Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 111 views

    Navarro Vs CA

    Uploaded by

    MonicaCelineCaro
    The document summarizes a court case between Jalbuena, a reporter, and Navarro, a police officer. According to the summary: 1) Jalbuena recorded a conversation between himself, Lingan, and Navarro at a police station without their knowledge. During the exchange, Navarro threatened and assaulted both Jalbuena and Lingan. 2) Lingan later died from injuries caused by Navarro hitting him in the head with a pistol. 3) While Navarro disputed Jalbuena's account, the voice recording confirmed Jalbuena's testimony and established that Navarro assaulted Lingan, leading to his death. 4) Both the trial court and appellate court found Navarro

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Navarro Vs CA

    Uploaded by

    MonicaCelineCaro
    111 views1 page
    The document summarizes a court case between Jalbuena, a reporter, and Navarro, a police officer. According to the summary: 1) Jalbuena recorded a conversation between himself, Lingan, and Navarro at a police station without their knowledge. During the exchange, Navarro threatened and assaulted both Jalbuena and Lingan. 2) Lingan later died from injuries caused by Navarro hitting him in the head with a pistol. 3) While Navarro disputed Jalbuena's account, the voice recording confirmed Jalbuena's testimony and established that Navarro assaulted Lingan, leading to his death. 4) Both the trial court and appellate court found Navarro

    Original Description:

    Evidence Anti-Wire Tapping Case Digest

    Original Title

    Navarro vs CA

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document summarizes a court case between Jalbuena, a reporter, and Navarro, a police officer. According to the summary: 1) Jalbuena recorded a conversation between himself, Lingan, and Navarro at a police station without their knowledge. During the exchange, Navarro threatened and assaulted both Jalbuena and Lingan. 2) Lingan later died from injuries caused by Navarro hitting him in the head with a pistol. 3) While Navarro disputed Jalbuena's account, the voice recording confirmed Jalbuena's testimony and established that Navarro assaulted Lingan, leading to his death. 4) Both the trial court and appellate court found Navarro

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    111 views1 page

    Navarro Vs CA

    Uploaded by

    MonicaCelineCaro
    The document summarizes a court case between Jalbuena, a reporter, and Navarro, a police officer. According to the summary: 1) Jalbuena recorded a conversation between himself, Lingan, and Navarro at a police station without their knowledge. During the exchange, Navarro threatened and assaulted both Jalbuena and Lingan. 2) Lingan later died from injuries caused by Navarro hitting him in the head with a pistol. 3) While Navarro disputed Jalbuena's account, the voice recording confirmed Jalbuena's testimony and established that Navarro assaulted Lingan, leading to his death. 4) Both the trial court and appellate court found Navarro

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    15 Navarro vs CA b.

    Said law only prohibits overhearing, intercepting, or recording of


    private communications – the exchange in this case is not a private
    1. Jalbuena and Lingan, who were reporters of a radio station went to
    communication.
    Entertainment City because of reports that there were nude dancers
    2. Said voice recording is likewise duly authenticated.
    a. Jalbuena took a photo of the strippers
    a. By the testimony of the witness: who personally recorded the
    b. He was approached by Liquin (floor manager) and Sioco (security
    conversation; the tape played was the one he recorded; the voice on
    guard) and was made to explain
    tape are those of the persons whom are claimed to belong to
    c. He said “wala kang pakielam”. Sioco threatedned to kill him, but
    3. The voice recording established that there was a heated exchange
    Jalbuena ran outside and went to the police station.
    between Lingan and Navarro; and that there was some form of violence
    2. At the police station, Navarro, one of the police on duty was drinking,
    that occurred.
    while Jalbuena reported the matter to the sergeant officer.
    4. An autopsy medical certificate was issued by Dr. Yamamoto showing
    a. Liquin and Sioco arrived to the station and talked to Navarro
    Lingan’s death was caused by cerebral concussion and shock, because of
    b. Navarro then turned to Jalbuena and cursed at him, pushed him and
    a blow to the head by a hard object.
    pulled out his firearm and threatened to kill him.
    5. However, the remarks of Lingan constituted sufficient provocation, a
    c. Lingan intervened and had a heated exchange with Navarro. Lingan
    valid mitigating circumstance. And the lack of intent of Navarro to
    told Navarro to drop his gun and have a fist fight with him instead.
    commit so grave a wrong as that committed.
    d. Navarro hit Lingan with the handle of the pistol above his left
    a. Aggravating circumstance – commission of a crime where public
    eyebrow. Navarro then punched Lingan.
    authorities are engaged in the discharge of their duties
    3. Lingan was taken to the hospital but later on died from injuries.
    4. Unknown to them, Jalbuena was able to record on tape the exchange
    between the parties.
    a. Navarro was arguing that it was Lingan who tried to hit him twice but
    he was able to duck. That Lingan was too drunk which caused him to
    hit the concrete twice.
    5. TC: Navarro is guilty of homicide, based on the testimony of Jalbuena, the
    post-mortem report as to the cause of death of Lingan.
    a. CA affirmed.
    6. Navarro questioned the credibility of Jalbuena. That the latter had a
    grudge against him
    a.

    WON the voice recording is admissible YES

    1. As to Jalbuena’s credibility, the SC found that it was confirmed by the


    voice recording made by him
    a. RA 4200 prohibits wire tapping, and evidence obtained by him in such
    is inadmissible in any judicial, quasi-judicial, legislative or
    administrative hearing or investigation

    You might also like