CentralExciseMadeSimpleJun 2013 PDF
CentralExciseMadeSimpleJun 2013 PDF
CA Madhukar N Hiregange
CA Rajesh Kumar T R
& CA Roopa Nayak
The opinions and views expressed in this soft book are those of the authors. The
authors do not undertake any responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of the
contents of the book. Expert advice maybe taken, wherever felt necessary.
2
PREFACE
Manufacture also constitutes a major part of the economic activity of our country.
The Central Government had also realised that unless this sector is nurtured, there
would be no inclusive growth. The vast unemployed population of the country mainly in
the rural areas also requires gainful employment which can be provided only by a vibrant
and robust manufacturing sector. Although the services sector is growing exponentially,
the maximum employment would be in the manufacturing especially the SSI and other
ancillaries sector. Central Excise has for the past decade been the mainstay of the
revenue with service tax and direct taxes stealing the show as far as growth of the taxes
are concerned. The Central Government gets the revenue from Central Excise, Income
Tax, Service Tax and Customs, and these taxes are administered by Central
Government.
The scores of multinationals setting up shop in India may also wish to take
advantage of the technical skills at lower costs. The world over India today is truly
considered an alternative and an attractive alternative option to China for outsourcing of
manufactured products/ parts. The purchasing of automobile or steel companies by
Indian companies would lead to increasing outsourcing from India of manufactured
products. The slow but sure increase in the standard of living of the average citizen
foretells huge demands/increased consumption. The fall in the average rates of duty for
the past few years reaching 10% now if continued would augur well for the
manufacturers within India. Today India is among the top three nations of the world in
terms of purchasing power.
The reforms in Central Excise have been largely successful in spite of the partial
rollback taking place through executive instructions and actions in the past three years.
The doing away with almost all statutory formats, declarations and intimations has made
the tax compliance less cumbersome. The self assessment has been in place for all
products except Cigarettes. The onus of compliance has shifted from the Range to the
Manufacturers.
Professional advisors, managers and executives in charge of Taxation should
have an in depth idea of the law of central excise as there is a very high responsibility on
them. This knowledge would make the decision-making process function less risky and
make the manufacturing activity cost effective thereby remaining globally competitive.
This soft book has made an attempt to introduce & update the law and
procedures of excise in brief. For the interested, an explanatory section has been
included providing the landmark judicial decisions and definitions as may be required.
The specific important topics/ subjects of interest to professionals as well as the industry
managers have been included in brief separately.
The tax planning avenues, special chapter on the SSI’s, Traders registration,
FAQs, Common Errors chapter are a result of the assessment of readers’ need. The
audit from the Government’s side has gained a very high importance with the powers of
scrutiny removed from the Ranges. Consequently the need for professional audit by
Chartered Accountants or other professionals of the excise records is being felt. The
possibility of the mandatory audit in line with Income Tax is real as that would be value
additive to the tax administrators, industry and the consumer now appears slim and
maybe incorporated in the GST regime.
The book has reached this “user friendly” form largely on suggestions of my
professional colleagues in practice and industry who provided a direction and topics of
interest, for which I am indebted. My thanks to articles and assistants in my office staff
who have done the job of collation of the FAQs and Common errors. This was initially
3
bought out in 2002 by the KSCAA. This updated 2012 edition has been largely the effort
of CA Roopa Nayak who requires special praise for the meticulous editing and updation.
We would like to thank Ms. Lakshmi GK, who has updated this book.
The readers, my professional colleagues, other professional and students are
requested to provide their free and frank comments on the deficiencies in this effort by
our team to enable us to improve. [email protected], [email protected] and
[email protected]
CA Madhukar N Hiregange
CA Rajesh Kumar T R
CA Roopa Nayak
4
Roopa Nayak: Regular contributor of articles for past two years to KSCAA, assisted in
revising the ICAI study material 2010. Assisted in editing book on service tax
andassisted in the updation effort of the CA Final Indirect Taxes Study material.
6
INDEX
Chapter Contents Page
number
1 Practical approach to determination of liability 7
2 Suggested approach to advise the manufacturer under central 31
excise
3 What are goods 41
4 Understanding trading, processing and manufacture 56
5 Whether manufactured goods are liable to duty of excise or 61
not?
6 Valuation 67
6A What is the value of goods intended for sale? 70
6B What is the value of goods not intended for sale? 80
7 What is set off of credit on inputs, capital goods, input services 86
Indirect Tax was introduced for the first time in India as far back as 300 BC. Kautilya
in his “Arthashastra” had enumerated that kings could collect taxes on the manufacture
of textiles, alcoholic drink and textiles.
However in more recent times, the Central Excise Act, 1944 (which prior to 1996,
was known as the Central Excises and Salt Act 1944) is the main law relating to duties
of Excise on goods manufactured or produced in India and on Salt. This Act had
replaced not less than 10 separate Excise Acts and 11 sets of statutory rules besides 5
Acts relating to Salt. Thus the Central Excise Act, 1944 is a comprehensive Excise duty
enactment administered by the Union Government.
At present, some of the beneficial provisions include coverage of cenvat scheme to
all inputs except diesel and petrol, inclusion of cenvat on capital goods (1994), passing
on of credit by dealers under excise (1994). There is also no need to file copies of
invoices or copies of cenvat availed invoices for verification along with returns. Cross
credit between service tax and excise was one of the later measures. (2004)
The valuation of goods under Central Excise is done under any of the following four
main methods. They are the transaction value method, MRP method, Tariff Values,
Valuation method prescribed under Central Excise Valuation Rules .
• Firstly the transaction value under Section 4. (for definition see chapter 6 on
classifications & valuation) This value is applicable when the goods are sold to by the
assessee for delivery at the time and place of removal, where the buyer and
assessee are not related and price is sole consideration for the sale. . “Assessee”
means the person who is liable to pay the duty of excise under this Act and includes
his agent.
Here the clarity of the purchase/ work order and its independence with other orders
to the same client could be very important. The place and time of delivery is also
important. In these cases the invoice value would be accepted. Most of the goods fall
into this category.
• Secondly the MRP method of valuation under Section 4 A is applicable to the notified
products (Appendix) which are covered under the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 and
rules made there under. This is applicable only for those goods, which are proposed
to be sold in retail. The value is based on the MRP declared on the packages less
the abatement allowed under the law. The retail sale price is the maximum price at
which the excisable goods in packaged form maybe sold to the ultimate consumers
inclusive of all taxes and expenses and price is sole consideration for such sale. It
should be noted that the goods covered under MRP based valuation would not get
any deductions other than the abatements.
MRP based valuation is applicable to specified goods only. The FMCG as well as a
few other products find a place in the list (Appendix for definition and detailed listing
of all items covered by MRP as well as the abatement applicable to them)
• It is to be noted that excise duty is payable on removal and not on sale.
• Thirdly a few products fall under Section 3(2) called the valuation under Tariff Values
where the Government itself has kept control for various purposes like political
expediency, public interest, high tax revenue etc. In this segment the method could
be specific ( per piece, based on length, per Kg, or based on Retail Sale price or
even ad valorem). Examples could be pan masala and cigarettes.
• Fourthly, the residuary category items which are not covered by the above three, the
ones which are considered as ‘removals’ and not sale. This could also be the method
applicable when the goods sold are consumed captively, sold to relatives, sold at the
11
depots, additional consideration exists, job worker discharges the duty and removals
other than sale such as samples, warranty repairs, donations, captive consumption
etc. In this case reference to the Valuation Rules 2000 would be required.
(Alternative valuation methods refer chapter 6).
Note: There is a capacity based levy wherein the duty maybe based on the capacity of
the machine rather than the value of the goods. The provisions for the same have been
notified. Pan masala is covered there under effective from 1st July 2008.
• Ultimate Consumers: To the ultimate consumers for their personal use. The
consumer who procures the goods for personal use would not be interested in
cenvat credits since he/she is not in a position to utilise the same.
• Dealer: The dealer purchasing the goods from the manufacturer would be
trading in the same. If the goods are to be sold to the manufacturer or service
provider who can avail Cenvat credit, then it is possible to pass on the credit of
duty paid to such manufacturer. Here it should be remembered that in order to
pass on the duty paid by a dealer on goods that are procured by him from a
manufacturer he has to be registered under excise law. Therefore the credits
availability would not be available where such industrial user/ manufacturer buy
goods from an unregistered dealer.
12
assessee is in possession of the asset. The components, spares and accessories, moulds,
tools and dies and refractories and refractory materials need not be in possession of
assessee in second year for availing credit thereon.
l. In case of capital goods the credits would be denied if used exclusively for exempted activity.
m. The cenvat credit on capital goods can be availed even if such assets are acquired on Lease,
hire purchase or loan agreement basis.
n. Cenvat credit is not allowable if depreciation under Income Tax Act is calculated including the
amount of cenvat credit. ( This would amount to conferring a double benefit which is not
allowable)
o. Cenvat credit can be claimed on the goods received in the factory and subsequently sent to
the job worker for processing or otherwise.
p. The goods so sent have to be received back within 180 days of the removal to job worker.
Otherwise the duty availed has to be reversed. Re-credit is permissible on receipt any time
later.
q. Cenvat credit is allowable even in case of jigs, fixtures, moulds & dies sent to job
worker by a manufacturer. There is no time limit as to its return to the factory. Rule
4(5)(b) is being amended by Finance Act 2010 to provide that cenvat credit shall be
allowed in respect of jigs, fixtures, moulds and dies sent by a manufacturer of final
products to another manufacturer for production of goods or to a job worker for the
production of goods on his behalf
(iii).Where the order is received as basic + taxes as applicable would mean that the
manufacturer would benefit by opting for duty payment.
(iv). A comparative analysis of the two situations ( opting for registration and opting
for exemption ) would highlight the benefit to the client. The manufacturer doing
very low value addition could register. ( for comparative tables refer table later in
this chapter).
9 SSI Exemption
¾ What is SSI Exemption?
The exemption notification could be availed only if the substantive conditions attached
thereto are fulfilled. The exemption based on the value of clearances for units who have
had clearances not exceeding Rs. 400 Lakhs [also called the SSI Exemption] is
available for specified products, which may be confirmed by reference to the Notification
8/2003 dt. 1.3.2003. The manufacturer who is eligible for the exemption can claim the
15
¾ What are the major Locational Exemptions? Why these exemptions are
called Locational exemptions?
Where industries are set up in/ located at specified areas of Kutch in Gujrat or North
East of India and more recently Himachal Pradesh, Uttaranachal, Special Economic
Zones (SEZs) set up by various States in India, and undertake manufacture specified
products, these are exempt from duty of excise/ re-imbursement of duty paid. Income tax
and CST benefits are also available in such areas. Since these duty exemptions are
available only to units set up in certain areas these are called as area based
exemptions.
¾ Can units availing area based exemptions send goods for job work to units
who are not so covered?
It may not be possible for such units to send goods on job work basis other than if
permitted. This is because one of the main conditions for availing the exemption under
Central Excise Notification No.214/86 dt 25.3.1986 is that the final product must be
cleared on payment of duty. Since the principal manufacturer who supplies the material
is exempted from duty liability the benefit of this exemption would not be available.
It is expected that at the time of introduction of GST in April 2012, all such area based
exemption would be replaced by a subsidy scheme in the balance period.
Note: The benefit may be shared between the customer and manufacturer. There is a
possibility, though not probable that with the coming in of GST this exemption could be
done away with totally.
Account Number (PAN) of the Company are to be provided. The PAN, residential
and official addresses of the partners or directors or authorized signatories are
also required.(copies maybe enclosed). In case of any resistance to accept the
form, the same maybe sent by speed/ registered post acknowledgement due.
c. Tariff Classification: The description and tariff heading applicable of the excisable
goods, which are going to be manufactured, are also required. In case
manufacturer is not clear on the classification he may consult an expert rather
than making a mistake.
d. Registration Grant: .The registration has to be issued on the same day and if for
any technical or other reason it is not possible within the next working day.The
jurisdictional ACCE/DCCE shall grant the registration Certificate in specified form
containing registration number within 7 days from the receipt of the duly
completed application.
e. Certificate Exhibit: The certificate of Registration or its certified copy should be
exhibited in a conspicuous part of the premises.
f. Fresh registration: Fresh registration has to be sought in the event of change in
premises or in case of change in the ownership of the business.
The registration number is based on the PAN number of the registrant. There would be
need to get fresh registration in case of change in premises or change in ownership of
business. The registration certificate cannot be revoked on flimsy grounds by revenue
department.
The revenue department has now ACES software in place to allow the facility of on-line
registration to assessees under central excise. The password and user id has to be
obtained by submitting details of authorized person’s name and mail id. The password
and user id would be intimated by mail, after which the online registration can be done
by filling in details like assessee profile, location details, product details along with
classification etc.
In case the applicant wants to make an on-line application the additional steps are as follows:
The applicant has to log on the www.aces.gov.in and go to the link Central Excise
(i) Applicant to access ACES application by clicking http:/www.aces.gov.in
(ii) Applicant to click central excise or service tax as required
(iii) Select the hyperlink “New users to register with aces” to create user name and password
after giving valid E-mail ID and other basic details of the person registering with the aces
application.
(iv) User id once selected is permanent , password can be changed regularly. Applicant
receives an e-acknowledgement.
20
(v) Once user id and password is received from the aces, the applicant again requires going
aces website and clicking on service tax link and fills in the user name and password to log
in to his account.
(vi) Select REG module, fill form From A-1. This enable online filing of application form for
registration with department. Applicant receives an e-acknowledgement.
(vii) After it is submitted, a print out could be obtained.
(viii) It is to be submitted along with the PAN card copy, address proof like phone bill or khatha
of premises or municipal taxes receipt as well as copies of constitution document of
assessee like partnership deed in case of firm, Memorandum of Association, Articles of
Association in case of Company would have to be submitted to the jurisdictional officer.
the owner of the factory or his authorized agent as informed to the revenue
department.
• The invoice under Rule 11 does not have to adhere to a specified format.
• The invoice has to be generated in triplicate marked as (i) Original for buyer,
(ii) Duplicate for Transporter, (iii) Triplicate for assessee. An extra copy also
may be generated in addition to the above whenever called for.
• Only one copy of invoice book shall be in use at a time unless allowed by the
Assistant/Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise.
• In case where assessee requires two different invoice books i.e. separate
series for DTA removal and Exports, he may do so by intimating to the
jurisdictional Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise. The contents
of the invoice as per law is provided in rule 11 of Central Excise Rules.
classified and the assessable value correctly determined the correct amount of duty can
be paid. The following procedure has to be followed by the manufacturers:
3. The goods cleared should match in description of goods in the purchase order
if any, received from the customer. The calculations of assessable value and
excise duty payable in the invoice should be done correctly.
4. An invoice under Rule 11 of CER should be prepared showing the assessable
value and Excise duty payable.
11. The due date for payment is 5th of succeeding month which could be extended
to the 6th of next month if paid electronically. However SSI units can make
23
payment by 5th/6th of month succeeding the end of the quarter. However this
method may lead to cash crunch for SSI units unless they plan their cash flow
correctly so that cash is set aside to make quarterly payments.
12. The date of payment would be the date of submitting to the bank provided that
the cheque is honoured. The account of the payments and utilisation of the
PLA could be maintained in the normal financial accounts of the concern.
13. Where there is a delay in duty payment in any financial year beyond more than
30 days from due date by the manufacturer there could be an order suspending
the duty payment by adjusting duty credit. In such case the assessee would
have to clear every consignment after debiting the account current. This is a
very harsh measure.
Decision: No duty can be imposed on the stock lying in the factory transferred to
new owners without any physical removal of goods from the factory.
4. B.P.L. Electronics Ltd. v CCE, Bangalore [1994 (71) ELT 801 (T-
Delhi)]:Facts/Issues: The goods manufactured on their own account, using
moulds but, to raise working capital through the bank or financial institutions, the
manufacturers have entered into a leasing arrangement with a financial
company, by which these moulds are sold to them parting with possession of the
same.
Decision: The fact of raising an invoice in favour of a financial company does not
create a liability for charging duty.
(vi) Once the details are obtained from registers maintained for the purpose, the
26
figures are to be totaled and checked for accuracy and correctness by comparing
the totals with the figures as per the financial ledgers to spot entries that were
missed out.
(vii) The figures as per the registers should then be entered on to the Excise returns in
the relevant columns and boxes. The details that are to be normally entered are –
item description, tariff heading, details of nature of clearance (whether export or
under notification), duty payable, duty paid through cenvat credit and in cash,
details of cenvat credit giving break up of the cenvat credit on inputs, capital goods
and input services and utilization of the same etc
(viii) If the balance of credit on hand at the end of the month is insufficient to pay off the
excise duty liability, the shortage should be met through cash payment in the
designated bank. If there is a delay in payment, the same is to be paid with interest
at 18% p.a (13% upto 31-03-2011) for the delayed period.
(ix) The returns should be checked for errors in posting if any and then filed with the
revenue department with a covering letter. A dated acknowledgement is to be
obtained. Where it is filed electronically, the procedure laid down in the revenue
departmental website is to be followed.
27
Yes
Product
in State
List?
Yes State Excise
No
Is it in
CETA
Yes Central Excise duty Applicable Process
manufacture?
No No Yes Yes
No
No
Eligible for
Exemption No. Pay duty of excise
Yes
Beneficial to avail
No Benefit Foregone Pay duty of excise
pay duty than claim
exemption
No
To be provided
on the same day.
Form A-1
Take Copies –
Frame Original
Intimate
Records
¾ Rules of Valuation
Yes
MRP
Arrive At Value
Applicability Yes after Abatement
No
Prepare Monthly
For SSI opting to pay after Rs.150 lakhs same monthly
Statement Invoice
payment by 5th/6th of subsequent month after end of quarter.
Wise of Duty Payable
9 Introduction
Readers would have got a glimpse or bird’s eye view of implications under central excise
under the First Chapter. However, the suggested approach would require several
questions to be answered.
The practicing professional / industry executive would know that points of law and
interpretations are considerably less frequent than the day to day queries. Under Central
Excise there have been hundreds of Circulars and Trade Notices, which could be used
for specific purposes of clarifying the practical aspects of the law, as long as they are not
repugnant to the new rules.
To dwell on the legal validity of Circulars, it was held by the Supreme Court in the case
of CCE vs. Ratan Melting and Wire Industries (2008(231) ELT 22 that the Circulars are
binding on the Revenue department. However a Circular that is contrary to the statutory
provisions has really no existence in law. The Supreme Court in the case of Suchithra
Components Ltd vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Guntur (2008(11)STR 430(SC)
had held that Beneficial circular to be applied retrospectively while oppressive circular
applicable prospectively. Hence when Circular is against the assessee, they have right
to claim enforcement prospectively.
The following are the broad steps with reference to which the manufacturer who wishes
to understand the excise implications of his products could be guided:
9 Ascertain if the process amounts to manufacture?
Sometimes there may be a doubt as to whether the process undertaken amounts to
manufacture at all. Here the following precautions could be borne in mind:
1. Wherever there is a bona fide doubt the manufacturer could intimate the process
undertaken/to be undertaken to the revenue department by way of a letter. The
manufacturer could ask for a clarification in writing if the process amounts to
manufacture as well as resulting classification of subject goods.
2. The legal advice of an expert in the field of indirect taxes could be taken.
3. Where there are conflicting decisions of Tribunals on the matter of excisability of
product in question, the payment under protest is to be made erring on the side of
revenue to avoid demand for interest, penalty later.
32
4. When duty is paid under protest intimation to revenue is necessary along with the
fact indicated clearly on the face of GAR-7 Challan as well as in returns.
5. Along with the first invoice a detailed letter of protest should be filed to the range with
a copy to the Assistant/Deputy Commissioner indicating the grounds on which it is
felt to be in doubt.
6. The benefit of duty payment under protest, is that the limitation period u/s 11B of
Central Excise Act 1944, would not be applicable. However, it should be noted that it
is fraught with risk to avail the credit of duty paid under protest by the customer
7. However, if the customer/buyer is willing to bear the duty component on clearances,
there would be no need to discharge duty liability under protest.
8. The amount of duty paid in pursuance of an adjudication order is a payment under
protest. The duty payment against confirmed demand, pending appeal could also be
treated as payment under protest at time of hearing appeal.
his product is covered under this notification prior to opting for it.
b. The manufacturer availing benefits of Notification 8/2003 does not avail CENVAT
credit on inputs during the exemption period(though the notification only speaks
about inputs, in terms of Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 even credit on
input services cannot be availed. Here it should be noted that the SSI exemption
cannot be denied when input credit is taken by bona fide mistake while operating
under exemption. It was held in Ramdarshan Rolling Mills vs. Commissioner of
C.Ex. Indore (2010(255) ELT 584(Ti-Del) that input credit during period of
exemption taken due to mistake of clerk without mala fide intent. Excess credit
debited by assessee when they started paying duty. SSI exemption not to be
denied. Relaxation is provided in respect of cenvat credit on capital goods and
though the credit can be availed during the exemption period the same can be
35
Intertec v CCE [2001 (127) ELT 609 (T-LB)]: Facts/Issues: Vertical blinds were treated
by the manufacturers as branded goods. Full duty on these goods was paid at the time
of clearance. In respect of other goods manufactured by them, concession as per
Notification No. 1/93-C.E. was availed of.
Decision: If the goods manufactured by the SSI unit manufacturing a branded goods,
payment of duty on such branded goods would not disentitle the other products from
getting the benefits of the Notification.
Supercoat Industries v CCE [2008 (225) ELT 477]: Facts/Issues: The brand name of
another person appeared on the cartons containing several tins of paint. The brand
name did not belong to the manufacturer.
Decision: The benefit of this notification is available when the brand name is used on
secondary packing.
Macfield Beverages I P Ltd v CCE [2008 (223) ELT 231 (Tri Bang)]: Facts/Issues: The
appellant claims SSI exemption on the ground that their factory is situated in rural area.
Decision: The certification by the tehsildar that the factory is located in rural area is a
good evidence for manufacturers to prove that the branded goods manufactured from
the unit located in rural area
36
9 What are the Inclusions & Exclusions to compute value of clearances for
SSI Exemption?
Value of clearances for the purpose of calculating basic exemption of Rs. 150 lakhs or
Entitlement limit of Rs. 400 lakhs would mean value fixed under section 4 or 4A or tariff
value fixed under section 3(2) of the Act. However it would not include the following
clearances-:
Summary of Exclusions:
Summary of Inclusions:
For Rs 150 Lakhs turnover For Rs 400 lakhs turnover
Goods manufactured in rural area with Value of exempted goods (exempted
other’s brand name. under any other notification) or goods
Captive consumption if final product is chargeable to nil rates as per tariff would
exempt under any other Notification & have to be included.
intermediate product is marketable.
Export to Bhutan. Goods manufactured in rural area with
other’s brand name
When manufacturer gets Job work from Export to Bhutan
other job workers on principal to principal When manufacturer gets Job work from
basis & the process amounts to other customers on principal to principal
manufacture & manufacturer discharges basis & the process amounts to
Central Excise liability. manufacture & manufacturer discharges
37
Job work amounting to manufacture when Job work amounting to manufacture when
undertaking is given as per Notification No. undertaking is given as per Notification No.
214/86. 214/86.
The reasons for commencing investigation are same/adjoining location,
same product, sharing of customers, same partners (beneficial interest),
interest free advances, shared facilities, sharing of expenses and
incomes etc. None of these in themselves can be said to be a reason for
clubbing.
9 Judicial Decisions relating to clubbing of the clearances
1. Commissioner vs. Khanna Paper Mills Ltd (2010 (255) ELT A084 SC)
Facts: The basic dispute is whether three manufacturing facilities, are to be
treated as three different factories.
Decision: The recovery of some records or the fact that some persons attending
38
to some work relating to more than one unit or that there was some financial
arrangement between units was of no consequence and the evidence could not
lead to the conclusion that the three factories could be treated as a single unit.
Therefore, the three manufacturing facilities started at different points of time by
different legal entities were three different factories entitled to separate
exemption.
2. Ramanujam Chemicals & Co. vs. Commissioner of C.Ex.Trichy (2010 (253 ) ELT
500(Tri-Chennai)
Facts: Proprietary concern purchased and manufacture continued in same
premises.
Decision: Since factory is same, the clearances from the factory including
clearances made by proprietary concern prior to its purchase by new owners is to
be included in computing the ceiling limit prescribed for SSI exemption.
3. AC v JC Shah [1978 (2) ELT J 317 (SC)]:Facts: The assessee is a partner in two
firms as well as owner of a factory which were treatable as production by or on
behalf of same person.
Decision: If one person owns a factory and is a partner in another factory, the
production of all factories cannot be clubbed.
4. Verna Frost v. CCE 2000 (118) E.L.T. 504 (Tri):Facts: Both units are situated in
one premises and were in the name of father and son, respectively.
Decision: Since both units are controlled by father, and there was common
control of management and sales, the clubbing provisions were applicable.
5. Lubricare Relays P. Ltd. V. CCE 2000 (125) ELT 904 (Tri):Facts: There were
several concerns producing different goods set up at different points of time, with
common strategies, to raise resources, to effect modernization, improve
efficiency, and extend the market share that had treated themselves as one for
various purposes including financial transactions.
Decision: Where the units are started at different points of time but
manufacturing. activities are co-ordinated, planned and organised centrally in
such a way that the activities have financial implications and bearing on the
profitability of units intermingled ,the clearances have to be clubbed.
6. Akay Filtips P. Ltd. V. CCE 2000 (122) ELT 761 (Tri):Facts: There was the
presence of common employees; the fact that a design mould press machine
39
which was imported by one entity was in fact found installed in the other factory
when there was no document to show sale or official transfer of the machine by
one company to the other, common offices; common directors, many within the
family
Decision: The value of clearances of the two units was to be clubbed, units being
not independent.
Rule 19(1) permits the export of any excisable goods without payment of duty from the
factory, warehouse or any other premises as may be approved by the Commissioner.
Rule 19(2) similarly permits the removal of any material without payment of duty from the
factory, warehouse or any other premises for use in the manufacture of goods which are
exported, as may be approved by the Commissioner.
The Related Benefits of Exports Are As Under:-
a. The manufacturer could apply for a rebate of excise duty paid on inputs used in
the manufacture of export product under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules 2002.
The benefit of rebate of duty paid on the inputs is available for even exempted
goods or nil rated goods. This is vide Notification No.21/2004-CE (NT) dated
6.9.2004.
b. The duty could be paid at the time of export under Notification No.19/2004-CE
(NT) dated 6.9.2004(in respect of exports to countries other than Nepal and
Bhutan) or 20/2004-CE (NT) dated 6.9.2004(for exports to Nepal) after availing
credit on the inputs by utilising the credit balances and claiming a refund of the
duty paid also called the exports under rebate claim.
c. The clearance of excisable goods without payment of duty, under Letter of
Undertaking/bond, by exporters or merchant exporters, is another option which
40
9 Introduction:
Section 3 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, which is charging section, talks
of levy of excise duty on goods manufactured in India. Therefore, there
are two fundamental propositions as under:
(i) There has to be a manufacture.
(ii) The manufacture must result into goods.
Therefore conversely it can be seen that in case of immoveable property there can be no
excise duty liability. (Refer case laws in Exp-1)
The words “goods” has not been defined under the Act or Rules and one would have
referred to the definition under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 or Article 366 of the
Constitution. The Constitution of India defines ‘goods’ in Article 366 (12) as goods
includes all materials, commodities and articles. As per the Sale of Goods Act definition,
“goods” means the following:
• every kind of movable property other than actionable claims and money;
• and includes stock and shares, growing crops, grass, and things attached
to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be served before sale or
under the contract of sale.
In the context of Central Excise duty, the liability on subject goods would have to be
noted with reference to the undergoing:
• It is not sufficient if there are goods. It is also required that such goods must
be moveable, saleable/marketable.
article, material or substance which is capable of being bought and sold for
a consideration and such goods shall be deemed to be marketable.
• Therefore at present all goods that find a place in the Central Excise Tariff
are deemed to be marketable. In our opinion, the said amendment would
not shift the burden of proving that the manufactured goods are not
marketable on the assessee, how much ever the revenue department
would want to.
Explanations to Chapter 3
¾ Explanation - 1: Immovable Property
¾ Definitions:
Section-2(26) of the General Clauses Act 1897 defines Immovable property as under:
“Immovable Property” shall include land, benefits to arise out of land, and things
attached to the earth, or permanently fastened to anything attached to the earth.
Sec-2(7) of Sale of Goods Act 1930 defines goods:- “Goods” means every kind of movable
property( other than actionable claims and money) and includes stock shares, growing crops and
things attached to or forming part of land which was agreed to be severed before sale or under a
contract for sale
1. Commr. Of C.Ex. Ahmedabad vs. Solid & Correct Engineering Works (2010(252)
ELT 481 (SC) Facts: Asphalt drums/hot mixes plant are supplied, erected,
44
not marketable and had not acquired the character and status of PVC films
as known to the market. It was contended that only marketable PVC film
would fall within the said item.
Decision: The court held that an article would not be liable to duty of excise
merely because of its specification in the tariff schedule unless it is “goods”
and known to the market i.e. marketability is an essential ingredient for
dutiability.
2. Gurdaspur Distillery Vs CCE Chandigarh (2008 (224) ELT 337 (SC):Facts:
The residue known as spent wash comes into existence during manufacture
of de-natured Ethyl Alcohol. The same is reacted in a closed type digester
and Methane gas is produced which, in turn, is used by the respondent as
fuel in distillery. Is it excisable gas?
Decision: Article not becomes liable to excise duty merely because of its
specification in the Schedule to Central Excise Tariff Act. The methane gas
produced is not marketable. Evidence has to be produced by Revenue to
prove marketability of goods.
3. Board of Trustees v. Collector of Central Excise, A.P., 2007 (216) E.L.T. 513
(S.C.):Facts: The Department has taken the view that Cement Concrete
Armour Units (CCAU) used by Port Trust for the installation of break waters in
the outer harbour for purpose of keeping the water calm and tranquil is
excisable under Central Excise Act.
Decision: The concrete armour blocks used for installation of break waters in
harbour for keeping water calm are not goods as they are not marketable.
The Court further held that Concrete armour blocks are essentially in
prisomoid form, of certain specification and are made to order and these are
harbour or location specific. No evidence to show that these blocks could be
used any other place.
Decision: In absence of any tariff entry regarding the waste and scrap of
printed circuit board generated during manufacture of printed circuit board the
same is not excisable goods. It is not liable to excise duty.
2. Diwan Sahib Fashions Pvt. Ltd., v. CCEx., Delhi, (2008(229) E.L.T. 204(Tri.-
Delhi):Facts: There would be no excise duty liability on the garments made as
per an individual customer’s measurements and specifications as it is not
marketable and the same cannot be sold to any other person and cannot be
displayed in a showroom for sale.
Decision: Garments Sale to one person found to be sufficient for satisfying
marketability criterion. It is not required that product must be sold in
showroom/shop
3. CCE, Mumbai v Laljee Godhoo & Co. [2007 (216) ELT 514 (SC)]: Facts:
Whether the process to which the raw asafoetida (hing) is subjected to,
resulting in the formation of “compounded asafoetida”, constitutes
“manufacture” under the Central Excise Act, 1944?
Decision: The process of subjecting raw materials asafoetida (hing) resulting
in formation of compounded asafoetida. No Chemical change brought by
impugned process. Products remaining the same at starting and terminal
points of the process. It was held that test of manufacture not satisfied. Twin
tests of manufacture and marketability applicable for making goods excisable.
Section 2(f)(i) of Central Excise Act, 1944 defines the term “manufacture” to include any
process which is incidental or ancillary to the completion of the manufactured product.
Further as per section 2(f)(ii) that process which is specified in relation to any goods in
the Section or Chapter notes of the First Schedule to the CETA 1985 as amounting to
manufacture, would be regarded as amounting to manufacture. This is commonly or
popularly known as ‘Deemed Manufacture’ concept.
Further as per section 2(f)(iii) any process involving packing or re-packing of such goods
as are covered in the Third Schedule to CETA 1985, in a unit container or labeling or re-
47
labeling of containers (including the declaration or alteration of retail sale price on it) or
the adoption of any other treatment on the goods to render the product marketable to the
consumer would also be regarded as manufacture. This is termed as manufacture in
respect of goods specified in Third Schedule.
The goods covered under Third Schedule would be regarded as having been
manufactured if any processes by way of packing or re-packing, labelling, affixing
stickers or any other process to make the goods marketable to the customer are
undertaken. Here even if the subject goods in question do not undergo a change in
name, character and use as a result of the processing, the process undertaken would
still be regarded as amounting to manufacture. Therefore even a trader undertaking
such processes could be liable to a duty of excise.
The term ‘manufacturer’ is to be construed accordingly and would include one who does
manufacturing on his own account as well as a person who hires labour in this regard for
manufacturing.
and use. If the final product is distinct and different with regard to the three
criteria stated above, then manufacture has taken place as understood under
central excise. In other words, the produce which arises out of the process
must be distinct from the inputs out of which it is processed.
• If the use has not altered, then it would be advisable to seek an opinion from
experts in the field or err on the side of revenue. There have been a large
number of decisions of the Tribunal and the courts with regard to
manufacture of innumerable products, which may shed light (See Exp - 2).
• However it should be ensured that processes not amounting to manufacture
are not described as manufacture as the revenue department may at a later
date take the view that there is no manufacture. This could result in denial of
credit along with consequent demand for interest and penalty.
• Lastly, excisable goods must be manufactured or produced in India in order
to attract duty of excise.
9 What is the Difference between Manufacture and the activity carried out as
Deemed Manufacture?
• Manufacture implies change but every change is not manufacture. Deemed
manufacture includes process which is termed as manufacture by the Tariff, such
process shall be deemed to be manufacture.
49
• Manufacture is defined under clause (i) of the definition under section 2 that any
process which is incidental or ancillary to the completion of manufactured product
to be considered as manufacture. The section notes or chapter notes of the Tariff
chapter under which the product falls should be perused to see if it is specifically
stated therein that a particular process amounts to manufacture and if there is no
such specific provision in section or chapter note of the Tariff, the commodity
would not become excisable merely because a separate tariff item exists in
respect of commodity.
• In the case of goods mentioned in Third Schedule of the Central Excise Act ,
1944 even if process / activity (like packing, labeling, repacking etc) NOT
amounting to manufacture are undertaken, such processes would be DEEMED
to be manufacture and the excise duty would have to be paid. (For definition see
Exp - 1) Therefore, in respect of goods mentioned in Third Schedule, apart from
seeing of manufacture has taken place, it should be checked if any of the
activities mentioned under Section 2(f)(iii) are carried out. (Refer Appendix for list
of processes deemed to be manufacture.)
Here it should be noted that the deemed manufacture concept is applicable to products
valued at MRP under Section 4A of the Act. (Refer Appendix - MRP Based Valuation for
Third Schedule of Central Excise Tariff Act 1985)
This leads to a situation where the minor processors or trader of certain goods may be
liable for payment of central excise duty. Consequently they would also be eligible for
the credit on the incoming products and the exemptions provided under law for a
manufacturer.
9 Explanation 2: Manufacture
¾ Definition:
Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944 defines ‘manufacture’ and ‘manufacturer’ in an
inclusive manner as follows:
"manufacture" includes any process,—
(i) incidental or ancillary to the completion of a manufactured product; and
(ii) which is specified in relation to any goods in the Section or Chapter notes of the First
Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986) as amounting to
manufacture,
50
(iii) which, in relation to any goods specified in the Third Schedule, involves packing or
repacking of such goods in a unit container or labelling or re-labelling of containers
including the declaration or alteration of retail sale price on it or adoption of any other
treatment on the goods to render the product marketable to the consumer and the word
"manufacturer" shall be construed accordingly and shall include not only a person who
employs hired labour in the production or manufacture of excisable goods, but also any
person who engages in their production or manufacture on his own account;
9 What is trading?
Trading in common understanding is purchase and sale of goods without
undertaking any processing on the same. From the Central Excise perspective trading
can be done by importer or dealers. Again the first stage dealer and second stage dealer
is defined from the central excise perspective.
• The credit of duty passed on by through an invoice issued by importer or the First
Stage Dealer or Second Stage Dealer is available as CENVAT Credit subject to
the conditions in the rules as per Rule 9 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 specifies
such invoices/documents as documents on which credits can be claimed.
• The invoice would be raised by such registered dealer in accordance with the
provisions of Rule 11 of Central Excise Rules 2002.
53
• The dealer who wishes to pass on credit would have to register and the buyer
seeking to avail the credit benefit would have to buy from importer or a registered
First Stage Dealer or a Second Stage Dealer
• The importer or 1st / 2nd stage dealers can pass on the cenvat credit only if they
indicate that the goods have been issued from duty paid stocks, recorded in the
register and pro rata duty has been indicated in the invoice. The duty would be
passed on proportionately to the extent of goods that are purchased by the
industrial user.
• The dealer has to ensure the identity and address of the supplier-manufacturer
by personal knowledge, or on the strength of the certificate given by a person
with whose handwriting or signature he is familiar or on the strength of the
jurisdiction SCE of manufacturer/ supplier.
• The records are to be preserved for 5 years.
• The central excise officer needs to get permission of the AC/DC to visit the
dealers.
A list in duplicate would have to be maintained of all the records prepared or maintained
by the assessee for accounting of transaction in regard to receipt, purchase,
manufacture, storage, sales or delivery of goods including inputs and capital goods
should be submitted to the revenue department. These should also be made available
along with the audit reports when the revenue department audit is conducted.
• The dealer shall keep a stock register in a form, which contains entries of
receipts/issues, the value of the same and duty details passed.
• A stock register has to be maintained wherein entries are made at the end of the
54
• The stock registers are to be maintained for each godown if there is more than
one godown.
• The dealer shall maintain the details in stock registered invoice-wise i.e. he shall
keep account of each consignment received under invoice and in respect of
which he issues one or more cenvatable invoice.
• All the sales / transfers are to be accounted in the Stock register (Old RG23D)
irrespective of whether a Cenvat Credit Invoice or Commercial invoice is issued.
• Each open consignment item wise would be available as open and once closed
the incoming BOE or Invoice is to be cancelled by way of endorsement.
• The stock records and the financial records should be reconciled. The columns
(indicated in above note) are to be entered filled up and the pages signed. The
month end summary of Opening Balance + Credit - Debit = Closing Balance in
the financial records by way of a memorandum account would ensure that the
excise record and the financial records are reconcilable.
• The invoices are to be filed on basis of time of receipt and separate files for
commercial invoice whereby the duty of excise is passed and only commercial
invoice for other purchases are to be kept.
• The invoices should contain the details of duty per unit, and other details
mentioned above. Due to this the customer would know the source as well as the
margin under which the dealers have supplied the goods.
• The online entry could be done. The balances in all cases should be correct, and
should also match with the physical stock.
1. Ganga Engineers v CCE Kanpur [2007 (219) ELT 406 (T-Delhi):Facts: All the
invoices were issued by the dealer, without fulfilling the requirement of obtaining
Central Excise registration.
Decision: As the CENVAT/Modvat invoices issued by dealers who were not
registered with the department the cenvat credit was denied. The fact that the
dealer failed to apply for registration due to ignorance of law was not
maintainable.
2. Bhuwalka Trade Links P. Ltd. v CCE, Bangalore [2001 (133) ELT 490 (T-
Bang)]Facts: The invoices were issued to the customers before the cancellation
of their Registered dealers status.
Decision: On the cancellation of the registration of the dealer, all the invoices
issued by him do not become void ab initio and invalid documents.
3. Commissioner of C.Ex Vishakapatnam vs. Balaji Iron & Steel Traders (2009
(236) ELT595(Tri-Bang):Facts: The customer of the manufacturer is a
unregistered dealer who passes on the credit to registered dealer.
Decision: Original manufacturer selling goods to the unregistered dealer who in
turn consigns the same to second stage dealer. Second stage dealer invoice is
valid duty paying document to take credit.
56
9 Introduction:
The amount of duty of excise payable on excisable goods depends upon the rate of
duty. This in turn depends on the tariff heading or sub-heading under which the goods
are covered. When the classification is done correctly the eligibility to exemptions also
can be determined.
• Where an alternative with a lower rate is chosen, the justification of the choice
should be clear and legally defendable including the fulfillment of the conditions.
9 What is HSN?
This international practice of adopting a uniform classification was done to facilitate a common
understanding of products across countries. This classification was called the Harmonised
System of Nomenclature or HSN for short. HSN is a multi-purpose 8 digit product coding system
for classifying goods. The Supreme Court has held in CCE v. Wood Craft Products Ltd. 1995 (77)
E.L.T. 23 that HSN can be resorted to in case of ambiguity in classifying goods. The Honorable
Supreme Court in the case of Phil Corporation Ltd 2008 (223) ELT 9 (SC), has held that HSN is a
safe guide for classification.
1. Rule 1 provides that the titles of sections, chapters and sub-chapters are provided for ease of
reference and determination of where the goods would fall and would be dependent on the
relevant section and chapter notes contained in the Tariff. Example: The heading of Chapter 84
refer to nuclear reactors, machinery etc but even a hand pump falls under chapter 84. In the case
of Intel Design System (I) P Ltd 2008 (223) ELT 135 (SC), the Honorable Supreme Court had
observed that the classification of excisable goods was to be determined according to the terms
of the Heading and in terms of Section/Chapter notes.
The Tribunal held in Rajasthan Synthetic Industries Ltd. v. CCE 1989 (42) ELT 24 that rules for
interpretation are not invokable if the section and chapter notes clearly determine the
classification.
Where the Notes are silent, classification would be as per Note 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the Interpretative
Rules. It would therefore be noted that Note 2, 3, 4 and 5 would have to be resorted to only if the
Chapter does not contain any guide to classify the particular product.
59
2. Rule 2(a) governs classification of incomplete or unfinished goods. It specifies that if the
incomplete or unfinished goods have the essential characteristics of the complete or finished
goods, then such goods would be classified in the same heading as the complete goods.
Complete or finished goods would cover goods removed in unassembled or disassembled form.
For instance a cycle removed in CKD condition is a ‘cycle’ or railway coaches removed without
seats would still be railway coaches.
It was held in Delphi Automotive Systems v. CCE, Noida, 2004 (163) E.L.T. 47 (Tri. - Del.), that
the supply of the components like evaporator (cooling) coil, condensor coil, fan or blower for
circulating the air and compressor would be considered as the main product, if it has the essential
characteristics of the complete air conditioning machine or else it would be classified as ‘parts’
only
3. Rule 2(b) provides that any reference in a heading to a substance shall include mixtures or
combinations of that material with other materials. Any reference to the goods of a given material
or substance shall be taken to include a reference to goods consisting of such material or
substance. However, classification would be according to Rule 3 in such cases, where the subject
goods consists of more that one material or substance.
4. Rule 3 states that for the purposes of sub-rule (b) of rule 2 or where goods are prima facie
classifiable under two headings, the following shall be done sequentially :
a. Specific description would have to be adopted in place of a general description. Example:
Steering wheel of a car is part of motor vehicle as it is more specific. This was held by the
Supreme Court in Moorco India Ltd. v. CC, 1994 (74) E.L.T.
. However, when two or more headings each refer to part only of the materials or
substances contained in mixed or composite goods or to part only of the items in a set,
those headings are to be regarded as equally specific in relation to those goods , even if
one of them gives a more complete description of the goods. In such instances,
classification has to be determined in terms of rule 3(b) or rule 3(c)
b. Mixtures, composite goods consisting of different materials shall be classified as if
they consist of that material or part which gives them their essential character. Ex:
Concrete mix mainly consists of cement, further small proportions of stone, water and
chemicals, in terms of rule 3, the classification of concrete mix is made under articles of
stone, plaster, cement as concrete mix consists mainly of cement. Tribunal held in
Hemkunt Industries v. Commr. of C.E. Delhi-I, 2003 (156) E.L.T. 246 (Tri. - Del.), by
applying the above rule held that the decorative plastic photo frames, consisting of both
plastic and steel has to be classified as an article of plastic only as plastic gives the
60
6. Rule 5: In respect of packing material which are specially designed or fitted to contain
a specific article and given with the articles for which they are intended, shall follow the
classification of the items which are packed. Ex: Camera cases, mobile cases, musical
instrument case etc. such packing material if not used with the article for which it is
intended for may have low or no utility. However this rule should not be adopted when
packing material itself gives the essential character as a whole.
The packing materials and containers cleared or presented along with the goods are
classifiable with the goods, however this provision would not be applicable when such
packing material are intended for its repetitive use. Ex: Glass bottles are meant for
repetitive use and therefore cannot be classified along with soft drink.
What are the other Rules for Interpretation – Non‐statutory Principles
Apart from the above statutory principles of classification, the Courts have evolved certain non-
statutory principles. Some of these decisions have been illustrated below. But it must be
understood that statutory principles would have precedence over non-statutory principles.
Some of the non statutory principles for classifications are:
(i) Trade parlance theory: This theory is used when the words are not defined under the act
and words are not used in scientific or technical sense in the tariff. Trade parlance means the
meaning as commonly understood by the people dealing commercially with the subject goods or
the commercial recognition that is given to a commodity. This aspect is at times ignored by the
61
In a nut shell:
¾ The first step-find out the heading and sub-heading read with the relevant section and
chapter notes. If there is no ambiguity the classification is final and do not proceed to the
rules of classification.
¾ Get the trade understanding of goods in minds of people using the goods/dealing in the
goods, if the meaning is not clear.
¾ If the trade understanding is not available, go to the technical or scientific meaning. If the
tariff headings however have technical or scientific meanings, then that has to be
ascertained first before the test of trade understanding.
¾ If none of the above are available reference may be had to the dictionary meaning or ISI
specifications. Evidence may be gathered on end use or predominant use.
¾ Where classification is not clear, based on the section/chapter headings and sub-
headings, find out the classification of the finished product, ascertain if the unfinished
product has the essential characteristics of the finished product, if yes apply that
classification to the unfinished product as per Rule 2(a).
¾ If the classification is not ascertained as per Rule 2(a), find out the heading which is more
specific to the nature of product. Use the classification which is more specific as per Rule
3(a).
62
¾ If the classification is still elusive, ascertain which material gives the article its essential
characteristics and use that classification as per Rule 3(b).
¾ If the problem still persists, use the thumb rule, later the better as per Rule 3(c).
¾ If product in question does not fall under any of the entries following the steps given
above, then the last step is to find out the tariff entry to which the product is most akin as
per Rule 4.
The exemptions could mainly be in respect of products/processes, industry based or area based
exemptions. However, it should be remembered that where the benefit is not claimed under the
correct provision at all is comparable to claiming a benefit under a wrong provision of law and
therefore such exemptions could be availed subsequently also by assessee.(held in the case of
CCE vs. Kankai Imports 2008 (223) E.L.T. 62 (Tri.-Chennai).
To understand what the courts have to say about the same we provide case laws as
under:
CHAPTER 6: VALUATION
Firstly, we would see what are the various basis on which valuation is
done under excise.
If one were to guess the percentage of products sold which are covered under Section 3(2), 4A
and 4 it could be of the order of 1%, 29% and 70% respectively.
In the case of duties charged on the basis of value, such value may be charged on either of the
following basis:
a. Duty as a percentage of Tariff value fixed by the Central Government U/S 3(2) of the
Central Excise Act, 1944 :
Section 3(2) empowers the Central Government to notify and amend the values for excisable
goods. These values could be fixed generally or specifically in the Central Excise Tariff. These
are based on whole sale trade prices. Tariff Value for certain notified goods may either vary
depending upon the class of goods or depending upon the class of manufacturers or even
depending upon the class of buyers. Once the goods are notified under this provision, the
valuation section i.e. sec 4 becomes ineffective i.e the value so fixed is to be considered and the
manufacturer’s sale price would not be considered.
c. Retail Sale Price (RSP): Duty may also be fixed on the basis of maximum retail price
after giving permissible deductions in the form of abatements. This has been done under Section
4A on many mass consumption products (FMCG) where the retail price and wholesale price of
goods are at wide variance and the Government wants to raise revenues knowing that the
manufacturer has shifted much of the overheads away from the factory by planning the
production and marketing structure.
The valuation under section 4 (transaction value)& also Section 4A (MRP valuation) is discussed
in detail below:.
The scheme of valuation for sales in general could be summarised in the form of the chart
provided under:
No
Valuation under
Section- 4
69
CHAPTER 6A: WHAT IS THE VALUE OF GOODS INTENDED FOR SALE?
9 Valuation under Section 4 (Transaction value basis) :
• When is transaction value applicable?
For applying the transaction value for any case, the following requirements should be satisfied:
a. The goods are sold by an assessee for delivery at the time and place of
removal. The term “place of removal” and “time of removal” has been defined
basically to mean a factory, a warehouse, and a depot, premises of a
consignment agent or any other place or premises.
b. The assessee and the buyer of the goods are not related; and
c. The price is the sole consideration for the sale.
The definition of transaction value is comprehensive and covers not only the selling price but also
other related aspects in relation to the sales paid or payable either to the manufacturer or to any
person on behalf of manufacturer. The definition though seems to cover some of the elements
which are beyond the manufacturing and sale either paid at the time of sale or any time
thereafter.
The scheme of valuation under section 4 can be put in the form of chart provided below.
Valuation U/S 4
Yes
No Apply CE
Whether sales
Valuation Rules
2000
Yes No to any one
such goods.
Whether the warranty charges are charged separately and not considered as “price” of goods by
the assessee, then also warranty charges would be includable in the transaction value forming
basis of valuation. In those transactions where warranty charges are not recovered, the question
of including warranty charges in transaction value does not arise.
As per commercial practice, the price for the goods charged, normally includes the cost of
packing charges. Any charges recovered for packing are obviously charges recovered in relation
to the sale of the goods under assessment and would form part of the transaction value of the
goods. It is immaterial whether packing is ordinary or special. Whatever amount is charged from
the buyer for packing and if not already included by the assessee in the price payable for the
goods would be included while determining the transaction value of the goods for assessment to
duty. Thus all packing charges would be includible.
considered as gross receipts or cum duty price and duty is to be paid after computing
the assessable value from the gross receipts.
• Would the reduction in price subsequent to removal on payment of duty, be excluded from
assessable value or lead to refund?
If the goods are removed on payment of duty, based on declared price, subsequent
reduction of price for whatever reason, including Govt. interference or discount would not
create a claim for refund of Central Excise duty paid on the amount of price reduction.
• Would the interest payable after the credit period is over, form a part of the assessable
value?
Illustration- Assessee charges Rs.2000/- per unit for his goods, if the payment is made
within 45 days. Rs.2000/- per unit would of course include the interest component
pertaining to the general credit period of 45 days. Even if the payment is made at the
time of delivery, Rs.2000/- would be the assessable value, irrespective of the possible
inclusion of interest element in the price. If the assessee charges Rs.2040/- per unit after
45 days and Rs.40/- per unit is identifiable as being relatable to time lag in payment, this
amount of Rs.40/- per unit would not form a part of the value. This is based on the
decision of the Supreme Court in GOI Vs MRF Ltd. 1995 (77) ELT 0433 SC
• Would notional interest have to be charged on the advances / deposits accepted by the
manufacturer and included in assessable value?
Interest on advance / deposits received against future sale of goods is includible in the
assessable value only if there is a nexus between the advance / deposit and the sale
price. It was held in the Metal Box case – 1995 (75) ELT 449(SC)that before adding
notional interest, the fact should be established that the interest free advance reflected
favoured or special treatment and that advances had the effect of pegging down the
wholesale price. If the assessee charges the same price from those who give advances
75
and those who do not, the question of including notional interest on advances does not
arise –This was held in VST Industries Ltd Vs CCE 1998 (97) ELT 395 (SC).
• Would the cost of parts supplied free of costs by the manufacturer be includible?
It is clarified vide Circular No. 725/41/2003-CX., dated 30-6-2003 that since the
assessable value should take/include the entire intrinsic value of the article sought to be
assessed, irrespective of the fact that manufacturer or processor of the article does not
pay for the cost of some of its components, the value of caps fitted with the tubes should
be included while determining assessable value of the tubes.
Valuation Rules the actual cost of transportation from the place of removal up to the
place of delivery is only to be excluded. If the assessee is recovering an amount from
the buyer towards the cost of return fare of the empty vehicle from the place of delivery,
this amount would not be available as a deduction. Therefore, unless it is separately
mentioned on the invoice that the transportation charges indicated therein do not include
cost of transportation for the return journey of the empty truck/vehicle, the deduction of
the said transportation charges maybe disputable. However this is questionable since
post removal expenses are not considered to be a part of assessable value.
a. The goods are to be covered under Legal Metrology Act, 2009 or rules made there
under or under any other law in force which require declaration of retail sale price on the
package.
b. The Government may notify such products for the purpose of this Section.
c. The law requires such products to declare the retail sale price on the package. At
present there are 108 entries notified vide Notification No.49/2008-CE(NT) dated
24.12.2008. ( as listed at Appendix 2)
d. The valuation has to be done on the basis of retail sale price declared on the
package less abatement. The basis of such abatements has not been made public but is
expected to cover the taxes and the normal distribution expenses.
e. It is also stated that where there are more than one retail sale price, the maximum
of such retail sale price would be deemed to be the retail sale price for the purpose of
this section.
9 What happens when the Retail sale price is not declared as per provisions on
notified goods?
¾ Goods are liable for confiscation when they are cleared without declaring the retail
sale price on them or,
¾ where the declared retail sale price does not constitute the sole consideration for
sale. Or
¾ where a dealer obliterates or alters, tampers such declaration after removal, the
same would render the goods liable for confiscation or
¾ if a wholesaler tampers with the MRP (RSP) declaration after removal the goods
could be confiscated.
9 What happens where multiple prices are declared for different packages of same
subject goods?
Where different retail sale prices are declared on different packages for the sale of any
excisable goods in packaged form in different places, each such retail price shall be the
retail sale price for the purposes of valuation of the excisable goods intended to be sold
in the area to which the retail sale price relates.
9 Are goods covered under MRP (RSP) levy to be assessed under section 4A when
removed in bulk?
The goods specified under the MRP regime would not be liable to be assessed under
Section 4A when removed in bulk (not for the purpose of retail sale/without any packing).
In the case of Jayanti Foods Processing P Ltd. [2007 (215) ELT 327 (SC] it was clearly
observed that the sale of 4 litres pack of ice cream for the use in a hotel for serving its
customer was not liable as there was no sale of packaged product.
79
CHAPTER 6B: WHAT IS VALUE OF GOODS NOT INTENDED FOR SALE?
Scenarios where Transaction Value does not apply:
As given in the chart for the valuation scheme under section 4(1)(a) there are four
conditions which have to be fulfilled for valuation of goods on transaction value basis.
a. There should be sale of excisable goods
b. The goods sold should be for delivery at the time and place of removal
c. The assessee and the buyer of the goods are not to be related persons
d. The price should be the sole consideration for the sale.
In the cases where any of the above said requirements are not met, the
assessable value shall be adjusted/ determined on the basis of the Central
Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000.
Further it should be noted that assessable value for excise duty purposes would
be decided on basis of selling price, if the above mentioned conditions are
fulfilled even if it is below manufacturing cost.
The Valuation Rules should not go against the provisions of Section 4. The said
rules may be summarised in the following manner:
Rule 3 : General: If the conditions of valuation set out under section 4(1)(a) is not
fulfilled, the value has to be computed as per these rules. These conditions are that the
goods are sold to related parties, additional consideration accrues or is paid, time and
place of delivery and sale are different or the goods are manufactured by a job worker
and the principal does not carry out any processing at his end.
Rule 4 : Difference in Timing: Adjustment for the value for the differences in the time of
removal and the time of delivery the value of the excisable goods based on the value of
such goods sold by the assesse for delivery at any other time nearest to the time of the
removal of goods under the assessment. If necessary, make adjustment due to different
in the dates of delivery of such goods removed at nearest time and of the excisable
goods under assessment.
80
Rule 5 : Difference in place of delivery :Adjustment for the value for the difference in
place of removal and of delivery. The freight payable by the customer if indicated in the
invoice and on actual basis would not form part of the assessable value and could be
deducted. Even averaged freight could be allowed as a deduction provided it is
computed on acceptable costing principles. Where the sale is completed at factory gate
itself there would be no excise duty charged on the freight charged for transportation
which would be a post removal expense.
Rule 7 : Depot sales: Value for the clearances to depots or consignment agents or any
other place for sale. The 2 options are - a) The removal from the factory should be at the
price of the same item at the depot at the relevant (removal from depot) time. The
subsequent sale at different rates would then not be relevant. This was confirmed in the
case of Commr. Of C. Ex., Siliguri vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd
(2010(255)ELT568(Tri-Kolkata) where held that charges collected at depot could not be
added to assessable value which had to be based on date of removal from factory. b)
The assessee may opt for provisional assessment for want of information on the prices
prevailing at depot at time of clearance from factory. In such situation assessee could
discharge the duty at estimated values. At periodic intervals the same should be
adjusted for the actual values. The additional duty payable would be required to be paid
or refund claimed. This has been found to be practically cumbersome.
Rule 8 : Captive consumption :Value for the captive consumption. The value is to be
computed on cost of production + 10% . The cost of production may have to be certified
81
Rule 9 : Value for sale through related persons other than inter-connected undertakings:
As per section 4(3)(b) persons shall be deemed to be related if
• They are inter-connected undertakings
• They are relatives
• The buyer is a relative and distributor of assessee or a sub-distributor of such
distributor
• They are so associated that they have direct or indirect interest in each others
business.
The price at which the said goods are sold by the related person to independent buyers
would be considered the appropriate value under excise on which duty would have to be
discharged. This valuation would also be applicable when all the goods manufactured
are sold only through or to such related persons.
Rule 10 : Inter-related companies and holding and subsidiary companies: There should
be mutuality of interest (two way interest) between the inter-connected undertakings for
this rule to apply. They should also be related in terms of sec 2(g) of the Monopolies and
Restrictive Trade Practices Act or Sec 4(3)(b) explanation (i) of Central Excise Act
However if the inter-connected undertaking are holding or subsidiary companies the
relationship is presumed. The valuation is at the value at which the sale takes place if
82
goods are sold to unrelated party by the inter-connected undertaking. Further such sale
should be exclusively through such inter-connected undertakings for this rule to apply.
Rule 10A: Value determination when the manufacture is done by job-worker- For the
purposes of this rule, job-worker means a person engaged in the manufacture or
production of goods on behalf of a principal manufacturer, from any inputs or goods
supplied by the said principal manufacturer or by any other person authorised by him.
(i) In a case where the goods are sold by the principal manufacturer for delivery at
the time of removal of goods from the factory of job-worker, where the buyer is not a
related party, and price is sole consideration for sale the value of the goods shall be the
transaction value of goods sold by the principal manufacturer.
(ii) In a case where the goods are not sold by the principal manufacturer at the time
of removal of goods from the job-worker’s factory, but transferred to some other place
from where the said goods are to be sold to a party that is not related to the principal
manufacturer the value of the excisable goods would be the normal transaction value
sold from such other place at or about the same time and, where such goods are not
sold at or about the same time, at the time nearest to the time of removal of said goods
from the factory of job-worker.
(iii) In a scenario not covered under clause (1) or (2), the provisions of Central Excise
Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000, wherever applicable,
shall mutatis mutandis apply for determination of the value of the excisable goods. Thus
it can be stated that if the cases are not covered by clauses (1) or (2) above, valuation of
goods shall be determined in terms of the ratio decided by the Supreme Court in the
case of Ujagar Prints and Others v Union of India 1987 (27) ELT 567 (SC), read with
other Rules of Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods)
Rules, 2000.
Rule 11: Residuary rule. If all the above rules fail then any method which is practiced,
decided or as per the best judgment of the assessing officer.
1. UOI & Ors. V. Bombay Tyres, 1983 (14) ELT 1896 (SC): Facts: The question
under consideration was whether any post-manufacturing expenses are
deductible from the price when determining the “value” of the excisable article.
Decision: The post-manufacturing expenses cannot be excluded as it is not
permissible. The storage charges, freight and other transport charges, handling
charges, interest on inventories, after sale service charges, insurance charges,
packing charges, marketing and selling organisational expenses as well as
advertisement and publicity expenses all to be included in the assessable value.
2. Voltas Limited vs. Union Of India(1991(56)ELT329(Bom):Facts: The short
question which falls for determination is whether the deductions in respect of
maintenance charges and site service charges in respect of air-conditioners and
water coolers are permissible while determining the assessable value of the
manufactured goods.
Decision: These charges are not includible in assessable value.
3. Collector vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd(1995(078)ELTA030(SC): Facts: The question
involved was whether the cost of packing (durable) is includible in the assessable
value, irrespective of who supplied the packing?
Decision: The durable and returnable packing is not includible in the assessable
value irrespective of whether durable packing belongs to the assessee or
belongs to the customer.
4. Philips India Ltd. V. CCE, 1997 (91) ELT 540 (SC)Facts: The advertisement and
free after-sale-service during guarantee period were provided by dealers to the
product of manufacturer under an agreement.
Decision: Such agreement at arms length and genuineness thereof not in dispute
- Manufacturer sharing half and half advertisement expenses, since
advertisement benefited both - Free after-sale-service by dealers to all goods of
Philips even if sold by any dealer throughout the country also for the mutual
benefit of the manufacturer and the dealer.
5. Commisioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad vs. Xerographic Ltd
(2010(257)ELT11(SC):Facts: The distributor companies alleged as related
persons of manufacturer and value adopted by such companies sought to be
taken as assessable value of goods removed.
Decision: Three conditions to be satisfied before invoking related person
concept. These are mutuality of interest, alleged related person should be related
84
as defined in statutory provision and price charged from related person should be
lower than normal value due to extra commercial considerations - Section 4 of
Central Excise Act.
6. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mysore vs Nestle India Ltd(2009 (248) ELT 737
(Tri-Bang):Facts: The “Instant coffee” valuation is covered under Section 4A of
Central Excise Act, 1944. The manufacturers supplied soluble coffee powder
packed in unit container of 200 and 500gms to Indian Army. The issue involved
in the instant case is regarding assessment of clearance of soluble instant coffee
cleared in bulk to such organization.
Decision: Instant coffee packets without printed MRP and with marking ‘for
Defence Services only’. It was held there was no sale and valuation under
Section 4 was proper.
7. CCE v. Bhaskar Ispat Pvt. Ltd., 2004 (167) ELT (189) (T-LB: Facts: The issue is
whether the chargers for additional testing conducted at the request of customer
and the cost of such testing charges being born by the customer, are includible in
the assessable value of the goods.
Decision: The cost of additional testing of goods conducted at the request of and
borne by the customer, was not includible in the assessable value.
10. Haldia Petro Chemicals Ltd vs. Commissioner of C.Ex. Haldia(2009(233) ELT
344 (Tri-Kolkata) Facts: The manufacturer charges their customers an increased
freight amount which covers not only the outward freight but freight for bringing
back empty tankers can be considered as a part of assessable value.
Decision: The Impugned goods being butadiene notified as explosive, specially
designed container necessary. The transaction value is exclusive of freight
available for sale at factory gate. The return freight is not includible.
86
By the introduction of Cenvat Credit Rules with effect from 10-9-2004 the credit of excise duty
paid on inputs and capital goods as well as input services used in relation to business are allowed
to both manufacturers and service providers. Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 has unified the credits
available on goods and services, the Cenvat credit of duty on inputs and tax on taxable services
would be available to both the ‘manufacturers’ and ‘output service providers’.
However, credit cannot be allowed on inputs and input services that are used to manufacture
exempted goods or providing exempted services. The cenvat credit on capital goods can be
allowed to be availed only where it is partially used to manufacture dutiable/excisable goods or to
render taxable output services.
Motor Vehicles
Goods used primarily for personal use
or consumption of any employee
including food articles etc.
Goods having no relationship with
whatsoever with the manufacture of
final product.
• What Are the Conditions for availing Cenvat credit on capital goods:
(ii). The credit could be taken upto 50 % of the total eligible credit in the year of
receipt and the balance in any subsequent year in which the same are in
possession of the manufacturer.
(iii). Finance Act, 2010 provides facilities to SSI units that are eligible for availing
benefit under notification No.8/2003-CE to avail full cenvat credit on capital
goods in one installment i.e. availment in year of receipt of such goods. This
change would be w.e.f. 1.3.2010. It would be applicable even if the eligible units
opt not to avail SSI exemption.
(iv). Credit on capital goods is not allowed when it is used as appliance for purpose
other than for manufacture; for instance equipments, furniture, air conditioner
installed in office premises etc though known to be capital goods under normal
parlance. Whether the same would be allowed for service providers is a question
to be judicially confirmed.
88
(v). Whereas, cenvat credit on motor vehicles is not available to manufacturer and is
available only to specified service providers providing defined services using the
vehicles.
(vi). Further, Cenvat credit facility would be available only if the manufacturer/service
provider uses capital goods fully or partially for manufacturing goods liable to
excise duty or provision of taxable services.
(vii). When the capital goods are used exclusively to manufacture exempted goods
the cenvat credit on such capital goods cannot be availed.
(viii). The Government had amended with effect from 07.07.09 the definition of inputs to restrict
credit of excise duty on inputs like cement, angles, channels, TMT bars etc used for
construction of factory shed or building or laying of foundation or making structures for
support of capital goods. Now, the present definition of inputs specifically restricts
availment of any goods used for construction of a building or a civil structure or laying of
foundation or making of structures for supporting the capital goods.
(ix). The definition of inputs is also amended to restrict the availment on capital goods except
when used as parts or components in the manufacture of a final product.
(x). It was also held recently in the decision in Vandana Global v. CCE Raipur
(2010(253) ELT 440(Tri-LB) that goods like cement and steel items used for
laying foundation and for building support structures cannot be treated as inputs
for capital goods or as inputs used in relation manufacture of final products and
therefore was held that no credit of duty paid on the same is allowable. This
appears to go against the basic principles of the scheme and maybe agitated at
higher forums. However, the principal of the above is now factored within the
definition of inputs to exclude goods used for construction of a building or civil
structure or laying of foundation or making of structures to support the capital
goods.
(xi). When the capital goods are imported, the restriction of availment as discussed
above would aptly apply i.e. availment of CVD upto 50%, however this restriction
would not be applicable for SAD i.e. full benefit of SAD paid on importation would
be available.
Inclusions Exclusions
Any service used by the provider of Architect service, port
taxable service for providing output service, air port service,
service or other port services,
Used by a manufacturer whether commercial or industrial
directly or indirectly in relation to construction service, works
manufacture of final product and contract service and
clearance of final product upto the construction of residential
place of removal complex when they are
used in construction of
building or civil structure or
even when used for laying
foundation or making
structure for support of
capital goods.
Services in relation to Services such as rent a
• Modernization or cab service, general
renovation or repairs of insurance service,
the premises of provider authorised service station
of output service or an service and supply of
office relating to such tangible goods service
premises shall not be available as
• Advertisement or sales credits, unless they are
promotion used by service providers
• Market research who have been allowed to
• Storage up to the place take Cenvat credit of duty
of removal paid on capital goods
• Procurement of inputs
• Accounting, auditing,
financing, recruitment
and quality control,
coaching and training,
computer networking,
90
(iii) The Cenvat Credit on Input Services shall be allowed on or after the day on which
the invoice / bill of the vendor has been received. However, if the payment not made
to the vendor within in three months from the date of Invoice, then the CENVAT
Credit availed on such services should be reversed and can be re-availed after
making payment to the vendor.
(iv) For Input Service Tax credit paid under reverse charge / Joint charge mechanism,
91
the CENVAT Credit shall be allowed after making payment to the department by the
recipient.
Exempted Goods & Exempted Services
Rule 2(d) of Cenvat Credit Rules defines “exempted goods” to mean
goods which are exempt from the whole of duty of excise leviable
thereon, and includes goods which are chargeable to “Nil” rate of duty.
The definition is now amended to include the goods in respect of which
the benefit of exemption under notification 01/2011 as amended – CE is
availed.
Rule 2(e) defines “exempted services” to mean taxable services which are exempt from
the whole of service tax leviable thereon, and includes services on which no service tax
is leviable under section 66B of the Finance Act. Exports as clarified by the board would
not be considered as exempted or nil rated. The definition is amended to include taxable
services whose part of the value is exempted on the condition that no credit of inputs
and input services, used for providing taxable service shall be taken.
Further the explanation is also added to clarify that exempted service to include trading.
How to calculate the amount of Cenvat credit to be availed where the manufacturer has
both dutiable and exempted clearances and separate records for consumption are not
being maintained:
The provisions of Rule 6 before amendment had not considered many of the vital
aspects prevalent in the industry, the application of rule 6 was very limited in as much as
it had not considered the trading activity. Further value with respect to compositional
scheme with respect to the abated portion is also brought into the preview of Rule 6.
Further goods falling within the preview of notification 1/2011, wherein the assessee
avails the benefit of paying duty at the rate of 1%, would also be considered as
exempted goods.
Rule 6 of the Cenvat credit Rules 2004 has undergone major change. The heading of the rule has
been changed as ‘Obligation of a manufacturer or producer of final products and a provider of
taxable service’. Earlier the heading was ‘Obligation of manufacturer of dutiable and exempted
goods and provider of taxable and exempted services. This very change in the title of the rule will
have serious implication as the argument of non applicability of the rule 6, when the manufacturer
manufacturing dutiable goods also provides services which are not liable to service tax would not
92
Sub Rule 1 of rule 6 has also been changed to provide that the Cenvat credit benefit
would not be allowed on inputs or input services which are used in or in relation to
manufacture of exempted goods or for provision of exempted service. Earlier the rule
has the wordings that the credit would not be allowed on ‘input or input service which is
used in the manufacture of exempted goods or for provision of exempted service’. Due
to this change, now the assesse is prevented from taking the contention of availing full
credit on input or input service in relation to manufacture of exempted goods or
provision of exempted goods.
The sub rule 2 now provides for maintenance of separate records in more detailed manner in
respect of receipt, consumption an inventory of inputs / input services i.e. when the manufacturer
or provider of output service avails cenvat credit in respect of any inputs or input services and
manufacturers final product or provides output service which are chargeable to duty or tax as well
as exempted goods or services, then the manufacturer or service provider shall maintain
separate accounts for:
Where separate records as aforesaid are not maintained, one of the option available for the
manufacturer is to pay an amount equal to 6% of value of exempted goods.
93
The new option which is now available is that the maintenance of separate accounts for the
receipt, consumption and inventory of inputs as provided above and pay an amount as
determined under sub-rule (3A) in respect of only input services.
Framework for determining the amount of credits admissible
The calculations / steps for ascertaining provisional credits in relation to exempted activity
would be as follows -
1. Ascertain the cenvat credit attributable to inputs services used for manufacturing
exempted goods/ providing exempted services, if any and let the credits be A.
2. Ascertain the cenvat credits provisionally in respect of inputs services used for exempted
activity – (B/C) * Total credits taken during the relevant month not including amount A
indicated above.
For this purpose, B = total value of exempted activity provided during the preceding
financial year
C = total value of dutiable goods manufactured and removed during preceding financial
year + total value of exempted services and taxable services provided during preceding
financial year.
At the end of the relevant financial year, the following calculations would have to be made
–
1 Ascertain the cenvat credit attributable to inputs services used for manufacturing
exempted goods/ exempted services if any and let the credits be H.
2 Ascertain the cenvat credits in respect of input services used for providing exempted
services/ goods during the financial year as follows – (J/K) * Total credits taken during the
relevant financial year not including amount H indicated above.
For this purpose, J = total value of exempted services / goods provided during the
relevant financial year
K = total value of dutiable goods manufactured and removed during relevant financial year
+ total value of exempted services and taxable services provided during relevant financial
year.
For the purpose of Rule 6 of cenvat credit Rules, exempted means the following
Actvity Status Treatment
Trading activity Exempted service Difference between the
purchase price and
sale price needs to be
considered
Goods attracting 1% rate Exempted Goods Turnover of such 1%
of duty as specified in rated goods to be
94
Where the credits ascertained finally in relation to exempted activity are less than the
credits ascertained provisionally, the service provider can take credit for the differential amount.
Where the credits ascertained finally in relation to exempted activity are more than the
credits ascertained provisionally, the service provider would have to pay the differential amount
on or before the 30th June of succeeding financial year. Where the payment is made after 30th of
June, interest at 24% p.a. would be payable for the period of delay.
the final products or provider of output service, as the case may be, shall pay an amount
equal to the credit availed in respect of such inputs or capital goods and such removal
shall be made under the cover of an invoice referred to in rule 9.
• W.e.f. 1-4-2011, reversal of credit on inputs in terms of Rule 3(5) is not required where
any inputs are removed outside the factory for providing free warranty for final products.
• Sub Rule (5) of Rule 3 provides for removal of used capital goods as capital goods or
scrap or waste, the manufacturer or service provider shall pay an amount equal to the
CENVAT Credit taken on the said capital goods after reducing specified per cent for each
quarter of a year or part thereof from the date of taking the Cenvat Credit as follows :
(a) For computers and computer peripherals
(b) For capital goods other than computers and computer peripherals @ 2.5% for each
quarter.
• Rule 3(5A) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, provides if the capital goods, on which
Cenvat credit has been taken, are cleared as waste and scrap, an amount equal to the
duty leviable on the transaction value for such capital goods cleared as waste and scrap,
would be payable.
• In terms of sub-rule 5(B), where input or capital goods (Capital goods which have not
been put to use) on which CENVAT credit has been taken is written off fully/partially or
any provision has been made in the books of accounts to write off fully/partially the
manufacturer shall pay an amount equivalent to the CENVAT credit taken.
• if the input or capital goods which is written off or full /partialprovision is made in the
books of accounts is subsequently used in the manufacture of final products, the
manufacturer shall be entitled to take the credit of the amount equivalent to the CENVAT
Credit paid earlier .
• Rule 3 (5A) are being amended to prescribe that in case the capital goods on which
Cenvat credit has been taken are cleared after being used then the amount payable shall
be either the amount calculated on the basis of Cenvat credit taken at the time of receipt
reduced by a prescribed percentage or the duty on transaction value whichever is higher.
• This provision also provides provision for confiscation of the goods on which such credit is
wrongly availed.
• Rule 15(2) provides where the CENVAT credit in respect of input or capital goods or input
services been taken or utilised wrongly by reason of fraud, collusion or any wilful mis-statement
or suppression of facts, or contravention of any of the provisions of the Excise Act, or of the rules
with intent to evade payment of duty, then, the manufacturer is liable to pay penalty u/s 11AC of
the Excise Act.
• Rule 15A deals with general penalty for contravenes of the provisions of rules for which the
penalty has been provided in the rules, the personal shall be liable to the penalty which may extend
to five thousand rupees.
Definitions:
(i) all goods used in the factory by the manufacturer of the final product: or
(ii) any goods including accessories, cleared along with the final product, the value
of which is included in the value of the final product and goods used for
providing free warranty for final products: or
(iii) all goods used for generation of electricity or steam for captive use; or
(iv) all goods used for providing any output service:
but excludes
A) light diesel oil, high speed diesel oil or motor spirit, commonly known as
petrol:
(B) any goods used for-
(a) construction of a building or a civil structure or a part there to or
(b) laying of foundation or making of structures for support of capital goods.
Except for the provision of service portion in the execution of a works contract
or construction service as listed under clause (b) of section 66E of the Act;
(C) capital goods except when used as parts or Components in the
manufacture of a final product;
(D) motor vehicles;
(E) any goods. such as food items, goods used in a guesthouse, residential
colony, club or a recreation facility and clinical establishment, when such
goods are used primarily for personal use or consumption of any employee:
and
(F) any goods which have no relationship whatsoever with the manufacture of
a final product.
Explanation. — For the purpose of this clause, “free warranty” means a
warranty provided by the manufacturer, the value of which is included in the
price of the final product and is not charged separately from the customer;’;
(B) services provided by way of renting of a motor vehicle, in so far as they relate to
a motor vehicle which is not a capital goods; or
(BA) service of general insurance business, servicing, repair and maintenance, in so
far as they relate to a motor vehicle which is not a capital goods, except when used
by
a) a manufacturer of a motor vehicle in respect of a motor
vehicle manufactured by such person ; or
b) an insurance company in respect of a motor vehicle
insured or reinsured by such person; or
(C) such as those provided in relation to outdoor catering, beauty treatment, health
services. Cosmetic and plastic surgery, membership of a club, health and fitness centre,
life insurance. health insurance and travel benefits extended to employees on vacation
such as Leave or Home Travel Concession, when such services are used primarily for
personal use or consumption of any employee;’;
(vi) for clause (naa), the following shall he substituted with effect from the l day of March.
2011, namely:‘
(naa) “manufacturer” or “producer”.
(i) in relation to articles of jewellery or other articles of precious metals falling under
heading 7113 or 7114, as the case may be, of the First Schedule to the Excise Tariff Act,
includes a person who is liable to pay duty of excise leviable on such goods under sub-
rule (1) of rule I2AA of the Central Excise Rules. 2002:
(ii) in relation to goods falling under Chapters 61. 62 or 63 of the First Schedule to the
Excise Tariff Act, includes a person who is liable to pay duty of excise leviable on such
goods under sub-rule (1A) of rule 4 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002:’;
98
(i) all goods falling under Chapter 82, Chapter 84, Chapter 85, Chapter 90, [heading
6805, grinding wheels and the like, and parts thereof falling under heading 6804] of the
First Schedule to the Excise Tariff Act;
(ia) outside the factory of the manufacturer of the final products for generation of
electricity for captive use within the factory; or
(iii) components, spares and accessories of the goods specified at (i) and (ii);
(vii)motor vehicles other than those falling under tariff headings 8702, 8703, 8704,
8711 and their chassis but including dumpers and tippers;
used -
(1) in the factory of the manufacturer of the final products, but does not include any
equipment or appliance used in an office; or
(B) motor vehicle designed for transportation of goods including their chasis
registered registered in the name of the service provider, when used for (i) providing an
output service of renting of such motor vehicle; or
(ii) transportation of inputs and capital goods used for providing an output service; or
[(C) motor vehicle designed to carry passengers including their chassis, registered in the
name of the provider of service, when used for providing output service of –
[(D) components, spares and accessories of motor vehicles which are capital goods
for the assessee;
(b) “Customs Tariff Act” means the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975);
(c) “Excise Act” means the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944);
(d) “exempted goods” means excisable goods which are exempt from the whole of the
duty of excise leviable thereon, and includes goods which are chargeable to “Nil” rate of
duty goods in respect of which the benefit of an exemption under notification 1/2011 CE,
dated 1st March 2011 or under entries at serial numbers 67 and 128 of notification no.
12/2012 CE, dated the 17th March, 2012 is availed:
(1) taxable services which are exempt from the whole of the service tax leviable
thereon,
(2) services on which no service tax is leviable under section 66B of the Finance Act or;
(3) taxable servicds whose part of value is exempted on the condition that no credit of
inputs and input services, used for providing such taxable service, shall be taken;
But shall not include a service which is exported in terms of rule 6A of the
Service Tax Rules, 1994.
(f) “Excise Tariff Act” means the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986);
(g) “Finance Act” means the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994);
(h) “final products“ means excisable goods manufactured or produced from input, or
using input service;
(ij) “first stage dealer” means a dealer, who purchases the goods directly from, -
(i) the manufacturer under the cover of an invoice issued in terms of the provisions
of Central Excise Rules, 2002 or from the depot of the said manufacturer, or from
premises of the consignment agent of the said manufacturer or from any other premises
from where the goods are sold by or on behalf of the said manufacturer, under cover of
an invoice; or
(ii) an importer or from the depot of an importer or from the premises of the
consignment agent of the importer, under cover of an invoice;
100
• What are the various options available with regards to job work?
Principal to principal basis:
Both principal manufacturer and job worker could act as independent manufacturers if
excisable goods manufactured are cleared on payment of excise duty by job worker. As
job worker is regarded as an independent manufacturer, he would be under an
obligation to discharge duty of central excise at the time of clearing the intermediate
goods to principal manufacturer. In such a scenario, job worker would be eligible to avail
the credit on inputs used in the manufacture of excisable goods supplied by principal or
procured otherwise. Principal manufacturer can use the cenvat credit of duty paid on
intermediate products supplied by job worker if they are used as inputs for further
manufacture of goods that are cleared on payment of excise duty at principal
manufacturer’s end.
101
2. The challan could be pre-printed with the name and address of the Manufacturer,
in book form, pre-numbered, by the manufacturer and could be in triplicate.
Computerised Challans should be kept in bound form, on monthly basis. Where
the goods are directly sent to job worker, the name and address of such supplier
of materials should also be indicated in the challan.
3. The goods should be sent to job-worker along with original and duplicate copy of
challan mentioning therein the quantity of inputs sent, its tariff classification, the
process for which it is sent, value of the inputs / semi-finished goods, amount of
duty debited and reference to entry number.
4. The goods sent to job-worker should be received back after processing within
180 days. If delayed amount of duty is to be debited / reversed in the cenvat
credit register.
5. The goods from the job-worker should come back along with duplicate copy of
challan i.e., duly filled for the process carried out, quantity of processed goods
being returned and quantity of waste or scrap returned. The DC of the job worker
providing the cross link would also suffice. Where the scrap is not returned to the
manufacturer the excise duty on such scrap would have to be discharged by the
principal manufacturer or by the job worker himself .
6. After receiving all the goods (full quantity) the credit of duty debited if any after
lapse of 180 days may be re-credited proportionate to quantity received..
Where there is a direct despatch of inputs to job worker without receipt in factory
the principal manufacturer should follow the procedures set out above and the
following additional procedures as listed down as under-
i. The manufacturer shall instruct the supplier to send the inputs direct to the job
worker and would be eligible to Cenvat credit though the input is not received
directly at his factory premises.
ii. The principal manufacturer should raise a challan after receiving the duplicate
copy of the supplier's invoice from the job worker. This challan should also
indicate the name of and address of the supplier apart from the name of the
manufacturer.
iii. The manufacturer shall make only stock entry for receipt and a contra entry for
issue with reference of the challan being issued.
iv. The manufacturer shall take credit of duty in format U/R 7 only when the inputs
duly processed or without process are received in full from the job worker.
103
v. The credit shall be taken on the basis of duly filled in challan and on the strength
of valid duty paying document prescribed U/R 7.
Additional steps in the scenario of removal of inputs / partially processed goods
from job worker to job worker are listed below -
a. The first job worker should make out his own challan in triplicate containing the
required information after he has completed the process. (Which would be akin to
the original Delivery Challan issued to him by the customer)
b. The first job-worker should send the semi-processed goods to the second job-
worker with original and duplicate copies of the said challan.
c. The first job-worker should make an endorsement on the challan of the customer
(under which he originally received the materials) providing the name of the
second job-worker and return the duplicate copy to the customer/manufacturer.
d. After the completion of process the second job worker shall make an
endorsement on both the copies of the challan of 1st Job Worker and return the
processed goods to the Customer (manufacturer) with the duplicate challan duly
filled.
e. The first and second job-workers should maintain an account in the form
suggested Annexure V wherein the entries relating to the receipt of goods and
issue of processed goods are to be recorded.
f. The subsequent job worker shall store, process and despatch the goods challan-
wise i.e. each challan shall be equal to one lot. Where it is not possible and
goods are despatched in batches, separate accounts for such batch-wise
despatch should be maintained.
g. Where the scrap is not received back the appropriate duty of excise leviable on
the waste or scrap is to be paid by the job worker or the customer,.
h. The manufacturer has to ensure that the goods are received back within 180
days (no time limit specified in CENVAT) from the date on which the raw
materials were despatched to the first job-worker.
The manufacturer would be able to take re-credit of duty reversed (where inputs are not
received back after lapse of 180 days), when processed goods are received
subsequently on receipt of the full consignment from the second or subsequent job
worker based on own challan from the original job worker and the duplicate of the
challan from the subsequent job
104
• Is there an exemption from duty of excise to any clearance of Excisable Goods Made Inside
the territory of India?
There are instances where certain specified clearances are exempted from duty liability.
In order to avail the exemption a certificate is given by the customer, to the manufacturer
of the goods. The certificates are issued to the customer by the authorities depending on
the end use of the items to be procured by such customer. Even where clearances are
made to a 100% EOU it would be exempt from duties of excise. The condition being that
the goods procured are used by such unit for the purposes of manufacturing of goods
which would ultimately be exported outside the country.
• What is An EOU?
An EOU means export oriented undertaking for which letter of permission (LOP) has
been granted by the Development Commissioner. Notification No.22/2003-CE dated
31.3.2003 provides an exemption to the goods brought into EOU.
• What is An SEZ?
An SEZ means Special Economic Zone which maybe specified by the Central
Government in this behalf. Sections 7 and 26 of the SEZ Act provide that any goods
procured by a developer or SEZ unit from the domestic market shall be exempt from
taxes subject to the fulfillment of prescribed conditions. Such duty free procurement is
done vide Rule 27 of SEZ Rules which provides that the SEZ unit and developers are
entitled to procure from DTA their requirement of goods, materials without payment of
duty to be used for their authorized operations.
3. Does the unit have permission u/s 65 of Customs Act 1962 to do the
designated manufacturing operations in the bonded warehouse?
• The manufacturer would do well to get the copy of the CT 3 certificate which
105
• He shall also make entries in the Central Excise records and raise the invoice
u/r 11 of CER 2002.
• He shall check that the details on the CT 3 certificate match with the invoice
to ensure that the descriptions and quantities match.
• The goods should be received at the 100% EOU and intimation sent to the
SCE having jurisdiction over the 100% EOU regarding such receipt.
• The SCE shall then check the goods and endorse such fact on all copies of
the ARE 3 form. The original copy is then sent to the SCE having jurisdiction
over the supplying manufacturer’s factory and the duplicate copy would be
received by such manufacturer for proof of such warehousing at the 100%
EOU.
Note: Only manufactured goods can be removed without discharging the duty of
excise. Traded goods are not extended the same facility.
on the inputs and input services used in manufacture of goods cleared to such SEZ. The
DTA unit can clear the excisable goods without payment of duty under bond by raising
an ARE 1 to a unit in SEZ. The goods can also be cleared on payment of duty where a
rebate claim is to be filed.
• What is the Procedure for clearance of excisable goods without payment of duty to a
unit/developer in SEZ?
1. The DTA unit should raise a bond as in case of exports and raise an ARE 1 form
having a pre-printed serial number, in quintuplicate along with invoice for
clearance.
2. The procedure laid down under Notification 19/2004-CE(NT) for export under
claim for rebate can be followed with regard to distribution of ARE 1 copies.
3. The DTA unit shall coordinate with the SEZ unit/developer for the purpose of
raising a Bill of Export in addition to the ARE 1 where the clearance is under
claim for export entitlements
4. The DTA unit should see that within 45 days from the date of clearance, a copy
of the ARE 1 form and/or Bill of Export endorsed by the Authorised Officer of the
SEZ for receipt of goods into the SEZ is received/submitted to the SCE having
jurisdiction over his factory
5. If the jurisdictional SCE of DTA unit does not receive the proof of export (ARE-1)
within 45 days from the date of removal of goods from the factory or warehouse,
he shall raise a demand of duty against the DTA unit.
6. The DTA unit should confirm that where export entitlements are to be claimed,
the receipt for supply is from the Foreign Currency Account of the SEZ
unit/developer
There are certain benefits to both the merchant exporters as well as manufacturer
exporters. Rule 18 and Rule 19 of Central Excise Rules 2002 deals with the provisions
pertaining to Exports and benefits associated therewith. Under Central Excise, the
assessee has two options which are given below—
Rule 19 of Central Excise Rules 2002 sets out provisions relating to export under
bond/Letter of undertaking states that any excisable goods may be cleared for export
without payment of duty from either the factory of manufacture or warehouse or any
other premises approved by the Commissioner of Central Excise. The materials can also
be cleared for use in the manufacture or processing of goods which would be exported.
The exact procedures for exports in this regard have been notified by the Government
vide Notification 42/2001 CE (NT) dated 26.06.01 which deals with exports to countries
other than Bhutan.
• What is the Procedure for export to countries other than Bhutan by a manufacturer exporter?
• The exporter should submit a Letter of Undertaking in Form UT-1 to the
ACCE/DCCE having jurisdiction over his factory or premises from where the
goods are cleared for export.
• The exporter has to get the goods ready for dispatch. The packages should be
checked and sealed either by him (could be partner/proprietor/ director of
company) or a person who has been duly authorized in this regard.
• The clearance of goods details are to be made in the Daily Stock Account
(DSA).
• The Original and Duplicate copies of ARE 1 goes with the goods to the place of
export and the Triplicate and Quadruplicate copies would be sent to the
jurisdictional SCE within 24 hours of the removal. (Where a quintuplicate copy is
maintained, the same may be sent with the Original and can be used for claiming
any other export incentive).
• At the place of export, the Customs officer authorized would examine the goods
and documents and certify on the copies that the goods have been exported with
the Shipping Bill reference and other details.
• The said officer would return the original and quintuplicate (if filed) to the exporter
and the duplicate may be sent either directly to the ACCE/DCCE with whom the
LUT is filed or given in a tamper proof cover to the exporter who would then hand
it over to such officer.
• The exporter shall file a statement in the prescribed format at least once in a
month giving details of exports made and the proof of shipment received for
earlier clearances as well as the cases where the proof is pending along with the
copies of ARE 1 form as specified above.
• What is the Procedure for export to countries other than Bhutan by a merchant exporter –
Notification 42/2001 CE (NT)?
• The exporter should give a general bond in Form B-1 annexed to the said
notification for an amount equal to the duty chargeable on the goods, to the
ACCE/DCCE having jurisdiction over the factory or approved premises from
where the goods are cleared.
• The bond should have adequate surety or security as may be approved by the
officer. The security is normally 25% of the bond amount and surety is for the full
bond amount. The bond shall be on non-judicial stamp paper of the value as
applicable to the state where it is executed.
• The exporter the gets CT-1 certificates from the jurisdictional SCE to procure
109
• The exporter issues CT-1 to the manufacturer from whom the excisable goods
are to be procured without payment of duty for the purposes of export. The CT-1
should set out the description of goods sought, the quantities, value and duty
amount.
• The exporter should keep a running bond register where the duty amount on the
excisable goods received under CT-1 would be debited. The debit cannot exceed
the credits in the bond account at any point of time and where it is about to
happen, another bond is to be furnished.
• The exporter should get goods ready for dispatch. The goods should be
examined and packages sealed by him in the presence of either the
owner/partner/Managing Director of the entity or a person who has been duly
authorized in this regard.
• The invoice and in addition to the invoice, a specified form (Form ARE 1) in
quadruplicate (a quintuplicate copy can be raised to claim any other export
incentive desired) should be prepared.
• The ARE 1 shall also be signed by the person authorized by the manufacturer
(as required by Chapter 7 of CBEC Manual).
• The Original and Duplicate copies of ARE1 would accompany the goods to the
place of export and the Triplicate and Quadruplicate copies would be sent to the
jurisdictional SCE within 24 hours of the removal. (Where a quintuplicate copy is
maintained, the same may be sent with the Original and can be used for claiming
any other export incentive).
• At the place of export, the Customs officer would check, verify the goods and
documents and certify on the copies that the goods have been exported by
stating the Shipping Bill reference and other details of export.
• The Customs officer would return the original and quintuplicate (if filed) to the
exporter and the duplicate may be sent either directly to the ACCE/DCCE with
110
whom the LUT is filed or given in a tamper proof cover to the exporter to be given
to such officer.
• The exporter shall file a statement in the prescribed format at least once in a
month giving details of exports made and the proof of shipment received for
earlier clearances as well as the cases where the proof is pending along with the
copies of ARE 1 form as specified above.
• Once the proof of export as stated above is submitted and acknowledged by the
ACCE/DCCE, the exporter shall claim the credit in the bond register maintained
which had been debited at the time of procurement of materials.
• What is the Procedure to procure excisable goods without payment of duty for the use in
manufacture or processing of goods for export — Notification 43/2001-C.E (NT), dated 26-6-
2001 – Read with Rule 19(2) of Central Excise Rules 2002?
• The manufacturer should be registered under Excise
• The manufacturer has to file LUT, undertaking to export the goods manufactured
or processed
• The input-output ratio of raw material to finished goods as well as the duty rate
governing the goods to be procured would have to be set out
• He may ask for samples of the finished products or inspect them at the factory
and countersign the application/declaration. One copy of the same would be
retained by him and two copies shall be forwarded to the manufacturer while the
other copy would be sent to the SCE who has jurisdiction over the factory of the
supplier of the goods.
• The manufacturer-exporter would send one copy of the declaration signed by the
ACCE/DCCE to the manufacturer who supplies him the excisable goods without
payment of duty by following the procedure laid down under Central Excise
(Removal of Goods At Concessional Rate of Duty for Manufacture of Excisable
111
• The goods received can be processed in the factory or sent for job work after
which the goods are to be received back in the factory of the manufacturer.
• Even scrap generated outside would have to be received inside the factory.
• The intermediate goods or goods received from job worker can even be cleared
for export under bond.
• The scrap is generated in the factory of the manufacturer; the same can be
cleared locally on payment of applicable duties of Excise.
2. Where the finished goods are exported under a claim for duty drawback
4. Where Cenvat Credit is availed on such raw materials under Cenvat Credit Rules
2004
• What is the Procedure to export goods under rebate to countries other than Bhutan —
Notification 19/2004-C.E (NT), dated 6-9-2004?
• The clearance is to be done by raising an excise invoice raised in accordance
with the requirements of Rule 11 of CER 2002 and the Form ARE 1 which is to
be in quintuplicate
• The manufacturer shall record the details as to clearance in his Daily Stock
112
Account showing the goods sought to be cleared, the value, the duty payable
and the details as to invoice number and ARE 1 number.
• The valuation would be as applicable under the CEA 1944 to goods cleared for
home consumption and the value may be more or less than the FOB (Free On
Board) value indicated on the Shipping Bill. The actual payment of duty would be
as per Rule 8 of CER 2002
• The Original, duplicate and quintuplicate copies of the ARE 1 form would be sent
with the goods to the place of export. The triplicate and quadruplicate copies
would be sent to the SCE having jurisdiction over factory or warehouse within 24
hours of removal.
• The SCE shall verify the particulars with the entries in the DSA and invoices and
endorse the fact of his verification on the ARE 1 copies and forward the copies to
the officer with whom rebate claim is to be filed or hand over the same to the
exporter in a tamper proof sealed cover to be given to such officer
• At the place of export, the Customs officer authorized would examine the goods
and documents and certify on the copies that the goods have been exported by
citing the Shipping Bill reference and other details of export.
• The export should be within six months from the date of clearance for export.
• The said officer would return the original and quintuplicate (if filed) to the exporter
and the duplicate may be sent either directly to the officer with whom the rebate
claim is to be filed or given in a tamper proof cover to the exporter to be given to
such officer.
• The claim for rebate can be filed on the letterhead with the following documents
namely,
Where the particulars are found in order the rebate claim is sanctioned. (Where the
claim exceeds Rs. 5 lakhs sanction would be after an audit)
114
under with intent to evade payment of duty. When there is no intention to evade the
payment of duty, the question of invoking the extended period of limitation does not
arise.
(i) Can Duty demanded be paid Along With Reduced Penalty within 30 Days in
Case of Demand Notice? Can duty be paid before the issue of SCN? The
amended provisions of section 11A relating to the recovery of duty not levied,
short levied, not levied, short paid, or erroneously refunded are as follows. A
separate category has been carved out from cases involving extended period of
limitation (fraud, collusion, willful mis-statement etc.) wherein a lower mandatory
116
penalty of 50% of the duty (rather than 100% of the duty) would apply. These
would cover cases where it is noticed during an audit, investigation or verification
that duty has not been levied, short levied, not paid or short paid or erroneously
refunded but the transactions to which such duty relates are entered in the
specified records.
(ii) While a provision has been made for issuance of show cause notice invoking the
extended period for recovery of duty with interest under section 11AC and
penalty equivalent to 50% of the duty, it has also been specifically provided that
even in cases where show cause notice has been issued involving extended
period of limitation (fraud, collusion, willful mis-statement etc.) with penalty equal
to the duty, the penalty can be remitted to 50% if the Central Excise officer is of
the opinion that the details of the transactions in respect of which the demand
notice has been issued have been duly recorded by the person charged with duty
in the specified records.
(iii) As per sub section (6), the facility of compounding the penalty amount has been
confined only to the new category and if the person chargeable with duty (for and
extended period) pays the duty in full or part along with interest before the
issuance of a show cause notice, the penalty shall stand reduced to 1% per
month but not exceeding 25% of the duty. However if the duty along with interest
is paid within thirty days of the issuance of adjudication order, the penalty would
be 25% of the duty.
• How to reply to revenue departmental letters involving duty payment or credit reversal without
issuing Show Cause Notice?
The revenue departmental authorities could send letters for duty payment including duty debit or
reversal of cenvat credit availed for various reasons. There is no provision under the Central
Excise Act or Rules to issue Demand Notice without following the provisions of section 11A.
Section 11A or Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules postulates that the Show Cause Notice is to be
issued and an opportunity is given to the manufacturer to reply to the same. Subsequently after
hearing out the manufacturer the order to pay may be made.
the amount may be debited or paid in cash and revenue department intimated
with the compliance.
iii. In some cases it could be possible that the demand is unjustified. In such case
the manufacturer may choose to ignore the said notice. However it would be
better to communicate to the revenue department in writing asking them to
explain on what grounds and under which provisions of the law the demand /
reversal is sought to be made.
iv. The manufacturer may if there appears to be confusion in understanding, provide
the reasons why the said demand is not tenable. He should include all material
facts on which he feels that the demand is not proper.
v. As the notice is not a Show Cause Notice he would be replying to the officer who
issued the notice. He could provide any clarifications issued by the revenue
department that are relevant to the matter, any decisions of the Tribunal, High
Court or the Supreme Court which may support his contention.
vi. This method though not required under the law could ensure that Show Cause
Notices are not issued for trivial matters. This would ensure that the time of the
manufacturer and the adjudicating officers is not wasted.
vii. If the revenue department does not agree and goes ahead to issue a Show
Cause Notice the assertions setout in reply to demand notice by manufacturer
would be required to be rebutted by it.
Steps to Reply to Show Cause Notice issued under Section 11A
The suggested procedure for the same is detailed hereunder:-
i. The proper officer of designation of Superintendent or above may issue a Show
Cause Notice (SCN). The date of receipt of SCN should be noted on the notice
and the proof of the same retained. (Preserve the cover under which the same is
received)
ii. The contents of the SCN may be gone through and if the allegation in the same
is genuine and SCN is received within 1 year, the amount may be debited and
the adjudicating officer intimated about the same. In the event the SCN seeks to
levy penalty, a request for condonation may be made mentioning therein, the
bona fide nature of the error.
iii. Where the circumstances mentioned in point No. ii. do not exist the
118
Company Secretary, a post graduate or Honors degree holder in Commerce, or post graduate
degree or diploma holder in Business administration or a retired employee of the Revenue
department of Central Excise or Customs after rendering not less than 10 years service if not an
advocate.
• What is Rate of Interest Applicable Where a Person is Liable to Pay Duty u/s 11A?
If the demand , is raised the person liable to pay duty under sec 11A would also have to pay
interest at the notified rate of 18% and the interest would be payable from the month in which
such duty was payable up to the date of actual payment of the amount of due.
In case the amount determined is either increased or decreased by Commissioner (Appeals) or
CESTAT or Court as the case may be, then the amount of interest payable would also be
determined accordingly.
Changes in Finance Act, 2011, 11AA and 11AB have been replaced by one section 11AA wherein it is
stating as follows:
• The person who is liable to pay duty shall in addition to the duty, be liable to pay interest at
notified rate whether such payment is made voluntarily or after determination of the duty amount
under Section 11A.
• The notified rate of interest w.e.f. 01.04.2011 is 18% p.a.
• no interest is payable where the duty became payable consequent to the issue of an order,
instruction or direction by the Board under Section 37B
a. such amount of duty is voluntarily paid in full, within 45 days from the date of issue of
such order, instruction or direction, without reserving any right to appeal against the said
payment at any subsequent stage of such payment.
Appeal is a remedy available to the aggrieved by the decision or order passed by the
authority, wherein the higher authority decides about the correctness of the said decision
or order.
Stay Order by Appellate Tribunal – including additions as per Finance Act, 2013
• As per Section 35C (2A) Appellate Tribunal, to hear and decide every appeal within
three years from the date when appeal is filed.
• Where a stay has been granted, the Appellate Tribunal shall dispose of the appeal
within 180 days from the date of such order and if not disposed of within 180 days,
the stay order shall stand vacated.
• As per the Finance Act, 2013, even if the assessee is not in fault, the CESTAT does
not have the power to grant stay beyond a period of 365 days.
• The High Court would have to intercede in such cases and in normal course it is
expected that the demand would be stayed.
124
excise and service tax (ACES) project has been done now.
• As per this circular, the preliminary scrutiny of return would by done by the
system.
• The scrutiny would be done based on the risk involved.
• Then the returns would be forwarded to the Joint/Additional commissioner. The
Commissioner should not select those units which are to be mandatorily audited.
Based on the checklist set out, the scrutiny would be done and non compliance
issues would be raised. It may also lead into referrals for audit and anti-evasion.
There has been a change from the transactional audit to a risk based one. In a risk
based audit, there would be a thorough review of the business and the industry to
identify the areas where the risk of duty evasion and illicit removals and such
other malpractices before one finalizes the extent and nature of checking.
The revenue department uses the returns filed by the assessee, correspondences
with him, copies of the assessee profile, published reports, details of the
transactions he has with his suppliers/sub-contractors/ service providers and
customers to assess the risk profile of assessees . The transactions details can
be obtained from other jurisdictional offices where needed.
9 At least 20% of the Units paying cash duty less than Rs.10 lakhs are to be
audited in a year.
9 Therefore, all assessees are now subjected to EA 2000.
• What is Coverage of Special Audits under sections 14-A and 14-AA of Central Excise Act?
Special audits under sections 14-A and 14-AA could be undertaken as per the order of
the Excise officers in respect of excise valuation or for checking the validity and
accuracy of Cenvat credits availed by an assessee.
9 Under Section 14A an officer not below the rank of the Assistant Commissioner
/Deputy Commissioner CE could order a manufacturer to get the accounts of his
factory, depots, office, or other places audited by a cost accountant/Chartered
Accountant.
9 Such auditor would be nominated by the Chief Commissioner of Central Excise.
This provision can be used when during the inquiry, investigation or any
proceedings in relation to assessee; such officer has doubts regarding the value
declared of the excisable goods.
9 The direction to get audit done shall be only after getting permission from the
Chief Commissioner of Central Excise.
9 The audit report should be submitted to such officer within 180 days including the
period of extension
• When Can the Commissioner of Central Excise Get Such an Audit Done?
9 Where the Commissioner of Central Excise has reason to believe that the cenvat
credits availed by a manufacturer of excisable goods have been availed through
fraud, collusion, wouldful misstatement or suppression of facts or that credits are
abnormal in light of the goods manufactured and the type of inputs used the
Commissioner may direct such manufacturer to get his accounts audited by a
cost accountant/Chartered Accountant to be nominated by such CCE.
9 The Cost Accountant/Chartered Accountant would submit his report to the said
CCE within the time specified.
• What is Meant by Audits under Rule 22 by Central Excise Commissionerates and C& AG?
The Commissioners of Central excise and the Comptroller and Auditor General of India can also
direct parties to audit the records.
9 It is to be noted that such audit parties have powers to go through all records, as they
127
may deem fit and necessary for the purpose of their audit.
9 These audits are carried out on a selective basis and usually a notice of 15 days is given
to the assessee to keep the records ready for the audit.
9 The records which they may take up are the ones indicated by the assessee to the
revenue department under Rule 22(2) of Central Excise Rules 2002 apart from the Cost
Audit Report u/s 233B of Companies’ Act 1956 and Income Tax Audit Report u/s 44AB if
any.
a. How to Select An Auditee?
A risk analysis is conducted based on the certain parameters and afterwards units are
selected on the basis of the results of such an analysis. This results into the assessees
possessing a bad track record in terms of past duty evasion cases, past duty dues ,
audit objections and non-compliances are given importance for conducting audit over
those who are regularly and correctly complying with provisions in relation to records
and returns. Another basis could be the areas where revenue leakage is possible due to
basic nature of the activities and processes undertaken by assessees and recent
changes in law.
128
b. What is meant by Desk Checking?
Since all the information required can be obtained by officers at their desks without going to
assessees factory/office this step is called as 'desk-checking/desk review'.
What Are the Steps Involved In Desk Checking?
9 The assessees to be audited are assigned at the beginning of the financial year. The
auditors need to gather as much information about the assessee as possible. Such
knowledge can be got from the revenue departmental records, revenue departmental
correspondence with the assessee, published documents like balance sheets annual
statements etc., and through market Enquirer.
9 Auditors can read and understand the financial records like the balance sheet, profit and
loss account, directors’ reports, auditors’ reports, schedules, disclosures in notes to
account to get a grasp of the assessee’s product and business.
9 This would equip the auditors as to the nature of operations, history and the track record
of the firm.
9 Since all the information required can be obtained by officers at their desks without going
to assessees factory/office this step is called as 'desk-checking/desk review'.
How to Document the Information?
While doing ‘Desk Review’ the auditors could identify certain areas, which could need to be
closely examined. The auditor may at this stage ask assessee to give certain documents or
information to complete the initial investigation. In order to accomplish this he may write a letter to
the assessee or send him a questionnaire to obtain this information. This step could be called as
‘documenting of information'.
Why should the Auditee’s Place Be Visited?
The auditor then follows up with a visit to the unit of the assessee to see the actual running of the
unit on the ground, the record maintenance systems in various sections and the system of
movement of goods and the authorizations/ raising and movement of related documents within
the unit. This step is called 'touring of the premises'. This step is very important since it gives the
auditors a general overview about the procedures adopted by the assessee at the unit as well as
129
to locate significant control weaknesses in documentation and the possible loopholes through
which revenue leakage can take place.
How to Draft an Audit Plan?
9 Based on information gathered about the assessee and his own experience with similar
assesses and businesses, and from the result of his desk review the auditor would draft
an 'audit plan'.
9 The audit plan helps the auditor to list the vulnerable areas which could result in loss of
revenue.
9 Since large numbers of documents and records are maintained and the time and
resources may not be sufficient, the auditor should verify only a few relevant areas,
9 The objective of an audit plan is to list the areas, which, as per the auditor are prone to
loss of duty from the revenue point of view.
9 In a risk based audit, the auditor should time his audit procedures so as to completely
verify such areas and the audit plan would enable him to focus on these areas effectively.
9 It must be remembered that an audit plan could be changed.
9 Where after the audit is commenced the auditor notices certain new facts or new aspects
of the planned area of audit, he can change the plan, with the approval of his superiors.
9 Similarly, in case during the actual audit, if the auditor is convinced that any area requires
lesser amount of scrutiny as against plan , he may change the plan midway with the
approval of the superiors.
How to Actually Conduct an Audit?
The auditors visit the unit of the assessee on a scheduled date which is intimated to the
assessee in advance.
• There auditors scrutinise the records of the assessee as per the audit plan.
• The auditor has to compare the documentation of a transaction as disclosed in different
documents. For instance, the auditor may check the figures of clearance of finished
goods showed by the assessee in central excise return with the sales figures of the said
goods in Balance Sheet, Sales Tax Returns, Bank statements etc
• The idea of such cross checking is to ensure that no dutiable clearances , which as per
the Central Excise law are chargeable to duty, escape duty liability and also to ensure
that no Cenvat credit is wrongly claimed.
130
• The process is always carried out in presence of the assessee so that he can clarify the
doubts and provide required information to the auditor.
What is an Audit Para/Audit objection?
9 Where the auditor comes across cases of short payment of duty or availing
credits on inputs that are cleared as such or non-observance of Central excise
procedures, he is required to discuss the issue with the assessee.
9 After the assessee provides an explanation, if the auditor is satisfied that such
non-compliance has happened, he would record the same as an 'Audit Objection'
9 or 'Audit Para' in the 'draft audit report' that is done after completion of audit
process.
9 Auditor should not include audit objections for mere procedural lapses /
infractions / adoption of wrong procedures, which do not impact the duty payment
adversely.
9 Where there are minor procedural irregularities the auditor could discuss the
matter with the assessee and advise him to follow the correct procedure in future.
Further, to the extent possible the auditor should compute and include in the
audit para the duty short paid by the assessee at the spot.
9 However, if this cannot be done due to want of time or for the want of some
information not available at that time, then the auditor should make a note of the
same in his report.
How to Issue an Audit Report?
After the end of audit and verification the auditor prepares a 'Draft Audit Report' which includes all
the audit objections in the form of audit paras.
9 An audit report provides the issue in brief, the reply or the explanation of the assessee,
the reason for the auditor not being satisfied with the reply, the amount of short payment
(if tabulated) and the recoveries of the same (if could be made at the spot).
9 The draft report is then subjected to the superior officers review, who would examine the
sustainability of the objections raised by the auditors.
9 After such review is undertaken by the superior officers, the audit report becomes final.
131
9 In case the disputed amounts have not already been paid by the assessee on the spot at
time of audit, demand notices are issued by the jurisdictional revenue department asking
from the assessee as to why recovery of the said amounts should not be made.
As a pre-requisite to Excise Audit 2000 the auditors must in addition to being computer savy,
have a complete knowledge of the latest position of Central Excise law and procedures,
notifications, instructions and circulars issued by the Finance Ministry and the judicial decisions
on issues relating to central excise laws.
• What are the Points to be borne in mind while dealing with Revenue department Audit?
• To achieve professionalism in audit, the revenue department has under taken the training
of all their officers on understanding the accounting methods. However officers are found
wanting in knowledge area.
• The Generalised Audit Software (GAS) for excise audits is also being developed. The
auditors are being trained to look for errors and are usually successful in detecting it.
• The extended period of 5 years of demand is invoked citing suppression in many such
cases.
• They also try to get the amount debited immediately.
• However this does not stop the revenue department from issuing a Show Cause Notice
for demanding payment of interest and penalty.
• The assessee should as far as possible refrain from debiting of duty on the oral
instructions of the audit party or on the letter asking for compliance from the range.
• In many such cases the duty would not be payable at all in the facts and circumstances
of the case.
• Sometimes the auditors are on a fault finding mission and arrive at many errors and
quantify the same along with penalty and interest to arrive at the total amount of demand
realizable.
• Then the revenue departmental auditors undertake negotiations with assessee to decide
as to the issues which they would drop, the ones requiring the assessee to reverse and
the one they would report.
• The job of the audit is only to note non compliance and the range on instruction from the
Audit would examine the same and may ask for further details.
• A Show Cause Notice may then be issued if any issue exists where the assessee and
revenue department are not in agreement.
132
APPENDIX
Deemed manufacture
In relation to the products of the following chapter, labeling or re-labeling of
containers or repacking from bulk to retail packs or the adoption of any other treatment
to render the product marketable to the consumer, shall amount to manufacture.
The process of refining, that is to say any 0ne or more of the processes namely
treatment of crude oil with an alkali, bleaching and deodorization shall amount to
134
manufacture.
The process of cutting or sawing or sizing or polishing or any other process for
converting of stone blocks into slabs or tiles shall amount to manufacture.
The process of compression of natural gas (even if it does not involve liquefaction)
for the purpose of marketing it as compressed natural gas, for use as a fuel or for any
other purpose
135
The process of cutting, slitting, perforation or any one or more of these processes
shall amount to manufacture.
Addition of chemicals and other ingredients like inert carriers or solvents, surface
active dispersing and stabilizing agents, emulsifiers, wetting and dispersing agents,
deodorants, masking agent, attractants and feeding stimulants to pesticidal chemicals in
concentrated form, and labeling or re-labeling of containers or repacking from bulk to
retail packs or the adoption of any other treatment to render the product marketable to
136
The process of milling, raising, blowing, tentering, dyeing or any other process or any
one or more of these process shall amount to manufacture.
doubling, multiple folding, cabling, air mingling, air texturing, any other like process any
combination of products into another form of such product shall amount to manufacture.
The process of bleaching, dyeing, printing, shrink proofing, tentering, heat setting,
crease resistant processing, any other like processing and any combination of such
processes shall amount to manufacture
The process of cutting or sawing or sizing or polishing or any other process for
converting stone blocks into slabs or tiles shall amount to manufacture.
71 Precious Metals
The process of refining of gold dore bar into standard old bar amounts to
manufacture
the process of drawing or re drawing a bar, rod or wire rod, round bar or any similar
article into bright bar shall amount to manufacture and the process of hardening or
tempering shall also amount to manufacture
for chapter heading 7113 or 7114, the process of affixing or embossing trade name
or brand name on articles of jewellery or on articles of goldsmiths or silversmiths wares
of precious metal or of metal clad with precious metal, shall amount to “manufacture”
The process of oiling and pickling in respect of goods of heading 7208 shall amount
to “manufacture”
The process of matching, matching, batching and charging of Lithium ion batteries or
the making of battery packs shall amount to “manufacture”
Definition of Section 4A dealing with MRP based valuation:
(1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, specify any
goods, in relation to which it is required, under the provisions of the Standards of
Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976) or the rules made thereunder or under
any other law for the time being in force, to declare on the package thereof the retail sale
price of such goods, to which the provisions of sub-section (2) shall apply.
(2) Where the goods specified under sub-section (1) are excisable goods and are
chargeable to duty of excise with reference to value, then, notwithstanding anything
contained in section 4, such value shall be deemed to be the retail sale price declared
on such goods less such amount of abatement, if any, from such retail sale price as the
Central Government may allow by notification in the Official Gazette.
(3) The Central Government may, for the purpose of allowing any abatement under sub-
section (2), take into account the amount of duty of excise, sales tax and other taxes, if
any, payable on such goods.
14a[(4) Where any goods specified under sub-section (1) are excisable goods and the
manufacturer -
(a) removes such goods from the place of manufacture, without declaring the retail
sale price of such goods on the packages or declares a retail sale price which is not the
retail sale price as required to be declared under the provisions of the Act, rules or other
law as referred to in sub-section (1); or
(b) tampers with, obliterates or alters the retail sale price declared on the package of
such goods after their removal from the place of manufacture,
then, such goods shall be liable to confiscation and the retail sale price of such goods
shall be ascertained in the prescribed manner and such price shall be deemed to be the
retail sale price for the purposes of this section.
142
Explanation 1. - For the purposes of this section, “retail sale price” means the maximum
price at which the excisable goods in packaged form may be sold to the ultimate
consumer and includes all taxes, local or otherwise, freight, transport charges,
commission payable to dealers, and all charges towards advertisement, delivery,
packing, forwarding and the like and the price is the sole consideration for such sale :
Provided that in case the provisions of the Act, rules or other law as referred to in sub-
section (1) require to declare on the package, the retail sale price excluding any taxes,
local or otherwise, the retail sale price shall be construed accordingly.
(a) where on the package of any excisable goods more than one retail sale price is
declared, the maximum of such retail sale prices shall be deemed to be the retail sale
price;
(b) where the retail sale price, declared on the package of any excisable goods at the
time of its clearance from the place of manufacture, is altered to increase the retail sale
price, such altered retail sale price shall be deemed to be the retail sale price;
(c) where different retail sale prices are declared on different packages for the sale
of any excisable goods in packaged form in different areas, each such retail sale price
shall be the retail sale price for the purposes of valuation of the excisable goods
intended to be sold in the area to which the retail sale price relates.
MRP Valuation Abatement table
List of products under MRP based levy with abatements
TABLE
S.No Chapter, heading, Description of goods Abatement as a
sub-heading or tariff percentage of
item retail sale price
(1) (2) (3) (4)
1. 17 or 21 Preparations of other sugars 35%
2. 1702 Sugar syrups not containing 35%
added flavouring or colouring
matter; artificial honey,
143