Scribd
Upload
150 views1 page

(IELTSMaterial - Com) 100 IELTS Speaking Part 2 Topics in 2016 & 2017 & Sample Answers

The summary provides a band score of 4 for a candidate's assessment response. For task achievement, the candidate copied the question rubric and failed to compare data for adults. The description lacked detail and was too short. The data was described logically but no linking phrases were used. Lexical range was limited with repetitive verbs and errors. Grammatical errors were present throughout, including incorrect verb tense, agreement issues, and confusion of singular and plural forms. The overall grammatical range and phrasing was limited.

Uploaded by

Anh Phong
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
150 views1 page

(IELTSMaterial - Com) 100 IELTS Speaking Part 2 Topics in 2016 & 2017 & Sample Answers

The summary provides a band score of 4 for a candidate's assessment response. For task achievement, the candidate copied the question rubric and failed to compare data for adults. The description lacked detail and was too short. The data was described logically but no linking phrases were used. Lexical range was limited with repetitive verbs and errors. Grammatical errors were present throughout, including incorrect verb tense, agreement issues, and confusion of singular and plural forms. The overall grammatical range and phrasing was limited.

Uploaded by

Anh Phong
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

SAMPLE ANSWER – ASSESSMENT & BAND SCORE

The candidate has copied rather than paraphrased the question


rubric, making the introductory paragraph ineligible for assessment.
Although some minor comparison has been made between data for 4
TASK ACHIEVEMENT boys and girls, no attempt has been made to compare and contrast
the data relating to adults/men/women. The description contains
insufficient detail and is under-length by more than 30 words
resulting in a deduction of 1 band
The data is described in a ordered and logical way, however the
candidate has not used any cohesive or linking phrases in the
description. 5
COHERENCE & COHESION

Lexical range is very limited with repetitive use of certain verbs and
frequent errors in word choice. Little attempt has been made to use
comparative/contrastive expressions 4
LEXICAL RESOURCE

The candidate has used an incorrect verb tense throughout the


description. There is almost no control over accuracy and systematic
errors including verb agreement, confusion between singular/plural 4
GRAMMATICAL RANGE & forms, and confusion with verb use predominate throughout. Overall
ACCURACY grammatical range is very limited and phrasing is repetitive.

OVERALL BAND SCORE: 4

You might also like