See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/321269125

STUDENTS ATTITUDE TOWARDS E-LEARNING

Article · November 2017

DOI: 10.21090/IJAERD.15380

CITATIONS READS

0 907

2 authors:

Samir Thakkar Hiren Joshi

Government Polytechnic, Rajkot 3 PUBLICATIONS   7 CITATIONS   
8 PUBLICATIONS   8 CITATIONS   
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Development of an E-learning System and Evaluating its Effectiveness for Distance Education View project

E-Learning View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Samir Thakkar on 24 November 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 e-ISSN (O): 2348-4470
Scientific Journal of Impact Factor (SJIF): 4.72
p-ISSN (P): 2348-6406

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research

Development
Volume 4, Issue 11, November -2017

Students’ Attitude towards E-learning

Samir Thakkar1, Hiren Joshi2
1
Information Technology Branch, Government Polytechnic, Rajkot, India
2
Rollwala Computer Centre, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, India

Abstract —Electronic learning is emerging as a prominent way to carry teaching-learning process. In countries like
India, where population is large and the educational resources are limited to cop up with the increasing needs of
providing education, E-learning can play a critical role to overcome this problem. One of the key factors in taking road
of E-learning is learners’ readiness. Despite of several advantages of E-learning, it would not be meaningful if leaners
don’t adapt to it. This study tries to learn attitude of diploma engineering students towards adaption of e-learning.
The present study is based on a survey method. Fifty six students of information technology branch of diploma
engineering programme were taken as sample for the population. An attitude scale was used to collect the data. The
differences in students’ attitude towards the use of E-learning were studied in terms of gender, locality (rural / urban)
and cast category (General/ Reserved).

Keywords-Student attitude; e-learning; online learning; engineering students

I. INTRODUCTION

There are many definitions of e-learning across available literature. Wentling et al.[1] and Rosenberg [2] defined
e-learning as utilization of Internet and related tools and technologies to provide a broad range of solutions that improves
performance and knowledge. E-learning is the term widely used to refer to instructional material or learning practice
disseminated or supported by electronic tools and technologies [3].
In general, E-learning can be considered as the process of learning formed by communication with contents
delivered digitally with electronic services and support. It includes extensive use of information and communication
related technologies to assist, enable, and reform the process of learning. E-learning can theoretically incorporate all the
other types of learning.
Wide spread of Internet has encouraged universities and organizations to develop Learning Management
Systems (LMS) based on Internet technologies to support teaching and learning process. Such LMSs provides various
features like registration of courses, distribution of learning material, tracking learner’s progress, conducting tests,
interaction between teacher and learner and other educational needs. Such LMSs based on Internet technologies, which
are a type of E-learning systems, can be used to provide hybrid learning experience that is a combination of face-to-face
traditional classroom learning with Internet oriented learning [4]. In an E-learning environment, learners can learn at their
own convenience of schedule and willingness. Ease of access to the learning material, time independence, repetitive
learning and mobility are critical factors which drives the utilization of E-learning systems.
Along with the increasing inclination towards E-learning within academics, it is very necessary to identify
perspectives of E-learning from the ultimate stakeholders, the students. This paper tries to examine diploma engineering
students’ perception about E-learning. Section II describes review of related literature. Objectives are stated in section III
followed by Hypotheses in section IV. Section V describes the research method used in the study. Section VI discusses
the results followed by Conclusion.

II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

D.W. Sanders & A.I. Morrison-Shelter observed attitude of undergraduate students towards the web-enabled
learning components in a biology course. The outcomes exhibited a constructive influence on critical thinking skills,
problem-solving skills and student learning [5].
Patricia Bertea’s observed that there is a connection between technical capabilities and students’ attitude
towards e-learning. Attitude is also impacted by time dedicated to computer use, showing computer experience. Attitude
differences were found between hired students and the unemployed ones [6].
Naila et al. conducted a study on nursing students to learn their attitude towards E-learning. In this quantitative
and cross sectional study, 120 nursing students participated. A questionnaire was distributed to all students to measure
their attitudes towards E-learning. The result confirmed the readiness of students to adopt E-learning and recognized its
use in education. Though, technical support and stress of using technology were noted to be discouraging factors to adopt
E-learning [7].
Neelam Dhamija tried to evaluate undergraduate students’ attitude towards the academic utilization of E-
learning. An attitude scale was developed and the study was carried out on 300 students belonging to arts, commerce and
science streams. Differences in attitude between different stream students were observed. The findings revealed that

@IJAERD-2017, All rights Reserved 209

 International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development (IJAERD)
Volume 4, Issue 11, November-2017, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470, print-ISSN: 2348-6406

overall it was affirmative approach towards E-learning among most of the students. There were no differences in attitude
between arts and commerce students as well as arts and science students. Also no differences were reported between
commerce and science students. Though, significant difference was reported among students with respect to gender and
rural and urban residence [8].
Opposite to these results, no differences were found between rural and urban students or between male and
female students in a study carried out by Avant on undergraduate students of Aligarh Muslim University. A computer
attitude scale from previous study was used to measure attitude of students towards computer. All students demonstrated
favorable attitude while rural girls showed less favorable attitude compared to urban girl students [9].
Supporting the similar results a study was conducted by Suri and Sharma to assess attitude towards E-learning
with respect to gender. This study comprising of 477 students concluded that there is no substantial connection between
gender and students’ attitude towards E-learning [10].
Rhema et al. discussed perception and experiences of students from two Lybian universities on technology
enabled learning. The impact of demographic features, technology access, technology utilization in learning,
technological skills and technology satisfaction on students attitude were studied. The results stated that demographic
features such as gender differences locality of student, current enrollment year and age have no effect on students’
attitude towards E-learning. Students having access to technology were more favorable towards E-learning. A substantial
factor of attitudes toward e-learning is student skills in technologies [11].
Teachers are playing key role in educational settings and their perception about E-learning affects students’
attitude towards E-learning. Kisanga surveyed various factors determining teachers’ attitude towards E-learning. The
well-known technology acceptance model was modified to include factors like gender, qualification, teaching experience
and computer exposure as independent variables. I was found that teachers have positive attitude towards E-learning with
computer exposure as key contributing element towards their attitude. The other factors gender, qualification and
teaching experience were found to be insignificant in determining attitude towards E-learning [12].
In another similar study carried out by Krishnakumar and Rajesh, higher education teachers’ attitude towards E-
learning was measured. Favorable attitude was revealed as the study outcome. There were differences in approach
towards using E-learning between the teachers familiar with computers and technology compared to technologically
novice teachers [13].
Individual innovativeness also affects attitude towards online learning. Özcan et al. examined the effect of
individual’s creativeness level on change in approach towards E-learning of prior-service teachers. To determine level of
creativeness, a scale was used from prior studies whose result puts an individual into one of the profiles from Innovators,
Early Adopters, Early Majority and Laggards. Attitude of these teachers was measured using another scale and it was
found that there is substantial variance in their attitude towards online learning in regards with individual’s level in
creativeness [14].

III. OBJECTIVES

The following objectives are defined for the study:

1. To investigate diploma engineering students’ attitude towards the usage of E-learning
2. To investigate differences in attitude towards the use of E-learning between male and female students
3. To investigate differences in attitude towards the use of E-learning between rural and urban students
4. To investigate differences in attitude towards the use of E-learning between general category and
reserved category students

IV. HYPOTHESES

To achieve the above mentioned objectives, the following hypotheses are formed:
1. There is a significant difference in attitude towards the use of E-learning between male and female
students
2. There is a significant difference in attitude towards the use of E-learning between rural and urban
students
3. There is a significant difference in attitude towards the use of E-learning between general category and
reserved category students

V. RESEARCH METHOD

5.1. Participants
The participants of this investigation include final year diploma engineering students from information technology
branch of Government Polytechnic under Gujarat Technological University at Rajkot. From 80 final year students 56
participated in the study. Table 1 highlights the demographic information of the participating students.

@IJAERD-2017, All rights Reserved 210

 International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development (IJAERD)
Volume 4, Issue 11, November-2017, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470, print-ISSN: 2348-6406

5.2. Instrument
A survey was designed by from prior studies carried out by Abdelrahim M. Zabadi and Amr Hussein Al-Alawi [15],
Laura Briz-Ponce et al. [16] and Amal Rhema et al. [11]. Few items were found to be duplicating and they were
removed. The final version of the survey consisted of two sections. The first section collects demographic information
which includes gender, locality and category. The other section includes 13 items to measure students’ approach towards
the usage of E-learning. Each item in this section is measured on five-point likert scale ranging from minimum value 1
(Strongly disagree) to maximum value 5 (Strongly agree). Other scale values are 2 (Disagree), 3 (Neutral) and 4 (Agree).
Experts were consulted to ensure validity of the survey items.

Table 1. Student demographic information

Var Description No of students Frequency (%)
Male 33 58.9%
Gender
Female 23 41.1%
Rural 13 23.2%
Locality
Urban 43 76.8%
General 31 55.4%
Category
Reserved (ST/SC/OBC/PH) 25 44.6%

5.3. Method
The survey was prepared online and hyperlink to the survey was distributed to students using mobile group messaging
application. It was made sure in a class that most of the students are having smart mobile devices and sufficient Internet
connectivity to fill up the form online. Students who were not using Internet were encouraged to take help from their
friends having Internet enabled device. Prior to the distribution, students were made clear about the objectives of this
study and were also demonstrated an online learning system they expected to enroll in during the semester. It is to be
noted that student participation was voluntarily and they could opted not to fill up the survey. The data collected
anonymously from May to June 2017.
The samples used in the study were tested for normality and found to be non-normal. Thus, samples violate one of the
necessary conditions for conducting parametric tests like ANOVA, t test, etc. Therefore, Mann Whitney U test was
carried out to test significant difference between groups, which is a most commonly used non-parametric test. The Mann-
Whitney U test is a non-parametric test, ideally used to assess variance between two independent sets. It used in
situations where the dependent variable is either ordinal or continuous and non-normal. It is one of the alternative
methods available to test significant differences when independent sample t-test is not applicable due to normality
assumption violation.

VI. DATA INTERPRETATION AND RESULTS

To investigate the overall attitude of students towards the usage of E-learning, a frequency distribution table as
given below is prepared. Each item comprises maximum score of 5 and minimum score of 1. Thus, minimum score for
second part of survey measuring the attitude is 13 (13 items × 1) and maximum score is 65 (13 items × 5).

Table 2. Frequency distribution of attitude score

Attitude Score Frequency Percentage of the Students
11 – 20 1 1.79%
21 – 30 0 0.00%
31 – 40 6 10.71%
41 – 50 13 23.22%
51 – 60 30 53.57%
61 – 70 6 10.71%
Total 56 100.00%

Table 2 shows that more than 64% students scored greater than 50 and 23.22% students scored in range 41-50.
Only 1.79% of students scored between the minimum range of values that is 11-20. Thus, it shows that high number of
students have positive inclination towards E-learning.

Hypothesis 1: There is a significant difference in attitude towards the use of E-learning between male and female
students
Mann-Whitney U test was conducted on male and female attitude scores as their normal distribution shapes
were different. Table 3 shows the results.

@IJAERD-2017, All rights Reserved 211

 International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development (IJAERD)
Volume 4, Issue 11, November-2017, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470, print-ISSN: 2348-6406

Table 3. Ranks and Mann-Whitney U Test statistics (Gender-wise)

Gender N Mean Rank Mann-Whitney U Z p
Female 23 24.70
Attitude
Male 33 31.15 292.000 -1.461 .144
Score
Total 56
It can be seen from the above results that the value of p = 0.144 > 0.05 level of significanc. It shows that there
exists no significant difference in attitude towards the use of E-learning between male and female students. Thus
Hypothesis 1 is rejected.
Hypothesis 2: There is a significant difference in attitude towards the use of E-learning between rural and urban
students.
Since the data divided by locality groups are non-normal, this hypothesis is tested using Mann-Whitney U test.
Table 4 shows the relative results.

Table 4. Ranks and Mann-Whitney U Test statistics (Locality-wise)

Locality N Mean Rank Mann-Whitney U Z p
Rural 13 29.38
Attitude
Urban 43 28.23 268.000 -.224 .823
Score
Total 56
Since the value of p in the result is .823 which is greater than significance level 0.05 (p= .823 > 0.05), this
hypothesis 2 is rejected. Thus, no statistically significant difference was found in attitude for E-learning between rural
and urban students.
Hypothesis 3: There is a significant difference in attitude towards the use of E-learning between general category and
reserved category students.
Following non-normal distribution, General and Reserved category students score was tested using Mann-
Whitney U test. Table 5 shows the relative results.

Table 5. Ranks and Mann-Whitney U Test statistics (Category-wise)

Category N Mean Rank Mann-Whitney U Z p
General 31 31.03
Attitude
Reserved 25 25.36 309.000 -1.297 .195
Score
Total 56
From Table 5, it can be seen that the significance value p = 0.195 > 0.05 significance level. Thus, this
hypothesis 3 is also rejected. Hence, there is no significant difference in attitude towards the use of E-learning between
general category and reserved category students.

VII. CONCLUSION

The main aim of the study was to gauge students’ attitude towards the use of E-learning systems. We analyzed
their attitude with respect to gender, locality and social category. Results show that there is a highly positive incline of
diploma engineering students towards the usage of E-learning. Also this attitude is not affected by differences in gender,
locality or social category of students.

REFERENCES

[1] Wentling, T. L., Waight, C., Gallaher, J., La Fleur, J., Wang, C., & Kanfer, A., “E-learning: A review of
literature”. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, 2000.
[2] Rosenberg, Marc Jeffrey. “E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age”. Vol. 9. New York:
McGraw-Hill, 2001.
[3] Ong, Chorng-Shyong, Jung-Yu Lai, and Yi-Shun Wang. "Factors affecting engineers’ acceptance of asynchronous e-
learning systems in high-tech companies." Information & management 41.6 (2004): 795-804.
[4] Exploring the Pros and Cons of Online, Hybrid and Face-to-face Class Formats. A Provost Report Series. University
of Washington. 2013.
[5] Sanders, Diana W., and Alison I. Morrison-Shetlar. "Student attitudes toward web-enhanced instruction in an
introductory biology course." Journal of Research on computing in Education 33.3 (2001): 251-262
[6] Bertea, Patricia. "Measuring Students’ Attitude Towards E-Learning. A Case Study." Conference proceedings of»
eLearning and Software for Education «(eLSE). No. 01. Universitatea Nationala de Aparare Carol I, 2009.
[7] Ali, Naila, et al. "Attitude of nursing students towards e-learning." Advances in Health Professions Education 2.1
(2016): 24-29.

@IJAERD-2017, All rights Reserved 212

 International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development (IJAERD)
Volume 4, Issue 11, November-2017, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470, print-ISSN: 2348-6406

[8] Dhamija, Neelam. "Attitude of Undergraduate Students Towards the use of e-Learning." MIER Journal of
Educational Studies, Trends and Practices 4.1 (2016): 123-125.
[9] Varshney, Anant Kumar. "Attitude of Rural and Urban Undergraduate Students of Aligarh Muslim University
towards Computer." EDUCARE 8.1 (2016): 97-104.
[10] Suri, Gunamala, and Sneha Sharma. "The impact of gender on attitude towards computer technology and e-learning:
An exploratory study of Punjab University, India." International Journal of Engineering Research 2.2 (2013): 132-
136.
[11] Rhema, Amal, and Iwona Miliszewska. "Analysis of student attitudes towards e-learning: The case of engineering
students in Libya." Issues in informing science and information Technology 11 (2014): 169-190.
[12] Kisanga, Dalton Hebert. "Determinants of Teachers’ Attitudes Towards E-Learning in Tanzanian Higher Learning
Institutions." The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 17.5 (2016).
[13] Krishnakumar, R., and K. M. Rajesh. "Attitude of Teachers’ of Higher Education towards E-learning." Journal of
Education and Practice 2.4 (2011).
[14] Özcan, Seher, Şahin Gökçearslan, and Ebru Solmaz. "Investigation into Attitudes of Pre-Service Teachers towards
E-Learning With Respect to Their Individual Innovativeness Levels." Journal of Educational and Instructional
Studies in the World (2016).
[15] Zabadi, Abdelrahim M., and Amr Hussein Al-Alawi. "University Students’ Attitudes towards E-Learning:
University of Business & Technology (UBT)-Saudi Arabia-Jeddah: A Case Study." International Journal of Business
and Management 11.6 (2016): 286.
[16] Briz-Ponce, Laura, et al. "Learning with mobile technologies–Students’ behavior." Computers in Human
Behavior 72 (2017): 612-620. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.027

@IJAERD-2017, All rights Reserved 213

View publication stats