The document discusses the scientific evidence for evolution and contrasts it with anti-science views of religious fundamentalists known as creationists. It argues that creationists wage organized campaigns to discredit evolution and prevent people from learning the science, insisting that life forms have remained unchanged since creation rather than evolved. However, the document states that scientists have uncovered extensive evidence of evolution over the past century and it is now considered a fundamental fact of science. Nonetheless, creationist views persist in influencing legislation in countries like the US. The document calls for engaging in discussion of these issues to understand both the science of evolution and the political agenda behind creationism.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views4 pages
Evolution and Creationism
The document discusses the scientific evidence for evolution and contrasts it with anti-science views of religious fundamentalists known as creationists. It argues that creationists wage organized campaigns to discredit evolution and prevent people from learning the science, insisting that life forms have remained unchanged since creation rather than evolved. However, the document states that scientists have uncovered extensive evidence of evolution over the past century and it is now considered a fundamental fact of science. Nonetheless, creationist views persist in influencing legislation in countries like the US. The document calls for engaging in discussion of these issues to understand both the science of evolution and the political agenda behind creationism.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4
Evolution and Creationism
What’s Real
The evolution of life on this planet, and contrasting this to
the anti-science rantings of : the religious fundamentalists who wage organized campaigns to try to discredit the science of evolution and prevent people from learning about it. The most extreme of these religious fundamentalists (also known as “creationists”) insist that life never evolved at all, and that all the different life-forms we see on this planet today—all the plants and animals, including human beings—are completely unrelated to each other, share no common ancestors, and have remained unchanged from the way they supposedly appeared at the beginnings of the earth, launched by the hand of a supernatural
of life on this planet, and contrasting this to the anti-science
rantings of the religious fundamentalists who wage organized campaigns to try to discredit the science of evolution and prevent people from learning about it. The most extreme of these religious fundamentalists (also known as “creationists”) insist that life never evolved at all, and that all the different life-forms we see on this planet today—all the plants and animals, including human beings—are completely unrelated to each other, share no common ancestors, and have remained unchanged from the way they supposedly appeared at the beginnings of the earth, launched by the hand of a supernatural Creator. The truth is that scientists have been uncovering plenty of evidence and proof to the contrary for more than a century and a half, and today the overwhelming majority of scientists all around the world have absolutely zero doubts about the basic facts of evolution. Evolution is actually considered to be one of the very best-established facts in all of science, and as much of a sure thing as the fact that the earth is not flat or that it goes around the sun. A great many of the advances of modern science have been accomplished on the basis of our understanding of evolution, and would not have been possible without it. Evolution is such a crucial core concept for the understanding of all of life that many scientists like to quote the famous geneticist Theodosius Dobzhansky who once remarked: “Nothing in biology makes sense, except in the light of evolution.” And yet, despite all the scientific consensus, the creationists and their anti-scientific rants will simply not go away. The question is why? And in countries like the United States some of the nuttier proponents of creationism even sit in the halls of power, influence legislation, and are welcomed advisers of presidents. Again, why is that? These are questions we all need to engage. I would argue that we all need to know at least the basic scientific facts about evolution and understand also how the religious fundamentalists who want to keep the people ignorant and confused about evolution are driven by a reactionary social and political agenda. And we need to learn to recognize what is fundamentally wrong and unscientific in the arguments of creationists, no matter what form they surface in—and this includes the arguments of the new crop of Intelligent Design Creationists who acknowledge the fact that some evolutionary change has taken place, but continue to insist that much of the diversity and complexity of life could not have come into being without the involvement of some kind of “Intelligent Designer” at some point in the process. It seems to me that the best and most visionary of revolutionaries are always thinking and wrangling about many different kinds of “big” social, cultural, philosophical and political questions, even right in the midst of the most intense struggles. It’s never a good idea for the focus of our thinking and actions to become so narrow that we fail to grapple with a variety of big questions—including in science and the arts—especially if we’re interested in figuring out how to fundamentally change the world. I am hoping to spark some lively debate and discussion of these important questions among (and between) a wide variety of readers of this newspaper. We live in a society where professional scientists and non-professionals, those with formal education and those who have been offered little or no such education, are usually kept apart and rarely get to interact and learn from each other. We don’t have to accept these divisions. With its unusually diverse readership, this newspaper is in a position to play an important role in overcoming such divisions.