CHPP Application Guidance Webamends1
CHPP Application Guidance Webamends1
Professional (ChPP)
Application Guidance
Helping you to understand, decide and prepare for
the Chartered Project Professional (ChPP) standard
Becoming a Chartered Project Professional (ChPP) will demonstrate
your commitment to professional standards, continued professional
development and ethical and professional conduct. It will provide
assurance for your employer and clients and help raise the profile
and value of project management as a professional practice.
This guidance will help you to decide when the time is right for
you to apply and will help you to prepare for an application now
or at a future date.
Sara Drake
Chief executive officer
Contents
Page 3 Introduction
Page 4 Why become chartered?
Page 4 Are you ready for chartered?
Page 6 The application process
Page 9 Helping you to prepare
Page 13 The interview
Page 15 Other things to note
Page 16 Appendix 1 – Professional practice
assessment criteria
Page 31 Appendix 2 – Technical knowledge
assessment criteria
Understand what being chartered means for you and the profession.
If you are successful, you will join the Register of Chartered Project Professionals.
The chartered standard has been designed to be accessible, yet rigorous with different
assessment routes according to qualifications, previous assessments and experience.
You have the required breadth of project experience to meet the requirements of ten
mandatory and two elective competences.
You have an advanced technical knowledge and are able to confidently evaluate and
analyse theory of current practices and methods.
a) having a proven track record delivering projects, programmes, portfolios or a key control
or enabling function; and
Technical knowledge
b) having up-to-date knowledge of current practices and methods; and
means: an advanced
c) being actively involved in the project management profession. technical knowledge and
understanding of how to
If the majority of evidence provided in your application is more than five years old, you can deliver projects, programmes
still apply, you will just need to explain how you continue to meet points b) and c) above. and portfolios. You could
think about this as the theory.
What is being assessed?
The application process is designed to assess the following areas, so consider whether you
can provide evidence of this now or if you need some more experience or learning first.
There is more detail later on in these guidance notes about the competences that support
these areas. You will need to show: Professional practice
means: being able to provide
Technical knowledge: advanced technical knowledge and understanding of how to evidence of applying the
deliver projects, programmes or portfolios taking into account many interacting factors technical knowledge (theory)
and different approaches that could be taken. to practice. You could think
about this as experience.
Professional practice: successful application of this knowledge to deliver projects,
programmes or portfolios that involved:
You will need to commit to professional ethics and show continuing professional
development (CPD). You will also need two proposers who support your application.
For the full details of competences that will be assessed, please see Appendices 1 and 2.
The next section tells you how to provide the evidence required.
There are three routes and the online application process will guide you through according to
whether you have a recognised assessment and what it covers.
Route 1: for those who have a recognised assessment for technical knowledge.
Route 2: for those who have a recognised assessment for technical knowledge and
professional practice.
Route 3: an experiential route for those who do not have a recognised assessment but do
meet the eligibility criteria.
The next step is where you The next step is where you
provide evidence of professional provide evidence of professional
practice. practice.
There are three steps to this part: There are three steps to this part:
You will be asked to declare You will be asked to upload You will be asked to declare
that you have kept up to your CPD log (12 months), your that you have kept up to
date through CPD, give your proposers’ details and pay the date through CPD, give your
proposers’ details and pay the application fee. proposers’ details and pay the
application fee. application fee.
Your application will be assessed at this stage, and if successful you will be invited to interview.
* It may be possible to arrange a Skype interview if you are unable to attend in person.
*Can’t see your assessment listed? Don’t worry, you can still apply
through the experiential route and provide evidence through the
written submission and interview.*
Checklist If needed:
Method of payment
If you are already registered on the APM website you will need to log in to begin. If you aren’t
already registered, it is quick and easy to do so. You will be asked to provide some basic
information to complete the registration process.
The form has help available as you go but if this doesn’t answer your question, you can contact
the APM Service Delivery team.
Personal information
You are asked to provide some basic personal information such as any professional memberships
and your employer (if applicable). We respect your information and will only use it in accordance
with data protection rules and our privacy policy; this is available on request and via the online
link when you register.
Recognised assessments
Select any recognised assessments from the drop-down list. This will determine the next steps If your most recent
of the application process. You will be directed automatically to the parts you need to fill in assessment is more than
next. If you don’t have a recognised assessment you will go to the written submission stage and five years old you will need
technical knowledge will be tested at interview. to provide a statement
showing how you have
Be ready to upload any relevant certificates.
kept up to date with current
The current list of recognised assessments can be found here: apm.org.uk/ practice and methods and
recognisedassessment. been actively involved in
the project management
If you have an assessment that covers both technical knowledge and professional
profession.
practice, you can skip the next section and go straight to the section on continuing
professional development.
You will be expected to write up to 500 words for each project overview.
You will need to have completed 35 hours of CPD in the 12 months up to your application and
CPD: Things you might confirm that you will maintain this every year. All CPD must meet the requirements of APM’s
want to consider could CPD scheme which can be found here: apm.org.uk/cpd.
include: work-based
learning; distance learning;
special work projects,
writing technical papers; CPD
mentoring; voluntary work; You will either have to upload your record or self-declare (see
association activities or section above on the application process)
committee work; promoting
project management to APM will do an annual audit of a sample of ChPP CPD records.
young people; seminar/
conference presentations; You can use the APM CPD log, but this is not mandatory provided you meet the necessary
any relevant course or requirements. This includes a statement on the areas you would like to develop further over
private study. the next 12 months.
Your proposers
You must provide contact details for two proposers who can support your application.
Proposers could be another project professional or your line manager but can’t be a family
member.
Your proposers should believe you are suitable for consideration for ChPP and be happy to
confirm this if contacted by APM.
You will also be asked if, subject to your application being successful, you would like your name
to be published on the APM website.
The interview is a mandatory part of the assessment process for all applicants. It is based on
the information you provide in your application and will validate and explore your responses.
See the earlier step-through of the application process on page 8 to check what your
interview will cover.
Interviews may be recorded for quality assurance purposes with the applicant’s permission.
The interviewers will make their judgements based solely on the information in your application
and your performance during the interview.
Interviewers are experienced assessors and understand the requirements and criteria for Keep a copy of your
ChPP. You will each be told one another’s name in advance of the interview to identify and application for your records
prevent any conflicts of interest. They won’t necessarily be matched to your market sector or and to review before the
area of expertise, but will give a very brief introduction of themselves for your benefit before interview stage. There is
the interview. an ‘export to PDF’ link on
each page of the online
For face-to-face interviews, an event coordinator is appointed by APM to ensure that
application form.
interviews run smoothly. They will meet you before your interview and be available to answer
any questions that you may have about the process.
Interview format
The interview will take the format of a discussion, designed to evaluate and assess your
level of professional competence. There are no trick questions and you should structure
your responses to questions using ‘I’ not ‘we’ or “the team”. The interviewers are seeking to
understand your evidence.
You are expected to provide detailed and specific answers about actual events relating to the
evidence in your application. You may also be asked to expand on some of your answers and,
particularly if you do not have a recognised assessment, highlight how processes or tasks might
have been done differently.
Unless your recognised assessment was for technical knowledge and professional practice, the
interview will focus on a selection of the competences, spending more time on some than on
others.
All applicants will have a mandatory question on ethics and the final few minutes of the
interview is your opportunity to talk about anything that you think is important to your
application that has not yet been mentioned.
If you do not have a recognised assessment your two-hour interview will include technical
questioning designed to assess your breadth of knowledge against the criteria.
Interviewers may take the opportunity to develop a particular issue or aspect of your written You can find the technical
application. This could take the form of an in-depth question-and-answer exchange of the knowledge assessment
project management principles involved to establish your theoretical understanding. criteria in Appendix 2.
If you are successful, you will receive a letter and a certificate from APM confirming
your achievement within eight weeks from the date of interview. Your name will be
included on the Register of Chartered Project Professionals.
Your name will be published on the APM website if you have given permission for us
to do so.
If your application is not successful, we will write to you and explain the reason for the
decision. You will be given feedback and guidance to help you to resubmit.
Special arrangements
Medical and mobility
Access to the facilities or arrangements described here can be granted to applicants with
disabilities/learning difficulties who apply to the APM Service Delivery team. A dispensation
may be allowed for applicants with a medical or physical condition that prevents them
from completing the assessment within the normal regulations.
Large print papers may be produced where required with prior arrangement with the
chartered team in the APM Service Delivery team.
For assistance with any of the above, or for any other requirements, please contact the
chartered team in the APM Service Delivery team at [email protected].
FAQs
For a list of frequently asked questions, please visit the APM website at: apm.org.uk/chpp.
1b Financial management You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the To meet the minimum four
following assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this
adopt a consistent approach to the investment instance, you could, for example,
appraisal of a programme or portfolio in line with provide examples from one of
organisational practice; the programmes or portfolios
within your project experience,
ensure a consistent approach to estimating is used
and explain how you ensured a
across the programme or portfolio;
consistent approach to estimating
establish control limits for the reporting and across the programme or portfolio,
approval of budget variances; established control limits for the
establish arrangements for the release of funds at reporting and approval of budget
appropriate stages in a programme or portfolio; variances, established financial
determine capital and revenue expenditure for a reporting milestones and reviews,
programme or portfolio ensuring alignment with and adjusted the financial plan
the organisation’s financial plan; based on the progress of a change
establish financial reporting milestones and initiative and associated financial
reviews for a programme or portfolio; reviews.
produce financial progress reports based on the
financial information related to a programme or
portfolio;
adjust a financial plan based on the progress of a
change initiative and associated financial reviews.
3 Conflict management You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the To meet the minimum four
following assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this
take a proactive approach to identify and address instance, you could, for example,
potential conflict situations which may impact on a provide examples from one of
project; the projects within your project
experience, and explain how
take an impartial approach to investigating the
you took a proactive approach
cause of conflict;
to identify and address potential
evaluate and implement conflict management conflict situations with may
measures including the role of colleagues and have impacted on your project,
specialists; evaluated and implemented
monitor the extent to which conflict management conflict management measures
measures are successful; including the role of colleagues
support others to resolve conflict; and specialists, supported others
respond appropriately and promptly to conflict to resolve conflict, and resolved
situations where intervention is required; conflict giving due respect to the
views, opinions and concerns of all
resolve conflict giving due respect to the views,
parties.
opinions and concerns of all parties.
5 Governance arrangements You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the To meet the minimum four
following assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this instance,
define reporting, decision-making hierarchies and you could, for example, provide
levels of authority for a project; examples from one of the projects
within your project experience, and
establish the relationship between a project’s
explain how you defined reporting,
governance and organisation’s governance
decision-making hierarchies
structures;
and levels of authority for the
design the project governance structure taking into project, designed the project
account context, complexity and potential impact; governance structure taking into
ensure clarity of ownership and levels of account context, complexity and
authority by agreeing the responsibilities and potential impact, ensured clarity of
accountabilities with relevant individuals; ownership and levels of authority
ensure effective reporting and decision making by agreeing the responsibilities
through maintained governance structures, and accountabilities with relevant
staffing and maintenance of approved reporting individuals, and ensured effective
and decision making. reporting and decision making
through
7 Reviews You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the To meet the minimum four
following assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this
consider factors which need to be evaluated instance, you could, for example,
during a review; provide examples from one of
the projects within your project
establish and implement a schedule of reviews
experience, and explain how you
incorporating key milestones during and after a
considered factors which needed
project;
to be evaluated during a review,
obtain appropriate information from valid sources obtained appropriate information
to inform the review; from valid sources to inform
maintain records of any deviations from plans to the review, communicated the
include reasons for and responses to the deviations; outcomes of reviews to relevant
communicate the outcomes of reviews to relevant stakeholders, and implemented
stakeholders; agreed actions and updated the
confirm stakeholder understanding and lessons learned log.
acceptance of proposed actions;
implement agreed actions and update the lessons
learned log.
9 Stakeholder and You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the To meet the minimum four
communications management following assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this
determine stakeholder interests, requirements and instance, you could, for example,
levels of influence for a project; provide examples from one of
the projects within your project
produce stakeholder management and
experience, and explain how
communication plans;
you determined stakeholder
monitor the effectiveness of stakeholder interests, requirements and
management and communication plans; levels of influence for a project,
adjust stakeholder management and monitored the effectiveness of
communication plans to respond to any changing stakeholder management and
needs of the project; communication plans, employed
employ relevant communication methods and relevant communication methods
media to meet stakeholder requirements and and media to meet stakeholder
expectations; requirements and expectations
disseminate clear, timely and relevant information and disseminated clear, timely
to stakeholders; and relevant information to
stakeholders.
obtain, and respond to, feedback from
stakeholders which may have an impact on a
project.
13 Business case You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the To meet the minimum four
following assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this instance,
determine the relevant factors which could you could, for example, provide
influence the development of a convincing examples from one of the projects
business case; within your project experience,
and explain how you supported
support a persuasive argument through effective
a persuasive argument through
analysis of relevant factors;
effective analysis of relevant
establish a benefits framework for a business case; factors, documented a business
document a business case in a relevant format; case in a relevant format, gained
gain initial and ongoing formal acceptance of a initial and ongoing formal
business case; acceptance of the business case,
monitor and refine a business case as and implemented a change
circumstances and factors change; control process and configuration
management system when
implement a change control process and
updating the business case.
configuration management system when updating
a business case.
15 Contract management You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the To meet the minimum four
following assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this
effectively monitor supplier performance against instance, you could, for example,
agreed contractual obligations; provide examples from one of
the projects within your project
ensure the organisation meets its contractual
experience, and explain how you
obligations through effective monitoring;
effectively monitored supplier
respond appropriately to ensure all parties comply performance against agreed
with the terms of a contract; contractual obligations, responded
manage contract variances promptly to resolve any appropriately to ensure all parties
contractual problems; complied with the terms of the
effectively manage supplier relationships; contract, effectively managed
effectively close a contract once all contractual supplier relationships, and
obligations have been met. effectively closed the contract
once all contractual obligations
had been met.
17 Independent assurance You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the To meet the minimum four
following assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this
effectively resource independent assurance instance, you could, for example,
activities; provide examples from one of
the projects within your project
agree the scope of and responsibilities for
experience, and explain how you
manageable independent assurance activities;
effectively resourced independent
prioritise independent assurance activities based assurance activities, agreed the
on a risk assessment of the projects; scope of and responsibilities
conduct independent assurance activities making for manageable independent
recommendations for corrective action where assurance activities, conducted
required; independent assurance activities
maintain effective two-way communication with all making recommendations for
stakeholders such that corrective action is reported corrective action where required,
and concerns are addressed promptly; and analysed patterns of change
provide effective advice, guidance and support to which could inform he future
the implementation of recommendations; performance of projects.
analyse patterns of change which could inform the
future performance of projects.
19 Quality management You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the To meet the minimum four
following assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this instance,
establish agreed quality indicators for the you could, for example, provide
processes and outputs of the project referring to examples from one of the projects
the business case; within your project experience,
and explain how you established
prepare the quality management plan for a project
agreed quality indicators for the
through liaison with relevant stakeholders and in
processes and outputs of the
accordance with the processes, culture and values
project referring to the business
of the organisation;
case, created a quality register
create a quality register for a project; for the project, managed the
manage the process of quality assurance for a process of quality control for the
project, to confirm the consistent application of the project to determine whether
procedures and standards defined in the quality success criteria had been met,
management plan; and actioned outcomes from the
manage the process of quality control for a project quality management process,
to determine whether success criteria are met; implementing the change control
capture lessons learned during a project to process where required.
contribute to continual improvement;
action outcomes from the quality management
process, implementing the change control process
where required.
21 Resource capacity planning You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the To meet the minimum four
following assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this
establish resource requirements for each project; instance, you could, for example,
provide examples from one of
determine where related projects have
the programmes or portfolios
dependencies and similar deadlines, taking
within your project experience,
account of the schedule for realisation of benefits;
and explain how you established
assess the total resource capacity for the duration resource requirements for
of all related projects; each project, assessed the
phase the related projects to fully optimise total resource capacity for the
resource usage taking account of opportunities for duration of all related projects,
shared infrastructures and/or procurement; built contingencies into relevant
build contingencies into relevant resource plans; resource plans, and prepared and
establish reporting requirements and schedules for delivered overall progress reports
relevant project managers; to relevant stakeholders.
inform the direction of project activities through
effective scheduling of phases, milestones and
review points;
prepare and deliver overall progress reports to
relevant stakeholders.
25 Transition management You need to demonstrate a minimum of four of the To meet the minimum four
following assessment criteria to show that you can: assessment criteria in this instance,
determine key staff required to support a transition you could, for example, provide
process; examples from one of the projects
within your project experience,
establish the logistic requirements to support a
and explain how you determined
transition process;
key staff required to support the
determine the knowledge transfer requirements transition process, established
for a transition process; the logistic requirements to
create a transition plan where priorities, potential support the transition process,
disruption and output ownership are key created a transition plan where
considerations; priorities, potential disruption
negotiate with stakeholders to gain agreement on and output ownership were key
the transition process plan; considerations, and negotiated
negotiate with stakeholders to gain agreement on with stakeholders to gain
staffing solutions, logistics and knowledge transfer agreement on staffing solutions,
requirements; logistics and knowledge transfer
requirements.
establish a benefit review process to monitor
benefits realisation which meets the requirements
of relevant stakeholders.
1b Financial management You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
critically evaluate methods for producing an to demonstrate evidence of
effective investment appraisal to a programme or your knowledge in response to
portfolio; questions from the assessor about
your understanding of project
evaluate the importance of differing levels of
management principles. For
financial accountability in a programme or portfolio;
example, for the first criterion, this
analyse sources and impact of estimation bias; could take the form of explaining
evaluate the importance of aligning the financial why a certain method was used
plan of a programme or portfolio to an overall over another, demonstrating
financial plan; critical evaluation of methods for
analyse the extent to which adjusting a financial producing an effective investment
plan would be beneficial to a programme or appraisal.
portfolio and the sources required to do this.
3 Conflict management You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
evaluate positive and negative conflict in the to demonstrate evidence of
context of a project; your knowledge in response to
questions from the assessor about
critically evaluate the causes of conflict;
your understanding of project
analyse ways in which to effectively manage management principles. For
conflict in the context of a project; example, for the first criterion, this
evaluate the extent to which conflict could be a could take the form of explaining
tool to improve performance; ways that you effectively managed
evaluate the methods and techniques which could conflict and why you chose those
be used to manage and resolve conflict including approaches over alternatives,
monitoring their effectiveness; demonstrating analysis of ways
evaluate the importance of objectivity and in which to effectively manage
impartiality when resolving conflict. conflict.
5 Governance arrangements You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
critically evaluate the concepts of hierarchies and to demonstrate evidence of
organisational structure in the context of a project; your knowledge in response to
questions from the assessor about
analyse types of organisational structure;
your understanding of project
evaluate the importance of establishing and management principles. For
maintaining timely reporting and decision-making example, for the first criterion, this
hierarchies for a project; could take the form of explaining
evaluate the importance of establishing the hierarchies and structures that
governance structures, roles and responsibilities you employed within your project
within a project; and why those were chosen
evaluate the importance of establishing clear levels over alternatives, demonstrating
of authority within a project. critical evaluation of the concepts
of hierarchies and organisational
structure in the context of a
project.
7 Reviews You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
critically evaluate the range of factors during to demonstrate evidence of
reviews, and how these vary through the stages of your knowledge in response to
a project; questions from the assessor about
your understanding of project
critically evaluate the importance of aligning
management principles. For
reviews with organisational, legal and regulatory
example, for the first criterion, this
requirements;
could take the form of explaining
evaluate the validity of various sources of the range of what you considered
information; during reviews, and how you
analyse situations, potential or real, where approached them across the
deviations to a plan may occur in the context of a different stages of the project,
project and how to determine suitable solutions; demonstrating critical evaluation
critically evaluate the importance of stakeholder of the range of factors during
engagement when implementing the outcomes of reviews, and how these vary
reviews; through the stages of a project.
analyse the importance of managing updates to
documentation impacted by reviews.
9 Stakeholder and You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
communications management critically evaluate the importance of stakeholder to demonstrate evidence of
management and communication in the context of your knowledge in response to
a project; questions from the assessor about
your understanding of project
critically analyse the methods to identify
management principles. For
stakeholders and analyse their interests,
example, for the first criterion, this
requirements and levels of influence;
could take the form of explaining
analyse ways in which to effectively engage with how you approached stakeholder
stakeholders; management and communication
evaluate methods and media used to communicate across the different stages of the
with stakeholders; project, including examples of
evaluate the importance of stakeholder feedback lessons learned from previous
in the context of a project. experiences and how you
incorporated these, recognising
the impact and importance of
them, demonstrating critical
evaluation of the importance of
stakeholder management and
communication in the context of a
project.
12 Benefits management You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
critically evaluate approaches to confirming and to demonstrate evidence of
categorising benefits against strategic objectives; your knowledge in response to
questions from the assessor about
critically evaluate approaches to establishing
your understanding of project
measures for benefits;
management principles. For
critically evaluate approaches to identifying and example, for the first criterion, this
recording dependencies between benefits; could take the form of explaining
evaluate the significance of a benefits management how you approached confirming
strategy and a benefits realisation plan; and categorising benefits against
analyse approaches to monitoring the progress of a strategic objectives, and why
benefits realisation. you chose these approaches
over alternatives, demonstrating
critical evaluation of approaches
to confirming and categorising
benefits against strategic
objectives.
14 Capability development You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
critically evaluate the importance of conducting a to demonstrate evidence of
skills analysis on individuals who will be deployed your knowledge in response to
on projects; questions from the assessor about
your understanding of project
evaluate the importance of an effective learning
management principles. For
and development strategy to the creation of a
example, for the first criterion,
competent workforce employed on projects;
this could take the form of
analyse approaches to implementing a learning explaining why conducting a
and development strategy; skills analysis was important
analyse tools and techniques which could be used and how it impacted your work,
to determine an organisation’s capability to support demonstrating critical evaluation
projects; of the importance of conducting a
evaluate the importance of applying relevant skills analysis on individuals who
competence models to an organisation; will be deployed on projects
critically evaluate approaches to monitoring and
evaluating organisational learning in relation to
project management.
16 Frameworks and You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
methodologies critically evaluate characteristics and limitations of to demonstrate evidence of
different frameworks and methodologies which your knowledge in response to
could be used for a project; questions from the assessor about
your understanding of project
evaluate approaches to tailoring frameworks and
management principles. For
methodologies;
example, for the first criterion,
critically evaluate the sources of information this could take the form of
which could inform the selection of an appropriate explaining frameworks and
framework and/or methodology; methodologies that you have used
analyse the benefits and costs of prescribing for a project, why these were
frameworks and methodologies to different chosen over alternatives, and what
aspects of projects. characteristics and limitations
you experienced, demonstrating
critical evaluation of characteristics
and limitations of different
frameworks and methodologies
which could be used for a project.
18 Procurement You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
critically evaluate the implication of different to demonstrate evidence of
procurement options; your knowledge in response to
questions from the assessor about
evaluate the function of procurement specifications
your understanding of project
in a project;
management principles. For
analyse approaches to identifying resources example, for the first criterion, this
required; could take the form of explaining
critically evaluate approaches to negotiate internal approaches that you have used
and external resource; for procurement, why these were
analyse approaches to selecting suppliers; chosen over alternatives, and
critically evaluate the nature and implications of how these impacted your work,
different forms of contract. demonstrating critical evaluation
of the implication of different
procurement options.
20 Requirements management You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
evaluate methods and approaches to investigate to demonstrate evidence of
and select different possible requirements; your knowledge in response to
questions from the assessor about
evaluate the importance of engaging with
your understanding of project
stakeholders to inform requirements and confirm
management principles. For
the outcomes of research;
example, for the first criterion, this
critically evaluate the role of negotiation in could take the form of explaining
confirming requirements; what methods and approaches
analyse the characteristics of well-specified you’ve used to investigate
requirements. and select different possible
requirements, and why these
were methods and approaches
were chosen over alternatives,
demonstrating evaluation of
methods and approaches to
investigate and select different
possible requirements.
22 Resource management You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
analyse different characteristics of resources; to demonstrate evidence of
your knowledge in response to
evaluate the role of assumptions in resource
questions from the assessor about
planning;
your understanding of project
analyse methods which could be used to manage management principles. For
resources used within a project; example, for the first criterion, this
critically evaluate the benefits to a project of could take the form of explaining
constantly monitoring and refining a resource different resources that you have
schedule; used in projects and how they
analyse the techniques to guide the choice, have varied, and how you have
capture and analysis of relevant data to effectively used them to meet different
monitor resources. needs, demonstrating analysis
of different characteristics of
resources.
24 Solutions development You need to show that you can: The interview is your opportunity
evaluate possible tools and techniques which to demonstrate evidence of
could be used to identify options to deliver the your knowledge in response to
requirements for a project; questions from the assessor about
your understanding of project
evaluate tools and techniques which could be
management principles. For
used to analyse and select options to deliver the
example, for the first criterion,
requirements for a change initiative;
this could take the form of
critically evaluate the importance of modelling, explaining how you used tools and
prototyping and testing; techniques to identify options,
evaluate the importance of monitoring and refining and why these were chosen
delivery requirements and options within a project. over alternatives, demonstrating
evaluation of possible tools and
techniques which could be used
to identify options to deliver the
requirements for a project.