Energy conservation in domestic rice cooking

Tribeni Das a,b, R. Subramanian a,*, A. Chakkaravarthi a,

Vasudeva Singh c, S.Z. Ali c, P.K. Bordoloi b
a
Department of Food Engineering, Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore 570 020, India
b
Department of Energy, Tezpur University, Tezpur 784 028, India
c
Department of Grain Science and Technology, Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore 570 020, India

Abstract

Energy conservation in cooking rice is an important area for scientific investigation. Experiments were conducted to measure the
energy consumption during normal and controlled cooking of both unsoaked and presoaked rice using two types of domestic cook-
ing appliance, namely, an electric rice cooker and a pressure cooker. Cooking rice with controlled energy input, under pressure and
with presoaking were the three approaches, which resulted in saving of energy. Electric rice cooker was found to be the most energy-
efficient among the different combinations of cooking appliance and the types of heat source used in the study. The energy consump-
tion was much less (23–57%) compared to other methods. Prior soaking of rice generally reduced energy consumption as well as
cooking time, more prominently during normal cooking. Controlled cooking offered more savings in energy compared to presoaking
rice. Considering the energy consumption and cooking time, controlled cooking of presoaked rice was found to be the best among
the several approaches investigated. Measurement of water evaporation loss appears to be a good indirect method of assessing the
efficiency of heat utilization. Controlled energy input is another useful method that optimizes the energy utilization for cooking,
besides presoaking and pressure cooking. Controlled cooking is desirable in all types of rice cooking.

Keywords: Controlled cooking; Cooking time; Domestic cooking appliance; Energy saving; Gelatinization; Presoaking; Pressure cooking;
Rice cooking

1. Introduction texture are different from place to place. Consumers in

Western countries prefer long grain, light, fluffy or
Rice is one of the worldÕs major cereal crops next to slightly dry individual kernel of rice having cooked fla-
wheat and maize, and is the staple food for nearly half vour with essentially no gritty or hard uncooked core.
of the worldÕs population. It is grown in over 100 coun- Japanese preference is for short grain, which produce
tries spread in every continent except Antarctica (Juli- rather sticky cooked rice. However, Indian preference
ano, 1985). The production of paddy in India during is for medium grain with fluffy, light individual kernel
2004 was 124 Million tonnes (http://faostat.fao.org) of rice with cooked flavour and without hard core.
and ranks second in the world next to China. Milled The two important variables in rice cooking are the
raw and parboiled rice are consumed mainly as cooked amount of water and the control of heating. The
rice. The cooking process and the choice of cooked rice water-to-rice ratio is important in keeping the cooked
rice from being either too hard or too soft. Controlled
heating ensures that the rice is gently heated and gelati-
nized to the core without getting scorched. The cooking
of rice is associated with complete gelatinization of the
starch, complex formation, transformation and interac- (energy and cooking time) in cooking stored or freshly
tions involving biopolymer by heat treatment in the milled rice. However, cooking rice without presoaking
presence of water. Suzuki, Kubota, Omichi, and Hosaka is the general practice in many parts of the world. While
(1976) reported that cooking rate followed the equation presoaking needs to be promoted as an energy conserva-
of a first-order chemical reaction. tion measure, there is a necessity to look for further sav-
Electric rice cooker and pressure cooker are com- ing in energy. In the present work, attempts have been
monly used in domestic rice cooking. The electric rice made to optimize the energy requirements in rice cook-
cooker works on the principle of dielectric heating and ing by controlling the cooking conditions in the domes-
originated from the military equipment (Juliano & Sak- tic cooking appliances such as electric rice-cooker and
urai, 1985). This method has been improved over the pressure cooker.
years to make the quality of the cooked rice more
acceptable. In the automatic rice cooker, heat is regu-
lated by a thermostat coupled with microswitch, which 2. Materials and methods
switches off the heater when the water is completely ab-
sorbed and the temperature begins to rise rapidly. The 2.1. Materials
temperature of the rice decreases quickly after the heater
is switched off. Therefore, cookers with ÔcookingÕ and One lot (100 kg) of milled B.T. (Bangara Thigadu)
Ôkeep warmÕ modes were introduced which are common variety rice was procured from the local market and
in countries like India. In 1938, Alfred Vischler intro- stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C. The required quantity
duced the very first pressure cooker, Flex-Seal Speed of rice was taken out as and when necessary for the
Cooker designed for home use (http://missvickie.com). experimental work. The moisture content of the raw rice
The pressure cooker has seen many developments and was 12.8% (w.b.) as determined by oven dry method
is extensively used in many households. (105 °C for 24 h) (Swamy, Ali, & Bhattacharya, 1971).
Past research has indicated that presoaking, storage
and degree of milling influence the cooking time of 2.2. Methods
whole rice grain. Santos, Guzman, Umali, Mananes,
and Abanto (1980) carried out a study on time and fuel A number of preliminary experiments were con-
conservation in rice cooking. They reported that it is ducted to standardize the conditions for each set of
possible to reduce the cooking time of rice with presoa- experiments.
king by 7 and 5 min using electricity and gas (LPG),
respectively. Sowbhagya and Ali (1991) also observed 2.2.1. Hydration behaviour at ambient conditions
reduction of cooking time when rice was presoaked. Rice (150 g) was soaked in excess water at room tem-
Since presoaking leads to energy saving, it is included perature and samples were drawn at different time peri-
as a vital step in the manufacture of dried rice from pre- ods (at intervals of 15 min up to 2 h, and at intervals of
gelatinized starch (Yano, Taniguchi, & Nakanaga, 30 min from 2 h to 5 h) and moisture contents were mea-
1988). Kim and Cho (1993) studied changes in water up- sured using oven-dry method as suggested by Swamy et
take rate, cooking and gelatinization properties during al. (1971). A hydration curve was obtained by plotting
storage of milled rice for 3 months. They reported that the moisture content (% w.b.) of rice versus soaking
rice grain became harder and cooking time was pro- time. Besides, the rate of absorption of water during
longed by 3–8 min as a result of storage. Cheigh, Kim, soaking was obtained from the data.
Pyun, and Kwon (1978) reported that the cooking rate
of rice followed the equation of a first-order reaction 2.2.2. Identification of end point of cooking
and the reaction rate constants increased with increasing The end point of cooking was identified by using par-
polishing degree from 50% to 90%. Cooking rate of allel glass plate method as proposed by Desikachar and
brown rice was about 50% that of white rice (Kim, Subrahmanyan (1961). In this method, the rice samples
Pyun, Choi, Lee, & Kim, 1984). Bhattacharya (1993) periodically drawn during cooking were pressed in be-
carried out a study on energy consumption for cooking tween two small glass plates and when there was no
raw and parboiled rice using a pressure cooker with more white core observed, then the sample was consid-
LPG stove. He reported that the lowest specific energy ered to be completely cooked. Sowbhagya and Ali
consumptions were achieved by cooking large quantity (1991) examined the texture of cooked rice by a sensory
at a time as well as adopting cooking methods of shorter method of testing the firmness by pressing the cooked
duration. grains between thumb and forefinger. They reported that
ÔEnergy saved is twice generatedÕ and rice cooking is a the moisture content of cooked rice samples was in the
good candidate for a case study since rice is the staple range of 72–73% for raw rice. Therefore in all our exper-
food for nearly half of the Indian population. Pres- iments, method of Desikachar and Subrahmanyan
oaking is a simple technique that offers great savings (1961) was used as a quick test and for confirmation;
moisture content of the cooked rice was subsequently ducted to achieve energy savings by controlling the en-
measured for parallel samples. ergy input to closely match the actual energy required
for cooking. Temperature was monitored and the heat
2.2.3. Cooking in excess boiling water input was cut off whenever the temperature of the con-
A known quantity of water (300 g) was taken in a tents (rice and water) reached the boiling temperature
beaker and heated over an electrical coil stove. A mea- (100 °C) and was resumed whenever the temperature
sured quantity of rice (50 g) was added once the water fell below 90 °C. This strategy of controlled heat input
reached boiling state. The heating was continued till was continued till rice got cooked which prevented
the completion of cooking at the same heating rate excessive evaporation of water resulting in energy
and the time was recorded. Samples were drawn out saving.
periodically for assessment of cooking stage (5–6 grains)
and measurement of moisture (3–5 g) at different (1–3 2.2.4.1. Cooking in electric rice cooker. Experiments were
min) time intervals. Temperature of rice and water was conducted to standardize the cooking procedure in the
recorded at regular time intervals using a thermocouple electric rice cooker mainly to optimize water evapora-
at a fixed appropriate location. This experiment was car- tion loss. The amount of water evaporation was moni-
ried out for both unsoaked as well as presoaked rice tored during experimentation with the help of an
(soaked for 30 min). The moisture content of completely electronic balance (Model DS-420, Essa-Digi, India).
cooked rice was 74% (w.b.). In the subsequent experiments, the amount of extra
water required owing to evaporation loss was added
along with the water required for cooking to make the
2.2.4. Cooking in domestic appliances
final moisture content of cooked rice to 74% (Table 1).
Experiments were conducted with electric rice cooker
Thermostat coupled with microswitch automatically
(SR-810FN, 2.7 L, 450 W, National, Thailand) and
switched off the cooker at the end of cooking when there
pressure cooker (Model: Butterfly, 7.5 L, IS: 2347,
was no more free water available in the container.
Gandhimathi Appliances Ltd., India). The pressure coo-
During controlled cooking experiments, heat input
ker was evaluated using two different heat sources,
was controlled using the ON–OFF power supply of
namely, electrical coil stove (2000 W, Surana, India)
the electric rice cooker. The temperature of the cooker
and LPG stove (Pentax Pioneer, India). It was operated
contents was measured at a fixed location with the help
in two modes, namely, open cooking (without pressure
of a thermocouple linked to a display unit. The total
pin) and pressure cooking (with pressure pin). Normal
duration of cooking as well as power ON–OFF dura-
and controlled cooking experiments were carried out
tions were recorded. Energy consumption was measured
for both unsoaked as well as presoaked (30 min) rice.
with an energy meter.
The detailed experimental plan is provided in Table 1.
The normal cooking experiments were performed Moisture content of cooked rice at different locations
generally as per the recommended guidelines of the (normal cooking of unsoaked rice)
appliance manufacturer and according to the general After cooking was done, the cooker container was
practice. The controlled cooking experiments were con- covered with the lid and kept undisturbed for 10 min.

Table 1
Experimental plan and standardized conditions for cooking rice using different types of cooking methoda
S. no. Type of cooking Method of heating Unsoaked Presoaked
Normal Controlled Normal Controlled
Standardized conditions Total waterb (g); Total waterb (g); Total waterb (g); Total waterb (g);
No. of whistles No. of whistles No. of whistles No. of whistles
1 Electric rice cooker 830 725 830 723
2 Pressure cooker Electrical stove
(a) Open cooking 706 706 706 706
(b) Pressure cooking 706; 2 706; Nil 706; 1 706; Nil
3 Pressure cooker LPG stove
(a) Open cooking (high flame) 706 706
(b) Open cooking (high + low flame) 706 706 706 706
(c) Pressure cooking (high flame) 706; 1 706; 1
(d) Pressure cooking (high + low flame) 706; Nil 706; Nil
a
Quantity of rice used for cooking was 296 g (moisture content 12.8% w.b.); water required to achieve 74% moisture content was 706 g; water used
for steam generation in pressure cooker was 500 g.
b
Total water used in the cooker container.
The moisture content of the cooked rice was determined consumption for various experiments were obtained
at five different layers from top to bottom at 1 cm apart with the LPG consumption rate and the duration of bur-
by oven-dry method. Samples at different layers were ner ON-time. These values were also verified by measur-
collected by obtaining cylindrical portion of cooked rice ing the weight of the gas cylinder before and after each
from three locations (one at the centre and two at the experimental run. Energy consumption was calculated
periphery), using an open-ended cylindrical glass tube. by multiplying the quantity of LPG consumed with its
The samples were immediately transferred in to the calorific value, 47 700 kJ/kg (www.lpgforyou.com). The
moisture cups for moisture estimation. amounts of water used for cooking and measurement
of water evaporation loss were as per the procedure de-
2.2.4.2. Cooking in pressure cooker using an electrical coil scribed in Section 2.2.4.2.
stove. Experiments were conducted to standardize the
Open cooking
cooking procedure in the pressure cooker in two modes
Normal cooking was done using two methods, (a)
(open cooking and pressure cooking) using electrical coil
keeping the LPG burner at high flame throughout the
stove and also to standardize the quantity of water re-
process [normal (high)], and (b) keeping the burner ini-
quired for steam generation (Table 1). The electric rice
tially at high flame till the vapours steadily escape
cooker container was used in these experiments as well.
through the hole on the lid of the cooker and then main-
Water evaporation loss during cooking occurred mainly
taining low flame till the rice gets cooked [normal
from the water added into the cooker for steam genera-
(high + low)].
tion that acts as a heat transfer medium and sets the
Controlled cooking was performed by keeping the
upper limit of temperature inside the cooker. A good
flame initially high till the contents of the cooker
material balance between water added for cooking and
container reached the boiling temperature and then the
moisture gained during cooking was observed. Water
burner was switched OFF. It was again switched ON
evaporation loss was obtained by measuring the amount
at low flame when the temperature fell below 90 °C.
of water inside the cooker (for heat transfer) before and
The ON–OFF cycle between the above temperature
after 10 min (resting time with the lid on) of cooking
range was continued till the cooking was completed.
with the help of an electronic balance. Electrical energy
Energy consumption, temperature, water evaporation
consumption was measured with an energy meter.
loss and total duration of cooking were measured as
Open cooking described earlier.
During normal cooking, the electrical coil stove was
Pressure cooking
switched OFF after the cooking was completed. In the
Experiments were conducted to standardize normal
case of controlled cooking, the temperature was moni-
cooking procedure in the pressure cooker with pressure
tored and heat input was controlled using the ON–
pin including the required number of whistles. During
OFF power supply of the electrical coil stove. The
pressure cooking, the burner was switched OFF soon
power ON–OFF duration was also recorded.
after the required number of whistles occurred and the
Pressure cooking cooker was removed from the stove and left undisturbed
Experiments were conducted to standardize normal for 10 min.
cooking procedure in the pressure cooker with pressure Controlled pressure-cooking performed by control-
pin including the required number of pressure releases ling the energy input within the specified temperature
(whistles). The electrical coil stove was switched OFF range as described earlier. Fuel consumption, tempera-
soon after the required number of whistles occurred ture, water evaporation loss and total duration of cook-
and the cooker was immediately removed from the stove ing as well as burner ON(high and low)–OFF duration
and kept undisturbed for 10 min (Table 1). were measured as described earlier.
Controlled pressure cooking of unsoaked rice in pres- All the experimental runs were carried out in dupli-
sure cooker was performed by controlling the power cate and practically no difference was observed in the
supply to the electrical coil stove according to tempera- energy measurements (±1%).
ture (between 100 °C and 90 °C) of the contents as de-
scribed earlier.
3. Results and discussion
2.2.4.3. Cooking in pressure cooker using a LPG stove.
Experiments were conducted to standardize the cooking 3.1. Hydration of rice
procedure and the amount water required for steam gen-
eration in the pressure cooker in two modes (open cook- The initial moisture content of the raw rice was 12.8
ing and pressure cooking) with LPG stove. The rates of (% w.b.). Hydration curve of rice (Fig. 1) shows that the
LPG consumption at high flame and low flame positions water absorption during soaking increased rapidly up to
of the burner were determined. The amounts of LPG 30 min. Thereafter the rate of absorption decreased and
 30 1.3 the case of presoaked rice. Gelatinization, marked by
swelling of starch granules and increase in viscosity of
Moisture content (% w.b)

1.1

Water absorption rate

25
the starch-water slurry occurred gradually over a range
0.9
of temperature often above 55 °C (Halick & Kelly,

(g/100g.min)
Moisture content 0.7 1959). The initial rate of absorption in presoaked rice
20 Absorption rate was very high, which may be due to the fact that presoa-
0.5
ked rice had already attained near equilibrium moisture
0.3 content that facilitated rapid cooking of the grain in the
15
0.1 initial stages. Presoaking also leads to fissures on the
10 -0.1
grain surface facilitating easy access of additional water
0 60 120 180 240 300 required for further cooking.
Soaking time (min) Many researchers have observed that presoaking of
rice before cooking reduces the cooking time. Presoa-
Fig. 1. Hydration curve of rice.
king results in homogenous gelatinization of starch
and a tasty rice with a soft texture (Matsumoto, 1970).
While unsoaked grain becomes coated with a gelatinized
attained an equilibrium (moisture content 27% w.b.)
layer, which probably reduces the heat and mass trans-
after 1 h of soaking. The moisture content of rice re-
fer into the grain, resulting in half-boiled rice with the
mained almost the same between 2 and 5 h of soaking
cores neither swollen nor completely gelatinized. Santos
and practically, there was no further absorption of
et al. (1980) reported that a mean saving of 7 min was
water in rice grain (Fig. 1). The hydration behaviour
obtained for two different rice-water proportions (1:1
was generally similar to the earlier studies conducted
1/2 and 1:1 1/3) using electricity, and an average saving
with raw rice of indica variety (Sowbhagya & Ali,
of 5 min was obtained with LPG by soaking the rice for
1991; Swamy et al., 1971). By looking at these results
an hour. Sowbhagya and Ali (1991) reported that pres-
on rate of absorption, it was decided to stick to 30
oaking at room temperature for 15 min for raw rice and
min of soaking for studying the effect of soaking on rice
2–3 h for parboiled rice reduced the cooking time by
cooking.
50% for raw rice and 25–40% for parboiled rice com-
pared to unsoaked rice. Hirannaiah, Bhashyam, and
3.2. Cooking in excess water (unsoaked and presoaked
Ali (2001) reported that presoaking of Basmati rice re-
rice)
duced the cooking time from 20 to 10 min, when cooked
in excess water.
Preliminary experiments revealed that the moisture
The reduction in total cooking time of presoaked rice
content of rice cooked in excess boiling water was
could be due to the swelling of the rice grains (Santos
74% (w.b.). Unsoaked rice took 15 min for cooking
et al., 1980). Swelling upon hydration is a characteristic
and during the process the moisture content increased
property common to starches and proteins. A solid
from 12.8% to 73.2% (w.b.). Presoaked rice took only
swells when it takes up a liquid and at the same time
9 min for cooking under similar conditions and the
(a) it does not lose its apparent (microscopic) homoge-
moisture content rose from the initial value of 27.1%
neity, (b) its dimensions are enlarged, (c) its cohesion
to 74.4%. Moisture content of rice was plotted against
is diminished, and (d) it becomes soft and flexible (Katz,
cooking time (Fig. 2). The water absorption was gradual
1933). Rice, whose nitrogen-free extract is mostly starch,
for both unsoaked and presoaked rice, but more rapid in
therefore, has the ability to imbibe water. Moreover, if
starch granules are soaked for some time before heating,
gelatinization begins at a lower temperature (Santos
et al., 1980).
Moisture content (% w.b)

75
Results showed that presoaked rice cooked in less
65 time (9 min) compared to unsoaked rice (15 min). There-
fore, parallel experiments were conducted with soaking
55 as a pretreatment step throughout this study, along with
experiments of unsoaked rice.
45 Moisture (unsoaked)
Moisture (presoaked)
3.3. Cooking in electric rice cooker
35
0 4 8 12 16 Data on energy consumption, water evaporation loss,
Time (min)
total duration and power-ON time during normal and
Fig. 2. Changes in moisture content of unsoaked and presoaked rice controlled cooking of unsoaked and presoaked rice are
during cooking in excess boiling water. presented in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.
Table 2
Energy consumption during normal and controlled cooking of unsoaked rice using different types of cooking method
S. no. Type of cooking Normal Controlled
Energy Duration Water evaporation Energy Duration Water
(kJ) loss (g) (kJ) evaporation
On time Total On time Total
(min) (min) (min) (min) loss (g)

1 Electric rice cooker 675 25 25 125 405 15 36 20

2 Pressure cooker-Electrical
(a) Open cooking 2880 29 29 412 1440 15.5 33 72
(b) Pressure cooking 1620 16.5 26.5 53 1260 12 30.5 27
3 Pressure cooker-LPG
(a) Open cooking (high flame) 2098 24 24 298
(b) Open cooking (high + low flame) 1510 10 + 16 26 102 1216 10.5 + 7.5 33 63
(c) Pressure cooking (high flame) 1180 13.5 23.5 80
(d) Pressure cooking (high + low flame) 1137 10.5 + 5.5 32.5 30

Table 3
Energy consumption during normal and controlled cooking of presoaked rice using different types of cooking method
S. no. Type of cooking Normal Controlled
Energy Duration Water evaporation Energy Duration Water
(kJ) loss (g) (kJ) evaporation
On time Total On time Total
loss (g)
(min) (min) (min) (min)
1 Electric rice cooker 621 23 23 125 405 15 26 17
2 Pressure cooker-Electrical
(a) Open cooking 2340 25 25 321 1260 13 30 62
(b) Pressure cooking 1440 14 24 34 1080 11 30 25
3 Pressure cooker-LPG
(a) Open cooking (high flame) 1749 20 20 259
(b) Open cooking (high + low flame) 1391 10 + 13 23 90 1132 10 + 6.5 32 39
(c) Pressure cooking (high flame) 1180 13.5 23.5 79
(d) Pressure cooking (high + low flame) 1137 10.5 + 5.5 32 19

3.3.1. Cooking of unsoaked rice 76

Moisture content ( % w.b)

75
Normal cooking
The time and energy required for cooking 296 g of 74
unsoaked rice under normal condition were 25 min 73
and 675 kJ (Table 2). The contents of the cooker (rice
and water) reached boiling temperature in 12–13 min, 72

when evaporation of water could be observed. It contin- 71 Centre

ued steadily for the rest of the cooking period. There Periphery-1
70 Periphery-2
was 10 g of water loss by evaporation even after the
power was switched OFF. The total water evaporation 69
loss during cooking under normal condition was 125 0 1 2 3 4 5
g. The maximum water loss occurred during the time Depth of rice layer (cm)
period between 14 and 25 min when the contents were Fig. 3. Moisture content of cooked rice at various locations (normal
in the boiling state. cooking—unsoaked) in ERC.
The variations in moisture content of cooked rice in
different layers and at different locations in the cooker
container are shown in Fig. 3. Moisture content of rice the container. The heat is transmitted from the bottom,
at the top layer was the lowest apparently due to surface so also the moisture is driven out from bottom to top.
evaporation. The moisture content increased up to the Surface evaporation at the top and location of heat
middle layer reaching the highest value and then de- source at the bottom explains the above observation.
creased in the subsequent layers towards the bottom of The moisture contents in different layers at two locations
in the periphery are expected to be identical. But they 800 40
were found not to be so, which may be due to the non- 700
Energy
Total time
uniform arrangement of heat source in the cooker lead- 600 On time 30
ing to non-uniformity of heat distribution.

Energy (KJ)

Time (min)
500

Controlled cooking 400 20

During controlled cooking, power was switched OFF 300

whenever the temperature of the contents reached the 200 10

boiling point and was switched ON whenever the tem- 100
perature fell below 90 °C. By adopting this strategy, 0 0
the power-ON time could be brought down to 15 min Unsoaked (N) Unsoaked (C) Presoaked (N) Presoaked (C)
(savings of 10 min of power-ON time) for cooking Type of cooking
unsoaked rice. This strategy was aimed at reducing the
Fig. 4. Energy consumption and time taken during normal and
water evaporation loss and thereby achieving savings controlled cooking of unsoaked and presoaked rice in ERC.
in power consumption. The water evaporation loss dur-
ing controlled cooking was 20 g, which was much less
than that for normal cooking (125 g) (Table 2). This is possible to achieve substantial savings in energy (40%)
method of controlled cooking resulted in saving of 270 by incorporating a fine temperature controlled ON–
kJ of electrical energy (Table 2). But, the total duration OFF system in the cooker.
of cooking increased to 36 min as against 25 min for
normal cooking. However, saving in energy to the extent
3.4. Cooking in pressure cooker with electrical coil stove
of 40% in controlled cooking is very significant and an
attractive proposition.
Data on energy consumption, water evaporation loss,
total duration and power-ON time during both open
3.3.2. Cooking of presoaked rice
and pressure (normal and controlled) cooking of unsoa-
ked and presoaked rice are presented in Tables 2 and 3,
Normal cooking
respectively.
The time and energy required for cooking presoaked
rice under normal condition were 23 min and 621 kJ
(Table 3). As in the case of normal cooking of unsoaked 3.4.1. Open cooking
rice, evaporation of water was steady once the cooker
contents reached the boiling stage. Presoaking reduced Normal and controlled cooking of unsoaked rice
the cooking time by 2 min and energy consumption by The amount of electrical energy required for normal
54 kJ (Tables 2 and 3). However, the total amount of cooking of 296 g of unsoaked rice was 2880 kJ. The tem-
water lost due to evaporation remained the same as that perature gradually increased to reach the boiling condi-
of unsoaked rice (125 g). tion and remained in that condition until the cooking
was complete. The water evaporation loss during cook-
Controlled cooking ing was very high (412 g) compared to other methods
Energy requirement for cooking presoaked rice (Tables 2 and 3).
reduced by 35% during controlled cooking compared During controlled cooking, the total power-ON time
to normal cooking. But there was no difference in the of the electrical stove for cooking the same amount of
energy consumption between controlled cooking of unsoaked rice was reduced to 15.5 min, thereby energy
presoaked and unsoaked rice. However, presoaking consumption reduced to 1440 kJ that amounts to
reduced the total cooking time from 36 to 26 min that 50% saving in electrical energy over normal cooking.
was close to the time taken (23–25 min) for normal The water evaporation loss also significantly reduced
cooking. The water evaporation loss for controlled to the extent of 82.5% but the total cooking time in-
cooking of presoaked rice was 17 g, which appears to creased by 4 min.
be close to the near ideal condition (Tables 2 and 3).
Controlled cooking of presoaked rice in electric rice Normal and controlled cooking of presoaked rice
cooker appears, therefore, to be the best option among The energy and time required for normal open cook-
the four different approaches studied (Fig. 4). ing of presoaked rice were 2340 kJ and 25 min (Table 3).
Mori (1983) reported that a microcomputer–con- Evaporation of water was steady once the cooker con-
trolled rice cooker offers higher thermal efficiency by tents (rice and water) reached the boiling stage. The
holding down evaporation to a minimum. Thermal effi- water evaporation loss was 321 g that was 91 g (22%)
ciency improved by 19% when rice was cooked in a lower than the corresponding value for unsoaked rice.
microcomputer-controlled cooker compared to ordinary Soaking reduced energy consumption by 540 kJ (19%)
type electric rice cooker. Present studies revealed that it and the cooking time by 4 min (Tables 2 and 3).
 The total electrical energy required for controlled 3000
Energy
40
open cooking was 1260 kJ (Table 3), down (46%) from 2500
Total time
On time
2340 kJ for normal cooking. The water evaporation loss

Energy (KJ)
30

Time (min)
2000
reduced to 62 g. Although the power-ON time reduced
from 25 to 13 min, the total cooking time increased to 1500 20
30 min. 1000
Presoaking the rice reduced the total cooking time 10
500
from 33 to 30 min in controlled open cooking that was
close to the time taken (29 min) for normal open cook- 0 0

)
ing of unsoaked rice in the pressure cooker. Energy

(N

(C

(N

(C
(N

(C

(N

(C
en

re

re

en

re
r
pe

pe
su

su

su
op

op
s
consumption was further reduced with controlled cook-

-o

o
es

es

es

es
d-

d-

d-
d

pr

pr

pr

pr
ke

ke

ke

ke
d-

d-

d-

d-
oa

oa

oa

oa
ing of presoaked rice (1260 kJ) compared to unsoaked

ke

ke

ke

ke
ns

ns

es

es
oa

oa

oa

oa
Pr

Pr
U

ns

ns

es

es
rice (1440 kJ). This was also reflected in the amount of

Pr

Pr
U

U
water lost due to evaporation during cooking. Con- Type of cooking
trolled open cooking of presoaked rice in pressure coo- Fig. 5. Energy consumption and time taken during normal and
ker appears to be the best among the four different controlled (open and pressure) cooking of unsoaked and presoaked
approaches studied (Tables 2 and 3). Presoaking fol- rice in pressure cooker (electrical).
lowed by controlled cooking reduced the electrical
energy by 56% compared to normal cooking of unsoa-
ked rice. ilar conditions (Tables 2 and 3). Presoaking also resulted
in the reduction of water evaporation loss from 53 g to
34 g and the total time of cooking from 26.5 min to 24
3.4.2. Pressure cooking
min. Both power-ON time of the electrical stove and
cooking time reduced by 2.5 min.
Normal and controlled cooking of unsoaked rice.
The energy required during controlled pressure cook-
Pressure cooking reduces the cooking time as the
ing of presoaked rice reduced to 1080 kJ, i.e. 25% sav-
cooking is carried out at an elevated temperature corre-
ings in energy compared to normal pressure cooking
sponding to the higher pressure maintained inside the
(Table 3). The power-ON time reduced by 3 min. How-
cooker. This also leads to lot of savings in energy as it
ever, total cooking time increased to 30 min, which was
is operated as a closed system minimizing the water
nearly equal to the cooking time of unsoaked rice during
evaporation loss. During cooking unsoaked rice, the
normal open cooking in pressure cooker (29 min). The
total power-ON time of the electrical stove reduced to
water evaporation loss during controlled pressure-cook-
16.5 min, which resulted in the reduction of energy
ing of presoaked rice was the least (25 g) among the
requirement to 1620 kJ, i.e. 44% saving compared to
eight different approaches attempted with pressure coo-
open cooking. Cooking under pressure reduced the
ker (electrical) (Tables 2 and 3).
power-ON time by 12.5 min and cooking time by 2.5
Presoaking reduced the energy consumption by 180
min. During cooking the temperature of rice and water
kJ, i.e., 14% reduction compared to the energy re-
gradually increased to the maximum (122 °C) and re-
quired for controlled pressure cooking of unsoaked rice
duced to 116 °C during pressure release (whistling) and
under similar conditions (Tables 2 and 3). This also re-
again rose with time and the cycle repeated. The water
flected in the reduction of water evaporation loss (2
evaporation loss during normal cooking reduced from
g) during cooking. There was no appreciable saving in
412 g (open cooking) to 53 g (87% reduction) by pres-
total cooking time (0.5 min) with soaking. Controlled
sure cooking (Table 2).
pressure cooking of presoaked rice appears to be the
The water evaporation loss during pressure cooking
best among the eight different approaches studied (Fig.
reduced from 53 g (normal cooking) to 27 g by con-
5).
trolled cooking (Table 2). Controlled pressure-cooking
reduced the energy requirement from 1620 to 1260 kJ
3.5. Cooking in pressure cooker with LPG burner
(22.2% saving), saved 4.5 min of power-ON time while
increasing the total cooking time by nearly the same
Data on energy consumption, water evaporation loss,
duration (4 min). The water evaporation loss during
total duration and burner-ON time during both open
controlled pressure cooking reduced by 45 g under
and pressure (normal and controlled) cooking of unsoa-
otherwise similar conditions during open cooking.
ked and presoaked rice are presented in Tables 2 and 3,
Normal and controlled cooking of presoaked rice respectively. The rate of consumption of LPG at high
Presoaking reduced the electrical energy in normal and low flame positions in the burner were estimated
pressure cooking to 1440 kJ, that is 11% saving com- as 1.833 g (87.43 kJ/min) and 0.833 g (39.73 kJ/min),
pared with cooking unsoaked rice under otherwise sim- respectively.
3.5.1. Open cooking 3.5.2. Pressure cooking

Normal (high flame and high plus low flame) and Normal and controlled cooking of unsoaked rice
controlled cooking of unsoaked rice. Pressure-cooking reduced the cooking time and en-
The amount of energy required for normal open ergy requirement as explained earlier. The rice and water
cooking of unsoaked rice at high plus low flame combi- inside the cooker during cooking attained a maximum
nation (1510 kJ) was lower by 28% than cooking at temperature of 122 °C. During normal pressure cooking,
high flame (2098 kJ). The water evaporation loss during the energy required for cooking the same quantity of
normal cooking at high plus low flame combination was rice was reduced compared with normal open cooking
102 g as against 298 g at high flame. Although the cook- by 44% at high flame, and by 22% at high plus low
ing time increased by 2 min, the energy saved was con- flame (Table 2). The water evaporation loss reduced to
siderable and hence it is desirable to switch over from 80 g and cooking time to 23.5 min during pressure cook-
high to low flame in the gas stove once the vapour builds ing of unsoaked rice (Table 2).
up in the cooker during normal cooking. This proce- Controlled pressure cooking reduced energy require-
dure, in fact, is probably being practiced in many ments from 1180 to 1137 kJ (4% saving) due to con-
households. trolled cooking under otherwise similar conditions.
The energy required for controlled open cooking of The water evaporation loss reduced by 50 g, but the
rice was 1216 kJ, resulting in a saving of 19% com- cooking time increased by 9 min during controlled pres-
pared with normal cooking at high plus low flame com- sure cooking (Table 2).
bination and 42% compared with normal cooking at
Normal and controlled cooking of presoaked rice
high flame. The amount of water evaporated was re-
There was no change in LPG consumption and cook-
duced by 39 g compared with normal cooking at high
ing time during normal pressure cooking of presoaked
plus low flame combination and 235 g compared with
rice compared to unsoaked rice under otherwise similar
normal cooking at high flame. However, cooking time
conditions (Tables 2 and 3). The water evaporation loss
during controlled open cooking increased compared
was also nearly the same.
with normal cooking by 9 min at high flame and 7
Controlled pressure cooking saved 43 kJ of energy
min at high plus low flame.
compared to the normal pressure cooking of presoaked
rice (Table 3). The water evaporation loss reduced to
very low levels (19 g) during controlled pressure cooking
Normal (high flame and high plus low flame) and
of presoaked rice. However, the cooking time increased
controlled cooking presoaked rice
by 8.5 min over normal pressure cooking. It was ob-
The energy required for normal (at high flame) open
served that presoaking did not contribute to energy sav-
cooking of presoaked rice reduced to 1749 kJ, 17%
ing either in normal or controlled pressure cooking
saving compared to unsoaked rice. The water evapora-
using LPG burner (Tables 2 and 3). Controlled cooking
tion loss and the burner-ON time were also reduced dur-
of unsoaked and presoaked rice gave more or less simi-
ing normal cooking at high flame (Tables 2 and 3).
lar values of energy consumption and cooking time for
Presoaking reduced energy requirement, water evapora-
both open and pressure cooking (Fig. 6). In normal
tion loss and duration of cooking during normal open
cooking at high plus low flame combination, however,
the quantum of reduction was much lower compared 2500
Energy
to normal cooking at high flame (Tables 2 and 3). Cook- Total time 40
On time (high)
ing at high flame leads to huge loss in energy in any type 2000
Energy (KJ)

On time (low)
Time (min)

of cooking. 30
1500
The water evaporation loss reduced by controlled 20
cooking method. Controlled open cooking of presoaked 1000

rice reduced the energy consumption by 35% com- 500 10

pared with normal cooking at high flame and by
0 0
19% compared with normal cooking at high plus low
h)
)

)
)

h)

)
)
h)

)
)

gh

w
ow

(C
(C

(C
C

ig
ig
ig

lo
(

flame. However, controlled cooking of presoaked rice

i
+l

re
-h
-h

en
en

-h
-h

h+
ur
gh

su
(N
(N

(N
(N

op
op

ig
ss
i

es
re
-h
re
-h

en
en

d-
d-

re

increased the cooking time to 32 min, much higher than

pr
su
(N
su
(N

ke
ke

op
-p
op

d-
es
es

oa
en
oa
n

d-
d-

ke

ke
pe

pr
pr

es
op
ns

ke
ke

oa
oa
o

for the normal cooking. During controlled cooking of

d-
d-

Pr
oa
oa

d-
d-

ns

ke

es
ke

ke
ke

es
ns

Pr
oa
oa

oa
oa

Pr
U

es
ns

presoaked rice the energy consumption reduced by 84

es
ns

Pr
U

Pr
U

kJ and water evaporation loss by 24 g compared to Type of cooking

the controlled cooking of unsoaked rice. However, there Fig. 6. Energy consumption and time taken during normal and
was no appreciable difference in the cooking time due to controlled (open and pressure) cooking of unsoaked and presoaked
prior soaking. rice in pressure cooker (LPG).
pressure cooking also, energy consumption and cooking ditions. The savings were much more pronounced in the
time values were similar for both presoaked and unsoa- case of normal pressure cooking of presoaked as well as
ked rice (Tables 2 and 3). unsoaked rice. In the case of controlled cooking, the en-
ergy consumption during open cooking could be nearly
3.6. Effect of presoaking rice brought down to the level of pressure cooking; more so
with LPG as source of heat.
Experiments of cooking in excess boiling water
showed that presoaked rice cooked in less time com-
pared to unsoaked rice and the cooking time typically 4. Conclusions
reduced from 15 to 9 min. In electric rice cooker, there
was some reduction in the energy consumption (8%), Controlled energy input, cooking under pressure and
however, there was only little reduction in cooking time soaking of rice prior to cooking are the three ap-
(2 min) during normal cooking. Although there was no proaches, which resulted in energy saving. The type of
change in energy consumption during controlled cook- cooking appliance and heat source also are important
ing, the cooking time reduced by 10 min. factors that decide energy requirements for cooking.
In the case of pressure cooker with electrical coil Electric rice cooker was found to be the most energy-
stove, prior soaking of rice generally reduced the energy efficient implement among the different combinations
consumption and cooking time. Controlled pressure of cooking appliance and types of heat source used in
cooking of presoaked rice consumed the least power, this study (Fig. 7). Its energy consumption was much
while normal open and pressure cooking of presoaked less (23–57%) compared to pressure cooker (open and
rice took the least time. pressure cooking) with either electrical or LPG stove.
In open cooking in pressure cooker with LPG stove, Open cooking in pressure cooker with continuous high
presoaking reduced the energy consumption and cook- flame (LPG burner) leads to high energy consumption
ing time. However, presoaking did not affect the energy due to increased losses.
consumption and cooking time both in normal and con- Prior soaking of rice generally reduced energy con-
trolled pressure-cooking. Controlled open and pressure sumption as well as cooking time, more prominently
cooking of presoaked rice consumed the least fuel. Nor- during normal cooking. Controlled heat input could
mal open cooking of presoaked rice at continuous high generally lead to substantial energy savings but gener-
flame took the least time for cooking (20 min). ally prolonged the cooking time. Energy consumption
in controlled cooking of unsoaked rice was even lower
3.7. Controlled cooking than the normal cooking of presoaked rice in electric
rice cooker and pressure cooker. In the case of con-
Controlled cooking reduced the energy consumption, trolled cooking in electric rice cooker, energy consump-
but prolonged cooking time for all the different ap- tion did not reduce with presoaking but there was
proaches used for cooking rice. In electric rice cooker, substantial reduction in cooking time. Considering the
controlled cooking resulted in large saving in energy energy consumption and cooking time, controlled cook-
for both unsoaked and presoaked rice (40% and 35%, ing of presoaked rice appears to be the best among the
respectively). Controlled cooking in electric rice cooker several approaches investigated in the present study.
was found to be the most energy efficient among all Presoaking of rice and cooking under elevated
the different methods used in the study. pressure have been reported to offer energy savings;
Controlled open cooking in pressure cooker with
electrical coil stove, for both unsoaked and presoaked 1500 50
rice resulted in large energy savings (50% and 46%, Energy
Total time
respectively). Among the different approaches made 1200 On time (high) 40
On time (low)
with electrical coil stove, controlled pressure-cooking
Energy (KJ)

Time (min)

of presoaked rice consumed the least amount of energy. 900 30

As in the case of electrical coil stove, controlled open

600 20
cooking of unsoaked as well as presoaked rice resulted
in large energy savings in pressure cooker with LPG
300 10
stove. Controlled open and pressure cooking of presoa-
ked rice consumed the least amount of energy. 0 0
E.R.C P.C-Electrical P.C-LPG E.R.C P.C-Electrical P.C-LPG
(unsoaked) (unsoaked) (unsoaked) (presoaked) (presoaked) (presoaked)

3.8. Pressure cooking Type of cooking

Fig. 7. Comparison of energy consumption and time taken during

Pressure cooking generally consumed lower energy controlled cooking of unsoaked and presoaked rice in ERC and PC
compared to open cooking under otherwise similar con- (pressure cooking).
controlled energy input is another useful method that Juliano, B. O., & Sakurai, J. (1985). Miscellaneous rice products. In B.
optimizes the energy utilization in cooking. Controlled O. Juliano (Ed.), Rice chemistry and technology (2nd ed.,
pp. 569–618). St. Paul, Minnesota: American Association of Cereal
cooking is desirable to apply in all types of rice cooking. Chemists.
Measurement of water evaporation loss appears to be Katz, J. R. (1933). The laws of swelling. Trans. Faraday Soc., vol. 29,
a good indirect method of assessing the efficiency of en- p. 279. Cf. Santos, A. H., Guzman, M. P. E. De., Umali, C. C.,
ergy utilization. Assessment of the quality of cooked rice Mananes, B. R., & Abanto, Z. U. (1980). Study on time and fuel
would help in deciding the best method of cooking from conservation in cooking rice. Philippine Journal of Nutrition, vol.
33, pp. 36–40.
sensory point of view. There is also ample scope to ex- Kim, K. J., Pyun, Y. R., Choi, H. T., Lee, S. K., & Kim, S. K. (1984).
tend this type of study to the processing of other types Cooking properties of akibare and milyang 23 brown rice. Korean
of grains. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 16, 457–462.
Kim, S. K., & Cho, E. J. (1993). Effects of storage temperatures on the
physicochemical properties of milled rice. Journal of the Korean
Agricultural Chemical Society, 36, 146–153.
Acknowledgements Matsumoto, F. (1970). General explanation: Essentials of cooking rice
and its quality and taste, Chori Kagaku, p. 2, 3, 68. Cf. Juliano, B.
This research was funded by the Council of Scientific O., & Sakurai, J. (1985). Miscellaneous rice products. In B.O.
and Industrial Research, New Delhi, India. Tribeni Das Juliano (Ed.), Rice chemistry and technology (2nd ed., pp. 569–618).
thanks the Director, CFTRI for providing necessary St. Paul, Minnesota: American Association of Cereal Chemists.
Mori, K. (1983). Effective utilization of energy in cooking. Energy
facilities. saving effect in a micro-computer controlled rice cooker. In Rep.
spec. project res. on energy under Grant in Aid of Min. Ed. Sci. Cult.
Japan, SPEU 11 (pp. 145–148). Cf. Juliano, B. O., & Sakurai, J.
References (1985). Miscellaneous rice products. In B. O. Juliano (Ed.), Rice
chemistry and technology (2nd ed., pp. 569–618). St. Paul, Minne-
Bhattacharya, S. (1993). Energy economy in food processing–cooking. sota: American Association of Cereal Chemists.
In V. H. Potty & M. J. Mulky (Eds.), Food processing (pp. 11–20). Santos, A. H., Guzman, M. P. E. De., Umali, C. C., Mananes, B. R., &
New Delhi: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Abanto, Z. U. (1980). Study on time and fuel conservation in
Cheigh, H. S., Kim, S. K., Pyun, Y. R., & Kwon, T. W. (1978). Kinetic cooking rice. Philippine Journal of Nutrition, 33, 36–40.
studies on cooking of rice of various polishing degrees. Korean Sowbhagya, C. M., & Ali, S. Z. (1991). Effect of presoaking on
Journal of Food Science and Technology, 10, 52–56. cooking time and texture of raw and parboiled rice. Journal of Food
Desikachar, H. S. R., & Subrahmanyan, V. (1961). The formation of Science and Technology, 28, 76–80.
cracks in rice during wetting and its effect on the cooking Suzuki, K., Kubota, K., Omichi, M., & Hosaka, H. (1976). Kinetic
characteristics of the cereal. Cereal Chemistry, 38, 356–364. studies on cooking of rice. Journal of Food Science, 41, 1180–1183.
Halick, J. V., & Kelly, V. J. (1959). Gelatinization and pasting Swamy, Y. M. I., Ali, S. Z., & Bhattacharya, K. R. (1971). Hydration
characteristics of rice varieties as related to cooking behaviour. of raw and parboiled rice and paddy at room temperature. Journal
Cereal Chemistry, 36, 91–98. of Food Science and Technology, 8, 20–22.
Hirannaiah, B. V., Bhashyam, M. K., & Ali, S. Z. (2001). An improved Yano, N., Taniguchi, M., & Nakanaga, R. (1988). Method of
cooking quality test for basmati rice. Journal of Food Science and manufacturing dried rice with pregelatinized starch content. United
Technology, 38, 116–119. States Patent, US 4794012.
Juliano, B. O. (1985). Production and utilization of rice. In B. O. http://faostat.fao.org/.
Juliano (Ed.), Rice chemistry and technology (2nd ed., pp. 1–16). St. http://missvickie.com/library/history.html.
Paul, Minnesota: American Association of Cereal Chemists. http://www.lpgforyou.com/asp/datasheet.asp.