Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by HPLC
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by HPLC
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons by HPLC
NAMES & SYNONYMS: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, PAHs; also see Table 2.
SAMPLING MEASUREMENT
APPLICABILITY: This method is applicable to samples that can be extracted with acetonitrile. This method is not applicable to samples
that require a different extraction solvent or contain large amounts of highly adsorptive particulate matter, e.g., fly ash or diesel soot; also,
this method is not applicable to asphalt fume samples.
INTERFERENCES: Any compound that elutes at the same HPLC retention time may interfere. Heat, ozone, NO2, or UV light may cause
sample degradation.
OTHER METHODS: This revises P&CAM 206 and 251 [1]. Method 5515 uses the same sampling technique, with gas chromatographic
measurement [2]. Method 5800 uses the same sampling technique, and a flow-injection method to determine total polycyclic aromatic
compounds at two different sets of fluorescent wavelengths [3].
REAGENTS: EQUIPMENT:
SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS: Treat all polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons as carcinogens. Samples and
unused standards are considered toxic waste. Dispose of in an appropriate manner. Counter tops and
equipment should be checked regularly with a "black light" for fluorescence as an indicator of
contamination by PAHs.
SAMPLING:
SAMPLE PREPARATION:
NOTE: UV light may degrade PAHs; therefore, recommend using yellow, UV-absorbing shields for
fluorescent lights or use incandescent lighting.
6. Refrigerate samples upon receipt at laboratory.
7. Extract PAH from filters.
a. Add 5.0 mL of acetonitrile to each culture tube containing a filter. Similarly, add 5.0 mL of
acetonitrile to each culture tube containing the media and reagent blanks. Cap the tubes.
b. Place capped tubes in an ultrasonic bath for 30 to 60 min.
8. Desorb PAH from sorbent.
a. Score each sorbent tube with a file in front of the front (larger) sorbent section. Break tube at
score line.
b. Transfer front glass wool plug and front sorbent section to a culture tube. Transfer back sorbent
section, and the middle glass wool plug to a second culture tube.
c. Add 5.0 mL acetonitrile to each culture tube. Cap the tubes.
d. Place capped tubes in an ultrasonic bath for 30 to 60 min.
9. Filter all sample extracts through an 0.45-µm syringe filter.
MEASUREMENT:
13. Set HPLC according to manufacturer’s instructions, conditions on page 5506-1, and steps 14 and
15.
14. Inject sample aliquot (10 to 50 µL). Start mobile phase gradient:
a. Linear gradient from 60% acetonitrile/40% deionized water to 100% acetonitrile at 1 mL/min
over 20 min.
b. Hold at 100% acetonitrile for 20 min.
c. Linear gradient to initial condition, 5 min.
15. Measure peak areas for each analyte using the appropriate detector as specified in Table 1.
NOTE 1: The order of elution for the PAHs appears in Table 4.
NOTE 2: If peak area is above the calibration range, dilute with acetonitrile, reanalyze, and apply
dilution factor in calculations.
NOTE 3: If sample has many interferences, additional sample cleanup may be necessary.
CALCULATIONS:
16. Read the mass, µg (corrected for R or DE) of each analyte found on the filter (W) and front sorbent
(Wf) and back sorbent (Wb) sections, and on the average media blank filter (B) and front sorbent (B
f)
and back sorbent (Bb) sections from the calibration graphs.
17. Calculate concentration, C (mg/m3), as the sum of the particulate concentration and the vapor
concentration in the actual air volume sampled, V (L).
W Wf Wb B Bf Bb
C , mg/m 3
V
NOTE 2: Wf and Wb include analyte originally collected on the filter as particulate, then volatilized
during sampling. This can be a significant fraction for many PAHs (e.g., anthracene,
fluoranthene, fluorene, naphthalene, phenanthrene).
EVALUATION OF METHOD:
The UV detector is used to analyze for some PAHs (see Table 1), and the remaining PAHs are analyzed by
a fluorescent detector, which gave better sensitivity for some PAHs. The ranges of the limit of detection
(LOD) and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) values for the 17 PAHs are reported in Table 4 [4]. The LOD and
LOQ values varied because of differences in the detectors used and the concentrations of the standards.
Therefore, it is important that the LOD and LOQ values be determined for each set of samples. The LOQs
are the lower end of the analytical ranges. The upper end of the analytical ranges were not determined.
This method was evaluated by means of a user check [5]. An independent laboratory prepared spiked filters
and sorbent tubes for a recovery and desorption efficiency study (see Table 4). For the filters, except
naphthalene, the recovery results were greater than or equal to 75%. Since naphthalene is fairly volatile
under ambient conditions, this may account for the poor recovery results. For the sorbent tubes, only four
of the 17 analytes had desorption efficiencies that were greater than or equal to 75%. During the user check,
the sorbent tubes were extracted by adding 5 mL acetonitrile and were allowed to stand for 30 minutes with
occasional swirling. In more recent quality control experiments, the desorption efficiencies were often better
for some analytes (see Table 4) [4]. These results were achieved using an ultrasonic bath for 30 to 60
minutes. The results indicated the importance of preparing media spikes for recovery and desorption
efficiency studies for each set of samples; moreover, the results reenforce this need when using new lots
of media.
REFERENCES:
[1] NIOSH [1977]. Total particulate aromatic hydrocarbons: Method P&CAM 206. NIOSH Manual of
Analytical Methods, 2nd ed., Vol. 1. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health, DHEW (NIOSH) Publication No. 77-157-A.
[2] NIOSH [1994]. Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons by GC: Method 5515. In: Eller PM, Cassinelli ME,
®
eds. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM ), 4th ed. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94-113.
[3] NIOSH [1998]. Polycyclic aromatic compounds: Method 5800. In: Eller PM, Cassinelli ME, eds.
NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM®), 4th ed., 2nd Supplement. Cincinnati, OH: National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 98-119.
[4] NIOSH unpublished data.
[5] User Check Report for Method 5506, Analytical Report for NIOSH Sequence 4170 (NIOSH, DPSE,
MRSB, unpublished, March 16, 1984).
[6] Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 78th ed. [1997], Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
[7] IARC [1983]. IARC monographs onthe evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans:
polynuclear aromatic compounds, Part1, chemical, environmental and experimental data. Vol. 32.
Lyon, France: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer.
[8] Lenga RE, Votoupal KL, eds. [1993]. The Sigma-Aldrich library of regulatory and safety data, Volume
1. Sigma-Aldrich Company.
[9] NIOSH [1998]. Registry of toxic effects of chemical substances data base. Cincinnati, OH: National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Unpublished data base.
[10] NIOSH [1997]. NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97-140.
[11] ACGIH [1997]. 1997 TLVs® and BEIs®, Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical
agents, Biological exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists (ACGIH).
[12] NIOSH [1992]. NIOSH recommendations foroccupational safety and health, compendium of policy
documents and statements. Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 92-100.
MELTING BOILING
POINT POINT
COMPOUND (by M.W.) FORMULA WEIGHT DETECTOR ( C) ( C) REFERENCE
1. NAPHTHALENE C10H8 128.17 UV 80.2 218 [6]
2. ACENAPHTHYLENE C12H8 152.20 UV 92.5 280 [6]
3. ACENAPHTHENE C12H10 154.21 UV 93.4 279 [6]
4. FLUORENE C13H10 166.22 UV 115 295 [6]
5. ANTHRACENE C14H10 178.23 UV 215 340 [6]
6. PHENANTHRENE C14H10 178.23 UV 99.2 340 [6
7. FLUORANTHENE C16H10 202.26 FL 108 384 [6]
8. PYRENE C16H10 202.26 FL 151 404 [6]
9. BENZ[a]ANTHRACENE C18H12 228.29 FL 167 435 [7]
10. CHRYSENE C18H12 228.29 UV 258 448 [6]
11. BENZO[b]FLUORANTHENE C20H12 252.32 FL 168 -- [7]
12. BENZO[k]FLUORANTHENE C20H12 252.32 FL 217 480 [6]
13. BENZO[a]PYRENE C20H12 252.32 FL 177 495 [6, 8]
14. BENZO[e]PYRENE C20H12 252.32 FL 178 311 [6]
15. BENZO[ghi]PERYLENE C22H12 276.34 FL 278 -- [7]
16. INDENO[1,2,3-cd]PYRENE C22H12 276.34 FL 164 -- [7]
17. DIBENZ[a,h]ANTHRACENE C22H14 278.35 FL 270 524 [7, 8]
PHENANTHRENE PYRENE
Figure
1. Structure of the PAHs.