0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views5 pages

Methodology & Result (Updated)

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 5

4.

0 METHODOLOGY
4.1 Participant
 Students taking ECW568-EC2206A5A Environmental Engineering Laboratory

4.2 Apparatus
1. Beaker
2. Measuring Cylinder
3. Jar Test Apparatus
4. Turbidometer
5. pH meter
6. Spectrometer
7. Coagulant Solution (Alum or Ferric)
8. Laboratory Coat

4.3 Procedure
1. A study location is selected either lake, trench or river and about 6 liters of sample is
taken at the chosen location.
2. 1000mL of water sample was prepared and placed in beaker. This step was repeated
for the remaining 5 beakers resulting total of 6 beakers overall.
3. The PH level, turbidity and colour of water sample were recorded and assumed same
for all beakers.
4. The coagulant solution (alum or ferric) is added to each beaker with different amount
of 1.0ml, 2.0ml, 3.0ml, 4.0ml, 5.0ml and a blank sample.
5. The beakers were placed inside the jar apparatus and ensure the stirring paddles were
placed at the center of the beaker.
6. The jar test apparatus was started and operated with a speed of 140rpm for 3 minutes.
7. The speed was reduced with the speed of 70rpm for 5 minutes.
8. The stirring machine was stopped and allowed the sample to settle for 10 minutes.
9. The water sample was taken out from the jar test apparatus.
10. The beaker with the blank sample was put inside the spectrometer to measure the
reading of the colour, turbidity value obtained by using turbidometer and the PH
value is determined by using PH meter. These step is repeated for the remaining 5
beakers.
5.0 RESULT AND ANALYSIS
5.1 Data Acquisition

Water Sample taken from : Tasik Seksyen 7, Shah Alam, Selangor.

Coagulant Solution Used : Ferric Chloride

Figure 5.1.1: Location and View of Sample

Table 5.1.1: Data Recorded during the experiment

Beaker No. 1 2 3 4 5 6
Before Jar Test
pH 6.66
Colour (ptco) 230
Turbidity (NTU) 33.8
After Jar Test
Coagulant Dosage (ml) 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
pH 6.66 6.57 6.33 6.25 5.78 5.54
Colour (ptco) 230 167 118 46 210 215
Turbidity (NTU) 33.8 13.8 12.6 7.56 9.56 12.1
5.2 Data Analysis

a) pH versus amount of coagulant solution used.

pH Level versus Coagulant Dosage


14
13
12
11
10
9
pH Level

8
6.66 6.57 6.33
7 6.25
5.78 5.54
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Coagulant Dosage (ml)

Figure 5.2.1: Graph of pH level against Coagulant Dosage of Ferric Chloride

b) Colour versus amount of coagulant solution used.

Colour versus Coagulant Dosage


250 230
210 215

200
167
Colour (Ptco)

150
118

100
46
50

0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Coagulant Dosage (ml)

Figure 5.2.2 :Graph of Colour Removal against Coagulant Dosage of Ferric Chloride
c) Turbidity versus amount of coagulant solution used.

Turbidity versus Dosage of Ferric


40
33.8
35

30
Turbidity (NTU)

25

20
13.8
15 12.6 12.1
9.56
10 7.56

0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Coagulant Dosage (ml)

Figure 5.2.3: Graph of Turbidity against Coagulant Dosage of Ferric Chloride


6.0 DISCUSSION
Based from experiment conducted, the data obtained are presented in three set of graphs.
The first graph is the pH level against the coagulant dosage of ferric chloride. The graph begins
with a pH value of 6.66 in the beaker with no concentration of ferric chloride which the value
near to the neutral level of pH. Then, pH values decrease steadily with increasing dose of
ferric into the beaker as final pH value of 5.54 were recorded at 5.0ml dosage of ferric chloride.
Thus, it shows that the presence of ferric affect the pH values of the water sample and makes
the water become more acidic.

You might also like