The Bharat Microfinace Report 2017 Final PDF
The Bharat Microfinace Report 2017 Final PDF
The Bharat Microfinace Report 2017 Final PDF
Supported by:
Data Acquisition Analytics
& Report Generation by
Ardhendu Nandi
Shyamasree Nandan
Sunny Koshy
The Bharat Microfinance Report 2017
Disclaimer:
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the opinions/views of any of the
insitutions referred to and they are not to be held responsible for the opinions/views in this report.
Preface
T he Indian Microfinance Sector has witnessed a phenomenal growth over the past 18 years. The number of
institutions providing microfinance services has gone up from a few to several hundreds. The quantum of credit
made available to the poor and financially excluded clients has reached `46,842 crore and number of clients benefitted
crossed 29 million as of March 2017 without the data of 6 large sized MFIs who converted to Small Finance Banks
before April 2017. The SHG bank linkage programme has equally grown to touch the lives of individuals through
SHGs with an outstanding loan portfolio of `61,581 crores.
The Government of India and the Reserve Bank of India have created conducive policy and regulatory framework for
Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) to operate in the country. This has provided necessary legitimacy and impetus to
the sector. MFIs in general comply with the regulations, take care of client protection issues, adhere to the Industry
Code of Conduct. These factors go a long way in infusing confidence among all the stakeholders. This year the sector
had to face certain issues when two denominations of currency notes were demonetized. This was coupled with
efforts in certain regions to put spokes in the recovery efforts of the institutions. Though in the short term these
developments have indeed affected the sector, we have displayed enough resilience to carry on with our activities to
achieve the goal of financial inclusion.
In this context, I think there are three areas within our domain deserving our special attention. One is the need for
articulating the fact that microfinance is a strategic part of the financial inclusion agenda of the government and that
of the central bank. The second is the criticality of re-demonstrating our collective intention to help the poor and the
unbanked populace by way of having the right mission, social performance measures and client protection processes.
The third area is in projecting the fact that microfinance institutions are sustainable financial institutions and they
continue to be the investible destination for the bankers and the investors.
In order to articulate these positions, we need empirical data. This Bharat Microfinance Report has been designed
to provide comprehensive information and newer perspectives on the above three areas. Primary data received from
168 MFIs and 4 Small Finance Banks who represent around 96 percent of the microfinance sector in India and
analysis thereon forms the basis for this report.
Sa-Dhan, as the leading association of community development finance institutions in India, has been publishing
The Bharat Microfinance Report for the past fourteen years. This year 172 MFIs/SFBs reported data, including 62
non-members of Sa-Dhan. We thank them for reposing confidence in us and valuing transparency through data
reporting.
This year the substantial part of the work relating to the report has been shouldered by Mr. Ardhendu Nandi, right
from data collection, consolidation, analysis to report writing in which he was ably supported by Ms. Shyamasree
Nandan and Mr. Sunny Koshy.
Mr. Somesh Dayal and Mr. Saibal Paul provided a broad support to the report, especially in sourcing useful inputs.
Ms. Sangeeta Naik and Mr. Chandan Thakur also supported by giving write-ups for box items.
Special thanks are due to CRIF High Mark, Prime M2i Consulting Pvt. Ltd, Smart Campaign, Gram Vaani, National
Payment Corporation of India, Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company Ltd, Satya MicroCapital Ltd for inputs in
bringing out this report.
We are grateful to overall patronage from NABARD for generously sponsoring the publication of The Bharat
Microfinance Report, 2017 with financial assistance from Research and Development Fund of National Bank for
Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) and dissemination of the report widely among all stakeholders. We
are also thankful to SIDBI, World Bank Group (IFC), DFID, RBI and Government agencies for their support to the
activities and initiatives of Sa-Dhan.
We hope this report would be extremely useful to you as a reference and data source. We welcome suggestions for
further enhancing its coverage and utility.
P. Satish
Executive Director
14 September, 2017
iii
Contents
Preface iii
List of Boxes vi
List of Figures vii
List of Tables ix
List of Abbreviations x
Glossary xiii
Executive Summary xv
Chapter 1: Inclusive Financial Sector: Progress with Continuity 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Demonetization and its aftermath 1
1.3 Microfinance: The Continuing Relevance 3
1.4 Quarter Century of SBLP 4
1.5 Furthering Financial Inclusion 4
1.6 DBT and Social Security 5
Chapter 2: Outreach and Loan Portfolio 7
2.1 Geographical Spread of Microfinance 6
2.2 Branch Network 8
2.3 Client Outreach 11
2.3.1 Regional Outreach of MFIs 11
2.3.2 State-wise Client Outreach 12
2.3.3 Rural – Urban Share of MFIs Borrowers 13
2.3.4 Outreach to Special Segment of Borrowers (Women, SC/ST, and Minorities) 13
2.3.5 Leading MFIs in Client Outreach 14
2.3.6 Client outreach distribution across Players 15
2.4 Loan Portfolio of MFIs 17
2.4.1 Rural – Urban Share of Gross Loan Portfolio 18
2.4.2 Regional Spread of Loan Portfolio 18
2.4.3 Loan Portfolio Across States / UTs 19
2.4.4 Managed Portfolio 21
2.4.5 Business Correspondent (BC) Portfolio 21
2.4.6 Gross Loan Portfolio distribution across players 22
2.4.7 Loan Outstanding per Borrower 22
2.4.8 Trends in Outreach and Outstanding Portfolio 23
2.5 Loan Disbursement 23
2.5.1 Loan Disbursement - States/UTs and Regional Pattern 24
2.5.2 Rural – Urban Share of No. of Loans Disbursed 26
2.5.3 Loan Amount Disbursed 27
2.5.4 Purpose of Loan 27
2.5.4.1 Income Generation Loans 28
2.5.4.2 Non- Income Generation Loans 28
v
List of Boxes
Figure 3.1.1 No. of MFI Staff - Yearly Trend and MFI-Category-wise Break-up 31
Figure 3.1.2 MFI Field Staff vs Other Staff Distribution – 2017 & 2016 31
Figure 3.1.3 New Staff Recruited by the MFIs over the years 32
Figure 3.1.4 Distribution of MFIs based on clients served per Staff & per Credit Officer 33
Figure 3.1.5 ABCO Across MFIs 33
Figure 3.1.6 Distribution of MFIs Based on Loan Portfolio per Credit Officer 34
Figure 3.1.7 MFI Loan Portfolio at Risk (PAR) 34
Figure 3.1.8 Distribution of MFIs Based on PAR 34
Chapter 3.2 Cost and Revenue
Figure 3.2.1 Break up of expenses by Indian MFIs 35
Figure 3.2.2 Break up of expenses by Indian MFIs based on portfolio size and legal form 36
Figure 3.2.3 Operating Expenditure Ratio across MFIs 36
Figure 3.2.4 Finance Cost Ratio across MFI Categories 37
Figure 3.2.5 Trends of OER and FCR 38
Figure 3.2.6 Break-up of Income 38
Figure 3.2.7 Yield Trend of MFIs 39
Figure 3.2.8 Yield on Portfolio across MFIs 39
Figure 3.2.9 Yield, Cost and Margin of MFIs –size wise 40
vii
Chapter 3.3 Surplus, Sufficiency and Profitability
Figure 3.3.1 OSS Across MFIs 41
Figure 3.3.2 OSS based on average loan size 42
Figure 3.3.3 OSS based on yield category 42
Figure 3.3.4 OSS based on OER of MFIs 42
Figure 3.3.5 Return on Asset (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) across MFI types 43
Figure 3.3.6 Return on Asset (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) of MFI-Size wise 43
Figure 3.4.1 MFI Total Assets- Yearly Trend 44
Figure 3.4.2 Composition of Total Assets of MFIs 44
Figure 3.4.3 MFI Equity Outstanding - Yearly Trend and MFI- Category- wise Break-up of 2017 Figure 45
Figure 3.4.4 Fresh Equity Raised by MFIs and MFI-Category-wise Break-up 46
Figure 3.4.5 Top 10 MFIs in terms of Equity Raised 46
Figure 3.4.6 Sources of funding based on types of instruments 47
Figure 3.4.7 Sources of funding based on Institution types 47
Figure 3.4.8 Outstanding Borrowing – Yearly Trend and MFI-Category wise Break-up of 2017 Figure 48
Figure 3.4.9 Fund Received during the year – Yearly Trend and MFI-Category wise Break-up of 2017 Figure 48
Figure 3.4.10 Source wise Share of Loans lent among Different Legal Forms of MFIs during 2016-17 49
Figure 3.4.11 Capital to Total Asset Ratio 58
Figure 3.4.12 Debt - Equity Ratio Trend and Break–up of 2017 Figure across MFI –Categories 58
ix
List of Abbreviations
xi
96 PAR Portfolio at Risk
97 PFRDA Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority
98 PLF Primary Level Federation
99 PMDJY Pardhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana
100 PMJJBY Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana
101 PMSBY Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana
102 POS Point of Sale
103 PSIG Poorest State Inclusive Growth
104 PSL Priority Sector Lending
105 PSLC Priority Sector Lending Certificate
106 PSU Public Sector Unit
107 RBI Reserve Bank of India
108 RF Revolving Fund
109 RFF Responsible Finance Forum
110 RFIP Rural Financial Institutions Programme
111 RGMVP Rajiv Gandhi Mahila Vikas Pariyojna
112 RMK Rashtriya Mahila Kosh
113 RoA Return on Asset
114 RoE Return on Equity
115 RPCD Rural Planning and Credit Department
116 RRBs Regional Rural Banks
117 RSETIs Rural Self Employment Training Institutes
118 RWAs Risk Weighted Assets
119 SBLP Self-Help Group Bank Linkage Programme
120 SBLP SHG Bank Linkage Programme
121 SC/ST Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe
122 SERP Society for Elimination of Rural Poverty
123 SFB Small Finance Bank
124 SGSY Swarnajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana
125 SHGs Self-Help Groups
126 SHPI Self Help Promoting Institute
127 SIDBI Small Industries Development Bank of India
128 SLF Secondary Level Federation
129 SLR Statutory Liquidity Ratio
130 SMS Short Message Service
131 SPM Social Performance Management
132 SRLM State Rural Livelihood Promotion
133 SRLP State Rural Livelihood Promotion
134 SRO Self-Regulatory Organisation
135 SRTT Sir Ratan Tata Trust
136 UCBs Urban Cooperative Banks
137 UID Unique Identification
138 UIDAI Unique Identification Authority of India
139 UT Union Territory
140 WSHGs Women Self Help Groups
141 Y-O-Y Year On Year
ABCO
ABCO is an acronym for Average Borrower per Credit Officer, a measure of client-staff ratio. It is also known as Case
Load
Average Loan Size
Average Loan size represents the client-per capita loan amount. It is calculated as: The Loan portfolio divided by the
number of clients of an MFI.
Borrowing Cost
The total charge for taking on a debt obligation that can involve interest payments and other financing fees.
Capital Adequacy
Capital Adequacy is the means of measuring the solvency level of MFIs which is an important indicator of risk bearing
ability of the entities. It is the proportion of the capital/own fund held by an MFI against its total asset
Capital to Total Assets
Ratio of net worth to total assets
Debt-Equity Ratio
Debt-Equity Ratio is the proportion of total debt borrowed to the total equity held at a given point of time.
Debt Funding
Debt Funding refers to the percentage of loan portfolio funded by outside borrowings
External Cost
External Cost here refers to Finance cost which is determined by the lending rate of banks and hence is beyond the
control of MFIs
Finance Cost
Finance Cost here refers to the interest and other expenses incurred on average bank loan outstanding in the books of
MFIs. This does not include notional cost of utilizing the equity fund.
Financial Inclusion
Financial Inclusion is the delivery of financial services at affordable costs to sections of disadvantaged and low income
segments of society.
Margin
Margin refers to the difference between the finance cost on portfolio and the total yield on portfolio. This term is anal-
ogous to the concept of Net Interest Margin (NIM) widely used in banking parlance. Margin Cap refers to the ceiling
of Margin of 12 percent fixed by RBI.
Managed Loan Portfolio
Managed Loan Portfolio is the loan asset originated by MFIs and later sold to banks for getting liquidity. The MFIs
continue to manage it i.e. collection of repayment on behalf of the banks which purchased the portfolio.
xiii
Non Performing Assets (NPA)
A debt obligation where the borrower has not paid any previously agreed upon interest and principal repayments to
the designated lender for an extended period of time. The NPA is therefore not yielding any income to the lender in
the form of principal and interest payments.
Operating Expense Ratio (OER)
Ratio of staff, travel, administration costs, other overheads and depreciation charges of the MFIs (non-financial costs)
to the average loan portfolio during a year
Operating Self Sufficiency (OSS)
Operating Self Sufficiency (OSS) shows the sufficiency of income (operating income and investment income) earned
by MFIs to cover the cost like operating cost, loan loss provision and finance cost, incurred for conducting the
operations.
Portfolio Quality
Amount of risk of default in the loan portfolio. A high quality portfolio contains a lower amount of risk. Portfolio
quality changes continually as loans are disbursed, payments are made, and payments become due.
Portfolio at Risk (PAR)
PAR indicates the proportion of outstanding amounts of all loan accounts having past due/arrears to the total out-
standing loan. In general, PAR 60, i.e., the portfolio / part of the portfolio remaining unpaid 60 days and beyond
crossing the due date, would be used as a measure to assess the portfolio quality.
Qualifying Assets
Qualifying Assets are loan portfolios created by MFIs adhering to certain conditions to make the MFIs eligible to be
called as MFIs and to raise loans from banks under Priority Sector Advances Scheme ( as per recent RBI norms).
Return on Asset (RoA)
Return on Asset (RoA) is the universally accepted profitability measure which, in essence, is the percentage net in-
come earned out of total average asset deployed by MFIs during a given period, say a year.
Return on Equity (RoE)
Return on Equity (RoE) is the net income earned out of average equity of MFIs held by MFIs during the given period.
Self Help Groups (SHGs)
SHGs refer to groups of 10-20 women coming together to form a semi formal community based institution to meet
their common financial and social needs.
SHG Bank Linkage Programme (SBLP)
SHGs are linked to mainstream banks for depositing surplus savings of the SHGs and to obtain loans. It is considered
to be an effective strategy to ensure financial inclusion.
Surplus
Surplus is Yield minus Total cost
Yield on Portfolio
Yield represents total income from microcredit operation-Interest income, processing fee/ service charge – earned out
of average loan portfolio outstanding. It does not, include investment income. It is a good proxy / surrogate for loan
interest rate.
xiv The Bharat Microfinance Report 2017
Executive Summary
Context
F or the microfinance sector in India the year 2016 -17 was one of growth with a few hiccups. External
environment had some non-conducive elements for the sector. RBI’s continuing interest in the sector
is reflected in its engagement with both the SROs of the Microfinance sector-Sa-Dhan and MFIN, coming
out with modifications and improvements in guidelines whenever required, and support to the sector in the
aftermath of demonetization.
MFIs continue to be major contributors for the progress of MUDRA. The Pradhan Mantri Bima Yojana
(PMBY) and the Atal Pension Yojana provide additional financial instruments for MFIs to offer to their
clientele. Bandhan Bank which rose from the microfinance sector completed two years of its service, five
MFIs started off as Small Finance Banks during the year along with four Payment Banks. Further, RBI is
coming up with guidelines for Peer To Peer lending. These are game changers for the banking and financial
sector landscape of the country in general and for financial inclusion scenario in particular.
Objective
This report is an attempt to collect primary data on MFI client outreach, their loan portfolio and other
financials of MFIs in India that includes both members as well as non-members of Sa-Dhan.
The report purports to provide primary data based analytical information to a wide range of stakeholders
such as the Government, policymakers, regulators, banks, investors, researchers, media, MFIs and others,
helping them to understand the current status and the underlying trends in the sector in order to take
appropriate decisions/actions that are critical for the development of the industry.
Methodology
The contributing MFIs have voluntarily provided their data and detailed information as sought through a data
acquisition sheet consisting of their financial, outreach, geographic spread, credit plus and developmental
activities etc. For this report we have compiled data from MFIs representing all legal forms (Societies, Trusts,
Sec-8 Companies, NBFC-MFIs, Cooperatives). The data has been collated, validated, and analysed for peer
groups.
The project team rigorously scrutinized the self reported data, validated it from the MFIs’ financial statements,
and reconciled from other secondary sources. The validity of the findings however, is subject to the accuracy
of the self-reported data, though reconciliation techniques used would have minimized such errors.
The analysis of the report was undertaken on the basis of a predesigned framework and the findings have
been improved to the extent possible though advisory inputs from microfinance experts and practitioners.
The chapters pertaining to SHGs and the BC model, while culled out from secondary sources, have been
further enhanced by inputs from the experts in the field.
In the Part 2 of the report, Chapter 5 deals with the SHG section of microfinance and Chapter 6 presents an
overview of the BC model and other technology led approaches of financial inclusion.
MFIs currently operate in 29 States, 4 Union Territories and 563 districts in India. The reported 168 MFIs
with a branch network of 10,233 and 89,785 employees have reached out to 29 million clients with an
outstanding loan portfolio of `46,842 crore. This includes a managed portfolio of `13,898 crore. Out of
managed portfolio, BC portfolio accounts for `10,131crore. The average loan outstanding per borrower
stood at `12,751 and 85% of loans were used for income generation purposes
Outreach fell by 26% and loan outstanding grew by 27% over the previous year. The Southern region
continues to have the highest share of both outreach and loans outstanding, followed by East. However
growth rates are higher in the Northeastern and East regions. Outreach proportion of urban clientele has
decreased significantly as against the rural population. The proportion of urban clientele which was 62% in
2015-16 decreased to 39% in 2016-17. Women borrowers constitute 96% of the total clientele of MFIs, SC/
ST borrowers constitute 20% and minorities 10%.
Of the total, For Profit MFIs (NBFC/NBFC-MFIs) contribute to 79% of clients outreach and 79% of
outstanding portfolio, while NGO MFIs contribute to the remaining. MFIs with portfolio size of more than
`500 crore contribute significantly to the total outreach (80%) and loan outstanding (82%) of the sector.
Financial expense is the major expense (48%) incurred by MFIs. Personnel expense and other administrative
expenses contribute 24% and 28% respectively. Median OER (Operating Expense Ratio) and FCR (Finance
Cost Ratio) remained at 10.5% and 14.8% respectively. It is seen that the OER comes down with scale of
operation. MFIs, with portfolio of more than `500 crore have a median OER of 8.5% and FCR of 17.7%.
The Yield of the sector for the year was 22%, which is the highest for Others MFIs (Society/Trust/MACS)
(23%) and lowest for the Section 8 Companies (21%). The Margin for different types of institutions was in
the range of 6-9%. For-profit MFI (NBFC/NBFC-MFIs) maintained a median margin of 8.1%. Median OSS
(Operational Self Sufficiency) is 114%. Approximately 8% of MFIs have OSS less than 100%. This includes
3% of the NBFC-MFIs on account of AP portfolio and 5% not for profit MFIs. Generally, the OSS improves
with the average loan size and yield of the institution.
xvi The Bharat Microfinance Report 2017
Median ROA and ROE for the sector remained at 2.4% and 13.31% respectively. The returns are generally
higher for not for profit MFIs and very large sized MFIs.
The CAR (Capital Adequacy Ratio) for all types of MFIs remained above the desirable level of 15%. NBFC-
MFIs have CAR of 21%. Leveraging of the sector was 2.9 The sector received a sum of `26236 crore, which
includes a portfolio sale of `3768 crore. Total outstanding borrowing of MFIs stood at `33923 crore, with a
substantial share of this derived by NBFC-MFIs (94%) especially from the very large MFIs (87%).
The amount of savings and the average per SHG savings (`18,788) held in the banking system are both
increasing since 2011-12. Average loan disbursed per SHG for 2016-17 is reported at `204,314, whereas
average loan outstanding per SHG stood at `127017
The aggregate NPA of SHG loans remain a concern though it has declined marginally to 6.45% in 2015-16,
it again rose in 2016-17 to 6.5 %. Quality of SHGs, their performance has emerged as one of the major issues
affecting the movement.
Also the fact that NRLM will push for improvement in the SHG bank linkage with better monitoring, lower
rates of interest and a sharper focus on livelihood generation, would give a greater fillip to the growth of
SHG programme.
MFIs are finding the BC model increasingly attractive to carry out their activities on the credit side and to
spread it to deposit taking activities 44 MFIs had an exposure to a BC loan portfolio of `6712 crores through
linkage to 29 banks. Apart from this 6 MFIs were undertaking deposit related activities for 9 banks. The
deposit portfolio of BCs amounted to `588.11crores.
xvii
Performance Highlights: A Snapshot
Indicators: MFI Model 2017 2016 Change
Client Outreach 295 lakh 399 lakh
Women Clients 96% 97%
SC/ST Clients 20% 30%
Other Minorities 10% 27%
Rural Clients 61% 38%
Gross Outstanding Portfolio `46,842 Cr. `63,853 Cr.
Own Portfolio `32,944 Cr. `46,939 Cr.
Managed Portfolio `13,898 Cr. `16,914 Cr.
Avg. Loan per Borrower `12,751 `11,425
Income Generation Loan 85% 94%
Female Staff in MFIs 12% 15%
ABCO 426 440
OER 10.50% 10.22%
FCR 14.8% 13.83%
Yield 22% 21%
Margin 8.08% 10.00%
OSS 114% 113%
ROA 2.4% 2.2%
ROE 13.31% 11.6%
CAR 21.13% 19.39%
Leverage 2.9 3.2
Fund Flow (Outstanding) `33,923 Cr. `44,822 Cr.
Equity Outstanding `3,615 Cr. `4,509 Cr.
NPA 0.69% 0.15%
SHG Model
Total No of SHGs Linked 85.77 lakh 79.03 lakh
No. of Families Reached 112 million 103 million
Total Savings of SHGs `16,114 Cr `13,691 Cr
Total No. of SHGs Credit Linkage 18.98 lakh 18.32 lakh
Gross Loan Outstanding `61,581 Cr `57,119 Cr
Total Loan Disbursed `38,781 Cr. `37,286 Cr
Avg. Loan Disbursed per SHG `2,04,314 `2,03,495
Avg. Loan Outstanding per SHG `1,27,017 `1,22,242
NPA 6.50% 6.45%
xviii The Bharat Microfinance Report 2017
Chapter 1 Inclusive Financial Sector: Progress with Continuity
1.1 Introduction
D uring the last financial year 2016-17, the Indian economy has continued to consolidate the gains achieved
in restoring macro-economic stability. Despite the continuing global sluggishness and recent pick-up
in petroleum prices, the economic growth has continued to be robust and inflation has remained more or
less stable, while fiscal deficit and current account deficit as percentage of GDP have improved. The growth
rate of the economy during the first half of the year is estimated at 7.2 per cent, which makes India one of the
fastest growing major economies in the world. At the sectoral level, the growth rates for agriculture and allied
sectors, industry and services sectors for the first half of the year were estimated at 2.5 per cent, 5.6 per cent,
and 9.2 per cent respectively. The stress given to fiscal consolidation through expenditure rationalization
and revenue raising efforts and the focus on administrative measures for cooperative financial governance
and also steps towards containing inflation have contributed significantly to macro-economic stability
Over the previous year, several SFBs have commenced operations. This is an exciting development for
microfinance clients, as SFBs will offer a full range of financial services to them. RBI’s guidelines for SFBs,
issued in July 2017, require them to extend 75% of their Adjusted Net Bank Credit (ANBC) for priority
sector lending.
According to RBI, “the scope of activities of a small finance bank would primarily be to undertake basic
banking activities of acceptance of deposits and lending to unserved and underserved sections including
small business units, small and marginal farmers, micro and small industries and unorganized sector
entities.” SFBs are required to open 25% of their branches in unbanked areas. While 40% of the lending has
to be allocated according to the norms for commercial banks, the remaining 35% can go towards any priority
sector where the small finance bank has competitive advantage. Domestic commercial banks and foreign
banks with more than 20 branches have to lend at least 40% towards priority sectors within which 18% has to
be towards agriculture, 7.5% towards micro enterprises, 10% towards weaker sections and remaining 4.5%
towards any priority sector. The lending to agriculture sector will be categorized as (i) Farm Credit (which
will include short-term crop loans and medium/long-term credit to farmers) (ii) Agriculture Infrastructure
and (iii) Ancillary Activities. Farm Credit includes loans to individual farmers, (including SHGs or JLGs, i.e.
groups of individual farmers, provided banks maintain disaggregated data of such loans), directly engaged
in Agriculture and Allied Activities – dairy, fishery, animal husbandry, poultry, bee-keeping and sericulture.
Early evidence suggests that MFIs that have become SFBs will easily exceed these targets. There will be an
opportunity for them to sell Priority Sector Lending Certificate (PSLC), to other banks which need to cover
their shortfalls in priority sector loans. In the near term, SFBs face the challenge to evolve their business
model in a manner that makes it possible for them to serve their clientele, which to a large extent will include
low income households as well as micro and small enterprises. They will need to evolve a mix of financial
products and services that are tailored to the needs of this market segment. At the same time, they will need
to establish sound risk management systems so that they can successfully cope with any uncertainty that
their operating environment throws at them.
This year has provided evidence that the microfinance sector has matured and is in a better position to
manage risks that may arise from time to time. However, the need to remain vigilant at the organizational
level as well as the sector level remains as important today as ever. In the past year we have seen high profile
cases of fraudulent organizations mimicking MFIs as well as SHPIs (in Odisha and Bihar). Such instances
create confusion among the general population and harm the reputation of microfinance. It is therefore
important for responsible organizations involved in microfinance to make efforts to safeguard their clients
from becoming victims of such frauds. There is now an imperative from a risk management perspective for
responsible organizations to make efforts to raise the financial literacy levels of their clients. They should
ensure that their clients are able to distinguish between legitimate and fake financial institutions, genuine
and fake financial products and genuine and fake banking agents.
It is worth mentioning that the SHG bank linkage movement has entered its 26th year. According to
NABARD’s “Status of Microfinance in India (2016-17)” report, as on 31 March 2017, the SHG bank linkage
program covered “10 crore families through 85 lakh SHGs with savings deposits of `16,114 crore and 48.4
lakh groups with collateral-free loan outstanding of over `61,500 crore, of which, 88% for rural women”. An
important factor that has helped this program achieve this scale has been the wide participation of banks,
NGOs, as well as State Rural Livelihood Missions in the recent years. The organizations involved in the
SHG bank linkage project are now making efforts to link credit data of SHG members to credit information
bureaus. Once this is achieved, there will be greater integration of the low-income population living in the
rural areas of the country with the formal credit markets.
MFIs currently operate in 29 States, 4 Union Territories and 563 districts in India. Table 2.2 shows the
distribution of MFIs by state. In particular, it shows the number of MFIs operating in each state, their
total number of branches in the state and the number of districts with microfinance operations. Annexure1
indicates the state wise presence of different MFIs.
Twenty one MFIs with a large outreach and portfolio have operations in more than five states, out of which
four leading MFIs are operating in more than fifteen states. A total of 57 MFIs (34%) are operating in two to
five states, while 90 MFIs (54%) have confined their operations to only one state. The details of States/ Union
Territories wise operation of 168 MFIs are given in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1: No. of MFIs in Indian States/UTs
MFIs with a smaller scale or regional focus have concentrated their operations in 1-2 states only whereas other
MFIs have spread across a higher number of states in order to increase their size, scale and simultaneously
mitigate concentration risk. MFIs operating in multiple states, in general, are typically larger in size and
follow the legal form of an NBFC-MFI. The geographical expansion of bigger MFIs is illustrated by the
fact that while in 2013 -14 only 15 MFIs had operations in more than 5 states, that number increased to 25
in 2015 -16 and stands at 21 in 2016-17. List of top 10 MFIs operating in more number of states and more
number of districts are presented in Figure 2.1 and 2.2 respectively.
Asirvad Microfinance 17
Basix 14
Spandana 13
Muthoot Microfin 11
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
No. of States/UTs
BFIL 322
Spandana 192
Sonata 112
No. of Districts
The distribution of branches among different categories of MFIs as of March 2017 showed that NBFCs
(NBFC/NBFC-MFI) had the lion’s share of 8852 (87%) branches.
Figure 2.3: MFI Branch Network – Yearly Trend and Category-wise Breakup
16000
13562
14000
12221
11459 11687 11644
12000 10697 10233
10000 8852
8000
6000
4000
2000 450 931
0
Names of Top 10 MFIs in terms of Branch Network are given in Figure 2.4.
Figure 2.4: Top 10 MFIs in Terms of Branch Network
BFIL 1265
No. of Branch
Some observers say high stress had already built up in the areas of very high growth, which is where
Some observers say high stress had already built up in the areas of very high growth, which is where the
the collections efficiency have been very low after the currency note-ban. It is difficult to establish the
collections efficiency have been very low after the currency note-ban. It is difficult to establish the
causality,causality,
since areas in Tamil Nadu and West Bengal which have larger portfolios and experienced
since areas in Tamil Nadu and West Bengal which have larger portfolios and experienced high
high growth, did not observe similar drops in collections. Severe impact of localized external reasons
growth, did not observe similar drops in collections. Severe impact of localized external reasons seems
seems totobe more plausible.
be more plausible.
The growth has also been tepid since the de-monetization. Uttar Pradesh saw very minor year-on-
year increase of just
The growth about
has also been 5%
tepidin thetheportfolio
since outstanding
de-monetization. as well
Uttar Pradesh as in
saw very new
minor customer addition.
year-on-year
There has been a 30% drop in number of new disbursements and 20% drop in disbursed
increase of just about 5% in the portfolio outstanding as well as in new customer addition. There has value in
the monthly averages considering a period of 6 months before and 6 months after demonetization,
Maharashtra most affected amongst the larger states.
The shockwave forced the industry to relook at how the industry operates --- moving away from
dependence on cash, and of course on use of technology to improve cost and process efficiencies.
The industry is in a state of flux also for another reason. Most large players are getting into the banking
fold – some becoming banks and some being acquired by an existing bank. There is still no clarity
when and how the code of conduct guidelines will get reviewed by the regulator. It assumes more
relevance as the data for self-help group (SHG) bank linkage program gets reported at a member-
level to the credit bureaus. Recent mention by the RBI Deputy Governor on moving towards activity
based regulations from entity-based is a ray of hope.
Courtesy: CRIF-High Mark
450 399
400 371
317 330
350 275 275 295
267
No. of Borrower (in lakh)
Client Outreach grew by 10% 2017 relative to 2016 without six SFBs which indicate a sound growth of MFIs
in 2016-17. This rise in the number of borrowers is positively correlated with an increase in fund flow from
banks, MUDRA and financial institutions to MFIs.
2.3.1 Regional Outreach of MFIs
Out of the total client base of Figure 2.6: Regional break up of Client Outreach
295 lakh, Southern region alone
contributes to 38% followed by 6% 3%
25% in East and 19% in Central
region whereas West and North 9%
38%
have 9% and 6% of total outreach
respectively. Northeast has the least 19%
client outreach numbers with 3%.
Share in outreach has expanded 25%
only in case of East and Northeast
regions from 20 to 25%, 2 to 3%
respectively. South East Central West North Northeast
Clients of MFIs are essentially Loan Borrowers. ‘Clients’ and ‘Borrowers’ have been interchangeably used in this report.
1
80%
69%
67% 67%
70% 62% 61%
56%
60%
Rural-Urban Borrowers (%)
50% 44%
38% 39%
40% 33% 33%
31%
30%
20%
10%
0%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Rural Urban
BFIL 53.24
SKDRDP 37.19
Active Micro-lenders2
11%
41%
22%
26%
Box 2.2: Limited Liability Group (LLG) –A New Way of Doing Microfinance
In India, Microfinance has a practice of Joint Liability Group (JLG), wherein borrowers come together
to form a group and take the responsibility of each other in case of default by any of the members.
In the current scenario, the responsibility of the financially disciplined members are extended to a
large extent in case the group has few customers who are intentional defaulters. This puts additional
financial pressure on the disciplined customers and at times, such customers also default in repayment
due to extended financial obligations. So, the existing JLG model has this limitation that good clients
face pressure due to few defaulting customers in the group.
To address this limitation, Satya MicroCapital Ltd has come up with a refined model of JLG which
it termed as “Limited Liability Group (LLG) Model”. In this model, the share of responsibility of
defaulted clients of a group on disciplined clients is limited to certain time. Under this process,
delinquencies are controlled through its credit appraisal and seven layers approval process which
would lead to take the responsibility of defaulting customers beyond a point. So, under LLG model,
good customers will have limited liability (maximum up to 10 percent of loan tenure through joint
liability) in case of an event of default by a delinquent member. Satya will take the ownership of this
delinquency and will relieve the disciplined customers from the obligation of making payment on
behalf of a delinquent customer. A special software is employed to capture the source of repayment
whether it is member herself or through joint liability. This MFI has focused training for its staff on
delinquency management and client relationship and they ensure ethical behaviour on these grounds.
SATYA MicroCapital Ltd, one of the latest entrant in the microfinance sector is building a vision of
change and transformation in the financial inclusion space through its innovative approach on the
Joint liability model. In addition, it is disbursing all its loans in cashless manner from the initial stage,
and moving on E-KYC and Aadhaar Enable Payment System for its collection purpose.
As of March 2017, the total loan portfolio outstanding of MFIs excluding 6 Small Finance Banks (SFBs) has
reached to `46,842 crore. In 2015-16, six SFBs alone had `24,034 crore out of total GLP `63,853 crore. GLP
in 2016-17 has declined to `46,842 crore from `63,853 crore but actually there is a growth of 18% (factoring
in 6 SFBs’ exit as an MFI).
Total managed portfolio also includes a BC portfolio of `13,898 crore which is 30% of total loan portfolio.
The net loan portfolio or owned portfolio on the books of the MFIs stood at `32,944 crore.
The share of NBFC-MFIs stood over 79%, followed by Others (Society, Trust and MACS) at 17%. Nearly
82% of the portfolio is held by MFIs with a portfolio size above `500 crore.
List of top 10 MFIs in terms of loan portfolio is indicated in Table 2.5. Among these, BFIL has the largest
portfolio i.e. approximately 20% of the total client outreach of the sector. SKDRDP, Satin Creditcare, Grameen
Koota are the other major players in this area.
Table 2.5: List of Top MFIs with Loan Portfolio as of March 2017
70000
63853
60000
Gross Loan Portfolio (₹ in crore)
48882
50000 46842
37032 38313
40000
33517
30000 24332 24607 25699
20000
2017
28% In 2016-17, the
45%
trend of rural
to urban is the
2016 reverse of trend of
55% 2015-16 because
72% of exclusion of 6
SFBs.
Rural Urban
Figure 2.11 indicates that the Gross Loan Portfolio in Rural areas is `25,959 crore which constitute 55%
whereas the share of Urban areas is `120,882 crore which constitutes 45%. In the year 2015-16, share of
Rural and Urban portfolio was 28% and 72% respectively.
2.4.2 Regional Spread of Loan Portfolio
Among the regions, South still dominates the overall loan portfolio outstanding of MFIs with 43% followed
by East with 23%. Central and West have a share of 17% and 9% respectively. While North and Northeast
have least portfolio share of 5% and 3% respectively.
18 The Bharat Microfinance Report 2017
Figure 2.12: Region wise Loan Portfolio
5%
17%
3%
23%
9%
43%
All regions have experienced an upward trend in loan portfolio outstanding except Northern and Central.
Highest growth is visible in Northeast with 50% followed by East and South with 28% and 8% respectively.
Table 2.6, indicates that portfolio in most States/UTs has declined, except Andaman, Assam, Odisha, Bihar,
Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland. Exclusion of 6 SFBs is the reason for the fall in loan portfolio in most of the
States/UTs.
Table 2.6: Loan Portfolio Outstanding Across States/UTs – 2017 & 2016 (Decreasing Order)
State 2017 2016 Growth (%)
Karnataka 11952 12645 -5%
Tamil Nadu 5164 9039 -43%
Uttar Pradesh 4207 6671 -37%
Odisha 3564 3339 7%
Bihar 3541 3526 0.4%
Top five states
Maharashtra 3457 6589 -48%
account for 60%
West Bengal 3140 3406 -8%
of total client
Madhya Pradesh 2711 4088 -34% outreach and rest
Kerala 1668 2372 -30% of other states
Assam 1186 1013 17% hold only 40% of
Rajasthan 1022 1368 -25% total clientele.
Jharkhand 897 977 -8%
Chhattisgarh 872 1136 -23%
Gujarat 783 2193 -64%
Punjab 738 1116 -34%
Haryana 536 1186 -55%
Telangana 389 393 -1%
Uttarakhand 257 577 -55%
Andhra Pradesh 164 893 -82%
18000 16914
16000
13898
14000
11715
Managed Portfolio (` in crore)
12000
9854
10000
8000 6446 6655
6000 4075
3694 3361
4000 2776
1672
2000 797 511
0
12000
10131
10000
BC Portfolio (₹ in crore)
7984 8388
8000
6595
6000
4000 2768
2000 1325
768 418
0
11%
31%
28%
30%
Out of the total loan portfolio, NBFC-MFIs are leading with 31% followed by SFB & Aspirants with 30%
whereas Banks and Others contribute to 28% and 11% respectively.
2.4.7 Loan Outstanding per Borrower
Average loan outstanding per borrower has been an important criterion to understand the general profile of
clients borrowing from MFIs (a surrogate indicator for depth of outreach). It has implications on operating
cost as well as the adequacy of loan amount for the purpose it was borrowed.
Average loan for the year stood at nearly `12751 which is a big jump of 12% over the previous year. Average
loan size in South is reported close to `14589 followed by West at `14588.
22 The Bharat Microfinance Report 2017
Figure 2.16: Loan Outstanding per Borrower yearly trend and across regions for the FY 2016-17
120
97
100
72
80 61 56
60 41
18 30 33 31
40 20
18 19
7 8
20 3 13 -27%
-3
0 -15 -26%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
-20
-40
Growth in Client Outreach (%) over previous year Growth in Loan Portfolio (%) over previous year
4
No of MFIs reported in 2010 - 11 was much higher than other years (184 MFIs)
Figure 2.19: Top 10 MFIs in term of Loan amount disbursed during 2016-17
80000 72345
70000
56860
Loan Disbursed (` in crore)
60000 52447
50000 38558
35176
40000 29330
25796
30000 22635
20000
10000
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
BFIL 14667
SKDRDP 5855
State-wise Disbursement as shown in Table 2.7, indicates that States like, Odisha, Assam, Jharkhand,
Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh, Goa, Arunachal Pradesh, Andaman and Nagaland have substantially
increased their disbursement during 2016 -17 compared to the previous year. In other States/UTs, the
disbursements have shrunk as 6 MFIs became Small Finance Banks and are not part of MFI sctor.
3%
5%
9%
39%
15%
29%
Among the regions, South still dominates the overall loan disbursement of MFIs with 39% followed by East
with 29%. Central and West have a share of 15% and 9% respectively. While North and Northeast have least
disbursement share of 5% and 3% respectively.
In 2016-17, 100 lakh loans had been disbursed in Rural areas which constitute 44% of total, whereas 128
lakh loans had been disbursed in Urban areas which constitutes 56%. Figure 2.21 depicts that number of
loans in Urban areas had decreased and number of loans in Rural areas had increased over 2016 to 2017.
Figure 2.21: Percentage of Rural - Urban Share of No. of Loan Disbursed
2017
26%
2016 44%
56%
74%
Rural Urban
100% 94%
91%
90% 85%
80% 80%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20% 20%
20% 15%
9%
10% 6%
0%
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
9%
2% Agriculture
4%
30%
2% Animal Husbandry
Trading/Small business
Transport
Cottage
31% Handicraft
Any Other
22%
Purpose of MFIs’ loans has assumed significant importance after the RBI regulation which stipulates that
aggregate amount of loans, given for income generation, should not be less than 50 per cent of the total loans
given by the MFIs. An analysis of the loan portfolio held by reporting MFIs under different sub-sectors is
portrayed in Figure 2.23.
Figure 2.24: Share of MFIs Non-Income Generation Loans under Different Sub-sectors as of March 2017
13%
Education
39% Housing
Health /Medical
26% Water & Sanitation
Consumption
Any Others
2%
13% 7%
The Figure 2.24 confirms that among the non-income generation loans, Housing loans are predominent
with 26%.
28 The Bharat Microfinance Report 2017
District wise Penetration of Portfolio Outstanding of MFIs5
1. Quantitative aspect includes financial parameters which will give us a better understanding of the
quarterly growth of MFI in terms of clients, portfolio outstanding, PAR status.
2. Qualitative aspect covers parameters of COC which provide us with information on client
protection practices at MFI level.
3. In order to monitor Over indebtedness, the Smart Campaign is currently developing an add on
tool to identify states, districts with higher risk of over indebtedness and a broad guidance on the
field visits and interaction with branch/field staff of MFIs and clients.
We are in the process of developing a web based online platform to enable MFIs to report their data
every quarter. Following the completion of the online tool, Sa-Dhan members will be trained through
workshops on how to use the self-reporting online platform to report their data as well as get their
self-assessment reports. Sa-Dhan foresees this as a unique digital breakthrough in the industry which
will be beneficial to all stakeholders including regulators, funders, MFIs and donors to keep abreast
with industry trends and the status of implementation of Code of Conduct.
M icrofinance services, by nature, have a close human touch with clients on the ground. Even with the
advent of technology, these services still predominantly depend on human resources for ensuing
effective delivery. Considering the fact that personnel costs contribute substantially to the total expenses
of MFIs (i.e. 24% as given in section 3.2 of this report), staff productivity plays a major role in determining
their cost efficiency. Staff productivity is measured through some key indicators such as active borrowers
per credit officer (ABCO), active borrowers per MFI staff, amount of loan outstanding per credit officer etc.
The MFI sector had brought down its workforce significantly from over one lakh in 2011 to just over 75000
in 2013. Thanks to an increased fund flow to the sector, MFIs increased their workforce over the years in
order to support their enhanced activity. As on 31st March 2017, total workforce stood at 89,785 excluding
6 large sized MFIs who graduated to Small Finance Bank is (SFB) and not part of this data. In 2016, these
6 SFBs together engaged 30156 employees. By excluding their (6 SFBs) part, there is a growth of 23%. The
following figure illustrates the trend and furthermore shows that NBFC–MFIs and large MFIs have major
share of employees (Figure 3.1.1).
Figure 3.1.1: No. of MFI Staff - Yearly Trend and MFI-Category-wise Break-up
140000
114659
120000 103415
94773
100000 86956 80149
89785 81% workforce is
75670 72728
80000 66300 being engaged by
60000 For-profit MFIs and
40000 MFIs with outstanding
No. of Staff
Sixty per cent (60%) of total staff is field staff, working in the branches of MFIs. This is obviously because of the
labour- intensive nature of the MFI- operations, which involves human interaction with clients, cash handling
etc. Female staff comprises of approximately 12% of the total workforce of MFIs and 11% of total field staff.
Figure 3.1.2: MFI Field Staff vs Other Staff Distribution – 2017 & 2016
2016
40%
38% Field Staff
2015 Other Staff
62%
60%
Diversity in the microfinance industry is also reflected in staff productivity levels among different MFIs.
Figure 3.1.4 depicts the staff productivity ratios measured through active borrowers per staff member and
ABCO. We can find that about 13% of MFIs have less than 100 borrowers per staff member, 31% have 100-
200 borrowers per staff, 26% have 200-300 borrowers per staff, and 30% have more than 300 borrowers per
<100 4% <100
4%5% 13% 12%
100 -<200 100 -<200
37%
21%
200 -<300 14% 200 -<300
31% 300 -<400 300 -<400
400 -<500 17% 400 -<500
26% 16%
> 500 > 500
The Median ABCO for 2017 stands at 426 as against 440 in 2015-16. ABCO has high for For-profit MFIs
(426) followed by Other MFIs (364). Section 8 Companies typically have lesser ABCO of 350, as most of
these organisations follow the philosophy of providing financial services along with some development ac-
tivities. ABCO seems to be increasing with the scale of operations. MFIs with larger scale of operations have
systems and processes in place that require minimal time for credit officers to be spent at the client level.
Figure 3.1.5: ABCO Across MFIs
600 537
502
500 440 426 426
400 350 364 344
300
200
100
0
< ₹15
> ₹100 lakhs lakhs
₹15 -
12% 9%
<₹30
₹70 - < ₹100 lakhs
lakhs 15%
18%
₹30 - < ₹50
₹50 - < ₹70 lakhs
lakhs 24%
22%
3. 1. 3 Portfolio Quality
The loan portfolio is the primary income-generating asset in an MFI’s balance sheet. Interest income typically
constitutes over 90% of the total income of MFIs. Lending, obviously, is fraught with the inherent risk of
repayment default. Therefore, maintaining a healthy loan portfolio with minimum loan default ensures the
profitability and financial health of an MFI. This section presents the analysis of current performance of the
loan portfolio quality as measured through Portfolio at Risk (PAR 30 Days)
The portfolio quality of Indian MFIs is by and large healthy if we exclude the CDR (Corporate Debt
Restructuring) MFIs’ figures based in Andhra Pradesh. The overall PAR for the MFI sector has been coming
down since 2012, but has shown an increase in 2014-15 and 2015-16, adding to the concerns of the sector
observers.
Figure 3.1.7: MFI Loan Portfolio at Risk (PAR) Figure 3.1.8: Distribution of MFIs Based on PAR
1.4 1.32
1.2 1
1
>5 PAR
0.8 <1 PAR
29%
0.6 0.4 39%
0.29
0.4
0.13
0.2 0.02 3 -<5 PAR 1 -<3 PAR
0 7% 25%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Distribution of MFIs as per various levels of PAR shows (Figure 3.1.8) that over 39% of MFIs have PAR <1 for
30 days, 25% of MFIs have PAR in the range of 1-3, and 36% of MFIs have a PAR of more than 5%. Approx 7%
of MFIs have PAR in the range of 3-5%.
Another important indicator of portfolio quality is overdue installments beyond 180 days. The pending
installment amount is `576 crore as of March 2017, which is lower compared to March 2016 (`1319 crore).
The significance of this amount is that the MFIs concerned ought to make 100 % provision in the balance
sheet as per RBI prudential norms.
1
PAR indicates the proportion of outstanding amount of all loan accounts having past due/arrears to the total loan portfolio. In general, PAR 30, that is, the
portfolio / part of the portfolio remaining unpaid 30 days and beyond crossing the due date, would be used as a measure to assess the portfolio quality.
T his section of the report covers the analysis of income and expenditure patterns of the microfinance
sector and the sustainability of the sector through its profitability and self sufficiency. This section hence
contains the analysis of operational and financial expenses, revenues/income, margin, surplus, operational
self sufficiency and return on assets and return on equity.
Loan Loss Provision (LLP) expenses have increased significantly from the previous years. In 2017, LLP
to Operating Expenses is 19% whereas it was only 9% in 2016 because of demonetization. This marks a
deterioration in the overall quality of the outstanding portfolio of the sector.
As seen in Figure 3.2.1, the total expenses incurred are distributed at 48% in finance expenses and 52% in
operating expenses. The operating expenses of 52% comprised of 24% personnel expenses and 28% other
administrative expenses. Loan Loss Provisions for the year are 19% of operating expenses and 15% of total
expenses has been incurred as a part of other administrative expenses.
28%
Financial Expenses
48% Personnel Expenses
Other Admn. Expenses
24%
Since MFIs with an outstanding portfolio over `500 crores account for 81% of the total portfolio of the
sector, it is understandable that they incur a major chunk of the expenditure too i.e. 81% of total financial
expenses and 81% of total personnel expenses. This leaves the MFIs with portfolio less than `500 crores with
financial expenses less than 19% and personnel expenses less than 19% of the overall expenses of the sector.
This proportion of expenses is consistent with the outstanding portfolio of the MFIs.
120%
100%
25% 20% 21% 29%
80% 34%
61% 25%
60% 24% 38% 24%
28% Other Admn. Expenses
40%
20% 54% Personnel Expenses
20% 51% 42% 48%
39%
19% Financial Expenses
0%
4.0
2.0
0.0
1
Denotes ratio of all administrative and salary expenses to average loan portfolio.
The median FCR of the microfinance sector in 2017 is 14.8%. As can be seen in Figure 3.2.4, FCR is lowest
for Other MFIs (Society/Trust/MACS) at 13.3%, In addition to the legal form, Figure 3.2.4 also shows that
there is a direct correlation between FCR and portfolio size. FCR is only 14.6% for MFIs with portfolio size
of <`100 crores, it is at a high of 17.7% for MFIs with portfolio size of above `500 crore. This is due to the
fact that smaller MFIs but with portfolio size lower than `100 crore have more access to low cost funds from
NABARD, SIDBI, MUDRA, Ananya etc. compared to larger MFIs.
Since bank loans are the major source of funds for MFIs and the rates are largely similar or within a range,
FCR for most legal forms, especially those dependent mainly on bank loans, are almost similar with FCR
for Not-for Profit MFIs marginally lower than that of For-profit MFIs and Section 8 Companies. This is
primarily because not for profit MFIs may have access to grants, revolving funds and subsidised loans from
government sources.
Figure 3.2.4: Finance Cost Ratio across MFI Categories
20.0 17.7
18.0
14.8 14.8 15.4
16.0 14.8 14.6
13.3 13.3
14.0
12.0
10.0
Per Cent
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
OER of MFIs in 2016-17 has increased over the last year. OER had been consistently increasing for the last
3 years from 11.88% in 2011-12, to 12% in 2012-13 and 12.08% in 2013-14. But OER has come down to
11.45% in 2014-15 and 10.2% in 2015-16. OER 10.2% in 2015-16 and OER 10.5% in 2016-17 is the lowest
and second lowest respectively in the last 6 years.
FCR has been however growing consistently for the last 6 years from 11.89% in 2012-13, 12.17% in 2013-14,
12.42% in 2014-15 and to 14.8% in 2016-17.
OER FCR
13 20.00
11.88 12.00 12.08 14.8
11.45 12.00 11.89 12.17 12.42 13.3
12 15.00
11 10.5 10.00
10.2
10 5.00
9 0.00
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Other Income
30
25 24 24
22 22
21
20
17
Per Cent
15
10
0
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Figure 3.2.8 shows that MFIs in all legal forms have a yield within the range of 21% to 23%. Among them
Section 8 Companies have least yield at 21%, followed by For-profit MFIs at 22% whereas Other MFIs
(Society/Trust/MACS) have yield of 23%. But portfolio size has a very major bearing on the yield on portfolio.
Yield is decreasing with the increase of portfolio size. Yield is lower at 19% for the bigger MFIs whereas yield
is marginally higher at 23% for the smallest MFIs with the portfolio of less than `100 crore.
25 23 23
22 22
21 21
19 19
20
15
10
As can be seen from Figure 3.2.9, MFIs with portfolio less than `100 crores have the lowest financial cost
and highest yield on portfolio and highest margin while the MFIs with portfolio above `500 crore have the
highest financial cost and the second highest and yield and margin. The lowest margin is for those MFIs that
have a portfolio `100-500 crore, as their financial costs yield are moderate.
Figure 3.2.9: Yield, Cost and Margin of MFIs –size wise
25
23
19 19
20
17.7
15.4
14.6
15
Yield
Finance Cost
10
9.1 Margin
8.4
5 5.7
0
<100 cr 100-500 cr >500 cr
Margin is the difference between MFIs’ financial revenue (excluding processing fee) % age on average loan portfolio and the financial cost % age on average
3
S ustainability of an organisation is a key factor and in MFIs it is measured through profitability and self
sufficiency. Operational Self Sufficiency (OSS), Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE)
etc. are some of the key ratios that are used to determine the profitability and self sufficiency of MFIs. In this
report, operational profit is taken to be the net surplus after taxes.
3.3.1 Surplus
The total net surplus (after tax) generated by the sector is `1286 crore. This is despite the fact that some AP
as well as non AP based MFIs having reported negative surplus and negative impact of demonetization. In
line with the 82% outstanding portfolio that is owned by the large MFIs (MFIs with GLP>500 crore), their
contribution to the net surplus is 58% at `741 crores. An overwhelming share of the surplus (94%), at `1205
crores of the `1286 crores is from For-profit MFIs (NBFC/NBFC-MFIs).
120 118
118
116 114
113 114 113
114 113 113
112
110 108
108
106
104
102
As can be seen from Figure 3.3.2, average loan size has a direct impact on the OSS of an MFI. While very
small loan sizes result in lower OSS, higher loan sizes result in higher OSS.
It is interesting to note the impact of yield on the OSS of MFIs. While it can be seen from Figure 3.3.3 that
the median OSS increases steadily with yield till yield greater than 30%.
Impact of Operating Expense Ratio (OER) on Operational Self-Sufficiency (OSS): Figure 3.3.4 shows that
MFIs with the lowest OER (<10%) have the best median OSS (122) while MFIs with the highest OER (>14%)
have the lowest median OSS (109). The figure also shows that any decrease in OER results in significant
increase in OSS.
Figure 3.3.4: OSS Based on OER of MFIs
OSS vs OER
125 122
120
115 113
110 109
110
105
100
<10% 10-12% 12-14% >14%
Figure 3.3.5 shows the distribution of ROA and ROE across different legal forms of MFIs and it makes for
interesting viewing. The chart shows clearly how the asset and equity base of the different types of MFIs
differ and hence how it impacts the ROA and ROE of the MFIs. It has been established from 3.3.1 that For-
Profit MFIs contribute to 94% of the surplus generated by the sector. In terms of ROA and ROE, For-Profit
MFIs are at 2.37% and 13.31% respectively.
42 The Bharat Microfinance Report 2017
For- Profit MFIs have highest ROA at 2.37%, followed by Section 8 Companies with 2.33%. As for ROE,
Others MFIs (Society/Trust/MACS) have the highest at 18.36%, followed by For-profit MFIs with 13.31%.
Figure 3.3.5: Return on Asset (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) Across MFI Types
20.00 18.36
18.00
16.00
14.00 13.31 13.31
12.00
10.18
Per Cent
10.00 RoA
8.00 RoE
6.00
4.00 2.37 2.37 2.33 2.18
2.00
0.00
All MFIs NBFC/NBFC-MFI Sec. 8 Com Others
Impact of scale of operation on ROA and ROE: Figure 3.3.6 shows a clear trend of higher ROA and ROE
for larger scale of operations. Hence the largest MFIs with outstanding portfolios over `500 crores have the
highest ROA and highest ROE of 2.55% and 18.99% respectively while the MFIs with outstanding portfolio
under `100 crore have ROA and ROE of only 2.37% and 10.21%.
Figure 3.3.6: Return on Asset (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) of MFI-Size wise
20.00 18.99
18.00
16.00
14.04
14.00
12.00 10.21
Per Cent
10.00 RoA
8.00 RoE
6.00
4.00 2.55
2.37 2.46
2.00
0.00
<100 cr 100-500 cr >500 cr
I t is critical for MFIs to manage their balance sheet effectively in order to be able to generate better
profitability, strengthen themselves and attract investors and funders. This chapter attempts to analyse
the balance sheet structure of MFIs and studies the patterns of funding and leverage as well as allocation of
assets.
3.4.1 MFI Assets
In 2016 -17, total assets of the MFIs excluding 6 Small Finance Banks (SFBs) is `46247. In 2015-16, six SFBs
alone had `25188 crore out of total assets of `58621 crore. Volume wise total assets in 2016-17 have declined
by `12374 but actually there is a growth of 38% (factoring in 6 SFBs’ exit as MFIs).
Total assets of MFIs have seen a consistent growth trend over last 6 years from 2011 to 2016 but in 2016-17,
there is a sharp decline of 21%.
Figure 3.4.1: MFI Total Assets - Yearly Trend
70000 58621
60000 51564
46247
Amount (` in crore)
50000
36125
40000 28051
22736 25240
30000
20000
10000
0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Distribution of Assets: The assets of an MFI comprise mostly of its net loan portfolio. At the end of the year
2016-17, the net loan portfolio of reporting MFIs was over 73% of the total assets. This was followed by cash
and cash equivalents of 19%. Cash and cash equivalents are at this level mainly because most MFIs receive
debt funding largely towards the very end of the year while it can be lent to the clients only at the beginning
of next year. Trade and other receivables form the other major component of MFI assets at 7%.
Figure 3.4.2: Composition of Total Assets of MFIs
0.1%
1% Cash & Cash Equivalent
19%
Trade and other receivable
7%
Net Loan Portfolio
The MFIs reported a total Net Owned Funds (NOF) of close to `8845 crores for the year 2016-17. This
NOF comprised of paid up equity, share premium, retained earnings and other reserves. For-profit MFIs,
as can be expected, hold the lion’s share of the NOF, at over 95% of the total NOF of the sector. Other MFIs
(Society/Trust/MACS) follow with 3% of the total NOF of the sector at `253 crores.
Equity Outstanding
In 2016 -17, of the total NOF of `8845 crores equity constitutes nearly `3615 crores excluding 6 Small
Finance Banks (SFBs). In 2015-16, six SFBs alone had ₹1502 crore out of total equity of `4509 crore. Volume
wise total assets in 2016-17 have declined by `894 but actually there is a growth of 20% (factoring in 6 SFBs’
exit as an MFI).
It is understandable that For-profit MFIs (NBFCs/NBFC-MFIs) hold 97% of the equity as their legal form
is the most conducive to absorb equity. Again, there is a direct correlation between equity size and portfolio
size, as close to two-thirds of the total equity is held by MFIs with portfolio over `500 crores.
Figure 3.4.3: MFI Equity Outstanding - Yearly Trend and MFI- Category- wise Break-up of 2017 Figure
5000
4509
4500 4233 4195
4000 3615
Equity Outstanding (` in crore)
3513
3500
3000
2500 2034 2073
2000
1500 1325
During the year 2016-17, the reporting MFIs collectively raised fresh equity to the tune of `1995 crores. This
is significantly higher than equity raised in the previous years.
Again, of the total fresh equity raised, close to 99% is by For-profit MFIs (NBFC/NBFC-MFIs) and close to
87% by MFIs with portfolio over `500 crores.
2500
1995 1976
2000 1739
Equity Raised (` in crore)
1500
1000
500
190
8 11 66
0
BFIL 740
Spandana 300
Satin Credit Care 294
Equity Raised (` in crore)
The confidence of lenders in the microfinance sector continues to grow post the AP microfinance crisis as
MFIs show compliance to RBI guidelines and the strengthened regulatory framework takes effect. Strong
performance of MFIs outside Andhra Pradesh, strengthening operational efficiency and the effective
functioning of credit bureaus has again made banks start lending to MFIs in a major way.
The total MFI debt funding for the sector has been reported at over `33923 crores during the year 2016-17.
While most of this funding is through borrowing (77%) and Non-Convertible Debenture (11%), Figure
6%
0.5% 0.2%
11% Borrowing
Subordinated debt
2%
Bond
3%
NCD
ECB
Saving & Deposit
77% Any Other
The total amount of outstanding borrowings as on 31st March, 2017 for all MFIs collectively was close to
`33923 crores without data of 6 SFBs (Equitas, ESAF, Janalakshmi, Suryoday, Ujjivan and Utkarsh). Of this
the maximum outstanding borrowings were from public sector banks at 29% followed by private sector
banks at 28%, for a combined portfolio outstanding of over 57% (`19217crores) of the total borrowings.
Figure 3.4.7: Sources of Funding based on Institution Types
111
Public Sector
6650
Private Sector
9687
SIDBI
NABARD
3524
MUDRA
Bulk Lenders
556 2580 Other Financial Institutions
9530 Any Others
1286
Figure 3.4.8: Outstanding Borrowing – Yearly Trend and MFI-Category wise Break-up of 2017 Figure
50000 44822
45000
40000 35573 33923
35000 31765
27662 27989
30000
25000 20724
20000 16959
15000
10000 4648
5000 1314 844 1286
0
The total debt fund received during the year (April ’16 – March’17) for all MFIs collectively was close to
`26236 crores without data of 6 SFBs (Equitas, ESAF, Janalakshmi, Suryoday, Ujjivan and Utkarsh). Out of
total debt fund received, the share of For-profit MFIs (NBFC/NBFC-MFIs) alone constitutes `25048 crore
(95%), whereas NGO-MFIs hold only 5%. Size-wise, MFIs with portfolio size above `500 crore hold 84%
of the total debt fund received and MFIs with portfolio size of 100-500 cr. hold another 13%. Smaller MFIs
hold a miniscule amount of the outstanding borrowed portfolio.
Figure 3.4.9: Fund Received during the year and MFI-Category wise Break-up of 2017 Figure
30000
26236
25048
25000 21968
20000
15000
10000
5000 3465
826 362 803
0
0.2% 4%
Any Others 0.1%
SIDBI Others
3% 13% 3%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
It was also found that MFIs with a portfolio above `500 crore hold approximately 90% of the loan outstanding
amount from all lenders.
Top Lenders to MFIs during 2016-17
The data of reporting MFIs has been further analysed to enumerate major banks and bulk lenders having
outstanding balances with MFIs as of March 2017. The MFIs had been asked to list down lenders names who
appear under Top 10 lenders as per their books as of March 2017.
Table 1 lists banks and other lenders respectively, which appear in the list of Top 10 lenders in the books of
the MFIs. This list is obviously significant, though not exhaustive, as it contains the names of lenders who
happened to be Top 10 among the reporting MFIs.
Table 3.4.1: List of lenders reported among Top 10 Lenders of the individual reporting MFIs
(in terms of Outstanding as of March 2017)
Name of the Banks No. of MFI
Allahabad Bank 1
Andhra Bank 4
Assam Cooperative Apex Bank 1
Assam Gramin Vikas Bank 4
Axis Bank 7
Bandhan Bank 9
Bangiya Gramin Vikas Bank 8
Bank of America 1
Bank of Baroda 8
Bank of India 7
Bank of Maharashtra 13
Bharatiya Mahila Bank 2
Balance Sheet Distribution and Capital Structure 49
Canara Bank 23
Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd 1
Central Bank of India 3
Citi Bank 2
Corporation Bank 5
Development Credit Bank (DCB) 6
Dena Bank 13
Dhanlaxmi Bank Ltd. 5
ESAF Small Finance Bank 1
Federal Bank 5
HDFC Bank 10
HSBC Bank 1
ICICI Bank 10
IDBI Bank 29
IDFC Bank 5
Indian Bank 9
Indian Overseas Bank 10
IndusInd Bank 4
Karnataka Bank 2
Karnataka Gramin Vikas Bank 1
Karur Vysva Bank 1
Kaveri Grameen Bank 1
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. 7
Lakshmi Vilas Bank 4
MUDRA 5
NABARD 31
National Housing Bank 1
Oriental Bank of Commerce 6
Pallavan Gram Bank 2
Punjab National Bank 4
Rabobank 3
Ratnakar Bank 1
RBL Bank 8
Shinhan Bank 1
SIDBI 40
South Indian Bank Ltd. 9
Standard Chartered Bank 1
State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur 4
State Bank of Hyderabad 1
State Bank of India 57
State Bank of Mysore 3
State Bank of Travancore 2
Syndicate Bank 5
Tamilnad Mercantile Bank 1
UCO Bank 20
Union Bank of India 24
United Bank of India 7
Vijaya Bank 16
Yes Bank 7
Note: This is not an exhaustive list of lenders as we only collected MFI-wise top 10 lenders in terms of amount of loan
outstanding. Some MFIs received funds from more than 10 lenders which are not captured here.
Note: This is not an exhaustive list of lenders and outstanding loan amount as we only collected MFI-wise top 10
lenders in terms of amount of loan outstanding. Some MFIs received fund from more than 10 lenders which are not
captured here.
Balance Sheet Distribution and Capital Structure 57
3.4.3 Capital1 (Net owned Fund) to Total Asset Ratio
The Capital Adequacy of Indian MFIs, by and large, is well above the prescribed norms. The RBI has
stipulated that NBFC-MFIs need to maintain at least 15 per cent capital on their risk weighted assets. The
risk-weighted asset details are not readily available. However, with the help of Net Owned Fund and Total
Asset particulars, Figure 3.4.11 brings out the estimates of CAR for the MFIs who reported this data. The
median CAR for 2016-17 stands at 21, which is slightly higher than the figure of 19.4 for 2015-16.
NBFC-MFIs, for which maintaining Capital adequacy is now mandatory, have an adequate CAR of 21% in
aggregate, while Sec-8 Companies also have a CAR of 21%. Others MFIs have a median CAR above the
desirable limit at 18%.
Figure 3.4.11: Capital to Total Asset Ratio
Leverage of NBFC-MFIs is highest at 2.9, followed by Section 8 companies at 2.8. According to Size of MFIs, MFIs
with portfolio of more than `100-500 crore have the highest median leverage of 3.5
1
The capital includes the free reserves and surplus also ( collectively termed as Net Owned Fund)
2
Equity refers to Net Owned Fund (Equity + Free Reserves and Surplus)
Box 4.1: Microfinance and Affordable Insurance Access - A path to achieve Sustainable
Development Goals
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance is one of the largest private players in the rural insurance space and the
largest micro insurance provider in India. It has covered more than 20 crore lives through 350 Rural
Partners and settled more than `47,139 crore worth of claims. It has also covered MFI client through
50 MFI Partners and settled 3,97,942 claims during last six months with 98% claim settlement ratio.
Claims paid of `1015.43 crore under Financial Inclusion (Group Scheme). It has entered into more
than `2700 crore new business and more than `1600 crore renewal business.
All the insurance products are designed through extensive market research to fit the budget of the
rural clients. It also involves in training the rural clients on various livelihood earning activities such
as Nukkad Nataks, Drum beating etc.
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance is a joint venture between Allianz SE, the world’s leading insurer, and
Bajaj Finserv Limited. Allianz SE is a leading insurance conglomerate globally and one of the largest
asset managers in the world. Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company was incorporated on 12th March
2001 and started its operations on 3rd August 2001 with a commitment to offer premium financial
solutions providing financial security to individuals and their families. It is one of India’s leading
private life insurance companies today. The Company has developed insurance solutions that cater to
all kinds of customer needs from ULIPs to Child plans, and from group insurance to health insurance.
The Company has a pan-India presence with 638 branches in India. Recently, the Company achieved
a milestone of crossing `50,000 crores of Assets Under Management (AUM) on 31 May 2017.
Courtesy: Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co Ltd.
“Punji Ki Kunji representatives were here to tell us about the Punji Ki Kunji service. It gives
us information about loans etc. and also allows us to file a complaint if we face a problem.”
Rita Devi from Muzaffarpur, Bihar
Others 10 6
NPS Lite 44 29
Total 154
Tier - I account: This is the non - withdrawable permanent retirement account into which the accumulations
are deposited and invested as per the option of the subscriber. As on 31st March 2017, the total number
of active accounts of All Citizen subscribers under Tier I is 437,076.
Tier - II account: This is a voluntary withdrawable account which is allowed only when there is an active
Tier I account in the name of the subscriber. The withdrawals are permitted from this account as per the
needs of the subscriber as and when claimed. As at the end of March, 2017, there are 81,607 subscribers
aving Tier II accounts under NPS.
A number of MFIs have been providing micro pension services under various schemes. As the Table 4.3
below states, 9 MFIs have reached to 3.85 lakhs clients.
Sa-Dhan has received special reports from MFIs on their development activities undertaken during the last
year. The primarily development interventions of reporting MFIs are summarized in Tables 4.5, 4.6, & 4.7.
Given the persistent issues in view, Sa-Dhan with financial support of SIDBI and DFID under Poorest
State Inclusive Program (PSIG) has been providing handholding and capacity building support to
selected Microfinance Institutions (MFIs). These initiatives would help partner MFIs to evolve as
bigger MFIs with robust practices in place. It would also help in improving their Gross Loan Portfolio
(GLP), Client Outreach, Non Performing Asset (NPAs) and so forth.
Handholding and Capacity Building Support is primarily being provided in various aspects of their
operations viz. Risk Management, Process Mapping, Financial Management, MIS, Internal Audit,
Operations, Human Resource, Grievance Redressal, Business Plan, Training modules and so forth.
It has also been earmarked that this support would help in improving their rating thereby augment
fund flow. Efforts are being taken to enable them to avail India Microfinance Equity Fund (IMEF) of
SIDBI and from other sources. We are optimistic that this would yield fruitful result for partner MFIs.
In addition to this, good governance is another important component. Good governance has assumed
increasing importance in the Indian microfinance sector over the last few years. There is a need for
prudent corporate governance structure as strong governance not only contributes to robust growth
of the institution but also avoids the possibility of mission drift. Furthermore, the credibility building
initiative for microfinance sector has to be strengthened. In this context, a series of governance
workshops are being organized to inculcate good governance practices among MFIs and sector at
large. Workshops are primarily for Non Executive Board Members and Independent Directors and
touch upon various aspects of good governance viz. Companies Act, 2013 and other acts governing
MFIs, the Board’s legal environment, compliance issues, emerging role of Independent Directors,
Leadership for maximizing effectiveness and accountability of Boards and so forth.
Source: Sa-Dhan’s initiatives with financial support of SIDBI and DFID under PSIG
20.00 45000
18.00 38781
37286 40000
16.00 35000
Bank Loan (` in crore)
14.00
27582 30000
No. of SHGs (in lakh)
12.00 24017
25000
10.00 20585
20000
8.00 14453 14548 16534
12254 15000
6.00
8849
4.00 6570 10000
4499
2.00 2994 5000
10 2 4 6 12 33 136 288 545 1022 1856
0.00 0
Source: NABARD
1
The SHG savings amount held by banks has been growing (Figure 5.2) except for a marginal decline in 2011-
12. This is largely due to the decline in saving of SHGs in the Eastern region. As of March 2016, the banking
system held SHG savings to the tune of `16,114 crore which is 17.7 % more than the previous year.
Figure 5.2: All India Trend in SHG Savings Amount Held in the Indian Banking System
18000
16114
16000
13691
Saving Amount (` in crore)
14000
12000 11059
9897
10000
8217
8000 7016 6551
6199
6000
4000
2000
0
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Source: NABARD
20000 18788
18000 17324
16000 14367
Average Saving per SHG (`)
14000 13321
12000 11230
8915 9403
10000 8230
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Source: NABARD
12000 10170
10000
8000
6000
3632
4000 2312
2000 44 26 16 86
0
Commercial Bank Regional Rural Bank Cooperative Bank Total
Source: NABARD
20 19
18
18
No. of SHG availed Bank Loans (in lakh)
16 16
16
14
14 12
12 11
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Source: NABARD
2500
2018
2000 1824
Saving Amount (` in crore)
1500
1063
1000
694 646
500 398 392 372 314 242
Source: NABARD
Figure 5.7 depicts that the loan amount disbursed to SHGs at all India level during the year was `38,781
crore which is an increase of a modest 4% in comparison to last year.
Figure 5.7: All India Trend in Bank Loan Amount Disbursed to SHGs
45000
40000 38781
Bank Loan Disbursed to SHGs (` in crore)
37286
35000
30000 27582
24017
25000
20585
20000
16535
14859 14548
15000
10000
5000
0
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Source: NABARD
45000
38781
40000
35000
30000
24297
25000
20000
15000 11613
10000
5000 2871
11.2 5.6 2.2 19
0
Commercial Bank Regional Rural Bank Cooperative Bank Total
Source: NABARD
Maintaining the trend, Commercial Banks are leading the chart in terms of bank loans disbursed to number
of SHGs and amount disbursed during 2016-17 with `24,297 crore having been given out to 11.2 lakh SHGs
(Figure 5.7). Commercial Banks alone account for around 63% of the total loan amount disbursed to SHGs.
RRBs and Cooperative banks come in at the second and third positions with 30 % and 7.4 % respectively.
4000
3403
3500
3000
Saving Amount (` in crore)
2625
2411
2500
2077
2000 1688 1658
1500 1231 1200
1083 1054
1000
500
Source: NABARD
Figure 5.9 shows top 10 banks in terms of amount disbursed where Andhra Bank is leading with `3403
crores, followed by Indian Bank with `2625 crores.
SHG Movement and its Role in Financial Inclusion 77
Average Loan Disbursement per SHG
Figure 5.10: All India Trend in Average Bank Loan Amount Disbursed per SHG
250000
203495 204314
Average Disbursement per SHG (`)
200000
175769 169608
168732
144046
150000
121623
93616
100000
50000
0
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Source: NABARD
The average loan amount disbursed per SHG has been on the increase. It was `204314 during 2016-17 across
India (Figure 5.10). Average loan amount disbursed per SHG has been maintaining an increasing trend over
the period of years, though the increase in the current year was only 0.4 % over the previous year.
70000
61581
60000 57119
Loan Outstnding (` in crore)
51545
50000
42927
39375
40000 36340
31221
28038
30000
20000
10000
0
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Source: NABARD
Figure 5.12: All India Trend in Average per SHG Loan Outstanding in the Banking System
140000 127017
122242
115361
120000
Average Outstanding per SHG (`)
102273
100000 88455
83455
80000
65224
57795
60000
40000
20000
0
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Source: NABARD
On an average, the loan outstanding per SHG as of March 20117 is `127017 at an all India level, which is a
jump of around 4 %.
Figure 5.13: Agency-wise Bank Loan Outstanding Against SHGs as on 31 March 2017
70000.0
61580
60000.0
50000.0
38668
40000.0
30000.0
19120
20000.0
10000.0 3792
26.7 16.1 5.7 48
0.0
Commercial Bank Regional Rural Bank Cooperative Bank Total
Source: NABARD
Figure 5.13 depicts the agency wise bank loans outstanding against SHGs as on 31 March 20117. Yet again,
Commercial Banks lead the chart, with around 63% of total bank loans outstanding. RRBs are second with
31%, followed by Cooperative banks with 6.2%.On the basis of their size and outreach, RRBs have acquitted
well in comparison with their commercial bank peers.
8 7 6.8 7.0
6.45 6.5
7 6.1
6 4.7
5
4
3
2
1
0
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Source: NABARD
450000
400219
400000
350000
300000 264112
250000
200000
150000 104500
100000
50000 31607
6.8 5.5 8.3 20.6
0
Commercial Bank Regional Rural Bank Cooperative Bank Total
Source: NABARD
Figure 5.15 throws light on Non Performing Assets of Banks against SHG loans outstanding as of 31 March
2017. It is evident that Cooperative Banks have highest NPA with 8.33%. However, they account for only
6.2% of total bank loans outstanding. On the contrary, Regional Rural Bank, which account for 31% of
total loan outstanding, have an NPA of 5.47 % while Commercial Banks account for 63 % of total loan
outstanding, have an NPA of 6.83 %.
Integration of credit history of individual SHG members in the Credit Bureau could be a way forward for
reducing NPAs. A report from the Aditya Puri Committee highlighted the need for sharing the data of
SHG members with CIBs. Furthermore, the Nachiket Mor Committee also stated the need to develop a
robust legal and regulatory framework around customer data generated in various transactions (credit and
payments, digital and off-line), with the objective of customer ownership of their own transactions data and
There are four components of the NRLM (World Bank – Government of India project). The first component
of the project is institutional and human capacity development. The objective of this component is to
transform the role of the Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) into a provider of high quality technical
assistance in the field of rural livelihoods promotion. The second component of the project is state livelihood
support. The objective of this component is to support state governments in the establishment of the necessary
institutional architecture for the implementation of the National Rural Livelihoods Mission (NRLM)
activities from the state to the block level. The third component of the project is innovation and partnership
support. The objective of this component is to create an institutional mechanism to identify, nurture and
support innovative ideas from across the country to address the livelihood needs of the rural poor. The
fourth component of the project is project implementation support. The objective of this component is to
establish an effective project management unit at the national level that develops key systems and processes
for coordination and management of the project and the NRLM.
According to the latest report of DAY-NRLM, NRLM has now been rolled out across 30 States/UTs, Number
of Districts with intensive blocks in NRLM States stood at 557, Number of Blocks identified for intensive
approach in NRLM States is 4066, Number of Blocks where intensive implementation has commenced is
4049, Number of villages in which intensive implementation has started is 2,65,325, Number of households
mobilized into SHGs (in Lakh) is 365.7, Number of SHGs promoted (in Lakh) is 36.2, Number of Village
Organizations promoted is 161350, Amount of credit mobilized through banks reached `561 crores Amount
of Revolving Fund disbursed to SHGs is `1131 crores and the amount of Community Investment Fund
disbursed to SHGs is `2505 crores
In the year 2016-17, 37.44 lakh SHGs were savings linked to banks under NRLM. This represents a growth
of 8.3 % over the previous year. These SHGs had savings to the tune of `7552.70 crores which is growth of
17.3 % over the previous year. Under NRLM, in 2016-17 credit was disbursed to 8.86 lakh SHGs, indicating
a growth of 8.6 % over the previous year. The amount disbursed was `17,336 crores which represents a
growth of 3.3 % over the previous year.24.91 lakh NRLM groups had credit outstanding of `29,994.4 crores
in 2016-17 which indicates a growth of 14.1 % and 12.7 % respectively.
The Figures 5.16, 5.17 and 5.18 below indicate the progress of SHG linkage under NRLM.
http://aajeevika.gov.in/content/welcome-national-rural-livelihoods-mission-nrlm
2
8000 7552.70
7000 6244.97
6000
5000 4424.03
4000
3000
2000
1000
30.52 34.57 37.44
0
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
20000
16783.8 17336.2
15000
9487.7
10000
5000
Challenges Recommendation
• Opening of bank account • Proper capacity building model for SHGs as
well as SHPIs .
• Credit linkage to bank of SHGs
• The forms and rules of bank keep on
• Getting repeat credit from banks changing, therefore banks should also
provide financial literacy to the SHGs. This
• The cost of promoting SHGs will help n reducing the cost of the SHPIs.
1
RBI Annual Report 2016-17
2
RBI Annual Report 2016-17
Note :The total figures do not match with the figures in section 2.4.5 as some MFIs have not filled in the BC data collection
sheet.
Total No. of
State
No. of MFIs hav-
Name of the wise
Name of the MFIs working in the State MFIs in ing head-
States Disctrict
oper- quarter in
covered
tion same state
Andaman BMC, BFL 2 0 1
Nicobar
Island
Andhra RASS, Disha Microfin Ltd, Spandana 3 1 12
Pradesh
Arunachal Nightingale Finvest Pvt. Ltd, RGVN (North East) Microfinance 4 0 4
Pradesh Ltd, NABARD Financial Services Ltd, NERFS,
Assam Ajagar, Asomi Finance Pvt. Ltd, Sarala Development & 21 9 28
Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, Satra Development Finance Pvt. Ltd,
Arohan Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, GDFPL, Unacco Financial
Services Pvt. Ltd, Nightingale Finvest Pvt. Ltd, VFSPL, YVU
Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, Prochesta Thrift & Credit Co-
Operative Society, ASA International India Microfinance Pvt.
Ltd, RGVN (North East) Microfinance Ltd, Vedika Credit
Capital Ltd, Annapurna Microfinance (P) Ltd, Deshabandhu
Micro Finance, Satin Creditcare Network Limited, Uttrayan
Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, KDS, NERFS, SML
Bihar Margdarshak Financial Services Ltd, S V Creditline (P) Ltd, 32 5 37
DCBS, SMGBK, Annapurna Micro Finance (P) Ltd, Arohan
Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, NBJK, Saija Finance Private Limited,
Sarala Development & Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, Satin Creditcare
Network Limited, BFIL, Vedika Credit Capital Ltd, VFSPL,
NEED, ASA International India Microfinance Pvt Ltd, CDOT,
Cashpor Micro Credit, Srija Chemo Pvt. Ltd, BMC, Seba Rahara,
Uttrayan Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, Asirvad Micro Finance Ltd,
BASIX, BOARD, CPSL, Gramotthan Micro Finance Company,
Jagaran Microfin Pvt Ltd, KDS, Mass Care International, Sonata
Finance Pvt. Ltd, Spandana, SML
Chandigarh Satin Creditcare Network Limited, Asirvad Micro Finance Ltd, 3 0 1
BASIX,
Chhattisgarh S V Creditline (P) Ltd, BFIL, Grameen Koota Financial Services 20 0 22
Private Limited, Cashpor Micro Credit, Growing Opportunity
Finance (India) Pvt Ltd, Annapurna Micro Finance (P) Ltd,
Sambandh Finserve Pvt Ltd, Satin Creditcare Network Limited,
Adhikar Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, Altura Financial Services Ltd,
Arohan Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, Hindusthan Microfinance
Pvt. Ltd, Samhita Community Development Services, Asirvad
Micro Finance Ltd, Digamber Capfin Ltd, NABARD Financial
Services Ltd, Spandana, Svatantra Microfin Pvt Ltd, Varam
Capital Pvt Ltd, SML
Annexures 91
Madhya S V Creditline (P) Ltd, Prayas, VAMA, Annapurna Micro Finance 33 7 48
Pradesh Pvt. Ltd, Satin Creditcare Network Limited, BFIL, Namra Finance
Limited, Cashpor Micro Credit, Grameen Koota Financial
Services Private Limited, Arth Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, BMC, BSS
Microfinance Private Limited, Capital Trust Microfinance Pvt Ltd,
Disha Microfin Ltd, Hindusthan Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, Muthoot
Microfin Limited, Samhita Community Development Services,
Asirvad Micro Finance Ltd, Belstar Investment and Finance
Pvt. Ltd, BASIX, Digamber Capfin Ltd, Hand In Hand India,
Jigyasa Livelihood Promotions Microfinance Foundation,
Lok Biradari Trust, NABARD Financial Services Ltd, Pratigya
Mahila Samanvit Vikas Bachat Avam Sakh Sahakari Sanstha
Maryadit, Sanghamithra Rural Financial Services, Sonata
Finance Pvt. Ltd, Spandana, Svatantra Microfin Pvt Ltd, Yukti
Samaj Sewa Society, SMSSM, SML
Maharashtra Annapurna Micro Finance Pvt. Ltd, BSS Microfinance 40 15 36
Private Limited, Hindusthan Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, IDF
Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, Sampada Entrepreneurship and
Livelihoods Foundation, Satin Creditcare Network Limited,
BFIL, Navachetana Microfin Services Pvt Ltd, Grameen Koota
Financial Services Private Limited, Altura Financial Services Ltd,
Anik Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, BMC, Disha Microfin Ltd,
dMatrix, Muthoot Microfin Limited, Namra Finance Limited,
Prayas, Samasta Microfinance Limited, Unnati Microfin Private
Limited, Agora Microfinance India Ltd, Annapurna Mahila
Coop Credit Society Ltd, Asirvad Micro Finance Ltd, Belstar
Investment and Finance Pvt. Ltd, BASIX, Chaitanya India Fin
Credit Pvt Ltd, Digamber Capfin Ltd, GBP Nobel Microfinance,
Gramin Mahila Swayamsiddha Sangh, Hand In Hand India,
IRCED, M Power Micro Finance Pvt. Ltd, Madura Micro Finance
Ltd, NABARD Financial Services Ltd, Sakhi Samudaya Kosh,
Samruddhi Welfare Development Foundation, Sanghamithra
Rural Financial Services, Sonata Finance Pvt. Ltd, Spandana,
Svatantra Microfin Pvt. Ltd, SML
Manipur VVD, YVU Financial Services Private Limited, Chanura 5 5 10
Microfin, Self Employment Voluntary Association, NERFS,
Meghalaya GDFPL, Nightingale Finvest Pvt. Ltd., RGVN (North East) 8 0 5
Microfinance Ltd, Annapurna Micro Finance Pvt. Ltd, Arohan
Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, ASA International India Microfinance
Pvt. Ltd, BASIX, NERFS,
Mizoram Nightingale Finvest Pvt. Ltd, Unacco Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, 4 0 8
NABARD Financial Services Ltd, NERFS,
Nagaland GDFPL, RGVN (North East) Microfinance Ltd, NERFS, 3 0 2
Annexures 93
Tripura Unacco Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, ASA International India Mi- 9 0 6
crofinance Pvt Ltd, Annapurna Micro Finance Pvt. Ltd, RGVN
(North East) Microfinance Ltd, VFSPL, BASIX, KDS, NABARD
Financial Services Ltd, NERFS,
Uttar Cashpor Micro Credit, Margdarshak Financial services Ltd, S V 27 8 68
Pradesh Creditline (P) Ltd, Saija Finance Private Limited, Satin Creditcare
Network Limited, BFIL, Vedika Credit Capital Ltd, NEED, ASA
International India Microfinance Pvt Ltd, DIMC, BMC, Capital
Trust Microfinance Pvt Ltd, Futureage India Micro Credit
Services, Muthoot Microfin Limited, Namra Finance Limited,
Samhita Community Development Services, Satya MicroCapital
Limited, Asirvad Micro Finance Ltd, BASIX, Gramotthan Micro
Finance Company, HPPI, IMPACT, SMPL, Sonata Finance Pvt.
Ltd, Spandana, Svatantra Microfin Pvt Ltd, SML
Uttarakhand Satin Creditcare Network Limited, BFIL, Margdarshak Financial 20 1 6
services Ltd, S V Creditline (P) Ltd, DIMC, Balajee Sewa, BMC,
Capital Trust Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, Namra Finance Limited,
NEED, Satya MicroCapital Limited, VFSPL, Asirvad Micro
Finance Ltd, BASIX, Gramin Micro Credit Foundation, HPPI,
NERFS, SMPL, Sonata Finance Pvt. Ltd, SML
West Bengal Belghoria Janakalyan Samity, DCBS, SMGBK, Arohan 40 28 21
Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, Dakshin Budhakali Improvement
Society (DBIS), Sarala Development & Microfinance Pvt.
Ltd., Satin Creditcare Network Limited, BFIL, Unacco Financial
Services Pvt. Ltd, Vedika Credit Capital Ltd, VFSPL, Sahara
Utsarga Welfare Society, Destiny Finco Private Limited,
ASA International India Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, Srija Chemo
Pvt. Ltd, Altura Financial Services Ltd, Barasat Sampark,
Margdarshak Financial services Ltd, Muthoot Microfin Limited,
RGVN (North East) Microfinance Ltd, Seba Rahara, Uttrayan
Financial Services Pvt. Ltd, Agradut Polly Unnayan Samity,
Asirvad Micro Finance Ltd, BRAWAS, Barasat SSERIAL,
Barasat Gramin Society, Barasat Unnayan Prostuti, BWWA,
BASIX, BURS, Jagaran Microfin Pvt Ltd, KDS, NABARD
Financial Services Ltd, STEP, Sreema Mahila Samity, SSVWS,
Swayamsampurna, VSSU, SML
Total 563
Annexures 95
Andaman and South Andaman 2 BMC, BWDA
Nicobar (AN)
Araria 6 Cashpor, Jagaran, Satin, Sonata, Asirvad, BFIL
Arwal 3 Cashpor, Satin, BFIL
Aurangabad 6 Cashpor, Satin, Sonata, Annapurna, Arohan, BFIL
Banka 2 Satin, BFIL
Begusarai 9 Vedika, Saija, Satin, Sonata, Asirvad, Arohan, BFIL, Sarala, Ut-
trayan
Bhagalpur 4 Saija, Satin, Village, BFIL
Bhojpur 8 Vedika,NEED, Saija, Satin, Annapurna, Arohan, Basix, BFIL
Buxar 6 Vedika, Cashpor, Satin, Arohan, BFIL, SVCL
Darbhanga 8 Margdarshak, Cashpor, Saija, Satin, Sonata, Asirvad, Arohan, BFIL
East Champaran 8 Margdarshak, NEED, Cashpor, Satin, Sonata, Asirvad, Arohan,
BFIL
Gaya 9 Vedika, Cashpor, Satin, Sonata, Arohan,Annapurna, Basix, BFIL,
SVCL
Gopalganj 6 Cashpor, Satin, Asirvad, BFIL, Grammothan, SVCL
Jamui 2 Spandana,BFIL
Jehanabad 8 Vedika, Saija, Satin, Sonata,Annapurna, Arohan, BFIL, SVCL
Kaimur 4 Cashpor, Satin, BFIL, SVCL
Katihar 10 Jagaran, Saija, Satin, Seba Rahara, SMGBK, Srija, Village, Asirvad,
Basix, BFIL
Khagaria 5 Saija, Satin, Arohan, Basix, BFIL
Kishanganj 7 Jagaran, Satin, Village, ASA, BFIL, KDS, Sarala
Lakhisarai 5 Spandana, Asirvad, Arohan, BFIL, SVCL
Madhepura 2 Satin, BFIL
Bihar (BR)
Madhubani 3 Margdarshak, Arohan, BFIL
Munger 3 Saija,Arohan, BFIL
Muzaffarpur 11 Margdarshak, Vedika, Cashpor, Saija, Satin, Sonata, Annapurna,
Asirvad, Arohan, Basix, BFIL
Nalanda 10 Vedika, Saija, Satin, Sonata, Annapurna, Arohan, Basix,
BFIL,CDOT, SVCL
Nawada 8 Vedika, Saija, Satin, Sonata, BMC, Arohan, BFIL, CDOT
Patna 16 Margdarshak, Vedika, NEED, Saija, Satin, Annapurna, Asirvad,
Arohan, Basix, BFIL, CPSL, CDOT, Masscare, NBJK, SVCL,
BOARD
Purnia 6 Saija, Satin, SMGBK, Village, Asirvad, BFIL
Rohtas 5 Cashpor, Satin, Basix, BFIL, SVCL
Saharsa 3 Asirvad, Arohan, BFIL
Samastipur 11 Margdarshak, Vedika, Saija, Satin, Sonata, Annapurna, Asirvad,
Arohan, Basix, BFIL, Sarala
Saran 9 NEED, Cashpor, Saija, Satin, Sonata, Asirvad, Arohan, BFIL, SVCL
Sheohar 2 Arohan, CDOT
Sitamarhi 5 Margdarshak, Cashpor, Asirvad,Arohan, BFIL
Siwan 5 Cashpor, Satin, Asirvad, BFIL, SVCL
Supaul 1 BFIL
Vaishali 14 Margdarshak, Vedika, NEED, Cashpor, Saija, Satin, Sonata,
Annapurna, Asirvad, Arohan, Basix, BFIL, SVCL, Uttrayan
West Cham- 7 Margdarshak, Cashpor, Satin, Sonata, Asirvad, Arohan, BFIL
paran
Chandigarh (CH) Chandigarh 2 Satin, Asirvad
Balod 6 Spandana, Annapurna,Asirvad, BFIL, Grameen Koota, Svatantra
Chhattisgarh (CG)
Baloda Bazar 6 Samhita, Satin, Annapurna, Asirvad, BFIL, Svatantra
Annexures 97
Mehsana 6 Disha Microfin, Satin, Spandana, Swayam, Namra, Sewa
Morbi 1 Prayas
Narmada 2 Disha Microfin, Namra
Panchmahal 6 Disha Microfin, Satin, Spandana, Mpower, Namra, Digambar
Patan 1 Satin
Rajkot 1 Satin
Sabarkantha 5 Disha Microfin, Satin, Spandana, Namra, Digambar
Surat 2 Adhikar, BMC
Surendranagar 2 Satin, Prayas
Tapi 1 Namra
Vadodara 7 Disha Microfin, Satin, Spandana, Mpower, Namra,Shroff
Valsad 1 Namra
Ambala 8 Margdarshak, Satin, Sonata, Asirvad, Altura, BFIL, Disha India,
SVCL
Bhiwani 4 Satin, Asirvad, BFIL, SVCL
Faridabad 2 Satin, Shikhar
Fatehabad 4 Satin, Asirvad, BFIL, Midland
Gurgaon 5 Satin, Altura, BFIL, HPPI, Anandita
Hissar 3 Satin, Asirvad, BFIL
Jhajjar 1 BFIL
Jind 3 Satin, Asirvad, BFIL
Kaithal 4 Satin, Asirvad, BFIL, HPPI
Karnal 9 Margdarshak, Satin, Satya, Sonata, Asirvad, Altura, BFIL, Disha
Haryana (HR) India, Midland
Kurukshetra 10 Satin, Satya, Sonata, Asirvad, Altura, BFIL, Disha India, HPPI,
SVCL, Midland
Mahendragarh 6 Satin, BFIL, HPPI, Mpower, SVCL, Digambar
Palwal 5 Satin, Satya, Altura, BFIL, Shikhar
Panipat 6 Margdarshak, Satin, Satya, Sonata, Asirvad, Altura
Rewari 5 Satin, BFIL, HPPI, SVCL, Digambar
Rohtak 3 Altura, BFIL, Digambar
Sirsa 3 Satin, BFIL, Midland
Sonipat 3 Satin, Asirvad, BFIL
Yamuna Nagar 8 Margdarshak, Satin, Sonata, Asirvad, Altura, BFIL, Disha India,
SVCL
Bilaspur 1 Margdarshak
Himachal Pradesh Kangra 3 Margdarshak, Satin, BFIL
(HP) Mandi 1 Margdarshak
Sirmaur 3 Satin, BFIL, Disha India
Jammu & Kashmir Jammu District 1 Satin
(JK)
Bokaro 9 Vedika, Saija, Satin, Spandana, Annapurna, Asirvad, Arohan, Basix,
BFIL
Chatra 1 BFIL
Deoghar 8 Jagaran, Satra, Spandana, Village, Asirvad, Basix, BFIL, MESP
Dhanbad 8 Vedika, Saija, Satin, Spandana, Annapurna, Asirvad, Arohan, BFIL
Dumka 9 Saija, Satin, Spandana, Village, Asirvad, Arohan, Basix, BFIL, MESP
Jhardhand (JH)
East Singhbhum 12 Vedika, Saija, Satin, Spandana, Village, Annapurna, Asirvad, Aro-
han, Basix, BFIL, HPPI, Sambandh
Garhwa 3 Cashpor, Spandana, BFIL
Giridih 8 Vedika, Jagaran, Saija, Satin, Spandana, Asirvad, Arohan, BFIL
Godda 5 Saija, Spandana, Asirvad, Arohan, BFIL
Gumla 2 Cashpor, Arohan
Annexures 99
Kodagu 8 BSS, SKDRDP, Spandana, Asirvad, BFIL, Grameen Koota, Samasta,
Nabfins
Kolar 11 Disha Microfin, BSS, Prakruthi, Rors, Sanghamitra, SKDRDP,
Spandana, Asirvad, Basix, BFIL, Grameen Koota
Koppal 10 Disha Microfin, Navchetana, SKDRDP, Spandana, Asirvad, BFIL,
Chaitanaya, Grameen Koota, Madura, Nabfins
Mandya 10 Disha Microfin, BSS, Opportunity, SKDRDP, Spandana, Asirvad,
BFIL, Grammen Koota, Samasta, Nabfins
Mysore 10 Disha Microfin, BSS, Sanghamitra, SKDRDP, Spandana, Asirvad,
BFIL, Grameen Koota, Samasta, Nabfins
Raichur 8 Disha Microfin, Sanghamitra, SKDRDP, Spandana, BFIL, Chait-
anya, Grameen Koota, Nabfins
Ramanagara 10 Disha Microfin, BSS, Sanghamitra, SKDRDP, Spandana, Asirvad,
BFIL, Grameen Koota, Nirantara, Samasta
Shimoga 15 Disha Microfin, BSS, IDF, Navchetana, Sanghamitra, SKDRDP,
Spandana, Asirvad, BFIL, Chaitanya, Grameen Koota, Madura,
Nirantara, Belstar, Nabfins
Tumkur 14 Disha, BSS, IDF, Sanghamitra, SKDRDP, Spandana, Asirvad, Basix,
BFIL, Chaitanya, Grameen Koota, Nirantara, Samasta, Nabfins
Udupi 7 BSS, SKDRDP, Spandana, Asirvad, BFIL, Grameen Koota, Samasta
Uttara Kannada 9 Navchetana, SKDRDP, Spandana, Asirvad, BFIL, Chaitanaya, Gra-
meen Koota, Samasta, Nabfins
Vijayapura (Bi- 11 Disha Microfin, Navchetana, Sanghamitra, SKDRDP, Spandana,
japur) Asirvad, BFIL, Chaitanya, Grameen Koota, Nirantara, Nabfins
Yadgir 8 Disha Microfin, Sanghamitra, SKDRDP, Spandana, BFIL, Chait-
anya, Grameen Koota, Nabfins
Alappuzha 4 Asirvad, BFIL, WSE, FREED
Ernakulam 6 Life, Spandana, Asirvad, BFIL, WSE, Nabfins
Idukki 5 Life, Asirvad, IMPACT, FREED, Nabfins
Kasaragod 1 SKDRDP
Kollam 2 Asirvad, BFIL
Kottayam 5 Asirvad, BFIL, WSE, FREED, Nabfins
Kozhikode 2 Spandana, BFIL
Kerala (KR)
Malappuram 1 BFIL
Palakkad 8 Smile, Spandana, Asirvad, Blaze, BFIL, Jeevankiran, Madura, Bel-
star
Pathanamthitta 3 Asirvad, BFIL, FREED
Thiruvanan- 3 Asirvad, Madura, Nabfins
thapuram
Thrissur 5 Spandana, Asivad, BFIL, Jeevankiran, WSE
Alirajpur 1 Prayas
Anuppur 5 Samhita, Satin, Sonata, Spandana, Annapurna
Ashok Nagar 8 Disha Microfin, Samhita, Satin, Sonata, Spandana, BFIL, SVCL,
Svantantra
Balaghat 7 Hindusthan, Samhita, Sonata, Spandana, Annapurna, BFIL, Gra-
meen Koota
Madhya Pradesh
Barwani 9 Disha Microfin, Prayas, Spandana, Annapurna, BFIL, Grameen
(MP)
Koota, Namra, Svatantra, Pratigya
Betul 9 Disha Microfin, Satin, Sonata, Spandana, Annapurna, Asirvad,
Basix, Grameen Koota, Namra
Bhopal 13 Disha Microfin, Samhita, Satin, Spandana, Asirvad, BMC, BFIL,
Capital Trust, SVCL, Jigayasa, Belstar, Nabfins, Digambar
Burhanpur 3 Disha Microfin, Satin, Annapurna
Annexures 101
Seoni 12 Disha Microfin, Hindusthan, Sonata, Spandana,Annapurna, Asir-
vad, Basix, BFIL, Grameen Koota, Namra, SVCL, Svatantra
Shahdol 6 Samhita, Satin, Sonata, Spandana, Annapurna, BFIL
Shajapur 7 Satin, Spandana, Arth, BFIL, Grameen Koota, Namra, SVCL
Sheopur 1 Spandana
Shivpuri 4 Samhita, Sonata, Spandana, SVCL
Sidhi 2 Sonata, Samhita
Tikamgarh 3 Cashpor, Sanghamitra, Sonata
Ujjain 14 Disha Microfin, BSS, Satin, Spandana, Annapurna, Asirvad, Basix,
BFIL, Capital Trust, Lok Biradri, Namra, SVCL, Svatantra, Digam-
bar
Umaria 5 Samhita, Satin, Sonata, Annapurna, Grameen Koota
Vidisha 8 Disha Microfin, Samhita, Satin, Spandana, Annapurna, Basix, BFIL,
SVCL
Ahmednagar 13 Belstar, Svatantra, Namra, Madura, M Power, Grameen Koota,
BFIL, Annapurna, Spandana, SELF, Hindusthan, BSS, Disha
Akola 8 Grameen Koota, BFIL, Basix, Annapurna, Spandana, Satin, Hindu-
sthan, Disha
Amravati 11 NABFin, Svatantra, Grameen Koota, BFIL, Basix, Annapurna,
Spandana, Satin, SELF, Hindusthan, Disha
Aurangabad 8 NABFin, Grameen Koota, BFIL, Basix, Annapurna, Spandana,
SELF, Hindusthan
Beed 6 SSK, Grameen Koota, BFIL, Basix, Anik, SELF
Bhandara 9 Svatantra, Grameen Koota, BFIL, Basix, Asirvad, annapurna, Span-
dana, Hindusthan, Disha
Buldhana 8 Grameen Koota, BFIL, Basix, Annapurna, Spandana, Satin, Hindu-
sthan, Disha
Chandrapur 5 BFIL, Basix, Spandana, Hindusthan, Disha
Dhule 8 NABFin, Svatantra, Namra, Grameen Koota, BFIL, Annapurna,
Spandana, Disha
Gadchiroli 1 Grameen Koota
Gondia 5 Svatantra, BFIL, Annapurna, Hindusthan, Disha
Hingoli 5 Grameen Koota, BFIL, Basix, Anik, Spandana
Maharashtra (MH) Jalgaon 8 Svatantra, Namra, Grameen Koota, BFIL, BMC, Annapurna, Span-
dana, Disha
Jalna 3 Grameen Koota, BFIL, annapurna
Kolhapur 17 NABFin, Samasta, Svatantra, Madura, M Power, IRCED, Grameen
Koota, Chaitanya, BFIL, Asirvad, Annapurna Mahila,Spandana,
Navchetna, IDF, hindusthan, BSS, Disha
Latur 8 SSK, GBP Nobel, Grameen Koota, Chaitanya, BFIL, Basix, Anik,
Sanghamitra
Mumbai City 4 M Power, annapurna Mahila, Satin, Unnati
Mumbai subur- 1 Agora
ban
Nagpur 11 NABFin, Grameen Koota, BFIL, Altura, Asirvad, Annapurna,
Spandana, Sonata, Satin, Hindusthan, Disha
Nanded 5 NABFin, Grameen Koota, BFIL, Basix, Spandana
Nandurbar 2 Grameen Koota, BFIL
Nashik 8 Namra, M Power, Grameen Koota, BFIL, Annapurna, Spandana,
Hindusthan, Disha
Osmanabad 11 SSK, Madura, Grameen Koota, Chaitanya, BFIL, Basix, Asirvad,
Anik, Spandana, IDF, Sanghamitra
Palghar 3 Unnati, Hindusthan, Svatantra
Annexures 103
Bargarh 7 Mahashakti, Adhikar, Spandana, Annapurna, Arohan, Basix, BFIL
(Baragarh)
Baleswar 12 Adhikar, GU Financial, Jagaran, Spandana, SMCS, Village Finan-
(Balasore) cial, Annapurna, Arohan, Basix,BFIL, Anandita, KDS, Gramutthan
Cuttack 12 Mahashakti, Adhikar, GU Financial, Spandana, SMCS, Annapurna,
Altura, Arohan, Basix, BFIL, Gramutthan, SMSS
Debagarh (De- 3 Annapurna, BFIL, Sambandh
ogarh)
Dhenkanal 9 Adhikar, GU Financial, Spandana, Annapurna, Altura, Arohan,
Basix, BFIL, Gramutthan
Ganjam 6 Mahashakti, Spandana, Annapurna, Arohan, Basix, BFIL
Gajapati 3 Spandana, Annapurna, BFIL
Jharsuduga 6 Spandana, SMCS, Annapurna,Arohan, BFIL, Sambandh
Jajapur (Jajpur) 8 Adhikar, GU Financial, Jagaran, Spandana, Annapurna, Arohan,
BFIL, Gramutthan
Jagatsinghpur 4 Spandana, Altura, Arohan, SMSS
Kendujhar (Ke- 7 Spandana, SMCS, Annapurna, Arohan, Basix, BFIL, Sambandh
onjhar)
Kalahandi 7 Mahashakti, Adhikar, Spandana, SMCS, Annapurna, BFIL, Eastern
Multipurpose
Odisha (OR) Khordha 13 Mahashakti, Adhikar, Spandana, SMCS, Annapurna, Asirvad, Altu-
ra, Arohan, Basix, BFIL, Sambandh, SMSS, Eastern Multipurpose
Kandhamal 4 Spandana, Annapurana, Basix, Eastern Multipurpose
Koraput 7 Mahashakti, adhikar, Spandana, SMCS, Annapurna, Adhikar Soci-
ety, BFIL
Kendrapara 3 GU Financial, Arohan, Gramutthan
Malkangiri 3 Adhikar, adhikar Society, BFIL
Mayurbhanj 7 Jagaran, Spandana, SMCS, Annapurna, Arohan, BFIL, Sambandh
Nabarangpur 5 Adhikar, Spandana, Annapurna, Adhikar Society, BFIL
Nuapada 9 Mahashakti, Adhikar, GU Financial, Spandana, SMCS, Annapurna,
Arohan, BFIL, Gramutthan
Nayagarh 6 SMCS, Annapurna, Asirvad, Arohan, Basix, BFIL
Puri 7 Mahashakti, Adhikar, Spandana, SMCS, Arohan, BFIL, Prasad
Rayagada 8 Mahashakti, Adhikar, Spandana, SMCS,Annapurna, Adhikar Soci-
ety, Basix, BFIL
Sambalpur 8 Spandana, SMCS, Annapurna, Arohan, Basix, BFIL, Sambandh,
SARC
Subarnapur 6 Mahashakti, Adhikar, Spandana, Annapurna, Arohan,BFIL
(Sonepur)
Sundargarh 7 Spandana, SMCS, Annapurna, Arohan, BFIL, Sambandh, Belstar
(Sundergarh)
Karaikal 2 Smile, Valar Aditi
Puducherry (PY) Puducherry 6 Smile, Asirvad, BWDA, Gramin Micro, Growing Opportunity,
Belstar
Amritsar 3 Satin, Asirvad, BFIL
Gurdaspur 2 Satin, Asirvad
Hoshiarpur 4 Satin, Asirvad, SVCL, Midland
Rupnagar (ear- 4 Satin, Sonata, Asirvad, BFIL
Punjab (PB) lier Ropar)
Sangrur 7 Satin, Satya, Asirvad, BFIL, Capital Trust, SVCL, Midland
Barnala 4 Satin, Capital Trust, SVCL, Midland
Bathinda 4 Satin, BFIL, Capital Trust, Midland
Faridkot 3 Satin, BFIL,Midland
Annexures 105
Sirohi 1 BFIL
Tonk 4 Asirvad, BFIL, HPPI, Digambar
Udaipur 8 Disha Microfin, Satin,Annapurna, Asirvad, Basix, BFIL, Shram
Sarathi, Digambar
East Sikkim 2 RGVN, Village
Sikkim (SK) South Sikkim 1 RGVN
West Sikkim 1 RGVN
Ariyalur 8 PAT, READ, SMILE, Virutcham, Asirvad, Madura, REPCO, Sa-
masta
Chennai 10 SMILE, Virutcham, Asirvad, BWDA, Growing
Opportunity,Madura, REPCO, Samasta, Varam, Nabfin
Coimbatore 9 SMILE, Asirvad, Blaze, Grameen Koota, Madura, REPCO, Samasta,
Belstar, Nabfin
Cuddalore 10 PAT, Sarvodaya, SMILE, Asirvad, BWDA, Madura, REPCO, Bel-
star, RASS, Nabfin
Dharmapuri 5 Sanghamitra, Asirvad, Grameen Koota, Madura, REPCO
Dindigul 10 Disha Microfin, Sanghamitra, Sarvodaya, SMILE, Asirvad, Gra-
meen Koota, Madura, REPCO, Samasta, Nabfin
Erode 11 Rors, Sanghamitra,Sarvodaya, SMILE, Asirvad, Blaze, Grameen
Koota, Growing Opportunity, Madura, REPCO, Nabfin
Kanchipuram 12 Disha Microfin, Sarvodaya, SMILE, Asirvad, BWDA, Growing Op-
portunity, HHI, Madura, REPCO, Varam, Belstar, Nabfin
Kanyakumari 6 Mahasemam, Asirvad, BWDA, Madura, REPCO, Nabfin
Karur 5 SMILE, Asirvad, GUARDIAN, Madura, REPCO
Krishnagiri 9 Disha Microfin, Rors, Sanghamitra, Asirvad, Grameen Koota, Ma-
dura, REPCO, Samasta, Nabfin
Madurai 12 Mahasemam, Sarvodaya, SMILE, Virutcham, Asirvad, Madura,
REPCO, Varam, Mass Trust, CONSO, Magilchi, Nabfin
Nagapattinam 11 Disha Microfin, PAT, SMILE, Valar Aditi, Asirvad, IMPACT, Ma-
Tamil Nadu (TN) dura, REPCO, Samasta, BWDC, Nabfins
Namakkal 8 Sanghamitra, SMILE, Asirvad, GUARDIAN, Madura, REPCO,
Belstar, Nabfins
Nilgiris 8 Sanghamitra, Asirvad, Blaze, Grameen Koota, IMPACT, REPCO,
Samasta, Nabfins
Perambalur 5 Opportunity, GUARDIAN, IMPACT, Madura, REPCO
Pudukkottai 10 Disha Microfin, Sarvodaya, SMILE,Valar Aditi, Woman, Asirvad,
GUARDIAN, IMPACT, Madura, REPCO
Ramanathapura 4 Mahasemam, SMILE, Asirvad, Madura
Salem 12 Rors, Sanghamitra, Sarvodaya, Asirvad, Grameen Koota, Growing
Opportunity, HHI, GUARDIAN, Madura, REPCO, Belstar, Nabfins
Sivagangai 10 Opportunity, Sarvodaya, SMILE, Asirvad, HHI, Madura, REPCO,
Belstar, Mass Trust, Nabfins
Tanjore 9 Disha Microfin, Opportunity, PAT, SMILE, Asirvad, Madura,
REPCO, Samasta, Nabfins
Theni 6 Disha Microfin, SMILE, Asirvad, Madura, REPCO, Nabfins
Thirupur 11 Sanghamitra, Sarvodaya, SMILE, Asirvad, Blaze, Grameen Koota,
HHI, Madura, REPCO, Samasta, Nabfins
Thiruvallur 13 Disha Microfin, PAT, Sarvodaya, SMILE, Asirvad, BWDA, Growing
Opportunity, Madura, REPCO, Samasta, Varam, Belstar, Nabfins
Thiruvarur 11 Disha Microfin, Opportunity, PAT, SMILE, Asirvad, IMPACT, Ma-
dura, REPCO, Samasta, BWDC, Belstar
Thoothukudi 3 Virutcham, HHI, REPCO
Annexures 107
Azamgarh 6 Cashpor, Satin, Spandana, Asirvad, BFIL, SVCL
Bagpat 2 Satin, BFIL
Bahraich 3 Margdarshak, Samhita, BFIL
Ballia 7 Cashpor, Saija, Satin, Asirvad, BFIL, SVCL, Svatantra
Banda 3 Cashpor, Sonata, BMC
Barabanki 6 Margdarshak, Vedika, NEED, Sonata, BFIL, Namra
Bareilly 9 Margdarshak, Satin, Sonata, Basix, BFIL, Capital, HPPI, SVCL,
Shikhar
Basti 7 Margdarshak, Cashpor, Saija, Satin, Sonata, Asrivad, BFIL
Bijnor 8 Margdarshak, Satin, Sonata, Asirvad, BFIL, Capital Trust, SVCL,
Shikhar
Budaun 6 Satin, Sonata, BFIL, Capital, HPPI, SVCL
Bhadohi 3 Margdarshak, Cashpor, SVCL
Bulandshahr 6 Satin, Satya, Sonata, BFIL, Capital Trust, SVCL
Chandauli 10 Cashpor, Saija, Satin,Sonata, Spandana, ASA, Asirvad, BFIL, SVCL,
Svatantra
Chitrakoot 2 Cashpor, Sonata
Deoria 9 Margdarshak, Cashpor, Saija, Satin, Sonata, Asirvad, BMC, BFIL,
SVCL
Etah 2 Satin, Sonata
Faizabad 9 Margdarshak, Cashpor, Saija, Satin, Sonata, BMC, BFIL, Namra,
SVCL
Fatehpur 8 Margdarshak, Cashpor, Satin,Sonata, Asirvad, BMC, BFIL, SVCL
Firozabad 6 Margdarshak, Satin, Sonata, Asirvad, BFIL, SVCL
Gautam Buddh 3 Satin, BMC, Shikhar
Uttar Pradesh (UP) Nagar
Ghaziabad 6 Satin, Sonata, Asirvad, BFIL, SVCL, Shikhar
Ghazipur 9 Cashpor, Saija, Satin, Sonata, Spandana, Asirvad, BMC, BFIL,
SVCL
Gonda 4 Cashpor, Samhita, Sonata, BMC
Gorakhpur 9 Margdarshak, Cashpor, Saija, Satin, Sonata, Asirvad, BMC, BFIL,
SVCL
Hamirpur 1 Cashpor
Hapur 7 Margdarshak, Satin, Sonata, Asirvad, BFIL, Capital Trust, SVCL
(Panchsheel
Nagar)
Hardoi 4 Margdarshak, Samhita, Sonata, IMPACT
Hathras (Ma- 9 Margdarshak, Satin, Sonata, Asirvad, BFIL, Capital, HPPI, SVCL,
hamaya Nagar) Shikhar
Jalaun 1 Cashpor
Jaunpur district 12 Vedika, Cashpor, Saija, Satin, Sonata, Spandana, ASA, Asirvad,
BFIL, Futureage, SVCL, Svatantra
Jhansi 3 Margdarshak, Sonata, SVCL
Kannauj 2 Margdarshak, Sonata
Kanpur Dehat 2 Margdarshak, Sonata
(Ramabai Nagar)
Kanpur Nagar 4 Margdarshak, Cashpor, Sonata, BMC
Kaushambi 5 Cashpor, Satin, Sonata, BFIL, SVCL
Kushinagar 8 Cashpor, Saija, Satin, Sonata, Asirvad, BFIL, Gramotthan, SVCL
Lakhimpur 6 Margdarshak, Samhita, Sonata, BMC, BFIL, SVCL
Kheri
Annexures 109
Malda 8 Jagaran, Village, ASA, BFIL, Destiny, KDS, Sarala, Uttrayan
Medinapore 7 Jagaran, Village, ASA, Asirvad, Arohan, KDS, Sarala
(Purba)
Medinapore 5 Jagaran, Asirvad, Village, Arohan, BFIL
(West)
Murshidabad 11 Jagaran, Sahara Utsarga, Village, ASA, BJS, Arohan, BFIL, KDS,
Sarala, Sreema, Uttrayan
Nadia 16 Vedika, Jagaran, Sahara Utsarga, Satin, SMGBK, Srija, Village, ASA,
Asirvad, Barasat Sampark, Arohan, BFIL, KDS, Sarala, Sreema,
West Bengal (WB) Uttrayan
North 24 Par- 21 Vedika, Jagaran, Sahara Utsarga, Seba Rahara, Village, ASA,
ganas Asirvad, Barasat Sampark, BJS, Arohan, BURS, BFIL, DBIS, KDS,
Barasat Unnayan, BGS, Sarala, Sreema, Uttrayan, Sserial, STEP
Purulia 4 Village, Asirvad, Agradut Polly, Basix
South 24 Par- 19 Vedika, Jagaran, Sahara Utsarga, UNACCO, Village, ASA, Asirvad,
ganas Arohan, BRWAS, BFIL, DBIS, DCBS, KDS, Swayamsampurna,
Sarala, VSSU, Uttrayan, BWWA, SSVWS
Uttar Dinajpur 10 Jagaran, Seba Rahara, SMGBK, Srija, Village, BFIL, DCBS, Destiny,
KDS, Uttrayan
Annexures 111
(I) No. of MFIs across Size (GLP Base)
Size Gross Loan Portfolio (GLP No. of MFIs Percentage (%)
Small < `100 crore 118 70%
Medium `100 crore and < `500 crore 31 18%
Large > `500 crore 19 11%
Total 168
Note: States in bold indicate MFIs having headquarters in that state and have submitted data to BMR 2017.
(A) List of MFIs with Loan Portfolio Less than `100 crore
S.No. Name of the MFIs State Legal Form
1 Adhikar Society Odisha Society
2 Agora Microfinance India Ltd Maharashtra NBFC-MFI
3 Agradut Polly Unnayan Samity West Bengal Society
4 Ajagar Finance Pvt Ltd Assam NBFC-MFI
5 Altura Financial Services Limited Delhi NBFC-MFI
6 Anandita Micro Credit Services Haryana Sec. 8 Company
7 Anik Financial Services Ltd Maharashtra NBFC-MFI
8 Annapurna Mahila Coop Credit Society Maharashtra Society
9 Arth MicroFinance Pvt. Ltd. Rajasthan NBFC-MFI
10 Asomi Finance Pvt Ltd Assam NBFC
11 Bagaria Relief Welfare Ambulance Society West Bengal Society
12 Balajee Sewa Sansthan Uttrakhand Society
13 Bal-Mahila Vikas Samiti (VAMA) Madhya Pradesh Society
14 Barasat Grameen Society West Bengal Society
15 Barasat Sampark West Bengal Society
16 Barasat SSERIAL West Bengal Society
17 Barasat Unnayan Prostuti West Bengal Society
18 Belghoria Janakalyan Samity West Bengal Society
19 Bengal Women Welfare Association West Bengal Sec. 8 Company
20 Bharathi Women Development Centre Tamil Nadu Society
21 Bhartiya Samruddhi Finance Ltd Telangana NBFC
22 Blaze Trust Tamil Nadu Trust
23 Bureau of Obligate and Accompainer for Rural Development Bihar Trust
(BOARD)
24 BURS West Bengal Society
25 BWDA Finance Limited Tamil Nadu NBFC
26 Capital Trust Microfinance Private Limited Delhi NBFC-MFI
27 Centre for Promoting Sustainable Livelihood (CPSL) Bihar Society
28 Centre for Development Orientation and Training Bihar Society
29 Chanura Microfin Manipur Manipur Society
30 Consortium For Social Care And Development (CONSO) Tamil Nadu Trust
31 Dakshin Budhakhali Improvement Society (DBIS) West Bengal Society
32 Deshabandhu Micro Finance and Livelihood Institution Assam Sec. 8 Company
(DMLI)
33 Destiny Finco Private Limited West Bengal NBFC
34 Dhosa Chandaneswar Bratyajana Samity (DCBS) West Bengal Society
Annexures 113
35 Disha India Micro Credit Uttar Pradesh Sec. 8 Company
36 dMatrix Development Foundation Maharashtra Sec. 8 Company
37 Forum for Rural Environment and Economic Kerala Society
Development(FREED)
38 Futureage India Micro Credit Services Uttar Pradesh Sec. 8 Company
39 G B P Nobel Microfinances Maharashtra Sec. 8 Company
40 Gaddala Financial Services Pvt Ltd Telangana NBFC
41 Gramalaya Urban and Rural Development Initiatives and Tamil Nadu Sec. 8 Company
Network
42 Grameen Development and Finance Pvt Ltd Assam NBFC-MFI
43 Gramin Mahila Swayamsiddha Sangh Maharashtra Trust
44 Gramin Micro Credit Foundation Delhi Sec. 8 Company
45 Gramotthan Micro Finance Cpomany Uttar Pradesh Sec. 8 Company
46 Gram-Utthan Odisha Society
47 GU Financial Services Pvt Ltd Odisha NBFC
48 Hand In Hand India Tamil Nadu Trust
49 Humana People to People India Delhi Sec. 8 Company
50 IDF Financial Services Ltd Karnataka NBFC-MFI
51 Innovative Microfinance for Poverty Alleviation and Com- Tamil Nadu Sec. 8 Company
munity Transformation (IMPACT)
52 Institute of Rural Credit and Entrepreneurship Development Maharashtra Society
53 Jeevankiran Kerala Society
54 Jigyasa Livelihood Promotions Microfinance Foundation Madhya Pradesh Sec. 8 Company
55 Kotalipara Development Society (KDS) West Bengal Society
56 Life Foundation Kerala Trust
57 Lok Biradari Trust Madhya Pradesh Trust
58 Magalir Micro Finance Private Limited Tamil Nadu NBFC-MFI
59 Magilchi Foundation Tamil Nadu Trust
60 Mahashakti Foundation Odisha Trust
61 Makkal Sakthi Sangamum (MASS) Tamil Nadu Trust
62 Mass Care International Bihar Society
63 Matashree Gomati Devi Jan Seva Nidhi Rajasthan Trust
64 Micro Enterprises and Sustainable Project Jharkhand Sec. 8 Company
65 Nanayasurabhi Development Financial Services (NDFS) Tamil Nadu Sec. 8 Company
66 Nav Bharat Jagriti Kendra Jharkhand Society
67 NEED Livelihood Microfinance Ltd Uttar Pradesh NBFC-MFI
68 Nightingale Finvest Pvt Ltd Assam NBFC-MFI
69 Nirantara FinAccess Pvt Ltd Karnataka NBFC-MFI
70 Opportunity Microfinance India Ltd Karnataka NBFC
71 People's Action for Transformation Tamil Nadu Trust
72 Planned Social Concern Delhi Sec. 8 Company
114 The Bharat Microfinance Report 2017
73 Pragathi Seva Samithi Telangana MACS or Co-opera-
tive
74 Prakruthi Foundation Karnataka Trust
75 Prasad Foundation Odisha Trust
76 Pratigya Mahila Samanvit Vikas Bachat Avam Sakh Sahakari Madhya Pradesh MACS or Co-oper-
Sanstha Maryadit ative
77 PRAYAS- Organization for Sustainable Developent Gujarat Trust
78 Prochesta Thrift & Credit Cooperative Society Asom Ltd. Assam MACS or Co-oper-
ative
79 Pustikar Sakh Sahakari Samiti Ltd Rajasthan Society
80 Rajasthan Shram Sarathi Association Rajasthan Sec. 8 Company
81 Rashtriya Seva Samithi (RASS) Andhra Pradesh Society
82 RORS Finance Private Limited Karnataka NBFC-MFI
83 Rural Education and Action Development Tamil Nadu Society
84 Sahara Utsarga Welfare Society West Bengal Society
85 Sakhi Samudaya Kosh Maharashtra Sec. 8 Company
86 Sampada Entrepreneurship & Livelihoods Foundation Maharashtra Sec. 8 Company
87 Sampurna Training and Entrepreneurship Programme West Bengal Sec. 8 Company
88 Samruddhi Welfare Development Foundation Maharashtra Sec. 8 Company
89 Sarvodaya Finance Ltd Tamil Nadu NBFC
90 Satra Development Finance Private Ltd Assam NBFC-MFI
91 Satya MicroCapital Limited Delhi NBFC
92 Seba Rahara West Bengal Society
93 Self Employment Voluntary Association Manipur Society
94 SHEPHERD Tamil Nadu Society
95 Shikhar Microfinance Pvt. Ltd. Delhi NBFC-MFI
96 Shroff Capital and Finance Pvt. Ltd. Gujarat NBFC-MFI
97 Social Action for Rural Community (SARC) Odisha Society
98 Society for Model Gram Bikash Kendra West Bengal Society
99 Sreema Mahila Samity West Bengal Society
100 Srija Chemo Pvt Ltd West Bengal NBFC
101 Sripur Swami Vivekananda Welfare Society West Bengal Society
102 Swashree Mahila Sakh Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Madhya Pradesh Society
103 Swayam Micro Services Gujarat Sec. 8 Company
104 Swayam Shree Micro Credit Services (SMCS) Odisha Sec. 8 Company
105 Swayamsampurna West Bengal Trust
106 Swayamshree Mahila Samabaya Samiti Ltd. Odisha MACS or Co-oper-
ative
107 The Eastern Multipurpose Coop Society Ltd Odisha MACS or Co-oper-
ative
108 The Saath Saving And Credit Co Operative Society Limited Gujarat MACS or Co-oper-
ative
Annexures 115
109 UNACCO Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Assam NBFC-MFI
110 Unnati Microfin Pvt Ltd Maharashtra NBFC
111 Valar Aditi Social Finance Pvt Ltd Tamil Nadu NBFC
112 Virutcham Microfinance Ltd Tamil Nadu NBFC-MFI
113 Vivekananda Sevakendra O Sishu Uddyan (VSSU) West Bengal Society
114 Volunteers for Village Development Manipur Society
115 Welfare organisation for Multipurpose Mass Awareness Tamil Nadu Society
Network (WOMAN)
116 Welfare Services Ernakulam Kerala Society
117 Yukti Samaj Sewa Madhya Pradesh Society
118 YVU Financial Services Pvt. Limited Manipur NBFC-MFI
(B) List of MFIs with Loan Portfolio between `100 crore and < `500 crore
S.No. Name of MFIs State Legal Form
1 Adhikar Microfinance Private Limited Odisha NBFC-MFI
2 ASA International India Microfinance Ltd West Bengal NBFC
3 Bhartiya Micro Credit Uttar Pradesh Sec. 8 Company
4 Chaitanya India Fin Credit Pvt Ltd Karnataka NBFC-MFI
5 Digamber Capfin Ltd Rajasthan NBFC-MFI
6 Growing Opportunity Finance India Private Limited Tamil Nadu NBFC-MFI
7 Hindusthan Microfinance Pvt Ltd Maharashtra NBFC-MFI
8 Jagaran Microfin Private Limited West Bengal NBFC-MFI
9 M Power Microfinance Ltd Maharashtra NBFC-MFI
10 Mahasemam Trust Tamil Nadu Trust
11 Margdarshak Financial Services Ltd Uttar Pradesh NBFC-MFI
12 Midland Microfin Ltd Punjab NBFC-MFI
13 Namra Finance Ltd. Gujarat NBFC-MFI
14 Navchetna Microfin Services Pvt Ltd Karnataka NBFC-MFI
15 North East Region Fin Services Limited Manipur NBFC
16 Peoples Forum Odisha Society
17 REPCO Micro Finance Pvt Ltd Tamil Nadu NBFC-MFI
18 Saija Finance Private Limited Bihar NBFC-MFI
19 Samasta Microfinance Limited Karnataka NBFC-MFI
20 Sambandh Finserv Pvt Ltd Odisha NBFC-MFI
21 Samhita Community Development Services Madhya Pradesh Sec. 8 Company
22 Sanghamitra Rural Financial Services Karnataka Sec. 8 Company
23 Sarala Development & Microfinance Pvt. Ltd. West Bengal NBFC-MFI
MACS or Co-oper-
24 Shri Mahila Sewa Sahakari Bank Ltd. Gujarat
ative
25 SMILE Microfinance Limited Tamil Nadu NBFC-MFI
(II) Profile of Small Finance Banks (SFBs) which Contributed Data for this Report
S.No. Name of SFBs State Legal Form
1 ESAF Small Finance Bank Limited Kerala SFB
2 Suryoday Small Finance Bank Limited Maharashtra SFB
3 Utkarsh Small Finance Bank Uttar Pradesh SFB
4 Equitas Small Finance Bank Tamil Nadu SFB
A REGRET
We regret that despite constant follow-up by the Sa-Dhan team the following institutions have not provided data for The Bharat
Microfinance Report- 2017: Janalakshmi, Intrepid Finance & Leasing Pvt. Ltd, Light Microfinance Pvt. Ltd, Pahal Financial
Services Pvt. Ltd, Sahayog Microfinance, Kalighat Society for Development Facilitation. Needless to say, such an attitude is
contrary to the principles of transparency and information dissemination which are essential for financial services providers in
the present times.
Annexures 117
Mission of Sa-Dhan
Mission of NABARD
HeadOffice:
A1-248,3rdFloor,SafdarjungEnclave
NewDelhi‒110029,India
Tel:+91-11-47174400
Fax:+91-11-47174405
E-mail:[email protected]
Website:www.sa-dhan.net