0% found this document useful (0 votes)
195 views22 pages

Bearing Capacity Caluclation

This document provides calculations to determine the bearing capacity and settlement of a 1.5m deep isolated column footing. It includes calculations of net ultimate bearing capacity based on local shear failure using equations from IS:6403-1981. Values are determined for shape factors, depth factors, bearing capacity factors, and the final net safe bearing capacity taking a factor of safety of 2. Settlement is also calculated including consolidation and immediate settlement and checking that the total settlement is less than the permissible limit. Conclusions provide bearing capacity values for different footing depths.

Uploaded by

SG Shah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
195 views22 pages

Bearing Capacity Caluclation

This document provides calculations to determine the bearing capacity and settlement of a 1.5m deep isolated column footing. It includes calculations of net ultimate bearing capacity based on local shear failure using equations from IS:6403-1981. Values are determined for shape factors, depth factors, bearing capacity factors, and the final net safe bearing capacity taking a factor of safety of 2. Settlement is also calculated including consolidation and immediate settlement and checking that the total settlement is less than the permissible limit. Conclusions provide bearing capacity values for different footing depths.

Uploaded by

SG Shah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22

1 ISOLATED COLUMN FOOTING at 1.50 M.

DEPTH :

Depth of footing
Width of footing
Lenth of Footing
The ground water table is not encountered during boring.
Taking factor of safety
The basis of calculation was taken as under :

Taking a case of Local shear failure,


C'=0.67C
f’= tan-1 [0.67 (tan _____)

For f’ = __________ ,

As per IS : 6403 – 1981,

Q’d = 2/3 C N’c Sc Dc Ic + q (N’q – 1 ) Sq Dq Iq + 0.5 B ¡ N’¡ S¡D¡I¡W’


……………… Equ. (A)
Where,
Q’d Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity based on local shear failure in kg/cm2
C Cohesion, in kg/cm2
N’c, N’q, N’¡ Bearing Capacity factors

Sc , Sq , S¡ Shape factors
Dc ,Dq ,D¡ Depth factors
Ic , Iq , I¡ Inclination factors

q Effective surcharge at the base level of foundation, in kg/cm2


B Width of footing in cms.
¡ Bulk unit weight of soil, in kg/cm3
W’ Correction for the position of watertable
f Angle of internal friction (degrees)
Taking values from field data and laboratory test results,
Sc = _______ ; Hansen formula
Sq = ____ ;
S¡ = ______ ; (SHAPE footing)
Ic = Iq = I¡ = 1.0 (No Inclination)
W’ = 1.0 (Assuming no ground water condition)
Depth factors,
Dc by hansen's formula
Dq
Dg
Putting the values in Equ. (A),

Q’d = (2/3) (__________ ) (__________ ) (__________ ) (__________ ) (1.0)


+ (__________ ) (__________ - 1) (__________ ) (__________ ) (1.0)

Q’d __________ + __________ + __________


= __________ kg/cm2

Taking factor of safety = __________ ;

Net Safe Bearing Capacity = __________


= __________ kg/cm2

CHECK FOR SETTLEMENT :


The total settlement is given by,
Sf = Sc + Si
Where,
Sf Final Settlement in cms,
Sc Consolidation Settlement
Si Immediate Settlement

(i) Computation of Consolidation Settlement Sc :

As per IS : 8009 (Part –I) – 1976,


Sc = l Soed
Where,
Sc = Consolidation Settlement
Soed = Settlement computed from consolidation test
l = A factor

Soed = [ Ht / (1+eo)] . Cc . log10 [(Po+DP)/Po]

Where,
eo = Initial void ratio
Cc = Compression Index
Po = Initial effective pressure at mid height of layer, in kg/cm2
DP = Pressure increment at mid height, in kg/cm2

From field and laboratory test results,


P = __________ kg/cm2 ; (Assumed from shear criteria)
Df = __________ cms ; eo = __________ ; Cc = __________ ;
Ht = __________ cms. ; B = __________ cms. ;
Po = __________ kg/cm2 ; DP = __________ kg/cm2 ;

Putting values in Equ. (A).,


Soed = [___ / (1+____ )] . (____ ) . log10 [(____ +____ )/ _____ ]
= __________ cms.
Now, l = __________ ,
Sc = (__________ ) (__________ )
= __________ cms.

(ii) Computation of immediate Settlement Si :

Si = q . B [ (1-m2) / E ] . I
= (_____ ) (____ ) [{1-(____ )2} / ____ ] (____ )
Err:509

So, total final settlement,

Sf = Sc + Si
Sf = (6.714) + (1.093)
= 7.807 cms.
Applying the depth and rigidity factors, the value becomes,
Sf = (0.8) (__________ ) (__________ )
= __________ cms.
This value is less
than the
permissible value
of 5.0 cms., as
per IS : 1904.
Hence, SAFE.

The bearing
capacity values
have been
worked out for
different depths,
and are shown in
the Conclusions.
Fyi Nc Nq Ng
0 5.7 1 0
Df = ________ 4m 5 7.3 1.6 0.14
= B = ________ 8m 10 9.6 2.7 1.2
L= 12 m 15 12.9 4.4 1.8
20 17.7 7.4 5
1 25 25.1 12.7 9.7
C = _______ 100 kN/m2 30 37.2 22.5 19.7
f= 0° 35 57.8 41.4 42.4
¡ = _______ 18 gm/cm3 40 95.7 81.3 100.4
45 172.3 173.3 360
C'= 67 kN/m2 50 347.5 415.1 1072.8
tan [fi] 0

0.67 tan fi 0
\f’ = 0 0

Nc’ = __________ 5.7


Nq’ = __________ 1
N g’ = __________ 0

Net Ullti 570


w/o depth factors
UBC 642
SBC 642
Nc Nq Ngama
5.7 1
Genreal shear Failure
rect/square 0 72
strip UBC= c*Nc qNq 72 0.5gBNg
strip UBC= 72
rect/squareUBC= 72 SBC 72
strip SBC= 72
72 Local sher failure
C N’c Sc Dc Ic q (N’q – 1 ) Sq Dq Iq
UBC= 2199.744 + 72 +
UBC= 2271.744
Taking factor of safety 2
SBC= 1136
4.8
1
0.7333333333

1.2
1 0 1 0.5
1

+ (0.5) (_____ ) (_____ ) (___ ) (___ ) (_____ ) (1.0) (1.0)


0

skempton

0 850
0

0.5 B ¡ N’¡ S¡D¡I¡W’


0
Depth of
Dia of pile pile a d f g
0.5 12 0.3 18 25 19
m m kn/m3
Qu = Qeb + Qs 2781.666 kN
= Ab x qb + As x f Ab 0.7844 As 18.84

= p/4 x d2 x (C Nc + q Nq)
+ pdl x ( a x c + k s tand) qb 3397.6 Qs 6.188351
Cohesion NC Nq Ng
20 25.1 12.7 9.7
kn/m2
c f g df b l fos inclinationdepth of gwt
100 0.01 18 4 8 12 1

0.2
c' 67 tan q 0.00 q 0.01
f' 0 tan-1 0 value 0.00 tanfi dash
tan 45+fi/2 0.999902
Nc 1321.72
Nq 1.92
Ng 0.00
N f  tan 2  45  f
Nfi 1.00 0.999902  2
W' 0.5
sc 1.133333 ic 1 N q  e p tan f N f
N c   N q  1  cot f
sq 1.133333 iq 1
sg 0.733333 ig 1

dc 1.06666 N g  2  N q  1  tan
dq 1.03333
dg 1.03333

UBC 106682.7
SBC 106682.7 111.196
111.196
 tan 2  45  f 
 2 
 e p tan f N f
  N q  1  cot f
 2  N q  1  tan f
c f g df b l fos inclinationdepth of gwt
100 0 18 4 8 12 1 0 20
tan 45+fi/2 1.00
Nc 5.14 sc 1.133333 ic 1
Nq 1.00 sq 1.133333 iq 1
Ng 1.00 sg 0.733333 ig 1
Nfi 1.00 0.999204
W' 1 dc 1.07
dq 1.00
Net UBC 674 dg 1.00
SBC 674
q

N
g
0 5.14 1 1
1 5.38 1.09 0.07
2 5.63 1.2 0.15
3 5.9 1.31 0.24
4 6.19 1.43 0.34
5 6.49 1.57 0.45
6 6.81 1.72 0.57
7 7.16 1.88 0.71
8 7.53 2.06 0.86
9 7.92 2.25 1.03
10 8.35 2.47 1.22
11 8.8 2.71 1.44
12 9.28 2.97 1.69
13 9.81 3.26 1.97
14 10.37 3.59 2.29
15 10.98 3.94 2.65
16 11.63 4.34 3.06
17 12.34 4.77 3.53
18 13.1 5.26 4.07
19 13.93 5.8 4.68
20 14.83 6.4 5.39
21 15.82 7.07 6.2
22 16.88 7.82 7.13
23 18.05 8.66 8.2
24 19.32 9.6 9.44
25 20.72 10.66 10.88
26 22.25 11.85 12.54
27 23.94 13.2 14.47
28 25.8 14.72 16.72
29 27.86 16.44 19.34
30 30.14 18.4 22.4
31 32.67 20.63 25.99
32 35.49 23.18 30.22
33 38.64 26.09 35.19
34 42.16 29.44 41.06
35 46.12 33.3 48.03
36 50.59 37.75 56.31
37 55.63 42.92 66.19
38 61.35 48.93 78.03
39 67.87 55.96 92.25
40 75.31 64.2 109.41
41 83.86 73.9 130.22
42 93.71 85.38 155.55
43 105.11 99.02 186.54
44 118.37 115.31 224.64
45 133.88 134.88 271.76
46 152.1 158.51 330.35
47 173.64 187.21 403.67
48 199.26 222.31 496.01
49 229.93 265.51 613.16
50 266.89 319.07 762.89
SBC B L Q1 Q2 L1 L2 L3 e colum c/s
150 7 2200 1800 1 0 6 1 0.5
RHS LHS C/c
A 26.66667
CG of load 2.7 L B
B 3.81 Rectangle 7 4

b1 3.25 Trepezoid B1
b2 4.36 B2
sfd values
Rl 2640 Strap OK A 264
Rr 2240 UDL B 1936
A
Ll 2.5 q-lef 1056 C 704
Bl 7.0 D -416
Lr 3.9 q-right 580 E 1384
Br 3.9 F 1120
B
D

B E

You might also like