The Amazing Quran

By Dr. Gary Miller

Source: http://www.thetruereligion.org/amazing.htm

Translate this page

About Gary Miller, the author

Gary Miller (Abdul-Ahad Omar) shows how we can establish true faith by setting
standards of truth. He illustrates a simple but effective method of finding out the right
direction in our search for truth.

G.R.. Miller is a mathematician and a theologian. He was active in Christian missionary

work at a particular point of his life but he soon began to discover many inconsistencies
in the Bible. In 1978, he happened to read the Qur'an expecting that it, too, would
contain a mixture of truth and falsehood.

He discovered to his amazement that the message of the Qur'an was precisely the same
as the essence of truth that he had distilled from the Bible. He became a Muslim and
since then has been active in giving public presentations on Islam including radio and
television appearances. He is also the author of several articles and publications about
Islam.

The Amazing Quran

Calling the Quran amazing is not something done only by Muslims, who have an
appreciation for the book and who are pleased with it; it has been labelled amazing by
non-Muslims as well. In fact, even people who hate Islam very much have still called it
amazing
Index

 Introduction
 Merchant Marine
 The Smallest Thing
 Honey
 Prophet Muhammad (s) and the Quran
 Scientific Approach to the Quran
 Falsification Test
 Ask Those Who Have Knowledge
o Embryology
o Skeptic's Reaction
o Geology
 You Did Not Know This Before!
 Proof of Authenticity
o An Approach
o Exhausting the Alternatives
o The Critic's Trail
 A Revelation - Abu Lahab
 The Flight
 An Encounter with a Minister
 The Source of the Quran
 Mythomania
 New Catholic Encyclopedia
 Testimony of an Intellectual
 Burden of Proof on the Critic
 Origin of the Universe and Life
 More on Falsification Test
o People of the Book
 A Mathematical Approach
o The Female Bee
o The Sun
o Time Zones
 Conclusions
 Addendum 1
 Addendum 2: 'Iram
Introduction

One thing which surprises non-Muslims who are examining the book very closely is that
the Quran does not appear to them to be what they expected. What they assume is that
they have an old book which came fourteen centuries ago from the Arabian desert; and
they expect that the book should look something like that - an old book from the
desert. And then they find out that it does not resemble what they expected at all.
Additionally, one of the first things that some people assume is that because it is an old
book which comes from the desert, it should talk about the desert. Well the Quran does
talk about the desert - some of its imagery describes the desert; but it also talks about
the sea - what it's like to be in a storm on the sea.

Merchant Marine

Some years ago, the story came to us in Toronto about a man who was in the merchant
marine and made his living on the sea. A Muslim gave him a translation of the Quran to
read. The merchant marine knew nothing about the history of Islam but was interested
in reading the Quran. When he finished reading it, he brought it back to the Muslim and
asked, "This Muhammad, was he a sailor?" He was impressed at how accurately the
Quran describes a storm on a sea. When he was told, "No as a matter of fact,
Muhammad lived in the desert," that was enough for him. He embraced Islam on the
spot.

He was so impressed with the Quran's description because he had been in a storm on
the sea, and he knew that whoever had written that description had also been in a storm
on the sea. The description of "a wave, over it a wave, over it clouds" (Surah Nur,
24:40) was not what someone imagining a storm on a sea to be like would have written;
rather, it was written by someone who knew what a storm on the sea was like. This is
one example of how the Quran is not tied to certain place and time. Certainly, the
scientific ideas expressed in it also do not seem to originate from the desert fourteen
centuries ago.

The Smallest Thing

Many centuries before the onset of Muhammad's prophethood, there was a well-known
theory of atomism advanced by the Greek philosopher, Democritus. He and the people
who came after him assumed that matter consists of tiny, indestructible, indivisible
particles called atoms. The Arabs too, used to deal in the same concept; in fact, the
Arabic word dharrah commonly referred to the smallest particle known to man. Now,
modern science has discovered that this smallest unit of matter (i.e., the atom, which
has all of the same properties as its element) can be split into its component parts. This
is a new idea, a development of the last century; yet; interestingly enough, this
information had already been documented in the Quran (Surah Saba', 34:3) which
states:

"He [i.e., Allah] is aware of an atom's weight in the heavens and on the earth
and even anything smaller than that..."

Undoubtedly, fourteen centuries ago that statement would have looked unusual, even to
an Arab. For him, the dharrah was the smallest thing there was. Indeed, this is proof,
that the Quran is not outdated.
Honey

Another example of what one might expect to find in an "old book" that touches upon
the subject of health or medicine is outdated remedies or cures. Various historical
sources state that the Prophet (s) gave some advice about health and hygiene, yet most
of these pieces of advice are not contained in the Quran. At first glance, to the non-
Muslims this appears to be a negligent omission. They cannot understand why Allah
would not "include" such helpful information in the Quran. Some Muslims attempt to
explain this absence with the following argument: "Although the Prophet's advice was
sound and applicable to the time in which he lived, Allah, in His infinite wisdom, knew
that there would come later medical and scientific advances which would make the
Prophet's advice appear outdated. When later discoveries occurred, people might say
that such information contradicted that which the Prophet (s) had given. Thus, since
Allah would never allow any opportunity for the non-Muslims to claim that the Quran
contradicts itself or the teachings of the Prophet (s), He only included in the Quran
information and examples which could stand the test of time." However, when one
examines the true realities of the Quran in terms of its existence as a divine revelation,
the entire matter is quickly brought into its proper perspective, and the error in such
argumentation becomes clear and understandable.

It must be understood that the Quran is a divine revelation, and as such, all information
in it is of divine origin. Allah revealed the Quran from Himself. It is the words of Allah,
which existed before creation, and thus nothing can be added, subtracted or altered. In
essence, the Quran existed and was complete before the creation of Prophet Muhammad
(s), so it could not possibly contain any of the Prophet's own words or advice. An
inclusion of such information would clearly contradict the purpose for which the Quran
exists, compromise its authority and render it inauthentic as a divine revelation.

Consequently, there was no "home remedies" in the Quran which one could claim to be
outdated; nor does it contain any man's view about what is beneficial to health, what
food is best to eat, or what will cure this or that disease. In fact, the Quran only
mentions one item dealing with medical treatment, and it is not in dispute by anyone. It
states that in honey there is healing. And certainly, I do not think that there is anyone
who will argue with that!

Prophet Muhammad (s) and the Quran

If one assumes that the Quran is the product of a man's mind, then one would expect it
to reflect some of what was going on in the mind of the man who "composed" it. In fact,
certain encyclopaedias and various books claim that the Quran was the product of
hallucinations that Muhammad underwent. If these claims are true - if it indeed
originated from some psychological problems in Muhammad's mind - then evidence of
this would be apparent in the Quran. Is there such evidence? In order to determine
whether or not there is, one must first identify what things would have been going on in
his mind at that time and then search for these thoughts and reflections in the Quran.

It is common knowledge that Muhammad (s) had a very difficult life. All of his daughters
died before him except one, and he had a wife of several years who was very dear and
important to him, who not only proceeded him in death but died at a very critical period
of his life. As a matter of fact, she must have been quite a woman because when the
first revelation came to him, he ran home to her, afraid. Certainly, even today one would
have a hard time trying to find an Arab who would tell you, "I was so afraid that I ran
home to my wife." They just aren't that way. Yet Muhammad (s) felt comfortable enough
with his wife to be able to do that. That's how influential and strong woman she was.
Although these examples are only a few of the subjects that would have been on
Muhammad's mind, they are sufficient in intensity to prove my point.
The Quran does not mention any of these things - not the death of his children, not the
death of his beloved companion and wife, not his fear of the initial revelations, which he
so beautifully shared with his wife - nothing; yet these topics must have hurt him,
bothered him, and caused him pain and grief during periods of his life. Indeed, if the
Quran was a product of his psychological reflections, then these subjects, as well as
others, would be prevalent or at least mentioned throughout.

Scientific Approach to the Quran

A truly scientific approach to the Quran is possible because the Quran offers something
that is not offered by other religious scriptures, in particular, and other religions, in
general. It is what scientists demand. Today there are many people who have ideas and
theories about how the universe works. These people are all over the place, but the
scientific community does not even bother to listen to them. This is because within the
last century the scientific community has demanded a test of falsification. They say, "If
you have theory, do not bother us with it unless you bring with that theory a way for us
to prove whether you are wrong or not."

Such a test was exactly why the scientific community listened to Einstein towards the
beginning of the century. He came with a new theory and said, "I believe the universe
works like this; and here are three ways to prove whether I am wrong!" So the scientific
community subjected his theory to the tests, and within six years it passed all three. Of
course, this does not prove that he was great, but it proves that he deserved to be
listened to because he said, "This is my idea; and if you want to try to prove me wrong,
do this or try that."

This is exactly what the Quran has - falsification tests. Some are old (in that they have
already been proven true), and some still exist today. Basically it states, "If this book is
not what it claims to be, then all you have to do is this or this or this to prove that it is
false." Of course, in 1400 years no one has been able to do "This or this or this," and
thus it is still considered true and authentic.

Falsification Test

I suggest to you that the next time you get into dispute with someone about Islam and
he claims that he has the truth and that you are in darkness, you leave all other
arguments at first and make this suggestion. Ask him, "Is there any falsification test in
your religion? Is there anything in your religion that would prove you are wrong if I could
prove to you that it exists - anything?" Well, I can promise right now that people will not
have anything - no test, no proof, nothing! This is because they do not carry around the
idea that they should not only present what they believe but should also offer others a
chance to prove they're wrong. However, Islam does that.

A perfect example of how Islam provides man with a chance to verify it authenticity and
"prove it wrong" occurs in the 4th chapter. And quiet honestly, I was very surprised
when I first discovered this challenge. It states (Surah An-Nisa, 4:82):

"Do they not consider the Quran? Had it been from any other than Allah, they
would surely have found therein much discrepancy."

This is a clear challenge to the non-Muslim. Basically, it invites him to find a mistake. As
a matter of fact, the seriousness and difficulty of the challenge aside, the actual
presentation of such a challenge in the first place is not even in human nature and is
inconsistent with man's personality. One doesn't take an exam in school and after
finishing the exam, write a note to the instructor at the end saying, "This exam is
perfect. There are no mistakes in it. Find one if you can!" One just doesn't do that. The
teacher would not sleep until he found a mistake! And yet this is the way the Quran
approaches people.

Ask Those Who Have Knowledge

Another interesting attitude that exists in the Quran repeatedly deals with its advice to
the reader. The Quran informs the reader about different facts and then gives the
advice: "If you want to know more about this or that, or if you doubt what is said, then
you should ask those who have knowledge." This too is a surprising attitude. It is not
usual to have a book that comes from someone without training in geography, botany,
biology, etc., who discusses these subjects and then advises the reader to ask men of
knowledge if he doubts anything. Yet in every age there have been Muslims who have
followed the advice of the Quran and made surprising discoveries. If one looks to the
works of Muslim scientists of many centuries ago, one will find them full of quotations
from the Quran. These works state that they did research in such a place, looking for
something. And they affirm that the reason they looked in such and such a place was
that the Quran pointed them in that direction.

For example, the Quran mentions man's origin and then tells the reader, "Research it!"
It gives the reader a hint where to look and then states that one should find out more
about it. This is the kind of thing that Muslims today largely seem to overlook - but not
always, as illustrated in the following example.

Embryology

A few years ago, a group of men in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia collected all of the verses in the
Quran which discuss embryology - the growth of the human being in the womb. They
said, "Here is what the Quran says. Is it the truth?" In essence, they took the advice of
the Quran: "Ask the men who know." They chose, as it happened, a non-Muslim who is a
professor of embryology at the University of Toronto. His name is Keith Moore, and he is
the author of textbooks on embryology - a world expert on the subject. They invited him
to Riyadh and said, "This is what the Quran says about your subject. Is it true? What can
you tell us?"

While he was in Riyadh, they gave him all the help that he needed in translation and all
of the cooperation for which he asked. And he was so surprised at what he found that he
changed his textbooks. In fact, in the second edition of one of his books, called Before
We Are Born... in the section about the history of embryology, he included some
material that was not in the first edition because of what he found in the Quran was
ahead of its time and that those who believe in the Quran know what other people do
not know.

I had the pleasure of interviewing Dr. Keith Moore for a television presentation, and we
talked a great deal about this - it was illustrated by slides and so on. He mentioned that
some of the things that the Quran states about the growth of the human being were not
known until thirty years ago. In fact, he said that one item in particular - the Quran's
description of the human being as a "leech-like clot" ('alaqah) at one stage (Surahs al-
Hajj 22:5; al-Mu'minun 23:14; and Ghafir 40:67) - was new to him; but when he
checked on it, he found that it was true, and so he added it to his book. He said, "I never
thought of that before," and he went to the zoology department and asked for a picture
of a leech. When he found that it looked just like the human embryo, he decided to
include both pictures in one of his textbooks.

Although the aforementioned example of man researching information contained in the

Quran deals with a non-Muslim, it is still valid because he is one of those who is
knowledgeable in the subject being researched. Had some layman claimed that what the
Quran says about embryology is true, then one would not necessarily have to accept his
word. However, because of the high position, respect, and esteem man gives scholars,
one naturally assumes that if they research a subject and arrive at a conclusion based on
that research, then the conclusion is valid.

Skeptic's Reaction

Dr. Moore also wrote a book on clinical embryology, and when he presented this
information in Toronto, it caused quite a stir throughout Canada. It was on the front
pages of some of the newspapers across Canada, and some of the headlines were quite
funny. For instance, one headline read: "SURPRISING THING FOUND IN ANCIENT
PRAYER BOOK!" It seems obvious from this example that people do not clearly
understand what it is all about. As a matter of fact, one newspaper reporter asked
Professor Moore, "Don't you think that maybe the Arabs might have known about these
things - the description of the embryo, its appearance and how it changes and grows?
Maybe they were not scientists, maybe they did some crude dissections on their own -
carved up people and examined these things." The professor immediately pointed out to
him that he [i.e., the reporter] had missed a very important point - all of the slides of
the embryo that had been shown and that had been projected in the film had come from
pictures taken through a microscope. He said, "It does not matter if someone had tried
to discover embryology fourteen centuries ago. They could not have seen it!"

All of the descriptions in the Quran of the appearance of the embryo are of the item
when it is still too small to see with the eye; therefore, one needs a microscope to see it.
Since such a device had only been around for little more than two hundred years, Dr.
Moore taunted, "Maybe fourteen centuries ago someone secretly had a microscope and
did this research, making no mistakes anywhere. Then he somehow taught Muhammad
(s) and convinced him to put this information in his book. Then he destroyed his
equipment and kept it a secret forever. Do you believe that? You really should not unless
you bring some proof because it is such a ridiculous theory." In fact, when he was asked,
"How do you explain this information in the Quran?" Dr. Moore's reply was, "It could only
have been divinely revealed!"

Geology

One of Professor Moore's colleagues, Marshall Johnson, deals extensively with geology at
the University of Toronto. He became very interested in the fact that the Quran's
statements about embryology are accurate, and so he asked Muslims to collect
everything contained in the Quran which deals with his speciality. Again people were
very surprised at the findings. Since there are a vast number subjects discussed in the
Quran, it would certainly require a large amount of time to exhaust each subject. It
suffices for the purpose of this discussion to state that the Quran makes very clear and
concise statements about various subjects while simultaneously advising the reader to
verify the authenticity of these statements with research by scholars in those subjects.
And as illustrated by the previous examples of embryology and geology, the Quran has
clearly emerged authentic.

You Did Not Know This Before!

Undoubtedly, there is an attitude in the Quran which is not found anywhere else. It is
interesting how when the Quran provides information, it often tells the reader, "You did
not know this before." Indeed, there is no scripture that exists which makes that claim.
All of the other ancient writings and scriptures that people have do give a lot of
information, but they always state where the information came from.
For example, when the Bible discusses ancient history, it states that this king lived here,
this one fought in a certain battle, another one had so may sons, etc. Yet it always
stipulates that if you want more information, then you should read the book of so and so
because that is where the information came from. In contrast to this concept, the Quran
provides the reader with information and states that this information is something new.
Of course, there always exists the advice to research the information provided and verify
its authenticity. It is interesting that such a concept was never challenged by non-
Muslims fourteen centuries ago. Indeed, the Makkans who hated the Muslims, and time
and time again they heard such revelations claiming to bring new information; yet, they
never spoke up and said, "This is not new. We know where Muhammad got this
information. We learned this at school." They could never challenge its authenticity
because it really was new!

In concurrence with the advice given in the Quran to research information (even if it is
new), when 'Umar was caliph, he chose a group of men and sent them to find the wall
of Dhul-Qarnayn. Before the Quranic revelation, the Arabs had never heard of such a
wall, but because the Quran described it, they were able to discover it. As a matter of
fact, it is now located in what is called Durbend in the Soviet Union.

Proof of Authenticity: An Approach

It must be stressed here that the Quran is accurate about many, many things, but
accuracy does not necessarily mean that a book is a divine revelation. In fact, accuracy
is only one of the criteria for divine revelations. For instance, the telephone book is
accurate, but that does not mean that it is divinely revealed. The real problem lies in
that one must establish some proof of the source the Quran's information. The emphasis
is in the other direction, in that the burden of proof is on the reader. One cannot simply
deny the Quran's authenticity without sufficient proof. If, indeed, one finds a mistake,
then he has the right to disqualify it. This is exactly what the Quran encourages.

Once a man came up to me after a lecture I delivered in South Africa. He was very angry
about what I had said, and so he claimed, "I am going to go home tonight and find a
mistake in the Quran." Of course, I said, "Congratulations. That is the most intelligent
thing that you have said." Certainly, this is the approach Muslims need to take with
those who doubt the Quran's authenticity, because the Quran itself offers the same
challenge. And inevitably, after accepting it's challenge and discovering that it is true,
these people will come to believe it because they could not disqualify it. In essence, the
Quran earns their respect because they themselves have had to verify its authenticity.

An essential fact that cannot be reiterated enough concerning the authenticity of the
Quran is that one's inability to explain a phenomenon himself does not require his
acceptance of the phenomenon's existence or another person's explanation of it.
Specifically, just because one cannot explain something does not mean that one has to
accept someone else's explanation. However, the person's refusal of other explanations
reverts the burden of proof back on himself to find a feasible answer. This general theory
applies to numerous concepts in life, but fits most wonderfully with the Quranic
challenge, for it creates a difficulty for one who says, "I do not believe it." At the onset of
refusal one immediately has an obligation to find an explanation himself if he feels
others' answers are inadequate.

In fact, in one particular Quranic verse which I have always seen mistranslated into
English, Allah mentions a man who heard the truth explained to him. It states that he
was derelict in his duty because after he heard the information, he left without checking
the verity of what he had heard. In other words, one is guilty if he hears something and
does not research it and check to see whether it is true. One is supposed to process all
information and decide what is garbage to be thrown out and what is worthwhile
information to be kept and benefited from immediately or even at a later date.

One cannot just let it rattle around in his head. It must be put in the proper categories
and approached from that point of view. For example, if the information is still
speculatory, then one must discern whether it's closer to being true or false. But if all
the facts have been presented, then one must decide absolutely between these two
options. And even if one is not positive about the authenticity of the information, he is
still required to process all the information and make the admission that he just does not
know for sure. Although this last point appears to be futile, in actuality, it is beneficial to
the arrival at a positive conclusion at a later time in that it forces the person to at least
recognize, research and review the facts.

This familiarity with the information will give the person "the edge" when future
discoveries are made and additional information is presented. The important thing is that
one deals with the facts and does not simply discard them out of empathy and
disinterest.

Exhausting the Alternatives

The real certainty about the truthfulness of the Quran is evident in the confidence which
is prevalent throughout it; and this confidence comes from a different approach -
"Exhausting the alternatives." In essence, the Quran states, "This book is a divine
revelation; if you do not believe that, then what is it?" In other words, the reader is
challenged to come up with some other explanation. Here is a book made of paper and
ink. Where did it come from? It says it is a divine revelation; if it is not, then what is its
source? The interesting fact is that no one has yet come up with an explanation that
works. In fact, all alternatives have bee exhausted. As has been well established by non-
Muslims, these alternatives basically are reduced to two mutually exclusive schools of
thought, insisting on one or the other.

On one hand, there exists a large group of people who have researched the Quran for
hundreds of years and who claim, "One thing we know for sure - that man, Muhammad
(s), thought he was a prophet. He was crazy!" They are convinced that Muhammad (s)
was fooled somehow. Then on the other hand, there is a group which alleges, "Because
of this evidence, one thing we know for sure is that that man, Muhammad (s) was a
liar!" Ironically, these two groups never seem to get together without contradicting.

In fact, many references to Islam usually claim both theories. They start out by stating
that Muhammad (s) was crazy and then end by saying he was a liar. They never seem to
realize that he could not have been both! For example, if one is deluded and really thinks
that he is a prophet, then he does not sit up late at night planning, "How will I fool the
people tomorrow so that they think I am a prophet?" He truly believes that he is a
prophet, and he trusts that the answer will be given to him by revelation.

The Critic's Trail

As a matter of fact, a great deal of the Quran came in answer to questions. Someone
would ask Muhammad (s) a question, and the revelation would come with the answer to
it. Certainly, if one is crazy and believes that an angel put words in his ear, then when
someone asks him a question, he thinks that the angel will give him the answer.
Because he is crazy, he really thinks that. He does not tell someone to wait a short while
and then run to his friends and ask them, "Does anyone know the answer?" This type of
behavior is characteristic of one who does not believe that he is a prophet. What the
non-Muslims refuse to accept is that you cannot have it both ways. One can be deluded,
or he can be a liar. He can br either one or neither one, but he certainly cannot be both!
The emphasis is on the fact that they are unquestionably mutually exclusive personality
traits.

The following scenario is a good example of the kind of circle that non-Muslims go
around in constantly. If you ask one of them, "What is the origin of the Quran?" He tells
you that it originated from the mind of a man who was crazy. Then you ask him, "If it
came from his head, then where did he get the information contained in it? Certainly the
Quran mentions many things with which the Arabs were not familiar." So in order to
explain the fact which you bring him, he changes his position and says, "Well, maybe he
was not crazy. Maybe some foreigner brought him the information. So he lied and told
people that he was a prophet." At this point then you have to ask him, "If Muhammad
was a liar, then where did he get his confidence? Why did he behave as though he really
thought he was a prophet?" Finally backed into a corner, like a cat he quickly lashes out
with the first response that comes to his mind. Forgetting that he has already exhausted
that possibility, he claims, "Well, maybe he wasn't a liar. He was probably crazy and
really thought that he was a prophet." And thus he begins the futile cycle again.

As has already been mentioned, there is much information contained in the Quran whose
source cannot be attributed to anyone other than Allah. For example, who told
Muhammad (s) about the wall of Dhul-Qarnayn - a place hundreds of miles to the north?
Who told him about embryology? When people assemble facts such as these, if they are
not willing to attribute their existence to a divine source, they automatically resort to the
assumption someone brought Muhammad (s) the information and that he used it to fool
the people. However, this theory can easily be disproved with one simple question: "If
Muhammad (s) was a liar, where did he get his confidence? Why did he tell some people
out right to their face what others could never say?" Such confidence depends
completely upon being convinced that one has a true divine revelation.

A Revelation - Abu Lahab

Prophet Muhammad (s) had an uncle by the name of Abu Lahab. This man hated Islam
to such an extent that he used to follow the Prophet around in order to discredit him. If
Abu Lahab saw the Prophet (s) speaking to a stranger, he would wait until they parted
and the would go to the stranger and ask him, "What did he tell you? Did he say, 'Black'?
Well, it's white. Did he say 'morning'? Well, it's night." He faithfully said the exact
opposite of whatever he heard Muhammad (s) and the Muslims say. However, about ten
years before Abu Lahab died, a little chapter in the Quran (Surah al-Lahab, 111) was
revealed about him. It distinctly stated that he would go to the fire (i.e., Hell). In other
words, it affirmed that he would never become a Muslim and would therefore be
condemned forever. For ten years all Abu Lahab had to do was say, "I heard that it has
been revealed to Muhammad that I will never change - that I will never become a
Muslim and will enter the Hellfire. Well, I want to become Muslim now. How do you like
that? What do you think of your divine revelation now?" But he never did that. And yet,
that is exactly the kind of behaviour one would have expected from him since he always
sought to contradict Islam.

In essence, Muhammad (s) said, "You hate me and you want to finish me? Here, say
these words, and I am finished. Come on, say them!" But Abu Lahab never said them.
Ten years! And in all that time he never accepted Islam or even became sympathetic to
the Islamic cause.

How could Muhammad (s) possibly have known for sure that Abu Lahab would fulfil the
Quranic revelation if he (i.e., Muhammad) was not truly the messenger of Allah? How
could he possibly have been so confident as to give someone 10 years to discredit his
claim of prophethood? The only answer is that he was Allah's messenger; for in order to
put forth such a risky challenge, one has to be entirely convinced that he has a divine
revelation.

The Flight

Another example of the confidence which Muhammad (s) had in his own prophethood
and consequently in the divine protection of himself and his message is when he left
Makkah and hid in a cave with Abu Bakr (ra) during their emigration to Madinah. The
two clearly saw people coming to kill them, and Abu Bakr was afraid. Certainly, if
Muhammad (s) was a liar, a forger and one who was trying to fool the people into
believing that he was a prophet, one would have expected him to say in such a
circumstance to his friend, "Hey, Abu Bakr, see if you can find a back way out of this
cave." Or "Squat down in that corner over there and keep quiet." Yet, in fact, what he
said to Abu Bakr clearly illustrated his confidence. He told him, "Relax! Allah is with us,
and Allah will save us!" Now, if one knows that he is fooling the people, where does one
get this kind of attitude? In fact, such a frame of mind is not characteristic of a liar or a
forger at all.

So, as has been previously mentioned, the non-Muslims go around and around in a
circle, searching for a way out - some way to explain the findings in the Quran without
attributing them to their proper source. On one hand, they tell you on Monday,
Wednesday and Friday, "The man was a liar," and on the other hand, on Tuesday,
Thursday and Saturday they tell you, "He was crazy." What they refuse to accept is that
one cannot have it both ways; yet they need both theories, both excuses to explain the
information in the Quran.

An Encounter with a Minister

About seven years ago, I had a minister over to my home. In the particular room which
we were sitting there was a Quran on the table, face down, and so the minister was not
aware of which book it was. In the midst of a discussion, I pointed to the Quran and
said, "I have confidence in that book." Looking at the Quran but not knowing which book
it was, he replied, "Well, I tell you, if that book is not the Bible, it was written by a man!"
In response to his statement, I said, "Let me tell you something about what is in that
book." And in just three to four minutes, I related to him a few things contained in the
Quran. After just those three or four minutes, he completely changed his position and
declared, "You are right. A man did not write that book. The Devil wrote it!" Indeed,
possessing such an attitude is very unfortunate - for many reasons. For one thing, it is a
very quick and cheap excuse. It is an instant exit out of an uncomfortable situation.

As a matter of fact, there is a famous story in the Bible that mentions how one day some
of the Jews were witnesses when Jesus (pbuh) raised a man from the dead. The man
had been dead for four days, and when Jesus arrived, he simply said, "Get up!" and the
man arose and walked away. At such a sight, some of the Jews who were watching said
disbelievingly, "This is the Devil. The Devil helped him!" Now this story is rehearsed very
often in churches all over the world, and people cry big tears over it, saying, "Oh, if I
had been there, I would not have been as stupid as the Jews!" Yet, ironically, these
people do exactly what the Jews did when in just three minutes you show them only a
small part of the Quran and all they can say is, "Oh, the Devil did it. The devil wrote that
book!" Because they are truly backed into a corner and have no other viable answer,
they resort to the quickest and cheapest excuse available.

The Source of the Quran

Another example of people's use of this weak stance can be found in the Makkans'
explanation of the source of Muhammad's message. They used to say, "The devils bring
Muhammad that Quran!" But just as with every suggestion made, the Quran gives the
answer. One verse (Surah Al-Qalam 68: 51-52) in particular states:

"And they say, 'Surely he is possessed [by jinn],' but it [i.e., the Quran] is not
except a reminder to the worlds."

Thus it gives an argument in reply to such a theory. In fact, there are many arguments
in the Quran in reply to the suggestion that devils brought Muhammad (s) his message.
For example, in the 26th chapter Allah (SWT) clearly affirms:

"No evil ones have brought it [i.e., this revelation] down. It would neither be
fitting for them, nor would they be able. Indeed they have been removed far
from hearing." (Surah ash-Shu'ara 26:210-212)

And in another place (Surah an-Nahl 16:98) in the Quran, Allah (SWT) instructs us:

"So when you recite the Quran seek refuge in Allah from Shaytan, the
rejected."

Now is this how Satan writes a book? He tells one, "Before you read my book, ask God
to save you from me?" This is very, very tricky. Indeed, a man could write something
like this, but would Satan do this? Many people clearly illustrate that they cannot come
to one conclusion on this subject. On one hand, they claim that Satan would not do such
a thing and that even if he could, God would not allow him to; yet, on the other hand,
they also believe that Satan is only that much less than God. In essence they allege that
the Devil can probably do whatever God can do. And as a result, when they look at the
Quran, even as surprised as they are as to how amazing it is, they still insist, "The Devil
did this!"

Thanks be to Allah (SWT), Muslims do not have that attitude. Although Satan may have
some abilities, they are a long way separated from the abilities of Allah. And no Muslim
is a Muslim unless he believes that. It is common knowledge even among non-Muslims
that the Devil can easily make mistakes, and it would be expected that he would
contradict himself if and when he wrote a book. For indeed, the Quran states (Surah an-
Nisa 4:82):

"Do they not consider the Quran? Had it been from other than Allah, they would
surely have found therein much discrepancy."

Mythomania

In conjunction with the excuses that non-Muslims advance in futile attempts to justify
unexplainable verses in the Quran, there is another attack often rendered which seems
to be a combination of the theories that Muhammad (s) was crazy and a liar. Basically,
these people propose that Muhammad was insane, and as a result of his delusion, he lied
to and misled people. There is a name for this in psychology. It is referred to as
mythomania. It means simply that one tells lies and then believes them. This is what the
non-Muslims say Muhammad (s) suffered from. But the only problem with this proposal
is that one suffering from mythomania absolutely cannot deal with any facts, and yet the
whole Quran is based entirely upon facts. Everything contained in it can be researched
and established as true. Since facts are such a problem for a mythomaniac, when a
psychologist tries to treat one suffering from that condition, he continually confronts him
with facts.
For example, if one is mentally ill and claims, "I am the king of England," a psychologist
does not say to him "No you aren't. You are crazy!" He just does not do that. Rather, he
confronts him with facts and says, "O.K., you say you are the king of England. So tell me
where the queen is today. And where is your prime minister? And where are your
guards?" Now, when the man has trouble trying to deal with these questions, he tries to
make excuses, saying "Uh... the queen... she has gone to her mother's. Uh... the prime
minister... well he died." And eventually he is cured because he cannot deal with the
facts. If the psychologist continues confronting him with enough facts, finally he faces
the reality and says, "I guess I am not the king of England."

The Quran approaches everyone who reads it in very much the same way a psychologist
treats his mythomania patient. There is a verse in the Quran (Surah Yunus 10:57) which
states:

"O mankind, there has come to you an admonition [i.e., the Quran] from your
Lord and a healing for what is in the hearts - and guidance and mercy for the
believers."

At first glance, this statement appears vague, but the meaning of this verse is clear
when one views it in light of the aforementioned example. Basically, one is healed of his
delusions by reading the Quran. In essence, it is therapy. It literally cures deluded
people by confronting them with facts. A prevalent attitude throughout the Quran is one
which says, "O mankind, you say such and such about this; but what about such and
such? How can you say this when you know that?" And so forth. It forces one to consider
what is relevant and what matters while simultaneously healing one of the delusions that
facts presented to mankind by Allah can easily be explained away with flimsy theories
and excuses.

New Catholic Encyclopedia

It is this very sort of thing - confronting people with facts - that had captured the
attention of many non-Muslims. In fact, there exists a very interesting reference
concerning this subject in the New Catholic Encyclopedia. In an article under the subject
of the Quran, the Catholic Church states:

"Over the centuries, many theories have been offered as to the origin of the Quran...
Today no sensible man accepts any of these theories!!"

Now here is the age-old Catholic Church, which has been around for so many centuries,
denying these futile attempts to explain away the Quran.

Indeed, the Quran is a problem for the Catholic Church. It states that it is revelation, so
they study it. Certainly, they would love to find proof that it is not, but they cannot. They
cannot find a viable explanation. But at least they are honest in their research and do
not accept the first unsubstantiated interpretation which comes along. The Church states
that in fourteen centuries it has not yet been presented a sensible explanation. At least it
admits that the Quran is not an easy subject to dismiss. Certainly, other people are
much less honest. They quickly say, "Oh, the Quran came from here. The Quran came
from there." And they do not even examine the credibility of what they are stating most
of the time.

Of course, such a statement by the Catholic Church leaves the everyday Christian in
some difficulty. It just may be that he has his own ideas as to the origin of the Quran,
but as a single member of the Church, he cannot really act upon his own theory. Such
an action would be contrary to the obedience, allegiance and loyalty which the Church
demands. By virtue of his membership, he must accept what the Catholic Church
declares without question and establish its teachings as part of his everyday routine. So,
in essence, if the Catholic Church as a whole is saying, "Do not listen to these
unconfirmed reports about the Quran," then what can be said about the Islamic point of
view? If even non-Muslims are admitting that there is something to the Quran -
something that has to be acknowledged - then why are people so stubborn and
defensive and hostile when Muslims advance the very same theory? This is certainly
something for those with a mind to contemplate - something to ponder for those of
understanding!

Testimony of an Intellectual

Recently, the leading intellectual in the Catholic Church - a man by the name of Hans -
studied the Quran and gave his opinion of what he had read. This man has been around
for some time, and he is highly respected in the Catholic Church, and after careful
scrutiny, he reported his findings, concluding, "God has spoken to man through the man,
Muhammad." Again this is a conclusion arrived at by a non-Muslim source - the very
leading intellectual of the Catholic Church himself!

I do not think that the Pope agrees with him, but nonetheless, the opinion of such a
noted, reputed public figure must carry some weight in defense of the Muslim position.
He must be applauded for facing the reality that the Quran is not something which can
be easily pushed aside and that, in fact God is the source of these words.

As is evident from the aforementioned information, all of the possibilities have been
exhausted, so the chance of finding another possibility of dismissing the Quran is
nonexistent.

Burden of Proof on the Critic

If the book is not a revelation, then it is a deception; and if it is a deception, one must
ask, "What is its origin? And where does it deceive us?" Indeed, the true answers to
these questions shed light on the Quran's authenticity and silence the bitter
unsubstantiated claims of the unbelievers.

Certainly, if people are going to insist that the Quran is a deception, then they must
bring forth evidence to support such a claim. The burden of proof is on them, not us!
One is never supposed to advance a theory without sufficient corroborating facts; so I
say to them, "Show me one deception! Show me where the Quran deceives me! Show
me, otherwise don't say that it is a deception!"

Origin of the Universe and Life

An interesting characteristic of the Quran is how it deals with surprising phenomena

which relate not only to the past but to modern times as well. In essence, the Quran is
not and old problem. It is still a problem even today - a problem to the non-Muslims that
is. For everyday, every week, every year brings more and more evidence that the Quran
is a force to be contended with - that its authenticity is no longer to be challenged! For
example, one verse in the Quran (Surah al-Anbiya 21:30) reads:

"Do not the unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined
together, then We clove them asunder, and made from water every living
thing? Will they not then believe?"

Ironically, this very information is exactly what they awarded the 1973 Noble Prize for -
to a couple of unbelievers.
The Quran reveals the origin of the universe - how it began from one piece - and
mankind continues to verify this revelation, even up to now. Additionally, the fact that
all life originated from water would not have been an easy thing to convince people
of fourteen centuries ago. Indeed, if 1400 years ago you had stood in the desert and told
someone, "All of this, you see (pointing to yourself), is made up of mostly water," no
one would have believed you. Proof of that was not available until the invention of the
microscope. They had to wait to find out that cytoplasm, the basic substance of the cell,
is made-up of 80% water. Nonetheless, the evidence did come, and once again the
Quran stood the test of time.

More on Falsification Test

In reference to the falsification tests mentioned earlier, it is interesting to note that they,
too, relate to both the past and the present. Some of them were used as illustrations of
Allah's omnipotence and knowledge, while others continue to stand as challenges to the
present day. An example of the former is the statement made in the Quran about Abu
Lahab. It clearly illustrates that Allah, the Knower of the Unseen, knew that Abu Lahab
would never change his ways and accept Islam. Thus Allah dictated that he would be
condemned to the Hellfire forever. Such a chapter was both an illustration of Allah's
divine wisdom and a warning to those who were like Abu Lahab.

People of the Book

An interesting example of the latter type of falsification tests contained in the Quran is
the verse which mentions the relationship between the Muslims and the Jews. The
verse is careful not to narrow its scope to the relationship between individual members
of each religion, but rather, it summarizes the relationship between the two groups of
people as a whole. In essence, the Quran states that the Christians will always treat the
Muslims better than the Jews will treat the Muslims. Indeed, the full impact of such a
statement can only be felt after careful consideration of the real meaning of such a
verse. It is true that many Christians and many Jews have become Muslims, but as a
whole, the Jewish community is to be viewed as an avid enemy of Islam. Additionally,
very few people realize what such an open declaration in the Quran invites. In essence,
it is an easy chance for the Jews to prove that the Quran is false - that it is not a divine
revelation. All they have to do is organize themselves, treat the Muslims nicely for a few
years and then say, "Now what does your holy book say about who are your best friends
in the world - the Jews or the Christians? Look what we Jews have done for you!" That is
all they have to do to disprove the Quran's authenticity, yet they have not done it in
1400 years. But, as always, the offer still stands open!

A Mathematical Approach

All of the examples so far given concerning the various angles from which one can
approach the Quran have undoubtedly been subjective in nature; however, there does
exist another angle, among others, which is objective and whose basis is mathematical.

It is surprising how authentic the Quran becomes when one assembles what might be
referred to as a list of good guesses. Mathematically, it can be explained using guessing
and prediction examples. For instance, if a person has two choices (i.e., one is right, and
one is wrong), and he closes his eyes and makes a choice, then half of the time (i.e.,
one time out of two) he will be right. Basically, he has a one in two chance, for he could
pick the wrong choice, or he could pick the right choice.

Now if the same person has two situations like that (i.e., he could be right or wrong
about situation number one, and he could be right or wrong about situation number
two), and he closes his eyes and guesses, then he will only be right one-fourth of the
time (i.e., one time out of four). He now has a one in four chance because now there are
three ways for him to be wrong and only one way for him to be right. In simple terms,
he could make the wrong choice in situation number one and then make the wrong
choice in situation number two; or he could make the wrong choice in situation number
one and then make the right choice in situation number two; or he could make the right
choice in situation number one and then make the wrong choice in situation number
two; or he could make the right choice in situation number one and then make the right
choice in situation number two.

Of course, the (only instance in which he could be totally right is the last scenario where
he could guess correctly in both situations. The odds of his guessing completely correctly
have become greater because the number of situations for him to guess in have
increased; and the mathematical equation representing such a scenario is ½ x ½ (i.e.,
one time out of two for the first situation multiplied by one time out of two for the
second situation).

Continuing on with the example, if the same person now has three situations in which to
make blind guesses, then he will only be right one-eighth of the time (i.e., one time out
of eight or ½ x ½ x ½ ). Again, the odds of choosing the correct choice in all three
situations have decreased his chances of being completely correct to only one time in
eight. It must be understood that as the number of situations increase, the chances of
being right decrease, for the two phenomena are inversely proportional.

Now applying this example to the situations in the Quran, if one draws up a list of all of
the subjects about which the Quran has made correct statements, it becomes very clear
that it is highly unlikely that they were all just correct blind guesses. Indeed, the
subjects discussed in the Quran are numerous, and thus the odds of someone just
making lucky guesses about all of them become practically nil. If there are a million
ways for the Quran to be wrong, yet each time it is right, then it is unlikely that someone
was guessing.

The following three examples of subjects about which the Quran has made correct
statements collectively illustrate how the Quran continues to beat the odds.

The Female Bee

In the 16th chapter (Surah an-Nahl 16:68-69) the Quran mentions that the female bee
leaves its home to gather food. Now, a person might guess on that, saying, "The bee
that you see flying around - it could be male, or it could be female. I think I will guess
female." Certainly, he has a one in two chance of being right. So it happens that the
Quran is right. But it also happens that that was not what most people believed at the
time when the Quran was revealed. Can you tell the difference between a male and a
female bee? Well, it takes a specialist to do that, but it has been discovered that the
male bee never leaves his home to gather food. However, in Shakespeare's play, Henry
the Fourth, some of the characters discuss bees and mention that the bees are soldiers
and have a king. That is what people thought in Shakespeare's time - that the bees that
one sees flying around are male bees and that they go home and answer to a king.
However, that is not true at all. The fact is that they are females, and they answer to a
queen. Yet it took modern scientific investigations in the last 300 years to discover that
this is the case.

So, back to the list of good guesses, concerning the topic of bees, the Quran had a
50/50 chance of being right, and the odds were one in two.
The Sun

In addition to the subject of bees, the Quran also discusses the sun and the manner in
which it travels through space. Again, a person can guess on that subject. When the sun
moves through space, there are two options: it can travel just as a stone would travel if
one threw it, or it can move of its own accord. The Quran states the latter - that it
moves as a result of its own motion (Surah al-Anbiya 21:33). To do such, the Quran
uses a form of the word sabaha to describe the sun's movement through space. In order
to properly provide the reader with a comprehensive understanding of the implications of
this Arabic verb, the following example is given.

If a man is in water and the verb sabaha is applied in reference to his movement, it can
be understood that he is swimming, moving of his own accord and not as a result of a
direct force applied to him. Thus when this verb is used in reference to the sun's
movement through space, it in no way implies that the sun is flying uncontrollably
through space as a result of being hurled or the like. It simply means that the sun is
turning and rotating as it travels. Now, this is what the Quran affirms, but was it an easy
thing to discover? Can any common man tell that the sun is turning? Only in modern
times was the equipment made available to project the image of the sun onto a tabletop
so that one could look at it without being blinded. And through this process it was
discovered that not only are there spots on the sun but that these spots move once
every 25 days. This movement is referred to as the rotation of the sun around its axis
and conclusively proves that, as the Quran stated 1400 years ago, the sun does, indeed,
turn as it travels through space.

And returning once again to the subject of good guesses, the odds of guessing correctly
about both subjects - the sex of bees and the movement of the sun - are one in four!

Time Zones

Seeing as back fourteen centuries ago people probably did not understand much about
time zones, the Quran's statements about this subject are considerably surprising. The
concept that one family is having breakfast as the sun comes up while another family is
enjoying the brisk night air is truly something to be marveled at, even in modern time.
Indeed, fourteen centuries ago, a man could not travel more than thirty miles in one
day, and thus it took him literally months to travel from India to Morocco, for example.
And probably, when he was having supper in Morocco, he thought to himself, "Back
home in India they are having supper right now." This is because he did not realize that,
in the process of traveling, he moved across a time zone. Yet, because it is the words of
Allah, the All-Knowing, the Quran recognizes and acknowledges such a phenomenon.

In an interesting verse it states that when history comes to an end and the Day of
Judgement arrives, it will all occur in an instant; and this very instant will catch some
people in the daytime and some people at night. This clearly illustrates Allah's divine
wisdom and His previous knowledge of the existence of time zones, even though such a
discovery was non-existent back fourteen centuries ago. Certainly, this phenomenon is
not something which is obvious to one's eyes or a result of one's experience, and this
fact, in itself, suffices as proof of the Quran's authenticity.

Conclusions

Returning one final time to the subject of good guesses for the purpose of the present
example, the odds that someone guessed correctly about all three of the aforementioned
subjects - the sex of bees, the movement of the sun and the existence of time zones -
are one in eight!
Certainly, one could continue on and on with this example, drawing up longer and longer
list of good guesses; and of course, the odds would become higher and higher with each
increase of subjects about which one could guess. But what no one can deny is the
following: the odds that Muhammad (s), an illiterate, guessed correctly about thousands
and thousands of subjects, never once making a mistake, are so high that any theory of
his authorship of the Quran must be completely dismissed - even by the most hostile
enemies of Islam!

Indeed, the Quran expects this kind of challenge. Undoubtedly, if one said to someone
upon entering a foreign land, "I know your father. I have met him," probably the man
from that land would doubt the newcomer's word, saying, "You have just come here.
How could you know my father?" As a result, he would question him, "Tell me, is my
father tall, short, dark, fair? What is he like?" Of course, if the visitor continued
answering all of the questions correctly, the skeptic would have no choice but to say, "I
guess you do know my father. I don't know how you know him, but I guess you do!"

The situation is the same with the Quran. It states that it originates from the One who
created everything. So everyone has the right to say, "Convince me! If the author of this
book really originated life and everything in the heavens and on the earth, then He
should know about this, about that, and so on." And inevitably, after researching the
Quran, everyone will discover the same truths. Additionally, we all know something for
sure: we do not all have to be experts to verify what the Quran affirms. One's iman
(faith) grows as one continues to check and confirm the truths contained in the Quran.
And one is supposed to do so all of his life.

May God (Allah) guide everyone close to the truth.

Addendum 1

An engineer at the University of Toronto who was interested in psychology and who had
read something on it, conducted research and wrote a thesis on Efficiency of Group
Discussions. The purpose of his research was to find out how much people accomplish
when they get together to talk in groups of two, three, ten, etc. The graph of his findings
goes up and down at places, but it reaches the highest point at the variable of two. The
findings: people accomplish most when they talk in groups of two. Of course, this
discovery was entirely beyond his expectations, but it is very old advice given in the
Quran (Surah Saba 34:46):

"Say, 'I exhort you to one thing - that you stand for Allah, [assessing the truth]
by twos and singly, and then reflect...'"

Addendum 2: 'Iram

Additionally, the 89th chapter of the Quran (Surah al-Fajr 89:7) mentions a certain city
by the name of 'Iram (a city of pillars), which was not known in ancient history and
which was non-existent as far as historians were concerned. However, the December
1978 edition of National Geographic introduced interesting information which mentioned
that in 1973, the city of Elba was excavated in Syria. The city was discovered to be 43
centuries old, but that is not the most amazing part. Researchers found in the library of
Elba a record of all of the cities with which Elba had done business. Believe it or not,
there on the list was the name of the city of 'Iram. The people of Elba had done business
with the people of 'Iram!

In conclusion I ask you to consider with care the following (Surah 29:50-51):
"And they say, 'Why are not signs sent down to him from his Lord?' Say,
'Indeed, the signs are with Allah, and I am but a clear warner.' But it is
sufficient for them that We have sent down to you the Book [i.e., Quran] which
is rehearsed to them? Verily, in that is mercy and a reminder to people who
believe."