Lean Six Sigma - Yellow Belt Program: Prepared For
Lean Six Sigma - Yellow Belt Program: Prepared For
Module 3
prepared for
3-4 October 2008 zumtobel lighting division ZDL Curtici – lean 6 sigma
Agenda
Day 1 Day 2
2
Learning Objectives
3
TPM
3-4 October 2008 zumtobel lighting division ZDL Curtici – lean 6 sigma
1. TPM definition (1)
Î A company-wide team-based effort to build
quality into equipment and to improve overall
equipment effectiveness
Î Total
y all employees are involved
y it aims to eliminate all accidents, defects and
breakdowns
Î Productive
y actions are performed while production goes on
y troubles for production are minimized
Î Maintenance
y keep in good condition
y repair, clean, lubricate 5
1. TPM definition (2)
6
TPM Goal
Î Zero Breakdowns,
Î Zero Accidents,
Î Zero Defects.
7
2. Origins of TPM
8
3. TPM principles
9
Autonomous Maintenance
Planned Maintenance
11
4. Eight major pillars of TPM
4.1. Autonomous Maintenance (2)
12
4. Eight major pillars of TPM
4.2. Equipment and process improvement
13
4. Eight major pillars of TPM
4.2. Equipment and process improvement
4.2.1. Equipment losses
Process errors
Quality loss
Rework / scrap
14
4. Eight major pillars of TPM
4.2. Equipment and process improvement
4.2.2. Manpower and material losses
Waiting materials
Manpower
losses
Waiting instructions
Material yield
Material
Energy losses
losses
Consumable material losses
15
4. Eight major pillars of TPM
4.2. Equipment and process improvement
4.2.3 Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)
16
4. Eight major pillars of TPM
4.2. Equipment and process improvement
4.2.3 Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)
17
4. Eight major pillars of TPM
4.2. Equipment and process improvement
4.2.3 Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)
18
4. Eight major pillars of TPM
4.3. Planned maintenance
22
4. Eight major pillars of TPM
4.7. Education and training
Î 2 major components
y soft skills training: how to work as
teams, diversity training and
communication skills
y technical training: upgrading
problem-solving and equipment-
related skills
23
4. Eight major pillars of TPM
4.8. Safety and environmental management
24
5. TPM implementation
3 requirements for fundamental improvement
25
5. TPM Implementation
12 steps
26
5. TPM Implementation
5.1. Announce top management’s decision to introduce TPM
27
5. TPM Implementation
5.2. Introductory education campaign
28
5. TPM Implementation
5.3. TPM Promotion
29
5. TPM Implementation
5.4. Establish basic TPM policies and goals
30
5. TPM Implementation
5.5. Preparation and Formulation of a master plan
31
5. TPM Implementation
5.6. TPM kick-off
32
5. TPM Implementation
5.7. Develop an equipment management program (1)
34
5. TPM Implementation
5.8. Develop a planned maintenance program
35
5. TPM Implementation
5.8. Develop a autonomous maintenance program
36
5. TPM Implementation
5.10. Increase skills of production and maintenance personnel
37
5. TPM Implementation
5.11. Develop early equipment management program(1)
38
5. TPM Implementation
5.11. Develop early equipment management program(2)
Î Existing machines:
y analyze historical records for
• trends of types of failures
• frequency of component failures
• root causes of failures
y determine how to eliminate the problem
and reduce maintenance through an
equipment design change or by changing
the process
39
5. TPM Implementation
5.12. Perfect TPM implementation and raise TPM levels
40
6. TPM Benefits
41
Systematic Problem Solving
3-4 October 2008 zumtobel lighting division ZDL Curtici – lean 6 sigma
Intro
Abstract:
Î Successful total quality management (TQM) is dependent
on first class problem solving. Numerous techniques have
been created to help the TQM practitioner along the
problem solving journey. However, it can be very difficult to
decide which of these techniques should or could be used
at any point in the journey and in particular to see how the
different approaches are related to each other. As a result,
most people use only a small number of these techniques
and tend to cling to their own limited toolbox. Three of the
strongest groups of tools are “the seven simple tools of
TQM”, “the four thinking models of Kepner-Tregoe” and
“root cause analysis”. This presentation argues that all
three are complementary to each other and provides a flow
chart to help navigate between them. This is particularly
relevant for programmes aimed at implementing total
productive manufacturing/maintenance (TPM).
43
Î Don't confuse decision-making with
problem-solving
y The outcome of one may be sub-optimal
for the other!
Î Decision making seeks to choose between
known alternatives
Î Problem solving tries to find entirely new
options
y The following approach has similarities to
"brain-storming", but is more methodical
44
What is a "problem"?
Î A problem is a question raised for inquiry,
consideration, or solution
Î An intricate unsettled issue which is a
source of perplexity, distress, or vexation
y And that may be difficult to understand or
accept
Webster's US dictionary
Î Problem solving answers the general
question
y "How do I make this thing work?"
45
• Problem = situation where there is deviation
from what is expected and
what actually is.
• Problem-solving = finding a way to attain what is
expected or desired from what actually is.
• Problem-solving method = specific way of
proceeding in the determination of the
solution(s) to a problem.
• A key perspective is that one should be
systematic and follow some method when
trying to solve a problem.
46
Problem Solving?
47
Problem Solving Process
Symptom
Recognition
Fact
Finding
Problem
Identification Follow Up
Idea
Generation
Solution
Development
Plan
Implementation
48
All Managers Need Problem Solving
Skills
49
Problem Solving Skills for Managers
Recognize
Problem
ACT PLAN
STUDY DO
51
Gap
Gap Analysis
Analysis
Internal or
External
Supplier
Internal or
Input Process A Output External
Customer
Quality Requirements
Characteristics and
Expectations
52
10 Problem Solving Steps
Continuous Recognize
improvement Problem
Ensure Form quality
performance improvement
ACT teams
Define
Problem
Evaluate Analyze
STUDY PLAN
Solution Problem
Determine
Possible
DO
Causes
Identify
Implement Possible
Solution Solutions
53
Florida Power & Light’s 7 step model
54
FPL’s PDCA cycle
Involve the right people
Execute cycle again
Gather all available data
Improvement standardized
Understand customers needs
Improvement becomes
Thoroughly study
current best approach
the process
Improvement ACT PLAN Capable of meeting
projects identified needs?
Develop plan
Understand differences Train people
Analyze and STUDY DO
display data Implement the
Review problems/errors improvement
What was learned?
Collect appropriate data
What is still not working?
55
Xerox Problem Solving Process
56
Process Analysis Method
UNDERSTAND
SELECT
ANALYZE
ADOPT PLAN
CHECK DO
57
Why do we need the 7 QC tools?
58
PDSA and QC Tools
Brainstorming
Pareto analysis
Run charts
Cause and effect
Control charts STUDY DO diagram
Histograms Scatter diagrams
Check sheets Control charts
Scatter diagrams Check sheets
Pareto charts Run charts
59
Quality Control Tools
• Pareto chart
• Histogram
• Process flow diagram
• Check sheet
• Scatter diagram
• Control chart
Run chart
• Cause and effect diagram
60
Pareto Principle
7 Quality Tools
61
Pareto chart
30
28
% Complaints
25
20
16
15
12 12
10
6
5 4 3
0
Loose Stitching Button Material
Threads flaws problems flaws
7 Quality Tools
62
Chart
Pareto
0
Po
or
W D
ro es
ng ig
di n
(64)
m
De ens
fe io
ct n
(13)
ive s
M pa
ac rts
hi
ne
(10)
ca
O l
pe ibra
ra tio
to
(6)
r e ns
De rro
fe rs
ct
(3)
ive
m
Causes of poor quality
Su at
rfa er
ce ia
ls
(2)
ab
ra
sio
ns
(2)
63
Frequency
0
5
10
15
20
25
Histogram
1.
9
2.
9
3.
9
4.
9
5.
9
6.
9
7.
9
8.
9
9.
9
Category 10
.9
11
.9
12
.9
13
.9
14
.9
15
.9
M
or
e
7 Quality Tools
64
Histogram
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0 1 2 6 13 10 16 19 17 12 16 20 17 13 5 6 2 1
65
Flowcharts
Î Flowcharts
y Graphical description of how work is done.
y Used to describe processes that are to be
improved.
7 Quality Tools
66
Flow Diagrams
67
Flowchart
Flowchart
Activity
Yes
Decision
No
7 Quality Tools
68
Flowchart
69
Flow Diagrams
70
Flow Diagrams
71
Process Chart Symbols
Operations
Inspection
Transportation
Delay
Storage
72
Process Chart
Date: 9-30-00 Location: Graves Mountain
Analyst: TLR Process: Apple Sauce
Distance
Operation
Transport
Storage
Description
Inspect
(feet)
(min)
Time
Delay
Step
of
process
73
74
Check
Check Sheet
Sheet
Shifts
√√ √√√
√√√√ √√√
√√ √
7 Quality Tools
75
Check Sheet
76
Cause-and-Effect Diagrams
7 Quality Tools
77
Cause-and-Effect Diagrams
Materials Procedures
Quality
Problem
People Equipment
78
Fishbone Diagram
Measurement Human Machines
Quality
Inaccurate Problem
temperature Poor process
control Defective from vendor
design
Ineffective quality
Not to specifications management
Dust and
Dirt Material- Deficiencies
handling problems in product
design
Environment Materials Process
79
Cause and effect diagrams
Î Advantages
y making the diagram is educational in itself
y diagram demonstrates knowledge of
problem solving team
y diagram results in active searches for
causes
y diagram is a guide for data collection
80
Cause and effect diagrams
81
Scatter Diagram
82
Run Charts
83
Control Chart
27
24
UCL = 23.35
21
Number of defects
18 c = 12.67
15
12
6
LCL = 1.99
3
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Sample number 84
Control Charts
85
Quality Improvement: Problem Solving
“Stem and leaf” displays
Data
Integrated Circuit Response Time (ps)
4.6 4.0 3.7 4.1 4.1 5.6 4.5 6.0 6.0 3.4
3.4 4.6 3.7 4.2 4.6 4.7 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.3
3.7 4.1 4.5 4.6 4.4 4.8 4.3 4.4 5.1 3.9
86
“Stem and leaf” displays
3 7 4 4 7 7 4 3 7 9
4 6 0 1 5 6 2 6 7 1 1 5 6 4 8 3 4
5 6 1
6 0 0
87
Dot diagrams
3 4 5 6
Plant A
Plant B
88
Brainstorming
Î Purpose - generate a
list of
y problems
y opportunities
y ideas
Î Success requires
y no criticism
y no arguing
y no negativism
y no evaluation
89
Brainstorming
90
Brainstorming
91
Brainstorming
92
Problems for
“Why-Why” discussion
93
Problem Solving
DMAIC approach
3-4 October 2008 zumtobel lighting division ZDL Curtici – lean 6 sigma
What Is a Project Charter?
ÎDefines the problem background and its affect on the
broader business
ÎDescribes why the problem is strategically important
to the business
ÎDescribes the specific opportunity and goals of the
project
ÎPuts a value on the opportunity
y Net of the potential effort it will take to implement
y Also describes non-financial benefits
ÎIt does NOT solve the problem
ÎIt is a living document, until the project is launched
y Minimal changes can made beyond after the launch, but any
change to the scope has the risk of not having the proper
project team members involved or even a potential ‘false start’ 95
Life Cycle of a Charter
Project
Birth Initial Charter Creation DMAIC
Complete
Scoping
Simple PDF Template Revised 10-24-00 Simple PDF Template Revised 10-24-00 Simple PDF Template Revised 10-24-00
Project Name Project Name Project Name
page 1 of 2 page 1 of 2 page 1 of 2
- include the 4 basic elements : What, Where, When, Extent - include the 4 basic elements : What, Where, When, Extent - include the 4 basic elements : What, Where, When, Extent
- make quantifiable whenever possible
Ca lculations - make quantifiable whenever possible
Ca lculations - make quantifiable whenever possible
Ca lculations
& &
Assumptions Assumptions Assumptions
• Complete ‘Shallow-Dive’ • Complete ‘Deep-Dive’ • It’s a set of ideas and an • It’s a cleaned-up
• It’s the initial ideas
• It’s a couple sentences • It’s 1-2 pages implementation plan set of files & data
developed during a
Diagnostic, or other • 1 hour • 4-8 hours • 3-5 months of effort • 2 days of clean-up
• Value unknown • “Ballpark” value • Value established (+/-) • Value, costs, timing • Value is Fixed
estimated are refined during • Metrics monitored
Define & Measure & value captured
phases
Screening Prioritization 96
What’s Needed on a Charter?
Problem Statement
The problem statement should contain the What, Where, When and Extent of the issue.
Describe the “pain.”
The opportunity should be related to a key business issue and have strategic relevance.
Goal Statement
Quantitatively describe the key objectives of the project, in terms of a metric and a target.
Financial Benefits
Describe the financial benefits, net of implementation and potential capital costs.
Generally described in terms of Economic Profit (EP)
State key assumptions.
Planned Resources
Insure the team is adequately staffed with the sufficient skill sets to solve the problem.
Insure time commitments are clearly identified.
Project Scope
The boundaries of the project.
Project Plan
High level estimate of the project timeline
Generally, hard dates should be placed only on key milestones, such as Gate Reviews
97
Project Charter Example
CHARTER FORM
General Information
Project Name: Implement Sales and Operations Planning Process Project Goals:
Project Definition: Implement SOP to provide better visibility into capacity planning for all areas, provide Improve On-Time Delivery (79% to 84% - Industrial,
improved production scheduling, and also drive specific shop orders and purchase part 72% to 81% - Airborne, 80% to 85% - Valves)
releases for select strategic purchases. 1
Start Date: Improve Order Fulfillment Time (34 days to 29 days -
Industrial, 48 days to 40 days - Airborne, 62 days to
End Date: 2 52 days - Valves)
Site Location: Improve Inventory Turns (3.7 to 4.3 - Switches, 2.4 to
Valencia, C Process Type: Planning 3 3.7 - Valves)
Value Center: Aerospace Process Owner: Bob Lacy 4 Improved Direct Labor Productivity (65% to 66.5%)
nagement Company: Improve Revenue (5% increase - Industrial, 5%
increase - Airborne, 1.5% increase - Airborne, 1%
SPG Champion: Brian Jordan 5 increase -Valves)
BlackBelt:
% of time required: 100% Risk Projection: Medium
Planned Benefits
Team Memb kills Requir Start Date End Date % of time required Capital Investment ($0.0MM)
1 General MaExecutive sponsorship 5%
2 Master SchDevelop capacity planning tools & estimates 25%
3 Demand MDevelop forecasting tools & forecasts 25%
4 Sales & M Project overview 10%
5 Operations Project overview 10%
6 Order MgmDevelop policies & procedures 10%
7
8
0.85 Total Equivalent Resources Required
98
Project Charter Example (Cont.)
Project Background
Project Background: An SOP process doesn't currently exist. An attempt at implementing some form of this process had been undertaken in the past, but didn't realiz
potential (and was eliminated) due to inaccurate and too detailed Planning BOM's and lack of a formal pr
Measurement of Success:
Project Output: Implemented and functioning S&OP process (pilot). On-time order delivery, shipment $ vs. Plan
99
Who Develops the Charter?
101
Elements of a Problem Statement
AA Problem
Problem Statement
Statement contains
contains information
information that
that gives
gives specificity
specificity to
to the
the issue.
issue.
After
After reviewing
reviewing the
the data,
data, describe
describe the
the problem
problem in
in the
the terms
terms below.
below.
ÎWhat is occurring/happening?
y Example: Services are delivered late to our customers
ÎWhen did the problem start?
y Example: The problem has developed over the last six
months
ÎWhere is the occurrence?
y Example: Our West Coast customers are primarily affected
(roughly 75% of the total)
ÎExtent of the problem
y Example: 30 orders worth $790,000 in July
102
Building a Problem Statement
A Problem Statement:
ÎContains information that gives specificity to the issue
ÎDescribes the “pain” caused by the problem
ÎIdentifies the issues
What When Where Extent
Late Services Last Six Months To West Coast • 30 orders worth
$790,000 in July
Warranty Issues Last Year Plant XYZ • Warranty costs
equals 4% of
revenue
• 3x higher than
other plants
103
Problem Statement Example 1
106
Goal Statement Example
107
Financial Benefits
Includes:
ÎProjected Financial Benefits
y One-Time Benefits (example: sale of equipment made
surplus by the project)
y On-Going Benefits (example: decrease in labor)
ÎFinancial Benefit Assumptions
ÎOther Qualitative Benefits (additional benefits that
are difficult to quantify)
ÎCan also include Expected Expenses:
y One-Time Expenses (example: capital expenditure)
y On-Going Expenses (example: increase in labor)
108
Types of Financial Benefits
ÎRevenue Growth
y Volume/Price/Mix Improvement
y Asset Utilization Enhancement
y Product/Service Generation
ÎCost Reductions
y Purchase Items and Services
y Waste Elimination
y Labor Reduction
• Salary
• Hourly
y Productivity Improvements
ÎWorking Capital Reduction 109
Incremental Financial Analysis
Objective
ÎIsolate the results of an action from the background
activity (the things which would have happened if the
action was not taken).
Practice
ÎEstablish the baseline performance.
y Choose a representative data set.
y Adjust it for any one-time events.
ÎEstablish what will change and the effect(s) that
change will have, relative to the baseline case.
ÎEstimate the financial benefit(s) associated with each
change.
y There’s more than one way to “skin a cat.” 110
Estimation Approaches
Î Bottom-Up
y Identify all individual elements of the total benefit
y Estimate each component’s contribution
y Sum up the pieces
Î Top-Down
y Start with the whole pie
y Exclude items out of scope or not likely to happen
y See how much is left
Î Subjective/Conditional
y When all else fails, gather many views and average
the estimates
111
Bottom-Up Estimates
ÎCreate a statement that summarizes the change and
where/how the financial impact will occur
y Must correspond to the baseline situation
y Can be a “hypothesis statement”
ÎLay out a “Chain of Causality” that describes how
the benefits will be realized
y IF <this action> THEN <this result>
(there may be several steps in a given chain)
y Explicitly list any assumptions
ÎEstimate the financial benefit of each “Chain of
Causality”
y Show your work (formulas, calculations)
ÎCheck for double counted and missing elements
112
Examples:
“Chain of Causality”
Revenue Increase
ÎDecreasing delivery lead times will increase sales.
y Facts:
• Average service delivery lead time is 9 business days
• Sales reps say we lose 4-6 orders each month because we
cannot meet customer requirements of 3 business days
• Order sizes average $10,000 each (YTD numbers)
• Contribution margins on our services average 18% (YTD
numbers)
y Calculation:
• 5 orders/month X $10,000 X 18% margin = $9,000 /
month
What assumptions have been made?
113
Examples:
“Chain of Causality”
Cost Reduction
ÎImproving uptime on the Main Server will reduce
working capital.
y Facts:
• Main Server has a 63% uptime record (YTD)
• Similar servers average > 75% uptime in other facilities
• Average queue waiting for processing is $540,000 (YTD),
80% of which is dependent on Main Server (estimated)
y Calculation:
• ($540,000 X 80%) X 50% reduction = $216,000
Î Confidence
y What are the assumptions behind the estimates?
y How comfortable are we with the assumed values? How does this
impact the result?
y How good is the “hard data” we based our calculations on?
y Is the “Chain of Causality” believable?
Î Convergence
y Do we have any independent estimates?
• They must not share any underlying assumptions to be
“independent.”
y How closely do they match?
116
Elements of a Scope Statement
ÎScope-In
y Areas that will be addressed
y Consider applying the 80/20 rule to narrow the scope addressed
y Example: The project will address services to customers in the
West Coast region from facility XYZ.
ÎScope-Out
y Specific areas that will not be addressed
• Aspects of the problem
• Areas of the business/physical locations
• Related issues that can be addressed later
y Example: The project will not address other customers/regions.
The project will not address suppliers or the sales process.
117
Scoping Guidelines
118
Planned Resources,
Risk and Accelerations,
and Project Plan
3-4 October 2008 zumtobel lighting division ZDL Curtici – lean 6 sigma
Planned Resources (Team Resources)
ÎObjective:
y Insure the team is adequately staffed with sufficient skill sets to
solve the problem.
y Insure time commitments are clearly identified.
ÎDecisions to be made:
y Resource Requirements
• How many team members ?
y Project Duration
• The longer the project the more stress it places on the organization.
Also affects resource constraints and risk.
y Areas of Expertise Needed
• The should have representation from each department affected by the
potential change
y Percent of time required
• Core team members generally need to commit up to 25% of their time
• Extended team members may need to commit up to 10% of their time
120
Risk and Accelerations
ÎCategories of Risk
y Risk to Schedule
• Factors that could cause slippage of the schedule (ex. IT resources
will be critical during the implementation of the solutions)
y Risk to Benefits
• Factors that could negatively impact achievement of planned
benefits (ex. The new process will require a highly skilled resource
with is in high demand)
• Important: Assumptions on which the financial benefits are
calculated are a separate issue, and are located in the Financial
benefits section (ex. The revenue growth assumption assumes that
the broader service category growth continues at 10%)
ÎAccelerations
y Factors that could enable the early completion of the project
(ex. Leverage best practices obtained from previous
implementation of similar process in another department) 121
Project Plan
“SMART.” Relevant
• Does it relate to a business objective?
ÎThis acronym is a
checklist to ensure that Time Bound
• Have we set a date for completion?
124
Improvement Process Road Map
Activities
• Identify Problem • Identify Key Input, Process and • Propose Critical X’s • Develop Potential Solutions • Develop SOP’s, Training Plan
• Complete Charter Output Metrics • Prioritize Critical X’s • Develop Evaluation Criteria & & Process Control System
• Develop SIPOC Map • Develop Operational Definitions • Conduct Root Cause Select Best Solutions • Implement Process
• Map Business Process • Develop Data Collection Plan Analysis on Critical X’s • Evaluate Solution for Risk Changes and Controls
• Map Value Stream • Validate Measurement System • Validate Critical X’s • Optimize Solution • Monitor & Stabilize Process
• Gather Voice of the • Collect Baseline Data • Estimate the Impact of • Develop ‘To-Be’ Process Map(s) • Transition Project to Process
Customer & Voice of the • Determine Process Each X on Y and High-Level Implementation Owner
Business Performance/Capability • Quantify the Opportunity Plan • Identify Project Replication
• Develop CCR’s & CBR’s • Validate Business Opportunity • Prioritize Root Causes • Develop Pilot Plan & Pilot Solution Opportunities
• Finalize Project Focus • Calculate Financial Benefits
Tools
• Pareto Charts • SIPOC Map • Pareto Charts • Brainstorming • Control Charts
• Project Selection Tools • Operational Definitions • C&E Matrix • Benchmarking • Standard Operating
• PIP Management Process • Data Collection Plan • C&E/Fishbone Diagrams • Process Improvement Procedures (SOP’s)
• Value Stream Map • Statistical Sampling • Brainstorming Techniques • Training Plan
• Various Financial Analysis • Measurement System Analysis • Detailed ‘As-Is’ Process Maps • Line Balancing • Communication Plan
• Charter Form (MSA), Gage R&R • Basic Statistical Tools • Process Flow Improvement • Implementation Plan
• Stakeholder Analysis • Constraint Identification • SupplyChainAccelerator • Replenishment Pull • Visual Process Control
• Communication Plan • Setup Reduction Analysis • Purchasing and Sales Strategy • Process Control Plans
• SIPOC Map • Generic Pull • Non Value-Added Analysis • Poka-Yoke • Project Commissioning
• High-Level Process Map • Kaizen • Hypothesis Testing • FMEA • Project Replication
• Non-Value Added Analysis • TPM • FMEA • Solution Selection Matrix • Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle
• VOC and Kano Analysis • Control Charts • Box Plots • ‘To-Be’ Process Maps
• RACI and Quad Charts • Process Capability, Cp & Cpk • Interaction Plots • Piloting and Simulation
• Simple & Multiple Regression
• ANOVA
125
Dashboards
and Metrics
3-4 October 2008 zumtobel lighting division ZDL Curtici – lean 6 sigma
Learning Objectives
127
What’s in It for Me?
Î Understanding measures
y Will allow you to ask more effective questions about
historical data, use it better where possible and avoid
using it where it is not appropriate
y Will assist you in setting up new measures that
balance effectiveness, risk and cost
y Will help you to understand the linkages between
different measures at different levels of the
organization and their effect on organizational
behavior
128
Thought Provoking Quotations –
Why Measure?
Î “Our task now is not to fix the blame for the past,
but to fix the course for the future.” – John F.
Kennedy
130
Maximizing Results Via Metrics
Show
Show me me how
how aa person
person or
or organization
organization is
is measured,
measured,
and
and I’ll
I’ll tell
tell you
you how
how the
the person/organization
person/organization is
is behaving.
behaving.
131
Dashboards
3-4 October 2008 zumtobel lighting division ZDL Curtici – lean 6 sigma
Dashboards Definition
133
Dashboard – Example
Order Managm em ent Cycle Tim e
On-Time Delivery
45
66% 40
65%
35
64%
63%
OTD (%)
30
62%
25
61% OM Cycle Time
OM CT Goal
60% 20
59% 15 Owner:
58% J. Stubbs
57% 10
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 5
OTD Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
DSO (000s)
65% 48
OLP (%)
60% $160.00
55% 46
50% $155.00
45% 44
$150.00 42
ct
v
l
g
n
c
b
ay
p
ar
Ju
Ap
No
De
Ja
Au
Fe
Se
Ju
O
M
$145.00
De v
Au l
n
c
M r
g
p
ar
b
ct
ay
Ju
Ap
No
Ja
Ju
Se
Fe
O
M
Labor Productivity
$140.00
Labor Prod Goal
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun DSO
Linear (Labor Productivity)
Millions of Dollars
RTY (%)
19.5 4
50%
19 3 Revenue
0%
2 Revenue Goal
18.5
De v
Au l
Fean
J un
c
M pr
S eg
Op
Aar
Mb
Noc t
J uy
a
1
J
ay
v
p
ar
Ju
No
Ja
Se
M
M
Rework Costs Goal
Dashboard Example
136
Management of Goals:
Dashboards
138
Key Dashboard Design Principles
ÎCost Effective – Many metrics look good on paper,
but are difficult or expensive to implement.
y Evaluate the labor and systems cost required to implement
a metric before selecting it - a metric that is cumbersome
to generate will not last long
• For example, pulling data from the business system into a
database, parsing using queries and uploading to excel - versus
using manual markups on a white board.
y If a metric is difficult to implement, there are usually ways
to simplify the it (and therefore its implementation) - seek
to SIMPLIFY!
ÎDifficult to Manipulate – A metric should be difficult to
manipulate, “game”, or “cook.”
• For example, using actual and standard hours to measure
productivity. Productivity could be improved by simply
increasing the standard hours required to complete an
operation.
139
Key Dashboard Design Principles
ÎConstructive – One purpose of metrics is to drive behavior.
y If a metric doesn’t drive any behavior, it is likely a poor choice - and the
behavior must be constructive.
y Needs to create: (1) focus (2) energy (3) action
ÎComprehensible – Straightforward and easy to understand.
y If not, they are not good for communication or as a vehicle for influencing
behavior.
ÎVisually Consistent – Easy to read at a glance
y Help the audience quickly assess whether performance is getting better
or worse, and where performance stands with respect to the target.
• For example all trend lines should be positive up or all positive down
ÎFrequency of Measurement should be:
y Balanced between the desire for action/learning cycles and level of
effort/ cost
y Typically based on how often the parameter changes, using the shortest
practical interval
y Highest frequency at the lowest level (where the key drivers are)
140
Project Dashboard – Example
100% 50 65%
OM CT (days)
80% 40
OTC (%)
60%
OLP (%)
60% 30
40% 55%
20
20% 50%
10
0% 0 45%
v
v
l
l
n
n
c
c
r
r
g
p
g
p
ar
ar
b
ct
ct
se
se
ay
ay
Ju
Ju
Ap
Ap
No
No
Ja
Ju
Ja
Ju
Au
Se
De
Au
Se
De
l
n
n
Fe
Fe
c
r
g
p
ar
b
ct
se
ay
Ju
O
O
M
M
Ap
Ba
No
Ba
Ja
Ju
M
M
Au
Se
De
Fe
O
M
Ba
M
Owner: Owner: Owner:
J Crew OTC OTC Goal Linear (OTC) G Gap OMCT OMCT Goal Linear (OMCT) J Crew OLP OLP Goal Linear (OLP)
$200 25
100%
UBC (000's)
RWC (000's)
$150 80% 20
RTY %)
60% 15
$100
40% 10
$50 5
20%
$- 0% 0
v
l
n
n
v
c
r
g
p
l
n
ar
b
ct
c
se
r
g
p
ay
Ju
ar
b
ct
se
ay
Ju
v
l
n
Ap
c
r
g
p
Ap
No
ar
b
Ja
Ju
ct
se
ay
No
Ju
Au
Se
De
Ja
Ju
Fe
Au
Se
De
Ap
Fe
No
Ja
Ju
O
Au
Se
De
M
Fe
O
M
Ba
M
Ba
O
M
Ba
141
Dashboard Implementations
ÎKeep it simple, understandable and get it installed
quickly!
y Momentum and energy will be lost the longer it takes to
install a dashboard – don’t “polish the cannonball!”
ÎEstablish clear accountability for individual metrics
y Each metric should have a clear owner and clear timeline
for updates
ÎAnswer the key questions:
y If I excel on this metric will I gain advantage over the
competition?
y If I do not do well on this metric, will something really bad
happen?
ÎCommunicate the metrics to the organization
y It should be very clear who owns the metric, how it is
calculated, and how to impact it 142
Linked Dashboards
ÎBefore you start building dashboards, it is important to
understand the concept of “linked dashboards.”
ÎDashboards can be built at many levels of any organization:
y Enterprise level
y Corporate level
y Site level
y Department level
y Process level
ÎEach measure should be “linked” to a higher and/or lower level
dashboard
ÎRelationship of Measures – clear linkages:
y Enterprise – Summary or result required for success
y Corporate – Focused on key drivers not measured at the site level
y Site – Value drivers that, when executed with excellence, yield the
above enterprise results
y Department/Process – Drive improvements in site results
143
Linked Dashboards – High Level
Overview
Site Level
Process/Department Measures
(Cycle Time, Productivity, Rework)
Department
Level
(Order Entry, Scheduling, etc.)
144
Metrics
3-4 October 2008 zumtobel lighting division ZDL Curtici – lean 6 sigma
Dashboard Metrics (Measurements)
147
Example Metrics
ÎWork-In-Process
ÎExit Rate
ÎCustomer returns
ÎProductivity
WIP
information!
Transactional (Process) Cycle Time
Raw Finished
Material Goods
Order Take Order Entry Credit Check Shop Orders
Order
Order Order
Order Order
Order
Order
Order 5 5 each:
each: Order 5 each:
Order 5each:
each: Order
Order 5 each:
5each:
each:
5each: A, B, C 5each: A, B, C
5 5each: A,
A,B,B,CB,
CC 5 5each: A,
A,B,B,CB,
CC
A,A, B, C A,A, B, C
A, B, C A, B, C
Exits
(“things”/time)
ÎCan be based on equivalent units
(standard hours, for instance) to
aggregate.
Starts
Process Exits
150
Standard Metrics:
Process Cycle Time (PCT)
PCT
is called Process Cycle Time.
Î Single largest driver of results
Î Cycle time represents summary for entire
process
y Weighted average actual
y Approximation: PCT = WIP / exit rate
y May need to be smoothed
151
Standard Metrics:
First Pass Yield (FPY)
FPY
TIME (without internal rework)
ÎCommonly used after inspection,
which can be misleading.
ÎMajor productivity driver (labor and
material)
ÎProduct of key yield measurement
points throughout process
ÎMix can impact measurement
ÎTrue measurement should capture
rework 152
Standard Metrics:
Rolled Throughput Yield (RTY)
FPY
Î Simply the multiplication of the
individual first pass yields of each
process step.
Î For example, if a process has 4 steps
and each step has a first time yield of
90%, the RTY would be:
y RTY = .90 X .90 X .90 X .90 = .66 or
66%
153
Standard Metrics:
Rolled Throughput Yield
80%
70%
60%
50%
b
l
ar
n
c
p
ay
ine
ct
r
Ju
g
Fe
Ap
No
De
Ja
Ju
Ju
Se
Au
M
O
M
el
s
Ba
Month
Owner: Randy Johnson
RTY Goal Linear (RTY)
154
Standard Metrics:
Customer Returns
Customer Returns
from customers
perspective
Î Measured in either
dollars or units
Î World Class typically
measures as PPM
155
Standard Metrics:
Productivity
OF
ÎFor Transactional:
Productivity Index
DL
156
Standard Metrics:
Day Sales Outstanding (DSO)
DSO
Î Day Sales Outstanding typically
equal to accounts receivables
divided by sales per day
Î DSO = Accts Rec.. $ / (Sales $ / day)
Î Period oriented (one year, one
quarter) etc.
157
Standard Operational Metrics:
On-Time Performance (OTP)
On-Time Performance
or by order, the % on-time
Shipments (COGS)
from what was completed and
delivered to the customer
y Due date is typically the
promise date (may be different
than the customer request
date)
y May need to be smoothed
y Also known as On-Time
Delivery (OTD)
158
Takeaways
160