Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 33 views

    Republic of The Philippines) in The City of Baguio ..) S.S

    Uploaded by

    Sui Juris
    Jennica C. Segundo filed an affidavit complaint against Brenda Villacorta for violation of the Anti-Bouncing Check Law. Segundo loaned Villacorta 2.5 million pesos evidenced by a promissory note in 2017. When the note became due in 2018, Villacorta issued a check for 2.8 million pesos which was dishonored due to a closed account. Despite demands, Villacorta has failed to settle her obligation, making her liable under the Anti-Bouncing Check Law. Segundo executed this affidavit to attest to the truth of the allegations against Villacorta.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Republic of The Philippines) in The City of Baguio ..) S.S

    Uploaded by

    Sui Juris
    33 views3 pages
    Jennica C. Segundo filed an affidavit complaint against Brenda Villacorta for violation of the Anti-Bouncing Check Law. Segundo loaned Villacorta 2.5 million pesos evidenced by a promissory note in 2017. When the note became due in 2018, Villacorta issued a check for 2.8 million pesos which was dishonored due to a closed account. Despite demands, Villacorta has failed to settle her obligation, making her liable under the Anti-Bouncing Check Law. Segundo executed this affidavit to attest to the truth of the allegations against Villacorta.

    Original Title

    AFFIDAVIT COMPLAINT.docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Jennica C. Segundo filed an affidavit complaint against Brenda Villacorta for violation of the Anti-Bouncing Check Law. Segundo loaned Villacorta 2.5 million pesos evidenced by a promissory note in 2017. When the note became due in 2018, Villacorta issued a check for 2.8 million pesos which was dishonored due to a closed account. Despite demands, Villacorta has failed to settle her obligation, making her liable under the Anti-Bouncing Check Law. Segundo executed this affidavit to attest to the truth of the allegations against Villacorta.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    33 views3 pages

    Republic of The Philippines) in The City of Baguio ..) S.S

    Uploaded by

    Sui Juris
    Jennica C. Segundo filed an affidavit complaint against Brenda Villacorta for violation of the Anti-Bouncing Check Law. Segundo loaned Villacorta 2.5 million pesos evidenced by a promissory note in 2017. When the note became due in 2018, Villacorta issued a check for 2.8 million pesos which was dishonored due to a closed account. Despite demands, Villacorta has failed to settle her obligation, making her liable under the Anti-Bouncing Check Law. Segundo executed this affidavit to attest to the truth of the allegations against Villacorta.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES)

    IN THE CITY OF BAGUIO…………..)S.S.

    AFFIDAVIT COMPLAINT

    I, JENNICA C. SEGUNDO, Filipino, and of legal age, herein


    represented by Atty. Anton Luis Avila with address at No. 20
    Juniper Building, Bonifacio Street, Baguio City, under oath
    declare and state that:

    I am executing this affidavit to support my complaint for


    VIOLATION OF BATAS PAMBANSA BILANG 22 or the
    ANTI-BOUNCING CHECK LAW against RESPONDENT:

    BRENDA VILLACORTA

    who is of legal age, Filipino, who holds office at Unit. 23


    Maharlika Bldg., Session Road, Baguio City where she may be
    served with summons and other processes of the Honorable Office.

    1. On August 15, 2017, the RESPONDENT issued a


    PROMISSORY NOTE in favor of the COMPLAINANT,
    promising to pay the PRINCIPAL AMOUNT of TWO
    MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND PESOS
    (P2,500,000.00) with INTEREST of TWELVE PERCENT
    (12%) per annum.

    2. On August 15, 2018, the PROMISSORY NOTE became due


    and demandable.

    3. On September 8, 2018, the RESPONDENT issued BPI


    CHECK with Check No. 0029859 amounting to the
    PRINCIPAL AMOUNT and INTEREST of TWO MILLION
    THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND PESOS (P2,800,000.00) to
    the COMPLAINANT.

    4. On September 10, 2018, the COMPLAINANT deposited the


    check in her account at BPI Baguio Abanao Branch.

    1
    5. On September 11, 2018, the check was returned to the
    COMPLAINANT in her residence address by the bank due
    to the fact that the check was DISHONORED due to a
    “CLOSED ACCOUNT”.

    6. On September 18, 2018, DARSA Law Firm, the legal counsel


    of the COMPLAINANT, personally served and tendered the
    DEMAND LETTER and NOTICE OF DISHONORED
    CHECK to the RESPONDENT through its secretary,
    Katrina Reyes.

    7. On the same date, the RESPONDENT refused to receive the


    DEMAND LETTER and NOTICE OF DISHONORED
    CHECK.

    8. On September 19, 2018, the DEMAND LETTER and


    NOTICE OF DISHONORED CHECK was mailed to the
    RESPONDENT through registered mail by KATRINA
    REYES.

    9. On December 4, 2018, the COMPLAINANT sent the


    RESPONDENT a final demand to settle her obligation else
    the COMPLAINANT will institute a criminal action of
    VIOLATION OF BATAS PAMBANSA BILANG 22 or the
    ANTI-BOUNCING CHECK LAW.

    10. The actions of the respondent in issuing a check


    against a closed account makes her liable for violation of
    BATAS PAMBANSA BILANG 22 or the ANTI-BOUNCING
    CHECK LAW.

    11. I am executing this affidavit to attest to the truth of


    the foregoing allegations.

    WITNESS MY HANDS this 6th of February, 2019 at Baguio


    City, Philippines.

    JENNICA C. SEGUNDO
    Affiant
    2
    CERTIFICATION

    SUBSCRIBED and sworn to before me in Baguio City on this 6th


    day of February 2019. This is to certify that I have personally
    examined the herein affiant and that I am convinced that she
    freely and voluntarily executed the foregoing and understood the
    same.

    CITY PROSECUTOR

    You might also like