Business Analysis and Valuation
Business Analysis and Valuation
Business Analysis and Valuation
Introduction
WorldCom which was at one time the second-largest telecommunication company in the U.S is
perhaps best known for a massive accounting scandal that led to the company filing for
bankruptcy protection in 2002. WorldCom executives effectively fudged the company's
accounting numbers, inflating the company's assets by around $12.8 billion dollars. The swift
bankruptcy that followed led to massive losses not only for investors but also for retailers and
employees. The WorldCom scandal is regarded as one of the worst corporate crimes in history,
and several former executives involved in the fraud were held responsible for their involvement.
WorldCom inflated assets by as much as $11-12.8 billion, leading to 30,000 lost jobs and $180
billion in losses for investors.
Former CEO of WorldCom Bernie Ebbers was the main culprit and he did it by capitalizing
inflated revenues with fake accounting entries and he is sentenced to 25 years for fraud,
conspiracy and filing false documents with regulators.
Former CFO of WorldCom, Scott Sullivan received a five-year jail sentence after pleading guilty
and testifying against Ebbers.
David Myers, former director of General Accounting of WorldCom was sentenced to one year
in prison after the fraud incident .
Cynthia Cooper formerly served as the Vice President of Internal Audit at WorldCom. She and
her team were the first people who uncovered the major fraud at WorldCom.
Due to the low demand at the onset of the economic recession and the aftermath of
The dot-com bubble collapse and also as a result of high competition the telecommunication
industry began to fall. This also leads the price to fall. So, WorldCom also forced to increase
their revenue. They thought that they would not be attracted by the investors anymore. Also,
Ebbers, the CEO, forced the managers to improve the revenue condition to remain in their jobs.
The fraud committed by WorldCom was characterized mainly by the improper reduction of line
costs and false adjustments to report revenue growth. Line cost is the cost that WorldCom had to
pay to other telecommunication companies due to using their phone calls. If WorldCom
customer made a phone call from New York to London, then the call would first go through the
local telephone company’s line in New York to WorldCom’s long distance and finally to
London’s local telephone companies. This process was very costly for WorldCom; in fact this
was half of the cost that they had incurred in a particular time period. WorldCom had to reduce
those costs to make them profitable. Especially after 2000 it became crucial for them to manage
those costs in a way that would help them to show shareholders that WorldCom was profitable.
WorldCom’s competitors such as Sprint and AT&T had line costs that were 52% of revenues.
WorldCom reported line costs of about 42% of revenues, in reality these costs were 50%-52% of
revenues. WorldCom had made inappropriate accrual releases both in the domestic and
international divisions that amounted to about $3.3 billion (Beresford, Katzenbach, & Rogers,
2003).
These are some of the ways through which they committed fraud:
Releasing Accruals:
According to Breeden (2003), the end of each month, during the fraud period at WorldCom, was
characterized by the estimation of costs that were associated with using the phone lines of other
companies. The actual bill for the services was usually not received for several months (Breeden,
Ahnaf & Others
3
2003).This meant that some of the entries they had made to the payables were overestimated or
underestimated. As result liability was overestimated, and when the actual bill was received it
would have had a surplus in liability. Here is the journal entry to show the adjustment for
WorldCom-
WorldCom adjusted its accruals in three ways; some accruals were released without even
confirming any accruals. Secondly, they didn’t release the accruals in proper time; instead they
kept them as “rainy days” future fund. Lastly, some of the accruals were released not
establishing any accruals.
Revenue:
∑ WorldCom initiated a process called ‘close the gap’ to falsify the information in company
records.
∑ There were meetings after every accounting period between top management who helped
to change the records of the company. They would receive a report called ‘MonRev’
report which showed the actual image of the company.
Ahnaf & Others
4
Ratio comparison
In 2002, WorldCom showed disastrous market ratios even though S&P 500 promised quite good
benchmarks for the year. Considering the company’s financial situation, this was not actually a
surprise. With a crushing debt of $41 billion and $3.8 billion expenses improperly booked, the
company had to file for a bankruptcy. Later this led to a shocking ROA of 1.33% and ROE of
2.39%, when S&P 500 benchmark showed an average 10% for both ratios. Top-line growth was
at negative 10% but surprisingly they managed to keep their CA ratio at 0.99. Through
comparing the market performance the disaster within the company was pretty obvious.
Conviction
Total 6 people were convicted for playing key roles in the fraud. The 63-year-old former CEO of
WorldCom Mr. Bernard Ebbers was sentenced for 25 years of prison time for orchestrating the
$11 billion fraud that sank the company in 2002, the biggest corporate fraud and bankruptcy in
U.S. history. His chief financial officer Scott D. Sullivan was sentenced of five years, a reduced
prison time for co operating the investigation and acknowledging his own crimes. Another four
members of WorldCom including Buford Yates Jr, David Myers were also convicted from 5
months to 3 years of prison
Conclusion
The internal problems at WorldCom were its lack of a competitive strategy, weak internal
controls, an aggressive culture that demanded high returns, and the failure to look out for what
was best for the stock holder as well as the stake holder of the company. The competitive culture