Ethics in Healthcare Setting (Therapy)
Ethics in Healthcare Setting (Therapy)
Ethics in Healthcare Setting (Therapy)
Name
Institutional Affiliation
ETHICS IN HEALTHCARE SETTING (THERAPY) 2
Ethical dilemma
The client a 19 year old Chinese female has been diagnosed with a mild learning
disability with a little bit of developmental delay. She came for the therapy planning session but
her goal and that of her caregiver (the father) differ due to the fact that the caregiver wants
occupational therapy that is based on telerehabilitation while the client wants non-technology
clinic based one on one session with a therapist. After turning 19 years she is now legally an
adult and would like her to have more influence in the direction of her therapy. She wants to
stick to her choice or otherwise forego therapy. Coming from a Chinese family the culture is
patriarchal in nature with the father having a lot of say in family member’s decisions including
health. The client has come for her first session and both she and the father strongly express their
Client’s goal is to improve nonverbal communication skills (body proximity, tone and
loudness of voice, body language and posture, and facial expressions) so that she can start a part-
time job. The client’s father heard from a close friend that telerehabilitation works and he insists
on this though due to lack of enough medical background knowledge he fails to understand that
it might not work for his daughter. According to the therapist, the telerehabilitation might not
work for nonverbal communication skills/ social skills. Nonverbal communication skills training
may best be addressed through one on one session in the clinic (Kavale & Mostert, 2004).
Telerehabilitation has been shown to have the following advantages: easy access to services,
better clinical support and educational benefits (Castillo & Hilkey, 2004; Cason, 2014; AOTA,
2016).
Despite the efficacy of telerehabilitation the choice presents with several ethical issues.
ETHICS IN HEALTHCARE SETTING (THERAPY) 3
The fathers request is impacting the principle of autonomy which gives the client the right to
make decisions about their own care (Perry et. al., 2009). The therapist is required to ensure that
the client makes a written voluntary informed consent without duress from the father. Cultural
factors are also in play especially the issue of social stigma and patriarchal decision making. The
father may prefer to treat his daughter from home because of the stigma associated with mental
illness in the Chinese community (Yang et. al., 2013). Further to this patriarchal culture is in play
with a male family member being the head of family and consequently having the final say in
family decisions including the health care. The father may feel he is just fulfilling his familial
duty.
An ethical dilemma is occurring because the therapist has to select from two intervention
options the client’s choice, the father’s choice or a possible alternative choice. The therapist has
to select from: option one client uses clinic based one on one therapy sessions option two client
uses telerehabilitation for therapy option three is home therapy without technology initially but
slowly expose client to technology. The dilemma is that selection of any of the listed options
Three possible treatment options are: option one client uses clinic based one on one
therapy sessions option two is client uses telerehabilitation for therapy option three is home
therapy without technology initially but slowly expose client to technology. Decision on
interventions will now be evaluated using deontological, consequentialist and virtue theories
Bioethical principles that are applicable in occupational therapy practice and intervention
selection include: beneficence, nonmaleficence, utility, respect for person, truthfulness, fidelity,
autonomy (AOTA, 2015). Stakeholders are each impacted by the principles in different ways as
Table 1
Bioethical Principles
PRINCIPLE RATIONALE/EXPLANATION
1. Beneficence/ Beneficence requires that therapists to show concern for the well-being and
Nonmaleficence safety of clients who receive their services (Beauchamp & Childress, 2013).
All therapists’ actions should benefit the client through doing good with the
therapist acting for the best interest of the client (AOTA, 2015) Closely
harm the therapist must use professional judgment to analyze and minimize
harmful procedures that the client may be exposed to (AOTA, 2015). The
clinic based one on one therapy option will be beneficial because it will fulfill
the client’s desire and will up hold the principles of client centered care
telerehabilitation may not benefit the patient as her decision will have not
been implemented, option three will benefit the client and the father in terms
of strong family relations (Perry et. al., 2009). In terms of maleficence clinic
based one on one individual therapy option may result in a narrowed skill set.
Option two the use of telerehabilitation may reduce the client’s level of social
contact option three does not respect clients wishes. Regarding stakeholder
roles in terms of beneficence and non-maleficence the client, the father and
ETHICS IN HEALTHCARE SETTING (THERAPY) 5
the therapist want care options that are beneficial to the client and do no harm
to the client.
2. Truthfulness Truthfulness requires that the occupational therapist shall provide the client
the client with full disclosure about the benefits and risks of the all the
disabilities especially the pressure they may feel to try out new technology
and telerehabilitation interventions with the hope that one will work. Clients
all times (AOTA, 2015). Clients and the father will expect full disclosure of
information from the therapist about the type and duration of interventions
3. Autonomy This principle requires occupational therapists to respect the right of their
2015). This means that the occupational therapists are required to treat the
client according or her desires based on the accepted standards of care and
more that acknowledging the client as a mere agent but realizing that they
have rights such as having personal views, choice and taking actions that are
valued by all the stakeholders but to different degrees the client and the
therapist value individual autonomy but the father values collective autonomy
In this case deontological ethics will be used to make the decision (Baumane-Vitolina,
Cals, & Sumilo, 2016). AOTA principles and standards of ethical practice will also apply with
the decision based on autonomy (AOTA, 2015). The duty of the therapist is first to the client
therefore the client’s autonomy is at the core of this decision. The client’s choice of clinic based
one on one therapy was thus selected. The decision is based on autonomy standards that require
respect for the expressed wishes of the client, voluntary informed consent and client education
on benefits, risks and outcomes of intervention. At the same time the principle of autonomy also
calls for collaboration of stakeholders. The therapist will make a concerted effort to incorporate
the father in the care through caregiver education. He will be educated about the benefits of
implementing his daughter’s choice, the role he will play and also what progress to expect. The
occupational therapist will take into account the culture of the client in this case it’s values are
based on family therefore the therapist will work with the father who is the decision maker in the
family to get his support for the treatment and also keep him appraised of the treatment process
and outcomes whenever possible (Yang et. al., 2013). AOTA ethical principle 3 of autonomy and
stakeholders to promote shared decision making (AOTA, 2015). Based on this the therapist will
References
AOTA. (2015). Occupational therapy code of ethics (2015). American Journal of Occupational
Therapy, 69.
AOTA. (2016). The American Occupational Therapy Association Advisory Opinion for the
/media/corporate/files/practice/ethics/advisory/telehealth-advisory
Baumane-Vitolina, I., Cals, I., & Sumilo, E. (2016). Is Ethics Rational? Teleological,
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University
Press, USA.
Cason, J. (2014). Telehealth: A rapidly developing service delivery model for occupational
Castillo, R., & Hilkey, J. (2004). Assistive Technology for Individuals with Learning
Disabilities: Through the lens of Occupational therapy practice framewok: Domain and
Kavale, K. A., & Mostert, M. P. (2004). Social skills interventions for individuals with learning
Perry, J., Beyer, S., & Holm, S. (2009). Assistive technology, telecare and people with
Tanner, K., Hand, B., O’Toole, G., & Lane, A. (2015). Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve
Social Participation, Play, Leisure, and Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors in People
Yang, L. H., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Kotabe, H., Link, B. G., Saw, A., Wong, G., & Phelan, J. C.
(2013). Culture, threat, and mental illness stigma: identifying culture-specific threat
Appendix
Table 2
PRINCIPLE RATIONALE
10. Confidentiality The client’s clinical information should only be shared with
legally authorized users to maintain client’s right to privacy.
11. Non-comparative The therapist should treat the client according to their rights and
Justice what they are entitled to in terms of care.
12. Comparative The therapist should utilize the best way to distribute scarce
Justice occupational therapy resources with focus on optimum care.
Non applicable
principles
13. Universality A system of ethics can be applied universally for individuals
with similar situations. This may not be applicable to all
individuals as each client presents with unique needs as in the
case above.
Table 3
Table 4