Finals in Taxation Law Review
Finals in Taxation Law Review
Finals in Taxation Law Review
Problem 1
A Corporation is a non-vat registered entity. For the first quarter of the calendar year, their
sales ballooned to 2M
a. Is A corporation required to register for VAT? 4 pts.
No, under the train law the minimum threshold for registration of vat is 3 Million.
b. Suppose that the facts of the case occurred in 2016, how much is the VAT threshold?
3 pts.
1919500
c. Suppose that the facts of the case occurred in 2018, are the sales of the Corporation
subject to VAT? 3pts.
No, because the total sales for the first quarter did not reach the minimum threshold.
He is only liable upon reaching the 3 million threshold, upon which he will be
required to pay vat.
Problem 2
Madam X owns real property in Caloocan City. On July 1, 2014, she received a notice of
assessment from the City Assessor, informing her of a deficiency tax on her property. She
wants to contest the assessment.
- Within 30 days from receipt of the FAN, the taxpayer must file a
protest before the BIR to dispute the FAN. The BIR shall then have
180 days within which to decide on the matter. If the protest is in
the nature of a request for reconsideration, the 180-day period shall
be reckoned from the day the protest has been filed. However, if
the protest is in the nature of a request for reinvestigation, the 180-
day period shall be reckoned on the day the last submission of
documents or receipts, which the taxpayer is required to submit
within 60 days from filing of the protest [Sec. 228, Supra].
(B) May Madam X refuse to pay the deficiency tax assessment during the
pendency of her appeal? 5 points
Problem 3
How much is the foreign currency denominated sales? (suppose the exchange rate of USD to
peso is 42 per USD and yen to peso is P0.50 to 1 Yen.?
Problem 4
Phil-Air is a domestic air carrier with both domestic and international operations. During the
month, it had the following gross receipts:
Domestic operations
Transport of passengers P40,000,000
Transport of cargoes 12,000,000
International operations
Transport of passengers 30,000,000
Transport of cargoes 20,000.000
- Otherwise stated, output tax is the VAT due on the sale or lease or
taxable goods, properties or services by an VAT-registered person.
On the
- other hand, input tax is the VAT due on or paid by a VAT-registered
person on importation of good or local purchases of goods or
services, including lease or use of properties, in the course of his
trade or business.
Problem 5
Attorney B is a self employed professional (SEP) whose annual earnings from cases handled
is P2,900,000.00.
- Percentage Tax
- For small businesses with gross annual sales and receipts that do
not exceed Php1,919,500.00, and are not VAT-registered,
percentage tax is imposed for sold or leased goods, properties or
services. The tax rate varies depending on the nature of business.
The usual rate is 3% but it could go as high as 30%, for gross
receipts of Jai-Alai and racetrack operators for instance.
c. If Attorney B pays both the VAT and income tax, is this not a clear case of double
taxation? Explain. 4 points
- No
d. Suppose Attorney B is earning only P500,000.00 yearly, what is his tax liability under
the TRAIN law? 2 points
Problem 6
- Only once, for LAs issued in the Revenue Regional Offices or the
Revenue District Offices; or Twice, in the case of LAs issued by
the National Office.
Problem 7
C Corporation is manufacturing and selling various products. The BIR suspects that C
Corporation is involved in illegal activities, so one day, it forcefully opened the door of the
warehouse of C Corporation and found smuggled goods and assessed them with the proper
tax.
i. His name
ii. Signature
b. Suppose that the BIR already had prior request for the production of documents to C
Corporation and the same had been ignored time and again, will the assessment be
valid?
Problem 8
Explain the TAX remedies of the government in 200 words (10 points)
1. ADMINISTRATIVE
a. Distraint of personal property;
b. Levy of personal property
c. Enforcement of forfeiture of property
d. Enforcement of tax lien
e. Requiring the filing of bonds
f. Requiring proof of filing income tax returns
g. Deportation of aliens
h. Inspection of books of accounts.
2. JUDICIAL
a. ordinary civil action
b. criminal action
DISTRAINT- seizure by the government of personal property, tangible or intangible, to enforce the
payment of taxes to be followed by its public sale if the taxes are not voluntarily paid.
Kinds of Distraint
a. Actual- there is taking of possession of the personal property out of the taxpayer into that of the
government;
b. Constructive- the owner is merely prohibited from disposing of his property.
LEVY- A summary administrative remedy, seizure of real property to enforce payment of taxes.
A written notice of levy, containing a description of the property upon which levy is made, the
name of the taxpayer and the amounts of the tax and penalty due from them is served upon the
taxpayer.
TAX LIEN- a legal claim or charge on property either real or personal established by law as a
security in default of the payment of taxes. The tax, together with interest, penalties and cost that
may accrue in addition thereto is a lien upon all property and rights to property belonging to the
taxpayer. The lien however, shall not be valid against any mortgagee, purchaser or judgment
creditor until legal notice of such liens should be filed by the Commissioner of internal revenue in
the Office of the Register of Deeds of the province or city where the property of the taxpayer is
located. The lien attaches when the taxpayer neglects or refuses to pay the tax after demand, but
relates back from the time when assessment was made by the Commissioner.
REQUIRING THE FILING OF BONDS- Filing of performance bond to secure the payment of taxes
or compliance with certain provisions of tax laws and regulations. This may be required by the BIR
for the issuance of a tax clearance.
REQUIRING PROOF OF FILING INCOME TAX RETURNS. – Before a license to engage in trade or
business or occupation or to practice a profession can be issued to a person, partnership,
association or corporation, he must submit to the officer issuing such license or permit, proof that
he has filed his income tax return during the preceding year and that income taxes due have been
paid thereon.
Where an assessment was made, the period for collection by judicial action or by distraint or levy is
within 3 years after the date of assessment. Where no assessment was made and a return was filed, and
the same is not false or fraudulent, the period for collection by a proceeding in court is within 3 years
after the return was due or filed whichever is later, except:
Where a return required to be filed was not filed, or even if filed the same is false or fraudulent, and
made with the intent to evade the tax, the period is ten years after discovery of the omission to file the
return or from the discovery of the falsity or fraud. The other exception relative to the prescriptive
periods for assessment are also applicable.
Where the government makes another assessment on the basis of a reinvestigation requested by the
taxpayer, or a revised assessment because of an amended return or as a result of a reinvestigation
asked for by the taxpayer, the period is counted from the last assessment or the last revised
assessment.
Where the action is brought to enforce a compromise agreement into between the commissioner and the
taxpayer, the prescriptive period is ten years from the time the cause of action accrues as fixed in the
civil code.
The running of the statute of limitation on the making of an assessment, the beginning of
distraint or levy or any proceeding in court for collection is suspended: IMPT!!!!!
1. for the period during which the Commissioner of Internal Revenue is prohibited from making tax
assessment or beginning the distraint or levy or any proceeding in court and for sixty days thereafter;
2. when the taxpayer requests for a reinvestigation which is granted by the commissioner;
3. when the taxpayer cannot be located in the address given by him in the return filed upon which a tax
is being assessed or collected, unless the taxpayer informs the Commissioner of any change in address;
4. when the warrant of distraint and levy is duly served upon the taxpayer, his authorized
representative, or with a member of his household with sufficient discretion and no property could be
located; and
Explain the TAX remedies of the taxpayer in 300 words (10 points)
BEFORE PAYMENT
1. administrative protest
2. request for reconsideration
3. request for reinvestigation
4. judicial protest
AFTER PAYMENT
WHERE: BIR
PROCEDURE:
4. Judicial Protest
PROCEDURE
5. Refund/Credit
- based on the legal principle of quasi-contract or solutio indebiti
- in the nature of an exemption, which cannot be allowed unless
granted in the most explicit and categorical language
- strictly construed against the claimant (proof of claim must be
established)
- partial payment of a tax cannot be the basis for a tax refund
- interest on taxes refunded may not be paid by the Government to
the taxpayer, UNLESS: (a) the CIR acted with patent arbitrariness
(inexcusable or obstinate disregard for legal provision); and (b) in
the case of income taxes withheld on the wages of employees,
which must be refunded within 3 mos from April 15
Within 30 days from receipt of the FAN, the taxpayer must file a protest
before the BIR to dispute the FAN. The BIR shall then have 180 days within
which to decide on the matter. If the protest is in the nature of a request
for reconsideration, the 180-day period shall be reckoned from the day the
protest has been filed. However, if the protest is in the nature of a request
for reinvestigation, the 180-day period shall be reckoned on the day the
last submission of documents or receipts, which the taxpayer is required
to submit within 60 days from filing of the protest [Sec. 228, Supra].
Appeal to the Court of Tax Appeals (“CTA”)
If the protest is denied by the BIR, in whole or in part, or the 180-day
period has already lapsed without the BIR acting upon the protest, the
taxpayer may appeal the denial to the CTA within 30 days form the receipt
of the denial, or from the lapse of the 180-day period to decide.
1. After appealing to the CTA, and after rendering an unfavorable
decision, taxpayer may file a motion for reconsideration of said
decision within 15 days from receipt of the decision of the CTA
sitting in division.
2. If the decision is still unfavorable, the taxpayer may appeal to the
CTA en banc [See: R.A. No. 9282].
Appeal to the Supreme Court
If the CTA en banc still renders an unfavorable decision, the taxpayer still
has the remedy to file a petition for certiorari before the Supreme Court,
only on the ground of grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or
excess of jurisdiction. Jurisprudence describes grave abuse of discretion as
referring to the capricious or whimsical exercise of judgment as is
equivalent to lack of jurisdiction. The abuse of discretion must be patent
and gross as to amount to an evasion of a positive duty or a virtual refusal
to perform a duty enjoined by law, or to act at all in contemplation of law,
as where the power is exercised in an arbitrary and despotic manner by
reason of passion and hostility [See: G.R. No. 172832].
Action for collection of taxes
Once the assessment has become final, a civil action for collection of
taxes may be instituted by the government against the taxpayer before
the following courts:
Tax compromise
In such instances where the assessment has already become final and
executory, the taxpayer will be obliged to pay for the amount of taxes as
assessed by the BIR. But if the taxpayer has no capacity to pay the
assessed amount, the taxpayer still has another remedy that he may avail
of, and that is, to enter into a compromise with the BIR.
If the compromise is based on financial incapacity to pay the tax, the
taxpayer will be required to settle only as low as 10% of the basic tax due.
The taxpayer may also opt to compromise based on doubtful validity of
the assessment, but the amount to be settled can be as low as 40% of the
basic tax due [See: Sec. 204(A), NIRC].
Given the foregoing, it is therefore clear that there are remedies available
for a taxpayer to avail in every stage of the assessment and collection
process. This does not mean, however, that these remedies may be
abused and misused just to evade payment of correct taxes, or even just
to delay the process. There is still no substitute to making the necessary
tax payments when payment is indeed due. After all, taxes are the
lifeblood of the government, without which, the State cannot fulfill its
mandate of promoting the general welfare and well being of the
people [See: G.R. No. 159796].