University of Massachusetts Amherst

ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst
Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014

1-1-1994

Public versus private education : a comparative case

study of a public and a private school in Nepal.
Jeetendra Raj Joshee
University of Massachusetts Amherst

Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1

Recommended Citation
Joshee, Jeetendra Raj, "Public versus private education : a comparative case study of a public and a private school in Nepal." (1994).
Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 2220.
https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/2220

This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in
Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact
[email protected].
 PUBLIC VERSUS PRIVATE EDUCATION:

A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY OF

A PUBLIC AND A PRIVATE SCHOOL

IN NEPAL

A Dissertation Presented

by

JEETENDRA RAJ JOSHEE

Submitted to the Graduate School of the

University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree of

DOCTOR OF EDUCATION

May 1994

School of Education
© Copyright by Jeetendra Raj Joshee 1994

All Rights Reserved

 PUBLIC VERSUS PRIVATE EDUCATION:

A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY OF

A PUBLIC AND A PRIVATE SCHOOL

IN NEPAL

A Dissertation Presented

by

JEETENDRA RAJ JOSHEE

Approved as to style and content by:

GeOi. vjc u • uton |

ncmuer

Patt Dodds , Member

 This dissertation is dedicated to

My late father Raj Kumar Joshee

My late brother Devendra Raj Joshee
and
My mother Gyan Kumari Joshee
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

No project such as this is possible without the

encouragement and help of many individuals. I would like to

take this opportunity to express my gratitude and

appreciation to the people who helped me during various

stages of my doctoral program.

First and foremost, I would like to thank my family,

for their enormous love, support, and encouragement which

enabled me to complete this degree. I am most appreciative

to my wife, Subarna, for being a great companion in my life.

Her belief and support in my endeavors has always given me

courage and strength in doing the right thing. I am

thankful to my daughter, Nisha, for her interest in my work

and sharing the joy of my achievement. And, to my son,

Abiral, who kept on asking me "Dad, are you done yet?" Yes,

son, "I am DONE." Both of you have given me the meaning to

continue learning.

I am grateful to all my committee members. I would

like to thank Dr. David Evans, my committee chairperson, for

constantly posing challenging intellectual questions. You

always made me think for something better. Drs . George Urch

and Patt Dodds read my drafts, commented, and provided very

helpful suggestions. I also would like to thank Dr. Fredi

v
Munger, my comprehensive committee member.
I am indebted to
my friend and colleague Sue Thrasher for her
continuing help
in editing my papers. Also, I appreciate my friend Patrick
Burns, for his help in editing my comprehensive
papers.

I would like to thank all the participants of this

study. Without their help and willingness, this research
would not have been possible. Also, thanks to all other

educators, parents, and individuals in Kathmandu and at the

research site in Nepal, for sharing useful information

related to this study. I am appreciative of Chij Shrestha,

for lending me the use of a laptop computer during data

collection, and for sending so many important documents,

books, and reports from Nepal. Also, I am thankful to my

friend, Shyam Kumar Shrestha, for finding many important

documents and articles.

I am thankful to many members of the Center for

International Education. Especially, Greg Thompson, for

introducing me to the Center. Besides academics, Center

community was like a family to me, full of Fall retreats,

Spring picnics, Christmas parties, and tag sales.

I am grateful to my friends, Totraman Gurung and Erica

Piedade, for their comradery, support, and encouragement.

My mother, Gyan Kumari Joshee, my father in law, Ganesh

vi
Bahadur Shrestha, and my mother in law, Mishri
Devi
Shrestha, always blessed me for success. I also want to
thank my brother in law, Hemanta Shrestha, for his
support.

I have been able to come so far in my life today

because of one person, my father, the late Raj Kumar Joshee.

Although he did not hold any education degree, he was one of

the best educators I know. He taught me to be truthful,

courageous, and strong. Thank you, father.

Vll
 ABSTRACT
PUBLIC VERSUS PRIVATE EDUCATION:

A COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY OF

A PUBLIC AND A PRIVATE SCHOOL

IN NEPAL

MAY 1994
JEETENDRA RAJ JOSHEE, B.A. TRIBHUVAN UNIVERSITY
M- A.T . SCHOOL FOR INTERNATIONAL TRAINING
M Ed
.
. UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST
Ed D . . , UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST

Directed by: Professor David R. Evans

This dissertation examines and analyzes the differences

between a public and a private school in Nepal. The study

looks at different factors such as school management and

operation, school environment, external interference in

school business, student discipline and behavior, teacher

qualification and training and school curriculum. The study

examines them as factors contributing to the school's

success and effectiveness.

The study explores how the two schools are managed and

operated, the curriculums that are taught, and the learning

environment that existed. The study describes how students,

teachers, school Headmaster, Principal, and parents felt

about the public and the private school.

viii
 A qualitative case study method was used
as the primary
research methodology for this study. The main source of
data came from in-depth interviews of 16 participants
who
were students, teachers, school Headmaster, Principal,
and
parents of the two schools. Additional data was gathered
from the researcher's journal based on school observations,

government statistical reports, and school documents.

The findings indicate that the school Headmaster needs

autonomy and decision making freedom to manage the school

effectively. A positive learning environment is necessary

for a school to succeed and outside interference and

presence of non-educational activities such as politics is

destructive to the school environment. The study suggests

that the government and the community must clearly define

and understand their role in the school, so that their

involvement helps rather than interferes in the school.

The study indicates that the quality of education in

the private school was better than the one in the public

school. Although not significantly different, the public

school teachers had more qualifications and training than

the private school teachers. However, more supplemental and

advanced curricula was taught in the private school.

Despite the high tuition and fees, the parents preferred to

send their children to private schools.

IX
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
v
ABSTRACT
vm
LIST OF TABLES .
. .

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS •
,

Chapter

I . INTRODUCTION 1

Statement of the Problem 2

Purpose of the Study 8
Research Questions 8

Primary Question 8
Implementing Questions 9

Rationale and Significance of the Study 10

Assumptions 14
Definitions of the Terms 15
Limitations of the Study 16
Organization of the Dissertation 17

II. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 21

Introduction 21
Public Versus Private Debate 22
Research on Public and Private
School Effectiveness 33
Literature on Private Schools in Nepal 48
Conceptual Framework for Research Question
From the Literature 52

III. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 56

Introduction 56
Theoretical Assumptions - Qualitative
Case Study Method For This Study 57
Selection of Site and Sample 62

Reasons for Selecting the Schools 64

The City 65
The Schools 67
The Participants 72

x
 Role of the Researcher
79
Data Collection "
ncL

Observation 7g
Interviews ’
84
Documents 87
Data Analysis 87
IV. EDUCATION IN NEPAL 94

Introduction 94
Background of the Country 94
History of Education in Nepal 100
The Early Days of 1950s 101
The Change During 1960s 104
The 1970s and the National Education
System Plan 107
Failure of NESP HO
Continuation of NESP in the 1980s 112

The Current Picture 114

Primary Education 117

Secondary Education 120

Private Education 124

V. SCHOOL MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION 130

Introduction 130
The Different Segments in School Management .... 131

The Headmaster 131

The School Management Committee 141
District Education Office 147
The Community and the Parents 154

VI. THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION 161

Introduction 161

School Curriculum 164

Medium of Instruction 173
Teacher Qualification and Training 176
Teacher Morale 182
Class Size 186
Public Perception 190

xi
VII. SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT WITHIN AND OUTSIDE
197
Introduction
197
Student Discipline and Behavior 199
Student Motivation Towards Learning 207
Politics in Schools 212
VIII. CONCLUSIONS, IMPLICATIONS OF STUDY, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH 226
Conclusions 226
Implications 232
Recommendations for Further Research 235

School Based Management 236

School Leadership 237
Teachers as Role Models 237
Teacher Education 237
Adult Education 238
Private Schools 238
Students 239
Equity in Education 239

APPENDIX: WRITTEN CONSENT FORM 241

BIBLIOGRAPHY 243

xii
 LIST OF TABLES
Table _
Pagi
1. Growth of Education in Nepal 1954-1961
103
2. Growth of Education in Nepal 1961-1970 106
3. Growth of Education in Nepal 1970-1980 109
4. Teachers in Nepal 110
5. Progress of Education in Nepal
(In Actual Numbers) 1953-1990 115
6. Private Education Data 1990 126

xiii
 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

CERID Research Center for Educational Innovation

and Development

DEO - District Education Office

IEES Improving the Efficiency of Educational

Systems
MOEC - Ministry of Education and Culture
NEC - National Education Committee
NESP - National Education System Plan
RETT - Radio Education Teacher Training

SLC - School Leaving Certificate

xiv
 CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

This dissertation research examines the differences

between a public and a private school in Nepal. The study

explores several internal and external factors that exist in

the two schools. Also, it looks at how public and private

schools are viewed by parents and educators. The study

looks at factors such as teachers', students', school

administrators', and parents' attitudes and behaviors which

contribute to the success and effectiveness of public and

private schools. Other internal variables such as school

management, school curriculum, teacher qualification and

training, and school environment are examined.

Additionally, the government policies regarding the

expansion, management, and supervision of both kinds of

schools are explored. All of these variables were examined

as key factors contributing to the success and effectiveness

of the private and the public school.

Along with other public services, involvement of the

private sector in education is a growing trend in many

developing countries. Nepal has experienced a tremendous

growth of public and private schools over the past decade.

Generally, private schools are considered better and more

1
effective schools. However, only a few research studies
can
be found that have focused on private
schools in developing
countries. This study will add some knowledge in

understanding the key internal and external factors

surrounding the school environment which contribute

to the
success and effectiveness of public and private
schools in
Nepal

Statement of the Problem

In quantitative terms, the development of education in

Nepal has undergone massive growth since independence in

1950. The growth has occurred in public as well as private

sectors. But more recently, the tremendous growth in

student enrollment and the increase of private schools in

Nepal indicate that private education has been very popular.

In Nepal, the rapid growth of private schools started after

the government established a policy in 1980 encouraging the

private sector to open up schools. The Educational

Statistical Report of Nepal (Ministry of Education and

Culture, MOEC, 1986), indicated that from 1984 to 1985 the

number of private primary schools increased by 93 percent,

lower secondary by 137 percent, and secondary by 11 percent.

Over the same period, student enrollment in private primary

schools increased by 233 percent, in lower secondary by 185

percent, and in secondary level by 27 percent. This is a 64

2
percent average increase in the number of private
schools at
all levels and a 122 percent increase in student
enrollment.

The Education and Human Resources Sector Assessment

final report prepared by the Improving the Efficiency of

Educational System Project (IEES, 1988) indicated that 8.7

percent of all lower secondary school grades 6 and 7 were

supported completely privately. This represented 8.1
percent of the total of lower secondary students enrolled in

private schools. Similarly, 27.7 percent of secondary

grades 8, 9, and 10 were totally privately supported,

enrolling more than 19 percent of all secondary students.

The report indicated that 2.6 percent of private primary

schools enrolled 3.1 percent of all primary school children

in the country. There are also kindergarten and nursery

(pre-primary) schools owned privately and they are

increasing every year. It is notable here that the

government has not conducted an extensive survey of private

schools, so the number of private schools and the percentage

of student enrollment might be even higher. The private

school educators estimate that currently, 30-40 percent of

the total K-10 students are enrolled in private schools in

Nepal. If their claim is true, this is a very high

percentage of enrollment for a country like Nepal, where the

history of private schools is short.

3
 There is evidence in the statistics that
private
schools have become a major part of the nation's
school
system and they are producing a good number of
high school
graduates every year. Besides some short papers and
articles, research on private schools in Nepal has
been a
neglected area. The government does not have an organized
mechanism to keep track of private schools. Until very
recently, the Ministry of Education and Culture's (MOEC)

national annual statistical report didn't even include the

number of private schools and the students enrolled in these

schools

Certainly the expansion of private education has helped

the country by supplying more classroom space to meet the

increasing demand of education. But without a systematic

examination or an evaluation process, the actual

productivity of this large private sector is unknown. Thus,

the evaluation of the education sector as a whole is

incomplete without a thorough examination of private

education in Nepal. Although private schools are considered

better than public schools, there is no comparative study

conducted in Nepal examining the differences between the

two. This study hopes to fill that gap.

In general, there are very few research studies

conducted on school effectiveness in developing countries

4
(Cohn & Rossmiller , 1987). There is a need to look at the
causes of the success and effectiveness of these
schools.
In the case of Nepal, where public schools are
supported
partly by the community and private schools operate

independently without the coordination and supervision of

any particular agency, it is important that their students,

teachers, administrators, management structure and operation

be examined. The school culture and environment that exists

in schools may be contributing to the success and

effectiveness of these schools.

According to James (1988a), the development of the

private sector in education is determined by three

variables: excess demand (not enough public schools),

differentiated demand (people wanting a different type and

choice of education) , and the supply of non-profit

entrepreneurship (often with religious motivations). She

argued that while excess demand is more likely to be the

reason for private school expansion in developing countries,

the availability of religious educational entrepreneurs adds

to the power of differentiated demand. But the case of

Nepal is a unique one. Here, the affiliation of religious

organizations with the private schools is almost negligible.

Only a handful of schools are run with religious

affiliations. Thus, as in many countries, private schools

in Nepal are not operating as non-profit organizations.

5
 It is possible that both excess
demand and
differentiated demand could be the reasons for
private
school expansion because public schools are
also increasing
in Nepal. However, the demand for and expansion of
these
schools are not supported by religious educational

entrepreneurs. Private schools in Nepal are for-profit

organizations. In many cases, they are operating as

"educational industries".

The expansion of many private schools at all levels and

their increasing demand indicate that people are attracted

to private schools. Although private school costs are much

higher compared to public schools, enrollment in these

schools has continued to soar. But what makes private

schools so popular has not been explored by previous

research studies. The differences in the quality of

education, school management, student discipline, and

teacher qualification have not been examined between the two

schools. Some private schools are perceived to be better

than public schools simply because they are labeled as

"private". One of the reasons for this "private popular"

movement might be the attitude of parents towards public and

private schools.

The government's decentralization policy, not only in

education, but for all public services, encourages the

6
involvement of the private sector in
education. The
government promotes this policy for financial
and supply
reasons. While privatization increases the
enrollment and
helps meet the public demand for access
to education, it
also reduces the financial burden on the
government in
managing and running the schools. Since
1981, one of the
Ministry of Education and Culture's strategies
to increase
enrollment in schools has been through privatization
(IEES,
1988). In order to promote private sector involvement
in
education, government policy on private schools may be

relaxed. As a result, the policy guidelines are unclear and

private schools have very little or no communication with

the government.

The lack of research looking at the differences between

the two types of school raises many questions. What factors

are involved and to what extent they matter has not been

examined. What differences exist in school management? Is

absolute autonomy helpful to schools? What programs and

incentives are needed for teachers? What effect does the

school environment have on student behavior and learning?

The lack of answers to these questions not only poses a

problem for the government educational planners, but also to

the private school entrepreneurs, parents, teachers, and

school administrators.

7
 Purpose of the .qtnriy

The main purpose of this study is to

conduct a
comparative field research project in Nepal
involving a
public and a private school and to examine
the factors
contributing to their success and effectiveness.
The study
looks at the differences between a private
and a public
school and examines the factors that affect their
success
and effectiveness. The study looks into factors such as
school management, teacher qualification and training,

government policy on education, the curriculum design and

implementation, and the school environment made up of

students, teachers and administrators.

The study also examines how parents view the public and

the private school, because it is the parents who choose

schools for their children. I believe that the study will

be of interest to private school entrepreneurs, educators,

parents, and government officials involved in policy making,

planning, and implementation of education programs.

Research Questions

Primary Question

What are the differences between a public and a private

school in Nepal? And what are the factors that contribute

to their success and effectiveness?

8
Implementing Questions
Internal Factors:

1. How is the public school managed differently

than the
private school?
2. What is the difference in students' attitudes
and
behaviors between the public and the private school?
3. What is the difference in teachers' attitudes
and
behaviors between the public and the private school?
4. What is the difference in school administrators'

attitudes and behaviors between the public and the

private school?

5. What kind of school environment do students, teachers,

and administrators build in public and private schools

and to what degree does this environment influence the

school's success and effectiveness?

6. What is the difference in teacher qualification and

training between the public and the private school?

7. What different curriculum is implemented in the public

and the private school?

External Factors:

8 . What is the socioeconomic background of the students

who attend the public and the private school?

9. What is the perception of parents and the community

towards the public and the private school? And why?

9
10. What is the government policy and role
regarding the
management, and supervision of public and
private
schools?

In order to address the research questions

above, this
study utilized qualitative case study method as
the primary
methodology. The data were collected through in-depth

interviews of 16 participants who were associated with

the
two schools used as research sites in this study. The
participants involved were students, teachers, principal,

headmaster, and parents. Additional data also came from the

researcher's journal based on school observations and

informal conversations with many educators. School

journals, documents, and government papers were consulted

for more data.

Rationale and Significance of the Study

This study will be of greatest interest to those who

are interested and involved in the development of education

programs in Nepal. Particularly, this study will be of keen

interest to all the individuals and organizations who play

vital roles in the establishment, expansion, and operation

of public and private schools in Nepal.

In a sense, this study is a pioneering one because of

the lack of research in this field in Nepal and it is a

10
significant one because of the exploratory
research approach
it applied. Examining both the internal and external
factors, particularly from a social
behavioral perspective,
is an important way to look at the
success and effectiveness
of schools because it is these factors
that build a school
environment which may be instrumental in the
success and
effectiveness of a school.

Due to the lack of research, especially a

comparative
study between public and private schools in developing

countries, the findings of this study will be of significant

value to educational planners, policy makers, educators,

parents, community leaders, and to educational leaders and

entrepreneurs in the public and the private sector.

Although this study is focused on the case of Nepal, other

developing countries in the same situation may benefit from

its findings.

In western industrialized countries, involvement of the

private sector in education is not a new phenomenon. There
is a long standing debate over public versus private

education in many countries. Public policy on private

schools and its success and effectiveness has been examined

by several researchers (Alexander, 1987; Blaug, 1987;

Cibulka, 1989; Coleman, Hoffer, and Kilgore, 1982; Cooper,

1989; Devins, 1989; James and Benjamin, 1988; James, 1988b;

11
Levin, 1989; Talbert, 1988). Therefore, this study in its
broadest sense, lies within the context
of choice of
education, alternative educational services,
demand and
supply of education, effectiveness and
efficiency of
schools, and financing of education. in the context of
developing countries, privatization relates
more to the
demand and supply side and financing of education
(James,
1989). However, effectiveness with higher achievement
and
expectations are reasons for private school operations
in
the Philippines, Korea, and Tanzania Psacharopoulos
( and
Woodhall, 1986).

The history of education development in Nepal is not

that old. The opening of public schools became legal only

after the political revolution of 1950. So private schools

are relatively new in Nepal. The growth of private schools

has been especially rapid during the last decade and no

systematic research study has been conducted to examine the

popularity, success, and effectiveness of these schools.

For the first time, the recently formed National Education

Commission 1991 has recognized the need for such a research

study focusing on private schools.

Most of the school effectiveness studies have focused

on input and output indicators. They have measured

effectiveness by examining the product and outcomes of a

12
school system. Some other studies have based
effectiveness
on the school's cost efficiency
factors (Blaug, 1981 ;

Jimenez and Cox, 1989; Windham,

1988;). All of these
studies have focused more on one single
variable— product—
rather than process. The process which
involves the
attitudes and behaviors of the key players
in a school
environment, such as students, teachers,
school principals
and parents, has often been ignored. I think it is
important that the process, which has direct
impact on the
product, needs to be examined very carefully.
This study
has looked at those factors from an ethnographic
perspective
rather than the traditional psychometric-experimental

approach. This notion is realized and supported even by

experimental researchers like Windham who mentioned that

"some educational production issues are researchable only

by
ethnographic methods" (1988, p.21). So, I believe this
study will be of significant value in the field because of

its prime focus on process indicators.

Private educational institutions in many countries have

strong religious ties. Many non-profit religious

organizations often control and operate the private schools.

Thus, many research studies have been conducted with a

particular focus on the non-profit nature of the private

schools and the religious values they provide (Lines, 1988;

James, 1989b). But the case of Nepal is quite different.

13
Religious ties with private schools
are almost nonexistent
in Nepal. Private schools in Nepal are not
operating as
non-profit organizations. And, there is a lack of research
study for this kind of situation. I hope that this study
will fill the gap to some extent and
will add to the
knowledge in understanding these independent
schools and the
differences that exists between the public
and private
sector

Assumptions
The following assumptions guided me through
this study.
1) That there are differences between public and private

schools in Nepal and private schools are widely

considered and accepted as more successful and

effective schools.

2) That in order to find out the differences between the

two schools, a comparative case study is the right

approach to use.

3) That school effectiveness can best be presented by a

thorough examination of organizational/structural and

process variables together (Purkey and Smith, 1983).

4) That students, teachers, principals, and parents play

important roles in creating certain environments in

schools and those environments are key factors in the

school's success and effectiveness.

14
 D efinition s of the Terms

P rivate Schools . Private school means different

things
in different countries. This study used the description
outlined in the National Education
Commission (1992) report,
which says private schools are the ones
that do not receive
regular financial support from the government,
but are
established under government policies and
procedures. They
are allowed to collect tuition and fees
from the students as
set forth by the school management committees.
They must
follow the national curriculum required by the
government
but are free to have additional curriculum (text
books,
extra subjects etc.) decided by the schools themselves.
The
district education office is supposed to provide supervision

for these schools.

Public Schools . Public schools in Nepal are those

which receive government financial support on a grant in aid
basis. Primary schools up to grade five are fully supported

by the government; however, secondary schools are supported

only 50 percent. The community must come up with the other

half of their operating costs through school fees,

donations, volunteering for school building maintenance work

and so on. This way, considerable private costs are

involved in these public schools. Curriculum is centralized

and implemented throughout the country. Public schools in

15
each district are supervised and
coordinated by the district
education office.

Limitation s of the Study

This study was limited by the following
factors:
1) Only two schools, one public and one
private, were used
as the sites for this study.
Participants for
interviewing were selected only from those
two case
schools. Thus, the findings were based solely on
what
the people associated with the two schools
said. These
two cases may not fully represent the range
of
perceptions of other people associated with public
and
private education in Nepal.

2) This study was conducted in the southern, semi-urban

area of Nepal so the case schools used in this study

may not be "representative" of schools from all parts

of Nepal. However, each case school studied is

described in detail so that readers of this study will

be able to interpret the "transferability" and

"fittingness" of the case (Lincoln and Guba, 1985).

3) This researcher cannot claim that the findings of this

research can be generalized to other developing

countries because this study was based in the

educational situation in Nepal. But policy makers in

other countries in similar situations may find certain

aspects of the study helpful.

16
4) Another limitation of thi s study
is that it focuses on
processes rather than product. The
findings of the
study are based on observations
of the school
environment and interviews with students,
teachers,
principals, and parents. The success
and effectiveness
of a school is described according
to what the
participants said in their interviews.
5) The major source of data was interviews
using a tape
recorder. Although a very small microphone
was used to
decrease its visibility, the participants were
not used
to being taped which might have affected
their level of
openness

Organ ization of the Dissertation

This dissertation is divided into eight chapters. In
summary, the chapters contain the following:

Chapter One outlines the problem statement, purpose,

rationale, and significance of the study. The primary and

implementing research questions are posed, central terms

used in the study are defined, and limitations of the study

are outlined. This chapter provides the reader with the

heart of the problem and explains what is in the chapters

ahead.

17
 Ch apter Two presents literature
written on public and
private schools and related topic areas
for this study. An
extensive review of the literature is
done on public-private
education, and school effectiveness.
Examples of public and
private schooling systems are drawn from
various countries
in the world. Literature found specifically addressing
education in Nepal is reviewed in a different
section. At
the end of this chapter, a conceptual framework
emerging
from the literature is outlined and linked with
the research
questions of this study.

Chapter Three describes the research design and

methodology used in this dissertation. Justification and

appropriateness of the qualitative case study approach for
this study are presented. Data collection and analysis
methods are explained. Also described in this chapter are
the participant profiles, the city, and the schools. The
reasons for selecting the schools are presented.

Chapter Four provides important contextual information

about the country and its historical background of

education. The development of education since 1950 to the

current situation is described. The status of primary and

secondary education is presented. Further, this chapter

provides the reader with information on student enrollment,

18
teachers, and schools. A section on private education
in
Nepal is presented at the end of
the chapter.

C hapter Five, six, and Seven are the heart

and soul of
this dissertation. Each chapter systematically presents
parts of the data; together they outline
the findings of
this study.

C hapter Five is focused on school

management and
operation. The role of the Headmaster, School Management

Committee, District Education Office, and the

community are
described. Data are presented in a truly descriptive manner

with lines from the participants' own words.

Ch apter Six addresses the issue of quality of education

in public and private schools. Factors that affect the

quality of education such as school curriculum, medium of

instruction, teacher qualification and training, teacher

morale, and class size are addressed.

Chapter Seven is focused on internal and external

school environments. This chapter describes the differences

in student discipline and behavior in the public and the

private school. The chapter also addresses the impact of

political activism in the schools.

19
 C hapter Flight offers the
conclusions of this study.
This chapter outlines the
implications of the findings and
points out several areas for further
research regarding
education in Nepal.

An appendix and a bibliography are

provided at the end

20
 CHAPTER II

REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Introducti nn
This section consists of a critical
review of the
literature on private and public schools.
The studies
reviewed here have examined the factors that
affect a
school's success and effectiveness. While there is
considerable literature on public and private
school
efficiency and effectiveness in developed countries,
there
is very little that examines the situations
in developing
countries. The field especially lacks case study

literature

First, this review will look at the public versus

private education debate in some countries which deals with

why either public or private education is preferred. Then

it will examine some of the factors that people consider

when choosing either public or private schools. Analysis of

this debate should provide some insight into various

attitudes people have held regarding the public and private

of education. Secondly, it will examine research studies on

school effectiveness. This will provide important

information about different factors and how they impact in

different situations. Also, the limited literature found on

21
private education in Nepal will be
reviewed. And lastly,
this chapter will show the linkage
of the concepts found in
the literature with the research
questions in this study.
Throughout the review, an attempt will be
made to indicate
why this study is significant and explain
the research gap
this study will fill. The study will generate theoretical
propositions directly from the data collected.

Public Versus Private Debate

Education has been recognized as one of the key
factors
for national development. Necessary economically,
politically, socially skilled people according to the

specific need of the country, can be produced only if the

country has an effective and relevant education system. For

the last several decades, many developing countries have

struggled to find such effective education systems.

Largely, providing education has been a task of the

government as a service to its people in developing

countries. In many countries, education is provided through

public school systems with all or most of the cost paid by

the government. But with growing populations, increased

costs, and financial strains in other areas of government,

the task of providing public education has not been easy for

many governments. In addition to the financial problems,

there has been a growing concern about the effectiveness of

22
the subsidized public education
systems in many countries.
Privatization, or involving the private
sector in education,
has increasingly been seen as an
alternative to address part
of this problem.

But the alternative, access and

availability of private
education, has not been free of controversy,
and its
effectiveness in a national context has been
challenged.
While discussing private or public education,
it is
important to know which particular system and
country is
being discussed, because private education
means different
things to different people in different countries.
in many
countries, private schools have strong religious ties
and
are run strictly by various types of churches, which
creates
another set of controversies such as domination of one

religious values over another (Crain and Rossell, 1989;

Lines, 1988; Marshall and Brant, 1989). In other countries,

both public and private systems of education are fully

supported by the government and the only difference between

the two is recognized by who runs the school, the

government, or a private organization. While many private

school systems operate as non-profit organizations, there

are private systems which operate strictly for profit

purposes. So there is a great deal of variance in the

private sector of education itself. Depending on the type

of private institution, its degree of effectiveness or

23
appropriateness might be different from a
national
perspective

Countries have gone back and forth in

promoting and
adopting private education systems. in Australia, the dual
system of public and private schools, both
supported by
government funding, has been in existence for
a long time.
Sherman (1982) stated that there have been
many proposals to
expand the private sector to create a competitive
education
system. These proposals have asked for increased government
funding for private schools mainly with tax - credit

legislation, education vouchers, and direct grants to low-

income families. Nevertheless, with the development of the

present system of free, compulsory, and secular public

education, the government funding for private sector

education was discontinued (Beswick and Harman, 1984;

Sherman, 1982). Primary and secondary education is

effectively organized and controlled by the ministerial

departments in all states.

Kenya 'a Harambee Schools, which are considered private,

offer a different example of local communities coming

together to open new schools to meet the demands of

education, although they have not been free of

controversies. Sixty percent of financing of secondary

education in Kenya is local, one of the highest in

24
developing countries. These schools enroll more than
half
of the country's secondary
school population (Mwiria, 1990).
Even so, the Harambee schools
have received criticism for
the deteriorating quality of
education they provide,
overcrowded classrooms, planning that
does not meet
government expectations, and the burden
they put on local
communities. Mwiria (1990) stated that
in order to control
the rapidly increasing number of these
Harambee schools, the
government in 1965 strictly regulated the
opening of new
schools and required the local community to
come up with
U.S. $2500 (an almost impossible amount for
communities in
Kenya at that time) before establishing a school. But
within a couple of years, the government realized the
importance of Harambee schools and understood the

dissatisfaction of the communities with the government

restrictions. This prompted the Secondary School Harambee

Package Plan in 1975, which provided limited financial

assistance to some of these schools (Mwiria, 1990). The

controversy still exists. It now appears that the Harambee

schools in Kenya will continue to play an important role

politically and socially. They may be of lower quality than

the government controlled public schools but their need and

importance in the society is certainly not.

In France, a different model exists. Private schools,

which are mostly run by the Roman Catholic Church, play an

25
important role in the education
system because they enroll
close to 20 percent of all primary
and secondary level
students. But Hough (1984) mentions that
with the socialist
government in power, the attitude towards
these schools has
been unclear and there was some
suspicion that these schools
might be abolished on ideological
grounds. Also, the public
funding of private schools has been a
source of considerable
political conflict (Teese, 1986). However, the role of
private schools in France has continued to
be a significant
one since the postwar period. Private schools have been
effective and they are very popular from the
perspective of
moral and religious values. So even though the
controversy
exists from a political standpoint, their disappearance
is
very unlikely in France (Hough 1984, p. 90).

Another example of public versus private education can

be seen in the Japanese education system. Ichikawa (1984)
stated that in order to meet the social demand for higher

education, the Japanese government promoted private

universities with financial support during the mid-sixties.

The number of private universities grew from 9 to 165 in a

ten year period and the share of private enrollment rose to

76 percent. This rapid expansion resulted in a diminishing

quality of education which caused massive student protests

during the late sixties and led to government

reconsideration of its education policy. Ichikawa further

26
stated that in this reform process
financial assistance to
private universities was severely
limited, which resulted in
the failure of many private
universities. But soon after,
according to James and Benjamin
(1988), the Japanese
government realized that private institutions
were necessary
and the country could not afford to
lose them and began to
provide subsidies. By the early eighties, private
education
institutions were receiving 50 percent of
their operating
costs from the government (Ichikawa, 1984).
In Japan, where
public education institutions are evidently of
higher
quality and private institutions are seen as
"the other side
of the coin" (James and Benjamin, 1988,
p. 55 ),their
successful existence is important because they fill the
gap
left by the public school system. So, in the case of Japan,
private schools are necessary, not because they are more

effective than public schools, but because they help in

maintaining the higher standards of public schools (which

enrolls only high achievers) by filling the excess demand

gap.

In a situation where public and private schools have no

differences in status and standard, such as Sweden, the

public system tends to be more popular than the private. In

Sweden, the government provides an equal amount of financial

support to both the public and private sector of education

(up to 50 percent of their expenditure); local authorities

27
are responsible for the other
50 percent. This makes
private ventures in education
less appealing because
there
is no problem with excess
demand. Marklund (1984)
reported
that in Sweden, establishing a
private school is very simple
and easy but little use is made
of that liberty. in
Sweden's case, the effectiveness
of the public system and
the quality of education is not a
concern, thus reducing the
need for an expanded private school
system (James, 1988a).

Public versus private education is nowhere

more
controversial than in the United States of
America. The
controversy here is not only about effectiveness
and
efficiency of the systems, but is surrounded by
broader
issues such as social inequity, desegregation,
and service
and power to the elite class. The controversy
between
public and private schools became intense mainly after
the
Supreme Court ruling in Brown v. Board of Education,
1954,
which required states to desegregate schools. In this
context, Guthrie and Bodenhausen (1984) wrote,

The mid-1950s Supreme Court school desegregation

decisions precipitated numerous reactions. One
outcome, white efforts to avoid racially
desegregated schools ... resulted in the greatest
surge in non-public school enrollments in the
twentieth century. By 1968, the time by which
court-ordered desegregation was at its most
intense nationwide non-public school enrollments
climbed to 14 percent of the total population. The
growth resulted primarily from the formation of
hundreds of 'white academies' in the southern
states .. .Virginia attempted to aid such segregated

28
 schools by Closing its public
schools.
Mississippi rescinded its compulsory
attendance law and attempted to school
arrange state
tuition payments for students
attending segregated
seqreaated
private schools (pp. 247 - 248 ).

While many segregated schools could

not operate because
of court rulings and other federal
government
investigations, and private school enrollment
went down to 7
percent by 1975, the popularity, demand,
and success of
private schools was not gone for long. By
1980, the K-12
private school enrollment in the US had risen
to about 11
percent (Guthrie and Bodenhausen, 1984). At
present,
according to James (1988a), 18 percent in primary
and 10
percent in secondary level are enrolled in private
schools
in the United States. This indicates that despite all the
controversies, private schools continue to play an important

role in the United States.

In 1992, when President George Bush announced an

education voucher plan it received mixed reviews along the

line of public-private education. Although the President's

voucher plan was intended to help low income families and to

bring competitiveness among public schools, educators were

skeptical about its positive results.

Some research studies on public and private schools

have generated more controversies than solutions to the

29
issue. The publication of Equal ity
of Ednr.at i

Oppqrtjmity, based on the study

conducted by Coleman et al.
(1966), was quite controversial. Well known as the Coleman
Report, the study concluded that
schools really don't matter
in the learning for children;
what matters more are the
student's family, peers, and the social
environment. Many
educators and researchers around the
country didn't agree
with this finding. Another study conducted
by Coleman,
Hoffer, and Kilgore (1982) contradicted
Coleman's earlier
finding. in that report, Public and Private Schnni q
(1982),
Coleman, Hoffer, and Kilgore found that private
schools
produced better cognitive outcomes than the public
schools.
However, this report also generated lots of
controversies,
because the report was seen as overwhelmingly supportive
of
private education.

Private schools have long been present in the British

education system. There also, the debate over public versus

private education has involved many social issues. Mainly,
they relate to inequity, freedom of choice for parents,

privilege for elites, and raising standards in education.

Discussions on the issue with a focus on key points helps to

understand the subject matter better, but often these

debates turn out to be very political, which undermines the

main points of the discussion. Walford (1990) stated that -

30
 P°liti c ia ns policy makers,
, and the aenerai ™,ki 1C
tend to have strong opinions P
schools. They are often either
about p??vate
m r equally fir “ly against,
firmlyY in favor nf
tor d?
or discussion with little room
or compromise, what debate
occurs is usually conducted more that
in terms of
polemic than of rational argument,
W and a detailed
i)d ge about private schools ik often lacking
(p?

The two major political parties

in Britain, Labour and
Conservatives, have taken completely
opposite viewpoints
regarding private schools. While the
Conservative
government thinks of privatization as
freedom and choice,
innovation, and efficiency, the opposition
Labour Party
portrays it as a policy of inequality,
exploitation, and
individualistic competitiveness (Walford, 1990;
Shipman,
1984). Walford (1990) quoted the two parties' views on
private schools as follows:

schools are a major obstacle to a free and

P-^-j-Vci'te
fair education system, able to serve the needs of
the whole community. We will abolish the Assisted
Places Scheme and local authority place buying;
and we will phase out, as quickly as possible,
boarding allowances paid to government personnel
for their children to attend private schools
whilst ensuring secure accommodation for children
needing residential education.
(Labour Party Election Manifesto, 1983, pp. 32-33)

Giving parents more power is one of the most

effective ways of raising educational standards.
We shall continue to seek ways of widening
parental choice and influence over their
children's schooling.
(Conservative Party Election Manifesto, 1983, p.35)

31
 Although both political parties
state that their views
are the best for public
good, they do so for
political
reasons. So it is important to note
what the public opinion
has been on these issues,
because parents and students
are
the ones who practically have
to deal with the systems.
Among the recent studies on British
private schools, Johnson
(1987) conducted a study on why
parents send their children
to private schools. Although Johnson's research methodology
in this study has been challenged
by researchers, some of
his findings are consistent with other
researchers like Fox
(1984, 1985). Johnson looked at different groups of
people
using the private schools and found the
following.

Users and ex users of direct grant or

similar low-
fee schools.
Satisfied customers of the maintained grammar
school
'Natural' users of the private sector (for
whom
the state system served as a temporary
substitute)
Aspiring users of the private sector (who
considered it was bound to be better')
Parents alienated by their contemporary experience
of state primary education.
Parents alienated by their contemporary experience
of state secondary education.
Families with boarding need.
Parents looking for a school to benefit a problem
child. (Johnson 1987, p. 89)

The above points indicate that certain group of parents

send their children to private schools because they have

good perception of those schools.

32
 Another study of private
school parents conducted
by
Fox (1984, 1985) in Britain
showed similar group of
parents
sending their children to
private schools. The reasons
she
found for private schooling
were to produce better
academic
results, to develop character
by instilling discipline,
to
get on better in life, to continue
the private education
culture of their family, and, to
do the best for their
children

In all of these findings, one

thing that can be
categorized is that parents want the best
and the most
effective school for their children and
for this reason in
many instances they select the private
schools. Research on
private school effectiveness is important and
I believe that

can be done more effectively on a case by

case basis.

Also, what shows from the above debates and

examples
from many countries is that both public and private
schools
continue to remain in those countries amidst growing

controversies. Instead of getting into the uncompromising

debate of which system is better and effective, extensive

and reliable research studies are needed as evidence.

Research on Public and Private School Effectiveness

Many studies on school effectiveness have been

conducted by researchers at various times and settings

33
 (Brundage et.el, 1980 ; Cohn and Rossmiller, 1987;
Coleman
et. al,
1966; Coleman, Hoffer, and
Kilgore, 1981; Edmonds
and Friedriksen, 1979 ; Ellis,
1975; Gray and Jones, 1985;
Jimenez and Cox, 1989; Wayne,
1981). in the following
section, will review some of the past
I
studies of school
effectiveness in order to present a
relative framework for
the research questions examined
in this study.

Why is research on school effectiveness

necessary?
James and Levin (1987) posed the following
thought provoking
questions about the effectiveness of public
versus private
schools

What draws people to public or private

schools'?
What do parents think about when they choose
a"
school? Are private schools better than public
schools? Do they generally produce higher levels
of academic achievement? If so, how - and how
much? How strong are current trends toward
privatization in schooling? How do the two
sectors compare in serving the aims of social
equity and equal educational opportunity? is the
profession of teaching distinctly different in
public and private schools? How do salaries
compare, and what do the differences mean? How
does the organization and authority of schooling
differ between the two sectors? How do the two
sectors prepare citizens for participating in a
democracy? What can the two sectors learn from
each other about renewing moral education and
civic learning? (pp. 6-7)

To answer all the questions posed above by James and

Levin may require several research studies. But each and

every question is uniquely important in order to understand

34
 the schools in every
society. If in fact one type
of school
system is better and more
effective than other types
of
schools, research studies
should be able to identify
those
factors associated with both
effectiveness and
ineffectiveness in schools.
Particularly, studies of this
sort would be extremely important
in developing countries,
because the quality of education
and effectiveness of the
education system is one of the key
issues for many
developing countries today. The
fundamental question
examined in this proposal is very
much in line with some of
the lingering issues faced by
educators and researchers in
this field.

Although there were some research studies

done on
school effectiveness before 1966, many
emerged after the
publication of the Coleman Report (1966). As noted earlier,
the Coleman Report found that outside
factors such as
family, peers, and social environment were
much more
influential on student learning than the school itself.

Coleman study used multiple regression analysis to

measure
the relative influences of variables such as family

background, social environment, and teacher attributes on

student achievement. Because the effects of each variable

cannot be isolated, the interpretation of this study was

challenged by other researchers (Bowles and Levin, 1968).

They claimed that because the variables were correlated, it

35
could be shown that schools and
teachers did have direct
effects on student achievement.
Later, when qualitative
methodologies became more and more
popular in the education
literature, questions were raised
whether multiple
regression analysis was an appropriate
tool to measure
social variables, and school
effectiveness research studies
were conducted using case study and
other qualitative
methods (Brookover et at. 1979 ).

While 'school effectiveness' and 'student

achievement'
are two different topic areas for
research, many school
effectiveness studies have based their findings
on students'
cognitive achievement. For example, the study
conducted by
Coleman, Hoffer, and Kilgore (1981) on public
and private
schools in the United States had looked mainly at
cognitive
outcomes. Although quite controversial, this report is
considered one of the most extensive studies conducted on

school effectiveness that compares both public and private

sectors of education. The study was conducted because of

continuing concern over public and private schools and the

lack of factual answers to questions such as how well do

Public and private schools work for children? Do they work

differentially well for different types of children? Are
private schools divisive, and, if so, along what lines? Are
private schools more efficiently managed than public

schools, and, if so, why? (Ibid, 1981, p.l). Coleman,

36
Hoffer, and Kilgore found
that private schools
produce
better cognitive outcomes,
provide better character
and
personality development, and
provide a safer, more
disciplined, and more ordered
environment than do public
schools. They further stated that
private schools are more
successful in creating an interest
in learning and encourage
interest in higher education and
lead more of their students
to attend college than do public
schools with comparable
students. They found that private schools
are smaller and
thus bring about greater degrees
of participation in sports
and other activities than do public
schools. The smaller
class size in private schools allowed
teachers and students
to have greater contact. Additionally, they stated that
private schools are more efficient than
public schools in
accomplishing their task at lower cost.

The study not only reported the positive sides

of
private schools, it also pointed out some negative
aspects
that private school might produce. It concluded that
private schools are socially divisive along income,

religious, and racial lines. It further stated that the

expansion of private schools would benefit whites more than

blacks and other minorities, creating racial and economic

segregation. The authors also noted that private schools

provide a limited educational range with fewer electives

compared to public schools, a narrower range of

37
extracurricular activities, and
an unhealthy and
unnecessarily competitive learning
environment. Although
the report pointed out both
positive and negative sides
of
private schooling, it generated
a big controversy
because it
is considered mostly supportive
of private schools. The
findings in this study add to the
fact that private versus
public education is an extremely
complex policy issue. This
issue becomes more complex in
developing countries because
of the lack of clear educational
goals for both the private
and the public sectors of education.

In their study, Coleman, Hoffer,

and Kilgore looked at
factors such as student attitude and behavior,
and the
school climate, and their effect on student
learning.
However, the validity of their data collection
and method of
analysis is questionable. Although the quantitative
data
provides some specific and important information,
factors
such as student behavior and attitude and the school
climate
are not quantifiable items. Students were asked only 3-5
questions related to their attitude and behavior which I

think provided very limited information. I believe that

qualitative research methodologies are most effective and

informative for studies of school climate, students,

teachers, and school administrators' attitudes and

behaviors

38
 There are very few studies
conducted comparing public
and private school effectiveness
in developing countries.
Few researchers have looked into
the research from developed
countries and have examined their
potential application in
developing countries. Cohn and Rossmiller (1987) found
that, "although there are differences
between developed
countries and less developed countries
(as there must be),
there are also great similarities in
the determinants of
academic performance (p. 390)." Cohn and
Rossmiller
mentioned that spending more money on schools
would result
in increased scholastic achievement in
developing countries.
The Coleman Report (1966) argued otherwise.
Cohn and
Rossmiller argue that simply "throwing money at schools"

(1987, p. 393) may not have a significant effect, but how

the additional funds have been utilized might have

substantial effect.

Pointing out the limitations of school effectiveness

research, Cohn and Rossmiller stated that most of the

studies are conducted in the primary education sector in

urban areas of developed countries, thus limiting its

generalizability to the secondary schools and to schools in

developing countries, particularly in rural areas. They

also mentioned that school effectiveness research varies in

quality and rigor, because many researchers have just

assumed effective schools and student achievement to have

39
particular characteristics
(determined a priori rather
than
from clear evidence). They concluded that -the
research on
effective schools has produced a
list of ingredients but
has
not, to this point, produced
a recipe for an effective
school. The research does not specify
the precise
ingredients necessary for an effective
school nor identify
the relative importance of the various
ingredients" (p.
399) .

Cohn and Rossmiller also clearly

recognized that most
of the school effectiveness research
is based on imperfect
methodologies and data, whether using multivariate

statistical analysis or qualitative case studies.

They
stated that "effective schools have been defined
primarily
in terms of gains in cognitive knowledge rather
than by
broader, more inclusive measures of the outcomes of

schooling" (p. 381), a clear indication of the need of an

alternative approach on school effectiveness research.

Jimenez and Cox (1989) conducted a comparative study of

private and public school effectiveness in Columbia and

Tanzania, in which they found private schools had an

achievement advantage over public schools. They concluded

that "students in observationally equivalent settings

perform much better in private schools" (p. 29). In both

countries, the socioeconomic backgrounds of students

40
attending private schools were
much better. For example
the students in private schools
came from high income
families, better educated parents,
and a larger proportion
from urban areas. Among the school
related variables they
examined in Columbia, public school
mean teacher salaries
were higher than private schools,
student teacher ratios
were lower in private schools, and
private school students
had an advantage in the aptitude scores.
The findings were
different in Tanzania, where public schools
are considered
the elite schools. The student aptitude test scores were
better in public schools, but teacher salaries
were lower
compared to the private sector, and student teacher
ratios
were higher in private schools. Jimenez and Cox
based their
findings mainly on aptitude and achievement test scores,

leaving out other important variables such as school

climate, administration and leadership, teacher attitude and

qualifications, and student attitude and behavior. So, it

is not clear if the findings would be different, if the

other variables are taken into consideration.

Talbert (1987) pointed out that Coleman, Hoffer, and

Kilgore (1981) and other subsequent research studies

thereafter did not analyze school organization, which she

claimed is one of the important variables in comparative

public-private school effectiveness research. She stated

that it has been assumed that stricter administrative

41
policies and practices in private
schools helps to increase
their academic performance, but
the fact that private
schools are organizationally more
capable of recruiting
academically talented and committed
students has not been
taken into consideration. The point is that feeding with
the best and the better into the
system might have been
producing the better outcomes in private
schools rather than
the stricter administrative policies,
in this regard,
Talbert pointed out the sectoral differences
of public and
private schools. Public schools run under
a more complex
organizational model than do private schools, so
this needs
to be taken into consideration before jumping
to a
conclusion that private schools are better run.

Purkey and Smith (1983) conducted an extensive review

°f effective school studies. They found that past research

studies on effective schools have considered many different

variables and used several study designs such as outlier

studies, case studies, program evaluation studies, and

multivariate analysis of survey data. Based on their

examination of the use of these variables in many studies,

they found that the variables belonged to two groups. The

first set which dealt mainly with administration and

leadership factors in effective schools, which they called

organizational and structural variables. The second set

they identified were process variables, which created the

42
school environment and culture
for enhancement of student
learning. All together they
identified 9 organizational
and
structural variables and 4 process
variables. The following
is a summary of those variables.

Organizational and Structural Variables

1 . School Management: This included the
core elements
a n0mY f ° r the P rinci Pal. teachers, and
other Vfe°
staff, coordinated decision makinq
flexibility, creativity, and independence
to
improve the school. It recognized the
different
needs of each school and managed accordingly.

2 . Strong Instructional Leadership: While the

leadership and initiative came from the
principal
a good instructional leadership came
from a well
coordinated effort of the principal, teachers,
and
other staff members.

Staff Stability and Continuity: Keeping the best

and the most effective teachers and other staff
is
important to maintain the effectiveness of a
school. Effective team of teachers and staff were
retained through strong leadership and management
in the school.

4. Planned and Purposeful Program: A carefully

planned program with clear purpose and
expectations is important for a school's success.
Purkey and Smith advocated for an expansion of
basic reguirements in the secondary curriculum and
a decrease in the electives.

5. Staff Development Programs: These were organized

on a continuing basis based on the needs of the
teachers and other staff. Training areas focused
to enhance the staff members' skill and knowledge.

6. Parents Involvement and Support: Parents were made

aware of the students progress, especially in
their homework assignments. Parents were involved
as part of the students learning in and outside of
school

43
 7 . Reward and Recognition System:
was recognized publicly to Academic success
encourage students to
work hard and succeed.
8 . Increased Learning Time: School time
was managed
effectively, allocating more time
for academic
activities than non-academic activiti
es
9 . District Support: This was strong for
of school facilities. improvement

Process Variables

1 . Collaborative Planning and Collegial Relationship:

Relationship between teachers and the
and within teachers were strong and principal
positive. This
was especially positive when a change was
needed.
2 . Strong Community: Everyone, the principal,
teachers, students, and parents had a strong
of community. They felt they belonged to
sense
the
school as a community.

Goals and Expectation: Goals were clear and

expectations set high with well defined purposes
in all academic areas.

Discipline and Order: These were maintained with

fair and consistent enforcement of clear rules and
policies. This created a positive school
environment, (pp. 443-445)

Purkey and Smith pointed out that effective school

research is incomplete if both sets of variables are not

examined, because the two groups are interconnected and

support each other for effective functioning of a school.

While organizational/structural variables work towards

carrying out the mission of the school, the process

variables create an environment to accomplish that mission.

This study also shares this notion and variables from both

categories as suggested by Purkey and Smith have been

44
 researched More explanation about this
is given in the
conceptual framework section at
the end of this chapter.

The study conducted by Davis

and Thomas (1989) is one
of the most recent research
work on school effectiveness.
In this study they conducted
an extensive review of the
literature on school effectiveness
and analyzed the findings
of the previous studies (Austin
and Garber, 1985; Brookover
et al., 1979; 1982; Blumberg and
Greenfield, 1986; Edmonds,
1979; Lipsitz, 1983; Purkey and Smith,
1983; Sergiovanni
1987; Weber, 1971) on effective schools,
in addition from
their review of previous research studies,
they identified
five main categories of specific
characteristics of
effective schools. They included (a) good classroom
management practices, (b) high academic engagement, (c)
monitoring of student progress, (d) instructional
improvement as a school priority, and (e) clear goals and
objectives (Davis and Thomas, 1989, p. 71). They also
mentioned that school excellence assessment tools can be

developed in schools which would evaluate the achievement of

stated school goals and beliefs and identify areas that need

improvement

Davis and Thomas also looked at the characteristics of

effective principals and teachers. Among many

characteristics, they identified four main categories of an

45
effective principal, strong leadership
skills and traits,
effective problem solving and decision
making abilities,
high social skills, and good
professional knowledge and
competence. Effective teacher characteristics
included
classroom management, organizing and
structuring learning,
orienting students, reviewing, and
presenting objectives,
developing efficient routines, increasing
clarity, ensuring
high success rates, and monitoring student
progress.

Another recent study on school effectiveness

comes from
Gilchrist (1989), with his book titled "Effective
Schools:
Three Case Studies of Excellence". This study was conducted
using a total case study approach. The complete data for
the study was gathered through observations and interviews.

Gilchrist s reporting of his study is quite intriguing with

thick descriptions often citing the words of teachers

students, and parents. The last chapter of the book is

written by Deede Sharpe summarizing the findings on

effective schools. Sharpe points out seven common

characteristics of good schools and explains the way to

attain them. The effective school characteristics mentioned

are as follows.

1. In every effective school, the climate is

positive, promoting a desire to care.

2. In every effective school, there exists a clear

organizational personality, characterized by
stated missions, goals, values and standards of
performance

46
3 .
eff ® ctive school, people
all the people, all the time. are involved -

4 . e er
effective school, people are
^_ y any informed
UniC ti0nS between administration,
staff L^°T
staff, ^ community
parents and are a given.
5 . The effective school doesn't just
too. The school is a contributory take; it gives
community it serves. partner to the

6 . The effective school follows the

as I say and as I do".
principle of "do

The effective school knows where it

is at all
eS t WS thG importance of assessment.
(pp 136 140°

One of the highlights of Gilchrist's study

is its
extensive coverage and explanation of the people's
actions,
attitude, and behavior at these three schools.
He
identified the principal, teaching staff, other
professional
staff, students, parents, and community members as
key
players and reasons for an effective school. Unlike other
school effectiveness research, Gilchrist stressed the role

of the community which included many parents and volunteers

in the making of an effective school. He stated:

If I have learned nothing else during my lifetime

in education, it is that democracy can't survive
without good schools and that good schools are
only as good as their communities make them. To
put it another way: Our schools are much too
important to be entrusted entirely to the
professionals - citizens can and should take
active roles in making their schools as good as
the best in the nation, (p. 1)

47
 Li terature on Private r,r-hr^ i K in Mo p a1
The report recently submitted
by the newest Nepal
Education Commission to the
government stated that -

...parents are attracted towards

boarding schools. However, poor private and
facilities, lack of qualified physical
teachers lack of
inancial security for teachers,
high fees and
unplanned schoois show that such
schools give more
ty t0 flnancia l gain than
Dai i S k education aspect
h ® ve ttle n °tion that the
Duh??i school is generally weak management of
public 1

given the responsibility of providing ...government has

private schools but there is no clear educatior^ to
cut poUcies
has b ^n felt that there should
clear policies on the ownership, be
management
process, text books and curriculum,
fees control
and supervision and inspection,
(p. n)

However, as I stated earlier, no major studies have

been conducted examining the private sector
of education in
Nepal. As a result, it is extremely difficult to find
literature on this subject. There are some short research
articles which can serve as anecdotal references, but
their
validity as research projects can hardly be justified.

Their sampling is small, the length of study is short, and

the methodological reasoning is unclear. Other general

education studies have mentioned private schools, but

reported their status so briefly, that the information is

very limited. Especially, this researcher could not find

any research work, longitudinal or short, on the subject of

effectiveness of private schools in Nepal.

48
 of the very few studies
to be found is that
conducted by the Research
Center for Educational
Innovation
and Development (CERID) on
pre-primary and privately run
primary schools in 1982-83.
In her article based
on this
project, Malakar, the coordinator
of the project, stated
that the objectives of the
project were to examine the
aims
and the educational programs
of pre-primary and privately
run primary schools; to assess
the physical facilities
available and the student enrollment
practices followed in
them; to find out about teachers
recruitment procedures,
their qualification levels, and their
training and
instructional processes; to study the
financial and
administrative aspects of the schools; and
to study the role
of the school managing committees in
the schools. (1984,
p.25). Thus, some of the related areas of school

effectiveness research in this study can be

identified as
teacher qualification and training and the
instructional
processes they use, the role of the school management

committees, and the educational programs these school

used.

Following are some of the findings of the study that

are related to the effectiveness of the private schools.

1. Educational programs and school curriculum were

inconsistent between schools. Only English, math
and Nepali were taught in all schools. Other
subjects varied from school to school.

2. Physical facilities were inadequate in private

schoos. There were not enough rooms for staff and
libraries. Very few schools had playgrounds.

49
 3 .

4 .

5. e enC a te ch ® r evaluation
mechanism
rj
was
dS rfound
°una. ?h« e evaluations
These f
hrity pu „ ctualityi profSHnS
and dedication to teaching.
were mo^tiv
S?aSS? '

6 .
001 tutoring was Provided to
students^ weaker

7. The Headmaster provided the

overall leadership in
school administration including
teacher
supervision in the classrooms.
8 . School Management Committees were
not part of the
academic advancement of the school. They
mainly
participated in finding funding source for
school and teacher searches, the
(pp. 28-42)

As the study was conducted in the

pre-primary and
primary sectors, their findings may not be
generalized for
secondary and other levels of education. However,
the study
does provide some interesting information about
the
independent nature of the private schools in respect
to
their curriculum, and the lack of supervision from the

district education office.

Another study conducted by CERID in 1982-83, and

carried out by Pande (1984) as the coordinator of the

project, focused on the status of private colleges in Nepal.

The study found that the privately run campuses severely

lacked physical facilities as most of them didn't have their

50
 own buildings and were running
in local school buildings.
Their financial status was
deteriorating because they solely
depended on student fees. Campus
management lacked strong
leadership and the managing
committees were almost
dysfunctional. Most of the teachers were employed
part-time
so their commitment to the job
was low. Although a majority
of the teachers had completed
the required education level,
they lacked necessary training.
However, the study found
that classes on private campuses
were held more regularly
than public campuses and that the
relationship between
students and teachers was better.

Shrestha (1982) conducted short case studies

of 4

successful secondary schools in Kathmandu Valley.

At the
time of the study, the National Education
System Plan (NESP)
1971 which also supervised private schools, was
considered a
failure and was blamed for much of the deteriorating
quality
of the education system in the country. in this context,
Shrestha pointed out that although NESP had failed, some

schools were succeeding on their own initiative. The single

most important reason these schools were succeeding, the

study claimed, was the magnificent leadership and active

role played by all 4 headmasters (Shrestha, 1982). The

headmasters were seen as a teacher first and then as an

administrator. Some other findings of the study included:

the shared decision making process exercised by those

51
schools, good relationships
between teachers and the
administrators; incentive programs
for teachers and even for
students who showed extraordinary
progress in learning; and
the good rapport created between
students and teachers.
Additionally, the study found that all
4 schools were

consistent with a well planned curriculum

and creation of
instructional teams; teachers' attitudes
were positive and
they were dedicated to their jobs.
Shrestha claimed that
the factors contributing to the success
of these 4 schools
would be applicable to all schools in Nepal.
However, it is
important to note here that all schools studied
were from
the urban Kathmandu valley which is guite
different socially
and economically than the majority of the countryside
in
Nepal

Conceptual Framework for

Research Question From the Literature

Although there is no one recipe for effectiveness

(Davis and Thomas, 1989) , there is sufficient evidence from

previous research studies that effectiveness of a school is
a combination of several things: the management, the skills

and knowledge of the people in and out of the institution,

their attitude and behavior, the environment surrounding

them, and the school culture they create. A clear

understanding of these elements would help to create an

effective school. Leaving out one of these factors in a

52
 Study decreases the level
of understanding.
The research
questions for this study are
drawn from all the areas
of
school effectiveness and
address the elements that
need to
be examined to understand
the differences between
public and
private schools in Nepal and
the factors that make
them
successful and effective.

concur with the arguments of

I
Purkey and Smith (1983)
that an effective school can
be described only if both
sets
organizational and structural, and
process variables are
examined together. study of one without the other
is
incomplete because the two sets of
variables are
interrelated and interdependent (Cohn
and Rossmiller, 1987
)

While organizational and structural

variables deal with the
leadership and administration ensuring
the operational
aspect, process variables work towards
the dynamic of the
school and creation of an atmosphere for
the enhancement of
learning. My primary research question addresses
the need
to examine both sets of variables as
categorized by Purkey
and Smith (1983). This notion of looking at both sets of
variables in school effectiveness expands also from
the
perspective of social organizational theory.

The implementing questions 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 10 seek

information from the organizational and structural point of

view. They require a careful examination of strategic

53
management practices used in
the schoois and the
leadership
provided by the principal (or
headmaster, which is used
more
often in Nepal), other
implementing questions 2,
3, 5 and ,

9 explore the process

variables, examining school
cultures,
the attitudes and behaviors of
people involved in the
school, and the community they
create together.

This study is also associated

with the theoretical
framework of school effectiveness which
has emerged over the
last decade. Cuttance stated that "the new frameworks
count
instructional variables and social
psychological inputs,
such as pupil motivation, attitudes and
behaviors, among the
resource input to schooling, and more emphasis
is placed on
the social, organizational, and historical
context of
schools" (1985, p. 17 ). Cuttance has further guoted Erbring
and Young who have argued that "many of the
theoretical
models which are suggested as the basis of contextual

effects are sociologically and social psychologically

vacuous and that meaningful models of inter-individual

interaction require a reconceptualization of the role of

context in school effectiveness research" (1979, p. 16).

Many researchers have recently advocated a multi-

methodology approach in school effectiveness research

because of the crucial importance of the social behavioral

variables. Strivens (1985) argued that variables like

54
perceptions of pupils should not
be ignored, because they
form the majority of the
institution's members. Patton
shared the view that "multiple
methods and triangulation
of
observations contribute to
methodological rigor" (1990, p.
492). Gray and Jones stated that
combining the two
methodologies, qualitative and
quantitative, is a practical
strategy for enhancing understanding
of both educational
processes and outcomes. They preferred
"a combination of
'detective' work and the methodology
of case study based on
interviews and observations" (1985, p. 113 )

In summary, the research questions in this study

extend
from the past comparative studies on
private and public
schools and the studies on school effectiveness.
The
research questions emerqe from the perspective
of social
organizational theory which looks at schools as
separate
organizations and seeks to understand the whole process
that
occurs in them. For this case study set in Nepal, these
questions become unique, and the findings of the study
will
add to the knowledge and understanding of private and
public
school policy issues in developing countries.

55
 CHAPTER III

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY

Introducti on
The purpose of this chapter is to
outline and describe
the research design and methodology
used in the study. The
chapter attempts to explain the
appropriateness and
fittingness of the qualitative case study
method for this
study. Additionally, the chapter describes other
components
of the study such as selection of site
and sample, data
collection techniques, data analysis, and timelines
of the
study.

The decision to utilize the qualitative case study

method as the main approach for this inquiry (with some

utilization of quantitative data) stems from the conceptual

framework that I have described under the literature review

section. The conceptual framework came out of the

literatures reviewed to meet the specific needs addressed in

the research questions of this study. While some basic

statistical data provided specific information for the

study, the data collected from observations and interviews

clarified the deeper issues like students', teachers',

administrators', and parents' attitudes toward private and

public schools. As Kidder and Fine (1987) pointed out, the

56
combination of qualitative and
quantitative measures in a
study is a form of triangulation
which enhances the validity
and reliability of one's study.

T heoretical Assump ti ons - QuaT ita

tive Case c- udv H eth^H
For This Study
Qualitative case studies explore and
define a
particular event or situation in detail.
Case study
descriptions are thick and they contain
specific accounts
and insights of a phenomenon. Merriam
(1988) stated that:

A qualitative case study is an intensive,

holistic, description and analysis of a single
instance, phenomenon, or social unit... Case
studies are particularistic in that they focus
on
a specific situation or phenomenon;
they are
descriptive; and they are heuristic - that is,
they offer insights into the phenomenon under
study (p. 21).

Qualitative research methodology examines events as

they occurs naturally. Settings are not created for a

study, they exist as a bounded phenomenon. Criteria are not

set by the researcher, they evolve out of the research

process. As Patton (1984) described,

Researchers using qualitative methods strive to

understand phenomena and situations as a whole;
...a qualitative research strategy is inductive in
that the researcher attempts to make sense of the
situation without imposing preexisting
expectations of the research setting.
...Qualitative designs are naturalistic in that

57
 " 10 P
and for the researcher (p. 40prele?ermInefcou?se
and^or^he - 41 ). by
Y

This case study includes a

private and a public school
in Nepal for which existing
differences were explored and
factors that contributed to the
success and effectiveness of
those schools were examined. Meaning
was drawn from the
'thick description' and direct accounts
given by all
participants. As the private schools in
Nepal are totally
independent and different from one another,
the school
studied was viewed as a case in itself.
The study examined
both internal and external factors influencing
the operation
of schools.

Merriam (1988) pointed out four characteristics as

essential properties of a qualitative case study research.

They are particularistic, descriptive, heuristic, and

inductive (p. ll).

Particularistic means that case studies focus on a

particular situation, in this case the situation of two

schools that I selected as my research sites. Also the

situation examined here is the expansion and increasing role

of private schools as well as public schools in the

development of education in Nepal. Private schools,

58
especially in Nepal have expanded
very fast in a short
period of time and their role
has become significant.
So,
this particular phenomenon needs
to be examined carefully.

De scriptive means that the

findings of a case study
include "thick" and "detailed"
description, which in this
study are the real accounts given
by all participants, the
students, teachers, principals, and
the parents. This study
describes the way public and private
schools in Nepal are
run and what they do to make themselves
successful and
effective

Heuristic means that the case study increases

the
understanding of the phenomenon, in this case the

differences between a public and a private school and

the
examination of why private schools are considered more

effective than public schools. This study seeks to increase

our understanding about the effectiveness of schools with
a
careful examination of the variables involved in this

process

Inductive means that case studies rely on inductive

reasoning rather than prior hypotheses, assumptions, or

concepts. They emerge as the data is examined. In the case

of public and private schools and their effectiveness in

Nepal, lots of things are unknown. Data were analyzed as

59
 they were collected, and
tentative generalizations were
made
and concepts and hypotheses
were identified simultaneously.

Qualitative case study method was

the most effective
method for this study because my
main focus of inquiry was
to look at how things are done
differently in public and
private schools in Nepal. Drawing
upon that information, I
examined how different factors
contributed to their success
and effectiveness. Instead of gathering test scores
and
numbers about them, I talked directly to people who were
instrumental to the school. I observed the human behavior
and the daily activities of the schools
in order to get a
first hand look. I did it this way because
understanding
the process in these schools was more
important than
examining their products or outcomes. I believe that all

the approaches I used fit into the qualitative

research
framework.

In order to have an in-depth look at a phenomenon,

one
needs to understand the process from a cultural perspective.

I looked at the school cultures of public and private

schools comparatively. In this context, understanding the

attitudes and behaviors of students, teachers, headmasters,

and parents was very important. In support of this notion,

Wilson (1977, quoted in Marshall and Rossman, 1989) has

60
 provided the following arguments
which I found relevant
throughout this study:

* Human behavior is significantly

influenced by the setting in
occurs; thus one must study which it
that
behavior in situations. The
setting physical
e.g., schedules, space,
and rewards - and the internalized pay
notions of norms, traditions,
roles, and
alues are crucial contextual
variables.
Research must be conducted in the
setting where all the contextual
variables are operating.
* Past researchers have not been able
derive meaning and useful findings to
from
experimental research.
* The research technigues themselves,
in
experimental research, have affected the
findings. The lab, the questionnaire,
and so on, have become artifacts.
Subjects are either suspicious and wary,
of they are aware of what the researcher
want and try to please them.
Additionally, subjects sometimes do not
know their feelings, interactions, and
behaviors, so they cannot articulate
them to a questionnaire.
* One cannot understand human behavior
without understanding the framework
within which subjects interpret their
thoughts, feelings, and actions.
Researchers need to understand the
framework. In fact, the "objective"
scientist, by coding and standardizing,
may destroy valuable data while imposing
her world on the subjects.
* Field study research can explore the
processes and meaning of events, (p. 49)

In order to understand the culture of the schools, I

spent as much time in schools as possible. Besides the

61
 actual participants, talked with many other
I
people who
could provide more information
about the schools. I „ as
gathering information in the
actual setting through
observations, formal and informal
interviews, and attending
school meetings. I was observing the
students at play time,
listening to teachers at group
meetings, conversing with
parents as they visited the schools,
and talking to students
as they became curious about
my presence at their school.
The qualitative research framework
allowed me to do all this
more effectively.

S election of S i te and Sampl p>

As this is a comparative case study,

it involved two
secondary schools in Nepal, one public
and one private. in
order to protect the identity of the schools
their real
names are changed. The two schools are

1) River Front High School (public), and

2) Lakeside High School (private).

Both schools are located in Bijayapur, Nepal. To

further protect the identity of the schools and the

participants, the real name of the city has also been

changed. Bijayapur was an ideal site for this study for the

following reasons.

62
 Most of tho private schools
in Nepal are centered
around the urban areas and
Bijayapur is one of the
fastest growing urban areas
in the country. it
contains a wide range of private
and public schools.
Preliminary contacts with people
associated with the
two schools had already been
made before my departure
from the United States. Both schools had responded
positively about the possibility
of having me as a
researcher
The two school sites are in
close proximity which
allowed the researcher to maintain
a continued presence
in both schools.

4. The city of Bijayapur contains

people from various
socio-economic backgrounds. Because it is a relatively
new city, people of different ethnic
backgrounds from
all over the country have migrated here.
The city and
the areas surrounding it are a mix of people
of
different castes including Brahmans (priests),
Newars
(businessmen), Marwaris (tradesmen), Tharus (peasants),

Gurungs (hills people) and so on. From this mixture, I

had the opportunity to select participants for the

study from different cultural and socio-economic

backgrounds
’• As I indicated earlier, private schools are considered

better and more effective than public schools in Nepal,

and Bijayapur provides some of the well known schools

63
 1,1 b ° th PUbUC and Private sect ors
This allowed me to
.

have comparable schools

from both sectors.
However I '
should point out here that
it is difficult to
know
everything about the comparability
of schools
beforehand. I made my decision
based on what I knew
about the schools and the
study of some materials
about
them.

Reasons for Selecting the .Snhnni c

1) Both schools have grades from

K through 10, and both
have re putations as good schools
on the basis of student
discipline, student performance in
national examinations,
and their skills in foreign
language, math, and science
subjects.

2) From the very beginning of my contact

personnel at
both schools showed a willi ngness and
interest to be part of
this study.

3) Both schools have competitive results showing

in the
national School Leaving Certificate (SLC) examinations
in
their own category. Although Lakeside's results (up
to
100%) are better than River Front's (up to 60-80%), both

have much better results than the national average

(20-25%)
and other schools in the area.

64
 4) Within their category, both
schools have higher
demands for admission than
other schools in the area.
From
the number of students
attending these schools and
the
number on the waiting lists to
get into these schools,
it
was evident that parents
preferred to send their children
to
these schools.

The City

Bijayapur has always been a connecting

point between
the southern terai belt and the
northern mountain region of
Nepal. Since the government decided to have
organized
settlements here about 40 years ago,
Bijayapur has been seen
as a commercial center. People from the mountains as well
as from the southern plains near the
Indian border migrated
here for business purposes.

Today, Bijayapur is a rapidly growing city in

Nepal.
Because of its central location in the country with
major
highways passing through it, large industries are being
set
up here bringing people from all over the country. it has
become a site for many national and international

industries. Besides the industrial image, Bijayapur is also

a big agricultural center in Nepal; its surrounding areas

provide a wealth of rich and cultivable land. Within the

last several years, the population of the city has almost

doubled.

65
 As a result of all this
development, the need for
educational institutions has
increased tremendously.
There
are nine high schools within
the city and a few more
in the
towns nearby. There are numerous
middle and primary
schools. Higher education has also expanded
with 3 new
colleges. There has been a
significant increase in private
schools in Bijayapur. with the
development in industry and
agriculture, Bijayapur has also become
an educational
center

With business, industry, and agriculture

being the main
occupation of people in Bijayapur, the city
accommodates a
very diverse population with different
levels of socio-
economic standards. The scope of business and
industry
ranges from very small scale to the national
and
international level. People in agriculture, the largest
majority, probably have the most unequal distribution
of
income. There are farmers who barely make their living
through farming. But there are also landlords who are among
the richest in the region. They own a great amount of land.
The real farmers who plough the field do not own much of the

land. So the farmers only receive a small percentage of the

crops they grow. The landlords take most of the product.

This unequal income level among the households has a direct

impact on education and schools in the area. Students come

from families with vastly different economic conditions.

66
 The School k

At the tine of this study,

secondary education in
Nepal
consisted of grades six through
ten. However, a new
structure was being established
at that tine which
nade
grades one to five as prinary,
grades six through eight as
lower secondary, and grades
nine and ten as secondary,
a
higher secondary section of
grades n and 12 was being
introduced in some schools.

After the completion of the tenth

grade curriculum
every student must go through a
series of examinations.
First, the school conducts an
internal examination which
screens out students before they are
allowed to appear in
the district wide test examination.
All students passing
the district wide test examination are
sent to take the
national School Leaving Certificate (SLC)
examination. SLC
is administered and carried out throughout
the country by a
National Examination Board. Every student must pass this
examination in order to be eligible for higher
education.

River Fr ont High School enrolls more than twelve

hundred students in its (secondary section) grades six

through ten. Although there are eight other high schools

and numerous middle and primary schools within a 4-5

kilometer radius in the city, River Front's name

67
 recognition, better physical
facili ty and experienced
teaching staff is an attraction
to many parents

There are eighteen teachers who

teach in the secondary
grades. Most of them are very
experienced and well
recognized teachers in the district.
Several of them have
more than 25 years of teaching
experience. On the average,
the pupil teacher ratio is very
high in River Front High
School which is 66 to 1. m
some grades, there are up to 80
students. The Headmaster has been with the
school for more
than 25 years, one of the teachers
serves as Assistant
Headmaster and helps the Headmaster in school

administration. Also, there are subject departments mainly

in English, Math, and Science and a
senior teacher heads the
department

Fifty percent of every teacher's salary comes from

the
District Education Office as government aid. The DEO does
not help with the cost of administrative personnel like

secretaries, clerks, and maintenance workers. Also, the DEO

does not bear any cost related to building construction,

maintenance, and supplies. The school collects student fees

to offset the remaining fifty percent of the teacher salary

and other personnel costs. The school building,

maintenance, and furniture depend on the generousity of

donors

68
 In addition to the internal
school administration,
there is a School Management
Committee. This committee is
made up ot local businessmen,
community leaders, parents,
and donors. The Headmaster
serves as the member secretary
of this committee. Members of the committee are
nominated
by the District Education
Office. The management committee
is responsible for finding
additional funding sources for
the school. The local community is closely
involved with
the school through this committee.

River Front is considered as one of

the successful
public schools in the district. About
15 years ago it
earned a national reputation when a number
of River Front
students were among the top ten graduates
in the national
School Leaving Certificate (SLC) examination.
Recently,
River Front has not been able to place any of
its students
among the top ten in the country, but the average
SLC
results have been better than many other public
schools in
the area.

River Front High School was established 28 years ago.

The local community has always played a significant role in

the making of the school. It has one of the most impressive

public school buildings in the area. People here claim that

no other town or city in Nepal has built such a large public

school building by community funding efforts alone. The

69
 names of major donors who
built parts of the beautiful
building can be found everywhere
on the walls while
walking
around the school. Eve n today, local people's
interest in
supporting this school and making
it a leading educational
institution can be seen from their
generous financial
contributions and considerable time
commitments. In spite of
their efforts, however, today
River Front is facing the
challenge of increasing student
enrollment and dwindling
educational quality.

L akeside High School enrolls about 450 students in

grades one through ten. Many parents want and try to admit
their children to this school but it
has a very strict
admission policy. The school limits the
number of students
per grade and conducts pre-admission
tests of every child.

There are 17 teachers altogether in Lakeside.

About
half of them teach in secondary grades six
through ten. The
teaching staff there is not as experienced as in
River
Front, but three teachers have taught for more than
20
years. On the average, the student teacher ration is 26 to

1. The largest clsss has 35 students.

The school is self sufficient and does not receive any

government or other outside funding. As a result, the

school fees are quite heavy. Lakeside does not have its own

70
building; thus, it operates
in a residential building
which
is insufficient for the
school and student needs.
However,
the location of the school,
away from the city and
without
highway traffic noise, is much
more ideal than other
schools
in and around the city. The management of the school
has
plans to build a building of its
own in the near future and
has already bought land for
construction in a town nearby.

Lakeside also has a Management

Committee. The
structure of this committee is similar
to that of River
Front's except the members are mainly
selected by the school
itself. The District Education Office has very
little
contact with its management structure.
Most of the
committee members are founding board members
of the school.
The committee works with the principal and
supervises large
scale school projects like building construction
and land
purchase

Lakeside High School was established eight years ago

privately by a group of educators, most of whom had been

teachers at some point in their life. Some of them are

still teaching in various schools in the Bijayapur area.

The principal is a founding member of the school.

Since its inception, Lakeside seems to have made some

very impressive progress in providing quality education. It

71
 is considered one of the
most sought after schools
in the
area. Lakeside students have passed
the national SLC
examination with impressive
results. m
1992 loo percent
,

of Lakeside Students passed

the SLC examination with
almost
95 percent showing in the first
division.

The Par ticipants

A total of 16 participants
were interviewed for this
study. From the two schools, 6 teachers,
2 headmasters, 4
students, and 4 parents were chosen
for a formal interview.
The representation of participants
from public and private
schools was half and half. Written
consent forms and/or
verbal consents were received from all
participants before
the interviews. Throughout this dissertation, pseudonyms
are used to protect the identity of the
participants.

Among the six teachers who were interviewed,

Kaji,
Bhola , and Bimala were from River Front High, the public

school, and Devi, Bhim, and Kamal from Lakeside, the

private
school. Bimala and Devi are two female teachers. Public
school teachers Kaji and Bhola had more than 20 years of

teaching experience and Bimala had 10 plus years. All three

private school teachers were younger than the public school

teachers. Bhim had 7 years of teaching experience and Devi

and Kamal had less than 3 years. All the teachers from the
private school had been teachers either in Lakeside or other

72
 public school systems in the
past, Also, all six of them
were educated in public schools.

The four parents interviewed

were Nil, Mehar, Shyam,
and Chandra, all of whom are
males. Nil, Mehar and Shyam
had their children in both the
private and the public
school. Chandra had both of his children
in the private
school. Nil stated agriculture as his
main occupation and
the other three were businessmen.
Among the parents, only
Chandra had not completed high school.

Among the students, Krishna and Lok were

from the
private school and Ashu and Lata were from
the public
school. Lata was the only female student participant.

Krishna and Ashu were attending 10th grade, Lata

in 9th, and
Lok in 8th. Krishna and Lok both had public school

education before transferring to the private school in

7th
grade. Krishna and Lata came from agricultural households
and Ashu and Lok's family had some retail business.

Both the public school Headmaster Badri and the private

school Principal Shekhar had been in the teaching profession

for nearly twenty-five years. Before coming to the private

school, the Principal had been a Headmaster and teacher in a

number of public schools. Badri and Shekhar both have good

reputations in the city. According to some teachers and

73
 parents, Badri is considered
a notable figure in
the
education field.

The selection of participants

for interview was based
on gender, work experience,
their willingness to take
part
in this study, their comfort
with interviewing, and level
of
information they could provide.
I consulted with the

Headmaster and the Pricipal for the

prospective teacher and
student participants from their
schools. They both provided
several names, but I personally asked
each participant to be
part of this study.

Besides these formal participants there

were many other
teachers, students, parents and local
educators who
contributed information relevant to this study
through
informal conversations and spontaneous discussions.
These
conversations occurred during my school visits.
Individuals
who were visiting the schools were interested in
what I was
doing and got involved in discussions. Although the
discussions were not planned or structured, some of the

information I received from them was quite interesting and

important. I took notes after some of these conversations.

Among the informal participants were government

personnel and administrators from the District Education

Office. Some of the teachers and local educators I talked

74
 to were not associated with
the two case schools.
The
information they provided was
general in nature and
neutral
from both case schools.

Role of t he Researcher
As researcher, my role in this study
a
was as an
observer. Right at the beginning, I informed
and explained
the purpose of the study to all
the teachers, students,
principals, and parents who were the
active participants in
this study. I observed some classes,
attended school
functions, and sat in teachers' meetings.

In most cases I received written consent from the

active participants before I conducted interviews. But some
participants suggested that written consent was
not
necessary. Signing a document is considered very formal in
Nepali culture. So I understood and had to respect why some
participants were hesitant to have it in writing. They
assured me that their verbal commitment was more reliable

than the written agreement. As a qualitative researcher in

this cultural context, I had to be flexible and go ahead
with the interviews without written agreement.

As I moved through the data collection process I was

constantly checking with the participants about my

interpretation of the data that I had collected through

75
 behavior observations, formal
interviews, and informal
conversations. This not only
clarified my interpretations
of the data, but also avoided
misunderstanding and confusion
that the participants might
have had about my work.
But it
is difficult to have a set
procedure or to follow certain
protocols step by step (Merriam,
1988). i had to be

flexible and willing to change the

schedule guite often

As a citizen of Nepal, I had a tremendous advantage in

terms of cultural knowledge, language,
adjustment to the
society, and the system of education.
Although I was
entering into a new community, I was not
seen as a total
stranger. I was a public school teacher
myself before I
came to the United States, so, I was
knowledgeable about the
general mechanics of the school community. As
a fellow
citizen, I felt that I was able to build the trust and
openness between me and the participants very well.
But in
the meantime, I was being very careful not to take things
for granted. I had made my role as a researcher strictly
clear.

Data Collection

Preliminary, mainly quantitative data collection for

this study began in September 1992. A research assistant in

Nepal helped me to collect documents, government reports,

and relevant articles. He also helped me contact the

76
schools before my departure from
the United States.
Although site entry for data collection
was formally
negotiated when I arrived there, verbal
commitments were
made to the research assistant by school
officials.

School observations and interviews took

place between
December 1992 and January 1993. Initial interviews with
participants were done in the beginning of December
and the
follow up formal interviews were conducted towards
the end
of that month and into January 1993. During this time, I

attended the school six days a week, Sunday through Friday.

I visited the public and the private school on a rotating
basis so that I could stay in one school the whole day.

The following three technigues were utilized to collect

data for this study:

- Observations,
- Interviews, and
- Documents

Primary sources of data came from on-site observations

and interviews with teachers, students, principals, and

parents of both public and private schools.

Observations were conducted in the classrooms, at

planned school activities, at teachers meetings, and at some

77
unplanned school events. I saw many parents during the
first week as they were admitting
their children for the new
academic year. Participants were
informed about my role as
a researcher except in the
case of unplanned school
activities. Interviews were conducted in a mutually
agreed
place. Most of the interviews were conducted
right at the
school, and others were done at my
private residence. with
the exception of two, I made specific
appointments for all
interviews

As the study's focus is on the processes that

make the
school effective rather than the product, recording
as much
information as possible was very important. I was looking
student to student, student to teacher, teacher to

teacher, and principal to teacher interactions. I was

listening to their stories which represented how they felt

about their school and job. Often, I found myself in the

midst of serious discussions among teachers, listening to

parents' concerns about their children, and students

interacting with each other.

The data include participants' beliefs, thoughts,

memories, history, feelings, and attitudes. These consist

of detailed descriptions of events and activities, direct

quotes from participants' interviews, their view about the

school from their hearts, and explanations about why things

78
are the way they are. As Patton (1984) said, the
data
provide depth and detail.

Observation

observed four formal structured classes

I
and numerous
unstructured activities daily at both schools.
I limited

the formal class observation to four

because unstructured
settings and activities were more informative
than the
formal class. I felt that the teachers as well
as the
students were overly cautious with my presence in
the class.
But they were much more open in an unstructured
environment
and were affected less by my presence.

As an observer I had the opportunity to look at things

and events as they were, first-hand. As I continued
observing events at the schools, I found them to be a very
important source of information for the study. As Patton

(1990) talked about the strengths and advantages of

observation to an evaluator/researcher ,
I found the
following to be true.

* It allowed me to understand the

circumstances more closely within which

the school programs were functioning.

* As I continued observing I found out

more new things. I was able to be

inductive in approach.

79
 I was able to see and hear things
that
participants were doing and saying

consciously or unconsciously.
* Many observations were informal and

unstructured which put participants at

ease to talk more freely than in an

interview setting. I was discovering

things without me asking a question.
* Lot of things made sense as I saw them
happening. It allowed me to interpret

the events and activities at schools.

(pp. 203-205)

As I noted earlier, I saw lots of interactions during

my first week at school among teachers, parents and

students. Also, the first couple of days at school my

observation schedule was fragmented in terms of specific

place and event. However, this allowed me to identify the

right place, time, and event to observe in the coming days.

As suggested by Taylor and Bogdan (1984) I was becoming

familiar with the environment, being passive, honest,

practical, and not getting overwhelmed. I strolled around

the hallways, and roamed outside in the playground to

observe student behavior during unstructured time. I

participated in informal conversations with students,

teachers, and the principal. This not only allowed me to

80
adjust to the school climate, it also
provided my first
impressions of their personal attitudes
and behaviors.

The four classroom observations I made were planned

ahead of time, and permission of the
teachers was received.
But some events were unplanned as the
situations and events
occurred spontaneously. At times it was kind
of exhaustive
and overwhelming because there were so many
things to
observe. I agree with what Merriam stated "participant

observation is a schizophrenic activity in that one

usually
participates but not to the extent of becoming totally

absorbed in the activity" (1988, p. 94). To avoid the

exhaustion I was being selective about some of the

activities which I could avoid. As suggested by Merriam

(1988, p. 90) I was focusing my observations in the

following five areas: (a) the setting : school buildings,

other physical facilities, the environment near the school;

(t>) the participants : teachers, students, parents, school

committee members, personnel from District Education Office,

visiting teachers from other schools; (c) activities and

interactions : teachers' meetings, student play time,

principal dealing with parents; (d) frequency and duration :

parent visits, students outside classrooms; (e) subtle

factors : leisure time discussions, teacher comments about

school committees, student reaction to teacher presence.

81
 Recording each and everything during
observations was
not an easy task. I was one person, and
there were so many
others to notice, to listen to, and to
understand what was
going on. Also, I did not want to be seen
writing all the
time because I thought that would not be too comforting
to
some of the participants. So I wrote field notes after each
observation. In order to help my memory, I used the
following guide suggested by Bogdan and Biklen (1982).

1. Get right to the task. Do not procrastinate. The

more time that passes between observing and
recording the notes, the poorer your recall will
be and the less likely you will ever get to record
them

2 . Do not talk about your observation before you

record it. Talking about it diffuses its
importance. In addition, it is confusing because
you begin to question what you put down on paper
and what you said to your colleague.

3. Find a quiet place away from distractions and with

adequate equipment to record and get to work.

4. Set aside an adequate amount of time to complete

the notes. It takes practice to accurately judge
how long completing a set of notes will take.
Especially for your first few times out, give
yourself at least three times as long to write as
to observe.

5. Start by jotting down some notes. Sketch out an

outline with key phrases and event that happened.
Some people draw a diagram of the setting and use
it to walk through the day's experience.

6 . Try to go through the course of the observation

session chronologically. While some people do
their notes topically, the natural flow of
chronology can be the best organizing outline.

7. Let the conversations and events flow from your

mind onto the paper. Some people actually talk
through the observations as they write.

82
 If, after you have finished a
otes you realize that you have section of the
S forgotten
1 dd t Similarly if you
set of notes and a ;h ' fini sh your
then remember something that
not included, add it to the end.
Don'^be
con cer n e d about getting everything
through. There is always time the first time
later to add?
Understand that note taking is laborious
urdensome, but as the Vermont farmer and
said when
W1 t r ^
9 Warm day
suffering ?^ S ? v 6 Y ° U Paid f ° r
" I1: '
s a sweet
'

Sprin 9-
(pp?91-92)

One of the technigues I developed at the site was to

record my observations using the tape recorder.
I did this
immediately after I came back to my residence which was not
very far from both schools. At times, I found tape
recording more useful than taking notes. This helped me
memorize more things than by writing them down. Also, I

could compare my notes and the recording at a later time.

I had a laptop IBM computer with me on site. Whenever

possible, I used it to write notes. I did not have a
separate room in which to use the computer so it was

difficult at times to find an appropriate place. I shared

the main teacher's office room to write notes and use the

computer. As the laptop was a strange machine to many in

the school, there were times that I found myself explaining

about its functions more than using it for my note taking.

83
Interviews

The initial meeting with the

participants was more like
a free floating conversation
rather than a structured
interview. For this first meeting, I met one
on one with
teachers, students, and principals, but
met with the parents
in a group of three. I tape recorded some of these

conversations, and for others I took only notes. After

this, I made specific appointments for a formal interview.
I reviewed my notes and listened to the recordings
of the
first meeting before I did the formal interview.
The formal
interview lasted from one to two hours. I had specific
focused questions to guide the participants during the

interview; however, they were also allowed to share their

views about public and private schools and on education in

general

In this case study research, interviews were very

important because they provided information from the

participants' perspective. As Merriam pointed out, "the

main purpose of an interview is to obtain a special kind of

information" (1988, p. 72). I wanted to find out what was

in their minds. I think the interviews provided the

information that I could not get through observation. Also,

the interviews clarified confusions, questions, and

misunderstandings that I had from the observation. So,

84
these interviews served as a tool
to validate information
gathered through other sources

As mentioned earlier, private schools in

I
Nepal are
highly independent and one of the main
reason for their
perceived success and effectiveness could be
the attitudes
and behavior of students, teachers, parents,
and principals.
In this context, it was important to get
the information in
their own words. Patton (1990) suggested that in-depth,
intensive interviewing is necessary in order to
understand
the perceptions, feeling, and knowledge of people.

Similarly, Bogdan and Biklen (1982) shared the view that

good interviews produce rich data which reflects the

participant's perspective. I tried to be very careful and

clear while asking them guestions.

Although the structure of the interview differed

according to who the interviewee was, I was very careful to

let the participant speak from his/her perspective. I was

following the basic rules of interviews, as suggested by

Bogdan and Biklen (1982) that I should listen carefully, ask

for clarification but not challenge, not blame the

participant, be flexible, and try different technigues.

Depending on the interviewee, situation, and the kind of

information reguired, I accommodated slightly different

formats between interviews as many researchers have talked

85
about different types of interviews
(Bogdan and Bikl
Biklen,
1982; Marshall and Rossman, 1989;
Merriam, 1988; Patton,
1990). with some participants, I didn't need to ask many
questions as they were talking about
the specific
information I needed, whereas other
participants needed
somewhat more structured questions from
me.

Merriam (1988) has proposed three types of

interviews,
first, a standardized structured interview
in which
questions are previously set; second, a semistructured
interview which has some guidelines to get the
desired
information, but with flexibility depending on the

interviewee and situation; and third, an unstructured

interview in which there are no set questions and the

information sought is of an exploratory nature. Most of the

interviews in this study ranged from unstructured to semi

structured. The initial interview was unstructured and

participants were free to share as much information as

possible

The interviews with the Headmaster and the Principal

were somewhat different than with others. They definitely

had more information and a different perspective to share

about their schools. I think this is what Marshall and

Rossman (1989) mean by "elite interview". According to

Marshall and Rossman "an elite interview is a specialized

86
treatment of interviewing that
focuses on a particular type
of respondent. Elites are considered to be the influential
the prominent, and the well-informed
people in an
organization or community" (1989, 94
p. ). The Principal
provided much information pertaining
to both the public and
the private school and about the
community.

Documents

In addition to the primary data

collected through
observations and interviews, some documents were
studied as
well. Mainly, school annual newsletters, governing

documents, government reports, and some previously

written
individual articles were studied. Reports of the National
Education Commission and annual reports published by the

Ministry of Education and Culture were reviewed. Data

received from this source were primarily of a guantitative
These included the number of teachers, students, their

background, and the economic status of the schools. The

government documents provided information regarding broader

educational statistics of the country.

Data Analysis

Analyzing the data in a qualitative case study can be

overwhelming and tedious because of the massive data the

researcher gathers through observation, interviews and

document search. Patton (1990) admitted that he "found no

87
way of preparing students for
the sheer massive volume of
information with which they will find
themselves confronted
when data collection has ended.
Sitting down to make sense
out of pages of interviews and whole
files of field notes
can be overwhelming" (p. 379). But several strategies have
been suggested by many researchers to
deal with the
voluminous data a gualitative study generates (Bogdan and
Biklen, 1982; Glaser and Strauss, 1967;
Lincoln and Guba
1985; Marshall and Rossman, 1989; Merriam,
1988; Patton,
1984). Although "data collection and analysis is a

simultaneous activity in qualitative research" (Merriam,

1988, p. 119), the final and intensive analysis began after

the data collection phase had been completed.

Preliminary analysis of each interview and observation

was done right after they were conducted. Some initial
patterns were identified from the field notes and recordings

of each observation. Information received from those led to

further observation of a particular event or activity.

As suggested by Marshall and Rossman (1989, pp. 114-

119), I was using the five modes in the analysis procedure:

organizing the data; generating categories, themes, and

patterns; testing the emergent hypotheses against the data;

searching for alternative explanations of the data; and

writing (notes for) the report. In each of these steps I

88
was carefully selecting important
information, placing it
into the right category, and omitting
information that did
not fit the study's research
questions. Doing this helped
me to manage the data and guided me
to further observation
and specific questions for interviews.

Q rqanizinq the Data : In order to be able to organize

the data, I needed to be familiar with the data collected
every day. The best way to be familiar with the data

according to Marshall and Rossman (1989) is through

thorough
reading. Every evening during the data collection period, I

read the field notes from the day and listened to the

recordings I made after observations. I also listened to

the interview tapes and took notes from them. Although I

had the laptop computer, I did not have a printer or a

transcriber in the field. So taking notes from the

interview tapes was the only way for me to be familiar with

the information participants provided during interviews.

Throughout this process I was creating index cards for

information that initially fell into certain patterns. The

use of separate index cards for different information was

similar to what Glaser and Strauss (1967) and Lincoln and

Guba (1985) have suggested in their constant comparative

method of qualitative data analysis.

89
 The emerging patterns at this
stage of analysis were
not given any particular name,
and they were being
reshuffled constantly to different
categories as more
information became available every day.
I „ as also creating

index cards of direct 'words and quotes'

from the
participants. The exact source of the information
was
indicated on each card. These data organizing processes
helped me to find regularities in the data.
When I noticed
some regularities in the data, that led me to
the next stage
of data analysis.

2 ) Generating Categories. Themes, and Patterns ; This

stage was a continuation from the first stage and was much

more intensive. Here I was not only looking for the

regularities in the data, I was placing them in different
categories, themes, and patterns. The identification of
categories was driven by the different variables that are

indicated in the research guestions of this study.

At this stage I was also checking for the consistency

of data from various sources. New data was being cross

checked with data that had already been placed in one of the

categories. If a new pattern emerged from the new data and

did not fall into the existing categories, a new category

was created. In general, categories were created

90
intuitively, but I was linking those categories
with the
purpose of this study.

Also, I was constantly checking my interpretations

of
data with the participants through followup
questions and by
showing my notes to them. This further clarified
my
interpretations and also helped me explore new
categories.
I think this cross checking of interpretations with
the
participants added to the trustworthiness of the data

previously collected.

3 ) Tes ting Emergent Hypotheses : This was done after

all the data were collected and I had already left the
field. At this data analysis stage I had all the interview
tapes transcribed verbatim. On average, it took me about

ten to twelve hours to transcribe one interview. This

process took longer than normal because the interviews were

conducted in the Nepali language so I was translating into

English and transcribing at the same time. Transcripts were

printed and read more than once. I matched the themes and

categories which I had identified in the field from my

notes. Transcripts were highlighted as they were being read

and more index cards were created for new categories.

Marshall and Rossman stated "this phase is to evaluate

the data for their informational adequacy, credibility,

91
usefulness, and centrality"
(1989, p. 8) n
since j already
.

had some categories identified

by this stage, I was looking
at the interrelationship between
the categories and the
information included in them. I checked the consistency
of
information that came from the same and
different data
sources at different times. Once credibility,
adequacy, and
usefulness were established, then theoretical
memos were
generated for the study. I matched these with the
purpose
of this study and checked to see if they
illuminated the
research questions.

Searching— or Alternative Explanations : Once a set

of categories was identified and the memos were
created,
they were checked for their soundness by testing out other

possible categories and theories. I looked and identified

some alternative explanations and tried a comparative

analysis of them. For example, I compared information about

the same topic coming from different sources. Also, I

constantly compared the data from the two schools to see if

the patterns and themes and their interpretations were

consistent

5 ) Writing the Report : Writing is not a separate stage

in data analysis process; rather it started right at the

beginning of the process when I began to review the data

every evening and made notes on them. Writing the report

92
was an ongoing process for me
during data collection and
analysis

As have mentioned earlier, the nature

I
of this study
is exploratory and descriptive.
The report includes "thick
descriptions" and interpretation of the
variables examined
in this study. I have tried to describe
the events and
activities that occurred in each of the case
schools of this
study. The report includes descriptions and
interpretations
of the participants' attitudes and
behaviors about their
schools, often in their own words.

Several suggestions have been made by many researchers

for an effective writing process of a gualitative case

study. Merriam (1988) suggested a four step process which I

have tried to follow in writing this report: assembling the

case record, determining the audience, selecting a focus,

and outlining the report.

93
 CHAPTER IV

EDUCATION IN NEPAL

Introducti on
The purpose of this chapter is
to provide information
about the country, the people,
culture, socioeconomic
condition, and the education system,
where field data for
this dissertation was collected. I think the information
on
the topics above is important and crucial
for the reader,
especially, in a case study based dissertation
like this
one. in the following pages, first I have
tried to provide
the background information about Nepal, then
describe the
history of education in Nepal beginning in 1950
and
continuing to the current situation.

Background of the Country

Nepal, the only Hindu Kingdom in the world, is located

in the South Asia sub-continent, south of the Tibet province

of the People's Republic of China, and surrounded by India

on the east, west, and the south. It is about 500 miles

long and 120 miles wide covering nearly 55000 square miles

in total area. Nepal is a mountainous country with almost

80% of its territory covered by mountains. The other 20% is

plains in the south and river valleys in the middle mountain

ranges. Nepal can be divided into three major ecological

94
 and topographical zones.
They include the
Malayan
mountain region in the north,
hills in the central,
and the
plains in the south. The
great Himalayan range
runs through
the northern part of
Nepal. Eight of the world's ten
highest mountain peaks are
in Nepal. The world's highest
mountain, Mt. Everest, lies
on the border of Nepal
and
Tibet. The Himalayan region
is very sparsely
populated.
People there depend on basic
agriculture and animal
husbandry.

The central part of Nepal is

covered with the mid-range
mountains which go up to 3 thousand
meters. Almost 60 % of
the country's rural population live
in this region, where
only 30 % of the land is cultivable
(Seddon, 1987 ). This has
caused a high dependency ratio on these
cultivable lands.
There are many fertile river valleys found
in this region
and the majority of the mountain populations
concentrate
around these valleys. One of them is the Kathmandu
Valley,
which is also the capital city of Nepal.

The southern plain, called the Terai 1 region, is very

densely populated, concentrated more on the eastern part of

the country. The research site for this study was located
in this region. The southern border with India is almost

1
Terai region is the low land similar to the plains of the
Ganges river in India. The land is very fertile and most of the
country's big industries are located in this region.

95
 completely open from both sides.
People from both countries
are allowed to travel back
and forth without any
government
documents. it is very common to find
Indian nationals
living permanently on the Nepal
side and vice-versa.
Although the open border situation
is almost unavoidable
because of the historical, social,
and religious
relationships between the people of
the two countries, it
has caused problems to both sides
in terms of immigration,
employment, and land ownership. The problems seem to hurt
India less than Nepal because of the
huge difference in the
size and population of the two countries.

Nepal is predominantly an agricultural

country. More
than 93 percent of the population depends
on agriculture,
which contributes 65 percent of the Gross Domestic
Product
(GDP) and accounts for 85 percent of the
export trade
(Poudyal, 1983, p.2). Being a land locked country and
having the giant neighbor India on three sides, Nepal's

import and export trade is mainly dominated by India.

Until
recently, about two thirds of Nepal's trade was with India

alone and the current figure stands at about 50%. Land-

locked countries face problems in terms of transit

facilities, but Nepal's situation is unique and of a

different nature than other land-locked countries in the

world. The only alternative Nepal has in this case is to

96
 negotiate with India, even if the
negotiated conditions are
not fair. in this context Rana wrote
that:

^/ and locked countries, Switzerland

example, may choose among several
access to sea through different avenues
for
of
countries. Thus
competition between the many countries
offering transit facilities provides
most land
locked countries with easy terms of
in Nepai s case even the building transit. But
of Kodari Road 2
has not altered the Indian monopoly
over
access to sea. The unavoidable dependence our
for transit facilities has made on India
Nepal 'India
locked rather than just land locked.
'
(Rana, 1969
p 1.
5 ) .
'

Nepal has been one of the poorest countries

in the
world for a long time. In 1971, the United Nations declared

Nepal as one of the 'least developed' countries in the

world, and since then it has remained in the same
category.
The situation shifted towards improvement, but the

improvement primarily depends on foreign aid and loans

received through multinational institutions like the World

Bank and the Asian Development Bank. Every year the

national budget has a deficit, causing more and more

dependency on foreign aid and a higher debt. Nepal's total

external debt in 1970 was only 3 million dollars and that

2
Kodari Road is the highway which connects the capital city
Kathmandu and Tibet. The construction of this highway has
provided accessibility to do some trade with China. However, it
has not been a major factor in Nepal's foreign trade. The road
passes through high mountain ranges making the route long and the
transportation cost high. Also, Tibet is not a developed region
and it's a long way from Nepal before anyone can get to Chinese
industrial cities.

97
 " ,o! *»*»
**“
i» .....
«
cioi
... 1‘illlon
sirs in i qq i mu _ •

~
,
'
aSS1StanCe inc "»“*
to 345 million
dollars " ,
(W° rld ° eVel0
Report, World Ban k
1989) .
,

When the national

budget of a country
remains deficit-
ridden for many years,
the government
becomes unable to
provide basic services
like health housir
ho •

»g, and education.

'

though the Nepal

government has stated
in various
development pl ans that
its main goal is to
increase the
Gross Domestic Product
(GDP), and provide
basic services to
its people, the goal
has yet to be met.

There has been a tremendous

change in Nepal within
the
last three years. The Panchayat System’,
which ruled the
untry for about thirty
years, has been thrown
out of power
by a people's revolution.
The monopoly and stronghold
of
the King and his family
have been considerably
diminished.
Under the new constitution,
the current King is only
a
constitutional monarch and political
power rests with the
elected Prime Minister and the
Parliament. The Nepali
Congress party was victorious
in the free election held

T^
6 3 ain< hi ld ° f the late Ki
Shah , ’^bTned an noTit caT ; i
"9 Mahendra
all powers in^hi^owTha^
emocracy, freedom was very limited
under this system.
98
 three years ago. The Nepal Communist
Party is the ma in
opposition in the Parliament.
There also are quite
a few
other political parties
represented in the parliament
by a
handful of elected members.

Democracy is still very young

in Nepal. People's
expectation of the government
is too high but resources
are
very limited. Although the
present government is formed
with modern democratic
principles, lack of coordination
and
cooperation between the two main
parties has created great
political confusion among people.
At times, rivalry between
the Congress and the Communists
almost becomes undemocratic
to the point that the government
seems dysfunctional. The
leaders in power spend too much
time to get their political
message across rather than working
towards the much needed
development activities.

Recently, there has been a considerable

power struggle
within the ruling Congress Party. The Prime
Minister is
opposed by his own party members. This situation has
brought lots of confusion and ineffectiveness
to the
government. While the ruling party is struggling to resolve
its internal disagreements, the opposition is
trying to take
advantage of the situation with strikes, demonstrations,
and
often with violence.

99
 The political
instability in the country
has direct
impact on schools where
political activism is
alive as it
was found in this
study, students as well as
teachers are
deeply involved in
local and nationai
pontics; has
affected the functionin
g of the schools and the
qU ality of
education, while learning
democratic values and
principles
could be an important
part of the education
system for
students, unwarranted
political activities in
schools need
to be controlled and
political education needs
to be
delivered in an organized
and meaningful way.
More
discussion on politics and
education is presented in
the
chapters following this one
where findings of this
study are
outlined.

History of Educa tion in

Nepal was in the hands of the
Rana Dynasty* for 104
years until 1950. During this period, a limited
number of
educational facilities were available,
but they were
strictly reserved for a very few
selected group of people.
Expansion of education was considered
as a threat to the
Ranas in power. There were strict
regulations for opening
schools and the establishment of other
forms of educational
institutions. At times, people who demanded
education and

Rana family ruled Nepal for 104 years.

u e
They had a
Y S •° f beCOming Pril" e Ministers °f the country,
The total and ultimate
n?f i power was with the Prime Minister and his
faniif
family No h
development projects were initiated and the capital
was out of touch with the rest of the country P

100
 trlSd t0 W ° rk 93 teaCh

1950 ' N6Pal

h9Ve
-S — jailed and punished.
Until
organized system of
education
The country was in total
darkness. The Rana
Dynasty was
overthrown in 1950 by a
political revolution
organized by
the people and the King.
Democracy emerged as an
uncertain
system of government.
People were uneducated,
so the
meaning of democracy was
unclear and confusing.

T he Early Day s of iQsns

During the 1950s, education

in Nepal was poorly
organized under the supervision
of the Ministry of
Education
headquartered in the capital city.
No scientific, specific
data were found about the
status of education in the
countryside. The only available data were
about the
institutions in the capital city
of Kathmandu. The
curriculum of some schools were under
the supervision of the
University of Patna in North India.
Nepal didn't have a
University of its own.

In 1954 the government appointed

a Nepal National
Education Planning Commission. After a year of hard work,
the National Education Planning Commission
submitted its
report to the Ministry of Education in March
of 1955. The
report included extensive research on how people
felt about
education and the kind of system the country needed.
The
commission submitted some very specific schemes for
how

101
 primary, secondary, and
higher education needed to
be
Planned and managed. it pointed out that
scientific data
collection in the country was
needed in order to plan and
provide necessary educational
services in the country.
Without accurate data it was
very difficult to assume
what
kind of services existed and
what other kinds of services
needed to be planned. The commission
recommended stress on
primary education, vocational
education, teacher training,
adult education, and the creation
of a university. Most
important of all, the report of this
commission was the
first detailed official document in
the history of education
in Nepal.

By the time the commission completed

its report,
various educational activities were going
on throughout the
country. The need of education for development was
being
realized by both the political leaders and the
people.
Primary and secondary schools were being established
by the
efforts of the local community. The government encouraged

the communities to participate in the development of

education and helped them as much as possible.

Although most of these educational activities were

centered around urban areas and district headguarters ,
the
increase of new schools was significant. Table 1 on the
next page shows the growth of education during this time.

102
 _ Table
rowth of Education inl
Nepal 1954-1961

ssrja x. f ss g- «-

As we can see, the number of

schools and student
enrollment were growing rapidly,
but there were no formal
teacher training colleges in Nepal
until 1956. A major step
toward strengthening teacher
education was taken in
September of 1956 when the College of
Education was
established under the Ministry of
Education. The college
was authorized to grant a Bachelor
of Education ( B Ed
.
.

degree. The process of establishing a National

University
was also underway and the College of
Education was to be
part of the National University at a later
date.

Although the idea of a National University was

initiated for the first time in 1948, by the Rana
Prime

103
 Minister Mohan Sumsher,
the idea never materialized
into
action. The strong proposal
of the National
Education
Planning Commission then
played an important role
in the
emergence of a University
system in Nepal. m i 956 a
University Commission was
appointed which drafted the
Tribhuvan University Act. The
act was later approved
by the
King on May 29, 1959 . Finally, the Tribhuvan
University was
born with the promise of
providing guality higher
education
in the country.

Although various educational

activities were happening
between the period of 1955 to
1960, the country was going
through stressful political turmoil.
Different governments
changed in a short period of time.
The disagreement between
the several political parties
created instability and
disorganization in the country. The educational activities
were affected and occasionally disrupted
by this political
scene (Wood, 1987, p.161). As a result
of this, the Nepal
National Education Planning Commission's
report, which was
considered an important step towards the
development of
education in Nepal, was never fully implemented.

The Change Purina 1960 s

A major change in the structure of government occurred

in December of 1960, when the king utilized his

constitutional power to dissolve the 18 month-old government

104
 Which was the first ever
elected government in
the history
of Nepal, a year after that he
introduced the partyless
political system called
"Panchayat".

Significant progress was made

during the sixties in
terms of enrollment and the
building of new schools
throughout the country. Educational developments in
the
urban areas were more rapid
than in the rural areas.
Although accurate and scientific
data are not available from
year to year, some data were
collected by the Ministry of
Education. Statistics showed that during the
five year
period 1964-69 student enrollment
went up by 33.5 percent at
the primary level, 69.7 percent
at the secondary level, and
134.4 percent at the tertiary level
(Gurung, 1972 p. 13 ).
The tremendous increase of enrollment
at the higher
education level supports the government's
goal to produce
more highly educated citizens.

There was also a considerable increase in the

number of
high school (SLC) 5 graduates. The number increased
from
1,811 graduates in 1963 to 8,387 in 1969, an increase
of 463
percent in a seven-year period. This also resulted in an
increase in the number of college graduates. A total of

."School Leaving Certificate (SLC) is the national

examination conducted by an examination board at the central
level. Every student in Nepal must pass this examination in
order to graduate from the high school. The examination is
conducted once a year throughout the country.

105
 6,063 students graduated
from colleges in 1967
and that
number reached 10,887
in 1969, which was
a 64 8 percent .

crease m
two years, or 16.2
percent annually (Gurung,
1972, p 1 3
. )

Tablebelow indicates the increase

2
in student
enrollment and number of
educational institutions
between
the period of 1961 - 1970.

1961 1965 1970 1961 1965 1970

Primary 4165 5696 7256 240000 386104 449141
Lower Secon. * combined with primary and secondary
levels
Secondary 590 687 1065
Higher 62175 58207 96704
33 34 49 5043 8081 17200
Total 4788 6417 8370 307143 452392 563045
Source Ministry of Education.
National Planning Commission.

Although student enrollment and the number

of schools
were increasing in the country, Nepal was
not able to
produce the mid-level technicians that it
needed for many
development projects. The curriculum in the schools
and
colleges were dominated by general subjects and
were similar
to that of Indian institutions, which also was
derived from
the British education system. The country was lacking

106
 “
““*** .it.
“’7
Pro ems for these
“ ““
•»«,..«.
graduates had begun
„_r
to appear.
„„„„„

ma^aZajS-AtK1
I" 1971
^^ System
the National Education
,
System Plan (NESP)
introduced in Neoal was
paI The “in notion of
-

_ ,
this nl.n was that
I11S plan
education should work
for nation building.
This new
education plan was
designed to bring about
change and
Progress in education,
which the previous
education system
Education- as educators
called it) was not able
to do
This new plan also
came with a centralized
national
curriculum for schools,
which the planners said
was relevant
to the developmental
needs of the country.

NESP tried to address

the imbalance of general
education graduates from
schools and colleges during
the
sixties. The system looked promising
in terms of school
curriculum. The major focus of the
system was on vocational
and technical education.
The Human Resources Division
of
National Planning Commission*
always identified a shortage
of middle and high-level
technicians in the country.
NESP's
mam focus was to expand the vocational
and technical
schools along with general
education. Every secondary

Ti e Nat: onal
Planning Commission is the central hndv
*-

i,
-
i
e
is headed by the king himsel?
e
nlng C ° Untry ^
The commission ‘

107
 school was required to
teach at least one
nn„ vocational
subject. in addition, some
schools in
in every
district were
designated as vocational
schools.

Along with the regulation

of NESP, the National
Education Committee (NEC)
was formed as a policy
formulating
body for the education
sector as a whole. m the initial
stage of NESP, NEC was
the highest government
agency
monitoring the new system.
From the beginning of
its
inception, NEC's main
responsibility was to monitor,
implement, and evaluate the
education policies in the
country. Although there have been
several changes in the
education system, the NEC still
pl ays an important role
for
the Ministry of Education and
Culture in guiding national
education policy.

Quantitatively, the growth of education

in Nepal since
the regulation of NESP has been
remarkable. The number of
schools at all levels and the enrollment
rate have gone up
very sharply. Although NESP went
through numerous changes
over the years, and looked confusing
to many educators, it
certainly raised a wide-spread consciousness
about education
among the general public. The wave of
education development
was strong even in the remote regions of
the country.
People were involved and villages raised money
to open

108
 schools. Table
below illustrates the
3
rapid expansion of
education during 1970-80
period.

Number of Institutions
Levels of student
Education 1970 1975 1980 1970 1975 1980
Primary 7256 8314 10136 449141 458516 1043332
Lower Sec, . * 1893 3261 * 174143 408907
Secondary 1065* 479 704 96704* 62214 120838
Higher 49 79 94 17200 23504 39863
Source Ministry of Education

NESP placed emphasis on producing

more trained teachers
m the c °untry. in the beginning there were very
few
trained teachers and the plan provided
in service training
opportunities to teachers and some pre service
opportunities
to people who wanted to become teachers.
But without enough
teacher training institutions and facilities,
it was beyond
the scope of NESP to fulfill the demand
for trained teachers
m the country. There were enough people who were qualified
to become teachers with their education degree,
but they
were not adequately trained to become teachers.
Table 4 on
the next page shows the status of trained/untrained
teachers
in various levels of education in Nepal.

109
 Table 4
Teachers in Nepal

Total # 20775 24652 27805 29134 32259 38131

% Qualified 58 63
46484 51286
65 67 68 69
% Trained 39 39 71 73
36 36 36 34 32 32
Lower Secondary

Total # 7930 9416 11693 12245 10820 10146 10602

% Qualified 67.7 67.1 11120
72.7 75.8 81 83 82.4
% Trained 38.3 41
.
83.8 .
. 39.2 39.5 42.0 42 43 41.9 . .

Secondary

Total # 3449 3948 4683 4909 5634 5764 6467 7242

% Qualified 96.6 98.0 98 . 98 . 95.5 95.6 95.7 95.7
% Trained 50.0 63 . 62 . 62.5 62.4 58.6 55.0 53.0
Sources: MOEC, Educational Statistical
Report of Nepal 1976-

According to the table above, the supply of

trained
teachers in primary and lower-secondary levels
has been
below 50 percent for many years. The situation seems to
improve little at the secondary level, but after
1981 the
percentage of trained teachers went down every year.

Failure of NFSP

The spirit and promise NESP had in the beginning years

could not continue after its first phase of implementation

1971-76. It was mainly because the system had too many

flaws and the expectations were unrealistically high. The

110
 government could not keep up
with the promise to
finance
education, as the system
demanded more and more
funds every
year. As a result, the main
objective of the NESP to
expand
the vocational/technical
education was cut dramatically.
Later, in 1981, the
government decided to eliminate
the
compulsory vocational curriculum
from secondary education.
This was kept as an optional
subject in some schools
because
there was a scarcity of
qualified, trained teachers
to teach
these subjects and also because
of the high cost involved
in
instructional materials. Regarding
the various problems of
NESP, Bista (1992) wrote that

The fact that NESP was pushed

rather prematurely
became more than obvious in
strong supporters themselves
subsequent years L
Sr?
rLn
challenging
-
With ^ displayed their
bY either ending their own
ren t0 schools not operating under
NESP or by
its effectiveness when their own Y
dld n ° b Succeed in getting admissions
into ^
institutions they wanted, especially
p vidSd degrees in social sciences
^
with little effort. ... The legacy
of NESP is the
large educational budget, the power
of the
Education Minister and the large job
providing
bureaucracy, many parts of which no longer
any purpose as the programs for which they have
were
created have been abolished, (pp. 125—127)

NESP could have been a successful program if

it was
carefully planned and implemented. It provided a new avenue
in the field of education in Nepal, but the overly

unrealistic expectations and unpreparedness of the

government to carry out such a large scale program could not

111
 take that avenue very
far. it was lost before
it could
provide some good results.
The government estimate
in terms
°f cost, and the
instructional methods used
were proven
inadequate to the task. Enough
trained teachers were not
available and the government
was not able to continue
the
teacher training program fast
enough. This caused the
internal efficiency and the
quality of education to be
very
low. Critics say that the average
performance of high
school graduates under the
NESP was far below that of
graduates from the old system.
Although students came out
of the schools with vocational
degrees, their lack of skill
did not help them to get a job.
Because of this, the
quality of the labor force also went
down.

C ontinua ti on of NESP in the 1 9 ROr

Revised forms of NESP continued during

the early years
of the eighties. The main ingredient, vocational
education,
was no longer the focus of the education
system. All
vocational subjects were made optional in
schools. However,
NESP still remained as a changing force
in the development
of education in the country because there
was no other
alternative. The government did not have resources and was
not able to come up with another large scale
program to fix
the problems of NESP.

112
 As the NESP's objective
to produce low-level
technicians through vocational
schools failed, the
National
Education Committee develooed
eveiopea a« new
r.^,7 u
scheme called the
"Technical School Plan". The
main objective of this
plan
was to establish specific
technical schools in various
parts
of the country. There were at least 6
technical schools
opened under this plan. The
main difference between
these
schools and the previous
vocational schools was that
previously the vocational schools
were not totally
independent. General education
courses were also taught in
the same school. But the new technical schools
were
designed specifically to train
people in the areas of
health, agriculture, mechanical
training, and electrician
training. Although these schools helped to some
extent in
producing technical manpower, the plan
could not expand
throughout the country.

One of the remarkable events of this

decade for the
education sector was the King's announcement
of the Basic
Needs Program in December of 1985. The
Basic Needs program
identified universal primary education as a basic
need for
the people. The program has targeted a 100 percent

enrollment of school aged children in the primary schools

by
the year 2000 A D
.

113
 The Ministry of
Education and Culture
has prepared a
comprehensive program guide
on how to achieve
this goal
However, looking at the
resources available, the
ambitious
goal of universal primary
education by the year 2000
seems
to be unrealistic. it is projected that
the number of 6 - 10
year old children will
be 292,8984 by the
end of this
century. In order to achieve the
100 percent enrollment
goal, the enrollment of
boys must increase by
21 percent and
girls by 157 percent (IEES,
Nepal Education and Human
Resources Sector Assessment,
1988).

There is also a big problem

in training the teachers
necessary for primary schools.
The Basic Needs document
projects that a total of 88,565
teachers will be needed by
the year 2000 A.D., of which
63,765 will need to be trained.
This means that about 5000 teachers
per year need to be
trained. Currently, the teacher training
colleges and other
projects have a capacity to train only
about 2000 teachers
(IEES, Nepal Education and Human
Resources Sector Assessment
1988). The Radio Education Teacher Training
(RETT) project
can reach about 1000 teachers a year
through distant teacher
training, but this number has to be increased
in the future.

The Current Picture

The development of education in Nepal since
its
conception in 1951 to today is considered as rapid
growth.

114
 Nepal has made considerable
investments in education
allocating 9 5% of total.
government expenditure to
education
" 1980/81 " hlCh lnCreaSed
'
to 9 -^% in 1981/82
and 10.5% in
1982/83. The expenditure increased
even to 11.0% in
1983/84
(Matronal Planning Commission,
Government of Nepal) but
decreased slightly in recent
years with an average of 10 %

Tablebelow should be helpful in

5
order to understand
how the country's education
has come to today's
situation.
The figure shows the
progress in the number of
schools,
enrollment, and teachers.

_. Table 5
rogress of Education in Nepal
(in Actual Numbers) 1953-1990

Educ Level
1 Primary
•

Schools 921 8,314 10,404 11,704 17,842

Enrollment 26,186 458,516 1 ,317,068
Teachers 1,833,655 2,788,644
1,278 18,874 28,353 49,305
Lower Sec. 71,213
Schools 316 1,893 2,223
Enrollment 33,408 174,143 3,502 3,964
142,271 266,639 344,138
Teachers 1 ,325 6,496 11,145
Secondary 11,037 12,399
Schools 83 479 785 1,280 1,953
Enrollment 12,697 62,214 121 007, 228 502
, 364,525
Teachers 921 3,451 4 683, 7,882 10,421
Total (Lines 1+2+3)
Schools 1320 10,686 13,412 16,486 23,759
Enrollment 72291 699,873 1,580,346 2,328,796 3,497,307
Teachers 3524 28,821 44,181 68,224 94,033
"
7 iNfcjpdj. national Education
7
Planning Commission, 1956. For 1990: Ministry of Education
and Culture For other years: National Planning Commission,
The Sixth Plan, 1980-85 and The Seventh Plan, 1985-90.

115
 The achievement in
student enrolment and
the increase
m the number of schools
is remarkable. The enrollment
ratio in primary,
lower-secondary and secondary
levels by
1984-85 had reached 78
percent, 34.5 percent,
and 24 percent
respectively (ZEES, Education
and Human Resource
Sector
Assessment, 1988
1988, n
p.2o-'xa mu
34).
\
The enrollment ratio in
1990
increased to 107% for
ror nrimarw
primary, 41*o ^for lower
secondary, and
29% for secondary. Looking at the number, only
about
72
thousand students in the country
were enrolled in the
primary through secondary levels
in 1953 - 54 which increased
,

to more than 2.3 million by

1984-85, and reached to almost
3.5 million in 1990. The number of schools at all
levels
was increased from about 13
hundred to more than 23 thousand
in the same period.

The literacy rate in Nepal was only

2% in 1951, which
went up to 23.26% in 1981 and is
estimated to be about 33 %
today. There is a big gap between the male and
female
literacy rate. According to the 1981 census
in Nepal, 33 9 % .

of males were literate, whereas the

figure was only 12.04%
for female (Planning Division, Ministry of
Education and
Culture, Nepal, 1987). Although the literacy rate is going
up in total numbers, two thirds of the population
still
remains illiterate.

116
 AS schools are growing,
the number of teachers
is also
increasing every year, but
the heavy bulk of
untrained
teachers remains a serious
problem in the system,
student
enrollment has increased
considerably, but less than
50 % of
those taking the SLC pass
the examination. Drop-out rates
are high, especially in
the primary and early
secondary
levels. Financing of schools has always
been a big problem
in the rural areas. The equity between male
and female
enrollment is still a problem
and this problem is even
bigger in the rural areas. There
are some continuing
serious problems in the system.

Primary Education

Primary Education is a major area

of emphasis for the
Ministry of Education and Culture.
Nepal has set a goal of
providing universal primary education
by the year 2000 and
the government is working hard to
achieve this goal. When
primary education was made free in 1975, the
growth in
student enrollment between the period 1975-81
was
remarkable. There was an annual growth rate of 11 % in this
period. In recent years, the growth rate has slowed
down to
a seven percent average. The reason for this might be the
absence of new incentives by the government.

The primary education sector receives a comparatively

larger share of the education budget. Of its overall

117
 ucation budget, the Ministry
allocated 35.261 in 1984-85
34.65% in 1985-86, 36.32%
in 1986-87, 38.37%
in 1987-88,
1988 89, and 46.37% in
1990 to primary education
Although the budget allocation
in the primary sector
has
increased over the years,
it will require even
more funding
in the coming years as
the government has set
the goal of
providing universal primary
education by the year 2000
A.D.

In the seventh plan

(1985-90), MOEC had a target of
opening 1000 more primary schools
and adding about 13000
more teachers. The government
will continue to provide free
education up to 5th grade and
distribute free textbooks to 3
grades. The plan was to enroll
87 percent of the school-
aged children (6-10) by the end
of 1990 (National Planning
Commission, The Seventh Plan).

The government has been promoting

the opening of
private primary schools. Private schools
are operated and
managed by local resources only and recognized
by the
government. However, this new incentive of
the government
seems to be working mainly in the urban areas.

Although girls' enrollment has increased remarkably

over the past years, it is still a challenge for the

government. By 1985, 30 percent of the total primary

enrollment was girls. The percentage was slightly better in

118
 the urban areas, which wac t/is- w
Cn Was 34 «' but
'
.

considerably lower in
the mountain and hill
areas (13%). The
government has
introduced several incentives
to promote girls'
enrollment.
For instance, girls
receive completely free
primary
education, including textbooks,
in the rural areas.
The
government also plans to increase
the number of female
teachers

If the government is to
enroll 100 % of the primary
school age children by the year
2000, the annual enrollment
growth rate has to remain at about
3.26 percent over that
period IEES Education and Human
(
,
Resource Sector
Assessment, 1988). The annual
enrollment growth rate has
been declining in recent years.
in 1982-83 the enrollment
growth rate was 8.0%, which declined
to 4.3% in 1985-86.
The drop-out and retention rate also
has to decrease
significantly. The government's goal might
be overly
optimistic and may not be achieved by the
targeted time.

To raise the quality of primary education,

the
government needs to provide more trained teachers.
in 1985,
only 32-g percent of the total primary teachers were trained
and 27% percent weren't even qualified (MOEC,
Educational
Statistical Report, 1986). The percentage of trained
teachers in primary sector improved slightly to 38% in 1990.

Although the government policy requires all primary

119
 education teachers to hold
a minimum of the
SLC degree,
there are still raan
y teachers without the
minimum
requirement. When candidates
with the SLC degree are
not
found, schools are still
hiring underqualified
teachers. In
order to decrease the
repetition rate in the first
grade,
the government also has
to think about developing
pre-
primary education.

The aim of providing universal

primary education is
admirable, but the task has yet
to be done. Given the
present situation and the pace
of progress in the country
it is almost certain that
the project will fall behind
schedule. Strategic planning and some careful
implementation criteria should be
established in order to
achieve this great goal.

Secondary Education

Secondary education in Nepal has grown

very rapidly and
gone through many changes over the past
two or three
decades. By definition, the main objective of
secondary
education is to prepare the students for higher
education.
Secondary education also has to provide some
base knowledge
and a solid ground-work for people who are
planning to enter
the institutions which produce mid-level professionals.

120
 Most secondary schools
also consist of the
lower
secondary grades a through
8. There are very few lower
secondary schools (6 through
8 only) operating.
The
statistics which indicate
the number of lower
secondary
schools and enrollment
combine the separate lower
secondary
schools and the ones operating
within the secondary schools.
The structure of education
has changed many times
in Nepal
and this has affected the
lower secondary sector.
The
grades for this sector ranged
from 4 to 8 at various times.
Before the current structure
was placed two years ago,
lower
secondary education was completely
eliminated.

Although the number of secondary

schools has gone up
remarkably over the past several
years, the pressure in
terms of space in this sector is
still very high. The
announcement of the government to provide
universal primary
education by the year 2000 will put even
more pressure on
secondary enrollment in the coming years.
After the
completion of five years in primary school
and two years in
lower secondary school, will be entering
secondary schools,
which have to be ready to take an overwhelming
number of
students. Therefore, the government must plan to increase
secondary education.

The share of the education budget that secondary

education receives seems to be decreasing in recent years.

121
 secondary education was
allocated 15.93% of the
total
education budget in 1984-85,
which decreased to 15
.22% in
1985-86, 15.30% in 1986-87,
13.27% in 1987-88 and
an ^ven
lower 12.9% in 1988-89.
in 1990 the budget
k ^ 4.
'
allocation for
secondary and lower secondary
sector combined was only
13.79%. morder to improve the
financial problems and
quality of education in the
secondary schools, budget
allocations need to be carefully
examined.

The problems in secondary

education are similar to the
ones in other sectors of
education. Although the growth
of
secondary education is seen in
terms of numbers, quality is
still a very big issue. Whether it is defects in the
evaluation process or the poor
quality of teaching in
schools, more than half of the
students who take the
national examination (SLC) do not
pass the secondary level.
Students completing the 10th grade
curriculum are not just
passed on to take the SLC examination.
They also have to
pass a district wide pre-SLC test.
Private schools even
screen out their 10 th graders internally
before letting them
take the district wide test. The standard
of the pre-SLC
test is believed to be comparable to that of
the SLC. Thus,
students are screened out as much as possible before
they
take the SLC examination, but still the passing
rate is less
than half. Critics say that it is defects in the SLC
examination process rather than in the students. There has

122
 been some discussion
lately about the
credibility of SLC.
The recommendations
include that the SLC
should be a
screening device for entry
to higher education.
Thus, it
should be taken as an
entrance examination into
higher
education, rather than a
graduation requirement for
secondary level, some suggest that passing
the pre-SLC
examination should be a sufficient
standard to complete the
secondary level. The pre-SLC
examination may need some
coordination, but that can be done
on the district or the
regional level.

Presently, the structure of education

in Nepal is
grades 1 through 5 in primary schools,
6 through 8 in lower

secondary, and only two grades 9 and

10 in secondary
schools. But currently, there is another
major change going
on in the education structure.
The 10+2 system has already
been implemented in some schools. The
11th and 12th grades
are considered higher secondary grades
but not part of
secondary education. Students will still
be required to
take the SLC examination after the completion
of loth grade.
Although it is unclear at this point, the two
grades are
seen as equivalent to the first two years of college.

However, there already are numerous problems associated

with
this structural change. These two grades are not funded by
the government. If a school wants to add the two grades,

the local community must be able to come up with all the

123
 expenses needed, who will teach those +
2 grades is still
not clear. Teacher qualification,
curriculum, and
availability of facilities
are some of the major
issues with
the +2 grades.

Private E ducation
history of private education
in Nepal is not that
Old. However, the concept of private
school started right
after the political revolution
of 1950. The first few
schools were opened in Kathmandu
by foreign religious
groups, mainly by the Jesuit
fathers and sisters. Some
Nepali educators followed the concept
and opened some
privately run schools in the Kathmandu
valley. The idea
grew to some extent in the sixties and
a few more schools
were opened in Kathmandu. A limited
number of private
schools were also seen in other urban
centers outside the
Kathmandu Valley.

Private schools were hit hard in 1971 with the

regulation of the National Education System Plan.

The new
education plan abolished all private schools and
reguired
the existing schools to be part of the government
school
system. The District Education Office took control of the

teacher salary scale, school curriculum, and the formation

of management committee. Any private organizations,

including the foreign missions wanting to help schools, were

124
 required to provide their
monetary and non-monetary
aid to
the government. Then the government decided
where to send
the help.

Although the regulation imposed

by the NESP against
private schools seemed strict,
the schools did not
disappear
from the picture. They followed government
regulations but
also continued their operation
as before.

The country went through another

political turmoil in
1979-1980. The political establishment was
challenged and
the King's role in national politics
was guestioned. A
party Political system based on modern
democratic
values was demanded. As a result, the
government
reconsidered its policies in various areas
including the
education system. In 1980, the education policy was
amended
and private schools were allowed to open and
operate.

With the failure of NESP, the quality of education

was
diminishing in public schools. Many parents had begun
to
send their children to Darjeeling and Kalimpong areas
in
India where private schools were considered to be of high

quality. Taking children to Darjeeling was not convenient

to many parents because of the distance. Also, the schools
there were very expensive. With the new education policy
allowing private schools to open, and recognizing the demand

125
 for them, many educators
began to establish
private schools
in Kathmandu and other
urban areas. In fact, many private
school venturers came from
the Darjeeling areas
in India.
The timing was perfect
and the demand was
increasing.
Private schools became very
popular throughout the
eighties
and continue to be popular
today.

Private school educators claim

that 30 percent of the
total student enrollment in the
country is in the private
sector. But the government statistics
suggests otherwise.
Table 6 below shows the number of
private schools,
enrollments, and teachers for the
year 1990.

Table 6
Private Education Data 1990

Nepal Total Private Sector Private

Schools
Primary 17,842 253
1 ,
7 02
Lower Secon 3 , 964 558
.

Secondary 14.07
1.953 899 46.03
Total 23,759 2,710 11.4
Students
Primary 2,788,644 112,171
Lower Secon. 4.02
344 ,138 37,275 10.83
Secondary 364.525 107,943 29.61
Total 3,497,307 257,389 7.35
Teachers
Primary 71 ,213 4,861 6.82
Lower Secon. 12,399 1,827 14.73
Secondary 10 .421 3 .734 35.83
Total 94,033 10,422 11.08
Source: Ministry of Education and Culture, 1990.

126
 The above data on private
schools is based on the
number of schools officially
registered with the government
as private. Although the total student
enrollment in the
private schools is shown at
only 7.35 percent, the
data on
secondary schools and enrollments
is significant. According
to the data above, the
government is reporting that
46.03
percent, almost half, of all
secondary schools in Nepal are
private and almost 30 percent
of all secondary students
are
enrolled in those schools. This
statistics verifies the
private school educators' claim
of having 30 percent of
all
students in the private sector.
The data for the secondary
sector seem to be accurate because
all secondary schools
must report to the government for
the purpose of the SLC
examination. If a school is not registered,
students from
that school are not allowed to appear
in the SLC
examination

The government requires all schools to

register
officially in the District Education Office, but
without any
compelling reason many private primary and lower
secondary
schools do not report and register. So the data
on the
primary and the lower secondary sector may be inaccurate.

Generally, private schools in Nepal can be classified

in five different categories:

127
 1 ) schools that are established
by a single individual
with his or her personal
financial investment, m this
kind of private school,
the founder is normally
the
head and the sole owner of
the school.
2 ) schools that are run by a
group of people with shared
financial investment and leadership.
3) schools that receive aid from
non-governmental
organizations. Leadership for this
kind of school is
normally designated by the funding
agency,
4) schools which initially opened as
government schools
and later turned private with
their own financial
strength. There is no personal investment in
this kind
of school.

schools that are established under the

Company Act of
Nepal. This category includes the schools run by
foreign missions, corporations and trusts.

The growth of private education has both

pros and cons
for the education sector in Nepal. Private schools
certainly help meet the increasing demand for schools
and
higher enrollment in the country. Public schools have
heavy
enrollment problems. Shifting some of these students to the
private sector might help the public schools improve their

conditions. Also, people who want private education can

have it without having to go to India or other countries.

128
 The quality of education
is a big problem in
Nepali
schools. Private schools seem to
be making good
progress in
maintaining the quality of
education. The academic
rigor
and evaluation methods
seem more organized and
111^ PriVatS schools- If the quality is
established
maintained, it
will provide better-skilled
workers necessary for the
country, students will be better
prepared for higher
education.

flip side, private schools

are very expensive.
They are inaccessible to many
children. The majority of the
population in the country cannot
afford the high cost of
private education. Unless the
quality of education in the
public schools is raised, the
majority will be denied access
to receive a quality education.

Further growth of private schools in

Nepal seems
inevitable. The government has continued to
encourage the
private sector to get involved in education.
However, the
government must have clear guidelines for the
private
sector. More discussion on private schools is
presented in
the findings chapter following this one.

129
 CHAPTER V

SCHOOL MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION

Introducti on
The purpose of this and the
next two chapters is to
present the findings of the study.
The main objective of
this study was to find the
differences between a private and
a public school in Nepal.
In order to get this information,
the interview questions and
informal conversations focused
on the following areas: school
management, internal and
external school environment, school
curriculum, and attitude
and behaviors of students, teachers,
principals, and
parents

The focus of this chapter is to report

the findings on
school management and operation. Although
the management of
both the public and private schools is mandated
with clear
policies by the government, the data present
significant
differences in the way different schools are managed
and
operated. On this topic participants talked about power

struggles within the management, government policy on public

and private schools, and parent and community involvement

in
school matters.

130
 The data suggest that
quite often there existed
unhealthy power struggles
in public school
management amQng
Headmaster, the School
Management Committee, and
the
Education Office. The
management structure in the
private school was similar
to that of the public
school, but
the data suggest that the
private school Principal
had
considerably more management
freedom than his counterpart
in
the public school.

The data showed that parents

and the members from the
local community were highly
involved in both the public
and
the private school, but the
productivity and relevance of
their involvement was very different.

T he Different Segments in School

Manaasmpnf
There are different units who play
important roles in
school management and operation in Nepal.
Mainly, these are
the Headmaster, the School Management
Committee, the
District Education Office, and the parents
and the
community.

The Headmaster

The Headmaster in the public school and the Principal

in the private school are responsible for all

aspects of
school management including academic excellence and school

administration. In addition, the Headmaster in the public

131
 school assumed regular
teaching responsibilities
because the
school did not have
sufficient teachers. Both
Headmasters
reported to their respective
School Management Committees
and to the district
education officer.

Although a similar management

structure existed in both
schools studied, the functioning
and effectiveness of
management was found to be quite
different in the two
schools. The private school Principal
carried considerable
more management autonomy and
freedom than the Headmaster
in
the public school. Participants expressed that the
public
school Headmaster was quite a
capable person, but his
capability was limited by the
interference from the School
Management Committee and the District
Education Office. The
Headmaster was caught between the power
struggles and often
found in the midst of it. The private
school Principal did
not have that problem.

A controlled student population and an

adequate number
of teaching staff helped the private
school Principal to
manage the school effectively. The public school had to
admit more students than it could handle, but
additional
teachers were not available to teach the extra sections.

Badri, the Headmaster in the public school, pointed out

some systemic problems as the cause of the public school's

132
lack of success. He felt no support fro m
anywhere in order
to run the school effectively.
"No matter how hard I work
to make this school successful,"
he said, "problems seem to
follow one after another."

I don't have much support to do my

job
effectively. I have financial problems. I have
discipline problems. And there are other
problems. The School Management Committee (SMC)

looks at these problems, but there is so

much they
can do to it. For example, if the teachers are

not getting the salary when they are due, the

SMC
cannot come up with the money needed. So when
there is a financial problem like this the SMC
tries to stay away from these. They ask me to
resolve it somehow. They ask me to talk to the
District Education Office (DEO). And the DEO does
not do much in this kind of situation either.

Most of the time the DEO acts only as an agent of

the central government. They are not actively

involved in the development of the school. School
supervision from them is almost nil. The DEO has

school supervisors but they never do supervision.

They never come to school - absolutely not. The

supervisors have never initiated teacher

conference or workshops. They are no resource.

133
 Helping teachers is supposed
to be part of their
supervision responsibility, but
they themselves
are not qualified to supervise
in the content
area. And I don't know what else I
can do in this
kind of situation. I get caught in between

everything.

Badri went on to describe more internal

challenges he
and his school face all the time. He talked about his
students with different learning needs an
their varying
socio-economic backgrounds.

I have all kinds of students here. I have

students from all economic backgrounds. They
belong to different scales and have different

needs. I have students who come from wealthy

families. I have students from agricultural

households. There are students who study hard,

some even with a caliber to come in the national

board. But I also have students who are not

interested in schooling and are disruptive. They

usually leave their home to come to school but end

up somewhere else. So there are all kinds of

students in my school. I have tried hard to

control the situation here. But I am having hard

time disciplining them. I am having difficult

134
 time to motivate the students
in their studies.
It is a normal thing here
to find students with
homework assignments not completed.
if the
student is asked why he didn't
do the homework,
the answer simply is that they
had no time. They
give all kinds of reasons. Mostly they say they
had to work. But even if the student comes
with
his homework, the teacher cannot
check them all.
If all students do their homework
in my school,
then the teachers are in deep trouble
(laughter).
Because there are too many students, sixty
to
seventy in one class. One teacher cannot check
that many papers

Continuing his comment about management, Badri

pointed
out other problems he faces. He said that management is the
key to many other aspects in the school.

There (in private school) is more control and the

Principal is able to act effectively. Their

development of the quality of education is

praiseworthy. And it all comes down to

management. Teachers there cannot come late.

They are immediately reprimanded if they come

late. Teachers have to check the homework and

follow up with the students. Teachers need to be

135
 prepared there. Their teaching gets supervised
on
a continuing basis.
So the teachers don't
get to
neglect their responsibilities.
if one teacher is
seen incompetent, the students
as well as the
parents complain about it. So
intervention and
improvement is done sooner. So it is much better
there

The private school Principal,

Shekhar, pointed out some
fundamental differences in a private
school Principal and
the public school Headmaster. He noted that as Principal he
is authorized to make all the necessary
decisions to manage
the school

I definitely have more power here. Private school

Principals have considerably more power than the

Headmasters of public schools in management

decisions. I think that should be the case and

that is what I have here. I make almost all the
important decisions here. For example, if I need
a teacher I have the liberty to find a good

teacher and my decision will be honored by the

executive board. They will not doubt in my claim

for an additional teacher and the decision that I

make who to hire. But in public schools, if you

need a teacher you have to go through a lengthy

136
 process. if you don't want to go
through the
government process the school will
have to pay for
the extra teacher itself, and
that is never
possible, because there is no
money.

Shekhar further commented about

the availability of
necessary resources in order to manage
a school effectively.
He described his experiences in
public school and compared
that to his present situation as the
Principal of the
private school.

The success of managing a school depends

on how
much resources are available. when I was in
public school, resources were so limited. I could
not hire more teachers for the increasing
number
of students. Because the quota for hiring
teachers was controlled by the DEO. I can't
provide good education without teachers. I would
have to make the existing teachers work hard with

more students in the class. That is not good

management. But here, there is sufficient money.

I can buy library books, teaching materials,

laboratory equipments. Because if I can provide

quality education there are parents who will pay

for the services. Parents really don't care how

much I charge, they want quality education, that's

137
 it. They are ready to pay. I was never able to
do that in public school.
Here, when I have a
problem I can find a way to resolve them.
But in
public school you can't do that.
You live with
your problems.

Recalling his experiences in the public

school, Shekhar
further said.

When I was in public school, I didn't get

necessary resources for me to be effective as
a
teacher. I felt that I had to accomplish an
impossible task. But here in the private school

teachers are challenged to work hard because they

are given a manageable class size, and a

reasonable teaching load. In public school it was

hard for me to keep the motivation to continue. I

felt that I was set for failure. My teachers here

check student homework. They inform the parents
about their students' progress. It is satisfying.

I feel good.

Teacher Kamal, from the private school verified the

good leadership and management he has seen in his school.

He said that the capable leadership from the Principal was

the key to the success of his school.

138
 The leadership here is more
visible and strong. I
find the Principal here very
capable and managing
the school very effectively.
He sets clear
expectations, when I was hired
it was mentioned
to me how hard I have to work
in this school.
Also this school is kind of owned
by the
Principal. I don't mean to criticize about it.
i
think it is good. When you own something you
certainly work harder and make the
teachers work
harder. He has good intentions. He wants to
provide good education to students.

Kamal further commented about the Principal

and other
people's positive feeling of ownership and
accountability in
the private school.

People who are involved in private schools have a

strong feeling of ownership towards the school

they are working in. The ownership is not only

for financial reasons but also it is to become

successful. This way there is accountability in

the work they do. This is not the case in public

schools. It is public, as we call it. It is

everybody's but not of any particular individual

or group of people. So nobody takes serious

responsibility in running it successfully.

139
 Participant Shyam, father of two children,
a
expressed
the same view that the people
who started the private
school
sense their own success when
the school is running well.

Private schools, like Lakeside

is a product of
highly motivated interested group
of people. The
key teachers there are founding
members of the
school. They have invested time and money
in that
school. So it is their institution, they
own it.
If they don't do well they will
not be in
existence and they will loose their job.

Ownership is a big incentive for them to do

well.
I think they are very competitive in quality
with
other schools.

But, Kaji, the teacher in the public school,

described
his Headmaster as being under pressure from a variety
of
people and places and not being free to manage the school

effectively. He thought that his Headmaster's effectiveness

was hindered because of the lack of power and freedom to

manage the school.

There are things that happen here that I cannot

believe. I have seen people who have donated

large sums of money asking the Headmaster for some

favor like upgrading a student to a higher grade

140
 or passing the student in the
examination. That
is clearly a violation of
school policy, but the
Headmaster has to do it, because there
is no way
he can say no to those people.
I am sure he does
not agree with the request but he
does it. So
this kind of pressure exists in the
public school
management. But it is entirely different in the

private school. The Principal there is free to

manage the school and is the sole in— charge.
He
has the power.

Clearly, the Headmaster, as the leader of the public

school, needs far greater autonomy to manage the school

effectively. The private school seem to have recognized

that fact and empowered the Principal with necessary

decision making power . Although the School Management

committee, especially in the public sector, has important

responsibilities in school management and operation, it

should strengthen and support the Headmaster.

The School Management Committee

Every school in Nepal has a management committee

comprised of local educators, community members, parents,

and donors. The main responsibility of this committee is to

find additional funding sources for the school. The

government provides only 50 percent of the public school

141
budget, so the responsibility
of this committee is
phenomenal. The committee looks
into matters such as the
purchase of land, construction and
maintenance of school
buildings, and in some cases, the
hiring of teachers. The
Headmaster is usually the member
secretary of this
committee

In the public school, membership

positions for the
School Management Committee were
suggested by the school and
approved by the District Education Office.
But the
formation of the committee was made according
to the
political affiliation of individuals. The data
indicate
that some members had no educational motivation
to be on the
committee, but remained only for political reasons.

The private school also had a management committee,

but
the District Education Office did not have much say in
its
formation. This allowed the private school to keep

effective members on the committee who held a genuine

interest in education and the development of the school.

Most of the people in the committee were founding members of

the school who had both an educational and financial

interest in the well being of the school.

Although the role of the School Management Committee

was considered important, participants expressed the fact

142
 that the management in the
public school seems to be
unnecessarily guided by the SMC
and the District Education
Office. Participants said that often
the members of the SMC
in the public school were
not educationally motivated
and
they were not there to really
help the school, m other
instances, the members had too
much conflict of interest to
be on the management committee,
because they either belonged
to local political parties or
to some other organizations,
and in some cases they held official
positions in those
parties. Their involvement in the management
committee
brought politics into the school, which
created tremendous
obstacles in school management.

Public school teacher Bhola pointed out the

flaws in
the management of his school and compared
that with the
private school. He said that school management
should focus
on the quality of education in the school rather
than
anything else.

There is no autonomy in the public school. When

there is no autonomy the management is not strong.

There are so many flaws in the management. Our

School Management Committee is one example. I

think the SMC should be comprised of people who

are keen to the success of the school and who

knows about this school . It could be parents and

143
 other educators from the
local community. People
Who work in the SMC should
have no political
biases. The formation should
be made
democratically. Private school management is
much
clear and much organized. Private
schools are run
by individuals who wants to
make significant
difference in education development.

Private school teacher Bhim was also

critical about the
government policy on school management
and operation. He
pointed out the government's indirect
political intention in
forming the School Management Committees.
He talked about
the different role of School Management
Committee in the
public and the private school.

One big reason public schools are failing is

that
during Panchayat (the overthrown political system)

all the SMC members belonged to the Panchayat

party and now Nepali Congress is in power and all

the SMC members are from that party. If they

cannot find suitable people from their party in

this village, the party goes out to other places

for the SMC. How can a person who is not from

this place can work in the local SMC? This just

doesn't make sense. That does not happen in

private school. The SMC members in my school are

144
 very close to the school.
They help our school
They have no other intentions.

Public school teacher Kaji pointed

out some of the
inappropriate management practices
that the School
Management Committee exercises in the
school. Because of
this the teachers are divided and
the leadership has no
control over things in his school.

There is no unity here (in River Front).

There is
lot of blaming each other. Some teacher have
rival feeling. They doubt each other. And
neither the management committee nor the

Headmaster can do anything about it. Besides, the

School Management Committee is very much

politicized. They try to influence the teachers

in terms of what their political affiliation is.

How can we operate successfully in this kind of

situation?

Badri talked about the internal difficulties and lack

of responsibility exhibited by the SMC members and the

teachers. He said that the structure of the public school

management, the SMC and the DEO, were part of the reason for

the unproductivity.

145
 You know there is no real
enthusiasm here in the
public school side. Immediate teacher supervision
is not good. The teachers here are not
so eagerly
involved in the progress of the
school as they are
in private schools. The managers (SMC and DEO) in
public school side are not so
invested in the
growth of the school as they are in
private
school. They have tighter control over
things in
private school They conduct very close
.

supervision there. I think the management

structure here is not good. Because the pay scale
m private school is not better than the public

school. The salary is less there (in private

school). Newly hired teachers have to bargain for

their salary. There is no specific salary scale
for private school teachers. They make the
teachers work hard and pay less. But still we
have less enthusiasm here. Sometime it is
puzzling

In Nepal, especially in the villages, finding educated

people to serve on the School Management Committee is often

very difficult. Usually, the same individual or the same

group of people are active in politics, education, and other

development activities. Because of these people's

involvement in multiple activities, conflict of interst

146
 seems very likely. However, the District Education
Office
must be careful in forming the
School Management Committee

Di strict Education Office

There are 75 administrative

districts in Nepal, and
each has a district education
office which is responsible
for the supervision and
coordination of all schools in the
district. The DEO implements the education
policy as set
forth by the Ministry of Education
and Culture.

The district office is headed by a

district education
officer along with several school supervisors.
The
supervisors are responsible for class observation,
teacher
training, and helping the school in academic
matters. While
the DEO staff is mostly involved with the
public schools,
they are egually responsible for the supervision
of private
schools in the district.

Although the District Education Officer is the highest

ranking educational administrator in the district, it is

possible that the person in this position may not have any

education, training, and background in educational

management and administration. This happens because of the

government's policy to transfer its personnel from one

ministry to another. Except for the very technical fields

147
 such as medicine and engineering,
public servants can be
transferred across the government
offices.

Some aspects of education in

Nepal are centralized with
manor policies being formulated by
the Ministry of Education
and Culture. A central curriculum committee
under the
education ministry develops curriculum
and selects textbooks
for all secondary schools in the
country. All secondary
school students in the country, public
as well as private,
must pass the national School Leaving
Certificate
examination in order to graduate from the high
school. The
SLC examination is based on the curriculum
set forth by the
curriculum committee. The DEO is responsible implementing
and overseeing the above matters at the district
level.

All schools in each district must be registered,

approved, and supervised by the District Education Office.

But the data indicated that many private schools were

operating without the knowledge of the District Education

Office. Participants said that many private schools were

just making money rather than providing education. They
said that the expansion of private schools was uncontrolled

and unsupervised by the District Education Office.

The data suggest that supervision and administrative

control from the District Education Office varied

148
considerably for the two schools.
The DEO had almost no
connection and communication with
the private school.
Lakeside High operated with complete
autonomy of its own
management. Whereas, the DEO constantly
participated in
River Front High's internal business
such as teacher hiring,
termination, and other administrative
supervision issues
like transferring teachers from one
public school to
another. This involvement was perceived as
unnecessary
interference rather than help. The data also suggest that
the DEO's supervision did not focus on
improving the guality
of education in the public schools; rather
the supervision
as such was often politically motivated and
intervened in
the normal functioning of school. According to the teachers
no school supervisor had ever visited the private
school.

Kaji was quite outspoken about his frustration with the

District Education Office. He has been teaching in public

schools for the last 20 years and stated that he has not

seen much improvement in public schools. His displeasure

with the DEO was evident in his remarks.

I don't even want to talk about the District

Education Office. They don't do anything. They

do not care. All they are concerned about is the

bureaucratic stuff, all the unnecessary

administrative stuff. The DEO has done nothing to

149
 improve the quality of education.
DEO leaves the
quality part with the Headmaster.
Well, the
Headmaster can do something, but
there is a limit.
What can the Headmaster do when
some teachers are
on leave. The teachers can be on leave
sometime.
When they are, the classes are not
covered.
Students hang out free without any
supervision.
How much can one Headmaster cover? How many
classes can he substitute? Because there are no
substitute teachers and we are already overworked.

The DEO knows this, but they never try to do

anything about it.

Another teacher, Bhola, talked about the disorganized

and unclear government policy regarding public schools.

He
presented the view that the government's policy has caused

management difficulty in public schools.

We are kind of nowhere. We are neither totally

government funded nor supervised, nor we have the

autonomy to do that internally. I think our

education system has a big flaw. It needs an

overhaul from the traditional set up. Either they

should fund the schools totally or they should

provide the autonomy to the school itself. The

government makes the policy and the schools have

150
 to face the consequences.
The DEO interferes too
much, unnecessarily. our Headmaster is one of
the
most capable person, but he
is not free to
exercise his management skills.
He has to survive
too. So it is going as it has
been for a long
time. We know it is not working out
but what can
we do.

Participants indicated that the DEO was

not supervising
many private schools, especially the
ones which focus more
on money making than providing good
education. Shekhar
voiced his concern about the increasing
number of private
schools which he believes are not delivering
good education.
He asserted the distinct characteristics
of his school from
the rest of them.

There are so many private schools who do not

provide good education. People think that every

private school is good. But that is not true.
Parents need to check these things out. They need
to find out what these private schools are doing

rather than just sending their kids to these

schools. Many private schools are running just

like family businesses, a money making occupation.

I think the government has to control this

situation. Schools are not like business

151
 companies. Their primary objective
should not be
profit making. I have good intentions.
i have

results to prove that. Last year I had 18

students take the national
examination, and 17 of
them came out in first division
and one came in
second division. This year in
the district level
examination, four of my students
are in top ten
including the first position. So
I have good

output to show. My main goal is to

provide good
education to my students.

Nil, a father of three children, of

whom two were in
the private school Lakeside, and the
third in the public
school River Front, spoke with confidence
and knowledge
about education and the different kinds of
schools he had
seen. He said that the government needs to control
the bad
schools

There are many private schools which only tries to

make money, profit. It is a dilemma for parents

because on the one hand public schools are not

good, and on the other, there are private schools

which are charging more and not providing good

education. This is really not a good situation.

There are many parents who are uneducated and

unconscious about education. They send their kids

152
 to schools according to
what they hear. I see a
trend among parents today
that even if the school
is expensive they want to
send their kids to the
private school, so if they
spend so much money to
send their kids to school, the
school should give
good returns. Just look at
Lakeside, this is an
example of a good school. I think this school
has
good planning and it has made
impressive progress.
This school is also expensive but
I know that my

children will get good education here.

So I don't
mind paying more.

Public school teacher, Bhola, talked about

a prolonged
strike and pointed out the government's
negligence with the
situation

Once, all teachers were on strike which lasted

for
38 days. The government didn't care about this

long strike and the loss of school days. They

simply ignored the problem and thought it will be

resolved somehow. I was amazed that the

government could ignore for such a long time.

They should have interfered right away. I haven't
seen anything like this in private schools.

During the democracy movement about 2 years ago,

all public schools were closed for weeks, but

153
 private schools were in
business as usual. i
think they were closed for
a day or two because
of
security reasons and that was
it.

Although the problems with the

District Education
office might be different in
each district, the major issue
of the government inefficiency
seem to be a systematic
problem. The change in the
education system may need to
come from top down. The District Education Office
needs
clear guidelines from the center.
Also, the government
should place only qualified personnel
as District Education
Officer.

The Community and the Parents

The role of the community in the Nepali

schools is
tremendous. Without active participation and
help from the
local community public schools may face serious
difficulty.
The community members serve in the School Management

Committee, donate money for the school building, and

organize activities to raise funds. The community needs to

do these things because public schools in Nepal are not

fully supported by the government.

The government provides 50 percent of the public

secondary school teachers' salary and no support for

clerical and other administrative needs. The school must be

154
 able to come up with more
than half of its budget.
The
private schools receive no
financial support from the
government. But they are self sufficient
and financially
strong with their expensive
fees.

Participants said that it is a hardship for many public

schools to collect 50 percent of
its budget. The majority
of this money comes from
student fees; this practice
forces
schools to admit more students than
it can handle. But
still a lot of help from the community
is needed. School
building construction and maintenance
is the responsibility
of the community. I observed that the public
school
building was built from donations by the
members of the
community

The level of involvement of parents in both

the public
and the private school was found high; however,
the guality
of such involvement was guite different. in the private
school, parental involvement included conferencing
with
teachers about their children and the guality of education.

There was also a certain degree of parent teacher

interaction in the public school concerning the progress of

the student. However, this participation was usually

parents involved in fund raising activities, school

maintenance, and teacher recruitment. While participation

of community members in these areas was not necessarily bad,

155
it created an outside
influence in the schoo!
business. The
data suggest that this outside
influence interfered rather
than help in the management
of the school.

Headmaster, Badri, explained the

difficulties he has
faced in managing a public
school, on top of the
administrative issues with the District
Education Office, he
said that the parents and community
members play unnecessary
roles in school business.

The local people interfere too much

in public
school business. it makes hard for me to be

effective. I am not even free to carry out a

disciplinary action against a student who violates

school policy. There will be too many questions
from the public. I don't understand this thing,
parents invest so much in private school. The
tuition is high and other fees are high. The
public school tuition is not that heavy for

parents. But they think they own this place.

Sometimes the parents aren't disciplined

themselves. If a student is suspended for

misbehavior, the parent goes out to look for some

powerful people like local political leaders or

the people in the School Management Committee, and

always someone turns up to speak in favor of the

156
 Student in trouble.
They come up with all
k i nds
Of excuses. They never think about
what kind of
message they are sending to
the student in doing
that. Also, other students find
out about these
things and they don't trust
us. so we are too
close to the community which
is not working in
favor of us.

But private school Principal,

Shekhar, thought that the
parent's participation and contributions
he receives in his
school enhance his management
abilities. He talked about
the productive concerns of parents
about the quality of
their children's education.

I think the parents here are more concerned

about
their children's education. These are not only
rich parents. I get parents who cannot afford to
send their kids here, but they show extreme
desire
for their kids to have good education. Even a
street sweeper wants to send his kids to private

school. That's why I think the parents who have

kids in my school keep more contact with us.

Parents are involved here. They inguire about

their children's progress. I like it when a
parent comes here with a concern. It's productive
when there are people concerned for positive

157
 results I am sure the parents in
the public
school also want their kids
to have good
education, but the public
relation is not good
there. Parents are rarely invited
to the school.

Devi, the teacher at the

private school, talked about
the role ot parents in educating
their children and how that
helps the school to run effectively.
She compared the
differences in parent involvement
between the public and the
private school.

I think there are some parents in the

public
school who are really concerned about
their kids
education. They want to know what their kids have
learned. I know some of them personally. But
there are many parents there (in the public

school) who do not pay much attention to their

kids. I don't know why parents do that. I don't

think they check their kids school work and ask

them to complete the work at home. But the

parents in this (private) school are very

concerned about their kids education. They

communicate regularly. If they find any weakness

in their kids they consult with us and the

Principal

158
 Parent Nil talked about
the benefit of parents
getting
involved in the school and
their children's education.
He
said that parents should
worry about their children's
education and should keep in
touch with the teachers.
Nil
also said that the schools
should involve the parents and
talked about the difference he
finds between the two
schools

In public school also, if the guardians pay a

little more attention kids will do
alright there
too. it's not that all kids in public
schools are
bad. But the difference here in the
private
school is that even if the guardian do
not pay
attention, the Principal and the teachers
send a
note to the parent about the kids. They keep
parents informed. I know this because I have kids
in both schools.

In summary, the study finds significant difference

between public and private school management. In the public

school, lack of coordination between the various units;
the
Headmaster, the SMC, the DEO and the community, hindered the

school management and operation. Although their roles seem

clear, communication between the DEO, the SMC and the

Headmaster appears ineffective.

159
 With the problems in the
management, the public school
seemed unable to focus on its
ultimate goal of providing
good quality education. This
study examined the issue of
quality in education. The next
chapter will specifically
deal with that issue.

160
 CHAPTER VI

THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION

Introducti nn
This chapter presents the findings
on the quality of
education in the public and the
private school, m
order to
get a full picture on the quality
issue, several topic areas
such as school curriculum, the medium
of instruction,
teacher qualification and training,
teacher morale, class
size, and the public perception of
the quality in the two
schools are discussed.

Participants talked about their view of what a good or

a successful school is. Although some participants at the
time of this study were affiliated only with
the private
school, all participants had some kind of affiliation
with
the public school at some point in time. Thus all
participants were able to give a comparative view of the
public and private schools.

The data shows a great deal of variance among teachers

from the private and the public school about their

motivation to do the job and their satisfaction in doing it.

While the private school teachers indicated more motivation

and satisfaction in their job, the public school teachers'

161
feelings were mixed. Public school teachers liked
being a
teacher but they consistently
expressed dissatisfaction with
the school they were working in,
thus, lowering their
motivation to do a good job.

The public school teachers talked

about the lack of
professional development opportunity, subject
related
training, and incentive to do a good job.
All teachers
talked about the difference in school curriculum
and
textbooks between the two schools. While both schools
followed the government regulated curriculum, the
private
school had added extra textbooks and expanded the
content
area in each subject.

All parents expressed the same view that they wanted

good education for their children no matter what school they

were attending. Many opted for private schools because

public schools were unable to provide good guality

education. The data indicates that the parents defined

"good education" as having their children pass the final

examination with good grades and moving up to higher grades.

Successful completion of SLC examination seemed the most

important to the parents because it was necessary for their

children in order to go to college.

162
 The parents were concerned
about the rising cost of
secondary education of their
children, but all of them
wanted their children to get
a good education even
though
the cost was high. Two parents who had at least
one child
in the private school
indicated that it was difficult
for
them to pay the expensive
private school fees, but they
both
thought their investment was worth
facing the difficulty.

Although private schools charged high

fees and seemed
strong financially, teacher salaries
were not higher than
that of the public school teachers.
In addition, the
physical facility in the private school
was worse than the
public school's, and the playground and
availability of
intramural sports was also better in the
public school.

the students interviewed indicated that they

wanted to get a good education and do something meaningful

in the future. The two students from the private school

provided some comparative insights from their own experience

of both the private and the public school. They

consistently stated that the private school had tighter

discipline control and more structured activities which

helped them concentrate on their studies. They mentioned

the public schools they attended before were too large to

offer such control and structure. The two public school

163
 students expressed concern
about the lack of guidance
they
receive from their teachers.

Schoo l Curriculum

The school curriculum in

Nepal is centralized. The
Educational Materials Center in
Kathmandu develops, prints,
and distributes the textbooks
throughout the country. All
schools must follow the curriculum
as set forth by the
government. However, schools are not restricted
from having
supplemental textbooks or extra subjects.
The data shows
that the curriculum between the
public school and the
private school was vastly different.
While the private
school curriculum included the government
prescribed
textbooks and subjects, their instruction was
not based on
those books alone. in each subject, the private school had

selected additional and more advanced textbooks

for
instruction

The public school was also using some outside

textbooks, but without additional teachers and no incentive

for existing teachers, effective instruction of those books

was lacking. Some teachers indicated that students who

worked hard on their own benefitted from having those books,

but the necessary help was not given to them.

164
 Many teachers, public as
well as private, were
critical
of the government set
curriculum. They questioned
the
quality, significance, and
appropriateness of the curriculum
and many teachers were
critical because they had
no input in
designing that curriculum.

Teacher Bimala, from the public

school thought that the
quality of text books that the
private school used gave them
an edge in providing better
education.

In terms of curriculum, the private school also

follows the government curriculum.
They must use
the government curriculum, that is
the base. But
they have additional text books of
their own.
Those additional text books are the main
reason
that they have better standard in the
private
school. Students are required to work more.
Teachers are required to prepare more. But in
this (public) school we are left on our own.
The
government sends the curriculum and we make the

interpretations on our own. No one supervises, no

one does anything, we find a way how to use those

books

Public school teacher, Kaji, mentioned that his school

also has some extra text books in addition to what the

165
 government has prescribed,
and he thought that
those books
have helped some students.

we have some extra text

books in English, Math and
Science. These books strengthens the
curriculum,
I think. it helps the main curriculum.
I think

these books helps the students

to do more work and
get more clari 1 ication. Not all public schools
have them, but we can have them
if we want.
Because we also have some good
students who work
hard. They can benefit from these books.
But for
average students, I don't know if it is helping.
But as long as it benefits some
students we should
keep them.

Private school teacher, Bhim, spoke about

the
flexibility his school has over their curriculum.
He
pointed out that his school curriculum is reviewed
and
revised right in the school rather than following
the
lengthy government procedures.

I think our (private) curriculum is more

diversified and it covers more content than the

curriculum in the public school. Because we teach

good quality extra books. We have developed our

own curriculum. The thing is our curriculum can

166
 be improved right here
locally. If the subject
teacher points out some
deficiency in the subject
that can be discussed immediately
and changed
beginning the next term. The
public school
curriculum cannot be changed like
that, without
the approval of the education
ministry. Even if a
teacher discovers a flaw, changing the curriculum
in public school is a long
process and takes
forever

Headmaster Badri provided a comparative view of the

curriculum used in the private school and the
public school.
He said that the private school was
providing better guality
education but didn't think that public school
curriculum was
that bad.

The ultimate goal of every school is to provide

better learning opportunity for students. I think

the private school do that with better and

complete curriculum than what I have in the public

school. Everyone know they (private school) have
much better results in the examination. So they
do perform better than us. But our curriculum is

not completely bad. It needs work but what is

important is how they are taught. I think we

should focus on that aspect.

167
 Public school teacher, Bhola,
was quite critical about
the way public school
curriculum is developed and
very
dissatisfied with the fact that
teachers have no say in that
process

Teacher contribution is almost

nil in curriculum
development. The central curriculum development
committee in Kathmandu do not seek
input from us.
Planning, decision making and
everything happens
m the central level and we teachers
have no input
m the curriculum we teach. We don't know what
teaching material to use. All I get is the book,
there is no particular training about
the
curriculum. I follow what they (central
committee) say. I have no choice. There is no
questioning. There is no evaluation about the
text books, about the curriculum. Once I get it
(books) I just go with it.

Another teacher, Kamal, criticized the way public

school curriculum was designed. He expressed that there

should be flexibility in revising the curriculum and that

teachers should be consulted in the process.

The way public school curriculum is designed is

not scientific. They never consult the teachers.

168
 People at the center decide
what they think is
right for schools. I think some
teacher
representation is needed in the
curriculum
committee. the central committee only
use
experts. They may be experts
but they don't know
what is needed in the schools.
Private schools
have lots of flexibility in
deciding school
curriculum. We are able to decide what
to teach
our students.

Devi presented a broader view on

curriculum and spoke
about providing education in all
areas and not just from
books. She talked about the areas Lakeside
can improve
although many people consider that a
successful school.

Lakeside is certainly better than many other

schools. We have good exam results, we promote

better learning for students, we emphasize better

study habits. But there are areas we can improve

here. It should expand the student service. Our
library is not in good condition. We charge every
student for reference books and we really don't

provide the service. Also the location of the

library is right in the teachers' room which

discourages some students to come and use them.

Many students do not know they can borrow those

169
 books. we also charge sports fee
but we don't
provide much sports equipments.
We also need to
think about some extra subjects
for teaching like
dancing, sewing, cooking etc.
There isn't much
thought given to extra curricular
activities.

Nil talked about quality of

education being the main
reason for his selection of a private
school for his
children. He mentioned that he was not against
public
education but went on to say, when your kid's
future is
involved you have to make a right decision
and nothing else.
He said that River Front can be a great
public school
because of it's excellent facility and experienced
teaching
staff, but there are too many internal and
external problems
to be solved.

Quality is the main reason that I wanted my kids

to come to this school (Lakeside) . When I moved
in this town I was really worried about my kids'

education. But I heard about this school and I

came here to talk with the teachers. I was

impressed. I would have also admitted my older
son in this school but this school didn't have 9th

grade at that time. So I sent him to the public

school. He is doing okay there. My brother's son

also went to a private school in Kathmandu. He

170
 was one of the top ten
student in the national
board in SLC examination.
That also motivated me
to get a good school like
this for my kids.

Bimala said that the quality

of education was different
in the public and the private
school because of their
examination and admissions policies.
She said that public
schools are basically open to anyone,
but private schools
are very selective in accepting
students and strict during
examination

We admit whoever wants to come to

this school. We
admit students who aren't academically
ready to
start in the grade they are admitted to.
I think
many times we take students for financial
reasons.
Because 50 percent of our salary comes from

student fees. But that is not the case in

Lakeside. They conduct strict entrance test

before they admit a student. And the examination
system is very bad in public schools. We promote
students who are not ready to move up. Also the
examination here is not so strict. Students cheat
a lot during exams. Lakeside conducts pre tests
of their students before they are allowed to sit

in the district and national level examinations.

We cannot be selective like that here.

171
 Participant Mehar a father of four children,
three
going to public school and
one in the private school
talked
about the knowledge difference
he finds among his children,
He said that all his
children are well behaved and
always
wanting to make good progress
in their studies. But he
finds the one attending the
private school was ahead of the
other three because he thinks
the quality of teaching there
is good.

My younger son is better in math

and English than
his older brother and sisters. He is always with
his books. His school, you know the private one,

really does a good job. I wish I had enough money

to send the other three to Lakeside.
It is
expensive, I cannot afford it. Even with one in
there puts me in lots of pressure financially.

But I am satisfied with my son's education.

The government's policy to centralize the school

curriculum is understandable because it provides national

unity in education. However, in doing so, the effectiveness

and appropriateness of the curriculum needs to be looked at

very carefully. The teachers who are responsible for

teaching the curriculum should be part of the the curriculum

development

172
 Medium_ o_f instnmi-inn

The medium of instruction

„ as another major
difference
between the two schools.
The private school used
English as
its medium of instruction
in all subjects, thus,
increasing
and emphasizing the knowledge
of English language among
its
students. Also, students at the private
school were not
allowed to speak Nepali during
school time. The medium of
instruction in the public school
was Nepali including the
English subject where English
instruction was translated in
Nepali. some participants mentioned that
a vast majority of
students have difficulty with the
English subject.

The emphasis and knowledge of English

in the private
school was a strong attraction and
decisive factor for many
parents to send their children to that
school. Many parent
stressed that they wanted their children to
be very
knowledgeable in English because it was the most
popular
international language.

The private school educators seemed well aware

of the
demand and popularity of English language. I observed many
private school advertisements emphasizing themselves as

"English medium school". The schools specifically

highlighted the English teachers having been educated and

trained in respected schools in India.

173
 The government curriculum
requires all schools to teach
the English subject.
Instruction of English starts
early in
the primary grades. But without qualified and
trained
teachers, English instruction
seemed ineffective in public
schools. The private schools were
perceived to have better
instruction in English and brought
trained English teachers
from Darjeeling areas.

Many participants talked about the

popularity and
importance of English language instruction.
Proficiency in
English language by the private school
students was one of
the significant factor for parents to send
their children to
the private school. Private school teacher, Bhim, talked
about the popularity of English language and how
they focus
the usage of English in their school curriculum.

Many parents want their kids to learn English. It

has become an universal language. We emphasize
English from the very beginning in Nursery grades.

The medium of instruction in most subjects is

English

Parent participant, Chandra, stressed the importance of

English, and provided his reasons for it. He wanted his

children to learn the language and thought that the private

school could provide that service.

174
 This is the age of Engiish.
English is necessary
everywhere in the world and
most of the technology
is based on English
language. My son and daughter
will have to study in
English in the future so I
want them to learn it now.
I want them to
have a
sound knowledge of English
and they can get that
in the private school.
Lakeside has good
teachers, they are better English
speaking
teachers. that was one of the main reason
that I
sent ray kids there.

Private school teacher, Devi, expressed

similar view
that many parents are attracted to
the private school
because of the English instruction.

They (parents) want their kids to speak

English.
It is the international language and
every parent
want to see their kids talk in English.
That is a
big motivation to send their kids in the
private
school. We teach all the major subject like

English, social studies, math in English language.

We don't allow students to talk in Nepali during

class. We punish them if they don't follow that

rule. Sometime I am flexible but mostly I teach

in English.

175
 The demand of schools
where English is the
medium of
instruction is very high.
This seem to be one of
the main
reason that private schools
are very popular in
Nepal.
Although the government
requires all schools to
teach
English, many schools lack
qualified and trained teachers

Teach er Q ualific ation and Training

There is no teacher
certification system in Nepal.
People with degrees in education
are regarded as having
pedagogical training and therefore
considered "trained
teachers." However, an education
degree is not a
requirement to become a teacher.
A person with a Bachelors
degree (in any discipline) is
considered as having the
qualification to become a teacher and
can be hired by
schools

The Institute of Education under the

Tribhuvan
University in Kathmandu is the main institution
which offers
education degrees and teacher training
opportunities. The
Institute offers Bachelors and Masters degrees
in education
for people who want to have careers in teaching.
in
addition, the Institute provides in-service teacher
training
programs with an option to earn a degree. But the institute
alone is not capable of training teachers as needed.
There
are a few other colleges in different regions offering lower

176
 level education degrees.
But still, the supply of
trained
teachers seems to be far short
of what is needed.

The majority of teachers in

Nepal are not trained.
According to the Ministry of
Education and Culture's 1990
annual report only 38 percent of
public school teachers in
primary through secondary levels were
trained. in the
private sector it was even lower at
23 percent. The trained
teacher percentage in the secondary level
alone was slightly
better at 45 percent for public schools
and 31 percent for
private schools.

The data in this study suggests considerable

difference
in teacher training, gualif ication and job security between
,

the public and the private school. The data indicates that
job security was better in the public school than
the
private school. Public school teachers could be permanent
and could belong to a nation wide teachers' union which

would protect their jobs. Also, the data suggests that many

public school teachers were more experienced and trained

than the private school teachers.

However, the evidence above contradicts with the

finding that quality of education was better in the private

school than in the public school. The data indicates that

private school teachers worked harder and more effectively

177
than the public school
teachers. The reason for this was
attributed to ineffective
management, external
interference
and political activism
in the schools, low
motivation among
teachers, and increasing
student population in the
public
school. Although better
educated and trained than the
teachers in the private school,
the public school teachers
faced an unfavorable teaching
learning environment.
Maintaining the quality of education
in the private school
also depended on teachers being
evaluated more, supervised
on a continuing basis, and
supported by the Principal.

Headmaster Badri claimed that public

school teachers
were better trained, qualified and
experienced than the
private school teachers. He said that the job situation for
teachers was better in the public school.

Lots of teachers in private school are

untrained.
Most of them are untrained. They are not ahead in
qualification (than the public school teachers).
I think public school teachers are more qualified

than private school teachers . there are more

experienced teachers in public school. But the
reality is that private school teachers work

harder . Because there is more control everyone

has to work hard. However, I don't like the

178
 private school exploiting
hard working teachers.
Teachers there are not
adequately paid.

Badri further presented the

view that some teachers
from the private school would
prefer to work in the public
school. He gave the following reasons
for that.

There are teachers in the private

school who want
to come to my school. Because we have fixed pay
scale, we have job security, we
have more freedom.
Public school teachers have an
association.
Private school requires you to work
more but the
remuneration is not given according to the
work
you do. Public school teachers can be permanent.
The DEO guarantees the job once you are
a

permanent teacher. Public school teachers are

paid almost as the government pay scale. So it is
not bad at all.

Teacher participant, Devi, talked about the difference

in pay and job security between the public and the

private
school. She said that not all private school salary was bad

but generally private school salary were not comparable to

the public school.

179
 Public school teachers
have better pay and
benefits. They have provident
fund for teachers
which is non existent in
the private sector.
Public school teachers
get raise according to
their experience and years
of service. But
Lakeside is also trying to
do as much as it can
for it's teachers. We have set up a fund
here in
which we all contribute and
that fund can be used
by teachers on a loan basis.
I think our

(Lakeside's) salary scale is

comparable to the
public school. But generally private schools
are
worse in compensating teachers,
it is really bad.
Even with a low salary there is
no job security.
Sometimes teachers get fired for no
reason.

Public school teacher, Bhola, talked

about the lack of
training being a big problem. He said
that necessary
training is not provided in both the public
and the private
school

Teachers aren't adequately trained. it is a

problem. Even if a teacher is trained there is no

renewal of that training. There are teachers who

trained but they were trained ten years ago.

But the curriculum have changed, the text books

have changed, and there is new findings in student

180
 learning and teaching, and
there is no renewal of
that training. Also there
are many teachers who
have never been trained at
all. This is true both
in the public and the
private school.

Principal Shekhar stressed the

importance of teacher
training and explained what he does
in his school.

I pay attention to teacher training

and their
satisfaction in their job. it is very important.
I want them to be successful. We have to work
hard to be successful. I provide the
opportunities and the teachers will have to work
with that. From time to time, I organize training
workshops for my teachers. We just had two
workshops couple of weeks ago.

The quality of education depends heavily on the

qualification and training of teachers. The majority of

teachers in Nepal are untrained. While there is no
requirement and incentive for teachers to get training,

there is also not enough teacher training institutions in

Nepal. In order to improve the quality of education,

teacher training is an important area for the government to

focus

181
 Teacher Hnralp

All teacher participants

who were interviewed
indicated
that they are proud to be
teachers and wanted to continue
their profession. However,
the public school teachers
did
not seem satisfied with
what was happening in their
school.
Although they wanted to do a
better job personally, they
blamed the system for not creating
a conducive learning
environment in the school.

Public school teachers acknowledged

they lack the
motivation and willingness to do a
better job because there
is no incentive to do a better
job and they get no support
from the school management and the
District Education
Office. The teachers said that school supervisors
from the
District Education Office never come to help
them. Instead
the DEO creates problems for the school.

The private school teachers indicated satisfaction

in
their job, but expressed concern about their job
security.
They were not protected by a union as the public school

teachers. Also, the pay scale of the private school

teachers was lower. Some teachers indicated that their hard

work should be rewarded accordingly and that the private

school should at least pay them comparable to the public

school teachers.

182
 Teacher, Kaji, tried to
explain the situation with
teachers in the public school.

am frustrated with the

I
general attitudes of some
public school teachers. Because
it is unionized,
•••the public school teachers
have unions, it is
not easy to fire them even
if they do a bad job, a
lousy job. The unions protects them. But that is
not the case in the private
school. if a teacher
does not do a good job, the
Principal will
immediately terminate the teacher or
will at least
take necessary actions. in our school even a
necessary action is not taken when a teacher is
not doing a good job.

Student participant, Krishna, had transferred

to
Lakeside from a public school four years ago. While he was
not unhappy in the public school, he feels that
his current
school teachers are much better.

I feel very comfortable talking to the teachers

here. They are strict but friendly. When I don't

understand a lesson, I can ask for help with the

subject teacher. If they don't have time right

away they will ask me to come after an hour or

whenever they have time, but they never ignore me.

183
 also tried getting help
I
from my teachers when
I
was in the public school
but things were different
there. I think the
teachers were very busy
there.
Many times I could not
talk to them because they
were in other classes.
Also some teachers there
were not interested in
helping me after the class
time. But here, I can even
talk to the Principal.
He is always interested in
talking with students
and offering help.

Another student participant, Lata,

who attends the
public school, spoke about irregular
classes and not
understanding what the teacher is
teaching.

Sometime the teacher does not come to

our class
and for the whole period we do nothing.
When the
teacher is not present in the classroom there
are
some students in my class who make lots
of noise.
I think that should never happen. Sometime I feel
good that there is no class but I think that is
wrong. if I don't do anything in the class then I

will not be learning anything. Also, my class is

big and many times I do not understand what the
teacher is saying. I have problem especially in
English and Math but I don't know what to do. I

184
 cannot get help at home
because nobody understands
those subjects.

Private school teacher, Bhim,

talked at length about
his experience when he was
a public school teacher.
He
described the problems in public
school as a combination of
many things.

As a public school teacher, I had some faults

myself. i admit that I use to wait for the clock
to hit 4, so that I could go home. The sense of
responsibility was not there. I was not thinking
like a real responsible teacher should
think. But
Ithink the reasons for me to think that
way was
not totally my fault. That was the norm developed
by the system. I felt like nobody cared about
what was happening in the schools. The main
reason was that the education plan and it's

implementation was at fault. The Headmaster was

not functioning right. It really didn't matter

whether I did a good job or not.

Bhim also said that the continuing financial problems

in the public school is not good for teacher morale.

Because of this situation teachers there don't feel good

about their job.

185
 Most public schools face
hard financial problems.
Looking at the building and
support from local
people River Front seem to
,
be doing well, but
they have difficulty in
supporting their teaching
and administrative staff.
Although the government
helps public school financially,
their support is
not enough to run the school.
The government
provides only 50 percent of the
teachers' salary.
Private schools are financially
strong because the
tuition there is high. I think the tuition in
private school is expensive for many
people, but
it is necessary to have a good
school.

Class Size

Although the government aims to have no more

than 40
students in one class, the public school suffered
from an
overwhelming student enrollment. The data indicated
considerable difference in class size between the
public and
the private school. The public school classrooms had
anywhere from 50 to 90 students in one class as compared
to
35 students at the most in the private school.

Many participants agreed that the over crowded

classrooms in the public school was the main reason for it's

diminishing quality of education. Pubic school teachers

said that they didn't even know all the names of their

186
 students. They were not able to
check student homework
assignments, find out who was
missing from the class,
or
check to see if students
understood what they taught.

When more students were

admitted, the private school
created separate sections and
hired additional teachers.
The public school also had
multiple sections of the same
Class but each section was
equally crowded. However, the
physical facility in the public
school was much better, and
the classrooms were considerably
larger, while the private
school had a lower number of students,
the classroom space
was much too small.

Kaji talked about the large class

size in his school,
and the lack of support for him as a
teacher. He mentioned
how things are different in the private
school. He also
talked about the difference in workload between
teachers in
public and private schools.

I have 60 to 70 students in my classes. In one

class I have 75 students and I teach 34 period a
week. The less crowded class has at least 55-60

students. That's why I can never check student

papers. I go to my class, lecture from the front

of the room, sometimes I use blackboard and that's

about it. Whoever gets it (learns), gets it. I

187
 cannot conduct a proper evaluation because
there
is too much work with
that many students in one
class. There is no time to evaluate
students.
Whereas in private school, the
teachers have about
30 students, may be 40 at
the most. This is a big
difference

Shekhar, the Principal of Lakeside

High, talked about
the signf leant difference in class
size in the two schools.
Before becoming the Principal in Lakeside,
he was a teacher
in River Front. He said that a manageable class size
is
important because that provides better learning

opportunities for students and a supportive environment for

teachers

I have worked in public schools for a long time.

I have spent all my life in education and I am

proud that I became a teacher. As much as I liked
being a teacher, I was getting fed up with the

scene in public schools. Class sizes were way too

big and the teaching load was extremely heavy. I

had to deal with so many kids. I was not able to

provide individual attention to my students. I

had no idea who was doing well and who was not.

The average class size here in my school now is

about 30 students which is an increase from 22

188
 when I started here, But 30 is still a manageable
number

On a related topic, Shekhar

talked about the work load
issue for teachers.

The teaching load is very reasonable

in my school.
Out of the 39 periods in a week,
the teachers in
my school teach an average of
22 periods, whereas
in public schools, every teacher has to teach 32-
34 periods. The teachers here in the private
school have more time for lesson preparation
and
keeping up with individual student progress.

Public school teacher, Bimala, talked about the

admission problem in her school. She said that having so

many students in one class was one of the main reason
of bad
quality.

We have a problem here. We cannot control the

admission. This is a public school so everyone

has the right to be in this school. And that

makes things hard. We have too many students. My
classes are too big. I think even 50 students in

one class is too much. But we have more than

189
 that. How can I maintain quality in this kind
of
situation?

The excessive number of

students in one class seems
to
be one of the main reasons
for the deteriorating quality
of
education in public schools. Nepal's
population growth at
2.5 percent (World Development
Report, 1991) puts a lot of
pressure on student enrollment.

The government policy of providing

free primary
education has also increased the enrollment
in the primary
sector. As a result, the lower secondary and
the secondary
sector is experiencing increased enrollments.
Unless, more
schools are opened and more teachers can be
trained and
hired, the big class size may continue to be a major problem
in schools in Nepal.

Public Perception

Community participation in the making of the public

school in this study was very high, indicated by the

investment of money and time in the school. The school has

one of the most attractive and spacious school buildings in

the area, all built by donations from the local people. So,

it seems that people wanted the public school to run

smoothly and meet the educational needs of the communities.

But as a public school, it is under the direct supervision

190
Of the District Education
Office which many people see
as a
problem. The result is that the
quality of education in the
public is perceived as not good.

The private school, on the

other hand, was perceived as
better school The parents who were interviewed
.

indicated
that they wanted to send their
children to the private
school because they thought the
quality and standard of
education in the private school was much
better.
Participants constantly referred to the
SLC examination
results as proof of the private school's
success. Although
there is no scientific data to prove the
claim, private
school educators claim that 84 percent of the
students who
pass SLC examination belong to private schools.

Participants said that not long ago the public school

used to be of highest prominence in the country. But
increasing political activism, uncontrolled student

population, and decreasing financial support has been the

cause of it's diminishing quality of education.

Bhola ,
a veteran teacher of 25 years, openly pointed
out the issue of social perception about public and private

schools and its negative effect in his job. He expressed

that people really do not know the facts but still believe

in what they hear from others.

191
 on top of the internal
difficulty in my school, I
have to face the negative
image of being a public
school teacher. There are people who think I
just
earn ray salary without working.
That is the
general thinking many people have.
one hand I m
have poor working conditions
and on the other I am
perceived to be a lazy guy. i think the community

should try to strengthen the school

rather than
making negative comments about me and
other
teachers. Instead of supporting the school with
fund raising, people just run after
the rumor.
Yes I admit that the teaching quality is not
good
in my school, but I need help to improve that, the
school needs help, not the negative perception.

People also think that private school teachers

are
better and hard working. One cannot make that
judgement so easily. I think there are many
teachers in River Front who are superbly

qualified. I am not saying that the teachers in

the private school are not good. My point is that

they have better working condition, so they are

effective

Devi, who has been a teacher in Lakeside High for the

last three years, spoke about the national examination

result, SLC ,
as the sign of success for a school and an

192
important factor for the parents
to send their children to
private school. But in the meantime she also
said that
parents should not judge a school
only by it's SLC results.

I think the school which has excellent

results in
the national SLC examination
should be considered
successful and effective. Many parents
come here
because of our good results in the SLC

examination. They think we are good. But that is

just one factor. I also think that students
should gain useful knowledge from a school. They
have to have gained some moral education from the

school. The education should uplift their life.

If this does not happen then I don't think that

school should be considered effective and

successful. The parents should worry about these

things

From her experience, Bimala talked about people's view

of a successful school.

They see school success from different angles.

The most important thing for a school is to have a

good institutional base and stability. I mean the

school should have its own building, school bus,

necessary furniture and so on. Some private

193
 schools aren't even registered
and aren't licensed
to operate. But some like Lakeside
High is making
good progress. Many parents have good
feeling
about that school. They
have already bought land
or its own building. They are moving towards
their goal of becoming a great
school. But there
are private schools who shows
some glitters in the
beginning but nothing more than
that. That kind
of school disappears within
a couple years.

Chandra, who had both of his children

in Lakeside High,
pointed out some basic differences
between the two schools.
He was active in the community
programs and has regularly
organized fund raising campaigns for the
public school.
Chandra mentioned that he always wanted to
see the public
school succeed. However, he made the decision to send both
of his children to the private school.

I want my son and daughter to get a good

education. So I had to send them to a good school.

I would like the public school to run better but

that is not the case. There are about 250 school

days in a year I think, but public schools

probably have classes only 125 days. Half the

time they are on strike. Sometime it is student
strike and sometime it is teacher strike. I

194
 didn t want my kids to
get involved in that when
they should be focusing
in their studies. I have
not known a strike in
Lakeside. They have regular
classes. ...of course I would have
send my
children to public school if
they had good
education. Why wouldn't I, public school
is
cheaper. Private school cost a lot of money.
But
money is not everything. M
y children's education
is more important to me.

Another parent, Shyam, said that

people's perception is
based on fact and reality regarding
the situations in the
schools

I think people want a good public school.

I do.
But there are so many problems and we get
tired
after sometime. Sometime teachers have demands,
other times students have demands. in public
school we are always talking about problems. When
are the kids getting education. the private
school don't do that. They have regular classes
all the time. I think they have problems too.
But they put education first. That is good.

In summary, the guality of education was the foremost

reason for parents to choose private schools. Most

195
participants expressed the view
that the private school
was
running smoothly, successfully,
and effectively. They said
that the "education there
is good," "they bring
good
results," and for that reason
"expensive but satisfied with
the quality."

The public school which offers

a better physical
facility more trained teachers,
,
and better job security for
teachers was not able to get the same
positive results
because of other variables; school
curriculum, class size,
work load, and low teacher morale greatly
affected the
quality of education. In addition, the poor quality of

education in the public school was caused by

other internal
and external environmental factors. The next chapter
specifically deals with those factors.

196
 CHAPTER VII

SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT WITHIN AND

OUTSIDE

introduction
The purpose of this chapter
is to present the findings
on the school environment.
Both, the internal and external
elements affecting the school
environment are considered.
Internally, student discipline,
behavior, and attitude
towards learning are examined. Among
the external factors
considered is the impact of local and
national politics.

The environment was one of the major

differences
between the two schools examined in this study.
Many
participants expressed again and again the belief
that a
safe and supportive environment, free of external

interference is necessary for a school to run successfully.

They said that a better environment is one which motivates
students in learning, maintains good student discipline, and

focuses on high quality education. The data suggests that

Lakeside High (the private school) provided a much better
learning environment with good student discipline, more

student teacher interaction, more supervision of students

and more focus on the quality of education. Participants

indicated that River Front High's (the public school)

environment was not conducive to learning because of the

197
lack of student supervision,
behavioral problems, and the
uncontrollable number of students in one
class.

One other factor that every informant

talked about was
the involvement of local politics in the
schools, mainly in
the public sector. The data indicates that in River Front
High, students as well as teachers were deeply
involved in
different political ideologies and they regularly
confronted
each other on school grounds. Some teachers, as many
participants pointed out, were "preaching politics in school

rather than teaching." As one public school teacher

commented "I don't know how many political groups we have in

here. Teacher groups, student groups, and even outside

groups .

The scenario was quite different in Lakeside High.

Although some teachers were active in local politics, they

were not allowed to bring political issues into school.

Students at Lakeside were monitored very closely and were

not allowed to participate in politics. One of the teachers

in Lakeside said "local politics stop right at the school

gate. I actively participate in politics but not during

school time, absolutely not." One of the students commented

"I am sure I would be suspended from school if I tried to

form a political group in this school."

198
 Among the participants,
the teachers felt very
strongly
about the school environment
and it's effect in
teaching and
learning. Their areas of concern
ranged from safety,
student achievement, and
prestige of their school,
one
public school teacher commented
"tI sometime worry
/
about my
safety, students seem to
get more and more violent."
All
teachers expressed the similar
view that their jobs have
become more difficult because
of unnecessary external
interference

S tudent Disci p line and Rehavior-

Student discipline and behavior was

a topic of concern
for many participants. The data suggest that the discipline
problem is significantly more serious
in public schools than
m private schools. Teachers said that Lakeside High had
very few behavior problems which were
dealt with immediately
by the Principal, parents and the teachers.
But River Front
High faced numerous student behavior problems
which were
complicated and often times just let go.

The data indicates that the problem is not only

the
lack of student discipline, but also the way problems
are
handled at the two different schools. When there was a

problem, the private school Principal and the teachers took

action immediately and informed the parents of the student.

In the worst cases they were not hesitant to suspend

199
 students from the school r„+- fh.
But
•
the public school
Headmaster
and the teachers quite
often were not able to
react to the
student behavior problems
because of various external
pressures. Even when they took action
for misbehavior, the
School Management Committee
members and some powerful
community leaders pressured
them to retract their
decisions.

Many participants attributed

the discipline problem in
the public school to lack of
leadership, outside
interference, and lack of control
over it's student body by
the school management and teachers.
on some occasions,
teachers themselves got involved in
activities which
encouraged and increased the student
behavior problems.

Student discipline in the private school

seemed much
more in control. Student behavior was monitored very
closely by the Principal and the teachers.
Also, students
were kept busy with their studies which didn't
allow them to
get involved in politics or other non educational

activities

Lok, a student attending Lakeside High, talked about

his experience with student discipline between the public

and the private school. He attended a public school until

he was in the 6th grade and came to Lakeside for the 7th

grade

200
 I think this is what is
happening. My class in
the public school had 75
students. And here my
class has only 30 students.
We have more direct
communication with teachers.
We know our teacher
more and they know us more.
This helps in
controlling and maintaining
discipline. Public
school students don't have that
opportunity.
Because of the lack of contact
with teachers,
students in public schools do all
kinds of
unnecessary and bad things. Teachers
never find
out what their students are engaged
in. Also I
think teachers there are mentally drained.
it is
too much for them to take care of.
They get tired
too early and wants to go home. I remember some
teachers there (public school) came to class
and
just asked us to study. That doesn't help us in
any way.

Shyam, a father of two children, was familiar and

involved in both the Lakeside and the River Front High

School. One of his sons goes to the public school and the

other one to the private. He participates actively in local

community development activities, and especially, school

related activities. He expressed his views and observations

about student discipline and learning environment between

the two schools.

201
 I know that both schools
have discipline
procedures. it is just that the
way they are
enforced are different. In
my observation, public
school teachers also warn
their students from time
to time. But the problem is the
uncontrollable
number of students they have.
The teachers cannot
supervise that many students. And
also the
students m
the public school do not respect
their
teachers that much. I think sometime the
teachers
are scared of some students there.
I have seen

students threatening their teachers

there. Just
this past month during test (loth
grade) exam, the
teachers in the public school had to face
lots of
problems from the students. One day the teachers
had to call the police to control the
disturbing
students

Another parent, Mehar, said that student discipline

would be maintained in both schools if someone in the
school
was in charge with authority to control the situation.

I think it has to do with who is in control.

Public schools do not have control over it's

students. When students are left unsupervised, it

is possible that they get involved in

inappropriate behavior. And the students are just

202
 kids, they copy these
things from their friends
very fast. I think there is
peer pressure among
students to get into these
bad behaviors. its
like our old saying "goose
going with goose and
cows going with cows." When
there are groups of
students displaying bad behavior
somebody has to
do something about it.
otherwise more students
will follow. I think the private
school provide
better educational environment so
that their
students do not get into bad behaviors.

The public school teacher, Bhola,

pointed out that
private schools have mostly bright students
which provides
them with a group of highly motivated students. They
control their admission. He said "the brighter the group,
the better the result."

They (private schools) are very selective. They

only admit sharp and bright students. They don't
admit the one who are going to cause trouble.

Once you have a group of bright students, then you

definitely will have better results in the

examinations, less discipline problem, and better

learning environment. That is not the case here.

We have students of all types. We have no choice.

203
 This is a public school,
we can't say no to
students. We just have to
deal with it.

However, the private school

Principal, Shekhar,
disagreed with the "brighter the
group, better the result"
notion. He said that his school certainly
conducts
admission tests, but that does not
assure all the students
he is getting are bright and are
not going to cause
discipline problems. He said admission
tests indicate the
knowledge level of the student at that
time and help place
the student in a certain grade.

I don't think so. We are selective but we don't

know at the time of admission how the student we

have chosen is going to behave. The reason they

behave well here is that I and the teachers
observe and monitor every students' behavior very

closely . We immediately notice any misbehavior

and take action on that. I know where my students

are during school time. I know what they are
doing. This way we maintain discipline here. We
keep ourselves busy in monitoring student behavior

and their progress. If a student is slacking and

needs more help we try to provide that.

204
 Public school teacher,
Bimala, agreed with
Shekhar that
the school environment
was a more important
factor in
student motivation and learning
than anything else. No
matter how bright a student
is, if the school
environment
does not foster learning,
then students will not
learn and
will subsequently lose
motivation, she said that public
schools also had bright students.

Of course we also have bright

students here. But
it all depends on how we
(teachers) handle them
from the very beginning. Our mechanism is not
effective. That's why our students do not excel.
We have to improve that mechanism.
in order to do
that the government has to empower the
Headmaster
in the school to have good discipline.
Also the
public has to trust the Headmaster in disciplinary

matters

Badri , the Headmaster at the public school was not as

concerned as other participants about the discipline

problem
in his school. Although he mentioned groups of students who
continuously display disruptive behavior, he thought that

they could be controlled.

Generally, discipline is not a huge problem. I

mean it is not uncontrollable. I don't see

205
 teachers having difficulty in
carrying out their
teaching responsibilities
because of discipline
problem. There are problems
but we can
communicate with students. it use to be bad but
it's okay now. I don't see a major problem in
this

Teacher Devi felt that student discipline

can be
maintained if all teachers and the Principal
work together.
She said that students must be informed
about their behavior
immediately and held responsible for their
actions. she
talked about an incident with a student and the way she
handled the situation.

I think we supervise students here on a continuing

basis. When we notice any misbehavior we

reprimand the student immediately. For example,

once I noticed a student kick the door in anger
while leaving the school. He had left for that

day. But when he came back the next day, I called

him up in the office and let him know that it was

inappropriate to kick the school door like that.

He was a fine student with good grades but I

wanted him to know what he had done wrong. I

asked him for reasons. He realized his mistakes

and was very apologetic. He even began crying.

206
 My point is that if I had not intervened right
away that student might
have done something bigger
than kicking the door. Also,
we have good
communication among teachers here.
if one teacher
notices problem with certain
student we all get
informed about that behavior. So I think we have
good team work here in disciplining
students.

When discipline and behavior cannot

be maintained in
the school, it adversely affects the
students' learning and
their interest with the school. Furthermore,
the negative
environment may lead the students to other
unproductive
behaviors inside and outside the schools. The
responsibility to create an environment ideal for
learning
rests with the school administrators and managers,
teachers,
parents, and the community.

Student Motivation Towards Learning

The degree of student motivation towards learning

depends on the educational environment they are in. All

students interviewed indicated that they personally wanted

to learn more and liked going to school. But the public and
the private school environment was quite different. The
public school students pointed out that their learning was

affected by such things as strikes and student groupism.

Even if many students wanted to attend regular class, they

207
were canceled because of
some political activity or
other
conflict between different groups.

In the public school,

students were found heavily
involved in non-educational
activities such as local and
national politics. These activities
disrupted the
educational environment of the public
school. Participants
said that students often create
strikes in school resulting
from the political scene in the country.
According to some
participants, the public school looses more
than one third
of its' school days in a year because
of such strikes and
walk outs. The result is that students loose motivation

towards learning and continuing in school.

The participants said that students need to be

advised
well by teachers, parents, and by other adults so that
they
are motivated in their studies. The School Management
Committee which includes respected and powerful members from

the local community must support the Headmaster and the

internal school administration. Especially, the SMC may be

effective in controlling the external interference so that

the school can govern and create an environment conducive to

learning. Also, in this matter, the public school may look

at the private school functioning and how they are able to

maintain a good environment.

208
 Krishna, the student participant,
who attends Lakeside
High talked about his school
environment and how he thought
it has helped him learn more.

I think the teachers are very

punctual here. They
stay in school the whole time.
And the students
are not allowed to leave their
classroom until it
is recess or half time. Even if the teacher is
not in the class that day, we are
given study task
to do on our own. Other teachers who have leisure
time comes to our class and helps us. But when I

was in the public school, I remember going to tea

shops and sometime also to movie halls when a

teacher was not in for the day. That way public

schools loose teaching time and miss learning.

Kaji, the public school teacher, talked about the

^ifi^^snce he sees in student ,

s motivation towards learning
and their attitudes towards school between the students of

the private and public school. He identified some of the

reasons for private school students paying more attention to

learning than public school students. He said that students

should not be blamed totally for their low interest in

learning, because their motivation is affected by how

teachers and the school in general treats them. Comparing

the different teaching environment between the private and

209
the public school teachers,
Kaji .entioned that
student
motivation and learning is
directly affected by how
they are
taught

Ithink student motivation

for learning and
knowledge development has a lot
to do with how
they are taught. in private schools, they
just
don't teach from the text book.
There, students
are encouraged to think more
and guestion more.
Here we still use the same old
system. Students
are taught to memorize exactly from
the books and
write exactly the same words from the
book. They
at least have some kind of library
and reference
books that students can consult with.
But in
public schools we don't have that facility.
It's
mainly the prescribed text books. I think the
private schools are trying some innovative

teaching. For example, when they teach geometry I

think the teachers there just don't use the

examples from the books, they ask the students to

practically utilize how it works. They experiment

it. They emphasize in learning and knowing the

content. But here, we come at ten in the morning,

teach from the book, and wait for the time to go

home (laughter).

210
 Showing his concern about
the iow motivation of
his
students towards learning,
Badri, the public school
Headmaster pointed out that the
reason may be how they are
taught

...there is a bigger problem of

motivation and
learning. Students are not motivated towards
learning that much. They have very
low interest.
Not only in school, I think students
don't want to
do much at home either, I mean
other things
besides study. I think something needs to be done
in teaching technigues to motivate
students in
learning. Teaching learning environment needs a
change

There seems to be lack of guidance for students.

Shekhar, the Principal in the private school said

that
students need help to increase motivation in learning
and
that help should come from teachers and parents.

I think it is the attention. We need to be

careful and find out where the kids are with their

studies. I mean teachers, parents, everybody

should be aware how the students are doing. I ask

my teachers here to pay careful attention to every

students' progress. I myself keep track of that.

211
 we detect something
wrong, we work with that
student and talk to their
parents. That doesn't
happen in the public school.
Students are
distracted by the negative
environment there. And
instead of controlling the
environment people
blame on students for that
environment.

Student motivation in learning

is not only affected by
the internal school environment,
often the external
environment may be more distracting.
Especially, the public
schools are very closely connected with
the community,
therefore, what happens in the community
has a direct impact
in the public schools.

Politics in School

Politics plays a profound role in educational

institutions in Nepal. The effect of local and national
political development can be found in primary to
higher
education institutions. In fact, many political changes in

the country have come from student activism, putting

the
schools and colleges in the forefront in political

movements. The big political movement during 1979-1980 was

started from student unrest which resulted in a nation wide

referendum to choose between the then ruling one party

Panchayat system and a multi-party democratic form of

government

212
 High school and college
students played a crucial and
important role in the massive
political change that swept
the country about three years
ago. This time the 30 year
old rule of the Panchayat system
was toppled and a
democratic form of government was
established. The King's
power was diminished and he was made
a constitutional
monarch. Political power in the country is given
to the
democratically elected Prime Minister.

Political consciousness among students is not

necessarily a disadvantageous thing. The students, who

eventually will be the educated work force in the
future,
should have political knowledge. The country, especially
from the perspective of a developing world, may benefit,
if
more people are involved in the democratic political

process. But, political education and democratic

participation should be orderly and should be delivered in

an organized way. The process is particularly important for

school aged students.

When strong political viewpoints take over basic

democratic principles, then the essence and the value of

political education gets lost. The political activism in

the schools in Nepal seems to have over stepped the lines of

democratic principles. The process lacks discipline, order,

and organization. Instead of receiving important political

213
education, students get involved
in disruptive activities
and create a chaotic environment.

The data suggests that local and

national politics were
important external factors adversely
affecting the public
school environment. All participants spoke strongly
about
the extent and disadvantages of politics
in public schools.
The adverse effect was evident from groups
of students
engaged in political activities inside and
outside the
school. Political activism was evident in the teachers
group as well. The political activities in the public
school caused cancellation of classes, increased
behavior
problem among students, tension between the teachers, and

distraction in studies.

Students in the public school were engaged in non-

educational activities causing interruptions in school time.

According to the participants, students constantly took part

in the local political rallies and speeches. Students

missed school for those activities and no action was taken

against those students for missing classes. Political

activism in the school was the main cause of student

discipline problems in the public school. When a particular

group organized an activity, the majority of the student

body got involved either to support or oppose the activity.

According to some participants in this study, almost 100

214
days out of the 220 school
days in a year is usually wasted
for these politically
motivated or other non school related
activities

The data indicates that any

political activities or
formation of such a group was not
allowed in private
schools. Participants said that Lakeside High
has a firm
policy about this and no political
groups existed inside the
school. Participants agreed that this was one of
the main
reasons that Lakeside was able to maintain
a good school
environment

Lok, the student at Lakeside High, expressed

his view
about student politics and what it does to his
education.

I can't do politics here. My main responsibility

is to study and get a good education. But in the
public school, if there is a political rally in
town students as well as teachers go there to

participate in the rally. They don't care about

the classes. I think when teachers go, it is

natural that students will follow them. Also

public school students have their own political

branches in schools. I think usually they are

influenced by their parents or elders. Also, I

think the teachers in the public school do too

215
 politics.
There are also some
teachers here
who have strong political
views. But they never
talk about it during
school time. Even after
school time they don't want
us to get into
politics. Politics has a negative impact in my
education

Another student participant,

Ashu, from the public
school talked about the disruption
he has seen in his
school, caused by these political
groups.

Politics in my school disrupts lots of

classes. I

have come home many times because

those groups
keep fighting, and there was no class.
What
happens is that you know there are mainly
two
factions. One group support the Nepali Congress
Party and the other support the United Communist

Party. When one party, one group in the school

organizes certain activity, the other always

becomes disruptive. No matter what the purpose of

the activity is the opposite party does not like

it. They never cooperate each other even in

matters which would benefit the school and the

student body. And sometime our teachers also get

involved in this. I think the teachers also have

groups just like the students. I have heard some

216
 teachers discussing very loudly
about politics in
their office.

Kaji, the public school teacher,

expressed his
disappointment at not being able to do
anything because of
the political groups in the school.
He said that he is
neutral and does not belong to any
of these groups, but he
is suspected for his actions by
both groups which are active
in his school.

The political climate in my school (public)

is
very bad. Students and teachers both have their
own groups. They support the two major parties in
our country , the Congress and the Communist. Both
of them are hindering the education in the school.

We teachers are divided, we are not working as a

team. There is no one whole group working for the

betterment of the school. if one teacher tries to

do something, no matter what he is trying to do,

other teachers look at him from political point of

view. It really depends what group that teacher

belongs to. So actually there is no way to do

better work here. Even if I have good intentions,

even if I try to do something good for the school,

good for the students and the teachers, I am

always looked from the political eyes, from the

217
 political point. i am not even a political
person. I don't get into those groups.
But I
have to be very careful about
what I am doing.
Because there is this some kind
of fear among
teachers and students. Students are vocal and
their groups act. But for a neutral person like
me, it is very difficult. Because I don't belong
to a group. Whenever I do something, both groups
are suspicious about me. So this kind of thing is
really hurting the school.

Another teacher from the public school, Bhola,

expressed his view that the public school environment

would
be better if the political groups were not
there.

Private schools are effective because of it's

internal control . This kind of internal control

does not allow political groups and movements in

private schools. The leadership in private school

is strong. So if they see any indication of

political activity, they intervene immediately.

If we could do that here in the public school

these political groups would not be here and our

school would have functioned a little better than

the way it is functioning right now. This thing,

218
 politics has created a very bad and dirty
environment in this school (River
Front).

Another teacher from the public school,

Bimala,
specifically talked about the groupism
among teachers and
how that has affected the entire teaching
staff.

Because of this politics, there is no team

concept
among teachers in this school. The politics has
created lot of tension in the teaching staff.
And
the cooperation between the two teacher groups

(political groups) is almost non existent. There

is always something going on. There is no trust.
This really leaves a bad impression about the
teaching staff. And the students know about this.

We are loosing respect because of that.

Parent Nil agreed that teachers were losing respect

from the students in public schools. He said that politics

in schools was responsible for creating this kind of

situation and that the relationship of teacher and student

is overshadowed by political activities.

I am surprised, the students do not show any

respect for their teachers these days. In our

time, we use to respect our teachers so much. We

219
 still respect then when
we meet them. But these
days students don't do
that at all. I don't think
only the students should
be blamed for this.
Teachers do not maintain
their own position. They
don't earn the respect.
They get into all kinds
of groups along with the
students. They get into
politics, that politics and
when do they get
to teach. I think this politics
is causing the
disrespect

Headmaster Badri talked at length about

the impact of
political activism in public schools
and particularly about
his own.

Politics is playing a major role in school

environment. Whatever happens in the community,
whatever happens in the local politics or even
the
national politics, has a direct impact in my
school and my students. Students participate in
that. if there is a political rally in the bazaar

(town), they would just walk out of the class and

go join the rally. If there is a mass speech,

they boycott the class and go to the speech to

listen to those political leaders. And they just

don't go out there, they bring the politics inside

the school. This is true with students as well as

220
 teachers. Basically the communist and the
congress have strong holds in the student

population. Every issue that comes up in the

school is somehow connected to politics.
I know
deeply how badly this thing hurts the
school. But
it is a complicated issue. it is not easy to deal
with

Shekhar, the private school Principal, reflected

on his
prior experience in public school and explained how he
has
been able to avoid political activities in Lakeside High.

My students here in Lakeside do not have any time

to get involved in any kind of groups. Their

study is very heavy for them. We keep them busy

in studies. Also my teaching staff do not get

into that kind of thing like in public school. it

is clear to them that politics has no place in

this school. I know what politics does to a

school. You can see the public schools here,

people there are always fighting for nothing. So

I would not allow any of those things here.

Shekhar went on to explain that not only students and

teachers bring local politics into schools, but blamed the

School Management Committee members themselves for this

221
environment. He said, "even the District Education
Office
is in this."

SMC (School Management

Committee) should include
educated people who are concerned
about the
development of the school. in public schools SMC
people are too politically motivated.
People have
their own agendas rather than working
for the
school. Political leaders sit in the committee
normally as chairperson. That is wrong and should
not happen. Many of them are uneducated and do
not understand the educational mission of
the
school. The DEO (District Education Office)

appoints these people. They have some secret

reasons for doing this. It is purely political.

Everything is driven by politics.

Private school teacher, Bhim, said that he is

personally interested in politics but he would not want to

practice his interest in his job as a teacher. He explained

how teachers have been used by political parties in the

country

There is too much politics in public schools. I

think more so among students than teachers.

During Panchayat time (the overthrown old

222
 political system), political
parties were banned.
But the Panchayat itself used
to direct teachers
to work for their political
agenda. So teachers
were not playing politics, teachers
were being
used as political tools by the
system. And now,
although the country's political system
has
changed, same thing has continued.
Go to the
parliament and see, there are many teachers.
They
used to be teachers who were very much
into
politics and now they are elected in the

parliament. The party in power is using the

teachers for their gain right now. I think the

teaching profession and politics is getting worse.

There used to be one teachers' association, now

there are two, because of the two major political

parties. By name these are teachers' association

but they are purely political groups. The local

politics is kind of run by these teachers'

organizations

Another private school teacher, Kamal, said that he

believes private school teachers also have political

interest and ideologies, but he said, those political ideas

are not exercised inside the schools.

223
 Lets take the example of my own
school. We have
democrats, communists and people with
other
political ideas. But for 10 to 4 during school
hours we are all honest teachers working
with the
same goals in mind. We do not try to influence
any of our students with our political ideologies.

School time should be purely school time. Nothing

but education should be happening there. It is
not right to be talking about politics in school

whether it is congress or communist. We have

differences in political views, but as teachers we

are a team in our school. If team concept is not

there then we cannot work successfully.

In summary, the student discipline problems and the

rising trend of political activity in public schools seem to

be tightly interconnected. Participants said that public

schools face more discipline problems because of the high

involvement in politics by it's students, teachers and other

people associated with the school. They said that private

school students do not get into politics and devote more

time to studies rather than causing problems.

Many participants expressed the view that the school

environment is the key to student motivation towards

learning. Students display negative attitudes towards

224
school when the school climate is
not good. The data
suggests that the students at Lakeside
High were much more
motivated in studies because their
school environment was
good and free of outside interference.
Teachers and the
school management at Lakeside did not
engage the students in
politics

The data suggest that if students are encouraged

to
study more and kept busy with educational activities,

outside interference of political groupism decreases

significantly. The environment at Lakeside High was an

example, as one student participant said "I have no time to

do politics," and "my teachers don't want me to get involved

in it." In contrast, River Front High suffered from outside

political interference because teachers themselves were

engaged in these activities. Student political groups were

often followers of the teachers 7
groups. Because of this,
student motivation towards learning at River Front was found

to be low, and their attitudes towards school were not good.

225
 CHAPTER VIII

CONCLUSIONS
IMPLICATIONS OF STUDY, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

Conclusi ons
Nepal is currently going through
a significant change
in its history. A thirty year old one party rule
has
recently been overthrown and a democratically elected
government is now in power. The King has stepped aside from
the political spectrum and has become
a constitutional

monarch. In this change process, every sector

in the
country has been affected including education.

As the study suggest, the political change in

the
country has direct implications in the development of

education. Local communities play vital roles in the

management and operation of public schools. So, whatever

happens in the community has a direct impact in the school

environment

The debate on public versus private education is a

continuing one in many countries. The critics of the public

school say that the public sector is inefficient in

delivering good quality education. But in Nepal, especially

226
at this time, the problem
requires special attention
because
of the increasing demand
and role of private schools.

This study clearly points out

that the quality of
education in the Nepali public schools
remains a major
problem. in quantitative terms, the
development of
education in the last decades is noteworthy;
however, this
research reveals that the quality of
education has not
improved. Some private schools, like the one
examined in
this study, are providinq better quality
education, but the
expansion of private schools without orqanized

implementation of government policy and procedure

seem to
have created more quality problems. In addition, many
private schools in Nepal operate with money makinq
motives
rather than as an institutions of learninq. But without a
clear evaluation process in place, it is difficult for

people to fiqure out which private school is providinq qood

education and which is not. This problem becomes even more

complicated when one considers that the majority of the

parents are not educated themselves, and thus, are not able

to understand the school systems.

Adequate fundinq is an important factor for a school to

run successfully, but this study reveals that money alone

will not help a school to become successful and effective.

Althouqh the private school was in a better position

227
financially, it received no
support from anywhere. The
school depended entirely on it's
own revenue. The public
school received 50 percent of
it's teachers' salaries from
the government and was allowed
to collect student fees to
offset the remaining 50 percent.
So the financial situation
of the public school was not in
bad shape. But there is
sufficient evidence in the study that
other factors, such as
external interference, political activism,
student behavior
problems, low teacher morale and so on
were equally or more
important for the school to run successfully.

The study indicates that autonomy, freedom

in decision
making, and the trust vested in the Principal
was key to the
success of the private school management. He was
able to
use his leadership skills without any interference
from
outside the school. Although the Headmaster in the public
school was considered a very capable leader, he needed to

balance too many things in his management decisions such as

the School Management Committee, District Education Office,

political groups in the school and so on. The power

struggle between these groups clearly limited his capability

to manage the school

As a whole, the teaching staff in the public school was

more qualified and trained than the staff in the private

school. But the environment in the public school was not

228
 Ideal for students and
teachers. The teaching learning
environment in the private
school was much more conducive
to
learning than the one in the
public school, so a better
qualified and trained staff at
the public school was not
able to produce a good result. The school environment,
workload, and class size were
important factors for the
teachers to be effective. Although
quite a few private
school teachers lacked adequate
education and training, they
received constant supervision and
support from the Principal
which helped them succeed in their job.

The study illustrates that the social

and external
environment is very important for a school to operate
successfully. The public school, which had lots of

community involvement, was constantly and directly

influenced by the happenings in the nearby environment.

Mainly, the local and national political movements

interfered adversely in the public school environment.

There is considerable evidence that political activism in

the public school was one of the main reasons for its

declining guality of education. Because of political

activities, the school could not run on time and students

constantly missed classes. The worst situation, however, is

that occasionally the school went through prolonged strikes.

The private school was able to refrain from these activities

229
which helped them carry out
the normal school business
and
maintain the quality of education.

Students from both schools expressed

their desire to
learn more and get a good education.
The study indicates
that if a good environment is created
in the public school,
students would get into learning more
and not participate in
political and other non-educational
activities. The private
school students did not participate in
non educational
activities because there was no time for
activities other
than their studies.

The study indicates that parent involvement in

their
children's education is very important. Parents in the
private school played crucial roles in their children's

education. The teachers and the Principal constantly

informed them about their kids progress in school. If there

was any problem the parents were informed immediately. But

the situation in the public school was different. Parents
rarely followed up with their children's education and the

school was not in communication with the parents.

This study shows that community involvement was

considerably higher in the public school. School building,

playgrounds, and their maintenance was done by donations

from the members of the local community. But the

230
involvement was not limited to
donations only. Quite
often community involvement
,
interfered too much in the
school business. The donors and other powerful
figures in
the community expected favorable
treatment for their kids
from the teachers during annual
examinations.

This study reveals that private

school education is
perceived to be of higher quality and
desired by many
parents. There is strong indication in the study
that
despite expensive tuition and fees, many
parents sent their
children to the private school. The demand
for private
school was high. As a result, private schools
with
questionable motives and poor performance records
continued
to enroll students.

In conclusion, there is strong evidence in this

study
that a strong, school based, internal management like the

one in the private school worked much more effectively than

the coordinated structure utilized by the public school

involving the School Management Committee and the District

Education Office. The school based internal management of

the private school provided the control and the power

mechanism to check the non-educational activities inside the

school. These non-educational activities were the major

destructive elements in the public school environment.

231
 Additionally, this study shows
that education in Nepal
is not free of the social
and political structure
in the
country. Although political process and
democratic
consciousness can be taught to students
productively,
politics and education are intertwined
very closely in Nepal
and that relationship has harmed
the development of
education because schools turn into a
political center which
severely damages the school's learning
environment. So far
private schools have managed to stay away
from this
situation which indicates that politics can
be separated
from schools.

Implicati ons
This research study has several implications for
the
education sector in Nepal. One implication to the
government educational planners is that planning should take

place with specific knowledge of the grassroots problems.

Local issues affect the schools greatly and they become

important factors in the success of a school . Maximum input

from all parties involved (such as teachers, educators,

administrators, and community members) should be acguired in

advance before any plan is put into place.

In a developing country like Nepal, government

involvement in public education is inevitable. Without the

help of the government it is almost impossible for a school

232
to run. Only private schools run without help
from the
government, but they charge high tuition
and fees.
Therefore, private schools are not accessible
to the
majority of the population. Only the members
of the elite
class and rich people can afford private schools.
in this
situation, it is important that there are schools
which are
accessible to the general public. But the government should
clarify it's role in running public schools. The government
should not assume total responsibility and must include the

community. Most important of all, the schools themselves

should be made stronger.

Schools in Nepal, especially public schools, need help

from members of the local community, but everyone involved

in the school should clearly understand their roles,

responsibilities and limitations. Multi-group involvement

should be a collaborative and helping effort for the school

rather than interference in school business. The

involvement of the community, School Management Committee

and any agency of the government should work toward

strengthening the school.

This study also has implications for the school

management structure and practice in Nepal. The study

suggests that school-based management such as the one found

in the private school studied, is much more successful and

233
 effective than a government supervised system,
School
business should not be influenced
by external agencies and
individuals. A school based
management with considerable
autonomy to the leadership, the
Headmaster, would not allow
such external influence.

Another implication of this study

will be of interest
to the educators in Nepal who are
involved or are interested
in opening private schools. Schools should be established
for purely educational purposes.
Private schools which are
established for profit and financial gain do
not help
towards the development of education. This
study shows that
such schools add to the existing deterioration
and low
quality of education in the country. Private school
entrepreneurs should think about quality, stability, and

accessibility in a school. When establishing a school, the

P^im^ny intention should be to provide good educational

services to the community and to create an excellent

learning environment for the students.

Another implication of this study is directed to the

teachers. The success of a school depends on a qualified

and trained teaching staff. This study indicates that

teacher training in Nepal is not organized and many teachers

are not trained or qualified to do their job. In service

training opportunities for teachers are not available; this

234
has direct impact on the quality of
education in the
schools. The government has established required

qualifications for teachers but that policy is

not
implemented. Even if the policy were to be implemented
effectively, there is a lack of trained teachers in the
country

Teachers play an important role in creating a positive

learning environment in schools. Students look to them as
their role models. This study indicates that political

activism among teachers is alive in public schools and

causes more students to follow their footsteps and engage in

non-educational activities. Teachers must put education

first in their priority.

Recommendations for Further Research

The findings and implications of this study between a

public and private school raise many questions about

secondary education in Nepal. This study indicates that an

autonomous, decentralized school-based management works more

effectively in schools than a government-regulated

controlled management structure. This raises questions

regarding the role of the government. Should the government

completely stay away from the schools and leave the

responsibility of education to the private sector? In my

opinion, the government should enhance education in the

235
 country by helping the schools.
it should not try to
take
over the responsibility of
the whole education system
and
interfere in the operation of
schools. clear guidelines and
specific policies may be set by
the government but school
administration should be allowed to
operate as a unit within
those guidelines.

Further research on student learning,

teacher
education, school administration and
management should be
conducted in order to understand the
specific needs of a
school. I recommend further research on the following.

S chool Based Management

Education in the national context is a large system in

which each school is a unit operating with it's own local
needs and circumstances. The school cannot completely
separate itself from those local needs and circumstances,

while working to meet the national education goals.

Should
schools be completely decentralized in developing countries?

Does the school based management work best in an environment

like Nepal where the community is very much connected with

the schools? And, if so, would these schools still help the

national goal of education by producing a skilled grassroots

level workforce needed for every developing country? My
study shows that a school which is managed autonomously

works effectively, but is it the kind of high school

236
graduates the country needs? Further research should be
conducted in this area.

School Leadership

This study clearly shows that the Principal

in the
private school and the Headmaster in the public
school
assume leadership in the school, and that strong
leadership
is a must for any school to run successfully.
But the
leadership in the public and the private school faced

different problems. I recommend that further research be

conducted to find out the different issues surrounding the

private and the public school leadership.

Teachers as Role Models

The role of a teacher in the school is not limited to

just teaching a certain subject matter. Teachers are seen

as role models by students as well as parents. Teaching
goes beyond what is contained in the textbooks. This study

shows that students were very much influenced by their

teachers. Further research is needed on teacher role

modeling in order to more clearly see the multi faceted

responsibilities of the teachers.

Teacher Education

This study indicates that teacher education in Nepal is

very disorganized and many teachers are unqualified and

237
untrained. Schools are forced to hire
untrained teachers.
No education goal can be met
without a qualified teaching
staff. The decreasing quality of
education is a result of
this situation. Teacher qualification standards can
be set,
but teacher education institutions
should produce the kind
of teachers needed for the schools.
Further research should
be conducted to understand the needs
of the teachers and the
teacher education programs.

Adult Education

The importance of adult education is much greater

in a
country like Nepal where the national literacy rate
is below
40 percent. The majority of parents are uneducated and do

not understand the value of education. In this situation,

the parents either do not send their children to school or

do not know what kind of education they want for their

children. Research studies should be conducted to

understand the adult education needs and their implications

for public schooling.

Private Schools

My research indicates that private schools are

expanding very rapidly in Nepal. Public perception of these

schools are good and many parents send their children to a

private school despite the financial hardship they have to

bear. While expansion and growth of schools is a positive

238
thing especially in country where education is not
a
easily
accessible, there should be further
research on the purpose
and need of these schools. As this
study indicates, many
private schools do not provide quality
education, they
should be thoroughly examined so that the
schools serve the
people and the country better.

Students

Success of a school can be measured by looking at the

number of its student body who complete high school. This

study shows that many parents send their children to a

private school with the hope that their children will

receive good education and move on to further study and a

good career. Further research is needed to see what the

students of public and the private schools do after they

graduate from the high school.

Equity in Education

If the expansion of private schools continue to grow

like it has in the past several years, soon there will be

more private schools than public schools in Nepal.

According to some participants in this study, about 30 to 40

percent of students up to grade 10 are enrolled in private

schools. This study indicates that private schools are very

expensive and many people cannot afford it. What is

possible in this situation is that only those who have money

239
have access to education. This creates a serious issue of
equity in education. Further research should focus on
equity issues and look into the
private schools and their
accessibility.

240
 APPENDIX

WRITTEN CONSENT FORM

"Public Versus Private Education: A Comparative

Case Study
of a Public and a Private School in Nepal"

To Participants in This Study:

I am Jeetendra R. Joshee, a doctoral

candidate at the
University of Massachusetts at Amherst, United States of
America. The subject of my doctoral research is: "Public
versus Private Education: A Comparative Case Study of a
Public and a Private School in Nepal." I am interviewing
students, teachers, headmasters, and parents of both public
and private schools in ( ) Nepal.
/ You are
one of approximately twenty to thirty participants.

As a part of this study, you are being asked to participate

in two in-depth interviews. The first interview will be
focused on what you think about the public and the private
school in ( ), your experience with them, and the
differences you find between them. The second interview
will be concerned with the different factors associated with
the two schools and how they contribute to their success and
effectiveness. As the interviews proceed, I may ask an
occasional question for clarification or for further
understanding, but mainly my part will be to listen to your
views and your experience.

My goal is to analyze the materials from your interviews, in

order to understand better what the underlying differences
are between a private and a public school ( ) .

I am interested in the concrete details of your views, the

different factors that you think are contributing to the
success and effectiveness of public and private schools. As
part of the dissertation, I may compose the materials from
your interviews as a "profile" in your own words. I may
also wish to use some of the interview material for journal
articles or presentations to interested groups, or for
instructional purposes in my teaching. I may wish to write
a book based on the dissertation.

Each interview will be audiotaped and later transcribed by

me or by a typist (who will not be connected with your
school and who will be committed, as I am, to
confidentiality). In all written materials and oral
presentations in which I might use materials from your
interview, I will use neither your name, names of people
close to you, nor the name of your school. Transcripts will
241
b e typed with initials for names and
in final form the
interview material will use pseudonyms.

You may at any time withdraw from the

interview process
You may withdraw your consent to have
specific excerpts
used, if you notify me at the end of the
interview series.
If I were to want to use any materials in
any way
consistent with what is stated above, I would ask not
for your
additional written consent.

In signing this form, you are also assuring me

that you will
make no financial claims for the use of the material
in your
interviews; you are also stating that no medical treatment
will be reguired by you from the University of Massachusetts
should any physical injury result from participating in
these interviews.

Participants Consent :

< have read the

above statement and agree to participate as an interviewee
under the conditions stated above.

Signature of Participant

Signature of interviewer Date

Parent or Guardians Consent:

I, , have read the

above statement and agree to my son or daughters
participation in the study under the conditions stated
therein

Signature of Parent or Guardian Date

242
 BIBLIOGRAPHY

lexander Karl L. "Cross-sectional Comparisons of Public

,

and Private School Effectiveness: A

Review of Evidence
and Issues', m
Edward H. Haertel, Thomas James, and
Henry M. Levin eds Comparing Public and Private
(
. ) .
Sc hools Vo] 2 Philadelphia
.
The Falmer Press, 1987 :

Amatya, D.B N epal s Fis ca l Issues New Challenge

'

Delhi India New

Sterling Publishers Private Limited,
,

1986.

Austin G. R., and Garber, H., (eds.) Research on

,
Exemplary
Schools New York, Academic Press, 1985. :

Barth, Roland S. Improving Schools from Within: Teachers,

—and Principals can Make the Difference San
,
.

Francisco Jossey Bass, 1990.

:

Bernard, Thomas L. ed. Community Education in International

Perspective, East Longmeadow, Massachusetts Celecom :

Corporation for International Association of Community

Educators, 1979.

Berstecher, D. Education and Rural Development Issues for :

P lanning and Research Paris UNESCO, International . :

Institute for Educational Planning, 1985.

Beswick, David, and Harman, Grant. "Australia", in J. R.

Hough (ed.). Educational Policy; An International
Survey New York
. St. Martin's Press, 1984.
:

Bista, Dor Bahadur. Fatalism and Development Nepal's :

Struggle for Modernization Calcutta, India: Orient .

Longman Limited, 1992.

Blaug, Mark. The Economics of Education and the Education of

an Economists New York New York University Press,
. :

1987.

Blaug, Mark. "Can Independent Education Be Suppressed?"

Journal of Economic Affairs October, 1981 30-37. . :

Blumberg, A. ,
and Greenfield, W. D. The Effective Principal .

Boston : Allyn and Bacon, 1986.

Bogdan, R. and Biklen, S. Qualitative Research for

,

Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods .

Boston Allyn and Bacon, 1982.

:

243
B° Wle ?' and eVin "• M " The Determinants of ‘
!; h
'

m v An A PP raisal ° f some Present Scholastic

JournIT o? Human
J ournal of h Findings"!
Resources 3 1968 f , : 3-24.
Bray Mark "The Re-emergence of Private Education
^rnational Review of Educat ion, Vol in 28, No
I™’ .

rookover, Wilbur B., Lezotte, Lawrence W.

Chan ge in School
Characteristics C oincident with Changes in stnH^ni
,

A chievement East Lansing Michigan State University

, :

Occasional Paper No. 17, May 1979 .

Brookover, W. B., Beady, C., Flood, P. Schweitzer, J. and ,

Wisenbaker J. School Social Systems and Student
,
,

Achievement —Schoo ls can Make a Difference New York*

,
Praeger, 1979.

Brookover W. B. Beamer, L. Efthim, H., Hathaway, D.,

, ,

Lezotte, L. Miller, S., Passalacqua, J.

, and ,
Tornatzky, L. Creating Effective Schools: An Inservice
Pro gram for Enhancing School Learning Cl imate and
Achievement Holmes Beach, Florida
, Learning :

Publications, 1982.

Brundage, Diane et al. The Journalism Research Fellows

Report: What Makes an Effective School? Washington D.C.
Institute for Educational Leadership, George
:

Washington University, 1980.

Burgess, Robert G. ed Field Methods in the Study of

( . )

Education Philadelphia
. The Falmer Press, 1985. :

Burgess, Roberst G. (ed.) Issues in Educational Research:

Qualitative Methods Philadelphia The Falmer Press,. :

1985.

Carnoy, Martin, and Samoff Joel et al. Education and Social

Transition in the Third World Princeton, NJ . :

Princeton University Press, 1990.

Chapman, David W. and Windham, Douglas M. The Evaluation of

,

Efficiency in Educational Developmental Activities .

Tallahassee, Florida Educational Efficiency Clearing :

House, Florida State University, 1986.

Cibulka, James G. "Rationales for Private Schools: A

Commentary", in William Lowe Boyd and James G. Cibulka
eds( Private Schools and Public Policy:
.
)

International Perspectives Philadelphia The Falmer . :

Press, 1989.

244
COhn
'
Effective 'schnn?°
rniin^t
untries
S 5' 1
S£
TH
er Richard A -. "Research on
Im P llca tions for Less Developed
:

Co mparative Educat ion Review. Vni

,,
.
'

ii Nc
No
3, August 1987 377-399. :

Coleman James, Hoffer, Thomas, and Kilgore,

Sally. Public
1^
An analysis of schoo!^
B eyond, A national longitudinal study for the iq^; ,

ashington D.C. National Center for Education

:

Statistics, 1981.

leman, J Campbell, E. et. al. Equality of Educational

O pportunity Washington D.C. .
u.S. Government Printing :

Office, U.S. Department of Health, Education,

and
Welfare, Office of Education, 1966.

Coleman, James S., and Hoffer, Thomas. Public and

Private
H igh Schools New York Basic Books, 1987.
. :

Cooper, Bruce S., "The Politics of Privatization: Policy-

Making and Private Schools in the U.S. A. and Great
Britain", in William Lowe Boyd and James G. Cibulka
e<3s ( Private Schools and Public Policy:
. ) .

Internati onal Perspectives Philadelphia The Falmer . :

Press, 1989.

Crain, Robert, L. and Rossell, Christine H. " Catholic

,

Schools and Racial Segregation", in Neal E. Devins

ed -)- Public Values, Private Schools Philadelphia
( . :

The Falmer Press, 1989.

Cuttance, Peter. "Framework for Research on the

Effectiveness of Schooling", in David Reynolds (ed.).
Studying School Effectiveness Philadelphia The . :

Falmer Press, 1985.

Davis, Gary A., and Thomas, Margaret A. Effective Schools

and Effective Teachers Boston Allyn and Bacon, 1989. . :

Devins, Neal E. Public Values. Private Schools

, .

Philadelphia The Falmer Press, 1989.:

Edmonds, Ronald R. and Frederiksen, John R. Search for

,

Effective Schools: The Identification and Analysis of

City Schools That are Instructionally Effective for
Poor Children ERIC Document # (ED 170 396), 1979.
.

Edmonds, R. R. "Effective Schools for the Urban Poor".

Educational Leadership 37, 1979 15-27. . :

245
Education Day Souvenir. School
Level Curriculum Kathmandu
National Education Committee, .

of Nepal, 1985. His Majesty's government

Mucation

“
D ay Souvenir. A_GUm
Ese_oLEducation in
Kathmandu: National Education E ’

Committee, 1988.
EdUCa r Kat
-
National Education
commi??L?°^ 3 !
Education Day Souvenir. Mucati on: A
Programme for th.
— lfl j4 ment Qf Basic Needs Kathmandu: National .

Education Committee, 1990.

Educational Statisticai Report of Nepal.

Ministry of
Education and Culture, His Majesty's
Government of
Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal, 1986.

Educational Statistics of Nepal. Ministry of

Education ans
Culture His Majesty's Government of Nepal,
cpd i Kathmandu,
in iyyu ^ .

Eisner, Elliot W. and Peshkin, Alan, (eds.) Oualitati vp

,

Inquiry—in—Education The Continuing Debate New York

: . :
Teachers College Press, 1990.

Allan B. Success and Failure: A Summary of Findings

a ndRecom me ndations for Improving Elementary Reading in
Massachusetts City Schools ERIC Document # (ED 108 .

157), 1975.

Erbring, L. and Young, A. A. "Individuals and Social

,

Structure: Contextual Effects as Endogenous Feedback".

Sociological Methods and Research 7, 1979 396-430. . :

Erickson, Frederick. "Qualitative Methods", in Research in

T eaching and Learning Vol. 2 American Educational .

Research Association, New York Macmillan, 1990. :

Fagerlind Ingemar, and Saha, Lawrence J. Education and

,

National Development: A Comparative Perspective New .

York Pergamon Press, 1983.

:

Fox, Irene. "The Demand for a Public School Education: A

Crisis of Confidence in Comprehensive Schooling?" in
Geoffrey Walford ed British Public Schools Policy
( .
)

and Practice Philadelphia . The Falmer Press, 1984. :

Fox, Irene. Private Schools and Public Issues . London :

Macmillan, 1985.

246
Gertl Ul ^nd^Glewwe, Paul. The Willingness
^/_!f
E ducation: In Develop ing Countries: Evidence to Pav for
frn^T^T^T

Gilchrist, Robert. Effective Schools:

Three Case studio of
Excellence Bloomington IN
.
National Educational :

Service, 1989.

Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. The Discovery

of Grounded
Theory: Strategies for Qual it ative Research
New York Hawthrone ,

Aldine, 1967.
:
'

Grant, Carl A. Commun ity Participation in Education . Boston

Allyn and Bacon, Inc. 1979.
:

Gray, John, and Jones, Ben. "Combining Quantitative and

Qualitative Approaches to Studies of School and Teacher
Effectiveness, in David Reynolds (ed. Studying School ) .

Effectiveness Philadelphia The Falmer Press, 1985.

. :

Grove, Richard W. "An Analysis of the Constant Comparative

Method". International Journal of Qualitative studies
in Education Vol 1, No. 3, 1988
.
273-279. :

Gurung, Harka Nepal Dimensions of Development

.
. Kathmandu,
Nepal Sahayogi Press, 1984.
:

Guthrie, James, and Bodenhausen, Judith. "The United States

of America", in J R. Hough (ed.). Educational Policy
.

An International Survey New York St. Martin's Press,

. :

1984 .

Haddad, Wadi, D., Carnoy, Martin, Rinaldi, Rosemary, and

Regel, Omporn. Education and Development: Evidence for
New Priorities Washington D. C. The World Bank,
. :

Discussion Paper No. 95, 1990.

Hannaway, Jane, and Carnoy, Martin. eds ( .

) Decentralization
and School Improvement San Francisco . : Jossey-Bass
Publishers, 1993.

Harman, David. Community Fundamental Education A Nonformal :

Educational Strategy for Development Lexington, .

Massachusetts Lexington Books, 1974.

:

Hough, J. R. "France", in J. R. Hough (ed.). Educational

Policy: An International Survey New York St. . :

Martin's Press, 1984.

247
 Ichikawa, Shogo. "Japan" in
J R. Hough (ed.).
Policy: An Internal- Educational
'

Survey New York

i n
St.
Martin's Press, 1984 .
.
:

Improving^the^E^iciency^of ^Educational
^Systems (ZEES)

Ishurai, Abel G.M. Communi ty Education „ n d

Nairobi : Kenya Literature Bureau, 1981 '

James Estelle. "The Public/Private Division

of
S° nSlbl lty f ° r Education An
Comparison
(eds.)
! International
in Thomas James and Henry M.
.
Levin
:

cpmparinq Public and Private School s '

Philadelphia The Falmer Press, 1988a.

:

James Estelle, and Benjamin, Gail. Public Policy

and
_ nvate Education in Japan New York St. Martin's
.
11 s :
Press, 1988b.

James, Estelle. "Public and Private Education

in
International Perspective", in William Lowe Boyd,
James G. Cibulka (eds.). Private Schools and Pnh lioand
E olicy: International Pe rspectives Philadelphia The .
:
Falmer Press, 1989a.

James, Estelle. "The Private Nonprofit Provision

of
Education: A Theoretical Model and Application to
Japan", in Estelle James (ed.). The Nonprofit Sector in
In ternation al Perspective New york Oxford University
. :

Press, 1989b.

James, Thomas, and Levin, Henry M. (eds.) Comparing Public

and Private S chools Philadelphia
. The Falmer Press :

1988.

Jencks, Christopher. Rethinking Social Policy; Race.

Po verty, and the Underclass Cambridge, MA Harvard . :

University Press, 1992.

Jimenez, Emmanuel, and Cox, Donald. The Relative

Effectiveness of Private and Public Schools: Evidence
from Two Developing Countries Washington D.C. The . :

World Bank, LSMS Working Paper No. 60., 1989.

Johnson, Daphne. Private Schools and State Schools: Two

Systems or One? Philadelphia Open University Press, :

1987.

248
 ^ruaents Center for International
.
Education
UCa n Universit Y of Massachusetts, AmherstSchool of
(
(
KT'° K
'n npublished
Doctoral Comprehensive Examination 1990
Paper ' )

Joshee, Jeetendra R. Education al

Decentral on 1 .

Approach to Planning Education Systems Confer- f^

International Education, School of Education r .

University of Massachusetts, Amherst,

1990 .
(Unpublished Doctoral Comprehensive Examination
Paper).
Kelly, Michael J. Education in a Declining
Economy; The Ca^o
of Zambia 19 7 5-1985 Washington D.C. .
The World Bank,
EDI Case Studies No. 8, 1991.

Kidder, L.ll., and Fine, M. "Qualitative and

Quantitative
Methods: When Stories Converge", in M. M. Mark
and R.
L. Shotods (eds.). Multiple Methods in
Program
Evaluation San Francisco
, Jossey-Bass, 1987. :

King, Ronald. Education . London : Longmans, 1969.

Koirala Bidya Nath and Thapa Bijaya Kumar. Moral Education
,
,

in School Curriculum Kathmandu: Research Center for

.

Educational Innovation and Development, Tribhuvan

University, 1984.

Levin, Henry M. "Education as a Public and Private Good".

,

in Neal E. Devins (ed.) Public Values. Private Schools .

Philadelphia The Falmer Press, 1989.

:

Levy, Daniel C. "Latin America's Private Universities: How

Successful Are They?" Comparative Education Review .

Vol 29, No. 4, November 1985

. 440-459. :

Lieberman, Myron. Beyond Public Education . New York :

Praeger, 1986.

Lieberman, Myron. Privatization and Educational Choice . New

York St. Martin's Press, 1989.
:

Lillis, Kevin M. ed . School and Community in Less Developed

Areas, London : Croom Helm Ltd. 1985.

Lincoln, Yvonna S. (ed.) Organizational Theory and Inguiry

The Paradigm Revolution Beverly Hills, CA SAGE,. :

1985.

Lincoln, Y., and Guba E. Naturalistic Inquiry

,
. Beverly
Hills, CA SAGE, 1985.
:

249
Lines Patricia M. "Treatment of Public
Schools and the
PaCt n PriVate Education " in Thomas
^ M° TLevin (eds.).
Henry M. James, and
Comparing Pnbl r- and Private
•

i
S chools Philadelphia
.
The Falmer Press, 1988.
:

Lipsitz J. S uccessful Schools for Young

,
Adolescents New
Brunswick, NJ Transaction Press, 1983.
:
,

Locke Lawrence F., Spirduso, Waneen W. and Silverman ,

Stephen J. Propo sals That Work: A Guide for Planning
— sser tat ions—an d Grant Proposals Newbury Park, CA .
:

Malakar Sunita. "Pre-primary and Privately Run Primary

,

Schools: A Condensed Study Report", in Sharma S.

R. ,
Shrestha, G. M. and Pradhan, G. S. (eds.). Education
,

an d Development Kathmandu Research Centre for

. :

Educational Innovation and Development, Tribhuvan

University, 1984.

Marklund Sixten. "Sweden", in J. R. Hough (ed.).

,

E ducational Policy: An International Survey New York . :

St. Martin's Press, 1984.

Marshall, Catherine, and Rossman, Gretchen B. Designing

Qualitative Research Newbury Park, CA . SAGE, 1989. :

Marshall, William P. and Brant, Joanne C. "Employment

,

Discrimination in Religious Schools: A Constitutional

Analysis", in Neal E, Devins (ed.). Public Values.
Private Schools Philadelphia The Falmer Press, 1989.
. :

Merriam, Sharan B. Case Study Research in Education: A

Qualitative Approach San Francisco Jossey-Bass,
. :

1988 .

Midwinter, Eric. Education and Community ,

New York : John
Wiley and & Sons, 1975.

Ministry of Education and Culture. His Majesty sGovernment '

of Nepal. A Brief Overview of Nepal's Education

Statistics Planning Division, Manpower and Statistics
.

Section, Keshar Mahal, Kathmandu, Nepal, 1987.

Ministry of Education and Culture. His Majesty's Government

of Nepal. Educational Statistics of Nepal at a Glance
1983-1987
\
Planning Division, Manpower and Statistics
.

Section, Keshar Mahal, Kathmandu, Nepal, 1987.

Ministry of Education, His Majesty's Government of Nepal.

The National Education System Plan for 1971-76 .

Kathmandu, 1971.

250
MlniS Y dU d r
of Nepaf |econdarv ^H™V ®: ” iS Ma i^ty's Government
Kathmandu ,
•

Ministry of Education and Culture,

His
of Nepal. Educational Rl-ai-igf ino Majesty's Government
of Nepa] Kathmandu,
Nepal, 1990. .

Minzey Jack D. LeTarte, Clyde

, ,
Community Fdur.ation E. •

e
T^ endeirpln s h[°g gompanyy"l979. Midla " d Michi 9 a " ' '

MWlrl K le i K ya,S Harambee Secondary

The o ? 'a" f" School Movement
contradictions of Public Policy". Comarati™
Ed ucation Re V1 e W Vol. 34, No. August
,
3, 1990 : 3 5 0-

Myers, Charles A. The Role of the Pr ivate

Sector in Manpower
Development Baltimore Johns Hopkins Press, 1971
.
:
.

National Education Commission Draft Report

1992, Ministry of
Education and Culture, Kathmandu, Nepal, 1992.
Nepal. Educatio n and Human Resources Sector Assessment
.

Improving the Efficiency of Educational Systems

Project, Tallahassee, Florida Educational Efficiency :

Clearing House, Florida State University, 1988.

Ne pal. Cou ntry Implementation Plan for TEES Activities .

Improving the Efficiency of Educational Systems

Project, Tallahassee, Florida Educational Efficiency :

Clearing House, Florida State University, 1988.

Ne P al - Improving the Efficiency of Primary Education .

Improving the Efficiency of Educational Systems

Project, Tallahassee, florida Educational Efficiency :

Clearing House, 1990.

Neumann, Karl. "Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in

Educational Research - Problems and Examples of
Controlled Understanding Through Interpretive Methods".
International Review of Education Vol. 33, No. 2, 1987 .

159-170.
:

NEW ERA. Study of the Literacy Situation and of the National

Policy and Plan for Intensification of the Struggle
Against Illiteracy Kathmandu: Report Submitted to
.

UNESCO Bangkok, 1984.

OECD, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development,

Participatory Planning in Education Paris, 1974. .

251
OECE) , Organization for Economic Cooperation
School and Community and Development
Volume tt T ho Conseouence= or :
'

Some Policy Choices Paris Center for Educational , :

Research and Innovation, 1980.

p ande Badri D. "Status Survey of Private
Campuses: A
Condensed Study Report", in Sharma S. R.
M. and Pradhan G. S. (eds.). Education andShrestha
, ,
, , r
Development Kathmandu Research Centre for. :

Educational Innovation and Development, Tribhuvan

University, 1984.

Pande, Dr. Badri Dev. "Alternative Structure in

Higher
Education: A Feasibility Study" in Education
D evelopment Kathmandu: Research Center for Educational
.

Innovation and Development, Tribhuvan University, 1986.

Pandey Sardar Rudra Raj, K.C. Kaisher Bahadur, Wood, Hugh

,

B eds Education in Nepal: Report of the Nepal

. .

National Education Planning Commissi on Kathmandu, r

Nepal The Bureau of Publications, College of

:

Education, 1956.

Patton, Michael Quinn. Qualitative Evaluation and Research

Methods Beverly Hills, CA SAGE, 1990.
. :

Patton, Michael Quinn. Practical Evaluation . Beverly Hills,

CA SAGE, 1982. :

Popkewitz, Thomas S. Paradigm and Ideology in Educational

Research Philadelphia The Falmer Press, 1984.
. :

Poster, Cyril. Community Education its Development and

Management London Heinemann Educational Books, 1982.
. :

Poudyal, Sriram. Planned development in Nepal A Study New : .

Delhi, India Sterling Publishers Private Limited, :

1983 .

Pradhan, Gaja Sundar. ed. Determinants of Educational

Participation in Rural Nepal, A CERID/WEI Project .

Kathmandu, Nepal Research Center for Educational :

Innovation and Development, Tribhuvan University Press,

1984 .

Psacharopoulos George, and Woodhall, Maureen. Education for

,

Development: An Analysis of Investment Choices New .

York Oxford University Press, 1986.

:

Purkey, S. C., and Smith, M. S. "Effective Schools: A

Review". Elementary School Journal 83, 1983 427-452. . :

252
Rana p* s Nep al s International TraJp. and
•
'

Development Kathmandu Economin

, Nepalese Economic Review
:

1969, v. 2, n. 1. f

Regmi, Bednath (ed.). Education for

Develnpmpnt
Center for Educative f InnoTSuSTiSd^io^n?
Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal, P
l 99 i
Research Centre for Educational Innovation
and Development
nbhuvan University, Kathmandu, Parents Attitude /

Toward and Ex pec tations from Education .

Seminar Paper, Chitwan, Nepal, January, 1982.

Reynolds, David. "Effective Schools and Pupil

Behavior", in
Neville Jones (ed.). School Management and Pupi 1
Behavior Philadelphia
, The Falmer Press, 1989.:

Reynolds, David, (ed.) Studying School Effectiveness .

Philadelphia The Falmer Press, 1985.

:

Riddell, Abby Rubin. "An Alternative Approach to the Study

of School Effectiveness in Third World Countries".
Compar a t i ve Education Review Vol. 33, No. 4, November ,

1989 481-497.
:

Rondinelli, Dennis A., Middleton, John., Verspoor Adriaan M.

Planning Education Reforms in Developing Countries :

The Contingency Approach Durham, North Carolina Duke

. :

University Press, 1990.

Rossman, Gretchen B., Corbett, H. Dickson, Firestone William

A. Change and Effectiveness in Schools A Cultural :

Perspective Albany State University of New York

. :

Press, 1988.

Salisbury, Robert H. Citizen Participation in the Public

Schools, Lexington, Massachusetts Lexington Books, :

1980.

Salmen, Lawrence F. Listen to the People Participant- :

Observer Evaluation of Development Projects New York . :

Oxford University Press for World Bank, 1987.

Saxe, Richard W. School Community Interaction Berkeley, .

California McCutchan Publishing Corporation, 1975.

:

Seay, Maurice F. and Associates. Community Education: A

Developing Concept Midland, Michigan Pendell
. :

Publishing Company, 1974.

Seddon, David. Nepal A State of Poverty New Delhi, India . :

Vikas Publishing House Pvt. Ltd. 1987.

253
Sergiovanni, T. J. T he Principal sh i p:
Perspecti vp Boston
A Reflective Pr.nH^
Allyn and Bacon, 1987.
.
:

Sergiovanni, Thomas, J., and Starratt,

Robert J.
Supervision: A Redefinition New York
Inc McGraw-Hill
. :

. , 1993

Sharma, Suresh R. "Education: Then and Now",

in Kamal P.
Malla (ed.). Nepal: Perspectives on Continuity a nd'
Change Kirtipur, Nepal
, Centre for Nepal and Asian
:

Studies, Tnbhuvan University, 1989.

Sharma, Suresh R. Mainali Madhav P.

, Pradhan Gaja S., eds , ,
Education and Development Kathmandu, Nepal Research
, :

Center for Educational Innovation and Development

Tribhuvan University, 1986.

Sharma, Suresh R. Kasaju, Prem K. ,and Pradhan Gaja S., ,

Education—and Development Kathmandu: Research

•
.

Center for Educational Innovation and Development,

Tribhuvan University, 1983.

Sharma, Suresh R. Shrestha Gajendra M. Tuladhar, Bhagawan

, , ,

R. ,and Pradhan Gaja S., eds. Education and

Development Kathmandu: Research Center for Educational
.

Innovation and Development, Tribhuvan University, 1985.

Sharma, Suresh R. Shrestha, Gajendra M.

, and Pradhan, Gaja ,

S. ,
eds. Education and Development Kathmandu: Research
center for Educational Innovation and Development,
1984 .

Sharpe, Deede. "Seven Common Characteristics of Good Schools

and How to Attain Them", in Robert Gilchrist, Effective
Schools: Three Case Studies of Excellence Bloomington, .

IN National Educational Service, 1989.

:

Sherman, Joel D. "Government Finance of Private Education in

Australia: Implications for American Policy".
Comparative Education Review Vol 26, No. 3, October . .

1982 391-405.:

Shipman, Marten. "The United Kingdom" in J.R. Hough ed ( .

)

Educational Policy: An International Survey New York , :

St. Martin's Press, 1984.

Shrestha, Kedar N. "Success Stories of Selected Secondary

Schools: Short Case Studies". Education Quarterly Vol. .

XXVII No. 1, Institute of Education, Tribhuvan

University, January-March 1982. ,

254
Shrestha, Kedar N. "On The Proposed Educational
For Nepal: The 10+2+3 System: An Analysis",
Structure
in Dr.
Kedar Nath Shrestha and Bharat Nepali Pyakurel
(eds.).
ghiksha Annual Journal. Bhaktapur, Nepal
,
Ministry :
of Education and Culture, Curriculum textbook
and
Supervision Development Center, March, 1989.

Sinclair, M.E., Lillis, Kevin. School and Community in the

Third World, London Croom Helm Ltd. 1980.
:

Soltis, Jonas F. "The Ethics of Qualitative Research", in

Elliot W. Eisner, and Alan Peshkin (eds.). Qualitative
Inquir y in Education: The Continuing Debate New York , :
Teachers College Press, 1990.

Stockard, Jean, and Mayberry, Maralee. Effective Educational

Environments Newbury Park, California
. Corwin Press, :

Sage Publications, 1993.

Strivens, Janet. " School Climate: A Review of a Problematic

Concept", in David Reynolds (ed.). Studying School
Effectiveness Philadelphia . The Falmer Press, 1985. :

Talbert, Joan E. "Conditions of Public and Private School

,

Organization and Notions of Effective Schools", in

Thomas James and Henry M. Levin (eds.). Comparing
Public and Private Schools Philadelphia The Falmer
. :

Press, 1988.

Taylor, S. J. and Bogdan, R. Introduction to Qualitative

,

Research Methods New york Wiley, 1984.

. :

Teese, Richard. "Private Schools in France: Evolution of a

System". Comparative Education Review Vol 30, No. 2, . .

May 1986 247-259.

:

UNESCO, Diagnostic Studies on Educational Management:

Country Studies Nepal Bangkok Regional Office for
. :

Education in Asia and the Pacific, 1984.

United Nations Development Programme, Nepal Implementation :

of the Educational Plan Project Findings and :

Recommendations (Mimeo) Paris .

UNESCO, 1981. :

United States Department of Education, What Works: Research

About Teaching and Learning Washington D. C. 1987. .

Wake, C.J. Bikas Evolution in Nepal Kathmandu, Nepal ,

:

Research Center for Nepal and Asian Studies, Tribhuvan

University, 1980.

255
Walford, Geoffrey, (ed.) British, Public
Practice. Philadelphia
Schools: Polio,,
The Falmer Press,
:
1984.
~
Waiford, Geoffrey. Privatiza tion and Privilege
in Krtnci- „„ i
New York Routledge, 1990.
:

Weber^ G. In ner City Children can be Taught to

Read: Four
yccessful Schools Washington D.C. Council of Basic
g
Education, 1971.
, :

Willie, Charles Vert. E ffective Education: A Minority

Policy
P erspective Westport, CT
.
Greenwood Press, 1987.
:

Wilson, S. "The use of Ethnographic Technigues in

Educational research. Review of Educational Research
'
47, 1977.

Wilson, Bruce L. and Corcoran, Thomas B. Successful

,

Secondary Schools: Visions of Excellence in American

Public Education Philadelphia
. The Falmer Press :

1988 .

Windham, Douglas, M., Improving the Efficiency of

Educational System: Indicators of Educational
Effectiveness and Efficiency Tallahassee, Florida
. :

Educational Efficiency Clearinghouse, Florida State

University, 1988.

Wolcott, Harry F. "Ethnographic Research in Education", in

Richard M. Jaeger (ed.). Complementary Methods for
Research in Education Washington D. C.
. American :

Educational Research Association, 1988.

Wood, Hugh B. Nepal Diary Tillamook, Oregon

. : American
Nepal Education Foundation, 1987.

World Bank, Country Study, Nepal: Poverty and Incomes

Washington D. C., 1991.

World Bank, Country Study, Nepal: Policies for Improving

Growth and Alleviating Poverty Washington D. C., 1989.
.

World Bank, Developing the Private Sector: A challenge for

the World Bank Group Washington D. C. 1989.
.

World Bank, A Policy Study, Education in Sub-Saharan Africa .

Washington D. C. 1988.

World Bank. World Development Report 1989 . New York : Oxford

University Press, 1989.

256
World Bank. World Development Report qgn
i New York Oxford
University Press, 1990 :

World Bank. World Developm ent Reoort 1991

New york Oxford
University Press, 1991. :

World Bank. World Development Report 1992

New york Oxford
University Press, 1992. r :

World Bank. Nepal—L.P olicies for Improving Growth

and
Alleviating Poverty Washington D.C.
, A World Bank
:

Country Study, 1989.

World Education. Naya Goreto The Nepal National

;

Literacy Program Boston, Massachusetts, 1989.

,

Wynne, Edward A. "Looking at Good Schools" Phi Delta Kann^n

62, January, 1981 377-381.
:

257