India’s Mega Online Education Hub for Class 9-12 Students,

Engineers, Managers, Lawyers and Doctors.

Free Resources for Free Resources for Free Resources for Free Resources for Free Resources for
Class 9-12 Students Engineering Students MBA/BBA Students LLB/LLM Students MBBS/BDS Students

• Lecture Notes • Lecture Notes • Lecture Notes • Lecture Notes • Lecture Notes

• Project Reports • Project Reports • Project Reports • Project Reports • Project Reports

• Solved Papers • Solved Papers • Solved Papers • Solved Papers • Solved Papers

View More » View More » View More » View More » View More »

▼▼ Scroll Down to View your Downloaded File! ▼▼

Disclaimer

Please note none of the content or study material in this document or content in this file is prepared or
owned by Studynama.com. This content is shared by our student partners and we do not hold any
copyright on this content.

Please let us know if the content in this file infringes any of your copyright by writing to us at:
[email protected] and we will take appropriate action.
 A
Seminar Report

On
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT BUILDINGS

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING

m
c o
.
a
m
a
yn
d
tu
S
 INTRODUCTION

Earthquake-resistant structures are designed and

constructed to withstand various types of hazardous
earthquake exposures at the sites of their particular location.
According to building codes, earthquake-resistant structures
are meant to withstand the largest earthquake of a certain
probability that is likely to occur at their location. This
means the loss of life should be minimized by preventing
collapse of the buildings for rare earthquakes while the loss
of functionality should be limited for more frequent ones.

m
Building designed to prevent total collapse, preserve life,

c o
and minimize damage in case of an earthquake or tremor.
.
a
Earthquakes exert lateral as well as vertical forces, and a

m
structure's response to their random, often sudden motions
a
is a complex task that is just beginning to be understood.
yn
Earthquake-resistant structures absorb and dissipate
d
seismically induced motion through a combination of means:
tu
damping decreases the amplitude of oscillations of a
S
vibrating structure, while ductile materials (e.g., steel) can
withstand considerable inelastic deformation. If a skyscraper
has too flexible a structure, then tremendous swaying in its
upper floors can develop during an earthquake. Care must be
taken to provide built-in tolerance for some structural
damage, resist lateral loading through stiffeners (diagonal
sway bracing), and allow areas of the building to move
somewhat independently.
General principles for seismic resistant

buildings
(i)Structures should not be brittle or collapse suddenly.
Rather, they should be tough, able to deflect or deform a
considerable amount.
(ii) Resisting elements, such as bracing or shear walls, must be
provided evenly throughout the building, in both directions
side-to-side, as well as top to bottom.
(iii) All elements, such as walls and the roof, should be tied
m
together so as to act as an integrated unit during earthquake
o
shaking, transferring forces across connections and
c
preventing separation .
a
m
iv) The building must be well connected to a good foundation
a
yn
and the earth. Wet, soft soils should be avoided, and the
foundation must be well tied together, as well as tied to the
d
tu
wall.
S
(v) Care must be taken that all materials used are of good
quality, and are protected from rain, sun, insects and other
weakening actions, so that their strength lasts.
(vi) Unreinforced earth and masonry have no reliable
strength in tension, and are brittle in compression. Generally,
they must be suitably reinforced by steel or wood.
 Seismic performance
Earthquake or seismic performance defines a structure's
ability to sustain its due functions, such as its safety and
serviceability, at and after a particular earthquake exposure.
 A structure is, normally, considered safe if it does not
endanger the lives and well-being of those in or around it
by partially or completely collapsing
 A structure may be considered serviceable if it is able to
fulfil its operational functions for which it was designed.
 Building should survive a rare, very severe earthquake
by sustaining significant damage but without globally
collapsing. m
c o
 Building should remain operational. for more frequent,
but less severe seismic events. a
m
a
yn
d
t u
S
GENERAL PLANNING AND DESIGN ASPECTS

The behaviour of building during earthquakes depends

critically on its overall shape, size and geometry. Hence, at
planning stage itself, architects and structural engineers
must work together to ensure that the unfavourable features
are avoided and a good building configuration is chosen. If
both shape and structural system work together to make the
structure a marvel.

“If we have a poor configuration to start with, all the engineer

can do is to provide a band-aid – improve a basically poor
solution as best as he can. Conversely, if we start-off with a
good configuration and reasonable framing system, even a
m
poor engineer cannot harm its ultimate performance too
much”. c o
.
Size of Buildings
a
m
a
yn
d
tu
S

In tall buildings with large weight-to-base size ratio the

horizontal movement of the floors during ground shaking is
large. In short but very long buildings, the damaging effects
during earthquake shaking are many. And, in buildings with
large plan area, the horizontal seismic forces can be
excessive to be carried by columns and walls.
 m
c o
.
a
m
a
yn
d
tu
S

Horizontal Layout of Buildings

Buildings with simple geometry in plan perform well during

strong earthquakes. Buildings with re-entrant corners, like
U, V, H and + shaped in plan sustain significant damage. The
bad effects of these interior corners in the plan of buildings
are avoided by making the buildings in two parts by using a
separation joint at the junction.
Vertical Layout of Buildings

m
c o
.
a
m
a
yn
d
tu
S
Earthquake forces developed at different floor levels in a
building need to be brought down along the height to the
ground by the shortest path, any deviation or discontinuity in
this load transfer path results in poor performance of
building. Buildings with vertical setbacks cause a sudden
jump in earthquake forces at the level of discontinuity.
Buildings that have fewer columns or walls in a particular
storey or with unusually tall storey tend to damage or
collapse which is initiated in that storey. Buildings on sloppy
ground have unequal height columns along the slope, which
causes twisting and damage in shorter columns that hang or
float on beams have discontinuity in load transfer. Buildings
in which RC walls do not go all the way to the ground but stop
at upper levels get severely damaged

Adjacency of Buildings

m
c o
.
a
m
a
yn
d
tu
S
When two buildings are close to each other, they may pound
on each other during strong shaking. When building heights
do not match the roof of the shorter building may pound at
the mid- height of the column of the taller one; this can be
very dangerous.
Plan of building
(i) Symmetry: The building as a whole or its various
blocks should be kept symmetrical about both the axes.
Asymmetry leads to torsion during earthquakes and is
dangerous; Symmetry is also desirable in the placing and
sizing of door and window openings, as far as possible.
(ii) Regularity: Simple rectangular shapes, behave better in
an earthquake than shapes with many projections . Torsional
effects of ground motion are pronounced in long narrow
rectangular blocks. Therefore, it is desirable to restrict the
length of a block to three times its width. If longer lengths are
required two separate blocks with sufficient separation in
between should be provided.
(iii) Separation of Blocks: Separation of a large
m
o
building into several blocks may be required so as to obtain
c
.
symmetry and regularity of each block. For preventing
a
hammering or pounding damage between blocks a physical
m
separation of 3 to 4 cm throughout the height above the
a
plinth level will be adequate as well as practical for upto 3
storeyed buildings.
yn
d
The separation section can be treated just like
tu
expansion joint or it may be filled or covered with a weak
S
material which would easily crush and crumble during
earthquake shaking. Such separation may be considered in
larger buildings since it may not
be convenient in small buildings.
(iv) Simplicity: Ornamentation invo1ving large cornices,
vertical or horizontal cantilever projections, facia stones and
the like are dangerous and undesirable from a seismic
viewpoint. Simplicity is the best approach. Where
ornamentation is insisted
upon, it must be reinforced with steel, which should be
properly em-bedded or tied into the main structure of the
building.
(v) Enclosed Area: A small building enclosure with
properly interconnected walls acts like a rigid box since the
earthquake strength which long walls derive from transverse
walls increases as their length decreases. Therefore
structurally it will be advisable to have separately enclosed
rooms rather than one long room. For unframed walls of
thickness t and wall spacing of a, a ratio of a/t = 40 should be
the upper limit between the cross walls for mortars of
cement sand 1:6 or richer, and less for poor mortars
(vi) Separate Buildings for Different
Functions: In view of the difference in importance of
hospitals, schools, assembly halls, residences,
communication and security buildings, etc., it may be
economical to plan separate blocks for different functions so
as to affect economy in strengthening costs. m
c o
.
a
m
a
yn
d
tu
S
REQUIREMENTS OF STRUCTURAL
SAFETY
As a result of the discussion of structural action and mechanism of
the following main requirements of structural safety of buildings
can be arrived at.

(i) A free standing wall must be designed to be safe as a vertical

cantilever. This requirement will be difficult to achieve in un-
reinforced masonry in Zone A. Therefore all partitions inside the
buildings must be held on the sides as well as top. Parapets of
category I and II buildings must be reinforced and held to the main
structural slabs or frames

(ii) Horizontal reinforcement in walls is required for transferring

m
o
their own out-of-plane inertia load horizontally to the shear walls.
c
.
a
(iii) The walls must be effectively tied together to avoid separation
m
at vertical joints due to ground shaking.
a
yn
(iv) Shear walls must be present along both axes of the building.
d
tu
(v) A shear wall must be capable of resisting all horizontal forces
S
due to its own mass and those transmitted to it.

(vi) Roof or floor elements must be tied together and be capable of

exhibiting diaphragm action.

(vii) Trusses must be anchored to the supporting walls and have an

arrangement for transferring their inertia force to the end walls.

(vii) Masonary stone walls should be properly interconnected by

through stones.

(viii) Heavy masses at top should be avoided.

Earthquake Resistant Structures by Planning and
Design Approach

Earthquakes have plagued man for millennia. It is a

destructive force, which was once upon a time declared to be
wrath of God for infidelity of human beings. But today, we
understand what causes earthquakes, and can design
effective mechanisms to mitigate the effects of earthquakes.

Basically, there is the Conventional approach to achieving

earthquake resistance, then there is the basic approach, and
nowadays, there are active control Devices which can
counteract the effects of earthquakes on buildings.

Conventional Approach
m
o
Design depends upon providing the building with strength,
c
.
stiffness and inelastic deformation capacity which are great
a
enough to withstand a given level of earthquake-generated
m
force. This can be accomplished by selection of an
a
appropriate structural configuration and careful detailing of
yn
structural members, such as beams and columns, and the
d
connections between them.
tu
S
Basic Approach
Design depends upon underlying more advanced techniques
for earthquake resistance is not to strengthen the building, but
to reduce the earthquake generated forces acting upon it. This
can be accomplished by de-coupling the structure from seismic
ground motion it is possible to reduce the earthquake induced
forces in it by three ways.

1. Increase natural period of structures by Base Isolation.

2. Increase damping of system by Energy Dissipation
Devices.
 3. Mitigate earthquake effects completely by using Active
Control Devices

Design Philosophy of Earthquake Resistant

Designs

Engineers do not attempt to make earthquake proof

buildings that will not get damaged even during the rare but
strong earthquake; such buildings will be too robust and also
too expensive. Instead the engineering intention is to make
buildings earthquake-resistant; such buildings resist the
effects of ground shaking, although they may get damaged
severely but would not collapse during the strong
earthquake. Thus, safety of people and contents is assured in
earthquake-resistant buildings, and thereby a disaster is
m
o
avoided. This is a major objective of seismic design codes
c
throughout the world.
.
Design Philosophy
a
m
a
yn
1. Under minor but frequent shaking, the main members
d
of the buildings that carry vertical and horizontal forces
tu
should not be damaged; however buildings parts that do
S
not carry load may sustain repairable damage.
2. Under moderate but occasional shaking, the main
members may sustain repairable damage, while the
other parts that do not carry load may sustain
repairable damage.
3. Under strong but rare shaking, the main members may
sustain severe damage, but the building should not
collapse.

Earthquake resistant design is therefore concerned about

ensuring that the damages in buildings during earthquakes
are of acceptable variety, and also that they occur at the right
places and in right amounts. This approach of earthquake
resistant design is much like the use of electrical fuses in
houses: to protect the entire electrical wiring and appliances
in the house, you sacrifice some small parts of electrical
circuit, called fuses; these fuses are easily replaced after the
electrical over-current. Likewise to save the building from
collapsing you need to allow some pre-determined parts to
undergo the acceptable type and level of damage.

Earthquake resistant buildings, particularly their main

elements, need to be built with ductility in them. Such
buildings have the ability to sway back-and-forth during an
earthquake, and to withstand the earthquake effects with
some damage, but without collapse.

EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT TECHNIQUES

m
o
Conventional seismic design attempts to make buildings that
c
.
do not collapse under strong earthquake shaking, but may
a
sustain damage to non-structural elements and to some
m
structural members in the buildings. This may render the
a
buildings non-functional after the earthquake, which may be
yn
problematic in some structures, like hospitals, which need to
d
remain operational in aftermath of earthquake. Special
tu
techniques are required to design buildings such that they
S
remain practically undamaged even in a severe earthquake.
Buildings with such improved seismic performance usually
cost more than the normal buildings do.

Two basic techniques are used to protect buildings from

damaging earthquake effects. These are base isolation
devices and seismic dampers.
Seismic Base Isolation Technique
It is easiest to see the principle at work by referring directly
to the most widely used of these advanced techniques, known
as base isolation. A base isolated structure is supported by a
series of bearing pads, which are placed between the
buildings and building foundation.

The concept of base isolation is explained through an

example building resting on frictionless rollers. When the
ground shakes, the rollers freely roll, but the building above
does not move. Thus, no force is transferred to the building
due to the shaking of the ground; simply, the building does
not experience the earthquake.

Now, if the same building is rested on the flexible pads that

m
o
offer resistance against lateral movements, then some effect
c
.
of the ground shaking will be transferred to the building
a
above. If the flexible pads are properly chosen, the forces
m
induced by ground shaking can be a few times smaller than
a
that experienced by the building built directly on ground,
yn
namely a fixed base building .The flexible pads are called
d
base-isolators, whereas the structures protected by means of
tu
these devices are called base-isolated buildings. The main
S
feature of the base isolation technology is that it introduces
flexibility in the structure.

As a result, a robust medium-rise masonry or reinforced

concrete building becomes extremely flexible. The isolators
are often designed, to absorb energy and thus add damping
to the system. This helps in further reducing the seismic
response of the building. Many of the base isolators look like
large rubber pads, although there are other types that are
based on sliding of one part of the building relative to other.
Also, base isolation is not suitable for all buildings. Mostly
low to medium rise buildings rested on hard soil underneath;
high-rise buildings or buildings rested on soft soil are not
suitable for base isolation.

m
c o
.
a
m
a
yn
d
tu
S
Concept of Base Isolation
Lead-rubber bearings are the frequently-used types of base
isolation bearings. A lead rubber bearing is made from layers
of rubber sandwiched together with layers of steel. In the
middle of the solid lead “plug”. On top and bottom, the
bearing is fitted with steel plates which are used to attach the
bearing to the building and foundation. The bearing is very
stiff and strong in the vertical direction, but flexible in the
horizontal direction.

How it Works

To get a basic idea of how base isolation works, first examine

the above diagram. This shows an earthquake acting on base
m
isolated building and a conventional, fixed-base, building. As
o
a result of an earthquake, the ground beneath each building
c
.
begins to move. . Each building responds with movement
a
which tends towards the right. The buildings displacement in
m
the direction opposite the ground motion is actually due to
a
inertia. The inertia forces acting on a building are the most
yn
important of all those generated during an earthquake.
d
tu
In addition to displacing towards right, the un-isolated
S
building is also shown to be changing its shape from a
rectangle to a parallelogram. We say that the building is
deforming. The primary cause of earthquake damage to
buildings is the deformation which the building undergoes as
a result of the inertial forces upon it.

Response of Base Isolated Buildings

The base-isolated building retains its original, rectangular

shape. The base isolated building itself escapes the
deformation and damage-which implies that the inertial
forces acting on the base isolated building have been
reduced. Experiments and observations of base-isolated
buildings in earthquakes to as little as ¼ of the acceleration
of comparable fixed-base buildings.

Acceleration is decreased because the base isolation system

lengthens a buildings period of vibration, the time it takes for
a building to rock back and forth and then back again. And in
general, structures with longer periods of vibration tend to
reduce acceleration, while those with shorter periods tend to
increase or amplify acceleration.

m
c o
.
a
m
a
yn
d
tu
S
Spherical Sliding Base Isolation

m
c o
.
Spherical Sliding Base Isolation a
m
a
Spherical sliding isolation systems are another type of base
y
isolation. The building isnsupported by bearing pads that
d and low friction. During an earthquake
have a curved surface
isu
the building t free to slide on the bearings. Since the
bearingsS have a curved surface, the building slides both
horizontally and vertically. The forces needed to move the
building upwards limits the horizontal or lateral forces
which would otherwise cause building deformations. Also by
adjusting the radius of the bearings curved surface, this
property can be used to design bearings that also lengthen
the buildings period of vibration
Energy Dissipation Devices for Earthquake
Resistant Building Design

Another approach for controlling seismic damage in

buildings and improving their seismic performance is by
installing Seismic Dampers in place of structural elements,
such as diagonal braces. These dampers act like the hydraulic
shock absorbers in cars – much of the sudden jerks are
absorbed in the hydraulic fluids and only little is transmitted
above to the chassis of the car. When seismic energy is
transmitted through them, dampers absorb part of it, and
thus damp the motion of the building.

m
c o
.
a
m
a
yn
d
tu
S
Commonly used Seismic Dampers

1. Viscous Dampers (energy is absorbed by silicone-

based fluid passing between piston cylinder
arrangement),
2. Friction Dampers (energy is absorbed by surfaces
with friction between them rubbing against each other),
3. Yielding Dampers (energy is absorbed by metallic
components that yield).
4. Viscoelastic Dampers (energy is absorbed by
utilizing the controlled shearing of solids).

Thus by equipping a building with additional devices which

have high damping capacity, we can greatly decrease the
seismic energy entering the building
m
c o
.
a
m
a
yn
d
tu
S

How Dampers Work

The construction of a fluid damper is shown in (fig). It
consists of a stainless steel piston with bronze orifice head. It
is filled with silicone oil. The piston head utilizes specially
shaped passages which alter the flow of the damper fluid and
thus alter the resistance characteristics of the damper. Fluid
dampers may be designed to behave as a pure energy
dissipater or a spring or as a combination of the two.

A fluid viscous damper resembles the common shock

absorber such as those found in automobiles. The piston
transmits energy entering the system to the fluid in the
damper, causing it to move within the damper. The
movement of the fluid within the damper fluid absorbs this
kinetic energy by converting it into heat. In automobiles, this
means that a shock received at the wheel is damped before it
reaches the passengers compartment. In buildings this can
mean that the building columns protected by dampers will
undergo considerably less horizontal movement and damage
during an earthquake
m
c o
.
a
m
a
yn
d
tu
S
New Breed of Energy Dissipation Devices

The innovative methods for control of seismic vibrations

such as frictional and other types of damping devices are
important integral part of seismic isolation systems as they
severe as a barrier against the penetration of seismic energy
into the structure. In this concept, the dampers suppress the
response of the isolated building relative to its base.

The novel friction damper device consists of three steel

plates rotating against each other in opposite directions. The
steel plates are separated by two shims of friction pad
material producing friction with steel plates.

When an external force excites a frame structure the girder

starts to displace horizontally due to this force. The damper
will follow the motion and the central plate because of the
tensile forces in the bracing elements. When the applied
forces are reversed, the plates will rotate in opposite way.
The damper dissipates energy by means of friction between
the sliding surfaces.

The latest Friction-ViscoElastic Damper Device (F-VEDD)

combines the advantages of pure frictional and viscoelastic
mechanisms of energy dissipation. This new product
consists of friction pads and viscoelastic polymer pads
separated by steel plates. A prestressed bolt in combination
m
c o
with disk springs and hardened washers is used for
maintaining the required clamping force on the interfaces as
.
in original FDD concept.
a
m
a
After development of passive devices such as base isolation

yn
and TMD. The next logical steps is to control the action of
these devices in an optimal manner by an external energy
d
tu
source the resulting system is known as active control device
system. Active control has been very widely used in
S
aerospace structures. In recent years significant progress has
been made on the analytical side of active control for civil
engineering structures. Also a few models explains as shown
that there is great promise in the technology and that one
may expect to see in the foreseeable future several dynamic
“Dynamic Intelligent Buildings” the term itself seems to have
been joined by the Kajima Corporation in Japan. In one of
their pamphlet the concept of Active control had been
explained in every simple manner and it is worth quoting
here.

People standing in swaying train or bus try to maintain

balance by unintentionally bracing their legs or by relaying
on the mussels of their spine and stomach. By providing a
similar function to a building it can dampen immensely the
vibrations when confronted with an earthquake. This is the
concept of Dynamic Intelligent Building (DIB
The philosophy of the past conventional a seismic structure
is to respond passively to an earthquake. In contrast in the
DIB which we propose the building itself functions actively
against earthquakes and attempts to control the vibrations.
The sensor distributed inside and outside of the building
transmits information to the computer installed in the
building which can make analyses and judgment, and as if the
buildings possess intelligence pertaining to the earthquake
amends its own structural characteristics minutes by minute.
m
Active Control System c o
.
a
The basic configuration of an active control system is
m
a
schematically shown in figure. The system consists of three

yn
basic elements:

d
1. Sensors to measure external excitation and/or
tu
structural response.
S
2. Computer hardware and software to compute control
forces on the basis of observed excitation and/or
structural response.
3. Actuators to provide the necessary control forces.

Thus in active system has to necessarily have an external

energy input to drive the actuators. On the other hand
passive systems do not required external energy and their
efficiency depends on tunings of system to expected
excitation and structural behavior. As a result, the passive
systems are effective only for the modes of the vibrations for
which these are tuned. Thus the advantage of an active
system lies in its much wider range of applicability since the
control forces are worked out on the basis of actual
excitation and structural behavior. In the active system when
only external excitation is measured system is said to be in
open-looped. However when the structural response is used
as input, the system is in closed loop control. In certain
instances the excitation and response both are used and it is
termed as open-closed loop control.

Control Force Devices

Many ways have been proposed to apply control forces to a
structure. Some of these have been tested in laboratory on
scaled down models. Some of the ideas have been put
forward for applications of active forces are briefly described
in the following:
m
o
Active-tuned Mass Dampers (TMD)
c
.
a used in a number of
these are in passive mode have been

natural extension. In this a

m
structures as mentioned earlier. Hence active TMD is a
system 1% of the total building
mass is directly excitedn
y by an actuator with no spring and

(AMD). The u
d
dash pot. The system has been termed as Active Mass Driver
t experiments indicated that the building
Sare reduced about 25% by the use of AMD.
vibrations

Tendon Control

Various analytical studies have been done using tendons for

active control. At low excitations, even with the active control
system off, the tendon will act in passive modes by resisting
deformations in the structures though resulting tension in
the tendon. At higher excitations one may switch over to
Active mode where an actuator applies the required tension
in tendons.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
. Construct Earthquake-Resistant Structures

 It is possible to evaluate the earthquake forces acting on

the structure.
 Design the structure to resist the above loads for safety
against Earthquakes.
 Proper care should be taken durind construction.

 Base isolation can also be used for retrofitting of

structure.

 Construct symmetrical structure to o m

avoid torsion.
.c
a construction.
 Adopt proper workmanship during
m
a
yn
d
tu
S