Jonny Moss Research - For Printing

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

“Species diversity and distribution of Mosses in Mt.

Dulang-dulang Range, Bukidnon,


Philippines”

Author:
Affiliation:

Introduction

Mt. Kitanglad Range Natural Park (MKRNP) is the fourth highest mountain in the

Philippines. It has a total land area of 47,270 hectares and is located in the north-central part of

the province of Bukidnon, Mindanao. The park is one of the remaining rainforest in the country

with remarkable flora and fauna biodiversity (Canoy and Suminguit, 2001). Mt. Dulang-dulang

is the highest peak among the high mountains of Mt. Kitanglad range that has an elevation of

2,938 meters above sea level. At present, there were only two major research expeditions of

mosses that were conducted within the Mt. Kitanglad Range Natural Park (see Azuelo et al.,

2010; Tan and Shevock, 2014).

Mosses are the most species-rich of the three known phyla of bryophytes and they occupy

a broad range of habitats (Stotler and Began, 2007). The diversity and distribution of mosses

differs significantly according to the variability in climate, edaphic factor, and physiographic

changes of the vegetation (Costa and Lima, 2005; Shaw et al., 2005; Geffert et al., 2013;

Pirasenko and Bakalin, 2017). For instance, a montane forest has the largest number of exclusive

species and the highest species richness, the sub-montane forest has intermediate species

richness, while the lowland forest has fewer species (Costa and Lima, 2005).

On the other hand, Mosses are considered important components of the ecosystems due

to their significant role in nutrient cycling, in carbon sequestration, and in nitrogen cycling

between the land and the air (Lindo and Gonzales, 2010). Mosses has been used for
biomonitoring to examine air quality and evaluate heavy metal contamination in the atmosphere

that is harmful to the respiratory and cardiovascular system (Kayee et al., 2015; Donovan et al.,

2016; Hu et al., 2018; Shetekauri et al., 2018). Thus, inventory of mosses is of great importance

in order to identify particular species that can be used for biomonitoring and efficiently detects

atmospheric heavy metal particulates.

At present, there are 763 species in 239 genera and 56 families of moss taxa are known to

occur in the Philippines. These include the eight newly recorded taxa to the Philippines:

Acroporium rigens, Braunfelsia plicata, Brotherella fauriei, Bryoerythrophyllum recurvirostrum,

Gammiella pterogonoides, Oxyrrhynchium hians, Pterogonidium pulchellum, and Vesicularia

ferriei (Linis and Tan, 2013). However, the current number of recorded mosses occurring in

Mindanao island implies that there are still more moss species awaits to be discovered in the

field, particularly in the protected area, Hence, this study will be conducted which aims to assess

the species diversity and distribution of mosses in Mt. Dulang-dulang range along altitudinal

gradients.

Methodology
Study sites

The sampling sites will be selected according to the vegetation types along altitudinal

gradient. One site will be established in the lower montane, one in mid-montane forest, and in

the upper montane forest of Mt. Dulang-dulang range, which is part of Mt. Kitanglad Range

Natural Park in the province of Bukidnon (Figure 1).


Figure1. Map showing the proposed study site in the province of Bukidnon.

Collection and Identification of Specimens

Specimen will be collected at 10meters of each side of the trail from the lower montane,

mid-montane, and in the upper montane forest. Moss will be collected by hand or using a knife

for species closely attached to their substrate (Vanderpoorten et al., 2010). All specimen will be

photographed in their natural habitat before removal of voucher specimen. In addition, individual

species within a collection will be packed-up separately in a paper packet and will be labeled

with complete field information, such as the coordinates, elevation, and their associated habitat.

Voucher specimens will be classified, described, and identified using available taxonomic

keys of Moss. Diagnostic character will be examined using a stereomicroscope and will be

photographed using a digital camera.


Statistical Analysis

Data analysis will be conducted in Paleontological Statistics (PAST) software ver.2.17c

(Hammer et al., 2001). This will include the determination of diversity indices, seriation analysis

to visualize the species distribution, and Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) to

determine relationship between moss and abiotic factors.


References Cited

Azuelo, A.G., Sariana, L.G., Pabualan, M.P. 2010. Diversity and Ecological Status of
Bryophytes in Mt. Kitanglad, Bukidnon, Philippines. Asian Journal of Biodiversity, 1(1):
49-71.

Canoy, MEL. S. and Suminguit, V.J. 2001. Case study: The Indigenous Peoples of Mt. Kitanglad
Range Natural Park. Social Watch-Philippines Report, pp62-74.

Costa and Lima, 2005. Da Costa D.P., Lima, F.M. 2005. Moss diversity in the tropical
rainforests of Rio de Janiero, Southeastern Brazil. Revista Brasil. Bot., 28(4):671-685.

Donovan, G.H., Jovan, S.E., Gatziolis, Burstyn, Lichael, Y.L., Amacher, M.C., Monleon, V.J.
2016. Using an epiphytic moss to identify previously unknown sources of atmospheric
cadmium pollution. Science of the Total Environment, 559:84-93.

Geffert. J.l., Frahm, JP., Barthlott, W., Mutke, J. 2013. Global moss diversity: spatial and
taxonomic patterns of species richness. Journal of Bryology, 35(1):1-11.

Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T., Ryan, P.D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics software
package for education and data analysis. Paleontologica Electronica, 4(1):9pp.

Hu, R., Yan, Y., Zhou, X., Wang, Y., Fang, Y. 2018. Monitoring Heavy Metal Contents with
Sphagnum Junghuhnianum Moss Bags in Relation to Traffic. International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health. 15: 374.

Kayee, P., Songphim, W., Parkpein, A. 2015. Using Thai Native Moss as Bio-Adsorbent for
Contaminated Heavy Metal in Air. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 197:1037
– 1042.

Lindo, Z. and Gonzalez, A. 2010. The Bryosphere: An Integral and Influential Component of the
Earth’s Biosphere. Ecosystems. 13:612- 627.

Pisarenko, O.Y., Bakalin, V.A. 2017. Moss diversity distribution patterns and agglomerates of
local floras in the Russian Far East. Botanica Pacifica, 6(2): 21–33.

Shaw, J.A., Cox, C.J., Goffinet, B. 2005. Global patterns of moss diversity: taxonomic and
molecular inferences. Taxon, 54 (2): 337–352.

Shetekauri, S., Chaligaval, O., Shetekauril, T., Kvlividzel, A., Kalabegishvili, T., Kirkesali, E.,
Frontasyeva, M.V., Chepurchenko, O.E., Tselmovich, V.A. 2018. Biomonitoring Air
Pollution Using Moss in Georgia. Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 27(5):2259-2266.

Stotler, B.J., and Began, S.E. 2007. Morphology of Mosses (Phylum Bryophyta).
Tan, B.C. and Shevock, J.R. 2014. Noteworthy mosses and a new variety collected from the
2014 joint expedition of CAS and CMUH new to Mindanao Island of the Philippines.
Bryophyte Diversity and Evolution, 36 (1): 022–030.

Vanderpoorten, A., Papp, B., Gradstein, R. 2010. Sampling of Bryophytes. In Eymann, J.,
Degreef, J., Häuser, Ch., Monje, J.C., Samyn, Y., VandenSpiegel, D (Eds.), Manual on
Field Recording Techniques and Protocols for All Taxa Biodiversity Inventories and
Monitoring, 8(2):331-345.

You might also like