0% found this document useful (0 votes)
159 views12 pages

Differentiation Under The Integral Sign 2

1) The document discusses differentiating under the integral sign, which is the process of determining how an integral that depends on a parameter changes as that parameter changes. 2) It presents Leibniz's rule, which states that the derivative of an integral with respect to an external parameter t is equal to the integral of the derivative of the integrand with respect to that parameter. 3) A proof of Leibniz's rule is provided using Lagrange's mean value theorem and the assumption that the integrand and its derivative are continuous functions of both the variable of integration x and the parameter t.

Uploaded by

ssfdd
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
159 views12 pages

Differentiation Under The Integral Sign 2

1) The document discusses differentiating under the integral sign, which is the process of determining how an integral that depends on a parameter changes as that parameter changes. 2) It presents Leibniz's rule, which states that the derivative of an integral with respect to an external parameter t is equal to the integral of the derivative of the integrand with respect to that parameter. 3) A proof of Leibniz's rule is provided using Lagrange's mean value theorem and the assumption that the integrand and its derivative are continuous functions of both the variable of integration x and the parameter t.

Uploaded by

ssfdd
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

OpenStax-CNX module: m38159 1

Differentiation under the integral


sign *

Narayan C.R.

This work is produced by OpenStax-CNX and licensed under the


„
Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0

A denite integral f (x, t) dx of a continuous functionf (x, t) has a value that depends on the choice of
Rb
a
t. For example let

f (x, t) = cos (tx) dx (1)


Z Z
1
f (x, t) dx = cos (tx) dx = sin (tx) (2)
t
It can be seen that the indenite integral is a function of x and t. Consider a denite integral .
Z π/2 π/2
1 1
(3)

cos (tx) dx = sin (tx) =
0 t 0 t
It is clear that the denite integral is a function of t alone since the variable x disappears when the values
of the limits are plugged into the equation.
Now we will consider a case where the limits themselves depend on t . ' '

Z t t
1 2
= sin2 t (4)

cos (tx) dx = sin (tx)
−t t −t t
Which is again a function of t. Therefore we can easily conclude that
Z b
f (x, t) dx = F (t) . (5)
a
The above expression is called an integral depending on a parameter and here t is termed the parameter. In
many cases the indenite integral in the above expression cannot be found explicitly . Then the evaluation
is eected considering F (t) and investigating its contiuity and dierentiability. In particular we will try to
nd an expression for the derivative F (t). '

We shall show that in general F (t) can be dierentiated , when f(x,t) has continuous derivative with
respect to t. It is called dierentiating under the integral sign . We can show
Z b
dF (t) ∂
= f (x, t) dx (6)
dt a ∂t
* Version 1.2: Apr 29, 2011 1:22 pm -0500
„ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

http://cnx.org/content/m38159/1.2/
OpenStax-CNX module: m38159 2

. That is
Z b Z b
d ∂
f (x, t) dx = f (x, t) dx (7)
dt a a ∂t
In otherwords, dierentiation and integration can be interchanged. The above result is called Leibnitz's
rule, which is formally stated as follows:
Let f(x,t) be a continuous function and have a continuous derivative ∂f
∂t in the domain a ≤ x ≤ b, c ≤ t ≤ d,
then
Z b Z b
d ∂
f (x, t) dx = f (x, t) dx (8)
dt a a ∂t
Proof: Let f (x, t) and ∂f (x,t)
∂t both be continuous functions of x and t, where a ≤ x ≤ b, c ≤ t ≤ d,. Also
let
Z b
F (t) = f (x, t) dx (9)
a
Let ∆t denote a change in t. We then have
Z b
F (t + ∆t) = f (x, t + ∆t) dx (10)
a
Therefore
Z b
F (t + ∆t) − F (t) = f (x, t + ∆t) − f (x, t) dx (11)
a
Using Lagrange's mean value theorem, we obtain
Z b
F (t + ∆t) − F (t) = ∆tft (x, t + θ∆t) dx [0 < θ < 1] (12)
a
Z b
F (t + ∆t) − F (t)
= ft (x, t + θ∆t) dx (13)
∆t a
Z b Z b
F (t + ∆t) − F (t)
=⇒ = ft (x, t) dx + [ft (x, t + θ∆t) − ft (x, t)] dx (14)
∆t a a
Let  , be any positive number. Then, sinceft (x, t) is assumed to be continuous, there exists, a positive
number δ such that

|[ft (x, t + θ∆t) − ft (x, t)| <  (b − a) , (15)


When |∆t| ≤ δ.
Z #
b

[f (x, t + θ∆t)] − ft (x, t) dx <  (b − a) , (16)
a t

Z b
F (t + ∆t) − F (t)
=⇒

− ft (x, t) dx <  (b − a) when|∆t| ≤ δ.

(17)
∆t a
Therefore
b
F (t + ∆t) − F (t)
Z
lim = ft (x, t) dx (18)
∆t→0 ∆t a

http://cnx.org/content/m38159/1.2/
OpenStax-CNX module: m38159 3

That is,
Z b
dF (t)
= ft (x, t) dx (19)
dt a
Rewriting
Z b Z b
d ∂
f (x, t) dx = f (x, t) dx . (20)
dt a a ∂t
In a similar way, the rule for dierentiating an integral with a parameter when the parameter occurs in the
limits can be found. That is we wish to nd the derivative of
Z b(t)
F (t) = f (x, t) dx (21)
a(t)

We have now

F (t) = F (t, a, b) . (22)


Where a (t) and b (t) have continuous derivatives with respect to t throught out the interval, also f(t,x) is
continuously deerentiable in the given region. By the chain rule, we obtain,
dF ∂F ∂F db ∂F da
= + + (23)
dt ∂t ∂b dt ∂a dt
Applying the fundamental theorem of integral calculus we obtain the following formula .
Z b
∂f (x, t) db da
F' (t) = dx + f (b, t) − f (a, t) (24)
a ∂t dt dt
EXAMPLES-1
Obtain the following derivatives in the form of integrals:
1.
2
x2
Z
d
2 dx. (25)
dt 1 (1 − tx)
We have
" #
2 2
x2 x2
Z Z
d ∂
2 dx = 2 dx (26)
dt1 (1 − tx) 1 ∂t (1 − tx)
Z 2 Z 2
2x3
= 3 −3
2 x (1 − tx) dx = 3 dx (27)
1 1 (1 − tx)

2.
Z π
d cos (xt)
dt. (28)
dt π/2 x
Z π Z π  
d cos (xt) ∂ cos (xt)
dt = dt (29)
dt π/2 x π/2 ∂t x
Z π  
−x sin (xt)
= dt (30)
π/2 x

http://cnx.org/content/m38159/1.2/
OpenStax-CNX module: m38159 4

Z π
= − sin (xt) dx . (31)
π/2

3.
Z 2
d
log (xu) dx. (32)
du 1
Z 2 Z 2
d ∂
log (xu) dx = [log (xu)] dx (33)
du 1 1 ∂u
Z 2 Z 2
x dx
dx = . (34)
1 xu 1 u
4.
2
dn
Z
sin x
dx . (35)
dy n
1 x −y
2 Z 2 n 
dn
Z 
sin x ∂ sin x
dx = dx . (36)
dy n 1 x−y 1 ∂y
n x − y

We have
 
∂ sin x ∂ h i h i
= sin x (x − y)
−1 −2
= sin x −(x − y) (−1) (37)
∂y x − y ∂y

= 1 sin x (x − y)
−2
(38)
Dierentiating the above expression,
∂2 h i
sin x (x − y)
−1
= 1 . 2 sin x (x − y)
−3
(39)
∂y 2
Going by the above pattern we can easily conclude that
∂ n sin x
 
n! sin x
= n+1 . (40)
∂y n x − y (x − y)
Z 2 Z 2
dn sin x sin x
n
dx = n! n+1 dx. (41)
dy 1 x − y 1 (x − y)

5. Find dI
dx if
2x
ext
Z
I = dt (42)
x t
Since both the limits are functions of the parameter x, we have to use the second form of Leibnitz rule.
Applying which we get,
2x
text ex.2x ex x
Z
dt + .2 − .1 (43)
x t 2x x
Simplifying
2x
ext

1h 2 i
x2
(44)
2
e − ex +
x x x

http://cnx.org/content/m38159/1.2/
OpenStax-CNX module: m38159 5

2  2x2 
(45)
2
= e − ex .
x
EXAMPLES-2
1. Evaluate the following integral.


log 1 + a2 x2
Z
dx (46)
0 (1 + b2 x2 )
Let


log 1 + a2 x2
Z
I= dx (47)
0 (1 + b2 x2 )
Dierentiating I with respect to a we get

2ax2
Z
dI 1
= dx (48)
da 0 (1 + b2 x2 ) (1 + a2 x2 )
Z ∞ 
2a 1 1
= 2 − dx (49)
a − b2 0 1 + b2 x 2 1 + a2 x2
since it is known that
Z
1 1 x
dx = tan−1 (50)
a2 + x2 a a
it follows that
1
b2 dx
Z Z Z
1 1 1 1 1 1
= = dx = 2 tan−1 bx = tan−1 bx. (51)
1 + b2 x2 (1/b2 + x2 ) b2 (1/b2 + x2 ) b 1/b b
similalrly
Z
1 1
2 2
dx = tan−1 ax (52)
1+a x a
Therefore, by these values, equation (1) shall be
 ∞
2a 1 1
= 2 −1 −1
tan bx − tan ax (53)
a − b2 b a 0
π
= (54)
b (a + b)
That is,
dI π
= (55)
da b (a + b)
Therefore,
Z Z
πda
dI = (56)
b (a + b)
Integrating
π
I = loge (a + b) + k (57)
b

http://cnx.org/content/m38159/1.2/
OpenStax-CNX module: m38159 6

where k is arbitrary constant. When a = 0 then I = 0 So, in equation (2) putting a = 0 , We get,
π
loge b + k = 0 (58)
b
Therefore
π
k = − loge b (59)
b
Using the value of k in equation (2)
π π
I= loge (a + b) − loge b (60)
b b
Therefore,
 
π a+b
I = loge . (61)
b b
2. Starting from
Z ∞
1
e−ax dx = , a>0 (62)
0 a
deduce that
Z ∞
n
xn e−ax dx = (63)
0 an+1
Given,
Z ∞
1
e−ax dx = (64)
0 a
Dierentiating with respect to a, n times ,

∂n dn
Z  
1
−ax
(65)

e dx =
0 ∂an dan a
Now, denoting
d −ax 
e by y1 (66)
dx
We have y1 = (−1) xe−ax , dierentiating y1 we get, y2 = (−1)2 x2 e−ax . Proceeding in the same manner,
we can guess yn to be equal to (−1)n xn e−ax . Similalrly, let
1
y= , (67)
a
then y1 = − a12 . Continuing in the same manner we can guess yn , going by the above pattern, to be equal
to
n
(−1) n!
yn = (68)
an+1
Therefore, substituting the values of nth derivative on both side of the integral we have,
Z ∞ n
(−1) n!
n
(−1) xn e−ax = (69)
0 an+1

http://cnx.org/content/m38159/1.2/
OpenStax-CNX module: m38159 7

That is,
Z ∞
n!
xn e−ax = (70)
0 an+1
3. Dierentiating under integral sign the integral

Z r
1 π
e −ax2
dx = ; a>0 (71)
0 2 a
show that
∞ √
π 1.3... (2n − 1)
Z
(72)
2
x2n e−ax dx =
0 2 2n an+1/2
Dierentiating with respect to a, n times
∞ ∞ √
dn ∂ n  −ax2 
Z Z
π ∂  −1/2 
e −ax2
dx = e dx = a (73)
dan 0 0 ∂an 2 ∂an
Proceeding in a similar manner as in the previous examples we get the result.
4. Evaluate :
Z π/2
log α2 cos2 θ + β 2 sin2 θ dθ (74)

0
Let
Z π/2
log α2 cos2 θ + β 2 sin2 θ dθ (75)

I= (1)
0
Also we presume α and β to be greater than 0. Then
π/2
2α cos2 θ dθ
Z
dI
= (76)
dα 0 α2 cos2 θ + β 2 sin2 θ
π/2
cos2 θ dθ
Z
= 2α (77)
0 α2 cos2 θ + β 2 sin2 θ
Divinding the numerator and denominator of the fraction in the the integral, we get
Z π/2

2α (78)
0 α2 + β 2 tan2 θ
Substituting tanθ = t [range of integration changes from (0 to π/2) to (0 to ∞)] we get
dt
dθ = (79)
sec2 θ
Z ∞
1 dt
= 2α (80)
0 α2 + β 2 t2 sec2 θ
Since sec2 θ = 1 + tan2 θ = 1 + t2 , we can write the above integral as
Z ∞
dt
= 2α (81)
0 (1 + t2 ) (α2 + β 2 t2 )
Z ∞
β2

2α 1
= − dt (82)
β 2 − α2 0 α 2 + β 2 t2 1 + t2

http://cnx.org/content/m38159/1.2/
OpenStax-CNX module: m38159 8

   ∞
2α β βt
= tan−1
− tan −1
t (83)
β 2 − α2 α α t=0
  
2α β π π
= −1 = (84)
β 2 − α2 α 2 β+α
That is
dI π
= (85)
dα β+α
π
dl = dα (86)
β+α
Integrating, we get,

I = π loge (β + α) + c (2) (87)


Putting α = β in equation (1)
Z π/2
π
loge α2 dθ = 2 (logα) = π loge α (88)

I=
0 2
So it can be concluded that when α = β , I = π loge α. Sustituting the value of I in equation (2) while
subjecting it the condition that α = β we get,

π loge α = π loge 2α + c (89)


which can be written as

π loge α = π loge α + π loge 2 + c (90)


Which implies that

c = − π loge 2 (91)
Substituting this in equation (2) ,

I = π loge (α + β) − π loge 2 (92)


Therefore
 
α+β
I = π loge (93)
2
5. Evaluate

tan−1 (ax)
Z
dx (94)
0 x (1 + x2 )
Let

tan−1 (ax)
Z
I= dx (1) (95)
0 x (1 + x2 )
Dierentiating

tan−1 (ax)
Z  
dI ∂
= dx (96)
da 0 ∂a x (1 + x2 )

http://cnx.org/content/m38159/1.2/
OpenStax-CNX module: m38159 9

Z ∞
x dx
= (97)
0 x (1 + x2 ) (1 + a2 x2 )
Z ∞
dx
= (98)
0 (1 + x2 ) (1 + a2 x2 )
Throwing into partial fractions, we obtain

a2
Z  
1 1
− dx (99)
1 − a2 0
2 2
a (1 + x ) 1 + a2 x2
∞
a2

1 1
= tan−1 x − tan−1 ax (100)
1 − a2 a2 a 0
Plugging the values of the limits, we get
dI π
= (101)
da 2 (1 + a)
π
dI = da (102)
2 (1 + a)
Integrating, we get
π
I = loge (1 + a) + c (2) (103)
2
When a = 0, I in eqution (1) will be zero. Putting these values in equation (2) we get,
π
loge (1 + 0) + c = 0, (104)
2
Therefore c = 0. Putting back the value of c in equation (2) gives
π
I = loge (1 + a) . (105)
2
6. Assuming the validity of dierentiation under integral sign, show that

1 √ − 1 a2
Z
(106)
2
e−x cos ax dx = πe 4
0 2
Let
Z ∞
(107)
2
F (a) = e−x cos ax dx (1)
0
Dierentiating
Z ∞
(108)
2
'
F (a) = − x e−x sin ax dx
0
Integrating by parts,

a ∞ −x2
Z
1 −x2
(109)

e sin ax −
e cos ax dx
2 0 2 0
a
F ' (a) = 0 − F (a) (110)
2

http://cnx.org/content/m38159/1.2/
OpenStax-CNX module: m38159 10

Which implies
F ' (a) a
= − (111)
F (a) 2
Integrating, we get,
a2
loge F (a) = − + loge c (112)
4

F (a) a2
loge = − (113)
c 4
Therefore
a2
F (a) = c e− 4 (2) (114)
Putting a = 0 in (1) we get,
Z ∞ √
π
(115)
2
F (0) = e−x dx =
0 2
Putting a = 0 in (2) , we get F (0) = c. Therefore

F (a) = F (0) = c (116)

1 √ − 1 a2
F (a) = πe 4 . (117)
2
7.Prove that
a a
F (x) + 2x dFdx(x)
Z Z
d F (x) dx
√ = √ dx (118)
da 0 a−x 0 2a a − x
Under what circumstances will
Z a
F (x) dx
√ (119)
0 a−x
be independent of a ?
Let
Z a
F (x) dx
u= √ (120)
0 a−x
and let x = at then dx = a dt . The given integral will become
Z 1 Z 1 Z 1 √ √ Z 1√
F (x) dx F (at) a dt a aF (at) dt aF (at) dt
√ = √ = √ √ = √ . (121)
0 a−x 0 a − at 0 1−t a 0 1−t
We have
Z 1 √ 
du ∂ aF (at)
= √ dt. (122)
da 0 ∂a 1−t
Z 1 F (at) √
√ + a tF (at)
=
2 a
√ dt (123)
0 1−t

http://cnx.org/content/m38159/1.2/
OpenStax-CNX module: m38159 11

1
F (at) + 2atF ' (at)
Z
= √ √ dt (124)
0 2 a 1−t
which is equivalent to
a
F (x) + 2xF ' (x)
Z
du
= √ dx (125)
da 0 2a a − x
If u = 0a F√(x)dx is to be independent of a , then its dierential coecient with respect to a must be zero.
R
a−x
Therefore we must have

F (x) + 2xF ' (x) = 0 (126)

F ' (x) 1
= = − (127)
F (x) 2x
integrating the above expression we get
1
logF (x) = − logx + constant (128)
2
Simplifying we get
C
F (x) + √ . (129)
x
8. Find the form of F(x) , so that for all values of a
Ra 2
x[F (x)] dx a
R0 a 2 = (130)
[F (x)] dx n
0
We have
Z a Z a
a
x[F (x)] =
2 2
[F (x)] dx (131)
0 n 0
Dierentiating with respect to a , we have
Z a
1 a
a[F (a)] =
2
[F (x)] +
2
[F (a)]
2
(132)
n 0 n
simplifying
1 a
Z
aih
[F (a)] a −
2
=
2
[F (x)] dx (133)
n n 0
1 a
  Z
1
= a 1−
2
[F (x)] =
2
[F (x)] dx (134)
n n 0
Dierentiating again with respect to a we have
    2
1 1 [F (a)]
1−
2
[F (x)] + 2a 1 − F (a) F ' (a) = (135)
n n n
Simplifying we get
   
2 1
1− F (a) + 2 a 1 − F ' (a) = 0 (136)
n n

http://cnx.org/content/m38159/1.2/
OpenStax-CNX module: m38159 12

Re adjusting the terms we get


F ' (a) 1 2−n
= . (137)
F (a) a 2 (n − 1)
Integrating we get,
2−n
logF (a) = loga + K (138)
2 (n − 1)
Where K a constant. Therefore
2−n
F (a) = K a 2(n−1) . (139)
Or we have
2−n
F (x) = K x 2(n−1) . (140)

http://cnx.org/content/m38159/1.2/

You might also like