What Is Buddhism
What Is Buddhism
What Is Buddhism
Buddhism is a religion to about 300 million people around the world. The word comes from 'budhi', 'to
awaken'. It has its origins about 2,500 years ago when Siddhartha Gotama, known as the Buddha, was
himself awakened (enlightened) at the age of 35.
• Is Buddhism a Religion?
To many, Buddhism goes beyond religion and is more of a philosophy or 'way of life'. It is a philosophy
because philosophy 'means love of wisdom' and the Buddhist path can be summed up as:
• Is Buddhism Scientific?
Science is knowledge which can be made into a system, which depends upon seeing and testing facts
and stating general natural laws. The core of Buddhism fit into this definition, because the Four Noble
truths (see below) can be tested and proven by anyone in fact the Buddha himself asked his followers to
test the teaching rather than accept his word as true. Buddhism depends more on understanding than
faith.
• What is Karma?
Karma is the law that every cause has an effect, i.e., our actions have results. This simple law explains a
number of things: inequality in the world, why some are born handicapped and some gifted, why some
live only a short life. Karma underlines the importance of all individuals being responsible for their past
and present actions. How can we test the karmic effect of our actions? The answer is summed up by
looking at (1) the intention behind the action, (2) effects of the action on oneself, and (3) the effects on
others.
• What is Wisdom?
Buddhism teaches that wisdom should be developed with compassion. At one extreme, you could be a
good hearted fool and at the other extreme, you could attain knowledge without any emotion. Buddhism
uses the middle path to develop both. The highest wisdom is seeing that in reality, all phenomena are
incomplete, impermanent and do not constitute a fixed entity. True wisdom is not simply believing what
we are told but instead experiencing and understanding truth and reality. Wisdom requires an open,
objective, unbigoted mind. The Buddhist path requires courage, patience, flexibility and intelligence.
• What is Compassion?
Compassion includes qualities of sharing, readiness to give comfort, sympathy, concern, caring. In
Buddhism, we can really understand others, when we can really understand ourselves, through wisdom.
the buddha
teachings
practice
festivals
what is buddhism?
Buddhism is a path of practice and spiritual development leading to Insight into the true
nature of reality. Buddhist practices like meditation are means of changing yourself in
order to develop the qualities of awareness, kindness, and wisdom. The experience
developed within the Buddhist tradition over thousands of years has created an
incomparable resource for all those who wish to follow a path — a path which ultimately
culminates in Enlightenment or Buddhahood. An enlightened being sees the nature of
reality absolutely clearly, just as it is, and lives fully and naturally in accordance with that
vision. This is the goal of the Buddhist spiritual life, representing the end of suffering for
anyone who attains it.
Because Buddhism does not include the idea of worshipping a creator god, some people do
not see it as a religion in the normal, Western sense. The basic tenets of Buddhist teaching
are straightforward and practical: nothing is fixed or permanent; actions have
consequences; change is possible. So Buddhism addresses itself to all people irrespective
of race, nationality, caste, sexuality, or gender. It teaches practical methods which enable
people to realise and use its teachings in order to transform their experience, to be fully
responsible for their lives.
There are around 350 million Buddhists and a growing number of them are Westerners.
They follow many different forms of Buddhism, but all traditions are characterised by non-
violence, lack of dogma, tolerance of differences, and, usually, by the practice of meditation.
What is Buddhism?
Buddha Shakyamuni, founder of Buddhism
Enlightenment
The Buddha was special because he was the first person to attain full
enlightenment in recorded history. But there is no essential difference
between the Buddha and us. We all have a mind, and we can all attain
liberation and enlightenment by working with our minds.
Our body, thoughts, and feelings are constantly changing. Buddhism
views them as “empty” — empty of any lasting essence, meaning that
they are no basis for a real, separate ego or self. The state
of liberation comes when we not only understand this intellectually but
experience it in a deep, lasting way. With no solid ego we stop taking
things personally. We gain an enormous space for joyful development,
without the need to react to every negative emotion that comes by.
Enlightenment is the ultimate goal in Buddhism. All positive qualities
— especially joy, fearlessness, and compassion — are now fully
perfected. Here, our awareness is all-encompassing, and not limited in
any way. With no confusion or disturbance in our minds, we benefit
others spontaneously and effortlessly.
If you’re interested in getting to know more about Buddhism, you
can visit a Buddhist center near you, or continue reading about what it
means to be a Buddhist.
who was the buddha?
Buddhism started with the Buddha. The word ‘Buddha’ is a title, which means ‘one who is
awake’ — in the sense of having ‘woken up to reality’. The Buddha was born as
Siddhartha Gautama in Nepal around 2,500 years ago. He did not claim to be a god or a
prophet. He was a human being who became Enlightened, understanding life in the
deepest way possible.
Siddhartha was born into the royal family of a small kingdom on the Indian-Nepalese
border. According to the traditional story he had a privileged upbringing, but was jolted out
of his sheltered life on realising that life includes the harsh facts of old age, sickness,
and death.
This prompted him to puzzle over the meaning of life. Eventually he felt impelled to leave
his palace and follow the traditional Indian path of the wandering holy man, a seeker after
Truth. He became very adept at meditation under various teachers, and then took up
ascetic practices. This was based on the belief that one could free the spirit by denying the
flesh. He practised austerities so determinedly that he almost starved to death.
Buddhism at a glance
Standing Buddha in Bangkok,
Thailand.
Buddhism is a spiritual tradition that focuses on personal spiritual development and the
attainment of a deep insight into the true nature of life. There are 376 million followers
worldwide.
Buddhists seek to reach a state of nirvana, following the path of the Buddha, Siddhartha
Gautama, who went on a quest for Enlightenment around the sixth century BC.
There is no belief in a personal god. Buddhists believe that nothing is fixed or permanent
and that change is always possible. The path to Enlightenment is through the practice and
development of morality, meditation and wisdom.
Buddhists believe that life is both endless and subject to impermanence, suffering and
uncertainty. These states are called the tilakhana, or the three signs of existence. Existence
is endless because individuals are reincarnated over and over again, experiencing suffering
throughout many lives.
It is impermanent because no state, good or bad, lasts forever. Our mistaken belief that
things can last is a chief cause of suffering.
The history of Buddhism is the story of one man's spiritual journey to enlightenment, and
of the teachings and ways of living that developed from it.
The Buddha
Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha, was born into a royal family in present-day Nepal over
2500 years ago. He lived a life of privilege and luxury until one day he left the royal
enclosure and encountered for the first time, an old man, a sick man, and a corpse.
Disturbed by this he became a monk before adopting the harsh poverty of Indian
asceticism. Neither path satisfied him and he decided to pursue the ‘Middle Way’ - a life
without luxury but also without poverty.
Buddhists believe that one day, seated beneath the Bodhi tree (the tree of awakening),
Siddhartha became deeply absorbed in meditation and reflected on his experience of life
until he became enlightened.
By finding the path to enlightenment, Siddhartha was led from the pain of suffering and
rebirth towards the path of enlightenment and became known as the Buddha or 'awakened
one'.
Schools of Buddhism
There are numerous different schools or sects of Buddhism. The two largest are Theravada
Buddhism, which is most popular in Sri Lanka, Cambodia, Thailand, Laos and Burma
(Myanmar), and Mahayana Buddhism, which is strongest in Tibet, China, Taiwan, Japan,
Korea, and Mongolia.
The majority of Buddhist sects do not seek to proselytise (preach and convert), with the
notable exception of Nichiren Buddhism.
Key facts
The two main Buddhist sects are Theravada Buddhism and Mahayana Buddhism, but
there are many more
...Most Western and Japanese Buddhists come away believing in the permissibility of
abortion, while many other Buddhists believe abortion to be murder.
James Hughes
Buddhists believe that life should not be destroyed, but they regard causing death as
morally wrong only if the death is caused deliberately or by negligence.
Traditional Buddhism rejects abortion because it involves the deliberate destroying of a life.
Buddhism believes in rebirth and teaches that individual human life begins at conception.
The new being, bearing the karmic identity of a recently deceased individual, is therefore as
entitled to the same moral respect as an adult human being.
Damien Keown, Science and Theology News, April 2004
Modern Buddhists, however, are more divided about the morality of abortion.
It's personal
Buddhists are expected to take full personal responsibility for everything they do and for the
consequences that follow.
The decision to abort is therefore a highly personal one, and one that requires careful and
compassionate exploration of the ethical issues involved, and a willingness to carry the
burden of whatever happens as a result of the decision.
The ethical consequences of the decision will also depend on the motive and intention
behind the decision, and the level of mindfulness with which it was taken.
According to the teachings of Buddha, five conditions must be present to constitute an act
of killing.
When a baby is conceived, a living being is created and that satisfies the first condition.
Although Buddhists believe that beings live in a cycle of birth death and rebirth, they
regard the moment of conception as the beginning of the life of an embodied individual.
After a few weeks the woman becomes aware of its existence and that meets the second
condition.
When she seeks an abortion that meets the fourth condition of making an effort to kill.
Buddhists face a difficulty where an abortion is medically necessary to save the life of the
mother and so a life will be lost whether there is or isn't an abortion.
In such cases the moral status of an abortion will depend on the intentions of those carrying
it out.
If the decision is taken compassionately, and after long and careful thought then although
the action may be wrong the moral harm done will be reduced by the good intentions
involved.
There are cases where not having an abortion may result in the birth of a child with medical
conditions that cause it to suffer.
Traditional Buddhist thinking does not deal with these cases, but it has been argued by
some Buddhists that if the child would be so severely handicapped that it would undergo
great suffering, abortion is permissible.
Of course, abortion, from a Buddhist viewpoint, is an act of killing and is negative, generally
speaking. But it depends on the circumstances.
If the unborn child will be retarded or if the birth will create serious problems for the parent,
these are cases where there can be an exception. I think abortion should be approved or
disapproved according to each circumstance.
Dalai Lama, New York Times, 28/11/1993
Karma
While it's pretty obvious why abortion is considered to generate bad karma for the mother
and the abortionist it may not be so obvious why it generates bad karma for the foetus.
The foetus suffers bad karma because its soul is deprived of the opportunities that an
earthly existence would have given it to earn good karma, and is returned immediately to
the cycle of birth, death and rebirth. Thus abortion hinders its spiritual progress.
Japan
Japanese Buddhists have had to make significant efforts to reconcile abortion with their
religion, as abortion is common in Japan, and has been used as a form of birth control.
Some followers of Japanese Buddhism who have had an abortion make offerings to Jizo, the
god of lost travellers and children. They believe that Jizo will steward the child until it is
reborn in another incarnation.
They do this in a mizuko kuyō, a memorial service for aborted children that became popular
in the 1970s. (The service can also be used in cases of miscarriage or stillbirth.) The ritual
includes elements of folk religion and Shinto as well as Buddhism.
The writer William R. Lafleur has pointed out some difficulties with this tradition:
...within the Japanese Buddhist community the discussion of abortion is now limited largely
to criticisms of those temples and temple-like organizations which employ the notion of
'foetal retribution' to coerce the "parents" of an aborted foetus into performing rituals that
memorialize the foetus, remove its 'grudges,' and facilitate its rebirth or its Buddhahood.
Many Buddhists find repugnant such types of manipulation of parental guilt - especially
when expressed in the notion that a foetus in limbo will wreak vengeance (tatari) on
parents who neglect to memorialize it.
William R. Lafleur, Contestation and Consensus: the Morality of Abortion in Japan,
Philosophy East and West Vol. 40, 1990
Buddhism and capital punishment
Because Buddhism exists in many forms, under many organisations, there is no unified
Buddhist policy on capital punishment.
In terms of doctrine the death penalty is clearly inconsistent with Buddhist teaching.
Buddhists place great emphasis on non-violence and compassion for all life. The First
Precept requires individuals to abstain from injuring or killing any living creature.
The Buddha did not explicitly speak about capital punishment, but his teachings show no
sympathy for physical punishment, no matter how bad the crime.
An action, even if it brings benefit to oneself, cannot be considered a good action if it causes
physical and mental pain to another being.
The Buddha
If a person foolishly does me wrong, I will return to him the protection of my boundless
love. The more evil that comes from him, the more good will go from me.
The Buddha
Buddhism and punishment
Buddhism believes fundamentally in the cycle of birth and re-birth (Samsara) and teaches
that if capital punishment is administered it will have compromising effects on the souls of
both offender and the punisher in future incarnations.
inhumane treatment of an offender does not solve their misdeeds or those of humanity in
general - the best approach to an offender is reformatory rather than punitive
punishment should only be to the extent to which the offender needs to make amends,
and his rehabilitation into society should be of paramount importance
punishing an offender with excessive cruelty will injure not just the offender's mind, but
also the mind of the person doing the punishing
if the crime is particularly serious, the person may be banished from the community or
country
Buddhist countries and capital punishment
Despite these teachings several countries with substantial Buddhist populations retain the
death penalty, and some of them, for example Thailand, continue to use it.
Alarid and Wang (see below) suggest that this apparent paradox partly stems from the
difference between popular and monastic Buddhism. The majority of lay Buddhists in these
countries follow Buddhist practices and are entirely sincere in their commitment, but "the
genuine study of Buddhism, its rituals, and carryover to daily life is superficial for most
Buddhist followers."
Buddhists are not unanimous in their view of euthanasia, and the teachings of the Buddha
don't explicitly deal with it.
Most Buddhists (like almost everyone else) are against involuntary euthanasia. Their
position on voluntary euthanasia is less clear.
States of mind
The most common position is that voluntary euthanasia is wrong, because it demonstrates
that one's mind is in a bad state and that one has allowed physical suffering to cause
mental suffering.
Meditation and the proper use of pain killing drugs should enable a person to attain a state
where they are not in mental pain, and so no longer contemplate euthanasia or suicide.
Buddhists might also argue that helping to end someone's life is likely to put the helper into
a bad mental state, and this too should be avoided.
Avoiding harm
Buddhism places great stress on non-harm, and on avoiding the ending of life. The
reference is to life - any life - so the intentional ending of life seems against Buddhist
teaching and voluntary euthanasia should be forbidden. Certain codes of Buddhist monastic
law explicitly forbid it.
Lay-people do not have a code of Buddhist law, so the strongest that can be said of a lay
person who takes part in euthanasia is that they have made an error of judgement.
Karma
Buddhists regard death as a transition. The deceased person will be reborn to a new life,
whose quality will be the result of their karma.
This produces two problems. We don't know what the next life is going to be like. If the next
life is going to be even worse than the life that the sick person is presently enduring it
would clearly be wrong on a utilitarian basis to permit euthanasia, as that shortens the
present bad state of affairs in favour of an even worse one.
The second problem is that shortening life interferes with the working out of karma, and
alters the karmic balance resulting from the shortened life.
Euthanasia as suicide
The Buddha himself showed tolerance of suicide by monks in two cases. The Japanese
Buddhist tradition includes many stories of suicide by monks, and suicide was used as a
political weapon by Buddhist monks during the Vietnam war.
But these were monks, and that makes a difference. In Buddhism, the way life ends has a
profound impact on the way the new life will begin.
So a person's state of mind at the time of death is important - their thoughts should be
selfless and enlightened, free of anger, hate or fear.
This suggests that suicide (and so euthanasia) is only approved for people who have
achieved enlightenment and that the rest of us should avoid it.
Non-violence is at the heart of Buddhist thinking and behaviour. The first of the five
precepts that all Buddhists should follow is "Avoid killing, or harming any living thing."
Buddhism is essentially a peaceful tradition. Nothing in Buddhist scripture gives any support
to the use of violence as a way to resolve conflict.
In times of war
Give rise in yourself to the mind of compassion,
Helping living beings
Abandon the will to fight.
One of Buddha's sermons puts this very clearly with a powerful example that stresses the
need to love your enemy no matter how cruelly he treats you:
Even if thieves carve you limb from limb with a double-handed saw, if you make your mind
hostile you are not following my teaching.
Kamcupamasutta, Majjhima-Nikkaya I ~ 28-29
Figures like the Dalai Lama (who won the Nobel Peace Prize) demonstrate in word and deed
Buddhism's commitment to peace.
For Buddhist countries this poses the difficult dilemma of how to protect the rights and lives
of their citizens without breaking the principle of nonviolence.
A Vietnam veteran was overheard rebuking the Vietnamese Buddhist monk, Thich Nhat
Hanh, about his unswerving dedication to non-violence.
"You're a fool," said the veteran - "what if someone had wiped out all the Buddhists in the
world and you were the last one left. Would you not try to kill the person who was trying to
kill you, and in doing so save Buddhism?!"
Thich Nhat Hanh answered patiently "It would be better to let him kill me. If there is any
truth to Buddhism and the Dharma it will not disappear from the face of the earth, but will
reappear when seekers of truth are ready to rediscover it.
"In killing I would be betraying and abandoning the very teachings I would be seeking to
preserve. So it would be better to let him kill me and remain true to the spirit of the
Dharma."
In order to see this content you need to have both Javascriptenabled and Flash installed.
Visit BBC Webwise for full instructions
Buddhist monks have been leaders in developing various forms of martial arts. The Shaolin
Order is perhaps the best known of these, famed for their fighting prowess.
Martial arts would seem to be about as far from non-violence as you can get, but Buddhist
forms of martial arts have very strict rules about how violence can be used.
The Shaolin teaching forbids the monk from ever being the aggressor, and instructs him to
use only the minimum necessary defensive force. By becoming skilled in physical conflict
the monk has a better understanding of violence and is able to use sophisticated techniques
to avoid harm, ranging from simple parrying of clumsy blows to paralysing grips and
knockout blows in the face of extreme violence - but always using only the amount of force
needed to refuse the violence that is being offered to them.
Most martial arts traditions have strong spiritual and philosophical elements, and insist on a
responsible and minimalist attitude to violence.
But Buddhism, like the other great faiths, has not always lived up to its principles - there
are numerous examples of Buddhists engaging in violence and even war.
in the 14th century Buddhist fighters led the uprising that evicted the Mongols from China
in Japan, Buddhist monks trained Samurai warriors in meditation that made them better
fighters
In the twentieth century Japanese Zen masters wrote in support of Japan's wars of
aggression. For example, Sawaki Kodo (1880–1965) wrote this in 1942:
It is just to punish those who disturb the public order. Whether one kills or does not kill, the
precept forbidding killing [is preserved]. It is the precept forbidding killing that wields the
sword. It is the precept that throws the bomb.
Sawaki Kodo
In Sri Lanka the 20th century civil war between the mostly Buddhist Sinhalese majority and
the Hindu Tamil minority has cost 50,000 lives.
The positive
The doctrine of right livelihood teaches Buddhists to avoid any work connected with the
killing of animals
The doctrine of karma teaches that any wrong behaviour will have to be paid for in a
future life - so cruel acts to animals should be avoided
Buddhists treat the lives of human and non-human animals with equal respect
Buddhists see human and non-human animals as closely related:
a soul may be reborn either in a human body or in the body of a non-human animal
Buddhists believe that is wrong to hurt or kill animals, because all beings are afraid of injury
and death:
Buddhist behaviour towards and thinking about animals is not always positive.
The doctrine of karma implies that souls are reborn as animals because of past misdeeds.
Being reborn as an animal is a serious spiritual setback.
Because non-human animals can't engage in conscious acts of self-improvement they can't
improve their karmic status, and their souls must continue to be reborn as animals until
their bad karma is exhausted. Only when they are reborn as human beings can they resume
the quest for nirvana.
This bad karma, and the animal's inability to do much to improve it, led Buddhists in the
past to think that non-human animals were inferior to human beings and so were entitled to
fewer rights than human beings.
Early Buddhists (but not the Buddha himself) used the idea that animals were spiritually
inferior as a justification for the exploitation and mistreatment of animals.
Experimenting on animals
Buddhists say that this is morally wrong if the animal concerned might come to any harm.
However, Buddhists also acknowledge the value that animal experiments may have for
human health.
So perhaps a Buddhist approach to experiments on animals might require the experimenter
to:
Not all Buddhists are vegetarian and the Buddha does not seem to have issued an overall
prohibition on meat-eating. The Mahayana tradition was (and is) more strictly vegetarian
than other Buddhist traditions.
The early Buddhist monastic code banned monks from eating meat if the animal had been
killed specifically to feed them, but otherwise instructed them to eat anything they were
given.
Buddhist attitudes to contraception are based on the idea that it is wrong to kill for any
reason.
The most common Buddhist view on birth control is that contraception is acceptable if it
prevents conception, but that contraceptives that work by stopping the development of a
fertilised egg are wrong and should not be used.
Buddhists believe that life begins (or more technically: a consciousness arises) when the
egg is fertilised. That is why some birth control methods, such as the IUD, which act by
killing the fertilised egg and preventing implantation are unacceptable since they harm the
consciousness which has already become embodied.
Unlike some other religions, Buddhism is not strongly pro-family and does not regard having
children as a religious duty.
Although Buddha's teachings do not condemn non-reproductive sexual activity, they do
object to the pursuit of sensual desire, which suggests that Buddhists actively seeking
enlightenment should not use birth control in order to pursue sexual pleasure.
Top
There are no rules in Buddhism for or against organ donation, but central to Buddhism is a
wish to relieve suffering.
There may also be occasions when organ donation may be seen as an act of charity.
In Buddhism the decision for or against organ donation relies very much on an individual's
decision. People may decide for or against it, without one choice being seen as right, and
the other wrong.
The needs and wishes of a potential donor should not be compromised by the wish to save a
life.
The death process of an individual is viewed as very important, and a body should be
treated with respect. However, there are no beliefs that say the body should be preserved in
its entirety, so removing organs is not an issue from this point of view.
A dead body, however, should only be disturbed for appropriate reasons, and with special
care.
It is also important to consider the consciousness of the dead person, and whether this
might be adversely affected by organ donation, as the surgery takes place immediately after
the donor takes their last breath.
Some Buddhists, including those who are followers of Tibetan Buddhism, believe the
consciousness may stay in the body for some time after the breath has stopped.
Until the consciousness leaves the body it is important the body remains undisturbed, so
Tibetan Buddhists may have some concerns that an operation so soon after death may
damage their consciousness and cause harm to their future lives.
But others may decide this final act of generosity can only have positive ramifications.