The Deterministic Life Contingencies Model
The Deterministic Life Contingencies Model
Part I
THE DETERMINISTIC LIFE
CONTINGENCIES MODEL
AL
RI
TE
MA
D
TE
GH
RI
PY
CO
JWST504-c01 JWST504-Promislow Printer: Yet to Come Trim: 244mm × 170mm September 19, 2014 23:59
JWST504-c01 JWST504-Promislow Printer: Yet to Come Trim: 244mm × 170mm September 19, 2014 23:59
of insurance, the basic principle is similar. A company known as the insurer agrees to pay
out money, which we will refer to as benefits, at specified times, upon the occurrence of
specified events causing financial loss. In return, the person purchasing insurance, known as
the insured, agrees to make payments of prescribed amounts to the company. These payments
are typically known as premiums. The contract between the insurer and the insured is often
referred to as the insurance policy.
The risk is thereby transferred from the individuals facing the loss to the insurer. The
insurer in turn reduces its risk by insuring a sufficiently large number of individuals, so that
the losses can be accurately predicted. Consider the following example, which is admittedly
vastly oversimplified but designed to illustrate the basic idea.
Suppose that a certain type of event is unlikely to occur but if so, causes a financial loss
of 100 000. The insurer estimates that about 1 out of every 100 individuals who face the
possibility of such loss will actually experience it. If it insures 1000 people, it can then expect
10 losses. Based on this model, the insurer would charge each person a premium of 1000.
(We are ignoring certain factors such as expenses and profits.) It would collect a total of
1 000 000 and have precisely enough to cover the 100 000 loss for each of the 10 individuals
who experience this. Each individual has eliminated his or her risk, and in so far as the estimate
of 10 losses is correct, the insurer has likewise eliminated its own risk. (We comment further
on this statement in the next section.)
We conclude this section with a few words on the connection between insurance and
gambling. Many people believe that insurance is really a form of the latter, but in fact it is
exactly the opposite. Gambling trades certainty for uncertainty. The amount of money you
have in your pocket is there with certainty if you do not gamble, but it is subject to uncertainty
if you decide to place a bet. On the other hand, insurance trades uncertainty for certainty. The
uncertain drain on your wealth, due to the possibility of a financial loss, is converted to the
certainty of the much smaller drain of the premium payments if you insure against the loss.
various numbers of losses. This will allow adjustment of premiums in order to allow for the
risk that the actual number of losses will deviate from that expected. We will however begin
the study of actuarial mathematics by first developing a deterministic approach, as this seems
to be the best way of learning the basic concepts. After mastering this, it is not difficult to turn
to the more realistic stochastic setting.
We will not get into all the complications that can arise. In actual coin flipping it seems
clear that the results of each toss are independent of the others. The fact that one coin comes
up heads, is not going to affect the outcomes of the others. It is this independence which is
behind the law of large numbers, and which results in outcomes that are usually close to what
is expected. There are some risks, often referred to as systematic or non-diversifiable, where
the independence assumption fails, and which can adversely affect all or a large number of
members of a group at the same time. For example, a spreading epidemic could cause life or
health insurers to pay more in claims than they expected. Selling more policies in order to
diversify would not help their financial situation. It could in fact make it worse, if the premiums
were not sufficient to cover the extra losses. Severe climatic disturbances causing storms could
impact property insurance in the same way. In 2008, falling real estate prices in the United
States affected mortgage lenders and those who insured mortgage lenders against bad debts,
to the extent that this helped trigger a global financial crisis. A detailed discussion of these
matters is not within the scope of this work, and for the most part, the stochastic model we
present will confine attention to the usual insurance model where the risks are considered as
independent. It should be kept in mind however that the detection and avoidance of systematic
risk are matters that the actuary must always be aware of.
meet its obligations and some of the insureds will necessarily not receive compensation for
their losses. The challenge in meeting this goal arises from the several areas of uncertainty.
The amount and timing of the benefits that will have to be paid, as well as the investment
earnings, are unknown and subject to random fluctuations. The actuary makes substantial use
of probabilistic methods to handle this uncertainty.
Another goal is to achieve equity in setting premiums. If an insurer is to attract purchasers,
it must charge rates that are perceived as being fair. Here also, the randomness means that it is
not obvious how to define equity in this context. It cannot mean that two individuals who are
charged the same amount in premiums will receive exactly the same back in benefits, for that
would negate the sharing arrangement inherent in the insurance idea. While there are different
possible viewpoints, equity in insurance is generally expected to mean that the mathematical
expectation of these two individuals should be the same.
1.5 Reassessment
Actuaries design insurance contracts and must initially calculate premiums that will fulfill the
goals of adequacy and equity, but this is not the end of the story. No matter how carefully
one makes an initial assessment of risks, there are too many variables to be able to achieve
complete accuracy. Such assessments must be continually re-evaluated, and herein lies the
real expertise of the actuary. This work may be compared to sailing a ship in a stormy sea.
It is impossible to avoid being blown off course occasionally. The skill is to detect when
this occurs and to take the necessary steps to continue in the right direction. This continual
monitoring and reassessing is an important part of the actuary’s work. A large part of this
involves calculating quantities known as reserves. We introduce this concept in Chapter 2 and
then develop it more fully in Chapter 6.
1.6 Conclusion
We can now summarize the material found in the subsequent chapters of the book. We will
describe the mathematical models used by the actuary to ensure that an insurer will be able
to meet its promised benefits payments and that the respective purchasers of its contracts are
treated equitably. In Part I, we deal with a strictly deterministic model. This enables us to
focus on the main principles while keeping the required mathematics reasonably simple. In
Part II, we look at the stochastic model for an individual insurance contract. In Part III, we
look at more advanced stochastic models and introduce the mathematics of financial markets.
In Part IV, we consider models that encompass an entire portfolio of insurance contracts.