0% found this document useful (0 votes)
114 views

2 Lesson 1 Introduction

This document contains summaries of 5 problems related to decision making under uncertainty. Each problem provides payoff tables or values for alternatives under different states of nature. It then asks questions to determine the best alternative using different decision criteria such as maximax, maximin, Laplace, minimax regret, and expected monetary value. For example, problem 1 asks the contractor to determine the best capacity decision for their business based on the probability of high or low demand using these different criteria.

Uploaded by

Leslie Aguirre
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
114 views

2 Lesson 1 Introduction

This document contains summaries of 5 problems related to decision making under uncertainty. Each problem provides payoff tables or values for alternatives under different states of nature. It then asks questions to determine the best alternative using different decision criteria such as maximax, maximin, Laplace, minimax regret, and expected monetary value. For example, problem 1 asks the contractor to determine the best capacity decision for their business based on the probability of high or low demand using these different criteria.

Uploaded by

Leslie Aguirre
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Lesson 04 Decision Making Solutions

Solved Problem #1: see text book

Solved Problem #2: see textbook

Solved Problem #3: see textbook

Solved Problem #6: (costs) see textbook

#1: A small building contractor has recently experienced two successive years in which work opportunities
exceeded the firm’s capacity. The contractor must now make a decision on capacity for the next year.
Estimated profits under each of the two possible states of nature are shown in the table below. The units
are in $ thousands.

Next Year’s Demand


-Alternatives- Low High
Do nothing 50 60
Expand 20 80
Subcontract 40 70

a. Calculate the regret table.

-Alternatives- Low High


Do nothing 0 20
Expand 30 0
Subcontract 10 10

Determine the alternative and payoff /regret which should be selected for the decision criteria in each of the
following questions.
b. Maximax (best of all possible alternatives)?

Expand – payoff $80 thousand

c. Maximin (best of all the worst alternatives)?

Do nothing – payoff $50 thousand

d. Laplace (best of the expected payoffs for all alternatives)?

Tie between Do nothing and Subcontract – Payoff $55 thousand

e. Minimax regret (least of all the maximum regrets for each alternative)?

Subcontract – Regret $10 thousand

#2: Refer to problem 1. Suppose after a certain amount of discussion, the contractor is able to subjectively
assess the probabilities of low and high demand: P(Low) = .3, P(High) = .7.

a. Determine the expected profit fore each alternative?

Do nothing - $57 thousand


Expand - $62 thousand
Subcontract - $61 thousand

1
b. What is the alternative the contractor would select under the Expected Value under Risk (EMV -
greatest expected payoff for all alternatives) decision criteria?

Expand with a payoff of $62 thousand

c. Compute the Expected Profit Under Certainty, Expected Profit Under Risk, and the Expected
Value of Perfect Information?

Expected Profit under Certainty - $71 thousand


Expected Profit under Risk - $62 thousand
Expected Value of Perfect Information – $9 thousand

#3: Refer to problem 1.


a. Construct a graph that will enable you to perform how sensitive the problem is to the probabilities
for each state of nature using P(High)?

Sensitivity Analysis for Probability of (High)

90.00

80.00 Expand

70.00 Subcontract

60.00 Do nothing
Alternative Payoff

50.00

40.00

30.00

20.00

10.00

-
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Probability (High)

b. Over what range of P(High) would each alternative be best?

2
Sensitivity Analysis for Probability of (High)

100.00

80.00 Expand

Subcontract

60.00 Do nothing
Alternative Payoff

40.00

20.00

-
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Do nothing Subcontract,
0.5000
(20.00) Expand Subcontract,
0.6667

(40.00)
Probability (High)

Do nothing best when 0 <= P(High) < .50


Subcontract best when .50 < P(High) < .6667
Expand best when .6667 < P(High) <= 1

c. Over what range of P(Low) would each alternative be best?

Sensitivity Analysis for Probability of (Low )

100.00

80.00

60.00

Do nothing
Alternative Payoff

40.00 Subcontract

20.00 Expand

-
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Do nothing Subcontract,
0.5000
(20.00) Expand Subcontract,
0.3333

(40.00)
Probability (Low )

3
Expand best when 0 <= P(Low) < .3333
Subcontract best when .3333 < P(Low) < .5
Do nothing best when .5 < P(Low) <= 1

#4: The lease of Theme Park, Inc., is about to expire. Management must decide whether to renew the lease
for another 10 years or to relocate near the site of a proposed motel. The town planning board is currently
debating the merits of granting approval to the motel. A consultant has estimated the net present value in
dollars of Theme Park’s two alternatives under each state of nature as shown below.

-Alternatives- Motel Approved Motel Rejected


Renew 500,000 4,000,000
Relocate 5,000,000 100,000

a. Calculate the regret table.

-Alternatives- Motel Approved Motel Rejected


Renew 4,500,000 0
Relocate 0 3,900,000

Determine the alternative and payoff /regret which should be selected for the decision criteria in each of the
following questions.
b. Maximax (best of all possible alternatives)?

Relocate – net present value (payoff) of $5,000,000

c. Maximin (best of all the worst alternatives)?

Renew – net present value (payoff) of $500,000

d. Laplace (best of the expected payoffs for all alternatives)?

Relocate – net present value (payoff) $2,550,000

e. Minimax regret (least of all the maximum regrets for each alternative)?

Relocate – net present value (regret) $3,900,000

#5: Refer to problem 4. Suppose that the management of Theme Park, Inc., has decided that there is a 35%
probability that the motel’s application will be approved. Answer the following questions.
a. If management uses the Expected Monetary Value (EMV) as the decision criterion, which
alternative should it choose? Why?

Renew
The expected payoff (net present value) for renew is $2,775,000 and the expected payoff (net
present value) for relocate is $1,815,000 and the EMV criterion rule is to choose the
alternative with the maximum expected payoff.

b. If management has been offered the option of a temporary lease which will cost $24,000 while the
town planning board considers the motel’s application, would you advise management to sign the
lease? Explain you answer.

Yes
The Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) is higher than the lease cost; therefore,
management should sign the lease.

4
#6: Refer to problem 4 and 5.
a. Construct a graph which can be used to analyze how sensitive the decision is to the probability
that a new motel is approved.

Sensitivity Analysis for Probability of (Motel Approved)

6,000,000.00

5,000,000.00 Relocate

4,000,000.00
Alternative Payoff

3,000,000.00

2,000,000.00

1,000,000.00

Renew

-
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Renew Relocate, 0.4643

(1,000,000.00)
Probability (Motel Approved)

b. What is the probability of the new motel’s approval at which point Theme Park, Inc.’s
management is indifferent to which alternative they choose? In other words, what is the
probability of the new motel’s approval at which point both alternatives will have the same
payoff? Specify your answer as a percentage using 2 decimal points of accuracy.

Probability .4643 or 46.43%

c. Identify the probability range for the new motels approval where
i. Renew is the best alternative

0 (0%) <= Probability (Motel Approved) < .4643 (46.43%)

ii. Relocate is the best alternative

.4643 (46.43%) < Probability (Motel Approved) <= 1 (100%)

#7: The research staff of a marketing agency has assembled the following payoff table (stated in thousands
of dollars) for 4 different project proposals: #1, #2, #3, and #4. There are only 2 possible future conditions:
either the proposal will be accepted or rejected.

-Alternatives- Accepted Rejected


#1 10 -2
#2 8 3
#3 5 5
#4 0 7

5
a. Construct a graph which can be used to analyze how sensitive the decision is to the probability
that the proposal is rejected.

Sensitivity Analysis for Probability of (Rejected)

12.00

10.00

8.00

#4

6.00

#3
Alternative Payoff

4.00

#2

2.00

-
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
#1 #2, 0.2857

(2.00) #1
#2 #3, 0.6000

(4.00) #3 #4, 0.7143

(6.00)
Probability (Rejected)

b. Identify the probability range for the proposal being rejected where
i. Proposal #1 has the highest payoff

0 (0%) <= Probability (rejected) < .2857 (28.57%)

ii. Proposal #2 has the highest payoff

.2857 (28.57%) < Probability (rejected) < .6000 (60.00%)

iii. Proposal #3 has the highest payoff

.6000 (60.00%) < Probability (rejected) < .7143 (71.43%)

iv. Proposal #4 has the highest payoff

.7143 (71.43%) < Probability (rejected) <= 1 (100%)

#8: The following payoff table represents costs in thousands of dollars associated with 2 states of nature
and 4 alternatives.

States of Nature
-Alternatives- #1 #2
A 120 20
B 60 40
C 10 110
D 90 90

6
c. Construct a graph which can be used to analyze how sensitive the decision is to the probability
that state of nature #1 occurs.

Sensitivity Analysis for Probability of (#1)

140.00

120.00 A

100.00

80.00
Alternative Payoff

60.00 B

40.00

20.00

-
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
A B, 0.2500
(20.00)

B C, 0.5833
(40.00)
Probability (#1)

d. Identify the probability range for the proposal being rejected where
i. Alternative A has the least cost

0 (0%) <= Probability (#1) < .2500 (25.00%)

ii. Alternative B has the least cost

.2500 (25.00%) < Probability (#1) < .5833 (58.33%)

iii. Alternative C has the least cost

.5833 (58.33%) < Probability (#1) <= 1 (100%)

iv. Alternative D has the least cost

D never has the least cost

You might also like