Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 64 views

    Session 2014-2015, Semester 2: KXGX 6101: Research Methodology

    Uploaded by

    L
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating student proposal presentations with criteria in several areas: 1. The background, problem definition, justification, scope and objectives are evaluated on clarity and relevance to the research problem. 2. The proposed methodology is evaluated on its relevance to the objectives. 3. Additional areas of evaluation include the organization, quality of presentation skills, slides, time management, and ability to answer questions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Session 2014-2015, Semester 2: KXGX 6101: Research Methodology

    Uploaded by

    L
    64 views1 page
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating student proposal presentations with criteria in several areas: 1. The background, problem definition, justification, scope and objectives are evaluated on clarity and relevance to the research problem. 2. The proposed methodology is evaluated on its relevance to the objectives. 3. Additional areas of evaluation include the organization, quality of presentation skills, slides, time management, and ability to answer questions.

    Original Description:

    Presentation Checklist

    Original Title

    Rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides a rubric for evaluating student proposal presentations with criteria in several areas: 1. The background, problem definition, justification, scope and objectives are evaluated on clarity and relevance to the research problem. 2. The proposed methodology is evaluated on its relevance to the objectives. 3. Additional areas of evaluation include the organization, quality of presentation skills, slides, time management, and ability to answer questions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    64 views1 page

    Session 2014-2015, Semester 2: KXGX 6101: Research Methodology

    Uploaded by

    L
    This document provides a rubric for evaluating student proposal presentations with criteria in several areas: 1. The background, problem definition, justification, scope and objectives are evaluated on clarity and relevance to the research problem. 2. The proposed methodology is evaluated on its relevance to the objectives. 3. Additional areas of evaluation include the organization, quality of presentation skills, slides, time management, and ability to answer questions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    KXGX 6101: Research Methodology

    Session 2014-2015, Semester 2

    Student Information

    Name :

    Matric No. :

    Rubric for Proposal Presentation Evaluation


    Very Poor Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent
    Marks Marks
    Item Criteria
    (Marks: <4) (Marks: In (Marks: 6) (Marks: In (Marks: In Allocated Obtained
    between 4 to6) between 6 to 8) between 8 to 10)
    Totally irrelevant Poor Overall good Fairly good Comprehensive
    background. background. background. background. background.

    Problem is not Problem is Problem Problem Problem is very


    Background 10
    defined and out vaguely defined definition is definition is clear.
    of context. and out of moderately clear. clear.
    context.

    Justification/ Not justified at Poorly justified. Average Good justification. Very well
    Content
    Problem all. justification. justified. 10
    Statement
    Vague. Poor. Good but little Fairly good. Very precise and
    modification clear.
    Too general. Not specific. required. Specific.
    Specific.
    Scope/ Not achievable. Not achievable. Specific. Achievable but
    need Achievable. 10
    Objectives
    Achievable but modification.
    need
    modification.

    Not relevant at Somewhat Relevant. Fairly relevant. Highly relevant


    Proposed all with the relevant with the with the 10
    Methodology objectives. objectives. objective.

    Not clear at all Little clarity. Clear but can be Fairly clear. Very clear
    Clarity improved. No confusion 10

    Not well Little organized. Organized but Fairly organized. Very well
    Organization organized at all. can be improved. organized. 10

    Very poor Moderate Good Very good Extraordinary


    presentation. presentation presentation presentation presentation
    skill. skill. skill. skill.
    Presentation Very poorly
    Skill organized. Not well Very well
    organized. organized.
    Delivery Disjointed 10
    presentation Rambled, Very
    dwelt too long professional.
    on less
    important
    aspects.

    Slides of very Some slides Acceptably clear Well thought Slides


    poor quality. are difficult to slides. out slides. outstanding.
    read.
    Slides 10
    Typos and
    other errors in
    slides.

    Exceed 15 min. Within 15 Within 15 min. Within 15 Within 15 min.


    Time or less than 7 min. several but rushed min. completed as 10
    min. points left out. through. planned.

    Unable to answer Had difficulty Able to answer Question(s) Question(s)


    Question and question(s). answering question(s) answered with answered with
    - question(s). without elaboration. elaboration and 10
    Answer
    elaboration. able to relate to
    project.

    TOTAL 100

    Name of Moderator :

    Signature :

    You might also like