The Hot Stove Rule
The Hot Stove Rule
The Hot Stove Rule
1. When you touch the hot stove, you burn your hand. The burn was
immediate. Will you blame the hot stove for burning your hand?
Immediately, you understand the cause and effect of the offense. The
discipline was directed against the act not against anybody else. You get
angry with yourself, but you know it was your fault. You get angry with the
hot stove too, but not for long as you know it was not its fault. You learn
your lesson quickly.
2. You had warning as you knew the stove was red hot and you knew what
would happen to you if you touched it. You knew the rules and regulations
previously issued to you by the company prescribing the penalty for
violation of any particular rule so you cannot claim you were not given a
previous warning.
3. The discipline was consistent. Every time you touch the hot stove you
get burned. Consistency in the administration of disciplinary action is
essential. Excessive leniency as well as too much harshness creates not
only dissatisfaction but also resentment.
4. The discipline was impersonal. Whoever touches the hot stove gets
burned, no matter who he is. Furthermore, he gets burned not because of
who he is, but because he touched the hot stove. The discipline is directed
against the act, not against the person. After disciplinary action has been
applied, the supervisor should take the normal attitude toward the
employee.