Samples-FORMAT ACTION RESEARCH
Samples-FORMAT ACTION RESEARCH
1.5” 1”
1”
1”
1 space
EFFECTIVENESS OF COLLEGIAL COACHING IN ENHANCING THE
INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE OF TEACHERS
1.5” 1”
by
ROGELIO S. PEREZ
October 2014
2 spaces
1”
(For Secondary)
1 Space
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
2 Spaces
This action research proposal entitled “EFFECTIVENESS OF COLLEGIAL
COACHING IN ENHANCING THE INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE OF
TEACHERS”, prepared and submitted by ROGELIO S. PEREZ, was evaluated by
the Committee and recommended for acceptance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Spaces
DIVISION ACTION RESEARCH EVALUATION COMMITTEE
2 spaces
NOEL L. LINSAO, Ed.D.
1 Space
CES, School Governance and Operations Division
Chairman
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 spaces
Accepted on ________________________.
2 spaces
2 spaces
This action research proposal entitled “EFFECTIVENESS OF COLLEGIAL
COACHING IN ENHANCING INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE OF
TEACHERS”, prepared and submitted by ROGELIO S. PEREZ, was evaluated
by the Committee and recommended for acceptance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 spaces
DIVISION ACTION RESEARCH EVALUATION COMMITTEE
2 spaces
RODEL G. ARAGON
1 Space
PSDS, OIC-Office of the Asst. Schools Division Superintendent
Chairman
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 spaces
Accepted on ________________________.
2 spaces
1 space
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL
2 spaces
This action research entitled “EFFECTIVENESS OF COLLEGIAL
COACHING IN ENHANCING INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE OF
TEACHERS”, prepared and submitted by ROGELIO S. PEREZ, was evaluated
by the Committee and recommended for approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 spaces
DIVISION ACTION RESEARCH EVALUATION COMMITTEE
2 spaces
______ROSARIO S. CRUZ, Ph. D.______
1 space
Asst. Schools Division Superintendent
Chairman
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 spaces
Approved on October 2, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 spaces
DIVISION ACTION RESEARCH EVALUATION COMMITTEE
2 spaces
FERNANDO L. JOSE, Ph. D., CESO VI
1 space
Schools Division Superintendent
Chairman
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 spaces
1 Tab
The researcher acknowledges………..
R.S. Perez
The research used the One Group Pretest-Posttest design. There were 20
The data obtained were processed through Stata using the following statistical
______________________________________________________________.
2 spaces
Page
2 spaces
Acknowledgement ---------------------------------------------------------------- ii
Rationale --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
Hypothesis ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3
Participants ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5
Instrument -------------------------------------------------------------------- 7
Data Analysis-------------------------------------------------------------------- 8
Appendices
Acknowledgement…………………………………………………………………………… ii
Certificate of Approval……………………………………………………………………….iii
Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………….iv
Rationale ………………………………………………………………………………………….1
Hypothesis ………………………………………………………………………………………..3
Participants …………………………………………………………………………………….. 7
Instrument ……………………………………………………………………………………….9
Data Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………..10
Summary ……………………………………………………………………………………. 18
Conclusions …………………………………………………………………………………..19
Recommendations …………………………………………………………………………20
References ……………………………………………………………………………………21
Appendices
2 spaces
1 Level of Instructional Competence
of the Teachers Before Treatment ---------------------------- 12
2 spaces
1 space
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2 spaces
Page
2 spaces
Rasyunale/Katuwiran……………………………………………………………………..1
Paglalahad ng Suliranin…………………………………………………………………..2
Ipotesis/Ipoteses……………………………………………………………………………3
Kahalagahan ng Pananaliksik…………………………………………………………..4
Kahulugan ng Terminologhiya………………………………………………………….5
Disenyo ng Pananaliksik………………………………………………………………….6
Patungkulan ng Pag-aaral………………………………………………………..…..…7
Paglikom ng Datos…………………………………………………………………….……8
Instrumento…………………………………………………………………………………..9
Pagsusuri ng Datos…………………………………………………………………………10
Paglalahad ng Resulta…………………………………………………………………....11
Lagom…………………………………………………………………………………………..12
Konklusyon…………………………………………………………………………………….13
Rekomendasyon……………………………………………………………………………..14
by the researcher:
Intervention Data to be
/Strategy Activities Dates
Collected
*Individual
Determine the initial level of
Teacher’s
the teaching competence of July 2015
Observation
the teachers before collegial (2nd week)
*Weighted
coaching.
Mean
July 2015 (
Results of
Provide the teachers with 2nd week) to
the
Collegial collegial coaching . October 2015
Observation
Coaching ( 3rd week)
*Results of
Conduct the mid-assessment September the
on the effect of collegial 2015 (2nd Observation
coaching. week) *Weighted
Mean
Determine the final level of
the teaching competence of October 2015 Weighted
the teachers after collegial (4th week) Mean
coaching.
Note:
1. The Data Collection Plan for experimental research.
2. The intervention/strategy must be changed if improvement is not
observed during the mid-assessment.
3. The Division Action Research Evaluation Committee must be informed
about the new Data Collection Plan.
by the researcher:
Note:
The Data Collection Plan for Descriptive Research
2 spaces
1.
2.
3.
4.
Average
1 space
Table 3. Comparison Between the Instructional Competence of the
Teachers Before and After Collegial Coaching Instruction
Means
Decision on the
Before After t-value Probability
Hypothesis
Collegial Collegial
Coaching Coaching
Reject
2.52 3.90 15.60 0.04
(Significance)