Unit 5 Automated Asssembly Systems
Unit 5 Automated Asssembly Systems
UNIT-5:
AUTOMATED ASSSEMBLY SYSTEMS
Reduce the amount of assembly required: This principle can be realized during
design by combining functions within the same part that were previously
accomplished by separate components in the product. The use of plastic molded
parts to substitute for sheet metal parts is an example of this principle. A more
complex geometry molded into a plastic part might replace several metal parts.
Although the plastic part may seem to be more costly, the savings-in assembly
time probably justify the substitution in many cases.
Reduce the number of fasteners required: Instead of using separate screws and
nuts, and similar fasteners, design the fastening mechanism into the component
design using snap fits and similar features. Also, design the product modules
so that several components are fastened simultaneously rather than each
component fastened separately.
Reduce the need for multiple components to lie handled at once: The preferred
practice in automated assembly machine design is to separate the operations at
different stations rather than to handle and fasten multiple components
simultaneously at the same workstation. (It should be noted that robotics
technology is causing a rethinking of this practice since robots can be
programmed to perform more complex assembly tasks than a single station in a
mechanized assembly system.
Limit the required directions of access: This principle simply means that the
number of directions in which new components are added to the existing
subassembly should be minimized. If all of the components can be added
vertically from above, this is the ideal situation. Obviously, the design of the
subassembly module determines this.
Implement hopperability: This is a term that is used to identify the ease with
which a given component can be fed and oriented reliably for delivery from
the parts hopper to the assembly workhead.
The first three types involve the same methods of workpart transport described in
automated flow line. In the stationary base part system, the base part to which the
other components are added is placed in a fixed location, where it remains during the
assembly work.
The dial-type machine, the base partare indexed around a circular table or dial. The
workstations are stationary and usually located around the outside periphery of the
dial. The parts ride on the rotating table and arc registered or positioned, in turn, at each
station a new component is added to base part. This type of equipment is often
referred to as an indexing machine or dial index machine and the configuration is shown
in Figure 1 and example of six station rotary shown in figure 2.
Hopper: This is the container into which the components are loaded at the
workstation. A separate hopper is used for each component type. The
components are usually loaded into the hopper in bulk. This means that the parts
are randomly oriented initially in the hopper.
Parts feeder: This is a mechanism that removes the components from the
hopper one at a time for delivery to the assembly workhead. The hopper and parts
feeder are often combined into one operating mechanism. The vibratory bowl
feeder, pictured in Figure 11, is a very common example of the hopper-feeder
combination.
Selector and/or orienteer: These elements of the delivery system establish the
proper orientation of the components for the assembly workhead. A selector is a
device that acts as a filter, permitting only parts that are in the correct orientation
to pass through. Components that are not properly oriented are rejected back into
the hopper. An orientor is a device that allows properly oriented pans to pass
through but provides a reorientation of components that are not properly oriented
initially. Several selector and orientor schemes are illustrated in Figure 12.
Selector and orientor devices are often combined and incorporated into one
hopper-feeder system.
Feed track: The preceding elements of the delivery system are usually located
some distance from the assembly workhead. A feed track is used to transfer the
components from the hopper and parts feeder to the location of the assembly
workhead, maintaining proper orientation of the parts during the transfer. There
are two general categories of feed tracks: gravity and powered. The gravity feed
track is most common. In this type the hopper and parts feeder are located at an
elevation that is above the elevation of the workhead. The force of gravity is used
to deliver the components to the workhead. The powered feed track uses vibratory
action, air pressure, or other means to force the parts to travel along the feed track
toward the assembly workhead.
Assuming that the delivery rate of components f θ is greater than the cycle rate Rc of
the assembly machine, a means of limiting the size of the queue in the feed track must
be established. This is generally accomplished by placing a sensor (e.g., limit switch,
optical sensor, etc.) near the top of the feed track, which is used to turn off the feeding
mechanism when the feed track is full. This sensor is referred to as the high-level
sensor, and its location defines the active length Lf2 of the feed track. If the length of a
component in the feed track is Lc, the number of parts that can be held in the feed track is
nf2 = Lf2/Lc. The length of the components must be measured from a point on a given
component to the corresponding point on the next component in the queue to allow for
possible overlap of parts. The value of nf2 is the capacity of the feed track.
Another sensor is placed along the feed track at some distance from the first sensor and
is used to restart the feeding mechanism-again. Defining the location of this low-
level sensor as Lfl, the number of components in the feed track at this point is nf1 =
Lf1/Lc.
The rate at which the quantity of parts in the buffer will be reduced when the high-level
sensor is actuated = Rc, where Re is the theoretical cycle rate of the assembly
machine. On average, the rate at which the quantity of parts will increase upon
actuation of the low-level sensor is f θ - R C However, the rate of increase will
not be uniform due lo the random nature of the feeder-selector operation.
Accordingly, the value of nf1l musl be made large enough to virtually eliminate the
probability of a stockout after the low-level sensor has turned on the feeder.
Lf2
RC → Cycle rate of Assembly System nf2 = → Number of component in feed track
LC
LC → Length of component Lf1
nf 1 = →Number of components at low
level sensors
LC
Lf2 → Length of feed track (High level
sensors
Lf1 → Length of low level sensors
f→ The rate at which parts are removed from hopper
The probability of the first event is the product of the fraction defective rate for the
station, qi, multiplied by the probability that a defect will cause the station to stop,
mi,. the probability that a part will jam at station i. For an assembly machine,
Pi = mi qi
The second possible event, when the component is defective but does not cause a
station jam, has a probability given by
Pi = (1 − mi ) qi
With this outcome, a bad part is joined to the existing assembly, perhaps rendering
the entire assembly defective.
The third possibility is obviously the most desirable. The probability that the com-
ponent is not defective is equal to the proportion of good parts
Pi = (1 − qi )
mi qi + (1 − mi ) qi + (1 − qi ) = 1
∏ m q + (1 − m ) q + (1 − q ) = 1
i =1
i i i i i
mi qi
In the special case of Eq., where all are equal and all are equal, then equation
becomes
n
m q + (1 − m ) q + (1 − q ) = 1
Measures of performance
Fortunately, we are not required to calculate every term to make use of the concept
of assembly machine operation provided by above Equations. One of the
characteristics of performance that we might want to know is the proportion of
assemblies that contain one or more defective components. Two of the three terms
in above Equation represent events that result in the addition of good components
at a given station. The first term is mi qi . which indicates a line stop but also
means that a defective component has not been added to the assembly. The other
term is (1 − qi ) , which means that a good component has been added at the station.
The sum of these two terms represents the probability that a defective component
will not be added at station i. Multiplying these probabilities for all stations, we
get the proportion of acceptable product coming off the line, Pap
n
Pap = ∏ m q + (1 − q )
i =1
i i i
In the special case where all mi equal and all Qi are equal, then equation
are
becomes
n
Pa p = m i q i + (1 − q i )
n
, Pqp = 1 − mi qi + (1 − qi )
n n
F = ∑ Pi = ∑ mi qi
i =1 i =1
In the special case where all mi are equal and all Qi are equal, then equation
becomes
F = nm q
Average production time per assembly is therefore given by
n
TP = TC + ∑ mi qiTD
i =1
In the special case where all mi are equal and all Qi are equal, then equation
becomes
TP = TC + nm q TD
∏ m q + (1 − q )
i =1
i i i
Pap
Rap = =
TP Tp
In the special case where all mi are equal and all Qi are equal, then equation
becomes
n
Rap =
( mq + (1 − q ) )
TP
The line efficiency is calculated as the ratio of ideal cycle time to average production
time.
TC TC
E= =
TP TC + nm q TD
The proportion of downtime, D, is the average downtime per cycle divided by the
average production time is given by
nm q TD nm q TD
D= =
TP TC + nm q TD
Cm + CL × TP + Ct Cm + CL × TP + Ct
C pc = n
=
( mq + (1 − q ) ) Pap
1. A 10 station in-line assembly machine has a 6-s ideal cycle time. The base part is
automatically loaded prior to the first station. The fraction defect rate at each of 10 stations
is equal to 0.01 and the probability that a defect will jam is 0.5. when jam occurs, the
average down time is 2 minutes. Determine the average production rate, the yield of good
assemblies, and the uptime efficiency of the assembly machine.
n
Pap = mi qi + (1 − qi )
10
Pap = 0.5 × 0.01 + (1 − 0.01) = 0.9511
Uptime efficiency
TC 0.1
E= = = 0.50 = 50%
TP 0.2
Many of the assembly elements involve the addition of a component to the existing
subassembly. As in our analysis of the multiple-station assembly system, each
component type has a certain fraction defect rate, qi and there is a certain probability
that a defective component will jam the workstation, mi When a jam occurs, the
assembly machine stops, and it takes an average Td to clear the jam and restart the
system. The inclusion of downtime resulting from jams in the machine cycle time
gives.
Average production time per assembly is therefore given by
n
TP = TC + ∑ mi qiTD
i =1
In the special case where all mi are equal and all Qi are equal, then equation
becomes
TP = TC + nm q TD
The rate of production of acceptable product is given by equation
1
RP =
TP
n
∏ m q + (1 − q )
i =1
i i i
Pap
Rap = =
TP Tp
In the special case where all mi are equal and all Qi are equal, then equation
becomes
n
Rap =
( mq + (1 − q ) )
TP
The line efficiency is calculated as the ratio of ideal cycle time to average production
time.
TC TC
E= =
TP TC + nm q TD
The proportion of downtime, D, is the average downtime per cycle divided by the
average production time is given by
nm q TD nm q TD
D= =
TP TC + nm q TD
Cm + CL × TP + Ct Cm + CL × TP + Ct
C pc = n
=
( mq + (1 − q ) ) Pap
Automated guided vehicles (AGVs) increase efficiency and reduce costs by helping
to automate a manufacturing facility or warehouse.
AGVS can carry loads or tow objects behind them in trailers to which they can
autonomously attach. The trailers can be used to move raw materials or finished
product. The AGV can also store objects on a bed. The objects can be placed on a
set of motorized rollers (conveyor) and then pushed off by reversing them. Some
AGVs use forklifts to lift objects for storage. AGVs are employed in nearly every
industry, including, pulp, paper, metals, newspaper, and general manufacturing.
Transporting materials such as food, linen or medicine in hospitals is also done.
There are a number of different types of AGVS all of which operate according to the
preceding description. The types can be classified as follows:
Driverless trains: This type consists of a towing vehicle (which is the AGV) that
pulls one or more trailers to form a train. It was the first type of AGVS to be
introduced and is still popular. It is useful in applications where heavy payloads
must be moved large distances in warehouses or factories with intermediate
pickup and drop-off points along the route. Figure 17 illustrates the driverless-
train AGVS.
AGVS pallet trucks: Automated guided pallet trucks are used to move palletized
loads along predetermined routes. In the typical application the vehicle is
backed into the loaded pallet by a human worker who steers the truck and uses
its forks to elevate the load slightly. Then the worker drives the pallet truck to
the guidepatn, programs its destination, and the vehicle proceeds automatically to
the destination for unloading. The capacity of an AGVS pallet truck ranges up to
6000 Ib, and some trucks are capable of handling two pallets rather than one. A
more recent introduction related to the pallet truck is the forklift AGV. This
vehicle can achieve significant vertical movement of its forks to reach loads on
shelves. Figure18 illustrates this vehicle type.
AGVS unit load carriers. This type of AGVS is used to move unit loads from
one station to another station. They are often equipped for automatic loading and
unloading by means of powered rollers, moving belts, mechanized lift platforms,
or other devices. The unit load carrier is pictured in Figure 20. Variations of the unit
load carrier include light-load AGVs and assembly line AGVs. The light-load
AGV is a relatively small vehicle with a corresponding iight load capacity
(typically 500 Ib or less). It does not require the same large aisle width as the
conventional AGV. Light-load guided vehicles are designed to move small toads
(single parts, small baskets or tote pans of parts, etc.) through plants of limited size
engaged in light manufacturing. The assembly line AGVS is designed to carry a
partially completed subassembly through a sequence of assembly workstations to
build the product.
The term guidance system refers to the method by which the AGVS pathways are
defined and the vehicle control systems that follow the pathways. As indicated above,
there are two principal methods currently in use lo define the pathways along the floor:
embedded guide wires and paint strips. Of the two types, the guide wire system is
the more common in warehouse and factory applications.
In the guide wire method the wires are usually embedded in a small channel cut into
the surface of the floor. The channel is typically about 1/8 in. wide and 1/2 in. deep.
After the guide wires are installed, the channel slot is filled so as to eliminate the
discontinuity in the floor surface as shown in figure 22. An alternative but less
permanent way to install the guide wires is to tape them to the floor. A frequency
generator provides the guidance signal carried in the wire. The signal is of relatively
low voltage (less than 40 V), low current (less than 400 mA), and has a frequency in
the range 1 to 15 kHz. This signal level creates a magnetic field along the pathway
that is followed by sensors on-board each vehicle. The operation of a typical system is
illustrated in Figure 22 Two sensors (coils) are mounted on the vehicle on either side of
the guide wire. When the vehicle is moving along a course such that the guide wire is
directly between the two coils, the intensity of the magnetic field measured by each
coil will be equal. If the vehicle strays to one side or the other, or if the guide wire
path curves, the magnetic field intensity at the two sensors will be different. This
difference is used to control the steering motor, which makes the required changes in
vehicle direction to equalize the two sensor signals, thereby tracking the defined
pathway.
When paint strips are used to define the vehicle pathways, the vehicle possesses an
optical sensor system that is capable of tracking the paint. The strips can be taped,
sprayed, or painted on the floor. One system uses a l-in.-wide paint strip containing
fluorescent particles that reflect an ultraviolet (UV) light source on the vehicle. An on-
board sensor detects the reflected light in the strip and controls the steering
mechanism to follow it. The paint guidance system is useful in environments where
electrical noise would render the guide wire system unreliable or when the installation
of guide wires in the floor surface would not be appropriate. One problem with the
paint strip guidance method is that the paint strip must be maintained (kept clean and
unscratched).
A safety feature used in the operation of most guidance systems is automatic stopping of
the vehicle in the event that it accidentally strays more than a few inches (typically 2
to 6 in.) from the guide path. This automatic-stopping feature prevents the vehicle
from running wild in the building. Alternatively, in the event that the vehicle is off
the guide path (e.g., for manual loading of a pallet truck), it is capable of locking
onto the guide wire or paint strip if moved within the same few inches of it. The
distance is referred to as the vehicle's acquisition distance.
The use of microprocessor controls on-board the vehicles has led to the development of
a feature called dead reckoning. This term refers to the capability of the vehicle to
travel along a route that does not follow the defined pathway in the floor. The micro-
processor computes the number of wheel rotations and the operation of the steering
motor required to move along the desired path. Dead reckoning might be employed
by the vehicle to cross a steel plate in the factory floor (where guide wires cannot be
installed), or to depart from the guide path for positioning at a load/unload station. At
the completion of the dead-reckoning maneuver, the vehicle is programmed to return
to within (he acquisition distance of the guide path to resume normal guidance
control.
When a vehicle approaches a branching point in which the guide path splits into two
(or more) directions, a decision must be made as to which path the vehicle should
take. This is sometimes referred to as a decision point for the vehicle. There are two
methods used in commercial AGV systems to permit the vehicle to decide which
path to take:
1. Frequency select method
2. Path switch select method
In the frequency select method, the guide wires leading into the two separate paths at
the branch have different frequencies. As the vehicle enters the decision point, it reads
an identification code on the floor to identify its location. Depending on its
programmed destination, the vehicle selects one of the guide paths by deciding
which frequency to track. This method requires a separate frequency generator for
each frequency that is used in the guide path layout. This usually means that two or
three generators are needed in the system. Additional channels must often be cut into
the floor with the frequency select method to provide for bypass channels where only
the main channel needs to be powered for vehicle tracking.
The path switch select method uses a single frequency throughout the guide path
layout. In order to control the path of a vehicle at a decision point, the power is
switched off in ail branches except the one on which the vehicle is to travel. To
accomplish routing by the path switch select method, the guide path layout most be
divided into blocks that can be independently turned on and off by means of controls
mounted on the floor near their respective blocks. These control units are operated by
the vehicles as they move in the various blocks. As a vehicle enters a decision point, it
activates a floor-mounted switching device connected to the control unit for the
relevant block. The control unit activates the desired guide path and turns off the
alternative branch or branches.
On-board vehicle sensing and zone blocking are often used in combination to
implement a comprehensive blocking system.
On-board vehicle sensing (sometimes called forward sensing) involves the use of
some form of sensor system to detect the presence of vehicles and carts ahead on the
same guide wire. The sensors used on commercial guided vehicles include optical
sensors and ultrasonic systems. When the on-board sensor detects an obstacle (e.g,
another guided vehicle) in front of it, the vehicle stops. When the obstacle is removed,
the vehicle proceeds. Assuming that the sensor system is 100% effective, collisions
between vehicles are avoided and traffic is controlled. Unfortunately, the effectiveness
of forward sensing is limited by the capability of the sensor system to detect vehicles
in front of it on the guide path. Since the sensors themselves are most effective in
detecting obstacles directly ahead of the vehicle, these systems are most appropriate
on layouts that contain long stretches of straight pathways. They are less effective at
turns and convergence points where forward vehicles may not be directly in front of
the sensor.
The concept of zone control is simple. The AGVS layout is divided into separate zones,
and the operating rule is that no vehicle is permitted to enter a zone if that zone is
already occupied by another vehicle. The length of a zone is sufficient to hold one
vehicle (or a train in driverless train systems) plus an allowance for safety and other
considerations. These other considerations include the number of vehicles in the
system, the size and complexity of the layout, and the objective of minimizing the
number of separate zone controls. When one vehicle occupies a given zone, any
trailing vehicle is not allowed into that zone. The leading vehicle must proceed into
the next zone before the trailing vehicle can occupy the given zone.
By controlling the forward movement of vehicles in the separate zones, collisions are
prevented and traffic in the overall system is controlled. The concept is illustrated in
Figure 23 in its simplest form. More complicated zone control schemes separate any
two vehicles by a blocked zone.
One means of implementing zone control is to use separate control units for each
zone. These controls are mounted along the guide path and are actuated by the
vehicle in the zone. When a vehicle enters a given zone, it activates the block in the
previous (upstream) zone to block any trailing vehicle from moving forward and
colliding with the present vehicle. As the present vehicle moves into the next
(downstream) zone, it activates the block in that zone and deactivates the block in the
previous zone. In effect, zones are turned on and off to control vehicle movement by
the blocking system.
from several inches to several feet. Most vehicles are programmed to require manual
restarting after an obstacle encounter has occurred with the emergency bumper.
Other safety devices on the vehicles include warning lights (blinking or rotating lights)
and/or warning bells. These devices alert people that the vehicle is present.
Finally, another safety feature that prevents runaway vehicles is the inherent op-
erating characteristic of the guidance system: If the vehicle strays by more than a
few inches from the defined path, the vehicle is programmed to stop.
System management
Managing the operations of an AGVS deals principally with the problem of
dispatching vehicles to the points in the system where they are needed (e.g., to
perform pickups and deliveries) in a timely and efficient manner. The system
management function depends on reliable operation of the other system functions
discussed above (guidance, routing, traffic control). There are a number of methods
used in commercial A.GV systems for dispatching vehicles. These methods are
generally used in combination to maximize responsiveness and effectiveness of the
overall system. The dispatching methods include:
* On-board control panel
* Remote call stations
* Central computer control
Each guided vehicle is equipped with some form of control panel for the purpose
of manual vehicle control, vehicle programming, and other functions. Most
commercial vehicles have the capacity to be dispatched by means of this control
panel to a given station in the AGVS layout. Dispatching with an on-board control
panel represents the lowest level of sophistication among the possible methods. Its
advantage is that it provides the AGVS with flexibility and responsiveness to
changing demands on the handling system. Its disadvantage is that it requires
manual attention.
The use of remote call stations is another method that allows the AGVS to respond
to changing demand patterns in the system. The simplest form of call station is a
press button mounted near the load/unload station. This provides a signal to any
passing vehicle to stop at the station in order to accomplish a load transfer
operation. The vehicle might then be dispatched to the desired location by means
of the on-board control panel.
More sophisticated call stations consist of control panels mounted near the various
stations along the layout. This method permits a vehicle to be stopped at a given
station, and its next destination to be programmed from the remote call panel. This
represents a more automated approach to the dispatching function and is useful in
AGV systems that are capable of automatic loading and unloading operations.
Both of the call station methods described here involve a human interface with the
AGVS at the load/unload station. It is also possible to automate the call function at
an automatic load/unload station. One example is an automated production
workstation that receives raw materials and sends completed parts by means of the
AGVS. The workstation is interfaced with the AGVS to call for vehicles as needed
to perform the loading and unloading procedures.
In large factory and warehouse systems involving a high level of automation, the
AGVS servicing the factory or warehouse must also be highly automated to
achieve efficient operation of the entire production-storage-handling system. Central
computer control is used to accomplish automatic dispatching of vehicles according to a
preplanned schedule of pickups and deliveries in the layout and/or in response to
calls from the various load/unload stations in the system. In this dispatching method, the
central computer issues commands to the vehicles in the system concerning their
destinations and operations to perform. To accomplish the dispatching function, the
central computer must possess real-time information about the location of each vehicle
in the system so that it can make appropriate decisions concerning which vehicles to
dispatch to what locations. Hence, the vehicles must continually communicate their
whereabouts to the central controller.
There are differences in the way these central computer dispatching systems operate.
One of the differences involves the distribution of the decision-making responsibilities
between the central controller and the individual vehicles. At one extreme, the central
computer makes nearly all the decisions about routing of vehicles and other
functions. The central computer plans out the routes for each vehicle and controls the
operation of the guide path zones and other functions, At the opposite extreme, each
individual vehicle possesses a substantial decision-making capability to make its own
routing selections and to control its own operations. The central computer is still
needed to control the overall scheduling and determine which vehicles should go to the
various demand points in the system. However, the vehicles themselves decide which
routes to take and control their own load transfer operations. Vehicles in this second
category are often referred to as "smart" vehicles.
To accomplish the system management function, it is helpful to monitor the overall
operations of the AGVS by means of some form of graphics display. Even with central
computer control it is still desirable for human managers to be able to see the overall
system operations, in order to monitor its general status and to spot problems (e.g.,
traffic jams, breakdowns, etc.). A CRT color graphics display is often used for these
purposes in modem guided vehicle systems.
Another useful tool in carrying out the systems management function is a system
performance report for each shift (or other appropriate time period) of AGVS
operation. These periodic reports of system performance provide summary
information about proportion uptime, downtime, number of transactions (deliveries)
made during a shift, and more detailed data about each station and each vehicle in the
system. Hard-copy reports containing this type of information permit the system
managers to compare operations from shift to shift and month to month to maintain a
high level of overall system performance.
Applications
Automated Guided Vehicles can be used in a wide variety of applications to transport
many different types of material including pallets, rolls, racks, carts, and containers.
Battery Charging
1. Driverless train operations: These applications involve the movement of large
quantities of materials over relatively large distances. For example, the moves
are with in a large warehouse or factory building, or between buildings in a
large storage depot. For the movement of trains consisting of 5 to 10 trailers,
this becomes an efficient handling method,
2. Storage/distribution systems: Unit load carriers and pallet trucks are typically
used in these applications. These storage and distribution operations involve the
movement of materials in unit loads (sometimes individual items are moved)
from or to specific locations. The applications often interface the AGVS with
some other automated handling or storage system, such as an automated
storage/retrieval system (AS/RS) in a distribution center. The AGVS delivers
incoming items or unit loads (contained on pallets) from the receiving dock to
the AS/RS, which places the items in storage, and the AS/RS retrieves
individual pallet loads or items from storage and transfers them to vehicles
for delivery to the shipping dock. When the rates of incoming loads and the
outgoing loads are in balance, this mode of -operation permits loads to be
carried in both directions by the AGVS vehicles, thereby increasing the
handling system efficiency.
vehicles deliver work from the staging area (where work is placed on pallet
fixtures, usually manually) to the individual workstations in the system. The
vehicles also move work between stations in the manufacturing system. At a
workstation, the work is transferred from the vehicle platform into the work
area of the station (usually, the table of a machine tool) for processing. At the
completion of processing by that station a vehicle returns to pick up the
work and transport it to the next area. AGV systems provide a versatile
material handling system to complement the flexibility of the FMS operation.