photographic developer and fixer chemicals used in
Australia. Accessed April 2015 from:
(0 – 6) 2.6 – 3.0
Main likely chemical contaminants Some metals such as Ni, Cr and Zn.
Overview The only coating materials of health concern are the chromates.
Potential health Low – medium: Chronic effects can include allergic responses and
Chronic toxicity
impacts chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Reproductive High: Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child and may
toxicity cause genetic defects.
Workplace
health & safety Personal protective equipment is needed by workers handling chromates.
impacts
Population
No population impacts for these industrial chemicals.
scale impacts
Has anything
happened Chromium releases from the chemical industry have been reported (see Y21) but not from
before in the metal surface treatment sector.
Australia?
1. www.henkelna.com/adhesives/complete-product-line-21163.htm.
2. www.telfordinfustries.com.au/system/products/pdf1/0000/0404/Alodine_1200S.pd
f.
References 3. Protective coatings for plastic items www.rhinolinings.com.au/industrial.
4. www.epw.com.au/trivalent.html.
5. SafeWork Australia: Health Monitoring for Exposure to hazardous Chemicals.
Guide for persons Conducting a Business or Undertaking
Biosolids
The vast majority of waste in this category by tonnage is biosolids
(80%), a product of sewage sludge (the sludge collected from
wastewater treatment) once it has undergone further treatment to
reduce disease causing pathogens and volatile organic matter,
producing a stabilised product.
Biosolids are typically 75-80% water in their ‘wet’ state, compared to
sewage sludge which is approximately 97% water.
Suitable quality biosolids can be applied as a fertiliser to improve and
maintain productive soils and stimulate plant growth.
Fly ash
Fly ash is a residue generated from combustion that comprises
particles so fine they mix and rise with combustion flue gases in
chimneys and post-combustion chambers of thermal plant, and are
captured by particle filtration equipment such as electrostatic
precipitators. Fly ash usually refers to ash produced during
Biosolids
Biosolids may have their own distinctive odour depending on the type
of treatment it has been though. Some biosolids have a stronger
Physical/
odour that may be offensive to some people, while most biosolids
chemical
have a slightly musty, ammonia odour. Sulphur and ammonia
description
compounds (both plant nutrients) in biosolids are normally the cause
of these odours.
Fly ash
Fly ash is characterised by the fineness of its particles, as opposed to
‘bottom ash’ from combustion processes, which falls to the bottom of
combustion chambers. Fly ash often contains hazardous materials
such as heavy metals at low concentrations derived from their
composition in input fuel – either as constituent of fine combustion
particles or as gaseous combustion products themselves. The major
constituents are crystalline silica and oxides of iron and calcium.
Biosolids
Wastewater treatment plants.
Fly ash
Incineration, meat processing, cement kilns, coal-fired power stations
(despite the waste classification name), asphalt plants, iron and steel
manufacturing and petroleum refining.
Biosolids
Biosolids may be productively used depending on their quality,
measured against state-based guidelines, for uses such as
agricultural land application, landscaping or land rehabilitation.
How is it Biosolids contaminated above guideline levels (in contaminants such
Main fates as heavy metals, for example) may be stockpiled onsite at treatment
managed?
plants or landfilled.
Fly ash
Fly ash is either stored in onsite storage ponds or landfills, hazardous
waste landfilled off-site or managed as a reuse product in concrete,
structural fill or road base.
The numbers above refer to all four waste types. A brief national level
Individual waste breakdown for each is provided below.
arisings Residues arising from industrial waste treatment/disposal
operations (N205)
Biosolids*
1,468,883 tonnes (on a ‘wet’ basis) = 80% of this category and 20.4%
of national tonnes overall in 2013
The least toxic wastes in this category with respect to human health
impacts are likely to be biosolids, which contributes 80% of the
category’s volume. Encapsulated wastes, by definition, should have
their hazards contained, rendering them very low impact to human
health.
Industrial waste treatment/disposal residues and fly ash have the
potential for higher human health impact, on account of the chemical
Overview
contaminants that may be present and, in the case of fly ash, the
inhalation risk of fine particles that may contain these contaminants.
Potential
While the likely levels of heavy metal contaminants in fly ash are low,
health
the concentrating effect of fly ash collection means that they may be
impacts
2
present at levels 10 times greater than in the original coal. Another
consideration of fly ash is its major constituent – crystalline silica – can
cause chronic health problems through prolonged inhalation.
Reproductive
Low.
toxicity
Residues such as fly ash present an inhalation risk due to the potential for very fine
particles to penetrate deep into the lungs. However, workplaces with large scale combustion
Workplace processes such as boilers or incinerators typically have very stringent controls in place such
health & as enclosed hoppers. Although crystalline silica is a large constituent of fly ash, worker
safety impacts inhalation exposure risk is much greater in industries such as sand blasting, foundries and
construction, due to close worker involvement in cutting, grinding or other abrasive
activities.
Has anything
happened
Unable to identify specific incidents that would reflect this broad waste category.
before in
Australia?
Liquid (and
Waste form
occasionally solid)
Workplace
health & safety Low use chemical/ waste generated in Australia. No specific workplace impacts known.
impacts
Population Low use chemical/ waste generated in Australia. No specific population scale impacts
scale impacts known.
Persistence Low.
Bioaccumulation Medium.
Reproductive
No information available.
toxicity
Workplace
Control of dusts containing beryllium. The eight hour time weighted workplace exposure
health & safety 3
limit is 0.002 mg/m .
impacts
Has anything
happened Health concerns arose in 2005 over waste (dust) from copper-beryllium alloys in material
before in used by the Australian defence forces.
Australia?
Reproductive High: Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child and may
toxicity cause genetic defects.
Chromic acid, commonly used in electroplating and surface finishing, is a strong irritant and
Workplace corrosive. Exposure usually arises as the result of splashes, as a mist of chromic acid coated
health & safety bubbles of hydrogen or as chromic acid contaminated dust. Cr (VI) may also be liberated as
impacts a fume during welding of steel.
Occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium has been associated with lung cancer.
Population The general population is exposed to chromium by inhaling ambient air, ingesting food, and
In 2011 a malfunction at Orica's Kooragang Island synthetic ammonia production plant (near
Newcastle) resulted in the release of hexavalent chromium (in the form of sodium chromate
Has anything particles) over parts of Stockton. The company was fined $768,000 over this and a series of
happened related chemical spills and safety breaches that occurred within months of each other.
before in As much as 10kg of dissolved hexavalent chromium was estimated to have escaped from the
Australia? front stack and, after the plant was washed down, arsenic levels in waste holding ponds had
risen above the legal discharge limit of 0.05 milligrams a litre and were accidently discharged
to the Hunter River (see Y24).
References 4. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. Toxicological Profile for Chromium. Accessed April 15, 2015 from:
http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp7-c2.pdf
5. Sigma Aldrich (2015). Chromium (VI) oxide Material Safety Data Sheet. Accessed April 13,
2015 from:
http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=AU&
language=en&productNumber=675644&brand=ALDRICH&PageToGoToURL=http
%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Faldrich%2F6756
44%3Flang%3Den
6. National Environment Protection Council (1999). National Pollutant Inventory Technical
Advisory Panel Final Report.
(0 – 6) 0 – 2.5
Copper (Cu) is a ductile metal with very high thermal and electrical
conductivity. Pure copper is soft and malleable; a freshly exposed
surface has a reddish-orange colour. It is used as a conductor of
heat and electricity in a wide range of electrical and electronics
products, a building material (such as in water pipes), and a
constituent of various metal alloys. It is biostatic, meaning bacteria
will not grow on it. For this reason it has long been used to line parts
of ships to protect against barnacles and mussels. There are many
Description of other uses for copper in industrial applications.
the waste
Copper compounds are used in a plethora of applications. These
include: dyes, catalysts, preservatives, in metallurgy, fuel additive, in
electroplating, battery electrodes, fungicides, anti-fouling marine
What is it?
paints, flame proofing and in wood preservation (see Y5).
Copper wastes are both solids, such as refinery slags and flue dusts,
water-treatment sludges and liquids such as washings from shipyard
barnacle removal and spent solutions from refinery acid-plant
processes and scientific research activities.
Reproductive
No reproductive toxicity exhibited.
toxicity
Occupational sources of copper may result from copper mining and ore processing, by
Workplace
inhaling high levels of copper dust and fumes. Other occupational exposures can occur in
health & safety
agriculture, water treatment, and industries such as electroplating where soluble copper
impacts
compounds are employed.
In April 2010 the Northern Territory media reported that copper concentrate (approximately
30-60% copper) had been spilled during use of the bulk ore ship loading facility, a
conveyer belt and portable loading mechanism with a chute, at East Arm Wharf in Darwin
Has anything Harbour. The media alleged that substantial amounts of copper concentrate were spilled
happened onto the wharf hard stand, where dust posed a hazard to human health and directly into
before in the water where it constituted aquatic pollution.
Australia? The NT EPA conducted an investigation and concluded that a number of incidents
involving copper concentrate pollution of the air and water environment of Darwin Harbour
occurred, and enforcement action was successfully undertaken against both Darwin Port
Corporation and the miner of the ore, Oz Minerals Ltd.
Higher risk workplaces like metal smelters, metal coating and metal
Industry – processing industries, where worker exposure to Cu compound
systematic wastes may be possible, are licensed by environmental regulators to
controls control industrial processes and equipment so as to limit
environmental emissions of pollutants like Cu.
What control
Potential industrial sources of Cu waste have strict emissions control
measures are
equipment in place, such as baghouse filters, dust extraction
in place to Industry –
systems, electrostatic precipitators and stringent trade waste
manage risks exposure
emissions agreements. Additionally at-risk workers wear appropriate
posed by this controls
personal protective equipment (PPE), particularly relating to
waste?
restricting exposure to airborne sources of copper.
Basic iron and steel manufacturing; Copper, Silver, Lead and Zinc
Where does it
Main sources smelting and refining; Metal coating and finishing, Inorganic chemical
come from?
manufacturing.
Reproductive
Low:
toxicity
Workplace Occupational exposure to higher than normal zinc levels may occur when breathing zinc
health & safety dust or fumes at industrial sites such as smelters, galvanising facilities or metal
impacts manufacturing plants.
Population
None included due to zinc’s relatively low potential for health impacts.
scale impacts
Extreme: Like other base or heavy metals, zinc does not break down
Persistence
in the environment.
Historical mining and metal processing operations have resulted in serious heavy metal
Has anything pollution in a number of areas in Australia, some of which involve zinc. These include the
happened King River (mainly Cu, also Zn, Pb and Cd) and the Derwent River estuary (mainly Zn and
before in Cd, also Hg) in Tasmania; as well as Captains Flat and Molongolo River in New South
Australia? Wales (mainly Zn, also Cu, Cd, Pb and As). These have resulted in legacy pollution of
1
waters, sediments, fish and other aquatic life.
Higher risk workplaces like metal smelters, metal coating and metal
Industry – processing industries, where worker exposure to Zn compound
systematic wastes may be possible, are licensed by environmental regulators to
controls control industrial processes and equipment so as to limit
environmental emissions of pollutants like Zn.
What control Potential industrial sources of Zn waste have strict emissions control
measures are equipment in place, such as baghouse filters, dust extraction
Industry –
in place to systems, electrostatic precipitators and stringent trade waste
exposure
manage risks emissions agreements. Additionally at-risk workers wear appropriate
controls
posed by this personal protective equipment (PPE), particularly relating to
waste? restricting exposure to airborne sources of zinc.
1. Hutchinson T and Meema K (ed), Lead, Mercury, Cadmium and Arsenic in the
Environment, Chapter 13 (Hart B and Lake P). John Wiley and Sons Ltd (1987). Accessed
April 17, 2015 from:
http://dge.stanford.edu/SCOPE/SCOPE_31/SCOPE_31_2.08_Chapter13_187-216.pdf
2. Australian Government Department of the Environment. National Pollutant Inventory
Fact Sheet – Zinc and compounds. Accessed March 19, 2015 from:
http://www.npi.gov.au/resource/zinc-and-compounds
References
3. Sigma Aldrich (2013). Zinc Material Safety Data Sheet. Accessed April 19, 2015 from:
http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=AU&
language=en&productNumber=324930&brand=ALDRICH&PageToGoToURL=http
%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Faldrich%2F3249
30%3Flang%3Den
4. Safe Work Australia. Controlling Risks associated with Electroplating.
5. National Environment Protection Council (1999). National Pollutant Inventory Technical
Reproductive
High: Possible reproductive and teratogenic effects.
toxicity
Occupational exposure studies have been conducted on adults working in copper smelters
3
in the 1940s-1960s, following their health impacts through to the 1990s . Definitive links
Workplace were established between arsenic, a by-product of copper smelting, and lung cancer via
health & safety inhalation. The pathway of exposure for these workers was mainly via inhalation of arsenic
impacts dusts but could also have been from arsenic trioxide vapours. Occupational and
environmental controls have virtually eliminated these workplace risks today, at least in
Australia.
Elevated arsenic concentrations in water have been indicated as a public health hazard in
4
many countries where individuals rely on groundwater for drinking purposes . Australian
Population cities maintain high levels of water quality so such epidemiological observations have not
scale impacts occurred in Australia. It is possible however, that more remote areas located near
abandoned mine workings could have elevated natural arsenic levels in the soil and, as a
result, drinking water supplies in these areas may be contaminated.
Effluent containing high levels of arsenic leaked into the Hunter River from Orica’s
Has anything
Kooragang Island chemical plant (in Newcastle) in 2011. Arsenic had not been used on the
happened
site since 1993, however, during a clean-up of a hexavalent chromium spill on the site the
before in
week prior (see Y21), approximately 1.2 million litres of washwater containing old deposits
Australia? 5
of arsenic leaked into a storage pond and drained into the Hunter River.
1. What is the role of arsenic in the mining industry? Accessed March 10, 2015 from:
References http://www.miningfacts.org/Environment/What-is-the-role-of-arsenic-in-the-mining-industry/
2. National Occupational Health and Safety Commission, Commonwealth of Australia
Trace amounts of selenium are essential for humans and most diets
usually provide enough selenium to meet the daily requirement.
Diets lacking selenium have resulted in heart problems and muscle
pain. Diets with too much selenium can be harmful at levels 5 to 10
times higher than the daily requirement.
Uses in electronics and photography account for the majority of
Description of selenium use, followed by the glass industry, then pigments (in
the waste plastics, paints, dyes, enamels, inks and textiles). Selenium dioxide
is the most widely used selenium compound in industry. It is used as
an oxidising agent in drug and other chemical manufacture, a
catalyst in organic syntheses, and an anti-oxidant in lubricating oils.
What is it?
In Australia, selenium waste is low in volume and limited to a small
number of industrial processes, typically involving metal processing
and/ or recycling.
Where does it
Main sources Inorganic chemical manufacturing, metal smelting, metal recycling.
come from?
Reproductive
Low: Not known to have reproductive effects.
toxicity
Workplace
health & safety Low use chemical/ waste generated in Australia. No specific workplace impacts known.
impacts
Exposure to selenium mainly takes place through food, because selenium is naturally
present in grains, cereals and meat. Humans need to absorb certain amounts of selenium
daily, in order to maintain good health.
Population
No specific population scale impacts from excessive selenium were identified, although a
scale impacts
number of references cited the impacts on populations with low selenium diets. For
example, epidemiological studies have reported an inverse association between selenium
2
levels in the blood and cancer occurrence.
Potential Overview Selenium can be toxic, particularly to livestock that eat plants that
Acute toxicity Extreme: Very toxic by inhalation – can be fatal. Toxic if swallowed.
Reproductive
Low: Possible risk of impaired fertility and harm to the unborn child.
toxicity
In the workplace, people are exposed where cadmium is used or generated as a by-
Workplace product, such as in battery manufacturing and recycling, some forms of painting and
health & safety sandblasting, metal soldering, welding or other activities in metal manufacturing and
impacts refining. There is the potential for airborne cadmium exposure anywhere where fossil fuels
are combusted.
People are exposed to cadmium primarily through their diet, since cadmium is absorbed
Population and bioaccumulated into plant and animal foods that people eat, from contamination of soil
scale impacts and to a lesser extent water. People are exposed to higher amounts of cadmium by
breathing cigarette smoke.
Physical/
Antimony is a brittle silver-white metal that occurs in soil and rocks in
chemical
certain parts of the world. It may present as waste in mine tailings.
description
Its toxicity highly depends upon chemical form and oxidation state
with +III compounds exerting greater toxicity than +V compounds.
Antimony compounds show toxic properties similar to those of
arsenic, though typically less severe. Exposure to antimony can
Overview result in a variety of adverse health effects, but it must be at quite
high levels, which is unlikely in most industrial settings.
It is noted that Antimony can have beneficial effects when used for
medical reasons. It has been used as a medicine to treat people
1
infected with tropical parasites.
Gross exposure to antimony compounds over long periods, usually the sulfide (SbS3) or
Workplace
the oxide (Sb2O3) has occurred in antimony miners and in antimony process workers
health & safety
overseas, although rarely studied. No specific information exists for Australian antimony
impacts
mining and related waste, which is limited.
Antimony has been implicated in the cause of cot deaths, or Sudden Infant Death
2
Syndrome (SIDS) by Richardson in 1990 . It was claimed that antimony compounds used
Population in fireproofing cot furnishings amongst other additives was primarily responsible for SIDS
scale impacts due to the action of a fungus (Scopulariopsis brevicaulis) growing on polyvinyl chloride cot
mattress covers. This causal role of antimony in SIDS was ultimately refuted due to lack of
3
evidence .
A former antimony processing plant in Urunga NSW, which operated between 1969 and
1974, was abandoned in 1974 without clean up or remedial work. Tailings and mill waste
water were discharged onto the wetland foreshore area during the plant operations. The
Has anything
tailings and adjoining environment are contaminated by a range of heavy metals,
happened
particularly arsenic, antimony and mercury. A belt of dead Melaleuca trees characterises
before in
the periphery of the tailings deposit. The tailings area is devoid of vegetation, and is
Australia?
periodically inundated by flood water and/or surface runoff. Preliminary works on the long-
anticipated remediation of the contaminated antimony site at Urunga commenced in
December 2014.
What control
Potential industrial sources of arsenic waste have strict emissions
measures are Industry –
control equipment in place, such as baghouse filters and
in place to exposure
electrostatic precipitators. Additionally at-risk workers wear
manage risks controls
appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE).
posed by this
waste?
State and territory governments regulate the management of
hazardous waste in their respective jurisdictions in Australia. These
Government place strict controls on the methods of transport, treatment and
disposal of all hazardous wastes, including this waste, through
licensing, tracking and transport accreditation requirements.
Potential health Humans exposed to even small concentrations in air exude a foul
1
Acute toxicity garlic-like odour known as "tellurium breath.” Tellurium is
impacts
metabolized by the body to dimethyl telluride, (CH3)2Te, a volatile
compound with a highly pungent garlic-like smell.
Reproductive
None known
toxicity
Workplace Inhalation of dusts from metal refining operations is a possible source of workplace
health & safety exposure to tellurium compounds. Such exposure has been linked to the ‘garlic breath’
Population
No population scale impacts identified.
scale impacts
Persistence Low.
What control
Industry – Companies that handle tellurium containing wastes are licensed by
measures are
systematic environmental regulators to control industrial processes and
in place to
controls equipment so as to limit environmental emissions of these pollutants.
manage risks
1. Lide, D. R., ed. (2005). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (86th ed.). Boca
Raton (FL): CRC Press.
2. Lightfoot N (2012). Laurentian University, Sudbury, Canada. Occupational tellurium
exposure and garlic odour. Occupational Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.47). 12/2010;
61(2):132-5.
3. Surawut C, Manaskorn R, Thantip P, Chanathip P, Chulalak C, Pongkiatkul P (2012).
Review of Environmental, Health and Safety of CdTe Photovoltaic Installations throughout
References Their Life-Cycle. Accessed on 16 April, 2015 from: http://www.pv-thin.org/wp-
content/uploads/2013/09/CdTe-peer-review_-Thailand.pdf
4. Kaczmar, S., Evaluating the read-across approach on CdTe toxicity for CdTe
photovoltaics, SETAC North America 32nd Annual Meeting, Boston, November 2011.
5. America 32nd Annual Meeting, Boston, November 2011.Fortey, Richard (2004). The
Earth: An Intimate History. Harper Perennial. p. 230.
6. Crystran Ltd (2012). MSDS for cadmium telluride. Accessed on 16 April 2015 from:
http://www.crystran.co.uk/userfiles/files/cadmium-telluride-cdte-msds.pdf
Potential sources of mercury exposure for the general population include inhalation from
ambient air, ingestion in water and foodstuffs, and dental and medical treatments. Of
these, dietary exposure is the major source of non-occupational exposure, often through
eating fish or shellfish contaminated with methylmercury. The next most likely source of
mercury exposure to the general population is via in-mouth releases and ingestion from
Population
dental fillings. Increased breath levels of mercury ranging from 0.1 to 16.2 ng/L (mean 8.2)
scale impacts
were detected in 167 people with dental restoration as compared to 0.008 to 0.1 ng/L
1
(mean 0.06) in five people with no amalgams.
There is transfer of inorganic mercury from blood to breast milk and a Swedish study
suggested that exposure of infants to mercury from this source was mainly from the
2
mother's amalgam fillings.
Both mercury and its compounds have high acute (short-term) and
have high chronic (long-term) toxicity on aquatic life. There is
insufficient data to determine the acute toxicity of mercury and its
Overview compounds on plants, birds or land animals. Mercury and its
compounds are highly persistent in water and the environment and
will concentrate in the tissues of fish. These concentrations will be
Potential
considerably higher than the water from which the fish is taken.
environment
impacts Acute ecotoxicity High: Toxic to aquatic organisms.
Minamata disease was first discovered in Minamata city in Kumamoto prefecture, Japan,
in 1956, when the local populace ate shellfish and fish containing bioaccumulated mercury.
Famously, it was caused by the release of methylmercury in industrial wastewater from the
Has anything Chisso Corporation's chemical factory, which continued from 1932 to 1968.
happened In Australia
before in Orica’s Port Botany chemical plant in Sydney released mercury vapour into the
Australia? atmosphere in September 2011, breaching environmental standards for nine hours. The
mercury vapour was associated with mercury which had polluted the soil on the Orica site,
due to leaking pipes.
In December 2011, Orica suffered another mercury leak at Port Botany. In a series of
What is it? of other minerals, namely from the smelting of copper, lead or zinc
and through coal power generation where it is a trace contaminant of
2
the raw material .
Occupational exposure to high levels of thallium can result in harmful effects. A study in
1986 on cement plant workers found that they exhibited numbness and tingling in fingers
6
and toes and muscle cramps as a result of inhaling thallium .
Workplace
Another study in 1998 found that a worker who handled thallium-containing raw materials
health & safety
for glass manufacturing over a period of four years suffered from alopecia, abdominal pain,
impacts
diarrhoea and numbness and tingling in hands and feet. Thallium levels in hair samples
were considered to be very high and it was concluded that the worker had suffered from
7
chronic poisoning due to the occupational exposure to thallium dust .
Areas around cement plants, ore smelters, coal burning power plants and brick works are
8
likely to contain high levels of atmospheric deposition of thallium . Studies in the 1980’s
found that populations living near cement factories in Germany had increased
concentrations of thallium in urine and hair. In this example, the major route for the intake
Population
of thallium was through the consumption vegetables and fruit grown in private gardens
scale impacts
contaminated with dust fall from emissions of a cement plant which contained thallium.
Nervous system paralysis, sleep disorders, headaches and fatigue were found to be major
health effects associated with thallium levels in urine and hair when compared with a
9
control population .
Extreme: It is persistent in air, water and soil and does not break
Persistence 1
down .
Where are the Generation Transport Storage Treatment Recovery Final disposal
risks of impacts
most likely? High Medium Medium Moderate N/A Low
Has anything
happened
No specific Australian incidents have been identified.
before in
Australia?
Higher risk workplaces like smelters and coal burning power plants,
where worker exposure to thallium or other airborne pollutants may
be possible, routinely monitor at-risk staff via blood or urine-based
Industry – testing. Thallium concentrations must be below specified risk
systematic guidelines to ensure the worker is safe to continue working in the
13
controls exposed environment .
Such companies are licensed by environmental regulators to control
What control industrial processes and equipment so as to limit environmental
measures are in emissions of pollutants like thallium.
place to
Potential industrial sources of thallium waste are have strict
manage risks
emissions control equipment in place. Additionally at-risk workers
posed by this
wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE).
waste?
Industry – Australia also has national standards in place regarding the exposure
exposure limits for atmospheric contaminants in the occupational environment.
controls These relate to average atmospheric contaminants over an eight
hour day and apply to a 40 hour week. The current limits for thallium
3
and thallium compounds are 0.1 mg/m of air. This limit acts as a
national guideline and may vary between states and territories.
1. United States Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Toxic Substances
and Disease Registry (2013). Toxic Substances Portal – Thallium. Accessed April 15, 2015
from: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/tf.asp?id=308&tid=49
2. Royal Australian Chemical Institute (2011). Thallium. Accessed April 15, 2015 from:
https://www.raci.org.au/document/item/492
3. Lenntech (2015). Thallium – Tl. Accessed April 15, 2015 from:
http://www.lenntech.com/periodic/elements/tl.htm
4. John Peter AL and Viraraghavan T (2005). Thallium: a review of public health and
environmental concerns. Environmental International, 31(4): 493–501.
5. Strem Chemicals Inc. (2011). Material Safety Data Sheet – Thallium. Accessed April 15,
2015 from: http://www.strem.com/catalog/msds/81-8200
6. Ludolph A, Elger CE, Sennhenn R and Bertram HP (1986). Chronic thallium exposure in
cement plant workers: Clinical and electrophysiological data. Trace Elements in Medicine
3:121–125.
7. Hirata M, Taoda A, Ono-Ogasawara M, Takaya M and Hisanaga N (1998). A probable
case of chronic occupational thallium poisoning in a glass factory. Industrial Health, 36(3):
References 300–303.
8. Kazantzis G (2000). Thallium in the Environment and Health Effects. Environmental
Geochemistry and Health, 22(4): 275–280.
9. Brockhaus A, Dolgner R, Ewers U, Kramer U, Soddermann H and Wiegand H (1981).
Intake and health effects of thallium among population living in the vicinity of a cement
plant emitting thallium containing dust. International Archives of Occupational and
Environmental Health, 48(4): 375–389.
10. Zitko V, Carson WV and Carson WG (1975). Thallium: Occurrence in the environment
and toxicity to fish. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 13(1):22–30.
11. Lan C-H and Lin T-S (2005). Acute toxicity of trivalent thallium compounds to Daphnia
magna. Exotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 61(3): 432–435.
12. Borgmann U, Cheam V, Norwood WP and Lechner J (1998). Toxicity and
bioaccumulation of thallium in Hyalella azteca, with comparison to other metals and
prediction of environmental impact. Environmental Pollution, 99(1): 105–114.
13. Safe Work Australia (2013). Thallium – Hazardous Chemicals Requiring Health
Monitoring. Accessed April 15, 2015 from:
http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/swa/about/publications/pages/hm-thallium
Lead and lead compounds are used in a wide variety of products and
manufacturing processes. Lead is used in the production of batteries,
metal products such as fishing weights, electronics and alloys and
devices to shield x-rays. Lead compounds are used in the
manufacturing of a range of products including electronic parts,
plastics, rubbers and metals. Lead is also used in pigments, dyes,
paints and coatings.
Description of the
Lead occurs naturally in mineral form, usually with Zinc and Silver.
waste
According to Geoscience Australia, Australia has the world’s largest
deposits of both lead and zinc and as a result, both are mined and
1
What is it? used locally and exported .
A significant component of lead waste in Australia is from lead acid
batteries. Leaded glass is another wastestream that has emerged
from the e-waste recycling industry, where cathode ray television/
monitor (CRT) glass contains large quantities of lead.
Lead, silver, copper and zinc mining and refining, lead acid battery
Where does it recycling and recovery, e-waste collection and recycling. metal
Main sources
come from? recycling, iron and steel manufacturing,
Lead and lead compounds are used in the production of consumer
Where are the Generation Transport Storage Treatment Recovery Final disposal
risks of
impacts most High Medium Medium Moderate N/A Low
The lead smelter in Port Pirie South Australia, in the northern Spencer Gulf, has a long
history of operation. It has historically been a large sources of lead and other heavy metal
emissions the surrounding air, water and land environment. The northern Spencer Gulf
Has anything
region has a substantial legacy of heavy metal pollution. Studies conducted over a number
happened
of decades have shown elevated levels of metals in the upper section of the gulf, particularly
before in 10
in Germein Bay near Port Pirie.
Australia?
However, practices at the smelter have been vastly improved in recent years and this has
helped to reduce the amount of heavy metals entering the marine environment. Slowing or
reversing the effects of historical practices in the region will take many years.
Higher risk workplaces like lead smelters and mines, where worker
exposure to lead or other airborne pollutants may be possible,
routinely monitor at-risk staff via blood or urine-based testing. Lead
Industry –
concentrations must be below specified risk guidelines to ensure the
systematic 7
worker is safe to continue working in the exposed environment .
controls
Such companies are licensed by environmental regulators to control
industrial processes and equipment so as to limit environmental
emissions of pollutants like lead.
Where does it Main sources Aluminium smelting, chemical and plastics industries, oil drilling and
High: Toxic by inhalation, ingestion and touch. Contact with skin or eyes
Potential Acute toxicity can result in severe burns and eye damage. Inhalation or ingestion will
2
health result in irritation to nose, throat and lungs .
impacts High: Chronic poisoning due to exposure to fluorine compounds is
Chronic toxicity characterised by issues with the central nervous system and major
2
organs such as the heart, lungs or kidney .
Elevated fluorine concentrations in the atmosphere and in drinking water are likely to occur in
1
Population close proximity to production and processing facilities that use fluorine compounds . However,
scale impacts little recent information is available to suggest that fluorine compounds have resulted in larger,
population scale impacts.
Extreme: Fluorine compounds are highly persistent and will take the
Persistence form of a gas, liquid or solid in a variety of ecosystems. Industrial
emissions can produce elevated concentrations in the atmosphere.
Has anything
A large number of hydrofluoric acid workplace incidents and accidents in recent decades in
happened
Australia are reported in Appendix C of NICNAS’s Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) Priority Existing
before in 9
Chemical Assessment Report No.19,
Australia?
What control Potential industrial sources of fluorine compound waste have strict
measures are emissions control measures in place through the use of plant equipment
in place to such as engineering controls (extraction ventilation). Additionally at-risk
manage risks workers are required to wear appropriate personal protective equipment
posed by this (PPE). Emergency facilities to manage the exposure of staff, such as
6
waste? eye wash stations, should also be readily available .
Industry –
Australia also has national standards in place regarding the exposure
exposure controls
limits for atmospheric contaminants in the occupational environment.
These relate to average atmospheric contaminants over an eight hour
day and apply to a 40 hour week. The current limits for fluorine
3 3
compounds are 1.6 mg/m of air for fluorine and 2.5 mg/m of air for
fluoride. These limits act as a national guideline and may vary between
7
states and territories .
Since they are water soluble and used as solutions, the wastes
Physical/
present as solutions containing cyanides and may also contain metal
chemical
species derived from other components of the applications that
description
employed the cyanide.
Reproductive
Cyanides do not exhibit reproductive toxicity.
toxicity
Population
There are no impacts on the wider community from these industrial chemicals.
scale impacts
High concentrations of cyanide in a tailings dam in central NSW led to the deaths of
several thousand birds in 1995. Many birds were killed in 2003 when containers of sodium
Has anything cyanide on a truck travelling to a WA mine cracked and released cyanide. Sodium cyanide
happened was released to the harbour from production facility in Gladstone Qld in 2012. In the period
before in 1990-2015 Australia has experienced release of cyanide due to transport accidents on
Australia? three occasions. Several thousand litres of cyanide solution spilled in Northern Territory in
2002, poisoning birds and dingoes. Solid cyanide was released after a train derailment in
1992 in NSW (100 tonnes) and a truck accident in Northern Territory in 2007.
Industry –
The mining industry subscribes to a Cyanide Code of Practice that
systematic
provides detailed specification of industry practice.
controls
Acidic solutions and acid solid waste can take a large variety of forms
including, but not limited to: sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, nitric acid,
phosphoric acid, chromic acid, hydrofluoric acid, mixed inorganic and
1
organic acids . As a result, waste materials can originate from a range of
Description of the
sources with the most common being manufacturing of other chemicals,
waste
fertilisers, electronics and metal.
Most acidic solutions and solids do not occur freely in nature. Some are
found in active volcanic areas while others, like phosphoric acid, can be
2, 3, 4, 5
found in soft drinks, human and animal food and cleaning agents .
The potential health impacts of acidic solutions and solids are widely
varied. As a result, a range has been described for the potential impacts.
While it is difficult to draw conclusions for all substances in the category,
exposure generally results in high to extreme acute and chronic toxicity
Overview in the form of severe skin burns and irritation to the eyes, nose, throat
and lungs. Exposure to concentrated forms may lead to death. Repeated
exposure may cause permanent damage to internal organs. Some (but
not all) have been found to have severe carcinogenic effects on
2, 3, 4, 5
humans .
High – Extreme
Most will result in severe corrosive burns when contacted with skin or
Potential Acute toxicity ingested. Irritating to eyes, nose, throat and lungs if inhaled. Exposure to
health concentrated forms can cause circulatory collapse which may lead to
impacts death.
Medium – High
Repeated exposures may cause permanent damage to the lungs,
Chronic toxicity
circulatory system and teeth. Long-term skin exposure may cause
dermatitis.
Low – Extreme
Carcinogenicity Sulfuric acid was found to be carcinogenic to humans through
7
occupational exposure .
Low - Medium
Reproductive
There is little evidence to suggest that acidic solutions or solids have
toxicity
large effects on reproduction.
Workplace The majority of exposure incidences around acid solutions and solids occur in the workplace
health & where the chemicals are used in production, manufacturing or cleaning. Exposure is often due to
The general public may be exposed to small quantities of some acidic solutions or solids through
the consumption of food and soft drinks or through the use of cleaning agents in the home.
Population
Some acids may also be present in small quantities in the atmosphere, especially around
scale
industries producing or using such substances. As a result of this, the population scale impacts
impacts
of acidic solutions or solids are likely to be small. Such exposure incidents are likely to be as a
result of accidental contact with the skin or through ingestion.
Low
Exposure to some acids will result in chemical burns to plants or animals.
Acute ecotoxicity
Some may also corrode other minerals such as limestone, clay and
Potential
igneous rock.
environment
impacts Low
Chronic Larger quantities of some acids can lower the pH of aquatic
ecotoxicity environments for extended periods of time, posing a potential risk to
aquatic organisms.
Low – Medium
Some acids may result in acid rain. For example when sulfuric or
Persistence hydrochloric acid enters the atmosphere it reacts with other chemicals to
form salts. The acid particles then dissolve in clouds, fog, rain or snow
forming dilute acidic solutions. This then falls to the soil as acid rain.
Low – Medium
Bioaccumulation Most acids do not bioaccumulate in the environment because of their
highly reactive nature.
Where are
Generation Transport Storage Treatment Recovery Final disposal
the risks of
impacts
most likely? High Moderate Moderate Medium N/A Low
risks posed
Australia also has national standards in place regarding the exposure
by this Industry – limits for atmospheric contaminants in the occupational environment.
waste? exposure controls These relate to average atmospheric contaminants over an eight hour
11
day and apply to a 40 hour week . For example, the current limits for
vapour from some acidic solutions include:
3
• Nitric Acid – 5.2 mg/m of air
3
• Phosphoric Acid – 1 mg/m of air
3
• Sulfuric Acid – 1 mg/m of air
These limits act as a national guideline and may vary between states
and territories.
1. New South Wales Environment Protection Authority (2013). Waste codes & descriptions.
Accessed April 16, 2015 from: http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/owt/wclist.htm
2. Australian Government Department of the Environment. National Pollutant Inventory Fact
Sheet – Sulfuric acid. Accessed April 16, 2015 from: http://www.npi.gov.au/resource/sulfuric-acid
3. Australian Government Department of the Environment. National Pollutant Inventory Fact
Sheet – Phosphoric acid. Accessed April 16, 2015 from:
http://www.npi.gov.au/resource/phosphoric-acid
4. Australian Government Department of the Environment. National Pollutant Inventory Fact
Sheet – Nitric acid. Accessed April 16, 2015 from: http://www.npi.gov.au/resource/nitric-acid
5. Australian Government Department of the Environment. National Pollutant Inventory Fact
Sheet – Hydrochloric acid. Accessed April 16, 2015 from:
http://www.npi.gov.au/resource/hydrochloric-acid
6. United States Geological Survey (1993). Storage, transportation, handling and disposal of
Hydrochloric Acid. Accessed April 16, 2015 from:
References http://water.usgs.gov/admin/memo/policy/wrdpolicy94.006.html
7. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Occupational exposures to mists and
vapors form sulfuric acid and other strong inorganic acids. Accessed April 16, 2015 from:
http://www.inchem.org/documents/iarc/vol54/01-mists.html
8. Remun B, Koster P, Houthuu D, Boleij J, Willems H, Brunekreef B and Van Loveren C (1982).
Zinc chloride, zinc oxide, hydrochloric acid exposure and dental erosion in a zinc galvanizing
plant in the Netherlands. The Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 25(3): 229–307.
9. Tuominen ML, Tuominen RJ, Fubusa F and Mgalula N (2006). Tooth surface loss and
exposure to organic and inorganic acid fumes in workplace air. Community Dentistry and Oral
Epidemoilogy, 19(4): 217–220.
10. Queensland Government (2011). Safe Handling & Storage of Hydrochloric Acid. Accessed
April 16, 2015 from:
11. Safe Work Australia (1995). Adopted National Exposure Standards For Atmospheric
Contaminants In The Occupation Environment [NOHSC: 1003 (1995)]. Accessed April 16, 2015
from: http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/SWA/about/Publications/
Documents/237/AdoptedNationalExposureStandardsAtmosphericContaminants _NOHSC1003-
Basic solutions and base solid waste can take a large variety of
forms including, but not limited to: alkaline cleaners, potash, caustic
soda, ammonium hydroxide, waste lime and cement and caustic
Description of 1
neutralised waste . As a result, waste materials can originate from a
the waste
range of sources with the most common being cleaning agents, the
manufacturing of other chemicals, fertilisers and metal treatment.
Most basic solutions and solids do not occur freely in nature.
Reproductive Low: There is little evidence to suggest that basic solutions or solids
toxicity have reproductive effects.
The majority of exposure incidences around basic solutions and solids occur in the
Workplace
workplace where the chemicals are used in production, manufacturing or cleaning or in
health & safety
transportation. Exposure is often due to chemical spills resulting in severe skin or eye
impacts 2
chemical burns .
Some bases may be present in small quantities in the atmosphere, especially around
Population industries producing or using such substances. As a result of this, the population scale
scale impacts impacts of basic solutions or solids are likely to be small. Such exposure incidents are
likely to be as a result of accidental contact with the skin or through ingestion.
Has anything As much as 1.7 ML of sodium hydroxide solution overflowed from a refinery tank as a ship
happened was unloading at Alcoa’s Kwinana jetty, in WA in June 2004. The spill was contained in an
before in earthen spill compound. It cost the company $366,000 to clean up after the incident and
Australia? they were fined $11,000.
Reproductive
There are no reproductive toxicity impacts from exposure to asbestos.
toxicity
The risk factors for contracting asbestos-related disease are simply the total number of
fibres breathed in over a lifetime. Most people who develop asbestos-related diseases
have worked on jobs where they frequently breathed in large amounts of asbestos fibres.
Workplace For example, in the past, construction workers using unsafe practices may have frequently
health & safety encountered asbestos fibre levels well above background levels. The current regulated
impacts workplace limit (over an eight-hour period) is 100 fibres per litre of air (which is between
500 and 10 000 times background levels). In the past, workers in asbestos milling or mining
often encountered fibre concentrations a million times higher than background levels (see
‘Has anything happened before in Australia?’ – Wittenoom).
We are all exposed to low levels of asbestos in the air we breathe every day. Ambient or
background air usually contains between 10 and 200 asbestos fibres in every 1000 litres
(or cubic metre) of air (equivalent to 0.01 to 0.20 fibres per litre of air). However, most
people do not become ill from this exposure, because the levels of asbestos present in the
environment are very low. Most people are also exposed to higher levels of asbestos at
Population
some time in their lives; for example, in their workplace, community or home. However, for
scale impacts
most people, this kind of infrequent exposure is also unlikely to result in any ill effects.
A very small number of asbestos-related disease cases occur each year in people who
have not worked with asbestos products. The low number of cases makes it difficult to
determine the exact cause of the disease or the likely exposure event, but unsafe handling
of asbestos materials in the home may have contributed to some of these cases.
Chronic
Low.
ecotoxicity
Persistence High.
Bioaccumulation Low.
Wittenoom, WA
Wittenoom is an area in the Pilbara region of Western Australia that carried out asbestos
mining during the 1930's up until 1966, which produced tailings that contain varying
amounts of residual blue asbestos fibres (crocidolite). The stockpiles of tailings have been
eroded and dispersed over the years since the mining operations have ceased and now
extend for several kilometres downstream from the actual mine sites. Tailings were also
historically removed from the stockpiles and used on roads and around the town site as fill.
The 1990 Midnight Oil song ‘Blue Sky Mine’ was inspired by Wittenoom and its deadly
mining industry. It’s estimated that more than 20,000 people lived at Wittenoom before the
mine closed in 1966. Asbestos-related diseases have killed more than 2000 former workers
and family members of Wittenoom, a death toll that continues to rise.
In 2007, the state government withdrew Wittenoom’s town status—disconnecting services
like water and electricity—but a small group of residents stayed. Today they number just
three.
Has anything
Remnants of blue asbestos (the most deadly of all types of asbestos) are still present
happened
throughout the Wittenoom Asbestos Contaminated Area, presenting a serious risk to
before in
human health. The Department of Environment and Conservation has classified the town
Australia?
and gorge as contaminated and "not suitable for any form of human occupation” and that
1
access to the area “should be prevented.”
1. The West Australian newspaper, article March 5, 2013: Wittenoom closure nears.
Accessed 24 April 2015 from:
https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/regional/north-west/a/16300082/wittenoom-closure-
nears/
2. The West Australian newspaper, article July 15, 2013: The last people standing.
Accessed 24 April 2015 from:
https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/18007972/the-last-people-standing/
3. ABC Radio National, 10 August 2014. Background Briefing: Asbestos: The Mr Fluffy
fiasco. Accessed 24 April 2015 from:
http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/backgroundbriefing/2014-08-10/5649508
4. The Canberra Times newspaper, article January 2, 2015: Andrew Kefford, the ACT
bureaucrat combating Mr Fluffy. Accessed 24 April, 2015 from:
http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/andrew-kefford-the-act-bureaucrat-combating-
mr-fluffy-20150102-12d5gp.html
5. Environmental Health Standing Committee (enHealth), Asbestos: A guide for
householders and the general public, Australian Health Protection Principal Committee,
Canberra, 2013. Accessed 24 April 2015 from:
References http://www.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/Content/asbestos-
toc/$FILE/asbestos-feb13.pdf
6. Safe Work Australia. Hazardous Substances Information System (HSIS). Accessed April
20, 2015 from: http://hsis.safeworkaustralia.gov.au
7. Safe Work Australia. Model Code of Practice - How to Manage and Control Asbestos in
the Workplace, 2011.Accessed 24 April 2015 from:
http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/swa/about/publications/pages/manage-control-
asbestos-cop.
8. Work Safe Victoria. Compliance Code – Removing asbestos in workplaces. Edition No.1,
September 2008. Accessed 24 April, 2015 from:
https://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/9234/cc_asbestos_remove.pd
f
9. Government of Western Australia Department of Lands. Wittenoom: Asbestos
contamination and management. Accessed 24 April 2015 from:
http://www.lands.wa.gov.au/Wittenoom
10. National Environment Protection Council (1999). National Pollutant Inventory Technical
Advisory Panel Final Report.
Low: Triaryl phosphates have low chronic toxicity but see below for
reproductive effects.
Potential health
impacts Medium: Chronic effects of longer term exposure to
organophosphate pesticides are of the same type as the acute
Chronic toxicity effects and result from decreased levels of the relevant enzyme
causing reduced muscular control. Such effects may be induced by
slow-release formulations of the organophosphate pesticides that
are designed to maintain very low concentrations of the substances
in indoor environments.
Workplace Workplace exposure must be avoided to the maximum extent possible. Spray and jetting
health & safety applications pose particular risks and require the use of face masks. Periodic testing of
impacts workers is recommended by Safe Work Australia.
Permitted residue levels for organophosphate pesticides on grains and other vegetable
Population
products are typically a few mg per kilogram on treated product and withholding intervals
scale impacts
of typically 7 days after treatment.
Has anything
happened Workplace exposures with poisoning of various extents are reported to state poisons
before in centres.
Australia?
Reproductive
Acetonitrile does not affect reproduction.
toxicity
3
Workplace The time weighted exposure limit for acetonitrile is 40 ppm (= 67 mg/m ), with short term
3
health & safety exposure permitted up to 60 ppm (= 101 mg/m ). That for acrylonitrile is 2 ppm (4.3
3
impacts mg/m ).
Population
There were no population-scale impacts identified.
scale impacts
Has anything
happened
No incidents in Australia have been identified.
before in
Australia?
Industry –
Health concerns are higher for acrylonitrile and ethane dinitrile on
systematic
account of their toxicity than for acetonitrile.
controls
What control
measures are Industry – Acetonitrile and acrylonitrile are generally used in closed systems so
in place to exposure workers are not directly exposed during normal operations.
manage risks controls Regulatory limits (see above) apply.
posed by this
Workplace health and safety limits are promulgated by government
waste? Government
agencies in States and Territories.
1. Public Release Summary on the Evaluation of the new Active Constituent Ethanedinitrile
in the product Sterigas 1000 Fumigant (2013):
http://archive.apvma.gov.au/registration/assessment/docs/prs_ethane-dinitrile.pdf.
References 2. Acetonitrile: http://pubchem.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/compound/acetonitrile#section=Top.
3. Toxic Substances Portal – Acrylonitrile (2013):
www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=4478ctid=78.
Phenols can cause acute toxicity through contact with skin and
mucous membranes. Since phenol is absorbed through the skin
Overview
relatively quickly, systemic poisoning can occur in addition to the
local caustic burns.
Reproductive
Low: Suspected of causing genetic effects.
toxicity
Occupational exposure to phenolic compounds may occur during the production of phenol
and its products, during the application of phenolic resins (wood and iron/steel industry)
Workplace and during a number of other industrial activities. The highest concentration (up to 88
3
health & safety mg/m ) was reported for workers in the ex-USSR quenching coke with phenol-containing
impacts waste water.
In Australia the most likely worker exposure is to the acrid fumes of decomposed phenolic
resin binders, used on foundry sands in moulding and casting processes.
Population For the general population, cigarette smoke and smoked food products are the most
Phenols are very toxic in the environment. Acute toxic effects may
include the death of animals, birds, or fish, and death or low growth
Overview rate in plants. Longer term effects may include shortened lifespan,
reproductive problems, lower fertility, and changes in appearance or
behaviour.
Potential
environment Acute ecotoxicity Extreme: Very toxic to aquatic life.
impacts
Chronic
Extreme: Toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects.
ecotoxicity
A worker was killed when a pipe burst and sprayed him with molten phenol in a horrific
Has anything
workplace accident in Melbourne’s west in May 2011. The man was working on pipes
happened
outside the Nufarm herbicide manufacturing facility in Laverton North when one exploded,
before in
dousing him in phenol which he also probably ingested. The man suffered a cardiac arrest
Australia?
in the decontamination shower and was unable to be revived.
Waste solvents are often subject to reclamation, but due to the high
How is it
Main fates flammability of ethers this will either be blended into a waste derived
managed?
fuel for energy recovery or incinerated.
Ethers are extremely flammable liquids and vapours. They may also
be prone to auto-oxidise to dangerous organic peroxides, diethyl
ether peroxide, which are thermally unstable. Consequently ethers
must be used stored and handled and disposed of with extreme
care.
MTBE gives water an unpleasant taste at very low concentrations,
Overview and thus can render large quantities of groundwater non-potable.
MTBE is often introduced into water-supply aquifers by leaking
Potential health
underground storage tanks (USTs) at gasoline stations or by
impacts
gasoline containing MTBE spilled onto the ground. The higher water
solubility and persistence of MTBE cause it to travel faster and
farther than many other components of gasoline when released into
an aquifer.[
Though MTBE has been used as a fuel additive since 1979, there have been no long-term
Workplace studies of the ability of MTBE to cause cancer or other long term effects in workers
health & safety exposed to high concentrations. People who might have been exposed to MTBE at work
impacts often have also been exposed to a number of other chemicals, which makes studying this
issue difficult.
MTBE and other ethers are not a significant from an ecotoxicity point
of view, but MTBE gives water an unpleasant taste at very low
concentrations, which can render large quantities of groundwater
non-potable. MTBE is often introduced into water-supply aquifers by
Overview leaking underground storage tanks (USTs) at petrol stations or by
fuels containing MTBE spilled onto the ground. The higher water
solubility and persistence of MTBE cause it to travel faster and
Potential farther than many other components of petrol when released into an
environment aquifer.
impacts
Acute ecotoxicity Low: Negligible to low toxicity to aquatic life.
Chronic
Low: Negligible to low toxicity to aquatic life.
ecotoxicity
While no ether related incidents were identified in Australia, MTBE in particular has been
implicated in explosions and groundwater contamination elsewhere in the world:
1. Falck website article. Explosion on the chemical tanker Stolt Valor. Accessed April 24,
2015 from :
https://www.falck.com/en/timeline-events/2012_2
2. Los Angeles Times article, 8 May, 2008: $423-million MTBE settlement is offered.
Accessed April 21, 2015 from:
References http://articles.latimes.com/2008/may/08/local/me-mtbe08
3. EPA Victoria information bulletin, publication 940, February 2004. Minimising VOC
emissions form the printing industry. Accessed March 21, 2015 from:
http://www.epa.vic.gov.au/~/media/Publications/940.pdf
4. Australian Government Department of the Environment. Petrol fuel quality standard.
Organic solvents are simply liquid organic chemicals that have the
ability to dissolve other substances. This usually assists their role in
an industrial application, such as cleaning and degreasing.
Halogenated organic solvents specifically describe those organic
solvents that include the halogens, mainly fluorine, chlorine and
bromine, in their chemical structure.
Potential health High: Toxic if swallowed. Irritating to eyes; irritating to skin. May
Acute toxicity
impacts cause an allergic skin reaction.
Workplace As organic solvents are volatile (i.e. tend to evaporate), inhalational exposure is an
health & safety important exposure pathway to be considered when assessing the health hazards that
Persistence Low.
Bioaccumulation Low.
What control
Companies that handle organic solvents and their wastes are
measures are Industry –
licensed by environmental regulators to control industrial processes
in place to systematic
and equipment so as to limit environmental emissions of these
manage risks controls
pollutants.
posed by this
1. UNEP (2002). Basel Convention. Technical Guidelines on Hazardous Waste from the
Production and Use of Organic Solvents (Y6). Accessed March 21, 2015 from:
http://www.basel.int/Portals/4/Basel%20Convention/docs/meetings/sbc/
workdoc/old%20docs/tech-y6.pdf
2. Solvents Australia Pty Ltd (2010). Trichloroethylene Material Safety Data Sheet.
Accessed March 21, 2015 from:
http://www.solvents.net.au/index_htm_files/Trichloroethylene.pdf
3. Solvents Australia Pty Ltd (2010). Perchloroethylene Material Safety Data Sheet.
Accessed March 21, 2015 from:
http://www.solvents.net.au/index_htm_files/Perchloroethylene.pdf
References 4. National Occupational Health and Safety Commission (1990). Australian Government.
Industrial Organic Solvents. Accessed March 21, 2015 from:
http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/SWA/about/Publications/Documents/157/
IndustrialOrganicSolvents_1990_PDF.pdf
5. The Age newspaper article, May 21, 2009. Mass decontamination as toxic drums
continue to wash ashore. Accessed 23 April 2015 from:
http://www.theage.com.au/national/mass-decontamination-as-toxic-drums-continue-to-
wash-ashore-20090520-bfpn.html
6. Queensland Government Queensland Health. Public Health Guidance Note – Organic
Solvents. Accessed March 21, 2015 from:
http://www.health.qld.gov.au/ph/Documents/ehu/2688.pdf
Organic solvents are simply liquid organic chemicals that have the
ability to dissolve other substances. This usually assists their role in
an industrial application, such as cleaning and degreasing.
Solvents have three principal areas of use; as cleaning agents, as a
raw material or feedstock in the production and manufacture of other
Description of substances, and as a carrying and/or dispersion medium in chemical
the waste synthetic processes.
Wastes deriving from solvents and their use may be either:
• relatively clean, derived from cleaning and washing processes
• inclusive of other reaction products and by products – from
What is it? synthesis/manufacture of other substances.
Low - medium: Both short and long term exposure to certain organic
solvents has been found to be harmful to the kidney. Petroleum
Chronic toxicity
distillates, for example, gasoline, jet fuel and turpentine, are among
the most toxic.
High: Some organic solvents may cause cancer and heritable genetic
Carcinogenicity damage. Benzene is the main organic solvent which has definitively
been proven to cause cancer in humans from industrial use – the
Workplace
Inhalation is usually the most significant route of entry by which organic solvents enter the
health &
human body at work. Poor hygiene practices could result in skin absorption.
safety impacts
Most non-industrial applications of benzene, a natural constituent of crude oil and one of the
most elementary petrochemicals, have been limited by benzene’s carcinogenicity.
However, significant primary exposure occurs routinely in everyday activities, particularly
relating to petrol (gasoline) or other fossil fuel use. These include petrol vapour exposure at
Population fuel outlets, burning coal and oil, motor vehicle exhaust, cigarette smoke, wood burning
scale impacts fires, some adhesives and low concentrations in ambient air from all of these sources.
Population exposure studies from any particular exposure pathway have proved difficult to
ascribe health effects to a particular source/ activity due to the range of confounding
variables. However, epidemiologic studies provide clear evidence of a causal association
between exposure to benzene and a number of forms of leukaemia.
Persistence Low.
Bioaccumulation Low.
The contaminated site industry in Australia, in terms of identification, testing, classifying and
Has anything remediating legacy waste impacts to land, was borne out of ground pollution from organic
happened solvents or, more particularly, petroleum fuel leakages from underground storage tanks.
before in Thousands of contaminated sites have been registered by environmental regulators across
Australia? Australia and are in various stages of identification, quantification, remediation and clean
up.
What control
Industry – Companies that handle organic solvents and their wastes are licensed
measures are
systematic by environmental regulators to control industrial processes and
in place to
controls equipment so as to limit environmental emissions of these pollutants.
manage risks
1. UNEP (2002). Basel Convention. Technical Guidelines on Hazardous Waste from the
Production and Use of Organic Solvents (Y6). Accessed March 21, 2015 from:
http://www.basel.int/Portals/4/Basel%20Convention/docs/meetings/sbc/
workdoc/old%20docs/tech-y6.pdf
2. Shell Trading International Ltd (2011). Naphtha (petroleum), solvent-refined light Material
Safety Data Sheet. Accessed March 21, 2015 from:
http://www.shell.com/content/dam/shell-new/local/corporate/trading-shipping/downloads
References /msds/in-country/uk-stasco/mogas-naphtha-petroleum-solvent-refined-light-cas-64741-
84-0---stil---en.pdf
3. National Occupational Health and Safety Commission (1990). Australian Government.
Industrial Organic Solvents. Accessed March 21, 2015 from:
http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/SWA/about/Publications/Documents/157/
IndustrialOrganicSolvents_1990_PDF.pdf
4. US EPA. TEACH Chemical Summary – Benzene. Accessed March 21, 2015 from:
http://www.epa.gov/teach/chem_summ/BENZ_summary.pdf
Workplace The polychlorinated dibenzofurans are not generally regarded as workplace hazards
health & safety except in cases of chemical manufacture where they may be present in a small number of
impacts products and wastes in Australia.
happened Dioxins from the site have spread throughout the sediments at the bottom of Sydney
before in Harbour and Port Jackson. Dioxins formed as a by-product of the manufacture of timber
Australia? preservatives and 2,4,5-T at the site have been linked by a characteristic chemical profile
to the dioxin contamination in other parts of Sydney Harbour, and the site appears to be
the major source of these contaminants in the harbour.
Given the bioaccumulative nature of dioxins, the only practicable means to ‘remove’ the
contaminants from the marine food chain is to allow other, clean sediments to cover the
contaminants. For much of the harbour, this process will take decades.
Fishing bans have been in place around Homebush Bay since 1989, and were extended to
parts of the Parramatta River in 1990. The extent of contamination from the site was not
recognised until 2006, when all commercial fishing was banned in Sydney Harbour after
tests revealed elevated levels of dioxin in fish and crustaceans in the harbour.
Recreational fishing in the Harbour has not been banned but, based on advice from an
expert panel, the NSW government recommends that no fish or crustaceans caught west
of the Sydney Harbour Bridge should be eaten. For fish caught east of the Sydney Harbour
Bridge, there are also restrictions suggested.
A study by the then NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water
suggested that much of Sydney Harbour remains contaminated by dioxins at levels that
will make eating fish from much of the harbour unsafe for decades.
Workplace The polychlorinated dibenzodioxins are not generally regarded as workplace hazards
health & safety except in cases of chemical manufacture where they may be present in a small number of
impacts products and wastes in Australia.
happened Dioxins from the site have spread throughout the sediments at the bottom of Sydney
before in Harbour and Port Jackson. Dioxins formed as a by-product of the manufacture of timber
Australia? preservatives and 2,4,5-T at the site have been linked by a characteristic chemical profile
to the dioxin contamination in other parts of Sydney Harbour, and the site appears to be
the major source of these contaminants in the harbour.
Given the bioaccumulative nature of dioxins, the only practicable means to ‘remove’ the
contaminants from the marine food chain is to allow other, clean sediments to cover the
contaminants. For much of the harbour, this process will take decades.
Fishing bans have been in place around Homebush Bay since 1989, and were extended to
parts of the Parramatta River in 1990. The extent of contamination from the site was not
recognised until 2006, when all commercial fishing was banned in Sydney Harbour after
tests revealed elevated levels of dioxin in fish and crustaceans in the harbour.
Recreational fishing in the Harbour has not been banned but, based on advice from an
expert panel, the NSW government recommends that no fish or crustaceans caught west
of the Sydney Harbour Bridge should be eaten. For fish caught east of the Sydney Harbour
Bridge, there are also restrictions suggested.
A study by the then NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water
suggested that much of Sydney Harbour remains contaminated by dioxins at levels that
will make eating fish from much of the harbour unsafe for decades.
What control
Industry – Industry exposure is limited to a small number of facilities operating
measures are
exposure chlorination processes and managing exposure to polychlorinated
in place to
controls dibenzodioxins.
manage risks
posed by this The National Dioxins Programme conducted during the first decade
waste? of this century surveyed polychlorinated dibenzodioxin and
Government
dibenzofuran content of Australian soils, foods, wildlife and human
milk blood.
Wide scale consumer product use at work, such as of computers and office furniture, could
result in low levels of exposure to organohalogen substances or wastes in the workplace,
Workplace
although their containment within the product will limit this potential. An exception to this is
health & safety
the e-waste dismantling industry, where there may be excessive handling or breakage of
impacts
plastic components that contain BFR chemicals. Also, firefighting has historically involved the
handling of PFOS in concentrate form.
The concentrations of PBDEs in human blood, breast milk, and body fat indicate that most
Population people are exposed to low levels of PBDEs, and many of these chemicals are known to be
scale impacts highly persistent and bioaccumulative. More significant impacts appear to occur in the
environment than directly on human health.
Chronic
Extreme: Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects
ecotoxicity
What control In August 2010, nine new chemicals were added to the Stockholm
measures are Convention's annexes. These are the first chemicals to be added to
in place to the annexes since Australia signed up to the Convention in 2004. For
manage risks Australia, an amendment to the annexes takes effect upon ratification
posed by this Government of that amendment. Accordingly, Australia is now considering
waste? ratification, and to do so must undertake a domestic treaty making
process.
Australia supported the addition of the new POPs to the Convention
following stakeholder consultation in early 2009.
Physical/
chemical Variable for each metal and their many compounds.
description
Ni
Motor vehicle manufacturing, glass manufacturing, aluminium
smelting, metal coating and finishing,
Co
Aluminium smelting
Where does it
Main sources Ba
come from?
Fabricated metal product manufacturing, explosives manufacturing,
polymer product manufacturing, aircraft manufacturing and
maintenance, scientific testing services.
V
None identified.
Reproductive
Low.
toxicity
Workplace Occupational exposure to high level of these metals may occur when breathing metallic
health & safety dust or fumes at industrial sites such as smelters, galvanising facilities or metal
impacts manufacturing plants.
Nickel in particular has high acute and chronic toxicity to aquatic life,
with cobalt similar and barium low. Insufficient data are available to
evaluate or predict the effects of these metals and their compounds
Overview
to plants, birds, or land animals. It is noted that very small amounts
of nickel have been shown to be essential for normal growth and
reproduction in some species of animals.
Potential
Acute ecotoxicity Extreme: Could be very toxic to aquatic life.
environment
impacts Chronic
High: May cause long term toxic effects in the aquatic environment.
ecotoxicity
Has anything
happened
No specific incidents identified.
before in
Australia?
What control
Higher risk workplaces like metal smelters, metal coating and metal
measures are
Industry – processing industries, where worker exposure to metals and their
in place to
systematic compounds wastes may be possible, are licensed by environmental
manage risks
controls regulators to control industrial processes and equipment so as to
posed by this
limit environmental emissions of these types of pollutants.
waste?
Physical/
chemical Variable for each chemical waste group
description
Workplace
Occupational exposure to high level of these compounds may occur when breathing dust
health & safety
or fumes at industrial sites.
impacts
The Coal Seam Gas industry is a contentious one for many stakeholders, including
communities located close the mining operations.
For example, this website has been set up expressly to chronicle incidents within the
Has anything
sector in Australia: http://coalseamgasnews.org/wp-
happened
content/uploads/2012/10/Contaminated-sites-and-accidents-related-specifically-to-CSG-in-
before in
Australia.pdf.
Australia?
A good discussion of the potential human health and environmental impacts of CSG
extraction,, rather than the non-toxic salts waste itself, can be found here:
http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2012/04/16/qa-csiro-scientist-discusses-impacts-csg.
What control
Potential industrial sources of these wastes have strict emissions
measures are
control equipment in place, such as baghouse filters, dust extraction
in place to Industry –
systems, electrostatic precipitators and stringent trade waste
manage risks exposure
emissions agreements. Additionally at-risk workers wear appropriate
posed by this controls
personal protective equipment (PPE), particularly relating to
waste?
restricting exposure to airborne sources of metal dusts and powders.
Physical/
chemical Variable for each chemical waste group
description
Surfactants (75%):
Organic and inorganic chemical manufacturing, aviation services,
ports, shipyards, firefighting services, Defence, mining and mine
processing, soap and detergent manufacturing.
Triethylamine catalysts (20%):
Where does it
Main sources
come from? Machine tool and parts manufacturing, foundries.
Isocyanate compounds
Polyurethane foam manufacturing
Mercaptans and acrylates
Non-specified manufacturing.
Workplace Occupational exposure to high level of these compounds may occur when breathing fumes
health & safety at industrial sites such as polyurethane foam blowers (in the case of isocyanates) and skin
impacts contact with surfactants, such as formulating from concentrates without sufficient PPE.
Has anything Approximately 1080kg of ethyl acrylate was discharged onto the ground while a container
happened ship was being unloaded by DP World stevedores at the Port of Melbourne in September
1. Reuters news article, 15 November 2015, Workers die after chemical leak at DuPont
plant near Houston. Accessed 23 April, 2015 from:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/11/16/us-usa-chemicals-death-
idUSKCN0J001B20141116
2. Warren D and Selchan D (2010). An Industrial Hygiene Appraisal of Triethylamine and
Dimethylethylamine Exposure Limits in the Foundry Industry. American Industrial Hygiene
Association Journal, Volume 49, Issue 12, 1988.
3. Chemical Book. N,N-Dimethylethylamine Material Safety Data Sheet. Accessed 23 April
References 2015 from: http://www.chemicalbook.com/ProductMSDSDetailCB5236897_EN.htm
4. Sigma Aldrich (2013). Nickel powder Material Safety Data Sheet. Accessed April 22,
2015 from:
http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/MSDS/MSDS/DisplayMSDSPage.do?country=AU&
language=en&productNumber=295515&brand=ALDRICH&PageToGoToURL=http
%3A%2F%2Fwww.sigmaaldrich.com%2Fcatalog%2Fproduct%2Faldrich%2F2955
15%3Flang%3Den
5. National Environment Protection Council (1999). National Pollutant Inventory Technical
Advisory Panel Final Report.
Carcinogenicity Low
Reproductive
No reproductive toxicity impacts are expected from these wastes.
toxicity
Workplace Hygiene is important in both food preparation and processing industries, for the purposes
health & safety of food standards and safety to the consumer as well as exposure to raw animal blood and
impacts associated carcass wastes of slaughtered animals.
High: Animal fats and vegetable oils can cause devastating physical
effects such as coating animals and plants with oil and suffocating
Acute ecotoxicity
them by oxygen depletion, foul shorelines, clog water treatment
plants and catch fire when ignition sources are present.
Chronic Low - medium: Can destroy future and existing food supplies,
ecotoxicity breeding animals and habitats.
There are numerous historical incidents in Australia of illegal dumping of wastes like
grease trap wastes and animal industry wastes.
While not illegal dumping per se, a rendering company in Wodonga, Victoria was fined
Has anything
$5841 for its stockpiling of 4,000 tonnes of rotting abattoir waste at a property on the city’s
happened
outskirts in 2010. The fine was levied following the completion of EPA Victoria’s
before in
investigation of community complaints about a stench coming from the property.
Australia?
The EPA received eight complaints in a day about the odour coming from the property.
The stockpiles of odorous waste material were identified as paunch — the contents of an
animal’s stomach, and sludge generated from the rendering process.
Tyres or ‘waste tyres’ are used, discarded or rejected tyres that have
Description of reached the end of their useful life, i.e., when they can no longer be
the waste used for their original purpose, and are subsequently removed from
What is it?
a vehicle.
Physical/
Tyres are composed of approximately 75% rubber and, as waste,
chemical
they are found in large stockpiles.
description
How is it Main fates Domestic fates: recycling, energy recovery, civil engineering,
Can result from inhalation of smoke from tyre fires, which emit
characteristic thick black smoke containing dangerous soot-laden
Acute toxicity
particulates from incomplete combustion, as well as other air
Potential health
pollutants.
impacts
Contraction of mosquito-borne diseases from the still-water breeding
environments that tyre stockpiles provide. Aedes albopictus, a
Chronic toxicity secondary dengue fever vector in Asia, has spread to North America
and Europe largely due to the international trade in used tyres (a
3
breeding habitat) .
Reproductive
No definitive evidence of risk to the unborn child.
toxicity
Repeated exposure to smoke from fires in general result in increased cases of respiratory
Population illness.
scale impacts Increased breeding habitats for disease-bearing mosquito vectors contributes to an
increase in cases of the disease.
Where are the Generation Transport Storage Treatment Recovery Final disposal
risks of impacts
most likely? Low Low High N/A Medium Medium
Has anything In NSW, fire services estimate a total of 256 tyre fires have burnt since 2009, with an
Industry –
exposure N/A
controls
1. COAG Standing Council on Environment and Water. Study into domestic and
international fate of end- of-life tyres, Final Report (2012). Hyder Consulting.
2. EPA Victoria Storage of waste tyres – Regulatory impact statement (RIS) (2014).
Publication number 1576.
3. World Health Organization. Dengue and severe dengue, fact sheet No.117 (2015).
Accessed March 12, 2015 from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs117/en/
4. Secretariat of the Basel Convention. Revised technical guidelines for the
environmentally sound management of used and waste pneumatic tyres (2011).
References
5. EPA Victoria. Media release: EPA investigates Moyston tyre stockpile fire (9 January
2015). Accessed March 12, 2015 from: http://www.epa.vic.gov.au/about-us/news-
centre/news-and-updates/news/2015/january/09/epa-investigates-moyston-tyre-stockpile-
fire
6. Environment Agency Wales: Regulation of Waste Management, p.31. Report prepared
for the Auditor General for Wales by the National Audit Office Wales (2004). Accessed
March 12, 2015 from:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120308220156/http://www.wao.gov.uk/assets/
englishdocuments/Environment_Agency_Wales_Waste_Management_agw_2004.pdf
Notes:
1. Taken from Annex III of the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous
Wastes and Their Disposal
2. Translation of Y-code to NEPM code(s) as described in Reporting hazardous waste under the Basel
Convention - guidance to states, territories and the Commonwealth (2014 version), Blue Environment,
Ascend and REC (Table 4)
3. Y46 Wastes collected from households not classified as hazardous waste in Australia and is not within scope
for this project
4. Y47 Residues arising from the incineration of household wastes not within scope of this project as, in the
main, this is not carried out in Australia
To establish a defensible basis for quantifying relative hazard, a modified form of the
National Pollutant Inventory’s (NPI) risk scoring approach, which quantifies environmental
and human health hazard, was used. The NPI Technical Advisory Panel (TAP) developed a
risk scoring methodology 2 in the late 1990’s for taking a long list of industrial chemical
contaminants and comparatively assessing their risk so that they could be ranked for
inclusion into the program. This approach is well suited to comparatively assess the hazards
posed by a list of hazardous wastes, so that a default categorisation can be arrived at using
a quantitative approach based on risk.
We used a modified version of the NPI TAP’s risk scoring approach to quantify relative
hazard, excluding assessment of potential exposure, as this is variable and dependant on
management controls and its life-cycle stage. This exclusion defines it as hazard scoring
approach.
• The general approach for each waste can be described as:
- Score human health effects on a scale of 0 – 3 per dimension, quantified based on
the allocated European risk phrases. The four component dimensions for human
health are: acute toxicity, chronic toxicity, carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity.
Obtain a total human health score out of 3 by dividing all dimension scores by four
(the total number of dimensions).
- Score environmental effects on a scale of 0 – 3, quantified based on the allocated
risk phrases. The component dimensions for human health are: acute toxicity,
chronic toxicity, persistence and bioaccumulation. Obtain a total environmental score
out of 3 by dividing all dimension scores by four (the total number of dimensions).
- Add the two component scores together to obtain a hazard score (out of a possible
6).
A worked example is shown for the waste Metal Carbonyls below in Figure C.1 overleaf.
Hazard scores were calculated by sourcing EC risk phrases for each hazardous waste (or
substance for those wastes whose hazard is clearly substance- based, such as ‘lead and
lead compounds’ or ‘Polychlorinated dibenzo-furan (any congener)’ for example). For those
not overtly substance-based (such as ‘clinical and related waste’), industry knowledge and
desktop research was used to understand the waste’s salient properties, so sound
professional judgement could be made about the primary hazard posed by the waste. Once
the primary hazard was clear, this was sufficient to undertake hazard scoring for these
wastes.
Apart from the TAP report itself, key references for this work were material safety data
sheets, Safe Work Australia’s Hazardous Substance Information System database and a
number of other literature references such as the World Health Organisation’s health and
safety guides.
The resulting hazard scores for each waste are shown in each impact profile, accompanied
by a colour-based scoring graphic, or ‘hazard scoring bar’, based on six ranges of hazard
score as follows:
2
Rae, I (1999), National Pollutant Inventory Technical Advisory Panel. Final report to the National Environment
Protection Council.
A key thing to note about the default waste categorisation table is that it is built on generic
assumptions about waste contaminants, properties and industrial processes. Particularly in
the case of wastes with chemical contaminants (for example lead; lead compounds), there is
no account taken of the concentration of the contaminant in the waste – because this is
entirely variable - which in turn varies the scale of hazard posed. Because individual wastes
will vary, scoring is by nature precautionary; the core assumption is:
Hazard of the contaminant (or primary influencing hazard property) = hazard of the
waste.
In the case where a waste is primarily a lead-containing waste, but the lead concentration is
typically low compared to hazardous waste contaminant criteria, it is assumed that such a
waste would not be classified as hazardous in the first place.