Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 153 views

    Spector 2005

    Uploaded by

    arikusuma12
    article by Spector 2005

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Spector 2005

    Uploaded by

    arikusuma12
    153 views3 pages
    article by Spector 2005

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    article by Spector 2005

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    153 views3 pages

    Spector 2005

    Uploaded by

    arikusuma12
    article by Spector 2005

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3

    Journal of Organizational Behavior

    J. Organiz. Behav. 26, 57–58 (2005)


    Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/job.297

    Point/ Introduction: The dispositional approach


    Counterpoint to job satisfaction
    PAUL E. SPECTOR*
    Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, U.S.A.

    The role of individual differences versus situations has been debated throughout the history of orga-
    nizational behavior research. Disposition researchers have argued that job satisfaction is to a great
    extent a product of personality, as individuals vary in their responses to the same situation. Others have
    taken an opposing view, suggesting that personality is often confounded with situations, the latter of
    which is the real driving force behind job satisfaction. This point/counterpoint exchange explores the
    role of dispositions and situations in determining job satisfaction.
    Barry Staw and Yochi Cohen-Charash take the ‘pro-disposition causes job satisfaction’ position.
    Their paper traces the history of the dispositional argument, discusses and refutes criticisms of the
    dispositional approach, and provides an information-processing model of how dispositions might
    affect job satisfaction.
    Barry Gerhart takes the opposing view, focusing mainly on two implications of the dispositional
    approach. First, he argues that dispositions do not constrain the effects of situations and that both
    can have important influences. He points out that some situations will produce higher satisfaction than
    others, although certainly individuals in each situation may differ from one another. Second, he dis-
    cusses the use of affective disposition measures for employee selection, outlining additional research
    that needs to be done before organizations adopt this approach.
    These two papers provide a contemporary overview of the issues concerning individual differences
    versus situations in determining job satisfaction. They raise a number of intriguing questions that need
    research attention concerning the interplay of individual differences and situational factors in the
    workplace.

    Author biography

    Paul E. Spector is a professor of I/O psychology and the I/O doctoral program director at the
    University of South Florida. His work has appeared in many journals, including Academy of Manage-
    ment Journal, Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Management, Journal of Organizational
    Behavior, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Journal of Vocational Behavior,

    * Correspondence to: Paul E. Spector, Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, U.S.A.
    E-mail: [email protected]

    Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Accepted 18 August 2004
    58 P. E. SPECTOR

    Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Personnel Psychology, and Psychological
    Bulletin. At present he is an associate editor for Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, and the
    Point/Counterpoint editor for Journal of Organizational Behavior, and is on the editorial boards of
    Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Organizational Research Methods, and Per-
    sonnel Psychology. In 1991 the Institute for Scientific Information listed him as one of the 50 highest-
    impact contemporary researchers (out of over 102 000) in psychology worldwide.

    Copyright # 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz. Behav. 26, 57–58 (2005)
    Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.

    You might also like