Scribd
Upload
107 views3 pages

Project With 3 Assignment Rubrics

The document outlines the rubrics used to evaluate 3 computer science and engineering projects. For each project, components are listed along with the maximum marks allotted for each. Project 1 focuses on problem statement, motivation, literature review and proposed design. Project 2 focuses on implementation details. Project 3 focuses on results, discussion of performance metrics, and user experience. Each project is worth a total of 100 marks.

Uploaded by

Sai Prudhviraj Gudipalli
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
107 views3 pages

Project With 3 Assignment Rubrics

The document outlines the rubrics used to evaluate 3 computer science and engineering projects. For each project, components are listed along with the maximum marks allotted for each. Project 1 focuses on problem statement, motivation, literature review and proposed design. Project 2 focuses on implementation details. Project 3 focuses on results, discussion of performance metrics, and user experience. Each project is worth a total of 100 marks.

Uploaded by

Sai Prudhviraj Gudipalli
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

SAVEETHA SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING

SAVEETHA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL AND TECHNICAL SCIENCES

COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRAMME

Project Rubrics

1. Report/Assignment 1

S.No Components Marks(100)


1. Problem Statement 10

1. Novelty (4)
2. Complexity (3)
3. Application (3)
2. Motivation 5

1. Feasibility (2)
2. Related area (3)
3. Issues 10

1. Number of Issues (5)


2. Open Issues (5)
4. Literature Survey 35

1. Recent papers with problem (5)


2. Number of papers surveyed (3)
3. Quality of Journals (5)
4. Classification topology (5)
5. Mathematical Models (5)
6. Comparison Table with metrics (5)
7. Comparison Graph with results (5)
8. Conclusion (2)
5. Proposed Design 30

1. Objectives (4)
2. Architectural Diagram (5)
3. Data Flow Diagram (5)
4. Module diagram (5)
5. Flowchart (5)
SAVEETHA SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
SAVEETHA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL AND TECHNICAL SCIENCES

COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRAMME

6. Algorithm or pseudo code (4)


7. Hardware and Software Specification (2)
6. Conclusion 5
7. References 5
Total 100

2. Report/Assignment 2

S.No Components Marks(100)


Implementation 90
1.
1) Language used (5)
2) Number of classes (5)
3) Number of functions (5)
4) Data Structures used (5)
5) Variable declaration (5)
6) Number of nested for loops used (5)
7) Database connectivity (5)
8) New mode of Input/output (Hardware (5)
devices) (5)
9) Programming Alignment or style (5)
10) Coupling (5)
11) Cohesion (5)
12) Time Complexity (5)
13) Space complexity (5)
14) Snapshots (10)
15) Results (10)
2. Conclusion 5
3. References 5
Total 100
SAVEETHA SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
SAVEETHA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL AND TECHNICAL SCIENCES

COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRAMME

3. Report/Assignment 3

S.No Components Marks(100)


1. Results and Discussion 90

1) Environment/Test bed used (5)


2) Number of test samples taken (5)
3) Duration of running time for taking results (5)
4) Number of trails for taking results (5)
5) Accuracy (5)
6) Scalability (5)
7) Reliability (5)
8) Security (5)
9) Quality and quantity of input and output (5)
10) Performance Metrics (5)
11) Comparison Graph (4 graphs ) (4 x 5 = 20)
12) Applications (5 )
13) User friendly (5)
14) Installation guide (10)
2. Conclusion 5
3. References 5
Total 100

You might also like