Pproaches To Learning: Kindergarten To Grade 3 Guide
Pproaches To Learning: Kindergarten To Grade 3 Guide
Pproaches To Learning: Kindergarten To Grade 3 Guide
TO LEARNING
Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1
EPPIC Skills: Core Expectations for Approaches to Learning,
Kindergarten to Grade 3 ............................................................................................................... 1
Appendix A
An Annotated Example: Opportunities for EPPIC Skill Development
Within a K-3 Curriculum Unit ................................................................................................... 29
Appendix B
Promoting EPPIC Skills with Remodeled Lessons ......................................................... 31
Appendix C
Including Approaches to Learning in K-3 Planning
Tools to Adapt and Use............................................................................................................... 34
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
INTRODUCTION
As a teacher in kindergarten and the primary grades, you know that children’s progress depends
greatly on their motivation, interest, persistence, and ability to plan their work and manage their
emotions. Just as New Jersey educators are guided by standards in areas like literacy and mathematics,
expectations are needed for the critically important domain of Approaches to Learning. This Guide
describes each of the core expectations and indicators; defines Approaches to Learning and explains how
these competencies connect with other aspects of development; describes why Approaches to Learning
competencies are so important for K-3 children; gives you grade-by-grade examples of how children
demonstrate these competencies; and lists many examples of ways that you can support children’s EPPIC
skills: engagement in learning, their planning and problem-solving, and their initiative and creativity.
This Guide has many features intended to help K-3 teachers provide children with what they
need to be successful learners, using the EPPIC skills of Engagement, Planning and Problem Solving,
and Initiative and Creativity. At various places in the Guide, you will find:
● Vignettes illustrating the importance of approaches to learning in the lives and learning of
individual students.
● “What’s So Important About . . . ?”—3 boxes, each of which briefly explains the importance of
one of the components of Approaches to Learning.
● “Yes, But . . .” boxes with questions or concerns that might be raised by administrators,
colleagues, or families—with answers you can use.
● Examples of “Remodeled Lessons” that continue to strengthen children’s competence in specific
content standards and curriculum areas while at the same time promoting skills in the three
components of Approaches to Learning.
● EPPIC child behaviors, grade-by-grade: Examples of children’s demonstrations of competence in
each ATL component: Engagement; Planning and Problem-Solving; and Initiative and
Creativity.
● Teacher supports, grade-by grade: Examples of specific ways that teachers can support growth
in each ATL component.
● Research evidence that shows why ATL are so important for overall development and learning,
AND how teachers’ everyday supports can strengthen each child’s ATL.
You may notice that the K-3 Approaches to Learning or EPPIC Skills are similar to but not exactly the
same as New Jersey’s Approaches to Learning standards for birth to age 3 and preschool. The K-3
standards are also organized somewhat differently than Approaches to Learning in the few other states
that have K-2 or K-3 standards in this domain. All the important aspects of Approaches to Learning are
here, but the expectations and indicators are organized to be (a) easy for teachers and administrators to
understand and remember—only 3 expectations with a few indicators under each, as compared with as
many as 5 standards and many more indicators in some other states—and (b) easily aligned with New
Jersey’s K-3 content standards and curriculum emphases.
1
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
INTRODUCTION
2
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
Marta has just begun first grade. Her family has recently moved from Mexico, and Marta is still
learning English. She has already made friends in the class and loves playing with them in the
dramatic play area and doing anything with markers and crayons. Although her teacher Ms. Abel’s
preliminary assessment indicates that Marta already has many competencies to support language
and literacy development in her home language and in English, so far Marta has tried to avoid
involvement in most of the class’s literacy-related activities. She seems to have difficulty paying
attention if something more interesting presents itself. If she participates, she usually gives up
quickly, saying that she doesn’t know the answer, cannot do the activity, or is too tired to keep
working.
Joe is a third grader with an eager attitude. Every day he comes to class with a big smile and
“Hello!”--ready to jump into whatever Mr. Kennedy has planned. The problem is that he doesn’t think
before he acts. For example, the class is beginning to become involved in an in-depth project1 on
transportation in their city, integrating literacy, math, and social studies. During extended periods of
the day, small groups work in learning centers or “worksites,” each with a different specific focus
within the transportation theme. His teacher encourages the children to choose where they will
spend their time, but Joe tries to do everything at once—and then becomes frustrated when his too-
ambitious plans don’t work out well. As a result, his work, although showing great potential and
creativity, is never well-organized and seldom completed.
Taniesha has very strong academic skills compared to many of her kindergarten classmates, at
least at this point in the year. Her teacher, Ms. Henry, finds that she has few problems completing
literacy and math activities correctly. She follows directions and tries to help others who may be
struggling. However, Taniesha seldom takes the initiative, even when choices are offered. Most of the
time, she sticks to what she already knows and always waits for her teacher to give directions. When
it’s time for learning centers, Taniesha gravitates toward a few where she feels comfortable. In class,
Tanisha doesn’t ask many questions, but when she does her questions are factual. She rarely tries to
explore new ideas or new ways of using materials.
In the years from kindergarten through Grade 3, children are expected to develop competence in
academic areas: language and literacy, mathematics, science and technology, and social studies.
However, these vignettes show that academic competence needs strong support from other areas of
children’s development. Marta, Joe, and Taniesha all have the potential to be capable young learners, but
each of them has difficulty becoming deeply engaged, planning and following through, or exercising
initiative in learning and creative thinking. Without these competencies, their academic skills are unlikely
to develop as well as they might, and their motivation and enthusiasm for learning are unlikely to grow.
3 1
For information and detailed examples of project work, see the NJ DOE’s First, Second, and Third Grade Implementation Guide.
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
4
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
Approaches to Learning,
Cognitive Development,
Social-Emotional Development, and “SEL”
The Approaches to Learning competencies that your K-3 children develop are closely connected with,
but are not the same as, their cognitive and social-emotional competencies. For example, engagement is
an essential element of children’s approaches to learning. Children who are deeply engaged in learning
experiences certainly have an emotional commitment to what they are doing. Engagement also depends
on children’s cognitive ability to identify, focus on, and solve the problems that learning experiences can
present. However, Approaches to Learning competencies are important enough to deserve their own
unique position in children’s development. The following image illustrates these overlapping connections:
Approaches
Cognitive Social-Emotional
to
Development Learning Development
● Responsible Decision-Making
● Relationship Skills
ATL and SEL: Partners in Learning in School and in Life. The SEL Working Group is in close
communication with the work on K-3 Approaches to Learning standards and teacher guidance. SEL and
Approaches to Learning expectations can and should support one another. For example, competencies
in “Social Awareness” (an SEL competency) can help children become competent in “Planning” (an ATL
competency), because planning and problem-solving strategies are more effective when children are
sensitive and respectful of classmates’ perspectives. Similarly, as teachers help children develop their
skills in the ATL competency of “Engagement” (effortful, persistent engagement in learning activities),
they are likely to strengthen several SEL areas at the same time, including “Self-Management.”
It’s also important to remember that both Approaches to Learning and Social-Emotional Learning
support children’s academic progress and prepare them for New Jersey’s Career Ready Practices.
Throughout this Approaches to Learning Guide, you’ll see examples of how teachers can
strengthen the connections across these key areas of children’s development, and how all of these
support and are integrated into implementation of K-3 standards for literacy, math, science and
5
technology, and social studies.
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
6
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
competence.
[First grade teacher Ms. Abbott has introduced a daily “planning time,” when each child describes
what he or she will accomplish during their work time, representing the plan by writing and drawing.
Planning, implementing, and flexibly modifying plans are all executive functions essential for
academic competence, including math competence.]
● When content is taught through activities that children find inherently enjoyable (such as small-
group work), their intrinsic motivation to learn increases.
[At the beginning of a class project about communities, Ms. Jackson creates small groups to
brainstorm questions they might ask when interviewing community members. In their groups, even
the quieter students offer creative ideas, which are then shared with the whole class.]
● Close relationships between teachers and children have positive effects on both engagement
and achievement.
[Mr. Mendez often shares his enthusiasm for baseball with his similarly baseball-obsessed third
graders. Often disengaged from academic work in the past, these children are working harder this
year, eager to receive their teachers’ approval.]
● Especially early in the school year, teachers who use daily routines to build children’s self-
regulation (they know what to do without being told) find that students are more deeply
engaged throughout the year.
[Kindergarten teacher Mr. Davis invests much time during the first weeks of school building the
children’s comfort and confidence in the daily routine. Individual, small group, and class
7
responsibilities are practiced and reinforced with picture schedules and other visual reminders.]
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
8
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
In the next section of this Guide, you will see lists of children’s expected behaviors grade by
grade, for each of the three core components of K-3 Approaches to Learning. These expectations are
useful, but you should keep a few cautions in mind:
Individual children’s development varies a great deal—in Approaches to Learning as well as in
other domains. You will see all children in your class make progress, but even at the end of the year
some children’s behavior may still be more typical of a child in a lower grade. This slower progress
may reflect a specific disability, or it may reflect a more general delay in this area of development. For
example, some children may enter your class with very few experiences that have supported their
EPPIC skills (Engagement; Planning and Problem-Solving; Initiative and Creativity). The supports you
provide in school, as suggested in this Guide, will help. To scaffold some children’s progress, you may
find that the suggested supports for lower grades are a better fit, at least for a while.
A child’s culture may also influence how he or she demonstrates some Approaches to Learning.
For example, some cultures value individual initiative more than others. Some children, who may be
growing up in families that strongly value interdependence and collaboration, may be more comfort-
able showing initiative as part of their contribution to group projects rather than in a solo activity.
Knowing the cultural norms and appropriate behaviors for the children and families you serve will
help you understand and encourage positive Approaches to Learning, but in a way that is responsive
to each child’s culture.
The Bottom Line:
Positive approaches to learning are essential for every child’s development and school
success. Teachers can ensure progress by paying attention to children’s individual characteris-
tics and cultural contexts.
9
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
At the beginning of the year, Marta did her best to avoid most of the first grade literacy activities. She
had trouble persisting and focusing, and only enjoyed being part of a few activities, such as dramatic
play and art work. Now, six months later, her teacher sees real growth in Marta’s engagement as well as
significant development of her language and literacy skills in her home language and in English. Marta’s
active involvement has now expanded to a greater number of activities, and even when these are
challenging Marta does not give up so easily. What’s happened? Many things. Her teacher Ms. Abel has
made a special effort to develop a warm relationship with Marta and her family, which has seemed to
foster Marta’s willingness to try things that are hard for her. Ms. Abel has also used Marta’s creative
talents to connect with specific literacy competencies—for example, a recent project on legends and
fairy tales tapped into Marta’s creative abilities while encouraging deeper, more focused engagement.
Ms. Abel has created more frequent, and longer, small group times than in the past, making it easier for
Marta and other children to stay focused than in whole-group literacy activities. Marta seems proud of
her own ability to concentrate and persist—a new favorite phrase is, “It was hard, but I did it!”
10
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
11
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
● Listens with attention for able to shift focus of minimal prompting from classmates exerting
brief periods. attention when needed adults. collective effort on learning
● Perseveres at tasks with (transitions to new lesson or ● Uses skills in reading and activities.
adult support. activity or topic). math for a wider variety of ● Uses academic skills flexibly
● Shows social competences ● Accepts redirection when purposes. for multiple purposes.
that will help the child focus of attention is not ● Perseveres at difficult ● Encourages other children
become involved in appropriate to the situation. academic tasks in class and become engaged or stay
collaborative learning ● Intentionally sets up own in home assignments. focused on learning activity
activities. learning situation to avoid or ● Shows pleasure at own that they are working on
● Recalls and carries out minimize distraction (e.g., ability to remain focused or together.
simple directions. choosing quiet corner of to persevere when learning ● In extended group
12
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
● From early in the year, develop strategies). within curriculum, leading to maintain their focus even in
individual supportive ● Praise/describe children’s deeper engagement. the face of significant
relationships with children demonstrations of effort and ● Use curriculum (such as distractions.
(known to predict greater persistence (rather than literature units or extended ● Increasingly, base projects on
engagement and persistence). focusing primarily on social studies projects) to the interests of individuals
● Praise children’s hard work performance). build and document 3 kinds and groups of children
and persistence even if ● Create the kinds of tasks that of engagement—behavioral, (known to foster
relatively brief. inherently build deeper cognitive, emotional—and engagement).
● Suggest strategies individual engagement in learning (e.g., engagement at deeper, more ● Identify and praise children’s
children can use to help reading tasks that involve sustained levels. use of strategies to keep
themselves pay attention. responding to texts, not just ● Create projects extending themselves focused.
● Model strategies for focusing isolated practice). over several weeks or longer. ● Involve children in more
and sustaining one’s attention ● Help children internalize cues ● Use stories about persistence complex reading and writing
and resisting distractions. and reminders to engage or from historical figures, about their own and others’
● Provide many opportunities focus attention. scientific leaders, and others engagement skills and
for children to make choices, ● Find and read stories to illustrate its importance. strategies.
which promotes attention illustrating value of ● Involve children in self-
13
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
Mr. Kennedy thinks that Joe may always remain the friendly but impulsive, somewhat disorganized
little guy that he was in the first weeks of third grade. Nevertheless, his teacher can see real progress for
Joe and many of his classmates. The class’s focus on in-depth projects has continued, and the quality of
Joe’s project contributions has improved thanks to the supports Mr. Kennedy began to implement. Every
day, the teacher begins with a “project check-in,” referring to the planning tools that each child uses to
keep track—especially helpful for Joe. In parent conferences, Mr. Kennedy has shared these strategies
with Joe’s family and others, recommending these for use at home to help children organize out-of-
school plans. Joe’s teacher also taps into Joe’s social skills and leadership potential by often designating
him as his team’s “master planner.” Joe is happily rising to this challenge. Finally, Joe is also making
progress in managing his frustration when his first attempt to implement his plans doesn’t work. One
especially helpful aspect of Mr. Kennedy’s program is that the literature curriculum includes books
featuring characters who face significant challenges, trying varied strategies to solve their problems.
Class discussions help children consider and apply these strategies to their own situations.
14
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
● Begins to make and follow and what result the plan will strategies and expected to achieve goals.
multi-step plans for lead to . results. ● Uses reflection on results of
completing tasks. ● Modifies plans on the basis of ● Makes and follows sequential problem-solving and flexibly
● With adult support, identifies results. plans. implements different
and tries out different ● Adapts problem-solving ● Evaluates original plan and approaches.
strategies to solve academic strategies to complete makes changes as needed ● Uses appropriate coping
and social problems. unfamiliar activities, or in ● Is increasingly capable and strategies to deal effectively
● Uses concrete methods to new contexts. reflective about how to with significant frustration
regulate own emotional ● Becomes increasingly able to anticipate and cope with and challenge in learning
response to frustrating regulate responses to frustration. activities.
learning situations. frustration during ● Anticipates possible problems
15
disappointment.
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
● Support children in drawing scaffolded support when possible solutions; [d] trying planning folders, wall charts,
pictures of their plans children’s problem-solving out and analyzing solutions; and other planning tools,
(“Playing with Blocks”) or attempts are not working. [e] communicating about the including electronic media.
writing a few words about ● Encourage children to use solution to others using ● Create routines in which
their plan. classmates as resources when multiple means of children self-evaluate the
● Use group time later in the trying to make or implement representation.2 effectiveness of their plans
day to review and discuss plans (“Maybe Josue has ● Encourage children to (for example, for getting
children’s plans. some ideas you can try; last elaborate on their plans by homework submitted on
● Use self-talk to model how to week he was working with asking them questions to add time) and brainstorm
plan (“After school today I’m that . . .”]. depth (e.g., “What are some alternate approaches.
going to pick up my twins and ● Continue to structure other ideas about how your ● Encourage children to think
go grocery shopping. I think I children’s individual group can share what you are ahead about problems they
need a list.”). development of their daily learning about clouds?”). may encounter and various
● When children are “stuck,” “Learning Plans” using ways that the problems
encourage them to come up writing skills. might be addressed.
with own solutions before ● Continue to emphasize
16
2
In Stone-Macdonald et al., Engaging young engineers, the authors use the following shorthand description for young children’s planning
and problem solving cycle: “Think About It; Try It; Fix It; Share It.”
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
Ms. Henry sees that Tanisha’s development has accelerated and broadened quite a bit, especially in
the last month or so. Taniesha has a cautious temperament, so it has taken a while for her to respond to
Ms. Henry’s supports. She’s now branching out into more innovative ways of using materials, and she is
more eager to act independently instead of always waiting for directions. Taniesha’s curiosity, which had
been hidden early in the year, is peeking out now, although still mostly during familiar activities. To
promote the children’s initiative and innovative thinking, Ms. Henry has redesigned or “remodeled” a
number of lessons that she’s used for years. Both in whole groups and small groups, the remodeled
lessons encourage children to experiment and try out new ideas. A recent math estimation activity using
pumpkin seeds is just one example. Ms. Henry’s frequent questions, such as “What’s another way you
could do this?” and her interested acknowledgement of children’s initiative and innovation seem to be
giving children—including Taniesha—the confidence to step beyond their comfort zones to take risks in
their learning.
17
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
for familiar materials, toys, concepts/ideas together from ● Evaluates which ideas may be range of new academic
and games. different areas of learning. best. challenges.
● Takes initiative in ● Uses materials in innovative ● Frequently brings concepts ● Takes appropriate risks in order
participating in class projects. ways. together from diverse to gain skills in new learning
● Demonstrate that he or she ● Joins with others in shared learning areas. areas.
sees new connections across interests. ● Selects from options given in ● Takes active role in
18
and language in new ways.
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
● Review and modify, as choosing a learning center, units and projects to promote opportunities in the
needed, curriculum activities creating small groups, etc.). individual initiative—“Which curriculum, emphasizing self-
to expand opportunities for ● Continue to offer many part of the project will you reflection on students’
creative and innovative work. creative opportunities, work on?” development of initiative and
● Simulate children’s curiosity extending over longer periods ● Encourage children to identify intrinsic motivation—e.g., at
with concrete materials— of time. and discuss new connections the end of projects.
mystery boxes, intriguing ● Identify opportunities within across projects, curriculum ● Use project work to further
objects, etc. content standards (e.g., New areas, between past and highlight children’s initiative
● Begin to build children’s Generation Science present activities, etc. and creativity, sharing with
ability to go deeper in their Standards) to promote ● Continue to ensure that other classes and families.
own learning: “How can we children’s inquiry and standards-based curriculum ● Help children develop or apply
find out more about turtles? innovation. includes strong inquiry rubrics to self-assess their
Let’s see what this book says.” ● Use project-based learning to emphasis. contributions to group
deepen children’s knowledge ● Offer opportunities to learn projects, especially in
in areas of individual and about scientists, artists, and implementing novel ideas
class interest, increasing other creative, innovative and self-directed
responsibility for their own women and men (across investigations.
learning. grades).
19
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
“In sum, learning occurs through a process of engagement and participation in a relationship with a
caring and trusted other who models the process of and provides opportunities for self-directed learning.
In acquiring the capacity for self-regulated learning, social–emotional skills that foster the relationship
and executive function skills that promote self-regulation are quite literally foundational for learning.”
(Blair & Diamond, 2008, p. 11)
20
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
Yes, But . . .
Q: I’m an administrator. From my classroom observations, using a daily planning time and
daily reflection about children’s plans and problem-solving strategies seems very time-consuming. Is
it really beneficial?
A: Higher-level thinking and problem-solving skills are essential for academic success as children
move through the elementary years and beyond. When teachers encourage children to plan, make
thoughtful choices, discuss, and try out different ways of dealing with learning tasks, all areas of their de-
velopment are supported, including those critically important executive functions. Making time for plan-
ning, flexible problem-solving, and reflection pays off. These are the kinds of skills that will be needed for
children to be college and career ready.
Reference: Epstein, A.S. (2003). How planning and reflection develop young children’s thinking
skills. Young Children, 58 (5), 28-36.
On line: https://www.naeyc.org/files/yc/file/200309/Planning&Reflection.pdf
Yes, But . . .
Q: Isn’t this emphasis on Approaches to Learning taking time away from important academic
goals?
A: Approaches to Learning are an investment worth making. Children who develop EPPIC skills (En-
gagement; Planning and Problem Solving; Initiative and Creativity) are more likely to do well academically.
If they have opportunities to practice these skills every day, children will become more motivated, involved,
and effective learners. This practice can easily be woven into the design of activities and lessons that are
already part of the NJ K-3 curriculum. Children’s strengthened Approaches to Learning will then help them
become more competent across all curriculum areas: literacy, mathematics, science, social studies, and
more.
Reference: Hughes, J. N., Luo, W., Kwok, O.-M., & Loyd, L. K. (2008). Teacher–student support, ef-
fortful engagement, and achievement: A 3-Year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology,
100(1), 1–14. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.1
21
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
Yes, But . . .
Q : Administrators have to be concerned about assessment. Is it possible to assess Approaches
to Learning?
A: Yes, it is possible, and some New Jersey school districts are beginning to do so. It’s important for
teachers to have simple assessment tools that will help them focus on individual children’s strengths and
needs in each of the EPPIC Skill areas: Engagement; Planning and Problem Solving; and Initiative and
Creativity. Quick observations using a simple checklist can help teachers see whether, and how deeply,
children are engaged during specific activities. Rubrics can be used to identify (and help students self-
identify) their use of innovative, creative approaches to various learning tasks. As discussed in the
Assessment section of New Jersey’s First, Second, and Third Grade Implementation Guide, assessment—
including but not only Approaches to Learning assessment--should primarily aim to help teachers improve
their teaching and individualize their supports.
Reference: Chen J. Q., & McNamee G. D. (Eds.). (2007). Bridging: Assessment for teaching and
learning in early childhood classrooms, PreK–3. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Yes, But . . .
Q: Shouldn’t these skills just be taught at home?
A: Certainly, home environments play a very important part in building what we are calling EPPIC
skills. However, just as in other areas of learning, these skills will develop better if they are emphasized
both at home and at school. A coordinated effort is likely to produce the best results. Schools can share
what they are doing with families, giving concrete examples of how teachers are helping every child
become more engaged, planful, independent, and creative as a learner. When they understand how these
skills help their children, most families welcome tips about how to encourage positive approaches to
learning at home—in homework practices, household tasks, out-of-school sports or music activities, and
more. Parental involvement works, and teamwork is the key.
Reference: Reynolds, A. & Clements, M. (2005). Parental involvement and children’s school
success. In E. Patrikakou et al. (Eds.), School-family partnerships: Promoting the social, emotional, and
academic growth of children. New York: Teachers College Press.
22
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
Yes, But . . .
Q: In my experience, some children are just not very motivated. Teachers can’t do much about that.
A: Many educators and parents think that children are born with more, or fewer, EPPIC competen-
cies. They may have heard that some children are simply more motivated or more creative. It’s more com-
plicated than that. Of course, children are born with different tendencies. But in Approaches to Learning,
as in other areas of development, research shows that children’s early environments are critically impor-
tant. Children may enter teachers’ K-3 classrooms with little apparent enthusiasm for, or engagement in
learning—but each school year is a new beginning. Opportunities provided in school can guide a child to-
ward developing greater engagement, planfulness, initiative, and other key EPPIC skills. Teachers, indeed,
are among the most powerful influences on children’s approaches to learning—which is the reason for this
Guide.
Reference: Hyson, M. (2008). Enthusiastic and engaged learners: Approaches to learning in the
early childhood classroom. New York: Teachers College Press and Washington, DC: NAEYC.
Yes, But . . .
Q : Administrators have to be concerned about over-burdening teachers. Teachers have so
much to do already. How can we add yet another area for them to emphasize?
A: This is an important concern, shared by administrators and teachers. In this Guide, we emphasize
strategies that teachers can use to integrate Approaches to Learning skills into New Jersey’s core curricu-
lum. There is no need for a separate Approaches to Learning curriculum. Many examples in this Guide
show how daily routines, content area lessons, and curriculum projects can be enriched by giving children
opportunities to be more deeply engaged, plan and follow through on their plans, solve challenging,
meaningful problems, and exercise initiative and creativity. Skilled teachers integrate these skills already;
in this Guide we highlight additional opportunities. The payoff is that children will at the same time
strengthen their academic and EPPIC skills.
Reference: Brophy, J., Alleman, J., & Knighton, B. (2010). A learning community in the primary
classroom. New York: Routledge.
23
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
Yes, But . . .
Q : Visiting K-3 classrooms, I often see “Learning Centers,” where small groups of children are
doing different things at the same time, often as part of time-consuming projects. Isn’t it more effi-
cient to teach directly, with everyone learning the same thing at the same time?
A : If we want children to develop the critical EPPIC skills (Engagement; Planning and Problem Solv-
ing; Initiative and Creativity), schools must think about the conditions that are most likely to provide op-
portunities to learn and practice those skills. As emphasized in NJ’s Implementation Guide for Grades 1-3,
and as supported by research, small-group work is very effective in promoting initiative and deeper, more
focused engagement with learning tasks. Described in depth in the Grades 1-3 Guide, project-based learn-
ing, in which blocks of time allow children to work on different aspects of the project in centers or “work-
sites,” has great potential to support the development of positive Approaches to Learning as well as a
range of academic competencies.
References: Marzano, R. (2007). The art and science of teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development; Jacobs, G., & Crowley, K. (2014). Supporting students,
meeting standards: Best practices for engaged learning in first, second, and third grades. Washing-
ton, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Yes, But . . .
Q : In my years in education, I’ve seen fads come and go. Is “Approaches to Learning” just an-
other educational fad?
A: It’s not surprising that experienced administrators and teachers may doubt whether Approaches
to Learning is an idea that is here to stay. This Guide summarizes a growing consensus from researchers in
child development and education, the business community, policymakers, and others: This set of compe-
tencies is truly essential for success in school and in life. Although different names have been given to these
skills, there is strong agreement about their importance. New Jersey is in the forefront of this movement,
both with these K-3 Approaches to Learning expectations and with the ongoing, closely related work on K-
12 Social and Emotional Learning Standards.
References: Dweck, C. (2006 ). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine;
Tough, P. (2012). How children succeed: Grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character. Boston:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
24
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
Yes, But . . .
Q : With the Common Core, there is so much new, challenging content in mathematics. Won’t
the children be better off if our teachers covered this content with the whole class, instead of having
so much small group work?
A : In many districts, children are struggling with mathematics, as reflected both in test scores and in
their negative feelings about this important part of the curriculum. Research indicates that children are
likely to be more mathematically successful, and have more positive attitudes about mathematics, if
teachers promote Approaches to Learning competencies within the mathematics curriculum. For
example, teachers can engage children in interesting, meaningful math tasks; involve children in rich
conversations about mathematical ideas; encourage innovative ways to solve problems; listen reflectively
and with interest to children’s own mathematical ideas; and scaffold children’s attempts to solve problems
using multiple strategies. All of this takes time and a classroom organization that moves away from whole-
group didactic instruction to more time spent in small, interactive groups that foster EPPIC skills:
engagement; planning and problem-solving; and initiative and creativity.
References: Copley, J. (2014). Goals for early childhood mathematics teachers. In H.P. Ginsberg, M.
Hyson, & T.A. Woods (2014). Preparing early childhood educators to teach math (pp. 75-95). Baltimore,
MD: Brookes; National Research Council (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward
excellence and equity. C.T. Cross, T.A. Woods, & H. Schweingruber, Eds. Committee on Early Childhood
Mathematics. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Yes, But . . .
Q: Kindergarten children seem too young to be learning these skills.
A: Actually, Approaches to Learning skills have been identified and intentionally promoted, even
with children birth to age 3 (see the New Jersey standards, for example). Kindergarten is an especially im-
portant time to emphasize EPPIC skills: According to the National Center for Education statistics, first-time
kindergartners who demonstrated these positive learning behaviors “very often” in the fall of kindergarten
had higher average reading and mathematics assessment scores than kindergartners who demonstrated
these behaviors less often. In Looking at this Guide’s descriptions of child behaviors and teacher supports
grade-by grade, you can see how competencies gradually develop every year, with later skills building on
earlier ones. And of course, the experiences that build EPPIC Skills should be developmentally appropri-
ate—well-matched to children’s ages, individual, and cultural characteristics.
Reference: NCES Blog (June, 2015). Children’s approaches to learning and academic achieve-
ment in the early grades. National Center for Education Statistics. On line:
http://nces.ed.gov/blogs/nces/post/approaches-to-learning-and-academic-achievement
25
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
26
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
Goslin, D.A. (2003). Engaging minds: Motivation and learning in America’s schools. Lanham, MD:
Scarecrow Press.
Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., & You, W. (2012). Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in
reading. In S.L. Christenson, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student
engagement (pp. 601–634). New York: Springer.
Hughes, J. N., Luo, W., Kwok, O.-M., & Loyd, L. K. (2008). Teacher–Student Support, Effortful Engagement,
and Achievement: A 3-Year Longitudinal Study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 1–14.
http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.1
Hughes, J., & Kwok, O. (2007). Influence of student-teacher and parent-teacher relationships on lower
achieving readers’ engagement and achievement in the primary grades. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 99(1), 39–51.
Hughes, J. N., Wu, W., & West, S. G. (2011). Teacher performance goal practices and elementary students’
behavioral engagement: A developmental perspective. Journal of School Psychology, 49(1), 1–23.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2010.09.003
Hyson, M. (2008). Enthusiastic and engaged learners: Approaches to learning in the early childhood
classroom. New York: Teachers College Press and Washington, DC: NAEYC. [E]
Jacobs, G., & Crowley, K. (2014). Supporting students, meeting standards: Best practices for engaged learning
in first, second, and third grades. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young
Children. [E]
Larson, R. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American Psychologist, 55 (1),
170-183.
Liew, J., McTigue, E., Barrois, L., & Hughes, J. (2008). Adaptive and Effortful Control and Academic Self-
efficacy Beliefs on Achievement: A Longitudinal Study of 1st through 3rd Graders. Early Childhood
Research Quarterly, 23(4), 515–526.
Mahatmya, D., Lohman, B.J., Matjasko, J.L., & Farb, A.F. (2012). Engagement across developmental
periods. In S.L. Christenson, S.L., A.L. Rechley, & C. Wylie (Eds.). Handbook of research on student
engagement (pp. 45-63). New York: Springer.
Marzano, R. (2007). The art and science of teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and
Curriculum Development. [E]
McClelland, M.M. (2011). Self-regulation and academic achievement in elementary school children. New
Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(133), 29–44. http://doi.org/10.1002/cd.302
McWilliam, R. A., & Casey, A. M. (2008). Engagement of every child in the preschool classroom. Baltimore,
MD: Brookes Publishing Co.
Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2006). Re-conceptualizing Emotion and Motivation to Learn in Classroom
Contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 377–390. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9032-1
Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation,
and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487-503.
National Research Council (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and
equity. C.T. Cross, T.A. Woods, & H. Schweingruber, Eds. Committee on Early Childhood Mathematics.
Washington, DC: National Research Council.
27
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
NCES Blog (June, 2015). Children’s approaches to learning and academic achievement in the
early grades. National Center for Education Statistics. On line:
http://nces.ed.gov/blogs/nces/post/approaches-to-learning-and-academic-achievement
Price-Mitchell, M. (2011). Fostering initiative in children and teens. On line:
http://www.rootsofaction.com/initiative-children-adolescents/ [E]
Ritchie, S., & Gutmann, L. (Eds.) (2014). FirstSchool: Transforming pre-K-3rd grade for African American,
Latino, and low-income children. New York: Teachers College Press. [E]
Schunk, D. H. (2008). Metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning: Research
recommendations. Educational Psychology Review, 20 (4), 463-467.
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. (in press). A motivational perspective on engagement and
disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children's behavioral and emotional
participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Stone-MacDonald, A., Wendell, K.B., Douglass, A., & Love, M.L. (2015). Engaging young engineers:
Teaching problem-solving skills through STEM. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. [E]
Stipek, D., & Seal, K. 2001). Motivated minds: Raising children to love learning. New York: Henry Holt. [E]
Tough, P. (2012). How children succeed: Grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character. Boston:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Urdan, T., & Schoenfelder, E. (2006). Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social
relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 331-349.
Urdon, T., & Turner, J.C. (2005). Competence motivation in the classroom. In A.J. Elliot & C.S. Dweck (Eds.),
Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 297-317). New York: Guilford Press.
Wentzel, K. R. (2005). Peer relationships, motivation, and academic performance at school. In A. J.
Elliot, & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 279-296). New York:
Guilford Press.
Wentzel, K. R., & Wigfield, A. (Eds.) (2009). Handbook of motivation at school. NY: Taylor and Francis.
Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest:
Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1),
1–35. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001
Wu, J., Hughes, J. N., & Kwok, O. (2010). Teacher student relationship quality type in elementary grades:
Effects on trajectories for achievement and engagement. Journal of School Psychology, 48(5),
357–387. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2010.06.004
Zimmerman, B.J., & Schunk, D. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement:
Theoretical perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
Appendix A
An Annotated Example:
Opportunities for EPPIC Skill Development
Within a K-3 Curriculum Unit
Note: The following description of part of a social studies unit is excerpted from the New Jersey First,
Second, and Third Grade Implementation Guide. Here we have inserted notes in bold italics to highlight
the unit’s many opportunities to build children’s EPPIC Skills.
“To begin the unit, Mrs. Thompson consults the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts
(ELA) and the New Jersey Core Curriculum Content Standards (NJCCCS) for social studies, as well as the
curriculum guides provided by her district. [To add a focus on Approaches to Learning, she can also
consult that guide, selecting one or more EPPIC skills for special emphasis—although all will
probably be addressed]. She then composes “I can” statements describing both the overarching
(throughout unit) objectives.
I can describe a community.
I can describe the people in my community.
I can describe the places in my community.
I can join with other students to learn more about something that interests us.
I can use many different ways to work on a problem.
To ensure she is responsive to the needs of her students, Mrs. Thompson begins the unit by eliciting
her students’ understanding of community. On the carpet in the literacy center, Mrs. Thompson begins:
Over the next few weeks, we are going to be reading stories about the people and places in the
community. Each of you will also choose a place [Research shows that engagement is promoted
when students are given choices] in the community you would like to learn more about. You will
meet with other students who are interested in that place in our community and work together as a
team [Small group work encourages focused attention and persistence.] to find facts that you can
share with the rest of the class. Your team will create a model of that part of the community. That
means you will use cardboard, construction paper, and other materials to make a smaller copy of what
your location looks like. Once everyone is done researching and creating [Note the emphasis on
creativity and innovative solutions to representing their chosen location in the community], we
will put all of your pieces of the community into a community map.
Mrs. Thompson introduces the book On the Town: A Community Adventure by Judith Caseley. After
reading the story, she posts the sentence strip containing the statement, “What do we want to know
about a community?” on the easel. Mrs. Thompson shows the children the KWL chart and asks them to
help her complete the K - “What they want to know.” She then asks them to share their “wonderings”
about communities [This part of the activity encourages varied responses and respects children’s
individual and cultural characteristics, as “community may mean different things to different children
and families] and records these comments:
29
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
Appendix A
30
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
Appendix B
Promoting EPPIC Skills with Remodeled Lessons
Almost any activity or lesson can be enhanced or “remodeled” to help children develop one or more
EPPIC skills. Here are three examples.
Example 1
Brief Description of Kindergarten Math Lesson on Measurement (found on the internet):
Common Core State Standards
K.MD.1.
● Describe measurable attributes of objects, such as length or weight. Describe several
“more of”/“less of” the attribute, and describe the difference. For example, directly compare
the heights of two children and describe one child as taller/shorter.
Activity: Teacher collects a variety of classroom objects of different lengths (e.g., paper clip, crayon,
ruler, etc.) and gives each child a set of these objects. Using a strip on the floor as a base, each child puts
his or her set in order from shortest to longest. Teacher gives help as needed and encourages children
who finish quickly to mix their items up and do it again.
Analysis in light of Approaches to Learning: The activity seems to have little potential to engage
children. It is likely that some children will find it very easy and finish quickly, while others will have
much more difficulty and perhaps give up. Problem-solving strategies could be further highlighted.
There is also little opportunity for innovative thinking.
Ideas for Possible “Remodeling”
EPPIC Skills to Emphasize: Engagement (sustaining attention and persisting); Planning and
problem solving (planning ahead; using varied strategies); Initiative and creativity (making connections
across different ideas and learning tasks).
● Increase intrinsic motivation by changing this from an individual task to a small-group activity
where 4-5 children are given a set of objects (6-12 of different lengths) and work together to
put them in order of length. (Note: It could also involve the whole class working together—it
is more challenging with more items, but therefore likely to be even more engaging.)
● Give small groups time to discuss and make plans for how they will go about this task. How
strategies (“Oh, I see that you have started with the longest and shortest ones, and you’ve left
room for the others!”)
● Consider adding a new level of challenge by combining small groups after the first step, either
children to compare how different small groups went about doing this.
● In the follow-up discussion, encourage children to make connections to other things they
31
have put in order of length or would like to (e.g., lining up by height).
● Other ideas?
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
Appendix B
Example 2
Brief Description of Science Lesson (adapted from internet)
NGSS: K-ESS2-1 Use and share observations of local weather conditions to describe patterns over
time (and other NGSS components)
Activity: Teacher reads a Dr. Seuss book about weather and asks children what they learned from
the read aloud. Teacher tells children they will be observing the weather every day for a month. Each
student will take a turn serving as class meteorologist and lead a discussion of current weather
conditions. A class chart will track observations. Each student will also keep a journal of the days’
forecasts and actual weather.
Analysis in light of Approaches to Learning: The activities in the unit have potential but can be
modified in light of important EPPIC skills. Much of the work is individual, and the plan does not respond
to diversity in students’ interests and experience. The daily activity of recording the weather could easily
become a simple ritual, lacking sufficient depth and challenge. Greater attention to problem-solving
would also strengthen children’s Approaches to Learning skills.
Ideas for Possible “Remodeling”
EPPIC Skills to Emphasize: Engagement (sustaining attention and persisting); Planning and
problem solving (planning ahead; using varied strategies); Initiative and creativity (making connections
across different ideas and learning tasks).
● Instead of having one child be the “meteorologist” each day, teams of children can serve this
function for several days in a row. This also allows each team to have time for in-depth thinking
about their observations in light of weather forecasts and perhaps see patterns over several days
rather than just one day.
● In the introduction to the weather investigation, the teacher can draw upon children’s own
experiences with weather and weather instruments, rather than just relying on a storybook.
Individual children may already have deep interest and curiosity about weather; some children
may also have lived in places with quite different weather patterns.
● Instead of the teacher pre-planning what the weather chart and recording process will look like,
it is possible to increase emphasis on planning and problem-solving with students sharing ideas
about good ways to keep track of the weather. Also, individual children or teams may organize
their weather notebooks in different ways, sharing ideas with classmates.
● The teacher might encourage teams of “meteorologists” to find innovative ways of sharing the
day’s weather findings with the class. These might include a drawing of the day’s weather, a
question for the class, or acting out what the forecast was for the day (miming strong winds, for
example).
32
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
Appendix B
Example 3
Brief Description of Science Lesson (adapted from internet)
NGSS: K-PS2-1 Plan and conduct an investigation to compare the effects of different strengths or
different directions of pushes and pulls on the motion of an object. (and other NGSS standards)
Activity: As part of a larger unit, teacher has children individually complete a “Different Ways Objects
Move” worksheet to check if the object is moving up or down, right or left, or in a circle. Afterwards,
teacher begins a KWL chart about the different ways that non-living things can move. Children then
participate in an activity in which small groups try to balance sorter and longer pencils on a table to see
which falls faster. They make predictions about possible differences, and whether it rolls in a certain
direction after it falls. The teacher introduces the concept of “gravity” to explain why pencils fall down
and not up. New vocabulary is placed on the word wall. At the end, children are asked to draw pictures
that would remind them of what the new vocabulary words mean.
Analysis in light of Approaches to Learning: The lesson does not seem to have much potential for
engagement or extended investigation of interesting phenomena. Children work in groups for some of
the lesson but they are not being encouraged to use varied problem-solving strategies. The pencil-
falling activity has potential for encouraging persistence and flexibility in using different strategies, but
the time seems too limited for deeper exploration.
Ideas for Possible “Remodeling”
EPPIC Skills to Emphasize: Engagement (sustaining attention and persisting); Planning and
problem solving (planning ahead; using varied strategies); Initiative and creativity (making connections
across different ideas and learning tasks).
● Using real objects instead of a worksheet would help to stimulate children’s curiosity. In pairs or
small groups, they could experiment with the objects and describe how they move or can be
made to move. This would respond to individual differences in children’s interests and skills, and
would build in more time for small group work, which movivates children’s learning.
● More time could be devoted to the pencil-falling activity, including encouragement to
experiment with different ways of helping the pencils remain upright, different methods of
recording what happens, and other innovations.
● During the small group pencil-falling activity, the teacher can notice and comment on children’s
ability to persist in the task: “Yes, it’s kind of frustrating when one pencil falls before you can get
the other one to stand up. What are your ideas for how to deal with that?”
● The teacher can encourage children to broaden and deepen their learning by asking them to
think of other objects whose movement they might explore, either in class or at home. With the
teacher, the children can make a list of those objects and follow up.
● Instead of the rather uninteresting task of drawing pictures related to the new vocabulary,
perhaps the lesson could be extended with a class mural or a class book, in which each child
could draw a picture of an object of his or her choice, showing ways that the object could be
made to move (for example, by falling down, by someone throwing it, by being blown by the
wind, etc.). Children would be using new vocabulary but also strengthening EPPIC skills
including initiative and creativity.
33
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
Appendix C
Including Approaches to Learning in K-3 Planning
Tools to Adapt and Use
Here is a simple tool that teachers can adapt and use in planning curriculum for Grades K-3. It can help
remind you to intentionally include EPPIC Skills (Engagement; Planning and Problem Solving; Initiative
and Creativity) in your plans, along with specific content standards in literacy, mathematics, social
studies, and science and technology.
Mathematics (CCSS)
Science (NGSS)
Social Studies
Approaches to Learning
--Engagement
--Planning and Problem-
Solving
--Initiative and Creativity
34
Approaches to Learning, Kindergarten to Grade 3 Guide
Appendix C
And here is another tool for teachers to use or adapt.
MATERIALS NEEDED EXAMPLE OF FEEDBACK PROVIDED TO IDEAS FOR EXPANDING THE ACTIVITIES TO A
DIFFERENTIATE OR SCAFFOLD LONGER TERM STUDY?
(FOR ONE CHILD)
35