Eliot Grinnell Mears - Modern Turkey 1908-1923 PDF

MESSRS. MACMILLAN & Co., LTD.
, will
be glad to receive a copy of the issue
containing a notice of this work.
The price of the book is..o!. .;t::::-net

Beball dC J oaiiiWJf'
Turkish Moslem Smoking a Nargileh-A Character Study.

MODERN TURKEY
A POLITICO-ECONOMIC INTERPRETATION, 1908-19~
INCLUSIVE, WITH SELECTED CHAPTERS BY
REPRESENTATIVE AUTHORITIES
BY
. ELIOT GRINNELL MEARS

M.B.A.. F.R.EcoN.S.
Lecturer in Economies, Lela.nd Stanford Junior University. Formerly
Ameriean Trade Commissioner at Athens and at Constantinople.
Economic Member, American Military Mission to
Armenia and Transcaucasia
.Bttu ltforl
THE MACMILLAN COMPANY
1924
0oPYBIGH'r, 19U,
BY ELIOT GRINNELL MEARS.
Set up and electrotyped.

Published December, 192,.
Priflted i11 the U11ited States of Ammro b,

1• ]. LITTLB AND IVBS C:OKPANY, NEW YOEK
FOREWORD
MARK LAMBERT BRISTOL, u. s. N.
The lack of frequent and reliable communications be-
tween Turkey and the United States of America has made
it difficult for either country really to know the other.·
Relatively few Americans visit Turkey, and even fewer
Turks cross the Atlantic. Histories, descriptions of
travel, and books describing the crimes and atrocities
committed in Turkey have been written, but these often
cause a strange misconception due to the absence at home
of any adequate knowledge of truthful conditions. In
the same way, it is not surprising that Turkish subjects
regard America as a "land flowing with milk and honey,"
where poverty, underfeeding, unemployment, and inter-
nal strife are unknown and where its peoples pause in
their mad chase for money only long enough to toss
about their easily acquired gains.
The author of this volume has realized, after months
of residence in Turkey as a government official, the neces-
sity for a book giving reliable and up-to-date practical
information regarding Turkey, especially of that Turkey
which was embraced within the boundaries as they existed
in 1914.
To accomplish this, he has been successful in securing
as collaborators for certain chapters persons who are
recognized as among the best informed and most qualified
to write upon the particular subjects. Like all writers,
they are human and give a personal touch, but at the same
time they have endeavored to be fair to their audience.
The subjects of the chapters have been so selected that
the knowledge contained therein should serve equally for
vii
viii FOREWORD
the statesman, the :financier, the merchant, the missionary,
the educator, and the student of affairs in general. The
economic and business experience of the author, Mr. Eliot
Grinnell Mears, together with his naturally observing and
analytical mind, have enabled him to plan and carry out
exactly the kind of book which is most needed now. Mr.
Mears, whom I knew well in Constantinople, has had an
exceptional opportunity to study Turkey in transition.
His prior residence in Greece (a country which was a
part of Turkey less than a century ago), his investiga-
tions in the Caucasus and Armenia as a member of the
Harbord Mission, and his position as commercial attache
to the American High Commissioner in Turkey with his
office in the American Embassy at Constantinople, have
given him a perspective and an insight into the situation
at first hand. ·
At this time when peace is being established in Turkey,
many changes are being made regarding nationalities
formed from the old Turkish Empire; the reconstruction
of the country must be carried forward. This volume
contains the information properly brought together for
those wlio are charged with or will be interested in the
future developments in the Near East. It is appalling
to know that a knowledge of the true situation has been
deliberately suppressed by sentiment and censorship, and
that the world in general has been led into accepting
specially prepared literature as fact. Few foreigners,
indeed, realize that in the Turkish Empire as it existed in
1914, the Arabs were as numerous as the Turks, that the
Armenians formed less than ten per cent of the total
population, and that the Arab and Kurdish Moham-
medans were hostile to the Turkish Mohammedans. Un-
less the foreign!'Jr, whatever his nationality, approaches
in a spirit of fair-minded studiousness the intricate over-
lapping questions of race, religion, and nationality in
their peculiar Oriental setting, he must fail to grasp the
FOREWORD ix
distinction between fiction and reality, between things as
he thinks they are and things as they ~eally are.
The efforts of Mr. Mears in this volume will be appre-
ciated by all readers. The book contains much that is
new and not to be found in any other published work.
The diversity of information and the convenient form
in which it is set forth make it very helpful for reference.
It is, moreover, unique, interesting, and comprehensive
-valuable to all students interested in the problems and
welfare of Turkey.
FOREWORD
By MARK LAMBERT BRISTOL, u.s. N.l
•Born in New Jersey, 1868. Graduate U. S. Naval Academy, 1889.
Designated as Captain, 1913; temporary Rear Admiral, 1918; Rear Admiral
1921. Sea duty in all parts of the worlll. In charge aeronautical develop·
ment of the Navy, 1913-16. Commander North CaroliM and Oklahoma.
1917-18. Commander U. S. Naval Base, Plymouth, England, 1918-19.
Member of International Armistice Commission in Belgium, November,
1918. Commanding U. S. Naval forces in Turkey, January-August, 1919.
Member, Interallied Commission of Inquiry into Greek occupation of Smyrna,
September-October, 1919. Appointed United States High Commissioner
to Turkey, August 12, 1919, and January 1, 1920, retaining duty as Com-
mander of U. S. Naval forces in Turkish waters. LL.D. Constantinople
Woman's College, 1921. Delegate of the U.S. Government at both Lausanne
Conferences, 1922-1923.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ICHAPTBB PAGB
I GENERAL INTRODUCTION, Eliot Grinnell Mears 1
II RACIAL CHARACTERISTICS, .Eliot Grinnell Mears • 31
III LEADING MINORITIES: THEIR ACHIEVEMENTS AND ASPI-
RATIONS • 60
ARMENIANS, Boghos Nubar Pasha 63
GREEKS, Adamantios Th. Polyzoides • 76
JEWS, Haim N ahoum • 86
IV RELIGIOus, Harvey Porter • 98
V EDucATION, Paul Monroe • 117
VI WoMEN, Mary Mills Patrick • 141
VII PUBLIC HEALTH, Walter Booth Adams, M.D•• • 155
VIII ARCHEOLOGY, Howard Crosby Butler • • 177
IX TRANSPORTATION AND CoMMUNICATION, Eliot Grinnell
Mears • 201
X LAND TENURE, Louis Steeg . . 238
XI IRRIGATION, Suleiman Sirri Bey . 265
XII AGRICULTURE, Edward Frederick Nickoley . 280
XIII FoRESTS, Eliot Grinnell Mears . 302
XIV MINEs, J emal Bey . 310
XV FoREIGN AND DoMESTIC COMMERCE, Eliot Grinnell Mears 328
XVI LEVANTINE CONCESSION-HUNTING, Eliot lliinnell Mears 354
XVII THE PUBLIC TREASURY, William Wilson Cumberland . • 384
XVIII GoVERNMENT, Gertrude Edgerton Knox • 411
XIX CAPITULATIONS, G. Bie Ravndal • 430
XX THill TURKISH PREss, Ahmed Emin Bey • • 448
XXI THill YOUNG TURK MOVEMENT, Saleh Kerameth Bey• 476
XXII INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, Albert Hutchinson Putney 491
XXIII ARMENIAN QUESTIONS, Eliot Grinnell Mears • • 517
XXIV THE ARAB QUESTIONS, Eliot Grinnell Mears • • 533
xiii
xiv TABLE OF CONTENTS
CJIAP'rBR PAGJI
XXV THE Knu.Ll:ST MoVEJU:NT, Eliot Grinnell Mears 552
APPENDIX I 577
" IT 578
" m 580
" IV 583
CHRoNOLOGY OF EyoT81 1908-1923 ~eLUSIVE 584
SELECT DOCUMENT 607
BooKS 6n
BIBLIOGRAPJUCA.L SoURCES 688
INDEX. 689
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Turkish Moslem Smoking a N argileh • Frontispiece
I'AOIHG PAOB
Turkish Patriots at Sivas, 1919 24
Anatolians, 1919 • 24
Student Group at Robert College • 58
Rumaili Hisar, the Site of Robert College • 86
Orthodox Dignitaries at the American University of Beirut • 112
Graduating Class at Constantinople, Woman's College, consisting
of Turks, Armenians, Greek, Israelites, and Bulgarians, together
with Professor Burns and Admiral Bristol • • 142
Headquarters of the Turkish Red Crescent • 142
The Hippodrome and the Mehemejeh (St. Sophia) Mosque • • 178
Land Walls of Stamboul • •· • 212
..
The Old and the New • 212
A Shepherd • • 254
Road in W estem Asia • • 286
Camel Train Laden with Tobacco • • 286
Arab as • 300
A Typical Hamal • 300
A Bazaar at Stamboul • • 330
The Railway Station at Haidar Pasha • • 370.
Irrigation Works at Konia 370
Silk Establishments at Brusa • • 396
Kurdish Travellers at a Khan • • 414
Angora, the Turkish Capital • • 414
Interior Views of Dolma Baghcheh Palace • • 440
Turkish Butcher Shop • • 472
A Shopping Street in Anatolia • 472
The Oulu Mosque of Brusa. • 510
Turkish Soldiers Preparing for their Greek Offensive • 554
The President's Mansion in the Angora Suburbs • • 554
President Mustafa Kemal and his Influential Attractive Wife,
Latifeh Hanum • 574
LIST OF liAPS
The Ottoman Empire at Its Supremacy • • • • . Faeiftg fHJ!Je 8

Turkish Highways of Trade and Communiea-
tion • • • • • • • • • • • • BetiiJeert pages 204--205
Physieal Features in Prewar Turkey • • • BetiiJeert pages 238-239
Tentative Mandates for Arab Lands, 1923 • Ftleifl!/ page 550
Abortive Treaty of Sevres, 1920 • • • • • • Faciwg page 631
Treaty of Lausanne; Present Turkey Aeeording to
Treaty of l.ausanne, 1923 • • • • • • • FIICirtg fHJ!Je 660
MODERN TURKEY
MODERN TURKEY
CHAPTER I
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
By ELIOT GRINNELL MEARS I
Before I finish writing of the confused memories I have of the com-

mencement of my life I wish to speak of another ray of sunshine-&
sad ray this time-that has left an ineffaceable impression upon me,
and the meaning of which will never be clear to me. ·
Upon a Sunday, after we had returned from church, the ray appeared
to me. It came through a half-open window and fell into the stairwa,Y,
and as it lengthened itself upon the whiteness of the wall it took on a
peculiar, weird shape.
Y~rs p~ssed.; I becam~ a ~an, ~nd ~fter havi~g be;n a~ong ·many
people and experienced many adventures I lived for an autumn and
winter in an isolated house in an unfrequented part of Stamboul. It
was there that every evening at approximately the same hour, a ray
of sunshine came in through the window and fell obliquely on the wall
and lit up the niche (hollowed out of the stone wall) in which I had
placed an Athenian vase. And I never saw that ray of sunlight without
thinking of the one I had seen upon that Sunday of long ago; nor
without having the same, precisely the same sad emotion, scarcely
diminished by time, and always full of the same mystery.
-PIERRE Lo'l'I, "Story of a Child.''
"Modern Turkey" is interpreted by the author to com-

mence in July, 1908, when the terrible power of the
1 Born in Worcester, Massachusetts. A.B., Harvard College; M.B.A.,
Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration. Secretary and in-
structor, Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, 1912-1916.
United States Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Commerce, 1916-1920, in
capacity of chief, trade commissioner division; chief, commercial attach6
division; American trade commissioner in the Near East; acting chief,
European division. Member, American Military Mission to Armenia and
Transcaucasia. Commercial attach6 to American High Commissioner in
Turkey. Director-at-large, American Chamber of Commerce for the Levant.
Permanent aecretary, Pan-Pacific Commercial Conference. Lecturer and
acting professor in eeonomica, Stanford University, since 1920.
1
2 MOD~~ Tl"RKEY
Ottoman Sultans was broken, when the palace spy system
was o•erthrown, when the pernicious influences of the
Imperial Harem were destroyed, when Moslems and non-
Moslems faced the future with joy and hope. The fol-
lowing decade and a half, the period co>ered in this
volume, was full of unlooked-for momentous events, of
which the most important were the ltalo-Turkish War
(1911-1912), the two Balkan wars (1912-1913), the World
War (1914-1918), subsequent wars in Asia Minor notably
between the Kemalists and the Greeks, the birth of the
Nationalist llo•ement (1919), and the establishment of
a Turkish Republic (1923) under the all-powerful govern-
ment of the Grand National Assembly at Angora, which
chose as the first Turkish President, His Excellency
Ghazi Mustafa Kemal Pasha. In no way can the reader
follow more clearly the internal and external events which
affected Turkey during the years 1908-1923, inclusive,
than by a ·frequent reference to the Chronology of Ennts
which appears at the end of the volume. In an effort to
forget even the recent past, the leade!S of the Turkish
Republic ha•e tabooed the word" Ottoman." "The Otto-
man Empire is dead," they cry, "Long li>e Turkey!" 1
The purpose of this volume, "Modern Turkey'', is
(1) to set forth the contemporary problems in as simple
a fashion as possible, and (2) to give that kind of a ~r
specti>e on the conflicting factors underlying the politico-
economic life of Turkey which may serre to reveal both
their relati•e values and their interrelation. Num~rous
writers dealing with the Levant ha>e been propagandists
" The name "Turk" is BUpposed to originate from "Tnrku" {helmet),
uaed. to designate a hill in Kan-Buh, a northwestern proTince of China not;
far from the eity of Shan-Tau, the home of the nomadie aneeston of the
Turk&. The name Tu-Kine is first mentioned by the Chinese in reeording
the re'("olt; of these people from the Jyen-Jyen in A.D.. 5!5.
In the Turkish Janguage there is no word equivalent to "Turkey." The
Young Turks ha'("e made e:fforts to popularize the Levantine form "Tnrkia."
Formerly the offieial title of the Empire was the "Exalted State" although
lhd Arabie term for the '' 0ttom&Jl Landa'' was frequently uaed..
GENERAL INTRODUCTION 3
and stylists, who have devoted their efforts in the presen-
tation of such well known subjects as ByzantinEt history,
race, origin and development, religions of Asia, war op-
erations, atrocities, harems, dogs, mosques, and eeme"'
teries. They have been informative intermediaries in
helping to explain the East to the West. It is true that
many of these writers have allowed their passions or en-
thusiasm to keep them from presenting sober, thoughtful
judgments of subjects of their particular interest, esp~
cially in the failure to give a sense of proportion ~nd
balance. Naturally the specialist cannot treat his spe-
cialty adequately and at the same time present within
the book covers adequate supplementary data. The same
observation applies to the stylist; while as to the avowed
propagandist it may be asserted with perfect fairness
that he adopts in addition the tactics of diverting atten-
tion to extraneous or relatively unimportant topics, of
interfering with a 'reader's perspective through the use
of illogical comparisons, or of making the subject un-
necessarily complex.
For both writer and reader to attain that simplicity
which alone can bring out an understanding of Turkey's
problems, fairness of spirit and honesty of intellect are
prerequisite. These latter characteristics, however, are
rare on the part of either natives or foreigners. It is
too much to expect that any racial groups in Turkey can
divorce their human, pent-up feelings and their fervid
beliefs. Few foreigners in Turkey or elsewhere can
maintain a real disinterestedness. While no one wishes
to be considered "faultily faultless, icily regular, splen-
didly null," there are millions of people in the world, of
whom the Americans and Englishmen are leading types,
who have achieved a well deserved reputation for fair
play. This book is intended for these and other persons
who are interested in the truth and are willing to reach
conclusions only after both sides of each question have
4 MODERN TURKEY
been presented. Thereafter, if the reader asserts that
Christians are better than Moslems, he should give rea-
sons. If he states that Turks or Turks only are "un-
speakable,'' he should submit evidence. If he should
refrain from making a distinction, applying to the pa-st,
between the typical Ottoman official and the Anatolian
peasant, he should justify his stand. If, in sifting the
evidence, he accepts all that is evil and shuns all that is
good, his mental and moral attitude is plainly deficient.
It is most important to remember that in Turkey as else-
where there are Christians and ''Christians,'' Jews and
"Jews," Moslems and "Moslems." That brilliant orator
Edmund Burke, in his plea for a conciliation between the
Mother Country and the American Colonies, admitted
his inability to indict a whole people. No one yet has
been successful in accomplishing such a feat.
The present need for "Modern Turkey" can be traced
to two distinct causes;. namely (1) Turkey's problems
almost without exception are international as well as
national, and (2) an unsatisfactory world knowledge and
understanding of existing affairs. Of the many reasons
why what we should normally regard as a country's
domestic affairs take on world importance are the fol-
lowing: the presence and ill treatment of active minori-
ties, geographical position, undeveloped natural re-
sources, and a religious and historical interest in the
lands which have produced Christianity, Judaism, and
Moha~medanism.
Referring again to propaganda, with censorship an
ally, there is a spreading of plain misrepresentation and
also a lack of adequate information. Dr. Cyrus Hamlin,
the first president of Robert College, in his illuminating
book, "Among the Turks" (1878), wrote of the organiza-
tion of a propaganda bureau in London which had for
its object the foreign dissemination of all news prejudicial
to the Turks. He s~ated that the onslaught o~ this one-
sided and unreliable information about any people would,
after a period of years, stir up a hostility and hatred that
could not be easily overcome. He added, "Whenever I
pick up a paper of eastern news I pray, 'Oh Lord, endow
me with a suitable sense of unbelief.' '' The effect of the
continuous stream of misinformation has come to such a
point that most people are more than ordinarily unwilling
to believe what does not accord with their personal views.
It may be recalled that Mr. Walter Lippmann in "Public
Opinion" tells the interesting story, that when General
Joffre was being photographed it was thought necessary
for the purpose to tack up several maps on the wall The
unwillingness of the portrait taker in this simple incident
to make a likeness of the great French general in the
true atmosphere illustrates, in a minute degree, the diffi-
culties involved in portraying Eastern happenings in
their real light.
The plan followed in "Modem Turkey" has been to
select subjects of far-reaching importance and then as-
sign the writing of certain of them to representative au-
thorities. Without exception, the writers have been in
Turkey and most of them have lived there. A unique
feature is the number of Turks who have contributed will-
ingly to a book of this character: furthermore, their chap-
ters were the first ones received and in each case without
even a suggestion of financial compensation. None of the
contributors placed any restrictions upon the author re-
garding manuscript changes or time of publication.
Because of great distances and the need for condensation,
the author, as editor, has taken many liberties for which
he stands ready to express his apologies to both readers
and contributors. Publication was deemed inadvisable
during the turmoil of 1920-1922: hence the contributed
articles, all of which with the exception of Government
6 MOD~~ TrnKEY
were written in 1920, are provided with a special intro-

duction designed to proYide subsequent information and
to promote inter-chapter unity.
The General Introduction (Chapter I) gives a brief
digest of (1) information not discussed elsewhere and (2)
information of a general basic character. The Foreword,
written by a distinguished American political and naval
officer who has occupied a most difficult position with
great credit to himself and his country, gi>es in a word
the merits of the book. The Chronology of Events, Se-
lect Documents, Appendices, Bibliography, and maps are
timely and serviceable for purposes of reference.
Among the many persons to whom the author owes a
debt of gratitude in thepreparationof"Modern Turkey"
are past and present members of the American High
Commission to Turkey, especially Rear Admiral Bristol,
Consul General RaYHdal, and Financial Attache Cumber-
land; members of the American Military Mission to
Armenia and Transcaucasia, notably Major General J.
G. Harbord, Brigadier General F. R. McCoy, and Col
Lawrence Martin; Ahmed Emin Bey; Fuad Kiamil Bey,
Turkish Director General of Industcy; Osman Bey, for-
mer Ottoman Under-Secretary for Foreign Affairs; Hali-
deh Edib Ranum; Ali Haydar Midhat Bey; Prof. G. H.
Huntington; Rev. E. C. Moore; Rev. G. E. White; Sir
Adam Block; Mr. S. Bilinski; M. Kerestejian; Dr. J. A.
Robertson; Prof. W. L. W estermanri; and Sir W. M.
Ramsay. For permission to reproduce in abstract form
an article on Religions taken from "Reconstruction in
Turkey," the author is indebted to Prof. W. H. Hall of
the American University of Beirut. For help in procur-
ing, translating or assisting on manuscript, much credit
is due to Miss Gertrude E. Knox, :Miss Mary C. Lambros,
Mrs. H. A. Davidson, Prof. Richard Jones, and Fazil
Niazi Bey. The staff of the Stanford University Library,
in particular Miss Nina Almond, Miss Alice M. Hays,
and Miss Minna Stillman, has been helpful. Acknowledg-
ment is made of the distinct usefulness of the resources
of the Hoover War Library of Stanford University, with
a collection of source materials relating to the World
War unequaled in America and rivaled only in the two
great European collections at Paris and at London. In
no instance, it should be added, has the author capitalized
his official or professional connections for the disclosure
of secret information.
This book, therefore, in its purpose, scope, and needs
stresses the politico-economic factors of the Turkey of
1908-1923, inclusive. Difficulties that arise in spanning
even these few years are many, since boundaries, peoples,
and governments are continually changing. The author
has taken the Near East to include the lands of the Otto-
man Empire in 1914 plus the Balkan States, the Middle
East to include Moslem Asia south of the present Turkish
Asiatic boundary, the Levant to include the present
European and Asiatic Turkey plus the Middle East, Asia
Minor or Anatolia to include the Asiatic provinces of the
Republic, Iraq to be synonymous with upper and lower
Mesopotamia (although the historical Persian Iraq,
"Iraq-i-Ajami," is larger than "Iraq-Arabi"), Syria to
exclude Palestine, the geographic boundaries to follow
the "Statesman's Yearbook" and the map in this book,
and the "war" to mean always the World War (19~4-
1918) unless otherwise stated.
II
At the height of its power, the Ottoman Empire owed
its commanding position to the martial qualities of the
hardy and fearless invaders and to the strong character
of the early Sultans. ''For ten generations,'' wrote Lord
Eversley in "The Turkish Empire," "the Othman fam-
ily produced 1Ilen capable of leadin~ their ~nnies in th~
6 MODERN TURKEY
were written in 1920, are provided with a special intro-
duction designed to provide subsequent information and
to promote inter-chapter unity.
The General Introduction (Chapter I) gives a brief
digest of (1) information not discussed elsewhere and (2)
information of a general basic character. The Foreword,
written by a distinguished American political and naval
officer who has occupied a most difficult position with
great credit to himself and his country, gives in a word
the merits of the book. The Chronology of Events, Se-
lect Documents, Appendices, Bibliography, and maps are
timely and serviceable for purposes of reference.
Among the many persons to whom the author owes a
debt of gratitude in thepreparationof''Modern Turkey''
are past and present members of the American High
Commission to Turkey, especially Rear Admiral Bristol,
Consul General Ravndal, and Financial Attache Cumber-
land; members of the American Military Mission to
Armenia and Transcaucasia, notably Major General J.
G. Harbord, Brigadier General F. R. McCoy, and Col.
Lawrence Martin; Ahmed Emin Bey; Fuad Kiamil Bey,
Turkish Director General of Industcy; Osman Bey, for-
mer Ottoman Under-Secretary for Foreign Affairs; Hali-
deh Edib Ranum; Ali Haydar Midhat Bey; Prof. G. H.
Huntington; Rev. E. C. Moore; Rev. G. E. White; Sir
Adam Block; Mr. S. Bilinski; M. Kerestejian; Dr. J. A.
Robertson; Prof. W. L. W estermanri; and Sir W. M.
Ramsay. For permission to reproduce in abstract form
an article on Religions taken from ''Reconstruction in
Turkey," the author is indebted to Prof. W. H. Hall of
the American University of Beirut. For help in procur-
ing, translating or assisting on manuscript, much credit
is due to Miss Gertrude E. Knox, Miss Mary C. Lambros,
Mrs. H. A. Davidson, Prof. Richard Jones, and Fazil
Niazi Bey. The staff of the Stanford University Library,
in particular Miss Nina Almond, Miss Alice M. Hays,
and Miss Minna Stillman, has been helpful. Acknowledg-
ment is made of the distinct usefulness of the resources
of the Hoover War Library of Stanford University, with
a collection of source materials relating to the World
War unequaled in America and rivaled only in the two
great European collections at Paris and at London. In
no instance, it should be added, has the author capitalized
his official or professional connections for the disclosure
of secret information.
This book, therefore, in its purpose, scope, and needs
stresses the politico-economic factors of the Turkey of
1908-1923, inclusive. Difficulties that arise in spanning
even these few years are many, since boundaries, peoples,
and governments are continually changing. The author
has taken the Near East to include the lands of the Otto-
man Empire in 1914 plus the Balkan States, the Middle
East to include Moslem Asia south of the present Turkish
Asiatic boundary, the Levant to include the present
European and Asiatic Turkey plus the Middle East, Asia
Minor or Anatolia to include the Asiatic provinces of the
Republic, Iraq to be synonymous with upper and lower
Mesopotamia {although the historical Persian Iraq,
"Iraq-i-Ajami," is larger than "Iraq-Arabi"), Syria to
exclude Palestine, the geographic boundaries to follow
the "Statesman's Yearbook" and the map in this book,
and the "war" to mean always the World War (19~4-
1918) unless otherwise stated.
II
At the height of its power, the Ottoman Empire owed
its commanding position to the martial qualities of the
hardy and fearless invaders and to the strong character
of the early Sultans. "For ten generations," wrote Lord
Eversley in "The Turkish Empire," "the Othman fam-
ily produced men capable of leadin~ their ~rmies in the ·
8 MODERN TURKEY
field to victory, and almost equally remarkable as admin-
istrators and statesmen. This succession of a single fam-
ily, father and son, for ten generations without a break,
culminating in the greatest of them, Suleiman the Mag-
nificent, is quite without precedent or example in history.
The Othman family were pure Turks in their origin. But
the Turkish blood was very soon diluted. The mothers of
future Sultans were either captives taken by corsairs or
slaves bought on account of their beauty."
Chief among the causes for the decline of the Ottoman
Empire may be reckoned the degeneracy of the later
Sultans and the unhealthy harem influences. In the ac-
customed sense, the Sultan did not marry. The female
members of the harem were slaves, therefore there were
no Turkish women among them for no Turk can be slave.
Four inmates, after bearing a child to the PadisJtah,
might be accorded the title of Kadin, or full wives: and
the mother of the first child was called Bash Kadin Ef-
fendi, or chief wife. The Sultan's mother, the V aJideh
Sultan, has occupied a special position in the harem above
that of any of his wives. No pure Turkish aristocracy
was possible since the ruler's mother was never a Turk.
This mixture of races may have had nothing to do with
the deterioration of the reigning house, but certain it is
that the Sultans of the past few hundred years, who suc-
ceeded the early able sovereigns, have been with rare
exception weak, profligate, and tyrannical, giving them-
selves over more largely to the pleasures of the harem
than to the performance of du~y. Along with the Sultan,
the harems themselves have been run by favorites and
cliques who instigated corruption and intrigue in every
branch of private and public life.
A second reason for the Ottoman decline has been the
lack of any large benefits conferred by the descendants
of the conquering Turks, who have ruled by the sword.
Little thought has been given to the building of public
Ada)lted from London Graphic,
'rhe Ottoman Empire at its Supremacy.
roads, the establishment of sChools, or the improvement
of urban and rural life. Wherever the Ottoman Govern-
ment has had an opportunity to exercise authority, decay,
destruction and desolation have resulted. The main con-
tributions of the nomad Turks to Western civilization
have been a religion which is Arabic rather than Turkish,
and an exemplary military prowess.· The British and
Arabs in the late Great War have testified repeatedly to
the clean fighting and bravery of Turkish soldiers, who
respected every truce, but whose record as captors \Vas
far less to be admired.
In most ways the Turks have been imitative. Their
language, literature, art, and costumes nave been bor-
rowed mostly from the East but now increasingly from
the West. They have failed to respond to the progress
of world civilization. Despite the fact that the fall of
Constantinople is generally regarded as the close of the
Middle Ages, the spirit of the Middle Ages has remained
with Turkey to this day.
Thirdly, Turkey has decayed because few Turks re-
main. Anatolia has a sparse population with a consider-
able majority of females. The young men have suffered
heavily through war and disease. Knowing Turks have
told me that the most serious feature of the Turkish State
was the deficiency of Moslems capable of maintaining
their government or of helping develop the rich resources
of Turkey through the natural agencies of agriculture
and commerce. The writer has been informed upon good
authority that of the 3,800 Moslems living in Mersivan
who responded to the first call to arms in the Great War,
only six returned within a few weeks after the armistice.
A fourth reason for Turkey's decline was the lack of
intellectual stimulus. The educational facilities available
to Turkish children were grossly inadequate. The vast
majority of the population of Anatolia is unable to read
or write. Practically the only foreign books at all widely
10 YODERS~
read are modern French novels. The rigorous censorship

maintained by Sultan Abdul Hamid poisoned the peoples'
minds and thoughts. For example, the Sultan forba~e
the words '':Macedonia'' or ''Armenia'' to be spoken pub-
licly or to appear in any printed matter circulating
through the Empire. A Scotchman, who had ordered an
English geography, diS<'.overed that the customs officials
had ripped out all pages mentioning the name Armenia.
The inability of the helpless population in Turkey to
become educated proved a serious handicap to the mainte-
nanc.e of the Empire.
Lastly, the a~sence of family life cannot be overlooked.
The husband and wife lived in separate rooms known as
the selamlik and the harem. Each member maintained a
degree of privacy under which there exists no mutual
helpfulness of companionship. The children were
brought up in the harem where they led an idle, uninspir-
ing existence in an atmosphere whieh was decidedly un-
wholesome. The children lacked the guidance of the
father who was usually somewhat better educated than
the mother and who also enjoyed greater contact with
the outside world. An educated Turk, referring to the
education of young Moslem children, said, "I do not be-
lieve in your religion nor do I think much of mine, but
your religion allows your girls and women to be trained
in family life. They become intelligent, and their influ-
ence upon the children is good. Ours are left to run about
the harem, to hear all the base talk of women and ser-
vants." The hopes for a rejuvenated Turkey rest largely
upon the training and guidance of the coming generations.
To know or understand the Turkey of the present as
well as of the past, a person must be sensitive to the sharp,
yet inexplicable contrasts between the Orient and the
Occident. In its essence Turkey is the Orient, the home
of races and cultures leading back into the midst of pre-
historic times whence many traditions and every day
customs can be traced until they become lost. Familiar-
. ity with classical, medireval, and modern history is an
essential. "There is nothing in our private and public
life," said Sir Mark Sykes, "which is not directly or in-
directly influenced by some human movement that took
place in this zone." Leaving out of all account the tem-
porary influence of large parts of Europe in the sixteenth
century and disregarding the tenure of Egypt and of
Northern Africa, at the outbreak of the World War the
Turkish Empire controlled Mesopotamia, the cradle land
of early Biblical history and of civilizations which had
left their impress on earliest western culture; it con-
trolled Syria and Palestine, the birthplace of two great
religions and one of the most important centers of Hellen-
istic civilization; it controlled the land called Armenia in
the north and large parts of Arabia in the south both of
which have had their share in building the foundations
of western civilization; and finally, it included Anatolia,
commonly known as Asia Minor, the largest contributor
of all to our own culture and institutions. These "trial
grounds'' of European religious beliefs, of western demo-
cratic social institutions, and of those principles of art
which have had the greatest influence upon western taste
have been for nearly five hundred years. in the possession
of a race which came out of central Asia and has had
little interest in or respect for the relics of those earlier
civilizations which were the direct antecedents of western
culture. Thousands of years have made relatively little
mutation in these venerated lands. Were the Great
Christian Teacher to return to the Holy Land and make
his dwelling there, the configuration of land and sea as
well as the crude agricultural tools would be familiar
sights. Likewise Cyrus, Alexander the .Great, Constan-
tine, and Khalif Harun-al-Rashid would observe surpris-
ingly little change. The passing of time has brought
about a certain amount of imitation and adaptation but
12 MODER...'i TrnKEY
the geographic environment has changed little. The sur-
roundings are those of the East.
In an Oriental land there is bred an atmosphere of
fatalism, of intrigue, of suspicion, of personal motiv-es
especially on the part of foreigners, and of a desire to
please. "What counts is not what an Oriental says but
·what he thinks; but what he thinks is generally not com-
municated. An amusing incident occurred during the
World War which involved a friend of mine, a·young lady
who was travelling through central Europe in 1916 en
route to Constantinople. She was detained at one of the
frontiers by a German customs officer who asked her her
name, her destination, and her purpose in travelling at
that particular time. She stated that she was on her way
to Constantinople where she had been engaged to teach
psychology in one of the American schools. The German
was dumbfounded. "Teach psychology to the Turks!"
She responded in the affirmative. Thereupon amid a roar
of laughter from his listeners, the officer granted the
desired vise, ejaculating, "Any one who could teach psy-
chology t~ the Turks should certainly be encouraged-
we gave up the attempt long ago." Fatalism is a trait
which is associated with most Orientals. · Certainly it
applies with great force to Mohammedans, yet persons
living in the Levant even for a few weeks cannot escape
its influence. "In Islam, the doctrines of prtH>rdination,
or fore-knowledge, of fatalism have taken away or at
least lessened the desire for knowledge and the thirst for
inquiry." In order to attain her position among nations
and perhaps indeed in order to liv-e, Turkey has reached
out for western ideas which have become irregularly
grafted on an Oriental state and people. Thus two forces
meet. Turkey cannot accept the new order without dis-
carding much of the old. The eventual working ou! of
mixed cultures, civilizations, and ideals presents a most
interesting study.
Turkey is primarily an agricultural and pastoral coun-
try. Among her famous products are figs, raisins,
oranges, tobacco, opium, cotton, silk, rugs, mohair and
wool. Her Angora goats and her Arab horses are highly
prized. Among the many experts who have surveyed at
first hand the economic possibilities of the country, not
one has a dissenting opinion relative to the potential
agricultural wealth. They testify unanimously to the rich
possibilities in the production of many articles, notably
tobacco, cotton, and fruits.and vegetables of nearly every
description. Minerals, which have been justly famous
since antiquity, are still being worked on a limited scale.
There remain unworked valuable deposits of copper, lead,
silver, gold, coal, emery, meerschaum, and petroleum.
In this age of foreign commercial exploitation it is not
surprising that outside peoples have shown a neverend-
ing desire to explore the hidden wealth of the land.
By virtue of geographical location, the Ottoman Em-
pire could not well escape western influences. Her lands
have served as the leading means of communication
between the East and the West. Their strategic, political
and economic importance has been notable. ''The impor-
tance and value of Asiatic Turkey," wrote Mr. J. Ellis
Barker in 1917, "can scarcely be exaggerated, for it
occupies undoubtedly the most important strategic posi-
tion in the world. It forms the nucleus and center of the
Old World. It separates, and at the same time connects,
Europe, Asia, and Africa, three continents which are in-
habited by approximately nine-tenths of the human race."
In a eulogy of Constantinople, Commander D. G. Hogarth
has stated, "No other site in the world enjoys equal ad-
vantages, nor perhaps ever will enjoy them ••• a dry,
sloping site, a superb harbor, and admirable outer r_9ad-
stead, easy local communication by way of the Bosporus
and inexhaustible water supply, and it is easy to agree
that those who founded Chalcedon, but left Byzantium
14 MODERN TURKEY
to others, were indeed blind.'' Careful writers, including
;Rear Admiral A. T. Mahan, U.S.N., have testified to the
great strategic importance of Constantinople and of
western Asia.
Indeed, it is hard to avoid exaggerating the surpassing
site of Constantinople. Prof. Archibald Cary Coolidge
wrote in 1917 ("Claimants to Constantinople"), that
"Never in all its history save perhaps when it fell into
the hands of the Turks in 1453, has the fate of Constanti-
nople meant more to the world than it does in the present
struggle.'' In 1922, another American historian, Dr.
A. L. P. Dennis, wrote in the Independent that "In 1914,
the chief, real cause of the World War was the struggle
for control at Constantinople." Without pretending that
this was more than one of the primary war aims, the
author has a due appreciation of the tremendous diplo-
matic moves which revolve about the City on the G9lden
Horn. It is possible that another war might bring about
an entirely different alignment of powers, and the center
of action. might be far removed from Constantinople and
the Straits. It is too early to know whether the peace
terms signed at Lausanne, but not yet ratified, shall stand
the test of many years. Their binding force depends
upon the solution of Turkish foreign and internal prob-
lems, which are set forth briefly in sections III and IV
of this General Introduction.
III
The international relations of Turkey have taken on
vast importance within the past five hundred years, espe-
cially since the Tre~ty of Kuchuk Kainarji in 1774, ex-
actly 150 years ago, when the Ottoman Empire lost its
status as a virtual independent state, and Russia was
established as a Black Sea power. It was the resulting
weakness which made Turkey the cock-pit of foreign
GENERAL lNTRODUC'l'lON 15
intrigue. "The Eastern Question," wrote Viscount
James Bryce in the Contemporary Review, January,
1920, "has been for a century or more the standing diffi-
culty of European diplomacy. It would have been settled
many years ago but for the jealousies of Russia, France,
Britain, and latterly, of Germany also, each of which had
what it deemed to be its special interests, interests which,
in some points at least, we can now see to have been mis-
conceived. It was probably a mistake of Britain to reject
the overtures made by the Czar Nicholas I., so far back
as 1852, for the Crimean war might have been avoided
and a settlement reached better even for Britain, and
certainly better for the Eastern Christians and the pe_ace
of the world, than that which was reached after that war,
in the treaty of 1855. The war is now generally admitted
to have been a mistake. It prolonged the miseries of the
subject populations, and became a cause of the Russo-
Turkish war of 1876-8, and of the Balkan wars of 1912
and 1913.'' The admittance of the Empire to the ''society
of nations" in 1856, the overthrow of the Sultan's
despotic rule, and the postwar revival are described in
Chapters XVIII-XXV, inclusive, supplemented by the
Select Documents and the Chronology of Events.
Turkey's foreign policies relate primarily to her rela-
tions with (1) Russia, (2) Western nations, (3) Balkan
states, (4) Mohammedan lands, (5) minority population.
Russia still is the paramount factor in the determina-
tion of Turkey's own stand in international affairs. This
fact is constantly glossed over; but without an apprecia-
tion of it, no one can attain any true measure of under-
standing. The question of the ''preservation'' of Turkey,
whether she was more useful as a "weak" or "strong"
power, has engaged the continual attention of European
statesmen. Napoleon I strove for French control over
Constantinople, declaring that "Constantinople was in
itself worth half an empire.'' Russian foreign policies,
16 MODElL.~ TI:RKEY
directed southward largely, have never o¥erlooked the
Eu.xine and the Straits. As early as 1808, according to
Cau.laincou.rt's report, the Russian Tsar stated to the
French .Ambassador: uconstanti.nople est u.n point im-
portant, trop loin de vous et que -vou.s regardez peut-etre
comme trop imporlaJJt pour nous. J'ai uJJe idee pour
que cela ne fasse pas de difjietdtes, faisons-en une espece
de ville libre. ,,
On the common assumption that Ottoman rule in
Europe was to end with the termination of the World
War, in 1917lli. J. Ellis Barker ("The Great Problems
of British Statesmanship") wrote that "t4.e only country
with a clear claim is Russia;" while in the same year,
Prof. Archibald Cary Coolidge said: ''The Russian claims
to Constantinople are numerous and weighty. They are
both sentimental and practical, they are based on his-
torical traditions, on the national sentiment and aspira-
tions of the Russian people and on geographical, political,
and economic reasons of ever growing importance. • • •
For the Russian people every Turkish war has been a
crusade. To sum np then: from almost every point of
view, the c.ontrol, that is to say the possession, of these
passages is of transcendent importance to Russia, and
this her allies have realized, and have promised that if
they are victorious she shall receive it.''
On the other hand, Turkey has stood in incessant fear
of the Muscovite giant. The war exCllSe made by her
rulers in 1914, that Russian ships were bombarding Turk-
ish ports (see Select Document 1), found a ready accept-
ance among the populace. No surprise was felt that
Tsarist Russia demanded and was p:romised Constanti-
nople as her price for entering the war (see Select Docu-
ments). And when the Russian revolutions o¥erturned
the existing order, no c.ountry was more affected thereby
than Turkey. In fact, these epoch-making events of 1917
were responsible exceedingly for Allied changes in for-
eign policies; for, with a disorganized Russia, affairs in
Persia, Afghanistan, India, and Turkey entered a new
phase with more clearly defined colonial and semi-colonial
spheres of influence. How this paper structure was shat-
tered by the Eastern revolt under the inspiration of
Turkish nationalist military and diplomatic successes, is
told in this book. At the same time, we have had the
recent spectacle of Turkey's sensational re~overy as-
sisted greatly by the Allied fear· of some kind of a
Russo-Turkish military alliance, by the Russian grants
of moral and material support during the Turko-Greek
military conflict, and by the presence of Russian repre-
sentatives at the Lausanne conferences. Without the
collapse of Tsarist Russia, and without Allied-Soviet
Russian mutual hostility, the Kemalist Movement in any
form doubtless would have been a mere bagatelle.
When the Soviet leader, 1\I. Trotzky', was asked in
December, 1922, about the "sentimental motives" of the
Russo-Turkish alliance (consult Select Document 27),
Mr. Arthur Ransome reports him to say: "Let me make
a correction. It was not an alliance, but an agreement
as to sentiments. These were natural sentiments of
mutual sympathy between two countries threatened with
destruction and slavery. Our enemies describe our
friendship as endangering European civilization, etc."
The inspired Izvestiia of Moscow has commented on
how the Bolshevists were "let down" by the Turkish
Nationalists at Lausanne, and how unlikely it is that the
seeds of a "world revolution" can be sown in Turkish
soil. While the threat of an aggressive Russo-Turkish
alliance is no longer regarded seriously by the Great
Powers, an overshadowing Russia looms as large as ever
in Turkish diplomacy.
Turkey occupies a sensitive position also because Rus-
sia is the historic Western outpost of Eastern civiliza-
tion. With her forty million Mohammedan subjects, with
18 MODERN TURKEY
her domains extending over huge stretches of both
Europe and Asia, Russia has many interests to conserve.
Furthermore, India with her over six hundred native
kings and chiefs are bound to Great Britain by treaty
agreements which are scrupulously observed on both
sides. To disturb this status quo would interfere greatly
with the peace of the world.1
Turkey's relations with Western Powers, a vast and
intricate subject, receives attention in Friedrich Nau-
mann's "Central Europe" (1916), from which the fol-
lowing suggestive passage is taken: "As things are
today the Russian and German economic systems supple-
ment each other wonderfully well. By a system of corn
storage we can protect our agriculture from a glut in
the supply, and for the rest we can make Russia the chief
source of our food-stuffs and raw material, so far as the
character of the country and the stage of development
over there admit of it. Our capital will then quicken
the further progress of Russian agriculture and the very
promising increase in mining, trade and industry. Looked
at purely from an economic standpoint the arrangement
is the most productive of all for us if it is permanent in
s Lord Curzon of Kedleston, in a published address before the Philoso-
phical Institute of Edinburgh, 1909, said: "If India were to remind us
that in the British system she is the sole and veritable Empire, the preten-
sion could not be denied. • • • Consider in the first place what a part India
has played in the shaping of British policy and the expansion of the British
dominion.. It has been the determining in1luence in every considerable
movement of British power to the east and south of the Mediterranean.
The Eastern question of the Middle Ages was merely the :reeol"e:ry of the
Holy Places from infidel hands. But once we had planted ourseh-es in
India, the Eastern question, though it revolved round Constantinople, was
in :reality directed by considerations of the security of our Indian p~s
sions. But for India, Lord Beaconsfield would not have bought the shares
in the Suez Canal; and but for the Suez Canal, we lihould not now be in
Egypt. The historic ril"alry and struggles with Russia for nearly a century
sprang from the supposed necessity of keeping her far away from the
frontiers of India. Had it not been for India, we should nel"er have seized
the Cape or begun that career of South .African expansion that has lately
entered upon so remarkable and pregnant a phase.''
character-but only if I But this is impossible so long as
we are the opponents of Russia in Turkey, in the Balkans
and in the Slav districts of Austria-Hungary. Herein
lies the insurmountable obstacle placed by history. In
such a case we barter our independent political future
for a temporarily great economic advantage, for through
this alliance our prosperity will indeed develop but so
also will Russia's strength, until finally Russia will shake
us off, because she no longer needs us."
The political problems of European Turkey are con-
cerned mainly with the contiguous countries of Bulgaria
and Greece. The failure of the Allies to accord Bulgaria
an outlet to the Aegean Sea, in contravention of the
Treaty of N euilly, is an open sore. The much-sought
city of Adrianople remains in Turkish hands ; moreover
the Karagach sector, another vital strategic center, has
Turkish sovereignty with adjoining Bulgarian and Greek
outposts. The special interest taken by France in the
Balkan States, Poland, and Russia may help to keep alive
the disorders in southeastern Europe.
With respect to the Moslem countries of western and
central Asia (for example, consult the Treaty with
Afghanistan), the Kemalist State was regarded as the
natural leader and spokesman. Perhaps the sensational
action of the Grand National Assembly in overthrowing
the sultanate and in taking over certain prerogatives of
the khalifate may result in radical changes in the Islamic
world; but the prestige of the Turkish Nationalists is a
mighty force to have and to hold. The ex-Sultan of
Turkey, who asserts that he has not abdicated, is resting
in Europe. While it is whispered that the Aga Khan,
the Emir of Afghanistan, or the Sultan of Morocco is
being groomed as the Padishah, a more likely choice
would appear to be a member of the tribe of Khoreish
whose representatives are widely-posted at Mecca, Am-
20 MODERN TURKEY
man, Mosul, and Baghdad. The Arabs, however, are
interested in a political rather than a spiritual union-
hence any agreement among them or for them has only
a bare chance of success. The present khalif (who, inci-
dentally, was reported in an interview in the London
Morning Post, September 16, 1921, to say, "if England
had expended in Turkey a small part of the efforts she
concentrated on Russia she could have had Turkey as
an unflinching Ally during and after the Great War") is
in a fortuitous position because he was the popular choice
of the Angora Assembly and was the Heir-Apparent to
the former Turkish throne. 1
The past plight of the Ottoman minorities has been
the main reason for the intervention of outside powers in
Turkish affairs. As one of the leading negotiators at
Lausanne has written in a personal letter: "The Turks
started out in the beginning resolved to have independ-
ence and sovereignty with no foreign interference in
their internal affairs, and no capitulations, while at the
same time doing everything they could to rout the for-
eigners out of Turkey. They looked upon the minorities
simply as tools of the foreign nations and therefore
wished to get rid of the Christian races.'' The ~e
diate test for the future comes when the Allied and Asso-
ciated Powers consider the treaties and s-pecial agree-
ments signed by their representatives at Lausanne.
In resume, a remarkably clear and succinct statement
• With the decree of the Angora Assembly, March, 1924, in forcing the
flight of their elected khalif-a series of events too late to be recorded in
the main text of this volume--there is the unprecedented spectacle of
residence in Christian Europe of this ex-Khalif Abdul Mejid Effendi, and
also his predecessor, Mohammed VI, the last khalif-sultan, who claims that
he has never abdicated. Truly the proud House of Osman is in exile I The
leaders of the Turkish Republic have good reason to fear possible intrigues
towards the restoration of the monarchy.
It is too early to analyze the silent forces behind this latest. and in
some respects, most sensational drama in the Islamic world. Still it must
not be forgotten, that the influence of the khojas (priests) far transcends
in importance that of the chosen claimant to the title of Commander of
the Faithful
by Major General Lord Edward Gleichen appeared in the
Asiatic Review, January, 1923:
Turkey has to be given frontiers inside which to
develop her new national consciousness; she must be
helped by unselfish European advisers and encouraged
to trade with the world, yet without being exploited by
one nationality more than another; she must be led to
treat her Christian minorities with consideration, as
long as they behave themselves and do not intrigue
agaim;t her; she must lay down a system of justice
which will be acceptable to all nationalities; and she
must allow passage to trading vessels-at all events
in peace time-through her Straits.
IV
Leading internal problems are those related to popula-
tion, economic reforms, the location of the national capi-
tal, the republican form of government, and the national-
istic movement.
There remain in Turkey less than three hundred
thousand Armenians, and a similar number of Greeks,
both confined almost wholly to Constantinople and its
European suburbs. The foreign element, always con-
centrated in a few cities, is smaller than in the prebellum
days. In fact, various pretexts are being employed by
the Turks to make living more difficult than before for
minorities and foreigners. The Arab population in Tur-
key, segregated in a few towns along the southern border,
may continue to cause local disturbances. The Kurdish
problem on account of the diminished size of Turkey has
come forward as one of the most perplexing State
questions.
The relations between Kurds and Turks have never
been friendly. The Turks have never been able to con-
trol these warlike, uncivilized people who have been,
22 MODERN TURKEY
moreover, the greatest persecutors of their Armenian
neighbors. These Kurds, upon whom religion weighs
lightly, are regarded as somewhat less friendly to the
Arabs than to the Turks, and by preference have sent
their representatives to the Angora Assembly. Rouf
Bey, the late Turkish Premier, protested openly against
the interference of other nations in Turko-Kurdish af-
fairs-for example, the unsuccessful attempt made by
the British authorities in Iraq during 1922 to establish a
Kurdish government at Sulaimaniya. The unruly Kurds
wish as much absolute independence as possible, an ideal
more possible of attainment under an Oriental than Occi-
dental regime. The shifting of the Turkish capital to the
interior of Asia Minor has meant a closer study of these
Moslem people. Turkey has cast off the Arab burden
but has assumed, apparently with entire willingness, the
not less difficult Kurdish load. In the Times (December
28, 1923), Premier Ismet Pasha is reported to have said
that "The Kurds are included in the term 'Moslem ma-
jorities'.of the National Pact. Turks and Kurds consti-
tute one nation. The populations of both are taken into
consideration as one element. It has been so in the past
Mosul negotiations and will be so always.''
Mosul, in the heart of the Kurdish country, has a
local economic importance not less . than that of Aleppo
to Syria. The corn crop of Mosul and Erbil provides
sustenance for a wide area extending nearly to Lakes
Urumia and Van. The mountains situated above Mosul
form a defensible military barrier that has not been
pierced, some historians say, since Xenophon and his ten
thousand marched from Mosul to Trebizond (Trap-
ezium). The strategic position of this region threatening
the security of lower Iraq and the mammoth oil pools,
together make this region a bone of contention between
the Turks, the Iraq Arabs and their supporters the Brit-
ish. The British and the Turks agree to settle the dis-
position of this disputed area within nine months after
the Treaty of Lausanne is ratified. Thus, upper Iraq,
a predominantly Kurdish region, is being made the basis
of international bargaining. .
The racial characteristics of the varied peoples is de-
scribed in Chapter II. The subject of literacy is treated
in the chapter on Education. There is no more serious
factor than the prevalence of disease, discussed to some
extent in the chapter on Public Health. Practically no
writers have paid much attention to the stationary popu-
lation of Turkey; yet, although reliable statistics are
nowhere available, it can be stated with a fair degree of
assurance, that despite the number of large families, not
over four out of ten offspring born to the :Moslem Turks,
Arabs, or Kurds survive childhood. The non-Moslems,
(Armenians, Greeks, and Jews) have enjoyed a small,
annual increase in their population which can be attrib-
uted more to health precautions than to fecundity. Some
students claim that, strangely enough, polygamy (which
is rare among the better educated Turks, although com-
mon among the peasants) does not result in large fami-
lies. There are no reliable figures to tell us whether the
Turkish :Moslems, taken by themselves, are not steadily
losing ground; but surely, it is safe to state that an in-
creased population, so vital to the prosperity of Asia
Minor, cannot come about unless the Turks apply modern
methods of hygiene and sanitation or are able to bring
about a large foreign immigration. The most momentous
problem of Turkey, as of every country, is concerned
with the number, virility, and capacity of her population.
Closely associated with the population question has
been the millet form of organization whereby the racial
minqrities in Turkey have had a semi-independent polit-
ical status on the basis of religion. The Greek patriarch
at Constantinople, for example, has been regarded by
Ottoman Greeks as their leader in political, in social, as
well as in spiritual matters. The New Turks have been
successful apparently in removing church dignitaries of
24 MODERN TURKEY
the minorities from non-religious activities. (Refer to
Chapter III.)
Inseparably connected with the millet system was the
capitulatory regime under which foreign nationals have
enjoyed a more privileged position in the Ottoman Em-
pire, even as they have in China and formerly had in
Japan. The foreigner has believed that it was imp9ssible
to reside or to do business in Turkey unless special safe-
guards were accorded him. (Consult the chapter on
Capitulations.) After a period of four centuries and a
half, the Americans, British, French, Italians and all
others have been obliged to relinquish entirely their
rights of extraterritoriality. In a word, the New Turkey
agrees to accord foreigners the same rights in Turkey as
Turkish nationals enjoy in reciprocating countries. Ad-
mitted to "the society of nations" in 1856 but with cer-
tain reservations, Turkey has now attained an equal
political position with the leading world powers. She ·is
the first Moslem country to achieve this goal.
Every effort is being made by the new Turkish rulers
to get away from the foreign, unwholesome atmosphere
of diplomatic Constantinople. A sage of long ago has
well said, "Perturbabamtur Constamtinopolitami innum-
era.bilibus sollicitudinibus.'' There is no certainty that
the Turkish capital at Angora may not be sometime
transferred to Brusa, Sivas, Konia, Adrianople, or Con-
stantinople. But Kemal and his group must be given
credit for displaying a high degree of patriotism and
self-denial in establishing themselves at Angora, a primi-
tive, hilly, muddy town of the interior. 1 Not only was
1 A graphic picture of recent conditions at Angora appeared in the Times
(December 28, 1923) from its special correspondent at the Turkish capi~al.
He reported that ''Even the most chauvinistic Turks admit the drawbacks
of living in a capital where half a dozen flickering electric lights represent
the public lighting of the town; where running water is almost unknown
in the houses; where a donkey or a horse is as often as not tethered to the
railings of the little house which serves as the Foreign Office; where open
drains run down the middle of the streets i where the modern fine arts are
Harbord Mission
'l'urkish Patriots at Sivas, 1919. Mustafa Kemal is Seated in the Center,
HarbonJ Ni81WA
Anatolians.
that city visited by a severe conflagrationafewyearsago,
but little has been done· to improve living conditions since
that.date. Angora, called by the ancient Greeks Ancyra,
"the Anchor," famous for the military exploits of Tam-
erlane (Timur the Lame), has now become the scene of
non-military events of great significance. In the choice
of the capital, Mustafa Kemal has given the closest
attention to strategic location in order to place the Turks
in a strong defensive military position and away from
European diplomacy. This new departure causes dis-
satisfaction both. among many Turks who prefer the
''flesh-pots'' of Constantinople and among practically all
foreign diplomatic and consular officers. The residents
of Constantinople complain regarding the prejudicial
acts of the leaders at Angora. There is much heated dis-
cussion regarding the merits of Angora versus Constanti-
nople as the more desirable capital.
The change in the form of government is described in
a special chapter. The sultanate is now a memory. In
·the Republic, the governmental functions are vested in
the Assembly at Angora, a single house which elects the
President of Turkey. The Assembly elects the Khalif
from the House of Osman but he has no temporal author-
ity. This new situation does not harmonize with the
Islamic ideal, but it is in conformity with the modern idea
to make a definite separation between Church and State.
As usual, Turkey lacks experienced administrators and
technical experts. The future of the Assembly, as well
as that of Turkey, depends io a marked degree upon the
confined to the manufacture and consumption of bad raki and the playing
outside the Assembly each day for half an hour by a very moderate band
of such masterpieces liB "Tarara-Boomdehay" and "After the Ball II
Over"; where galoshes are more needed and used than razors; where the
House of Parliament is no larger than many a public school cricket pavilion;
where, in short, there is an almost perverse absence of every amenity and
the presence of almost every conceivable disadvantage which could possibly
hamper the rulers of a backward country which has to make up not only
for the ravages of war but also for the neglect and stagnation of centuries."
26 MODERN TURKEY
wisdom shown in distinguishing between assistance from
outsiders and tolerance of foreigners. Sixty years ago
Japan had a pronounced antipathy towards other
peoples; but her citizens applied themselves to the study
of foreign methods and have freely employed foreign
advisers. This broad-gauged policy has been largely
responsible for the remarkable d.avelopment of Nippon.
Can Turkey profit by this example!
Economic, rather than foreign or military questions
are engaging the chief attention of the Angora Assembly.
Ways and means are being studied to improve the con-
dition of the agriculturalist. The Government has
arranged for the importation of American farm equip-
ment and machinery and is planning agricultural exposi-
tions. To date nothing has been accomplished in de-
creasing the hardships of onerous taxation, but Prime
Minister Ismet announces that this matter is being care-
fully considered in the budget of 1924-1925. The granting
of the Chester and other concessions is clear evidence of
the desire of the new rulers to modernize Turkey. Rail-
ways, port and harbor works, and mineral exploitation
are among the new enterprises that have found favor.
At the close of the year 1923, there are few evidences
that reconstruction has begun in earnest. The lack of
needed funds and governmental reorganization are the
prime reasons. Former flourishing enterprises in which
foreign control has been strongly exercised have been
depressed or shut down. For example, French interests
in Cilicia have suffered through the closing of banks,
mines, textile works, and schools; the tobacco regie may
be suppressed at any time. The Angora authorities are
confiscating the Galata Bridge tolls, pledged under the
Constantinople loan of 1909 to British creditors. The
"red tape" necessary to secure passports is interfering
greatly with the tobacco and other businesses. The re-
vival of the native needle handicrafts, so carefully nur-
tured by American missionaries and Near East ReJ.ief
workers, has been seriously threatened by the emigration
of the skilled workers. How unfortunate if an advanced
industrialism should wipe out these artistic and charac-
teristic products! Changes from a war to a peaoo State
machinery, however, are slow. A most impressive
demonstration of what the Turks can do has been their
speedy and effective cleaning out of the "dives" in the
"Christian" quarters of Pera and Galata across the
Golden Horn from unchanging old Stamboul.
A most happy augury was the Economic Congress at
Smyrna (February, 1923), a landmark in Turkish his-
tory, attended by several hundred delegates including the
national political leaders. At this meeting, Kemal Pasha
made a stirring address in which was sounded the k~y
note that Turkish prosperity had moved in cycles accord-
ing to her relative economic situation. A reproduction
of the "Economic Pact" (which, according to the Agence
d'Anatolie, is to appear hereafter in all hooks published
in Turkey) in an abbreviated form, is translated as
follows:
(1) In the limits of its frontiers, Turkey enjoying
complete independence constitutes an element of peace
and progress in the world.
(2) The Turkish people, having obtained their
national sovereignty at the price of their blood, will
no longer suffer the least sacrifice in this respect. They
will give their support always to the Assembly and to
the Government which have for its foundation the
popular sovereignty.
( 3) The Turkish people are not factors of de-
struction.
( 4) The people are trying to produce, as far as
possible, articles for their consumption.
( 5) From the point of view of natural resources
and wealth, the Turkish people are conscious that they
possess golden treasures.
(6) Theft, lying, hypocrisy, laziness-these are our
28 MODERN TURKEY
deadly enemies.· A solid faith, free from all fanaticism,
is the fundamental principle of our life. We shall
adhere always to useful innovations.
(7) The Turk is the hearty friend of enlightenment
and of the sciences.
(8) Our ideal is to insure the increase of our popu-
lation (decimated by wars and privations of all sorts)
and to safeguard our health.
. (9) The Turk is always the friend of people who
are not against his religion, his life, and his institu-
tions. He is not the adversary of foreign capital. But
in his country he entertains no relations with organiza-
tions incompatible with his laws and language. He
draws from the springs of science and the arts every-
where. He repudiates every intermediary in his
relations.
(10) The Turk loves to work freely and does not
want any monopoly in business.
(11) In his consideration of class and profession,
the Turk sympathizes with his compatriots.
(12) The Turkish woman and the Turkish school-
master mould the children in accordance with the pre-
cepts of the Economic Pact.
The establishment of law and order throughout the
land would do more than anything else to give foreigners
a feeling of confidence in the New Turkey. To bring this
about requires thoughtful, progressive action by the gov-
ernment and the development of qualities of personal
initiative in the individual Turk. The condition of abso-
lute safety and freedom from all disorder is not to be
expected either in the East or the West, but it is desirable
that living conditions be made attractive as well as fairly
safe. Contrary to the opinion expressed by a majority
of writers, the policing of the country is not a difficult
matter. The Turkish peasant wishes to be let alone and
is troubled only when aggravated by public officials.
Even brigandage is a much less important occupation
than in many other countries. Foreign capital will flow
in and in large volume provided the lenders are convinced
that their investments are free from dangers of confisca-

tion, unbearable taxation, and crass prejudice.
Turkey of the present day owes its independent posi-
tion to the genius of Mustafa Kemal Pasha. Moham-
medans are deeply stirred by a contemporary hero whose
exploits they can understand. They expect the ruler to
be arbitrary, to play favorites, but to be powerful always.
He is expected to be accessible to rich and poor. "His
crowning virtues are mercy, clemency, compassion; and
it matters little what claims of justice go unrequited if
a cry for mercy is kindly met. The rulers of the 'Arabian
Nights' represent the ideal of monarchs of this
character.''
Mustafa Kemal Pasha has countless difficulties in his
efforts to reconcile the varied political views of his own
party, to say nothing about the other Turks, many of
whom are in voluntary or forced exile. A coalition with
the remnant of the Committee of Union and Progress
(the rulers of "Modern Turkey" until the Kemalists
took control) would appear not to be impossible, because
both these liberal elements have no special scruples on
the subjects of the conservatism of Islam or of female
emancipation. The Turkish President is still the object
of an intense, justly-merited hero worship, yet his con-
tinued influence remains a matter for speculation. It
may not be inappropriate to repeat a Turkish proverb,
"Bir gunun beyliyi beylik dir" (One day of lordship is
enough for me). The judgments of Allah are withheld
· from view. And typical of the East, human life is not
taken too seriously, nor is a change of rulers outside the
sphere of practical politics.
The fierce nationalism which is sweeping Turkey is
neither Oriental nor anything novel. This patriotic
fervor recalls to mind how !socrates idealized Athens,
how Virgil and later Dante proclaimed the supreme
destiny of Rome. Did not M:ilton write that "God re-
30 MODERN TURKEY
veals Himself first to His Englishmen"! As one writer
has expressed it, ''Freedom'' has ever been interpreted
to mean the subjection of "your-Freedom" by "my-
Freedom.'' This great impulse, in many respects noble,
governs men's actions and men's lives in the age in which
we are living. But it might be well for everyone to pause
a moment, and to read the thoughts of that great inter-
preter of the East and the West, Rabindranath Tagore:
"In political civilization, the state is an abstraction and
relationship of men utilitarian. Because it has no root
in sentiments, it is so dangerously easy to handle. Half
a century has been enough for you (Japanese) to master
this machine; and there are men among you, whose fond-
ness for it exceeds their love for the living ideals, which
were born with the birth of your nation and nursed in
your centuries. It is like a child who, in the excitement
of his play, imagines he likes his playthings better than
his mother. . . . The past has been God's gift to you;
about the present, you must make your own choice."
CHAPTER IT
RACIAL CHARACTERISTICS
By "ELIOT GRINNELL MEARS
In a republic, to be successful we must learn to combine intensity

of conviction with a broad tolerance of difference of conviction. Wide
differences of opinion in matters of religious, political, and social belief
must exist if conscience and intellect alike are not to be stunted, if there
is to be room for healthy growth. Bitter internecine hatreds, based on
such differences, are signs, not of earnestness of belief, but of that
fanaticism which, whether religious or anti-religious, democratic or un-
democratic, is itself but a manifestation of the gloomy bigotry which has
been the chief factor in the downfall of so many, many nations.
-THEODORE RoosEVELT, "Citizenship in a Republic," Sorbonne, 1910.
A student of Turkey should at some time or other have

been a student in Turkey. It is an essential that he for-
get that he is a stranger or a visitor, for he must breathe
the atmosphere of a country situated in Europe as well
as in Asia providing he wishes to learn anything worth-
while of its distinction and its mysteries. He will be
completely translated into the world of the Near East if
he takes his cup of Turkish coffee, perhaps a Turkish
cigarette, and with a native companion sits down in a
cafe at the Stamboul end of the Galata Bridge which
spans the Golden Horn. For here the moving crowd,
composed of all creeds, races, and nationalities, presents
a vast panorama of glowing colors. Close by the bridge
hundreds of sailing vessels like white winged birds, their
damp canvas spread to dry in the sun, rest in port after
their fishing trips up into the Black Sea or the Sea of
Marmara. The native owners move about over them,
mending nets and ropes and singing as they work.
31
32 MODER...""i TCRKEY
Out in the harbor lie the ships of all nations. Of the
foreign flags, British, French, Greek and Italian predom-
inate; but from where one sits, the American newcomer,
"Hog Island, U. S. Shipping Board," close up against
the bridge, a new touch in the scenery of the harbor,
greets the eye.
But it is the people themselves that interest us most
of all. By the Golden Horn, one may note a group of
merchants from Pera or Galata, probably Armenians,
Greeks, Jews, or that vague nationality, the Levantine,
clad in conventional European costume except for the
inevitable fez or newly-adopted kalpak, talking volubly
about the latest political rumor or a lately~nSlliDIDated
bargain.
A Turkish peasant from the country, clad in bright
colored costume with long flowing, baggy trousers, steers
his goats through the passing crowd emitting at times a
raucous warning of his approach while he himself nar-
rowly escapes being run over by a smart French auto-
mobile which flies by. A porter, possibly a Kurd, bending
low under his staggering burden with eyes to the ground
calls out in Turkish, "Beware! Make way!" and nar-
rowly misses the head of a passer-by with the corner of
the bed which he is carrying. Two Greek priests, high-
hatted and in flowing black symbolic of authority, brush
elbows with green turbaned khojas from the mosques of
the city. Towering above the crowd the figure of an
Arab, picturesquely adorned in the garb of the desert,
moves with slow stride and a dignity surpassing all.
Always one gets the impression of the cosmopolitan char-
acter of the land, the intermingling of races in themseh·es
not distinct, and through it all the suggestion o( religious
fanaticism, economic rivalry, ignorance, and superstition.
Still, one scarcely knows Turkey who has seen only
Constantinople, for even in the heyday of the Ottoman
Empire that city was more Byzantine than Turkish, and
RACIAL CHARACTERISTICS 33
more cosmopolitan than Byzantine. Despite the power-
ful and fearful influence of the former Capital, the coast
and interior citi~s of Asia Minor are the best places for
observation of what is really Turkey. The country and
its people are better understood after a trip along the
Black Sea Coast to a distant coast town of Anatolia.
There, in the provincial city, one can jostle up against
the crowd, or talk politics with the tobacco merchant in
his magasin, while out of the window one watches the big
lighters full of tobacco make out to the ships anchored a
mile off shore. It is a liberal education to be in town on
a market day, when from all the mountain villages around
the sturdy peasants come to town to do their marketing,
the women trudging along, with their men often riding
behind them on donkeys. The more prosperous among
them come from large tobacco villages, with donkeys
heavily laden, and return with purchases of cheese, oliv~s,
and cloth; on prosperous days, with a bottle of wine in
addition. One can see galloping through the town a
band of mountain bandits, political outlaws of all races,
wearing the picturesque laz headdress trimmed with gold,
and with tight fitting black trousers with their narrow
gold and colored stripes. Veritable travelling arsenals
they are, with rows and rows of cartridges about their
waists, with hand grenades of German origin dangling
from their belts, and guns slung loosely from their shoul-
ders. These are the men who guard the mountain villages
in the guerilla warfare which is continually going on
between the neighboring localities. Places seething with
political unrest are the coast cities, where in the local
coffee houses and bazaars one can pick up all the latest
gossip from Constantinople about possible massacre, in-
vasion, changing government and what not. · And then,
five times a day, the muezzin from his minaret call the
faithful to prayer•.
If a person is really adventurous he will negotiate for
34 MODERN TURKEY
a wooden cart, the araba, and will take the trip along the
highway into the interior of Anatolia, past rich fields of
grain and tobacco yielding their harvest almost without
cultivation and in response to most primitive methods of
agriculture. He will stop for a night or two in a little
town by the roadside where he may spend the night in a
khan where rival bedfellows make sleep difficult. The
houses are mostly of mud without window gla~s.. Tiny
little shops which line the one street are the center of
local activity, the life of the city, its political gossip, its
racial jealousy, its petty bargaining. The houses are
squalid without sanitation, the streets without lights.
People live without hope or ambition, without any of the
amusements or excitement of the coast towns.
An hour's climb over the circuitous mountain path will
bring one to a tiny mountain village of which there are
many tucked away; sometimes they are Turkish, some-
times Greek, sometimes Kurdish or Armenian, now
mostly of Turkish population. Here it is usual to :find
women .slaving in the fields, the men too in the harvest
season when frequently all work throughout the night in
the moonlight in order to satisfy the demands of the
tax-collector. One such village the writer has in mind,
far up in the mountains of Anatolia, where dwelt Alba-
nians, rich in their hospitality as far as they could give,
but literally working all night during the moon that they
might pay their "twelfth." These peasants on the land,
stolid, hard working, and (notably in the case of the
Turks) hospitable, form the backbone of the country.
They know little about what is going on on the outside.
They ask only to be let alone to earn their living.
No understanding of the country and its problems is
possible without some study of the intermingled races,
which make up the problematic whole. The country
known as the Ottoman Empire, or the Turkey of prewar
days, was for centuries subject to repeated invasions
RACIAL CIIARACTERISTICS 35
and conquests from the East and the West, and to shift-
ing of population within its confines. This has led to an
intermixture of populations which makes it impossible
to draw any hard and fast racial lines. According to Sir
Charles Eliot (1) [for this and succeeding quotations,
consult references at end of chapter], the politico-geo-
graphical and the physical tests for racial classification
are unsatisfactory. "A third and very important method
of classifying mankind is based upon their languages.t
• Dr. Mary Mills Patrick has prepared for me the following lucid
explanation regarding the influence of language upon r&ee.-E. G. M.
"There was never a land richer in languages than the Near East.
Here the student of philology finds fruitful fields of investigation, and
abundant opportunity for practical study. An Oriental scholar in passing
over the bridge across the Golden Horn, on one occasion, distinguished
twenty-two different languages and dialects even in that short distance.
''Of the Mohammedan races, the Arabs, Kurds, Albanians, and Turks
all speak different tongues. Of these the Arabic and Turkish bear the
greatest resemblance to each other. Turkish is a Turanian language-
Ural Altaic, and unlike any other language familiar to us has borrowed
heavily both from Semitic and Aryan sources; namely from Arabic and
Persian. The alphabet used in Turkish is Arabic, so difficult of acqui·
aition that children are said to lose upwards of a year of time in learn·
ing it above that necessary in conquering easier alphabets. Even should
they be taught to read by the sight method, a knowledge of th$l changing'
value of the letters is essential, especially as the alphabet contains prac·
tioally no vowels. All the metaphysical and emotional wor4s in Turkish
are Arabic or Persian, from which languages Turkish has greatly in·
creased its abstract and aesthetic possibilities.
'' The Turkish language is very beautifuL A skillful use of its verbs,
participles, and gerunds can produce shades of meaning peculiar to the
aubtle atmosphere of the East, and almost unknown in the direct thought
of Western lands. Isolated words, even, have the power to create this
atmosphere of subtlety, and occur often to the mind of the Westerner
familiar with the Turkish language, as an illuminating mechanism of
thought, capable of creating nuaRCeB before unknown to him. Turkish
furnishes, furthermore, a fine medium of expression for the ever-present
humor of the Turkish people. A shrug of the shoulders and the repeating of
eome familiar expression, will convulse a Turkish company with a sense
of extreme but quiet humor.
'• Turkish is the official language of Turkey, although the Koran and
many other religious and legal works are written in Arabic. In town( and
villages where Turks, Greeks, Armenians, and Jews live side by si e in
adjoining houses or adjacent quarters, Turkish would be the common
language of traffic. An extremely small vocabulary, however, suffices
for that purpose, and the non-Turkish population, with the exception of
men of atfairs, are practically unable to read Turkish or to expr888
36 MODERN TLRKEY
There are, of course, many and obvious exceptions to its
accuracy: the negroes in America speak English, the
themselves in it beyond the elementary aet of bargaining or asking
simple questions.
''In many parts of the country Greek vies with Turkish as a
language in eommon use-furnishing a medium of thought less eolored
by Oriental 1111btlety than Turkish, but offering all the poetie beauty of
expression that has been the heritage of the world from the Greek eulture
of the past ages of art and literature. It ill true that the ignorant Greek
peasant, for example, does not speak the Greek of eultured sooiety. His
voeabnlary ill small and more or less mixed with foreign words, but even
in 1111eh eases the listener ill often 1!1lrprised by epigrammatic sayings that
he little expected to hear.
'' The difference between .Aneient and llodent Greek ill a matter of
degree diminishing as education and culture inereaae. The language
of the Greek press in Turkey aa well as in Greeee ill being constantly
purified and improved, and the in1luenee of the fine Greek sehools that
exist wherever Greeks are found in the Ottoman Empire ill strong in the
direction of restoring the ancient beauty of the Greek language.
''The Armenian language differs totally from any of the others. It
ill also a very old language and ill found in an ancient and modent
form, and it belongs by general eonsent to a separate family of the
Aryan languages. It was redueed to writing in the fourth eentnry, A. D.,
and possesses a literature of some importance. The most 1lourillhing
period of this literature extends from the fourth to the fourteenth cen-
tury, A.D. Its alphabet ill difficult, comprising thirty-six characters.
The Armenian press endeavors, as does the Greek, to restore the purity
and great7· richness of its aneient form, in which movement the in-
:finenee of the more advanced Armenian sehools ill strong. :Modern
Armenian as it ill spoken in regions distant from centers of eulture often
retains some expressions belonging to the ancient language that would
not be heard elsewhere; but on the other hand, in regions where the
Turkish population ill numerous, many of the eoneise idioms of Turkish
have been adopted in Armenian.
"The Kurdish language ill also very old in origin, for at the dawn of
history the mountains overhanging ABsyria were held by a people named
Gutu, signifying 'warrior' expressed in Assyrian by the synonym of
Kordu, which means the same as the Greek name Karadakes, which Strabo,
the geographer, used in the first century B.c. ill speaking of the Kurds. It
ill an old Persian patoi& mixed with Chaldean and Turanian elements,
whieh may be traeed baek to Babylonian times. It ill not wholly without
literature, but there are no books in common use for the people and
no sehools except in places where they have been established by m.ia-
sionary effort.
'' The .Arabie language ill that of the Koran and holy to the Moham-
medan races. As a means of expression, it abounds ill those picturesque
phrases, whieh truly represent the East. .Arabie ill a wonderful language,
but ill understood by few believers or non-believers.
''The last national language to be mentioned is the Albanian. This
is considered by philologists as the oDly surviving langnage of the Thraeo-
Jews of Salonika and Constantinople Spanish, and the
Bulgarians a Slavonic tongue. But, making all allo)V~
ances for such cases, similarity of language always im-
plies contact at some period, and probably union in some
kind of state or national organization. Languages in
Turkey form, on the whole, the best criterion of race in
the popular sense--that is to say, when we talk of Greeks
or Bulgarians we mean people who speak Greek or Bul-
garian. But some qualifications must be made. Moham-
medans, particularly of the upper classes, who migrate
from their homes in the provinces, generally drop their
original languages, and in the second generation speak
Turkish only. This is the case with many Albanians in
Constantinople and elsewhere. Of such, it would be more
corre<;t to say that they were Albanians than that they
are Albanians. Many districts, too, are bilingual; but
it may always be assumed that Greek or Turkish is an
acquired language, and that the second one gives the
speaker's real race."
A fourth metho4 of classification, he says, is that of
manners and customs, the most important of which is
religion. Bearing these principles of classification in
Illyrian group, but the lack of literature makes scientific statements re-
garding its development extremel,y difficult. A significant brochure which
has recently appeared on the subject is the result of the scholarly research
of M. Dako of Kortcha, Albania. A literary conference of leading
Albanians was convened shortly before the present war to consider the
choice of an alphabet for the new Albanian literature. The Latin alphabet
was favorably considered, but no decision, of a permanent character,
was reached.
"The Jews of Turkey speak Spanish, German, Italian, Russian, and
sometimes other languages according to their nationality. Jewish papers
are published in French and in Spanish, the latter in a modified Hebrew
character, which is called Hebrew Spanish. There is a mol'ement among
the Jews at present to return to the use of the Hebrew language, and
several women's clubs are working vigorously in pursuance of this
purpose.
''There are those who consider that the absolute separation in thinking
caused by using languages so widely different from each other, has in-
tensified and crystallized the intense racial feeling in the Turkish Em·
pire to an extent that no other force oould have accomplished.''
38 MODERN TURKEY
mind, certain racial groups stand out as having simi-
larity of language and racial traditions. Of these, the
most important in the old Ottoman Empire were the
Turks, Greeks, Armenians, Kurds, Arabs, Jews and
Syrians (the last-named in particular is a most inclusive
term). Countless smaller racial groups there were, such
as the Circassians and Lazes of Aryan origin and Mo-
hammedan in religion, and numerous smaller tribes of
Semitic extraction, sometimes Christian, sometimes Jew-
ish, sometimes Mohammedan. In the present limited
area of Turkey, which confines it practically to Asia
Minor with only a bit of territory in Europe, the race
problem is, of course, less complicated. Some under-
standing must be gained of the chief races, notably the
ruling race, in order to have any real insight into the
problems of the country. For the purposes of this chap-
ter, the author has followed the scheme of quoting rather
freely from the writings of leading authorities, including
Sir Charles Eliot, Viscount James Bryce, Sir Edwin
Pears, Dr. D. G. Hogarth; Sir Mark Sykes, and Sir W. M.
Ramsay. · The bulk of the testimony is British and pur-
posely so, mainly because that Commonwealth produces
thoughtful students of Turkey who combine direct writ-
ten expression with independent judgment.
To apply the word Turk to all Moslem inh~bitants of
the Ottoman Empire is a common error. Jemal (Djemal)
Pasha, a member of the famous "C.U.P." triumvirate,
brought out the distinction in his memoirs when he wrote
that he was an Ottoman, or Turkish citizen, but he prided
himself upon being a Turk. "It is convenient," says
Sir Edwin Pears (2), "to speak of the Moslem inhabi-
tants of the Ottoman Empire as Turks. The name Os-
manli is now officially applied to all subjects of the Sultan,
whether Moslem or Christian. But the term Turk re-
quires explanation. Among the Moslem subjects of the
Sultan, there are Turks strictly so-called, that is, de-
scendants of the Turkish race which entered the country
during the thirteenth, fourteenth and :fifteenth centuries,
but also Arabs, Circassians, Albanians, Lazes, Pomaks,
Yuruks, Kizilbashis and others."
Despite their Tartar and Mongolian origin, rarely does
one find the purely Mongolian type, so mixed has the
original race become with the native population. The
reason is stated succinctly by Lord Bryce (3):
"Very little Turkman blood flows in the veins of the
modem Mohammedan population of Asia Minor and
Europe; hardly more perhaps than there is of Frankish
blood in the modem French. That population is com-
posed mainly of the descendants of those subjects of the
Eastern Roman empire who embraced Islam as the tide
of Seljukian and Ottoman conquest advanced westward
and northward, partly also of the mongrel race which has
sprung from the marriage of Osmanlis with the Greek,
Georgian, Circassian, and Slavonic captives brought in
by the perpetual slave trade; and of janissaries, the off- ·
spring of Christian parents seized in childhood, and
brought up as Mohammedans. How little of the true
Turk there is in the modern Ottoman may be seen by
any one who will .compare the heavy languid faces and
flabby :figures of the Turkish royal family for instance,
with their drooping eyelids, smooth foreheads, and sen-
sual rounded outlines, and the :firm, hard, angular bony
features, small, :fierce, restless eyes and well-knit frames
of the genuine Turkman or Tatar of the Aral or Caspian
steppes.''
Since the boundaries of the present Turkey are so
limited as to make the Turk the leading Mohammedan
race and to place the emphasis on Turkey for the Turks,
the characteristics of the race as such are being very
naturally discussed more and more and with great vari-
ance of opinion. On one point all authorities seem
agreed, that the Turk has not adapted himself to business
40 MODERN TURKEY
as his Armenian and Greek neighbors, nor is he so in-
dustrious. (For further information, consult the chapter
on Foreign and Domestic Commerce.) Sir Charles Eliot
(1) says:
"All occupations except agriculture and military ser-
vice are distasteful to the true Osmanli. He is not much
of a merchant; he may keep a stall in a bazaar, but his
operations are rarely conducted on a scale which merits
the name of commerce or finance. It is strange to observe
how, when trade becomes active in any seaport or along
a railway line, the Osmanli retires and disappears, while
Greeks, Armenians, and Levantines thrive in his place.
Neither does he much affect law, medicine, or the learned
professions. Such callings are followed extensively by
Moslems, but they are apt to be of non-Turkish race.
The true Turk has three spheres of activity. First, he
is a Government official, a class of which I shall speak
elsewhere. Secondly, he is an agriculturist and a
breeder of animals. He does not rejoice in reclaiming
barren land or in turning the mountain-side into fruitful
vineyards. On the contrary, he has turned wooded conn-
tries into deserts by his improvident habit of cutting
down trees for firewood and making no attempt to plant
others in their place. But he has a keen appreciation
of the simplest and most material joys of country life.
He likes fine horses, fat sheep and cattle, good corn and
olives, rich grass. He willingly goes out shooting, and
some of the Sultans were mighty hunters. But more
than all, he likes a good kitchen-garden, where he can
grow fruit and vegetab~es, succulent pumpkins and cu-
cumbers, and perhaps regale a party of friends with
roast lamb in a little summer-house under the shade of
his mulberry and walnut trees. Thirdly, the Turk is a
soldier, not in the sense that Germans or Russians
"make" good soldiers, but in the sense that the moment
a sword or rifle is put into his hands, he instinctively
RAClAt CHARACTERISTICS
knows how to use it with effect, and feels at home in the
ranks or on a horse."
This distinction between Turk and Turkmen has be-
come an actuality in local terminology. According to
Sir W. M. Ramsay (4):
"Many of the distinctions about which we speak are
not recognized in government statistics, and the diverse
races are summed up as Moslems or as Osmanli. This
is the case with the distinction between Turkmen and
Turk. • . . One of the first impressions made on the
traveller when he leaves the railways and cities, and goes
out over the Central Plateau, is the difference between
. two classes of population, who are called in ordinary .
expression Turks and Turkmen. The population of towns
and generally of the settled villages consists of Turks,
or, as they call themselves, Osmanli; and the distinction
between them and the Turkmens is clearly marked. The
Turkmen tribes used to claim ostentatiously to be and to
be styled 'Turkmen', and repudiated the name 'Turk',
while the Osmanli would have regarded it as an insult
to be called 'Turkmen.' Formerly the usual account of
this difference was that the Turks represent the tribes
who overran Asia Minor in the years immediately fol-
lowing the great battle of Mantzikert in A. D. 1071 (which
laid the whole country prostrate before the invaders
from Central Asia), whereas the Turkmen belong to
various successive waves of immigration which came in
from Central Asia during the following centuries. On
the other hand, an explanation which has been favored
recently is that the Turkish population is the native Ana-
tolian population Moslemized, while the Turkmen tribes
are left unexplained, and it seems to be assumed that
they are the conquering race. . • .
"There has never been any real affection between the
Turks and the Turkmens, but rather a slight though dis-
tinct feeling of hostility; and for centuries even the
42 MODERN TURKEY
west Turkmen tribes {Asheret) maintained themselves
practically in independence of the Ottoman Government,
paying no taxes, treating great officials almost on terms
of equality, and not serving as soldiers in foreign coun-
tries. The Turkmens were an unruly and even a dan-
gerous element in the country. Peaceful merchants did
not venture to travel along the roads except in large cara-
vans, which had to be always on their guard against at-
tack from the Nomads. The Seljuk Sultans in the
twelfth and thirteenth centuries attempted to protect
the great lines of communication by means of splendid
khans. These khans are places of large size and mili-
tary strength, built for defence with loop-holed walls of
great thickness; and they could easily be maintained
against the attacks of large bands of Nomad assailants .
. . . The following hypothesis may serve to explain in
part the origin .of the distinction between Turk and
Turkmen. The Turkish population is not pure Turk, it
represents a mixed race, springing from the union be-
tween a section of the Asiatic conquerors and the old
population of Anatolia; and it is probably more truly
Anatolian than Turk. It consists really of two different,
and yet not practically distinguishable, classes, {1) the
offspring of Turkish conquerors marrying women of
the old population, and {2) a large number of the old
Anatolian population who adopted Mohammedanism."
To Europeans, most Orientals appear indolent. ThiS!
seems particularly true of those who profess Islam, which
is doubtless the result of a fatalism which seems to accom-
pany the uselessness of unnecessary effort. To quote
Sir Edwin Pears (2): "The sense of superiority :fills the
ignorant Turk with a spiritual pride, an intellectual con-
ceit which is a real hindrance to his progress in civiliza-
tion. No Moslem has need to offer the Scotch minister's
prayer, 'Gie us a good conceit of ourselves.' He has it
already. Having it, and being saturated with the idea of
fatalism, he is neither thrifty nor ambitious. Of course,
there are ambitious men among the Turks. So also there
are thrifty men. But they are exceptions, and, in so far
as they struggle to attain their e_nds, are acting against
the generally accepted teaching of their religion. In con-
sidering such cases it is necessary to generalize, and a
few exceptions do not vitiate the rule. The same results
of Mahometanism hold good in India. . • •
"Heredity and religion will account for most of the
characteristics of the Turkish character. The typical
Turk is, under ordinary circumstances, an honest, truth-
ful, self-respecting man. But I am not sure whether
these causes will account for his want of energy 1 or his
occasional outbursts of fanaticism. In the normal condi-
tion of an average Turkish peasant a long period of
laziness is alternated by short, spasmodic periods of in-
dustry. He is neither industrious nor persistent about
anything."
Whether the Turk has the qualities necessary for able,
efficient, and reasonably honest public service, remains
to be demonstrated. Historically, as brought out cle_arly
1 An amusing story is told by Dr. Ramsay (6): "The British Consul at
Angora in 1882, Mr. Gatheral, a Glasgow man, who died shortly after our
visit, told us a very characteristic story of Turkish habits. Stevens, the first
cyclist to make an excursion round the world, had passed through Angora
a year or two previously. His arrival on one of the old lofty 'bone-
shakers' caused immense excitement, and his departure on the following
day was made a public ceremony. A great crowd, including, I think,
the Vali-Paeha himself, assembled at the city gate from which he started,
and it was arranged that a cannon should be fired as he mounted, partly
as a signal to ths crowds of gazers along the road, partly, perhaps, as
a compliment to him. A number of Turks collected at a wayside coffee·
house a mile or more up the winding road that leads towards the Eut.
They waited till the gun was fired, then they all rose up, each selected his
own shoes among the pile that lay at the door, shuftled his way into hie
shoes, and then shuftled to the roadside a few yards from the house, and
sat down to wait till the strange machine with one wheel arrived. They
sat for an hour, and began to think there was some delay. They sat for
another hour, and then aome of them began to drop off to other preuing
concerna. The majority, however, aat on in patient expectation. But
they never aaw Stevena. He had shot past them while they were e"l•
gaged in shuftling on their shoea. •'
44 MODERN TURKEY
by Dr. A. H. Lybyer in ''The Government of the Ottoman
Empire in the Days of Suleiman the Magnificent," there
were two very important and distinctive State organisms,
the Ruling Institution, recruited largely from non-Mos-
lems, and the Moslem Institution, which grew more
rapidly, due to its cumulative influence. "The Moslem
Institution was always strongly Islamic, and extremely
conservative in all respects. The Ruling Institution was
originally liberal both religiously and in its receptivity
of new ideas, but it departed from its liberal tendency in
much the same proportion that the Moslem Institution
increased in power."
It is recorded that even the mighty Suleiman had to
humor his janissaries (the paid military guard recruited
from Christian families by the child tax), by enrolling
himself as a private and paying himself accordingly.
During the past four centuries and a half, the House of
Osman has held sway largely because it maintained a
large professional civil and military service. Corruption
has always been rampant. That the capacity of the
Turks for public leadership is open to some question in
the judgment of Sir Mark Sykes, ( 5) is well brought out
in these words :
"The Turk is not, truth to tell, very brilliant as a
rule, though very apt in assuming Western civilization.
This may sound extraordinary but is nevertheless true
so far as my experience carries me. Every Turk I have
met who has dwelt for a considerable period in any for-
eign country, although never losing his patriotism and
deep love for his land, has become in manners, thoughts
and habits an Englishman, a German, or Frenchman.
This leads one almost to suppose that Turks might be
Europeanized by the educational process without any
prejudicial result, for at present they have every quality
of a ruling race except initiative, which is an essentially
European quality. Their ardent patriotism is their only
RACIAl, CHARACTERISTICS 45
incentive; and their intelligence is scarcely suflicient to
show them that serving their country as soldiers is not
the only duty of citizens."
Like most persons, the Turk is neither a saint nor a
devil. He can be extremely aggressive when provoked,
but needs a sharp provocation which in the past has often
consisted of a sweeping State edict. The Turk has the
bluff, outstanding qualities of a dominant race, for which
he is attractive to Anglo-Saxons. On the other hand, he
has paid scant attention to literature, science, or art;
and until lately, at least, his record has not been com-
mendable either in governing or in the business de-
. velopment of his country. But there is no reason to
assume that the new rulers of Turkey cannot achieve con-
structiv~ results for their commendable programs. Sir
Adam Block, Chairman of the Ottoman Public Debt, has
been quoted as remarking at Lausanne (1922) of a com-
mon inability to estimate the extremely modern Turk, a
novel type in the country. But the typical and most
numerous element of the population consists of the Ana-
tolian Turkish peasant, who has been sorely stamped
under fo~t by the past wielders of Imperial authority at
Constantinople. The vast majority of people who have
lived in Turkey do not take exception to the verdict of a
leading scholar on Near Eastern civilization, Prof. W. L.
Westermann of Columbia University, who states (Asia,
December, 1922) that missionaries, archiDOlogists, mer.;,
chants, and soldiers testify that "the Anatolian Turk is
as honest as any other people of the Near East, that he
is a hard working farmer, a brave and generous fighter,
endowed fundamentally with chivalrous instincts."
Of most vital importance in the business and trade of
the country were the Greeks, who numbered over a mill-
ion people in Asia Minor (1914), but now are reduc.M t()
a few thousand in Turkey, exclusive of Constantinople.
They have long lived in Constantinople and in the coast
46 MODERN TURKEY
cities of the Aegean and Black seas. From the days of
early Greek colonization as early as the seventh century
B.c., they have been seafarers and traders. A few iso-
lated groups of Greeks, as well, were to be found in the
interior of Anatolia. In many cases these Greeks forgot
their own language entirely, and in some places even the
Greek language was written in Turkish characters. It is
of interest to note that in most of the little mountain
villages near the coast the peasant Greeks had preserved
a language quite different from that of the modern Greek
which showed also a more striking connection with the
classical period. These peasant Greeks of the villages
have been most thrifty; and placed side by side with their
neighbors they have frequently gained at the expense of
the latter.
To a noticeable degree, the Greek coast dweller has
represented in the past the intelligence of the country.
"The Greeks are inclined to public speaking and the
press, all of which are hateful to the Ottoman gove~
ment," says Sir Charles Eliot (1), "and therefore they
are regarded with disfavor; but in all the learned profes-
sions their intelligence and ambition secure them pre-
eminence, and in the most trying circumstances they
manage to lead a busy life."
There is great variance of opinion both as to what con-
stitutes a ''Greek'' and as to his characteristics. Sir
W. M. Ramsay (6), from his researches, believes that
"It would be vain and self-contradictory to try to
describe type and national characteristics of the Greeks
in Turkey. Those who are called Greeks are a religion,
not a nation. They have nothing in common except the
creed and ceremonial of the Orthodox Church. They
have not the tie of common blood, but are the direct
descendants of the most diverse races, Cappadocians,
Pisidians, !saurians, Pamphylians, men of Pontus, and
so on. Their outward look and their superficial character
(for I do not pretend to have seen more deeply) are often
markedly divergent. They are divided by difference of
language: some use Greek alone, some Turkish alone,
many are bilingual One sees Greek Orthodox Churches
in the eastern part of Turkey, over whose door is an
inscription in Greek letters ; but when you read the words
inscribed you find that they are Turkish, and on inquiry
you learn that not a soul in the congregation knows any
Greek except the priest. It is a remarkable fact that the
Orthodox Church should have been able to bind so well
together elements so diverse, and now for centuries so
far divided from one another by the estranging sea of
Mohammedanism, in which their scattered communities
are like islets. . • • While there is singularly little di-
versity of opinion about the Armenians, there exists
extraordinary contradiction between the opinions ten-
tertained about the Greeks by competent observers of
long experience. To take two examples out of many, I
may give the testimony of two persons, British by na-
tionality, both possessing long and intimate acquaintance
with business in Turkey, and deserving as well as hold-
ing a leading position in it. One of them, Scottish by
birth and training, could hardly contain himself if the
name of Greek was mentioned in his hearing, and could
not restrain himself from abusing the whole people as
knaves and cheats: on the other hand, he was in the
closest business relations with Armenians, and I never
heard him say a word against them as a class. The other
person, born and trained in the country, and controlling
a business that brought him into relations with many
Greek firms in various parts of the country, declared to
me often that he had nev~r found the slightest difficulty
in dealing with his Greek correspondents, that he had
not been cheated nor deceived by them, that he never
found it necessary to enter into formal written contracts
with them as was the practice with English firms, but a
word spoken on each side.was accepted and loyally car-
ried out by both.
The opinion of a stranger about the Greeks of Western
Asia Minor would be strongly affected according as he
came in contact with one or the other of these two ex-
cellent authorities. Which are we to believe! For my
own part, I think the second is nearer the truth, pro-
vided you remember that much depends on the tone and
spirit in which you deal with the Greeks."
Questionable commercial dealings, a survival of the
Byzantine love of gifts and fees, have been associated
with these practical, enterprising people. "The Greeks
have in some degree laid themselves open to these
charges," said a noted observer, Mr. Stanley Lane-
Poole (7). "It was very unwise of them to take the first
rank as merchants in the East, and thus arouse the
jealousy of the merchants of all European nations, whom
they have eclipsed by their superior business capacities.
Envy will pick holes anywhere, but it is especially easy
to criticise the customs of a merchant class. Mercantile
morality all over the world is a thing of itself, not gen-
erally understood of the people. But there is nothing to
show that the Greek merchants are less scrupulous than
the rest, though their temptations are infinitely greater.
H a little sharp business is said to be permissible, and
even perhaps necessary, at Liverpool for instance, it is
a fortiori essential in Turkey. It is a perfectly well-
understood principle that in Turkey, where everything
is done by bribery and corruption, a merchant, unless he
wishes to be -ruined, must steer a somewhat oblique
course. So long as the late Turkish rule extended over
Greek subjects, it was necessary to do in Turkey as the
Turks do. French and English merchants sin as much as
the Greeks in this manner, but the superior commercial
ability of the Greeks and their consequent success have
drawn on them the whole evil repute. It is not that the
Greeks cheat more than other commercial nations: it
is merely that they make more money on the same amount
of cheating. Hinc illaJ lacrimaJ!"
It is an evident fact that the Greeks, in spite of perse-
cution, have thrived in Anatolia and have been of great
economic aid to the country even though thwarted in their
ambition to carve out territory from Turkey for them-
selves. Many, perhaps a majority of them, have pre-
ferred living under Turkish rule to domination by Athe-
nian politicians. The overthrow of Sultan Abdul Hamid
II (Julys 1908) did not meet with favor among all Asiatic
Greeks, notably those of Smyrna.
Sir Mark Sykes (8) stated: "The Asiatic branch of the
great Hellenic nation is displeased with Huriyeh; it pre-
ferred the old regime. No one objected to them under
the old regime, and no one hunted them for various rea-
sons. Firstly, the Moslems were too few in number to
raise a successful riot in Smyrna; secondly, Greek bom-
bast rolled off the official Turkish back like water, and
Greek nationalism did not matter, since Turkish bureauc-
racy knew the Greeks to be too rich and businesslike to
do more than yelp; thirdly, the Greeks had interests
overseas and never worried inland. Consequently the
Asiatic Greeks had nearly every liberty, and could quack,
preach, and swagger to their hearts' content. Taxation
was light; they had no military service, and were within
the protective range of the guns of the fleets of Europe.
All this gave the Greeks enormous advantages, of which
they naturally availed themselves, in commerce, medi-
cine, and law. Accordingly, the idea of a rejuvenated
Turkey is not one to which they are partial. In the first
place, it knocks on the head once and for all that excellent
postprandial theme of a great Pan-Hellenic Empire;
secondly, it means heavy Armenian competition; thirdly,
taxation; fourthly, the hideous danger of military ser-
vice; fifthly, risk of inquiry into the vast wealth and
50 MODERN TURKEY
administration of Greek Church property. Conse-
quently, among the squash-hatted gentry of Smyrna there
is little enthusiasm for Huriyeh. It is simply a con-
spiracy to thwart the desires and wishes of the great
Greek nation; a vile injustice to the descendants of
Agamemnon; a great wrong, and so on. There is much
in this strain, accompanied by the parading of Greek
flags, demonstrations, and a copious stream of leading
articles. Revolver mania is as rampant in Smyrna as in
Beirut; but the revolvers are apparently discharged only
on feast days of the Greek Church, or about. twice a
week.''
To the average foreigner, the name Turkey suggests
immediately the subject of the Armenians. The contro-
versial side of the Armenian Question is discussed in a
separate chapter in this book. In the present chapter,
certain characteristics of this people are described.
In spite of innumerable vicissitudes, possibly because
of them, the Armenian race has clung tenaciously to-
gether in the desire to achieve a common nationality.
This ideal, however, they have never been able to realize,
thus making it technically incorrect to refer to an
''Armenia'' as a political part of the former Ottoman
Empire. According to Sir Charles Elio.t (1): "If we sum
up the characteristics of the Armenians, they would
seem to be somewhat as follows: First!y, they are
a race with little political aptitude or genius for king-
dom-building. This want of capacity was not due to
the Turkish Conquest. Even before that event they had
proved unable to hold their own ; they were divided by
continual dissensions, and became alternately the vassals
of Parthians and Romans, Persians and Greeks. This
was partly the result of their geographical position, but
after all, they had no one but themselves to thank for
that position. They seem to have had a natural aversion
to the coast-otherwise they might have occupied Con-
stantinople and the mountains of the Caucasus. A na-
tion holding those two fortresses would indeed have been
strong. Secondly, the Armenians do not belong to the
Orthodox Church. The differences which divide them
from that communion may be· absurdly trivial, but their
consequences are real and important. The average
Greek or Slav does not regard the Armenian as a brother
Christian. At the time of the Bulgarian "atrocities" the
Russian peasantry were indignant at the idea of Pravo-
slavnys (Orthodox· Christians) being slaughtered, but
the Armenian massacres of 1895-96 did not arouse any
popular indignation in Russia. They were regarded as
shocking, just as a massacre of Catholics in China
might be shocking, but they did not seem to come nearer
home. Neither the <Ecumenical Patriarch, nor any other
acknowledged authority of the Orthodox Church, dis-
played any practical indignation at these outrages.
Thirdly, the Armenians are a people of great commercial
and financial talents, supple and flexible as those must be
who wish to make others part with their money: stub-
born to heroism in preserving certain characteristics, but
wanting withal in tl}e more attractive qualities, in artistic
sense, kindliness, and some (though not all) forms of
courage." ·
"They are physically a fine race," said Sir Edwin
Pears (2). "The men are usually tall, well built and
powerful. The women have a healthy look about them
which suggests good motherhood. They are an ancient
people of the same Indo-European race as ourselves,
speaking an allied language. During long centuries they
held their own against Persians, Arabs, Turks, and
Kurds. Wherever they have had a fighting chanc~ they
proved their courage. In the economic struggle for life
against alien races they and the Jews have managed to
hold their own; but, unlike the Jews, a large proportion
of them have remained tillers of the soil.''
52 MODER..~ ITRKEY
, The Armenian has held his own in a remarkable way
considering the countless difficulties under which he has
labored.
''Conceive the inevitable result of centuries of
slavery," said Sir W. M. Ramsay (6), "of subjection
to insult and scorn, centuries in which nothing that
belonged to the Armenian, neither his property, his
house, his life, his person, nor his family, was sacred
or safe from violence--capricious, unprov-oked violence,
-to resist which by violence meant death! I do not mean
that ev-ery Armenian suffered so; but that ev-ery one
liv-ed in conscious danger from any chance disturbance
or riot. Ev-ery one knew that any sign of spirit or cour-
age would be almost certain to draw down immediate
punishment; and that in bribery of the officials lay the
only hope of redress, and the best chance of escape...•
I will say for the Armenians that they hav-e furnished
the most striking examples known to me of capacity to
receiv-e and assimilate and rise quickly to the lev-el of
higher education and nobler nature, when the opportu-
nity has been placed before them by other people.•••
Some, who have merely come in superficial contact with
the worst class of Armenians-rich and tyrannical, ig-
norant and grasping, tradesmen who hav-e made money in
narrow, sordid business in towns-deny that they hav-e
any Yirtues at all ••• Further, that is not the class
of Armenians which has giv-en rise to the recent Imperial
policy of massacre. None know better than the palace
officials that their most useful, nay, their indispensable
instruments in misgov-erning the Empire hav-e always
been found in that class and in a corresponding class of
Phanariote Greeks. It is among the poor Mohammedan
peasantry that the Armenian capitalists are hated; and
the massacres do not originate from the peasants. Gen-
erally speaking, that class of Armenians has suffered
from the massacres only so far as it was necessary to ap-
peal to the greed and envy of the Mohammedan city mob
in order to rouse them to the pitch of massacre."
The Jews have occupied a favored position in Turkey
ever since they were welcomed at the time of the Spanish
Inquisition (1492). In recent times, the Macedonian Jews
played a leading part in the restoration of the Constitu-
tion (1908). The well-known writer and exponent of
Pan-Turanianism, who took the surname of Tekin Alp,
was a Macedonian Jew, Albert Cohen by name. The
territorial loss of Salonika to Greece under the terms of
the Treaty of London (1913) caused a large departure
of this leading, local business element, the majority of
whom settled in Constantinople, Smyrna, and Palestine.
The Zionist Movement with its potential political aspects
runs the risk of encountering serious opposition from
the Turks as well as from the Palestine Arabs. Opposed
to the Zionists are many leading Jews in Turkey and
elsewhere who believe that Jewry should remain strictly
religious in character. On the settlement of this problem
rests to a considerable degree a continuation of the
tolerably good racial relations between Jews, Turks, and
Moslem and Christian Arabs.
Lady Fanny Blunt (7), who lived for many years in
Macedonia, is authority for the statement that "In
few countries is the contrast of wealth and indi-
gence among the Jews so striking as in Turkey. On one
side may be seen wealth so great as to command respect
for its possessors, and give them an influence in the lo-
calities in which they spring up greater than that of all
other nationalities: whilst hard by one sees poverty and
wretchedness of the most sickening nature. The princi-
pal cause of this is the limited sphere of action allotted
to, or rather adopted by, the Jewish communities. They
evince a strong repugnance to going beyond the few
trades generally practised by the labouring classes ; the
rest content themselves with performing the coarsest
54 MODERN TURKEY
and dirtieat work of the town. From generation to gen-
eration the Jews will cling to these callings without al-
lowing themselves to be tempted beyond them, or raising
themselves in the social scale by taking to agricultural or
other pursuits that might ensure them a comfortable
home and an honourable living.''
Sir Edwin Pears (2) wrote many years later: "There
are two distinct types of Jews in Turkey which
may be conveniently classed as Spanish, and German
or Polish. The first frequently show delicate features,
with light brown hair and occasionally with blue eyes.
The second have the heavy features with dark hair and
unusually large nose which we see in the race in Eng-
land. . . . Since the revolution of 1908, the Jews in Tur-
key have come very distinctly to the front, and now play
a very important part in the government of the country.
But even before that event, Jewish medical men, advo-
cates, and merchants, formed a valuable part of the
community."
Between the Jews and the Turks there have always
been, on the whole, good relations, partly because Chris-
tianity has not been involved. Jews, however, are usually
made to feel their political and social inferiority. Lady
Fanny Blunt (7) wrote: "The Jews in Turkey have from
all times shown a greater liking for their Moslem neigh-
bours than for the Christians. The Moslems sneer at
them and treat them with disrespect as a nation, but are
far more tolerant and lenient towards them than towards
the Christians. The Jews, on their side, although at
heart feeling no disposition to respect their Mohammedan
masters,· show great sympathy outwardly for them; and
in case of a dispute between Christians and Moham-
medans, unanimously espouse the cause of the latter.
The wealthy Israelites would render every assistance in
their power to remove the difficulties of the Government,
while those of humbler standing tender their service for
RACIAL CHARACTERISTICS . 55
the performance of anything that may be required of
them, however degrading."
The Kurds are both little understood and are one of
the most difficult races to deal with in Turkey. Probably
Aryan in origin, they are generally nomadic in their '
habits, living mainly in the Armenian districts in the
drainage area of the Tigris and the Euphrates. Sup-
posedly Mohammedan, their religious complexion varies
from tribe to tribe and is as mixed as is their race. ·
Wherever the Kurd goes, he seems to be a source of
difficulty. Dr. D. G. Hogarth (9) says:" So far as I under-
stand this vexed matter, the source of the graver trouble
is the presence in the heart of Armenia of the defiant
Kurdish race, which raids the villages where the flocks
are fattest and the women most fair, now· cutting an
Armenian's throat, now leaguing with him in a war on a
hostile tribe, and resisting in common the troops sent up
to restore the Sultan's peace. Whatever the Kurd does
is done for the sake neither of Crescent nor Cross, for he
bears neither one emblem nor the other in his heart, but
just because he is Ishmael, his hand against every man
who has aught to lose." .
The Kurd is known as a freebooter. According to
M:r. Leon Dominian (10): "Travel in the districts they
occupy is generally unsafe. Armenians and Christians
find them an inexorable foe. They are none too loathe to
prey even on Turks, although as a rule they later obtain
amnesty in return for the lenient dealings of the govern-
ment. In cases of Kurdish depredation on non-Moslem
communities, the strong arm of an organized gendarmerie
alone will end the lawlessness with which their name is
associated in Turkey."
Certain good qualities, however, the Kurd may be said
to have. "Good qualities are not wanting among them.
A Kurd is generally true to his word. The rude code of
honor in vogue among their tribes is rarely violated, and,
56 MODERN TURKEY
whenever disposed, the Kurd can become as hospitable
as his Arab neighbors. The tempering influence of a
settled existence among sedentary tribes is marked by
harmonious intercourse with surrounding non-Kurdish
communities. At the bottom their vices are chiefly those
of the restless life they lead in a land in which organized
government has been unknown for the past eight cen-
turies.'' Since certain of the towns along the southern
Turkish border have a considerable Syrian population,
the latter race deserves brief mention.
According to Mr. Dominian, the Hittites, Armenians,
Assyrians, Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Arabs and Turks
who conquered the land in turn, imparted their native
customs to its inhabitants. Those in Syria are now trans-
formed almost beyond possibility of analysis. The settle-
ments of the elevated and broken Northern area, repre-
sent ancient communities. While the most numerous
Syrians are largely of Moslem faith, many of them pro-
fess the Jewish and Christian religions.
The Arabs, though forming now no integral part of
the Turkish State, yet because of their past position as
probably the large Mohammedan population of the Otto-
man Empire and because of their geographical location,
have been and are noteworthy people. Their primary
instinct is racial rather than religious; there are thou-
sands of Arab Christians. The term, however, is generic;
there is little similarity between an Iraqi, W ahabi, and a
Syrian dweller.
The Arab, wanderer by nature, represents the purest
living branch of the Semitic race. It was among the
Arabs that the Mohammedan religion had its birth and
it was they rather than the Turks who, in the great con-
quests, gave this religion to the world. During the Dark
Ages they preserved learning in Europe and enjoyed a
literature rich in poetry, philosophy, and history. They
ha- ·e always been the enemy of the Turks whom they feel
have usurped their position in the Moslem world. A
more complete discussion of the relations between these
two races is given in the chapter on The Arab Question.
Besides these varied races native to the Near East,
there are also many European peoples represented within
the Turkish State-English, French, German, Austrian,
Italian, Russian, Hellenic Greeks, etc. A certain
number of these, the issue of families settled for a long
time in the East, have lost practically all the physical,
intellectual, and moral qualities of their racial heritage,
the language of which frequently they cannot speak.
They have intermarried with the non-Moslem minorities,
especially with the Greeks. They constitute the distinct
people commonly known as the Levantines. In speaking
of these people, many of whom are worthy citizens, any
generalization is difficult. A former British ambassador,
Sir Charles Eliot, ( 1) wrote : "The word Levantine is
not considered complimentary, and I use it reluct-
antly, but for the very good reason that it denotes
a definite type, and that there is no synonym. The
fact is that the name does not exactly suggest honest
and honorable dealings. Courts and Imperial cities do
not tend to develop the rugged and sterling virtues, but
rather encourage diplomacy and the arts of pleasing.
For many centuries before the Turkish conquest the
Greeks had been characterized by astuteness rather than
heroism, and probably the Byzantium of the Angeli and
Palreologi was in essential much like Pera to-day. But
it cannot be denied that the Turkish conquest intensified
all the faults of the inhabitants. They had to learn sub-
serviency, not only to an emperor but to a governing
class of scornful aliens. The only road to power and
prosperity lay in pleasing and flattering the Turks. The ·
latter, with their incapacity for administration and com-
merce, required continual assistance; but they continually
let the Christian know that, though he might be intel-
58 MODERN TURKEY
lectually their superior, and apparently indispensable,
he was but a dog in their eyes, who might ·be whipped
or killed in a moment of caprice. Every Christian who
served the Tt~rk was working against his oWii religion
and the traditions of his own race. Whatever ingenuity
he might display, whatever rewards he might gain, he
could not be stirred by a noble ambition or feel he was
laboring for a great cause. The number of foreign
colonies at Constantinople had doubtless always afforded
employment for the characteristic Levantine profession
of go-between, interpreter, dragoman, agent. or whatever
it is called.''
A recent study by M. Bertrand Bareilles, himself ~n
old resident of the Levantine colony in Constantinople,
presents a discerning picture of these distinctive people.
He tells us that the word "frank" is still the Turkish
equivalent of Levantine in the same way that Indians
call all Europeans "feringhis." He depicts the ill-
concealed contempt of the Armenian, Greek, and Jewish
communities for each other, separated by economic,
political, and religious motives. All Levantines, he states,
bear a strong family likeness. They are ingenious, ener-
getic, and industrious, possessed of an intense patriotism
which, nevertheless, never extended to the Ottoman gov-
ernment. Under the new order in Turkey, these Levan-
tines may develop an allegiance to the Republic as a
means of holding their significant place in the business
life of Constantinople and other coast cities.
In the Turkish Republic, the race problem Js become far
less complicated on account of the exodus of the
Armenian and Greek population from Asia Minor. More-
over, except adjacent to the southern frontier of Asia
Minor, there are virtually no Arabs in the local popula-
tion. The subject of racial characteristics has now the
most practical application in the case of the Kurds and
the Turks. But there are as many different types of
Student Group at Hobert College. Back Row, Lpft to Right, Croatian, Bulgarian, Greek, Circnssian,
Albanian, British, Chaldean; Seeond Row,l Turk, Israelite, Armenian, Persian, Egyptian, Ukrai·
nian; Front Row, Russian, American, Syrian, Swiss.
these Moslem peoples as there are of Americans, French-
men, or Chinese.
REFERENCES
(Permission kindly granted by publisher or author for foregoing quo-
tations.)
(1) Eliot, C. N. E., "Turkey in Europe." London, Arnold, 1908.
(2) Pears, E., "Turkey and Its People,". 2nd ed. London, Methuen,
1912.
(3) Bryce, J., "'Transcaucasia and Ararat.'' London, Macmillan and
Co., 1896~
(4) Ramsay, W. M., "The Intermixture of. Races in Asia Minor." Lon·
don, Milford, 1917.
(5) Sykes, M., "Dar-ul-Islam." London, Bickers, 1917.
(6) Ramsay, W. M., "Impressions of Turkey." London, Hodder and
Stoughton, 1897.
(7) Blunt, F., "The People of Turkey," with Introduction by Mr.·
B. L. Poole. London, Murray, 1878.
(8) Sykes, M., ''The Caliphs' Last Heritage.'' London, Macmillan and
Co., 1915. .
(9} Hogarth, D. G., "The Wandering Scholar." New York, Scribners,
1896.
(10) Dominian, L., "Frontiers of Language and Nationality." New
York, Holt, 1917. ·
(11) Bareilles, B., "Constantinople sea eit6s franques et Levantinea."
Paris, Bossard, 1918.
CHAPTER ill
LEADING MINORITIES: THEIR ACHIEVEMENTS AND
ASPIRATIONS
"If a man say, I love God, and hateth his own brother, he is a liar:
for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love
God whom he hath not seen Y"
-1 JOHN 4, verse 20.
Introrluction
In spite of the widespread departure from Turkey of
the non-Moslem minorities, it has seemed best, because of
their strong influence in the past and since the present
situation may possibly be greatly changed, to present in
this volume articles especially prepared by acknowledged
leaders of the three important minorities-Armenian,
Greek, and Jewish. In these contributions, a representa-
tive chosen by the writer sets forth from his own special
point of view, the local history and the aspirations of his
race. The religious differences, the millet system, the
capitulations, religions, and education are described at
greater length in other sections of "Modern Turkey."
In every national entity, minorities constitute a press-
ing, vexing problem which produces unbridled passions
and heated expressions of opinion. Unhappily, President
Wilson's proclamation of self-determination was inter-
preted by the people concerned to mean that the minority
was to be absolutely subject to the whims of the majority.
But others should not be so hypocritical as to appear
self-righteous; for, in the attitude towards the black race,
does the record of Belgium, France, Germany, Italy,
Spain, and the United States, all Christian nations, afford
a satisfying chronicle T At Lausanne, when American
60
LEADING MINORITIES: ACHIEVEMENTS; ASPffiATIONS 61
Minister Grew endeavored to carry out his instructions
from the Department of State, to insert ·a clause into one
of the Turko-American treaties so as to provide certain
safeguards for the minorities of Turkey, Ismet Pasha
made a most pointed remark, "Shall Turkey be the future
protector of minorities in the United States!"
Had the racial minorities not been placed in the posi-
tion whereby they served as a wedge for European po-
litical intrigue in Turkey, their lot would probably have
been less unhappy. The Turks hated the thought of the
creation of new, independent states within their frontiers
almost as much as they feared an imperialistic Tsarist
Russia. Contrast the status of the local Jews with that
of the Armenians and Greeks; in the case of the former,
there has been no strong, internal movement for political
independence, with the result that they have enjoyed a
position which compares most favorably with their racial
brothers in most countries of Continental Europe. Those
statements, virtual promises, emanating from foreign
countries during the last century, whether from France,
Great Britain, Italy, Tsarist Russia or the United States
of America, which aroused unfulfilled hopes among the
minorities, must not be overlooked by the fair-minded
student as he reads the wholly legitimate propaganda in
the three separate articles.
The population question in 1922-1923 took on a sensa-
tional turn when Dr. Nansen, charged by the Assembly
of the League of Nations to investigate the Near Eastern
refugee question, advised the exchange of Greeks in Tur-
. key for the Turks in Greece. This sweeping plan was
approved by the Allied representatives at Lausanne in
December, 1922. (The Nansen statement together with
discussion appears in Turkey No. 1 (1923), cmd. 1814,
pages 113-124.) The Angora delegates were only too
willing to accede to this "solution" which would have
shocked the whole world had the immediate initiative
62 MODERN TURKEY
come from the Turkish Nationalists. The press is full
of accounts of the circumstances attending the departure
of these poor wretches who have been forced to leave
home and practically forfeit all personal belongings (al-
though theoretically, "abandoned" property does not
automatically change title); but the whole proceedings
are by virtue of the sanction of Christian nations. Eco-
nomically, Greece is the gainer because of her greater
population influx and of its more settled, ambitious, and
industrious character; on the other hand, valuable tradi-
tions and connections of every kind, extending back into
the most glorious Hellenjc period, have been suddenly
disrupted. The individual Greek, tossed about like a
chattel, has gone from a fertile to a relatively unproduc-
tive country; moreover, a Greek makes little money off
other Greeks. In the case of Turkey, the departure of
these productive elements is a severe economic loss, but
the returning Moslem has a wonderful opportunity be-
cause of his freedom from hard competition; and the
Republic has acquired a national solidarity and a chance
for internal reconstruction which would have been denied
her otherwise.
The convention regarding this population transfer,
signed by the delegates of the Greek and Turkish Gov-
ernments at Lausanne, .January 30, 1923, provides that
"As from 1st May, 1923, there shall take place a com-
pulsory exchange of Turkish nationals of the Greek
orthodox religion established in Turkish territory, and
of Greek nationals of the Moslem religion established in
Greek territory. These persons shall not return to live
in Turkey or Greece respectively without the authoriza-
tion of the Turkish government or of the Greek govern-
ment respectively." However, it is stipulated that this
arrangement does not apply to the Greek inhabitants of
Constantinople nor to the Moslem inhabitants of Western
Thrace. In reality, according to the Turkish Minister of
LEADING MINORITIES: ACHIEVEMENTS; ASPIRATIONS 63
the Interior, approximately 400,000 non-Moslems (includ-
ing Greeks in large numbers) had left Constantinople
and suburbs during the fall of 1922.
The extreme chauvinistic policy of the State does not
give much satisfaction to minorities, despite the pro-
visions of the Treaty of Lausanne (Select Document 36).
The present national policy towards immigrants and re-
turning emigrants seems clear from the following an-
nouncement which· appeared in the News Bulletin of the
Federated American Chambers of Commerce of the Near
East, Inc. · (September 8, 1923'):
(1) The preliminary authorization of the Minister
of the Interior for the entry of foreigners into Con-
stantinople is cancelled. All foreigners, except Chris-
tian subjects of· Greece, may enter Constantinople
without a permit. Their passports must, however, be
vised by a Turkish consul in charge of Turkish interests
in their countries. If there are no consulates in their
native countries, the vises may be obtained at
Constantinople.
(2) Armenians who have emigrated from Cilicia
and the Eastern Vilayets will not be admitted.
(3) Foreigners who were previously Ottoman sub-
jects and have become foreign subjects without permis-
. sion will not be admitted•
.ARMENIANS
1
By BOGHOS NUBAR PASHA
The influence exercised by the Armenians in the social

and economic life of Turkey has always been consider-
able and altogether out of proportion to their numbers.
Without wishing, in this very condensed article, to enter
into an historical study of the Armenian people and the
• Born in Egypt. Son of Nubar Pasha. Educated and spent most ~f his
life in France. Armenian descent. Head of the Cilieian Armenians at
the Peace Delegation, Paris.
Article translated from the French.
64 MODERN TURKEY
glorious role which this people of Indo-European race
has played in the Orient, an attempt will be made to
show that they have not only been at the head of every
movement toward progress and toward Occidental civ-
ilization, but have even assisted very materially in pro-
longing the existence of the Ottoman Empire. That this
is a fact is due to their special aptitudes, to their faculty
of assimilation, and to their enterprising spirit.
The traveler, Tournefort, visiting Armenia in the
eighteenth century, bestowed the highest praise on the
Armenians. Ollivier, after him, confirming his judg-
ment, speaks of them in these terms:
The Armenians, intelligent, laborious, patient, eco-
nomical, austere in their morals, need only a govern-
ment less oppressive and more just to become a people
worthy of the highest esteem.
At a later date, Elisee Reclus says:
The Armenians, besides possessing more initiative
in commerce and industry, are distinguished from all
the other peoples of the Ottoman Empire by a freer
and franker spirit, and by a greater love of
instruction.
In order not to multiply citations, we shall give only
one more, from the learned German Haxthausen, which
is illuminating and explains the rOle of the Armenians
in Asia. This writer of seventy years ago states:
. We might say that the Armenian race forms a sort
of yeast which has been thrown into the midst of the
elements of fermentation in Asia to renovate and
awaken the nearly dead germs of intellectual life.
This intellectual life of a people, which is best ex-
pressed in its literature, is in Armenia a rich heritage.
Their historical documents are both numerous and valu-
able, being indeed the only available source of material
relating to events of western Asia. The written litera-
ture has existed only since Mesrop, who, at the beginning
of the :fifth century, invented the Armenian alphabet.
Before him the literature consisted only of "les chants
oraua; des aeres." The first Armenian writers, who lived
about the middle of the fifth century, have left, for in-
stance, very interesting details about the evangelization
of Armenia, which have been published in numerous au-
thoritative works. Modern Armenian literature is also
of a rare variety, and exercised a great influence on
social life within the Ottoman Empire.
The Armenians, together with the Greeks, were the
:first of all the Oriental peoples to found newspapers and
journals. Beginning with the year 1500, the Mekhitar-:
ists, who had taken refuge in Venice, published the first
work printed in Armenian, using the characters invented
by M:esrop. The example was soon followed elsewher~,
and from the beginning of the eighteenth century we :find
Armenian printing establishments in Vienna, Constanti-
nople, Smyrna, Marseilles, Amsterdam, even in America,
besides those established in Armenia. Wherever a print-
ing house exists, a newspaper or magazine is published,
it spreads Armenian ideas in the various and distant
colonies, thereby conserving intact the national sentiment
always so live and persistent among the Armenians.
Parallel to the development of its literature is that of
its educational institutions. Schools multiplied every-
where in Armenia and, although all privately founded
and in the sole charge of the communities, they developed
to such an extent that, according to statistics, they repre-
sented, some time before the war, more than eighty per
cent of the total of all the schools in Turkey.
But it is not only in literature and education that the
Armenians have distinguished themselves. They have
excelled in music, painting, sculpture, the goldsmith's
art, ·and in the theater. Above everything Armenian
66
architecture deserves particular attention, for the

churches and the convents which still remain and the
vestiges of monuments which are found to some degree
everywhere in Armenia, and especially in .Ani, indicate
a very characteristic art. The cathedral of Ejmiad-
zin, built in the :fifth century, those of Ste. Ripsime, of
San Stefano, etc., the convents of St. Varag, of Narek,
and very many other edifices constructed between the
:fifth and seventh centuries are the admiration of all
learned arch.reologists. In their originality and nobility
of conception they combine both Hellenic and Oriental
elements.
The most beautiful palaces of the Sultans, a large num-
ber of mosques, the most admired edifices of Constanti-
nople and of tJle interior are the work of Armenian archi-
tects. St. Sophia itself was restored by an Armenian
architect, who reconstructed its great cupola about the
year 990.
The rOle which the Armenians have played in Turkey
in the political and economic field is not less important.
Without going back to remote epochs, it may be remem-
bered that it was an Armenian, Krikor Odian, the coun-
selor of Midhat Pasha, who· was the principal promoter
of the Ottoman constitution; also that the Ottoman
finances were organized by Armenians, and that the prin-
cipal machinery of the interior administration of the
country was in their hands.
The most noted physicians, even those attached to
the Imperial Palace; the most renowned members of
the bar; the engineers in charge of public works, were
almost all Armenians. It was the Armenians who intro-
duced scientific agricultural methods into the Ottoman
Empire.
In the more strictly governmental and administrative
sphere they have played a role of the first order as titu-
lary ministers, high officials, and ambassadors in Europe,
thus helping to introduce into Turkey the progress of
the Occidental world. I may be pardoned, since we are
treating here of the political action exercised by the Ar-
menians in the Orient, for ·citing the work of my father,
the author of the judicial reform in Egypt. By creating,
nearly fifty years ago, mixed reform tribunals, com-
posed in part of European magistrates, Nubar Pasha
assisted very materially in the introduction of law into
Egypt, without which the country never would have been
able to enter into the path of modern progress and attain
the degree of civilization and prosperity which we wit-
ness today.
Finally, if we consider the economic, industrial and
commercial :field proper, we see that the Armenians have
also held a predominant place there. They represented
before the war only two and one half million in the total
population of twenty-two million in the Ottoman Empire,
and yet they have controlled nearly all the domestic com-
merce and two thirds of the import and export commerce.
They have established very important houses in England,
in Italy, in France, in the two Americas, in Egypt, and
in all the ports of the Levant. It is the same in the pro-
fessions and the manual trades which require dexterity
and some education. The goldsmith, silversmith, jew-
elers, sculptors, and mechanics of Turkey have been for
the most part Armenians.
From the preceding statements it may be inferred that
the Armenian element has been without a doubt a con-
structive element in the intellectual, political, and eco-
nomic life of the Ottoman Empire.
To set forth the aspiratiop.s of the Armenians of Tur-
key, and especially to make their legitimacy clear, it is
necessary to recall that during more than five centuries
they lived under the Ottoman yoke, oppressed, exposed
to all kinds of vexations, and to all kinds of iniquities.
It may be said that, for the Armenians, law, justice,
68 MODERN TURKEY
security, were unknown throughout the Empire. The
testimony of a Christian in the courts did not count
against that of a Mussulman. The life, the property, the
honor of every Armenian was at the mercy of any Mus-
sulman. The Armenian was the pariah whom govern-
ments oppressed, but at the same time utilized his serv-
ices, his aptitudes, and his enterprise. The Turk's
purpose in leaving to the Greek and the Armenian their
language and religions is by no means because of any
liberality and breadth of mind, but, on the contrary, be-
cause of .a desire to class either as a "rayah," and thus
be able, by excluding them from civil national life, to
hold him always in an inferior condition among the
Ottoman subjects.
And yet, although the Armenian people have kept in-
tact their national sentiment and with an unshakable
tenacity preserved their language, their religion, and
their own customs, not one of them before the world con-
flagration dreamed of the independence of Armenia,
because they believed it impossible to obtain. They were
resigned to become part of the Ottoman Empire, de-
manding only reforms which would assure the security
of their lives and their property under a regime of justice
and peace.
The Russo-Turkish War of 1878 offered them the first
opportunity to demand these reforms, and for this pur-
pose they turned to victorious Russia whose army occu-
pied a part of Armenian Turkey. Their just request was
approved, and thus it was that Article 16 was incor-
porated in the Treaty of San Stefano, by which the
Sublime Porte 1 pledged itself to introduce reforms in
its Armenian provinces. Unfortunately for the Arme-
nians, this treaty of San Stefano was annulled, even be-
sA faneiful translation of Bab-i-.A.li, or "High State." The Sublime
Porte was a term applied to the Ottoman Foreign Offiee.-E. G. M.
fore it was put in force, and replaced by that of Berlin.
Although the Treaty of Berlin also contained this reform
clause in its Article 61, there was no longer any penalty
attached so it was without practical significance. The
Russian army was to occupy the Armenian provinces and
·was not to evacuate them until after the reforms had
been put into effect; while in the Treaty of Berlin the
simple pledge of the contracting powers to see that the
reforms were put into effect was accepted.. Is it neces-
sary to add that the Porte took advantage of this fact to
evade reform altogether! Not only that, but the policy
since then has consisted in suppressing the Armenians
so as to solve more easily the Armenian question. Con-
sequently, there have taken place the massacres of 1894
and 1896 under Abdul Hamid, in which more than 300,000
Armenians perished.
The Armenians had hoped that the accession of the
Young Turks would finally deliver them; but it was a
vain hope. Less than a year after the proclamation of
the Constitution, 30,000 Armenians were massacred in
Cilicia. And yet, in order to overthrow the ill-omened,
despotic government of Abdul Hamid, the Young Turks
had not disdained to ask the help of the Armenians,
which the latter had willingly given them in the spirit
of "Union and Progress," of which the Young Turks
boasted. They hoped to see the end of persecution and
massacre. Too late did they see their error, for they
were recompensed for their help by the massacres of
Adana, in which the connivance of the "Government of
Union and Progress" has been established beyond a
doubt by the official investigation itself.
Such was then the situation in the Armenian provinces
when, in 1912, war broke out in the Balkans. Shortly
afterwards, when the Conference of London was held for
the settlement of the Balkan question, the Armenians
70 MODERN TURKEY
decided that the time had come to remind the Powers
signatory to the Treaty of Berlin of Article 61, relating
to the reforms which had never been executed.
Their national authorities applied to the Powers with
the request that they demand of the Porte the execution
of the reforms. His Holiness the Catholicus took official
cognizance. The Catholicus, who resides at Ejmiad-
zin, is elected by the whole Armenian people; he is rec-
ognized as their national as well as religious chief. In
this dual capacity at the time of the Congress of 1878,
he had sent to Berlin a representative, whose interven-
tion had procured the insertion of Article 61 in the
treaty.
The Conference of London could not take up the Ar-
, menian question, alleging that it had been appointed ex-
clusively for the adjustment of the Balkan question. In
reality, it would have been afraid of still further compli-
cations. As a result of direct appeal to the chancellories,
Russia took the initiative in elaborating a program of
reforms which she had proposed to the powers at Con-
stantinople. The Commission appointed to study this
plan and to decide on a definite text began its work, and
entered immediately into negotiations with the Ottoman
Government.
After long discussions with the Porte, which .encour-
aged by Germany offered obstinate resistance using all
the resources of Oriental diplomacy, a definite plan of
reforms was finally worked out by the ambassadors; it
was accepted and promulgated by the .Porte on February
8, 1914. This act was, to be sure, far from satisfying
Armenian aspirations. It was the plan of Russia, but
in a mutilated form. Such as it was, it offered at least
a beginning of reforms, giving reason to hope that in
time it could be improved, and that the end which was
aimed at would finally be attained; to give security and
justice to these peoples, while keeping them in the Otto-
man Empire. Events were not long in showing that
these hopes were vain.
Immediately on the declaration of war between the
Central Powers and the Allies-even before Turkey had
entered into the conflict-the Sublime Porte suspended
the execution of the reforms and annulled the contracts
of the two inspectors-general. Persecutions and massa-
cres began at once and the Ottoman Government inaugu-
rated the campaign of extermination of the Armenian
race, of which Europe was for long months a horrified
witness, but which it was unable to stop. This campaign
was methodically organized and carried out according
to a carefully studied plan. The orders originated with
the central government of Constantinople ; the massacres
began and ended on fixed dates; and it was ~t the call
of the public criers that on fixed dates also the whole
Armenian population of each city and village-old men,
women, children-were assembled on a public square to
be deported. They were scarcely given time to collect a
little clothing and as much food as they could carry, when
they were led away in caravans, most of them afoot, for
an unknown destination, which only a small number
could reach after days and months of marching over the
burning deserts or icy mountains. These deportations,
more cruel than the massacres perpetrated at the same
time, continued the work of extermination till the number
of victims reached the frightful figure of one million.
After the victory of the Allies it will readily be seen
that it could no longer be a question of simple reforms,
but that liberation from the Turkish yoke was impera-
tive. The Armenians therefore demanded their libera-
tion and the constitution of an independent Armenian
State. Furthermore, the Armenians shed their blood
on all the fields of battle, in France, in Asia Minor, in the
Caucasus, under the French, English or American flags,
in order to contribute, so far as their means permitted,
72 MODERN TURKEY
to the victory of those who fought for justice and right,
and from whom they awaited their deliverance and the
reconstitution of their national life.
In conclusion, a few words sh.ould be written regard-
ing the aspirations of the Armenians and the realization
of the program they have demanded from the victorious
Allied Powers.
It will be understood that the first of their wishes is
to see all the Armenian territories reunited in a single
state,-both those forming part of the Ottoman Empire,
as well as those previously conquered by Russia, which
after the fall of the Russian Empire in the course of this
war, have constituted themselves an Armenian republic,
with Erivan for the capital city. The Armenians are
aware that the state so constituted would need protection
against outside attacks until such time when it could be
organized and placed in position to defend itself. But as
simple protection could not suffice, and foreign aid was
indispensable in the general organization of the country,
they requested the Powers to choose one of their num"
ber as mandatory.
Such was the program until the idea of a League of
Nations took form. The Armenians were then naturally
led to request no longer the collective protection of the
Powers-which might have involved the inconveniences
of a joint sovereignty-but the protection of the League
of Nations itself, and, in accordance with Article 22 of
the Covenant, the assistance of. a mandatory powerful-
filling its mandate in the name of the League. The form
of assistance being thus established in principle, it re-
mained to determine the territories which would make
up the future Armenian state.
The Armenians have been reproached for claiming
territories too vast~especially in view of the number of
the population unfortunately reduced since the massacres
and the deportations-and with having presented a too
ambitious program. And yet, should we be astonished
that they have laid claim to regions which geographi-
cally, historically, and ethnologically are, and have always
been, Armenian! In strict justice can they be refused
the inheritance of their ancestors for the reason that
they are too few in numbers to occupy it, especially when
it is known that it was by murder and assassination that
the Turks created in certain regions a numerical major-
ity in their favor!
Moreover, it must not be forgotten that it is not only
the Armenian population which has been decimated in
the course of the Great War. The Turkish population
has paid just as heavy a toll. It is, in fact, in the prov-
inces of Asia Minor that the troops sent to the battle-
fields have for the most part been recruited. Epidemics,
privations, famine, very bad .sanitary conditions have,
on the other hand, made fearful ravages in the Mussul-
man population. According to German statistics, more
than two million Turks perished in this way during the
war. It follows, that if the Armenian population, which
before the war was in a majority in these provinces, has ·
been greatly reduced, the Turkish population has di-
minished also in about the same proportion; the balance
between the two elements has therefore not been per-
ceptibly modi:fied. 1 The majority of the population would
be rapidly reestablished in favor of the Armenians, for
all those who have taken refuge abroad or immigrated
nearly everywhere to escape the massacres will return
to their mother country as soon as they shall have the
assurance of living there in safety.
The dream of united Armenia could have been realized
only if the United States had accepted the mandate, for
of the belligerent Powers that country was the least af-
fected by the war, and was in position to undertake so
great a task and to take under their protection a united
1 Consult figures in the Appendi:J: to "Modern Turkey."
74 MODERN TURKEY
Armenia stretching from the Mediterranean to the Black
Sea and including the present Armenian Republic. The
other Powers, which had suffered so severely from the
war, had their own very heavy burdens, and each de-
clared that they could not assume such a task. In his
address to Parliament on April 29, 1920, Mr. Lloyd
George definitely confirmed this refusal by saying that
neither France, England, nor Italy was in a position to
undertake it. But since the United States Senate has
rejected the ratification of the covenant of the League
of Nations and has declared against accepting any man-
date, the first program of the Armenians can no longer
be realized; so much the less, as the Supreme Council,
in view of the situation created by the domestic policy
of the United States, has made known its decision to
give more modest proportions to the future Armenian
State.
With regard to the delimitation of the Armenian. State,
the Supreme Council has encountered difficulties which
led it to resort to the arbitration of Mr. Wilson, Presi-
dent of the United States, requesting him to determine
the frontiers between Turkey and Armenia. But it was
not only his arbitration on the question of the frontiers
that was asked of him. The Supreme Council offered at
the sam~ time to the President of the United States the.
mandate of Armenia, and if this mandate could not be
accepted, it asked him at least to grant to the Armenian
State financial or military aid. If the statements made
in the United States Senate do not permit the hope that
the mandate will be accepted, it seems, however, that
nothing may prevent financial aid and even military aid;
no matter how slight it may be, the latter would be ex-
tremely valuable for the moral effect which it would pro-
duce. Moreover, the offer of the Supreme Council might
be combined with the suggestions of the League of Na-
tions, even if the United States limit itself to granting
financial aid or guaranty.
The Armenians remember, and will never forget, the
wonderful enthusiasm shown in our favor by the Ameri-
can people, and how greatly it was promoted by the per-
sonal action of President Wilson, who three times issued
proclamations expressing, on behalf of the people of the
United States, noteworthy sentiments of humanity. We
have, therefore, the firm conviction that the verdict of
the United States of America will be based on equity and
that they will safeguard the rights of the Armenians. 1
Summarizing, what the Armenians ask is that the fron-
tiers of the new state be so mapped out as to permit it
to live, develop, and be protected from any aggression on
the part of its neighbors. They ask that their economic
life be assured by outlets on the Black Sea; that the- pos-
sibility be guaranteed to them of constructing a railway
belonging entirely to them, which will connect the in-
terior of Armenia with a seaport; that essentially Ar-
menian centers, to which they are linked by sacred his-
torical memories, shall not be taken from their territory;
that no important strategic point indispensable to its
defense shall be left to its traditional enemy. What they.
ask, lastly, is that the Armenian territories that are not
to be a part of the independent state shall be given a
1 The Supreme Council of the Great Powers established outside
boundariea which at best deprived the proposed New Armenia of a natural
seaport. The limits specified did not extend beyond the vilayets of
Trebizond, Bitlis, Van, and Erzerum. Tbe only possibilities consisted
of securing special privileges at the foreign port of Batum, or of con-
structing a tremendously costly railway over the Pontic Range to Trebizond
or to one of the other open roadsteads on the Black Sea. This personal
observation is based upon my study of all possible porta which might serve
the proposed Armenian State, embodied as an appendix to the elaborate
report of President Wilson, which was never acted upon by the Great
PowerL Thia whole procedure iB another instance of the lack of sin·
cerity exhibited towards the Armenians by their supposed supporters.-
E. G. :M.
76 MODERN TURKEY
special regime, which shall give them real guaranties of
security and of justice.
For the future, we may place confidence in the Ar-
menians themselves, for they will show themselves
worthy of the aid and protection of the Powers. Thanks
to this national sentiment so vigorous and tenacious, of
which they have always given proof, and which cen.
turies of oppression have been unable to destroy, thanks
to their special aptitudes, to their spirit of enterprise, to
their love of labor, and to the strong attraction which
western civilization has for them, they will soon have
bound up their wounds, reconstructed their ruins, im-
proved the fertile soil and rich subsoil of their coui;l.try,
and reassuming their place in the world will have be-
come, as they have been in the past, an element of pros-
perity and a new factor of pacification in the Near East.
GREEKS
1
By ADAMANTIOS TH. POLYZOIDES
That the Greek race has played a most important role

in the development of the Ottoman Empire, and remained
intimately connected with the fortunes and the vicissi-
tudes of Turkey during the last seven or eight hundred
years is only natural, when we take into consideration
the peculiar geographic and ethnic conditions under
which the two peoples came into contact.
As a matter of fact, it was not only the Turks, as such,
that first came to meet the Greeks in a country which from
time immemorial had been identified with the history of
the Greek race, and which during the last five centuries
1
Athenian journalist of Thracian descent. Studied in Constantinople
and Greece. Graduate, Law School of National University of Athens;
formerly managing editor of the Athenian dailies Athenre and Patris, and
for years Athens correspondent to the Italian daily Giornale d'Italia. Came
to America 1908; managing editor of the Greek daily, Atlantis. Author,
'' Greek Neutrality and Constantine.' ' Regular contributor to American
periodicals.
formed the largest part of the Ottoman Empire. Long
before the Seljuk Turks made their appearance in the
Near East, Greece was predominant in all that vast ter-
ritory, bordered on the north by the Black Sea, on the
south by the Mediterranean, on the west by the .LEgean,
and on the east by a straight line starting near Trebizond
and reaching down somewhere near Alexandretta. This
of course does not include any part of European Turkey,
most of which was lost to the Ottoman Empire during
the recent wars.
The character of this Greek domination varied accord-
ing to the different stages of history, beginning with the
legends of the Golden Fleece and coming down through
the Trojan expedition to the great Persian wars. Never-
theless, the time when Greek influence became more pro-
nounced in Asia Minor and Anatolia was during the times
of Alexander the Great, whose policy of Hellenization of
the East remains the chief characteristic of his cam-
paigns.
This process of Hellenization was continued long after
the death of Alexander, gradually blending itself with
the spread of Christianity, which, as far as the East was
concerned, was almost entirely propagated through the
medium of the Greek tongue. As a matter of fact, Hel-
lenism, in its new Christian form, was so powerful in the
East during the following three hundred years, that even
the Eastern Roman Empire established by Constantine
the Great had finally to succumb to its influence, so that
after the eighth century that vast political and military
organization became the Greek or Byzantine Empire and
held its preeminently Greek character to the day of its
fall in 1453, at which the Ottoman Empire became its
successor after a struggle covering almost two hundred
years, from the time when Ertogrul, or rather his son
Osman, the founder of the first Turkish state in Bythinia,
near Brusa, first began to encroach upon Byzantine ter-
78 MODERN TURKEY
ritory in 1288, to the day when Constantinople fell under
Mohammed II, to whom the credit for the establishment
of the Ottoman Empire belongs.
The Greek race fared rather badly in the first two cen-
turies of Ottoman domination. The Turkish State, being
a militant organization par excellence and existing
chiefly as the }llOSt perfect war machine of its time, was
in continuous and ever-increasing need of new armies,
and these the Turkish race was unable to supply in suffi-
cient number. Thus, as early as 1326, Orkhan, the son
of Osman and first conqueror of Brusa, instituted the
system of forcible recruiting of all his Christian prison-
ers in order to swell his army. This system continued
up to the time of the conquest of Constantinople, when it
was further developed at the expense of the Greek popu-
lation, who in addition to other taxation had to supply
the healthiest and strongest among their boys for the
exclusive service of the Sultan. These boys were liter-'
ally kidnaped from their homes at the tender age of
seven, made into Moslems, and brought up at the expense
of the state. They were the famous janissaries. Their
system of recruitment was gradually extended to all
countries falling under Ottoman domination, and not
even Hungary was exempt from it. Just how many mil-
lions of Greek boys thus passed into the making of the
Turkish race in Anatolia is an open question. When,
however, we figure that those were the years when the
Ottoman Empire was in its prime, and its military suc-
cesses almost continuous, we will come to the conclusion
that the loss of the Greek nation from that source alone
must have been enormous.
With the expansion of its frontiers, rulers of the Otto-
man Empire soon came to the conclusion that its military
men were not sufficient to manage the affairs of the state.
That they were ill-fitted for the work of civil administra-
tion and all the tasks of peace was apparent to the Turks
ever since they had crossed into Europe. S<!, no sooner
had they become the masters in Constantinople than
they approached their Greek subjects in a spirit of reli-
gious tolerance, which even today seems astonishing in
the semi-savage race, that the Turks of the fifteenth
century undoubtedly were.
This policy of toleration and even of friendship on the
part of the greatest and most intelligent Sultans towards
their Greek and other non-Moslem subjects, has remained
to this day as one of the strongest arguments of such
writers as Pierr~ Loti. And yet the phenomenon is
easily explained by the fact that the Turks, being a race
of soldiers, needed the Greeks and the other Christians
for the other functions of the Empire which could not be
successfully filled by Turks, especially in the early days
of the Ottoman Empire.
Thus we :find that out of the five grand viziers or prime
ministers of Sultan Mohammed II, the conqueror of Con-
stantinople, four were Christians, two of them, namely,
Mahmud Pasha and Rum Mehmet Pasha, were Greeks,
and two others, namely, Isak Pasha and Kedid Pasha,
were Albanians. It is a remarkable fact that the suc-
cessors of :Mohammed followed this precedent in the
selection of their prime ministers. Thus in the reign of
Solyman, or Suleiman the :Magnificent, out of nine grand
viziers, the eight were Christian born, while the total
number of Turkish premiers from 1656 to 1710, who were
mostly of Greek birth, are counted by the dozen. Gradu-
ally the Greek element entered other :fields of activity
under the Sultans, a number of them becoming famous
generals, governors, admirals and high officials of the
Empire. It is characteristic that the most famous of all
Turkish .naval men, the redoubtable Khaireddin Barbar-
ossa, was a Greek renegade. .
It will then be seen that the Greek race played no small
part in strengthening and in shaping the growth of the
80 llODERX TTRKEY
Ottoman Empire in Europe, even if this help was giYen
under the compulsion of major force. On the other
hand, the role played by the Greek business genius in
Turkey was second only to that of the Armenians and the
numerous Jews who at all times held an important ~lace
in the Ottoman Empire, the first as money lenders and
bankers, the second as merchants and artisans. NeYer-
theless, the place held by the Greeks was superior to both
Armenians and Jews; in the first place, because the
Greeks were more numerous, in the second, because they
happened to be of the race from which the Turks con-
quered the Empire, and in the third, because the Greeks
were seafarers-something which was lacking in their
companions in slaYery. In the seventeenth century and
late into the eighteenth, the Greek had made himself in-
dispensable to his Turkish master. Such high offices as
the governorships of W"allachia and lloldavia were open
to them, ambassadorships and high palace posts were'
giYen freely to them, and the whole diplomatic service of
the Empire was fast passing into their control The Otto-
man Empire in the middle of the eighteenth century was
daily giYing a larger control of public affairs to the
Greeks, and had the Hellenic race been pleased to remain
a permanent subject of the Sultan, there might haYe
developed a joint control of the fortunes of the Empire.
This, howeYer, could not be. The Greeks in the Turk-
ish service outdid their masters in fanaticism; they were
more Turkish than the Turks themselYes ; they worked
against the most ardent desire of the Greek race, which
was not joint control of Turkey• but Hellenic inde-
pendence, and eYentnal redemption of Constantinople.
Many as the Greek serrants of the Sultan were, they
were vastly outnumbered by the immense majority of
those who dreamed of a free and independent Greece.
And the struggle of 1821, with its terrible sacrifices, and
the declaration of Hellenic independence of 1829, were the
culmination of the silent effort of an entire race during
four hundred years.
The great Greek Revolution of 18211 which lasted for
eight years, naturally made the whole Greek nation sus-
pected by the Turks, much to the detriment of the five or
six million Greeks still living in those parts of the coun-
try which were unaffected by the Hellenic struggle for
independence.
The formation of the kingdom of Greece in 1833,
which put an end to that struggle, was soon afterwards
followed by the modernization of the Ottoman Empire.
Thanks to pressure from the European Powers and
mostly of Russia, the Sultan was forced to grant many
privileges to the Christian elements within the realm.
For the :first time the non-Moslem and the Moslem sub-
jects of the Sultan were allowed to stand on the same
level of political equality.
These reforms were embodied in an Imperial procla-
mation dated October 21 old style (November 3), 1839,
and given out from the Palace of Gulhane. This is the
famous edict known as the Hat-i-Sheriff, or Tanzimat,
which was afterwards reaffirmed and perfected by
another imperial proclamation known as the Hat-i-Huma-
yun, dated February 18, 1856, soon after the close of the
Crimean War. In this way absolute equality was estab-
lished between Turk and Christian, although the begin-
nings of this new regime were drenched in the blood of
the terrible massacre of Syria during which more than
30,000 innocent people, mostly women and children, per-
ished in Beirut, Damascus, and other cities, while an
equal number were sold as slaves. The property losses
in that massacre, which was directly due to an outburst
of Turkish religious fanaticism against the granting of
equal rights to the non-Moslems, amounted to more than
two hundred million francs, which must be taken as the
equivalent of so many dollars at that time. This mas-
82 MODERN TURKEY
sacre cost the Turks Syria, which was placed under a
special regime at the demand of the European Powers.
During the nineteenth and early in the twentieth cen-
turies, Turkey lost many of its dominions, such as Egypt,
Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, northern Thrace, Crete,
Thessaly and Epirus, which were soon followed by the
loss of Tripoli, the Dodekanese, Macedonia, Albania,
the lEgean islands, Arabia, Mesopotamia, Syria and
Palestine, while Anatolia and Asia Minor were only
saved by the great military disaster of the Greek army
late in August, 1922.
During the period between 1821 and 1922, the Greek
race in the Ottoman Empire had a varied and turbulent
existence, although it held its own up to 1914, when the
Young Turkish regime that came into power in 1908
embarked on a policy of forcible Turkification of all the
racial elements of· the Empire, along lines entirely differ-
ent from those established by the earlier Sultans. It'
was thus thai the Greek power within the Turkish
Empire was definitely broken.
It has been often said in support of the Turks that they
treated their non-Moslem subjects with tolerance and
consideration, and they used them extensively in the
government of the Empire. This as we have already
seen is true, and could be further supplemented by stat-
ing that up to very recent times the Sultan's ambassador
in London was a Greek, while another Greek represented
Turkey at Washington in the late eighties. A Greek rep-
resented the Sultan at Athens when that country became
an independent kingdom under Otho, and a Greek signed
the Berlin treaty in the name of the Sultan in 1878.
Greeks ruled Moldavia and W allachia, Crete and Samos,
as well as eastern Rumaili, prior to the annexation of
that province by Bulgaria in 1885. And yet this mark
of distinction bestowed on the Greeks was in itself the
best proof of Turkish incapacity to deal in the higher
problems of diplomacy, as diplomacy was in the compli-
cated years of the nineteenth century. The Ottoman
Empire lacked the men who would successfully deal with
Europe, in the name of the Sultan. There were some
very able and very clever Turks, and Abdul Hamid was
probably one of the best examples of Turkish diplo-
matic genius at its best. But these men were few, and
they all more or less were under the influence of their
Greek advisers. European Turkey was chiefly run by
Greeks, who held all the minor and some of the higher
posts in the provinces and districts, and it was through
the efforts of such men that the governmental machine
in those provinces was always a distinct improvement on
that of Anatolia.
After the fall of Constantinople the Greeks enjoyed
considerable religious freedom, and they were clever
enough to use it for educational purposes and for patri-
otic teachings. Thus every Greek church became a secret
school, and every priest a teacher. For lack of textbooks
these, mostly humble, men used the Bible, openly as long
as they could bribe the usually grafting Turkish officials,
secretly when the price became prohibitive. It is an
established fact that without the Greek Church there
could never be a Greek revolution .and a Greek inde-
pendence. And this fact explains the attachment of the
Greek people to their Church, which is more than a reli-
gious institution, because it was always identified with
the traditions, the dreams, and the aspirations of the
Greek race.
The Turkish State collected taxes for education, espe-
cially in the years following the promulgation of reforms.
But these taxes went to the support of Turkish schools;
and the Greek communities, established along the old
lines of the cities of Greece, in addition to the taxes they
paid for Turkish education, had to support their own
secular schools, colleges and seminaries in a way that
84 MODERN TURKEY
would astonish every one not familiar with the munifi-
cence of individual Greeks, when it comes to the ques-
tion of supporting those institutions of learning that
have always marked the progress of Greek life.
This intimate association between Greeks and Turks
during the last five centuries has been of immense benefit
to Turkey, notwithstanding the fact that the early Turks
looked upon their Greek subjects with the contempt of
all warlike tribes towards their vanquished opponents.
Gradually, however, the truth began to filter through the
Turkish military mind, that it is not only by the force of
arms that a nation can always win. Thus, they found
that learning and education, and the arts of peace, and
trade and industry and business counted for something;
and they saw that the Greeks, by the sheer fact of pos-
sessing those virtues, were almost the masters of the
entire business and social life of the Empire. Thus they
began to appreciate the Greek genius, and to use it for
the advancement of the Empire; and only when they
found that the Greek race, in educating itself and in pre-
paring itself, did not mean to use its mental and moral
forces for the maintenance of the Empire, but on the
contrary its members always cherished the prospect of
a greater Greece established on the old territories of a
redeemed Byzantine Empire, only then did the Turks
change front and become the bitter enemies of a race
that proved too dangerous to the Empire.
Without going too far into the past and confining our
observations only to the time just before the. outbreak
of the Great War, ·we find that in European Turkey
alone, that is to say, in Constantinople and Thrace, the
Greek communities supported; nearly 700' schools, of
which 113 were located in greater Constantinople, 50 of
them were in the city proper. In Asia Minor the Greek
communities supported twice as many schools, the total
number of pupils, both boys and girls, being much in
excess of 300,000. In view of the fact that the Greeks in
Thrace numbered nearly 1,000,000, and those of Asia
Minor nearly 2,000,000, the result of the above calcula-
tion seems to be that a Greek population of 3,000,000
people gave almost 300,000 pupils to their schools, which
is in itself an achievement when we compare it with such
an advanced community as the city of New York, where
a population of 6,000,000 gives almost 900,000 pupils to
its public schools. This educational effort of the Ottoman
Greeks cost them, before the war, nearly $10,000,000.
With 4,000 churches and nearly 600 priests, their thou-
sands of charitable associations, guilds, clubs, athletic
organizations, chambers of commerce, great commercial,
shipping, and industrial enterprises, and their connec.-
tions with the whole European and American business
world, the Greeks played a tremendous role in the devel-
opment of the Ottoman Empire; and throughout the
centuries have been its chief progressive asset.
Times have changed, and the Gr.eek military catastro-
phe in Asia Minor is pointing the way to a greater crisis
which is bound to come in the Near East. Since 1912
Turkey has lost not only in territory and population, but
also in human values which it is very hard to replace.
The Greeks who emigrated by the hundreds of thousands
from Asia Minor and Anatolia and the Pontus and all
those provinces which it has been difficult to include in a
more minute examination, are to all intents and purposes
lost to the Turkish State, and their places are being
taken either by Turkish immigrants of a positively lower
standard of civilization and mental development, or by
European professional colonizers, who will go to Turkey
with the object of serving their own particular interests,
without paying too much attention to the things that
would serve that country best.
86 MODERN TURKEY
The Greek seems to have played his role in Turkey, for
the time being at least. Others are taking his place, and the
question remains open as to what the future holds forth.
JEWS
By His EMIN~CE, H.ull NAHOUK •
When Suleiman Shah, the chief of the tribe of Kay

Han, was migrating in the year 1200 with all his follow-
ers from their camping place surrounding Horasan, little
did he imagine that two hundred and fifty years later one
of his descendants was to give the master stroke to the
Oriental Empire, thereby bringing to an end the last
chapter in the history of the Middle Ages. Modern his-
tory properly begins with the establishment of his capital
in the city of Constantine.
The Jews, individually and collectively, have contrib-
uted to the political, econo~c and commercial develop-
ment that has taken place in the Turkish Empire. In
order to judge this action more effectively it is necessary
that one should beco:rp.e acquainted at least with a synop-
sis of the history of the numerous settlements of· the
Jews in various sections of the Empire, and particularly
in Constantinople. The progress of the Jews and the
1
Born in Magnesia, Asia Minor, in 1872. Studied in Beirut, Tiberias
(Palestine), and in the Lyceum of Smyrna. After year of study in Con-
stantinople School of Law, studied seven years in the French Rabbinical
Seminary in Paris, I ':Ecole des Hantes Etudes and I ':Ecole des Langnes
Orientales. Returned to Constantinople in 1898. Appointed professor at
the Rabbinical Seminary founded by the Alliance Franc;aise Israelite-Uni-
verselle of Paris. Secured leave of llbsence, 1907-8, to investigate condi-
tion of Jews in Abyssinia. Decorated by Menelick II, with the Grand
Order of Solomon. During the Revolution. in Turkey, Angnst, 1908, elected
by all Hebrew communities of the Ottoman Empire as Chief Rabbi of
Turkey, holding position until resignation in April, 1920. Decorated by
Sultan with the Broad Ribbon of the Order of Osmanie, the Order of
Mejije, and the Grande Croix de I 'Ordre de Franc;ois-J oseph. Supervised
relief work in Turkey during the war. Representative Alliance Franc;aise
Israelite Universelle of Paris. (After the armistice of 1918, Mohammed
VI named His Eminence as Plenipotentiary to the United States, but
permission denied him to leave eontinent.-E. G. M.)
Contribution translated from the French.
Umnnili Hisar (European Castle), built by Mohammed the Conqueror before he stormed Constantinople,
now the site of Robert College.
extent of their influence are also worth careful considera-
tion.
The influence of the Jewish people upon the general
progress of Turkey corresponds very closely with their
own internal advancement: the latter, in turn, being re-
flected from individual as well as collective Jewish move-
ments in other countries. Their history can be divided
into two main periods. The first period begins in the
year 1500 and ends in the year 1650. This is the period
when the Jews took a leading part in the development of
diplomatic relations between. the Turkish Empire and
the countries of Europe. A number of influential Jews
from Spain and Portugal, who had settled in Turkey,
exercised a powerful influence over the political, commer-
cial, and intellectual expansion of the Empire. Then
through lack of leadership follows that period of decline
characterized by the lethargic condition of the Jews,
resulting in their temporary political and economic down-
fall. This interval lasted one hundred and fifty years,
beginning with the year· 1650. The last period begins
with the nineteenth century, and is noticeable for a com-
plete revival of a period of activity on the part of the
Jews in Turkey. This influence made itself felt gradu-
ally through the intellectual, commercial, and financial
rebirth of the country, thus contributing to the develop-
ment of the country in the world's civilization.
Bent on conquest in Asia, the descendants of Osman
had, from the very outset, come into contact with Jewish
settlements which had been established for centuries.
These settlements were to be found particularly in and
near seaports, because the latter offer facilities for quick
exit in troublesome and perilous times. In fact, nowhere
in the Ottoman Empire have they settled at a distance of
more than sixty to seventy kilometers from the shore.
For example, there are settlements of Jews at Brusa
(sixty kilometers from the port of Mudania) and at
88 MODERN TURKEY
~Magnesia (sixty kilometers from Smyrna). At one time;
towards the beginning of the sixteenth century, a settle-
ment established at Amasia had to disband and migrate
because of persecutions provoked by the Greeks of that
city, when they were accused of "ritual-murder." There
were, therefore, no Jewish settlements in the cities of
the interior, nor in any of the inaccessible vilayets of
Armenia. This holds true even today, with the exception
of the city of Angora, located on the Anatolian Railway,
where a small Jewish colony exists.
In spite of persecution and oppression during the
reign of Theodosius, Constantinople had the largest Jew-
ish population of any city in Turkey, but it was only
after the arrival of the Spanish Jews that the communi-
ties began to attain renown. Among the new immigrants
there were many leaders-men of great ability-who had
taken a large part in the political, commercial, and scien-
ti:fic activities in Spain and Portugal. With their arrival,
the existing settlements of Jews, especially those at Con-
stantinople, Salonika, Smyrna and Adrianople, took on
fresh virility. Thus was contributed new strength to the
Turkish Empire.
In addition to the influence exerted by the Jewish
immigration of the year 1492,1 we must bear in mind also
the importance of the influence exerted by individuals.
Among them may be mentioned Don Joseph Nassi and
Salomon Eskenazi, men of great political talent and
diplomatic tact. This political influence of the Jews of
Turkey extended to their coreligionists in countries
where the Jews were the object of persecution. When
the· Pope, Paul IV, was about to expel all the Turkish
and Spanish Jews from territories under his domination,
• The following remark is attributed to Bayazid II on the occasion of

signing in the year 1492 the decree allowing the Jews expelled from
Spain to enter Turkey: "By decreeing the ejection of the Jews,
Ferdinand has impoverished his country and enriched mine. 11
LEADING MINORITIES: ACHIEVEMENTS; ASPffiATIONS 89 .
Sultan Suleiman, at the solicitation of Don Joseph Nassi,
threatened him with similar punitive measures against
the Christians living in Turkey, if he attempted to carry
out his evil plans. The act of March 9, 1555, was the
result.
Within a space of approximately half a century these
political relations had, as one of their consequences, the
establishment of wide commercial connections. The eco-
nomic ties between the various parts of the Empire and
between the Empire and the outside world, were strength-
ened to a surprising degree. This was especially true of
the connections with the various states of Italy.
Also, it is a known fact that the city of Hamburg owes
its prosperity to a large extent to the first bank founded
there in the year 1620 by a score of Jews of Spanish,
Portuguese, and Dutch origin. The history of that city
has preserved their names. So was it with Turkey. She
has benefited through financial credits secured by her
Jewish inhabitants due to relations with their co religion-
ists in Europe. The banking house founded by Dona
Garcia Mendezia, the mother-in-law of Don Joseph Nassi,
is a case in point. This institution, with its branches in
Antwerp, France, Flanders, etc., and its agencies at sev-
eral Turkish ports, was a great source of strength to the
Jews, which they used very effectively when Pope Paul
IV started to persecute the Jews living in Ancona. The
Jews of Turkey and those of Salonika systematically
boycotted Ancona by sending their merchandise through
Pisa. As a result, the former city completely lost its
commercial importance.
A new impulse to economic progress was the conquest
of Syria, Egypt, and Mesopotamia (with its center in
Baghdad). 'Vhile Jewish communities had existed there
for many years prior to the conquest, they had no con-
nections with each other. It was not until all these terri-
tories were placed under the samE' political rule that a
90 MODERN TURKEY
union of all Jewish settlements occurred, and that men
of talent of the caliber of Joseph Chelibi of Egypt took
the lead and made further contributions towards the
commercial development of the country. With the pass-
ing away of such men, the courts and the palace lost their
salutary influences. Wars succeeded wars. Dreams for
the blending of the Orient with the Occident, through
the influence of Constantinople, faded. Commerical life
began to decay. As an immediate result, Smyrna and
Salonika took away from Constantinople the right of
being called the outstanding commercial center. At
Salonika, the number of Jews was continually increas-
ing and commerce developed rapidly. Even the Moham-
medan elements of that city were :fired by this commer-
cial spirit. This awakening was accelerated by the
Sabbatist movement which ended by the conversion of
many Jewish families to Islam, and whose descendants
are known today by the name of Dunmehs. A good por-
tion of the commerce of Salonika is still in the hands of
Dunmehs, who have also established their branch houses
in Constantinople and Smyrna.
To the diplomatic, commercial, and :financial part
played by the Jews, we must add the work they have
accomplished in the social and cultural branches. For
the :first time in the history of the Turkish Empire laws
were passed to promote the welfare of the country and
the people, accomplished by the great legislator, Sultan
Suleiman, through the pressure brought upon him and
his viziers by his Jewish advisers, including Nassi and
Eskenazi. Besides these influences, manuscripts in vari-
ous languages-in Arabic and Spanish script particu-
larly-which the Jews brought along with them, counted
very largely in the intellectual life of Turkey. This
literature was the moral food of that period, and it em-
braced all branches of knowledge: science, poetry, phi-
losophy, history, mathematics. The Dunmehs, for exam-
pie, were delighted to read the work of the Jews in Spain.
The second element certainly was the installment of the
first printing press in the country, imported by Abraham
Usque, a Jew from Italy; a second printing plant was
installed and operated by Reina Nassi in the famous
palace of Belvedere, in that quarter called "Koru-
chesme," situated on the European side of the Bospo-
rus. About the same time another printing concern was
started in Salonika.
It was due to this new vigor inspired by the Jews
towards their country of adoption which awoke the
Turkish poets, ulemas, and historians. It was about this
time that Turkish poetry, influenced by the growth of
Hebrew poetry, began to flourish.
Ever since the conquest of Spain by the Arabs, the
study which the Mohammedans cared for the most was
medicine. The Jews, who were the :first to devote them-
selves to the study of this science, derived their knowl-
edge from Spain, Portugal, and Italy. The famous doc-
tor, Amatus Lusitamus, emigrated from Italy to Salonika
in the year 1558. The families of Nassi and Eskenazi,
emigrating to Constantinople, brought with them many
doctors, including the well-known family of Amon, whose
descendants received for many years from the Sultan the
title of he kim bashi, or chief doctor. A J ewess, Esther
Kiera, practiced medicine and attended the Sultana
Baffa.
At the beginning of the nineteenth century, following
a century of. wars and decay, a new spirit pervaded the
Jews of Turkey, due partly to the influence of a number
of families of reputation in the cities of Constantinople,
Salonika, Damascus, and Baghdad, and also partly to the
influence and intervention of European Jewry in Turk-
ish affairs. Among the latter, the Alliance Israelite
Universelle became the main factor. The Alliance Is-
raelite was organized in Paris in the year 1860, having
92 MODERN TURKEY
as its aims the emancipation of Judaism, and the acquisi-
tion of equal rights. for the Jews in foreign countries.
This association established modern schools all over the
Near East, offering to the Jewish youth opportunities
for general education and manual training. Helping the
Alliance in this work were other Jewish organizations,
such as the Anglo-Jewish Association and the Jewish
Colonization Association. Thanks to these organizations,
the progress made by the Jews of Turkey contributed
extensively to the advancement of all branches of social
and intellectual life of the country. The schools of the
Alliance spread culture widely among the Turkish peo-
ple, since a goodly number of Mohammedan boys and
girls received their education in Jewish schools. The
Government, in their national and public schools, has
consistently followed the programs of studies adopted
by the Alliance Israelite. In many cases, instructors of
the Jewish schools were employed as official interpreters.
There were a few families that had already won a
great name in the political and :financial circles and had
contributed on many occasions to the sustaining of the
country's credit by advancing sums of money to the offi-
cial treasury. Most of them were connected with promi-
nent European families. Such were the Camondos and
Carmonas in Constantinople; the Allatinis, Fernandez,
and Morpourgos in Salonika ; the Estambulis, Altar as,
and Shemahias in Damascus; the Lisbonas in Aleppo,
the Bassoons, N ouriels, and Menahems in Baghdad. But
with the large immigration from Turkey to the great
centers of Europe, viz., London, Manchester, Paris, Mar-
seilles, Antwerp, Milan, Vienna, and Berlin, and to many
parts of America, and together with the arrival in Tur-
key of many Jewish families from Central Europe, new
ties were formed and new opportunities for commerce
became available. Limited and individual initiative gave
way to collective action. The Jewish proprietors of
small banking firms foresaw the necessity of getting the
cooperation of European capital, and thus created there-
by the great financial establishm~nts which helped to
improve the credit standing of the country, and extended
the boundaries of Turkish commerce and industry. This
applied to the early banking institution founded through
the initiative of great financiers-Jewish for the most
part-with French and English capital. This was the
case with the Banque Ottomane and the Societe Gen-
erale, both of Constantinople; the latter is no longer in
existence. Jews were chosen as managers and directors
of these banks. The Banque de Salonique was founded
through the same initiative and is managed essentially
by native Jews. So were the other banking institutions
as the Wiener Bank, Banque Hongroise, Banca Com-
merciale ltaliana, and other private banks having
branches in the various cities of the Empire. While
preoccupied with the establishment of credit houses, the
Jews did not fail to take an interest in the organization
of institutions for public business enterprise. They
were the ones to obtain capital from Europe and conces-
sions from the government. The concessions given for
the Credit Foncier Ottoman for the· opening of public
thoroughfares (Societe des Routes}, for the Sanaa-
y emen and J a:ffa-Jerusalem railways, for the telephone
company of Constantinople, are exclusively due to the
efforts of Jews such as Salem, Fernandez, Navon,
Menasche, etc. These organizations have enriched the
country and its inhabitants and proved of great benefit
to the Turkish domain in its contact with western
civilization.
Detailed statistics would prove that, in proportion to
their numbers, the Jews of Turkey have been more suc-
cessful than all other nationalities residing in the Turkish
Empire in lines of finance and in the export and import
business with Europe and America. At the same time,
94 MODERN TURKEY
it must be recognized that both the Greeks and the Ar-
menians are very active in commerce, and more particu-
larly in industry. But the development of the commerce
in paper, hardware, colonial products, glassware, ho-
siery, textiles and other manufactured products, is due
largely to the Jews. Following the example of the Jews
of Constantinople and Salonika, the Jews of Aleppo and
Baghdad played a great part in the development of com-
merce in Syria and Mesopotamia. By establishing busi-
ness houses in Egypt, Manchester, Bombay, and New
York, they increased the trade of Persia through Bagh-
dad. The influence of the Jewish business houses of
Messa Fils, established in Aden, which developed the
commerce between Sanaa (Yemen) and the ports of the
Red Sea in Egypt, are worth mentioning.
Thus, the Jews of Turkey contributed to the founda-
tion and management of credit establishments, and
through constant and progressive efforts increased do-
mestic as well as foreign business with leading European
and American firms. Dealers in raw materials came to
appreciate the value of their products. By combining
the associations of foreign capital and through the con-
cessions from the Government, public works were
started which brought cities, so to speak, nearer to each
other and enhanced the value of the land, increasing
thereby the natural wealth of the country. Further-
more, the work done in the educational and cultural field
through their schools is not to be forgotten.
The Jewish aspirations in Turkey center about the
restoration of Palestine. Before the arrival of the Otto-
mans the Jews in Turkey remained by themselves, striv-
ing only after security and repose, earning their bread by
hard and conscientious labor, and cultivating at the same
time their religious literature. This is why both the old
and the new settlers preferred the large centers for their
abodes. But with the arrival of the persecuted Jews
expelled from Portugal, Spain, and Italy, a new concep-
tion came to prevail in the minds of the Jewish people.
It was the scheme for the formation of a Jewish religious
unity in the historic land of Palestine. As early as the
sixteenth century, the idea of forming a religious council
in Jerusalem, after the style of the Great Sanhedrin, in-
spired many rabbis of Spain, who soon obtained the sup-
port of a large number of their colleagues of Constan-
tinople and Salonika. Don Joseph Nassi gave to this
religious movement a modern·outlook. He obtained from
the Sultan a concession of all rights to the lake of
Tiberias for the purpose of forming there a modern Jew-
ish colony. The Great Selim, who had a special sym-
pathy for N assi, gave orders to the governor of Syria
to help this enterprise in every way possible. Within a
period of one year, a city was built there with the help of
Arabian workmen. New colonies surrounded it. It was
Nassi 's plan to make Tiberias an industrial center. To
this end he planted mulberry trees and began the manu-
facture of silk. But this work required perseverance and
the most widespread cooperation. The good will and
the work of a single person were not sufficient, and the
plans had to be dropped. After the death of Joseph
Nassi no one could be found to carry on his activities for
the general good.
Until the nineteenth century Palestine was made up
of a conglomeration of Jews, both natives and those
coming from the outside for the purpose of continuing
their religious studies. This entire colony lived on char-
ity provided by their coreligionists of other countries,
giving rise to the evils of pauperism which have survived
up to this day. But toward the year 1860 newcomers
from Russia began to devote themselves to agriculture.
European Jewry looked with favor upon this movement.
Mr. Monte:fiore of London purchased, in the year 1866, a
large tract of land for the purpose of trying out the prac-
96 MODERN TURKEY
ticability of the scheme. This back-to-the-land move-
ment was the most important factor in the awakening of
the desire for the repopulation of Palestine, and was ac-
centuated by the foundation, on April 5, 1870, of the
agricultural school Mikved Israel under the Alliance Is-
raelite. The enthusiasm for agricultural work became
greater and greater. Edmond de Rothschild devoted a
great amount of money to the purchase of land in Pales-
tine. He established settlements for the immigrants
from Russia and Romania, and he built for them schools
and synagogues. Soon this initiative became very popu-
lar and almost general among the .Jews. The colonies
became larger and coop_erative associations with branches
in several cities were formed. The products from
the colonies were sent for sale to the cities, enabling
the former to become self-supporting. With the revival
of the Hebrew language in these settlements, it was
proved once for all that the regeneration of Palestine
was possible. It was at the time of the death of Herzel
that Zionism gave to this aspiration a new vigor and
a definite form. The memories of the Holy City, of its
glorious history, crystallized this time into an intense
and practical wish for the rebuilding of Palestine, where
the .Jews should live "each under his vine and fig-tree."
Several steps were taken to facilitate the immigration of
.Jews into Palestine and to form new settlements.
In the year 1312 of the Turkish calendar, correspond-
ing to 1897 A.D., the Grand Vizier of Turkey, Kiutshuk.
Said Pasha, closed the gates of Palestine to the new
.Jewish immigrants, and imposed restrictions on the pur-
chase by them of lands of any respectable size. He al-
lowed the .Jews to visit Palestine only when provided
with a "red passport," good for a brief period only, and
limited to the purpose of pilgrimage. By reason of rep-
resentations made in the year 1912 by the undersigned,
former ·Chief Rabbi of Turkey, these discriminations
against the Jews were abolished, and the latter were
about to receive additional privileges by way of facili-
tating the Ottomanization of the immigrants when the
Great War broke out. The declaration of Balfour with
regard to Palestine and the Jews became the basis for
the settlement of the Jewish question. And today, as in
the past, the Jews of Turkey are marching in the path of
progress and participating in every movement which
tends to raise the intellectual and commercial standard
of the country that has given them shelter in their hour
of distress. They, however, do not fail to cooperate with
all their might with the rest of the Jews in the intellec-
tual, economic, and commercial restoration of Palestine.
CHAPTER IV
RELIGIONS
By liAxvKr POBTEB •
My ~eem is not whether God is on our side. My great mneem
is to be on God's side, for He is always righL
lntroductiOB
The people of the Near and Middle East are classified
primarily on the basis of religion. Under the former
Ottoman Government, the welfare of each recognized
religious group was in the hands of a church functionary,
whose importance and authority was as much political
as spiritual. "The Turk," wrote Sir Charles Eliot in
his "Turkey in Europe," "divides the population of the
Ottoman Empire into millets, or religious communities:
Rum, or Greek, including all members of the Orthodox
Church who recognize the Patriarch of Constantinople;
Bulgar, or Bulgarians, those who recognize the spiritual
authority of the Bulgarian Exarch; Katolik, or Catholics;
Ermeni, or Gregorian Armenians; Musevi, or Jews;
Prodesdan, or Protestants; Vlachs, or Romanians; Sirp, _
or Servians. The last two millets are more recent than
the others, and were recognized by the Porte only in 1900
after much intrigue and agitation on the part of their
• Bom 18«.. A.B. Amherst College, 1870. Professor of History ud
Psyehology, 1870-1914, Syriall Protestant College at Beirut. Classified ud
eatalogued h"'bruy of SyriaJl Protestant College. Curator of :Mlllll"UJil of
Syriall Protestant College. (The Syriall Protestant College Dow bOW'Il aa
!he .AmerieaD Ullivenlity of Beirut.) Author of an Anbie-English die-
tiolllUY- Author of textbook oD ueiellt history, iD Arabie.. Deftased. 1923.
By the kind permiBsioD of Prof. W. H. HaD, editor, this ehapter 1n11
ab8traded from .. Beconstructioa iD Turkq" (see Bib1iograph7).
98
RELIGIONS 99
supporters. This system leads to the strangest results.
It divides the Armenians into two-for a Catholic Arme-
nian is, in Turkish estimation, not an Armenian, and not
to be killed, or at least, not at the same time as his Gre-
gorian brother-and it combines many races under the
comprehensive names of Islam and Rum. Popular lan-
guage follows the same method." The millet division,
old in its history and important in the past, is considered
very briefly in the chapter on Education, more fully in
the chapter on Government. It is introduced here to
indicate the tremendous emphasis placed on religious
divisions, so apparent to anyone living in small com-
munities in particular, who become struck with the im-
pressiveness and significance of the Greek and Armenian
bishops. The latter have kept alive the sense of political
entity in the minority elements. The Eastern Churches
are possessed of great vitality.
For many years, the Orthodox Church has a~pted
the practice that, wherever there is an independent State,
the Church within that State should have its own govern-
ment. The autocephalous form prevails. For historical
reasons, however, there were three patriarchates within
the Ottoman Empire-those of Constantinople, Antioch,
and Jerusalem. It has sometimes been held that the first
of these has authority over the others, but the extent
to which this is so in practice is very limited. Thus,
the Anatolian Greeks were under the jurisdiction of the
Patriarchate of Constantinople who maintained through-
out the centuries his title of Archbishop of New Rome.
There have been very few Greek Uniats in communion
with the Roman Catholic Church. Tsarist Russia's in-
terest in the Ottoman Empire was not only political and
economic but religious: religious, because of her millions
of Moslems in the southern provinces and even more
important, because of the influential position of the Greek
Orthodox Church in Russia, which looked towards the
100 MODERN TURKEY
ecclesiastics at Constantinople for assistance and guid-
ance. The power of the Orthodox Churches in Turkey
has been greatly diminished by the overturn of the rayah
community organization.
Thus far we have little definite information regarding
the Orthodox Churches in Turkey which have been
merged into a so-called Turkish Orthodox Church. Fol-
lowing the action of the Greek Patriarch at the Phanar
in forbidding the Ottoman Greeks from participating in
the election of October 5, 1919, the Turkish-speaking
Orthodox priest, Papa Eftimios Effendi, who was living
at Kiskin, twelve miles from Angora, opposed this decree
and was thereupon excommunicated by the <Ecumenical
Patriarch. Papa Eftimios, however, revolted against
this authority, and under his direction sixty-eight Ortho-
dox churches became insurgent and gave up their church
schools in March, 1922. The Nationalist Government
gave backing to this new religious dignitary, who appar-
ently made it obligatory that all metropolitans appointed
by him should have lived at least five years in the coun-
try, that they should be of Ottoman parentage and able
to read and write Turkish, and that they should have a
clear record of abstaining from undue political activity.
Papa Eftimios, as the leader of the Turkish Orthodox in
Anatolia has conducted himself, however, to the satis-
faction of neither the government nor the religious ad-
herents. Following his seizure of the Phanar in Decem-
ber, 1923, the Republic refused to recognize his position.
The <Ecumenical Patriarchate has had a stormy time in
which His Highness, Meletios Metaxakis, was assaulted,
and removed from the country with the consent of the
Greek Government nevertheless. In December, 1923, the
Archbishop of Kadikoi was chosen as Patriarch Grego-
rious VII. It is premature to state that the historic
Eastern Churches in Turkey have surrendered their
former pomp and splendor forever and ever.
RELIGIONS 101
Now, as formerly, however, the distinction between
believer and infidel is an important one in Turkey. There
is no other classification of religions to be found in the
Koran. The Moslems, therefore, have not troubled them-
selves seriously about sharp differentiations between the
various non-Moslem peoples. A Turk who ceases to be
a Moslem is no longer regarded as a Turk. He cannot
estrange himself from the Islamic religion without sub-
jecting himself to personal dangers and to the virtual
blotting-out of his racial existence. There is neverthe-
less, among the influential Spanish Jews of Macedonia,
the powerful Dunmeh sect, which makes the pretext of
carrying out the tenets of Mohammed but is secretly
loyal to another religion. It is stated, that when the
recent Ottoman-American Development concessions were
being drafted, the Turkish Government inserted a clause
that all employees except Americans in charge should be
Moslems ; but, this was altered to read "Turks" since
such religious distinction was repugnant to Americans.
Much prejudice as well as misunderstanding have
arisen in the outside viewpoint upon Ottoman problems
because the word "Christian" has been loosely applied.
Truth compels us to reaffirm Mr. Arnold J. Toynbee 's as-
sertion that ''Our common Christianity is not a living fact
but an historical curiosity:'' in its application, therefore,
it is subject to many limitations. Whether the Armenians,
Assyrians, Bulgarians, and Greeks are more Christlike
· than the professors of Christianity in the ·west is a ques-
tion upon which the author ventures to express no opin-
ion. But, in referring to the chapters on Racial Char-
acteristics and on the Leading Minorities, it becomes
apparent that it is a mistake to make no distinctions be-
tween adherents of the Orthodox, Catholic, and Prot-
estant· churches. We are correct, however, in calling
all their followers infidels or non-Moslems.
The following article by Professor Porter deals with
102 MODER..~ TURKEY
the religious beliefs prevailing in antebellum Turkey,
and also calls attention to the different Mohammedan
sects, notably the mutually antagonistic Shia and Sunni
branches. The doctrines and practices of the Moham-
medan religion require further elucidation than can be
presented in Dr. Porter's able but brief chapter. It may
be well, therefore, to add that the Mohammedan religion
was founded by an Arab, born in Mecca in the year
569 A.D. This man, Mohammed, who declared himself to
be the prophet of God, made known his revelations in
the Koran, the sacred book of Islam. The corner sto_ne
in the faith is the unity of God which finds its expression
in two leading dogmas, "La illab il Allah" (There·is
no God but God) and "Mokar.zmed Resaul Allah'' (Mo-
hammed is the Prophet of God). The Mohammedan be-
lieves in the efficacy of prayer and in a paradise which
has its delights and its punishments. He is not embar-
rassed to make a show of his religion when it comes to
the ''sweet hour of prayer.'' Islam insists upon thor-
ough abstinence from strong drink, it expects that all
Moslems give liberally to charity, that they shall observe
the fasting days, and that they shall make at least one
pilgrimage to Mecca during their lifetime, either in per-
son or by proxy. Before entering the mosque, the be-
lievers are required to wash their hands, feet, and faces,
and to remove their shoes; one result is that there are
numerous beautiful fountains in Turkey.
Whether the tenets of Islam are incompatible with ·
progress is a much discussed question. Sir W. M. Ramsay
has expressed the conviction that the Mohammedan relig-
ion is perhaps better suited than any other for persons
in an early stage of civilization, although there is a seri-
ous lack in its inability to provide inspiring, constructive
principles for training the youth. Rev. H. 0. Dwight
in his "Constantinople and its Problems" calls attention
to the distinction which should be made between the ritual
RELIGIONS 103
which should be rigidly followed and the moral precepts
to which great attention should be paid. Throughout
the Koran, sin is constantly recognized but condoned.
Thus, in the fourth sura of this Book we read, "God is
minded to make your religion light unto you, for men
are created weak.'' Another type of analysis-a fresh
outlook on the question is given by Mr. Toynbee in "The
Western Question in Greece and Turkey:" "The uncon-
scious grievance of the West against Islam is not
that Islam is incompatible with progress of any kind
for we are really practically indifferent to progress
or stagnation on Islamic lines. We really resent the fact
that Islam offers an alternative system of life to our
own-Christian and Islam, Europe and Asia, civilization
and barbarism." These "three false antitheses," of
which the Moslem-Christian conflict is the most her-
alded, are responsible for many warped conceptions by
Westerners. ' ·
Actually, it is too much to expect that Oi:ientl!-1 spec-
tacles may be adjusted to Occidental eyes, or Occide~~:.tal
spectacles to Oriental eyes. The accustomed visio!l is
wholly different. The l\Iohammedans associate Chris-
tianity with the Crusades and with the modern adherents
of the Eastern and Western Churches. They express
surprise at the irregular churchgoing, and the scant out-
ward manifestation of devotions. Have they not good
ground for questioning either the greatness of the relig-
ion or the insincerity of the communicant 7 They are
indignant over the terrible commercialized vice, main-
tained by the Greeks largely in the ''Christian'' sections,
Galata and Pera, while Stamboul and Scutari are notori-
ously free from the contamination. They rebel against
alcoholic drink and drunkenness, punishing the latter
with scores of real floggings. The typical :Moslems see
nothing inherently wrong in polygamy and criticise Chris-
tians for illicit intrigues. They do not recognize t4at
104 MODERN TURKEY
slavery is a degraded system.1 The Occidental from his
point of view finds much to criticise. And so it goes.
A most momentous event in Islamic annals took place
on November 1,1922, when the Grand National Assembly
at Angora announced that "The Khalifate will continue
to be exercised by the Osman family, but the Assembly
will choose a Prince whose moral qualities, talent and
conduct suit him for the choice. The Turkish Govern-
ment will be the principal rampart of the Khalifate. ''
With this change, the greatly-feared position of the
Sultan-Imam has disappeared. The Khalif is elected by
a non-ecclesiastic body. His political power has gone;
moreover, his religious position is under the control of·
the temporal Angora Assembly. The position of the
present Khalif is being disputed more. than ever by the
Sherif of Mecca, a lineal descendant of the Prophet and
a member of the Khoreish tribe, and by the members of
the Shiah, W ahabi, Senussi, and other sects. In addition,
the new rulers of Turkey are paying little attention to
the former prerogatives of the office. The National
Assembly at Angora has separated Church and State.
In its present form, the Khalifate therefore bears a
closer resemblance to the religious leadership in the Holy
Roman Empire than to that of the Papacy, for the posi-
tion has never carried with it theological infallibility.
Under the Ottoman Sultans, the religious State official
was the appointed Sheikh-ul-Islam, a member of the
Cabinet, who referred, however, spiritual controversies·
to the doctors of the law. In the republican form of
• In the Times of December 31, 1823 (quoted in the same newspaper one
century later), appeared the following interesting current item: ''Saturday
last a man, named Feake, led his wife into Chipping Ongar market, in Essex,
by a halter, and there exposed her for sale. She was soon purchased by a
young man, a blacksmith, of High Ongar, at the price of lOs. Her person
was by no means unpleasing, and she appeared to be about 25 years of age.
The collector of the tolls actually demanded and received from the pur-
chaser the customary charge of one penny, which is always paid upon live
stock sold therein per head!"
RELIGIONS 105
government, there is similarly a cabinet official with dif-
ferent designation who exercises somewhat the same
function. The very word '' khalif'' means ''successor,''
the only consecrated official who should carry on the
labors of the Prophet Mohammed, who had maintained a
rule political no less than spiritual. With the spiritual
prerogatives dwarfed after the lapse of thirteen cen-
turies, and now the temporal authority shorn, the khalif-
ate has been subject to a remarkable mutation. Mustafa
Kemal Pasha has wrought politico-religious changes no
less momentous than those ofCavour, but his new depar-
tures are more sweeping. Kemal 's grievance against the
khalifate was tremendously enhanced by the fetva issued
by the Sheikh-ul-Islam at Constantinople at Allied insti-
gation (1920}, when the Nationalistic or Kemalist Move-
ment was denounced as an impiety.
Yet the Angora leaders have given no evidence of
sacrificing their hold upon religious issues. It is signifi-
cant that at Lausanne, Ismet Pasha, acting upon instruc-
tions from Angora, absolutely refused to enter into a
discussion of religious issues, for example when Marquis
Curzon asked what the Turks were going to do about the
sacred objects their soldiers removed in 1916 from Mecca.
More recently, precipitated by the incident mentioned
in the next paragraph, Ismet (now Premier) announced
that while the khalifate was a sacred institution for all
Moslems, this office had no more rights over Turkey than
over Egypt, Afghanistan, or any other Mohammedan
country.
A religious issue in the Moslem world was projected,
in December, 1923, when the editors of three Government-
opposition newspapers at Constantinople published a
joint letter from the Aga Khan and Ameer Ali protest-
ing against the present position of the khalifate. These
two very influential leaders of the Indian Moslems, who
were probably as responsible for Britain's change in her
106 MODERN TURKEY
Eastern policy as the separatist manamvres of the Quai
d 'Orsai, were suspected by the Angora Government of
promoting a British design to transfer the khalifate from
Turkey. The Aga Khan and Ameer Ali, publicly dis-
claimed any collusion whatever with British officialdom,
announced that they were desirous that the worshipful
position should occupy a place in Turkey similar to what
it had formerly enjoyed in Egypt. Their fear was that
its disappearance from the "Turkish body politic" would
mean the disintegration of Islam and its practical dis-
appearance as a moral force in the world. Because of its ·
significance in State affairs, this interesting episode is
disclosed also in the chapter on Government.
The great experiment of the political leaders at Angora
smashes the idea of a Universal Khalifate, requiring as
the latter does, that all Mohammedans should be members
of a single organism. It overturns ·the fundamental
theocratic character of Islam under which authority is
both spiritual and temporal. It is a departure from the
role played by Selim I, following his conquest of Egypt,
subsequently assumed by the Ottoman Sultans during
the following four centuries.
These Islamic new departures in Turkey are causing
worldwide attention, and nowhere more than within the
confines of the Republic, where the venerable conserva-
tism of the khojas (clergy), especially marked in the case
of the powerful Mevlevi dervishes at Konia, exerts such
a strong influence. The developments in the Christian ·
Churches are likewise sensational. Professor Porter's
contribution furnishes a proper background for future
discussions.
Religions
Religion has been in the past a most important element
in the politics of ~urkey and cannot be ignored in any
RELIGIONS 107
plan for future reconsiruction. Religious fanaticism has
played a large part in the history of the Empire and has
by no means ceased and must be reckoned with. The
leading religious divisions have, of course, been Moslems,
Christians, and Jews, but. these have been subdivided
into numerous sects which have been far from peaceful
in ·their relations to each other and have led to serious
political complications and often to bloody conflicts.
The Moslems naturally· claim consideration first as
being the most numerous and the ruling class. The Otto-
mans accepted the Moslem faith before they came to
power and have, from the first, held to the doctrine of
the Sunnis, or the traditional faith generally regarded
as orthodox. They accept the Koran as_ authoritati_ve
and also the traditional legislation of Mohammed and
the early khalifs which are the basis of civil as well as
ecclesiastical law. Hence their system of government
has been, in effect, a theocracy; the sultan, at least since
the time of Selim, being head of both Church and State,
as were the khalifs from the beginning. But a large body
of the Moslems of the Empire have been loath to acknowl-
edge the right of the sultan to the khalifate which they
claim belongs of right to the Arabs. The latter have
generally acquiesced as they were unable to resist suc-
cessfully, but the W ahabi revolt in the 18th century and
various uprisings in Arabia have manifested their dis-
content. The Shias and Druses have also resisted Otto-
man rule and have submitted only to force.
The Shia sect is the largest and most important of the
sects of Islam which are regarded as heretical by the
orthodox. Their origin goes back to the early days of the
khalifate. It arose when Ali, the husband of Fatima,
Mohammed's daughter, was chosen Khalif. His election
was regarded as invalid by a strong party and a conflict
ensued in which Ali lost his life by assassination and
the Ommiad dynasty was established on the throne. But
108 MODERN TURKEY
the followers of Ali refused to submit and induced Hu-
sain, son of Ali, to set up the standard of revolt. This led
to the tragedy of Karbala in which Husain and most of
his little force were slain under most cruel circumstances,
which embittered his adherents to the utmost and made
a martyr of Ali. His followers became the sect of the
Shias, or Shiites, who have always been bitterly hostile
to the Turks as Sunnis. Sultan Selim I attempted to
exterminate them within the Empire. In 1514 he gave
secret orders to his subordinates to fall upon them, all
in one day without warning, and massacre them. As
usually happens in such cases, the execution of the decree
was impossible, and although some 40,000 are said to
have fallen victims there were many who escaped and
became bitter enemies of the Sultan. This act led to a
war with the Persians, the great majority of whom have
always been Shias, in which they were defeated. Many
wars between them have followed and the enmity is still
kept up, though the number of the Shias in the Empire
is not large and they have not often risen in revolt. There
is quite a large number of villages of them in Syria, where
they are called Mutawili, and have no more intercourse
with the orthodox Moslems than with the Christians and
are perhaps even more hostile to them. They number,
perhaps, some 50,000.
Other branches of the Shia sect with varying differ-
ences in doctrine, are the Druses, Nusairis, and Ismailiyis.
They all agree in having certain secret tenets and rites·
and belong to the class denominated Batiniyis which ac-
cepts the Koran as their guide but interprets it in a
mystical way which leads to doctrines that are wholly
at variance with the letter and abhorrent to the Sunni
Moslems. These doctrines are held in secret and hence
the designation of Batiniyi, that is, possessing inner
light, or illumination.
Qf th~E:~~ Batiniyis the Ismailiyis, formerly known as
RELIGIONS 109
the Order of Assassins, followers of the Sheikh el-J ebel,
or the Old Man of the Mountains, are the most famous
in history. ·
The order was founded in the latter part of the 11th
century by a certain Hasan bin-Sebah who was imbued
with the doctrines of the Batiniyis and became a preacher
of them, first in Egypt and afterwards in Syria and
Persia. He gathered his followers in a mountain fortress
in the northern part of Persia, _called Alamut, and from
there he sent forth his emissaries all over the Moslem
world. These men were devotees who put implicit faith
in his teaching and were consecrated to any service he
might require of them, even to the assassination of princes
or anyone whom the Sheikh ordered them to kill. He
thus became a terror and scourge to all western Asia.
During the Crusades a branch of this sect was established
in Syria, under a chief named Rashid ed-Din Sinan, who
terrorized Moslems and Christians alike and furnished
assassins to either party without distinction. He came
into conflict with the famous Saladin against whom at-
tempts at assassination were made several times until
Saladin was compelled to make concessions to him on con-
dition that he should be let alone. The sect contin~ed
until the middle of the 13th century when it was wiped out
in Persia by the Mongols and a little later the Syrian
branch was nearly exterminated by the Egyptian Sultan
Bibars. The remnant has continued to exist with its
center at Masyaf where their sheikh resides. They are
called Ismailiyi but the government reckons them as
Moslems though known to be heretical. They are trucu-
lent and inhospitable and troublesome to the authorities
and unfriendly to any except their own sect. They are
supposed to number about 20,000 but there may be many
more scattered throughout Syria, living in disguise, for
all the Batiniyis are allowed to assume any religious guise
they please when among people of other faiths.
110 MODERN TURKEY
The Nusairi sect take their name from Nusair who
lived in the latter part of the 9th century, but their dis-
tinguished teacher and apostle was Husain bin Hamdan
ul-Khasibi who flourished in the beginning of the lOth
century. They were prominent in Syria in 1029, occupy-
ing the mountain range along the coast to the north of the
Lebanon which is still known as the Nusairi mountains.
They also inhabit the region about Mersina, in the prov-
ince of Adana, and number altogether about 200,000.
They are divided into two communities; the Shemsiyeh
and the Kamariyeh, or Sunites and the Moonites, prob-
ably reflecting the heathen elements in their cult which
they seem to have inherited more than the other heretical
sects of Islam. They hold that the Deity has been seven
times incarnate, the last time in the Khalif Ali to whom·
they ascribe ·all the attributes of the godhead and seem
to really worship Him.
The Nusairi, like all the Batiniyis, conceal their beliefs
from the uninitiated·, and do not teach their esoteric
doctrines to all of their own sect, only to those who have
passed through a long course of instruction. They ac-
knowledge Mohammed, but as second to Ali, and call him
the Veil and they also honor one Selman al-Farisi whom
they denominate the Bab, or "door." Of course the more
enlightened among them would explain that they worship
Ali only as the incarnation of the Deity, as Christians
worship Jesus Christ. They believe in transmigration
and hold that ·Moslems, at death, become donkeys, Chris-
tians swine and Jews monkeys, while every faithful
Nusairi rises at death to a position among the stars.
Though they pose as Moslems to the world they often in
secret curse them and have never willingly obeyed the
Turks but have frequently resisted their authority and
made trouble. All orthodox Moslems regard them as
heretics and abhor their doctrines.
The sect of the Druses arose about the end of the lOth
RELIGIONS 111
century A.D. . A certain adherent of the Batiniyis, named
Darazi, appeared in Egypt in the reign of the Fatimide
Khalif el-Hakim, who from his acts seems to have been
insane. Darazi encouraged him to claim divine honors
and began to preach as exponent of the new faith. He
is said to have migrated to Syria and gathered a com-
munity of believers in the region of Mt. Hermon. It is
from him that the sect of the Druses is named, but the
teacher whom they especially honor was Hamzy who
is said to be the author of the books that contain their
secret doctrines and rites .. These doctrines are guarded
from the world with extraordinary care, even from the
uninitiated of the sect. The initiated are called the
Ukkal, the Intelligent or Wise, and have to ·pass through
a course of training before being admitted to the order
and to them is committed the exercise of religious rites
and the direction of the affairs of the sect.
The common people are supposed to have little or noth-
ing to do with the practice of their religion; that is
attended to by their. leaders, to whom they are taught
implicit obedience. This forms them into a compact body
so that whenever they have been called upon to act by
their sheikhs their organized unity has been apparent.
Such was the case when they arose against the Chris-
tians of Mt. Lebanon in 1860. Their superiority was
at once manifested and they quickly bore down all opposi-
tion. Their number is reckoned to be about 150,000,
distributed over southern Lebanon, about Mt. Hermon
and in Jebel ed-Druze in the Hauran with smaller com-
munities in various other places. They have always been
a militant body and troublesome to the government
against which they have been in frequent revolt, as llave
the other heretical Moslem sects.
These all have a more or less political character: for
in the system of Islam the religious leader is also the po-
litical head and whenever a new sect has ~risen it has
112 MODERN TURKEY
been an occasion of revolt against the constituted au-
thority. This has happened repeatedly in the history
of Islam, the most noteworthy instance in modern times
being the revolt of the Mahdi in the Egyptia!). Sudan and
the sect of the Senussi are today a standing menace to
Egypt.
Of the various Christian sects in the Empire the Ortho-
dox Greeks are the most numerous and have been the
most prominent in determining the policy of the Ottoman
government toward the Christians in general.
When Mohammed II took Constantinople he realized
that the Greek population was essential to the prosperity
of the city, for in the hands of the Greeks were to be
found all the facilities for carrying on trade and com-
merce and the means of production. The Turks were a
military clan wholly unskilled in such things and with
no inclination for them. Multitudes of Greeks had been
slain in the capture of the city and other multitudes had
fled to escape slavery but Mohammed set about restoring
them to their homes, so that Constantinople might recover
its prosperity. To this end he had them choose a patri-
arch to take the place of the former qne who had perish~d
in the siege and he gave him authority over his people
in all matters connected with the church and promised
to protect him and his people from violence and plunder.
A certain number of churches were restored and religious
worship in them was to be carried on as before. The
patriarch and bishops were given full jurisdiction over
marriage and divorce among members of their flocks and
over matters of inheritance, with some restrictions, and
they were allowed to levy taxes for ecclesiastical pur:..
poses and their customs were to be respected as far as
consistent with subjection to the Imperial authority. The
jurisdiction of the patriarch was to be absolute within
these limits and the government would assist him in the
enforcement of his decrees. Moreover the collection of
Gregorius, Pntriareh of Antioch and t.he Nt>ar East, Enterinj! the Chapel
of the American University of Beirut (Hallowed by the Memories of
the Bliss Family). Left to Right-Mt>tropolitan (Bishop) of Beirut,
Patriarch (Archbishop) Grt>gorius Haddad, Acting President Nickoley,
Bulus, Metropolitan of the Lt'banon, Arsanias, Metropolitan of Latakia.
RELIGIONS 113
the military tax laid upon the Greeks by the Porte was
to be in the hands of the Church authorities so that the
Turkish officers should come into contact with the Greek
subjects as little as possible.
Thus was established a sort of imperium in imperio.
This policy has had wide reaching results not anticipated
at the time. The sultan regarded the patriarch of Con-
stantinople as the head of all his Christian subjects ; but
as he and his successors extended their conquests they
found various bodies of Christians that did not acknowl-
edge the authority of this head, even of those who went
under the name of Orthodox. There were three other
patriarchs who claimed independent jurisdiction; those
of Antioch, Jerusalem, and Alexandria. Moreover there
were several Christian communities who owed allegiance
to none of them but to the Pope of Rome. This required
new arrangements, but the same principle was pursued,
in dealing with them as with the Orthodox. The ecclesi-
astical heads of these sects were recognized in the same
way as the patriarchs of Constantinople and given simi-
lar authority, but their election must be confirmed by the
sultan. In the case of the papal sects only the local heads
were recognized.
The policy thus outlined has brought about wholly
unforeseen results. The Christian subjects of the Porte
have been taught to look upon their ecclesiastical heads
as their immediate rulers and protectors and their alle-
giance has been primarily to them, or to their Church, and
their feeling of loyalty or patriotism has been to them
rather than to the sultan. Love of country as commonly
understood has been wanting, as has been plainly demon-
strated whenever the sultan was at war with other
powers and especially in the events of the last few years.
Also this policy has furnished occasion for the interfer-
ence of foreign powers in the affairs of the Empire in
the interests of the sects, which have frequently invoked
114 MODERN TURKEY
their protection. Besides, the segregation of these Chris-
tian churches has led to contentions among them and
strife has not been uncommon which sometimes has called
for interference on the part of the government. The
contentions over the Holy Places in Palestine are well
known.
Besides the Greek Church, which is the most widely
extended, there are the Armenian, which is practically
confined to the Armenian people, the Maronite, which
is predominant in Syria, the Syriac or Jacobite and the
N estorian, the last two being confined chiefly to the north-
eastern portions of the Empire. All of these churches,
except the Maronite and N estorian, are divided into two
branches, one branch being united to Rome and called
Catholic or Uniate. Thus we have the Orthodox Greek
and the Greek Catholic; the Gregorian Armenians and
the Catholic Armenians; the Jacobite or Syriac and the
Syrian Catholics. They differ very little except in the
adherence of the Catholics to the Pope. They are much
fewer in number than the bodies from which they
separated.
The Maronites are the most numerous in Syria, some-
what outnumbering there the Orthodox Greeks who come
next. They were organized as a church by John Mat:o
in 685 on the question of the doctrine of the Monothelites
which was rejected by the Orthodox but accepted by t_he
Maronites. When they united with Rome in 1182 they
abandoned this heresy. Their patriarch is chosen by
the bishops but has to be confirmed by the Pope as well
as by the sultan. They number perhaps 300,000 and are
found mostly on the Lebanon to the north of Dog River.
The Greek Orthodox in Syria are somewhat less but are
distributed throughout Syria and Palestine. The Greek
Catholics are about half as numerous. The J acobites
are from 100,000 to 150,000, found chiefly in northern
Mesopotamia, and the N estorians in the mountains of
RELIGIONS 115
Kurdistan number about 100,000. The Armenians are
now so decimated that it would be difficult to estimate the
numbers of the Gregorians or the Armenian Catholics,
but if the fugitives are restored they will probably form
the most considerable body of Christians in the Empire.
The Jews are distributed widely through the Empire,
residing chiefly in the towns, engaged largely in trade
but many .also being craftsmen. In Palestine they have
recently established agricultural colonies aided by their
brethren in Europe and America. These are not subjects
of the Empire, but those in other parts generally owe
allegiance to the Sultan. The number of these it is diffi-
cult to estimate but they cannot be more than half a mil-
lion and probably much less. 'They have their own ecclesi-
astical organizations, recognized by the government like
those of the Christian sects. It is only in Palestine that
they have any political significance where the Zionist
movement aims at a reoccupation of the country by its
ancient inhabitants. This prospect would have to be
considered in any reorganization of the Empire.
This outline of the religious conditions in the Empire
reveals the complexity of the question and the difficulty
of dealing' with it from a political point of view. This
difficulty does not lie in the great number of sects; a
greater number can be found in America; but in the age-
long antagonisms under which they have existed, and
their lack of cohesion in any political sense. The po-
litical life of the non-Moslem population, so far as it
has had any, has been circumscribed by the sect to which
the individuals belong; they have had no part in the po-
litical life of the Empire. To a large extent this has been
true of the heretical sects among the Moslems and to
some degree among the Arab Moslems. Hence the people
have never been accustomed to act together in political
matters and it would be difficult to bring them to do so.
There was great hope at the time of the revolution in
116 MODERN TURKEY
1908 that a real union of these antagonistic elements
for the general good might be brought about, but the
result was a dismal failure. This was due no doubt
to mismanagement on the part of the Young Turks, who
never intended to commit the control of affairs to the
people ; but had they done so the deep seated prejudices
of the sects and the underlying current of fanaticism still
existing, even among the Christians, would have proved
an almost insurmountable obstacle. It is doubtful
whether the different races and religious sects can be
moulded into one body politic capable of controlling its
own affairs without a long course of education and
training~
CHAPTERV
EDUCATION
By PAUL MONROE I
A. certain countryman, who was engaged in sowing his field, saw a

man of letters, who was also a Poet, approaching: "Sir," said the
Clown to him, "How can you study, as you do, in solitude!"
"I am a Poet," replied the other: "At first I studied in company
with others, but now I go on in my education alone."
The uneducated man who begins by seeking the society of the learned,
in this way becomes educated. In time he grows capable of finishing
his education, unaided by others.
-TURKISH FABLE.
Introduction
No country of its own free will is satisfied to intrust
the training of its youth tQ its minorities or to foreigners.
In respect to common school instruction, this attitude is
most pronounced. Markedly in Turkey, past and present,
all minority schools and a few foreign schools have ex-
posed themselves to criticism from the federal authorities
because of non-conformist tendencies expressed primarily
in matters of politics and religion.
1 Born in Indiana, 1869. B.S., Franklin (Indiana) College, 1890. Ph.D.,
University of Chicago, 1897. Student, University of Heidelberg, 1901.
Honorary LL.D., University of Peking, 1913, Franklin, 1915. Fellow in
sociology, University of Chicago, 1895-97; instructor history, 1897-99; ad-
joint professor history of education, 1899-1902. Lecturer in education,
University of California, 1905; Yale University, 1906-07. Writer of many
books on education. Commissioner to report on Conditions of Philippine
School system, Bureau of Insular Affairs. Educational expert, Division of
Research of Inquiry Commissioners, Department of State, 1918-19. Chair-
man of Committee to solidify American Educational Institutions in the
Near East, 1918-19. Educational expert to the Chinese Government, 1921-22.
Professor (since 1902) and Director of the School of Education, Teachers
College, Columbia University, 1915 to date.
Following the suggestion of Dr. Monroe, his article bas been supple-
mented by the insertion of material written by the late Dr. Samuel T.
Dutton of Teachers College, Columbia University.
117
118 MODERN TURKEY
Under the peculiar millet system mentioned in the
preceding chapter and here by Dr. Monroe, the minorities
as a rule patronized their own schools, which were sup-
ported by their own funds but had inadequate facilities
judged by Western standards. : This criticism of in-
adequacy is made with special reference to Anatolia. i:n
Constantinople, the Greek schools have been carefully
planned and fitted -out with departments for classical
and vocational training. Of the "minority" schools,
however, it is true that they are under the control of
the Church, that they are used for political purposes:
consequently, they have been and are, a source of difficulty
to the State.
The influence of foreign schools of secondary grade in
Turkey has been of importance. The French have estab-
lished many institutions throughout the country which
are attended largely by children of well-to-do families.
In Constantinople, the French have the Grand Lyooe and
the British have the British High School.
The Americans, in addition to maintaining lower grade
institutions, have established schools of higher education:
in this way, they, ·of all foreigners, have rendered Turkey
the greatest and most disinterested service. These col-
leges are attended by all nationalities, Moslems and non-
Moslems, and are doing a great work in the training of .
the leaders of Near and Middle Eastern affairs. 1 Stu-
dents are being prepared for leadership by being trained
along the lines of service, in courses in mechanical engi-·
• In her annual report for 1922-23, Dr. Mary Mills Patrick, President of
Constantinople Woman's College, referring to the various countries inter·
ested in the educational opportunities offered at this college, makes the
following interesting statement, ''These countries have always included
not only Turkey but the nations of the Balkan Peninsula. Interest in the
education of women, however, is now greatly increasing among the different
branches of the Arab nation. King Husain of Mecca and his two sons,
King Feisal of Mesopotamia and Emir Abdullah of Transjordania, are
all interested in this subject and would be glad to cooperate with us
when peace makes cooperation possible."
EDUCATION 119
neering, scientific farming, medicine, and business ad-
ministration. Still of even more value to the student
than the actual courses are the common ideals of toler- ·
ance and fair play which he acquires in his association
with other students. For the first time in their lives,
young men and women living in college dormitories are
freed from the incessant conversation of hate, so char-
acteristic of home life in Turkey. Within the college
.walls, there is shown an amazing ability of the younger
generation to sink suggestions of racial distinction in
the common cause. Student activities are carried on
without any sense of racial rivalry. Some of the most
intimate friendships in the colleges are between Greeks
and Bulgarians, between Armenians and Turks. Into
this environment, Prime Minister Ismet Pasha has sent
his brother as a student at Robert College (1923-1924).
The influence of the American systems of education
has not been confined to Turkey. For example, prac-
tically every cabinet of Bulgaria has contained at least
one graduate of Robert College, an institution- which
draws its numbers largely from the Armenians, Bul-
garians, Greeks, Jews, and Turks. Graduate students
from Constantinople Woman's College at Constantinople
are to be found in many of the leading universities of
· Europe. One of the graduates, Halideh Edib Ranum,
has been one of the most conspicuous leaders in the new
Turkish Nationalist Movement. To gain some concep-
tion of the success of the American University of Beirut,
the reader has only to note the names of the graduates
of this institution who have become the leaders in Syria,
Palestine, Iraq, Arabia, and Egypt.
The attitude of the new Nationalist Government on
this question of education is most important. In the
Lausanne Treaty the clauses affecting the foreign schools
were left out. In their place, was put the letter from
Ismet Pasha to the Allied Delegates providing for the
120 MODERN TURKEY
recognition of those educational institutions which were
in existence before October 30, 1914. These institutions
are subject to the same laws as the Turkish institutions.
A like agreement has been drafted in regard to Ameri-
can institutions.
Foreign schools, rated as private schools, are placed
under the supervision of the Turkish Ministry of Public
Instruction. No new school can be opened without the
permission of the Ministry and provision is made for
the right of inspection. Among the recent declarations
of the Turkish Minister of Public Instruction are (1) stu-
dents under fifteen years of age must attend native
schools, (2) foreign schools shall be required to pursue
courses in Turkish geography and history under Turkish
instructors. Thus far, the Nationalist Government has
shown good will towards the American schools which have
without exception adjusted themselves to the new re-
quirements, but the French and Italian schools in Asia
Minor have not yet complied with all the regulations and
are closed, at least temporarily.
The presence of non-Turkish schools can be attributed,
in the main, to the unsatisfactory system of past Turkish
education in which uneducated and ill-paid teachers,_ a
narrow course of study, and wretched school buildings
and equipment have been the rule. As in the case of the ·
minority schools, the religious as well as the political
factors have been strongly emphasized in the Turkish
system.
With reference to higher education, few persons appar-
ently realize that, following the restoration of the Con-
stitution (1908), the Government paid the expenses of
several students at Robert College and at Columbia Uni-
versity, thus giving official recognition to American edu-
cational methods. At the present time, the two sons of
Halideh Edib Hanum are studying electrical engineering
and scientific agriculture at the University of Illinois.
EDUCATION 121
Since the leaders of New Turkey include former students
of these colleges, and, inasmuch as funds are not available
for the immediate establishment of Turkish colleges of
rival personnel and equipment, there may be no further
innovations regarding foreign schools of collegiate grade.
It is in respect to secondary education that the Republic
is projecting the greatest changes.
Education
Educational conditions in Turkey whether of the pres-
ent or of the past cannot be understood without keeping
in mind certain fundamental features which characterized
the organization of the Ottoman Empire. Among these
were the institutions of the millet, the capitulations, and
the IDema; the general tendency to extreme laxity in the
enforcement of laws, admirable perhaps in themselves;
and the general unreliability of Turkish statistics, espe-
cially those of official origin.
The millet is the peculiar political. organization which
gave to non-Moslem subjects of the Ottoman Empire the
right to organize into communities possessing political
power under their own ecclesiastical chiefs. Under this
system, the non-Moslem groups built up their own edu-
cational systems and therefore took little interest in the
schools established by the Ottoman government during
recent years and gave them little patronage.
The capitulations, special treaties by which subjects
of foreign powers were free from the jurisdiction of the
Ottoman State, made it possible for foreigners to build
up extensive educational systems within the empire. The
French, English, and Americans took especial advantage
of this opportunity. Most of these schools had as their
incentive, religious motives aiming at the propagation
of a particular faith or the improvement of religious and
intellectual conditions among the -people living under
122 MODERN TURKEY
the millet system. But political and economic motives
also played a large part in the creation of this system
of private schools.
The Ulema is the priesthood or the clergy of the Mos-
lem state. In a narrower sense, the term refers to those
members of the priesthood holding government appoint-
ments. Until recently, the influence of the Ulema was
conservative and acfed as a great obstacle to reform and
progress. During the last three decades, however, the
spirit of the official Ulema at Constantinople has been
comparatively liberal.
The education of the ordinary clergy-the Ulema in
the wider sense-is of the narrowest character. They
are steeped in the details of the Mohammedan law, which
comprises innumerable rules for the minutim of conduct.
Consequently these men are extremely conservative, even
bigoted and fanatical, and ignorant of all that constitutes
knowledge to the western world. The prewar property
held by the Ulema was v~ry great, estimated at one-
third the wealth of the State.
Almost every mosque has its real estate, the income
from which is used for the support of the clergy, for the
service of the mosques, and for the instruction in the
Koran. Consequently each mosque is in a way a school
of the Arabic or of the vernacular language and of the
Koran. In reality the recent establishment of a system
of schools is little more than a subsidy for the mosque
schools. As the subsidy was often only a promise, tlie
government schools are often merely the old religious
schools with secular sanction and with some requirement
of increased attention to secular subjects.
The other considerations necessary in judging educa-
tional conditions are those common to all other phases of
life in the Ottoman Empire. In fact such conditions are
characteristic of all peoples of retarded culture, among
whom the importance of accurate quantitative statements
EDUCATION 123
is not realized as it is under the influence of modern
science.
Hence it· is true that all statistics must be taken with
an allowance. Most of them are estimates rather than
exact measurements. Official statistics may be even
more unreliable than unofficial ones. Their value is
chiefly that of relative indexes.
In a similar way statutory enactment, not always a
reliable evidence of actual conditions in the West, may in
the Orient be an altogether inaccurate indication of any-
thing save aspiration or of a desire to make a showing
or to "save their face." Allowance for this fact must
constantly be made in interpreting accounts of the educa-
tional legislation and of the system of educational ad-
ministration. Actual conditions in any community might
be quite unrecognizable from the general account of the
country as a whole. On the other hand, conditions of
intelligence are not always to be measured by school
buildings, from descriptions of educational systems, or
from statistics of illiteracy.
THE GOVERNMENT SYSTEM OF EDUCATION
Owing to the conditions already described there has

been no national system of education. There is a govern-
ment system of schools, open to all. But since these
schools were not patronized by the non-Moslem people
and since so large a portion of the population belongs to
the subject races living under the millets and having their
own schools, the system can hardly be called nationat
It will be necessary to speak of this government system
as it existed .before 1914 and during the early part of the
war; conditions since then have been so chaotic as to
defy general characterization.
According to official statistics in 1911, there were 36,230
of these schools and 1,331,000 students. Other sources
124 MODERN TURKEY
of evidence indicate that these numbers are greatly over-
estimated. This conclusion is borne out by the fact that
practically these same figures are given officially for
1914.
The Turkish educational system is good in theory but
poor in practice. It rests primarily on the Education
Act of 1869 and a reformed Provisional Law drawn up
in 1913. The Minister of Public .Instruction is the re-
sponsible head. All the Moslem schools, public and
parochial, receive government aid. The plan provides
for elementary education in two kinds of schools, lower
primary and higher primary; for secondary education
through a high school with a course of from five
to seven years; for higher education through college and
university.
A lower primary school is supposed to be attached to
every village mosque. Education is compulsory for boys
from six to eleven, for girls from six to ten-the limits,
for boys, have recently been changed to seven and six-
teen years. The lower primary curriculum is very simple,
including ciphering, reading or reciting the Koran, Otto-
man history, geography, and object lessons on familiar
· matters. The higher primary schools have the following
curriculum: religious instruction, history, geography,
Persian, Turkish or Arabic grammar, geometry, drawing,
bookkeeping, gymnastics, and the language of the
community.
The secondary school curriculum is founded on the
above list, but includes the French language and litera-
ture, mathematics and science. Theoretically, such
schools are open to children of all religious groups: prac-
tically, they are patronized by the Moslems only. Of
these schools, however, there are lamentably few-only
eighty-one in 1908. The great bulk of the schools is of
the lower primary grade or class connected with mosques,
though in practice many villages are entirely school-less.
EDUCATION 125
There is only one Turkish University, that situated at
Constantinople. It was nominallly founded in 1900 and
now includes five faculties, ·Arts, Theology, Medicine,
Law, and Science. Many theological colleges of very
rudimentary character are connected with the mosques
all over the country and are under the control·of the
Ulema. The important ones, at Konia and Constanti-
nople, are richly endowed. These schools teach thou-
sands of young men who are prep3:ring for the semi-
religious priesthood. There are also several large
military schools.
The organization, popularity, and social service per-
formed by this University are indicated by the distribu-
tion of the student attendance. This is best seen from the
figures of 1910, the last year in which this distracted coun-
try was not in a condition of war. The student attend-
ance was as follows: School of Law, 2,500; School of
Politics, 300; School of Theology, 140; School of Litera-
ture, 100; School of Natural Sciences, 90; School of
Higher Mathematics, 80; School of Civil Engineering,
500; School of Medicine (at Haidar Pasha), 850.
Education for women is in its infancy. Apart from
the small village schools, which little girls may attend to
the age of ten years-with the younger boys-there are
very few schools for girls. A large high school, in Con-
stantinople, and another, very recently founded in Beirut
by a graduate of Constantinople College, are among the
few. The courses in both of these are as yet very limited.
In Turkey there are no examination standards as we
find them in France, Great Britain, or in t)le United
States. Teachers are now obliged to have government
certificates of capability before beginning their work;
but nevertheless they are often ignorant men. The edu-
cation of Turkish youth does not compare, either in thor-
oughness or in breadth, with that offered at any of the
foreign schools in the fo'rmer Empire. Political pull and
126 MODERN' TCRKEY
personal influence have a great place in securing teaching
positions. Moreover, the fact that unscrupulous or· in-
capable governors of remote provinces are immediately
responsible for education in their province leads often
to neglect and mismanagement.
Little was done under government control to foster in-
dustrial and normal schools, though a few of the latter
were established. Natives in Turkey, wishing to sPe-
cialize, are forced to seek training either abroad or in
foreign schools established in their own country. What
made matters worse under the old regime was that Turk-
ish youths were seldom allowed to leave the country for
any purpose whatever. Government education has been
merely general, lacking in breadth and having little
practical value.
The conditions during the war quite naturally brought
an end io most educational endeavor, though a few gov-
ernment schools were kept open as well as some of those
founded and controlled by foreigners.
Even during the war, however, educational needs were
borne in mind. Legislation in 1918 reorganized the uni-
versity, founded in 1900, into the faculties of Arts, The-
ology, Law, Medicine and Science. Adequate housing
and equipment were given to some of these faculties.· The
most interesting innovation brought about by the war and
the accompanying social changes, was the development
of secondary and higher education for girls. In Con.;.
stantinople alone, five high schools for girls were estab-
lished under German teachers, with an attendance of
over 2000.
It should be said that under the rule of the Young
Turks since 1908, much greater interest has been taken in
education than ever before, despite the continuous war-
fare which has beset that regime. The law of 1913'
making school attendance compulsory and, so far as
the government of elementary schools ~s concerned,
EDUCATION 127
abolishing tuition fees, was the earliest and greatest re-
sult. The other changes were rather of the nature of
aspiration, though some progress was made in woman's
education. Future developments will depend wholly on
political stability and general social conditions.
ARMENIAN EDUCATION
According to reports by Marcel Leart in 1913 there

were 803 Armenian schools and 81,226 students in Tur-
key. The Armenian population in Turkey of the coun-
try at the time was estimated at 1,250,000. (See Ap-
pendix for other estimates.)
The Armenian educational system is worthy of praise,
for it has been maintained at great cost and against many
obstacles. Love of learning has been a marked charac-
teristic of the Armenian nation and, while circumstances
have hampered their working out anything resembling a
a complete system for themselves, they have never failed
to embrace an opportunity for further study, when such
was offered them. Owing to the peculiar situation of
the Armenians as a subject Christian race of Turkey, it
has not been possible for them to patronize the Moham-
medan government schools. In order to have schools
where their own religion and national ideals could be
promulgated, they had organized a national school sys-
tem, taxing themselves for its maintenance. Its head-
quarters were located in Constantinople under the name
of the Union of Armenian Schools. This organization
provided for a network of schools all over the Empire,
closely connected with and largely supported by the Gre-
gorian Church; The elementary schools were free but
higher education was paid for in part by the students.
It is noteworthy that nearly every village and town all
over the country where Armenians lived had its national
Armenian school while Moslem government schools often
128 MODERN TURKEY
were entirely lacking. As the present system under the
Republic is but slightly changed, the old system may be
described as of the present.
The curriculum of the Armenian elementary schools
is very restricted but the students get a fair grounding
in the reading and writing of their own language, in
ciphering and in the church catechism and history. There
are a number of higher schools for Armenian youths,
which are modelled after the French and which give a
very fair education in the liberal arts. A great point is
made of Janguages, French being the dominant foreign
language taught. There is an attempt at industrial edu-
cation, as for instance, the agricultural school at Varag.
Among higher schools for Armenians might be cited the
Berberian College at Scutari, near Constantinople.
The Armenian schools in Turkey have suffered mainly
from inadequate funds and from the harsh restrictions
imposed upon them by the government. Up to 1908, no
authentic history of Turkey could be taught and the dis-
cussion of certain subjects was never allowed. School
teachers were always under suspicion and their teaching
at times was so circumscribed as to be almost valueless.
Since 1908, however, there has been much more freedom.
The poverty of the country and the subsequent lack of
ample funds for school management have led to the em-
ployment of inferior teachers. The school system is
somewhat lax and the teachers are inclined to favoritism.
Standards of scholarship are low in many cases, owing
to the fact that teachers have had no professional train-
ing and have obtained the whole of their education within
the confines of their province.
In considering the inferior quality of the Armenian
national school, two things should be borne in mind.
First, that the system has always been greatly superior
to the Moslem, and second, that the Armenians have
always had to fight against the great odds of poverty,
EDUCATION· 129
prejudice, restricted opportunity, and an unjust govern-
ment.
The present republic of Armenia is composed mostly
of territory which was formerly under Russian rather
than under Turkish rule. But the changes introduced
indicate ideals which no doubt will soon be·applied to all
Armenia. The Armenian language has been made the
official language in all schools, the church and local state
school have been nationalized, and elementary education
has been declared compulsory (1918).
The revival of Turkish military power, the massacres,
the segregation or expulsion of the native Christian popu-
lation, have left little of the Armenian population. Where
life itself is such a venture, problems of education become
literally academic.
GREEK EDUCATION
No reliable statistics are obtainable as to Greek educa-

tion in Turkey during the recent past.
What has been said concerning Armenian education
might apply equally to the Greek. The system was the
same,--Greek national schools supported by self-taxation,
with a strong religious tendency (Orthodox in this in-
stance), and governed by a special board at Constanti-
nople. The Greeks established schools throughout the
Empire, the number bearing about the same proportion
to population as in the case of the Armenian schools.
But the Greek population being smaller than the Arme-
nian, there were fewer Greek schools. In the larger cities
there were several very excellent schools with curricula
based on those of the French schools. In comparison
with the Armenian system, it might be said that the Greek
schools on the whole showed a higher standard and more
modern methods, owing to larger funds and less repres-
sive laws. Greeks have })een subjected to persecution by
130 MODERN TURKEY
the' Turks but never, until these last days, to such an
appalling extent as have the Armenians.
The Greeks have very strong religious and national in-
stincts, which were openly fostered by their schools.
They are exceedingly proud of their traditions and have
the schools of Greece to imitate and emulate. Their school
system, while not equal to that maintained by the French
and the Americans, met the requirements of the people
fairly well.
FRENCH JESUIT (CATHOLIC) EDUCATION
According to the statistics of the World's Missions for

1914 the French Catholics in prewar Turkey maintained
500 schools and 59,414 students. The French Catholics
have long been missionaries to the Christian nations of
the Ottoman Empire and have established an extensive
network of schools. Capuchins, Carmelites, Dominicans,
and Franciscans have all founded educational and ecclesi-
astical institutions. So widespread has been their work
that the group of Armenian and Greek Catholics is recog-
nized as a separate entity by the Government as distin-
guished from the Armenian Gregorian and Greek Ortho-
dox communities. So closely are religion and nationality
interrelated that for an Armenian or a Greek to become
a Catholic means the renunciation of certain national
claims.
The French Catholic school system includes elementary
and secondary education. The teaching is almost entirely
in French and the types of schools are founded very
closely upon those of France. The main emphasis is on
language. There are schools for girls maintained by
French sisters, as well as for boys with priests in charge,
though the latter are more numerous. The teaching has
a decidedly religious tinge and much proselytizing is
done, though it is not an essential part of the program.
The curricula and standards' of scholarship are goo~
EDUCATION 131
on the whole, though the moral tone is not as high as it
might be and character building, which is made such an
important item in other missionary institutions, is some-
what neglected. Young men are fitted for government
positions as clerks, dragomen and interpreters. The
young women are given some instruction in needlework
and the domestic arts as well as excellent drill in the
French language and literature and of course in Catholic
history and religious formulas. In large centers, like
Constantinople and Smyrna, before the war, there were
many French schools, which owned excellent buildings
and grounds in favored locations. In Bebek, a small vil-
lage on the Bosporus, the Catholics owned practically a
whole hillside, with farm and dairy attached, and build-
ings, including a chapel, monastery, convent, orphanage,
boys' and girls' school. This sort of equipment was
typical of the security and prosperity of the French
Catholics in Turkey, before the war.
BRITISH EDUCATION
According to the statistics of the World's Missions

for 1914, the British :Missionary Societies in the Ottoman
Empire maintained 178 schools with 12,800 students. The
British missionary societies had a fair number of schools
dotted all through the Ottoman Empire. Their activity
in Syria was more conspicuous than in any other part
of the country. Elementary and ordinary high schools
were more numerous than any others, though there were
three normal schools and one industrial school. Th.ey
did very good work and laid special stress on the teach-
ing of morality and high standards of honesty and
integrity.
AMERICAN EDUCATION

1914, the Americans maintained in Turkey 675 schools
132 MODERN TURKEY
with 34,317 students. Of all the foreign educational sys:-.
terns, the American .undoubtedly holds the :first place.
The French Catholic is larger but not more effective.
Since the early part of the nineteenth century, American
missionaries have been planting schools, hospitals,
churches and colleges all over Turkey and today they
are a great power in the land. The American Board
of Foreign Missions, which operates in Asia Minor and
northern Mesopotamia, and the Presbyterian Board,
which confines itself to Syria, are the two principal socie-
ties, though there are several others. No foreign nation
can claim so disinterested an attitude towards the peo-
ple, Moslem and Christian alike, as can America. Her
purpose in education has been entirely humanitarian
and is entirely free from any political or commercial
bias, which can be said of no other foreign nation in
Turkey. This has been recognized by the Government
as well as by the people and the Americans have in
consequence enjoyed universal respect and esteem. They
have been able to include in their schools, representatives
of all the various nationalities found in the Ottoman
Empire.
The American system of education in Turkey is more
extended than any other and includes a larger variety
of institutions. There are besides ordinary elementary
and secondary schools, kindergartens, normal, industrial
and medical schools as well as theological seminaries and
colleges. There are also small schools for the blind and
deaf.
The equipment of these mission schools is varied, but
on the whole, very good inde.ed. Professors, instructors
and doctors connected with them are the representatives
of the best universities in this country. The standard
of scholarship is good and the curricula are based upon
American ideas, but cleverly adapted to the needs of the
country. For instance, a strong emphasis is put upon
EDUCATION 133
langJiage study especially that of the vernacular, also
the rudiments of science are given an important place.
While the mission schools and colleges fill a very im-
portant need, three American colleges under separate
boards should be mentioned as embodying the very best
that America has to offer to the youth of Turkey. These
are the American University (fo~erly called the Syrian
Protestant College) at Beirut, Robert College and the
Constantinople Woman's College at Constantinople. All
of these are admirably equipped with modern appliances
and facilities and all grant A.B. and A.M. degrees under
charters from America. They represent the best institu-
tions for higher education in the Ottoman Empire at the
present time. They will naturally take the lead in any
plans for a future educational system. ·
The American University of Beirut is a university as
it includes schools of medicine, pharmacy, dentisJry,
commerce, and arts and sciences. It has more than
twenty buildings and draws upon a large Christian and
Moslem population in Syria and Palestine. Robert Col-
lege has added a school of engineering to its well estab-
lished collegiate course and while this school is in its
infancy and will need years of peace to measure its full
strength, it has made an excellent beginning. The need
of such a technical school cannot be overestimated in a
country like Turkey, where nearly all work calling for
highly specialized training, has had, in the past, to be
done by foreigners. Robert College, in contrast to the
American University of Beirut, draws upon a Turkish .
instead of a Syrian population, as well as on large Chris-
tian communities, not only in the Ottoman Empire but
also in the Balkans. Constantinople Woman's College
is the only college for women in the whole region and
it offers the highest education obtainable. For nearly
fifty years it has educated the young women who have
become leaders in their several communities and has done
134 MODERN TURKEY
an invaluable service in enlightening the women of the
Empire in whose hands lies very largely the hope of the
future. Eastern women have been neglected, sheltered
and repressed. Constantinople Woman's College shows
what can be done for their minds. The College has started
a series of courses in the practical arts, which in time
will lead, it is hoped, to a school of practical arts. It
is needless to emphasize the importance of this in con-
nection with the period of reconstruction which is bound
to come at the end of the war and in which the women
will, of necessity, take a large part.
American schools in Tur~ey have aimed very decidedly
at a high standard of scholarship but their primary aim
has been character building. Their training in morality
and control has been their drawing card. Their discipline
also has been much stronger than that of either native
or other foreign schools. There has been some prosely-
tizing among the Armenians but that is not the main
object and the youth of all creeds who desire education
have an equal welcome. An interesting fact is that al-
ready the Americans have established cooperation among
different types of schools. Mission schools prepare their
students for higher American schools or colleges. We
:find evidence of an attempt to make a graded system of
education, beginning with the kindergarten and leading
to the college. Industrial education has as yet made lit-
tle headway in theory. Practical courses in arts and
crafts, however, are given in many of the schools. ·
Almost as much thought has been given by Americans
to the education of girls and women in Turkey as to.men
and boys. A great many mission schools are educating
girls on an equality with their brothers. This feature
has been almost entirely neglected by the Government
and has not been given as much thought as it needs by
the other native school systems. Altogether, the Ameri-
can educational system in Turkey has a widespread hold
upon the land.
EDUCATION 135
OTHER FOREIGN EDUCATION

1914 continental societies maintained in pre bellum Turkey
thirty-eight schools and 3,500 students. The other for-
eign schools in Turkey do not reach a very large number
of the population, though their work is good. Gerzp.an,
Danish, Russian and Italian were included under these.
The schools are subsidized in all cases by J.,"eligious socie-
ties in their respective countries, except German schools
which now are given government aid as well. In the
large cities, especially Constantinople, there are excellent
German elementary and secondary schools, based upon
the German system and making a great deal of language
study and the teaching of mathematics and the exact sci-
ences. The work is thorough and of a high grade. It
should be mentioned that since the war, German schools
have been planted in Turkey with great rapidity and
there has been a steady influx of German teachers and
professors not only into Constantinople but also into the
more remote cities of the Empire. German influence in
military schools has been dominant for many years.
A comparative table of schools in prewar Turkey
follows:
Syatem Schoolll No: of Sttulettt11

Turkish (Government) •••.•••••••. 36,230 81,226
Armenian .•••••.••.••••••••••••. 803 133,100
Greek .•••.•••..••••••.•••.•••••. 1,830 184,568
Jewish' •••.••..•.••.••.••.•..••.
Syrian ..•..•.....••••••••.••••••
French (Catholic) ..•....•..•••••. 500 59,414
British •.•..•...•.••.•.....•••••. 178 12,800 .
Continental (German, Danish) .••.•. 38 3,500
American ••••.•.•••••.••.•••••••• 675 34,317
1 The new Hebrew University at Jerusalem, at which the first lecture
was given by Dr. Albert Einstein, is an institution of great promise.-

E. G. M.
136 MODERN TGRKEY
THE FUTI:RE OF EDUCATION IN TURKEY
There should be established a government system of

elementary schools supported by a guaranteed propor-
tion of the national budget. These schools should be uni-
versal, open to all. They should make no religious re-
quirement and give no religious instruction. In addition,
under certain conditions, the government should tolerate,
encourage and even subsidize the work of the priv~te
schools. All private schools, however, should be under
government inspection and required to conform to mini-
mum government regulation. It is particularly in certain
phases of the work such as the training of teachers and
the elements of industrial and agricultural training, that
such schools might with profit be subsidized by the
government.
The schools should be closely correlated with. the com-
munity life in industrial, agricultural, horticultural in-
struction. In secondary and all schools, perhaps, even
in intermediate grades, forestry, horticulture, stock-rais-
ing and other forms of agriculture, as well as more tech-
nical and commercial forms of industry should be
introduced.
So large a proportion of the men have been killed in
Turkey during the war that the education of women now
assumes a most important place. Many women are left
alone to c~re for themselves and their children. In the
new school system, vocational education should be
planned for the women in all types of handicraft which
will give immediate support or will find a place in the
markets of the world. This expansion of this sphere of
women's industrial work would have its reaction upon
her new venture into freedom, as well as upon her ability,
and would thus constitute another factor in the progress
of the New. Turkt-y.
EDUCATION 137
Because of the present high death rate caused by un-
healthy conditions of life and inferior medical practice,
it is very apparent that one form of education most neces-
sary is that along lines of sanitation, proper housing and
medicine. This is the branch of education in connection
with which very little has been done in Turkey. The
work of the American schools in this respect, especially
that of the American University of Beirut, is most re-
markable, but, however, a definite professional training
of physicians and nurses should be now provided for in
a government system so that the work may be systema-
tized and developed to cover the terrible needs of the
population.
Training in engineering, civil, mechanical and mining,
is of course, one of the great demands at the present
moment in the country. Opportunities are great for both
individual and social profit along these lines. Such pro-
fessional education should be closely related to the vari-
ous departments of government work such as sanitation
and health, development of science, public works and all
that has to do with the utilization of natural resources.
No system of education, is of course, possible without
the trained teacher. Until within a few years, there
have been no trained teachers whatever in Turkey except
in a few of the colleges.
Education along the lines indicated, projected and
supervised by a government with a just and beneficent
purpose would do much toward bringing about unity be-
tween the various nationalities and removing one of the
greatest obstacles to progress in the Near East.
One of the :first important undertakings in connecti9n
with the reform of the educational system would be to
bring in skilled ability to reestablish and improve existing
industries and to start new enterprises in manufacturing,
mining, agriculture, etc., appropriate to the environment.
The schools and industries would react upon each other
138 MODERN TURKEY
so that the children and adults would be interested in the
same problem and could develop together.
The government undertaking a beneficent scheme of
rehabilitation and education will succeed in proportion
to the usefulness, tact, energy and patience of those ap-
poin~ed to administer and supervise the undertaking.
THE TURKISH REVIVAL
It is indicative of the social and even political impor-

tance of modern education that the new Anatolian Turk-
ish power turns its attention to education as of first im-
portance and even before the military and political
problems are settled, issues new laws or edicts declaring
its attitude towards education. Not only are the capitu-
lations overthrown, but as coming less questionably
within its own powers, it takes a position of hostility to
all the old regulations concerning education under which
the systems as described above have grown up.
We, of the western world, not closely in contact With
events in the East can only judge from news accounts
which are sent out by 'observers on the ground or by the
new government itself. One of the earliest acts of the
Anatolian Parliament, reported after the recent defeat of
the Greeks, was the requirement that all schools within
the Empire should teach tbe Turkish language. If this
requirement is simply that the Turkish language should
be one of the subjects of instruction, no just objection
could be raised against it. For this is what practically
every government does.
It was next reported that the requirement was made,
or to be made throughout Anatolia, that all instruction
must be given in Turkish and not in the various vernacu-
lars or in the French language as has been the custom.
Such action raises the entire ·question of the right of
racial minorities which was to have been settled by the
EDUCATION 139
Versailles Treaty. Since it was not settled, this question

of racial vernacular schools brings up the problems which
so vexed the Austro-Hungarian monarchy and does every
government where there is a great mixture of peoples
with one dominant one.
It is quite obvious that the new Turkish government
is proposing to take the most illiberal and even reac-
tionary point of view regarding schools. The policy
as announced is the most narrow of nationalistic policies
and denies to the various minority races some of the most
cherished fundamental rights.
Admittedly the Greek and Armenian schools were de-
signed to preserve minority racial groups. That was
their purpose. Foreigners will admit that many of the
- foreign schools, particularly the French, have political
and cultural designs rather than philanthropic. Even
when the missionary motives prevail, as with the Ameri-
can and British schools, it is difficult to prevent these
schools from being exponents of western cultural ideas,
political and social, as well as scientific and intellectual.
Consequently, while the American national is usually a
defender and a believer in the worthiness of the indi-
vidual Turkish citizen, he is at the same time, unre-
servedly, an antagonist to Turkish institutions. ~!te
practical question is, can he avoid being an opponent of
the Turkish government, and at the same time a
representative of western culture, individualism, and
democracy!
The American government is demanding for the Ameri-
can schools established within the territories of the new
Turkish government, recognition of their property rights
and of their teaching privileges.
However much we as individuals believe in the worth-
whileness and the disinterestedness of these institutions,
we will be forced to ~emember certain actions of the
American people. The recently adopted constitutional
140 MODERN TURKEY
amendment in Oregon requires all children between 8
and 16 to attend public schools. No private or church
school is allowed as an alternative. It is even a question
whether children legally may be sent out of the State for
this purpose. The so called Lusk Law in the State of
New York requires all teachers to take an oath to support
the existing government and deprive them of their office
if they hold views hostile to the existing political and
economic and social -institutions. Several states in recent
years have forbidden the existence of schools,-at least
those of elementary grade-which give instruction
through a medium of a foreign tongue, as do the parochial
schools of the French Canadians, of the Poles, and of
the German religious sects. The principles upon which
these laws are based are fundamentally the same as those
involved in the action of the Turkish government. We
believe that there is a vast difference between the two
cases, and that the racial minorities in the one case are
very different from the racial minorities in the other.
Several important problems arise and remain unsolved.
The first is, do the racial minorities in Turkey view the
problem of their national or vernacular school in any
different light than do these component racial groups
in the United States or in other countries! Another
problem which the Turks answer differently from the
western nationals, is whether the foreign national schools
are actually free from the motive of political propaganda.
A final problem is whether we can recognize the political
power of the present regime and deny to it the exercise
of rights under that power which we ourselves exercise
in our own political jurisdiction.
The only practical solution seems to be to so identify
such schools with the fundamental social welfare and
with the cultural aims and activities of the peoples of the
new Turkish State that they themselves will welcome and
protect such schools even though the religious propa-
ganda motive be recognized as present.
CHAPTER VI
WOMEN
By MARY MILLS pATRICK I
The new dawn already tinges the terraces of the harem with rose.
Hope, 0 lovely hanums I The door of the selamlik will be opened, the
grates will fall, the feredje will go to decorate the museum of the Grand
Bazaar, the eunuch will become a mere memory of childhood, and you
shall freely display to the world the graces of your visages and the
treasures of your minds; and then, when "the pearls of the Orient" are
spoken of in Europe, to you, 0 white hanums, will be the allusion I
-EDMONDO DE AMrcrs, Constantinople.
Introduction
Within recent years, the opening of the Imperial Uni-
versity in Stamboul to women students, including the
medical department, has in a very striking way sym-
bolized the rapid emancipation of Turkish women which
has been taking place in the country. Turkish women
in Constantinople are now throwing aside their veils
and are now to be found working in the offices of the gov-
ernment and in business houses of the town. Since the
war, a Young Women's Christian Association has been
founded in Constantinople. So interested were the Turk-
ish women in the activities, social and athletic, of the
girls, that they came and appealed to the authorities
that a Turkish branch of theY. W. C. A. might be formed
to which their daughters might go, a request that was
granted.
There has been much confusion in the popular mind re-
1 Born in Canterbury, New Hampshire. President ot Constantinople
Woman's College since 1890. Ph.D. University ot Berne. Honorary de·
greea: M.A. University ot Iowa, LL.D. Smith College. Author, "Sextus
Empiricua and Greek Scepticism;" "Sappho and the Island ot Lesbos."
141
142 MODERN TURKEY
garding Turkish women due to the failure to make a
distinction between the residents of Constantinople and
Smyrna, the interior cities and towns, and the peasant
women. The greatest change from former conditions
prevails in Constantinople. In the urban sections of the
interior, the influence from Constantinople has not per-
meated too any great extent although it is not uncommon
to see certain Turkish women dispense with the charshof.
The peasant women, who are active in the fields where
contact with persons of both sexes is a natural state of
affairs, are in this respect more liberated than are their
Turkish sisters, but in other respects, they are far more
conservative.
Halideh Edib Ranum, the noted Turkish feminist, in
an interview at Angora (1922) spoke especially of the
political sense of the common Turkish peasant woman.
She is quoted as saying: ''I am surprised at the com-
mon sense of the peasant women who have had no in-
tellectual training, but are grasping political questions
as easily as do their husbands and brothers. I think it
very significant that the women of Angora have recently
asked for a restaurant, a cafe, where they may come
together for coffee, and cigarettes and conversation.''
This is the same person who was regarded by the Allied
officers as the most dangerous political speaker in Con-
stantinople during 1919 and early 1920.
For economic reasons, most Turkish agriculturists are
polygamists, since the addition of wives and children
to their households means larger crops and larger reve-
nue. These women are little removed from slaves. For
economic causes, but for other reasons, few of the upper
or middle class Turks have more than one wife: partly
because they cannot afford them. The old-time Imperial
harem is a thing of the past. It is decidedly exceptional
for any Turk who has had contact with Western civiliza-
tion to practice polygamy.
Graduating Class at Constantinople Woman's College, consisting of Turks,
Armenians, Greeks, Israelites and Bulgarians, together with Honorary
Members Professor Burns and Admiral Bristol.
·Headquarters of the Turkish Red Crescent.

WOMEN 143
Latifeh Ranum, the exceedingly attractive young wife
of Mustafa Kemal Pasha, has set a noteworthy example
in complete emancipation. Not only does she go-about
unveiled and travel with her husband freely but she also
entertains at home in European fashion. She is the pres-
ent leader in the Turkish women's movement and in pub-
lic interviews is asserting freely her advanced ideas
regarding the place that women should enjoy in theRe-
public. Her husband shares her views which, he says, are
not inconsistent with native ideals. For the seclusion of
women in Turkey, he blames Persian influences, and he
asserts that in olden times Turkish women went to war
with their husbands and also succeeded to the thrones
of the Sultans. That the veiling of the Turkish women
should cease is the astounding statement accredited to
Mustafa Kemal whose liberal views regarding women
are well known. At the Economic Congress at Smyrna
(1923), its President in the closing session gave further
public notice to Turkish women by an especial appeal to
''Mothers! Sisters ! yv omen teachers!''
One most vital influence in advancing the position of
Turkish women has been the American schools and col-
leges. In the Constantinople Woman's College, the
Turkish students rank high. Here and elsewhere they
are embracing the opportunities offered for training ~or
public service as teachers, as business women, as scientific
farmers, and more recently in the newly opened medical
school as nurses and doctors. They are taking advanced
degrees in European universities and are demanding a
right to choose their own husbands and to make their own
homes.
The Nludafa-a-y-Houkou.ki Nissvan (Society for the
Defense of the Rights of Womerl), organized at Constan-
tinople, has these aims: to transform the outdoor cos-
tume of Turkish women; to ameliorate the rules of mar-
riage according to the exigencies of common sense; to
144 MODERN TURKEY
fortify woman in the home; to render mothers capable
of bringing up their children according to the principles
of modern pedagogy; to initiate Turkish women into life
in society; to encourage women to earn their own living
by their own work, and to find them work in order to
remedy the present evils; to open women's schools ill
order to give to young Turkish girls an education suited
to the needs of their country; and to improve those
schools already existing.
The emerging of :Moslem women from their isolated
mode of living, while not a wholly unmixed blessing, is
a mighty step forward. No new departure in Turkey is
of more interest or of greater power for good. In no
country in the world is the movement by women for bet-
tering the c.ondition of women making more rapid prog-
ress than in Turkey.
Women
When people speak about the women of Turkey from
any historical point of view, they _probably have in mind
Turkish women, without conscious consideration of the
women of the other races which have been an integral
part of Turkey. I shall, therefore, first of all, speak of
the position, present and past, of Turkish women.
The most advanced Turkish women of Constantinople
itself, and even of some other cities in the Empire, hold
in many ways a unique position. The seclusion of the
harems from which they have recently emerged had a
very strange effect on their development, of a kind which
had been elsewhere almost unknown. The property laws,
however, according to which the affairs of :Mohammedan
women have always been Controlled, are very progres-
sive. During the centuries in which European women
have been free personally, and enslaved financially, :Mo-
hammedan women have been enslaved personally and
more or less free financially.
WOMEN 145
Since shortly after the time of Mohammed, when the
property laws connected with the Mohammedan religion
took form, women have had a liberal control of their own
property. 'rhese laws were copied after laws belonging
to the time of Justinian in the Roman Empire, where
the property rights of women were regarded. They
suited the social organization of Mohammedanism for
the reason that no Mohammedan woman necessarily
bears a permanent relation to any man. Her father may
die, her husband may divorce her, and she therefore her-
self must have a permanent control of her own propel'ty.
Therefore, it has come about that during all the past
centuries Mohammedan women have been free to buy or
sell or alienate property, without the control of any other
person, and in fact without the signature of the woman
herself no transfer of any kind could be made of her own
property. This, of course, includes only the property
that belongs to a woman by inheritance or has come to
her through some other personal channel. -
These property laws have, however, developed in many
Mohammedan woi:nen a strong business sense and power
of judgment. Some Turkish women, even, have been in
the habit of pleading their own cases in property ques-
tions in the courts of law. This state of things is wholly
in contrast to the personal seclusion required of them
under the old customs. It is, therefore, the case that in
Constantinople and other advanced cities where women
are now breaking away from all outward restrictions,
there is a basis of preparation in their minds for the
ability to control affairs. In general, Mohammedan
women are considered of strong mentality.
In Constantinople, at the present time, the most pro-
gressive among them write for the papers, advocating
separation of Church and State. They belong to wom-
en's clubs, and they have social freedom in general so-
ciety. Certain leading Turkish women in Constantinople
146 MODERN TURKEY
give dances in their homes to men and women of their
acquaintances as freely as is done in the homes of other
nationalities. Quite a number have studied in the Con-
stantinople Woman's College, and also in leading Euro-
pean universities. During these years of war, the Otto-
man women have necessarily become involved in political
affairs and have done much to aid the Ottoman Turks;
in this way they have gained a pretext for greater lib-
erty. Today there are more than three hundred Moham-
medan girls working as clerks in the general post office,
as .well as many in other departments of the government.
There are also many in the shops, acting as cashiers and
in other capacities, endeavoring more and more to enter
business life.
The veil having power to conceal the face has prac-
tically disappeared in large cities, but from the veil has
evolved a very graceful and becoming headdress which
distinguishes Turkish women from others in the streets.
This strikingly picturesque costume adds an element of
charm to the general appearance of the streets of East-
ern cities, and it is to be. hoped that this costume will
never be changed for the less picturesque headgear worn
in the West.
The emancipation of the most advanced Turkish women
is rather of an anomalous character; in some things
ahead and in other things behind what would be found
in other places. As an illustration of the irregular na-
turE: of this emancipation, Halideh Hanum, the w~ll
;Imown leader among Turkish women, received a number
of votes from the vilayet of Konia for the office of dep-
uty to parliament, although her name was not posted as
a candidate for office. In fact, woman suffrage is .advo-
cated in the papers by leading women in a society in
which manhood suffrage in any systematized form does
not exist.
As an illustration of the anomaly of home life among
WOMEN 147
Turkish women not many years ago, I shall give a de-
scription of the· picturesque Oriental character of daily
experience in the house of the Grand Vizier of Constan-
tinople. We of the West often make the great mistake
of judging manners and customs by our own fixed ideas ;
and, in describing the family life in the palace of the
highest official in the political life of the city, I am not
writing in any spirit of criticism, but simply with the
idea of furnishing a glimpse of the combined freedom and
seclusion of the Oriental environment.
Then~ were four households represented in this fam-
ity, at the head of which combination was the Grand
Vizier himself. His daughter was married to a man who
was for that reason at the head of the inner family life
of the palace. Others dwelling there were relatives and
retainers. This family occupied a large and beautiful
palace. The first floor was entirely given to the men.
There they had their apartments, their sitting rooms,
and their smoking and sleeping rooms. ·
The second story was devoted to the apartments of the
women. The hu.sband of the daughter of the Grand
Vizier was very much of a gentleman, he had no other
wife, and no other entanglements with any of the women
of the harem. There were, however, many other women
who resided there, relatives, servants, and friends. The
man of the house was free to enter the apartments of the
harem whenever he liked. In fact; when called to a
sudden dinner at the British Embassy, it was there that
he would go to have the maids assist him in putting on
his stockings and his collar, and in arranging his shirt-
cuffs, until he was finally evolved into a well-groomed
gentleman of society. ,,
In the first floor of the palace there was a large dining
salon which was used on great occasions. Adjoining
this was an ordinary dining room where luncheons and
dinners were served. There was no regular breakfast
148 MODERN TURKEY
in a Turkish household, as a casual cup of coffee meets
every need. In this dining room from twelve to
fifteen people were served with luncheon and dinner.
The table was first prepared for the men who often came
in their dressing gowns, sametimes even barefooted,
unless for some especial reason they had been obliged
to go to their offices on business, or had been invited else-
where as guests. The first object was general comfort
and therefore too much attention was not given to per-
sonal preparation for the occasion, in the matter of shav-
ing, dressing, or wearing stiff and uncomfortable clothes.
The food was brought in in the large covered dishes
and trays. As many as nine courses of the delicious
food, to be found only in the Turkish Empire, were
served at each meal.
The food served to the men at the first table was, natu-
rally, better than that served later, and, for that reason,
my friend who was a nurse in this establishment was
invited to eat with the men. The lady of the house was
also sometimes present when there were no guests. At
other times she either ate with the women or had her
meals served to her in private. Mter the men finished,
the dishes were removed and the table was prepared for
the women of the establishment. The third table was
later prepared for all the domestics and retainers of the
large palace.
There were many different sleeping rooms, both in t~e
women's and in the men's apartments. Often the resi-
dents slept in different rooms each night. When there
were unexpected guests, richly embroidered beds char-
acteristic of Eastern lands were spread on the floors in
different places.
Even in the homes of emancipated Turks, there is a
casual attitude toward furnishings such as one never
finds in any other country. An illustration of this may
be found in the experience of Halideh Ranum, who told
WOMEN 149
me that shortly after she was graduated from Constan-
tinople College she thought she would like to arrange her
house in the European fashion; accordingly, she pre-
pared furniture, pictures and ornaments suitable for fur-
nishing her rooms according to Western customs. And
then she said the result was, to her surprise, that she felt
a great loss of freedom: she couldn't breathe with so
many things around, so she had most of them removed.
By placing the Oriental sofas at the side of the room,
she arranged large drawing-rooms with wide intervening
spaces, through which flooded the abundant light and air
which are common in all Oriental houses. Turkish
salons, with their painted walls, their floors covered with
the richest rugs, and heavily embroidered cushions on
low couches, are usually very beautiful.
I believe that the probable explanation of the Oriental
idea of beauty in the household comes from the mosques,
where one sees large spaces; they are never ornamented
except by quotations from the Koran and the hanging
chandeliers which furnish light at night, but the floors
are covered with the richest and most beautiful rugs that
can be found in the East. This religious idea of beauty
has doubtless furnished the suggestion in the conscious-
ness of the individual that makes a typical Oriental house
so different from a Western home-although from the
point of view of absolute resthetics perhaps not less
beautiful.
Peasants of all races in the Turkish Empire form a
wholly different class of society from the women in the
".ities, and constitute the conservative element that con-
nects the present with the past. As I have described the
life of Turkish women in the ~ties, by way of contrast,
let us turn next to that of Mohammedan women among
the Kurds, who live in the mountains of eastern Turkey.
Both Kurdish men and women wear flowing robes and
heavy embroideries. I remember once meeting a Kurd-
150 liODEIL~ TCRKEY
ish chieftain on horseback on a wild mountain road, wear-
ing a long gown of thin white muslin, heavily embroid-
ered, over his other robes.
The manufacture of rugs is carried on to a great ex-
tent among the Kurds, and in their homes the artistic
results of this industry form a background for the beauty
of Kurdish women. There is, perhaps, no woman in the
world so beautiful and so perfect physically as the Kurd-
ish peasant. She is tall, graceful, and well-formed, with
richly colored skin of the brunette type, black hair and
eyes; while the habit of carrying heavy burdens on her
head gives her also a personal carriage of extreme grace-
fulness and poise.
We of theWest demand equality of rights for men and
women. In the Kurdish nation this is carried to an
extreme, and the Kurdish women have all the rights of
working while the men have all the rights of pleasure.
No Kurdish man is expected to work. His life is the
life of a robber, and no Kurdish girl will marry a man
who is not a successful robber. All the work of the fields
and of the household is done by the women, although
cultivation of land is not carried on to any great extent
among them. Furthermore, the Kurdish woman is not
troubled by the weakening effect of culture-her brain
need not necessarily carry even the intricacies of an
alphabet. She is physically well and fr~ and not sub-
ject to the bondage of any kind of pain.
Mountain travel in the interior of Turkey is far from
easy and means many hours of climbing, sometimes with
exposure to great inclemency of weather. A friend of
mine, traveling over the mountains in company with a
Kurdish man and woman, suddenly noticed that the
woman was missing, although her husband paid no ap-
parent attention to the fact. A few hours later she re-
joined them, with her usual air of serenity, and casually
bound to her back was a little child.
WOMEN 151
Polygamy is usual among the Kurds. The more wives
a man is able to support, the more land he is capable of
cultivating. I once had the privilege of being a guest in
a Kurdish family for four or five days. There were.
three wives in this home, all of them were tall, beautiful
young women. I think they must have been about the
advanced age of twenty-five, for the inequality of rights
of labor among the Kurds removes the beauty and grace
of Kurdish women at an early age, so that at thirty years
of age, one may have lost her bloom, her teeth, and her
vigor. With the magnificent physique which they have,
if the demands of physical labor were not carried to so
great an excess, their freedom from weariness and pain
might easily last through a vigorous old age; unless the
theory be correct, which is frequently advanced, that
culture is necessary to preserve the beauty of both men
and women, which, although of a different type, is often
enhanced in later years.
I should like to give here an illustration of the vicissi:
tudes to which life is sometimes subject among the
Kurds. About the time the Constitution was declared
in the Ottoman Empire, and when Sultan Abdul
Hamid II was dethroned, a certain prominent Kurd ob-
tained enough influence through his friends in Constan-
tinople to secure the appointment of governor of a com-
paratively large region of country in Kurdistan.
Shortly after he was appointed, he issued a command to
all the landowners in the whole region, asking them to
send in their deeds to him as a mere matter of formality,
as he had received official orders from the Imperial gov-
ernment in Constantinople to make certain slight changes
in these deeds.
This command could not be disobeyed, and on receiv-
ing these official papers the Governor naturally held in
his hands the key to the possession of the whole region.
These papers he had made over, deeding to himself or
152 MODERN TURKEY
to some relative each piece of land mentioned, so that
in a short space of time he and his family became the
owners of the whole of that part of the country; and
all of the previous owners of the land were now his ten-
ants. This naturally produced a tremendous excitement,
and each of the owners of the above-mentioned deeds
sent on an official protest to the Turkish Imperial Gov-
ernment, giving the date of the deed in question and stat-
ing all the facts of this infamous transaction. Justice,
however, is difficult to obtain under some circumstances,
and the status of these deeds is still unsettled.
The life and characteristics of the Arab women in the
peasant class are not greatly different from those of the
Kurds, with the exception that the former usually lack
the extreme physical beauty and poise of their Kurdish
sisters. Arab women, for the most part, still live in the
darkest ignorance. Even in rich families girls are not
taught to read and write. In Algeria and Tripoli the
government has tried to open schools for girls, but in
Algeria these schools and education in general are- di-
rected by French officials, so no Mohammedan would send
his daughter to them. In Tripoli the Turkish Govern-
ment founded and built a school for girls of the rank of
a grammar school, which was to serve as a model. But
very few girls were enrolled, and those who came were
for the most part daughters of officials, and not really
Arab. .
The harem life is very strict. The women live abso-
lutely in seclusion, apart from the men. It is prohibited
for a girl even to appear freely before her boy cousin,
because marriage is possible between them. In fact,
wherever marriage is possible the seclusion is absolute.
Arab women are very superstitious. Their whole life
consists in household service and work in the fields; for
instance, the cotton fields are always cultivated by
women, and the harvesting is done by them. They also
WOMEN 153
store the food for winter, weave cloth, do needle work,
and make their husbands' clothes. Their only pleasure
is found in society composed of women, and in singing
and dancing on the occasion of celebrations of birth and
marriage.
In some of the more progressive places, like Syria or
the city of Damascus, there is a great difference between
the Christian Arab women and the Mohammedans,
though they belong to the same race-the Christians
being more advanced. The great number of Arab Mo-
hammedans in Syria are illiterate and live in absolute
seclusion; and, though they are not very moral, they are
not allowed to go into the streets unveiled. Arab women
in Egypt, however, have all the freedom and privileges
that belong generally to civilized society.
Social restrictions among the Arabs are practiced only
among sedentary people. The Bedouins have perfect
freedom, both men and women. Women go unveiled. A
Bedouin girl or married woman can receive a stranger,
even a Christian, in her tent during the absence of her
husband, and talk with him and even invite him to dinner.
She is quite free and exceedingly chaste in comparison
with the city women. •
The Albanian women are more or less an unknown
element. The peasants live the same life as those of
other nationalities in Turkey. The length to which
Albanian women may go, however, is well illustrated in
the life of :Miss Paraskevy Kyrias, who was one of the
very few women delegates in Paris in 1917 and 1919,
and who was chairman of the Albanian Delegation and
far more intelligent than the other members. Several
Albanian women have been graduated ·at Constantinople
Woman's College and have in other instances than in the
one cited above shown characteristics of leadership.
The Christian women in the Turkish Empire include
the Armenians, the Greeks and some Albanians. The
154 MODERN TURKEY
Greek and Armenian women are much like those of other
European nations-the only great difference being that
although they live mixed in with other nationalities in
the same towns and cities, their social and religious life
is wholly confined to those speaking their own language
in their own nation, and their thought life is limited, ex-
cept in such cases as those who have a knowledge of for-
eign languages, to that expressed in their own literature
and press. The good schools among the Greeks and Ar-
menians in Turkey have made the Greek and Armenian
women,of the cities cultured, and have given them the
same point of view and customs in life as would be found
among other European races. Both nationalities have
marked individuality and have for many years included
distinguished women who have written for the press and
have been leaders in those activities which the restric-
tions of the Turkish Government allowed. With the new
freedom offered at the present time, the world may ex-
pect much from Armenian women. The Ottoman Greeks,
also, will not be behind those of their-true fatherland in
the enterp!ises that will further the causes of a new
humanity.
The ·women of the Near East, especially those in the
Ottoman Empire, are ready for the progress which is
certain to come from outside social, political and edu-
cational world development. Although they have fewer
contacts than men with outside changes, they are ~n
many respects more susceptible to quick transformation
in their point of view. They have, in many ways, made
distinct advancement in education and social culture.
With the barriers that separate the various races form-
ing lesser obstacl~s, all the women of Turkey will attain
to a larger horizon, opening before them far-reaching
opportunities of activity and national influences
CHAPTER VII
PUBLIC HEALTH
By WALTEB BooTH ADAMs, M.D.'
There is no eure for the body apart from the soul; and the reason
why so many diseases elude the physicians of Greece is that they know
nothing of the soul.
-SOCRATES.
Introduction
Dr. von Diiring, a distinguished German specialist,
prepared a report early in the present century in which
he expressed his firm conviction that "unless radical
measures were taken to check the widespread diseases
with which he had to deal, the Turkish population would
be extinct in two generations." (E. Pears, "Turkey and
its People"). While this statement is certainly too
pessimistic, still the opinion given was partly substan-
tiated in a personal conversation which I had in 1920
with a British medical staff officer attached to the Allied
Forces of Occupation at Constantinople. The· discour-
aging features are governmental inefficiency, the igno-
rance and suspicions of the inhabitants, and the lack of
1
Born at Constantia, New York, 1864; A.B. 1887, New York University;
M.D. 1890, New York University; A.M. 1890, New York University. Post·
graduate work in chemistry at hie abna mater in preparation for the ap·
pointment to the chair of Chemistry, Materia Medica and Therapeutics in
the Syrian Protestant College, universally known through the Orient as the
American University at Beirut; passed hie examinations before the Ottoman
Imperial Medical Faculty for license to practise medicine in Turkey; after
twelve years' experience relinquished teaching of chemistry; has seen and
treated over 60,000 new eases of akin diseases at Beirut; lecturer on con-
tagious diseases in the Nurses' Training School of American Univeraity;
member of the Beirut Executive Committee of the Lebanon Hospital for
Mental Diseases.
155
156 MODERN TURKEY
surgeons, doctors, and nurses, of medicines, and of hos-
pitals for coping with the situation. The diseases and
maladies prevalent in Syria are not identical in all cases
with those existing in New Turkey. Each section has
its own peculiar conditions. The observations of Dr.
Adams, however, relative to the terrible lack of adequate
sanitation and to the unprogressive viewpoint of the in-
habitants apply equally well to the rest of the country.
The Ottoman Public Health Service was under the
supervision of the Director General of Public Health,
Department of the Interior, with headquarters at Con-
stantinople. There were local officials in the vilayets,
sanjaks, and municipalities. The Government main-
tained a bacteriological, a chemical, an antirabic, and a
smallpox vaccine institute. Quarantine was under the
Director of Ports and Frontiers. In the Lausanne 'Treaty
a declaration relating to sanitary methods by the Turks
includes a provision for the appointment of three Euro-
pean specialists for a period of five years, attached to
the Turkish Ministry of Public Health, to advise regard-
ing the sanitary administration of the frontiers.
The functions of the Public Health Service relate to
sanitation and public health, administration of govern-
ment hospitals, report and control of epidemics, and
reports .of diseases, deaths, and births. The organiza-
tion, based on the French syst~m, is excellent, but in
practice is deficient with reference to personnel, hospi-
tals, and laboratories. Th.ere is a general lack ·of
information among officials concerning diseases, birth
and death statistics. Inefficient attention is paid to
quarantine of infectious diseases that can be traced
largely to pilgrims and other travelers from adjacent
territories.
A great deal in the way of education along medical
lines in prewar Turkey has been accomplished by for-
eign institutions, especially by the medical department
PUBLIC HEALTH 157
of the University of Beiru~. Graduates from this uni-
versity are to be found practicing in almost every town
and city of any size in Syria, Palestine, Iraq, Egypt and
Anatolia. The newly opened medical department of the
American Constantinople Woman's College, with its
nurses' training school and hospital, will do much
toward relieving the conditions among the Turkish
women. The missionaries with their hospitals, and more
recently the Near East Relief which has equipped and
run hospitals and nurses' training schools all over the
country, have furnished an example of modern medical
science which have influenced decidedly the movement for
improved health conditions.
The Government at Angora is sympathetic with the
reform of the Department of Health, considerably due
to the influence of Halideh Edib Ranum, wife of Dr.
Adnan Bey, who as Minister of Education in the cabinet
of Mustafa Kemal Pasha started a new organization
among the upper class Turkish women of Anatolia simi-
lar to the settlement organizations in America, for the
purpose of showing peasant women how to live and con-
duct their homes in a more healthful way. There exists
within Turkey, nevertheless, the inevitable clash between
the old and the new, between suspicion of and appeal to
foreigners. Western ideas are revolutionizing many pro-
grams of New Turkey. For Turkey's sake, it is to .be
hoped that the pronounced movement to nationalize
medical practice so as to exclude foreign influences may
not be carried too far.
Public Health
This chapter is descriptive of conditions prevailing in
that section of Asiatic Turkey with which I am most
familiar, namely, with the region south of the Gulf of
Alexandretta (the ancient Gulf of Issus), where the
158 MODERN TURKEY
Arabic tongue prevails, and where the civilization and
traditions are Semitic. In this southern section there is
present a stagn~tion in all stages of development-the
unchanged and unchanging Bedouin wanders over the
land dwelling in black tents, the fellaheen lives, or
rather exists, in mud huts, and the civilization of· cul-
tured business and professional men of the large cities-
men educated in the colleges of the country or in Europe
or America, dwelling in handsome and capacious houses
in the cities of the coast, interior, or mountain villages.
It is thus evident that there must be a great variety and
diversity of local culture, habits, and conditions.
Beirut, Damascus, Aleppo, and the new sections of
Jerusalem, J a:ffa and Haifa, have developed like modern
cities. But many of the other cities, such as Horns,
Hama, Antioch, Aintab, Sidon, Tripoli, and other lesser
towns, seem, like Topsy, to have "just growed." They
have narrow, tortuous streets, not infrequently com-
pletely arched over, with holes cut in the roofs letting a
little light down to assist the. wayfarer in dodging the
meandering donkey or prowling street dogs. A narrow
gutter often is found in the middle of these streets,
through which trickles a little stream of water or of
sewage. One may expect to find conditions and manners
and ways and means of doing things in very many in-
stances in the Orient quite the opposite to those of the
Occident. For example, the sewers and ditches are not
on the sides of the streets, as one naturally expects ·to
find them, but in the middle of them. Again, a street is
considered only incidentally a place in which to walk or
to drive; in the East, it seems to be a place where people
throw rubbish and commit nuisances. Bearing that in
mind, one can readily understand why the Oriental puts
off his shoes on entering his home, and regards a shoe
as an unmentionable topic of conversation; and if he is
forced to speak of it he asks your pardon for mentioning
PUBLIC HEALTH 159
it. To call a person ''an old .shoe'' is the very last insult
possible; the reason is due to the condition of the town
streets. In the newer streets of some cities sidewalks
are being built, but the inhabitants seem to regard them
as useful mainly for displaying their goods, ·as places
where they may sit and smoke bubble-bubble pipes, gos-
sip, play backgammon, do tailoring-anything but let
pedestrians walk. Local residents still promenade in the
middle of the street.
In recent years the street dogs have been removed,
either "deported," as from Constantinople by the Turks
to a desert island in the Marmara and left to die of
hunger and thirst, or, more humanely, poisoned in some
of the Syrian cities when there have been cases of rabies.
This treatment was regarded as too cruel in certain quar-
ters of the Syrian city, Beirut, and the conservative in-
habitants enticed the street dogs into their houses and
fed them until the poisoning campaign was past. The
next step was the importation into Beirut from Sidon of
a ship load of these natural scavengers.
Sewage systems are virtually unknown in Eastern
cities. There are two or three sewers in Beirut emptying
into the sea, but even their construction meets with seri-
ous opposition and obstruction on the part of the inhabi-
tants and even officials who say "it would harm the fish."
The universal method of disposal of sewage in the cities
is in cesspools. As far as I know, the American Univer-
sity and the J ohanniter Hospital at Beirut have the only
septic tank systems in the East. In the towns and vil-
lages of the mountains the ordinary out of doors out-
house, with a narrow slit in the floor, is the usual accom-
modation. This lack of sanitation and use of primitive
methods, especially when coupled with a primitive water
supply, is the cause of very disastrous epidemics of
cholera and typhoid.
In Syria there has been a wide movement for good
160 MODERN TURKEY
and proper water supply in the cities and 2ven in the
large villages. It began at Beirut in the early '70's,
when an English company put in the admirable water
works-the greatest blessing which the town possesses.
The Barada, anciently called the Abana, runs through
the city of Damascus and is divided and subdivided, sup-
plying not only the gardens and fountains, but was also,
until a few years ago, the only water available for drink-
ing and cooking. Anyone familiar with the careless
habits of the East, and with the Arabic proverb that
"water falling over three stones purifies itself," can
appreciate how a cholera epidemic would rage, and has
raged repeatedly in Damascus. Only a few years ago,
after repeated scourges of cholera, there was installed
a water works system taking the water directly to the
city from Ain Feejee, one of the purest and most salu-
brious sources possible. ~d yet too many Damascenes,
wedded to custom, refuse to take that water when they
may use those of the Abana, or "our father," as their
forefathers called this life-giving and death-giving
stream. Aleih, one of the chief summer resorts of the
Beiruteans, enjoys water brought many miles from huge
springs ; the resort also supplies neighboring towns.
The largest town in the Lebanon, Zahleh, has followed
the good example and recently installed a fine and abun-
dant water supply from mountain springs. English en-
gineers were putting in a system for the villages along
the coast suburbs of Beirut when the Great War broke
out; they were sent by the Turks into the interior as
prisoners of war. A quarter of a century or more ago,
Lady Burdett Coutts offered to install a water supply
for Jerusalem from Solomon's pools, the ancient source
for the city, but the rapacity of the grafting Turkish
governor and the howls of the carriers of water (who
plied with their goatskin bags from the huge cisterns
PUBLIC HEALTH 161
under the Mosque of Omar) frustrated the project. The
residents of Jerusalem had to continue to drink cistern
water until the British captured the city, and undertook
the first city water works. The population of Tripoli
drinks from the ''sacred'' Abu Ali River-unfiltered and
unpurified-another source of much disease. In vain
have efforts been made to install a proper supply, piped
from places above the sources of contamination. Many
persons use their own cisterns or wells. The water sup-
ply of Horns and Hama, those huge overgrown villages,
is from the Orontes river that flows past and partly
through them. Aleppo has a very poor supply: cisterns,
wells, and the river supply most of the people. Fastidi-
ous people have drinking water brought on donkey back
from distant springs. Artesian wells would most prob-
ably provide this city with an abundant supply of good
water. Geologically it seems to be feasible. Engineers
are now proposing a plan to bring the water of the
Euphrates in pipes directly to Aleppo, a large and flour-
ishing city which needs an adequate water supply.
The water is generally a matter of local pride. A
villager is almost sure to ask you, '' IIow did you like the
water of our village 7 Is it not better than any other!"
If a man from another yillage overhears the remark, it
is almost sure to start a quarrel, at first friendly, but
quite liable to develop into an acrimonious and bitter
discussion and often blows. The water of the wells of
the coastal towns, such as Sidon, Tyre, Haifa, and Jaffa
is brakish, containing considerable quantities of salts.
When students come to the American University at
Beirut and drink the waters of the Dog River, which is
fairly hard (14 degrees of hardness, as the Lebanon is
one great mass of limestone mixed with some strata of
sandstone) they become badly costived; and it requires
considerable time and patience to become accustomed to
162 MODERN TURKEY
the lime in the water, and to the lack of the sodium and
magnesium salts to which they have been accustomed all
their lives.
The earliest record of epidemic disease in this country
appears in the Bible where the bubonic plague is detailed.
The buboes are called '' emerods'' in the King James
version, but more properly are called "tumors" in the
American revised version. This interesting account is
given in the fifth and sixth chapters of I Samuel. There
is also a most interesting recognition of the connection
of mice, or rats (for often the Oriental calls them indif-
ferently by the same name) with the disease. It will be
recalled that th~ Philistines, in returning the Ark, sent
back five golden tumors and five golden mice as a pro-
pitiatory offeriRg. Possibly it was another epidemic of
plague that routed Sennacherib's army when
The Assyrian came down like a wolf on the fold,
His cohorts were gleaming in purple and gold
And the sheen of their spears was like stars on the sea
When the blue wave rolls nightly on deep Galilee.
For the Angel of Death spread his wings on the blast,
And breathed in the face of the foe as he passed,
And the eyes of the sleepers waxed deadly and chill,
And their hearts but once heaved, and forever grew still.
Whether this was a plague epidemic that Byron has

paraphrased from the thirty-fifth verse of the nineteenth
chapter of the second book of Kings is not clear, but it
seems probable. In the Middle Ages epidemics are re-
corded, and it is probable that there have been many that
have not been noted. The present pandemic world-wide
spread of plague did not strike Turkey until quite
recently, when the nature and control of the disease have
been better understood and the epidemics have been
mild. The outbreak in Beirut .in 1919 had a mortality of
only thirteen per cent of reported cases. It is probable
that some deaths were concealed as to the cause, and it is
PUBLIC HEALTH 163
certain that many ambulant cases and other mild attacks
were not reported at all to the government. Thus it is
more likely that the percentage of deaths to number of
cases was actually much smaller than thirteen per cent.
It apparently did not attack the Ottoman armies during
the Great War.
There is great carelessness in regard to l!!mallpox, an
epidemic disease. Many of the common people do not
recognize the difference between it and chicken pox, and
accordingly do not vaccinate their children. In general,
the disease is less severe than in Europe and America:
Whether this is due to the milder climate, or, as some
hold, to a partial racial immunity, is not settled. Cer-
tainly, I have heard people remark with a great sigh of
relief, when I have pronounced by diagnosis of bee jidry,
"Only smallpo:x:f I feared it was some bad disease I"
They have failed to enlighten me what they thought could
be worse. It is the cause of much blindness, for, even
though the disease is generally milder than in America,
there occur not infrequently confluent ·cases that destroy
the eyes and also badly disfigure the countenance. Local
peoples are gradually waking up to the importance of
vaccination, realizing that such a simple precaution will
prevent a girl from being forever after an unsightly
object-an almost certain bar to all chances of marriage.
Since there is no career for women in the Levant but
marriage and home-making, a girl with a face pitted with
smallpox scars must have a very large dowry to induce
the fastidious young man to take her,-there are too
many others bidding through the go-betweens and other
matchmakers.
Typhus had pretty much died out in Syria, at least till
1892, when a steamer brought a large company of labor-
ers from Benghazi, that strip of country west of Egypt,
where they had had no rain for three years. "There was
famine in the land" and these men came to Beirut seek-
164 :MODERN TURKEY
ing work on the Beirut-Damascus railroad, then in
process of construction. It was soon found that they had
brought typhus, which resulted in a widespread epidemic
in the city. It was, however, mild and short-lived com-
pared to the epidemics, not only in Beirut but all through-
.out the country, bred and spread by the Ottoman armies
during the last war. It would be hard to estimate
which carried off more victims-typhus, the enemies'
projectiles, starvation, or roassacre.s and deportation
into the wilderness where wretched women, children and
old men were left to die of hunger and thirst.
Typhoid and paratyphoid are epidemic diseases. They
are more prevalent in the villages than in the large!"
towns, where the new water supplies are so greatly im-
proving conditions. The Syrians are awake to this, and
village after village is improving and safeguarding its
water supply.
Cholera lias appeared again and again, almost always
being brought from Mecca by the returning pilgrims.
It is believed to be carried to Mecca by the India pil-
grims and from there it travels along the various routes.
But the international quarantines that the nations of
Europe established at the head of the Red Sea, taking
the administration out of the hands of the indolent and
corrupt Turks, has largely prevented epidemics-at any
rate, epidemics coming from Mecca. It has been an open
book, however, that cities with a proper water supply
have escaped cholera epidemics. There has been no epi-
demic of cholera in Beirut since the Beirut Water Works
Company was installed, while Tripoli and Damascus,
Sidon, Tiberias, Aleppo, Horns and Hama have suffered
severely. One of the causes of the spread of the disease
has been the funeral customs of the Moslems who wash
the body before burial beside running water at the
mosque or elsewhere. The washings from cholera
corpses run back into the stream from which a little
PUBLIC HEALTH 165
lower down the people dip out their water for cooking,
washing and drinking. It is well known that several epi-
demics in several cities have started in just this way
from sporadic, imported cases, and it is no wonder that
the disease spreads through the cities like wild fire. Cou-
pled with the fanatical belief of ignorant people that
the government doctors regularly give the sufferers
medicine in order to let them die easily, or even to put
them out of the way so as to prevent the spread of the
infection, and also coupled with the fatalism that "all
things are from God" and "if they will die they will
die," that "their time has come and nothing can avert
it, no medicine or other treatment,'' one can readily see
the difficulties the medical profession encounters in fight-
ing a cholera epidemic. Again, it used to be the practice
for all native doctors to clear out of town when there was
cholera, to have "urgent business" in the mountains
or in a distant city. Now, thanks to the teaching and
example of the professors of the American University at
Beirut, that day has passed. But the "yellow wind," as
the disease is called in Arabic, is the greatest terror in the
land. Nothing equals it in its effect on the minds of the
people ; and I think they are right, when one considers its
sudden and terrible attack and frightful mortality.
Among the epidemic diseases of childhood, measles
prevails in recurring waves, but does not seem to be as
severe nor followed by pulmonary complications, such
as bronchopneumonia, as often happens in America.
But whooping-cough often follows in its train, and, as
in America, few escape this troublesome malady.
One of the great terrors in America is absent from the
Arab part of old Turkey, though it does prevail in the
mountainous parts of Armenia. I refer to scarlet fever.
In my thirty years' residence in Syria I have seen but one
case of scarlet fever, at the same time that I have seen
over 60,000 cases of skin disease. More than a quarter
166 MODERN TURKEY
of a century ago there was a severe epidemic of scarlet
fever in the large town of Zahleh. Some of its inhab-
itants emigrated to America, where they made consider-
able money, but lost all their children frQm this red
scourge. They did not realize its deadly infectiousness
nor how the yet undiscovered germ can and does cling
to clothing. They boxed up the fine new clothes of their
children and shipped them to their relatives in Zahleh.
For a week or two the proud little Zahlehites strutted
about the streets, the bitter envy of their friends and
neighbors, till all at once they sickened and grew steadily
worse. The local doctors were puzzled over it till they
finally came to recognize it as scarlet fever, and then
were at a loss how to treat it. They had in the old d~rs
skipped all consideration of the disease on the ground
that "it did not occur in Syria." Of course, sympathiz-
ing friends crowded in during the sickness to offer help
and comfort (no people are more sympathetic than the
Syrians in sickness or trouble) and also naturally every
one went to the funeral, scorning the warning that the
disease was infectious. Consequently the epidemic
raged, took its toll of the children of the town and died
out, and has never reappeared. There have been spo-
radic cases in Jerusalem among the Jews, brought, it
is believed, from Salonika, but it does not become
epidemic.
Diphtheria is not uncommon, though I must say that
it is less frequent, if one may judge by general impres~
sions and by statistics, than in America.
Cerebrospinal-meningitis cases come in epidemics
which do not last long and generally are not as severe
as in America. Jerusalem and Smyrna, in recent years,
have suffered rather severely. It was during one of the
Smyrna epidemics of this disease that Dr. Flexner's
serum proved its efficacy and was found to be superior
to any made in Europe. I am told that the Rockefeller
PUBLIC HEALTH 167
Institute sent the sernm with a generosity that aston-
ished the people as well as the doctors who used it with
such marvelous effect. In the cities there are occasional
outbreaks of the disease, which, however, do not persist
if they happen outside the wet season.
Writing of children's diseases there is a matter of
hygiene that is not a disease, and yet doubtless is a cause
of much mischief and indirectly the cause of many deaths
of infants. I refer to improper infant feeding. The
mother has the baby at the breast "whenever he cries,"
and as too frequent feeding is one of the greatest causes
of indigestion and colic it becomes a "cause of a cause,"
one of the "vicious circles" of medicine, and the direct
and indirect cause of other intestinal troubles and great
infant mortality. Yet it is one of the most difficult things
possible to regulate the nursing of a baby. The mothers
will not do it. They cite their own mothers and their
grandmothers and great-grandmothers and so on back
to Eve I And what does a mere man, even though he be
a doctor of medicine, know about it f
Trachoma is the slow, insidious cause of so much
misery and eventually of so many cases of blindness in
the land. I have mentioned the blindness caused by con-
fluent smallpox. But this trachoma thickens the lids, and
curls in the lashes which are often longer and thicker
than we see in America; these lashes irritate the cornea,
leading to its inflammation and eventual opacity, as well
as to other diseases of the eyes. These maladies are espe-
cially trying because most inhabitants of the Orient have
large, handsome, expressive eyes.
Epidemics of purulent ophthalmia are not uncommon in
the cities in the summer time, when flies carry the infee-
tion from one child to another. Colonel Lawrence-the
famous aide-de-camp to Prince Feisal, whose disguise as
an Arab was so complete that he several times entered
the Turkish lines and dined at the table with J emal
168 MODERN TURKEY
Pasha, the viceroy of Syria and commander of the
Fourth army.:_said that he could do all things the Arabs
did but one: he could not let the flies crawl over his eyes!
Gonorrheic ophthalmia is another frequent cause of in-
fant blindness.
Both gonorrhea and syphilis were all too common be-
fore the Great War; the war and its ravages, its lowering
of the moral tone, its attendant starvation of whole
provinces, the rape and seduction and the temptation
to starving women spread these diseases horribly. ThQ
consequences will endure for years to come.
On the coast, rheumatism and lobar pneumonia are
not common diseases. I have known my colleague, Dr.
Graham, professor of internal medicine, to subsidize
and to bring from a distance pneumonia patients to enter
the hospital in order that he might have a specific case
to show to his class. In the mountains both diseases are
common and severe. Rheumatoid arthritis, is, however,
a common malady, and too often affiicts poor women who
have to earn their living by laundry work, or the male
cobblers who find difficulty in wielding the awl.
Dysenteries, both amoebic and bacillary, as in all trop-
ical and subtropical countries, are common, and will be
until the people learn proper sanitation. Here again,
the improvement in the water supply is diminishing this
class of disease, and when there is a corresponding im-
provement in sewage disposal it will mark a further
advance in better hygiene. It is by a campaign of edu-
cation along all these lines that improvement will come.
Already the American Medical School, through the teach-
ings of its professors and then through its graduates, has
done much.
Leprosy is the topic I am questioned about most when
on my furloughs in America. It is present in the coun-
try. I have seen about a dozen new cases of it annually.
It is mostly of the nodular type. For many years it has
PUBLIC HEALTH 169
· been believed that cases deported to the interior, notably
at Damascus, remain nearly stationary. Such is the
belief of the people. During the regime of the Turks
a sort of hospice was established there where the lepers
could live. Most of them got their living by begging in
the streets, though some were supplied with money by
their families at a distance. There is here no insane fear
of the disease. In Jerusalem, the Germans maintained
a hospital for lepers; and when I visited it in 1913 there
were about seventy-five inmates, all of them cheerful,
and many of them even hopeful, due to a new vaccine. I
have seen many begging in the streets of Jerusalem and
other places; in some instances they were shopkeepers,
greengrocers, etc. During the reign of the Turks there
was no segregation nor any attempt at it. It remains to
be seen whether the French, with their mandate for
Syria, will follow the lead of America in her wonderful
work for the unfortunate lepers in the Hawaiian and
Philippine islands.
But there is a disease of which the Oriental is more
afraid than of any except cholera, and that is consump-
tion, called in Arabic sil, which means the ''creeping
disease.'' There is a considerable and increasing amount
of tuberculosis in the country and has been for a long
time, but it has mostly manifested itself as bone and
gland tuberculosis. I remember that the bete noire of
Dr. Post, over forty years professor of surgery in the
American University at Beirut, was tubercular glands.
He would rather operate than eat or do anything else,
but I have heard him confess that he was tired of glands
in the neck! So great is the fear of pulmonary tubercu-
losis, which the people largely ascribe to the returned
emigrants who have been in America, that they have
been known to abandon the sick and dying to shift for
themselves-which is not only barbaric, but also foreign
to the naturally sympathetic nature of the people.
170 MODERN TURKEY
The American Presbyterian Mission maintains a .
tuberculosis hospital on Mount Lebanon; Professor
Nucho of the American University is the visiting physi-
cian. An Anti-Tuberculosis League which has been
started in Beirut by the Syrian community is expecting
soon to build another hospital in a salubrious site m
Lebanon. There is abundant need of it and of many
more in the country. The success of the American Mis-
sion Hospital at Shebeneeyeh has stimulated s,i.milar
good work elsewhere. There is need of much education
as well as of municipal ordinances in regard to the
spread of this disease. The people must learn that pro-
miscuous expectoration is dangerous, and that fresh air,
and night air especially, are not harmful.
From a dermatological point of view, one of the most
interesting diseases in the Orient is the ''Oriental but-
ton." It goes by many names, and in Syria is often
called the ''Aleppo button,'' because it is so prevalent
in that great city. Few escape it who live there many
years. (I am not going to write a treatise on this skin
disease, though I might be pardoned, if I did, for it
has been my good fortune to find a radical cure for it.)
The germ is an animal parasite, discovered by the Scotch
bacteriologist Leishman. The disease is widespread
over what was once Turkey-in the valleys of the Tigris
and Euphrates, in most parts of Asia Minor, and, since
the last war, far more widespread in Syria than ever
· before. Deportations and movements of soldiers are
the causes. It is still unknown how the germ is carried
from one person to another; but it is my opinion, and
there is much to substantiate it, that the germ is carried
from person to person by the mosquito, and not the sand-
fly, as some have supposed. The scar, which the button
leaves after the whole year or more that it requires to
go through its cycle of development and healing, is un-
sightly, though it does not cause as much contraction of
PUBLIC HEALTH 171
the tissues as one would expect.. However, as the buttons
always occur on an exposed part, and the place of pre-
dilection is on the face, it is decidedly a malady to avoid.
There is a common belief among many, Europeans and
natives, that the button is always single. Such is not
the fact. About a third of the cases I have seen have
been multiple, and I have a number of times counted
thirteen buttons on one patient.
The ringworms, especially of the head, are rather
common among children; men who do not shave them-
selves, but once a week patronize a barber, sometimes
contra~t ringworm of the beard, a common disease.
Favus on the head, that :first cousin to ringworm and so
difficult to cure, is distressingly common in many villages
and cities. Historically, favus is most interesting to all
students of pathology, for it was the :first disease demon-
strated to be caused by a germ, and so lies at the base
of our modern pathology.
In recent years, in fact, during the war, a new skin
disease appeared in Turkey, which we have named the
"epidemic ulcer." Its fusiform bacillus has been found
in practically all the ulcers tested. It occurs on the ex-
posed parts, like the Oriental button, but in this case
most commonly on the legs, ankles and feet; though not
infrequently on the hands and forearms. It is exceed-
ingly painful during its early stages, and unless radically
and heroically treated, it is likely to persist for months
unhealed. I have seen ulcers that had become chronic
and had lasted during a year and a half. .
I cannot close this enumeration of the ills that affiict
mankind in the Orient without mentioning the vulgar and
almost unmentionable itch. In my polyclinic practice the
attendant would often beg me in German (the faculty of
the American University served the German Johanniter
Hospital at Beirut for forty-eight years until the war
severed our relations so long and happily maintained),
172 MODERN TURKEY
not to use the Arabic .word jurrub in my diagnosis,
"for it is a terrible word, Doctor, and ihe people beiieve
that once having contracted jurrub there is no cure till
death.'' This disease formed about seven per cent of my
private and ten per cent of my polyclinic cases before the
war; but during the war at one period, the percentage
rose to over fifty.· The distress and suffering were very
great, and in so many cases among the poor it led to much
complicating impetigo and furunculosis. Ordinarily, the
disease is traced to the camel and from that ugly brute to
his driver, then to his wife, thence to his son, then to the
friend of his son and so into another family. And so the
trial goes on, much like the nursery rhyme of ''This is
the house that Jack built." During the war the Turks
maintained a camel hospital at Zahleh especially for the
treatment of the itch in camels. This is why the "ship
of the desert,'' like the ship of the sea, has smelled of
tar. The Turks were far less solicitous about the disease
in their soldiers.
There are four medical schools in what was Turkey;
one, the Ottoman Government Medical School at Con-
stantinople, with a new and finely equipped set of build-
ings and, contrary to the opinion of many who hardly
supposed that this would be possible, some very able men
in charge of the instruction. One reason for this is that
during the reign of Abdul Hamid, the ablest men in the
country went into medicine; it was safer than political
or army life. The chief trouble with the school was the
system, and sometimes the lack of system in the instruc-
tion due" to the intrigue and factious caprice of the
directors. And may I say, no care or attention was paid
to the moral training of the student body. The profes-
sors themselves frankly recognized this great weakness.
The next school to be established was the American
School of Medicine in the Syrian Protestant College at
B.(Jirut7 known all through the Near East as the '' Ameri-
PUBLIC HEALTH 173
can University." In 1867, this institution began teach-
ing medicine with a four-year graded course of nine
months each year. At that time no school in America
had such a course. At present it has a faculty of twenty-
three members, including persons dismissed from the
J ohanniter Hospital during the war; it occupies three
hospitals, and maintains an out-patient department of
polyclinics in medicine, surgery, gynecology, . eye dis-
eases, and skin diseases, where many thousands of the
poor of the city and environs are treated gratuitously by
the professors who are specialists in their lines of work.
The students come from all over the limits of the old
Empire. There are Turks, Syrians, Armenians, Greeks,
Cypriots, Persians, many from nearby Egypt, and a
sprinkling from Peru, Brazil, America, and other parts
of the world. After they receive the coveted diplomas,
they scatter all over the East to bring about a better .
state of sanitation and health conditions. The adminis-
tration of the school has ambitious plans for a School
of Applied Hygiene or Preventive Medicine in connec-
tion with the regular school, with the idea of granting the
degree of Doctor of Public Health; but it lacks the neces-
sary money to carry out the project. Well-equipped
schools of Dentistry and of Pharmacy are a part of this
American University at Beirut. Beginning in 1920
women were admitted to courses in medicine, dentistry,
and pharmacy. In the University hospitals, a Nurses'
Training School is maintained, where young women are
given a three years' course in nursing. These graduates,
too, scatter all over the East and are in great demand
as hospital superintendents, as trainers of other nurses
in more remote districts, and as private nurses.
The third institution, the French Medical School, is a
department of the Jesuit University of St. Joseph. This
was opened in the early eighties at Beirut, and aims to
do the same work that the American University does.
174 MODERN TURKEY
It is a good school, teaching in French. No doubt the
rivalry is good for both universities.
Before the war the Ottoman Government established a
medical school at Damascus. The language of instruc-
tion was Turkish, and though there were some able men
in the faculty, their work was much handicapped by the
lack of proper preparation and preliminary education of
the students. The graduates did not shine during the
war. During the short reign of Prince Feisal the school
was reorganized and gave one year of teaching in the
Arabic language. It is doubtfuLwhether it will reopen,
as the American and French schools at Beirut can do
the work for the country. Damascus is but a few hours
distant by rail.
The hospitals, largely the result of foreign and mis-
sionary enterprise, have been another great boon. Scat-
tered all over the land of the late Empire are American
hospitals, some of them small, all too small to accommo-
date the pressing needs of the people. At Van, Dr. U ssher
got a hospital built against the steady and strenuous
opposition of the Turkish Government, but only to have
it completely ruined in the siege and sack of Van. There
is an American Mission Hospital at Kharput (sometimes
spelled Harpoot) away up in the interior on the Tigris
River. This, too, is small, but it has done great work.
Poor Dr. Atkinson, its founder, died of typhus during
the war. The Azariah Smith Hospital is in Aintab, long
and brilliantly served by Dr. Shepard and Dr. Caroline
Hamilton and their assistants. I have mentioned the
long career of the German Johanniter Hospital at Beirut,
now sold to the French and converted into a military hos-
pital; likewise the small Roman Catholic German Hos-
pital of St. Charles in Beirut. The American University
has three pavilions, built to receive patients for the spe-
cialties of obstetrics and gynecology, of diseases of the
eye, and of children's diseases and orthopedics. But
PUBLIC HEALTH 175
since the entry of America into the war and the expulsion
of the American doctors from the German Hospital, these
pavilions have to accommodate general medical, surgical
and dermatological cases as well. The medical facult~
members are pleading for a general hospital.
The French Jesuit University has a small, well-
equipped hospital in Beirut. The Greek Orthodox com-
munity started a hospital in the city before the war, but
it has not yet been completed on account of the great
cost of materials. There are also two pioneer hospitals
in the vicinity of Beirut-the tuberculosis hospital at
Shebeneeyeh, on Lebanon, which is a pioneer and model
of its kind, although too small. The other is the Lebanon
Hospital for mental diseases, commonly known through-
out the land as ''The Asfuriyeh,'' from the name of
the estate on which the pavilions have been erected. It
is the only hospital of the kind in Syria. The Jews have
recently opened a small hospital in Jerusalem, and re-
ceive patients from the Holy City and from all the sur-
rounding country, Damascus, Hama, Tripoli, and not a
few inmates come from Egypt. It is an international
institution. Its founder was Theophilus Waldmeier, a
Swiss Quaker missionary. It draws its support from
England, where the Central Committee is; from Amer-
ica, where there are several subcommittees; from occa-
sional Swiss and Dutch contributions. The executive
committee, which manages its affairs locally, consists for
the most part of professors and graduates of the Amer-
ican University Medical School.
In Palestine there were before the war, well-equipped
mission hospitals owned and operated by the Scotch
missions at Damascus, Nazareth and Tiberias. These
were used by the Turks, who, on ~vacuating, carried off
or wantonly destroyed, everything. The best hospital-
ized city for its size in this part of the world is J erusa-
lem. The beautiful mission hospital of the London Jews
176 MODERN TURKEY
Society, which the Turks treated the same as those I
have already mentioned, the Italian hospital, the Greek
hospital, the French, Jewish, and I do not recall how
:rp.any more, compete to get patients I The city is over-
supplied. It is a pity that these needed institutions could
not have been more scattered over the field. Mention
should also be made of the Hebron Hospital of Dr. Pat-
terson, which underwent the same fate. as all British
property during the war, and the English Mission Hos-
pital at Jaffa, connected with the Church Missionary
Society.
To the north, there is an American hospital at
Kaisarieh, another small one at Konia, and another still
at Mersivan that have done fine work for years.
At Smyrna there are several hospitals, including one
well managed and well equipped by the Turks ; but, no
doubt, new hospitals will be built as the needs of the
population call for them. Constantinople has its gov-
ernment and military hospitals; the French, for several
years, have had a hospital there, and so have the English.
Now an American college has built and opened one
on the Bosporus. I have probably omitted some that
deserve mention; but in the main, these are the principal
hospitals where disease is fought outside the homes of
the sick in what once was the Turkish Empire. They
are all too few !
The climate of most of prewar Turkey is one of the
finest in the world and is a powerful ally to those who
are fighting disease.
CHAPTER VIII
ARCH1EOLOGY
By HowARD CROSBY BUTLEB a
For Art alone is great;

The bust survives the state,
The crown the potentate.
Carve, burnish, build thy theme,-
But fix thy wavering dream
In the stern rock supreme.
-THEoPHILE GAUTIER, "Enamels and Cameos.''
Introduction
Supplementing the following article by the late Dr.
Howard Crosby Butler (believed to be the last he wrote
for publication), in which reference is made to the work
to be done within the former Sultan's domains in caring
for its priceless antiquities, the subject should not be
left without some mention of the work of the late Turk-
ish scholar Hamdi Bey and of the beautiful museum in
Stamboul, the building of which is due to his initiative.
Back in the seventies there was an archreological
museum in Stamboul housed in a kiosk (built about 1590)
in the old Seraglio. This contained a miscellaneous col-
' Born at Croton Falls, New York, 1872. A.B. Princeton 1892, A.M. 1893.
Post-graduate work Columbia School of Architecture, American Schools of
Classical Studies, Rome, Athens, Fellow in Archreology, Princeton 1893-97.
Fellow American School of Classical Studies, Rome 1897.98. Or-
ganized and constructed archreological expeditions to Syria, 1899-1900,
1904-05, 1909. Author: Scotland's Ruined Abbeys, 1900; The Story of
Athens, 1902; Architecture, Part II of Publications of America's ArchiBOlog·
ical Expedition to Syria, 1903; Ancient Architecture in Syria, Division II;
6 publications of Princeton Expedition tc Syria. Drexel Gold Medalist 1910.
Since 1905, Professor of the History of Architecture, Princeton University.
Resident master of Grauuate College, Princeton. Director, Amerieall
excavations at Sardis in Asia Minor. Deceased 1922.
177
178 MODERN TURKEY
lection, gathered up by the Ottoman Government from
all over Turkey, of Assyrian, Greek, Hittite, Arabic,
Turkish, Lydian and Persian objects. Hamdi Bey, direc-
tor of art in 1882, obt_ained. funds from the Government
for the erection of the present museum, a splendid build-
ing, especially designed to house the great findings of
Sidon, also the unique Hittite collection gathered from
all parts of the Empire. Great numbers of Babylonian
tablets, seals, carvings, statues, tiles, etc., from Iraq
were given places adapted to their importance and char-
acter. Housed there are the only authentic stone from
Herod's Temple in Jerusalem, the Siloam inscription
from the time of Hezekiah, together with a beautiful col-
lection of ancient glass from Syria. An art lover is re-
paid by a visit to Constantinople merely to see the ex-
quisite Alexander Sarcophagus which is in this museum.
The end of one wing of the building is devoted to a beauti-
ful art library, one large room of which is :filled with a
special historical library, presented to the museum by
J evdet Pasha, a learned Constantinople Turk.
Hamdi Bey, who ·as an artist, had pictures accepted
in salons in Paris and London, received honors from
European academies. In his capacity as director, he was
constantly introducing enlargements and improvements
into the museum. He died about ten years ago. His
brother, Haleb Bey, is the present director.
The museUm. has become disorganized as a result of
recent wars. The gold objects, some of them from Troy
and Sardis, and the more precious bronzes were sent to
the interior for safety and are not at present on exhibi-
tion. The many thousands of coins are not yet rear-
ranged, but it is reasonable to hope that in the near
future, the museum will once more take its place among
the great attractions of the City.
A smaller museum, the Evkaf Museum, should not be
forgotten in any description of modern Turkey. It is a
Tile Hippodrome contains the remains of the Colossus of Constantine; the decapitated Serpent Col·
nmn from Delphi; the Egyptian Obelisk from Heliopolis, antedating by twenty centuries the
Christian Era; an•l the Canopied Monument erected by ex-Kaiser William of Germany in 1898.
The Majestic Mosque of St. Sophia (.-;; d'Yl\t uo<J>C11 ), now called by the Turks the Mehemejeh Mosque,
thrice rebuilt, is supported by pillars taken from the far-flung Temples of Isis at Heliopolis,
Osiris- at Ephesus, Pallna at Athens, Phrebus at Delo~, and Cybele at Cyzieus.
ARCIUEOLOGY 179
beautiful old building (formerly the soup kitchen) con-
nected with the Sulaimaniya Mosque. It has a valuable
and well arranged collection of objects of Mohammedan
art, old lights, manuscripts, illuminations, miniatures,
metal and glass lanterns, tiles, wood carvings, callig-
raphy and many other objects. Both the larger museum
and the Evkaf Museum have always been managed en-
tirely by the State.
The territories which are perhaps the richest in
archreological matter in the Ottoman Empire, and the
ones with which the following article deals more in detail,
have, since the writing of the article, been ·lost to the
Turkish State. For years, archreological research, which
has been going on in these areas under foreign scholars,
especially German, French and British, has often been
under great difficulties because of the attitude of t)le
Ottoman Government. Now that the war is over, and
even before the status of these countries under "manda-
tories'' ·has been entirely established, excavating is
again being resumed, especially under the direction of
the French and the British. There remains, however,
the wealth of hidden treasures in Asiatic Turkey of
somewhat corresponding periods, of unquestioned rich-
ness-in fact, a virgin field.
Arc1u:eology
The Ottoman Empire has embraced lands which are of
the greatest importance for the study of human history,
especially the study of what we ordinarily call Western
civilization.
No other empire, or no other nation, since the breaking
up of the Byzantine Empire, to which it became successor
on the fall of Constantinople in 1453, has ever controlled
so much territory that is of vital importance to the his-
tory of religions, institutions, and art.
1.80 MODER...~ ITRKEY
Happily
-
those remains ha¥e been, in part at least,
buried deeply beneath the ground. Such monuments of
the past as were possible to destroy ha¥e been destroyed
in large measure. A few are so huge and so strongly
built as to ha¥e defied complete destruction. But the
earth is still rich in historic records, and still holds ¥ast
treasuries of art. Fortunately for arch:rological re-
search, large tracts that were fertile in ancient times
ha¥e become deserts. The soil of nearer Asia has been
hardly more than scratched by the arch:rologist, and the
waste places in which man once lived in productive luxury
ha¥e been only imperfectly examined by the explorer.
The ancient inhabitants of :Mesopotamia, together with
the peoples of the X":lle Valley, ha¥e long been belie¥ed
to ha¥e been the first to introduce the arts of life and all
that these bring with them. In any e¥ent arch:rological
research has brought to light some records of this people
that can be definitely placed at the beginning of the third
millennium before Christ, and others that are probably
older; from which it is erident that this particular corner
of the Turkish Empire was the scene of one of the oldest,
if not quite the oldest, attempt of man to rise from a
brutal state to a higher order of liring. Here, too, ha¥e
come to light records of the greatest importance for Bib-
lical history and for the earliest origins of our own
religion-side lights on the Old Testament-records
which ha¥e a direct bearing not only upon theology, but
upon laws and institutions upon which are based tlre
foundations of our own social system.
It is a little o¥er a hundred years since the arch.reologi-
cal importance of Mesopotamia was pointed out to
Europe by an Englisbman, C. J". Rich, who visited X"me-
veh and Babylon in 1811, and brought home the first
examples of tablets bearing cuneiform inscriptions. But
nearly half a century elapsed before serious exploration
ARCIUEOLOGY 181
of the ancient sites was undertaken. In 1842 Botta began
his great work, followed by Layard in 1845, and by Place
in 1851. All three names stand out in the history of
Assyriology as the names not only of pioneers but of
great contributors to scientific knowledge. Botta exca-
vated at Kouyunjik and ancient Nineveh, Place at Khon-
sabad, and Layard at Nimrud. The results of the three
were somewhat similar but with interesting and im-
portant differences of detail. All three unearthed the
remains of ancient Assyrian .palaces, the regal abodes of
great Oriental monarchs, the oldest of which are datable
in the eighth and ninth centuries before Christ. A vast
amount of information was brought to light bearing upon
the architecture, sculpture, painting, metal work and pot-
tery of the ancient Assyrians, and upon a number of
minor arts and crafts. All preconceived notions of archi-
tecture, derived from Egyptian and Greek remains, had
to be altered, the Biblical references to the building of
this part of the world became intelligible, and the thick-
ness and height of the walls of Babylon as described by
Herodotus became credible. A vast new field on the
history of the sculptor's art was opened up.
Explorations in Babylonia, to the south of Assyria,
were begun by Layard and others. Here ancient Larsa
was partly excavated by Loftus, and yielded records as
early as the third millennium B.c. In Assyria the im-
portant ruins had been those of palaces and staged
towers, but in Babylonia, where more ancient remains
were brought to light, several great temples were dis-
covered.
It must be remembered that excavation in Mesopo-
tamia was a very different kind of digging from anything
that had been undertaken before. The remains of cities
and palaces here appear only as huge mounds, or as
series of mounds of earth, which represent the disinte-
182 MODERN TURKEY
gration of the material of which the buildings were made.
For unbaked mud brick was the chief material in all
these huge constructions; this was often veneered with
baked brick and occasionally with stone, and only the
lower parts of the walls which had become buried early,
and thus protected from further decay, were found in
place, all the superincumbent mass being of earth, which
had once been bricks, mixed with baked bricks and tile
and fragments of all kinds. The excavations were car-
ried on by·means of deep pits and trenches and often by
long tunnels. The cost of removing completely all this
earth would have been very great, and was never under-
taken at any one site, so that the ruins themselves pre-
sent little that is impressive or beautiful, like the ruins
of Egyptian architecture, and we owe it to the careful
work of scholars who have restored the buildings in elab-
orate drawings, that we have now so vivid and so true a
picture of these palaces as they looked to the eyes of
Sargon, Nebuchadnezzar, and Nebonidus.
The first few years of archreological investigation in
Mesopotamia had provided so many objects for study to
the small number of scholars who were equipped to han-
dle them intelligently that there seemed a plethora of
material, and further investigations in the field were
almost abandoned for about two decades. But, soon
after 1870, the work of the British was resumed by
George Smith and that of the French by E. de Sarzek.
The former was made famous by his discovery of the
Babylonian account of the Flood and other interesting
records pertaining to the biblical narrative. The latter
made a great reputation by his work at Tello (Lagash)
where he had the good fortune to come upon extensive
remains and written records of the earlier Babylonian
civilization. Among his very interesting finds was a
striking portrait of Gudea, priest-king of Lagash about
2540 B.o. Many other objects and records of the earlier
ARCH.lEOLOGY 183
Babylonian dynasties came to light in this ancient center
of Sumerian civilization.
Since this revival of archreological operations in Meso-
potamia in the last quarter of the nineteenth century
hardly a year has passed without its excavations, and few
of the last fifty years have been barren of results. Dur-
ing that period other nations have entered the field, espe-
cially the Germans and ~ericans, and the results of
their excavations in different parts of the country, at
Nippur and at Babylon itself, have been so rich as to
defy brief description. Even the names of the successful
excavators of this period would make a list too long for
the purposes of this present publication. Many of these
men are still alive and many of them are still working
upon their results. An extensive, highly organized,
powerful and influential civilization, after from two to
four thousand years of oblivion, has been restored in
many minute details. We know almost as much about
Gudea and his people as we do about William the Con-
queror and his times. These later excavations have
brought out material not only of the early Babylonian
and Assyrian periods but of the Persian and Parthian
periods, and even of the Hellenistic age.
The most significant single discovery among the mass
of very important monuments is perhaps the legal code
of King Khammurabi, Amraphel of the Old Testament,
who reigned about four thousand years ago, of which
Handcock in his ''Mesopotamian Archreology'' says:
To form an accurate estimate of the influence
which Khammurabi 's code of laws has had upon the
Mosaic code, and indirectly on the European codes of
today, is beyond our power; but one fact is indisput-
able, and that is that the legal code of Khammurabi
some four thousand years ago enshrines many of those
principles of justice and mercy which we are apt to
regard as the peculiar offspring of our own enlighteLed
age.
184 MODERN TURKEY
In spite of all that has been done, in spite of all the
objects which we have safely stored in museums, the work
has only begun. If one takes a map of Mesopotamia in
which the ancient sites are indicated and on which the
sites where excavations have been carried on are under-\
scored, he will be astonished to see how many known sites
of ancient cities remain unexamined. And yet there are
undoubtedly hundreds of buried cities which have not
yet been recognized. Then if one takes plans, or even
photographs, of the excavated parts of the places that
have been chosen for investigation, and compares them
with plans showing the areas of unexcavated parts still
worth examination, he will observe that the pits and
trenches of the excavators make a very small show-
ing upon large blank spaces. The volumes of the un-
known regarding these ancient peoples, are far larger
and more numerous than the volumes of the known, and
it rests largely now with us to decide whether knowledge
in this field shall be increased, or whether we shall
rest upon the achievements of those who came before
us.
Subsequent Mesopotamian archreology related to Per-
sian and Greek, Parthian and Roman occupation of
the country which seem to have left far fewer monu-
ments, although Parthian remains of considerable extent
have been found by several excavators who were in search
of older things; but the Christian period in Mesopotamia
is known to have been important from the standpoint "of
archreology. The little independent Kingdom of Edessa
in upper Mesopotamia, existing from 137 B. c. to 216 A. n.
was very active during the Christian period, yet little or
nothing is known of the architecture of Edessa either
before or after the establishment of Christianity, saving
some illuminated manuscripts of rare beau(·. Little is
known of the great fortresses and fortified towns which
the Byzantine emperors are known to have built in
ARCH.iEOLOGY 185
Mesopotamia and which are described by Procopius, who
wrote in the sixth century.
Of late, German scholars have published some very
interesting remains of Christian architecture and other
arts discovered by them along the line of the Baghdad
railway. The unexplored parts of the country are un-
doubtedly full of such remains, for much of northern
Mesopotamia is almost a desert and is quite uniiiliabited.
Our estimate of the importance of Syrian archreology.
is derived principally from four main sources: the Baby-
lonian, Egyptian and Assyrian records, and the Old Tes-
tament. Even before 2650 B.c. the Babylonians knew all
of Syria, and their records mention places some of which
can be recognized. Egyptian records of about 2000 B.c.
depict Palestine as a fruitful and prosperous country, and
show that not only did Egyptian merchants visit Syria
but that Syrian traders came to Egypt. On the pylons
of the temple at Karnak is a list dating from the Eight-
eenth Dynasty (approximately 1500 B.c.) which men-
tions 119 Syrian towns many of which can be identified.
These towns are mentioned as having sent envoys to the
victorious Pharaoh bringing as tribute among other
things, gold and silver vessels, inlaid furniture, and
embroidered garments. The Tel el-Amarna letters (ap-
proximately 1400 B.c.), though addressed to the Egyptian
king and written in the Babylonian script are actually
derived from native sources. They name about 150 cities
and towns, 100 of which are to be identified with modem
sites from Aleppo in the north to Jerusalem, and from
Tyre and Sidon to Damascus.
The Old Testament serves its most useful historical
purpose as a source of information for the period after
1200 B.c. at which point the Egyptian records cease,-the
period of the Judges and the Kings. These Biblical rec-
ords have to do chiefly.. with the history of the Hebrews.
From the ninth century to 625 B.c. the Assyrian records
186 MODERN TURKEY
are available for all of Syria, including Palestine, and
these together with the Old Testament and the new Baby-
lonian records, which come down to the fall of Babylonia
in 539 B.c. bring the story of Syria and Palestine down
to the period of the Persian invasion.
Extensive and systematic excavations, like those which'
have been conducted in Egypt and Mesopotamia, have
not yet been undertaken in Syria and Palestine. Renan
many years ago explored Phamicia, and published anum-
ber of interesting monuments of that country, but carried
on no extensive excavations. The Palestine Exploration
Fund has made small excavations at several sites in the
Holy Land, Harvard University has had considerable
success on a small scale at Samaria, and just before the
war the British Museum was beginning an important in-
vestigation at the old Hittite site of Carchemish on the
Syrian side of the Euphrates; but most of the sites of
great antiquity in Syria are still waiting to be examined.
There are hosts of places any or all of which might yield
monuments or documents of the highest value to the his-
torian and the archreologist. Kadesh, now Tell Nebi
Mindo, in northe:r;n Syria is a site marked as an impor-
tant city in some of the early Egyptian inscriptions, and
was later one of the capitals of the Hittites. Here is now
a gigantic mound, wholly artificial, which has never been
touched by the spade. The river valleys and plains of
northern Syria are strewn with larger and smaller arti-
ficial mounds each of which marks the site of a Syrian
town of the Babylonian, Egyptian or Hittite period, as
we know from Babylonian seals, Egyptian scarabs and
Hittite fragments that are found by the present inhabi-
tants from time to time. Yet little or nothing is known
of the native arts of Syria, and no native inscriptions
have been brought to light. Here is a vast unworked
field for archreological research, the results of which
should throw much-sought-for light upon the history of a
ARCH.lEOLOGY 187
very large part of the world that is known to have been
settled in very early times, upon the religions of the
· ancient Hebrews and their neighbors, and upon the cui~
ture of peoples who were the connecting link between the
two greatest nations of remote antiquity. We should
perhaps find that many of the unexplained and suppos~
edly foreign elements in the culture of Egypt, Babylonia
and Assyria had their origin in this great middle country.
Syria, including Palestine and the upper part of Ara~
bia, is a country which presents to the archreologist a
very different set of problems from those which confront
him in Babylonia. Here, instead of wide alluvial plains
are mountains and hilly regions and high plateaus, inter-
spersed with fertile river valleys and broad rolling
plains, and large parts of Syria which were once popu-
lous and productive, as I have remarked above, have
become desert wastes. Syria requires not only the exca-
vation of a large number of well marked sites, but thor-
ough exploration; for the desert tracts are only imper-
fectly known. Then many of the most important ancient
places are occupied today by large and flourishing cities.
Three significant sites mentioned in the Babylonian or
Egyptian records are now the thriving cities of Aleppo;
Hama and Damascus. The coast cities of the Phreni-
cians, like Tyre and Sidon, also are the sites of modern
cities or large towns. Excavation at these places is out
of the question; but there are other places, perhaps
equally important but still unidentified, where there are
no inhabitants.
Syria, Palestine and Arabia contain innumerable mon~
uments of the later phases of ancient history and of the
beginning of the Middle Ages. We do not know what the
relations of the earlier Hellenic world were to Syria, but
we do know that Alexander the Great brought Greek cul-
ture to Syria and that the impress of that culture was
indelibly stamped upon the country for a thousand years.
188 MODERN TURKEY
These are the things that time has not succeeded in hid-
ing completely; the art of ·Greece and the language of
Greece peer out at us from every heap of ruins, and some
of the most splendid monuments of the later phases of
Hellenistic art are to be found here in Syria.
The city of Antioch on the Orontes in northern Syria
for almost a thousand years remained a center of Hel~
lenistic culture for all Syria, repeatedly destroyed by
eruptions and by wars, but as often rebuilt with all the
splendor that Syrian kings and Roman and Byzantine
emperors could command, was finally completely over-
whelmed in one last destructive earthquake ; the depth
at which the old city lies buried and the presence of a
modern settlement. above it will forever prevent its un-
earthing. But there were many other cities built or
rebuilt in the north by the successors of Seleukos, and
in the south by these same kings or by the Ptolemies of
Egypt. Some of them, like the older cities, are now occu-
pied by modern towns, others, like Apamea on the
Orontes, are entirely deserted. There are few remains
visible that can be definitely referred to the time of the
Greek rulers of Syria, partly for the reason that later
buildings of the Roman period were erected upon many
of the same sites. But excavations would undoubtedly
reveal buildings and inscriptions and other treasures of
the Hellenistic period of Syrian history.
The architectural glories of the native kingdom of
Palmyra were depicted in the publications of Wood over
a hundred years ago, but little work has been done at
Palmyra since.
The Hellenistic kingdom of Commagene. in northern
Syria is hardly more than a name, its country has been
only partly explored by archreologists, yet it must still
possess artistic treasures of a high order and inscrip-
tions of great historical value.
Little or no investigation of the monuments of this
ARCH1EOLOGY 189
period in Syria has been made below the surface, though
excavations at Apamea, Palmyra, and many other sites
would surely solve many perplexing archreological prob-
lems and bring to light many beautiful works of art.
For the periods of Roman domination and of Christian
activity one may sweep Syria from end to end, to find
that the settled parts yield their quota and that the
desert has yielded much and will yield much more. Ara-
bia too has already been found to be rich in monuments
of these two periods and has many more undiscovered
treasures. The most truly Roman monuments in Syria
are the bridges and the splendid roads that still may be
traced in fragments all over the country and in long sec-
tions in the desert. Syria became very prosperous under
Roman rule, and the cities large and small were adorned
with splendid buildings in the later styles of Hellenistic
architecture, some of them bearing the names of Roman
emperors and imperial legates, others marked as having
been erected by rich natives or by the communities.
Every part of explored Syria is strewn with magnificent
remains of this period; there are Gerasa, Philadelphia,
Bostra and Kanatha, cities of the old Greek confedera-
tion called the Decapolis, adorned with some of the most
splendid buildings to be found anywhere in the Roman
Empire; there is Petra in the far south with its mar-
velous monuments of combined Hellenistic and Arab
architecture; and there is Baalbek, one of the most gor-
geous groups of buildings of any period in the whole
world. These great edifices of Baalbek are often cited
as examples of Roman architecture. But very little in-
vestigation below the surface has been carried on at any
of these places. The Germans did a pretty thorough
piece of work in clearing up around the great group of
buildings at Baalbek, and made tentative studies of the
buildings at Jerash (Gerasa) and in a few other sites
without excavation. The American Expedition of 1899-
190 MODERN TURKEY
1900 has published measured drawings of buildings of
the Roman period at Amman (Philadelphia), Bosra,
Kanawat (Kanatha) and a large number of less impor-
tant sites. Scholars of many nations, French, British,
Germans, Austrians and Americans have traveled
through Syria in search of inscriptions in Greek and
Latin, and in five or six Semitic languages, and thou-
sands of these written records have been published. But
all this is only the smallest kind of a beginning in com-
parison with the work that is to be done for history and
archreology even in these known localities. Dig any-
where in. Syria and you will discover something of
archreological interest.
The desert, too, is full of ruins of this important period,
and the extent of Syria which is now deserted, but which
was once fertile, seems limitless. The American and the
Princeton expeditions have done the most extensive work
of desert exploration.~ It is interesting to compare the
present maps of Syria, with their large blank spaces with
an ancient map discovered years ago and called after ·the
finder, the Tabula Pentingeriana, a map made up in
the fourth century after Christ from older materials, and
showing the principal roads of the Roman Empire. One
may easily make a scale of Roman miles, and apply it to
the roads and places which are known, and will be aston-
ished at the accuracy of the old mea{3urements. From
this we know the ancient names and the positions of
ancient towns which foreign eyes have not beheld for
almost fifteen hundred years.
The period known ·as early Christian is better repre-
sented in the archreological monuments of Syria than in
those of any other part of the world that adopted the
Christian faith at an early date. Some of the settled
parts of the country possess important buildings of the
period, like the Basilica which St. Helena built above
the Manger of Bethlehem; but the desert, though barren
ARCHlEOLOGY 191
of all else, is fertile in remains of the early days of
Christianity.
The desert parts of the old provinces of Syria and
Arabia are like a vast Pompeii. Town after town rises
unburied on high plateau or in sequestered valley, often
appearing like a modern city when seen from a distance.
The only destruction these places have known has been
caused by ravages of time and earthquake. Many build-
ings are almost completely preserved and require only
the restoration of their wooden roofs and floors to make
them habitable, and some have roofs and floors of stone
and are still well preserved. Here is the material with
which to build up a complete picture of the material pro-
ductions of a great people during the :first six centuries
of our era. All this is only architecture; to this we may
add thousands of inscriptions which were engraved upon
the edifices. It has never been possible to secure from the
Turkish Government permission to dig and to explore at
the same time. The buildings of the desert land require
little excavation; but all the smaller objects of art are
buried under the light soil. The smallest attempts to dig
have produced beautiful objects of glass and bronze,
ornaments of·silver and gold, and coins. The great muse-
ums of the world hold objects of the rarest beauty, such
as ivories and illuminated manuscripts which are known
to have come from Syria. Indeed the Syrian schools of
art are known to have had a most important influence
upon the architecture and the other arts of France and
of Europe in general during the Middle Ages. Our
knowledge of these things is only in its infancy, but the
stored up potential knowledge is almo·st infinite.
Sixty years ago the late Marquis de Vogue :first called
the attention of the scientific world to the vast number
and importance of the monuments in desert Syria. A
large number of measured drawings of buildings pub-
lished by M. de Vogue introduced new chapters into all
192 MODERN TURKEY
the histories of architecture, and his volume on Semitic
inscriptions greatly widened the field of Oriental studies;
while the inscriptions in Greek and Latin brought out by
M. Waddington shed an abundance of fresh light upon
many historical problems. These renowned explorers
had been preceded in parts of their field by English and
German travelers who had copied a considerable number
of inscriptions: but hardly any of their predecessors had
called attention to the monuments of architecture; being
too learned, one must assume, to have eyes for anything
outside their own fields of study. In 1899 the American
Expedition went out, followed in 1904, 1905, and 1909 by
other expeditions from the United States sent out by
Princeton University. These expeditions, better equipped
for extensive desert travel than de Vogue had been, and
equipped with cartographers, an architect, and experts
in Classical and Oriental epigraphy, revisited the sites
discovered by the pioneer explorer, taking photographs
of the monuments· which he had published only in draw-
ings (for his journey was made before the days of pho-
tography in the field), measuring and photographing
other monuments in the same places, and extending ex-
plorations much farther into the desert, taking careful
records of all the important monuments and making
copies of inscriptions. Hundreds of miles were covered
by these expeditions. About 250 ancient towns were
restored to the map of Syria, with architectural monu-
ments or inscriptions, or both from almost all of them.
And yet, when the area of these explorations is added to
the map, it is most astonishing to observe how much ter-
ritory still remains to be explored, and it is quite prob-
able that as much, or even more, that is of arch::eological
interest will be discovered in those parts of the desert
that are still unknown.
· The history of Asia Minor is the most kaleidoscopic of
all the parts of the Turkish Empire. Its culture, par-
ARCHJEOLOGY 193
ticularly as represented in monuments of art, began
almost as early as any, under the Hittites before 2000 B.c.
and continued longer, even well down into the Middle
Ages in the hands of the Seljuk Turks. The land was
inhabited by many different races, speaking many differ-
ent languages, even during single periods; it was divided
up into many independent states which encroached upon
each other from time to time. It was dominated again
and again by one or more of these native states that had
grown more powerful · than the others; it was ruled
entirely or in part, at one time or another, by foreign
powers-Assyrians, Persians, Greeks, Romans and By-
zantines. It was overrun by Gauls, Mongols and Tartars,
and finally fell to the Turks, first the Seljuks and then
the Ottomans, in whose hands it still remains. Hence its
political geography and history, its archreology and phil-
ology are the most complicated and intricate in all the
world.
Relics of the old Stone Age have been found in almost
all parts of Asia Minor;. but in the earliest historical
times the Hittites dominated the high plateau of the
middle of the peninsula, and had a great capital at a
place now called Boghaz Koi. This place has been quite
thoroughly, though not completely, excavated, and has
yielded remarkable monuments of architecture and
sculpture and many inscriptions in the Hittite language
which is still for the most part indecipherable. To the
westward, remains of Hittite art extend almost to the
JEgean Sea, exemplified in such works as the rock sculp-
tures of Mons Siloylus and the Kara Bel. This people
seems to have spread well over the interior of Asia
Minor, and we may yet discover Hittite remains beneath
the ruins of many an Hellenistic city. 'Ve are gradually
beginning to learn something about the Hittites. If we
could only discover a definite key to their writing we
should probably have a new Bible of information about
194 MODERN TURKEY
them; for the Hittite inscriptions already known are
very numerous.
After the Hittite period, and perhaps during or even
before it, the rest of Asia Minor was divided up among
a host of tribes who lived in the mountains or occupied
the river valleys of that region which is so completely
broken up by irregular chains of mountains and high
plateaus. No less than fifteen separate nations, speaking
almost as many tongues, appear in the very earliest
records. These records are scant indeed.
Then appears, like a flash in the dark, a highly devel-
oped Hellenic culture in Ionia, that strip along the
lEgean Sea. How early it came there or by what means,
we do not know. Of their civilization, their art, their
languages, we know next to nothing ; not because the
knowledge is not to. be had, but because we do not look
for it in the places where we know it is buried. In addi-
tion to our knowledge of the high culture of the feder-
ated city-states of Ionia, we begin to receive informa-
tion, through Greek channels, of highly civilized native
states in touch with the Hellenic world. We see Persia
advancing to overthrow one state after another. Then
Alexander the Great sets them free, or takes them into
his new empire, then they pass into a new empire, the
empire of Rome, under whose sway they were encour-
aged to continue the march of Hellenistic culture. At
Didyma, Priene, Sardis and Aphrodisias, one may see
the splendid remains of temples that have been over-
thrown, as at Magnesia, Teos and Pergamos. From sev-
eral places exquisite pieces of sculpture have been taken,
after little or no excavation, to adorn the great muse-
ums of Europe, among which may be mentioned the
sculptures from the Mausoleum at Halikarnassus and the
beautiful marble Demeter of Cnidus now in the British
Museum, and the remarkable reliefs from the great altar
of Pergamos now in the Museum at Berlin. These may
ARCH2EOLOGY 195
be taken as specimens of the kind of art produced in
Asia Minor during one of the greatest periods of Greek
sculpture, and we are safe in assuming that the soil of
Asia Minor hides hundreds of similar works of art.
Under Roman rule the greater cities which had already
attained prominence in the field of art, cities like Ephe-
sus, Miletos, Pergamos, Halikarnassus and Sardis, and
the smaller cities, like Didyma, Priene, Cnidus, Mag-
nesia and Klagomenai, still preserved their artistic
monuments of the former age and ~ook on a new artistic
impulse, under imperial patronage, without materially
altering their artistic traditions; for the policy of Rome
in these provinces was to cultivate and extend Hellenis-
tic culture. Hundreds of cities came into prominence
from one end of Asia Minor to the other. We have no
idea as to what these places were like during their earlier
history; but, from the time of their inclusion in the
Roman Empire, they began to produce works of art.
Some of the small temples of the Roman period in dis-
tant parts of Asia Minor are among the most beautiful
monuments of the time; theaters 'which are among the
most interesting known are to be seen in many of the
small provincial towns of the interior, monumental
tombs and other monuments of great interest and of real
artistic merit, are scattered all over the wildest parts of
the country, and inscriptions in Greek abound every-
where. There is an almost endless amount of explora-
tion to be done in the archreology of this period in Asia
Minor, e~ploration that would. be rewarded with im-
portant discoveries. There are hundreds of building.s to
be photographed and properly published; all these above
ground. The amount of investigation that remains to be
done below the surface is practically unlimited.
The Christian period also was a productive one in all
parts of Asia Minor and in Armenia; the remains of
churches and other monuments of the period are not so
196 MODERN TURKEY
conspicuous in the large centers of population where
they have been destroyed; but in the outlying districts
where jhey are often exceedingly well preserved. The
fact that a small area of ruins in southeastern Asia
Minor should be called by the Turks Binklisse (the thou-
sand and one churches) is significant of the extent of
the remains of early Christian architecture. Of late
almost every year has brought the discovery of some
new group of early churches, such as those of Cilicia and
Lycaonia. For a long time we have known of the exist-
ence of churches of great antiquity in Armenia. The
history of this country in Christian times is unique in
that Eusebius, an early Christian writer, speaks of hav-
ing seen a letter written by Christ to the Armenian king.
The architecture of this period, represented in mosques,
monumental gateways and other structures, at many
places in Asia Minor, but particularly at ;Konia, the
exquisite tiles and other faience, the bronze work and
the wood work are all worthy of careful study and elab-
orate publications, yet very little has been done to place
this art before the eyes of the world.
There is a vast discrepancy between the amount of
arch::eological work to be done and the amount that has
been done in Asia Minor. The areas that have been care-
fully explored even superficially are pitifully small in
comparison with those that have been thoroughly ex-
plored, the number of ancient names of cities and towns
that have not yet been attached to sites is astonishing,
and the number of places that have been ev~n partly
exc~vated is absurdly small in proportion to the number
that would certainly yield important results.
The earlier expeditions to the coast cities were little
more than looting parties in search of antiquities, sculp-
tures primarily, which were to adorn the halls of the
museums of Europe.
Schliemann 's excavations at Troy, between 1870 and
ARCH.lEOLOGY 197
1882, were the first serious attempt at the excavation of
an ancient site in Asia Minor, and the first to be made in
connection with prehistoric or Homeric archreology. Al-
though criticisms have been made of his methods, he was
the first archreologist to excavate in Asia Minor with a
true scientific spirit, and his discoveries made an epoch
in archreology. Since Schliemann's time little progress
has been made in the field of the earlier Hellenic or
...:Egean archreology of Asia Minor. The excavations at
Boghaz Koi have brought to light an almost unknown
phase of Anatolian history, and have made the Ottoman
Museum in Constantinople enviably rich in monuments
of Hittite art. Less extensive and less thorough excava-
tions at Gordeion have begun to reveal the culture of
Midas' Kingdom in Phrygia. Outside of these three
sites, Boghaz Koi of the Hittites, Gordeion for the early
Phrygians, and Troy for the prehistoric Greeks of Asia,
little investigation of the earlier cultures of Asia Minor
has been carried on, and these excavations have shed
much new darkness as well as much new llght upon the
subject, because they tell us of our vast ignorance of
peoples. of whom there is much to learn and of whom
we had barely heard.
In the historical period rather more extensive work
has been done. The English have uncovered important
remains of the early Ionian and Crmsean periods at
Ephesus, and the Austrians and Germans have unearthed
parts of the Hellenistic cities of Ephesus, Miletos, Perga-
mos, Priene and Didyma. As one might expect, remains
of the period of the successors of Alexander and of that
of Roman rule are inextricably mixed at most of these
places. Priene turned out to be a Greek Pompeii, largely
of the third century before Christ, but at the four other
sites buildings of the Roman period were found among
older buildings or superimposed upon older foundations,
and sculptures and inscriptions of both periods were
198 MODERN TURKEY
discovered in hopeless confusion. Nevertheless most
important additions were made to our knowledge of
typography, architecture and sculpture, of history by
means of the inscriptions, and many beautiful works of
art have been given to the world by these excavations.
In many instances the wonderful state of preservation
in which the streets and the buildings of later periods
are found rendered it difficult, or even impossible, to
examine the lower strata for more anoient remains.
Comparatively little was added to our knowledge of the
minor arts of these cities.
The work of the American Society for the Excavation
of Sardis, begun in 1910 and temporarily abandoned in
1914 because of the war, was the first directed toward
investigations in ancient Lydia. The Lydians were
known to have established a great empire in the heart
of Asia Minor, they were known to have had close rela-
tions with more ancient civilizations to the east and with
more recent though more renowned civilizations to the
west. They were believed to have had an important
influence upon Greek culture, but little else was known
about them. The first four seasons' digging were de-
voted to the unearthing of a colossal temple of Artemis
of the Hellenistic age, with details of unusual beauty;
but during these excavations and during the final cam-
paign, much important material connected directly with
Lydian culture was brought to light. The Lydian lan-
guage was discovered, and has been partly deciphered,
Lydian architectural terra-cottas, Lydian sculptures,
Lydian pottery, ivories, bronzes, silverware, gold orna-
ments and jewelry, and Lydian engraved seals; all show-
ing a high development of art apparently native to the
soil of Lydia. Pottery fragments found in the lower
strata of the excavations are believed to show that Sardis
existed as a center of culture in the second millennium
before Christ. The Hittites occupied Lydia at one time,
ARCHlEOLOGY 199
it is not impossible that the Hittite idiographic writing
and Lydian alphabetical writing existed at one time side
by side. We shall soon be able to read the Lydian, and
if we find Hittite-Lydian bilingual inscriptions, we shall
have opened the great library of Hittite writings which
is still composed of sealed books.
Excavations less important, because less thorough and
extensive, have been carried on at several other places
near the coast, some of these, like the excavations at
Magnesia, Mreandrum, Teos and the Smintheum, con-
sisted of little more than clearing out about one or more
buildings not deeply buried. At Cnidus a few pits and
trenches brought to light marvelous sculptures and
gained a glimpse of the former extent and magnificence
of the city. At Halikarnassus, which the ancients knew
as a city of peculiar splendor, only the site of the Mauso-
leum has been thoroughly excavated. The excavations
at Assos in the Troad were only sufficient to whet the
archreologist's appetite for more information about a
beautiful city, and the recent digging at Antioch in
Pesidia has no more than introduced an ancient site to
the world. Pits dug at Klazomenre have yielded some
beautiful painted sarcophagi of early date. The excava-
tions of the Turkish Museum at Notium (New Colophon)
had begun to interest the archreologist, a few trenches at
Phocaia brought forth pottery and other significant
archreological material. At other places, wherever the
archreologist has employed the spade however casually,
monuments of historical significance have been brought
forth, and wherever the spade of the peasant delves deep
enough, objects of one kind or another come to light. If
these are intrinsically valuable, and if' they are not
melted up, they eventually reach the antiquity dealers
of Smyrna ; if they are fragile they are soon broken and
thrown away, because their finders are ignorant of their
archreological value; if they are bulky, like statues of
200 MODERN TURKEY
marble and inscriptions, they are broken up intention-
ally because the foolish Turkish law makes it illegal for
a private citizen to possess them, and imposes a fine upon
the finder unless he transports them at once to the near-
est government house for which labor he receives little
or no reward.
There is most urgent need for the preservation of the
antiquities of the Turkish Empire that are standing
above ground; the Turkish Government has done noth-
ing to protect them. There is a crying necessity for
better and more equitable laws governing archreological
research, regulating native accidental discoveries, and
curbing antiquity dealers.
History and archreology are hungering for the huge
hoards of knowledge that are stored up and hidden away
beneath the soil of these early homes of culture. And
there is every reason why the United States of America
JShould assume the burden of supplying these needs.
America is the richest heir of all these successive genera-
tions of civilization. She alone :n,ow is able to see to it
that the records of civilization's history are preserved,
and to unlock the prisons in which historic Truth and
Art are shut away from the eyes of man.
CHAPTER IX
TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATION
By ELIOT GRINNELL MEARS
Think, in this batter'd Caravanserai

Whose Doorways are alternate Night and Day,
How Sultan after Sultan with his Pomp
Abode his Hour or two, and went his way.
They say the Lion and the Lizard keep
The Courts where Jamshyd gloried and drank deep;
And Bahram, that great Hunter-the Wild Ass
Stamps o'er. his Head, and he lies fast asleep.
··;;...;..E. FITZGERALD, "Rubaiyat of Om11r Khayyam.''
j •••. .'. .
Transportation and communication facilities provide

the necessary network for all international relations.
This simple fact, which has been too frequently over-
looked, is as pertinent· in times of war as in times of
peace. To quote Rear Admiral A. T. Mahan, U. S. N.,
''communications dominate war; broadly speaking, they
are the most important single element in strategy, po-
litical or military." That he might transport Ottoman
troops to quell Arab mutinies as well as to make an
easier access to the holy cities of AI Madina and Mecca,
Sultan Abdul Hamid II enlisted popular Turkish sub-
scription to build the Hejaz Railway. Mixed motives can
also be attributed to those back of the building of the
Baghdad Railway, a project which was an advance notice
that Germany intended to make a fixed place for he!'self
in the Middle East. Wonderful recent invention_!:!, time-
savers and controllers of the physical elements, have
made obsolete the majority of treatises dealing with the
broad subject of transportation and communication. The
aeroplane, the radio, the oil tanker, and the increased
201
202 MODERN TURKEY
efficiency of oil over coal for fuel purposes have revolu-
tionized communication; at the same time, these develop-
ments have made this whole question more important
than ever before.
The significance in Turkey of modern means of trans-
portation ·must be viewed more from the standpoint of
strategy and exploitation of natural resources such as
petroleum, metals, and cotton, than from that of strictly
transportation ventures. A railway concession carries
with it commercial privileges for the development of
neighboring treasures, primarily mines, forests, water
supply for irrigation or power purposes, and port works.
Without these attractive features, neither the Baghdad
Railway nor the projected Eastern Anatolian (Chester)
Railways would have the slightest attraction for the in-
vestor. On the basis of military strategy, too, both rail-
way systems, the former partly finished, the latter dis-
carded temporarily at least, possess advantages which
the Turk would be the last person to discount; for, it
is well known that both in Europe and in Asia, the Otto-
man railways were kept whenever possible at least ten
miles from the sea-an antiquated precaution against the
present-day forty mile or more range of a modern battle-
ship. Foreign concessionaires are willing to disregard
the likelihood of losses from railway operation provided
there are promising sources of gain to more than counter-
balance these deficits.
That the former Ottoman Empire had mortgaged a
large share of the country's economic assets is a com-
mon belief. But the validity of underlying and supple-
mentary concessions taxes the keenness of the ablest
Levantine lawyers. Difficult it is to trace out a history
of the individual concessions, and to locate documents
some of which are still hidden from public view. Po-
litical changes are an additional annoyance. The numer-
ous heirs of the late Sultan Abdul Hamid claim large
TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATION 203
property rights in the Mosul oil fields and elsewhere.
Nationalist Turkey has refused to recognize all con-
cessions granted by the Sublime Porte subsequeni; to
March 15, 1920, the date of the occupation of Constanti-
nople (Select Document 19). The subject of concessi<_>ns
is treated at some length in the .chapter on Levantine
Concession-Hunting.
In the present chapter, the chief considerations under-
lying transportation and communication by water, land,
and air, are noted. .To this objective, there are described
briefly the location of leading business centers and of
trade routes, and the characteristic features of the vari-
ous vehicles of transportation which compete for the
carrying of passengers, mail, and freight. Amo:p.g the
modes of communication, shipping, beasts of burden, and
railways receive major attention: the· postal, telegraph,
and air transport services are described briefly. The
abnormal situation in the Near East since October, 1914,
makes us place more reliance upon decade old rather
than upon up to date data, notwithstanding the occur-
rence of the prior Turko-Italian and the two Balkan
wars. Statistics since 1914 are of scant value. There-
fore, frequent reference is made herein to the Ottoman
Empire of 1914. The reader, however, should not forget
that Iraq, Syria, Palestine, and the Yemen no longer
belong to Turkey.
The study of local communication must take into ac-
count the following conditions under these five points:
(a) the territory is undeveloped, and sparsely popu-
lated by persons who are mostly in very modest circum-
stances and who travel little; (b) transportation facili-
ties are backward; (c) there is a marked tendency for
the more modern facilities to supplant the others; (d)
local and foreign spheres of influence are tremendous
factors; and (e) the internal prosperity is more or less
proportional to the progress and state of communica-
204 MODERN TURKEY
tions. Each of these five features is illustrated here-
with.
The traveller into the interior of Asia Minor is im-
pressed immediately with the scarcity of population.
There are few cities of any size. The straggling groups
of dwellings seem to offer little reason for modern im-
provements in transportation. Away from the more
prosperous cities the population does not number more
than five to the square mile. The inhabitants of these
scantily settled regions require practically no imports
from abroad, nor have they money or goods to purchase
local products other than the simplest articles of neces-
sity. Because of the lack of adequate transportation,
there .is no incentive to provide a surplus for outside
localities. There may be grain rotting in one community
while a hundred miles away there is famine. Not only is
the country in a primitive state in regard to the develop-
ment of natural resources, but also it is noticeable that
even on the part of prosperous business men of Con-
stantinople or Smyrna, there is little travelling. To
illustrate this point, the writer recalls a trip from Con-
stantinople to Samsun in company with an Armenian
employed by a leading foreign firm. This man, perhaps
forty-five years old, had lived all his life in Constanti-
nople, but this was his first experience on the Black Sea,
less than twenty miles away. Likewise, many influential,
internationally known citizens of former Ottoman na-
tionality have never been in Asia. (Every true Moslem,
however, hopes to make one pilgrimage to his sacred
cities.) The foreign tourist traffic to Turkey is consid-
erable, yet probably not one fifth that of Egypt. Ap-
proximately 25,000 Western tourists, about one-half of
them Americans, visit Constantinople each year; their
number is increasing due to the excellent :Mediterranean
tours conducted by well-known travel companies.
Communication facilities are simple for the most part.
... .,.
E A
T E R R A N E A N
AND TUS
ADJACENT COUNTRIE S
Scale of u na
0 20 tO eo 80 100 HI) 1.0 UlO 110 200
.. - - - --nf:JI'f:R£NCE
- - Tintl ob llall• ay Syotcr11
- ·· - ·- tt..<lopaaa.ab lo f O' l'o'.,..on. c. Cwl-"'c•
R-1b paauh lo fOf' ea.-1 &0<1
/ ..
o-t.-r C. t>l~ an. _.,.
• U....:co \lo'aa"" H,..d•
- CI'C•I S.m.ua-U...:bd•d aDd £n-.m-Tabria
A
Wq oa &Od c.ra...., Koul-
- --- - C&n..-.t.~~l'-dlab..J r op.il
- · · - -· C&l..,..ll.ocbdad Ail Rout.
...
................. e-. lll.f.
... a•
Turkish Highways of Trade nnd Commonieation.

especially in the regions not traversed by railways, where
the mule, donkey, camel or ox are commonly used. Rail-
ways in Turkey, though limited in extent, are well con-
structed, and normally would provide creditable service.
(In November, 1923', the '360 mile all-rail journey from
Constantinople to Angora required 36 hours.)
· Primitive animal transportation persists because it
has no commercial competition. Still, the carrying costs
of the former are so high that only a few products can
stand the charges, which, nevertheless, are not unreason-
able in consideration of the modes of travel Many
recent writers have overemphasized the present impor-
tance of the camel-carried trade. The use of other ani-
mals is frequently more economical. Furthermore, the
camel is unable to compete with the railway in any more
marked degree than the horse can compete with the auto-
mobile .. The two following illustrations are based upon
Trebizond and Smyrna..
Trebizond on the Black Sea coast owes its importance
in history largely to its location as the terminus of the
routes from the interior, mainly, the Persian caravan
route. For the five year period, 1861-1865, the average
yearly exports from Persia to this port amounted to
$5,000,000, and the average imports destined for Persia
amounted to $6,500,000. But for the period 1906-1910
inclusive the average annual exports dropped to $675,000
and the imports to $1,580,000. This remarkable decline,
which is evident both in the value and in the quantity of
goods, can be accounted for partly by favorable Russian
commercial tariffs and special freight rates; but the de-
ciding factor, to the detriment of Trebizond, was the
building of the Transcaucasian railway with its main
terminus at Batum, at the eastern end of the Black
Sea.
Another illustration of the comparative inferiority of
the camel is based on information furnished me in 1921
206 MODERN TURKEY
by reliable trading firms of Smyrna. One company stated
that practically all products with the exception of fire-
wood and charcoal from nearby villages enter Smyrna
from the interior by rail. Another firm stated that the
"per cent of products for regions from the interior by
rail was more than 80 per cent of the aggregate, although
under normal circumstances the share of rail transport
would be larger.'' A third firm prepared a table based
on conditions in January, 1921, which gives detailed
figures for normal imports from Baindir and Pergamos
and estimated figures from other hinterland districts.
This table which is reproduced here, • classifies the mer-
chandise according to cereals, fruit, and miscellaneous,
and gives estimated percentages according to the methods
of transportation. Thus, despite the number of camels
and other animals engaged in the carrying trade, modern
railways and ships account for most of the traffic move~
ment in the Aidin province.
*
Tons Produced .Annually (Est.) Perctgs. Bought in by
Location
Cereals Fruit Other Rail· Carts
roads Camels Ships·
-- - - - - - - - - --- - -
Aidin ......... .....
15,269 400 3,844 100o/o ...... ······ .....
Aivali .••••••• , 3,513 14,114
····· ······· ······ 100o/o
Edremid ...... ..... .... Olive
Oil ····· ······ ······ 100o/o
...... .....
100o/o ······ . .....
Ak Hisar 1,692 240 2,085 100o/o
Ak Shehr ...... 2,895
Kassaba ..•.••. 32
3,385
14
239
4,295
······
75o/o 12%% 12%%
·····
. ....
Chesme ••.••.•.
····· 127 269 ..... 25o/o ······ 15%
Endem ish 3,950 2,313 7,042 100o/o ......
······ .....
Kirk Agach 367 532 322 100%
······ ...... .....
Magnesia .•.••. 2,000
Muradieh ...... 90
4,000
641
3,200
833
90o/o
100o/o
10o/o
...... ······ ......
...... ....
Salahiya 9,513 2,820 32,142 100% ...... ······ .....
Thyra .......•. 5,298
Vurla ......... ..... 1,045
8,974
8,051
1,089
100%
..... ······ ...... .....
80o/o 20% •II•••
(Normal)
Baindir , . , , ••• , 2,5641 423l 9,035,100% I·. ..... ......

Pergamos . • • . • . 3,705 432 2,769 100%
1 1
. . .. . . ...••
The lack of adequate communication 1 is one of the
greatest handicaps which Turkey is experiencing at the
present time. It is noteworthy that the regions traversed
by railways have been those which have become con-
spicuously productive 2 in the space of a very few years.
But before describing the present status of railway
transportation, it may be well to describe other means
of communication, some of which have been in use from
time immemorial.
SEAPORTS AND SHIPPING
The sea lanes are the natural western approach to

Turkey, whose frontiers are still mainly along the coast.
Before the Great War, the land boundaries in Europe
were Bulgaria and Greece, and in the Middle East, the
Caucasus and Persia. In 1923, the European boundary
remains practically the same: but in Turkey-in-Asia,
there is no national outlet to the southeastern Mediter-
ranean, the Red Sea, the Persian Gulf, or the Indian
Ocean. The southern frontier is now roughly contiguous
to the northern land limits of Syria and Iraq. To appre·
ciate the import of the diminished area of New Turkey,
with particular reference to port commerce, consult the
special table in the chapter on Foreign and Domestic
Commerce. The seacoast cities have a large part in
Turkey's welfare both because of the inaccessibility of
1 There are the special territorial privileges accorded to foreign nationals,
described in considerable detail later in this chapter. The parcelling out

of these special privileges bas hindered the possibility of a unified trana·
portation system and at the same time it has turned trade from its natural
routes.
1 But not only should physical means of transportation be adequate but
also travelling should be made safer. The German scholar, Ratzel, has
shown that the periods of prosperity in Asia Minor have been those times
when roads were adequately protected and travel waa reasonably safe. This
observation bas been a result of researchea extending from six eenturiea
before the time of Christ until the present day. Thia conclusion requires
no elaboration.
20S MODERN TURKEY
interior places and on account of the very extensive coast
line. For present-day Turkey, the ports may be classified
into those on the Black Sea, on the Straits (Bosporus,
Sea of Marmara, and Dardanelles), and in western and
southwestern Anatolia.
The leading Turkish Black Sea ports are Trebizond,
Samsun, Ineboli, and Songuldak. Trebizond suffers from
the competition of Batum (returned by Soviet Russia to
Turkey in 1921, subsequently turned over under a special
arrangement to Georgia), and also from that of Samsun.
Products, principally tobacco, filberts and eggs, produced
in the immediate vicinity will continue probably to be
exported through Trebizond; but the tendency along the
Black Sea coast is towards decentralization of trade
entrepots. Thus, to the east, Batum takes away consider-
able business; a few miles to the west, Tireboli has some
importance; while Samsun stands out as the most prom-
ising port along ·the southern coast of the Black Sea.
Trebizond is handicapped by a difficult hinterland which
does not permit the building of serviceable roads or rail-
ways. Samsun, however, is the sea terminus of impor-
tant Anatolian trade routes extending in southeasterly
and southwesterly directions. The projected Black Sea
railways, initiated by French interests before the Great
War but included with many extensions in the abortive
concessions of the Ottoman-American Development Com-
pany, would enhance tremendously the economic develop-
ment of this rich region. Under present conditions, the
roads back of Samsun are nearly impassable during sev-
eral weeks in the year when the journey between Samsun
and Angora requires nearly a month. Ineboli is a more
advantageous port for the Turkish capital. It seems
likely, however, that the usual method of communication
from the outside world with Angora will continue to be
by the Anatolian Railway line which has been in opera-
tion for many years. Songuldak, together with Koslu
TRANSPORTATION AND CO.l'lf:MUNICATION 209
bay and Eregli (Heraclea), are conspicuous as the only
Turkish coal exporting ports of Anatolia. Other Turkish
Black Sea ports of local importance are Rizeh, Ordu,
and Sinope.
The leading coast citie~ along the Straits are Con-
stantinople, Haidar Pasha, Izmid, :Mudania, Panderma,
and Chanaq. Of these, the foremost place falls naturally
to Constantinople due to its superb location which is con-
cerned with all Black Sea-Mediterranean through ship-
ping, and to its excellent harbor. As a transit port,
Constantinople has a unique place among world shipping
centers, well-illustrated by the accompanying table of
arrivals and clearances in the year 1914. Noteworthy
is the fact that less than 25 per cent of the Black Sea
shipping in either direction has Constantinople as the
port of origin or of final destination. Yet the maritime,
and to a less degree, the commercial importance of the
City rests more largely with the fortunes of the Black
Sea territory outside of Turkey than with those of Tur-
key-in-Asia. With an unproductive European hinterland,
the surplus produce provided for export is small. Its
shipping activities are devoted primarily to through
traffic and transshipment. But transshipment charges
are heavy. During 1919 and 1920, landing charges from
ship's side to warehouse, separated by only a couple of
hundred yards, were maintained for a time at a price
in excess of. ~35 a ton because of inadequate quay and
warehouse accommodation,-with the result that many
commodities grown on the Turkish Black Sea coast, in-
cluding tobacco, were not handled locally if this pro-
cedure could be avoided. Unless conditions are improved
at Constantinople, there is every likelihood that !also in
an era of peace the numerous smaller ports may increase
their shipping totals.
Across from Constantinople there is the port of Haidar
Pasha, which is the starting point for the Anatolian Rail-
ARRIVALS AND CLEARANCES AT CONSTANTINOPLE IN 1914
(Excluding sailing and small coasting vessels)
Arrived from the Arrived from the

Arrived from and Mediterranean ana Black Sea and Arrived from and
Cleared for Cleared for the Cleared for the Cleared for the
:Regular Mail Steamship Services Mediterranean Black Sea Mediterranean Black Sea
Number Tonnage Number Tonnage Number Tonnage Number Tonnage

British: Khedivial Mail Steamship Com-
pany ............................
Austro-Hungarian: Austrian Lloyd
55 77,296 1 2,106 1 2,106 .. ······
Steam Navigation Company •..•••..
French : Messageries Maritimes •••••..
86
45
119,095
91,326
139
44
204,886
75,196
141
45
208,780
76,907 ....
7 9,410
······
French: Fraissinet & Cie .•..•••..•••
Greek: Panhellenic Company .••....••
8
..
10,951
······
16
55
22,651
53,699
17
56
23,572
54,591 .... ······
······
Italian: Florio Rubattino Line .•••...
Russian: Russian Steam Navigation and
5 8,140 113 192,510 112 190,901
······
Trading Company •••.••.••..••..•. ..
23 ······
25,883
158
36
265,129
27,112
155
18
259,657
17,495
114
49
82,581
Turkish: Mahsussie Steamship Company 39,986
Turkish: Courtgi & Company ••..••.. 79 23,245 35 16,506 33 12,492 39 29,034
Other Vessels:
British ....••••••••••••••••••••••. 92 141,388 1,897 3,536,718 1,894 3,530,497 1 1,203
Austro-Hungarian •••••••••••••..•. 1 1,995 188 350,715 187 350,132 17 9,820
German
··························
Greek ....•••••••••••••••••••••...
11
191
28,815
45,798
155
915
241,905
1,092,554
153
910
240,904
1,097,013
1
18
1,389
10,432
Italian •...•••••.•••••••••••••.••. 8 8,397 236 356,001 236 356,157 .. ······
Other nations
Total ····················
........................
124
728
60,699
643,028
441
4,429
594,256
7,031,944
427
4,385
605,556
7,026,760
249
495
181,034
364,889
Total number of arrivals and clearances, 10,037; tonnage, 15,066,621.

way, the northwestern connection of the Baghdad Rail-
way. Many projects have been advanced for connecting
the ports of Europe and of Asia by either a tunnel or a
bridge. The proposal which has met with" most favor
has been to erect one or the other structure from Stam-
boul, near the site of the Mosque of St. Sophia, to Scutari,
on the Asiatic .side between the landing places of Salajak
Skelese and Harem Skelesi. Plans have been drawn for
making this bridge serve railway, street car, carriage,
and passenger traffic. A suitable European-Asiatic con-
nection of this character would solve many shipping diffi-
culties and would prove the most valuable boom conceiv-
able for both water and rail services in the metropolitan
area.
There are valuable possibilities in the development
of a high-grade but rather small port on the Gulf of
lzmid (perhaps at Derinje), fifty miles from Constanti-
nople, which has the present advantage of being the out-
let for extensive handling of cereals and other bulky
products from nearby sections of Anatolia. This latter
port received considerable attention from German rail-
way interests before the World War, and following the
Armistice was the main storage and distribution center
for the Near East Relief. Mudania is the terminus of
the railway from Brusa. Panderma is the terminus of
the Smyrna-Kassaba railway. Chanaq, strategically
located on the Asiatic shore near the entrance of the
Dardanelles, and not far from the site of ancient Troy,
can assume somewhat larger commercial importance than
at present, but its value should continue predominantly
military and naval. A French company is reported to
have the concession for a railway from Smyrna to
Chanaq. Mention should also be made of the small Euro-
pean coast town of Rodosto in eastern Thrace, a mid-
point between the Black Sea and the Mediterranean.
The Mediterranean ports of Turkey are many. By
212 MODERN TURKEY
far the most important of these is Smyrna, situated at
the head of the deep, attractive gulf of the same name,
the natural inlet and outlet for an exceedingly productive
hinterland. Its economic importance exceeds that of all
other Turkish cities in Turkey-in-Asia. It is second only
to Constantinople as the leading commercial city in the
State, but in certain respects it has even greater signifi-
cance than the former Imperial City. Despite the prefer-
ential freight rates on the German railways before the
War which diverted much traffic away from Smyrna to
Constantinople, in 1914 the exports from Smyrna ex-
ceeded those from Constantinople, while from the stand-
point of imports, it ranked second only. The railway and
road connections from the interior are unusually good.
The great, fertile stretch of country surrounding Smyrna
can produce several times its best past record. In order
to improve its economic status, however, the warehouse
facilities which are owned by the powerful Quay Com-
pany, a French enterprise, should be enlarged and im-
proved. A reduction in their onerous charges would
profit the whole region. Due to the vast conflagration of
1922 which swept over the Armenian and Greek sections,
business has become exceedingly quiet; but it seems in-
evitable that Smyrna will be rebuilt as in the past, but
next time, probably on more modern lines. Immediately
after the World War, the Italians developed actively
shipping and trade at the nearby port of Scala Nuova, ~o
the extreme detriment of Smyrna. This situation which
was produced by the Nationalist boycott on Smyrna, then
under a Greek High Commissioner, illustrates the poten-
tial competition between adjacent ports.
Of the other ports along the Anatolian coast, Aivali,
Makri, Adalia, 1\Iersina, and Yumurtalik are the most
conspicuous. Makri is noteworthy as the chief emery-
exporting port. Mersina, as the terminus of the Adana-
Tarsus-Mersina railway, is the natural outlet for the
For Centuries, the Sand Walls of Stamboul were the Chief European
Barricade against the Barbarian Hordes.
Contrast between the Old and the New in Motlern Turkey.

fe!'tile Cilician plain. It is reported that a French :firm
has secured the concession for port works. Mersina does
not tap Syria and the back country but the Nationalist
Government has announced its intention of developing
the port at Yumurtalik which is on the western side of
the Gulf of Alexandretta and is likely to become a serious
competitor of the famous port of Alexandretta. Yumur-
talik (practically synonymous with Ayas) can become a
superior port to Alexandretta providing its harbor is
dredged and that it is protected from further silting
through an undertaking whereby the river Jihun is
turned back to its former channel. In the Ottoman-
American Development Company concessions, great im-
portance was attached to the early construction of the
railway from the Persian border terminating at this
newly devised outlet. To date, the Turks in Turkey and
the French in Syria have an artificial barrier through
the enactment of high customs duties and due to the
failure to provide for easy transfer of commodities.
(See the chapter on Foreign and Domestic Commerce.)
The future of ports around the Gulf of Alexandretta, as
well as in other parts of. western Asia, seems likely to
be governed largely by special interests accorded to
foreign national groups, based on considerations not
confined to those of transportation merely.
The shipping situation in 1923 differs from that of
1914 chiefly in the greatly lessened traffic, the aftermath
of events following 1918, and in the displacement of
Austrian and German vessels mainly by those of Italian,
British and American nationalities. In 1914, the carrying
trade was controlled by foreign companies, mainly Brit-
ish, German, Austrian, Greek, French, and Italian. The
British are maintaining their shipping in Turkey. As
yet infrequent German ships visit Turkish ports al-
though a change in this regard would not be unexpected.
The excellent former Austrian liners are now owned and
214 MODERN TURKEY
operated by the Italians. The typical, small Greek liners
and "tramps" in Turkish waters are both finding little
business and are subject to many restrictions which are
proving prohibitory in character. To compensate for this
heavy loss, the Hellenic shipping interests are endeavor·
ing to cultivate close maritime relations with the Soviet
States touching the Black Sea. Striking is the fact that it
was not until May 9, 1919, that an American owned and
registered merchant vessel had ever appeared in Con·
stantinople harbor; yet, during the balance of that year,
56 vessels flying the American flag called there. Very
few Turkish vessels have engaged in foreign shipping.
In 1914, Turkey's merchant marine amounted to ap-
proximately 110,000 tons, of which somewhat less than
50,000 tons remain. The Turks have made limited pur-
chases of small craft during the past decade but the
vessels are mostly small. The Turkish Chamber of Com-
merce of Constantinople announced on November 1, 1923,
that the Seri Sefain firm owned six vessels in excess of
3,000 tons while no other Turkish company has any vessel
larger than 1,000 tons. The condition of practically all
Turkish ships leaves much to be desired. The foregoing
information, which applies apparently only to ships regis-
tered at Constantinople (although the November issue
of the Bulletin of the Turkish Chamber does not make
clear this distinction) has been presented in this table:
TURKISH MERCHANT MARINE, NOVEMBER 1, 1923
Operating Company Number Tonnage

Seri Sefain . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . 35 37,494
Chirket-i-Hairie ........... ~............ 27 4,815
Golden Horn Shipping Co............... 16 1,397
Other companies . . . . . . . . . . . • . . • . . . . . . . . 47 30,242
Miscellaneous vessels in the port of Con-
stantinople . . . • • . • . . . • . . • . . . . • • • . • . . . 17 4,300
Tugboats, etc. • • • • • • . • . . • . . • . . . . . . . . . . . 123 1,200
Steam barks . • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . 190 3,500
----- 82,948
Total . • • • • • . • • . • . . • • . • • • ••• . . • • . . . 455
.The Turkish coastwise shipping (maritime cabotage)
has in the past been open to all nations. Until recently,
Greek ships have :figured most prominently in this busi-
ness. Italian, British and Turkish small craft have also
been conspicuous. By agreements signed at Lausanne,
however, Turkey is reserving for herself as far as pos-
sible this internal shipping. In the correspondence ex-
changed between Ismet Pasha and Sir Horace Rumbold,
the former wrote that "the Turkish Government having
decided to reserve cabotage to the national flag,'' extends
the privilege of engaging in this trade to three British
firms-the Khedivial Mail Steamship and Graving Dock
Company, Ltd., M. and J. Constant, and the Ellerman
Line, Ltd.-by virtue of "reciprocal treatment on the
coasts of Great Britain.'' Nevertheless Turkey may
permit ships of other nationalities to operate between
Turkish ports in accordance with Article 9 of the Com-
mercial Convention whereby "Turkey undertakes, on
condition that reciprocity is accorded in this matter, to
grant to the ships of the other Contracting Powers a
treatment equal to that which she grants to national
ships, or any more favorable treatment that she grants
or may grant to the ships of any other Power." As an
indication of the increasing share in local cabotage by
Moslem Turks, it is well known that Mustafa Kemal 's
father-in-law has become a .leading factor in this busi-
ness. A report (November, 1923) from Athens an-
nounced that two ships formerly belonging to the Ang!o-
Belgian-Greek Company of Smyrna have been purchased
by him and that a third ship has also been added to his
fleet. (The names given to these three ships are said
to be Mustafa Kemal, Smyrna, and New Turkey.)
The bulk of the shipping in Turkish waters has been
by boats of less than 800 tons, which have acted both as
main carriers and as feeders for the regular liners and
the large "tramps." In fact, the logical shipping. prac-
216 MODERN TURKEY
tice in Turkey call~ for loading and unloading cargoes
at a limited number of distributing centers, with the
smaller craft serving as auxiliaries. Since the War there
have been two shipping "conferences," one Greek and
the other British. Neither conference, however, em-
braced all national liners. The plans devised by the
separate conferences, of according shippers a 10 per cent
deferred rebate for exclusive patronage, has been the
cause of little criticism, because their regular sailing
schedules have helped to bring stability into chaotic con-
ditions on the principle of "live and let live." Yet the
small, dirty craft, consisting of both steamers and sailing
vessels, travelling on a will-of-the-wisp schedule, still
is the most typical means of passenger and cargo trans-
portation seen in Turkish waters.
The most successful shipping companies are those
which have made a careful study of both Turkish and
adjacent ports. Generally it is possible to pick up dif-
ferent classes of cargo at the various ports during most
of the year. Ships calling in the eastern Mediterranean
and Black seas can secure cotton and cotton-seed oil
at Alexandria, silk and fruits at Beirut, emery at Makri,
dried fruits and rugs at Smyrna, tobacco at Samsun,
nuts and eggs at Trebizond, petroleum products at
Batum, manganese at Poti, wheat at Novorossisk, and
valuable cargoes as well at Nicolaev, Odessa, Galatz,
Constanza, Varna, Burgas, Kavala, Salonika, Piraeus,
and Patras.
INTERIOR CITIES AND WATERWAYS
To discover the main interior centers of trade and com-

munication, one cannot go far wrong in naming the capi-
tals of the vilayets and sanjaks. Among the most
prominent are Eski Shehr, Afiun Qarahisar, Konia,
Adami, Angora, Amasia, Sivas, Diarbekr, Nisibin, Van,
Bitlis, and Kharput. Primitive conditions exist in all
these localities. Their importance is due not to .indus-
trial development or commercial enterprise but rather
to their situation on through travel routes. Of immeas-
urably less importance than the coast cities from the
standpoint of foreign trade, the interior distributing
points, nevertheless, are the scene of the great majority
of domestic trade transactions.
Lakes and rivers provide very little transportation in
Turkey. The only large lake, Lake. Van, which is sit-
uated in eastern Asia Minor, is used only by small sailing
craft; but with the logical development of the surround-
ing country it can achieve considerable importance. In
the Konia region, the Smyrna-Aidin railway has naviga-
tion rights on Lake Egerdir, and in cooperation with
the Baghdad Railway, holds similar rights on Lake
Beyshehr.
The rivers of Anatolia are of scant present importance,
since they are for the most part navigable merely for a
short distance from the coast, and cannot be relied upon
due to the frequent torrents in the rainy season and to
the dry summer weather. Their possibilities lie more in
connection with irrigation and with hydroelectric power.
The main streams are the Sakkaria (sanjak of Izmid)
and the Kizil Irmak (vilayet of Trebizond) which flow
into the Black Sea, the Su Sigirli Chai which flows into
the Sea of Marmara, and the Sihun and Jihun (vilayet of
Adana) which enter the Mediterranean.
By far the most important rivers of the Ottoman Em-
pire were the Tigris and the Euphrates; but save for the
headwaters, these rivers are located wholly outside of
New Turkey. Above Baghdad, the Tigris is utilized only
by rafts made of inflated skins. The Euphrates, which
is navigable to Hit, situated somewhat northwest of
Baghdad, offers a possibility for an all-water route
between the Persian Gulf and the Mediterranean Sea.
218 . MODERN TURKEY
Chesney, in his famous expedition a century ago, reported
that the Euphrates was navigable on a latitude approxi-
mately ninety kilometers east of Aleppo, and that it could
be made navigable as far as Birejik. The present handi-
caps largely relate to shifting sand banks and to shallow
water; but these difficulties are not insurmountable.
Further information regarding the water supply is con-
tained in the chapter dealing with Irrigation.
HIGHWAYS AND ANIMAL TRANSPORT
The most famous caravan routes in the Ottoman Em-

pire were the pilgrim trails across the Arabian deserts
to the holy Mohammedan cities of Mecca and AI Madina
and to Karbala near the Euphrates river, and the three
great trade highways known as Baghdad-Aleppo-Damas-
cus, Baghdad-Samsun, and Baghdad-Hamadan. These
routes, together with many of lesser importance, are
available for wheeled vehicles.
There are five main highways in Turkey-in-Asia. The
famous Baghdad highway from Samsun passes through
Amasia-Tokat-Sivas-Kharput-Diarbekr-Mosul. A second
important road is that along the Eregli-Kaisarieh-Mala-
tia-Kharput-Diarbekr-Mardin course. There is a fairly
good road between Sivas and Kaisarieh, and one from
Aleppo to Urfa and Diarbekr. The fifth highway is the
historical caravan route from Trebizond via Biaburt to
Erzerum, which has been adopted as a road for wheeled
vehicles since 1872. This last-mentioned road, which has
an average width of eighteen feet, is kept in fairly good
condition, and despite heavy snows, is open to traffic most
of the year. Other roads in Anatolia, which have less
importance, however, are those from Kharput to Khozat,
Kharput to Egin, Unieh to Tokat, and Adalia to Elmali.
There is an exceedingly good road through the Cilician
gates from Eregli to Tarsus, crossed by a road running
to Adana and Alexandretta in one direction and to Mer-
sina and Karaman in the other.
Turkish roads are placed by the government into three
classes: (a) those which connect the capital of a vilayet
with the nearest port or railway station, such highways
to have a width of five meters; (b) those which join the
capitals of vilayets-, these to have a width of four meters;
and (c) those- which connect the chief towns of the kazas
with one another, with other highways, or with harbors
or railways. Forced labor on the road may be required
of the inhabitants of the vilayet by the vali (governor).
Notwithstanding this legislation, neither has the forced
labor produced unsatisfactory results, nor have the roads
been kept in repair. Frequently, the fields are traversed
in preference. Recognizing the deficiencies, in consulta-
tion with the War Department the Ottoman Minister of
Public Works ten years ago issued a report (a COP.Y
of which is in the possession of the author), which laid
out a program of public roads to be constructed within
a period of nine years. The total mileage under consid-
eration was 9,711 kilometers, of which 3,447 kilometers
were in need of repair, 3,238 kilometers were being main-
tained by continual repairs, and 3,026 kilometers should
be newly constructed. Shortly before the War, arrange-
ments were made with French construction companies
to undertake a part of this work. But the world conflict
caused the program to be abandoned; moreover, these
contracts have not been renewed.
In their present condition, few Turkish roads are even
possible for automobiles. Latest estimates are that there
are one thousand automotive pleasure cars and trucks
(mostly the former) in Constantinople and not over two
hundred in the rest of the country. Most of these were
left, first by German, then by Allied military forces upon
their departure: the importations have resulted from
military stores. True to form, the Ford car is the most
220 MODERN TURKEY
common (as well as the most popular) pleasure car f01·
foreign diplomats as well as for influential Turks of Con-
stantinople. But the chief means of interior communica-
tion is the araba, a two-wheeled vehicle generally drawn
by two or four bullocks, a terribly squeaky slow-moving
but comparatively cheap native contrivance. An official
of the Near East Relief has stated that he had charge of
arabas pulled by water buffaloes which drew as much as
1600 kilos in a single load. Horse arabas often carry
over 1000 kilos. While much speedier than ox or buffalo
arabas, their use is largely confined to short hauls from
railway stations. By comparison, the maximum pack
load of a camel is about 300 kilos.
Pack animals are controlled by rural merchants, lo-
cated away from trade centers, and by peasant owners
who sometimes act as drivers.
The merchants, .aside from using their own capital,
frequently act as purchasing agents for wealthy capi-
talists in leading Turkish cities. The commissioners or
forwarding agents generally operate also as merchants
on their own account. Their function as forwarding
agents is to unload, count or weigh, store, and transport
merchandise to more distant points where· it is sent by
other conveyances to its final destination. This system
has arisen, because merchandise is frequently brought
by wagon transport on a journey requiring fifteen days
or more before it reaches a railroad center or a seaport.
It is often impossible to secure conveyances which will
cover the entire distance. The drivers, or arabajes, are
exceedingly well organized, frequently controlling as
many as one hundred ox or buffalo carts. This gives ·
them a bargaining advantage over their business com-
petitors. The rates charged, which include labor, equip-
ment, and other expenses, average somewhat less than
forty cents per ton mile. It is not out of place here
to add a good word for the honesty and faithfulness
given by animal drivers to merchandise under their pro-
tection, even to the point frequently of risking their own
lives. Immense quantities of cereals, tobacco, pota~oes,
hides and wool are transported by arabas.
The typical camels belong to a well known species of
dromedary, raised and tended by the Yuruks-nomadic
peoples of Anatoli~ To train camels is not an easy
task, since it generally requires two to three years to
teach them to kneel. They are broken to loads at three
years of age, but they can do their maximum work when
they are from five to twenty years old. Their average
length of life is twenty-five years. The ordinary caravan
consists of seven camels, the maximum that can be rea-·
sonably intrusted to a single driver. It is, however, not
unusual to witness a line of a hundred camels, led by the
one small donkey. In certain parts of Asia Minor,
camels will presumably always have a use because of
their general adaptability and their low cost of main-
tenance: the average working cost of a camel before
the war amounted to approximately fifty cents a day.
The camel is far less common in Turkey than in Arab
lands. ·
In mountainous districts, camels, mules, oxen, and
horses are used. On the famous road from Erzerum to
Trebizond, a distance of 205 miles, the journey generally
requires between twelve and fifteen days, at a cost of
from 250 to 400 piastres per 200 kilos {approximately
twenty-five to forty cents per lb.). On this great caravan
route there are sometimes as many as a thousand loaded
camels in a single train. Banse ("Die Tiirkei," p. 207)
writes in 1916, that 50,000 laden camels pass annually
throughErzerum.
Thus far in the chapter emphasis has been given chiefly
to means of communication still employed that were in
use for many centuries. There remains to describe the
newer agencies of communication, viz., the railway, the
222 MODERN TURKEY
postal service, the telegraph service, and travel through
the air.
RAILWAYS
On January 1, 1913, the railways in the Ottoman Em-

pire totalled 1,046 miles in Europe and 2,836 miles in
Asia, a total of 3,882 miles or less than that of Belgi~.
The territorial losses resulting from the Balkan Wars
reduced severely the European mileage left to Turkey;
while in detached Asiatic provinces, including railway
construction since 1914, Syria has now 850 miles of rail-
way, Palestine 479 miles, not to mention the Hejaz rail-
way in Arabia and the developments in Iraq. In the
Turkey of January 1, 1924, there is a dearth of rail com-
munications, best illustrated perhaps by the non-exi!lt-
ence of any railways in central or eastern Asia Minor
(except the Baghdad line near the extreme southern
frontier), or anywhere near the Turkish Black Sea coast.
From a railway standpoint, Turkey, similar to China,
India, and other backward countries, is greatly und~r
developed.
There is nothing resembling a unified railway system
in Turkey due to independent penetration by nationals
of foreign countries in their desire to cultivate special
spheres of influence. The sordid story of blackmail and
bribery which accompanied the promotion and the opera-
tion of railways in Turkey reflects little credit on C<?n-
cessionaires, foreign chancellories, or Ottoman officials.
Because these concessions involve agricultural, mineral,
and building privileges as well, all of which required the
Imperial irade, the diplomatic negotiations are described
in the chapter on Levantine Concession-Hunting, to which
the reader is referred for interesting details.
The serious obstacle to railway development has been
the financial problem. The Turks have been unable to
provide the necessary funds. The many internal troubles
and the uncertain rewards to the pioneers have made
foreign capital timid. In view of the doubtful success
awaiting these undertakings, an unusual device, the kilo-
metric guarantee, was introduced whereby a certain fixed
revenue based on mileage was guaranteed by the Gov-
ernment. The yearly payments were handled by the
Ottoman Public Debt Administration acting for the for-
eign creditors. Under this system, a railway company
was assured a definite minimum revenue irrespective of
the number of trains run (in excess of one trip), the
nature of the traffic, or the character of the management.
This arrangement offers little incentive to efficiency. The
State was thus able to secure railways, although in t]le
case of most lines, the guarantees are a serious drain on
the public treasury, with the burden usua!lly falling
heaviest upon the localities through which the lines go.
As a rule, the Government participates in the financing
of railways in Turkey, either by according them guaran-
tees, or by sharing in profits above a certain :fixed
minimum.
The character of the general traffic is worth noting.
As on the Continent, there is provision for three classes
of passengers ; most persons ride third class. Practically
the only persons who ride either first or second class are
rich foreigners or Government officials (the latter usually
have passes). The railways carry to the seacoast prin-
cipally bulk products, such as wheat, barley, wool, mo-
hair, tobacco, and dried fruits. The quantity of minerals
transported is almost negligible. There are practically
no industrial establishments of any kind in the interior,
so this important class of goods does not figure among
the freight items. Railway rates are high, and ship rates
so low in comparison that there is only a small amount of
merchandise that can stand long rail carriage; moreover,
as already stated, sea routes are preferred. Since the
imports from abroad are largely consumed by the more
224 MODERN TURKEY
prosperous residents of the seacoast cities, the amount
of traffic on the railroads destined for the interior is much
less than that in the reverse direction, a situation true
of animal transportation as well. Thus railway traffic
is hindered by the backward development of an agri-
cultural and pastoral country, in which little opportunity
is afforded for "back hauls."
Certain detailed information regarding the railway
systems in Turkey is desirable. The Salonika-Monastir
line is now entirely outside of Turkey. The eastern sec-
tion of the Salonika-Dede Agach-Constantinople Rail-
way, a strategic Macedonian-Thracian line owned by
Belgo-French capital, is in Turkish territory. In Euro-
pean Turkey, the chief line, however, is the Oriental
Railway, promoted (1872)_ by the noted German, Baron
Hirsch, which provides through connection between
western Europe and Constantinople.
In European Turkey, the Oriental Railway is poorly
laid out, with no attempt at avoiding severe curves since
an underlying plan in the construction was to obtain as
large mileage as possible in order to benefit from the
kilometric guarantee. Thus, although Constantinople is
only 148 miles distant from Adrianople, by highway, the
railway has a length of 198 miles including 24 miles in
Bulgarian territory. This line is far less important than
formerly from the standpoint of central and south-
eastern Europe, due to the improvement in other types
of transportation; but it still offers the most available
overland route to the Straits and is the connecting link
with the Anatolian and Baghdad railways. The control
was vested in German and Austrian nationals who trans-
ferred their interests to a Swiss holding company, the
Banque des Chemins de fer Orientaux (referred to in
the chapter on Levantine Concession-Hunting as the
Swiss Bank).
The Anatolian Railway, which has its Asiatic starting
point at Haidar Pasha, on the Marmara Sea, is a single-
tracked road except between Haidar Pasha and Pendik,
and of 4 ft. 8% in. (standard European and Turkish)
gauge. This is probably the most important railway in
Asia Minor, because it connects Consta~tinople with
Angora, and it extends southward to Konia, the northern
terminus of the Baghdad Railway. There is also a branch
from Hamidiya, on the Haidar Pasha-Eski Shehr line to
Ada Bazar, approximately six miles distant. The Turkish
Government has granted it liberal kilometric guarantees.
Similar to the other railways in Turkey, this company
is a Turkish societe anonyme, until recently at least under
German financial control. There are no reliable figures
to indicate future earnings, since so much of the recent
traffic has been purely military. The region tapped, how-
ever, is one of great fertility and should prove prosperous
under even fair working conditions.
The Baghdad Railway, which must not be confused
with the Anatolian Railway although developed under
interlocking German interests, is wholly within the C<?n-
fines of prewar Turkey. The project called for a through
rail connection between Berlin and the Persian Gulf.
During the World War, the Anglo-Indian forces con-
structed an excellent line from Basra on the Shatt al
Arab to Baghdad; this section is under the British Civil
Administration in Iraq. According to last reports, there
is a line operating from Baghdad to Tikrit (133 miles),
now extended to Qalat Sharqat. To the northwest, in
Turkey, the Baghdad line from Konia goes through the
Taurus Mountains and the Cilician plain to Nisibin.
These two ends, which are considerably less than two hun-
dred miles apart, doubtless would be quickly connected
provided strategical considerations made this desirabJe.
Freight originating east of Nisibin would then be di-
verted to the Persian Gulf, while that between Nisibin
and Konia would find its outlet mainly by sea, and partly
226 MODERN TURKEY
by the Anatolian main line to Haidar Pasha. In Turkey,
the region traversed by the Baghdad Railway east of
the Taurus in the Cilician plain is the more productive
country; west of the lofty mountain ranges the territory,
except in the immediate vicinity of Konia, is not con-
ducive either to agriculture or to easy transportation.
In return for the rectification of the Turko-Syrian
boundary so as to give Turkey more of this southern
territory (originally included in the French mandate
for Syria and Cilicia), it is reported that the Nationalist
Government has assigned to a French syndicate the
Deutsche Bank's concession "for those sections of the
railway, including branches, between Bozanti and Nisi-
bin, together with all the rights, privileges, and advan-
tages attached to that concession." (E. M. Ear~e,
"Turkey, the Great Powers, and the Bagdad Railway,"
page 3'25.) The Chester concessions have introduced
conflicting claims in the neighborhood of the Turko-
Syrian-Iraqi border. It appears that the Turkish section
west of the Taurus is operated by the Turkish Govern-
ment, that the section in Turkey east of the Taurus is
in French hands, while the control in Iraq is cer-
tainly Britishi Information relative to the whole Bagh-
dad enterprise, too vast and complicated to be detailed
here, is brought up to the middle of 1923 by Professor
E. M. Earle in his noteworthy book just cited.
The Smyrna-Aidin (Ottoman) Railway, the oldest rail-
way in Turkey, is a standard-gauge, single-track line of
607 kilometers. It follows a route from Smyrna through
Ephesus to Aidin, and then up the Menderez valley to
Egerdir. Although the original concession of 1856 had
a provision that the government should pay annual in-
terest at the rate of six per cent on the original capital,
this understanding was not carried out. Twenty-three
years later a renewal of negotiations resulted in changes
in the concessions, with an agreement that thereafter the
'l'R.A.NSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATION 227
Smyrna-Aidin Railway should not receive any financial
State guarantees. In 1914, the Company was organized
as a Turkish societe Anonyme, with continued predomi-
nant British control, prior concessions consolidated, and
the franchise extended to the year 1999. New concessions
granted in July, 1914, were (1) navigation rights on
Lakes Egerdir and Beyshehr, the latter to be shared
with the Baghdad Railway Company and (2) branch lines
as follows: (a) Aidin to Mughla (95 km.), (b) Buldur
extension to Kizil Kaya (90 km.), (c) Lake Egerdir to
Lake Beyshehr (66 km.), and (d) Dineir to Sandukli (55
km.). The Smyrna-Aidin Company, which operates with-
out any kilometric guarantee and has been as efficiently
managed as any railway in Turkey, has been a great
factor in the prosperity of the Smyrna region.
The Smyrna-Kassaba Railway connects Smyrna with
the Anatolian Railway at Afiun Qarahisar, a distance of
421 kilometers; it has a line from Magnesia to the sea-
coast town of Panderma (282 kilometers), and a suburban
service to Burnabat. The original concession (1863) was
British; in 1893, the company was taken over by the
Ottoman Government which later made over the existing
concessions, together with important extensions, to a
Franco-Belgian group. The new Soma branch to the
Sea of Marmara has benefited the agricultural develop-
ment of its territory, and has become a strategic line for
the Dardanelles. Although the Smyrna-Kassaba has
proved a drain on the State funds, an average of half a
million dollars yearly was paid over the period of 1908-
1913 on account of kilometer guarantees, yet this enter-
prise shares with the Ottoman Railway great credit for
the agricultural and industrial productivity of Smyrna
and the back country.
The Mudania-Brusa Railway, forty-one kilometers in
length, connects the important but isolated city of Brusa
with a small port on the Sea of Marmara. It is a narrow-
228 MODERN TURKEY
gauge line, operating without kilometric guarantee, with
the concession expiring in the year 1990. Originally
· built by British capital, it is now controlled by a Franco-
Belgian syndicate. While the company operates nor-
mally at a small profit, the prospects would be greatly
enhanced by extensions and railway connections
(thwarted in the past through German influence) with
the nearby fertile regions.
The Mersina, Tarsus and Adana Railway has had an
interesting history. The first concession was granted in
1883 to two Turks. Three years later the railway was
in operation under Anglo-French direction. In 1896,
control was purchased by these same interests. This
railway, which did not have the benefit of State financial
aid, was not a paying enterprise, and, moreover, the Ger-
man interests represented by the Deutsche Bank blocked
prospective extensions in the Cilician plain as well as
towards the Turkish Black Sea coast. In 1906, and
shortly thereafter, the Deutsche Bank bought out the
French and British stockholders, and secured control
with the purpose of linking up this well-situated railway
with the Baghdad company. Through a community of
interests, the Baghdad has operated trains over the local .
company's tracks between Yeniji and Adana. The Mer-
sina, Tarsus and Adana Railway, which is only 67 kilo-
meters in length, serves the rich Cilician plain and the
port of Mersina; its future is bound up (1) with suc-
cess in competition with ports on Alexandretta Bay, and
(2) with a working agreement with nearby railway
companies.
The future international status of railways in Turkey
is problematical. Especially consequential are the un-
derstandings in 1914 between the French and Germans
(February l5}, between the British and Italians (March
26), between the British and Germans (June 15); and
finally, there is the French loan to the Ottoman Govern-
ment (in the spring) of 800,000,000 francs, of which
500,000,000 was actually paid over in return for special
concessions in northwestern and central Asia M:inor,
notably for the following new railway projects: Samsun-
Sivas (210 km.), Sivas-Kharput-Arghana (263 km.),
Arghana-Bitlis-Van (40 km.), branches to Egin and
Malatia (90 km.), Tokat-Kastamuni-Bolu-Eregli (600
km.), Kastamuni-Ineboli (90 km.), and Boyabad-Sinope
(97 km.), total 1790 kilometers. (The validity of this
entire French concession is open to question, despite the
large payment made by the French in good faith before
August, 1914, on the grounds (1) that the loan has not
been paid in full, and (2) that the terms were never
approved by the Ottoman Chamber of Deputies. Since
Nationalist Turkey has recognized the prewar acts of
the Ottoman Government, these agreements and conces-
sions seem likely to play an important part in the map-
ping out of new lines: in fact, a protocol signed at Lau-
sanne specifies compensative measures in regard to the
French Black Sea concessions.) For further data, refer
to Earle's "Turkey, the Great Powers, and the Bagdad
Railway," to M:r. G. R. Montgomery's article in Current
History, October, 1921, and to the chapter on Levantine
Concession-Hunting.
Events in 1923 furnish a new basis for railway de-
velopments. Railway and general economic developments
in eastern and central Anatolia are provided for in the
late Chester concessions, which, it is fair to presume,
represent the wishes of the National Assembly. 1 The
• With reference to new railway construction, one of the most perplexing
questions relates to the determination of the gauge. While every railroad
man must view with apprehension the introduction of more than one gauge
on any line which may form part of a unified system, there are both finan-
cial and geographic considerations which cannot be overlooked. In typica.
interior sections of Anatolia, swift streams have cut out channels through
mountain ranges, leaving isolated fertile basins which can be connected
up only at enormous expense. In many instances the only alternative to
heavy tunnels and gorge construction would be a prolonged climb of severe
230 MODERN TURKEY
public draft provides for the construction of the follow-
ing railway JIDes: (1) Sivas through Kharput, Arghana,
Diarbekr and Bitlis to Van; (2) the environs of Kharput
to Yumurtalik, traversing the valley of Jihun; (3) start-
ing on line (1), passing through Mosul and Kirkuk to
Sulaimaniya; (4) Samsun through Amasia and Zile to
Sivas; ( 5) a branch leaving line ( 4) at Mussa Koi and
ending at Angora; (6) Chalti upon line (4) to Erzerum;
(7) a branch from the Chalti-Erzerum line to the Black
Sea; (8) Erzerum to Bayazid and the Persian frontier;
(9) Sivas to Kaisarieh; (10) Haji Chefatli, on the An-
gora-Mussa Koi railway, to Kaisarieh; (11) Kaisarieh
to Oulu Kichla; and (12) the environs of Haji Bairam
upon the Samsun-Sivas line through Chorum to the end
of the Angora-Mussa Koi line.
Regarding western Anatolia, British financiers may
have been promised control of the Anatolian Railway
and the Mersina-Tarsus-Adana Company, in which event
that nationality has a dominant influence in Turkish rail-
ways. In the case of the Anatolian Railway, the British,
somewhat prematurely, have extended the right of par-
ticipation to the Italians and the French; the former ac-
cepted promptly, while the French have protested but
may accept. Dr. Franz Guenther of Dresden, for twenty
years the able manager of the Anatolian Railways, stated
at Lausanne on May 16, 1923, that there was a com-
munity of interest between the British group and the
Oriental Railway Bank of Zurich; also that it was con-
templated to spend $25,000,000 for rebuilding a greater
grades in order to reach elevated plateaus and ridges sometimes five to
seven thousand feet above sea level. Although engineers state that careful
surveys disclose the practicability of 2~% to 3% compensated grades, the
adoption of narrow gauge (3' 6") is economically preferable to the present
standard Turkish gauge (4' 8~"'). The choice of narrow gauge should
mean a saving of approximately 25% in construction cost. For many
projected lines the expenses of operation should not be prohibitive if we
may rely on the figures of the French railways and the Baghdad line,
which give the nnnsually low average operating expenses of less than 50%
of gross revenue.
part of the 900 miles destroyed in the Greek arml. re-
treat; and that it was proposed to build as well 1,200
miles of new lines provided for in the former German
concessions. While the so-called Chester Project is in a
questionable state of fulfillment, there is distinct promise
of new railway construction as well as consolidation of
existing systems in the richest sections of western Asia
Minor. The concessionary aspects are described in more
detail in the chapter on Levantine Concession-Hunting.
POSTAL AND TELEGRAPH SERVICES
Modern business enterprises could hardly be carried

on anywhere without the aid of modern methods of
communication, such as the postal and telegraph services.
Before the Great War, six European Powers main-
tained postoffices in Constantinople with branches in
leading ports of the Empire. This arrangement secured
by the capitulations was declared a dead letter by the
Turks on October 1, 1914; but after the 1918 Armistice,
postoffices were resumed by the Entente Allies. The
postal service in Turkey under foreign auspices was
never intended to be available to the Turk, who had his
own postal system. Similar postoffices which have been
in existence in China have now been abolished as a result
of the Limitation of Armaments Conference at Wash-
ington. By the terms of the Lausanne treaties, all for-
eign postoffices in Turkey have been abolished.
In Turkey (1914), there were six postoffices per 1000
inhabitants, the identical figure for British India, com-
pared with 40 postoffices per 1000 inhabitants for the
U. S. A. Turkey has a fair parcel post system. Under
the new order the administration of the Turkish post-
office, which is of great concern to natives and foreigners
alike, is making a very auspicious start. A considerable
part of the postal business of prewar Turkey, however,
232 MODERN TURKEY
has been entirely lost. One of the important as well as
interesting developments in the Middle East, is the
weekly motor transport of mail between Baghdad and
Haifa through the arrangement between the Govern-
ment of Iraq and the Nairn Transport Co. (a British
firm). This desert route requires a stop at Rutba wells,
the only available water supply along the route between
Ramadi and Damascus. The Iraq mails to Haifa, the
latter handled via Port Said, provide nine day service
from Baghdad to London, contrasted with four to six
weeks formerly when the mail was handled via the Per- ·
sian Gulf. The Haifa-Baghdad route is preferred to
the route from Amman, Transjordania (Kerak), because
of the lava country on the latter route which is damaging
to chassis and tires. The latter route is used, however,
for air mail. Eventually Turkey will doubtless make
some arrangement for an overland and possibly overair
postal connection.
The Turkish telegraph service, under the jurisdiction
of the Ministry of Posts and Telegraphs, maintains a
fairly satisfactory service. The rates are somewhat
lower than the rates of the Eastern Telegraph Company,
a British company which owns the Tenedos-Syra and the
Odessa-Invo lines. Before the World War, there was a
European line to Constantinople owned by German in-
terests, but it did not function during the Allied occupa-
tion of Constantinople.
In Turkey {1914) there were 91 miles of telegraph lines
per 1000 square miles, compared with 28 miles in British
India and 236 miles in the United States; and 175 miles
per 1000 inhabitants compared with 116 miles in British
India and 1849 miles in the United States. In 1914-15,
there were approximately 5,500,000 messages sent
throughout Turkey.
Until 1908, when the government installed a telegraph
system for its public offices, there was no telegraph serv-
ice in Turkey. An Anglo-French company, predomi-
nantly British, secured in 1911 a concession for thirty
years for the purpose of operating a system in Con-
stantinople and its suburbs, under a provision whereby
the Ottoman Government had the right after ten years
to purchase the system; if this option is not exercised,
the time of the concession shall be extended ten years.
The first public telephone service in Turkey was inaugu-
rated in 1913. Few Turkish cities have telephone service.
The same year, 1913, witnessed the introduction of
wireless telegraph for military use under the direction of
General von Sanders. Early in the period of the War,
wireless apparatus was placed at Ok-M:eidan on the
Golden Horn. Little is publicly known regarding sta-
tionary wireless apparatus erected in Anatolia and
elsewhere during 1914-1923. Many ships in Tur:kish
waters are equipped with receiving apparatus and are
thereby able to pick up messages di:t;"ect from Europe as
well as from Annapolis. But the sending of messages
from Turkey involves several relays to foreign countries:
for instance, a wireless message from Constantinople to
New York involves not less than four repetitions.
AIR ROUTES
The developments by air are being watched with the

keenest interest by both Turks and foreigners. In Iraq,
there are eight air squadrons concentrated at Baghdad
under the control of the Royal Air Forces, by which
means local police over all the country are being sup-
ported and the authority of the Iraq Government ren-
dered effective. Experimental trips are being made to
map out the best courses (consult the Geographical Jour-
nal, April, 1920, and April, 1923). Major G. H. Scott,
who commanded the British airship R-39 when it crossed
and recrossed the Atlantic, outlined a scheme before the
234 MODERN TURKEY
International Air Congress (June, 1923} for vessels with
displacement of 180 tons, with speed of 80 miles an hour
capable of a non-stop flight of 2,500 miles and a range of
24,000 miles. Such airships would be designed to carry
200 passengers and 11 tons of mail and freight.
In June, 1923, the British Air Ministry called for three
types of aeroplanes: (1} an aeroplane with a single engine
for transport to be used in Europe; (2} a three-engined
machine for Imperial communications connecting Croy-
den-Egypt-India-Australia; and (3) an aeroplane for
transport in the Middle East. The specifications for the
Middle Eastern type called for one or three engines
(total horsepower not to exceed 1,000}, the ability to fly
level on two-thirds of its total horsepower while carrying
three-fourths of its load capacity, to be built preferably
of metal construction in order to withstand great varia-
tion of temperature and hun:iidity. Long flights are con-
templated since it is specified that the machine must be
able to fly 500 miles at full throttle against a wind of
thirty miles per hour while the machine. travels at a
height of 10,000 feet. Among other details, there must
be provision for refrigeration, an adequate supply of
drinking water, and cooking arrangements. The machine
requires a crew of two persons and must be able to ac--
commodate at least eight passengers with an allowance
of 236 pounds per passenger with baggage. In Decem-
ber, 1923, details regarding the formation of the British-
subsidized Imperial Air Transport Co., Ltd., were pub-
lished. These various plans call attention to a revol~tion
in Near and Middle Eastern communications.
Already, regular air travel has been inaugurated, con-
necting the leading cities of England, France, Switzer-
land, Germany and Russia. In the middle of 1923, a new
airway was opened between Moscow and Tiflis (Soviet
Georgia} ; and since London and Manchester are already
linked aerially with Berlin and Moscow, air travel is
now possible from England to the Persian border in forty
hours' time. This route has the great advantage of
avoiding most sea and mountain stretches until it reaches
the Caucasus, and so offers a not too difficult trip to ad-
joining and nearby countries including India and Turkey.
Turkey has done little experimental work of her own
in connection with developments of travel by air. The
consequences of fresh means of communication affecting
nearby countries are, however, a matter of interest and
concern to her.
CONCLUSION
Future transportation and communication develop-

ments in Turkey are being considered by the Turks more
closely from the economic viewpoint than has been true
in the past. The Ottoman Turks exhibited neither tech-
nical skill nor did they provide the capital for these
enterprises. The leaders in New Turkey are little better
equipped in these regards than their predecessors; but
they are insisting upon a more direct participation both
in the work of construction and in the character of the
ownership. For instance, Article 24 of the Chester Con-
cession starts, "The company shall choose its function-
aries, employees, and laborers from among Turkish sub-
jects." The native financial control is expressed in
various articles: it is stated, "At the termination of the
concession, the Government of the Grand National As-
sembly shall acquire all the rights of the company," etc.
Thus the plans of the present masters of Turkey are to
eliminate as far as possible foreign influences by the
substitution of Turkish authority.
Prospects in Turkey, however, cannot be considered
apart from expansion in nearby countries. For example,
attention is again being given to a proposed :Mediter-
ranean-Euphrates railway, dating back to the Chesney
236 MODERN TURKEY
project, since students of the Middle East are emphasiz-
ing more and more the international importance of the
trade route between Syria and Palestine and upper and
lower Iraq. In the early stages of the Baghdad Railway
scheme, careful consideration was given to the advis-
ability of avoiding Anatolia altogether by the construc-
tion of the main line from the Syrian coast rather than
at Haidar Pasha. A leading German economist, Dr.
Rohrbach ("Die Bagdadbahn"), wrote in 1901:
If merely economic and not political advantages were
taken into account, the question might perhaps be
raised whether it would not be better to leave the Ana-
tolian section alone altogether and begin the Baghdad
Railway from Seleucia (on the Syrian coast). The
future export trade in grain, wool, and cotton will in
any case do all it can to lengthen the cheap sea-passage
and shorten correspondingly the section on which it
must pay railway freights. The fact that the route con-
necting Baghdad with the Mediterranean coast in the
neighborhood of Antioch is the oldest, greatest, and
still most promising trade route of Western Asia is
independent of all railway projects.
The geographical features of the country lend them-

selves readily to this strategic route (the Euphrates is
only 130 miles from the Mediterranean Sea), and on this
right of way there are only 40 miles more than 1,000 feet
above sea level, and even this 40-mile section has no heavy
gradients. London is approximately 6,700 miles by sea
from Basra; the rail journey from Basra to Mosul is 500
miles. By the construction of a railway from the Syrian
coast to Mosul, the distance from London would be ap-
proximately 3,400 miles by sea, and approximately 400
miles by rail from the coast to Mosnl. The distance from
Mosul to Baghdad by rail is approximately 200 miles.
Thus, while the rail difference is not great as approached
either from the Syrian coast or the Persian Gulf, there
is a distinct saving in the former case through the elimi-
nation of the Suez Canal dues and an additional sea
journey of 3,300 miles.
A most interesting new shipping route has been tried
out in a preliminary way by the voyage of the steamer
Pioneer, which has recently completed an entire wa~er
journey from Hamburg across Russia to Persia. The
route was from Hamburg to Petrograd, then along the
Neva and Lake Lagoda, then crossing the Marien Canal
to the Volga River whence the Pioneer entered the Cas-
pian Sea with its final destination at EnzelL Her cargo
was transported by automobile trucks from Enzeli to
Teheran in thirty-six hours which is a saving of nearly a
week contrasted with inbound goods from the Persian
Gulf ports by the use of camel caravans. Should Soviet
Russia devote its efforts to improving this combined river
and canal waterway, the course of transportation in the
East would likely become revolutionized.
Externally and internally, therefore, Turkey's destiny
is closely associated with developments in Eastern
Europe, the Near East, and the Middle East. Foreign
lenders are considering carefully alternative methods of
transportation and communication before committing
themselves in Turkish projects. At the same time, the
leaders of New Turkey have frequently given expression
to the great difficulty of bringing about any economic re-
vival in the country without greatly needed improve-
ments in existing methods of transportation .and co~
munication.
CHAPTER X
LAND TENURE
By LOUIS STEEG'
Let not Ambition mock their useful toil,

Their homely joys, and destiny obscure;
Nor Grandeur hear, with a disdainful smile,
The short and simple annals of the poor.
-GRAY.
Introduction
One of the most dramatic chapters in Ottoman history
was the defiance of the centralized government at Con-
stantinople by the Dere Beys, or ''Valley Lords,'' of
Asia Minor. The power of these local families had grown
during the 17th and 18th century until almost all the
peninsula of Asia Minor was parcelled out among them.
Although feudal families and hereditary chieftains in
Arab-dwelling areas still continue to exercise a large
measure of independence, the power of the Dere Beys of
Asia Minor was broken definitely in 1840 by Sultan
Mahmud II; none of them dared any longer to defy the
power of the Imperial officers.
The ownership of land in Anatolia is not necessarily
an indication of prosperity. It is noteworthy that among
the peasants who are the most well off are those who
1 Born at Libourne, France, 1865. Consul in Tunis, Bulgaria and Turkey.
Member of Commission of Financial Control instituted by the Powers in

Macedonia, 1905-09 inclusive. Member of Commission of Financial Reform,
created by the Turkish Ministry of Finance 1909-12. French Minister to
Norway 1912-14. Assistant Director General, now Director-General of the
Imperial Ottoman Bank. Delegate of the Imperial Ottoman Bank on the
Ottoman Public Debt. Author of standard treatise on Ottoman land legis-
lation.
Translated from the French.
238
LEGEND
- Cultivated Land
c::J Highlands
rorestand Un derbrush
c::;::J Desert
•
..;[>'-~- S wamps
.::F~ Lavo Fields
~ Mines
----- Notional B oundary
••••••··Boundary of Mediterranean Flora
rr==R==~~~~~·Q•rrunnf'llflfi NOrlhern .Boundary a+ Daft Palm Cultivation
..
, After BaMe.
Physical Features in Prewar Turkey.
LAND TENURE 239
dwell in villages which have been absorbed into the Im-

perial property. This condition recalls a similar situa-
tion in the Roman Empire when the Imperial authorities
took over the privately owned.lands. The private land
owners in Turkey suffer from burdensome taxes but are
much better satisfied than are the peasants who work on
estates belonging to non-resident, private owners:
Only since the year 1867 has it been possible for for-
eigners in Turkey individually to possess land. No for-
eign corporation, however, may hold real property in ~ts
own name. Ordinarily, foreigners own building sites or
control land concessions by having these titles to real
property made out in the name of Turkish subjects.
As in the case of the great majority of Turkish laws,
the regulations in regard to land tenure are prepared
intelligently but frequently are not respected in their
execution.
Land Tenure
Real property in Turkey is divided into five classes,
subject to different systems of laws, which are based
mainly upon Moslem religious law, and to a lesser extent
upon the civil law. These various classes are known as:
(a) mulk lands, or freehold property; (b) miri lands, or
crown lands; (c) vakuf lands, or pious foundations;
(d) metruke, or vacant land; and (e) mewat, or unused
land.
Mulk land consists of property subject to a full owner-
ship tfl.x. The ownership of mulk land, vouched for by a
deed (hodget), entitles the proprietor to convey title,
sell, mortgage, give it away, or convert it into "vakuf."
Miri land includes cultivated lands, meadows, winter
and summer pasture land, forests, and other varieties
of land, possession of which is conferred by the State,
and attested to by a deed (tapou senedi) delivered to the
possessor. The purpose of the concession is to put the
240. :MODERN TURKEY
land under cultivation; and an owner who leaves the land

untouched for three years, without a satisfactory reason,
may be deprived of its possession. The possessor of
miri land enjoys, under the supervision of the State, the
essential privileges of an outright owner. He may dis-
pose of the land freely or as a gift or for a. considera-
tion; but, he is subject to special formalities implying
the assent of the State (which the latter, moreover, can-
not refuse). He can transmit it to his heirs, the number
of whom is more restricted than that of persons who may
receive mulk land, but he cannot dispose of it by will.
The word "vakuf," derived from the verb "vakf,"
which designates the act by which an object is conse-
crated to a pious purpose, is applied both to the object
so consecrated and to the work which is benefited by it.
The obligation imposed on Moslems to give alms was the
origin of vakufs, which is an institution peculiar to Mos-
lem countries. The founder of the vakuf may be an
Ottoman or a foreigner, a Moslem or non-Moslem, or
may belong to a religion other than that of the person
who will be benefited by the vakuf. But from the time
of its inception the vakuf must be both definite and
everlasting.
The existence of rights belonging to third parties does
not hinder the object from bei:rig validly constituted a
vakuf; a property leased or mortgaged may be con-
stituted a vakuf, but the vakuf has no real existence
until the lease or the mortgage expires. A vakuf may
not become a mulk again unless another mulk of th~ same
value is changed to a vakuf. When the formalities
necessary for the establishment of a vakuf have been
complied with, a certificate is made out by the Moslem
religious authorities testifying to its description. This
certificate, legalized by the Fetvahan, is presented for
registration to the Cadastral Bureau, which records the
Il:ature of the vakuf on the land registers, but retains
LAND TENURE 241
the original need. The same procedure must be followed

when real property is made vakuf for the benefit of non-
Moslems. When the possession of vakuf real property
is conceded to an individual, the Cadastral Administra-
tion, after having entered in the land register the new
status of the property, delivers to the purchaser a deed
of possession. The deed is renewed at each transmis-
sion of the property by transfer or succession, on the
same conditions as those pertaining to mulk property or
miri land. •
The person instituting a vakuf must state the condi-
tions by which the consecrated property shall be admin-
istered, and also the conditions regulating the assign-
ment of revenues to the beneficiaries. The first adminis-
trator ( mutevelli) of a consecrated property is generally
named by the originator. After the death of the latter
the designation must be made by the court. The judge
chooses the new mutevelli, who must be a mature person
of sound judgment, either from the descendants of the
founder (providing the latter have retained administra-
tion of the real property) or from a list of names sub-
mitted by the late administrator. Should the founder
of the vakuf wish to name a minor, the judge must
designate a substitute to serve until the incumbent is no
longer a minor. Women are not excluded from the ad-
ministration of vakuf property.
In principle, the administrator is subject to the super-
vision of the Ministry of the '' Evkaf'' (Ministry of Re-
ligious Foundations). A great number of vakuf prop-
erties, such as the vakufs created by the Sultans or th~ir
families, are managed by the Ministry of the Evkaf.
Other exceptional vakufs (musfesna) are administered
in complete independence and without the intervention
of the Evkaf, notably those belonging to churches of non-
M:osJem religions, the administration of which is in-
trusted to the respective religious heads of thos~
242 MODERN TURKEY
churches. The vakufs put Under cultivation for re-
ligious profit are divided into rural and urban. The
rural vakufs constitute rural real property (gardens,
vineyards, etc.) which yield a revenue (musteghellat).
The urban vakufs ( moussakafat) are those on which
buildings have been erected or are to be erected.
There are three kinds of vakufs as follows:
(a) The vakuf subject only to one form of tax
(idjare-i-vahideli) rented on fixed conditions for a speci-
fied period not to exceed three years, the rent thereof to
be allotted to religious work and maintenance of the
property. This has the characteristics of a simple lease.
(b) The vakuf subject to a double tax (idjaretein)
is leased for an unlimited period, for a sum paid in cash,
equivalent to the value of the property, and a second
charge payable monthly or annually, the collection of
which is intended to prevent the occupier of the property
from laying claim to the reversion of the property after
a certain number of years' possession, by pleading the
right of prescription. The lease is granted on condition
that the buildings, trees, etc., which the tenant shall
add to the property, shall be considered as a donation
made by the tenant, and will in consequence revert to
the · vakuf. In other words, property improvements
acquire the attribute of vakuf. ·
(c) The vakuf subject to a fixed charge (moukataa)
covers a contract providing for a double charge but
allows the tenant to make improvements which become
the property of the tenant. Since ownership of improve-
ments involves also full right to the possession of the
land, land converted into moukataa cannot escheat and
revert to the foundation. That is why the fixed charge is
one per cent annually of the estimated official value.
Property uninhabited, not privately owned, or unused,
as far as can be ascertained from the best records, is
classed as waste lands ( mewat). Among such lands are
LAND TENUREl 243
mountains, barren areas, brushwood, and secti~ns where
the grass is too scanty for practical use. Waste lands
are generally situated a considerable distance away from
the nearest inhabited district.
Any person who clears mewat land, who "vivifies" it,
according to the expression of Moslem law, acquires cer-
tain rights thereby. The preliminary consent of the au-
thorities, secured without expense, is necessary for plac-
ing waste land under cultivation. The land thus cleared
assumes the status of miri land. The erection of build-
ing sites reclaimed from the sea is comparable to the
restoration of waste land, except that the act creates a
mulk proprietor. All forests ~nd salt marshes are sub-
ject to special laws. The state has the exploitation of
the salt monopoly, which it has transferred to the Dette
Publique Ottoman. A special law governs mining ex-
ploitation and development.
The ghedik is a unique Ottoman institution in the his-
tory of real property law. This term is· applied to an
industrial establishment, an "ensemble" of equipment
and tools, or fixed capital investment in a workshop
located on a specified parcel of land. The appellation
includes both this investment and also the tools neces-
sary for the carrying on of occupation and the place of
business. The ghedik is distinguished from the vakuf
in that it is not generally dedicated to religious purposes,
but profits the founder himself, his successors, or third
parties acquiring it. There have been, however, ghediks
constituted as vakufs. The foundation of new ghediks
has been prohibited since the year 1247 (1831) and the
law of February, 1328 (1913), ordered their suppression.
The ghedik has existed only at Constantinople and the
sacred cities, where it still remains in force.
Metrukated lands are those which are not and cannot
be privately owned; they remain vacant for common use.
The rights of ownership belong to the State, which may
244 MODERN TURKEY
turn it over for use to selected cooperative organizations;
The lands thus designated are forests, communal woods,
thrashing floors, or pasture lands. Of the lands left to
public authorities, there are roads, public squares, camp-
ing places, and sites for markets and fairs.
All formalities concerning the possession of real prop-
erty are handled exclusively by the Cadastral Adminis-
tration which delivers the deeds to the owners or pos-
sessors. Possession without deed is prohibited. For all
the formalities relating to vakuf property, whether or
not buildings have been erected on it, the directors,
agents, and clerks of the Cadastral Administration are
invested, in case the mutevelli (trustee or managing ad-
ministrator· of vakuf property) should not be present,
with the capacity of mandatories of the mutevelli, and
are authorized to carry out the prerequisite formalities.
Deeds to property have executory force. No deed can be
annulled, unless a court has lawfully issued a decree in-
validating its provisions. Whoever possesses, by virtue
of a deed to property, demesnal lands, or those given the
status of "mevkuf," can either alienate them, sell them
with privilege of redemption, rent them out, or mortgage
them as guaranty for a debt. He derives the benefit of
their improvements or natural products. The owner of
real property can use the land for making mortar, bricks,
or tile. For these purposes, however, he must comply
with the prescribed special regulations.
In court cases concerning reversionary interests, pos-
session and escheat, the agents of the Cadastral Adminis-
tration represent the Treasury, in the capacity of plain-
tiffs as well as defendants for a period of thirty-six
years.
Demesnal or vakuf lands as well as vakuf property,
with or without improvements, constitute security for
the owner's debts during his life as well as after his
death, irrespective whether or not these properties have
LAND TENURE 245
been escheated. However, if the debtor is a farmer, the

amount of his land which would be necessary for the
subsistence of his family cannot be sold, unless it has
been mortgaged to guarantee the said debt representing
precisely the purchase price of said land. The same is
true of dwellings necessary for the habitation of the
debtor either during his life or by his family after his
death. By. virtue of special laws, application for sale by
auction must be brought before the Cadastral Adminis-
tration before the real property can be definitely
adjudicated.
A provisional law promulgated February 18, 1913,
provided that all real property located within the terri-
tory of the Ottoman Empire shall be delimited and regis-
tered, that revenues and values shall be estimated and
determined by special commissions. It also establishes
commissions of delimitation, of registration, of esti-
mates; it determines the fees and charges for making out
deeds; it contains also penal provisions.
Persons of good charaiter have the right to own real
estate. Real property may be owned by the Government
and the municipal administration, by associations exist-
ing in conformity with the law relating thereto, and by
incorporated joint-stock companies organized for carry-
ing on commerce, industries, or construction work. Otto-
man incorporated agricultural joint-stock companies, the
shares of which are privately owned and the holders of
which are of Ottoman nationality may control real prop-
erty. In conformity with agreements,· stipulations and
regulations approved by the Government, Ottoman com-
munities and charitable establishments may own real
property only in the cities and villages, thereby deriv-
ing possible income which is subject to taxes and im-
posts. Real property owned by persons of good char-
acter is subject to an annual tax, so long as it remains in
their possession, of one tenth of one per cent if it is
246 MODERN TURKEY
classed as demesnal or "mevkuvated" land; one twen-
tieth of one per cent if it is absolute property; and a
fixed annual charge of one per cent if it is property.
Mulk and demesnal lands owned by the State are not
subject to these provisions.
A special law governs the succession of real property;
it applies only to demesnal, mevkuvated, and vakuf
land. The law divides the claimants of the inheritance
into three classes.
Claimants of the first class are the descendants in di-
rect line. A direct descendant deceased is represented
by his children or grandchildren. If one or more of the
children of the deceased die without leaving issue, the
right of inheritance belongs to the other descendants or
the heirs descending from the latter. The succession
continues indefinitely in the direct line of descent, and
the children, irrespective of sex, have equal rights. The
claimants of the second class are the father and the
mother of the deceased or their descendants. The father
and the mother inherit in equal proportion. If one of
them is deceased, his or her descendants are substituted
in the order established by the claimants of the first
class. If the deceased. parent has left no descendants,
the surviving parent then living shall be the only claim-
ant to the inheritance. If the father and the mother have
both previously died, their portions revert to their re-
spective descendants in the determined order. If one
of them has no descendants, his or her portion reverts
to the descendants of the other. The claimants of the
third class are the grandparents or their descendants.
The order of succession of the descendants of the father,
mother, and grandparents is the same as that of claim-
ants of the first class. Eac~ heir of the first, second, or
third class who shall have a right to the inheritance on
various grounds is entitled to the portions due him or her.
The claimants of an earlier class take precedence.
LAND TENURE 247
When, however, the deceased has left children or grand·
children, his or her father and mother or the one of the
two surviving inherits a sixth of the estate. If the sur-
viving husband or wife of the deceased participates in
the inheritance with the claimants of the first class, his
. or her part is one fourth. If he or she participates with
those of the second or third class, he or she has a right to
one half. If there is reason to assign a right of inher-
itance to the grandfather or grandmother along with
their descendants, the portion of the husband or wife
~urviving is equal to that coming to these descendants.
If there is no heir of the first or second class, nor any
grandparents, the husband or wife surviving the de-
ceased is the only claimant of the inheritance.
The provisions of the law apply also to vakuf prop-
erties, whether built on or not, subject either to the dou-
ble charge, the single Qharge, or a specified charge.
Absolute real property ( mulk) forms a part of the estate
of the deceased on the same grounds that chattels and the
succession thereto are vested in conformity with the re-
ligious law, of which the part pertaining to successions is
certainly the most complicated. The religious law does
not recognize th~ representation of an heir by another
party and it requires that the heir be living at the death
of the deceased. If the deceased leaves real property of
different kinds-mulk, miri, vakuf-the succession for
each class of property is governed by different legal
provisions.
The three principal classes of heirs recognized by the
religious laws are reserve heirs, or heirs with fixed por-
tions to whom a definite portion of the inheritance de-
volves; the residuary devises, who receive the remainder
, when those of the first class have inherited their share;
and the legatee. The total of the succession can be as-
sured by testament only in the absence of intestate claim-
ants to the inheritance. If there are heirs of this class,
248 MODERN TURKEY
only a third of the succession can be transmitted as a

bequest. The Treasury becomes the heir when there is
no other heir of any description.
The Moslem law of succession provides four causes for
incapacity to inherit, namely: slavery, homicide, differ-
ence of religion, and difference of nationality.
(a) To be able to inherit, one must be free. An in-
capacity applies even to the female slave who bears her.·
master a legitimate child. And yet, in the Moslem law,
the female slave who becomes mother of the offspring
of her master, is fully emancipated at the death of the
latter. She is, nevertheless, incapable of inheriting from
him. The master inherits from his slave.
(b) The person who commits the act, even if the
homicide is the result of an accident independent of his
personal wishes, is incapable of inheriting from his
victim.
(c) Difference of religion constitutes, in Moslem law,
an obstacle to the right of succession. Differences of
sect or of ritual do not constitute an obstacle· if the de-
ceased and his heirs belong in principle to the same re-
ligion. Thus, there is no difference of religion between
Moslems belonging to different sects, or between Chris-
tians, Roman Catholics, Greek Catholics, and Protes-
tants. Between Moslems and non-Moslems difference
of religion forms an absolute obstacle to the right of suc-
cession. A non-Moslem cannot inherit from a Moslem
and vice versa. With respect to difference of religion
between non-Moslems, there is no uniform opinion among
the lawyers, although the majority maintain that an
Israelite may· inherit from a Christian and vice versa.
(d) In Moslem law, a difference of nationality be-
tween the deceased and his heir or heirs constitutes an
incapacity with respect to succession. No foreigner can
inherit from an Ottoman. This general principle applies
to mulk real property as well as to vakuf property and
LAND TENURE 249
demesnal lands. According to the most authoritative
opinions, there is no incapacity on the part of Moslems
to inherit on account of difference of nationality.
Does the difference of nationality which makes a for-
eigner incapable of inheriting from an Ottoman recip-
rocally prevent the latter from inheriting· from a for-
eigner7 The question is a disputed one, but it generally
is decided in the negative; that is, the rule in question
does not apply to Ottomans and the latter may, with
entire legality, inherit from foreigners. Is difference
of nationality between foreigners an obstacle to inher-
itance 7 May a Frenchman inherit from an Englishman 7
This question is also a disputed one, but it is generally
decided in the affirmative, unless the foreign heir belongs
to a power which has not adhered to the law permitting
foreigners to acquire real property in the Ottoman Em-
pire, a law which will be discussed later.
A woman of Ottoman nationality who has married a
foreigner loses her Ottoman nationality. She, as a for-
eigner, loses all right to inherit from her Ottoman rela-
tives. If she becomes a widow, she can reclaim within
three years her Ottoman nationality. The foreign
woman who marries an Ottoman becomes Ottoman. This
legal situation has, moreover, been contested by certain
foreign powers.
An Ottoman subject who has acquired a foreign nation-
ality with the authorization of the Turkish Government
is considered and treated as a foreign subject; but if he
has been naturalized without the previous authorization
of the Turkish Government, his naturalization is con-
sidered void, and he continues to be treated in every re-
spect as an Ottoman subject. Children born of an Otto-
man subject before the change of nationality authorized
by the Government, remain Ottoman. Children of a for-
eigner, born before the acquisition of Ottoman national-
ity by the latter, retain the foreign nationality.
250 MODERN TURKEY
Prior to the promulgation of the law of 7 Sefer, 1284
(June 16, 1867), foreigners were not allowed real prop~
erty rights in Turkey. Yet, even at the time when they
were legally prevented from owning real property, they
had recourse to several means by which they succeeded
in eluding this prohibition. Thus, a foreigner who
bought a piece of real property had it recorded in the
name of a third person of Ottoman nationality; or else
he had the property recorded in his own name, by hav-
ing himself referred to as Ottoman, which did not, how-
ever, deprive him of his foreign nationality. Lastly, cer-
tain foreigners, married to women of Ottoman origin,
had their property recorded in the name of the latter,
who were referred to as Ottoman subjects. This state
of things was the source of a great many difficulties.
Negotiations were opened between the law of Sefer, of
which Article 1 says: "Foreigners are admitted on the
same footing as Ottoman subjects, and without other
stipulation, to enjoy the right of ownership of urban or
rural real property throughout the whole Empire, with
the exception of the province of Hejaz, on submitting
to the laws and regulations which govern Ottoman sub-
jects." There is a modification to Article 1 with regard
to properties situated in the nei.J?l'... '>rhood of mosques
and Moslem cemeteries, but Y -~f applied. There
are also restrictions for rea.t/p:foperty situated on the
frontiers of the Empire. The provisions of Article 1 do
not apply to subjects, Ottoman by birth, who have
changed their nationality. They are provided for by a
special law.
According to Article 2 of the law, "Foreigners owning
urban or rural real property are in consequence placed
on an equality with Ottoman subjects in everything relat-
ing to their real property.'' This equality means three
things: firstly, that foreigners are obliged to conform to
all the laws and all police or municipal regulations which
LAND TENURE 251
govern in the present or may govern in the future the
enjoyment, transmission, alienation and hypothecation
of landed property; secondly, to clear off all charges and
taxes in whatever form or under whatever name they
may be, w~ch are or may be in the future levied on urban
or rutal real property; and thirdly, to make foreigners
directly amenable to the Ottoman courts with respect to
all questions relating to landed property and for all real
actions, whether as plaintiffs or defendants, even when
both parties are foreign subjects.
Although a foreigner is on an equality with an Otto-
man in the matter of landed property, the dwelling house
of this foreigner and its outlying buildings are inviolable
by virtue of the treaties; and police agents cannot enter
there without the presence of the consul, or the delegate
of the consul, of the foreigner's country. Special pro-
visions apply to dwellings remote from the consular
residence.
According to Article 3, in the case of bankruptcy of
a foreigner who is owner of real property, the assignees
in bankruptcy must enter an appeal with the Ottoman
authorities and civil officers to demand the sale of the
real property owned by the bankrupt, which can be held
for the debts of the owner. In the same way, in foreign
courts, when a foreigner shall have obtained a judgment
against another foreigner, who is owner of real prop-
erty, he must apply to the competent Ottoman authority
for the execution of this judgment on the real property
of his debtor, in order to secure the sale of that part
of the property which can be held for the debts of the
owner.
Article 4 relates to the ability of disposing, either by
donation or testament, of that part of the real property
which is permitted by law. As to the real property of
which he may not have disposed or of which the law does
not permit him to dispose either by donation or testa-
252 MODERN TURKEY
ment, its succession is regulated according to the Otto-
man law.
Article 5 states that every foreigner will enjoy the
benefit of this law as soon as the Power of which he is a
subject shall have agreed to the arrangements proposed
by the Sublime Porte for the exercise of the right of own-
ership. The Powers which have adhered to this law are
hereby given according to the date of acquiescence:
France, Sweden, Norway, Belgium, Great Britain, Aus-
tria-Hungary, Denmark, Prussia and the North-German
Confederation, Spain, Greece, Russia, Italy, the Nether-
lands, the United States, Portugal, Persia, Serbia. The
Romanians and the Montenegrins are excluded from
the right of ownership of real property. It appears that
the Swiss, who have no representation of their own in
Turkey, must present themselves as French or German
proteges.
The law of Sefer has given rise to numerous conflicts
of jurisdiction between the Ottoman courts and .the con-
sular courts, since the latter say they are competent in
numerous questions of real property, especially when
they are of a personal character, involving, for example,
disputes about renting and promises of sale.
Mulk land is the only property owned outright and is,
therefore, the only kind which can, strictly speaking, be
the subject of a sale. The sale of mulk lands is subject
to general rules applicable to the sale of t ~'perty of all
kinds. The legal conveyance of these land "thout con-
sideration is subject to the rules applyin{ donation.
Miri land may also be transferred, eithe~ ~ atuitously
or for a consideration, by means of a '' firagh.'' ·whether
the transfer involves absolute ownership or simple pos-
session the act of sale or transfer includes the same
essential elements: agreement of the parties, specifica-
tion of the thing transferred, and the price. The sale,
the transfer and the donation are based on contracts
LAND TENURE 253
which arise from the mere agreement of the parties.

The free will of the parties is the first condition of every
contract. A contract, imposed by violence, lacks an
essential element. The transfer of title of lands belong-
ing to incompetent parties or minors is subject to special
legal provisions.
The law authorizes every competent person to make
full agency arrangements. The sale of mulk lands and
the transfer of miri lands may, therefore, be effected by
attorneys or both parties. As soon as the deal has been
closed by the contracting parties (providing, naturally,
they are possessed of the necessary capacity and when
a mutual agreement has been reached) the sale is defi-
nitely concluded without further formalities or the need
of making actual delivery. After the contract is con-
cluded, the buyer of real property may resell without
awaiting delivery, although the law expressly forbids
"- ~lling a real chattel before it is delivered. As distin-
guished from the procedure in case of sale, delivery is
an essential condition of the contract of donation.
Although the sale of mulk real property is validly
effected by mere contract, deeds are obligatory. The
delivery of these deeds requires certain formalities for
mulk lands as well as for the transfer of miri lands. A
person who wishes to sell mulk land, or the owner of miri
land, must provide himself with a certificate (llmou-
haber) signed by the. "Mukhtar" and the "Imam" of
his district, and then appear with the purchaser before
the official of the Cadastre in whose presence the act of
registration will be performed. With a view to accom-
plishing these formalities the Mukhtars and the Imams
are obliged to notify the agents of the Cadastre of all
sales of real property which come to their knowledge.
For the same reason, notaries are forbidden to legalize
contracts relative to sales of real property.
The contract to transfer miri lands can be put into
254 MODERN TURKEY
effect only after obtaining the consent of the State, which
retains eminent domain of landed property. For for-
eigners, the certification is delivered by the consuls of
their respective countries. The act by which the grantor
declares that he has transferred the property to the
grantee who, after the latter makes due acknowledgment,
having purchased it, is called '' takrir. '' After its accom-
plishment, a notation is entered in the land records, and
the purchaser receives a provisional deed (mouvakkat
senedi) delivered by the local Bureau of the Cadastre.
It is later replaced with a specific deed. The provisional
deeds have the same juridical value as the specific deeds.
For mulk real property, however, the transfer is con-
sidered as completed and the property as transferred by
the accomplishment of the takrir in presence of the au-
thorities, without noting whether the deed has been deliv-
ered to the purchaser. But with respect to miri lands,
the contract becomes irevocable only when the State has
given its assent. So long as this assent has not been
granted the contract can be annulled by either party.
The selling price must be specified at the time the con-
tract is closed, failing which, the sale may be annulled
at the instance of either party. In case of sale for cash,.
the vendor retains possession until the purchaser has
paid the price in full. The right of retention is not lost
even when the purchaser gives a pledge or furnishes
security; but the vendor who makes delivery before re-
ceiving the full price forfeits his right of retention. In
case of sale on credit, the vendor does not have the right
to retain the thing sold; he must deliver it immediately
to the purchaser and await the date of expiration to col-
lect payment. The vendor, who, after having stipulated
a cash sale, has granted a delay to the purchaser, for-
feits his right of retention, and is obliged to deliver im-
mediately though he will receive the price· only at the
end of the period agreed upon.
. A Shl'pherd of Asia Minor Tending the Famous Angora Flocks.
LAND TENURE 255
The contracting parties may validly agree on the time
for payment with the proviso that, failing payment at
the time agreed on, the sale will be voided. In a sale of
this kind, the contract becomes void, if the purchaser
should die before payment. Failure to mention the price
does not annul the contract, but the transfer is then con-
sidered as gratuitous. When an act of transfer shall
have been effected as gratuitous or without specification
of price, neither the grantor nor his heirs can claim sub-
sequently any sum whatever. The sale is voidable when,
as a result of fraud, a price has been paid which differs
to a considerable extent from the real value of the thing
bought, to the considerable disadvantage of either party.
Every portion of a thing sold which cannot be separated
from it must be considered as sold at the same time, even
if it is not mentioned in the act of sale. Crops in the
ground and fruits of trees are not appurtenances of the
soil. The mulk structures or appurtenances of miri land
can be acquired only by including them specifically in the
act of purchase.
Sale or transfer effected by the grantor on condition
that he shall be supported up to the time of his death by
the grantee is valid. The grantor cannot later secure the
return of the real property, unless it is decided that the
terms are not being lived up to. If the grantee dies be-
fore the grantor, the heirs of the former are obliged to
furnish subsistence: in case they do not comply, they
are obliged to return the property. If there are no heirs,
the property is restored to the grantor. So long as the
grantor is living, neither the grantee nor his heirs can
dispose of the property. The necessity for furnishing
subsistence must be mentioned in the deed; otherwise,
the grantor cannot take advantage of it to claim the
restitution of the property.
The transfer of mulk, miri, or vakuf property be-
tween non-Moslem Ottoman subjects is allowed on con-
256 MODERN TURKEY
dition that in case of dissolution of the marriage, on ac-
count of death or divorce, the property will be returned
to the former owner or possessor. Its grant as a dowry
must be mentioned in the deed; in the absence of such
reference, the property cannot be claimed by the grantor.
One who wishes to make such a dowry must present to
the Cadastre (a) a certificate drawn up by his religious
head, and (b) a certification in Turkish, certified by this
authority, of the marriage.
There is no doubt but that foreigners may make use
of the same privilege of conditional grant, since they
enjoy the same rights as Ottomans respecting real
property.
By exercising the right of preemption (choufa) or of
preference (rudjhan.) the law confers on third parties
the right to annul a sale or a transfer validly concluded.
The causes which justify this right are:
(a) Joint possession of the thing sold. The joint
owner of an undivided property may exercise his right
or preemption in case of sale by the other joint owner of
his undivided portion.
(b) The state of joint possession of a real right by
reason of an improvement of the thing sold, such as the
joint ownership of thoroughfare, the privileges of draw-
ing water, or the possession of a blind alley.
(c) Contiguity to the thing sold.
Preemption is exercised in the order indicated. Any-
one wishing to exercise his right of preemption must do
it fully, since this right is not divisible. Several persons,
having the right of preemption based on the same
grounds, can exercise their right jointly. In order that
this privilege may be exercised, it is necessary that there
shall have been an effective sale or transfer; that is, the
vendor no longer shall have any right to the property
sold. There is no ground for preemption in case of gra-
tuitous acquisition, of legacy of succession, or of dona-
LAND TENURE 257
tion, unless an equivalent consideration is involved. The
power of preemption is lost when approval to the act of
sale is given openly or tacitly. It cannot be exercised on
real property of a different class. A mulk owner cannot
exercise this right on miri or vakuf land, and vice versa.
The right of preemption applicable to mulk property is
not applicable to miri or vakuf lands. Neither is it
applicable to mulk buildings on lands of other classes.
There is, however, with respect to miri lands an analo-
gous right called right of preference, which may be exer-
cised by the owner or owners of the property. This right
is also granted. to the owner of mulk trees, shrubs, plants,
etc., and to buildings on miri lands. If the possessor of
the right of preference has given his assent to the trans-
fer, or if offers for the property have been made to him
and he has refused them, he cannot later make any effec-
tive claim respecting the land. The right of claiming the
alienated portion belongs, during the period of five years,
to the heirs of the person who could make this claim effec-
tive; it can be exercised against both the grantee and his
heirs. The right of preference respecting miri land may
even be exercised in case of a gratuitous grant. But the
possessor of miri land cannot grant it gratuitously or for
payment to another person, if the owner of the mulk
trees, shrubs, plants, etc., or buildings on it made the
grantee a cash offer. If the transfer has been effected,
the owner of these improvements, by payment of its real
value when making the claim, retains for ten years the
right to claim the land.
·The law promulgated in February, 1913, very compli-
cated before that time, has simplified the form of mort-
gages.
:Mulk real property, demesnal and mevkuvated lands
and vakuf properties with or without buildings, pos-
sessed as a whole or jointly, may be mortgaged as col-
lateral. Real property may be mortgaged to the Banque
258 MODERN TURKEY
Agricole, to the vakuf administrations as a guaranty of
sums lent on lands belonging to these vakufs, and to
Ottoman companies or banks authorized by the govern-
ment to issue loans and advances on property built on,
and on lands. But these companies and banks cannot
own the said real property unconditionally. When the
property mortgaged is a productive property, there
must be presented a report certified by. the municipality
stating whether the property is rented or not, and for
how long. If this period is longer than that of the loan,
the tenant is required to state that he is willing to abide
by the operation of the law on expiration of the loan. If
he refuses, the creditor signs a statement whereby he
pledges himself not to carry out the formalities of execu-
. tion before the expiration of the lease. The papers, in
connection with the loan attesting to the mortgage, are
made out in duplicate by the administration of the
Cadastre, and signed by the two contracting parties.
After having filled out before the witnesses the binding
takrir, these papers are certified to and a copy thereof
is delivered to each of the two parties. These papers
are admitted as binding evidence.
The revenue accruing to mortgaged properties belong
to the debtors. Losses and damages which occur on
these properties are charged to the debtors. The cred-
itor may, by the intervention of the Cadastre and with
the consent of the debtor, transfer his claim to a third
party offering as security the mortgaged property. If
the instrument or loan is made out "to order," he can
transfer it just the same, the consent of the debtor being
necessary. The debtor can also, with the consent of the
creditor, definitely transfer his debt to a third party who
accepts this transfer, the property mortgaged remaining
subject to the mortgage itself. The debtor has the privi-
lege of clearing off the mortgage before the date of pay-
ment becomes due. The amounts of the debt and fees
LAND TENURE 259
are then paid into some financial institution recognized
by the State, to the credit of the creditor and in the name
of the Cadastre. The latter gives notice thereof to the
creditor and proceeds to cancel the mortgage. The law
prescribes the procedure to follow in case the debt should
not be paid at the stipulated time. If the proceeds of the
sale are not sufficient, the creditor may claim from the
debtor the balance of the amount due him.
Miri lands and vakufs subject to double charge may
be seized and placed on sale on the same conditions as
mulk property in order to satisfy debts fixed by judicial
decisions. The sale is not lawful if the debtor proves
that he has turned over the revenues to his creditors,
and that the net revenue of the property is sufficient to
pay within three years the amount of the debt together
with legal interest and court charges. The person to
whom a claim has been ceded may carry out the sale of
the property on the same conditions as the creditor him-
self. If a portion of the real property of the debtor is
sufficient to guarantee payment, the debtor may specify
the property which is to be sold by auction. In the case
of miri or vakuf lands subject to double charges, the
crops are not seized, but remain under the care of the
debtor until the harvest is completed. The seizure of real
property does not deprive the owner of his property.
He retains possession of it until the accomplishment of
the sale and even afterward when the crops on it are not
yet ripe for the harvest. In case of a forced sale of real
property belonging to foreigners, the only way to e:x:e.-
cute judgments rendered by their consular authorities is
to apply for their execution to the Ottoman judicial
authorities.
Expropriation must be justified by reasons of public
interest, such as widening of streets, establishment of
public markets or gardens, or construction of railroads
or highways. The law defines it as the act of "taking
260 MODERN TURKEY
possession by the State of lands (built on or otherwise)

in consideration of payment corresponding to their
value." The law specifies the procedure to follow in
case of expropriation. Where real property has in-
creased in value, as the result of widening the streets, the
proprietors thereof are subject to the '' cherifie,'' or tax,
equivalent to the surplus value acquired. This tax is
collectable in four annual payments.
According to Ottoman law, the right to exploit the
mines is not collateral with ownership of the soil. The
proprietor of the land has no more right to exploitation
of the mines than any other individual, except in the
matter of obtaining a permit to carry on investiga-
tions.
The regulations governing the exploitations of min-
erals are of three categories; namely, those applying to
ores located under ground, those applying to ores scat-
tered on the soil surface, and quarries. Mineral waters
are governed by the same laws as mines, and for exploita-
tion the owner must obtain special concessions.
The owner does not have the right to dig for minerals
on his own land until he obtains a permit from the gov-
ernor of the province or independent sanjak. In the
case of Constantinople, an Imperial decree is necessary.
While the permit may be granted by other than the
owner or possessor without the latter's approval, never-
theless, without his permission, borings cannot be made,
wells opened, nor warehouses constructed. This permit,
which is delivered for a moderate, but variable, fee is not
. valid for more than a year from date of issuance, but·
may be extended. If the person who has obtained the
research permit does not request the definite concession
for exploitation within the extension of time allowed him,
the permit may be withdrawn and granted to another.
The right of exploitation turned over on certain condi-
tions and in consideration of a transfer fee to a third
LAND TENURE 261
party, cannot be granted to more than one person fo~:
working the same locality during the. specified time.
Ownership of mines and placers is conferred by decree
of the Sultan. The concession is generally granted for
ninety-nine years. It may be granted for a shorter
period, but never for less than forty years. The conces-
sion may be granted either to Ottomans or to foreigners
belonging to one of the nationalities which have adhered
to the law of Sefer. Certain formalities and qualifica-
tions are necessary in order to obtain a concession. The
concessionaire receives a real right transferable by sale
or inheritance, distinct from the ownership of the soil.
This consists in the privilege of exploiting the minerals
during the period of the concession. Subsequent trans-
fers of this right follow, in general, the regulations for a
succession of real property.
The concessionaire must pay these charges and fees:-
the charges for the :firman of concession; a fixed duty
which goes to the owner of the soil, or to the Evkaf or
the Treasury, and a proportional duty, varying with the
revenues of the mine and generally calculated on the
average selling price of the ore. This duty is divided,
according to the nature of the property (vakuf, mulk,
miri), between the owner of the soil, the Evkaf, the
Treasury and the administration of mines.
Whatever may be the category to which the land be-
longs, the right of opening and exploiting the quarries
which are found there belong in principle to the owner
or possessor of the land; but this right must be exercised
in conformity with the special provisions of the regula-
tions. The owner of the land may take from it stones or
materials necessary for his personal usage without being
held therefor to the observance of any formality or the
payment of any fee or charge whatever. But if he de-
sires to exploit the quarry, he must then request the
authorization of the Imperial Government, through the
262 'MODERN TURKEY
Ministry of Mines. To obtain permission to exploit a
quarry, the consent of the owner is necessary. If the
land is included in the category of demesnal lands not
granted to individuals, the consent of the state as owner
is necessary. As to communal lands, the quarries found
on them cannot be placed under exploitation, until it is
shown that this exploitation is not of a nature to cause
any damage to the beneficiaries dwelling there. In gen-
eral, a quarry can only be placed under exploitation by
virtue of a special permit. If the concession is given
for a period of less than twenty-five years, the permit is
secured from the Ministry of Mines ; · if the period is
twenty-five years or more, the concession can be granted
only by virtue of an imperial decree issued on the pro-
posal of the Council of State and based on specifications
enumerated in the permit.
Ownership of the following antiques mentioned in the
law is vested in the State: gold, silver, ancient coins of
all kinds, historical inscriptions, tablets, paintings, and
pieces of sculpture, objects of stone or terra cotta, vases,
arms, instruments, rings, temples, castles, amphithea-
ters, fortifications, bridges, aqueducts, and monuments.
No one, not even the owner of the soil, has the right to
make excavations for antiques without the authorization
of the government. The exportation· of antiques is abso-
lutely prohibited. They belong to the Imperial Museum
of Constantinople. Their discoverers have no right to
them other than to take copies or prints of them. An-
tiques found by accident in digging foundations or in a
similar manner, however, give half ownership to the
owner of the land; the State, by paying half of their
value, can preserve them for the Museum.
When the possessor of miri land dies without leaving
an heir capable of succession, the land does not revert
purely and simply to the Treasury as free property des-
tined to be the subject of a new concession; on, the othet
LAND TENURE 263
hand, a certain number of persons have the right to
claim-it after making due payment. The property, there.
fore, does not simply become "mahloul," or vacant land,
destined to be put up at" auction; it remains subject to
the right of "tapou," which is the right indicated above.
The claimants of tapou are the individuals who would
have inherited in equal proportions mulk trees or build-
ings found on the land; the associates or partners of
the deceased; and those inhabitants of the locality to
whom it may be seen necessary. Their right of revendi-
cation extends for ten years, :five years, or one year. The
right to tapou is not transmissible by inheritance. When
the possessor of miri land dies without leaving heirs or
claimants of tapou, or when the grantees refuse to exer-
cise their rights, the land becomes absolutely vacant
"sirf majloul." It is put up at auction and turned over
to the highest bidder. With respect to vakuf, the va-
cancy cannot be complete and absolute; relative vacancy
and the right of tapou apply exclusively to miri lands.
When a vakuf becomes vacant, it reverts immediately
to the pious foundation to which it is consecrated. It
may ther~upon be put at auction to be granted to a new
purchaser; the adjudication represents the rent paid in
advance. However, when an undivided part in a piece
of vakuf real property becomes vacant, the law grants
to the possessors certain rights, the exercise of which is
subject to conditions which vary according to each indi-
vidual case.
Ottoman recognizes only three methods of acquiring
property; (a) sale or donation, (b) succession, and (c)
acquiring monbah or mountain lands.
As a general rule the period of the limitation is :fifteen
years, which applies to cases concerning the ownership
of mulk property and the possession of vakuf property
with :fixed charge and double charge. However, different
periods have been established for various special actions.
264 MODERN TURKEY
The reversionary interest (rakkaba) is limited to thirty-
six years. The State's right of reversion on miri·lands
is also prescribed at thirty-six years. Thus, if anyone
has possessed a piece of real estate as mulk property for
more than thirty-six years, neither the vakuf adminis-
tration nor the Cadastre can claim it any longer as
vakuf property or miri land. Actions relative to the
right of possession of miri lands are prescribed at ten
years. Those relating to thoroughfare and water supply
are limited to fifteen years, when the former serves mulk
lands. The vakuf actions can be applied for a period of
thirty-six years. Those which are attached to miri lands
are prescribed for ten years. Prescription does not
affect actions relative to '' metruke'' lands, which can-
not form the basis for individual rights; it is continued
by intervening persons, purchaser or heir.
Limiting the right of possessing miri lands is exer-
cised against the State as well as. against individuals.
When the legitimate owner has died without leaving an
heir; the later occupation of the land by the State for a
term of ten years carried with it all the rights of posses-
sion, but it is necessary that the soil be cultivated regu-
larly. This procedure does not apply in the case of
private persons. Limitation does not apply to (a) those
persons who have valid excuses for not bringing suits;
(b) minors and insane persons who cannot be held re-
sponsible for the negligence of guardians; (c) persons
absent for good reasons. An action at law is necessary
to suspend the statute of limitations.
CHAPTER XI
IRRIGATION
By SULEIMAN SIRRI BEY'
Have ye considered if your waters on the morrow should have sunk,
who is to bring you flowing waterY
-THE KoRAN.
Introduction
The water supply through prewar Turkey is imper-
fectly utilized. The statements of Sir William Willcocks
about its utilization in Iraq are extremely sanguine. The
remainder of Turkey, while lacking any water supply in
any way comparable to the Tigris and Euphrates, does
present possibilities for development: the German works
at Konia are symbolical of the potentialities in other fer-
tile plains. The arid lands present conditions which are
not dissimilar to those found in our western states.
Their drainage presents no difficult physical problems.
As an illustration of the terribly extravagant irrigation
• Born in Salonika. Completed elementary and secondary studies in
Salonika and then entered the Engineers' School in Constantinople, securing
diploma in 1897. Road Engineer, Syria, 1898-1901. Also acted as member
of the Committee which surveyed the prevention of the destruction caused
by the river Barada. Superint~nd~d construction of government building
of Kastamuni and was chief engineer of roads in Yannina and Erzerum.
During two years attached to the survey of the Hindiya barrage and the
construction of the Huv~yyeh barrage. Chief engineer of Jerusalem trans-
ferr~d to Brusa, where he stayed two years and secured the water distribu-
tion of the town. In 1910 was appointed Assistant Director of Roads and
in 1912 Turkish Director-General of Public Works. Has superintended
construction of many roads and bridg~s. Lecturer on water works and
Improvement of rivers. The following are his published works: Practical
Algebra (Turkish), Water Constructions (Turkish), Draining and Irriga-
tion (Turkish), Huveyyeh Barrage (German) and at pr~sent is writing a
book on the Improvement of Rivers and Inland Navigation.
Translated from Turkish by a Cypriote Moham!nedan.
265
266 MODER~ TURKEY
methods used by the Iraqis, results show that the Shami-
yeh sheikhs use about twenty cusecs (cubic feet per sec-
ond) of water per acre for rice cultivation compared with
less than one-tenth this amount by the cultivators of
southern India. A late British official report states that
the Shamiyeh area is being worked with excellent results
for the cultivation of dates: a region, however, which
does not compare in productivity with the date -gardens
about Basra. Such possibilities of new cultivation are
proving attractive to the roving tribes which formerly
eked out their existence by the well-known practice of
robbery. It is impossible to venture the wildest guess
relative to the quantity and value of the possible output
from these drought areas.
Internal disturbances are partially responsible for the
tardiness in the initiation of irrigation projects. The
greatest obstacle to early development along these lines,"
however, is due to the small population. Under these
circumstances, capital is not easily obtainable.
Only those persons who have lived in arid or semi-
arid countries can appreciate the tremendous value of
water. The decay of Babylon and other famous Oriental
cities has been attributed largely to a widespread diminu-
tion in the supply of ground water-the result of the
physical changes ·of the centuries.
Irrigation
Any consideration of irrigation projects must be based
upon the physical features of rivers and lakes in local
areas. Prewar Turkey may be divided into Turkey-in-
Europe, Anatolia, Syria and Palestine, Mesopotamia,
and Arabia.
Turkey-in-Europe has no important water basin on
account of its low level. For instance, Lake Derkos on
the Black Sea littoral is only 0.08 meters above sealevel,
ffiRIGATION 267
while the lands in the Marmara littoral, which are high
enough near the sea, soon drop off, making a bed for the
River Erghene, a branch of the M:aritza. Kiaghad Khane
River, European Turkey, can supply only part of the
water required for Constantinople. Therefore, this basin
is not worth consideration for irrigation, navigation, or
even electric power.
The Anatolian Peninsula includes also the basin of the
Persian Gulf, as the Tigris and the Euphrates spring
within its boundaries. This district, however, will be
considered under Mesopotamia, with which the Persian
Gulf basin is more closely connected.
With one or two exceptions, a study of the Anatolian
river basins indicates that high lands border the sea. A
plateau covers most of the peninsula, but the basins are
separated from each other by mountain ranges and lofty
hills. This type of formation is unfavorable for rail-
ways; while navigation becomes limited. It is impos-
sible, moreover, to construct networks of canals because
the rivers cannot be· joined to each other. The plateau
cannot produce crops in abundance without irrigation.
The mountains, however, stop the north wind and make
the lands favorable for the cultivation of crops such as
rice, cotton, figs, grapes, lemons, oranges, mandarins, and
even sugar cane, which grows only in Adana. Extensive
.basins such as the Su Sighirli in the Marmara littoral,
Kediz, Menderez, and Adana and small basins such as
Edremid, Bakir Chai, Kutchuk Menderez, and Antalia
are all sheltered to the north by high mountains. The
irrigation possibilities of these areas are great. In ex-
tensive basins such as those at Adana, Kediz, Menderez
and Su Sighirli, cotton cultivation should prove more
profitable than the lands of Egypt, which suffer from
the north wind. ·
The water basins of Anatolia are of three classes:
large rivers, small rivers and lakes. The larger basins
268 MODERN TURKEY
are those of Kizil Irmak, Y eshil Irmak and Sakkaria in
the Black Sea littoral, Su Sighirli in the Marmara lit-
toral, Kediz and Menderez in the Archipelago littoral and
Sihun and Jihun in the Mediterranean littoral. The
more utilizable small basins are those of Philios in the
Black Sea littoral, Kionan, Bigha and Kuchuk Menderez
in the Marmara littoral, Bakir Chai, and Kuchuk Men-
derez in the Archipelago littoral, Dalman, Akchai, Du-
den Chai, Ak Su near Antalia, Kiopru Su near old Anta-
lia and Sukat Chai and especially Berdan in the Adana
plain.
Because of their potential use as reservoirs at a small
initial outlay, a few Anatolian lakes are of .considerable
importance. The rivers are torrentlike, capable of fur-
nishing a valuable water supply if harnessed. It is true
that owing to their topographical situation, some of
these lakes cannot be utilized as reservoirs. Many of
them are large enough to be utilized for reservoirs as
well as for navigation purposes. For instance, Lakes
Karaviram and Beyshehr, in addition to draining the
Konia plain, can also be utilized for navigation purposes.
Sailing vessels already in use in. Beyshehr could be re-
placed by steamships. Among other lakes suitable for
both purposes are Lakes Manios, Simav, Marmarajik,
Egerdir, Van, Tuz; Apollon and Amik provide an ~xample
of the smaller basins. Unfortunately, electric power can
be obtained only from Lakes Iznik and Sapanja.
In Syria there is a narrow strip of hinterland, running
north and south, divided by the rivers Sheria and Ayas;
the former an interior basin; the latter forming a basin
by turning westward after approaching the sea littoral.
In spite of the fact that these rivers are small, they
are of real utility because favored by the climate there
can be produced yearly valuable crops, such as oranges,
mandarins, and !~mons. The Elujeh is important
because it might be used to irrigate the Jaffa plain. The
.IRRIGATION 269
Sheria plain is absolutely unique, since it is in a position
to supply Egypt and J a:ffa with early-producing crops,
which are certain to be very profitable.
While the rivers of Syria are not suitable for naviga-
tion, the De'ad Sea can be utilized for this purpose,
affording transportation with regard to the crops of
Kerek and of Jerusalem and Jaffa.
Mesopotamia is a world by itself. Here scientific irri-
gation was first practiced. It is an historical fact, that
at a time when the lands in Egypt were irrigated by
means of inundations, this country was employing far
advanced methods. Ors-the old Turkish word for
·dikes-were constructed during the reign of Orkhan and
Samirkhan who ruled there before the Babylonians and
the Assyrians.
Although the principal basins are those of the Tigris
and the Euphrates, the Diala, a branch of the Tigris,
should not be overlooked because it supplies forty-two
cubic meters at low water, which is entirely utilized. In
Mesopotamia there is almost no rainfall except in cer-
tain easterly places. Nothing grows in this country with-
out irrigation, but ana~yses show that when irrigated it
becomes as fertile as Egypt. Fertilizers are unnecessary
for many years, as the lands have not been cultivated for
centuries. There grow the famous rice (amberbu),
cotton, and dates.
Navigation is good as far as Baghdad; it can be con:
tinned to Samarra and Tikrit at little expense. The
Euphrates can be adapted for steamer navigation. Com-
munications would be further developed if a large inte-
rior harbor were established at Korna, where the rivers
join; in fact, this matter was considered when the con-
struction of the existing irrigation works and also proj-
ects for future constructions were prepared. Iu the
Hejaz there is no water even for drinking purposes. As
for the Yemen, remains of old dikes show that reservoirs
270 MODERN TURKEY
were built there for irrigation purposes during the flour-
ishing period of the pre-Islamic Arab culture. Unfor-
tunately, the Yemen is an unknown country at present
as no survey was ever made relative to the extent of the
irrigable area and of the possible crops obtainable.
By referring to Table I it becomes evident that there
is less water available during the irrigation season than
during the flood season.
The Euphrates is so wide and deep that its waters can-
not be properly used without the Habbaniya reservoir.
The water, brought down during the floods, should be
accumulated in the Habbaniya lowland and returned to
the Euphrates during the irrigation season, at the rate·
of 50 cubic meters per second. The same application is
possible for the Marmara basin, due to the many swamps
and two large lakes produced by floods. In reality, at
the present time, the waters of the rivers Nilofe1·, Ker-
masti, Kara Dere, Manias, and Su Sighirli are not suffi-
cient for irrigation purposes, and the lake Manias has to
be used as a reservoir. There are no lakes in the Men-
derez plain, so dikes need to be constructed to accumu-
late water for irrigation purposes. The lake Marmaris,
however, can be utilized for the Kediz basin. Irrigation
in the upper parts of the Kizil Irmak requires large
dikes. The only rivers which have plenty of water are
the Berdan, Sihun, and Jihun which are ample for the
irrigation of the Adana plain. Syria is in the same con-
dition as Anatolia. As for Mesopotamia, there is no
suitable place for the construction of a reservoir for the
Tigris, although a large reservoir can be constructed on
the Hamrin hills for the river Diala.
Considerable expense would be saved by the utilization
of lakes. Reservoirs accumulating 30,000,000 to 50,000,-
000 cubic meters of water cost at the rate of 0.20 franc
( 4 cents) per cubic meter, while those of 200,000,000
cubic meters cost at the rate of ·0.10 franc (2 cents) per
ffiRIGATION 271
TABLE I
-----------,,---------.-------.-----r----·
N~ of the river
Maritza • • • .. • • • • • • 25,458 800-1000 80 10-15

Su Sighirli .. .. • .. .. 23,730 650 7.5 86.6
N ilofer ....... .' .... (included in Su
Sighirli basin) 500 0.60 833
Kermasti •••••••••• (included in Su
Sighirli basin) 1000 15 66.6
Manias ............ (included in Su
Sighirli basin) 280 uilknown
Kara Dere ••••••••. (included in Su
Sighirli basin) 350 uilknown
Muruvvetler •••••••• (included in Su
Sighirli basin) 90 unknown
Sakkaria .......... . 50,860 1100 4 ~75
Philios •••••••••••• 14,260
Kizil Irmak 68,100 unknown 30.88 uilknown
Y esbil Irmak •.••••• 39,260
Kionan •••••••••••• 2,440
Bigha •••••.••••••• 2,260
Menderez (Chanaq) . 8,120
Bakir Chai ....... .. 3,200
Kediz ........... .. 17,860 1000 10·15 66.100
Kuchuk Menderez •• 4,460
(Aidin)
Boyuk Menderez •••• 23,840 870 10 12.40
(Aidin)
Dalsman Chai ••.••• 6,020
Ak Chai ••••••••.•• 3,520
Kiopru Su ........ . 4,400
Kiok Su •••••••••.. 8,020 450 15 30
Sihun •••.••••••••• 21,080 2500 50 50
Jihun ........... .. 21,480 1800 30 51
Sheri& ........... .. 12,760 15
Euphrates ••••••••• 118,640 3200.4000 270.320 10-15
Tigris ...•..••••••• 5500-6500 220.250 22.30
Dial& ••••••••••••• 30,100 45
cubic meter. The Habbaniya reservoir on the Euphra-

tes cost 0.011 piasters ( 4.84 cents) per cubic meter
against 0.035 piasters (15.4 cents) spent on the dikes of
the Assuan in Egypt. If one takes into consideration the
fact that the dikes stopped the destruction which used
to be caused by the floods, it will be concluded that the
TABLE II
Extent of the Extent of the Estimated costs Average profit Profit per an·
Name of operations lands to be fno. lands to be Kind of crop (in Turkish per annum num afte.r 85
rigated (in drained (in pounds) (in Turkish years (in Tur-
dunams) dunams) pounds) kish pounds)
Maritza valley .•.. 1,100,000 250,000 Wheat, Maize, Rice 1,600,000 320,000 522,000
Su Sighirli ••.••.. 300,000 300,000 Wheat, Maize,. Clover 1,100,000 204,100 321,500 .
Menderez plain ... 1,117,000 150,000 Wheat, Cotton, Grapes 2,000,000 476,580 1,065,733
Kediz plain ..•... 165,000 120,000 Wheat, Barley, Cot·
Extension of Konia ton, Grapes 220,000 130,800 221,800
works ••.••.••••. 490,000 200,000 Wheat, Beet root 350,000 126,250 224,750
Eregli plain ....•.. 50,000 20,000 Wheat, Beet root 40,000 9,000 18,000
Bafra plain ..••••. 115,456 146,480 Wheat, Rice, Maize 575,000 30,000 80,000
Adana plain •••••• 2,175,160 - Wheat, Cotton, Su·
gar-cane 3,500,000 590,625 1,172,500
Amik plain ...... 330,000 330,000 Rice, Cotton, Wheat,
Barley . 312,400 64,000 118,720
Kasimiyye valley ••• 77,000 - Banana, Pomegran·
ate, Orange 70,000 20,000 60,000
Sheria valley •••.•. 110,000 - Banana, Pomegran·
ate, Orange 100,000 30,000 100,000
Eluje valley •••••. 44,000 - Banana, Pomegran·
Huleh swamp ••••

Mesopotamia •••••.
·I 44,000
15,000,000
71,500
-
ate, Orange
Every kind of cereals
Wheat, Cotton, Fruits
40,000
250,000
28,500,000
20,000
1,300,000
5,000,000
35,000
-
13,500,000
An acre is equivalent to 4.4 dunams.

The Turkish gold pound or lire is equal to $4.40 at parity.
ffiRIGATION 273
water is being accumulated without any cost whatever.

Likewise, 2,880,000 cubic meters of water could be accu-
mulated in Lake Manias at a total cost of 25,000 Turkish
pounds ($1,100,000); that is 0.0086 piasters (4 cents) per
cubic meter. Also, 1,700,000 cubic meters of water could
be accumulated in the Beyshehr Lake at a correspond-
ingly low cost per cubic meter. The foregoing figures
are based on prewar costs. .
Th~se data show what an amount of benefit could be
derived from these lakes of the Ottoman Empire, most
of which could be utilized for this purpose.
The selection of the best available lands to be irrigated
or drained appearing in Table II has been determined
mainly by the expectation of profitable investment (reck-
oned in prewar figures), the character of the crops, the
climate, and the local.economic situation.
It is naturally conceded that works to be constructed
on fertile lands will yield larger profits. In the same
way, there will be a great difference in costs, according
to the character and location of the lands. For example,
expenses on the Tigris works would exceed by five times
those on the Euphrates. Therefore, the Euphrates oper-
ations should come first. The human element deserves
prime attention. Desirable immigration should be en-
couraged. The question of roads, while perhaps not
so impo.rtant in those countries where there are well
developed railway lines, must never be overlooked in
Turkey either where railways are inadequate or in those
parts where the transport is exclusively by animals.
Because of excessive transport expenses crops of excel-
lent quality and quantity cannot be exported.
Underlying this whole subject we are confronted by an
imperfect system and abuse of land distribution, which
retards the development of both large and small holdings.
As there are various works to be built and as it is
advisable to start those first which should yield a profit-
274 MODERN TURKEY
able return, the Government had prepared a program for
a period of fifteen to twenty years, and made its own
surveys. It recognized that when surveys are entrusted
to private concerns, it becomes difficult to obtain access
to information. The construction work might be under-
taken by concession or contract; the latter appears less
objectionable. As a rule, concessions would be neither
as profitable nor as attractive to private firms, while, on
the other hand, should title to the lands also be sought,
the present inhabitants would suffer. The latter either
might lose their lands outright or at least would be sub-
ject to inconveniences and hardships.
In order to expedite the operations and to secure the
cultivation of the lands which would otherwise be left
uncultivated during the first years, companies might be
allowed to cultivate those lands for a few years and also
possibly be granted concessions for navigation purposes
and for producing electric energy. It is also being con-
templated to encourage the people of small holdings to
form companies for initiating construction works.
Existing irrigation enterprises, some of them dating
to antiquity, can be classified in general under three
periods-areas irrigated: (a) since earliest times, (b)
in recent times but before the first Constitution (1876),
and (c) since the restoration of the Constitution (1908).
There is no information available regarding the plans,
costs, and the workings during this first period, as it
dates back to the rulers in Mesopotamia before the Baby-
lonians and Assyrians. Details of the irrigation in con-
struction with the river Barada, near Damascus, are
equally unknown. Likewise, there is no information
regarding old irrigation works of Anatolia, supposed to
have been built by the Hittites. It is interesting to note
that the name Yeshil Irmak means Iris, to whom an idol
was erected near the spring of the water supply at
Eregli, within the vilayet of Konia.
ffiRIGATION 275
No information either can be given for the second
period when smaller undertakings were made by the
people themselves, while the larger works were built in
Mesopotamia, and elsewhere, by Sultan Abdul Hamid in
the name of the Crown Treasury. Troops and civil
groups were employed in the construction.
The only reliable information which can be given is
for the Konia plain and Mesopotamia plain where works
were undertaken after the Constitution and are already
in operation.
Konia development serves the following villages which
are situated on the railway line between the Kashin-Han
and Chomra station, at a distance of 20 and 40 kilome-
ters, respectively, from Konia:-
Kiok Hoyuk, Ali Bey Hoyuk, Chomra, Chariklar, Bo-
ruk Dulu, Fethiyye, Dedem Oghlu, Alemdar Kuchuk Koi,
Karghin, and Kara Hoyuk. Also, three cubic meters of
water is supplied to the villages already irrigated by the
Charshamba River. It was found that the Charshamba
River was insufficient to irrigate the whole plain, so it
was decided to drain Beyshehr Lake. Therefore, the Bey-
shehr River, which runs down from the Beyshehr Lake
was improved over a distance of 60 kilometers in such a
way as to draw 60 meters of water per second.. This
water drained into the river Charshamba through a canal
30 kilometers in length. In addition, water from Lake
Karavivan drained through Balikliova, 22 kilometers in
extent, and thus the water flowed into the River Char-
shamba and thence to the Charshamba plain. Because
of its irregular course, it was necessary to do consider-
able work on the bed of this river.
Total expenses of these works amounted to 19,500,000
francs ($3,900,000). Since but one third of this amount
was spent on the improvement of the Beyshehr and
Charshamba rivers, on the Beyshehr channel and on the
two canals, the relative insignificant cost for draining
276 MODERN TTJRKEY
becomes evident. After reaching the plain, the water is
distributed by means of primary, secondary, and tertiary
canals, their total length amounting to 746 kilometers.
The surplus discharge is through canals, 565 kilometers
in length. It is worth noting that only one main canal
was constructed for irrigating the Kara Arslan district,
near Konia, and for increasing its water supply. Vari-
ous barrages were constructed to hold back and store the
water. Also forty stone-laid roads, as well as those of
other description, were constructed in addition to the
bridges, large and small, alongside the canals. More-
over, there have been established telegraph and tele-
phone lines of 225 kilometers each with further extension
of these lines under contemplation. Houses for the
officials and huts for the barrage employes have also
been constructed. The Anatolian Railway Company,
which was and is greatly interested in the traffic possi-
bilities, undertook this work which they completed in
four years, or a year before the date called for by the
contract. ·
The first results of this irrigation work date from the
year 1913 when the profits, as it was the first year of
operation, were approximately only half of the expected
amount. The op_erations during 1914 were seriously
affected by the outbreak of the war. During the first
year, only about 300,000 dunams were cultivated, and of
this 225,250 dunams were devoted to wheat, 46,655 to
barley, 14,370 to melons and fruits, 1325 to oats and rye,
4875 to chick peas and vetches, and 100Q dunams. to maize.
Thus the greater part of the locality was left un-
cultivated. Only in the Kara Arslan locality and in the
model farm were the profits up to expectation. Three and
one half cubic meters of water was supplied throughout.
The profits from this valuable enterprise could be in-
creased by the following measures: (a) immediate regis-
tration should be made to establish the limits of the lands
IRRIGATION 277
belonging to the State, and the Ministry of the Evkaf
(Religious Institutions); (b) ownerless lands, amount'-
ing to 200,000 dunams, should be distributed to immi-
grants; (c) part of the large landholdings now in
possession of the inhabitants should be acquired and dis-
tributed to immigrants.
After making these changes, based upon pre-war
figures, the profits should increase 200,000 Turkish
pounds ( $880,QOO) per annum. Besides, this, further
improvements could be made by irrigating work to
include the Moram Chai river near Konia.
Turning to the irrigation of Mesopotamia, approxi-
mately a century and a half ago an Indian, named Assaf-
un-Dovleh opened a small canal on the Baghdad-Karbala
road, 12 kilometers south of Museyyeb, for the purpose
of diverting water from the Euphrates to the holy town
of An Najaf. But as the gradient of this canal was in ex-
cess of that of the former bed of the Euphrates, water ran
into this course, deposits began to heap up. It was of
small utility, except when there was high water. To pre-
vent this, a barrage was constructed on the new bed, but
still this did not improve matters as it was found impos-
sible to restore the old bed to its previous condition,
owing to deposits which were 11.5 meters in depth.
Therefore, it was thought more practicable to use it as a
canal and to supply it with water by means of a barrage.
This project, planned in 1905, was not completed until
four to five years had elapsed, when it was constructed
according to revised specifications. This barrage, which
is 237.5 meters in length, is supported by 36 arches, each
5 meters in breadth. Near this barrage was constructed
also a regulator, 33.5 meters in length, supported by 7
arches of 3 meters each. The amount of the water which
this barrage could accommodate amounted to 120 cubic
meters. Since both the old and new beds were navigable
there were also constructed floating tanks, 86 meters in
278 MODERN TURKEY
length and 8 meters in breadth. These facilities allowed
the Karbala, Museyyeb and Mahmudiya canals to be sup-
plied with any needed amount of water.
In order to accumulate the vast quantity o.f water car-
ried down by the Euphrates during the flood season,
there was constructed a reservoir in the Habbaniya
lowland, near the town of Ramadi. The advantage of
this reservoir, capacity of which is 2462 cubic meters, is
that the barrage is smaller, thereby effecting a large
saving on initial outlay, and at the same time allowing
navigation and irrigation to be in operation during the
drought. Moreover, destruction caused by floods has
been stopped and the building of dikes rendered unnec-
essary. When the military occupation took place, the
Hindiya barrage and that of the old bed had been
already completed and work had been started on the con-
struction of the regulators of these two canals, as well as
those of the Karbala canal and the Habbaniya canal.
It is a mistake to suppose that these irrigation proj-
ects, because not yet completed, are of little use. Such
is not the case. In Mesopotamia, and in this locality in
particular, effective irrigation has existed for a. great
many years, and, due to the construction of the Hindiya
barrage, the water was immediately used extensively-
even vessels appeared in the old. bed.
It was originally intended to have the works under-
taken by a contractor, but in order to expedite matters
the John Jackson Company, Ltd. was asked to carry out
the work temporarily on behalf of, the Government.
Meanwhile the Government called for tenders, but had
been obliged to agree to the conditions that the tenders
should be restricted to the Jacksons and Pearsons. This
first agreement was interrupted for periods by the Ital-
ian, Balkan, and European wars, with operations still in
the hand's of the British company. When the Turkish
Government took part in the European war, these busi-
mRIGATION 279
ness relations came to an end and the work was taken

over by the Government.
Although the extent of the lands covered by these
operations has not been definitely ascertained, it is
known that 50 cubic meters of water flowing into the old
bed was consumed. The extent of the lands, therefore,
can be roughly ~stimated. This information gives a good
clue to the irrigated areas, but at the same time it is
most likely that the peasants drew more water than was
actually required. On the other hand, the amount of the
water flowing into the Museyyeb, Ma.b.mudiya and .Kar-
bala canals has not been ascertained. Our only certain
information is that the increase on the tithes received
from· the lands surrounding the old bed amounted to
60,000 Turkish pounds ($264,000). An equivalent of this
amount might be estimated also for the lands which for-
merly belonged to the Crown Treasury and were after-
wards handed over to the Government, since no tithes
were being received from these lands. Therefore, the
total excess of the tithes amounted to 130,000 pounds
($572,000) including the 10,000 pounds ($44,000) esti-
mated for the Karbala section. Thus receipts amounted
to 150,000 pounds ($660,000); the previous receipts were
estimated at 20,000 pounds ($88,000). From these fig-
ures it may be concluded that the profits were equivalent
to 33 per cent since the total initial costs of construction
amounted to approximately 450,000 pounds ($1,980,000).
Later on, the rate of profit should redouble, owing to
increased crops and the construction of the Shamiya and
Hindiya canals which have been already started. If the
lands were distributed gratis, the receipts would meet or
even exceed the annual costs of operation.
CHAPTER XII
AGRICULTURE
By EDWARD FREDERICK NICKOLEY 1
An old fashioned Turk in discussing the Christians said, "Yes, effendi,

it is true that the Christians are very tricky and cause our Government
a lot of trouble. But"-with a slow smile-"they have their uses, too.
If a Turk has an apple tree, it bears, maybe, three apples; but if he
employs a Christian to look after it for him, it will bear eight apples.
True, the Christian will steal three of them, but the Turk gets five.
I know of what I speak, effendi, and I tell you that the Christians have
their points."
-THE CARAVANSERAI, The Near East.
Introduction
Nature has made of Turkey an agricultural country of
marvelous richness, yet the lands mostly lie fallow.
Little has been done by the Government or by private
initiative to aid the cultivators or laborers. The peas-
ants are universally fond of sheep and goats, and enjoy
a pastoral life. The methods · of plowing, harvesting
and threshing are almost identical with those adopted
over two thousand years ago. There is no incentive to
greater production, since the increased crop is grasped
immediately by the tax collector (zaptieh), or by raiding
bands. The situation.is pitiful, especially since approxi-
mately three quarters of the population dwell in rural
communities, and the economic hope of the country lies
solely in land products. Prince Sabaddine, the enlight-
s Born near Chicago, 1874. Educated in country schools. For four years
teacher in rural schools. Entered University of Illinois, 1894, graduated
from School of Arts and Sciences, 1898. Teacher of English in Aurora
(Illinois) High School. Organized School of Commerce of American College
at Beirut. Principal of this institution, 1900 to present time. Acting Presi-
dent of American University of Beirut, 1919-1922.
280
AGRICULTURE 281
ened nephew of the recently deposed Sultan, told me of
his strong convictiot.. that the future strength of Turkey
must center around Anatolia, where agricultural reforms
should be inaugurated without delay. Likewise, the
new leaders of Turkey appear keen to apply the funda-
mental principles of agricultural economics. At the
Smyrna Economic Congress, after giving as examples
former regions of the Ottoman Empire, Mustafa Kemal
Pasha said: "Gentlemen, those who effect conquests by
the sword finish by being beaten by those who employ
as their arm the plough, and by ceding their place to
them. . . . In the struggle between the sabre and the
plough it is always the latter which comes out on top."
Under modern farming methods, the soil is capable
of bountiful crops. It is wonderful that the lands are so
productive under' the present unfavorable conditions.
They receive no enrichment, since usually the animal
dung is mixed with straw and .made into cakes for use
as fuel. No artificial fertilizers are used. Modern
machinery and implements are little known. The cheap
labor in Anatolia often makes their use uneconomical.
It is hard to change the customs of Oriental peoples:
this statement is particularly true of the Moslems, since
they are not mechanically inclined and soon abandon any
mechanical contrivance when it gets out of order. All
peasant women work in the fields.
The Banque Agricole is the only financial establish-
ment which is prepared to lend money to the cultivator.
Generally, however, the loans granted are actually used
for his home. The bank is authorized to lend money
against land but not against crops. These advances are
made at such usurious rates of interest that the principal
can practically never be repaid; thus the loan often is
the first step in a foreclosure of a later sale. Further, the
resources of the bank have never been sufficient for the
country's needs. In every respect, this useful institution
282 MODERN TURKEY
should be the recipient of strong State support and wise
direction.
In Turkey, as in most countries, agriculture is con-
sidered a despised occupation. The farmer or peasant
prefers to live in the toWn. He encourages his son to
enter a career other than agriculture. If the young man
is bright, he may receive extra schooling; then he seldom
becomes a cultivator.. The knowledge of improved agri-
cultural practices in other countries must be brought to
the attention of the Anatolian peasants, who can be
taught the value of education as applied to their occupa-
tion. The material and social benefits that would result
cannot be exaggerated.
Agriculture
The regions which comprised the Ottoman Empire in
August, 1914, are essentially agricultural. Only in ex-
ceptional cases have their inhabitants risen above their
present level of economic development. They have at no
time taken kindly to change in their methods of living
or to economic progress. The pressure of growing popu-
lation has been met by migrations, wars and massacres,
and, only after an agelong struggle have they remained
in their present low grade of the agricultural stage, while
large tracts of land and great masses of the population
are still nomadic in their method of living. So far as
the knowledge of the past history and the present condi-
tion of these peoples throws any light upon their prob-
able future, it seems to be a safe and conservative state-
ment to make that the lands of the Levant seem to be
destined for an indefinite time to come to remain pre-
dominantly agricultural. While certain cities may pos-
sibly develop into thriving commercial centers or sporadic
manufacturing industries acquire local importance, these
will have for their purpose the serving of the greater
AGRICULTURE 283
mass of the population who will remain on the land. In
the international division of labor where in the long run
every group finds its proper occupation upon the basis
of the twofold standard of efficiency, the former Turkish
Empire is destined to play the part of the hewer of wood
and drawer of water. So far as investigations conducted
in the past indicate, the lands seem to be lacking in those
resources and the people appear to be deficient in those
qualities which constitute the indispensable prerequisites
to further advance towards what is conventionally de-
scribed as a higher stage of development, ..tamely indus-
try and commerce.
As an agricultural country, the former Ottoman Em-
pire poss~sses certain distinctive features. It has, first
of all, an extraordinarily wide range of climatic condi-
tions. It extends from approximately twelve degrees
to forty degrees north latitude, having a wider reach
than any other compact political unit except Russia,
possessing the advantage over Russia that it lies wholly
within the productive zone, whereas the latter extends
into the tundras of the frozen north. The extremes of
heat and cold are still further accentuated by the differ-
ence in elevation, ranging from the tropical alluvial
plains of lower Mesopotamia and Yemen to the elevated
tablelands at the foot of Mount Ararat in the north.
Soil conditions are equally diverse. There are fertile
plateaus where nature produces generously with but
little assistance or urging from man, and there are ter-
raced limestone mountain sides where scarcely a living
income is vouchsafed the hard-working winegrower and
truck gardener. There are vast stretches composed of
the richest fluvial deposit alternating with sandy deserts.
In general the rainfall is not such as to serve the best
interests of agriculture, being so scant in some regions
as to make agriculture impossible.
Data concerning area of land suited for agriculture are
284 MODERN TURKEY
not available for all of Turkey. The following table for
the vilayets of Anatolia presents useful information
based on fairly normal conditions:
Cultivated ..J.rable Per Cent

but not Per Cent
area Cultilvated Cultivated Possible to
(Hectares) (Hectares) Cultilvate
Aidin .•••••••••.•••. 600,626 864,374 10.53% 25.70%

Angora ............. 571,115 728,885 7.61% 17.33%
Trebizond .••..•..••• 550,000 500,000 7.85% 33.54%
Adana •.••••••••.•.. 467,780 1,375,090 11.69% 47.07%
Erzerum ............
Kharput .•..........
337,772 2,551,740 4.40% 37.66%
182,274 1,614,264 4.82% 47.53%
Van ................ 74,269 2,078,731 1.55% 45.13%
Diarbekr •.•••••••••. 38,479 3,610,921 .82% 77.97%
Comparative differences between the last two columns

may be due to many intermingling causes such as topog-
raphy, climate and weather, and the use of land for graz-
ing purposes rather than agriculture. Moreover, the
possible cultivated area has no direct reference to its
possible profitableness; for example, take the vilayet o£
Aidin, which has a lower given percentage in regard to
potential production than is true of the vilayet of Trebi-
zond, although the latter vilayet consists almost wholly
of mountainous country which does not compare in rich-
ness with the territory adjacent to Smyrna. The Turkish:
Government published in 1912 a resume of agricultural
conditions in Turkey in Asia and Africa (:figures for
Turkey in Europe published separately), covering the
Turkish year 1325 (1909-10), which gives the actual and
percentage crop distribution among the vilayets and
independent sanjaks.
Of the agricultural products of Turkey the item of
greatest importance is that of cereals. To a greater
extent, perhaps, than anywhere else in the world, bread
constitutes the staple article of food for all classes of
people. Wheat bread is the most common article of
Yilayets Cereals Vegetables Industrial and Oleagi • Ymes
11ous Products
Hectares % Hectares % Hectares % Hectares %
Constantinople •••••••••.•••••.••• 8,146 78.87 45 0.43 1,396 13.55 738 7.15
Erzerum ........................ 334,283 98.99 3,114 0.90 138 0.04 254 0.07
Adana
Angora ··························
......................... 298,445
516,490
63.89
90.45
4,753 1.03
6,757 1.18
151,604 32.45
1,463 0.25
12,313
46,411
2.63
8.12
Aidin
Bitlia
...........................
........................... 436,905
244,082
72.81
94.63
24,207 4.03
1,885 0.73
34,665 5.77
3,104 1.21
104,434
8,834
17.39
3.43
Basra ......•.•.•••..•••.......•.. 42,928 98.18 276 0.63 477. 1.09 41 0.10
Baghdad •••••••••••••••••••••••• 39,058 95.83 42 0.11 485 1.19 1,172 2.87
Beirut •••••••••••••••••••••••••• 233,960 78.54 27,963 9.41 29,813 10.02 6,049 2.03
Archipelago .....................
Aleppo ...........................
29,804
278,987
56.89
79.04
7,093 13.53
11,184 3.16
2,148 4.11
12,647 3.58
13,348
50,212
25.47
14.22
Brusa ••••••••••••••••••••••••• •• 401,730 79.47 9,586 1.89 14,138 2.79 80,167 15.85
Diarbekr • ; ••••••••••.•••••••••••. 249,422 81.08 10,952 3.55 8,812 2.86 38,497 12.51
Dama~~eua .......................
Sivas ••••••• , , •••••••••••••••••••
309,822
392,673
89.16
92.53
10,252 2.94
9,057 2.13
1,183 0.34
5,389 1.26
26,269
17,309
7.56
4.08
Tripoli .....•.•... , .. , , • , • , . , , , , , . 47,937 96.54 1,012 2.03 110 0.02 701 1.41
Trebizond
Kaetamuni
.......................
....................... 327,823
232,353
89.49
94.85
26,638
3,973
7.27
1.64
11,901 3.24
2,299 0.93
4
6,342
0.001
2.58
Konia ..........................
Kharput ••••••••••••••••••••••••.
572,936
134,125
90.50
73.58
11,065 1.74
5,123 2.83
10,393 1.64
16,474 9.03
38,759
26,553
6.12
14.56
Mosul ......••.•......••.••.••••• 202,649 87.22 2,067 0.89 9,138 3.93 18,515 7.96
Van ............................ 72,096 95.37 315 0.42 2,050 2.72 1,131 1.49
Independent Banjaka of
Izmid ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 53,215 74.79 1,896 2.66 4,712 6.63 11,327 15.92
Urfa ........................... 51,206 78.35 1,374 2.10 274 0.41 12,513 19.14
Bolu •••••••••••••••••.••••••••.•
Bengazi ......................... 89,363
129,301
95.01
99.99
2,533
......
2.69.
....
1,963
...... ....2.08
...... ....
207 00.22
Bigha ••..•.•••••••.•••.•••.•••••
.......................
Zor ..••••••••••••••••••.•••••• ••
Jerusalem
51,294
36,928
83.67
97.78
4,513
423
3,706
7.35
1.12
3.29
224 0.36
414 1.09
11,413 10.14
...... ....
5,289
3,437
8.62
3.05
KaJ'IUiai ......................... 93,976
172,407
83.52
83.10 18,634 8.98 7,932 3.82 8,517 4.10
Total• ...................... 6,084,344 84.73 210,438 2.93 346,659 4.83 539,348 7.51
286 MODERN TURKEY
diet, but barley, millet, and maize bread are also eaten,
especially in the regions lying in the interior of the coun.:
try. Considerable quantities of barley are exported to
Europe where it is used for malting purposes. On the
other hand, large quantities of wheat flour are in normal
times imported, principally from Russia. In 1910 the
value of imports under this head was over L. T. 3,000,000
gold ($13,200,000). The explanation of this anomaly. is,
first, the cheapness of water transport as compared with
the cost of carriage by pack animals and carts from the
interior of the country, and, secondly, the fact that in-
dustrial methods have not kept pace with the advance in
the standard of living. The demand is for finer grades
of flour than the native mills can produce.
Next in order of importance, and easily ranking first
as an article of export, stands tobacco. Before the
Balkan wars Turkey held a high position as a grower
of high-grade tobacco. Even after the loss of the Euro-
pean provinces, however, value of the exports in a single
year has amounted to $10,000,000. The greatest quan-
tity as well as the finest quality is grown in the provinces
bordering on the Black Sea, and a smaller amount of a
specially high grade is produced in the Latakia plain
in northern Syria. Smyrna has a vast production of
medium grades. At one time the greater part of the
'tobacco produced in the country was consumed in the
country, but at present Turkey produces to a large extent
for export. The systematic and steady demand for the
crop on the part of American manufacturers has greatly
stimulated production both as regards quantity and
quality. The table on page 287 gives the production in
Turkish territory for 1914 and 1920.
Olives thrive in all parts of the Mediterranean coast
and to a considerable distance into the interior. Both
the preserved fruit of the tree and the oil extracted from
it constitute an important article of diet among the peo-
()ourtesy ~ebali .to Joaun.er
Road in Western Asia Minor.
COtlr,_., .Salina Claii"Cl
Camel Tra:n Ladt!n with Tobacco near Balfra on the Euxine.

AGRICULTURE 287
Regi<m 1914 19i0

Kiw• KiWI
Samsun and vieinity •••••••••••••• 7,000,000 4,400,000
Trebizond .•••••••••••••••••••••• 3,000,000 600,000
Tashova ••••••.••..•.•••••••••••• 4,000,000 2,000,000
Izmid, Brusa, and Duzjen ••••••••• 6,000,000 3,000,000
Panderma .•••••••••••••••••••••. 500,000 200,000
Smyrna and vieinity •••• , ••• , , •••• 7,000,000 4,000,000
pie. It is produced almost wholly for home consumption.

There is no market abroad for Turkish olive products.
Recently under. the stress of competition with imported
cottonseed oil, the demand for: olive oil was materially
diminished. Landowners were obliged to cut down cen-
tury-old trees which might have continued to supply
fruits and oil if these could have been disposed of abroad.
But the methods of extracting the oil are so crude that
the product is usually acrid and easily becomes rancid.
The low quality of the oil is the obstacle to securing a
foreign market.
Grapes grow everywhere in the country. They are
valued not only as a fruit but large quantities are con-
verted into raisins and exported, especially from Smyrna
but also from other ports. In some parts of the country
much wine is produced from grapes. In general this is
of a low quality but several of the Jewish colonies, also
· monasteries in the Lebanon, have demonstrated the pos-
sibilities of this industry, if properly organized, both in
production and in marketing. Large quantities of other
fruit are produced and dried for export. The most im-
portant single item in this class are figs from Smyrna
and dates shipped from Basra.
Citrus fruit is abundant and of excellent quality, espe-
cially in Palestine and Syria. The Jewish agricultural
colonies have organized cooperative societies and have
succeeded in improving the fruit produced; they have
also reclaimed much land for orange growing and have
MODERX TLRKEY
succeeded in creating a large, steady and growing de-
mand for their output, not only in Europe but also in
Australia.
Cotton has been produced during the past twenty years
in the regions about Smyrna -and in lfesopotamia, but
of late on a larger scale in the Adana Plain. In 190! the
total production in the latter region amounted to 42,000
bales of 200 kilos each, although the cotton was of a
decidedly inferior grade. Under the encouragement of
a German syndicate operating in that district, the pro-
duction increased so that in the year 1907 it amounted to
65,000 bales, and in 1913 it amounted to 105,000 bales.
Two interesting and -suggestive aspects of the develop-
ment were: first, that the area under cotton culture had
not been materially increased but the yield per acre had
been advanced from 75 to 95 pounds; second, that while
the quantity had been more than doubled, there had been
even a more ma:rked advance in the improvement of the
quality.
The mulberry grows well-in several districts. Silk cul-
ture has been most successfully carried on in Syria and
in the vicinity of Brusa. The development of this indus-
try reflects the possibilities of improvement which char-
acterize almost every line of agricultural production.
Formerly silk growing was carried on in a haphazard
manner characteristic of Oriental industry. Mter the
tithes from silk products were placed at the disposal of
the Ottoman Public Debt Administration, this organiza-
tion took steps to increase the value of the yield. By a
campaign of education and enlightenment among the
producers, by assuring them of a steady market and by
protecting them against exploitation on the part of the
government and foreign buyers, they caused silk produc-
tion to advance in the most phenomenal manner. -
Opium is cultivated in the hinterland of Smyrna, near
Afiun Qarahisar, but also in Konia and Brusa. Most
AGRICULTURE 289
of the output is exported to America. In 1880 the total
output was 180 cases, in 1913 it had risen to 1700 cases.
Stock-raising/ though not strictly agricultural, cannot
be separated from tilling the land. Large areas in all
parts of the country are suitable only for grazing. The
mountainsides support large flocks of goats, . the level
stretches in the interior produce sheep and the marshy
grass-growing valleys are utilized for the rearing of
cattle. Further inland in the south camels and horses
are raised in large numbers, the former for domestic use,
the latter to a considerable extent for export, although
now placed under an embargo. Owing to the lack of
proper means of transportation, meat products are con-
sumed almost wholly in the country. Flocks of sheep
and goats are driven .long distances from the grazing
• There are very few cattle in Turkey now as compared with 1913.
Among the causes of the depleted numbers are the past and present
requisitions for military purposes, some cattle disease, and greatly
diminished reproduction. Taking these factors into consideration and
subtracting the territories of Mesopotamia, Palestine, Syria and· Arabia;
the Minister of Agriculture estimates a postwar decrease of over 40 per
cent in the number of farm animals. ·
A live-stock census for the years 1913 and 1919 disclose the following
approximate situation (useful only for suggesting future possibilities
in Asia Minor):
Kind of Animal Number Number

1913 1919
Buffaloes •••••••••••.•••••••••••• 300,000 378,000
Oxen ......................... .. 2,397,348
Bulls •.••••••.••••••.••.••••• • •• 175,085
Cows .•••••••••....•.••.•••••.•• 2,501,000 3,740,000
Calves ••••••..•.•.••••••••.••••• 1,158,494
Horses •••.••••..••••....•••.•••• 506,750
Ponies ...•.•••.•••.••••••••••••• 204,400 630,000
Draft 'lllld burden horses ••••.••••• 339,430
Mulea ••.•••••.••••••••••••••••• 144,600 85,000
Donkeya •••••••••••••••••••••••• 1,373,700 825,000
Sheep ..•••••••..••••••••••••••• 13,347,750! 11,200,000
Lambs •••••••••••••••••••••••••• 5,373,800
Goats ......................... .. 14,424,180 2,065,000
Angoras ••••••••••••••••••••••••• 2,039,000
Camels ........................ .. 314,000 95,000
Miscellaneous ••••••••••••••• , •••• 30,000 18,000
(Eliot G. Mears, Commercjf .Reporl8, April 6, 1920.)

290 MODERN TURKEY
grounds to the markets. Some live cattle and sheep are
shipped, mostly to Egypt. Dairy products are also con-·
sumed locally. Wool is abundant but of an inferior
grade. In the past it has been almost wholly consumed
in carpet and rug-weaving. With proper encouragement
of wool-growing such as could be given through the
organization of an export market this product could
be developed into an item of the greatest importance.
Syria and Asia Minor together might well become one
of the chief sources of the wool supply of the industrial
countries of Europe. The :fleece of the Angora goat,
which comes into the market under the name of mohair,
is an important product in a limited region of Asia Minor.
The exports, which were shipped almost entirely to Eng-
land before the war, amounted to 10,000,000 pounds a
year. Skins and hides represent an important by-prod-
uct of stock-raising, as do also guts or sausage casings of
which America alone purchases at least $150,000 worth
in a single year.
The Smyrna grape (sultana), a variety with white
berry, free from seeds, the rosaki variety with large
white berry, very sweet, good for drying, resembling
·the malaga, the Smyrna dryin~ fig, the table grape
( chauch) of Constantinople, the peaches of Brusa, the
apples of Amasia, the pears of Malatia and of Angora,
etc., are probably not surpassed by: any.
The above enumeration of agricultural products does
not claim completeness. The items have been selected
as being typical in· that they illustrate the possibilities
of expansion and improvement. In none of these lines
of production has the maximum been reached and what
has been or can be accomplished with these commodities
is also possible with many other products.
The following tables give government figures for vari-
ous products sown and harvested during the agricultural
season 1328 (1912-1913). The total area shown, about
.AGRlCtJLTURE 291
5,000,000 hectares, represents approximately only one
third of the lands put under cultivation on account of the
fact that the Turkish farmer sows annually only a third,
at the most, of his lands.
L CEREALS
Yariety Metric AretJ m Yield m

Quintal8 Hectares Hectares
Wheat ••••••••••••••••. 38,620,000 2,653,000 14.50
Spelt •••••••••••••••••• 1,084,000 82,000 13.10
Barley ......... .'....... 20,661,000 1,236,000 16.70
Oats ................... 1,760,000 100,000 17.60
Rye ·····••············ 2,972,000 169,000 17.50
Com ..•••..•........... 5,274,0'lf0 297,000 17.70
Rice 302,000 23,000 . 13.10
~illet·:::::::::::::::::: 677,000 65,000 10.40
Canary grass ........... 61,000 8,000 7.60
Millcellaneous ••••••••••• 100,000 18,000 5.55
Total ................ 71,511,000 4,651,400
2. LEGUllES
Common beans ••.•••••• 320,000 20,000 16.00
Jridney beans ••••••••••. 508,000 40,000 12.70
Greenpeu .............. 28,000 2,500 11.20
Chick peas ............. 371,000 41,000 9.00
Lentils •••••.••••••••••• 180,1i00 36,000 5.00
Dolichos ............... 15,000 2,700 5.50
Vetch
·················· 70,000 100,000 .70
Total ................ 1,492,000 242,200
3. BOOTS, TUBERS AND BULBOUS PLANTS
Potatoes •••••••••••••••• 595,000 14,000 42.50

Beets
Carrots
..................
................ 256,000
84,000
5,120
14,000
50.00
6.00
Onions
Garlic
.................
................. 1,000,000
60,000
28,000
6,000
35.00
10.00
Total ................ 1,995,000 67,120
4, PLANTS USED AS TEXTILE :MATERIALS AND IN INDUST&IEB
Cotton
Flax
.................
................... 200,000
89,000
40,000
8,000
5.00
10.50
Hemp •••••••••••••••••• 54,000 6,750 8.00
Opium .... ••••••••••••• 9,000 36,000 0.25
Tobaeco ••••••••••••••• 385,000 55,000 7.00
Total ................ 737,000 145,750
292 MODERN TURKEY
5. FRID'l' CULTURE AND MISCELLANEOUS PRODUCTS
Kilos Metric Quintal.t
Figs • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • 70,000,000 Olives . • • • . • . . • • • • . • • 1,314,000
Apples . • • • • • • . • • • • • • 25,000,000 Olive oil . • . • . . . • • . • • • 844,000
Pears . . . . . . . . . . . . • • . 18,000,000 Linseed . . • • • • • • • • . • • 71,000
Plums . . . . • . • . . . . • . . . 14,000,000 Linseed oil • . • . • • • • • • 2,000
Peaches . . . • . . . . . • • . . 370,000 Poppy seed • • • • • • • • • • llO,OOO
Oranges . . . . . . . . . . • . . 6,000,000 Poppy oil . : • ,. • • • • • • • 22,000
Almonds • . . . . . • . • • • . . 2,500,000 Sesame seed • • • • • • • • • 235,000
, Apricots . . . . • . . . . . . • • 6,500,000 Sesame oil • • • • • • • • • • • 7,000
Hazel-nuts ..•.• , • . . . • 30,000,000
Walnuts . . . • • • • • . . . • • 14,000,000
Chestnuts • • • • • • • • • . . • 6,500,000
Grapes • . • • • . • • . • • • • . 800,000,000
Honey • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 3,000,000
Wax • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 325,000
Cocoons • • • • • • • • • • • • • 8,000,000
Turkey is in its entirety a country of cereals exclu-

sively of the autumn variety. The fall sowings begin in
the latter-half of September, following the first rains,
and continue until December, according to location and
altitude. Plowing is done mostly with a hand-made in-
strument composed of a beam and a piece of iron which
serves as a share. The use of the modern plow is con-
fined to the plains of Adana, Eski Shehr, and Ada Bazar,
and in the vilayets of Adrianople, Smyrna and Brusa.
Plowing with mechanical tractors is very little done in
Turkey. Trials have been made in the plains of Adana
with multi-share cable plows drawn by two road engines
of "30 h.p., which have given fair results. German petrol
or benzine tractors were i.nlported and tried during the
war, but these trials have not been repeated since the
armistice. Fertilizer is rarely used on the lands devoted
to cereals. The manure from the villages or the farms
is generally adapted to industrial or market crops.
The seeding is absolutely unscientific. The choice of
the best varieties is not carefully made, nor are the seeds
treated with sulphate of lime or copper. On some farms
sorters for the preparation of the grain have been
adopted, but· generally speaking the Turkish farmer
takes his seed from the bulk of the harvest and does not
AGRICULTURE 293
even take the trouble to remove from it defective kernels
or seeds of other varieties. Sowing is generally done by
hand on plowed ground. The use of the mechanical
seeder is still unknown in Turkey. The seed is buried
with a turn of the native plow; it is rolled after spring
sowing; it is seldom hoed and weeded, and then only by
hand. The harvest begins generally during the last part
of May and continues to the end of August. It is esti-
mated that the sickle is employed in 85 per cent of the
cases and the harvester-binder in 15 per cent of the
total undertakings. Most of the mechanical instruments
come from America.
The threshing of cereals begins in June and continues
until November. It is done by treading the grain by
means of the deughene, a plank of .04 m. in thickness,
incrusted with pieces of flint and moved over the thresh-
ing floor (harman-yeri) by a pair of horses or oxen. The
particles of straw, known as saman, are used alone or
mixed with barley, for feeding cattle and draft animals.
Mechanical threshing of cereals . has been little devel-
oped. It is done chiefly on a few large estates in the
regions of Adana, Eski Shehr, Smyrna, and in eastern
Thrace. Spring sowing occurs in the class of crops whose
success depends on rainfall, but rarely takes place in
Asia Minor in sufficient quantities and at proper inter-
vals more than once in eight or ten years. The methods
of preparing the soil destined for spring sowing are
those used for the autumn sowing. These crops, espe-
cially corn and millet, are the only ones which receive
the manure produced on the farms and in the villages:
they are weeded once or twice by hand. The cultivation
of rice, which is one of the most remunerative, is still
practiced with stagnant water; and the miasmas engen-
dered by this water develop marsh fever, which deci-
mates the rural population devoting themselves to this
crop. It is forbidden to grow rice in the plain of Brusa
294 MODERN TURKEY
on account of the ravages of malaria which it causes.
The rice is husked by extremely primitive processes,
which break the grain to a great extent; when it is mar-
keted it is not free from other seeds and stones. This
diminishes its commercial value, despite its excellent
quality, which make it inherently the superior of the best
varieties of Egyptian and Indian rice.
Three systems of exploitation are in use in Turkey,
(a) direct cultivation, (b) working on shares, (c) rent-
ing. Direct cultivation is practiced the most. The
reason for this is that in Asia Minor agricultural prop-
erty is divided ad infinitum. The peasant is the owner
of one or several fields which he cultivates with the help
of his family. The total extent of these fields varies
between 20 and 1000 dunams, with an average of 150
dunams. (The dunam is a unit of surface equal to
about a quarter-acre.) These fields are seldom held by
a single tenant. The greater part of these peasant pro-
prietors are grouped in villages (karies), having each a
mayor (mukhtar) and its council of ancients (ehtiar-
mejlissi). Each village has within its official limits
(in addition to the cultivated fields) a market place
(pazar-yeri), a threshing floor (harmar~ryeri), a meadow
for pasturage; and sometimes a forest of greater or less
extent (kori) in which the villagers provide themselves
with firewood, charcoal, and lumber. These different
village proprietors, common to all inhabitants, consti-
tute the metrukated lands.
The large properties, or chiftliks, of an extent of
from 2000 to 20,000 hectares and more, are found chiefly
in the vilayets of Constantinople, Angora, Brusa, Aidin
and Smyrna. They are generally held by a single tenant,
and only a small portion is put under cultivation. A
small number of these large farms are in the hands of
proprietors with progressive ideas who have obtained
appreciable results by a better preparation of the soil,
AGRICULTURE 295
by judicious choice of seeds, and by the mechanical prep-
aration of crops. But the well-cultivated estates are still
the exception: the greater number are in the hands of
land stewards ( soUrbachis or nazirs) with special knowl-
edge, and whose mission consists of renting, on account
of the owner, to third parties the fields of the farm as
well as the meadows and pasture lands for a sum of
money realized from the product.
Small holdings take in seventy-five per cent of all
cleared land in Asia :Minor. The number of these small
agricultural properties, although not officially estab-
lished, cannot be less than 1,000,000. The table on page
296 shows an average size of farms in and over Asiatic
Turkey.
A part of the large properties are sometimes leased to
farmers for a period of from two to five years. The
lease makes no mention either of the kind of crop or sys-
tem of cultivation. Working on shares, as commonly
understood, does not exist in Turkey. A farmer, work-
ing on shares, or yariji, is generally a peasant living
on land included in one of the large agricultural estates.
He cultivates by the aid of his own equipment, and event-
ually turns over to the proprietor, after deducting treas-
ury tithes, a fourth or a third of the crop. If the village
included in the estate is common property, the owner of
the field receives only a fifth or a fourth of the crop.
These two ways of dividing the product apply only to
cereal crops. When industrial crops are in question
(cotton, tobacco, opium, etc.) the manner of division
varies according to the kind of crop and to the quality
of the fields turned over to the worker on shares.
No written instrument is exchanged between the pro-
prietor and the yariji. In case of dispute, usage gov-
erns. The farmer on shares remains the debtor of the
proprietor. His possessions consist, in the majority of
cases, of a pair of oxen, a native plow, and a few rough
296 MODERN TURKEY
Locality .Average Size of Under 1 1-5 0tJef' 5

Faf'fllll in Hectare. Hectare Hectare. Hectaru
A.rmeni.a Pef' Cent Pef' Cent Pef' Cent
Bitlis .................. 8.3 21 41 38
Trebizond ............
Kharput ..............
1.6
1.9
38
27
46
45
16
28
Erzerum .............
................. 1.5
3.3
45 40 15
Van 36 37 27
Diarbekr ............. 4.0 17 36 47
Mesopotamia
Mosul ................ 3.7 27 46
. ... . .. ...........
27
Zor .. .. .. ..4
Basra
Baghdad
................
.............
0.1
1.9
60 36
26 6 65
Syria and Palestine
Beirut ................ 3.7 20 25 55
Jerusalem
············
Aleppo .•.•••.••••••••
4.9
2.9
.. 67 33
11 38 51
Syria .•... - .. - ....... 4.3 15 44 41
Urfa ................ 3.1 18 53 27
Eastern .A.natoli.a
Janik .............••. 1.7 19 60 21
Adana
Angora
...............
.............. 4.5 18 36 46
4.1 13 58 29
Konia ................ 3.5 23 46 31
Sivas ................ 2.4 32 46 22
Kastamuni ........... 1.9 28 58 14
Western .A.natoli.a
Karassi .............. 5.4 35 43 22
Aidin ................ 4.5 18 36 46
Brusa ............... 2.3 15 60 25
Bigha ................ 2.0 21 49 30
Izmid .................. 2.7 --43 67 33
Stamboul ............. 1.1 35 22
Bolu ................. 2.0 19 66 15
agricultural implements. He is obliged to deliver to the

proprietor the latter's portion of the crop without pos-
sibly even having retained enough for the subsistence of
himself and family until the next harvest. He is often
led to borrow still more from his proprietor, who has
charged his account with usurious interest. The situa-
tion of the small peasant agricultural proprietor is no
better. Both are victims of the usurers.
Biennial rotation of crops is used almost exclusively
in Turkey. Since essentially extensive culture is prac-
ticed in Turkey, the soil there has relatively little value,
AGRICULTURE 297
and constitutes only a secondary factor in the cost pri~
of the crop. In those unusual instances when triennial
rotation of crops is practiced, the procedure is as fol-
lows : (a) corn or some other plant requiring weeding,
(b) a cereal, (c) fallow. Other than clearing away the
stubble, and sometimes plowing with a native plow dur-
ing the winter, the Turkish fallow field is not worked.
Dry farming, inaugurated and applied with such success
on the high plateaus of the United States of America and
in countries with dry summers, is still unknown to the
Turkish farmer.
Why is agriculture in Turkey primitive and undevel-
oped 7 The real cause is not the lack of possibilities of
natural productivity. · The explanation perhaps must be
sought among the following phenomena which are
familiar to all who know the Near East: (a) inherent
conservatism and lack of initiative; (b) traditional con-
tempt for labor, especially certain forms of labor; (c)
insecurity of life and tenure of property; and (d) lack
of steady markets for produce.
It is a fact that the native of the Levant, at heart,
belongs to the cult of ancestor-worshipers. He accepts
without question the traditions of the elders and allows
his own vision to be bounded by the horizon of his fa-
thers. Though some of the most fundamental and far-
reaching reforms have originated in the Near East, these
innovators must be regarded as "sports" and not as
typical representatives of the people from whom they
sprang. Agricultural methods are as crude as they prob-
ably were in the. days of the Patriarchs and every sug-
gestion of improvement is stubbornly resisted. It is one
of the anomalies of the character of the native that,
though he is shrewd and calculating in all matters finan-
cial, he will sacrifice, as a rule, his own pecuniary advan-
tage rather than break with tradition and custom. This
unquestionably accounts in a measure for the backward-
298 MODERN TURKEY
ness and the stagnation of the Far, Near or Middle
East.
In the East there are definite, hard and fast, immutable
distinctions between the occupations whieh are genteel
and those which are common. The peasant is regarded
as low in the social scale. In general, only those remain
on the land who fail to qualify for any other occupation.
The inevitable result is that those who till the soil are,
as a class, a remnant of the unfit, representing the lowest
level of mentality among the population. Education,
even Western education, has not elevated the condition
of the farmer. It has not touched agriculture except as
it has provided a means of escape from the land for
many young men, thus tending still further to degrade
and lower the status of the far:Ining class. In this atti-
tude towards those who are engaged in plowing, sowing
and~reaping must be sought at least a partial explana-
tion for the lack of progress which characterizes the
Eastern landowner and peasant.
From time immemorial the farmer of the East has
been oppressed. Sometimes he has suffered at the hands
of the foreign invaders, more frequently he has been vic-
timized by the government official. Whether it was the
requisitions of the conqueror, the extortions of the iniqui:.
tous tax collector or the levy of the unrighteous and
avaricious judge that threatened him, the peasant has
at no time had any strong inducement to make perma-
nent improvements in his holdings. More frequently
than not he has sowed his seed with fear and trembling
lest it should flourish to such an extent as to tempt those
against whose aggression he was unable to defend him-
self. Throughout the Near East natural.resources need
to be fertilized by a more generous investment of capital
before larger yield can justly be expected. During the
past, because of the conditions of uncertainty, the native
has persistently abstained from investing capital in crop-
· AGRICULTURE 299
producing land. The peasant is more a miner than a
farmer: he takes from the. soil all that he possibly can
but has no thought of assuring the permanency of the
productive power of the land.
The agricultural regions of Turkey are vast in extent,
and for the most part they are remote from the· great
markets of the world. Means. of transportation have
always been and for the most part still are, as crude and
inefficient as are the implements and the methods em-
ployed in the :fields. The ignorant peasant, even should
he escape being robbed of what he produced is not com-
petent to :find a market for the surplus which his crop
affords above his own needs. What escapes the tax col-
lector frequently falls into the hands of the exploiting
middleman. Traders of the Levant have always shown
a greater inclination and liking to importation as com-
pared with the exportation of local products. They have
not only been disinclined to till the land but they have
also been averse to soiling their hands with the products
of the :fields. Native merchants habitually visit Euro-
pean centers for the purpose of studying the particular
markets in which they are interested as importers, and
for laying in their stock of goods, but rarely does anyone
from the Levant go abroad to create a market for the
products of the country. The Near East has therefore
always had only a passive trade, the export business,
such as existed, being in the hands of foreigners. The
resultant uncertainty of disposing of any surplus oper-
ates as a most effective deterrent to the Turkish
producer.
What possibility, what probability, what hope is there
that there may be improvement T Though Turkey, and
the surrounding lands as well, are destined to remain
agricultural, is it likely that there will be any improve-
ment in methods and value of product T These are the
questions that are being considered with special earnest-
300 MODERN TURKEY
ness by those who are concerned with the destiny of the
units into which Turkey is being divided.
The diagnosis suggests the treatment. The first re-
quirement is a stable government, a government under
which the landowner, the farmer and the capitalist may
be assured against injustice and oppression, a govern-
ment that will inspire confidence in the people and lead
them to exercise buoyant faith in the future instead of
dull, sullen distrust and pessimism which represents the
typical state of mind. A change in the government, by
itself and alone, will not revolutionize agriculture. It
will, however, produce a condition that must precede
initiative on the part of individuals. Better conditions
for the peoples of the Near East can be attained only
when the soil is fertilized with capital and intelligent
labor. Whether the capital be foreign or native, it will
not be available for this purpose until conditions of secur-
ity have been created which thus far have been unknown
in the territories under Turkish dominion. When these
possibilities of a higher scale of living and production
are realized, Turkey's contribution in food supplies and
raw materials will be very much increased in quantity
and improved in quality.
Agriculture in the Near East is capable of develop-
ment along several distinct lines. The productive area
can be materially increased. Th~re is much waste and
unused land, resulting for the most part from the un-
equal distribution of water. Much arable land can be
created by proper irrigation. Even the most casual
observer notes that water rights in the river valley are
not utilized with a view to the maximum production.
The Jewish colonists in the vicinity of Jaffa have demon-
strated the possibility of making the desert bloom and
produce by sinking wells and bring the water to the sur-
face either by windmills or oil engines. In other parts
Q{ th~ CQuntry vast regions are rendered unfit for cui-
Wheat Transported into Sh·as by .Arabas (Ox-carts).
Huge S:wks of 1-'lnur C'arried by a Typical Hamal un<ler Dirt>etion of the

Ne11r East Rt>lief.
AGRICULTURE 301
tivation by inadequate drainage. Drainage works have
been undertaken on a small scale at the Huleh and the
upper reaches of the Jordan but the task has merely been
begun. The extent of the land that might be reclaimed
by irrigation and drainage would undoubtedly amount to
hundreds of thousands of acres.
Even more could be accomplished for agriculture in
Turkey by improvement of the methods of production.
The implements employed· in the extractive industries
are well known to all who have visited the Near East.
The crotched stick-plow, the long-tined wooden winnow-
ing-fork, the ox-drawn threshing sledge are typical of
the level of agricultural production in the Levant. Not
only are the implements and tools crude, but the ideas
underlying farming are equally primitive and rudimen-
tary. The familiarity of the barber surgeon or the vil-
lage quack is not farther removed from the realm of
modern medicine than is the knowledge and the practice
of the Eastern farmer from scientific agriculture. The
quack is being eliminated from society, even in the East,
but the ignorance of the peasant is as dense as ever and
his methods of production are as stupid and inefficient
as could well be imagined.
But the condition of agriculture is not hopeless~ Pro-
duction can be stimulated, thus making it possible for
the country to support a larger population than at pres-
ent and to sustain this increased population in a higher
plane of living, culture, and civilization than is now
known. In fact, it is only by increasing agricultural pro-
duction, that a higher plane of living can possibly be
attained in the Levant.
CHAPTER XIII
FORESTS
The Sinope region and all the mountainous country as far as Bithynia
lying beyond the seacoast already mentioned has good timber for ship-
building easily transported. This region of Sinope has maples and
mountain nuts from which tables are made; while the limited seaslopes
which are cultivated produce olives.
-STRABo.
Scant information is available regarding the forest

resources of Turkey. Public and private records are
uniformly unsatisfactory, yet even a meagre account of
these noteworthy resources is better than nothing at all.
For in Turkey there are large and valuable timber tracts,
at present almost wholly unused but capable of great com-
mercial development. Because they are situated away
from the beaten highways, moreover since traces of de-
parted forests have disappeared, there are many people
who are sceptical regarding. their past or even present
existence. lt may be said that the destruction in Asia
Minor has been terrific, although no less sweeping than
in the eastern section of America. In the former case,
the objective was primarily the need for fuel experienced
by private individuals and military authorities; in the
latter case, the wholesale clearing away of wooded tracts
preceded the building of homesteads and the establish-
ment of industries.
There are many varieties of trees to be found in Tur-
key. Official records estimate their prevalence in Asiatic
Turkey roughly as follows: pine 37%, oak 14%, beech
3W
FORESTS 303
11%, fir 10%, yoke elm 5%, evergreen oak 4%, rock rose
3%; there are also miscellaneous species including juni-
per, resinous pine poplar, olive, chestnut, elm, ash,
valonea oak, plane, elder, linden, boxwood, birch, gallnut,
and cypress. In addition, the country is famous for its
mulberry trees, nut trees, and fruit trees growing both
deciduous and citrus products. Among the most con-
spicuous as well as the most valuable woods are species
· of pine, oak, beech, fir, cedar, and ash. In the semi-arid
regions, there is a great deal of common underbrush.
The physical map· which appears in this volume shows
graphically the interrelation of relief, rainfall, and wood .
growth.
The three notable forest areas are those in Cilicia, in
Western Anatolia not far from the Mediterranean, and
along the shores of the Black Sea. In each instance, t;he
mountain slopes facing the sea absorb heavy moisture,
while across the ridges the comparatively dry climate
affords characteristic flora, largely scattered pines and
scrub oaks. Of these three mentioned districts, the most
valuable is that within the boundaries of the vilayet of
Adana, where the timber stands form a triangular shaped
area with the base near the Gulf of Adalia, approxi-
mately fifty to seventy-five miles in length, and the apex
one hundred and fifty miles northward in the Phrygian
Mountains. The British Expeditionary Forces under
General Allenby reported that from the standpoint of
timber quality, available water power, and utilization, the
forests of the Taurus, Anti-Taurus, and Amanus moun-
tains within this one vilayet were among the most im-
portant in the world (British Board of Trade Journal,
September 4, 1919). The entire stretch along the Black
Sea from the Soviet Russian boundary to the BospOI'Jl.S,
forming another source of wood supply, contains dense
valuable stands which owe their present virgin state to
the difficult country. T~e third significant timbered dis-
304 MODERN TURKEY
trict, the result of the moisture-laden winds from the
1Egean Sea, is to be found not far distant from Karassi,
Bigha, and Aidin.
Detailed and reliable information regarding the pres-
ent status of forest supplies is unobtainable. The most
authentic estimates are those issued by the Ottoman
Ministry of Agriculture, Mines and Forests in the year
1910, when it was estimated that the forest lands
amounted to 8,900,489 hectares, or 8.83 per cent of the
total area. These estimates included, however, Kossova,
Monastir, Salonika and other sections no longer part of
Turkey. In Asia Minor, there was estimated to be ap-
proximately five million hectares (between eleven and
twelve million acres), divided among certain vilayets as
follows: Aidin, 929,000 hectares; Brusa, 907,000; Adana,
420,000; Kastamuni, 716,000; Bolu, 600,000; Trebizond,
496,000; Karassi, 495,000; Konia, 480,000; Izmid, 334,000;
and Angora, 215,000 hectares.
The figures given in the Statesman's Yearbook (1921)
which estimate that 21,000,000 acres, of which 3,500,000
acres are in Europe, are in forests, must be reduced.
This revision affects especially estimates in regard to
reserves near Brusa, Aidin, and in southwestern Ana-
tolia, largely the result of a sweeping destruction of
forests along the railways for military needs within the
past decade.
There remain great stands of fir and of Scotch pine,
approximately fifty miles south of Kiresun in the vilayet
of Kastamuni. At an altitude of 1,500 metres, there are
vast forests of pitch pine. Beech and Corsican pine grow
to advantage in the vilayet of Brusa. · Oaks of fine grain
and straight fibre, therefore well-adapted to both split-
ting and cabinet work, are noteworthy in the sanjaks of
Bolu and Izmid, and in the vilayet of Sivas ; fine ash
forests in the Sivas section are not utilized due to their
distance from the seacoast. The valonea oak; important
FORESTS 305
commercially ·as a tanning extract material, occurs in
great abundance in the vilayet of Aidin. Along the
greater part of the Anatolian Peninsula coastline small
pines are noticeable. The record of the state revenues
for 1910 makes no mention of any return, either from
firewood or charcoal, from the vilayets of Basra, Bitlis,
Diarbekr, Jerusalem, Kharput, Lebanon, Mosul, Sivas,
Urfa, Van, or Zor.
The gradual receding of the forests near inhabited
regions is all too familiar a sight. Trees, large and small,
felled outright or cut haphazard in a most wasteful
fashion, are used in the form of wood ~r charcoal for
fuel purposes. Extensive groves of olive and mulberry
trees have been destroyed because of onerous taxes.
Even the brush lands are fast becoming bare, due to the
large numbers of sheep and goats. (In Turkey there is
a striking correlation between the wooded tracts and the
presence of sheep and goats.) There is the increasing
scarcity of wood as fuel. For example, at Kharput the
inhabitants no longer get their supplies in the neighbor-
hood but are obliged to make a three to four days' jour-
ney on donkey-back to get access to the fast diminishing
scrub oak saplings. Also, the swift-running mountain
streams during the wet season carry away fertile soil and
leave desolation behind. This disappearance of the for-
ests becomes a more serious problem because there have
been no coordinated measures taken by the State to pro-
vide for reforestation.
The forests have been virtually free from commercial
exploitation. There are a few primitive saw mills in
the Black Sea district and in southwestern Anatolia, but
practically all work is done by hand. Promising oppor-
tunities exist for the erection of wood working establish-
.ments, especially since in the timber districts, labor is
generally cheap and mountain streams can be utilized
both for transportation and power purposes. Lumber
306 MODERN TURKEY
felled from the seaward side of mountains frequently
can be floated towards the sea, while buffaloes can be
used to pull the logs over the snow. The conditions
are less favorable on the inner slopes of the ranges,
because of the greater dependence on transport by pack
animals.
The Turkish forests yielded in 1920 a revenue of
L. T. 1,360,000 (about $6,000,000) classified according to
the following uses: building purposes, L. T. 750,000; fuel
purposes, L. T. 500,000; miscellaneous products, L. T. 77,-
000; worked wood, L. T. 32,000. Of this total output,
76% was consumed within the country, and, despite the
insufficiency of the local production, the remaining 26%
was exported. The largest item of export was timber
for building purposes which amounted to L. T. 200,000,
destined mainly for Egypt. Wood for fuel purposes was
exported amounting to L. T. 88,000. During 1920, the
greatest output for export purposes was in the provinces
of Kastamuni, Konia, and Bolu. Among the main forest
byproducts which are exported to a limited degree with
the exception of valonea oak, are charcoal, valonea cups,
turpentine, bark, gums, and various oils. In spite of
this exportation of forest products, Turkey is, however,
primarily a wood importing country.
Prior to the middle of the last century, nearly every
local community had its own forest, in which peasant
proprietors were granted permission to cut wood, burn
charcoal, and also to rent pasturages to nomad herdsmen
and shepherds. This last-named privilege was beneficial
as an aid to local revenue but, on the other hand, exceed-
ingly destructive to the forests. With the organizatipn
of the vilayet system in Turkey, the forest lands were
placed under government control and reckoned as State
property; nevertheless, wooded land may be acquired
by private persons under special conditions.
The oWn.ership of forests in Turkey has been classi-
FORESTS 307
fied as follows: governmental, 88%; private, 6%; village
communes, 2%; Ministry of Evkaf (Religious Institu.
tions), 1%; doubtful, 3%. The forest laws, modelled
· on those of France, are well-devised but not enforced.
The State. forest service is empowered to maintain
numerous representatives in the provinces who are em·
powered to grant permission to local residents for util~z
ing wood for personal use; to collect the revenue there-
from; and to inspect cuttings.in order to note whether
concessionaires are conforming to their grants. These
agents are authorized to sell cuttings not exceeding 100
to 150 cubic meters, but in the case of greater quantities
permission must be secured from the forest bureau. In
the latter case, the prospective purchaser of the cutting
makes a written request either to the national or local
forest agent. He indicates in his request {a) the number
of cubic meters of lumber he wishes to purchase; {b) the
dates to cover his concession; (c) designation of the par-
ticular forest, its location and the limits of the cutting;
and, (d) the price per cubic meter he is willing to pay.
The local agent makes an inspection and then reports
to Constantinople. The contract may then be concluded
between the successful bidder and the government. One
of the clauses of the contract stipulates that in case the
cmicessionaire does not find within the limits of the cut-
ting the quantity of wood granted him, he shall have no
recourse against the government. Since the conces-
sionaire is given absolute freedom as to the nature and
manner of cutting the trees, the tract worked upon
generally becomes entirely barren.
Before 1914, the Government rarely authorized any
sale of forests amounting to more than three thousand
cubic meters. During the war, however, larger conces-
sions were granted. One of the most notable of these,
comprising large forest areas in the vilayet of Kastamuni
and in the sanjak of Bolu, was accorded to the "Forest
308 MODERN TURKEY
Exploitation Company," an Hungarian company. Ac-
cording to the forestry statistics, this concession covered
a wooded area containing the finest forests of resinous
trees and oak to be found in Anatolia. This Hungarian ·
company has not yet commenced operations. Another
illustration of a more recent willingness on the part of
the officials to make large grants appears in Article 11
of the Chester concession: ''The company shall have the
right to obtain all the wood supply necessary. for its
construction and for their maintenance from the public
forests, provided it conforms to the regulations laid
down ad hoc, and pays the usual charges."
Little attempt has been made to curb destructive prac-
tices; moreover, reforestation has been virtually untried.
Still, it should be mentioned that there is no record of
any wholesale, deliberate destroying of forests by the
Turks except in the year 1823, exactly one hundred years
ago, when Sultan Mahmud drove the janissaries (the
palace military guard) into the forests riear Constanti-
nople and then set the trees on fire. But in this instance,
the burnt over areas were taken care of so that now
these suburbs are covered with trees, largely of oak and
chestnut varieties. Reforestation in the Lebanon illus-
trates what can be accomplished in · Anatolia. The
Turkish Director-General of Forests told me in 1920 that
successful attempts at regrowth were being made at
Handek near Izmid, at Eski Shehr, at Konia, and else-
where. Such recent attempts as have been made to
ameliorate conditions can be attributed largely to the
employment of foreign experts, notably of French and
Austrian nationalities.
The present state of Turkish forests, therefore, is the
result of lack of law enforcement, lack of appropriations
at the disposal of the Ministry, and the indifference of
both government and people. The unfortunate neglect
of forest resources is not more peculiar to Turkey than
FORESTS 309
to most othe~ countries. But in the case of Turkey, the
adoption of modetn methods of silviculture is especially
urgent because of the non-existence of substitute re-
. sources which normally assist greatly in conserving
forest areas. ·· · ·· ·
CHAPTER XIV
Expectation whirls me around

Th' imaginary relish is so sweet
That it enchants my senses.
Introduction
The main objective underlying recent economic conces-
sions in Turkey consists of mineral lands, mainly unex-
plored. International diplomatic moves during the past
decade have been fairly intimately related to the oil fields
of Mosnl and eastern Asia Minor, the copper fields at
Arghana-Maden in the vilayet of Diarbekr, and the coal
deposits near Songnldak, not far from the Black Sea
coast. The mineral privileges under the grants to_ the
Baghdad Railway Company and the Chester project are
matters of prime moment. In one form or another there-
fore the politico-economic penetration into the Levant
has been closely related with the whole subject of useful
m.i.IJerals.
There is nowhere available relative to Turkey mineral
1
Born in Constantinople. Graduated from the primary 11ehool, Stamboul,
eompleting education at the Imperial Civil Academy (Mektebi Miliyi
Shahane), a training ~~ehool for Government oflieia1s. Employed in central
branch of the Ministry of Finance;· subsequently in the Ministry of
Commerce and Agriculture where Bei'Ved as Sub-Councillor to the Minister,
Director of Statistics, Chief of Correspondenee, Director General of the
Technical Bureau, and since December, 1915, Director General of Mines.
Published works (in Turkish), The Theory and Appliance of Statistics,
(1910); Cooperative Societies, (1914); and varioua oflieial publieatioua
of a statistical character. ·
Translated from the Turkish. The Anglieized. spelling of certain namea
is questionable.
310
MINES 311
data which are both carefully prepared and exhaustive.
A leading member of the foreign colony of Constantinople
told me that he doubted whether more than one firm
had even a fairly reliable survey. The chapter on M:ines
written for this book by the Turkish Director of M:ines,
J emal Bey, originally contained a voluminous amount
of statistical and other information which, unfortunately,
has had to be greatly condensed. This government offi-
cial is entirely justified in calling attention to the influ-
ences brought by foreign interests in order to procure
concessions; but at the same time the reader should
bear in mind that graft wh"ich in the past has sometimes
taken the form of blackmail is considered to be closely
connected with the obtaining of the firman (permit).
The whole subject is an exceedingly technical and com-
plicated one, so the editor has used his judgment in
condensing and revamping this article, having in mind
primarily the general reader.
Mines
Exploitation of mineral resources has been carried on
in Asia M:inor over two thousand years, yet prospects
appear more promising than ever before. :Manifold diffi-
culties, notably the scarcity of railways and highways,
must be overcome before satisfactory progress can be
made. A glance at a map shows us how small is the rail-
way mileage, but the exploitation of mines can hardly
be profitable without them. Another unfavorable circum-
stance is the clearing of forests, which has occurred to
such a degree in the vicinity of certain mines worked
for some years, that operations have had to be stopped
for want of wood material.
Turkey was obliged by the Treaty of Bucharest to cede
several important ore districts to Greece and also to
Serbia. While in the small part of Europe which still
312 MODERN TURKEY
belongs to Turkey comparatively few useful minerals
are now to be found, the extensive territories of Asiatic
Turkey yet hide many treasures. Their utilization is
dependent upon political and economic arrangements,
both national and international.
Mining in Turkey is in its infancy at present. There
are only two or three mines that are being exploited
with any degree of efficiency. So far, no geological sur-
vey has been made and all the information gathered is
superficial and sporadic in character. Thus it is incor-
rect to assume that localities that have had many
concessions granted for mining operations are rich in
mineral resources, nor would it be correct to claim that
all other localities are poor in mineral possibilities. Of
the several hundred concessions in force on March 31,
1920, there were 282 held by foreigners; these prop-
erties were distributed in the following districts. Medi-
terranean Sea and the islands, 142; Sea of Marmara, 60;
Black Sea, 60; Anatolian Railway, 17; eastern provinces
Diarbekr, Van), 3. In this chapter, the main attention
has been centered on (a) certain alleged facts regarding
the mineral wealth of Turkey and the present condition
of the mines and (b) the obstacles which hinder suc-
cessful exploitation.
The most important mineral products of Asia Minor
are coal, copper, petroleum, and the precious metals.
There are also other useful minerals such as meerschaum,
emery, pandermite and chrome, which exist only in
limited quantities in other parts of the world.
Asia Minor has been explored in many places, but the
western area is the best known region. The greatest
number of mining operations take place in this part of
the country. The vilayets of Brusa and Aidin, and the
regions south of the Sea of Marmara are the richest in
minerals. The southwestern Taurus region and the
region south of the Black Sea, beyond Trebizond and
MINES 313
Ordu, are less favorable localities. Syria and Palestine
are rich in minerals of all kinds; Mesopotamia and Arabia
will also become more important and better known in
that respect in time.
Most of the minerals extracted in Turkey are exported
to other countries, but the quantities are exceedingly
small. The value of the total coal output in Turkey is
equivalent usually to from one third to one half of the
total value of the various kinds of ores extracted. In the
year 1913, the total mineral output amounted to L. T.
2,040,000 ($8,976,000), made up of mineral products, L.
T. 1,633,000, salt, L. T. 263,000, and quarried products,
L. T. 144,000.
Coal is found in widely distributed sections of Ana-
tolia, but most of the coal mined in Turkey is taken
from the Heraclea (Eregli) region. This was originally
one of the most important basins of the world and its
future is decidedly promising. Its relatively recent de-
velopment began about the year 1840. The local con-
sumption was small, and it is recorded that in 1880, the
entire output was consumed by the Ottoman Navy. After
this date the consumption increased gradually until it
reached nearly one million tons. When the Heraclean
basin was opened, the extent of its wealth and its future
were not properly estimated. Franchises for the output
of coal, numbering about four hundred, all of them con-
sisting of small parcels, were granted to private persons,
but the permits for working pits were not regularly and
systematically devised. Some of these permits were
later on combined and some were held void because the
pits were being developed by other than their owners.
The present number of concessions in force is from
seventy to eighty. In 1893 the government built four
railroads at the most important points, viz: Songuldak,
Kozlu, Kilimli, and Chatal Agach. Each line was from
three to five kilometers in length. At the same time a
314 MODERN TURKEY
concession was granted for the building of shipping and
bunkering ports, which have been the main factor in
the rapid growth of the output of coal since that date.
The mineral basin starts from Koisi-Aghiz near Heraclea,
a distance of 130 miles from the Bosporus, and extends
approximately 100 miles along the Black Sea. Most
of the operations extend east from Heraclea and from
five to eight kilometers inland. It is possible to make
coke of the Heraclean deposits, but owing to the gas
content and considering its. lack of durability, it is
unsuited for smelting purposes.
·The Heraclean coal basin is the property of the Min-
istry of Evkaf (Religious Foundations). It is set off
by specified frontiers from Heraclea to Amasra. It is
subjected to some particular stipulations beyond the
jurisdiction of the code of the Ministry of Mines. Sev-
eral large operators hold concessions in this basin. The
most important firm, the Societe d 'Heraclee Anonyme
Ottomane, was established by French capitalists in 1896.
Since the 1918 armistice, the most important mines of
the basin are being bought by English, French and more
especially Italian capitalists.
Lignite exists all over the Ottoman Empire. It is of
good quality, suitable not only for local consumption
but for export as well. More than any other part of
the Empire, the provinces of Aidin and Adrianople are
conspicuous for their lignite deposits. Up to the time
of the Great War the output of lignite coal had been
very limited, its maximum not exceeding forty thousand
tons during any one year.
The most important basin of petroleum exists in
Mesopotamia. Though of higher grade, these petrols are
considered the continuation of Persian oils. They start
from the southeast of Mosul, parallel the river Dejle, pass
through Kirkuk, Tuz Khurmati, Kifri, and Salahiya, and
show an abundance of oil at a dozen places. (For de-
MINES 315
tails, consult British Foreign Office Handbook on
''Mesopotamia.'') The concession for exploitation of
Mesopotamian petroleum belongs to the private chest
of the throne by an imperial decree. 1 There are two
other concessions granted; namely, in the localities of
Barguiri in the province of Van, and in the province of
Kastamuni. Both are undeveloped. 2 The Standard Oil
1
The title to these oil fields is in dispute. There is the claim of the
twenty-two known heirs of the late Sultan Abdul Hamid II who have or·
ganized under the laws of the state of Virginia, a corporation known as
the Sultan Abdul Hamid Estate, with a capitalization of $150,000,000.
Affiliated thereto are three Turkish companies and the Ottoman Empirial
Estates, Incorporated. Then there is the frequently-mentioned Turkish
Petroleum Company, organized by the British in 1914, in which German
nationals received a remaining twenty-five per cent interest in return for
their permission for the British to construct the Baghdad-Basra section of
the Baghdad Railway, and a quarter share went to a Dutch oil group.
The validity of this claim was denied by Talaat Pasha, by Mahmud Pasha,
the Minister of Public Works in 1914, by Mustafa Kemal Pasha, and by
the American Department of State in a series of vigorous diplomatic notes
with the British foreign office. By the terms of the San Remo Conference,
France falls heir to Germany's former claim; but in 1922, American oil
groups acquired this quarter interest by virtue of an understanding with
the unchanged British and Dutch (with large British capital) oil interests.
Although the Chester concession appears to accord valuable rights in the
Iraq and Kurdistan oil fields, the Baghdad Railway concessions contain
definite provisions, some of which antedate the latest grants. The sov-
ereignty of this Kurdish country is a matter of negotiation between the
British and the Turkish governments, which is another difficulty which must
be surmounted before these oil fields of reputed great wealth have a clearly-
defined status.-E. G. M.
1 Within the present boundaries of Turkey, there are the vast oil fields
in the eastern vilayets of Van, Bitlis, and Erzerum which have received little
public notice yet are adjudged as rich as those in the Mosul .area. Geo-
logically, they are a continuation of the Transcaucasian and northern Per-
sian strata and in Turkey alone extend a distance of approximately 225
miles. It will aurprise most people to learn that these historic Armenian
regions possess such wealth. As the Manchester Guardian CommerciaE
(Reconstruction in Europe, July 6, 1923), points out, ~hese "are the least
known virgin oil fields of importance near to Europe which remain undis-
posed of•••• In the vilayet of Van, relatively the best explored, there
were at one time a great number of claims, extending together over an
area of 10,000 acres. But, one has it on good authority, these claims for
lack of further activities, have now become null and void. In the vilayet
of Bitlis the region near the town of Zakho, almost on the Mesopotamian
frontier, is supposed to be most promising, but no concessions or claims
have up to now been granted there. In the vilayet of Erzerum, a highly
reputed oil region is that of Pulk near Terjian. This area is owned by
the Evkaf Ministry, and just before the outbreak of the war was hotly
316 MODERN TURKEY
Co. of America has petitioned for concessions in the
proximity of the Dead Sea and in the neighborhood of
Rodosto on the European side of the Marmara.
Asphalt and naphtha exist at Hit and its environs, on
Tikrit in the province of Baghdad, and in the neighbor-
hood of the Dead Sea. Asphalt also exists in the moun-
tains of Middle Syria. The chief pits are near Suek-el-
Chan, at the eastern declivity of the Jebel-ed-Dahr.
Among the bitumen is the cultimeous schist: the latter
is likewise found on the southern shores of Izmid and
in many parts of the Aidin and Angora provinces.
Abundant supplies of manganese are found in the
Anatolian peninsula not far from ~e seacoast. Near
the Black Sea there are deposits seven or eight kilometers
from Eregli. Adjacent to the Sea of Marmara are the
pits of Sabanja, Satch Koi and Balia-:Yaden (operated
by the well-known Societe Anonyme Ottomane des Mines
eontested by American, British, and, ultimately, also by Russian interest&.
Apart from these, there exist at present 18 eiaims in the loealities of
Katranli, Neftik, Divan-HU83in, and Hanan-Kaleh. It is in some of these
elaims that the leading Ameriean enterprise appears to be taking an interesL
In order to eomplete the list of the most important Turkish oil fields
awaiting exploitation the region near the river Kizil Irmak. in the vilayet
of Kastamtmi, may also be mentioned. A 11111'Vey made of it by a Swiss
geologist deseribes it as very promising.''
Dr. Edward J. Bing, an unusually well-posted observer of Eastern affairs,
wrote in the Net~~ Republic (.July 18, 1923): "The oil wells of Mesopotamia
are merely so many simple, shallow pita. The 'exploitation' is earried out
by the inhabitant& of the adjaeent rulages, the oil being UBed only in their
hoW!ehold&. You eonld eall it a 'home industry.' While the emde oil is
transported on donkey and camel baek, it is removed from the wella by
villagers who deseend into the pit, generally six to eight feet deep, and dip
goatskin saeb, buekets or enp11 into the oil. Some aetually U8e palm leaves
and even the hollow hand.
"With the introduetion of modern working methods, however, the Tigris
and the Euphrates will provide euellent possibilities of transport, and pipe
lines will eonneet the oil fields and refineries with the prineipal harbor&.
It was stated some time ago that the Anglo-Persian Oil Company plana the
eonstruetion of a pipe line leading from ita oil fields in Persia to the
Mediterranean harbor of Haifa in Palestine. The eost invoh·ed was esti·
mated at $50,000,000. Optimists eonsider five yean the minimum time,
and $35,000,000 the minimum investment in eonneetion with the means of
transportation, ereetion of maehinery and for starting any modem exploit&·
tion of the Mosnl oil region.' '-E. G. M.
MINES 317
de Balia-Karaidin); within the Smyrna province there
are deposits at Hassan Chauschler, Yenije Koi, Ala
Shehr, and ¥endos near Makri. The actual total pro-
duction, however, does not amount to over a few hundred
tons annually.
About twenty chrome mines are being operated, the
most important of these being situated in the neighbor-
hood of Kutaya in the district of Muntesha. Among the
mines of Kutaya is one at Tagh-Ardi, remarkable for
the size of its mineral area and for the richness of its ore,
which runs 52 to 54 per cent. The yearly output from
this mine is from ten to twelve thousand tons. Chrome
ore in this locality is generally found in serpentine, the
layers having the form of flat lenses and of irregular
tubes. The needs of the whole world could easily be
supplied by the mines that have already been exploited.
Chrome is found in varying quantities all over Turkey.
There are a great number of chrome mines in Muntesha
and Denizli, but· the ore is of low grade. However, the
proximity of the mines to each other and their closeness
to the sea give them an advantage in the way of trans-
portation. During the year 1910, 12,186 tons of chrome
was exported from Turkey to England, Austria-Hungary,
Italy, United States, Belgium, Serbia, Holland and
France. In 1911, 17095 tons were shipped; and in 1912,
26,374 tons were shipped to Germany, Italy, United
States, Bulgaria, Holland and France. During the War,
the Germans purchased f«?ur chrome mines, exploited
two others, and exported four or five thousand tons of
ore to Germany for use in the chrome steel industry.
They also purchased 5,000 tons at Makri which were not
shipped. Normally, most of the chrome is exported to
England, Germany, and the United States.
The first emery mine in Turkey was discovered by an
American civil engineer. On account of a certain quantity
of iron in its composition, Turkish emery in comparison
318 MODERN TURKEY
to the emery of Naxos (Greece) is somewhat softer.
Turkish emery contains from 40 to 55 per cent· of corun-
dum. Because of its fitness in polishing metal and glass
it is in greater demand than the emery of Naxos although
commanding a lower price. Emery is mined in the open.
Scientific methods are not thought necessary. The total
output of emery in Turkey is from thirty to forty thou-
sand tons a year. Emery mines are abundant in Tirch,
Eudemish, Nazilly and Aidin, all in the province of Aidin.
The greatest number of concessions belong to the English
who have monopolized the entire mining and exportation
of emery ore.
Among the mineral resources of Turkey, pandermite,
erroneously called boracite, occupies an important place.
The principal mine, which is in the shape of a basin, is
situated about seventy kilometers inland from the Sea of
Marmara along the railroad from Panderma to Smyrna.
Twelve or thirteen mining concessions have been given
in this basin; but with the exception of two or three mines
belonging to the Borax Consolidated, Ltd.~ none has
been worked. The ore is found at a depth of about fOO
meters and in the lay of a clay from 30 to 35 meters
thick. Sometimes it is found in the form of a vein :five
meters thick, composed of pieces as small as a walnut
up to those weighing half a ton. The ore contains from
41 to 49 per cent boracic acid, from 27 to 32 per cent
lime and about 18 per cent water; in addition to these
components, there is usually. found a small quantity of
magnesium, carbonite, and sulphuric acid. The yearly
output of panderinite in Turkey is from fifteen to sixteen
thousand tons, mostly exported to France, Germany, and
England in nearly equal quantities.
Lead is very abundant in Turkey. In Anatolia, the
mines are. found in the following main regions,-Darda-
nelles and Aidin, Izmid, Tavros, and Sivas. The Balia-
Karaidin mines, situated 40 kilometers northwest of the
MINES 319
railroad station of Balikhisar, are the most important.
The ore contains argentiferous galena (silver and lead)
and zinc, in typical percentages of from 10 to 11 per cent
lead; and 8 to 9 per cent zinc. Most of the lead ores
found in Turkey contain a little silver, which consider-
ably enhances their composite value.
Another important argentiferous. galena mine is that
of Bereketli, north of Ponzanti. In the same neighbor-
hoo~ there are other similar mines at Evjiler and Papazti,
towards the Gulf of Edremid. The Bulgar Daghi mine,
a property of the Government, has been studied carefully
by various experts. The ore from this mine is very rich,
yielding about 20 per cent lead, 6.5 kilograms of silver,
and from 30 to 40 grams of gold per ton. Silver and
lead amalgamated with zinc appear in a large basin in
the community of Ada Bazar, in the district of Izmid,
and also at Prichmen, 35 kilometers east of the Arghana
mines, in the province of Diarbekr. The Keban mine,
situated in the province of Kharput and belonging to the
Government, is also worthy of mention. Almost all of
the total output of silver and lead in Turkey is exported
to Belgium; some goes to France. ·
As the proper mining of iron ore requires so many
elaborate devices and implements, there are but few de-
posits worked. So far nine concessions have been given
and seven or eight are pending. The Payas mine at the
Gulf of Alexandretta and the Ayuzmend mine between
Smyrna and Edremid are the only ones which have been
developed. The veins are approximately one hundred
meters in width. The ore contains from 60 to 64 per
cent of iron but in some places this percentage drops
to below 30 per cent. There is an iron mine in operation
at Melej near Anamoor in the province of Adana. The
concession belongs to the French and its yearly output,
of from fifteen to twenty thousand tons of ore, is shipped
to Holland. In addition to these mines there are others
MODERN TURKEY
at Chaghlalik, community of Golovar, in the district of
Itchil (Adana), in Furtuna village at Turbali (Aidin),
at Altum-Tash and Burgas, localities of Mudania
(on the shores of Marmara), and at Kozan Dagh.
One of the richest provinces in iron ore is Aidin. The
mine of Besch-Parmak, near Milas, is very favorable.
The average iron content is 60 per cent. Thousands of
tons of ore have been blocked out and with the use of
modern methods and up-to-date mining equipment,. this
mine could be made very profitable since the port of
Aidin, on the Gulf of Mandalieh, is only :fifteen miles dis-
tant. Rich mines of brown iron lie near the Russian
frontier in Lazistan, also in the vilayet of Erzerum and
in the province of Arghana, southeast of Van. However,
since they are so far removed from the railway and sea-
coast, these properties are not favorable for immediate
consideration. Near the port of Gemlik, in the province
of Brusa, promising iron mines are located, and in the
province of the Dardanelles, near Koru and Okjilar, ores
with 57% to 80% oxide of iron are found.
From two to three thousand tons of zinc are extracted
from the mines of Balia-Karaidin yearly. A yearly out-
put of about one thousand tons is made from the mines
of Latom, in the Rizeh district. The zinc ores of Turkey
are exported chiefly to Belgium and to Germany.
The only antimony mine in operation, belonging to the
English, is situated at Mesjidli, kaza of Eudermish, prov-
ince of Aidin. The yearly output averages from eight
hundred to one thousand tons of ore, which is export_ed
to Belgium. Several other beds of antimony exist, but
are not at present being exploited to· any great extent.
The more important of these are the Goeme-Chiflik
mine, belonging to the civil list of the Sultan, situated
about 24 kilometers west of Gedis; the one at Demir-
Kapu in the province of Brusa; and several mines in
the vilayet of Smyrna.
MINES 321
From fifty to sixty tons of arsenic a year are obtained
by the Balia-Karaidin Company; the whole output is
shipped to Belgium.
Two mercury 'mines have been exploited by the Eng-
lish; the one situated at Sizma about thirty kilometers
north of Konia, the second located at Kara Broon in the
province of Aidin. The ore yields about seventy-five per
cent. Three thousand bottles of pure mercury per year
are obtained, which are exported chiefly to England and
Germany.
Meerschaum is found exclusively in Turkey. It is ex-
tracted from a large basin situated twenty-five or thirty
kilometers northeast of Eski Shehr. This basin belongs
to the Government. Upon securing a permit, the people
of this locality can open pits and extract meerschaum on
their own account. There are, at present, nearly two
thousand pits. Everything is in a primitive state. There
is no machinery of any sort, no pumps, and no woodwork
of any kind exists· in these pits. The depths of the pits
vary from twenty to sixty meters. When the layer con-
taining meerschaum is reached, horizontal galleries are
opened and the meerschaum is dug out and removed from
its jacket. It comes out in shapes, usually varying
roughly from the size of a walnut to that of an apple.
The galleries are from fifty 1lo five hundred meters in
length. The stones are first brought to Eski Shehr, where
they' are dried, weighed and to some extent polished, and
after being sorted, they are packed in cases and shipped
to Vienna where they are worked. The balance of the
local output is being sent to France, Germany, Belgium,
and sometimes to the United States.
A great quantity of fuller's earth (terre a foul.on) is
extracted at the kaza of Mikhalijik near Angora, and
is used in lieu of soap by the people of Anatolia. The
income of the government from this clay is between
thirteen and fifteen thousand Turkish pounds yearly.
322 MODERN TURKEY
A number of sulphur mines are located 1n the vicinity
of the Smyrna-Egerdir railroad and also in the neighbor-
hood of Ala Shehr. At present the best among the sul-
phur mines in Turkey is the one situated near Egerdir,
district of Sparta. This is the Kechiborlu mine and is
the property of the Government. Sulphur is also found
in the district of Daralgos. In the same province, near
Guemur, sulphur is worked out of trachyte. In the neigh-
borhood of the Dead Sea, sulphur is regularly present
in the diluvial deposits of the former valley of the Jor-
dan, where it is found in the form of earth or fine powder.
It is also found in the Midian Land south of Makna, and
on the coast of the Red Sea.
Until the beginning of the European war the only cop-
per mine in operation in Turkey was that known by the
name of Arghana-Maden, which belongs to the Govern-
ment. It is situated between Kharput and Diarbekr and
has been exploited for centuries. For the past seventy
years it has been operated by the Ottoman Government.
The mineral layer has the form of a fiat disk, 120-200
meters in diameter, is at least 15 meters thick, and lies in
contact with limestone and serpentine. The forests have
been cleared away for miles around this mine, which,
of course, hampers its working. The implements at this
mine are primitive; ore Mntaining less than from five to
six per cent of copper is dumped. There is a yearly
maximum output of from five hundred to fifteen hundred
tons of ore containing from seventy to seventy-five per
cent black copper. In the past a part of this copper was
sent by mule-back to Tokat in the province of Sivas,
where it was refined; as ninety-three to ninety-five per
cent pure copper, it was then used in the military fac-
tories of the Ottoman Government. Later on almost the
entire output, in the state of black copper, was shipped
to western Europe, chiefly Liverpool. In the province
of Kastamuni~ about 24 kilometers from the port of
MINES 323
lgaibel, is the Kureyi-Nihas mine, which was certainly
exploited in the past, as there is a huge mass of
debris and fragments of ore, approximately two
million tons, still fit for smelting piled up around
the mine. A great number of ancient abandoned
copper pits are in existence throughout the whole
country, many of which probably could be profitably
mined.
Silver is found chiefly in the argentiferous galena
mines. The yearly output and export of refined or raw
silver amounts to from two hundred to three hundred
thousand Turkish pounds in value. The following mines
ar,e now in operation: Denek, in the province of Angora,
with a yearly output of from seven to eight thousand
tons of ore; Peitchman, in the province of Diarbekr;
Yolari and Bulgar Daghi, both in the province of Konia.
The last-named property, after being operated by the
Ottoman Government for some seventy to eighty years,
was abandoned in 1908. The Balia-Karaidin mine is the
most important. This mine is at present operated by the
Societe Anonyme Ottomane des Mines de Balia-Karaidin,
which has installed the most modern machinery and
scientific methods. A narrow gauge railway transports
its mineral output to the harbor of Ak-Chai at the Gulf
of Edremid.
No mine has been found in Turkey which contains only
gold or silver. These minerals are always found mixed
with lead and exported in this state to the foreign coun-
tries which explains why no figures showing the exact
amount of gold or silver produced in Turkey are obtain-
able. Hundreds of gold mines, abandoned for centuries,
are visible in widely scattered sections of the ~ountry.
In the Boz-Dagh is situated the famous Paktolos (now
Karasu) mine, which was the source of King Crresus 's
wealth. Gold has been discovered in the alluvial sands
in the province of Hedchatz and there are several gold
324 MODERN TURKEY
washing establishments near Sirwa on the Yemen
plateau.
Turkey possesses practically infinite possibilities for
salt production. Its sources include existing mines, salt
springs, and lacustrine and maritime salines. The salt
output is large in Syria, Palestine, Mosul, Aleppo, and
in most parts of eastern Turkey, including the salt lakes
and mines in the provinces of Van and Erzerum. The
salt production in the provinces of Adana, Sivas, and
Aidin is large. The salt desert of Konia can be easily
developed. In August, 1917, the salt swamp of'Yavchan
in the Konia vilayet turned out 96,000 metric quintals.
During the World War more local attention was paid to
salt production than to any other mineral in Turkey.
Using prewar estimates, Erzerum produces 4,800,000
kilograms of salt more than it consumes; Adana, on the
contrary, consumes 900,000 kilograms more than it pro-
duces; Trebizond uses 21,000,000 kilograms and p•roduces
none; Konia has an excess of 4,400,000 kilograms; Sivas
an excess of 900,000, Smyrna an excess of 90,000,000
kilograms, Angora a deficiency of 5,000,000 kilograms,
etc. Yemen, producing 114,500,000 kilograms of salt
more than it used, evidently supplied most of the former
Turkish exports to Rangoon, Singapore, and India.
Onyx, jasper and agate are found on the coast of the
Black Sea, near Trebizond. Precious opals, fire opals,
and hualite are found near the village of Karamanjik,
in the valley of Simar, west of Gedis in the vilayet of
Brusa. Amber io found in the Lebanon.
Marble is common, and there are famous quarries of
gray, black and rose marble at Sinada near Afiun Qara-
hisar. Beautiful alabaster is found not far from Kishehr.
In Syria, beautiful limestone and marble have been
quarried and used for the construction of buildings of
the better class ever since the days of King Solomon.
The quarry products have normally a value amou~t-
MINES 325
ing to approximately L. T. 250,000, of which lime, bricks

and tile and building stone each have an estimated outpuf
valued at from L. T. 25,000 to 50,000.
The following table gives quantity and value of leading
mineral products for the years 1912, 1913, and 1914,
figures in metric tons and Turkish pounds respectively:-
A. mount YaZue
Kind of Material
1911 1911 1914 1911 1911 1914
- -- -
Coal (including lignite). 839,025 842,471 661,074 578,200 811,500 644,200
Petroleum and tar ••.•. 182 4,717 2,579 1,322 1,710 13,340
Chrome ............... 20,094 29,126 9,827 45,200 68,140 22,110
Emery •••.•••••••••••• 37,449 42,488 19,110 134,820 152,960 65,150
Borax .................. 14,361 21,535 10,495 110,120 166,620 81,150
Lead ................. 13,751 14,200 5,832 321,340 339,100 124,630
Gold •••••••••••••••••• ...... ...... ......
Silver •••••••••••••••• ....... ...... ...... ······ ......
...... .......
.....
Zinc •••••••••••••••••. 6,822 ······
4,524 1,820 27,613 16,345 5,890
6,146 ......
Iron •••••••••••••••••• 2,800
Copper ................
Antimony ............. 1,826
202 87 ......
1,142
1,590 3,645
2,307 1,930
143 21,919 13,700
........
.....
1,720
•••••••••••• ...... ...... ...... ......
23 ······
255 ······
~anganese
Arsenic ............... 23 88 870 233
·~ereury
·············· 134 87 20 64,214 38,822
Slate .................
32 41 18 2,990 4,303 1,831
10,870
Clay •••••••••••••••••• 7,005 6,410 5,666 14,400 13,177 11,~50
Considering all this mineral wealth, what then are the

causes that prevent the mining industry from flourishing
in Turkey? Primarily, they are the result of an unsatis-
factory moral and material progress in the country. In
brief, unless there are broad constructive programs laid
out for the solution of national economic questions, it is
useless to expect the desired product in one branch alone
-that is, in mining. There should also be mentioned the
absence of geological surveys, inadequate knowledge re-
garding present concessions, the noticable tendency of
concessionaires to secure claims for purely speculative
purposes, lack of adequate transport, and defects both
in theory and in practice in the present mining co~e.
Among the reforms needed in the mining laws are (1) the
regulation and simplification of the formalities for search
326 MODERN TURKEY
perinits and concessions, (2) due regard for the financial
standing and technical ability of the parties applying for
concessions, (3) the determination of the mine possi-
bilities before granting concessions, (4) the reduction to
a minimum of the preliminary expenses, ( 5) the forbid-
ding of shareholders from acting independently when
the mine is concessioned in the name of a company, (~)
the definition of the rights and duties of concession
owners, (7) the providing of satisfactory living quarters
for mine workers.
Another improvement which could help the mining
progress would be the creation of a government Bureau
for Geological Surveys. This bureau's task should be
to record data pertaining to the geology and the metal-
lurgy which should serve as a reliable inventory of the
country's mines. It would act as a guide to the mines
actually in operation as well as to the mines to be opened
in the future; it would help in the discovery of mine
basins; it could appraise or estimate the mineral wealth,
define the mineral standing of the country, suggest the
necessary steps for the coming years; and it would pros-
pect mines for the benefit of the government. The utility
of such a bureau would not be reserved only for mines.
It could help the discovery of several quarries and could
also be a factor in furnishing better information concern-
ing the cultivable land areas.
The mining enterprise has in addition to the general
risks of any industrial venture some peculiar risks of its
own; for instance, ore exhaustion, flood, strike, bank-
ruptcy, etc. In order to ameliorate these conditions, it
is necessary to adopt a policy favoring and encouragip.g
the mine prospectors in this undeveloped country. It
would be advisable to encourage the introduction (by
admitting free of duty) all kinds of tools and machinery
and material for the use of prospecting, op-ening, and
operating the mines; and, moreover, to grant all possible
MINES 327
inducements to careful prospecting. It would be of great

value to grant permission to use any accessible water
power for mine operation and as a means of transporta-
tion, to assist the mine owner in securing and carrying
timber for the purpose of fuel or for poling the mines,
and to secure the application of special rates for mineral
· ores on the part of railroads, vessels, and the harbo_r
companies.
It is desired that foreign capital may become inter-
ested.1 It is true that so far Turkey has not given entire
satisfaction to outside investors, but no one can challenge
the fact that the concessionaires on their part have
frequently failed to respect the legitimate interests of
this country.
With the signing of the peace, it is hoped that this
abnormal situation will come to an end; that Turkey
will show a more sincere welcome to foreign capital and
foreign technicians; that foreigners will refrain here-
after from utilizing diplomacy, might, and one-sided
policies; that they will both act within the limits of
mutual right and justice.
1 In a British Official doeument issued by the foreign office, dated Decem-
ber 9, 1921, appears the following information regarding the securing of

real estate and the exploitation of mines:-
Foreigners whose Governments have adhered to the protocol of the 7th
Sefer, 1285 (see George Young's "Corps de Droit Ottoman," vol. I, p.
335), may acquire real property in Turkey under the same conditions as
Ottoman subjeets, that is, by subjecting themselves to the laws and usages
of the Ottoman Empire.
2. Permission for the exploitation of mines may be delivered to subjects
of foreign Powers under conditions laid down in the mining law of the
Hth Sefer, 1324 (the 26th March, 1906), see "Corps de Droit Ottoman,"
vol. VI, p. 17.
3. Mines may only be exploited in virtue of an Imperial irad6. Applica-
tion for a mining concession must be made to the Mines Administration.
The concession ia for a period of ninety-nine years, except in special circum-
stances when the Mines Administration have the power to give concessions
for a period of not more than ninety-nine or less than forty years.
4. Prospecting licences may be obtained from the Governor-General of
the provinee in which the applicant dt.l8ires to prospect, or from the mutes·
1arif if it be in one of the non-dependent eanjaka (districts).-E. G. M.
CHAPTER XV
FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC COMMERCE
If you would work any man you must either know his nature, and
fashions, and so lead him ; or his ends, and so persuade him ; or his
weakness, and disadvantages, and so awe him; or those that have inter-
est in him, and so govern him. In dealing with cunning persons, we
must ever consider their ends, to interpret their speeches; and it is good
to say little to them, and that which they least look for. In all negotia-
tions of difficulty, a man may not look to sow and reap at once; but
must prepare business, and so ripen it by degrees.
-FRANCIS BACON, "Of Negotiating."
The Turk of the Ottoman Empire scorned business

and despised those native elements who chose to engage
in business. To the typical Turk, there was a social stig-
ma attached to the word "tradesman" which is still so
marked in many countries of western Europe. Whether
the Turkish Moslem could have held his own against the
industrious, shrewd lovers of ·the gold franc is an un-
answered question, for the simple reason that he did not
make the attempt. By far the greater part, probably
eighty per cent, of the finance, industry, and commerce
was in the active control of Greeks and Armenians, many
of whom profited by freedom from military service, and
from remission of taxes under the capitulations. Prob-
ably the Turk would have been bested in competition
with these enterprising, talented peoples. But these
Greeks and Armenians no longer figure seriously as
business functionaries because few of them remain in
Turkey. Future commerce in Turkey appears to be in
the hands of the foreigners, Jews, and Turks-with chief
emphasis upon the Turks themselves. The departure of
328
FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC COMMERCE 329
the foregoing productive elements and the substitution
of the Turks for the Christians as the coming managers
of commercial enterprises and as the chief ''hewers of
stone and drawers of water" are the two great problems
in Turkey's national economy.
We should not be hasty in concluding that the TlU-"k
cannot become a successful business man. Certainly it
is true that the qualities he exhibits to such conspicuous
advantage in diplomacy-patience, cunning, and an un-
derstanding of other peoples-can be employed towards
other ends. When he has engaged in trade, largely due
to the absence of other races, his record has been that of
an easy-going individual with a rather high degree of
Oriental honesty. Yet since bu!>iness, similar to politics,
is a battle of wits, the Turk, if he is so inclined, ought to
be able to adapt his acknowledged talents into the new
role which he had voluntarily brought upon himself.
Before he can hope, however, to operate on an equal
basis with competitors in Turkey and without, he must
serve his apprenticeship. For business is a very complex
calling. It is not sufficient for an individual engaged
therein to be proficient in a single aspect such as market
news, salesmanship, foreign exchange, or transportation,
but he must have also an intimate all-around knowledge
of most phases of production, transportation, and dis-
tribution. Accurate data must be had relative ·to the
standing of reliable firms abroad and to commodity mar-
kets. Transportation has a technique of its own. Proper
safeguards must be present in commercial transactions,
otherwise the insurance risk can be covered at prohibitive
rates only. Future public and private policies towards
banks, insurance companies and shipping firms mean
much in trading with foreign countries. Limitations due
to barter and to credit requirements permit few foreign
trading firms, moreover, to be able to import without ex-
porting, or export without importing. The ability to sell
330 MODERN TURKEY
on favorable terms is conditioned upon careful purchas-
ing. Nowhere are these business essentials more difficult
to acquire than in Turkey.
The primitive conditions in Turkey do not warrant in·
-the near future either a large domestic or foreign trade,
for the country is largely in the pastoral stage with an
increasing attention being paid to products of the soil.
There are probably nearly as many goats as people in
Asia Minor. The excellent possibilities in regard to in-
creased production and careful marketing of wheat, silk,
olives, tobacco, figs, and raisins are neglected, although
the government officials appreciate the importance and
are studying ways and means of ameliorating rural life.
Second to agriculture locally is mining, likewise conducted
by rudimentary methods. Despite the artistic distinc-
tive handicrafts, such as rug making and brass and silver
working, industry in the modern sense is virtually non-
existent. There are practically no machine shops, valu-
able much-needed water power is not utilized, and good
roads are almost unknown. Wheat grown in the Ameri-
can plains, shipped to New York, thence to Samsun, can
be laid down cheaper than rival supplies from the won-
derfully rich region about Sivas. The prewar American
vice-consul at Sivas told me that before 1914, he could
feed his horse on the best of fare for a dollar a month.
In 1914, the Ottoman exports amounted to $5.10 per
capita, and the imports to $9.37 per capita; no one is
rash enough to predict the changes of the near future.
These per capita figures, subject to the usual query re-
garding accuracy, indicate the small surplus exported
as well as the low purchasing power of the inhabitants.
The typical Anatolian peasant does not handle the
equivalent of fifty dollars in cash during the entire yeari
the purchase of a foreign-made commodity is a great
event in his life. Before buying a cheap pocket knife, _he
may inspect the article on several hundred occasions.
Cotlrle~t~.fl Seball ..t· Joailli~r
One of Rtamhoul's many Fasdnating Bazaars.

Because of this. exceedingly small savings of the native
Anatolian, it is certainly a remarkable tribute to the
efficiency of a well-known sewing machine company that
its product is found throughout Turkey.
It is possible to travel scores of miles over leading
highways of Asia Minor, yet not encounter a single pub-
lic shop. Practically the only stores to be found any-
where in Turkey,' outside of the commercial districts 1
• There are famous bazaars to be found in the leading cities, made up
of numerous small shops located along winding streets sometimes with
covered roofs, where are to be found practically all the products and relics
of the Orient. These little shops devoted to the same class of goods are
grouped together. The merchants are Orientals. The most distinctive
bazaar for the products of the East is at Aleppo, Syria. At Stamboul, the
products are both Eastern and Western.
The Italian stylist, Edmondo de Amicis, wrote of the great bazaar at
Stamboul in his book "Constantinople": "In this dimly lighted thorough·
fare, carriages, horsemen, and camels are constantly passing, making a
deafening noise. The visitor is apostrophized on all sides with words and
signs. The Greek merchants call out in loud voices and use imperious ges·
tures. The Armenian, quite as cunning, but more humble in manner, solicits
obsequiously; the Jew whispers his offers in your ear; the silent Turk,
seated cross-legged upon his carpet at the entrance of his shop, invites only
with his eye, and resigns himself to destiny.••• It is amusing to go into
the shops of the Frank merchants where there are things to suit all purses.
You have scarcely entered before you are surrounded by a circle of people
sprung from you cannot tell where. It is not possible to deal with one
person alone. What with shopkeepers and their partners, middlemen, and
all the hangers on of each, there are always half a dozen. If you escape
one, you are due to fall into the hands of the other; and there is no help
for you; and it is incredible the artfulness, the patience, the obstinacy, the
diabolical astuteness which they display in making you buy what they
please. They begin by asking an absurd price; you offer one third; they
drop their arms in sign of profound diseouragement, or strike their fore·
heads with a gesture of despair and make no reply; or else they burst into
a torrent of passionate words intended to touch your heart. You are a cruel
man, you want to make them shut up their shop, you want to reduce them
to misery, you have no pity on their children, they cannot understand what
they have done to be treated in such a manner. While one is naming the
price of an object, a sensate (middleman, or touter) from a neighboring
shop, whispera in your ear:-'Do not buy; they are cheating you.' You
think he is sincere, but he is really playing into the bands of your merchant;
he tells you that they are cheating you in the shawl only to gain your con·
fidenee, and piek your pocket the next minute by advising you to buy the
table eovor or carpet. While you are examining the staff, they are exchang·
ing signs, winka and whispers. If you know Greek, they speak Turkish ; if
you know that they speak Armenian; if you understand Armenian, they
apeak Spanish; but in one way or another they are certain to get the
better of :you."
332 MODERN TURKEY
in a few centers consist of small booths, five to fifteen
feet square. The local shopkeeper carries an exceed-
ingly limited assortment of a wide variety of goods,
partly purchased locally and partly from a seacoast city.
What this "want of sale" typifies has been well described
by Sir W. M. Ramsay. "The shop cannot exist because
there is no money to buy from it, and no security for
anything if money could be got; robbery is indeed rare
in the village at present because there is absolutely noth-
ing to steal; but few persons would care to be known as
the only person in the village that possessed some money
and articles for sale.''
The peasant endeavors to produce his simple require-
ments, and if possible obtain a little money from a sur-
plus which he tries to sell in his local community. The
shopkeepers have their local supplies, consisting mainly
of articles of food and drink, cheap footwear and clothing,
on hand just before the harvest; otherwise, they stand to
lose their customers and their prospect of cash or kind.
The basis of sale in Turkey is price, not quality. Dura-
bility is a purely secondary consideration. The only
exceptions to be made are in the case of a limited number
of well-to-do Turkish citizens, the Levantines, and the
foreign colony in Constantinople who take pride in im-
ported goods.of superior grade. Recent emigrations have
cut down severely the demands for all foreign-made
articles. The Japanese, in particular, have been quick
to sense the situation and have already made inroads
into the American and British cotton-goods trade. In
the prebellum days, the high class trade was catered
to fairly well, but except in the case of German and
Austrian firms, the much more characteristic low class
trade was neglected. "In the case of German trade,"
as the writer said in Commerce Reports (July 28, 1919),
"the merchants who handled the articles of cheap manu-
facture and made money on them considered naturally
that the Germans had rendered a real service. The pub-
lic became familiar with German goods, and were
impressed by the willingness to consider their needs and
demands, which implied superior adaptability and pro-
gressiveness. Moreover, differences in price alone are
especially easy to appreciate, and this worked so favor-
ably in the case of German trade that a kind of supersti-
tion as to German industrial invincibility grew up. It
was a common opinion among merchants and importers
that it was futile for others to try to compete with Ger-
man trade. • . • It must be remembered, however, that
the markets for high and for low grade goods are entirely
separate, and that instead of excluding each other, they
may react favorably."
The foreign trade importance of Turkey cannot be
understood without a recognition of the central position
of Turkey in the Eastern hemisphere where Constanti-
nople stands half way on the route from the leading cities
of western Europe to India. Normally, the transit com-
merce which relates mainly to the tremendous passage
of commodities to and from Transcaucasian and south
Russian ports far exceeds the exports and imports of
Turkey alone. In 1920, possibly three quarters of the
economic life of Constantinople was concerned with that
outside area. And then there must be seriously reckoned
the part played by the City in the commerce of Greece,
Bulgaria, Romania, Jugo-Slavia, the Soviet Republics,
Turkestan, Persia, and the eastern Mediterranean sector.
The trade revival in the Levant in the latter part of the
nineteenth and in the present century, the result of an
expressed desire on the part of foreign financial and
commercial groups to exploit countries in which there
was a weak capitalistic class, gave to Constantinople,
despite the opening of the Suez Canal, fresh and en-
334 MODERN TURKEY
larged importance as the unquestioned metropolis of
the Near East.
Among Turkish seaports, Constantinople ranked first
in imports and second in exports in 1914, but now is
first in both, for Smyrna is merely a shadow of her
former self. There are no figures of any kind available
which show graphically the premier standing of Con-
stantinople in commerce, banking, shipping, ·and related
lines. With respect to certain products, including figs,
raisins, and licorice root, Smyrna is the national entrepot.
The well-balanced imports and exports as well as the
extent of the transit trade become evident in these figures
compiled by the Smyrna Quay .Company (figures in
thousands): 1913, imports 7,111 quintals, expmts 7,097
quintals, transit trade 779 quintals; 1914, imports 5,794
quintals, exports 5,340 quintals, transit trade 771 (thou-
sand) quintals .. The reader is referred to the chapter
on Transportation and Communication for more detailed
data relative to Turkish localities.
The relative commercial importance of the di:ffer~nt
regions of Turkey in 1912 and 1914 (the Balkan wars
intervening) can be well surveyed from the subsequent
table, which has been based upon the official Turkish
customs returns for the years ending March 13, 1912,
and March 13, 1914, respectively.
Expressed in dollars, the value of the foregoing Otto-
man foreign trade for 1914 amounted to imports ap-
proximating $175,000,000, and exports approximating
$100,000,000. Doubtless, the actual excess of merchan-
dise imp'Orts over exports was actually about half this
difference, or $37,500,000.1
• For imports, the Turkish official figures are reckoned upon the declared
value of the merchandise, based on the purchase price plus the other
expenses until the goods reach the custom house. The Turkish exports
are generally valued officially on the basis of prevailing prices at the port
of shipment. Even though account were taken of the many regular dis·
crepancies such as the omission of tobacco and other government monopolies
Trade Imports Trade Exports

Locality 19116
Value I 1914
Value
19116 ., 1914
Value
(In thousand Turkish pounds)
Value
Stamboul and Galata ..•.•..••••• 1,526 1,580 308 291

Haidar Pasha and dependeneies .••• 170 143 .343 258
Smyrna .•..•....•..•..•..•••••• 482 566 488 528
Dependencies of Smyrna •••••••.. 72 14 223 198
Alexandretta and dependencies ••••. 151 148 161 190
Salonika ........................ 420 .... 128 ....
Dependencies of Salonika .••.••••
Beirut .........................
78
406
....
440
34
117
....
.115
Dependencies of Beirut •..••••••• 222 368 158 176
Baghdad
Trebizond
.......................
......................
304
104
331
99
152
21
134
15
Dependencies of Trebizond ••••••. 151 191 160 169
Dede Agach ......•.....••••.•••.
Dependencies of Dede Agach •••••.
60
57
.....
..... 45
29
.....
...
Preveza and dependencies •...•... 96 ., .. 39 .....
...
Tripoli in Africa and dependencies.
Yemen and dependencies •••••••••
50
69
....69 25
37 42
Jidda and dependencies ....•...•. 83 107 4 5
Adrianople and dependencies •.••. .... 25 .... 23
Total ...................... 4,501 4,081 2,472 2,144
By analysis of the trade figures for 1914, the imports

can be classified into manufactured goods 59.4 per cent,
cereals 25 per cent, raw materials 7 per cent, miscel-
laneous 8.6 per cent; and the exports into manufactured
among the exports, the merchandise imported ·for government account,
undervaluation of both imports and exports, smuggling, etc., no person
conversant with Turkish custom house methods could be so bold as to state
that Turkish officials trade figures are sufficiently accurate to be relied
upon. Backsheesh is a regular part of the system for clearing merchandise.
It is well-known that officials in charges of the custom houses are
frequently obliged to wait months before they receive their salaries, and
at best they are distinctly underpaid in view of the services they are
required to perform. Under the circumstances, the offering and taking
of gratuities is really as much a government tax as a dishonest practice.
Sir Richard Crawford, an Englishman, appointed in 1910 to improve the
customs service, made a good beginning in the eradication of some of the
evils, but his tenure of office was short. He learned that reform in the
Orient is a slow process. It was an entertaining English writer who made
an observation regarding the Ottoman custom house charges, in these
words, "In no portion of the globe are the officers in charge of the
collection, of a more confiding facility or of so conciliatory a spirit in
every transaction regarding commerce.' '
336 MODERN TURKEY
goods 13 per cent,'cereals 45 per cent, raw materials 38.4

per cent, miscellaneous 3.6 per cent.
The postwar commerce has been too abnormal to give
figures much utility. For over two years, Constantinople
and Asia Minor have been separated politically and by
customs tariffs. No data have been compiled for the
Black Sea ports. For three years, the Smyrna district
was occupied and controlled by Hellenic officers. The
territories of former Tsarist Russia have been commer-
cially moribund. The only recent official Turkish figures
available are for the city of Constantinople, which record
for 1922 imports of L. T. 67,884,181, and exports of
L. T. 23,405,246. (The Turkish paper pound was worth
about 65 cents.) In local imports, the United States
leads with L. T. 12,144,264, followed by England with
L. T. 10,318,476, then in order, Bulgaria, Germany, Italy,
France, Romania, Holland, and Belgium. The unreli-
ability of these returns may be admitted since the Ameri-
can consulate general at Constantinople reports ship-
ments from the United States of $22,000,000 in 1922,
$23,947,110 in 1921 and $42,247,798 in 1920. The posi-
tion of the United States as the leading import country
may be temporary on account of the recently enacted
high tariff on flour, oleo' oil, and other manufactured
goods.
For late Turkish exports, official figures are not yet
available. The same consulate general at Constantinople
reports exports to the United States valued at $5,454,414
in 1921 and $10,086,423 in 1922; the American consulate
at Smyrna reports exports of $10,406,552 in 1921 and
$9,837,774 in 1922. The chief articles of export to the
United States are tobacco, figs, raisins, licorice root,
sausage casings, mohair, carpets and rugs.
The European Commercial (December 1, 1923) states
that the custom officials at Constantinople report that the
local imports for the period January-June, 1923,
amounted to L. T. 38,474,991, compared with L. T. 39,-
173,876 during the same period of 1922 and L. T. 58,523,-
999 in 1921. Total exports for the period under review
were valued at L. T.12,941,948 as against L. T. 13,177,-
856 and L. T. 12,360,403 in the corresponding periods of
1922 and 1921, respectively. It will be seen, therefore,
that Turkey's trade balance for the first half of 1922 and
1923, judging by Constantinople, has been relatively un-
changed. Actually, Turkey profited from a flow of money
into the country represented by expenditures and con-
tributions of relief, religious, and educational organiza-
tions, money spent by tourists, alien business men and
foreign public officials, remittances by emigrants, etc.,
large items which do not figure in the merchandise re-
turns but are none the less important. (The writer has
presented some figures, with particular reference to the
Near East, in the Quarterly Journal of Economics (Har-
vard), May, 1923, and ·in the Economic Journal, (Royal
Economic Society quarterly), September, 1923.] Ex-
cluding the huge expenses of representatives of the Allied
and Associated Powers, a conservative estimate for 1923
of these so-called "invisible" payments, of which the
United States is the chief contributor, is $20,000,000.
The largest exports from Turkey are agricultural and
mineral products. The tobacco is grown chiefly around
the Smyrna and Samsun districts. From 60% to 75%
of the production from each locality is purchased by
American resident buyers; the balance, consisting largely
of the poorer grades, is consumed in Egypt and in
central and western Europe. The emigration of the
Greeks and Armenians has already caused a much re-
duced output. There is a distinct possibility that these
cultivators in the former Ottoman Empire will aid in the
production of "Turkish tobacco" in Macedonia. In the
period just prior to the War, the production in Greece
and Turkey was nearly the same, amounting to approxi-
338 MODERN TURKEY
mately 85,000,000 lbs. 1n each country. The dried fig
crop in the Smyrna region has been little affected by
recent events since the fig is grown in a section which
is not seriously affected by military operations; produc-
tion in 1923 is about the same as a decade previous. In
connection with this industry, the chief difficulty is in
training Turkish labor for employment in the Smyrna
packing houses. The sultana raisin is now being grown
by the Turks who are succeeding the Greeks with appar-
ently satisfactory results in this culture. Unlike the
fig, the sultana requires little local manipulation. The
mohair exports, largely to England, France, Germany
and the United States, has good prospects for continu-
ance despite an estimated loss of one half to three
quarters of the number of Angora goats. The export
trade in wool is suffering due to an even heavier loss in
the number of sheep, a condition, according to Ameri-
can Consul General Ravndal, arising from the utilization
of mutton for military purposes. The supply of skins
has been much reduced. The rug industry has been hard
hit because of the loss of the household workers, largely
Armenians, and the manufacture of imitations mainly in
Europe and America. The recent destruction of mul-
berry trees has retarded the raw silk production which
is the.basis of a noted local industry. Among the other
important products which should figure in the country's
exports during the next few years are minerals (meer-
schaum, borax and emery), nuts on the Black Sea coast,
seeds (millet, sesame, alfalfa and canary), sponges, olive
oil, gum tragacanth, valonea (the acorns are important
.in the tanning industry), cotton, and cereals.
The imports into Turkey are likely to continue to con-
sist mainly of foodstuffs, mineral fuels, textiles, farm
machinery, and a limited line of manufactured goods.
In 1922, Turkey imported over $10,000,000 worth of flour
from the United States alone; but this trade is already
being lost to Bulgaria due to faster shipment and the
cheaper price mainly the result of poorer quality. In
accordance with the governmental policy of building up
local industries, doubtless Turkey's imports of wheat will
increase and those of foreign flour decrease. Turkey's
imports of rice amount to upwards of $7,000,000 an-
nually; due to the inferior local product, foreign pur-
chases of this commodity seem destined to continue on
the present scale. Coffee, another important staple, is
largely of Brazilian and Javanese origin. Sugar, largely
from Dutch and American sources, is another sought
after product which cannot be ·produced on any large
scale locally. Turkey imports about one third of her
coal requirements, mainly from Britain. The mineral oil
business is handled largely by American companies with
increasing competition from Russia and Romania. The
most important single class of imports is textiles, in
which Turkey is one of the leading world buyers. The
pioneers were American merchants who introduced the
famous "Cabot. A," still sold in large quantities .al-
though imitated by Japanese rivals. England, however,
is the big factor in Turkey's trade in woolen and cotton
goods. Oleo oil and cotton seed oil and glucose (the lat- .
ter used in the making of Turkish halva) should continue
to be supplied by the United States. Lumber has been
supplied by Austria, but in recent years Sweden and
Norway have figured prominently, with an excellent pos-
sibility of the Pacific Coast interests of Canada and the
United States of America appearing as prominenf
dealers. Farm and industrial machinery of all types
seem likely to be imported in large volume provided
proper arrangements can be made for financing. The
future is especially promising in the case of farm imple-
ments and machinery, a trade in which the United States
has first place. These producer goods are admitted duty
free. American automobiles have also had first place
340 MODERN TURKEY
although the depreciated currency in European c~untries
is causing difficult competition from rival French, Ger-
man, and Italian makes. Hardware, typewriters, office
supplies and motion pictures are largely American. T;he
great variety of cheaper grade novelties com~ from cen-
tral Europe. Turkey's imports within the next few years
are not likely to be up to prewar volume on account of
the readjustment of the internal economic situation, the
reduced purchasing power of the inhabitants, and the
promulgation of the high customs tariff which in the
case of many articles is practically prohibitive.
Until ~923, the naming of customs duties was largely
controlled by the Powers represented on the Council of
the Ottoman Public Debt, with the subsequent approval
of the Government. The prime objective was revenue
rather than the protection of native industries. In 1907,
the uniform ad valorem rate of 8% was raised to 11%
(the additional amount to accrue to the Debt Adminis-
tration), increased to 15% in 1914, and to 30% in 1915.
On its own initiative, the State enacted a specific tariff
in September, 1916; but this action was not officially
recognized by the Foreign Powers until the Treaty of
Lausanne, although as a matter of practice Levantines
and others, during 1918-1922, paid duties according to
the schedule in preference. The reason was simple: by
paying in the depreciated Turkish paper currency, the
average charge amounted to somewhat less than half the
prewar 11% ad valorem duty. The present tariff sys-
tem, which is being incorporated in commercial conven-
tions, is that "which came into operation on September
1, 1916," duties to be paid in Turkish paper !llOney, but
with coefficients that were in force on March, 1923, when
the pound sterling exchanged at 745 paper piastres
(there are 100 piastres in a Turkish pound). For exam-
ple, the convention signed at Lausanne provides that the
following articles are subject to coefficient 9,-potatoes,
oranges, confectionery (sweetmeats), mineral waters,
dressed leather, pigskin, footwear, gloves, peltry raw
or prepared, furniture, cotton, embroidery, lace and rib-
bons, silk waste, gauze, silk tulle, silk tissue, silk hosie_cy,
silk passementerie, woolen shawls and belts, clothing,
sunshades, umbrellas, parasols, etc. These, and other
foreign-made articles such as flour and vegetable oils,
are taxed severely in order to stimulate home industry,
a policy affirmed by the Economic Pact which is given in
the General Introduction. The tariff on industrial ma- ·
chinery has been increased approximately five times but,
as already stated, agricultural machinery is free of duty.
In 1921, due partly to military requirements, most
local products were on the forbidden export list. Nor-
mally, the list is confined to a few products. The injunc-
tions in the Koran, neither to buy nor sell untanned skins,
human hair, swine, wine, etc., have never been adhered
to until the recent action of the Repubiic regarding al~o
holic drinks. (The large wine exports from France,
which stand in danger of being cut off entirely, are a
not-to-be forgotten factor in Franco-Turkish relations.)
By Article 3 of the commercial convention signed at
Lausanne, Turkey undertakes to do away with all import
and export prohibitions except those which may be neces-
sary (1) to maintain the resources indispensable for the
food of the people, and to safeguard the economic activ-
ity of the nation; (2) to insure the security of the State;
(3) to protect persons, animals, and plants against con-
tagious diseases, epizooties and epiphyties; ( 4) to pre-
vent the use of opium and other poisons; (5) to prohibit
the import of alcoholic products, the use of which is for-
bidden in Tu:rkey; (6) to prevent the export of gold
money or gold metal; (7) to establish or support State
monopolies.
A further tariff obstacle to the foreign commerce of
Turkey is the present political and economic barrier be-
342 MODERN TURKEY
tween its present and its late territory. Thus we see
that the former thriving bazaars of Aleppo, Damascus,
Baghdad and other cities south of its present Asiatic
frontier are doing very little business and the same s_it-
uation applies to the former prosperous trade centers
of Turkey. Anatolia and Syria were closely related in
a trade way in the days of the Ottoman Empire; but with
the departure from Turkey of vast numbers of Arme-
nians and Greeks (many of the former have settled in
Syria) and the high Turkish import duty on most Syrian
products, this trade which has become foreign rather
than domestic is at a standstill. While there are many
products which are common to Turkey, Syria, Palestine,
and Iraq, therefore partly competitive, close commercial
relations between these various countries are necessary
for their national prosperity. Early in 1922, a Turkish
mission visited Syria in order to investigate and study
customs arrangements but no official action has yet been
taken. It seems probable that the colonial policies of
France and Great Britain will govern the trade policies
of the southern detached territories. Unless Turkey is
prepared to take a long step backward, it is necessary for
her to give constructive attention to questions of export
and import duties, drawbacks (which are refunds of im-
port duties when the same or a derived product is later
exported), embargoes on exports and imports, free ports
and free zones. The favorable geographic location of
Turkey requires an unusual amount of consideration to
these commercial problems.
There are good reasons why foreign firms are cautious
about Turkish commerce. First of all, Turkey is virtually
an unknown country abroad: her material resources, her
business machinery, and her geographical advantages
have never been adequately described. Another factor is
that of credit extension: most firms do not feel warranted
in doing business on other than a cash basis unless the
reputation of the customer has been established. Yet
few local firms can operate on this basis. Before the
'Var, most British, American, and other foreign houses
depended on the credit information gathered by the
Schimillfeng credit-reporting agency and by German
banks. The German prewar policy of granting long
credit, frequently from six to nine months and in the
case of agricultural machinery from a year to two years,
was possible through the instrumentality of the German
financing houses which discounted promptly the notes of
German customers. While it was the banks rather than
the manufacturers which granted long credit, the effect
was the same as far as foreign competitors were con-
cerned. Prior to 1914, British and American banks were
not interested in long credits, therefore their national
customers were confronted with the alternative of assum-
ing the risks themselves, of using the facilities of German
banks which they largely did, or of neglecting the Turk-
ish market entirely. That Germany was unwise in
adopting a too liberal credit policy seems fairly well
established. Not on.'ly did she induce her customers to
overstock, but also many open accounts in behalf of
her nationals will remain open for generations to come.
Those foreign firms which had had unfortunate ex-
periences, or had heard of unfortunate experiences in
connection with Levantine trade, have become duly wary.
And it must be confessed that there have been and are
numerous examples of sharp dealing. Still it is not fair
to condemn all trading firms, for in Turkey as elsewhere
there are honest bw:;iness men and others. Proper
caution should be exercised. Many European and Ameri-
can companies have become too easily discouraged, fre-
quently because of their ill-fortune resulting from casual
methods in the choice of an agent or in their failure to
accord him the support which he needs and has the right
to expect. Their travelling representatives have been
MODERN TURKEY
frequently poor selections. Another discouraging fea-
ture has been the necessity for speculation not only for
goods but, in currencies--the latter is a development only
recently due to the late instability of the Turkish pound.
To quote an article of mine in Commerce Reports (Oc-
tober 22, 1920) :-"In the coming struggle with experi-
enced and capable national competitors, the most
important single element in the promotion and extension
of American trade interests lies in the selection and
training of high-caliber foreign traveling representatives
of unquestioned American ideas and ideals. Nowhere is
this fact<?r of such decided value as in the Near East
and those other world areas practically unknown at the
present time to the rank and file of American foreign-
trade enterprises.
''The two great mistakes now being made are the gen-
eral choice of a foreigner of local origin or of a foreigner
who merely speaks any language other than English irre-
spective of its use in the particular locality. Regarding
the latter, the writer met in Greece more than one Ameri-
can commercial traveler who was obviously selected be-
cause of his ability to speak Spanish. Spanish, however,
is not understood in Greece except by the important com-
mercial Jewish element in Salonika which speaks, in addi-
tion to a peculiar Judreo-Spanish, also Greek, Turkish,
Italian, French, and often German and English. More
striking still was the number of Russians sent to Con-
stantinople, who strangely enough did not speak either
French, Greek, Armenian, or Turkish.
''An Armenian or Greek or Jew or Turk, irrespective
of whether he has been naturalized or whether he repre-
sents a bona fide American company, is never regarded
in commercial circles abroad as an American. He is
still a Levantine, and business negotiations with him
are conducted on that plane."
Then there is the question of locai merchandising. In
the past, commercial activity has been controlled largely
by Armenians and Greeks, exceedingly wide awake indi-
viduals, keen to follow up any business . opening, com-
monly indulging in practices which business labels as
dishonest, and always prepared to drive a hard bargain.
It is not surprising that both Moslems and non-Moslems
have become exasperated by the sharp practices indulg~d
in by these peoples, which have served to create personal
relationships, fundamentally similar, but much accen-
tuated, to those existing between Gentiles and Jews in
eastern Europe and elsewhere. Until recently, numer-
ous of these traders have enjoyed the special privileges
under the capitulatory regime, whereby many non-Mos-
lems have become naturalized abroad in order to occupy
a privileged position locally. Among the many perplexi-
ties arising in the diplomatic and consular services of
the great powers, there has been and is the question of
how far each country should go in order to support
naturalized citizens, many of whom have never been out-
side of Turkey. The various agreements reached at
Lausanne (1923) do not include a definite statement
regarding the status of persons born in Turkey who have
secured foreign citizenship.
Even more advantage has been taken of foreign flags
by other well known ''Levantine'' firms, largely of Brit-
ish, French and Italian nationalities, which have done a
considerable local business, although in the aggregate
much smaller than that of either the Armenians or the
Greeks. An outstanding weakness of these Levantine
firms is that they have stood ready to "buy or sell any-
thing"; but frequently have lacked the specialists who
are necessary if competition from other firms is to be
met on an even level. An exception might be made of a
few well-known Levantine firms, such as the Girauds,
the La Fontaines, the 'Vhittalls, which have strong
family and business connections in the country.
346 MODERN TURKEY
Few foreign firms have branch houses in Turkey. The
Standard Oil Company of New York and the Singer
Sewing Machine Company maintain large distributing
organizations. The leading American tobacco companies
.have resident buyers at Smyrna and Samsun. Mac-
Andrews and Forbes, another American firm, the leading
firm anywhere to be found in the purchase of licorice
root, has one of the largest establishments at Smyrna.
An American automobile corP'oration and several foreign
export and import houses also have branch houses in
Turkey.
As a rule, articles of foreign make are handled by
native commission firms, who occupy a place which is
similar to that of export houses in the United States. In
trade, there is the same division of functions between
the importers, wholesalers, and retailers that we find
in America, but the go-betweens (brokers and outrig_ht
speculators) are far more numerous. It is noteworthy
that the foodstuff and hardware business has been in
the hands of the Greeks, and that of textiles in the hands
of a few Armenian firms which have had strong repre-
sentation in Manchester or New York. The retail and
most of the wholesale trade is run by natives. Despite
the powerful efforts being made to Turkify local business,
it is too early to know whether the Turk will step aside
to let the Jews, Levantines, and foreigners replace the
Armenians and Greeks. Who will be the successors to
the 485 Greek business houses in Constantinople, includ-
ing 18 importing firms which have ceased business alto-
gether and 21 firms which transferred elsewhere during
the seven months following October, 1922? (These fig-
ures are from the Aksham.) The convention regarding
conditions of residence, business, and jurisdiction, signed
at Lausanne expressly P'rovides that corporations of the
contracting powers "will have the right to establish
themselves in Turkish territory and to engage in all
forms of commerce and industry in which nationals of
the country where they were incorporated may engage,
and which are not forbidden in Turkey to Turkish corpo-
rations. They will have the right freely to conduct their
affairs in Turkey, subject to compliance with the pre-
scriptions relating to public order, and will enjoy in this
respect the·same rights as any similar Turkish corpora-
tion.'' Most firms in Turkey have found it advisable,
. to the point of necessity, to replace Greeks and Arme-
nians by Turks. By and large, however, there is little
reason to expect any revolution in general merchandising
methods.
In order to cope with economic conditions in the
Levant, before July, 1914, the Germans had a model co-
ordinated organization which was so effective that it
deserved recounting. Its basis was common sense, first-
hand acquaintance with the situation in Turkey, along
with carefully worked out plans for acquainting Turk-
ish business men as well as Turkish youths with indus-
trial and commercial conditions in the German Empire.
Thus, in 1911, there visited Germany a special mission
composed of sixty Ottoman business men, only five of
whom had previously been there. The members were
provided with special trains and were shown leading
factories, dock and steamship yards, banks, and mercan-
tile establishments. They were received at Kiel by the
former Kaiser, who endeavored to impress them by a
show of submarines, torpedo boats, and other warships
in full display. The cost of this mission, estimated at
approximately $125,000, was contributed by banks, ship-
ping companies, the firms of Erhardt and Krupp, cham-
bers of commerce, and municipalities (Hamburg,
Bremen, etc.). The trade results seemed to stamp the
miSSion a success. Another far-sighted idea, namely
that of providing scholarships in German higher educa-
tional institutions for Turkish students, had been de-
348 MODERN TURKEY
veloped to such an extent that in 1916 many Turkish
youths were being educated largely at the individual
expense of interested German industrial and commercial
cities.
The Germans appreciated the wisdom of making their
beginnings on a small scale but on a solid foundation.
Thus their experience was acquired at small cost. Had
the World War been postponed a decade, it is probable
that German interests would have· controlled most of
Turkey's foreign trade. ]for carefully chosen represen-
tatives, notably of the German banks and of the German
Levant Line, were located in practically all places of
importance in Turkey. Their representatives, usually
Ottomans and not Germans, were in a position to furnish
trade and credit information to German ml;lnufacturers
and commercial organizations and also to communicate
on the ground with prospective customers. Thus, a small
manufacturer of an inland German town was enabled ·
to have his drafts drawn on the Turkish customer imme-
diately discounted by his local bank; and through the
assistance of the steamship lines, he was able to procure
a through bill of lading to any Turkish seaport at the
same rate as that of a competitor in Hamburg or Bremen.
Moreover, the steamship lines had a network of insur-
ance brokers and freight forwarders who would handle
all details in shipment of goods from factory until arrival
at destination. Under this system it is not difficult to
realize why competitive nations intrusting their goods
to German middlemen were always at a possible disad-
vantage when it happened, as it frequently did, that
German bankers, shippers, or traders were at the same
time looking after competitive German-made products.
The Germans possessed the business machinery which
included an all-around information service, the key to
business success.
That these concerted efforts brought results can be
noted by a reference to Turkish official foreign trade
figures over a period of years.
IMPORTS INTO TURKEY
(Figures in thousand dollars)
Countries 1894 1900 1906 191!

United Kingdom ••••• $39,842 $36,564 $48,366 $43,762
Austria-Hungary ••••• 22,720 21,129 28,671 30,027
Germany •••••••••••• 1,239 2,143 5,831 22,915
France
Italy ·············
···············
12,061
2,748
13,066
5,844
11,743
10,763
17,331
10,812
United States ••••••. 90 136 1,265 5,393
EXPORTS FROM TURKEY

(Figures in thousand dollars)
Countries 1894 1900 1906 191!

United Kingdom ••• , • $25,238 $24,264 $27,851 $20,506
Austria-Hungary • , • , • 5,846 6,520 9,404 9,817
Germany ............ 1,297 1,988 5,402 5,400
France .............. 15,656 20,954 21,168 18,873
Italy ••.••••.••••••• 2,067 3,120 4,382 4,080
United States •••••••. 661 2,517 2,165 6,066
Even making every allowance for the misleading char-

acter of figures by countries which do not record source
or final destination, and the large volume of American
and British goods which were handled via German or
Austro-Hungarian ports and thereby accredited to them,
the official returns show that from 1894 to 1912, inclusive,
the exports from the United Kingdom increased less
than 10%, from Austria-Hungary less than 40%, but
from Germany over 1700%, or from one million to 22
million dollars. During the past five years (1918-1923),
the Germans have been too much occupied at home to
reorganize plans for conquest of world markets, although
there are strong indications that they may revive their
connections in the Levant.
A strenuous rival appears in the British who have
gotten together, since the Mudros armistice (October,
350 MODERN TURKEY
1918), a noteworthy organization for the purpose of cap-
turing Near Eastern trade. The British Trade Corpora-
tion, which operates in many world markets, organized
a subsidiary, the Levant Trading Company, a revival
of the old Levant Company, which in turn- secured con-
trol of the J. W. Whittall and Company, Ltd., the leading
Levantine firm of British nationality in Constantinople.
The British Trade Corporation also has a major interest
in the National Bank of Turkey, a bank of Turkish
nationality but with British capital. The Quay Company
at Constantinople has combined British and French capi-
tal. British steamship interests are grouped together in
a "shipping ring." There is a working arrangement
with the Levant Stevedoring Company, which latter exer-
cises strong influence over the loading and unloading of
vessels, warehouses, coal and ship supplies. The British
Chamber of Commerce at Constantinople, with published
membership of approximately 600, is an active body with
important affiliations not only in Constantinople but also
extending through the Balkan states, south Russia, the
Transcaucasus and the Levant. The policy of the Brit-
ish Government in granting insurance against credit
risks is a not unimportant feature of the system. Ger-
man railway concessions are reported to have passed into
British control. And while these numerous associated
activities are not all closely integrated, it will be inter-
esting to discover whether the British Trade Corpora-
tion,1 with its many ramifications, can overcome the
traditional independent spirit, which in contrast to Ger-
man traditions, has characterized Anglo-Saxon enter-
prise. There are already signs that its bitterest rivals
are of British nationality, both Levantines and foreigners.
• The unexpected postwar disturbances in south Russia and Turkey have
given the subsidiary Levant Company a poor start. For the two year period
ending December 31, 1922, after a small dividend allowance, the net loss
on operation was £649,3151 and a debit balance of £361,169 was brought
forward; the total deficit was £999,604.
If we may believe a widely published announcement
(see New York Times, June 17, 1923), a British corpora-
tion has been organized by Mr. Leslie Urquhart, the
London-Scottish financier conspicuous as director of the
Russo-Asiatic Corporation, which would work with a
Turkish import and export company in order to monop-
olize the country's foreign trade. It is reported that"
this British firm, which has among its directors Lord
Goschen and Rustem Fehmi Bey, is to represent exclu-
sively abroad this Turkish company. It is also reported
that in the latter are several Turkish cabinet ministers as
well as somewhat less than two hundred deputies of the
National Assembly at Angora. It is stated that each
company is (a) to have a one-quarter capital share in-
terest in the other, (b) to cooperate in the establishment
of warehouses in coast cities, and (c) to have exploitation
rights in the important Eregli coal fields. The British
company, which is known as the Corporation for the
Economic Development of Turkey, Ltd., has invited
French participation. The political aspect of such a
combination would have ill-bodings for world peace, and
would contradict article ten of the Economic Pact, "The
Turk does not desire any monopoly in business." The
American Department of State advised that official Tur-
key is not a party to this agreement and that the arrange-
ment does not preclude other companies from doing
business. As in the case of all rumors of exclusive eco-
nomic privileges, few of which usually have any basis
in fact as first reported, time alone can indicate the ·
measure of truth.
In addition to the Germans and British, the French
as always are active in Near Eastern commerce. After
the armistice of 1918, the United States made a big
splurge and promised hard competition to all comers.
At one time, there were a dozen Shipping Board vessels
in Constantinople harbor; amid great ceremony the
352 MODERN TURKEY
largest trust company in the world opened a branch;
million dollar corporations were formed to capture the
cream of the trade. But a continued condition of war
caused a great relap•se, including the closing down of
most newly-established enterprises. American prestige
suffered a further blow in the annulment (December,
1923) by the Turkish Minister of Public Works of the
so-called Chester concessions. There seems scant pros-
pect that the United States can hold first place in Tur-
key's commerce, but second place belongs to her. Other
but less important trade rivals are the Italians, Spanish,
Scandinavians, Dutch, Russians, and Japanese.
At best, many years will elapse before Turkey's for-
eign trade can approach its former business activity.
Established trade connections have been swept away.
New firms are starting up every day, but what knowledge
abroad is there· of their facilities or of their financial
or moral standing? A certain amount of valuable in-
formation can be obtained from the United States Bureau
of Foreign and Domestic Commerce, the American Cham-
ber of Commerce for the Levant and government officials
at Constantinople, the Federated American Chambers of
Commerce of the Near East, Inc., banks, and mercantile
agencies ; still, the task is difficult to ap•praise the value
of even those enterprises which start with excellent pros-
pects. The mortality among new firms is high every-
where in the world. There will probably be more hand-
to-mouth buying and selling than in the past: in the long
run a not wholly unfavorable situation since the Oriental
does not become impatient because of small or postponed
profits. Another very important change is that the Turk
is master in his own country: therefore foreigners must
forget the tradition that it is impossible to do business
in Turkey without special safeguards. There is bound
to be a period of hesitation produced by a widespread
lack of abiding confidence in the State's future.
Onerous passport regulations, heavy taxation, hasty
legislation, roads in decay and unsafe travelling con-
ditions are further obstacles to be hurdled. The Republic
can do much to help but more to hinder international
commercial relations. Permit the writer to repeat the
words of wisdom of a leading international financial au-
thority, Mr. Hartley Withers, who concluded a recent
article in the Nation (London) in this manner:-"It
seems to me that, since governments habitually bungle
everything that they do, the less they are allowed to
interfere with trade the better.''
CHAPTER XVI
LEVANTINE CONCESSION-HUNTING
One day Khoja Effendi, on whom God be merciful, went to the city
of Konia, and going into a pastry cook's shop, seized hold of a tart,
and saying, "In the name of God," began to eat it. The pastry cook
cried out, "Halloa, fellow, what are you about 7" and fell to beating
him. The Khoja said, "0 what a fine country is this of Konia, in
which, whilst a man eats a tart, they put in a blow as a digester for
every morsel."
-THE TURKISH JESTER, or "The Pleasantries of Khoja Nasreddin
Effendi," tr. from the Turkish by George Borrow.
Probably there is no sovereign state where the influ-

ence of foreign capital was greater than in the Ottoman
Empire. Not only does this heritage relate to purely eco-
nomic undertakings but it extends throughout the politi-
cal and social life in Turkey. It is apparent even to the
novice in international politics that one of the simplest
and surest methods of exercising political control is
through the domination of capital funds. The story of
the scramble of the Great Powers for special privileges is
an oft-repeated tale. Some foreign diplomatic officers
spend most of their time in assisting their national in-
vestors. As a result the former Ottoman Empire is
mortgaged to a surprising degree to outside financial
interests who do not work always for the supreme good
either of Turkey or of their native land.
The mental attitude of the Turk is that of keen recep-
tivity towards foreign financial backing. To him it seems
the will of Allah that railways, port and harbor works,
local public utilities, mines, banks, and other enterprises
354
LEVANTINE CONCESSION-HUNTING 355
should be both owned and managed mainly by foreign-
ers. He accepts the situation without the show of resent-
ment and apparently seems to be well satisfied that
others are willing to assume what he has been accustomed
to regard as the aggravations of business enterprise.
A realization of the position of foreign creditors is im-
possible without a general knowledge of the important
organization known as the Council of the Administration
of the Ottoman Public Debt, the most businesslike large
organization in Turkey, which owes its existence to the
complete default of interest payments to foreign bond-
holders by the Turkish Government. This institution,
created by the Imperial Decree of Muharrem, 1299
8-20 December, 1881), provides for a Council of seven
members nominated for a five-year term and eligible for
reelection. Six delegates represent the interests of
French, British and Dutch, German, Austro-Hungarian,
Italian, and Turkish bondholders ; while the seventh rep-
resents the Imperial Ottoman Bank, the leading banking
institution in the Empire, financed by French and Eng-
lish capital. Owing to the large interest of creditors in
France and in England, the Ottoman Public Debt pre-
siding officer is either the French or the British repre-
sentative, each serving one year in turn.
The prime purpose of the Ottoman Public Debt Admin-
istration is to control the revenues ceded to foreign bond-
holders. Its activities, therefore, extend to loans for the
public treasury, railways, and other sources from which
stated revenues may be derived. The Government ren-
ders aid to the Council in the work of the administration,
such as granting special military protection, but it is
without power· to modify the rules and regulations
agreed upon under the Decree of 1\Iuharrem. The Gov-
ernment has as its representative an Imperial commis-
sioner who takes part in the sittings of the council and
356 MODERN TU:ltKEY
who enjoys the right of discussion without power to vote.
The Government also has numerous agents throughout
the country to assist this body. The revenues from Gov-
ernment monopolies, notably tobacco and salt, stamp
duties, as well as duties upon spirits, fishing, silk, etc.,
are controlled and handled by the Administration. Nota-
ble work has been accomplished at the Silk Institute at
Brusa under the auspices of the Public Debt.
There is no better evidence of the honesty and busi-
ness possibilities of the local inhabitants, in this case
largely Turks, than has been demonstrated by their em-
ployment as permanent or temporary agents. Of the 5652
persons employed by the Ottoman Public Debt Adminis-
tration in 1912, only 169 agents were of foreign national-
ity. In addition, normally 3250 persons are employed
part time.
The Turkish Government was arranging to have most
of its revenues collected by this private organization
when the War interfered. Despite the apparent high
cost for collecting revenues and the perfectly natural
feeling of resentment by the Turkish Government au-
thorities because their own powers are curtailed, it seems
likely that the foreign bondholders will insist on the
continuation of the Ottoman Public Debt Administration
or some similar organization.
The relations between France and! Turkey become
clearer if one appreciates that French capital invested
in Turkey far exceeds that of any other nationality.
While it is practically impossible to obtain reliable fig-
ures, it seems likely that two thirds of the Ottoman
Public Debt and approximately one half of the private
enterprises have been financed by the French. A French
publication entitled "Les Interets financiers de la France
dans l'Empire Ottoman, July, 1919," presents the fol-
lowing data relating to French, British, and German for-
eign investments in Turkey, based on the year 1914:
CAPITAL
French Briti8h German

FrafiCB Francs Francs
Public Debt ............ 2,454,417.377 577,499.821 867,583.506
Private Enterprises ••.•.. 902,893.000 230,458.675 552,653.000
Total ................ 3,357,310.377 807,958.496 1,420,236.506
French Briti811 German
Per Cent Per Cent Per Cent
Public Debt .•.••••••••• 60.31 14.36 21.31
Private Enterprises ..... 53.55 13.66 32.77
Total ................ 60.08 14.46 25.42
These returns, however, err in neglecting the amount of

investments of other nations such as Austria-Hungary,
Italy, Russia, and the United States; but they are signifi-
cant, even so, in showing the preponderant interests of
France, Qre8:t Britain, and Germany. (Prior to the
World War, Turkish private funds were confined
largely to two or three steamship lines and to a small
share of the Public Debt. War profits, however, have
caused a great increase in the character and amount of
their national investments.) The present status of Ger-
many's investments in Turkey is affected seriously by
the Treaty of Versailles. Article 261 undertakes to
transfer to the Allied and Associated Powers any claims
she may have to payment or repayment by the Govern-
ments of Austria, Hungary, Bulgaria or Turkey, and, in
particular, any claims which may arise, now or hereafter,
from the fulfillment of undertakings made by Germany
during the war to those governments.
France has spheres of influence in Turkey which are
both historical and practical. The conspicuous part
played by France in the Crusades made h~r the ex-
pressed guardian of the Christians in the Orient. For
centuries France represented the interests of western
European powers in Turkey and was so accepted by the
358 MODERN TURKEY
Turks : the word ''Frank'' is applied generally by the ·
Turks to Europeans and Americans. The western influ-
ence in Turkey has its origins largely in French educa-
tional institutions, literature and culture. Not only has
French enterprise permeated Turkey in its social and po-
litical life but the commercial relations have also been
conspicuous. For instance, the growth of Marseilles can
be attributed in a large degree to its shipping contacts
with French interests in the Levant, notably in Syria.
The special material_ interests of France in Turkey are
not confined exclusively to any one section of the Empire.
They include railway and road projects adjacent to the
Black Sea and lEgean Sea coasts, and oil and copper in
upper Mesopotamia, a name given to the Kurdistan
region. This diversity of interests can be attributed to
the special adaptability of French engineers and :finan- ·
ciers in connection with railways, ports and harbors,
local public utilities, and other technical enterprises.
French national sentiment towards Turkey, however, is
concentrated in Syria (to a lesser extent in Cilicia)
where railways, silk factories of the Lebanon, banks, and
other business interests are predominantly French.
The foregoing figures give Great Britain's share as
approximately one seventh or one eighth both of the
Ottoman publi~ debt and of the local private enterprises.
The British military operations during the World War
in Mesopotamia, Syria and Palestine have involved a
capital outlay-much of this is of a permanent character
-which doubtless far exceeds the total capital invest-
mi:mts in Turkey prior to 1914. The building of the rail-
way from Al Kantara to Palestine and of the approxi-
mately one thousand miles of railway in Mesopotamia
cost large sums of money. It has been stated by British
students that, since 1914, Great Britain has expended on
military account over one billion dollars in Mesopotamia
alone. Certainly no expense has been spared to enhance
the British predominant influence in Palestine and in both
upper and lower Mesopotamia. The great enterprises in
Turkey which interest British capital most are the irri-
gation projects in Mesopotamia so ably started by
British engineers following the plans of Sir William
Willcocks, the petroleum fields in the Middle East, and
railway and port development in Palestine and in western.
Asia Minor. Banking and trading activities, especially
at Constantinople and Smyrna, have always been con-
spicuous factors in British overseas enterprise.
German interest in Turkey has been a comparatively
recent development. The conclusion of the Franco-Prus-
sian War gave Germany a realization of her potential
strength as a world power. The wonderful resources
of Asia Minor have received most careful attention.-
The theatrical visit of the Kaiser to Turkey in 1898,
when he professed his keen friendship for the Moham-
medans, was of unquestioned aid in the later railway,
port, mining and other concessions which were success-
fully secured by German nationals. Petroleum, cop-
per, coal and chrome ore, as well as grain and cotton,
were desired by Germany in connection with her pro-
gram of national and international economy. Railway
concessions appeared to offer the best means for secur-
ing the easiest access to these raw materials and at the
same time for blocking British plans on the Persian Gulf.
What the future position ·of Germany in the Turkish Re-
public may be is an open question. But there are many
reasons for believing that Germany will occupy a much
more important position than would be inferred from a
digest of European and American books and periodicals.
The interest of Russia in Turkey largely relates to
securing an unrestricted passage for the products of
south Russia from the Black Sea through the Straits to
360 MODERN reRKEY
the 1Egean Sea. Aside from the weighty historic claims

of Russia there can be no logical argument advanced
why ports on the Black Sea, which normally handle more
than fifty per cent of the total Russian external com-
merce, should not have a clear outlet through the Bos-
porus, Sea of Marmara, and the Dardanelles. The eastern
part of Anatolia, due to contiguity, has been the objec-
tive of many Russian schemes. More truly than any other
nation Russia has· given physical support to the Armeni-
ans, a people who have been regarded frequently as
under Russia's protection. A suggestion has been made
from time to time that Russia might avoid the possibility
of the closing of the Straits by building a railway system
in a southwesterly direction from the Caucasus to Alex-
andretta or some other port on the Mediterranean Sea.
This alternative is a poor makeshift since commodities
entering Russian export trade consist largely of bulk
cargoes which cannot stand railroad freight rates. There
are practically no Russian incorporated companies in
Turkey. There are, however, a few enterprises operated
by British and French companies financed by Russian
capital.
The competition between Italy and Greece for economic
privileges in western Asia Minor was a forerunner of the
prolonged Gnreo-Turkish War which resulted so disas-
trously for Greece. Only within the past decade has
Italy taken any special interest in Asia Minor. The
antipathy between the Italians and the Greeks can be ac-
counted for largely on historical grounds, the control of
the Dodekanese Islands, and the maritime rivalry in the
eastern Mediterranean. It has been reported that the
Italians have secured from the Turks preferential rights
except where Turkish capital is available, in the Heraclea
coal basin, in certain sections of Afiun Qarahisar,
Kutaya, Aidin, and Konia, and in many public enter-
prises in the sanjaks of Adalia, Buldur, Mughla and
Sparta. In the future there will be, doubtless, an ascend-
ant position for the Italians in Asiatic Turkey.
The racial Greeks in Turkey, irrespective of nation-
ality, have settled mainly in the coast cities. In this
respect they have carried on the traditions of the ancient
Greek colonies. They have been most intimately asso-
ciated with Smyrna, with the islands off the western
Asia Minor coast, with Pontus, and with Constantinople.
Greek investments in Turkey have been confined largely
to commerce, shipping, banking and industrial enter-
prise. Greek capital utilized in Turkey has largely been
in liquid form.
In the days of the clipper ships the trade between the
United States and Smyrna was large. American sailing
vessels, most often hailing from New England, were a
conspicuous sight in the Levant waters. · But with the
internal development of the United States especially
after the middle of the nineteenth century together with
the conspicuous development of the steam engine, the
shipping and commercial relations between the United
States and Turkey largely ceased. Within the past
decade, principally due to the efforts of the American
government officials in Turkey and to the work of the
American Chamber of Commerce for the Levant, Ameri-
can business interests in Turkey have taken on a new
lease of life. Some of the most successful firms in Turkey
are of American nationality. But even more conspicuous
have been the laudable accomplishments during the past
century of our uncommercialized enterprises. American
educational institutions, American I hospitals, American
religious missionaries, and American philanthropy have
been noteworthy. Dr. Talcott Williams, writing in 1919,
stated:
Where others have invested for material profit we
have invested $20,000,000 in founding colleges, $40,000-
362 MODERN TURKEY
000 in feeding the hungry and $50,000,000 in preaching,
instruction and· free medicine. Such a record and
influence no people has ever had in another land.
A personal letter (December, 1922) from the general

secretary of the Near East Relief states that this single
organization has distributed approximately $70,000,000
in the aggregate. It seems reasonable to assert that
American business interests, as well, are destined to
hold a strong position in the country, especially since
American funds are now more and more often coupled
with American direction in local enterprise.
Austrian and Belgian capital have been interested
largely in public utility companies. As an illustration of
the complicated nature of penetration of foreign capital,
the city of Constantinople can be cited with reference to
the electric light and power supply, electric street cars,
and the telephone system. The franchises for these three
services were granted shortly before the World War
to private concerns. Electric light is furnished by the
Societe Anonyme d'Electricite Ganz, of Budapest; the
street cars are run by the Societe des Tramways de Con-
stantinople, originally a German company; and the tele-
phones are in the hands of the Societe Anonyme
Ottomane des Telephones, an Anglo-French-American
concern. The first two companies, however, have been
merged intq a Belgian syndicate, the control of which is
in America.
The Turkish Republic is suffering from numerous taxes
attributable in large part to the heavy foreign obliga-
tions. The investment of foreign funds in the securities
of the Ottoman government constitutes a dismal record
which is scarcely, if any, less creditable to the investors
than it is to the Turkish government officials. While the
writer makes no attempt to defend the cupidity and cor-
ruption of Turkish officialdom-since there must lie
largely the responsibility for the disastrous effect of
past borrowings....:......nevertheless, the foreign lenders surely
were not innocent in the probable disposition of the
loans. Many purchasers of the Turkish securities were
doubtless ignorant and innocent of the methods by which
Turkish loans are generally floated but the same excuse
cannot be made for the intermediaries. It is well
known that prior to the overthrow ,of Abdul Hamid the
budget system had not been attempted in Turkey; loans
were the usual means employed to secure the necessary
revenue to maintain the country's solvency. It has been
hinted more than once that grasping foreign powers
have rejoiced in the continued weakness of the Ottoman
fiscal situation. At any rate, European investors can
probably be charged with a large share of the responsi-
bility for the financial debauchery that has been rampant
in Turkey and for the confusion that has long existed in
that unhappy Empire.
Foreign investments in Turkish state loans have been
made almost solely for the purpose of securing special
ulterior advantages. The thought which apparently has
heretofore guided countries when loaning money to Tur-
key has been to exploit the country and only incidentally
to develop its resources. Loans have been issued for one
or more of the following purposes: (a) purchase of
materials including equipment and supplies for war from
the lending country, (b) the acquisition of one or more
concessions, and (c) the settlement of a political dis-
agreement between the l~nders and borrowers. Also
national jealousies have p\ayed a very important role in
the issuance of loans. Therefore the significant fact is
that most Turkish loans have been contracted in order
to enable foreign investors to secure desired concessions
notably related to transportation, mining and agricul-
tural grants; and in the process the security of the loans
and the rate of interest have been of minor importance.
364 MODERN TURKEY
To the credit of the Turkish officials it should be
stated that the Government has certainly appeared to
respect its engagements with reference to guaranteed
State loans and private obligations, despite the sordid
history.
A comparatively recent example of the relation be-
tween foreign capital and concessions was the grant in
April, 1914, to a Fre.nch company, the Regie Generale de
Chemins de Fer et de Travaux Publics, in connection
with the concurrent five per cent loan of 22,000,000 Turk-
ish pounds obtained in Paris through French banking
institutions. The Turkish Government thereby granted
concessions for extensive railways, public roads, port de-
velopment, gas works, etc. It was natural that French
technical experts should be employed and that the ma-
terials of construction should be supplied by the lending
country. Unfortunately, the outbreak of the World War
prevented the carrying out of these plans. In the long
run these enterprises would benefit Turkey more than
France.
According to a statement compiled late in 1922, the for-
eign holdings of the Turkish state loans were divided as
follows:
Including
Unifieil Debt Lottery Bonds
Per Cent Per Cent
France ••.••••••••••••.••••• 66.34 59.70
Great Britain •••.••.••••.••• 10.99 8.17
Germany ••••••••••••••••••• 7.65 11.00
Belgium •.••••••••••••.••••• 7.71 9.00
Holland •••••••••••••••••••• 1.77 2.13
Italy •••••••••••••••• • ••• • • 1.74 1.36
The percentage of Turkish loans held by French inter-

ests is doubtless somewhat larger than appears in the
foregoing table of those subject to the Decree of Muhar-
rem. No Turkish loans bear a higher rate of interest
LEVANTINE CONCESSION-liUNTING 365
than six per cent, while the actual return received has not
averaged over five per cent. A detailed history of the
external debt obligations appears in the chapter on
The Public Treasury.
Second in importance to the capital invested by for-
eigners in public obligations of Turkey are the sums in-
vested in Turkish railways. A study of these invest-
ments does not disclose the objectionable features so com-
mon in State loans though the manner of obtaining rail-
way concessions often was none too respectable. The
Baghdad Railway and the Hejaz Railway, the latter a
Turkish Government line, are regarded as the only two
railways which have been built for other than purely busi-
ness considerations. A Constantinople banker informed
me in 1920 that the capitalization of railways in Turkey
aggregated approximately $250,000,000, roughly divided
into four-fifths bonds and one-fifth capital stock.
The financial arrangements in connection with the
Anatolian and the Baghdad railways offers a suggestive
picture of the close relations between a foreign govern-
ment and a leading foreign bank. In 1888 the Imperial
Ottoman Government granted a concession for 99 years
to the Deutsche Bank for working the line which then ex-
isted between Scutari (opposite Constantinople at the en-
trance of the Bosporus) and Izmid, and guaranteed a
gross receipt of 10,300 francs per kilometer. The rail-
way was to be extended to Angora, that is to say the
whole length of the line was to be 578 kilometers
(Scutari-Izmid 92 kilometers, and Izmid-Angora 486 kilo-
meters). For the line bet~een Izmid and Angora the
Government guaranteed gross receipts of 15,000 francs
per kilometer. In both cases the gross receipts were to
be secured by the tithes of certain provinces, and such
tithes were to be collected by the Ottoman Public Debt ·
Administration.
In 1893 the Deutsche Bank obtained a further conces-
366 MODERN TURKEY'
sion for ninety-nine years for extensions to Kaisarieh
and Konia with a guarantee of 13,725 francs per kilo-
meter, of which the Government would be called upon
to provide 6,740 francs only per kilometer.
As a result of the concession granted in 1902 for the
building of a railway from Konia to Baghdad, the Ana-
tolian Railway undertook to spend 8,000,000 francs to im-
prove the Angora and Konia lines and to establish an
express train service. In return the Company was to re-
ceive: (a) an annuity of 350,000 francs for thirty years
dating from the commencement of the works of improve-
ment, to be utilized for the redemption in capital and
interest of the 8,000,000 francs to be expended; (b) a fur·
ther annuity of 350,000 francs was to be paid for the
service of express trains from the day that the Baghdad
Railway line was completed to Aleppo.
In 1902 a concession for ninety-nine years was granted
for the working of a railway line from Konia to Baghdad
and Basra. For every kilometer laid down and worked
the Government guaranteed an annuity of 11,000 francs
and a further annual sum of 4,500 francs per kilometer to
cover working expenses. The annuity of 11,000 francs
was to be represented by the issue of a 4 per cent State
loan to the Company of 269,110 francs in debentures for
every kilometer laid down and worked. The service of
the loan was to be secured. by various revenues. Strictly
speaking, no debentures were issued for the Konia-
Baghdad Railway, the Ottoman Government undertook
to issue a 4 per cent government loan to meet the cost of
building the line by each section of 200 ~ilometers.
· The table on page 367 makes manifest the approximate
amount of capital invested in railways in the Ottoman
Empire (1911) ..
Not the least important of the German designs regard-
ing the railroad were the benefits that would be derived
from various concessions which normally fall outside the
RAn.WAYS
Capital
NatrM Shares (Nom4- Debentures
nal Capital) Issued Total
L.T. L.T. L.T.

Bmyrna-Aidin ••.••••••• 1,294,340 3,293,407 4,587,747
Meraina-Taraua-Adana 188,154 193,540 381,694
Chemins de fer Orientaux. 2,000,000 2,000,000
Chemins de fer d 'Anato lie 5,400,000 8,800,000 14,200,000
Jaffa-Jerusalem ••••••••• 160,000 394,000 554,000
Smyrna-Kaasaba ..•••••• 640,000 5,362,000 6,002,000
Salonika-Monastir .••.... 800,000 2,400,000 3,200,000
Salonika-Constantinople .. 600,000 6,311,600 6,911,600
Damas-Hamaa and exten·
aiona ..••..••.•••••••. 600,000 4,774,960 5,374,960
Konia-Baghdad ••••••••. 600,000 11,24o;ooo 11,840,000
Mudania-Brusa ••.•••••. 153,000 153,000
12,435,494 42,769,507 55,205,001
sphere of railway management. Permission was granted

to exploit mineral resources within 20 kilometers (12¥2
miles) along either side of the right of way, the exploita-
tion of forests and water power, the monopoly of brick
and tile works, the erection of stores and warehouses,
navigation rights on the Shatt al Arab, Tigris, and
Euphrates (which would have seriously interfered with
the long-standing privileges of the famous firm of Lynch
Brothers), and the erection of port and harbor works at
Alexandretta, Baghdad, and at points on the Persian
Gulf.
These various concessions engaged the continual at-
tention of foreign diplomatic officials stationed at Con-
stantinople and at home offices.1 Therefore there was
1 The entire history of the Baghdad project ia too long and detailed to
be retold here. Certain features, however, relative to international rivalries

are of such importance that they cannot be overlooked.
In 1872, the Ottoman Government employed the German engineer Von
Pressel to draw up a comprehensive plan of railway eonstruction in Asia.
The following year Von Pressel pretended to Midhat Pasha a vast scheme
of lines whose principal feature was a route from the Bosporus to Baghdad
by way of Izmid, Angora, Bivaa, Diarbekr and the valley of the Tigris,
with branches from Sivaa to Samsun on the Black Sea, from Sivas to
368 MODERN TURKEY
great relief wlien it was announced in 1914 that a satis·
factory international understanding regarding the Bagh·
Erzerlim, and from Diarbekr to the mouth of the Orontes on the Mediter·
ranean. The Germans then decided to put into effect the main features
of Von Pressel's scheme; the Izmid-Angora line of the Anatolian Railway
was regarded as the first link in the Baghdad railway. The opposition of
Russia, however, caused the abandonment of this route for one south·
ward through Konia and Adana.
Although the German Anatolian Company was forced to abandon the
northern route, it continued to hold all rights for lines from Angora
to Kaisarieh, from Angora to Sivas, and from .Sivas to Diarbekr. No
other country could secure concessions for a comprehensive railway sys·
tern to northern Asiatic Turkey until these German interests had given
up their rights.
In 1900, the Tsar, alarmed at the proposed German lines close to his
borders, received from the Turkish Government preferential rights for
all railways to be constructed in the vilayets bordering upon the Black
Sea, with the exception of those already granted to the German company.
Russia, however, was fully occupied with the construction of lines in
her own domain, and could ill-afford capital necessary for railways in
Turkey. Nevertheless, she received concessions in order to block the
Germans in their plans to threaten the ·safety of the Russian Caucasus
territory.
Thus, with Germany and Russia nolding all concessions, but both
powerless to make use of them, the opportunity seemed at hand for a
third country to fall heir to their concession's. This country was France.
Germany had no serious objection as to :resigning its rights into French
hands, provided there was no interference with her all-important Baghdad
project, and provided she could secure substantial benefits in return.
Russia would willingly see the exploitation of the Black Sea section of
Asiatic Turkey fall to the lot of her friend and ally. Thus the French
began a series of negotiations with the Turks, with the Germans, and
with the Russians to clear the way for a great system of railways to
stretch from Eregli to Van. It was comparatively easy to secure the
consent of the Ottoman Government to the French plans. The two Balkan
wars had left Turkey in a state of financial distress. The expenses
of the wars and the loss of territory made it necessary for her to secure
immediate relief from foreign capitalists. In order to gain access to
French capital, it was necessary to make concessions to the French de·
mands in Asiatic Turkey.
In 1907 the European Powers, who held, as it were, a mortgage on the
Turkish Empire, and must be consulted upon custom changes, consented
to an additional tariff of 4 per cent on imports, in order that the Mace·
donian reforms might be effected. In 1913 this duty was about to ex·
pire and the Ottoman Government desired not only to renew it, but to
impose an additional charge of 3 per cent. When Djavid arrived in
Paris to negotiate this matter, he was given to understand that no French
money would be accessible to Turkey and that France would not consent
to the increase of customs duties unless extensive concessions were made
in various parts of Asiatic Turkey.
dad Company arrangements had been reached. The
"revelations" of Prince Lichnowsky, the German ambas-
sador· at London, are of such great significance that they
are quoted herewith.
At the same time I was negotiating in London, with
the able support of Herr von Kuhlmann, about the so-
called Baghdad Treaty. The real object of this was to
divide Asia Minor into spheres of influence, although
this term was anxiously avoided in view of the rights
of the Sultan. Sir E. Grey also repeatedly stated that
there were in existence no agreements with France and
Russia about the partition of Asia Minor.
In consultation with a Turkish representative,
Hakki Pasha, all economic questions concerning Ger-
man undertakings were settled in the main according
to the wishes of the Deutsche Bank. The most im-
portant concession Sir E. Grey made to me personally
was the continuation of the railway as far as Basra.
We had dropped this point in favor of the connection
to Alexandretta; up to that time Baghdad had been the
terminal point of the railway. An international com-
mission was to regulate navigation on the Shatt al
Arab. We were also to have a share in the harbor
works at Basra, and received rights for the navigation
of the Tigris, which hitherto had been a monopoly of
the firm of Lynch.
By this treaty the whole [of] Mesopotamia as far
In the meanwhile negotiatiollll had been going on between the French
and the Russians in regard to the proposed ''Armenian Railway.'' Russia
proved amenable to the French plans, but she requested that they be mod·
ified in two way11. She did not wish the new line to approach Erzerum
and asked that its eastern limit should be Perkarije, in the upper valley
of the Euphrates. The region bet;ween Perkarije, Erzerum, and the Trallll·
caucasian frontier Russia desired to have reserved for exploitation by
her own citizens, although she was willing to leave the work of construe·
tion to French engineers and contractors. She requested that the Tre-
bizond-Perkarije branch, and the Bitlis-Van branch, which was also
contemplated by the French, should not be started until a later date, to be
named by Russia. This request was made doubtless because Russia felt
that the safety of her frontiers would be jeopardized by the Colllltruc-
tion of these lines before her own Transeaueasian railways were completed.
The French seem to have oll:'ered no objection to these condition~~. There
seemed to be a likely prospect of international agreement11.
370 MODERN TURKEY
as Basra was included within our sphere of influence
(without prejudice to already existing British naviga-
tion rights on the Tigris and the rights of the Wilcox
[Willcocks] irrigation works), as well as the whole dis-
trict of the Baghdad and Anatolian railway.
The coast of the Persian Gulf and the Smyrna-
Aidin railway were recognized as the British economic
sphere, Syria as the French, and Armenia as the Rus-
sian. If both treaties were executed and published, an
agreement with England would be reached which would
preclude all doubts about the possibility of an ''Anglo-
German co-operation." ·
Mr. S. Bilinski, the able general manager of the Na-
tional Bank of Turkey, has prepared for the writer the
following statement regarding the financial benefits from
Turkish railway enterprises:-
Many railway companies in Turkey obtained the
funds necessary for building the lines by issues of de-
bentures, the services on which were secured by a kilo-
metric guarantee of the State, whereas the share cap-
ital was issued in payment of the concession. The net
results, therefore, were that:
(a) The concessionaires, who had obtained their
concessions by means which were more often dubious
than not, received in payment shares which they
promptly converted into cash. A large part of these
profits, which can be fairly regarded as ill-gotten, no
doubt found their way into the pockets of palace ravor-
ites and ministerial officials, who one and all seemed to
have been imbued with the spirit of the dying miser's
advice to his son:-'' Make money-honestly if you
can,-but make it.''
(b) The financial groups associated with the con-
cessionaires made money.
(c) The railway contractors made money.
(d) The debenture holders sporadically received
interest on their money.
(e) The debt charges of an already more or less
bankrupt country were increased by the pernicious sys-
tem of kilometric guarantees, than which nothing is
more calculated to prevent the progressive working of
The Railway Station at Ilaidar Pasha, the Asiatic Starting Point for
Imperialistic Germany's Drang Nach Osten.
Irrigation W'ork at Konia-A C'onstru<"li\'e Gt•rn~:m F:nh•rprise.

LEVANTINE CONCESSION-HUNTING 37i
a railway line and the development of the country it is
supposed to serve.
Funds expended in Turkey should properly be directed
at first towards better means of transportation and com-
munication. The building of railways, public roads, and
port and harbor works is greatly needed. One of the
urgent questions is the enlargement of Constantinople
harbor and the erection of modern warehouses. The
British have plans drawn for appropriating $10,000,000
for port and harbor works at Haifa. Needed transporta-
tion service requires at least, for railroads $200,000,000,
port and harbor works $50,000,000, and highways $25,-
000,000.
The mineral deposits in Turkey are reputed to be ex-
tremely valuable but scant data are available. At present
the chief foreign investors are, in order of nationality,
French, British, and German. The leading French enter-
prises are the Heraclean coal mines near the Black Sea
coast, the Balia-Karaidin lead-silver mines of western
Anatolia, ·the Ak Dagh zinc and the lead-silver mines of
Angora, the large interests in the Bulgar-Maden lead-
silver miiles of southwestern Anatolia and the famous
Arghana-Maden copper mines. The British are known to
have invested six million gold francs in the Borax Com-
pany, Ltd., of western Anatolia. The Belgians are inter-
ested in the Bender-Eregli coal properties. The German
capitalists are believed to be involved in the last-men-
tioned property. During the war the Krupp interests se-
cured important concessions in the chrome mines of west-
ern Anatolia. Actually little is known definitely regard-
ing the ownership of various properties including the
important Heraclean coal fields and the Arghana-:Maden
copper field, the latter said to be owned by the Turkish
crown but worked by French investors. The chrome de-
posits near Kutaya where is situated the Dagh Ardi
mine (which is the leading chrome mine in the world),
372 MODERN TURKEY
are owned by the Turkish Minister of Marine, but is op-
erated under a concession granted a half century ago to
an Italian national but later taken over by Ragil Pasha
who in 1917 gave a ten-year lease to a German firm. The
petroleum fields, which are said to be the most valuable
in central Asia Minor, are reported to be owned in part
a_t least by the heirs of the Sultan Abdul Hamid. Their
present status is further complicated by secret agree-
ments and the mandatory provisions in a region where at
present a foreign mandatory power exercises political
jurisdiction. Further information regarding minerals
appears in the chapter devoted to that subject. Outside
capital continues to take a keen interest in the exploita-
tion of both worked and, at present, unworked deposits.
Turkey in 1914 was mainly an agricultural and pastoral
country. Therefore the most widespread opportunities
for foreign investment relate primarily to the growing
of crops such as cereal, cotton, tobacco, fruits and prod-
ucts of the vine, as well as pastoral products connected
with the raising of goats, sheep, horses and poultry. The
Mesopotamia and Konia irrigation projects, still in their
very early stages, are indicative of what large rewards
await foreign capital provided the country remains quiet
for a period of years. The valley of_ the Jordan has rich
possibilities in this respect. A notable future awaits the
growing of cotton in Mesopotamia and Cilicia, wheat in
Konia and Sivas, tobacco along the coast of Anatolia,
figs, dates, raisins, and nuts in western Asia Minor and
Mesopotamia, silk and fruits in Syria and Palestine, wool
in the Angora district, etc. The reputed fertility of Asia
Minor is no myth. No wonder that the geographer
Hogarth has characterized Anatolia as one of the garden
spots of the world.
Industrial establishments in Turkey are almost non-
existent. There are a few flour mills, tanneries, rug and
carpet works, cotton and woolen mills, and cotton oil
establishments. Most of the industrial products through-
out the Empire are made in "the household, notably· the
foregoing, and in addition brass and copper utensils, pot-
tery, shoes and saddlery, and crude farming tools. How-
ever, absence of capital and of expert direction, the· ab-
sence of trained workers, the custom of Turkish women
in wearing the veil, and the shortage of male labor due to
military demands have tended to discourage new
industrial undertakings. Most foreign reside.nts are im-
pressed with the large profits that would ensue if native
products were worked along efficient lines for consump-
tion locally and abroad. Turkish raw materials which
are well adapted for manufacture include cereals, hides
and skins, tobacco, and other products already noted
which might be made into flour, leather, etc. Turkey is
a large exporter of wheat and a large importer of flour.
Yet water power is available near Izmid, in the Taurus
Mountains, and in other parts of Turkey. The abundance
of delicious fruits, vegetables, nuts, and food fishes sug-
gest valuable raw materials which might be worked in
canneries and food-preserving establishments.
For the industrial future of Turkey there is a lack of
accessible wood but there are important coal, iron, and
water power resources available for fuel purposes.
While there are frequent complaints regarding short-
age of labor in those parts of Turkey, such labor as is
available is poorly paid according to American stand-
ards. The male Anatolian peasant who receives 80 cents
a day and the female who receives one half of this amount
do not consider themselves ill paid. Should the govern-
mental·authorities in Turkey decide that from the stand-
point of social custom it would not be objectionable for
Turkish women to drop the veil in reward for the part
they might play in improving the economic status of the
country these women workers could relieve to a surpris-
ing extent the present shortage in labor supply. In Tur-
374 MODERN TURKEY
key there are practically no repair shops or machine
shops, but these necessary· accompaniments to an indus-
trial regime would come naturally providing they would
meet any general demand.
There is an immediate need for foreign capital for re-
building the burnt areas of Constantinople, Smyrna,
and other important cities and towns. The Turkish daily
V akit announced in the year 1920 that during the
past decade 17,191 buildings in Constantinople had been
burned. Yet within that period only 532 structures had
actually been rebuilt although 7794 authorizations for
new buildings had been granted. The destruction by fire
in Constantinople has rendered homeless approximately
100,000 over this ten-year period. Approximately one
fourth of the area of Stamboul has been burned over: it
is a desolate monument to past conflagrations. The most
disastrous recent fire was that of June 13, 1918, when
8,000 buildings were destroyed. These losses have been
especially heavy due to the typical wooden frame con-
struction, their lack of repair and general neglect, and a
primitive system for controlling fires. The municipal
authorities at Constantinople have plans ready for the
rebuilding of the Fatih quarter of Stamboul. They have
been refusing permits for the erection of wooden build-
ings, but, nevertheless, there is a distinct market for
portable houses and the more substantial structures of
the bungalow type. The rebuilding of Stamboul which
includes not only houses but also municipal services in-
volves a prospective outlay in excess of $50,000,000. The
reconstruction of Smyrna as the result of the conflagra-
tion of 1922 calls for large expenditures of funds. An-
gora also·suffered from a bad fire during the War period.
Numerous other proposals for capital expenditure in-
clude electric supply, street cars, telephones, water com-
panies, abattoirs, refrigerating plants, forests, fish hatch-
eries, motor transport, office buildings, model villages,
pleasure resorts, ·restaurants, and :five-and-ten-cent
stores. The new Turkish Government has wonderfully
attractive propositions at hand but recognition must be
given to the very good reasons why foreign capital has
been reluctant in many lines. The most promising ven-
tures would seem to be those in which Turkish capital is
largely interested. There is already an indication that
the authorities at Angora are insisting on a 51 per cent
participation by Turkish capital in certain enterprises.
There is, however, little capital wealth in the hands
of the private Turks, and therefore most of the needed
funds must doubtless continue to come largely from
abroad.
The influx of foreign capital will continue to come
largely through resident banking institutions incorpo-
.rated under European or Ottoman laws. In the past, the
most conspicuous banks in this respect have been the Im-
perial Ottoman Bank (a Turkish corporation with
French and British capital), the Deutsche Bank (German ·
capital), and the National Bank of Turkey (British cap-
ital in the Sir E. Cassel group, now controlled by the
British Trade Corporation). In addition to the Imperial
Ottoman Bank and the National Bank of Turkey, the
Bank of Salonika (French, Belgian and Swiss capital) is
an important, locally incorporated institution. The two
important Turkish companies with purely Turkish cap-
ital are the .Agricultural Bank (controlled by the Govern-
ment) and the Credit National Ottoman (with the sole
privilege of issuing bank, notes, commencing in 1925).
European banks include the Credit Lyonnaise (French),
Banque Commerciale de Ia :Mediterranee (French), Bank
of .Athens (Greek), Banca Commerciale Italiana (Ital-
ian), Banco di Roma (Italian), Banca Italiana di Sconto
(Italian), Banque Russe pour le Commerce Etranger
(Russian), Bank Marmorosch & Co. (Romanian), and
the Holland Bank for the :Mediterranean (Dutch). The
376 MODERN TURKEY
Deutsche Bank (German), the Deutsche Orient Bank
(German), the Wiener-Bank-Verein (Austrian) and
the Guaranty Trust Company (American) have aban-
doned temporarily, at least, their branches. Among
the other financial houses are Mavrogordato, Zarifi,
American Express Company, Delmedico & Co., Eliasco,
and Karagousian.
One of the ablest bankers in Constantinople was frank
when he explained to me that the present banking system
in Turkey is the outcome of grafting various parts of for-
eign practices with the result that many banks ''bear a
disconcerting family likeness to glorified money-
changers." Unfortunately it is true that the banks estab-
lished in Turkey are in the main unfriendly toward onP
another and at no time have they pooled their unques-
tioned strength in the stabilization or improvement of.
local financial, industrial, and commercial conditions.
Perhaps there may be better team-play hereafter.
The position of most of the foregoing banking institu-
tions in which there is a large proportion of outside
capital is precarious. A special cable, dated November
23, 1923, to the Christian Science "Monitor reports "on
the highest authority" that the Turkish cabinet has defi-
nitely decided that the Bank of Athens must cease busi-
ness in Turkey. In Cilicia, the branches of the Banque
Fran~aise de Syrie have been closed. The Imperial
Ottoman Bank is in negotiation with the Government
regarding a renewal of its concessions which expire in
1925 ; in the spring of 1923, it was reported that this
leading financial institution would be granted permis-
sion to continue operations providing the director gen-
eral was chosen from among the Turks and that the
bank changed its name.
The status of most concessions in Turkey has been
covered by a protocol signed at Lausanne by the repre-
sentatives of the British Empire, France, Italy, Greece,
LEVANTINE ·CONCESSION-HUNTING 377
Romania, the Serb-Croat-Slovene State, and Turkey, as
follows:
ARTICLE 1. Concessionary contracts and subsequent
agreements relating thereto, duly entered into before
the 29th October, 1914, between the Ottoman Govern-
ment or any local authority, on the one hand, and na-
tionals (including Companies) of the Contracting
Powers, other than Turkey, on the other hand, are
maintained.
In addition, agreements were made regarding special
concessions. Notes were also exchanged between the
British and French delegates regarding certain conces-
sions in the territories detached from Turkey (British
Treaty series No. 17, cmd. 1946, 1923). From the open-
ing session of the first Lausanne Conference (November,
1922) until the close of the year 1923, the chief interest
in Turkish concessions has related to the Kurdistan
(Mosul) oil fields, the Eastern Anatolian Railway con-
cessions (the so-called Chester Project), and the railways
and port works of western Asia Minor. These conces-
sions are described from other standpoints in the chap-
ters on Mines and on Transportation and Communication.
Petroleum diplomacy has been, and still is, closely asso-
ciated with projects for public works. It furnishes a
key position of interest in regard to past and present
railway developments.
A bomb shell was thrown into Allied diplomatic, finan-
cial, and industrial circles by the vote of the Ang~ra
Assembly on April 9, 1923, ratifying agreements entered
into by the Government arid the Ottoman-American De~
velopment Company, a holding company controlling the
new Chester concessions. Although under committee
consideration for months, this legislation was passed (the
vote stood 185 to 21) by the Government in a single ses-
sion, although, as it was stated in the Tevhid-i-Efkiar of
Constantinople, "It has taken four days for. our eco-
378 MODER.."'i TURKEY
nomic editor to study the Chester project." The actual

text of the law which is said to consist of "but a few
words, accepting the contents of an annexed convention
and annexed contracts, and charges the Commissariat
of Public Works with the execution of the law" (Levant
Trade Re1:iew, May, 1923) has never been published.
Thus lli. Henry A. Woodhouse, one of the promoters,
wrote in the New York Times (December 1, 1923) ~t
the terms of the concessions are in :five separate docu-
ments, only the sixth, a preliminary draft, having been
published. The contracts were signed by the company's
representatives at Angora, a Canadian, Colonel K. E.
Clayton-Kennedy, and Commander Arthur T. Chester,
son of the distinguished American, Rear Admiral Colby
M. Chester; the terms were approved in J nne by the
New York office of the company. It should be clearly
understood that these late Chester concessions differ ma-
terially from the original Chester Project, which was
so much before the public eye in 1908-1914, inclusive.
In the Levant, these later concessions are properly re-
ferred to as the Eastern Anatolian Railway project.
A great deal has been written upon the Chester con-
cessions of 1908 and of 1923. For an exposition of the
terms of the latter, the reader is referred to the :files of
Current History, the New York Times, the .Manchester
Guardian. Weekly, Asia, and to the especially illuminat-
ing article in theNew Republic (May 9, 1923), written by
Dr. Edward J. Bing, who has had remarkable oppor-
tunities for access to valuable information and obserra-
tion of local conditions. The writer has chosen to make
use of the version contained in the :files of the Le~;·anf
Trade Re~;·iew, published by the American Chamber of
Commerce for the Levant, Inc., Constantinople.
Briefly, the Company's plan provided for an elaborate,
well-devised railway system in central and eastern Asia
Minor, together with the exploitation of port works and
mineral, forest, and agricultural resources. The Grap.d
National Assembly doubtless had in mind the immediate
possibilities of divide et imperia in dealing with the dele-
gates of the Allied and Associated Powers just prior and
during the second Lausanne Conference, but primarily
it was a grandiose scheme for a broad economic recon-
struction of Turkey. Rauf Bey and others were firmly
and sincerely convinced that the enlistment of Ameri-
can, as distinguished from other, capital would not in-
terfere with the country's political independence. These
widely-heralded concessions seemed to meet with favor
among most of the Turks and to -them seemed an evidence
of America's interest in their situation. Unfortunately,
but perhaps unavoidably, the local impression was gen-
eral that this huge undertaking was being promoted and
directed by the American Government. In the mind of
the Oriental, it is frequently hard to distinguish foreign
public and private undertakings. A denial from Hon.
Leland Harrison, Assistant Secretary of State, appeared
in the New York Times for June 20 and contained these
words: "It is not the Government's practice to give
such assurance and to give implied future guarantees,
neither did the department nor its officers in the field take
part in the negotiations. It was carried on directly by
the parties concerned.'' The officials of the Ottoman-
American Development Company found little enthusiasm
among American business men or financiers ; and, on
August 29, 1923, the "Chester" group transferred the
rights to the Canadian group for $300,000 plus ten per
cent of any possible profits. On November 10, Com-
mander Arthur T. Chester charged· the management of
the company with unbusinesslike methods as well as
"false and misleading statements." Two days later the
voting trust, created on December 6, 1922, to assure
American dominance, was dissolved. Dispatches from
Constantinople late in 1923 ·reported that the Canadian
380 MODERN TURKEY
owners were negotiating with London and Paris financial
group'S. On December 17, Mukhtar Bey, Turkish Minis-
ter of Public Works, announced the abrogation of these
concessions although there was a subsequent hint that
this matter might be reopened when the Turko-American
treaties were ratified. In its present form, with its very
favorable terms as far as the Turkish Government is
concerned, and based more on conditions in 1908 than
in 1923, these tremendous ''Chester'' concessions will
doubtless never be put into effect.
With respect to the railway and port concessions of
western Asia Minor, the· situation is much more compli-
cated. His Excellency General Ismet Pasha, president
of the Turkish delegation, addressed this note to the
Peace Conference at Lausanne, July 24, 1923. "I have
the honor to inform you that the concession contrac~s,
as well as the subsequent agreements referring thereto,
duly concluded before the 29th October, 1914, with the
Ottoman Government in regard to the following under-
takings are maintained: Anatolian Railway, Baghdad
Railway, Mersina-Adana Railway, Oriental Railways
and Haidar Pasha harbor. The clauses of the said con-
tracts and agreements will, within a period of one year
to be reckoned from the coming into force of the Treaty
of Peace of to-day's date, be brought into conformity
with the new economic conditions." Subsequently, the_re
was organized in England the Anglo-Turkish Trust Co.,
Ltd., a private company with a nominal capital of £5,000
in shares of £1 each, ''to acquire and hold shares in the
Anatolian Railway Co., the Haidar Pasha Port Co., the
Mersina-Tarsus-Adana Railway Co., and to acquire any
shares or securities of any railway company or railway
trust, whether now existing or that may be formed relat-
ing to operations in Turkey, Turkey in Asia, or elsewhere,
etc."
The exact ownership of these properties, nevertheless,
is an enigma because the Bank at Zurich, identified with
the Deutsche Bank and the Wiener-Bank-Verein, is be-
lieved to have the controlling interest in the Baghdad
Railway (1,700 miles), the Anatolian Railway (1,200
miles), the railways about Adana ( 65 miles), and the port
installations at Haidar Pasha, Mersina, · and Alexan-
dretta. A couple of decades ago, the Germans had trans-
ferred their shares to this Swiss Bank which later issued
debentures. The Times (May 18) stated that the Bagh-
dad Railway was outside of this arrangement and its con-
trol had passed into French hands, but that the Anatolian
Railway was owned and controlled by this Swiss bank
perhaps under German camouflaged ownership; in that
case, the securities of the latter were outside the jurisdic-
tion of the Reparations Commission. The bonds out-
standing issued by the Bank are reported to be largely in
the hands of Swiss investors who desire regular financial
returns, which are impossible under recent conditions.
The Times announced on May 2 that a British syndicate,
headed by Baron Schroeder, the Rothschilds, and the
Lloyd's Bank, had acquired the interests of the Swiss
Bank in these enterprises. However, it is reported on
November 25, 1923, that the budget commission of the
Angora Assembly rejected the arrangement made be-
tween Mukhtar Bey and the British group headed by M.
Huguenin; and that it recommended the State purchase
of the Anatolian Railway. An eager competitor appears
in the Swiss group, represented by Col. Fonjallaz. Under
this situation, the Turkish Government seems to be in a
position to bring about a profitable deal.
The student of Turkey's railway concessions should
have access to numerous documents which are only
vaguely known. No writer has yet treated exhaustively
the exceedingly significant agreements and understand-
ings among the British, French, Germans, Italians, and
the Sublime Porte during 1914. There is the secret
382 MODERN TURKEY
accord between France and Germany on February 15,
under the terms of which these two countries defined their
spheres of influence and the Baghdad Railway was placed
more strongly than ever in German hands. The secret
British-Italian convention made allowance for the pene-
tration of Italian influence in the region adjoining the
Smyrna-Aidin Railway, an accord which was referred to
in the Pact of London, 1915 (Select Document 3). French
financial interests had secured large concessions in this
same year by virtue of a large loan, partly paid, to the
Ottoman Government. And finally, there was the Anglo- .
German Agreement of June 15, the main terms of which
have already been given in this chapter. Following
shortly after the Mudros armistice, British, French, and
Italian financial groups were formed in order to trans-
late these prewar agreements into positive control of
the railways in Asiatic Turkey. Their imperialistic in-
tentions were embodied in the abortive Tripartite Agree-
ment, August 10, 1920 (Select Document 23). The offi-
cials of the Turkish Republic are in a strategic position
to secure foreign loans based on extraordinary privileges
which they may be willing to accord in connection with
existing railways or in the settlement of the future of
Mosul. The writer ventures his personal opinion that
oil can smooth the troubled financial waters of Turkey.
The expressed attitude of the new leaders of Turkey
regarding concessions may be judged from these remarks
of Mustafa Kemal at the Economic Congress: ''One is
apt to believe that we are against foreign capitalists.
This is an error. On the contrary, we want their co-
operation. In consequence, we declare ourselves to be
ever ready to accord the necessary guarantees, provided
that they submit to our laws. We want foreign capital
to come to add to our efforts and to the wealth of our
country not yet exploited. But we do not admit, as in
the past, that the Government should remain with folded
arms merely as guardians of this foreign capitaL As
in the case of all civilized nations, we are not able to
agree to that. We cannot permit that this country should
bec~me as a city of slaves."
CHAPTER XVII
THE PUBLIC TREASURY
By WILLIAM WILSON CuMBERLAND'
"But, Socrates, it is possible to procure wealth for the State from

our foreign enemies."
"Yes, certainly, you may, if you are the stronger power; but, if not,
you stand to lose even what you have already;''
-XENOPHON, Memorabilia iii, 6, 7.
Introduction
Turkey is one of those few world countries whose
treasury is always low but whose natural resources are
rich and undeveloped. The financial regime during the
past decade has been remarkable in the very small re-
course to foreign or internal loans, the absence of cur-
rency inflation, and the ability of the Imperial and Na-
tional governments to "carry on" during an uninter-
rupted period of exhausting warfare. The military and
civil requirements of 1914-1918 were provided for by
Germany and Austria-Hungary, together with a small
internal note issue. From the Mudros armistice until
1 Born at La Verne, California, 1890. Occidental College, A.B., 1912;
Columbia University A.M., 1913; Princeton University Ph.D., 1916. Author
of "Cooperative Marketing," Princeton University Press, 1917. Superin·
tendent, Chrystie Street House, New York. Instructor, Assistant Professor,
and Associate Professor of Economics, and Chief of Division of Research
in Agricultural Economics, University of Minnesota. Manager, Markets
Information Service, Minnesota CommissiQn of Public Safety. Research
Associate, Doheny Research Foundation, under supervision of University
of California. Trade Expert, American War Trade Board, Washington.
Economic Expert, American Commission to Negotiate Peace, Paris. Finan-
cial Expert, American Military Commission to Armenia (Harbord Com·
mission). Financial Expert with American High Commissioner, Constanti-
nople. Foreign Trade Adviser, U. S. Department of State, Washington.
Financial Adviser to Peruvian Government. Chairman Peruvian Federal
Reserve Bank.
384
THE PUBLIC TREASURY 385
the close of the calendar year 1923, no foreign or domes-

tic loans have been flo a ted, there has been no increase
in treasury notes (in fact, the wearing out of the Turkish
paper money has caused an actual deflation), and the
Turkish paper pound has maintained its value better
than· that of any European country which participated in
the World War. Turkey has the smallest war debt of
any of the participants.
The financial arrangements incorporated in the Treaty
of Lausanne (Select Document 36) are unusually favor-
able to Turkey. Turkey pays no reparations. Turkey
is relieved of the cost of Allied occupation, which for the
British alone amounted to £29,115,000 for Constantinople
and vicinity, according to the testimony of Premier Bald-
win in the House of Commons. In accordance with the
stipulation that the detached territories shall bear their
brunt of the former Ottoman indebtedness, the external
debt has been reduced approximately 40%. It may be
noted further, as Sir Adam Block mentions in a special
report on the Ottoman Public Debt (Oct., 1923), "that
some of the detached states in Asia, as Turkish states-
men have themselves admitted, were a positive drag on
the Turkish treasury." Data relative to the gold stand-
ard adopted by the Empire during the World War period,
the state of the currency, the public debt, and the general
fiscal standing may serve to bring the following article
up to date.
The circulating medium in the Turkish State is still
based on a gold standard. The currency unit is the Turk-
ish pound (L. T.), par value, $4.40 (United States cur-
rency), consisting of 100 piasters. Practically no metallic
coins-gold, silver, or nickel-circulate, although there
are believed to be large hoards in the country. The law
stipulates that not less than one third of the paper cur-
rency shall be covered by gold reserves. The Imperial
Ottoman Bank; a Turkish company with British-French
386 MODERN TURKEY .
capital, has the sole right of issue for bank notec;, a
privilege expiring in. 1925 in favor of the Credit Na-
tional Ottoman, a purely Turkish institution. The real
currency situation is not correctly understood abroad,
since no distinction is drawn between the forced cur-
rency, which has, in reponse to Gresham's law, driven
out of circulation the Imperial Ottoman bank notes, and
the latter issues which commanded a premium in July,
1921, amounting to approximately 200 per cent. On
January 1, 1922, the total Ottoman currency amounted to
217,000,000 Turkish pounds. On account of conflagra-
tions and the destruction of Turkish paper money
through wear, this total should be reduced between 15
and 20 per cent.
The outstanding public debt of Turkey, on August
31, 1921, amounted to 148,000,000 Turkish pounds. In
addition, there was a war debt of 289,000,000 Turkish
pounds, which consisted mainly of advances from the Ger-
man and Austrian governments during the war, includ-
ing the internal loan of 1918 which they financed
indirectly. By Article 259 of the Treaty of Versailles,
Germany agreed "to deliver gold deposited in the Reichs-
bank in the name of the Council of Administration of the
Ottoman Public Debt as security for the :first issue of
Turkish Government currency notes.'' On the condition
that Turkey should give up her rights to L. T. 5,000,000
in gold deposited in Berlin and Vienna and by a with-
drawal of her claim for L. T. 7,000,000 (£6,363,000) rela-
tive to the Turkish battleships requisitioned by the Brit-
ish Government in 1914, the Allied claims for Turkish
reparations were reduced first from L. T. 15,000,000 to
L. T. 12,000,000, and then abandoned entirely. The Allied
negotiators at Lausanne spent a tremendous amount of
time in trying to make the Turkish delegates agree to
the payment of her external debts in gold rather than
in Turkish paper; but no decision was reached regarding
this matter. The French bondholders in particular, on
account of their predominant share in these obligations,
wished to place a construction upon Turkish debts which
they have been unwilling to apply to their own. An edi-
torial in the Manchester Guardian Weekly (June 29,
1923) supported the contention of the Turkish delegates
that the matter of the debt was between private indi-
viduals and Turkey, therefore that it was not a matter for
diplomatic peace negotiations. "Do not let us say that
we can act for our bondholders in support of their claims
but cannot act for them if their claims are to be reduced,
etc." That New Turkey has not at any time attempted
to repudiate the international obligations was confirmed
at a meeting held in Paris on May 23, 1923, between
delegates of the Government and of the foreign bond-
holders.
The budget for the year 1923 allowed for estimated
revenues of L. T. 94,000,000 and expenditures of
L. T. 104,000,000 (the L. T. averaged from sixty-five to
seventy cents in 1923). The receipts have been unsatis-
factory nevertheless and the Vatan reported late in De-
cember, 1923, that there would be a deficit of L. T. 53,000,-
000. For the financial year 1924, the budget commission
of the Angora Assembly estimates total expenditures of
L. T. 68,276,582 of which L. T. 22,644,000 is allotted for
national defense, L. T. 9,500,000 for pensions, L. T. 3,645,-
149 for military establishments and L. T. 2,662,566 for
navy,-or a total of 56.4% of the total expenses primarily
for military and naval purposes. At this writing, the
probable revenue sources have not been announced.
Mention is desirable at this point of the firm expressed
conviction on the part of a large number of Turkish depu-
ties that the Khalifate is a financial burden on the State
and that, if possible, the emoluments of this office should
not be a charge upon the public funds. Other deputies
are in favor of increasing the grant, which is very small
388' MODERN TURKEY
compared to the allotment to the ex-Sultans, from
L; T. 30,000 to L. T. 50,000. During the fiscal year 1923,
the Khalif's civil list was established as follows :-His
Majesty, L. T. 15,000 a year, plus an allowance of
L. T. 11,000. The sons of his Majesty up to the age of
16 years, L. T. 50 a month; 26 years, L. T. 80; 36 years,
L. T. 120; 46 years, L. T. 150. To his Majesty's daugh-
ters up to the age of 21 years, L. T. 50 ; 31 years, L. T. 60 ;
41 years, L. T. 80, and beyond 41 years of age, L. T. 100
a month. The widows of deceased Khalifs will receive
L. T. 50 and the daughters-in-law L. T. 30 a month. The
Khalif's nephews are not included in the Civil List.
Turkey is consistently a debtor nation, both finan-
cially and commercially. There seems to her no good
reason why this condition should not continue since for-
eign financial groups can be depended upon to pay the
deficits. Government officials are seldom paid promptly;
their salaries are usually doled out on installments.
Under these conditions, dishonest employees and finan-
cial confusion are not surprising results. Official duties_
often seem devoted to the securing of taxes and gratuities.
Even when the public funds consisted of 27 piasters, as
in October, 1921, there was no hysteria; instead, the oft-
repeated plea was made for outside assistance.
Despite the more or less fatalistic local attitude
towards the acquisition of public funds-a crisis has been
postponed because of sweeping requisitions, the with-
holding of revenues from the Debt, and the sale of aban-
doned property-the time is rapidly approaching when
the officials must decide between various expedients,
notably currency inflation and mortgaged resources.
The Public Treasury

For several centuries the Turks maintained a financial
regime equal to or superior to that of their contempora-
ries. Except for its rigidity ·and the discriminations
against non-Moslems, the revenue system, on the whole,
was reasonably well constructed. It was only after the
tremendous industrial expansion of the late eighteenth
and early nineteenth centuries in western Europe that
conditions in Turkey began to appear in an unfavorable
light. In that period the European nations had learned
how to organize credit for the support of industry, war
and government. In a word, it was the era of the origin
of modern ":financial statesmanship."
Looking around for fields for :financial expansion, the
Western bankers soon began to appreciate the availabil-
ity of Turkey. Here was a country of vast potential re-
sources, with a strategic geographical location and with
a government too ignorant, irresponsible and corrupt to
protect its interests. It was an ideal field for po'titical
intrigue and it did not long· remain uncultivated. Lord
Eversley, in ''The Turkish Empire,'' pages 311-313, gives
a vivid picture of affairs in the Ottoman Empire:
He (Abdul Medjid, 1839-61) was the first sultan to
fall into the hands of moneylenders of Western Eu-
rope. Great sums were borrowed ostensibly for the
war with Russia. But the larger part of them were ex-
pended by Abdul Medjid in wild extravagance, in grati-
fying the caprices of the multitudes of women in his
harem, in building palaces, and in satisfying the de-
mands of corrupt ministers. On the occasion of the
marriage of one of his daughters with the son of a
Grand Vizier he spent forty millions of francs on her
trousseau and in fetes .••.
The reign (of Abdul Aziz, 1861-76) ·was chiefly con-
spicuous for the enormous borrowings of money in
London and Paris by the Porte, following on the bad
example set by Abdul Medjid. The debt was rapidly
increased by Abdul Aziz till it reached a total of nearly
two hundred millions sterling. It does not appear that
the accruing interest on this great debt was ever paid
out of the revenues of the Empire. Fresh loans were
390 MODERN TURKEY
continually raised, out of which the accumulated in-
terest on previous loans was provided. Huge commis-
sions to financiers who brought out the loans, and
bribes to pashas for consenting to their issue, ac-
counted for another large part of the borrowed money.
What remained was mainly devoted by the sultan to
new palaces and to extravagances of his harem.
The attempt, beginning in 1839, to adapt modern finan-
cial methods was disastrous for Turkey. It only learned
how to borrow and how to issue paper money, and failed
to recognize that such operations imply a day of settle-
ment. Nevertheless, the day came, and Turkey lost its
TABLE I
BUDGETS 01' THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE, 1909-10 TO 1918-19 *
Budget as presented to the Chamber of Deputies (in Turkish pounds)
Total Credits
Estimated .Estimated Estimated Authorized Actual
Receipts Expenditures Deficits by the Receipts
Chamber
1909-10 •. 25,078,962 30,539,545 5,460,583 .. ..
1910-11 •• 29,183,418 35,994,587 6,811,169 37,002,276 ..
1911-12 •• 31,645,708 41,161,729 9,516,021 39,627,052 27,269,751
1912-13 •• 33,682,475 36,891,366 3,208,891 57,164,452 27,544,759
1913-14 .• 33,682,475 36,891,366 3,208,891 49,395,788 29,201,865
1914-15 .• 36,004,213 37,054,605 1,050,392 73,932,320 24,739,164
1915-16 •• 30,015,892 38,451,440 8,435,548 84,722,237 22,325,793
1916-17 •• 27,961,116 42,347,421 14,386,305 100,706,659 25,199,526
1917-18 •• 31,689,090 60,288,787 28,599,697 116,915,452 ..
1918-19 •• 42,397,297 60,146,352 17,767,055 136,888,532 ..
A.ctuaZ EzpendUures Actual Deficits

1911-12 •••••••••••••.••••••• 29,908,282 2,638,531
1912-13 •••••.••••••••••••••• 38,919,877 10,375,118
1913-14 .••.••••••••• ·•••••••• 35,329,950 6,128,085
1914-15 ••••••••••••••••••••• 57,841,339 33,102,175
1915-16 ••••••••••••••••.•••. 65,546,105 43,219,312
1916-17 ••••••••••••••••••••. 82,980,780 57,781,254
1917-18 ••••••••••••••••••••• 85,226,362 t
1918-19 ••••••.•••••••••••••• 94,509,235 t
• The table was prepared from figures courteously furnished by the Ottoman
Public Debt.
t The deficits for 1917-18 and 1918-19 are estimates, as information regarding
actual receipts and expenditures is not available,
TABLE II
JTTOKAN EKPIII.J:: RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITUB.EB, BY GEOGB.APWCAL
DIVISIONS, FISCAL YEAB 1911-12 *
(in. Turki8h po!.UUla)
..
., ;: ~
...
·~e
.....
~
~i
IS
~
.:!i, ,l21:q .:!t!
-~
., ""'li ....
·~~ €'=
~0 .,., ~~
-~~
s ..~ s
.,.,
~ i ~~
li'-
~~
-- - - .. -
~
~6.
~~l:q
-
~
Central Departments t
Turkey in Europe ••••
Adrianople •••••••••
4,165,800 19,219,500
1,420,200 1,851,400
..
1.21
.. .. ..
1.58 65.60 85.52
Chatalja ••••••••••• 70,400
Constantinople ..... 26,800
3,462,700 1,712,900
.90
4.05
.34 32.89 12.51
2.00 876.63 433.63
Dardanelles
Rumaili ~ ········
··········
222,600 165,500
4,538,400 4,570,700
1.30
1.21
.97 30.92 22.98
1.22 27.95 28.15
Total or average •••• 13,880,100 27,546,800 1.61 1.38 49.23 42.20
Anatolia
Adana .•.••..•••••• 284,600 1.23 .58 16.26 7.62
Aidin (Smyrna) .... 607,400
2,789,000 938,700 1.65 .56 49.59 16.69
Angora
Bolu ············
.............. 806,600
266,300
371,900
120,400
.70
.69
.32
.31
11.42 5.26
16.67 7.53
Brusa .•••••.•••.••. 1,294,600 480,300 1.01 .38 26.26 9.74
Kastamuni ••.•• , ••• 403,300 245,200 .55 .34 12.80 7.78
Janik .............. 243,000 163,900 .67 .46 28.75 19.40
Islands t: ••••••••••• 134,300 15,000 .36 .04 20.68 2.32
Izmid ..••.•••.••••. 232,000 107,700 .73 .34 23.43 10.88
KaraBSi ............ 506,200 107,800 1.13 .24 35.65 7.59
Konia .............
Total or average ••••
1,071,000
8,353,700
381,200
3,216,800
,85
.98
.30
.38
11.15 3.97
21.09 8.12
Armenia
Bitlis •.•••••••••••• 242,100 200,900 .59 .49 8.09 6.72
Diarbekr ••...••••.• 281,300 226,700 .51 .41 6.68 5.39
Erzerum ...........
Kharput ••.•••.•.•.
588,300 730,800
212,600
.78 .96
.42
12.15 15.10
7.99 6.75
251,700 .49
Sivas .•••...•.•..•• 784,200 379,100 .65 .32 13.61 6.58
Trebizond
Van ·········
............... 1,250,900
138,900
370,100
302,100
1.16
.45
.34
.98
52.56 15.56
3.96 8.61
Total or average •••• 3,537,400 2,422,600 .73 .50 13.18 9.03
Syria
Aleppo ••••••••••••• 782,500 380,400 .99 .48 13.55 6.59
Beirut •.••••••••••• 1,482,600 415,500 1.90 .53 104.41 29.26
Jerusalem .......... 231,400 106,400 .61 .28 21.43 9.85
Lebanon ••••••••••• 50,700 48,400 .10 .10 11.27 10.75
Syria ••••••••• • • • • • 716,500 770,100 .80 .86 7.54 8.11
Urfa
Zor
..............
............... 70,800
56,700
43,400
36,400
.44
.68
.27
.44
4.01 2.46
.67 .44
Total or average •••• 3,391,200 1,800,600 .92 .50 11.91 6.32
Arabia
Assir I ............
Hejaz .•..•.••••••..
..
143,500 272,400
.. .. ..
.57 1.09 U4
.. ..
7.86
AI Madina ••••••••. 16,700 158,000 .17 1.58 .09 .81
Yemen ............. 107,000 39,800 .11 .04 .47 .17
T!\tal or average •••• 267,200 470,200 .20 .35 .59 1.03
392 .MODERN TURKEY
TABLE II (Continued)
UTroMAN EMPIRE: RECEIPTS AND ExPENDITURES, BY GEOGILA.PliiCAL
DIVISIONS, FISCAL YEAR 1911-12 *
(in Turlci&la pound&)
......."' ..."' ... ....

~ ......~ ~! ~e ~~
:;1::1 ~ " ...
.:!
,s.
...
'6
...=
... ;::,.
l:>o.S
·a;u
~·~
;e.s
... to) ·-"'"....
;::,.., ..
...
...;::,..._E
oe<:>o
... ..
;::,.
gt; ~t
()
'"J <>;:s
~ I'>;J, ~;::,. I'>;J;::,. "'<:>o
~ ~~1::1
Mesopotamia
Baghdad ••••••••••• 997,600 68.5,100 1.02 .70 10.08 6.92
Basra ............. 341,000 185,100 .61 .33 5.83 3.18
Mosul ................ 340,500 377,400 .69 .76 3.78 4.19
Total or average •••• 1,679,100 1,248,300 .83 .61 6.78 5.04
Grand Total or Gen-
--- - - ---
eral Average •...•.• 31,108,700 36,705,300 1.18 1.40 16.82 19.85
• Table prepared from data in ''Bulletin Annnel de Statistiqne, 1329 (1911),"

Empire Ottoman, 1\Jinisti!re des Finance,.. Bnr...,n de Ia Statistiqne, pp. 8-9.
Tbere is doubt as to the aecoracy of some of the figures repreeentmc per
capita receipts and expenditures, doe to the fact tbat in the case of Yemen,
Assir, AI 1\Jadina and Lebanon the popnlation is only estimated.
t Obviously, a very large proportion of the receipts and expenditures of the
central departments of the gov.,mm.,nt are etf<>cted in Conrtantinople, and tb~
expenditures in those departments have a vital influence on the welfare ot
the vilayet of Constantinople.
f The returns for the vilayets of Adrisnople, Rnmaill, the Islands and
Yemen are incomplete.
t No data regarding receipts and expenditures for the sanjak of ABair are
available. The population and arl'll of this district are not included in arriving
at the per capita receipts and expenditures either for Arabia, or tor the Empire
as a whole.
financial independence. In 1875, the Empire became

bankrupt. In 1881 began the financial control by the
Powers exercised through the Ottoman Public Debt. The
resources of the Empire, if properly developed, would
have been ample to cover the requirements of an honest,
efficient government. But the deficits occurred; hence,
it is desirable to study the Ottoman budget and try to
determine why revenues failed to meet expenditures.1
As the Ottoman Empire had been in a state of almost
sA word of caution should be entered regarding placing implicit eon·

fidenee in Tnrkish statistics. Those in the best position to know assert
that at best official fignres are only approximations and that at worst they
are ealeulated distortions of the aetual situation.
constant turmoil since the Young Turk revolution of
1908, it is difficult indeed to find a "normal" year.
Though the year 1911-12 found the Turko-Italian War in
full swing, what few operations were carried on were re-
mote from the heart of the Empire, and in reality had lit-
tle effect on its economic life. Moreover, reasonably
complete statistics exist for that year, and the same can
be said of but few other years. The tables exhibit certain
phenomena. First, both revenues and expenditures apply
exclusively to the operations of the Imperial Govern-
ment. As in the United States, the various administra-
tive divisions such as vilayets, sanjaks, aud municipali-
ties have revenues and expenditures which are roughly
comparable to those of our states, counties or municipali-
ties. Second, Table I shows that the Turkish budget is
habitually unbalanced, the regular deficit during those
years included in the table being entirely typical of Turk-
ish fiscal experience. This fact in itself is of supreme im-
portance and implies continual borrowing. Third, actual
receipts had little relation to budgetary estimates, except
that they were uniformly much smaller. Fourth, as the
credits authorized by the Chamber of Deputies were con-
sistently far in excess of actual expenditures and even of
estimated expenditures, not to speak of estimated reve-
nues, an almost complete lack of parliamentary control
over the activities of the government is evidenced. It
will be observed that in several instances authorized ex-
penditures were more than 100 per cent greater than the
sums actually disbursed. Fifth, imperial receipts proved
to be quite inflexible or else the government's policy was
hopelessly shortsighted, for during the first years of the
Great War the resources of the treasury actually de-
clined, whereas prudence demanded that they be ex-
panded to the utmost limit.
Consideration of the territorial distribution of receipts
nnd expenditures (Table II) brings out several interest-
394 MODERN TURKEY
ing facts. By analyzing receipts per capita or per square
kilometer, it becomes evident that the actual amounts
flowing into the Ottoman treasury were quite modest
when judged by European or even by American stand-
ards. Since imperial revenues constitute the chief burden
on the taxpayer, it can hardly be argued that contri-
butions of L. T.l.18 ($5.19) per capita are excessive, pro-
vided that even a modest degree of wealth exists. On the
contrary, the revenues are not sufficient to provide ade-
quate government-including in that term the construc-
tion of public works, the development of education, and
those other benefits that a modern administration is ex-
pected to furnish. The explanation of this situation is
to be sought either in inadequate natural resources or in
an undeveloped economic regime, or in both. Applying
these tests, it appears that in the European provinces
and Mesopotamia, in much of Anatolia, and in part of
Syria and Armenia, meager revenues denote the failure
either to collect taxes or to develop natural resources,
many of which are of enviable richness. Arabia, how-
ever, as well as much of Syria and Armenia is probably
destined to continued relative poverty because of its
deficiencies by nature. By accident, there is also a tend-
ency for natural resources to become poorer in those re-
gions most remote from Constantinople, exception being
made of Mesopotamia.
Revenues per capita and per square kilometer tend to
decline in direct proportion as the distance from Con-
stantinople increases. At least a partial explanation is
to be found in the increasing looseness of :financial admin-
istration according as the vilayets are farther and far-
ther separated from the center of authority. An evidence
of laxity in administration is the enormous differences in
per capita and per square kilometer revenues which ap-
pear in vilayets of approximately equal natural wealth
and degree of development. It is to be feared that equal-
ity of taxation, according to ability to pay, is not one of
the principles of Turkish finance. There is, however,
little evidence that the non-Turkish races were unduly
burdened, as has so often been claimed; though the mix-
ture of population in the so-called Armenian, Greek or
Arabian vilayets makes. impossible a positive statement
on this point. Still, a study of the detailed figures for
expenditures indicates that perhaps these districts were
discriminated against in the amounts spent in them for
such services as education and 'public works, whereas
military expenditures were unduly high in most of the
non-Turkish provinces on the confines of the Empire
where it would be logical to concentrate troops.
Finally, expenditures by the central departments ap-
pear to ~e unreasonably high. Unquestionably a redun-
dancy of officials exists at Constantinople if account be
taken of the work accomplished. For example, in
· 1911-12, L. T. 1,185,700 ($5.217,080) was spent for public
works, and of this sum the central administration re-
quired L. T. 285,300 ($1,255,320) or 24.1 per cent. Even
the Ottoman Public Debt, controlled by foreigners and
unquestionably the most efficient part of Ottoman fiscal
administration, spends on an average some 19 per cent
of its total receipts for expenses of supervision and ad-
ministration. Although the Ottoman Public Debt works
under certain difficulties, such a showing would not be
tolerated for a moment in a modern :fiscal organization.
Direct taxes (see Table III) account for one half of the
state's income, one quarter of that income accruing from
tithes, or taxes on the products of the soil. Not one of
the direct taxes listed would appear among the federal
revenues of the United States. There is, indeed, a sort
of income tax more nearly approximating a license fee
for professional men. A very elaborate war-profits tax
was voted late in 1919. But for practical purposes it can
be said that one half of Turkey's imperial revenues are
396 MODERN TURKEY
derived from sources unknown to the United States Gov-
ernment, though land taxes form an important part of
American state, local, and municipal revenues. Monopo-
lies, state enterprises, state domains, tribute, and the
administration of pensions appear hardly at all in the
budget of the United States. In most countries, customs
duties are the only revenues that bulk large among the
sources of income. This fact emphasizes the difficulty in
visualizing .the fiscal system of the Ottoman Empire.
Of the total expenditures 61.4 per cent is used for in-
terest and amortization of the public debt and for the
ministry of war. Thus the needs for education and pub-
lic works, for commerce and agriculture, for order and
justice must be woefully neglected. The tithe, the chief
source of revenue, has been roundly condemned by many,
although the writer believes that it is not ill-adapted to
the conditions .prevailing throughout most of Turkey.
Not the tithe itself but its administration is to be criti-
ci~ed. For in an agricultural country like 'rurkey, what
better measure of taxpaying ability could be devised than
one based upon the crops actually obtained from the soil T
This is, in reality, a tax on income, whereas a land tax
calculated on the value of the land may have little relation
to the ability of the owner to pay during any given year.
Of course, the tithe is only applicable to the rural dis-
tricts and mtist be supplemented by equivalent taxes for
the urban population. Instead of being one tenth of the
value of the product, as its name implies, the title actu-
ally amounts to 12.1 per cent of the crop, 10 per cent go-
ing directly to the government, 1 per cent being devoted
to the agricultural bank, 0.5 per cent to public instruction
and 0.6 per cent to military armaments.
Needless to say, such a tax is of crushing weight in it-
self; but in addition it is chiefly administered in the worst
possible way, that is, by the system of tax-farming. The
evils of this system have too often been described to need
Brusa Silk has a Justly-desern•d Reputation. Abo,·e is thl' A~ri<'ultural
School and Experiment Station Maintaint'd by the Ottoman l'ublie
Departnwnt. Below is a Local Mill.
repetition, and one or two illustrations will suffice to
demonstrate its effects in Turkey:
If the tax-farmers were deceived in their calcula-
tions it is at the expense of the peasant that they try
to indemnify themselves. The peasant being almost
. always in debt, waits with impatience for the moment
when he can sell his crops; but when he has cut his
grain he is obliged, before threshing it, to wait some-
times for long weeks before it has pleased the tax-
farmer to come and take the part that is his. The tax-
farmer, who is ~enerally also a grain merchant, utilizes
this situation to force the peasant, threatened with see-
ing his harvest rot in the open field, to sell the rest of
his crop at a low price, and the tax-farmer knows how
to secure the protection of the officials • • • against
those who try to make trouble.
I have said that the tithes on fresh fruits and vege-
tables are paid in money. Here again the abuses of the
tax-farmers are many and varied. A cherry tree has
produced two ocques of fruit. The tax-farmer comes
after the cherries have been picked and estimates that
each tree has yielded ten ocques. The grower is
obliged to compromise with the tax-farmer or to appeal
to the authorities. More often he prefers to adopt the
former method, that is to say, to avoid a suit in which
the chances are, in advance, on the side of the tax-
farmer.1
Custom duties stand second in importance among Tur-
key's individual revenues, constituting 14.7 per cent of
the total. Unquestionably this source of income could be
materially expanded, were it not handicapped, first by
commercial treaties, and, second, by inefficient and often
dishonest administration.
Turkey maintains an export duty of 1 per cent and a
transit tax of equal magnitude. These taxes are merely.
vexations, as they yield little revenue and require consid-
erable machinery for administration.
Land taxes are the third most important source of
1 Du Velay, "Essai sur I 'Histoire Financi~re de Ia Turquie," page 672.
398 MODERN TURKEY
revenue, contributing 9.2 per cent. To the Western mind
the methods of assessment and collection are quite
unique. Constantinople has always enjoyed many fiscal
privileges, and not until1874-75 did real property in the
city have to pay taxes. Added to the evils of favoritism
and general under-assessment is the strange discovery
that one does not have to meet his taxes on the pain of
forfeiture of his property. He is merely estopped from
selling or repairing it-hardly an administrative device
of much terror in a place where sales of land are rare and
where the population needs little urging to let their build·
ings fall into dilapidation. Besides, at more or less
regular intervals the sultan issues an edict canceling all
tax payments that may be in arrears. It often pays not
to pay one's taxes. Both in Constantinople and in the
provinces there is little or no flexibility in assessments,
and values once determined are maintained indefinitely.
One of the chief abuses is that the tax collectors are quite
amenable to judiciously distributed largesse. Another
difficu:Uy is that city dwellers usually avoid their fair
share, thus inevitably shifting an undue burden on the
rural classes. As these are already chargeable with the
tithe and with live-stock taxes, this discrimination in the
administration of the land tax becomes even more unjust,
as well as unwise. ·
Regular annual deficits must mean borrowing, and bor-
rowing must be external or internal. Unfortunately for
itself, Turkey's borrowing has been almost exclusively
external, and the proceeds, until recently, have not been
used for productive purposes. It is, in fact, its external
financial engagements whiCh have been primarily re-
sponsible for Turkey's increasing political tutelage. In-
terest on foreign debts was defaulted, and the Powers
not unnaturally defended their nationals who were bond·
holders by assuming sufficient authority in Turkey to
safeguard their interests. After the opening wedge was
TABLE III
0TTOKAN EKPIBE: RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES BY GOVERNli:ENTAL FUNCTIONS, FISCAL YEAR 1911-12 •
Turkish
Beceipts Turkish P<Nnds Per Cent Expenditures Pounds PerCent
Public debt ....•.•.•....••.. 11,288,000 30.7
Diret!f Taxes ••••••••••••••••• 15,724,800 50.5 Civil list ................... . 494,100 1.4
Land taxes ....•..•••••••••• 2,866,900 9.2 General assembly •..•........ 222,900 0.6
:Military exemption ..•••••••• 1, 795,300 5.8 Ministry of Finance .••••..••• 2,762,100 7.5
Payment& in kind • • . • • • • • • • • 607,400 2.0 Court of accounts ....••.•••.. 18,300 0.0
Livestock taxes .••••.••• , , •• 2,106,200 6.7 Customs administration 425,900 1.2
Tithes .•.••••••••••••• , •••• 7,849,100 25.2 Posts and telegraphs •••.••••• 779,700 2.1
All other . . . . . . . • . • • • • • . . . • • 499,900 1.6 Registration of titles •••••.•• 103,900 0.3
Stamps, Fees, etc. • ••••••.•••.. 1,437,000 4.6 Hejaz railroad ...•..••.••.••.
Stamps . . • • . . • • • . • • • • • • • • • • 565,200 1.8 Grand vizierate .•••••.••••.•• 26,600 0.1
All other •.•••••••••••• , • • • 871,800 2.8 Ministry of the Interior •..• , • 1,367,000 3.7
Indirect Taxe1 .............. . 5,514,700 17.7 Public safety ............... . 431,600 1.2
Customs •.••.•••••••••••••. 4,555,700 14.7 Cabinet •...•...•.•...••••••. 33,400 0.1
All other • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 959,000 3.0 Ministry of Foreign Affairs : . 236,100 0.6
~Monopoliel .................. . 3,673,900 11.8 Bureau of Mohammedanism •. 418,300 1.1
1P Salt ••••••••••••••••••••••• 1,304,800 4.2 Ministry of Justice & Religions 724,600 2.0
Tobacco •••.•.•••..•••••••• 1,030,500 3.3 Ministry of Public Instruction. 850,500 2.3
Posts, telegraphs & telephones 929,000 3.0 Ministry of Public Works .•••. 1,185,700 3.3
All other . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 409,600 1.3 Ministry of Commerce & Agri-
culture •• , •••.•••••••••••• 373,600 1.0
State Enterprise• , .•••• , . , ••... 246,600 0.8
State Domains ••••••• , ••••••. 798,600 2.6 Ministry of the Navy •••••••• 1,718,500 4.7
Tribute ........•..•.•.••. , , .. 875,500 2.8 Ministry of War .......... .. 11,280,800 30.7
Egypt & Zahleh ••••••••.••• 769,500 2.5 Munitions factory ••••••••••• 534,700 1.5
All other ••••.••••.•••••••• 106,000 0.3 Gendarmerie .. , .•.• , .•••.••. 1,429,000 3.9
Repayment of ..4dvancu by the
State ••.••.•••••••••.•••. 56,600 0.2
1/.eserve for Penswns •••••••••• 1,077,100 3.5
Military Pensions •••.....••• 646,100 2.1
All other .•....••.......... 431,000 1.4
M illcellaneO'IUI ••••••• • . . ..• 1,703,900 5.5
Total ••••••••••.••••••••.•• 31,108,700 100.0 36,705,300 100.0
• Thla table Ia compiled from data found In "Bulletin Annuel de Statlstlque, 1327 (1911)," Empire Ottoman, Mlnlsti\re des
l'lnance"- Bureau dl' Ia Stntlstlque, pp. 18-23, 242-243. It will be ob1114'rved that neither the fliurea for receipts nor expend!·
tvru &il'ee with tho.e furnished b7 the Ottoman Public Debt tor the same 7ear.
400 MODERN TURKEY
driven, it was easy to pennit further delegations of
authority, until finally the :financial framework of the
Empire was in the hands of a group of foreigners-the
representatives of the bondholders.
Turkey first defaulted on the payment of interest in
1875, and in the final settlement which eventuated from
this debacle its total indebtedness was scaled down from
L. T. 278,082,000 ($1,223,560,800) to L. T. 116,135,000
($510,994,000) or a loss to the creditors of 58.2 per cent.
But the Ottoman Government, or, perhaps, the foreign
investors, did not profit by this stinging lesson, for more
loans were contracted, and in 1903 another partial can-
cellation was necessary. These losses were, however, not
as great as appears at :first glance, as many of the loans
were issued far below par. In general, it may be said
that Turkish finances were· in a reasonably satisfactory
condition from 1881 until 1914. Revenues showed con-
sistent gains; railways were opening up the country and
increasing the tax-paying ability of many sections; the
foreign administrative body known as the Ottoman Pub-
lic Debt gradually imparted a strength to Ottoman credit
that it had not previously known. Though deficits ex-
isted in the budget-deficits that efficiency and economy
would have rendered unnecessary-they were not alarm-
ing, as the growing wealth of the Empire much more than
counterbalanced them.
There has been much discussion in regard to the op-
pressiveness of Turkey's prewar debt. It is customary
to point to the fact that 30 per cent of total expenditures
had to go a& debt charges; therefore, the debt was oner-
ous. An alternative explanation is that both revenues
and expenditures were small in comparison with the
extent and wealth of'the coun~ry. In reality, Turkish
finances were in a comparatively favorable situation.
Can it be rea$onably supposed that a per capita indebted-
. ness of approximately L. T. 5.75 ($25.30) involving inter-
est charges of about L. T. 0.20 ($0.90) is literally t_o be
styled "insupportable"! Were it not for the fact that
these payments for the most part went out of the country
and thus necessitated an actual transfer of wealth from
Turkish subjects to foreigners rather than a mere redis-
tribution of wealth within the Empire, the debt would
hardly have attracted attention.
Finance during the Great War was a very different
story in Turkey from what it was in the other belligerent
powers. Whereas the other nations chiefly financed
themselves by the flotation of internal loans and saw
their national indebtedness increase many fold, Turkey
issued but one small internal loan and quite moderate ex-
ternal loans, and now finds its postwar debt only 173
per cent greater than before entering the contest. Such
a remarkable showing requires explanation. Table IV
discloses that during the first few months of the war the
total Ottoman debt was L. T. 170,648,107 ($750,851,671)
and has risen to only L. T. 465,673,338 ($2,048,962,687).
In these days, when national debts rise to colossal
heights, it is restful to find one country whose debt is
only a modest two billion dollars.
This is a very remarkable showing in view of the im-
mense armies that Turkey mobilized and maintained in
the field. The explanation 1 is found in the fact that mili-
• As the fiscal burden imposed by the "greenbacks" in the United
States is virtually nil, so is that of the Turkish paper money. Indeed its
burden is less, for in addition to paying no interest Turkey is not put
to the expense of supporting a gold reserve as in the 'United States.
Since the currency is inconvertible at present and will be probably for a
long time to come, there is every likelihood that the paper money has
become a permanent element of Ottoman currency; that is, that it will
never be redeemed. To obtain an accurate idea of the weight of the
Ottoman public debt, the amount of the paper money should therefore
be deducted. The same applies to the "Guaranteed loan," the "Defense
loan,'' and the ''Egyptian tribute loan,'' as the service of these loans
is a charge against Egypt. This involves a deduction of L. T. 153,600,644
plus 17,041,750 which is equal to 170,642,394, leaving a debt of L. T.
295,030,944 ($1,298,136,154), an amount only 93 per cent larger than
the prewar debt, again deducting the loans guaranteed by Egypt.
402 MODERN TURKEY
tary requisitions and issue of paper money accounted for
the chief part of its war expenses. In other words, Tur-
key unwittingly adopted a "pay as yo~ go" policy, and
as a consequence finds its financial position inherently
more sound than that of any of the actively belligerent
nations aside from the United States, Japan, and Bel-
gium. It is true that estimates for military requisitions
may considerably exceed those shown in Table IV (which
TABLE IV
DEBT OJ' THE 0'1-ro:M:AN E:M:PIILE
1915, 1919
.:.~..c= •.!:
;:It~
~ .. ~ ~ ~t~
;.,~~~
Designation of Lot111111 ~ ~=
;., C)
.a~..,~;: .a~ ~e.
~~ .,..,
" ...
.., ... 'I>.C~r-1 .c""r-1
~~ ~~ £~ ~r-1~ ~-' ~r-1~

1:1.:.1 CQ
External Loans (prewar) ••••.•••.

Unified converted debt ••••.•••• 1903 4 36,799,840 36,463,328
Turkish lottery bonds •••••••••• 1870 10,645,430 10,299,268
Osmanieh ..................... 1890
5 per cent, 1896 •.••.••.••.•••• 1896
4
5
2,886,400
2,814,020
2,230,800
2,596,220
4 per cent, 1903, with special
guarantees .................. 1903
Baghdad, first series ••••••••••• 1903
4
4
2,439,228
2,342,252
2,348,104.
2,327,358
4 per cent, 1904 •.••••••••.•••• 1904 4 2,594,064 2,594,064
4 per cent, 1901-05 ••.••.••••••• 1901-05 4 4,976,422 4,976,422
Tejhizat Askarieh ••.••..•••••• 1905 4 2,441,340 2,343,858
Baghdad, second series ••••••••• 1908 4 4,718,120 4,683,756
Baghdad, third series .••..••••.. 1908-12 4 5,221,700 5,199,810
4 per cent, 1908 ............... 1908 4 4,538,908 4,538,908
5 per cent, 1914 ••••••••••••••• 1914 5 22,000,000 22,000,000
Docks, arsenals and naval eon-
1913
struetions
··················
Tombac priority •.•••••••••.••• 1893
5.5
4
1,485,000
652,960
1,485,000
536,360
40,000,000 francs (Oriental Rail-
way) ••••..•••••••.••••••••• 1894 4 1,560,240 1,491,226
Customs .•.•••••••••••.•••••.. 1902 4 7,923,234 7,923,234
Loan of 1909 ................. 1909 4 6,550,698 6,550,698
Municipality of Constantinople,
1909 •••••••••..••.••.••.••. 1909 5 1,073,490 1,073,490
Municipality of Constantinople,
1913 •••••••••••••••••••.•••• 1913 5 1,100,000 1,100,000
Hodeida·Sana
Soma·Panderma
................
................
1909
1910
4
4
1,000,010
1,700,644
1,000,010
1,700,644
4 per cent, 1911 ••••••••••••••• 1911 4 6,699,880 6,258,549
Municipality of Baghdad •••.•.. 1912 6 31,660 31,660
Guaranteed loan ••••••••••••••• 1855 4 4,196,720 4,196,720
TABLE IV (Continued)
DEBT 01' THE 0'1"l''MA.N EMPIBB
1915, 1919 •
-..~..:
=t~
IM;.<:S
~e~
1M "' ;s Cl>
Designation of LoaM ~ ~~ ;:.,e!::!j., ;.,~-q ....
Q"' ,oc;:, ...... .0 c;:, ...:~
eli! ... t; '~)~"=~
.... <:S
<:SQ
~14
t;~
A:l .... ~~ ~ ..... - 'l>o&:
~~~~-
(:!
Defence loan .................. 1891 4 5,845,312 5,532,912

Egyptian tribute loan •••••••••• 1894 3.5 7,783,710 7,312,118
Total ..................... 152,021,282 148,794,517
Treasury Bonds, Advances, etc.
Treasury bonds of Imperial Otto-
man Bank .................. 1912 6 1,955,600 470,493
Treasury bonds of Perier & Co... 1913 5 3,520,000 3,520,000
Treasury bonds, 5 per cent, 1911. 1911 5 983,445 983,455
Advance of the Bkgie des Tabacs. 960,878 1,164,686
Konia irrigation project· •••••••• 809,902 779,888
Total .................... 8,229,825 6,918,512
Total of external loans ••••••• 160,251,107 155,713,029
War Loans
Ottoman internal loan ••••••••• 1918 5 17,851,120
Paper money (7 issues) ....... 153,600,644
Germany advanced in gold •••• ' 8,689,094
Germ'IL!ly advanced in gold for
first issue of paper money •••• 4,409,415
Germany advanced in silver ••••• 2,321,273
Germany advanced in Turkish
pounds ..................... 16,560,774
Germany advanced in mark& •••• 22,237,637
Austria-Hungary advanced in gold 57,546
Austria-Hungary advanced in gold
for first issue of paper money •• 2,109,724
Austria-Hungary advanced in gold
crowns 240,000,000 (Bal. 137,-
345,880) ..................•• 6,317,911
Total .................... 234,155,138
Miscellaneous
Old fioating debt .............. 10,397,000 10,397,000
Military requisitions, law of July
7, 1914 •••.••••••••••••••••• 25,000,000
Military supplies ••••••••••••••. 30,000,000
Annuities outaide the Decree of
Muharrem .................. 10,408,171
TotJil .................... 10,397,000 75,805,171
Total of war loans •••••••• 10,397,000 309,960,309
Total Debt of Xv.rkey •••• L.T. 170,648,107 465,673,338
404 MODERN TURKEY
are only provisional) and further sums will have to be

added in consequence of loss and damage to the property
and persons of foreigners. ;But when all is said and done,
Turkey's finances are in a strong position as far as the
internal situation is concerned.
But it must be remembered that Turkey was on the
losing side in the Great War, and this inherently sound
position may be completely reversed if heavy repara-
tion payments are assessed on the Ottoman Empire, or
what remains of it. By the treaties which concluded the
Balkan wars, the principle was established that those
countries which received Ottoman territories should also
assume their equitable share of the Ottoman debt. This
principle was never put into effect, as the Financial Com-
mission which was making the apportionment had not
completed its task when the Great War broke out. How-
ever, the principle is maintained in the treaties signed in
1919 and presumably will be extended to those territories
which may be detached from Turkey in the final settle-
ments. In a word, since its war debt is so small and the
prewar debt is to be apportioned, under almost any con-
ceivable peace settlement, Turkey has little ground for
fears of a financial nature insofar as its debt is con-
cerned. But all such calculations may be nullified if
reparation payments are assessed either on the principle
of ability to pay, as in the case of Bulgaria, or on the
principle of loss, as in the case of Germany. The actual
task of apportioning and reorganizing Turkish obliga-
tions is bound to be baffling, not because 'of the reorgan-
ization amounts involved, but because of the complexity
of the debt. Whereas in the United States the entire
debt is a general charge against general revenues, in
Turkey specific revenues in specific districts have been
assigned to particular loans or to kilometric guarantees
of railroads. The composite picture is truly complicated,
but simplification by unification, funding, and the aboli-
tion of special security for loans is bound to meet intense

opposition from various vested interests. Until this es-
sential task is accomplished, however, Turkish :finances
must remain a hodge-podge, hampering the economic
development of the country and ultimately militating
against the very foreign financial interests which are so
insistent about maintaining the regime of special assign-
ments of revenues.
Aside from military requisitions and advances from
Germany, the chief device of Ottoman war finance was
the issue of paper currency. Even in this regard the
Turks were more moderate than their cobelligerents,
with the result that the quantity now afloat does not rep-
resent an almost insuperable problem as in the cases of
France, Germany, Austria-Hungary and Russia. For
the first issue, gold was deposited in the name of the Otto-
man Public Debt in Berlin and Vienna, and for the other
issues German treasury bonds, payable in gold at vari-
ous dates after the conclusion of peace, were deposited in
Berlin in the name of the Debt. It should be noted that
no gold was ever sent to Turkey under these arrange-
ments and that the gold on deposit has been "transferred
to the Allied and Associated Powers by the treaties of
Versailles and St. Germain 1 and has been removed to
Paris. Turkey made a bad bargain by agreeing to float
a liquidation loan in Berlin as the German treasury bonds
were redeemed in gold. 2
Though depreciation has been considerable and the
Turkish paper now stands at about 15-20 per cent of par,
the depreciation has in nowise been comparable to that in
Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria, Russia and Ron-
mania and is little greater than in Italy. Currency fluc-
tuations and speculation have been rampant, these sorts
1 Treaty of Versailles, 1919 Article 259 sec. 1; Treaty of St. Germain,
1 1
1919, Art. 210, sec. 1.
• Mandclstam1 "Le sort de 1'empire Ottoman," page 160,
406 :MODERN TURKEY
of phenomena appealing with tremendous force to the
imaginations of the Greeks, Armenians, and Jews, with
the result that money-changing and exchange gambling
are among the most prominent and least desirable activ-
ities of the capital.
Before the war Turkey's currency was almost exclu-
sively gold and silver and amounted to about L. T. 52,000,-
000 ($228,800,000) of national money and the equivalent
of perhaps L. T. 12,000,000 ($52,800,000) of foreign me-
tallic money. 1 There was, besides, in circulation L. T.
1,200,000 in notes of the Imperial Ottoman Bank, a pri-
vate institution which has the exclusive right of note
issue. The currency situation was eminently sound
though far from satisfactory, chiefly due to the fact that
the Turkish pound was rated at a different number of
piasters in different districts and for different purposes.
One beneficial result o~ the issue of paper money and of
its depreciation is that now for all purposes and in all
those districts of the Empire where it still is in circula-
tion, the Turkish pound consists of 100 piasters. Even
the currency problem, therefore, is less acute in Turkey
than in most belligerent countries and the relatively
small amounts of paper in circulation together with the
large sums of gold that remain in the country, though in
hoards, should render the path to stabilization and parity
comparatively smooth.
Of almost equal importance with the facts relating to
revenues and expenditures, the size of the public debt
and the general financial situation of the country are
those regarding the revenues and expenditures of the
vilayets, sanjaks and municipalities. The vilayets are
for practical purposes under the control of the ministry
of the interior. They correspond in some respects to the
• Estimates of Count Paul de Guebhard of the Ottoman Pub lie Debt.
The former Minister of Finance, Djavid Bey, estimated the metallic money
at L. T. 50,000,000.
various states of the United States, and have revenues

for local purposes equal to about one tenth of those
which they turn over to the imperial exchequer. The
smaller administrative divisions constitute a vital ele-
ment in the financial and political life of the people, but
unfortunately very little statistical data are available to
aid in the exposition of the questions which naturally
arise. In the only year for which statistics are available
the percentage ranged from 4 for the vilayet of Constan·
tinople to 18 for that of Kharput. The official statis-
tics show that for most vilayets receipts and expenditures
balance to the piaster-a rather remarkable record I But
taking them at face value, expenditures administered
directly by the vilayets equal about 20 per cent of those
expended by the Empire in the same vilayets, ranging
from 4 per cent in Baghdad to 47 per cent in Adana. As
sources of provincial revenue, tithes and road taxes are
of about equal importance, and these two items account
for three fourths or four fifths of the entire amount.
Other sources are taxes on buildings, fees for slaughter-
ing animals, and interest on deposits. Expenditures
chiefly go for public instruction, public works, roads, the
agricultural bank, agriculture, and salaries of vilayet
officials.
One final question remains: the question of control.
Where does responsibility rest for the collection of reve-
nues f What checks are exercised over expenditures f
The answers to these questions must remain somewhat
nebulous and unsatisfactory, because positive statements
would simply be misleading. Everything depends upon
the character and attitude of the officials who happen to
be in power rather than upon the stipulations of the or-
ganic law. There are numerous advisory bodies on finan-
cial matters both in the capital and in the vilayets, but
an aggressive minister of finance or of the interior does
about as he pleases in regard to imperial expenditures,
408 MODERN TURKEY
while the same type of vali, or provincial governor, does
likewise in the vilayets. It is again a case in which the
Ottoman system seems on paper to be well organized and
coordinated, but which in practice may be reasonably
satisfactory or utterly chaotic, according as competent
and honest officials or the opposite happen to be in power.
As a rule, order and strict adherence to the law are not
found in Turkish financial administration, with the result
that on the revenue side taxes are always far in arrears,
and on the expenditure side public funds are often spent
without any proportionate return. The preparation of
the budget, as well as its approval by the council of state,
by the parliament, and by the sultan, is little more than
a formality. In reality, no responsibility exists. The
ministry of finance is helpless, because most of the other
ministries collect and disburse funds on their own ac-
counts. It is needless to point out that this lack of cen-
tralization and responsibilty provides an admirable set-
ting for irregularities of all kinds. Not only does this
confusion exist, but when creditors of the Government
fail to obtain satisfaction from the central authorities,
they apply directly to the provincial revenue officers.
Government funds are, as a consequence, chronically de-
pleted, officials are often unpaid for months at a time and
naturally reimburse themselves in ways that are readily
suggested.
. The lack of responsibility, order, and control, are
the chief defects in Turkey's :financial administration.
Though vexations and abuses exist, the revenue system is
not badly devised. Certainly the Turkish taxpayer is
far less burdened than his counterpart in most European
countries. During the last century, great progress has
been made in :fiscal reform; the internal obstacles to
establishing a satisfactory financial regime are not great.
Unless reparation payments impose a crushing weight
on the country, · Turkey has come through the war of
1914-1918 in remarkably sound financial condition. Un-
less prewar conditions are radically changed, why, there-
fore, are improvements not to be expected! The answer
is foreign interference. The story of foreign activities in
Turkey is a sorry one. Cabinet ministers have been cor-
rupted into betraying their country's patrimony. Even
attempts at reform have been repressed by the powers,
because a strong Turkey was the last thing they desired.
How could the country be expected to be honorable and
progressive when the so-called "civilized" powers were
doing their best to despoil it! Du V elay vividly de-
scribes the situation:
In Turkey, in contradistinction to other countries,
the government is not at liberty to act, to innovate, to
reform. For example, the regime of the capitulations
prevents the adaptation to the Ottoman fiscal system
of a multitude of new ideas in the matter of taxes.
When Turkey wants to inaugurate a license law diplo-
matic protests are heard immediately from all quarters
if foreigners are subject to the general law. When it
is desired to raise the taxes on alcohol and thus secure
revenues which would easily exceed 20,000,000 francs,
the interests of certain powers get alarmed, set diplom-
acy into operation, and the ..status quo is maintained.
The creation of the smallest monopoly, like one for
matches or cigarette paper, does not fail to bring forth
objections. In a word, the government is accused of
not paying its employees, of being at the end of its re-
sources, of contracting too many loans, yet, those who
make these accusations are the first to oppose the re-
forms which might put an end to the distress of the
public treasury. On the question of railroads, what
battles, what competition among the Powers! One
wants to secure a zone in which it will be absolutely at
liberty to build or not to build railroads. Moreover, it
will manifest its high displeasure at the construction
of lines even outside the sphere of influence which has
been allotted to it. Besides, when conflicts arise be-
tween rival countries the unsuccessful candidates de-
410 MODERN TURKEY
mand compensations, as if a share in the execution of
public works was their just right. Turkey is a battle
ground where each power is the opponent and rival of
all the rest-and it is in the midst of these handicaps
that some have the effrontery of demanding from the.
government a healthy administration like that in the
neighboring countries, of demanding equilibrium be-
tween revenues and expenditures, reform and harmony
in the manifestations of its financial life!
Under generous and disinterested peace terms there
are no adequate reasons that would prevent Turkey
from entering upon an era of financial prosperity. In
spite of all interference railroads have been built, irriga-
tion works established, and ports somewhat developed.
Internal conditions are ripe for a rapid realization of the
country's potential wealth. The prerequisites are seri-
ous, honest effort on the part of Turkish citizens of all
nationalities and constructive sympathy and coopera-
tion, or at least the cessation from obstructionist and
obscurantist policies, on the part of the foreign powers.
CHAPTER XVIII
GOVERNMENT
By GmmUDE EDGERTON KNox •
Refrain from these men and let them alone, for if this counsel or
this work he of men, it will come to naught; but if it is of God, ye
cannot overthrow it-lest haply ye be found even to fight against God.
-GAMAI.IEL to the Sanhedrin.
On November 1, 1922, the Grand National Assembly of

Turkey, situated in Angora, passed the following resolu-
tion:-
After having struggled for centuries against the
heavy calamities incurred through the ignorance and
dissipation of the Palace and the Porte, the Empire
had almost disappeared from history, when the Turkish
Nation, its real founder and possessor, rose against
both its foreign enemies and the Palace and the Porte
which had joined them, formed the Grand National
Assembly, and its armies entered into actual armed
conflict with its foreign enemies and the Palace and
the Porte under known conditions of difficulty and
privation, and has this day attained freedom.
Approximately one year later, Oct. 29, 1923, the Grand
National Assembly by unanimous vote decided that Tur-
key should become a republic and in simple terms out-
lined the new constitution.
A miracle has happened. The Turkey of long en-
• Mount Holyoke College B.A., 1909, M.A., 1911, Columbia University,
1917, Stanford University, 1923-24. Head of Department of History, Lin-
coln School, Providence, R.I., 1913-1919. Organizer and director at Samsun
(Turkey) of orphanage and relief work among •be Greeks, Near East Relief,
1919·1921.. .Associate Professor of History, \Jonstantinople Woman 'a Col-
lege, Constantinople, Turkey, 1921-1922.
411
412 MODERN TURKEY
trenched theocracy, of a complicated government with a
hierarchy of officials sapping its strength, has become
almost overnight a republic, governed by one all-powerful
assembly. Constantinople and the Sultan have been
thrust aside and Angora and the National Assembly have
taken their place. A great experiment in nationalism
and in democracy is being tried out.
The break from the old regime started with a revolu-
tionary movement under a military leader who had been
deprived of his command by the Constantinople Govern-
ment. Mustafa Kemal Pasha, the head of a strong
nationalist party, had labored for some time in vain to
build up such a party in the Imperial Government. Hav-
ing fled to Asia Minor, he stirred up the nationalist move-
ment there and in 1919 founded the Angora or Turkish
Nationalist State, as a result of the pacts made by con-
gresses of Turkish revolutionary nationals at Erzerum,
and Sivas under his presidency. The Greek occupation
of Smyrna on May 15, 1919, a dramatic and most· ill-
considered event from the point of view of the Allies,
threw all of Asia Minor into the hands of Kemal and
welded together the nationalist movement, as perhaps no
other· event could have done. On April 11, 1920, the
Constantinople Parliament was dissolved, and has not
met again.
On April 23, 1920, the Grand National Assembly met
. at Angora for the sole purpose of stating their adherence
to the "National Pact." This remarkable document of
six articles might in a way be called the "Turkish Dec-
laration of Independence of Foreign Control." It admits
the loss of all the southern regions of the Ottoman Em-
pire but demands complete independence without finan-
cial and military control for Turkey in a territory which
should include the whole of Asia Minor, Constantinople
and part of Thrace. The sixth article of the pact
states:-
GOVERNMENT 413
It is a fundamental condition of our life and con-
tinued existence that we, like every country, should
enjoy complete independence and liberty in the matter
of assuring the means of our development. In order
that our national and economic development should be
rendered possible and that it should be possible to
conduct affairs in the form of a most up-to-date legal
administration, for this reason we are opposed to re-
strictions to our development in political, judicial,
financial and other matters.
It is noticeable that in the National Pact, a new form
of government is provided for only insofar as an "up-
to-date, legal administration" is 'referred to.
After a period of war, internal and external, th·e Na-
tionalist Government of today stands with the aims of
the National Pact achieved. Turkey is to be a land ~f
the Turk, the Greek army is driven out, the capitulations
are abolished, the Constantinople Government is gone,
and the Angora Government is supreme in the land.
On what basis does the new government rest 7 What is
its constitution 7 Soon after its convocation on April 23,
1920, the Grand National Assembly passed what is known
as the Law of Fundamental Organization, a document
of twenty-three articles embodying the main constit~
tional principles of the new order. This "Law," to-
gether with the act of November 1, 1922, abolishing the
position of Sultan-Khalif, formed, until the recent dec-
laration of the Republic, the only constitution of the
New Turkey.
By the Law of Fundamental Organization, sovereignty
is said to belong to the nation "without reservation or
condition''; this sovereignty is vested in one chamber of
deputies elected by manhood suffrage every two years.
The Assembly of one chamber in Angora assumes the
legislative power of the government, formerly exercised
by the Sultan, the Senate, and the Chamber of Deputies.
Under the Ottoman Constitution the power of declaring
414 MODERN TURKEY
war and peace, of making treaties, of dissolving Parlia-
ment, of receiving diplomatic representatives from for-
eign states, of appointing the Cabinet and Senate, was
vested in the Sultan. By the Fundamental Pact the
National Assembly at Angora has in its hands the power
of declaring war and peace, and of making treaties. The
power of dissolving Parliament is not placed. Under the
old Ottoman government, the ministers were the ~p
pointees of the Grand Vizier, who was the choice of the
Sultan. They, however, represented the majority party
in Parliament. According to the Law of Fundamental
Organization, the ministers are the appointees of the
Assembly, which possesses executive as well as legisla-
tive power, a remarkable situation. The ministers and
their assistants in a sense are only committees chosen
by the National Assembly from among its own number
to execute its commands. In that it chooses the ministers
of the department of justice, the Assembly may also be
said to possess judicial power.
Mustafa Kemal Pasha, from the beginning the presi-
dent of the National Assembly, has been able to dominate
the policy of the new government. As far as any stipu-
lation in the Law of Fundamental Organization is con-
cerned, however, the President of the National Assembly
is practically without power, save as he gains the power
from the Assembly. There is no balance between _the
executive and legislative branch such as obtains in our
own or in the government of England, since the ministers .
and the president are directly the creation of the As-
sembly. Neither is there any possibility of an appeal
from the decision of the Assembly to the people, as in
the British Government.
With the creation of the Republic on October 29, 1923,
certain changes were made in this so-called constitution,
changes, the necessity for ·which had become increas-
ingly evident. The executive powers of the Assembly
Kurdish Tra\"l?llers at the Door of a Khan.
Colll"feq .4114
Angora, the Turkish <'apital, a M<>di~e,·al Hill Town.

GOVERNMENT 415
are now transferred to the president of the Republic
during the term of the Assembly. The president is chosen
by the Assembly from among its own number. He is
designated as the Chief of State and is assisted in his
executive office by a prime minister and a cabinet which
he chooses from the Assembly. The appointment of
these ministers must, however, be confirmed by the As-
sembly. The president may preside when he feels it
necessary over the Assembly and also over the council
of ministers. Mustafa Kemal Pasha was unanimously
elected the first President of the Turkish Republic.
Under the new arrangement the power of the executive
is greatly increased. During the recesses of the Assem.:
bly, which is to be in session only four months of the
year, the executive power -rests wholly in the hands of
the president and his ministers, strengthened by the ad-
dition of chairmen of standing committees.. Already,
criticism is rife, to the effect that Mustafa Kemal Pasha
is taking to himself too much power. He is president of
the Turkish State, president of the Council of Ministers,
president of the controlling "Peoples' Party" and presi-
dent of the National Assembly. Yet, "sovereign power"
still is said to reside in the Assembly of the people, elected
by manhood suffrage. Much depends upon the interpre-
tation by Mustafa Kemal of his new position. By re-
taining the position of president of the Council of Minis-
ters as well as of the Assembly and by remaining leader
of the Peoples' Party, he seems to be doing away with
any possibility of a rival to his power, in the person of
the Prime Minister, a contingency which many have
thought possible under the proposed change of govern-
ment. It is further intimated that the Assembly did not
have the power to create the new constitution, that the
change was put through by the People's Party, and that
the constitution can be legalized only by the consent of
a constituent assembly representing the whole nation.
416 MODERN TURK:f,:Y
The one chamber form of government, good for its

purpose when the country must keep to the one aim of
war, now that peace times have arrived, seems too clumsy.
Its duties are too many. The governments of western
Europe, for a period at least, seem to have worked
adv~ntageously on the. basis of the conception of the
separate legislative and executive departments and a
two-chamber form of government with a responsible min-
istry. It may be, however, that the time has come for a
change in the old parliamentary form. Surely, the pres-
ent situation in Europe would not seem to point to entire
success in the art of governing. May it not be possible
that a more powerful executive and a less complicated
parliament may be the solution of the governmental
difficulties which are now so apparent. One feels that
the experiment in Turkey as yet is not tried out and
it may be that in the further development of her present
constitutional form we may have the curious situation
of this "backward" country leading the way in a new
era of government reform.
By unanimous resolution on November 1st, 1922~ the
Grand National Assembly made the following startling
announcement:
1. By the Law of Fundamental Organization, the
,Turkish nation having transferred its sovereign power
to the moral personality of the Grand National Assem-
bly which is its real and irrevocable representative,
recognizes no form of government but that of the Grand
National Assembly within the territory bound in the
National Pact. Consequently, the Turkish nation con-
siders that the former government hitherto established
in Constantinople and based on personal sovereignty,
ended for all time on March 16, 1336 (1920).
2. The Khalifate belongs to the Ottoman dynasty and
the Grand National Assembly of Turkey will nominate
GOVERNMENT 417
him of the dynasty who is the most upright and wise in
knowledge and character. The Turkish nation is the
supporting power of the Khalifate.
Upon the passing of this resolution, it was proposed
that November :first and second should be set aside as
feast days, and the Grand National Assembly adjourned
to the noise of 101 guns. This was a great event in the
history of Turkey. Mohammed V, the Sultan in Con-
stantinople, upon the news of the resolution of the Grand
National Assembly, fled aboard a British warship in the
harbor of Constantinople and was carried to Malta.
From Malta, he went to King Husain of the Hejaz. Here
he does not seem to have received the hospitality he
desired and at present reports is in Europe. He claims
that he has not abdicated. On November 17, 1922, the
Grand National Assembly appointed in his place Abdul
Mejid Effendi of the family of Osman.
The position of the Sultan-Khalif is of course incom"'
patible with the idea of a strong, nationalistic, Turkish
state. As Sultan, the holder of this position was th,e
head of the Ottoman Empire. As Khalif, he was the
"Commander of the Faithful" and theoretical head of
the Moslem world. The title of Khalif has only been
assumed by the Sultans of the family of Osman since
the year 1517, when Selim conquered Egypt, the territory
of the Mamelukes, whose ruler was thus dignified. The
title meant little then in the way of political power, 'but
has been revived~ of late years, as a means of cementing
together the Moslem states. Among these Moslem states
there is spreading now, however, the fever of nationalism.
India, Egypt, and the Arab states are being affected.
Turkey is more than keeping pace with them in this re-
spect. With these nationalistic movements, the position
of a Khalif, as head of the Moslem world, with political
power, is incongruous. The Grand National Assembly
of Turkey has for the moment, by its resolution, depriv-
418 MODERN TURKEY
ing the Khalif of all political power put the office on
such a footing that the recognition of one common Khalif
may be compatible with the new nationalistic movement
in the various Moslem states. Meantime, the choice of
this figurehead, who shall hold together the various Mos-
lem countries, has been definitely assumed by the new
Turkish government.
The reaction of the Moslem world to this new situation
is the interesting factor yet to be seen in the world situa-
tion. Recently, in the month of November, 1923, Rauf
Bey, former prime minister of the new government and
one of the most brilliant leaders in the New Turkey, was
called to account by the Grand National Assembly for a
visit which he made to the Khalif·while on a recent trip
to Constantinople. By many this incident and the atti-
tude of the People's Party towards the Khalif which was
thus shown would seem to indicate a policy which has
been evident elsewhere, namely, that of using this office
of Khalif to forward the scheme of subjecting the whole
Islamic world to the ·secular authority of the Grand
National Assembly. On the other hand, Halideh Ranum,
the well-known feminist and one of the powers behind
the throne in the nationalist government is quoted as
having said that with the disappearance of the Sultanate,
all idea of "Empire" was gone and the possibility of a
democracy in a Turkey which should be "Turkish" and
not "Ottoman" was thereby brought all the nearer. In
December, 1923, the editors of three of the best and most
outspoken Constantinople papers were arrested and their
papers suppressed by the government. The alleged
reason for this action, in the face of the suppressed free-
dom of the press which prevails in Turkey, was the publi-
cation of an open letter from Ameer Ali and the Aga
Khan of India, addressed to Ismet Pasha, in which pru-
dence and calm reflection were councilled for the sake of
Turkey's prestige with the Moslem world, before any
GOVERNMENT 419
irrevocable hostile action was taken by the Turkish Gov-
ernment against the Khalifate. The publication of this
letter and its implied criticism of the government ad-
dressed was held by the Grand National Assembly to be
an act of treason and an indication of a desire to over-
throw the existing regime.
For a long time there has existed in Turkey the strange
condition of states within a state in the situation of self-
governing religious communities, these communities hav-
ing entire religious jurisdiction over their members and
also a great deal of secular jurisdiction. Such communi-
ties have been known as "millets," those of the Greeks
and Armenians being the most important. Presided over
by their patriarchs and bishops who in reality were po-
litical rulers, they have made almost impossible any unity
within the Turkish state. The Greek Archbishop, for
example, with all his trappings of an ancient Byzantine
king, presented to the eyes of the mass of Greeks in
Anatolia a symbol of their political entity. A member
of a wealthy Greek family of Anatolia was at one time
attending Greek high mass with the .writer; when the
Greek Archbishop put on his robes, the historical robes
of the Byzantine ruler, the Greek turned and said in
French, "I bow with the others, although I have no belief
in the church ; but, there stands my king."
Such a condition as that presented by the "millet" 1
1 CoL Jasper Y. Brinton, former member of the American Military Mis-
sion to Armenia and Transcaucasia, now Judge of the Mixed Courts in
Egypt, has contributed the following discussion of the millet system under
the old Turkish government:-
In Turkey, the division according to religion rather than nationality, is
expressed by the existence within the Empire of a large number of highly
organized il.nd powerful religious communities presided over by patriarchs,
bishops or other heads, and enjoying large privileges of. self-government.
The justification or rather the necessity of this state of affairs lay in the
recognition of the obvious fact that these Christian communities could not
be governed by the law of the Koran which at that time was applied as
the law of civil as well as of religious rule, and in the desire of the state
to rid itself of the responsibilities and embarrassment incident to interven-
ing in their local concerns.
420 MODERN TURKEY
system is of course entirely out of harmony with the new
nationalist movement. By the recent Treaty of Lausanne
(July, 1923), the enforced exchange of minorities relat-
ing to the Greeks will of course in part solve this prob-
lem. As far as the Armenians are concerned, they are
not mentioned in the Treaty of Lausanne, but the great
majority are now outside of Turkey. The government
has not in its new constitution made any definite state-
ments in regard to the treatment of the religious com-
munities but there has been created a separate "Ortho-
dox Church" in Anatolia, which has renounced its con-
nection with the Greek Patriarch at Constantinople and
has a representative in the present nationalist govern-
The privileges accorded to these communities have varied widely accord-
ing to the temper of the times and the power of their respective religious
leaders. From the first these leaders have been recognized as the repre-
sentatives of their respective nations before the Sultan and their ceremonious
appearance at the opening of the feast of Bairam during the presence of
this mission at Constantinople in company with the chiefs of the Moslem
Church was a very tangible exhibition of the offieial place which they still
hold in the Turkish world, in spite of the persecutions which their people
have suffered at the hands of the government.
While primarily limited to church rule, the privileges of the millets have
included a large number of other subjects, includ~ng generally the exercise
of legal jurisdiction over members of their own community in all matters
touching personal status such as marriage, divorce, inheritance and the
broad field of education. The collection of taxes has also been made
through the heads of these communities. In various ways their political
existence has been recognized, although their jurisdiction has been gradually
and steadily circumscribed.
The Armenian Church is represented by three distinct bodies, the Ortho-
dox Catholic and Protestant, the first of which includes about eighty per
cent of the Armenian population and the two remaining comprising ten
per cent each. The Church is under the immediate headship of the Patriarch
at Constantinople, and the privileges of the Church are established by an
elaborate document known as the Armenian National Constitution. The
Armenian Protestant Community is on a more democratic system under a
Vekil under a decree datE>d from 1877. The Armenian Catholic Church is
unde; the headship of the Pope and is administered by a Patriarch at
Constantinople.
The existence of these communities is of course an anomaly in a modern
state. Many of their privileges are inconsistent with national jurisdiction
and are justified primarily for historical reasons. Their separate judicial
jurisdiction must in time necessarily yield to the developmen: of a c~ntral .
judicial system under which the rights of all members can be 1ssued w1thout
doing violence to the religious privileges of any of them. .
GOVERNMENT ~21
ment at Angora. This is a most significant movement

from many points of view. It may tend toward a bring-
ing together of Moslems and Christians into one new
national ideal. Over fifty churches have already broken
off from the Patriarch at Constantinople. They have
pledged themselves to give up the teaching of Greek in
their schools and have at last reports closed their schools
and are sending their pupils to the government schools.
The government is contributing L. T. 2500 toward the
community expenses and the synod of the new Orthodox
church at Kaisarieh must submit a budget annually to
the Minister of Justice. All patriarchs are required to
be Turkish citizens and to have abstained from all "po-
litical activity.'' This last requirement is a rather exact-
ing one and yet it shows the part which the millet system
has played in the government of Turkey. By the Treaty
of Lausanne the Patriarch of the Greek Church is to be
allowed to remain in Constantinople. Recently Meletios,
the Greek Patriarch, was attacked by a crowd of Con-
stantinople ruffians (Greeks) possibly instigated by the
Turkish Government, and fled from Constantinople to
Mt. Athos. This would seem to point still further to the
desire of the nationalist government to divorce entirely
the church from the state and to leave no political power
in the hands of its religious communities as such.
The office of Sheikh-ul-Islam, theoretically the head of
the Moslem Church in Turkey and religious adviser of
the government, has been done away with by the new
government. Although the Sheikh-ul-Islam has for some
time really possessed no political power, yet according
to the Turkish Constitution his approval in regard to
form was necessary for the passage of laws. His posi-
tion has been taken in the nationalist government by the
Minister for Moslem Affairs, who resides at Angora.
This :Minister for Moslem Affairs is a repre~ntative of
the Moslem Church in the government in the same way ·
422 MODERN TURKEY
that the representative of the "Orthodox Community"
is a representative for the Christian Church, both of
them being under the control and a part of the new
National Assembly.
The judicial system of the old Ottoman government
has been practically retained under the new regime.
There is great need for a reform here in spite of many
changes which have already been made within recent
years. This reform is especially important in connection
with the abolition of the capitulations. The present sys-
tem is unsatisfactory for many reasons, but especially
because of the influence of the religious law upon the
civil law and the theory of the origin of all law in the
Koran and the teachings of the Prophet. The courts
have always been notoriously corrupt and the judges
underpaid. The Minister of Justice at Angora stated
in a recent interview that the reform of the courts was
under way, that he was planning for increased salaries
for the judges and for the lessening of the numbers in
the minor courts, as a move. toward the speeding up of
justice. The Turkish delegation at the Lausanne Con-
ference insisted that Turkey was qualified to give an
adequate judicial system to foreigners. It promised,
however, to have an investigation made with the idea of
reform and to take into its service as Turkish officers
a number of European legal counselors whom it would
select from a list prepared by the Permanent Court of
International Justice of the Hague. Such a list is to be
made up from jurists,· nationals of countries which did
not take part in the Great War.
The provincial system of government under the old
Ottoman Empire was in many ways excellent, having
been recently reformed. The important administrative
unit was the vilayet presided over by the vali, the repre-
sentative of the Sultan and the most powerful official in
the provincial system. The vilayet was subdivided first
GOVERNMENT 423
into sanjaks, then into kazas and the kaza into nahies.
The tendency under the present system is tgward the
simplification of this · arrangement. The vilayet still
stands as the important administrative division and is
governed by the vali who is the representative of the
National Assembly. The vilayet has an elected council
of its own which deals with all important local affairs.
This council chooses from among its members a presi-
dent and an administrative committee. This president
is the executive chief. Executive ·power in the vilayet
belongs to this committee which sits continuously. The
vali interferes in the administration of the vilayet only
in the case of conflict between national and local affairs.
The sanjak no longer plays any part of importance as an
administrative unit. In fact, it is not mentioned in the
new Constitution of Turkey. The nahie or commune is
now the significant subdivision in the provincial system,
being in great part self-governing and having a council
chosen from its own community in control of all matters
not reserved to the State. The kaza is merely a grouping
of nahies for purposes of administration. This scheme
of provincial administration is excellent in that it com-
bines a strong executive such as the vali with an elaborate
system of popular representation in the local assemblies.
There is thus furnished an elastic and democratic method
for receiving the support of the local communities and
for educating the people in lessons of self-government.
The whole tendency of the new government is toward
decentralization in the provincial system.
Perhaps the most dramatic change made by the na-
tionalist government has "been the shifting of its location
from Constantinople, that center of intrigue and foreign
domination, to Angora, a dirty, uncomfortable provincial
town. This is a clever move on the part of the Mustafa
Kemal Pasha to isolate his new government. Angora
possesses no charm; it has all the squalor and incon-
424 MODERN .TURKEY
venience of the ordinary provincial town in Anatolia,
and yet here are meeting together every day at one-
thirty, with the exception of Friday which is the Moham-
medan Sunday, the "little Sultans," as they have be_en
aptly called. They niay be seen walking about the room
talking in a most intense manner about the recent politi-
cal movements in Constantinople. They vary in type
from the most polished Turkish gentleman to the rough
Kurd who can neither speak nor write Turkish. Yet on
this body of over 300 deputies rests the responsibility for
the conduct of the Turkish state. Many of the members
of the Assembly have left more comfortable homes and
are serving on small salaries or with no salary in the
cause of nationalism. To the left of the Assembly build-
ing is an old edifice in which are housed the Ministries
of Interior, Finance, Justice, Public Works, .Economy,
and Sacred Law! In one'half of an empty school house
is the Ministry of Education. The Foreign Office occu-
pies the building once .used by the Ottoman Public Debt.
What will be the attitude of foreign nations toward
Angora as a capital Y Will they be willing to give up
their palatial embassies on the Bosporus for a modest
home in a provincial town T Will ambassadors be sent
to Angora or will they be only minor diplomatic repre-
sentatives! Many opinions are expressed in regard to
the matter, but the consensus of feeling seems to be that
Constantinople will come back as the capital. At pres-
ent, we have the curious situation of the appointment of
an official by the Angora Government, Dr. Adnan Bey,
to represent the Government in Constantinople for the
purpose of dealing with the diplomatic representatives
of foreign powers. It is evident that if the mountain
will not come to Mohammed then Mohammed must per-
force come to the mountain.
Surely Russia is still a factor to be considered; and
with her as a strong power again, the holding of Con-
GOVERNMENT 425
stantinople as its capital by the Turkish Government

might be a matter of timely importance. That at pres-
ent the Angora Government minimizes the value of the
city as a capital is evident from the fact that in the
Assembly, Constantinople has only :fifteen deputies, that
is, 5 per cent of the total number in the chamber. For
the moment this city of past power has become merely a
province of the nationalist government.
Will the new government make good! The answer to
this question depends in great part on international
complications which are discussed elsewhere in the book.
Certain good assets as a government it certainly has,
especially those of simplicity and democracy. The old
hierarchy of officials of the Ottoman Government with
its consequent opportunity for bribery and corruption
has been swept away and the government has cut itself
off from the destructive influences of Constantinople.
It is ruling over a population which is, comparatively
speaking, homogeneous. It has separated itself from
the old idea of theocracy and has put itself as far as
possible on an equal economic basis with the Western
nations. It has a leader of great strength and vision.
Professor Toynbee presents the problem which confronts
the new nation well, in one of its important aspects when
he says :-''It is a tremendous responsibility which the
small well-educated class bears in this crisis of transi-
tion in Anatolia toward the uninfonned and impression-
able majority. The new leaven of Western materialism
would be for the better in so far as it raised the standard
of life; it would be for the worse if it frothed up into
an ill-considered or over-ambitious economic program.
The need for wisdom and self-restraint on the part of the
few Turks with whom the initiative will be, is certainly
very great." On this question of the wise economic de-
velopment of Turkey depends a great deal of the future
success of the new government. In a conference recently
426 MODERN TURKEY
held at Smyrna by Mustafa Kemal Pasha, composed of
delegates from all over Anatolia, the great need of a
common effort for economic development was emphasized
by him, showing that the leaders of the new. country
realize that their military victory will not be in reality a
victory unless they develop the "arts of peace" which
the Turk has always so notoriously neglected.
The government was greatly strengthened by the re-
turn of Ismet Pasha from the successful signature of the
Lausanne Treaty, a great diplomatic victory over the
powers of Europe in which the Turk gained practically
all of his demands. Moreover, the occupation of Con-
stantinople by the forces of the Entente Allies, which oc-
cupation had been in force for over four years, came to
an end formally on October 2, 1923. On October 6, 1923,
the Nationalist veteran troops entered the city and took
possession amid great excitement and rejoicing.
The new government has been, and is still, going
through a period of factional strife and is subject to
much criticism. Refet Pasha, governor-general of East-
ern Thrace, is leading a zealous and fanatical religious
group in demanding a return to the Sultanate and a resto-
ration of the union of Church and State. Rauf Bey, for-
mer prime minister, is the leader of an opposition group
within the government, which for a time feared the dic-
tatorship of Mustafa Kemal and demanded the declara-
tion of a republic. With this recent declaration on Oc-
tober 29, 1923, a partial compromise seems to have been
effected. A weak bolshevist movement tending toward
the establishment of a soviet government is said to be
on foot, but this is at the moment negligible. Ismet
Pasha, in his first interview with the press after becom-
ing prime minister in November, 1923, laid great
emphasis upon the need for more self-confidence on the
part of the Turkish· people and for more faith in the
republican form of government. He felt strongly that
GOVERNMENT 427
the view still held by many that Turkey cannot get on

without the help of some foreign power should be dis-
couraged on every hand. The recent gains of the Turks
at Lausanne he cited as sufficient basis for this inde-
pendent attitude. He fears the beginning of secret
intrigue at Constantinople against the present govern-
ment; and for this fear he undoubtedly has some reason.
The program of the present government was very
clearly presented to the Assembly on September 5, 1923,
by Fethi Bey, intimate friend of 1fustafa Kemal Pasha
and Prime Minister after the fall elections. The pro-
gram shows an earnest desire to meet the trying situa-
tion with which the country is confronted. First of all
Fethi is concerned with the budget. He announced that
the tithe would be reduced to 10% from its former 12%,
the deficit to be made good by increasing the indirect
taxation, by raising the taxation on certain monopolies
and by remodelling the income tax so as to make it more
just. This change would be of great benefit to the agri-
cultural class. He expressed the great desire of the
government to pay off its internal and external debts.
As far as possible he hoped that all borrowing might be
avoided except for the very necessary construction of
roads, bridges and railways. The introduction of most
necessary reforms among government officials, both mili-
tary and civil, was advocated. All such functionaries in
the future were to be of "impeccable moral character"
and would have to prove their ability by the passing of
examinations. Specialists were to be invited to come
from abroad to organize all the departments. No offi-
cials in the future would be dismissed simply by admin-
istrative decree but only upon the basis of incompetency.
This indeed would be a great achievement, as the cor-
ruption of the civil service in Turkey has always been
notorious. Great emphasis was laid by Fethi upon the
future plans for raising the standards of national edu~-
428 MODERN TURKEY
tion. Training colleges for teachers were to be estab-
lished, as well as evening classes and scholarships for
deserving and needy students. It is especially signifi-
cant that Fethi laid emphasis upon the equal importance
which would be paid to the education of girls as well as
of boys. The army and navy were to be reduced to the
lowest possible limits, the police strengthened, and
brigandage suppressed. This latter evil of brigandage
is a most distressing one. Unless something can be done
to suppress the formation of bands of political brigands
such as those at p·resent around Smyrna, the peasant will
find great difficulty in developing his land and the eco-
nomic advantage resulting from such development upon
which the government is depending to make up the
adverse trade balance of the country, will be impossible.
Such an idealistic and yet at the same time sensible
program as that presented by Fethi Bey makes one hope
for great results. Because of the peculiar nature of
the form of government of the country, the execution of
such a program depends in great part upon the quality of
men represented in the Assembly. In the minds of many
the Angora Assembly seems but a handful of illiterate
peasants, wholly unqualified to deal with the situation..
It is exceedingly interesting therefore to read the sum-
mary recently made by the Y eni-Gun of Angora relative
to the personnel of the Assembly brought into office by
the fall election of 1923. According to this summary,
the Assembly contains 56 officers, 17 pashas, 21 valis, 25
men of religion, 15 doctors, 9 financiers, 10 jurists, 14
business men, 46 notables, 4 poets, 14 journalists, 3 am-
bassadors and a number of other men of different call-
ings. Such a group would seem to include a high propor-
tion of educated men. Each new member of the original
National Assembly, as he took his place as a member of
that historic body, read out loud, in the hearing of his
fellows, the following oath:
GOVERNMENT 429
I swear that I will not follow an idea which will

be against the peace of my country and the happiness
of my nation and I agree that the people sha!l have the
sovereignty without any qualification, so help me
Allah.
CHAPTER XIX
CAPITULATIONS
By G. BIE RAVNDAL 1
One day the Khoja went with Sherif Ahmed to the den of a wolf,
in order to see the cubs. Said the Khoja to Ahmed: "Do you go in."
Ahmed did so. The old wolf was abroad, but presently returning,
tried to get into the cave to its young. When it was about half way
in the Khoja seized hard hold of it by the tail. The wolf in its struggles
cast a quantity of dust into the eyes of Ahmed. "Rallo, Khoja,"-he
cried, "What does this dust mean Y" "If the wolf's tail breaks," said
the Khoja, "you'll soon see what the dust means."
-THE TURKISH JESTER, or "The Pleasantries of Khoja Nasreddin
Effendi," tr. from the Turkish by George Borrow.
Introduction
By the terms of the Treaty of Lausanne, foreigners
resident in Turkey are for the first time subject to
Turkish laws. The capitulations, which were extraterri-
torial agreements between the Ottoman Empire and
foreign nations going back to early times, granting eco-
nomic and judicial privileges amounting almost to
sovereignty, have been abolished completely. This is
an event of the greatest importance for foreigners in
Turkey and for the Turkish Republic. Although one of
1 Born in Norway 1865., A.B. Royal University of Norway, 1883, A.M.
1884. Came to the United States 1885. Newspaper publisher, also member
South Dakota House of Representatives. Entered Consular Service 1898,
assigned to Beirut as Consul 1898-1905. Served at Dawson, Yukon terri-
tory, Canada, 1905-06. Consul General at Beirut 1906-10, and Consul Gen-
eral at Constantinople in 1910. In charge of consular interests at Con·
stantinople, France, Great Britain, Russia, Italy, Belgium, Serbia, Monte·
negro, Switzerland 1914-17. Detailed to Paris and St. Nazaire, France
1917-19. Appointed United States Commissioner and Consul General at
Constantinople April 20, 1919. Founder, American Red Cross chapters at
Beirut and Constantinople. Founder, Honorary President, American Cham-
ber of Commerce for the Levant.
430
CAPITULATIONS 431
the first wartime acts of the Ottoman Government· ( Sep-
tember, 1914) was to announce the abolition of the capitu-
lations, this act was regarded by Allied Powers and
America as lacking force because of its unilateral char-
acter. The privileges granted by the capitulations were
so commercially valuable to foreigners as well as a
guarantee of personal liberty that it was universally
believed that the institution might be materially modified
but would not be abolished for many decades. Thus, the
Republic has won a great unexpected victory for itself,
which makes more needful than ever a review of the
Turkish capitulatory regime.
By the capitulations, the groups of foreigners wit~in
Turkey living under the capitulations were subject only
to their own courts, their own law, and their own judges.
In the case of difficulties between foreigners of different
nationalities, the case was always tried in the court of the
defendant. In cases between foreigners and Ottoman
subjects, trial was conducted before the so-called mixed
courts in which sat three Ottoman judges and two for-
eign delegates accompanied usually by a dragoman from
the consulate of the foreigner. Perhaps the most strik-
ing example of the lack of legal control of the Turkis'h
Government over foreigners under the capitulations is
in connection with business houses. Any business house
could establish itself in the country without the authority
of the federal government and could organize accord-
ing to the laws of its own country. The following ex-
tract from an American official report deals with the late
legal status of American firms in Turkey:-
There is no law in Turkey obliging any foreign

bank, banking house, or mercantile firm wishing to
establish a branch house in Turkey to submit itself to
. any official or legal formalities. Consequently, any
bank or private firm is at liberty to establish a branch
in Turkey and freely transact and conduct business.
432 MODERN TURKEY
An illustration of this is shown by the presence in Con-
stantinople and other parts of Turkey, of branches
of foreign banks, like the Credit .Lyonnais, the Bank
of Athens, the Banca di Roma, etc., which had not to
ask the authorization of the Turkish Government for
establishing their branches here. Another example is
furnished by the branch of the Standard Oil Co., of
New York, which established itself in the same way
some years ago.
Foreign firms conserve their nationality and are
governed with regard to their internal organization,
and to the rights and duties of its members, according
to the law of their country. As regards the position of
such branches-be they bank branches or branches of
mercantile firms-in case of lawsuits in which they
would appear either as plaintiffs or defendants the fol-
lowing procedure was in force until the beginning of the
war.
By virtue of the capitulations, lawsuits between
Turkish and.foreign subjects or :firms were judged by.
the second chamber of the Turkish commercial court,
which was formed as a mixed court. In this court an
official delegate from the consulate of the nationality of
the foreign subject or firm was present and the pro-
ceedings of the court were not considered valid unless
the said delegate approved them by his signature on
behalf of the consulate he represented. The consulate
delegate had the right to. refuse signing the minutes
of the court if in his opinion the proceedings in the
court were not consistent with legality. Such cases
have happened in the past and the lawsuit had to be
· judged again. This is one of the many benefits of the
· capitulations which foreign subjects enjoyed as re-
gards judicial matters.
Sentences rendered in favor of or against foreign
subjects were executed by the Turkish competent
authorities under the supervision of the respective
consulates.
Such lawsuits were brought before the consular
courts instituted in each consulate, and were judged by
the defendant's consular court.
Pending the conclusion of peace with Turkey the
CAPITULATIONS 433
above procedure is held in abeyance. The allied and

associated high commissioners, refusing to recognize
the abolition of the capitulations approved and decreed
by the Turkish Government during the war, do not
allow their subjects to present themselves before the
Turkish courts. In cases of actions being brought be 4
tween them and Turkish subjects, they refuse to recog..

nize sentences rendered by the Turkish courts either
by default or even if the parties were present during;
the proceedings. The position is similar in case of
lawsuits between foreign subjects. (Eliot G. Mears,
Commerce Reports, May 22, 1920.)
Economically, the capitulations meant much in the
way of privilege. Foreigners were exempt from every
tax levied by the Ottoman Government except the ad
valorem export and import duties whose maxima were
fixed by the capitulations. Almost no internal tax could
be levied on foreign goods. It should be stated that the
powers have abused their economic privileges in many
instances to the extent of pr~venti:qg Turkey from de-
veloping her own industries while inferior European
goods have been unloaded upon the country in great
quantities. On the other hand, Turkey has been assisted
through foreign countries providing markets for native
raw products.
Will the abolition of the economic capitulations drive
away foreign concessions and trade! Or will foreign
nations place entire confidence in these new commercial
treaties which have been concluded in 1923!
Turkey is now to be on the same footing in her eco 4
nomic and judicial relations as the European powers,

with the sole exception that foreign legal advisers are
empowered to receive complaints relating to arrest and
imprisonment of foreigners. This provision in regard
to legal advisers, however, offers little protection to
countries desiring it most since the advisers, who are
to have residence only at Smyrna and Constantinople,
434 MODERN TURKEY
are to be chosen from countries which were neutral dur-
ing the World War. Moreover, their position is purely
advisory; they can act then only when notification has
been given them after arrests have been made.
What will be the outcome of the new situation! A
government, as yet untried in peace times, undertakes
to provide a judicial system which shall be satisfactory
to the foreigner. If we judge the future by the pa~t,
the outlook is not encouraging. The personnel of the
judicial system has been woefully lacking in training,
the judges underpaid, and the courts notoriously corrupt.
The judicial system, in spite of many reforms, is an
almost hopeless jumble of several coexisting systems of
jurisprudence. Moreover, there is great confusion be-
tween so-called religious and civil law court procedure,
although by the reform movements of 1908, this confusion
was supposed to have been removed. The Ottoman civil
code has its foundation in the religious law and is there-
fore inadequate for ~odern social and commercial usages.
Already the Turkish Minister of Justice in the Angora
cabinet is handicapped by lack of assistance and by a tre-
mendous amount of unfinished business. In a recent
(1922) interview, he stated that he had made some at-
tempt to speed up the action of justice in the lower courts
by lessening the number of judges, and by salary ~
creases. Changes in legal procedure are notoriously slow
in all countries, so it is not surprising that thus far,
apparently he has been able to accomplish practically
nothing in the way of reform.
China is one of the last countries, of any importance,
in which foreigners have extraterritorial privileges.
These rights, however, have not been equal to those for-
merly possessed by foreigners in Turkey. In the Wash-
ington Limitation of Armaments Conference (1921), the
Chinese asked for the abandonment of extraterritorial
rights by the foreign powers. A resolution was passed
CAPITULATIONS 435
by the powers endorsing this demand in principle. A
commission of jurists was to be organized three months
after the coming into effect of the Nine-Power Treaty
to inquire into the status of legal reforms in China and
the necessary steps to be taken for the reniov.al of the
capitulations. On the request of the Chinese Govern-
ment, the meeting of the commissioners was advanced
until 1923 but again postponed. Japan, which began the
modernizing of her government and the reform of her
judicial system shortly after the middle of the 19th cen-
tury, was not admitted on an equal footing judicially and
economically into the family of nations until over thirty
years later.
In Turkey, the process seems to have been in the re-
verse order to that in Japan and China, the privileges
having been granted before the reforms had been made.
Numerous persons have shared the experience of a for-
mer president of the United States, Gen. IDysses S.
Grant, who sharply resented foreign interference with
native law until he visited the Ottoman Empire; and
then he changed his mind. There is much wisdom in
the assertion of Hon. Joseph Grew to His Excellency,
Ismet Pasha, at Lausanne (1923) :-"On the adminis-
tration of justice within Turkey's territory more than
on any other factor will depend the economic future of
Turkey and her friendly relations with other countriea."
.Capitulations
The term "Capitulations" refers to treaties with com-

plex stipulations entered under minor heads (capitula).
In our day, the phrase "recapitulation of articles of
agreement" would be more exact.
The first designation of treaties as capitulations is not
of record, but probably did not antedate the Crusades.
Perhaps the earliest typical Capitulation available in
436 MODERN TURKEY
its entirety was concluded (911 A.D.) between the ambas·
sadors of Oleg, regent at Kiew during the minority of
Igor, king of Varangians, and the representatives of
Emperor Leo VI the philosopher, revised, renewed (944
A.D.), and.con:firmed (971 A.D.). Article.X of this Capitu-
lation reads as follows:
If the Greeks under our sway commit any crime,
the Great Russian Prince shall not require satisfaction
therefor, but he will await the orders of our Tsar
(Emperor) for the infliction of the punishment which
their crime shall have deserved.
It is well known that everyone in ancient Rome who
was not a Roman citizen was considered a barbarian,
unfit to enjoy the privileges pertaining thereto. When
centuries later (968 A.D.) the ambassador of Emperor Leo
I arrived in Byzantium to propose a marriage between his
August Sovereign and Theophania, daughter of the Greek
emperor Romanum II, he was treated, although a bishop,
as one beyond the pale of civilization on even footing
with Lombards, Saxons, Franks, Lotharingians, Bavari-
ans, Suabians, Burgundians and other "barbarians."
Imagine the proud daughter of an Eastern emperor
wedded to the son of a "barbarian" king! Strangers
and enemies were placed in the same category by the
Greeks, the Romans, the Jews, the Saracens, the Byzan·
tines, the Franks and the N orthmen (Christians, Mos·
lems, Jews, Gentiles), all of whom acted on similar prin·
ciples of exclusiveness, forbidding all fusion, all friend-
ship, all intercourse (as far as practicable) with foreign.
ers. The old Roman law was exclusively religious. The
primitive forms of contracts, of suits at law, of transfer
of real estate, were religious forms which the heads of
the Church guarded with greatest care.
Religion, in fact, lies at the very root of the practice
of exterritoriality which produced the Capitulations.
As long ago as 526 B.c., Amasis, ruler of Egypt, allowed
CAPITULATIONS 437
the Greeks immigrating into the valley of the Nile, to
build temples for themselves in which to worship their
gods, and to have laws and judges of their own. Simi-
larly, in the Capitulations of the Middle Ages, one of
their principal and most characteristic provisions ac-
corded the foreign consul and his fellow countrymen
the right to worship in accordance with their national
religion. According to Moslem reasoning, non-Moslems
are outside the religious pale. In the words of Rausas,
the civil law (which is at the same time the religious law)
neither can nor will protect him; and since the law is
derived from religion, only Believers can participate.
But the non-Moslem or foreigner could not always re-
main the enemy. Even as the Moslem law was not made
for the foreigner because he was a non-Moslem, the law
can neither protect him, nor judge him, nor punish him.
The foreigner must, therefore, be protected, judged and
punished by his own law. Capitulations do not refer
necessariiy to relations between Christians and Moslems,
owing to the radical differences in their religion, law and
customs. In the Greek Empire capitulations were per-
fectly well known between Christians of various races, as
well as in the Christian kingdoms of Jerusalem, Cyprus
and Armenia. They were also widely known as between
Christians and pagans and between Moslems and pagans.
As crystallized in Egypt, the fundamental principles
of the Capitulations may be analyzed under two
headings:-
1. The measures required for the proper care of
the rights and interests of the Christians;
2. The duties resting upon the Christians and their·
Governments with regard to the Mohammedans
in return for privileges bestowed.
In the first category belong: {a) safety of persons and
freedom of trade; (b) judicial and administrative pre-
rogatives of consuls; (c) possession of fonduks {national
438 MODERN TURKEY
compounds) and churches; (d) individual, not collective
responsibility for crimes; (e) abolition of the ancient
and barbarous right to wrecks of the sea and protection
of the property of shipwrecked merchants and seamen;
(f) suppression of the droit d'aubaine (seizing and ex-
propriating estates of foreign decedents); (g) mutual
prohibition of piracy; {h) various measures for the pro-
motion of commercial relations. In the second category
belong: {a) confinement of commerce to certain specified
ports; (b) regulations regarding the management of fon-
duks; (c) interdiction of smuggling; (d) reciprocal
treatment.
While it would be a signal error to assume that the
Moslem States in Africa which entered into Capitula-
tions as above outlined always lived up to their promises,
one is justified in pointing out that it was creditable to
the sultans of Egypt and to those Moslem rulers who
·followed their example that they stood sponsors to such
principles as the abolition of the right to shipwrecked
property and to decedents' estates; the inviolability of
private property; the personal safety and liberty of
consuls.
One of the most interesting of the Capitulations
granted by Egypt was that obtained by the French from
Sultan Suleiman I (1528 A.n.), which was the model for
the famous Turkish Capitulation of 1536. Going back
still further, the Capitulation of 1528 was largely a
repetition of the Capitulation signed by Selim I (on the
conquest of Egypt by the Turks in 1517} which in turn
was a confirmation of the Capitulation of 1251 obtained
·by St. Louis. The continuity of the Capitulations gave
them the form of perpetual treaties rather than armis-
tices or temporary truces. 1
~Their language is picturesque and pompous. The Levant Company
reprinted, in 1820, the Capitulations of 1675. The introductory statement
follows:-
CAPITULATIONS 439
The system of law now existing in Turkey, under

which foreigners residing in the country are subject t9
SULTAN MEHEMED, MAY HE LIVE FOR EVER!
Let everything be observed in conformity to these capitulations, and

contrary thereto let nothing be done.
Exte:~.sion to British Subjects of Privileges granted to

French, Venetians, Poles, &c.
The command, under the Sublime and lofty Signet, which imparts
sublimity to every place, and under the imperial and noble Cypher, whose
glory is renowned throughout all the world, by the Emperor and Con-
queror of the Earth, achieved with the assistance of the Omnipotent, and
by the especial grace of God, in this:
We, who by Divine grace, assistance, will, and benevolence, now are
the King of Kings of the world, the Prince of Emperors of every age,
the dispenser of Crowns to Monarchs, and the Champion Sultan Mehemed,
Son of Sultan, Ibrahim Chan, Son of Sultan Ahmed Chan, Son of Sultan
Mahomed Chan, Son of Sultan Murad Chan, Son of Sultan Sellin Chan,
Son of Sultan Bolyman Chan, Son of Sultan Sellin Chan.
The most glorious amongst the great Princes professing the faith
of Jesus, and the most conspicuous amongst the Potentates of the nation
of the Messiah, and the Umpire of public differences that exist between
Christian nations, clothed with the mantle of magnificence and majesty,
Charles the Second, King of England, Scotland, France, and Ireland (whose
end terminate in bliss!), having sent an Ambassador to the Sublime
Porte in the time of our grandfather Sultan Murad (whose tomb be
ever resplendent!) of glorious memory and full of divine mercy and pity,
with professions of friendship, sincerity, devotion, partiality, and
benevolence, and demanding that his subjects might be at liberty to come
and go into these parts, which permission was granted to them in the
reign of the Monarch aforesaid, in addition to various other special
commands, to the end that on coming and going, either by land or sea,
in their way, passage, and lodging, they might not experience any molesta-
tion or hindrance from any one.
He represented, in the reign of our grandfather Sultan Mehemed
Chan (whose tomb be ever resplendent!) to our just and overshadowing
Porte, his cordial esteem, alliance, sincere friendship, and partiality
thereto. As such privilege, therefore, had been granted to the Kings and
Sovereigns of France, Venice, and Poland, who profess the most profound
devotion for our most eminent throne, and to others between whom
and the Sublime Porte there exists a sincere amity and good understand·
ing, so was the same, through friendship, in like manner granted to the
said King; and it was granted him that his subjects and their interpreters
might safely and securely eome and trade in these our sacred dominions.
The Capitulations of sublime dignity and our noble commands hav-
ing been, through friendship, thus granted to the Kings aforesaid, and
the Queen of the above-mentioned kingdom [the monarchs referred to
440 MODERN TURKEY
the jurisdiction of the State from which they have come,
is, therefore, a survival from bygone ages. The idea
which underlay the legal conception was that each State
was proud of its law-in many cases regarded it as
sacred-and would not extend its benefits to others.
When the Moslems conquered Syria, Egypt and Spain,
it never occurred to them to allow Unbelievers to share
the legal privileges conferred upon Moslem subjects.
But as, chiefly for commercial reasons, they wanted for-
eigners to come amongst them, they agreed to Capitula-
tions. When Constantinople was taken by the Turks
(1453 A.D.) they found the Genoese living in the walled
quarter of Galata, under their own Consul and under
Capitulations entered into between them (the Genoese)
and the Greek emperors. These treaties were almost
immediately confirmed and ratified. Today the Capitula-
tions are practically what they were centuries ago. They
have suffered no essential modification, either in spirit,
or in language. But the regime they stand for is not now
normal and universal, but is exceptional; and what in
earlier days was intended as a disability and a penalty
(exclusion from the local jurisdiction), has turned into
a precious privilege.
Except in China ap.d in Turkey, the capitulatory
regime no more prevails over vast areas. In "\Vestern
Europe the idea' of territc:>rial sovereignty graduaJly
managed to obtain possession of the law and to national-
ize and secularize it. It is true that the Reformation,
because it severed the relationship of many peoples to
Rome, threatened to disrupt the law of nations as it then
were King James I, King Charles I, and Queen Elizabeth] having heretofore
also sent a noble personage with presents to this victorious porte, which is
the refuge and retreat of the Kings of the world, the most exalted places,
and the asylum of the Emperors of the Universe (which gifts were
graciously accepted), and she having earnestly implored the privilege in
question, her entreaties were acceded to, and these our high commands
conceded to her.
Courte"'! Abdulla~ Fri·n·•
Reception Room and Dining Room of the Sultan's Dolma Bagh~heh Palace
on the Bosporus. What does tht> future hold in store for thia Mansion
and also that of Yildiz Kiosk t
CAPITULATIONS 441
existed.· It is equally true that but for the Reformation,
the separation of law and religion would have been in-
definitely retarded and· thus also the establishment of
the true basis of territorial sovereignty. In the Peace of
Westphalia (1648) it was decided to subordinate the
religious idea to the legal one and so Europe emerged
from medieval exterritoriality into the modern scheme of
a family of nations, independent and self-governing in
all respects.
Though of Greek faith, Russia somewhat later entered
into the European system of public law. This step was
facilitated by the fact that Latin Europe and Greek
Europe cherished identical legal traditions, i.e. those of
the Roman Empire, derived in the one case from Rome,
in the other from Constantinople.
In Greece, Romania, Serbia, Montenegro and Bul-
garia, the capitulatory system likewise vanished. Along
with their political independence, these nations, in con-
sequence of diplomatic negotiations, gained full liberty
of action in the administration of justice through the
suppression of the Capitulations. It is worth while not-
ing that in the Treaty of Berlin (July 13, 1878), it was
provided that the immunities and privileges of foreign-
ers, as well as the rights of consular jurisdiction and
protection as established by the Capitulations and
usages, should remain in full force until modified with
the consent of the parties concerned.
That several nations possessing capitulatory rights in
Turkey are jointly concerned in their maintenance, is
expressed in Article V of the Treaty of August 25, 1870,
between Turkey and Bavaria, which runs as follows:
In the event that the Sublime Porte should under-
take to come to an understanding with the other
Powers with regard to the modification, in one sense
or another, of the jurisdiction exercised by Consuls in
Turkey in virtue of the Treaties and Capitulations, the
442 MODERN TURKEY
Government of Bavaria will not claim anything beyond
the privileges and immunities which would be main-
tained in behalf of the Consuls of the other Powers, to
whom, moreover, the Bavarian consuls will continue
to be assimilated in all respects.
That treaties in general cannot be abrogated or modi-

fied without the mutual consent of the contracting parties
was solemnly agreed upon at the Conference of London,
January 7, 1871 (called to revise in certain respects the
Treaty of Paris of March 30, 1856), in a protocol ad hoc
signed by the representatives present of the North-Ger-
man Confederation (Germany), Austria-Hungary, Great
Britain, Italy, Russia, and Turkey. As translated, the
protocol reads :
The Plenipotentiaries of North Germany, Austria-
Hungary, Great Britain, Italy, Russia and Turkey, to-
day assembled in conference, recognize that it is an
essential principle of international law that no Power
can absolve itself from the obligations of a Treaty, nor
modify its stipulations, except in pursuance of the
assent of the Contracting Parties in virtue of an
amicable agreement.
In witness whereof the said Plenipotentiaries have
signed the present Protocol.
Done in London, this 17th day of January, 1871.
(Signed) BERNSTORFF
APPONYI
GRANVILLE
CADORNA
BRUNNOW
MusuRus
BROGLIE
In his opening address, Lord Granville who presided

at the Conference had suggested this action saying that
the unanimity with which the Powers, signatories of the
Treaty of 1856, had accepted the idea of the present Con-
feren?e (proposed by Russia for the purpose of modify-
CAPITULATIONS 443
ing the stipulations of the treaty concerning the neutral-

ity of the Black Sea) furnished a signal proof of the
recognition by the Powers of the essentiality of that
principle of international law that none of them can be
released from the obligation of a treaty nor modify its
stipulations except in consequence. of the concurrent
action of the contracting parties by means of an amicable
agreement. In the discussion which followed, the Otto-
man Plenipotentiary, His Excellency Musurus Pasha,
declared that he adhered, in the name of the Government,
to the principle formulated by the presiding officer, since
the Sublime Porte always had recognized its sacred char-
acter and had constantly conformed to it in its political
relations with foreign nations. There can be no doubt
that in the understanding arrived at in the Conference
at London the Capitulations of the Ottoman Empire were
included. It is well known that the Treaty of Paris of
1856, as well as the Conference at London in 1871, chiefly
concerned Turkish affairs as affected by the Crimean
War.
Article VIII of the Treaty of Berlin (1878) stipulates
that "the immunities and privileges of foreigners, as
well as the rights of Consular jurisdiction and protection
as established by the Capitulations and usages, shall
remain in full force so long as they shall not have been
modified with the consent of the parties concerned."
This referred particularly to Bulgaria. Identical pro-
visions, however, were made in. the same treaty as re-
gards Serbia (article XXXVII) and Roumania (article
XLIX).
Japan presents the most striking case of a non-Chris-
tian people being received in the sisterhood of nations on
accepting the common public law as developed in Europe
and America. The capitulatory regime in Japan was
definitely abolished in 1899.
In the Ottoman Empire, ever since 1856, there have
444 MODERN TURKEY
been statesmen anxious to abolish the Capitulations as
humiliating and hurtful to the natives. It has been
claimed that foreigners occupy a preferred position and
enjoy privileges denied to the people of the country.
Why continue a system, Turks have argued, which
· hampers parliament in its legislation, the courts in the
administration of justice, the minister of finance in his
efforts to establish a budgetary equilibrium? Does not
the Ottoman Empire as an independent nation possess
the right to exercise exclusive sovereignty and jurisdic-
tion throughout the full extent of its territory? As a·
matter of fact, the Turkish Government of 1914 profited
by the outbreak of the European war to abrogate the
Capitulations. As, however, such an act could not be
consummated by a unilateral decree the capitulatory
system still remains. Consular jurisdiction is main-
tained, and the inauguration of a revised Mixed Court
system may be expected to accompany the promulgation
of the Treaty of Peace. Except on real estate, no taxes
can be levied on foreigners or their property without the
consent of the Powers. Customs dues cannot be modi-
fied unless the treaty nations agree to the proposed
change.1
1 In 1919, the Ottoman Minister of Finance prepared, for the American
High Commission, the following statement dealing with Economic Capitu·

lations:-
No reason or pretext of any kind can be found to justify the dis·
crimination of the foreign subjects against the natives of a country in
respect to taxes and duties. Therefore resumption of Economical
Capitulations cannot be allowed in any way even if Judicial Capitulations
be reestablished in some way or other. After the establishment of the
Constitution the taxes and duties are being subject to the sanction of
the Parliament and consequently these are being raised in accordance
with the Law; moreover the Embassies have in principle agreed to their
subjects being involved in principal taxes to which the Ottoman subjects
are liable.
PARTICULARS OF ECONOMIC CAPITULATIONS
(1) Exemption from Djizizh & Kharaj (personal tribute paid by non·
Moslem subjects of Islam) and exemption from general taxes.
'cAPITULATIONS 445
Undoubtedly before many years pass the Capitulations
in Turkey will disappear by the same route by which the
e:x:territorial regime in Japan was allowed to depart, i.e.
by agreement of all nations having treaties.
It seems possible, however, only through the complete
secularization and nationalization of the Islamic law and
through the further habilitation of the Ottoman courts,
so that non-Moslems may confidently and contentedly
come under such law and courts without having to sacri-
fice their customs and convictions and with reasonable
assurance of receiving fair and intelligent treatment.
.When the law of a people is an integral part of its reli-
gion, as Rausas observes, it cannot be applied to those
who profess a different faith. The human right of lib-
erty of conscience, which is the most necessary of liber-
ties, is entitled to such consideration. In leaving to the
conquered Christians their laws and their judges, the
first khalifs gave Europe a grand example which Europe
has not always followed. Herein we find a theoretical
justification of the Capitulations. To it may be added a
practical justification, When we impartially strike ~
balance for and against the Capitulations, we must admit
that while they impose fiscal restrictions which Turkey
is justified in resenting, and which should be promptly
removed, they have had the happiest results for the
Ottoman Empire, as constituting the breach which has
admitted into Turkey the progress of civilization. As
(2) Customs duties not exceeding the fixed rate; exemption from
taxes such as excise, slaughter fees, Bidaat ·(not provided by the Canou
Law), export duty, toll, and yasakkol (night watchman tax).
( 3) Abolition of monopolies. ·
Under the circumstances the Foreigners are liable only for the following
taxes:
(a) Tu:es provided by the Canon Law such as tithe and sheep taxes;
(b) Taxes for landed properties;
(c) Customs duties not exceeding the fixed rate;
(d) Taxes for special services such as lighthouse and cleaning.
They are exempted even from principal taxes such as the profits tu:
and the road tax.-E. G. M.
446 MODERN TURKEY
formerly Roman law was, in a measure, secularized by
contact with the jus gentium, so the law of the Moslems,
thanks to the Capitulations, has in part become secular-
ized by contact with European jurisprudence, especially
with that of France.
When the countries now Mohammedan, Kent remarks,
shall be more completely resubjected to the doctrines of
the Roman law, then can they be admitted to an unre-
stricted reciprocal community of rights with Europe and
America. Thus would be removed the legal incompati-
bility which renders the Capitulations necessary in Tur-
key, inasmuch as Mohammed law still, in vital respects,
is bound up in religion. Until this separation is per-
fected, Moslem states may enter, as Turkey has already
done, into the sphere of European and American public
law in the relation of government to government, but not
in the relation of. government to men. Foreigners cannot
in Turkey, as in Europe and America, be admitted into
the general body and mass of the society of the nation,
but they must under Moslem law continue strangers and
~ojourners, not acquiring any national character under
the general sovereignty of the country. How, for in-
stance, could Britishers, Frenchmen, Germans, Ameri-
cans, etc., domiciled in Turkey, accept the Turkish law
on questions,of personal status such as marriage, divorce,
succession, etc., as it now· stands!
The real question at issue is not one of municipal or
other taxes nor of foreign postoffices, customs immunities
or similar barriers. ·The essential consideration is this:
social justice and social order are impossible where law,
as in the Middle Ages, is governed by religious doctrines
and rights, repulsive to the minority. And the only rem-
edy for the racial prerogatives, as represented by consu-
lar courts and mixed courts and other survivals of the
doctrine of immiscibility, is the absolute secularization
of jurisprudence.
CAPITULATIONS 447
In a not distant future this separation of law and

religion is bound to materialize, as a natural and inev-
itable reformation. It is in true line with Turkey's prog-
ress since the Congress in Paris in 1856, and especially
since the reapplication, in 1908, of the Constitution of
1876. Turkey will recognize in full the principles of
modern international law.
CHAPTER XX
THE TURKISH PRESS
By AHMED EMIN BEY 1
There is no oratory so easy, no writing so trenchant and vivid as the
phrase-making of criticism and malice. There is none so difficult as
inspiration to construction.
-HERBERT HoovER, "American Individualism."
Introduction
The press in Turkey is a combined political and'propa-
ganda institution. Newspapers are owned and edited by
leaders of various races, and may appear written in any
language. There no longer exists the all-pervading cen-
sorship formulated by Sultan Abdul Hamid II, which
went so far as to create a board of censors to oversee the
first readers of foreign and local news. Still the rigid
rules of the postwar Allied board of censors was far
from permitting the independence of the press.
1 Born in Salonika, 1889. Attended Turkish elementary school, military
academy, six years in the German School at Constantinople. Studied law
at University of Constantinople. Joined the staff of the Babah, experiencing
for one year the hardships of the Hamidian censorship. Editorial writer
of the Jen-Gazetta. Sent to America by the Turkish Government in 1910
to study sociology at Columbia University, where he received degree of
Ph.D., 1914. Assistant Professor of Sociology later Professor of Statistics,
Stamboul University. War correspondent and later editor-in-chief, Sabah.
In 1917 established a daily newspaper of his own named Vakit (Times).
Arrested in the spring of 1919 because of moderate national policy of the
paper, making many enemies, including the Sultan. Subsequently released,
but a month · later exiled to Kutaya, where remained three months. In
March, 1920, he was taken to Malta by the British as a political hostage,
since his paper was considered partisan to the Nationalist cause. Released
in 1922. Resumed editorship Vakit. Editor Vatan.
This article, written in Malta and dispatched from there while the writer
was a political prisoner, was received promptly through the courtesy of the
,British military authorities.
448
THE TURKISH PRESS
The power of a country's press increases according to
the proportionate difficulty in maintaining open news
channels with the outside world. The deliberate misuse
of the printed word by interested parties of every nation·
ality is the fundamental reason for the publication of
this book. The Cf!mpaign of misinformation has been
under way for half a century or more. To quote Mr.
Cyrus Hamlin, "Among the Turks" (1878):
A great association has been formed in England
for the purpose of exposing all the faults of Turkey.
The testimony is mainly from travelers. It is not nec-
essary to emphasize the honesty or integrity of the
writers, or the purity of their motives. But it may be
permitted to inquire whether any government could
stand such an ordeal unharmed. .
Suppose a great association should be formed in
the United States, and money freely poured into its
treasury, with the object of searching out all the atro-
cious murders and cases of poison in England. • • •
Or, suppose such an association in England should
expose all our Indian massacres, etc. Should we prob-
ably consider those who engage in such a work as
actuated by a peculiarly Christian spirit T There
would be some among us, doubtless, who would take
that view, but would it be the national viewf Would
it work a grand reformation T
The Turks have not strongly presented their "case"
among English-speaking countries partly because few
Turks can either write or speak that language, more
largely, however, because of their innate pride which
has amounted to a feeling of superiority. The Arme·
nians have been possibly more successful than any
other peoples, due to their early contact with American
missionaries and to the periodical massacres which have
been the frequent subject of international investigation.
In recent years the case of the Greeks has been discussed
by the press in Greece and abroad, while the claims of
450 MODERN TURKEY
the Jews have been advanced largely through the Zionist
leaders.
That the new government recognizes the value of the
press is shown by the fact that at Angora, Mustafa Kemal
has set up his own printing press and publishes from
there the Hakimiyet-i-Milliye, the influence of which is
naturally far-reaching. It is under a distinct handicap
contrasted with Constantinople newspapers because of
delayed costly telegraph and mail service. N ewspoapers
published at Angora and Constantinople, respectively,
have an internal importance somewhat similar to those
of Washington and New York City. More than ever
before in Turkey's history, the Turkish-owned press
holds the position of great importance.
A battle, a massacre or a political victory immedi-
ately results in a scramble of every interested party to
the nearest post, telephone, or telegraph office-usually
all three. The writer has seen the story of a conflict be-
tween the Turks and Armenians written the day before
it happened. All nationalities are devout believers in
the wisdom of exaggerating poopulation estimates, atroci-
ties, and political claims. Their methods of propagation
are alike. They consider they are adopting the only
policy upon which they can base any real hopes for an
ultimately just world tribunal.
This historical chapter on the Press is devoted to the
struggle by local journals, mainly Turkish, to reach the
reading public living within the boundaries of the former
Ottoman Empire.
The Turkish Press
The press in Turkey has assumed functions which are
carried out by other specialized agencies in more ad-
vanced countries; and although the circulation is not
large, each newspaper is read by several people, often
being sent and read aloud to illiterates.
THE TURKISH PRESS 451
The first printing press in Turkey was set up in the
year 1728, but newspapers date only from the second
quarter of the nineteenth century. Previous to that
time, the functions of the press were discharged by the
mosque gatherings, public criers, traveling preachers and
singers, market places, and coffee houses. Thus were
made public government laws, regulations and orders,
military news, the appointment of a new governor, dates
of religious festivals, funerals of prominent people,
arrival or departure of caravans and ships. A promi-
nent role was played by preachers in molding public
opinion relating to current events. Especially in the
fasting month of Ramazan and the two months previous
the tra-veling preachers reached even the remotest places.
The French Embassy issued in 1795 a periodical named
the Gazette; and in 1811 published a news bulletin. The
:first real newspaper in Turkey was the Spectateur de
l 'Orient, started at Smyrna in the year 1825; its name
was later changed to the Courier de Smyrne. This jour-
nal took occasion often to attack the policy of Russia
with the result that the Russian ambassador strongly
protested to the Porte, and asked that publication of the
Smyrna journal should cease. Turkish statesmen of that
period, however, were not quite inclined to see the inter-
est of their country in any measure dictated by Russia.
In fact, one of them said: "Often, I do not need to do
any thinking for myself. I do exactly the opposite of
what the Russian ambassador advocates, and I am satis-
fied that it is the right thing." So the words of the Rus-
sian ambassador, instead of causing the French paper to
be stopped, directly stimulated the establishment of a
newspaper in Constantinople. This paper, also in
French, was called the ltl oniteur Ottoman, and was
edited by the same individual who had established the
Smyrna newspaper.
On May 14, 1832, the first official Turkish newspaper
452 MODERN TURKEY
was started. A list of suggested names presented to the
Sultan by his cabinet ministers did not meet his ap-
proval, so he himself devised the name of T akvini-
V ekayih (the Calendar of Events). Sultan Mahmud 's
order regarding the establishment of a newspaper was
in the following terms:
The publication of a newspaper was for me an
ideal for a very long time. But as the time was not
yet ripe, I preferred to wait for the proper moment.
As the time is now ripe and as the matter does not harm
our religion and our laws, and is willingly recognized
by everybody to be highly beneficial, we desire to pro-
ceed to the establishment of a newspaper.
In 1843, an Englishman, Mr. N. Churchill, established
the second Turkish newspaper, the Jeridei Havidis
(Register of News). In 1861, the name of Terjumani-
AhvaJ, (Interpreter of the Situation), edited by Shinassi,
was changed to Tasviri-Efkiar (Tablet of Opinion). In
1862, the great writer and agitator Kemal Bey joined the
staff of that paper. In 1865, Mushbir, a paper estab-
lished by Ali Suavi, the enlightened theologian, became
the center of Young Turkish agitation. Now, for the
first time, the government felt the necessity of exercising
restraint. The press law of January, 1865, was promul-
gated, and a press bureau instituted. This law soon
proved inadequate. Then followed a regulation char-
acteristic of the Turkish system of government ever
since--suspending the liberal press laws "On account of
considerations of public order, to act2 as often as the
interest of the country required, through administrative
channels, and independently of the existing press law,
against newspapers which should disregard the princi-
ples, the observation of which is the essential condition
of a national press." The three stages involved were
the warning, the suspension, and the suppression of un-
desirable papers. In 1867, the Mushbir, becoming the
victim- of this regulation, was combined with a Young

Turk paper of minor importance; published in London,
called the Hurriet (Liberty) started in 1864. This paper,
as well as the magazine Oulloum (Sciences), and a great
variety of pamphlets, were secretly sent to Turkey.
Between 1871 and 1876, the Turkish reform movement
was entirely a movement of the· press. -The leading
writer of the period, Kemal Bey, immediately after his
return from London, established a paper of his own, the
Ibret (Admonition). There is hardly a paper in any
country's history which has been subject to such severe
criticism, because of its endeavors for improving domes-
tic conditions. New papers appeared but few had a long
life. Their failure did not deter other young men from
trying the same experiment for themselves. The stand-
ard of the periodical publications was relatively high,
because the very cream of the educated people was en-
gaged, directly or as a side occupation, in journalism.
Newspaper work meant patriotic martyrdom. Not only
was suspension of papers by the government an every
day occurrence, but also journalists were exiled without
trial. For instance, the editor of the lbret was exiled
from the capital, and appointed governor of GallipolL
After some time he managed to return and publish his
paper. In 1875, the popular enthusiasm created by his
play V atan (Fatherland) caused him to be exiled to the
fort Magossa in Cyprus. Another form of discourage-
ment was a stamp duty imposed on all political publica-
tions.
In spite of the repressive policy of the government,
the press continued to grow both in numbers and in qual-
ity. This growth constitutes an excellent index of the
rapid development in the country. In 1860, the whole
Empire possessed only one official and one semiofficial
weekly. Also, there was the Adedepar, an Armenian
weekly published since 1853 by the American Board of
454 MODERN TURKEY
Foreiin Missions. In 1864, there were established official
weeklies in the seat of every province. In the latter,
wherever a non-Turkish community was in the majority,
half of the space was devoted to the language of that
community. In 1872, the following Turkish publications
were in existence-3 dailies, 2 papers appearing three
times a week, a satirical semiweekly, a satirical weekly,
a weekly political gazette, a military weekly, and a com-
mercial weekly. Also, there were 7 French journals, 11
Armenian journals, 7 Greek journals, 4 Bulgarian jour-
nals and 1 Hebrew journal. In 1876 there were 47 papers
published in Constantinople, 13 in Turkish (7 of them
dailies, 2 semiweeklies, 1 political weekly, 1 satirical
weekly, 1 medical monthly, 1 illustrated monthly); 9 in
Greek; 9 in Armenian; 7 in French ; 3 in Bulgarian; 2 in
English; 2 in Hebrew; 1 in German; and 1 in Arabic.
The activity of the press was no longer confined to the
capital.
Since 1861 there have continuously been one or more
weeklies devoted to popularizing different branches of
knowledge. The dailies also took interest in this line of
work. This activity was of tremendous effect in break-
ing down the old order of things. The humoristic pub-
lications contributed to bring about this result; their
influence in the period of 1870 to 1876 was far-reaching.
They were ably edited by the best writers of the time.
They achieved more in weakening the prestige of the
government in power and rendering it ridiculous in the
eyes of the people than the most frantic political attacks.
When Abdul Hamid became sultan on September 11,
1876, he was confronted by a turbulent press. He
promptly decided that the press was the most vital and
dangerous force to him in his fight for palace rule and
personal power. Journalists of note were exiled from
the capital by being given positions, such as governor-
general or ambassador. Through similar gentle methods
all the prominent leaders of the reform movements were
eliminated. There was no constitution and no free press
left in Turkey. With the leaders eliminated and the
press subdued, the country, which was under a cross-fire
from external dangers and internal unrest, easily became
the prey of an absolute ruler.
In 1877 the downfall of the press was complete. In
August, 1877, the Terjuman-i-Efkiar, a paper published
in the Turkish language with Armenian characters,
asserted that the press in Turkey no longer existed as a
factor in public life. The Turkish papers copied this
statement widely, bitterly admitting its truth.
It is not surprising that the journalists in the Hamid-
ian era could not be other than favor-seeking. Any
aggressive and patriotic men among them were immedi-
ately eliminated, while the others received from the Sul-
tan the highest titles and fattest sinecures.
The Sultan was shortsighted only on one point. While
repressing every sort of discussion and criticism, as well
as every open struggle for reform, he liked to pose as a
protector of science and learning. He founded many
institutions of higher learning which gave their students
not only free instruction, but also free board and even
pocket money. One of the purposes was to render the
new generation grateful to the Sultan. In the press also,
no restrictions were placed upon popularizing knowledge.
The daily newspapers virtually became daily magazines,
or better still, serial popular publications on history,
science, and art. Among them were the serial publica-
tions of the Ebouzzia Library, containing foreign classics
and valuable works by Turkish authors. The influence
of the Fortnightly Review (in Turkish), published by the
same editor, was also far-reaching.
This intellectual activity opened the eyes of a large
number of people, and with these open eyes they did not
only read fiction, but they also pondered over every
456 MODERN TURKEY
detail of the corrupt system of government. The Sultan
became the victim of his educational policy which
brought about just the contrary of what he expected.
The militancy which expressed itself in surreptitious
publications, in secret organizations, in various signs of
revolt against authority, increased with great rapidity
after 1890. In 1892, Ahmed Rira Bey, superintendent
of public education in Brusa, recently president of the
Senate, fled to Paris where he published the Meshverett
(Deliberation). In 1894, the Armenian massacres caused
a great irritation among the Turkish patriots. The
necessity for urgent action against the Hamidian regime
was strongly felt, especially by medical students. Four
medical students laid the foundation of the secret Com-
mittee of Union and Progress. Their literature fell
upon very receptive ground. The flight to Europe of
Murad Bey, the popular journalist and novelist, gave a
great impetus to the movement. The Sultan was exceed~
ingly terrified. Hundreds of suspects were arrested, tor-
tured, and condemned without trial. Some disappeared
forever, others were exiled, but this martyrdom only
strengthened the position of the revolutionary organiza-
tion. They organized a plot against the Sultan. New
arrests followed. Meanwhile, many hundreds succeeded
in escaping to Europe and Egypt, and began to publish
there revolutionary papers.
After the victories in the Greek ·war of 1897, the posi-
tion of the Sultan became stronger, and the press became
decidedly weaker.· Now not only the political discus-
sions, but every sort of intellectual activity, was checked.
The hopeful new literature movement was entirely
silenced. The daily press, which was ~ubsidized by the
palace, devoted most of its space to platitudes and to the
praise of the Sultan. The proof sheets were read by two
censors. The papers kept a large staff of translators,
who made use of whatever they found in foreign papers
that had nothing to do with Turkey or the European sit-
uation. News items concerning the Far East, America
or Australia were in special demand. Odd happenings
in America furnished a favorite subject about which to
write stories. In order to supply the papers .with the ele-
ment of attraction and sensation which they would other-
wise have lacked, exaggerated stories were published
about Americans. The papers were not allowed to give
prominence to any local events which did not copstitute
an occasion to praise the Sultan. The restrictions be-
came stricter daily. A general book or a copy of a news-
paper published several years before was very likely to be
considered by the secret agents of the police as incrimi-
nating and seditious literature. Not only were most of
the Turkish literary works on the black list, but also
books written by previous order of and by the Sultan; for
instance, concerning the sham trial of the liberal Grand
Vizier, Midhat Pasha. The last stage of restrictions con-
cerned the interdiction of :fiction, because ''it stimulated
the imagination.'' At :first, the interdiction concerned
only actions represented as happenings in Turkey or
among Turks. Later, every novel and story was pro-
hibited. Travel descriptions were singh:id out as undesir-
able. Love stories were placed under a very strict ban.
As a consequence of these conditions, the number of
Young Turk revolutionary publications increased very
rapidly. The Meshverett, on March 15, 1898, noted seven
new organs established within two months. Most of
these papers, usually distributed gratis, were short-lived
on account of financial difficulties. Anybody could ask
for any number of copies to be distributed in the interior,
and many copies were sent, through foreign post offices,
to different addresses in Turkey. While the recipient
was not expected generally to pay for each copy, he had
to pay a very heavy price if detected by the secret police.
In spite of the vigilance of the authorities such papers
458 MODERN TURKEY
and handwritten copies of forbidden and out-of-print
literary works were diffused everywhere in Turkey, and
helped to increase the general discontent and stir up still
more disposition to revolt. In 1908, when the Young
Turkish revolution broke out in Macedonia, the whole
country was prepared to accept the new situation with
great joy.
The papers of Constantinople, subsidized by the Palace
and until July 22, 1908, filled with laudable language
with grotesque praises of the Sultan, at once adopted a
very insulting and aggressive attitude. Their circula-
tion increased so fast that a person frequently had to
pay as much as forty cents for a newspaper issued to
sell at one cent. Everyone wanted to celebrate the end
of "the nightmare of despotism and oppression" by
speaking and writing, or by listening to or reading what
was spoken and written. Bulky street literature con-
sisting of leaflets, pamphlets, pictures and cartoons were
created overnight and found a wide circulation. Enter-
prising publishers were engaged at once in putting out
editions of all forbidden works. Within a few weeks the
number of Turkish dailies rose from 3 to 15. A new
class of comic publications, between 5 and 10 in number,
appeared during the first months of the new era. Some
of the more zealous men thought that periodical publi-
cations of every sort and shade had to be created at once.
Dailies, weeklies, and special magazines were accord-
ingly established without regard to satisfying any local
demand. There was even a communistic weekly, called
Ishtirak (Communism) with the following Turkish say-
ing as its motto: "One eats, one looks, there the trouble
broods.'' Every one of the new societies and groups
wanted to have its own organ. Almost simultaneously,
there appeared weekly or monthly organs for painters,
architects, chemists, veterinary surgeons, physicians,
lawyers, actors, workingmen, government officials, former
political exiles, alumni of the Civil Service School, and
university students. Nearly all of these journals were
short-lived. Enormous sums were wasted by inexperi-
enced men. Only three of the several dozen dailies sur-
vived, although some of the literary periodicals and
illustrated magazines were, relatively speaking, more
fortunate. European Turkey, especially Macedonia,
with its prosperous economic conditions and animated
intellectual environment took great interest in this class
of publications. Several well edited and printed periodi-
cals were published with financial success, until Turkey
lost most of her European possessions.
The press was the most active factor of the new era.
It had enormous influence, but with the rapid growth in
their number, coupled with the inexperience of their
editors in discussing public questions, unenviable abuses
arose. No one dared to object to the licentious language
of the press. The reactionaries, who were responsible
for the oppression of the press in former days, were now
most zealous supporters of an unrestricted press. The
discussion in Parliament of a press-control law was so
strongly attacked everywhere that the government was
helpless. These elements interested in creating anarchy
· took full advantage of the situation. The palace was
intriguing with great skill There were discontents
among every class of citizens. The larger part of the
press was on the side of discontents. On April 5, 1909,
Hassan Fehmi, editor of the opposition daily, the Ser-
besti, was mysteriously shot on the street. The funeral
was a very imposing one, and really was the first step
of revolt against the Government. On April 14, 1909,
the city was in the hands of military insurgents acting
according to the orders of the palace. The offices of the
Committee papers were pillaged by the mob. The inde-
460 MODERN TURKEY
pendent papers were silenced. The reactionary press
triumphed.
But within a week a Young Turkish army was within
reach of the capital. The language used regarding the
Sultan changed also from day to day. During the first
days of the counter revolution, there were papers using
the pompous phraseology of old days. When the news
of Young Turkish military preparations reached the
capital, he began to be spoken of simply as "our Sul-
tan.'' As soon as the army reached Constantinople, the
palace intrigues were made subjects of daring remarks.
When the city was actually taken, the papers assured
their readers that the great emblem of oppression and
despotism was no longer capable of further harm.
The new Government established after the dethrone-
ment of the Sultan held the press responsible for the
outbreak of April 13, 1909. Accordingly, the majority
of the opposition papers were suppressed, and most of
the members of their staff exiled. Some of them saved
themselves by flight to Europe, and became engaged in
violent denunciation of the Young Turkish Government.
The papers at home used what freedom was left them to
complain, in sharper and sharper tones, of the lack of
sufficient freedom.
The enchanting idealism of the revolution days had
entirely disappeared. The constitution did not prove to
be the magic panacea which could niake a paradise out
of a disintegrating empire. The militaristic tendencies
were especially represented by a new type of papers,
appearing in localities where the revolution of 1908 had
started. These papers were named Weapon, Sword,
Bayonet, Bullet, Thunderbolt, etc., and were published
by retired army officers. The arrogant chauvinism dis-
played by these papers was something beyond imagina-
tion. They attacked foreign powers: they strongly
attacked the political opponents of the "sacred" Com-
mittee of Union and Progress; they attacked the intel-
lectual environment of Constantinople where the idea of
opposition seemed to take root. The political intolerance
of the Committee increased the opposition and made the
press more and more hostile. On July 29, 1909, Samim
Bey, editor of the Sedayi Millet (Voice of the People),
was mysteriously shot and killed ill the streets. On july
11, 1911, Zekki Bey, another opposition editor, met the
same fate.
In those days of increasing chaos, some of the papers
became blind tools of international intrigues. For in-
stance, when an American group under Admiral Chester
was seeking a railway concession in Asiatic Turkey,
these papers were used by several foreign embassies,
which were naturally antagonistic, to agitate against the
project and to make it impossible for parliament to
give even a serious consideration to the matter. With-
out this agitation, the Chester project would undoubtedly;
have been carried out, and would have changed the whole
aspect of things in the Near East.
With the outbreak of the Italian War, the Committee
of Union and Progress put new restrictions on the press,
but chiefly with reference to those catering to the oppo-
sition. Another change came when the · :first Balkan
War broke out in October, 1912. The papers, which used
to give opinions rather than news and comment upon
every bit of news in a way to appeal to their readers,
learned now to put emphasis on news. Even the most
unpleasant events were recorded with headlines accord-
ingly. Whereas, in former days, a self-respecting man
never accepted work as a reporter, but began his jour-
nalistic career as a translator of f.oreign papers, a new
class of educated reporters now appeared.
After the humiliations of the Balkan War the Com-
mittee of Union and Progress returned to power. It had
not become more tolerant, but political conflicts had lost
4ti:& MODERN TURKEY
their old meaning for the people. The old game was no
longer played. The public, as well as the press, showed
more interest in constructive problems of reform than in
strife. Another sign of the new order of things was the
selective decrease in the number of the dailies and the
increase in serious periodical publications. Instead of
9 Turkish dailies in 1911, 6 only were published in 1913.
The number of humorous semiweeklies dropped from
seven to three. Illustrated magazines rose from three to
four. In 1913, there were 13 periodicals for children and
for school use, whereas there was not one such in 1911.
Two weeklies for women began to be published. Reli-
gious periodicals rose from 4 to 6; publications of socie-
ties and organizations dropped from 5 to 4. Five new
agricultural periodicals made their appearance. Mili-
tary and naval periodicals rose from 4 to 5 and the scien-
tific ones from 3 to 7. Besides there were an official daily
and 8 weeklies published by the different departments
of state. Among non-Turkish language dailies and peri-
odicals, published in Constantinople, there were also
great changes. French publications dropped from 14 to
10, while the Greek publications rose from 13 to 18,
Armenian from 16 to 23, Arabic from 2 to 3, and Hebrew
from 1 to 4. ·The only German daily was continuing its
publication. The Bulgarian weekly disappeared after
the Balkan War, while a new Persian paper appeared.
The provincial press also received a great development.
In 1913, there were 117 Arabic, 108 Turkish, 25 Greek,
19 Armenian, 11 Hebrew, 4 Albanian, 10 French papers,
and 1 Bulgarian paper in the provinces. The entire
number of periodical publications in the Ottoman Em-
pire was 338.
The self-critical tendency and the desire for internal
development were still dominating the publications of
the Turkish press, when new war clouds appeared on
the horizon. The Turkish press, naturally sympathetic
to Germany, was one of the chief factors in creating

local atmosphere favorable for German purposes. At
the same time, the German press bureau sought close
intercourse not only with the press of Constantinople,
but even with the Constantinople correspondence of the
remotest provincial paper. Even the unimportant Turk-
ish press reporter, who went to the German press bureau
for news, was treated with every attention. He was, of
course, inclined to give emphasis to the German news.
The Entente Allies had no similar news organization.
When, one day, a short communication appeared in
the papers, announcing that the Russian fleet had made
a surprise attack on some units of the Turkish fleet and
that a great victory had been won by the Turks, every-
one, including the Sultan, believed the false story. The
censorship imposed on Turkey, after the outbreak of the
war, was something beyond imagination. No foreign
papers were allowed to come in. Restrictions on home
papers were such that they could publish nothing but
official communications from German and Austrian
sources. Newspaper reporters had no opportunity to
get the facts. In order to attract attention, the papers,
limited to uninteresting news bulletins, published large
headlines, maps, and pictures on the first page. Most of
the dailies appeared with more pictures on the first page
than written material. The German and Austrian press
bureaus in Constantinople distributed picture cuts to the
papers. Practically every sort of discussion was pro-
hibited. Not only was external and internal politics
barred, but also the military situation was rarely allowed
to be mentioned, and then to be referred to in the most
uncritical and optimistic fashion. Even cultural, eco-
nomical and social problems could not be discussed. The
military censorship regarded every discussion, even of a
technical character, as a sign of dissension. It was to
the interests of the army not to give the enemy the im-
464 MODERN TURKEY
pression that there was any disharmony in the country.
There was not a single word in the Turkish papers
regarding the Armenian deportations, or the abuses in
the war organization, or the contrast on the one hand
between huge, unearned war fortunes and accompanying
waste and luxury, and, on the other, privation, famine
and death. Turkey's primitive economic organization
proved a complete failure.
For some time the papers could not give utterance to
these feelings. In the autumn of 1916 the situation began
to change. Commercial speculation in essential com-
modities had become unbearable. At last the Govern-
ment realized that general discontent would cause an
internal explosion if complaints in the press did not
receive attention. When the authority of the all-power-
ful censorship was once shaken, the arrogant military
rigidity could no longer be kept up in silencing every
suggestion of the press.
Besides the alarming living conditions, the question
of providing newsprint paper for the press was a vexa-
tious one. Turkey manufactured no paper. On the
other hand, paper was not allowed to be exported from
Austria and Germany. Paper, obtained through the
channels of the flourishing illegal war trade, was so ex-
pensive on account of graft that newspapers could not
afford to purchase it. Again, the Germans played the
game for all it was worth. The German press bureau
attached to the German Embassy was most ready to
supply the press with newsprint at bare cost. This was
a very tempting offer, because the cost price was one
sixth to one seventh of the. prevailing market price in
Constantinople. Of course, it was a very humiliatip.g
position for the Turkish press to be supplied with paper,
consequently influenced, by a foreign embassy during a
great national struggle. Indeed, the Ottoman Press
Association was established early in 1917 with the main
object of defending unitedly the dignity of the Turkish
press, and of breaking the absolute monopoly exercised
by the German Embassy.
In spite of the opposition of the Government, the
struggle for freedom from foreign influence was a long
one, but at last it was crowned with full success. The
German syndicate for supplying paper to the trade
began to furnish the national press association direct
with the necessary paper for the entire Turkish Empire
press.
Following the struggle relative to the newsprint paper
problem, the press began to show also a fighting spirit
against the Government. They succeeded in arranging
weekly sittings between the editors, the head of the press
bureau, and the head of the information department in
the general staff of the army also in charge of military
censorship. This meant at least an opportunity for dis-
cussion. Specific complaints could be made against the
censorship, which necessarily led to an amelioration of
the existing conditions. Bad feeling against the allies
and the causes of friction had increased to such an ~xtent
that public opinion was insisting that the columns of the
press should be thrown open for a general news service.
The political censorship was abolished on the ground
that it was unconstitutional. Curiously enough, the
members of the cabinet were the very men who had
established the censorship. Thereafter the press, sub-
ject to the press law only, could discuss anything. There
was a military censorship, but without any real author-
ity. The papers were asked to send to that censorship
only matters of a purely military character which might
contain information useful to the enemy.
A very active period began for the Turkish press.
War abuses and scandals implicating men in high posi-
tions began to be disclosed. Irregularities by. the mili-
tary authorities were not overlooked. Althougn the
466 MODERN TURKEY
general public was unsuccessful in devising remedial
measures, it hailed with joy the new order, because it
gave expression to the resentment and indignation
deeply felt by all. During the last six months of the war
perhaps no other country had such a free press as Tur-
key. The attacks against the Central Powers, princi-
pally over the booty in the Caucasus and in the Balkans,
were at times so bitter that the German authorities were
deeply alarmed. These discussions of foreign politics
helped to postpone an insurrection of the army. The
satisfaction created by the free discussion of domestic
problems had also a similar effect. Otherwise, the inter-
nal situation of Turkey would have been extremely
dangerous. Any incident might have caused a sweeping
outbreak. As soon as Bulgaria signed an armistice, the
military situation became hopeless. The war cabinet of
the Committee of Union and Progress was forced to
retire. The new cabinet of non-party character and
moderate national views was formed. Everybody had
suffered so badly through the system of administration
during the war, that it therefore pleased· them to have
the press indulging in most abusive language regarding
the war leaders. After the unanimous outbursts in the
press had. continued for some time, a new division among
them began to appear. Some papers began to point out
external dangers, to warn the public that attention should
be given to the problems of future existence, and that
hatred of the past could not be the main issue in public
life. Papers using such a language were called support-
ers of the old regime by the group of papers which were
interested in creating troubled conditions in order that
they could intrigue at leisure. But these leaders soon
had a large following. The Ottoman Press Association
which had comprised during the war all papers irrespec-
tive of language, became more and more united on a
common national policy.
The country was already in great internal chaos, when
the Entente representatives began to arrive. The ambi-
tious politicians, who well knew that they had no hold on
the nation, began to seek the favor and protection of the
foreign representations. Petty intrigues, individual lust
for power, and personal feelings of revenge took the
place of an open preparation for peace and a united
national struggle for existence. The parliament was dis-
solved by the government, although this meant the last
general representation for the whole Empire. The larger
part of the press was constantly complaining of the lack
of national harmony, attacking the government for its
weakness, and using a more and more threatening lan-
guage against the Sultan and his despotic designs. Some
big scandals in which two or three cabinet members were
directly involved also were disclosed. The government
could not establish a censorship, because it was uncon-
stitutional. One of the main causes of agitation against
the Union and Progress Party had been its unconstitu-
tional censorship. The new government, which had the
natural ambition of acting exactly contrary to their pre-
decessors, did not dare to establish a censorship. The
Allied missions came to their help. In December, 1918,
an interallied censorship was established; both for the
purpose of safeguarding the military interests of the
Allied Powers and at the same time of checking publica-
tions of a nature to create new interracial animosities.
Although this censorship was contrary to the spirit of
the armistice, the Turkish Government, instead of object-
ing to it, tried only to take advantage of it for its own
ends. The censorship was very arbitrary, it had no work-
ing principles, no definite aims, no leadership. It never
discussed matters; it only dictated and ordered. It im-
posed hard punishments for the slightest offenses. Not
only infractions of the rules, but also the mere sending
in of undesired news items created liability to punish-
468 MODERN TURKEY
ment. As the British, French and Italian officers had
charge of the control by turns, the political tendency of
the censorship and the special interests concerned
changed from day to day.
This extraordinary rOle, gradually assumed by the
Allied Powers on the press and ce.rtain other branches
of the public life, had a disintegrating effect on every-
thing Turkish. The country had been making prepara-
tions for peace. Political powers were given to those
who had taken a flattering attitude towards one or more
of the Allied Powers, which resulted in advantage being
taken of the situation to create an atmosphere of terror
to their enemies. In January, 1919, wholesale political
arrests were started, not with a reasonable plan to pay
for past wrongs and to punish the guilty, but merely to
satisfy political passions. At the beginning of March,
1919, this tendency was accentuated, when an extremist
party government came to power. The papers with
national aims were at once silenced, and two of the edi-
tors exiled. Party passions were so strong that there
was hardly any trace in the public life of any anxiety or
concern about the future of the country. All organiza-
tions interesting themselves in propaganda work rela-
tive to the further introduction of foreign languages
were suppressed. The head of the National Congress
was exiled to Kutaya. The responsible government of
. Turkey was really leading the country to a natural
death, anticipating the deadly blow of the peace treaty.
Without the occupation of Smyrna by Greeks, the Turk-
ish nation would have hardly found a possibility of sav-
ing itself from the increasing apathy and the loss of
national consciousness. The happenings in: Smyrna
stirred up so much indignation that the interallied cen-
sorship judged it a better policy to allow the press free
expression. Violent public meetings took as their main
theme the Fourteen Points of President Wilson. All the
papers had agreed to publish, simultaneously, in staring

headlines, the Twelfth Point, considered the only hope
for Turkey. As early as December, 1918, practically
the entire Turkish press favored the idea of establish-
ing a "Turkish Wilsonian League;" and then to invoke
American assistance and guidance for regenerating
Turkey.
When the agitation iu the interior threatened to be~
come too violent, the central government tried to check
it. It was too late. The interior country assumed a
defiant attitqde which gave rise both to local resistance
against the Greek advance in the western Anatolian dis-
tricts, and to a general nationalistic movement against
the peace treaty in the eastern districts. The press of
Constantinople sympathized with these activities, but
under the interallied censorship had now lost its former
importance in Anatolia. There appeared several nation-
alistic organs in the interior which gave all the news,
even if they might be considered of doubtful origin and
fantastic character; they commented upon the situa-
tion in a most aggressive and violent tone. In January,
1920, the parliamentary elections were finished at last.
There was now a representative body which could speak
in the name of the country and formulate the minimum
peace aims of Turkey. The situation was now well in
hand from the Turkish national point of view. All the
efforts were concentrated on the peace problems. Most
of the Turkish papers in Constantinople were acting in
a concerted way for national ends.
Of course, this could hardly be in the interest of the
Powers which had in mind an unacceptable peace, which
could be dictated only to a disunited, disintegrating Tur-
key, too weak to resist, and lacking a national conscious-
ness. To prepare for the peace, a violent propaganda
was set going about fresh Armenian troubles in Cilicia,
but thG Turkish press was forbidden even to mention
470 MODERN TURKEY
the matter; while the papers published in non-Turkish
languages were allowed to use the most abusive lan-
guage. The Ottoman Press Association protested vio-
lently against this attitude. The propaganda was also
designed to provide the proper atmosphere for the mili-
tary occupation of Constantinople. The occupation took
place on March 16, 1920. The supposed leaders of
thought and action, including Turkish editors, were then
arrested by the British authorities and exiled to Malta
as political hostages.
Since that time, there has been a complet~ break-vir-
tually a state of war-between the capital and the inte-
rior. After the occupation of Constantinople, three of
the papers with nationalistic tendencies (Tasviri-Efkiar,
lfham, Y eni-Gun) were suspended. The V akit, Ileri and
the Aksham continued to be published as mere news
sheets. The Peyam-Sabah and Alemdar, on the con-
trary, found now a very favorable situation to express
their opinions. A new successful pictorial daily came
out of the office of the humoristic weekly, the Diken
(Thorn). Since the most interesting political events
could not be touched upon, all attention had to be given
· to feature stories. A newspaper appearing as an illus-
trated daily magazine easily could succeed. The Con-
stantinople papers, which ordinarily satisfied the thirst
for news even in far-off districts, were not allowed to go
outside. For this reason, the interior of the country
developed more and more its own press.
Speaking generally, the Turkish press is technically
and intrinsically the best developed branch of Turkish
public life. It gives news, it stimulates, it advises, it
directs. One can hear statesmen in responsible positions
saying: "We could not help it. The press did not do its
duty of stimulation and guidance in this matter."
Strangely enough, the same persons are sometimes re-
sponsible for complete suppression of the freedoii\ of dis-
cussion. The public, also, on every question, places a
large share of blame on the press, which has consequently
many enemies, but, nevertheless, has a magical influence
on both the educated .classes and the masses. The read-
ing public is small, but select. Therefore, the literary
and moral standard of the press is relatively high. The
newspaper editor is honored in the community, and is
supposed to have great capabilities. The new type of
journalist takes a great interest in his profession, and
does not consider it a mere stepping stone for political
success. Among the best features of most Turkish papers
is the fact that they are owned by their editors, and that
the business side is subordinated. There are few papers .
controlled by financial or political interests. Most of the
papers profess to be, and to some extent are, independent
national organs. As it was clearly proved during the war
and since the armistice, the great majority of the papers
cannot be influenced with money, especially foreign
money. The editorial and news columns are generally
untainted, and a certain selection is exercised even in the
advertising columns.
Although the papers depend mostly on circulation and
advertisements for their income, these business depart-
ments have a primitive organization. No paper has its
own means of distribution; each copy is sold to any news
vender who calls to the office and pays cash. A reduction
of 25 per cent in the printed price is allowed agents.
There are, however, wholesale dealers covering every
part of the city, who handle and transport and then resell
the paper to news boys. Outside of the tobacco shops
there are no news stands. With a more efficient way of
distribution the papers could easily gain 50 per cent in
circulation. Street signs and other conspicuous methods
to increase circulation are not popular with the readers.
They often create the opposite effect. Prize distribution
has also proved a failure. As a rule, papers which fol..
472 MODERN TURKEY
low conservative advertising methods are preferred by
the public. ·
The circulation of every paper fluctuates widely. A
good "scoop," a special article, ~ feature story by a
popular writer, a serial publication of a good novel-
especially by a good native writer-may prove a great
success. The circulation changes with political activities.
Violent personal attacks and polemics which, ten years
ago, helped circulation, now, normally speaking, have a
strong detrimental effect. The people, so heavily tried
after many national misfortunes, take more interest in
issues than in personalities.
As a result of competition in late years, the papers
have greatly changed their make-up. The expression of
opinion is now confined to editorial columns. Commen-
taries in the news columns have almost died out. Even
the most unpleasant and adverse news is published, re-
ceiving position and display according to its value. Uni-
form headlines and display type have become the rule.
In addition, almost every daily publishes regularly pic-
tures, maps, sketches or cartoons on its first page. News
of accidents, crimes and scandals, which were dealt with
formerly in a few lines without headline, are appearing
even on the first page with proportionate display. For-
eign press dispatches dealing with Turkish affairs, in-
ternal politics, and news on national organizations of an
economical and social character receive a great deal of
attention. Since newsprint paper must be imported from
abroad, and as the exchange rate with countries furnish-
ing the supply is very unfavorable, the papers are reduced
in size. Nevertheless, they are expected to publish fea-
ture stories and a serial. Foreign news is obtained from
the bulletins of the telegraphic agencies, and from for-
eign papers. At present there are no professional corre-
spondents in foreign news centers. Occasional work is
accorded by students and other Turkish residents in for-
f.)ourteay lSeball -.t- Joaillier
A Characteristic Turkish Butcher Shop.
()ovrt••lf t;ebah dl: J oaiUier

A Well-appointed Shopping Strl'et, Devoted Largely to Pottery Wares, in
Anatolia.
eign countries. News service from the interior is rudi-
mentary and incomplete. Although some of the pro-
vincial dailies have a large private telegraphic service
from Constantinople, the dailies in Constantinople re-
ceive news only from occasional correspondents, or re-
print from the provincial press. The Turkish national
telegraphic agency which transmits news to the interior
gets very little from there in return.
The news service in the capital is much better organ-
ized. Most of the reporters are graduates or students of
the Turkish University and possess knowledge of one or
more foreign languages. The reporters receive a
monthly payment ranging between twenty and sixty
Turkish pounds ($88 and $264). The "free lance," paid
by the line, has made his appearance in late years, and
has proved in many instances a success. On the staff
of most papers, ·there are those who can translate
French, English, German, Greek, Armenian, and Arabic,
and sometimes Italian, Russian, and Persian. Formerly
after the French system, all the foreign articles went
through the hands of a secretaire de redaction. Now the
functions of the secretaire is increasingly divided be-
tween a news editor, a man in charge of make-up, and the
person looking after feature stories, fiction and special
articles. The editor-in-chief takes care mainly of the
editorial columns, writing daily editorials which appear
over his signature.
The advertising columns are gaining more and more
in importance. 1 In view of the limited size of all papers,
1
On the subject of advertising in Constantinople newspapers, the writer
(E. G. M.) had an article in Commerce Beports, October 30, 19201 which
depicted brjefl.y the conditions at that time:-
•' The population of Constantinople is very cosmopolitan. All the for-
eigners speak their own language and read their own newspapers. In order
to reach the public in general, advertisements should be published in news-
papers of at least four languages. However, the best results are obtained
by publication in Turkish newspapers, for on the one band the Turkish
populatio!l is most numerous, and on the other the Turkish reader is more
474 MODERN TURKEY
it is now very easy to fill the space available for adver-

tisements. The latter are either brought to the office
directly or sent through an outside bureau. No soliciting
of any kind is attempted. The papers are anxious to get
government advertisements. Formerly, the round sums
paid annually by banks and other companies for adver-
tisements were necessary for the very existence of the
papers, even though these sums meant a restriction of
certain possible criticism. Now the running expenses of
the paper are so high that these yearly payments are
relatively unimportant.
Although five Turkish and two Greek papers possess
modern rotating presses, most of the papers, because of
the limited circulation, are using simple flat-bed printing
presses. Owing to the irregularity of the communication
with the interior, circulation in the provinces is small.
Egypt, Syria, Mesopotamia, Hejaz, Albania, Western
Thrace, Macedonia, Bulgaria, which are very good :fields
for Turkish papers, are closed for the time· being. Be-
sides, the great mortality in the army, including thou-
sands of well educated reserve officers, has meant a great
loss in the ranks of the reading public. With the return
of normal conditions, it is hoped and expected that the
former outside sales may be resumed. Considerable im-
portance is also attached to a recent rapid movement
which has established the Turkish Turkish as the stand-
ard Turkish written language in Russia. Many news-
paper owners claim that the future business success of
their organs is dependent upon reaching effectively the
susceptible to the claims of advertisements than are Europeans and Ar-
menians. It has been found by experience that advertising in newspapers
gives very good results in Constantinople, especially if it be pushed vigor·
ously. No advertising is carried as yet on tramcars. Street .advertising
is not protected by law and cannot be recommended to foreign concerns.
All things considered, it is better to use the newspapers as a medium for
publicity. The circulation of printed newspapers is not very great, but in
spite of that advertising therein yields excellent results. French newspapers
have an approximate issue of 6,000 to 8,000; Greek, 4,000 to 12,000;
Armenian, 4,000 to 8,000; and Turkish, 10,000 to 15,000. ''
Turkish reading public in the former Russian provinces,
especially the Caucasus.
Typesetting is still done by hand. Although successful
experiments with linotypes have been made for the Turk-
ish language, they are not yet in use in newspaper offices.
In view of the fluctuating circulation, it becomes some-
times very hard to find the desired number of typesetters
(who are relatively well organized). Although Turkey
lacks legislation to protect labor, this organization of
workers has succeeded in compelling employers to pay
indemnities to discharged typesetters, to provide regular
pay when the paper is suspended by the censorship, and
to obtaining help in case of sickness and other emergen-
cies. In 1917, the newspapers had to pay 27 Turkish
pounds ($118.80) weekly for typesetting. In the summer
of 1920, this figure rose to 175 pounds ($140, considering
the Turkish pound worth now actually 80 cents), an in-
crease of 550 per cent in terms of local currency. During
the same period the wages of the journalists employed by
the same papers rose only 200 per cent. The journalists .
also had a syndicate, but this did not prove successful.
Valuable results have been accomplished by the Otto-
.man Press Association, a body which aims to defend the
rights of the press against the Government, to raise the
moral standard of the press, to maintain comradeship
and tolerance among journalists, to act as an arbitrator
in professional conflicts, and to represent the press as a
whole. It has offices and social rooms on the ·Avenue of
the Sublime Porte, where most of the newspaper offices
are located.
CHAPTER XXI
THE YOUNG TURK MOVEMENT
By SALIH KERAMETT BEY 1
Assurance is fatal and contemptible unless it is founded on self-

knowledge.
-GEORGE SANTAYANA, "Character and Opinion in the United States."
Introduction
On July 24, 1908, the Young Turks, under the name of
the "Committee of Union and Progress," brought about
a bloodless revolution against the hated Sultan Abdul
Hamid II, which resulted the following year in his per-
manent exile at Salonika. This series of events was
hailed with the greatest enthusiasm by most peoples
within Turkey as well as by those outside. Only a few of
the Sultan's personal followers were distressed at the
sudden changes. The early flood of book and magazine
articles emanating from impartial authorities were al-
most uniformly optimistic regarding a reformed Turkey.
The new leaders, however, mostly Macedonian Jews, soon
perceived that their sweeping reforms were more suited
to the West than to the East. The atmosphere of Paris
had made them forget the true character of conditions in
1 Born at Constantinople, 1885. Graduated from the Lyeee of the Galata
Serai with the degree of bachelor of arts a.nd sciences, 1903. Gr~duated
from the Higher School of Agriculture at Halki, 1907. Employed in the
Administration of the Ottoman Public Debt, 1907-1909. Inspector of
Studies in the Lyclie of Galata Serai, 1909-1910. Tutor to Prince Omer
Faruk, 1910-1915. Attended Institute of Scientific Agriculture at Vienna,
1910-1915. Attache to the Turkish Embassy at Vienna, 1916-1919. Regis-
tered in the Political and Economic Sciences at the University of Vienna,
1916-1919. Professor of Turkish at Robert College since the year 1919;
and also in December 1923, Private Secretary to his Majesty, the Khalif.
476
Turkey. The groups of Young Turks in Turkey and out-
side had little contact with each other, due to the almost
perfect censorship practiced by the Sultan. In a short
time the Young Turks gave evidence of their inexperi-
ence as well as their lack of intelligence for constructive
leadership. An autocratic monarchy was succeeded by
a like autocratic oligarchy.
The Old Turks left alone religious and race questions.
The Young Turks adopted the meddling policy of the
Turkification by force of non-Turkish nationalities. The
·Young Turks endeavored to impose their language, and
also universal compulsory military service. Their ideals
of "Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity" were too far ad-
vanced. (Dr. Nazim at Paris denied entirely the impor-
tance of the race question.) ·Their surprisingly easy vic-
tory made their leaders overconfident, childish, impetu-
ous and autocratic. Notwithstanding the flight of its
leaders in 1918, there is an important nucleus of the
"C. U. P." left in Turkey, especially in Constantinople.
This group has not thus far asserted open· political op-
position to the Defense of Right~ (Kemalist) Party, al-
though its members are not sympathetic towards the
adoption of many recent innovations of the newer pro-
gressive movement.
The Turkish Republic is the latest stage of the Young
Turk Movement.
The Young Turk Movement
'rhe expression "Young Turk," as opposed to Old or
Conservative Turk, means merely "Liberal Turk."
Altho1o1gh age in no way distinguishes the two, it is nat-
ural that the Liberals should recruit their ranks, for the
most part, among the intellectual youth. The century-
old decadence of the Ottoman Empire, accelerated in the
course of the nineteenth century, had engendered among
the enlightened Turkish patriots a movement of dissatis-
478 MODERN TURKEY
faction. This new spirit developed as the vexations in-
creased, and became accentuated near the end of the
reign of the Sultan Abdul Aziz. The opposition of en-
lightened ·minds to governmental abuses received the
name of the "Young Turk Movement."
The bankruptcy of the State in 1875, and the national
upheavals in the Balkans, accompanied by grave political
complications which prepared the way for foreign inter-
vention, profoundly- moved these Turkish patriots who
were awake to the situation. They were convinced that
all these evils were due to autocracy, and could be reme-
died only by suppressing absolutism. Convinced that it
was psychologically impossible to induce the Sultan to
adapt himself to new conditions, the reform statesmen
resorted to force and dethroned him in the year 1876.
They hoped from his successor, Murad V, the realization
of this fundamental reform, but were disappointed.· The
mental trouble of the new Sultan, in consequence of the
tragic death of his uncle, did not permit this. Therefore,
they were obliged to depose him also, after a reign of
three months. According to the law of succession to the
throne, he was succeeded by the oldest male survivor of
the dynasty: in this case, by his younger brother, Abdul
Hamid II. It was from the latter that Midhat Pasha,
then political chief of "Young Turkey," finally obtained
the P.romulgation of a fundamental law intended to insti-
tute a constitutio~al regime throughout Turkey. The
solemn promises of reform made in 1839 and 1856, had
remained to a great extent sterile owing to lack of na-
tional control. In the minds of its authors, the Con-
stitution granted December 23, 1876 should have pre-
cisely filled this gap, thus assuring the conscientious and
uninterrupted execution of the reforms so often
promised.
This is what would probably have occurred if the stub-
born and crafty resistance of the sovereign from the be-
THE YOUNG TURK MOVEMENT 479
ginning had not hindered it. His autocratic tempera-

ment, however, made him very jealous of his power, as
well as profoundly hostile to any attempt at effective.
control. In consequence, he systematically checked all
efforts tending to this end and for this purpose took ad-
vantage, without scruple, of the political crisis in which
the State was involved.
At the conference of ambassadors at Constantinople
large concessions were proposed in order to quiet the
national revolts in the Balkans. But the Sultan's council
rejected them on January 18, 1877, declaring them
incompatible with the Constitution. A few days later,
the Sultan dismissed· and exiled Midhat Pasha, claim-
ing that this minister was unsuccessful in the execu-
tion of this fundamental law. The reason for this was
very simple. The prime minister, whose patience with
respect to the inveterate hostility of th0 sovereign was
exhausted, had actually written to the Sultan that the
Constitution must not remain a dead letter, and that in
promulgating it there had been no other purpose than
abolishing absolutism. He indicated to the sovereign his
rights and duties, defining and e-stablishing those of the
ministers, assuring complete liberty to the nation, and
thus uplifting the country by a common effort. The
political result of this tyrannical action of the Sultan was
not long in appearing. The Marquis of Salisbury, reply-
ing to a question raised in the House of Commons, de-
clared in effect, February 20, 1877, that in Turkey there
was neither aristocracy, nor governing class, nor organ-
ized democracy, nor representative government. It was
in itself a complete indictment, of which later events bore
testimony to the wisdom of this English statesman.
Aside from the deplorable effect of the arbitrary meas-
ure above mentioned, the constitutional proclamation it-
self had been received in Russia with the most skeptical
reserve. The inspired echo of it is found in the press of
480 MODERN TURKEY
the period, which evidently reflected the opinion of influ.
entia! and pan-Slavic circles. Thus, at the moment when
· the subversive propaganda of the Russian political emis-
saries in the Balkans became more and more pernicious,
though the only rival Great Power still capable by
its "splendid isolation" of intervening in favor of the
reformist intentions of the Turkish Government was
Great Britain, yet Abdul Hamid did not hesitate to
alienate the progressive sympathies of the English
rulers (still disposed to give full credit to constitutional
promises on the strength of the favorable testimony
which Sir Henry Elliot, the ambassador from England
to Constantinople, rendered with regard to the sincere
liberalism and the constructive work of Midhat Pasha
and his collaborators).
This selfish and blind policy of the Sultan, tending
solely to affirm his despotic authority to the detriment
of the vital interests of his Empire, was not long in pro-
ducing its disastrous effects. Although he sought craf-
tily to give to his arbitrary encroachments some sem-
blance of justification, and convoked the Ottoman Parlia-
ment on March 19, 1877, to deceive public opinion, this
hypocritical dramatic trick no longer influenced the
course of events which continued to move on in conform-
ity with the diplomatic factors which determined them.
On April 24, 1877, Russia declared war. On February
13, 1878, the British fleet passed through the Darda-
nelles. The next day the Ottoman Parliament was dis-
solved by order of the Sultan. It was not destined to be
convoked again until thirty years later. Thus, the reform
effort of Midhat Pashahad failed miserably, due on the
one hand to the opposition of uneasy autocracy, and on
the other hand to the concerted pressure of foreign
ambitions.
It could not have succeeded even if it had victoriously
resisted these hostile influences; the average culture of
the mass of the people was still too little developed to
defend needed reforms. As a result, the movement was
dormant for a short period and soon disappeared, leaving
only regrets in the hearts of enlightened patriots.
That which followed was merely the inevitable psycho-
logical consequence. Abdul Hamid II, thus freed from
troublesome constitutional restraints, adapted himself
readily to the exigencies resulting from the military
catastrophe, and capitulated on March 3, 1878, giving his
consent to the Treaty of San Stefano. This was more
than sufficient to condemn him for all time in the eyes
of all those who, in this terrible debacle, retained suffi-.
ciently sound judgment to penetrate his personal and base
motives. Seldom, in fact, had people suffered a more
profound disappointment. Hopes ·disappeared of a
Turkey, elevated to the rank of great European powers,
possessing a formidable- fleet and an army commanding
respect, guided by the liberal tendencies and reform
measures of the leaders, Rachid, Ali, Fuad and Midhat.
These dreams vanished in an instant and he who, by
deliberately rejecting national representation, had as-
sumed alone full responsibility for it, exposed himself
in this way to the consequences of this profound
disappointment.
Ali Suavi Effendi, an enlightened theologian, endeav-
ored on May 20, 1878, to deliver from prison Sultan
Murad V, who was then living in seclusion in a palace on
the shores of the Bosporus, where he had now recovered
his health. The purpose of the coup d'etat was to re-
store to him the throne which belonged to him rightfully.
This daring attempt, which took the form of a bold
assault failed, owing to the vigilance of agents command-
ing the guard; and Abdul Hamid escaped with a nervous
shock which helped materially to develop in him that fear
of plots and that abnormal anxiety as to his personal
safety which characterized the rest of his reign.
482 MODER...~ TURKEY
Mter the Treaty of Berlin had been signed, the Sultan
deemed it advisable, on the day following his first dis-
memberment of his Empire, to keep public opinion in
his country occupied with the trial of Snleiman Pasha,
who had been held responsible for the military defeats.
He believed that he could disguise in this way the dis-
astrous effects of his arbitrary interventions. And as
the English fleet continued its stay in the Sea of Mar-
mora, he accepted on October 24, 1878, the reforms de-
manded by the British Government, which wished to
avoid in this way latent complications and the necessity
of keeping the pledges made as a result of the Conven-
tion of Cyprus. At that period English diplomacy ap-
pears to have hoped for the realization of the most
urgent reforms, an:d a year later, in November, 1879,
tried, by a naval demonstration, to assure the execution
of the promised reforms. But· once more it obtained
only promises, which led to a change in British tactics for
the purpose of coming to an agreement with other na-
tions, thus preparing the way for the occupation of Egypt.
English diplomacy was concerned chiefly with maintain-
ing communications with the Indies across the western
basin of the Mediterranean. Discounting, with customary
discernment, the chances of effective help from Turkey
against its great Asiatic rival, Russia, it foresaw from
the beginning the final bankruptcy of the Hamid regime,
and from the first decided on an effective seizure of the
Suez route. And while this grave change of policy was
taking place, the Sultan concerned himself only with the
consolidation of his own position, he thought only of
definitely eliminating all danger which might come from
the side of the liberals, and furthermore, he had Midhat
Pasha accused of regicide, going even so far as to have
him imprisoned in 1881 and strangled to death in 1884.
In this way he hoped to inspire his political adver-
saries with a paralyzing terror, and by this course he
appeared to have succeeded for some time. The friends
of reform, routed by perfidious accusations and hypo-
critical defenses, and discouraged by the abuses of their
own government and the encroachments of foreign pow-
ers, put aside temporarily all thought of resistance.
Those who could not submit without complaint preferred
to exile themselves voluntarily and take refuge in Switz-
erland, in France, or in England. Others resigned them-
selves, suffered, and waited. But the administrative and
political disorganization continued only to weaken the
nation. This truce of bewilderment and discouragement
lasted approximately ten years.
In 1894 the Armenian disturbances at Sassoun drew
general attention to the disastrous consequences of this
state of things; from that time, revolts followed one after
another-in September, 1895, at Constantinople, two
months later at Diarbekr, in June, 1895, at Van, and two
months later again at Constantinople. National aspira-
tions, revived by revolutionary propaganda, tried in this
way to bring on intervention by the Great Powers, basing
their demands on Articles 21, 23, 61, and 62 of the Treaty
of Berlin, which conferred the right to intervene in Turk-
ish domestic affairs. Even these violent efforts did not
yet attain the political results aimed at; they did have
a considerable influence in Turkish circles, where alarm
was felt at this imminent danger. On the 16th of Novem-
ber, 1895, the Ottoman constitutional party published
abroad a ringing proclamation, demanding reforms from
the Sultan. Excitement spread in the capital, and
shortly afterward (in September, 1896), the famous oc-
cupation of the Ottoman Bank took place. In Constan-
tinople the Young Turks were arrested en masse. On
the sixth day of December the Liberal Ottoman commit-
tee published abroad a new political manifesto, demand-
ing that the constitution of 1876 be put into effect. There
followed almost unceasing violent attacks, demands at
484 MODERN TURKEY
the foreign embassies for intervention, elaborate propa-
ganda in the interior provinces, merciless deportation
of the liberals, recrudescence of political espionage, and
systematic repression .
. The deep-seated suspicion of the Sultan accentuated
under the reaction of these nervous shocks, and espe-
cially under the pernicious influence of the vast spy sys-
tem with which he had surrounded himself, gave him a
morbid anxiety and monomania on the subject of treason.
As a result, he chose, as members of his immediate fol-
lowing, those persons who gave him the most incon-
testable proofs of blind servility. Naturally, these peo-
ple could be recruited only from the ranks of those who
were narrow-minded or corrupt or both. It is not at all
astonishing that under these conditions, the ignoble cam-
arilla, exploiting unceasingly the master's morbid terror
of plots (largely imaginary) directed against the secur-
ity of his person and his reign, should have incited him
to more and more arbitrary acts, and to harsher repres-
sions. These very excesses paved the way for decisive
liberal action.
Several propaganda committees were organized within
the country and abroad. That of "Union and Progress"
was established in 1896 within the faculty of medicine at
the Turkish University at Constantinople, but its foun-
ders soon found themselves obliged to go into voluntary
exile abroad in order to escape the terrible fate reserved
for the Young Turks who fell into the hands of the secret
police. The League of Personal Initiative and of Admin-
istrative Decentralization, which later operated in
France, possessed a vitality superior to that of the pre-
ceding organization, and ·rose considerably above it due
to the strong intellectual tone of its political and social
program. A multitude of propaganda organs sprang up
at the same time, and the Young Turk journals published
at Cairo, Geneva, Paris and London W!ilre disseminated
throughout the Ottoman Empire, despite the most vigi-

lant secret surveillance, through foreign post offices
whi.!h were free from the investigations of censors.
But the most energetic impulse to the liberal cause
came from the political situation, growing ever more .
threatening. The permanent dissolution of the Empire
was accelerated. Despite the Turkish armies, Tunis,.
· Egypt, Eastern Rumaili and Crete had virtually been
detached from the Empire. New Macedonian upheavals
continued to threaten the peace. To the covetousness of
the Great Powers was added that of the adjacent Balkan
States, and the Near Eastern question assumed even
greater difficulties.
The end of the nineteenth century is marked by a re-
turn to imperialistic designs, the intolerable pressure of
which was soon felt in its principal field of exploitation,
. the Near East. To England's proposition of an agree~
ment based on a division of the Ottoman Empire into
zones of economic influence, Germany presented her
policy of peaceful penetration and obtained the conces-
sion of the Baghdad Railway. The antagonism of these
two principal imperialistic tendencies regarding the land
route to India marks one of the starting points of a more
or less hidden issue which was to be settled on the same
ground, in open combat, fifteen years later.
An analogous and not less virulent rivalry existed in
the Balkans where the Teutons sought to hold and even
consolidate their position against Slavic expansion. By
the Muztef agreement relative to the maintenance of the
integrity of Turkish possessions, Austria began to. de-
fend herself in Macedonia, where joint control with Rus-
sia created a state of alarming uneasiness especially pro-
pitious to the revolutionary propaganda of the Young
Turks. It was partkularly in the military garrisons,
where those intelligent young officers, whom the central
government considered it prudent to remove from the
486 MODERN TURKEY
capital, found themselves thus united in homogeneous
groups. Ordinarily assigned to the pursuit of revolu-
tionary bands, they were directly exposed to the worst
consequences of the .arbitrary regime from which the
country was suffering. The common dread of the future
united them still closer, and the first secret military or-
ganization, a committee of public safety, was organized
in Scutari, Albania, shortly after the conclusion of the
Austro-Russian agreement.
This was the beginning of the domestic military organ-
ization which was later known under the name of the
"Committee of Union and Progress." It was entirely
independent of the exterior organizations and worked
solely by its own methods for the realization of the com-
mon purpose. And this purpose was the restoration of
the constitutional regime. According to the conviction
of the directors of this movement, such a change would
suffice to prevent the dismemberment of the Empire, by
virtue. of the administrative reforms which they prom-
ised to imitate and accomplish.
In 1907, the organization was directed from Monastir,
where a considerable military garrison was then sta-
tioned. It has reached to Erzerum. Even at that period,
it was not yet in touch with the Young Turk committees
functioning abroad, and was obliged to transmit its com-
munications for frequent publication in a French paper,
L'Independence Belge.
The English-French entente of 1904, dealing with the
question of Egypt, and the Anglo-Russian agreement of
1907, regulating Asiatic questions and deciding prin-
cipally the fate of Persia, greatly agitated the directors
of this secret organization, which now extended its action
to the capital, where it contented itself by way of pre-
caution, with a small group, the membership of which
was very carefully chosen. They dimly suspected that
these different agreements concerned indirectly the fate
of their own country, and discovered a year later the

confirmation of this suspicion. They then took an active
initiative in the liberal movement, soon forcing the Sul-
tan to proclaim the constitutional act of July 23, 1908.
The unexpected success, which almost in a day crowned
this bloodless revolution, was a surprise to everyone.
Those who had participated in the movement could
scarcely believe their eyes and still hesitated to unmask
themselves. They had no confidence in the sincerity
of this sudden decision and they expected a reaction.
The Young Turks abroad were, if possible, still more
astonished at this sudden disappearance of the absolut-
ism which had so long and heavily weighed on the destiny
of the Empire, and which burst at once, like a soap
bubble.
The first stupor having passed, acclamations came
from all sides. Politicians who were likely to be seri-
ously disturbed by this change applauded the most loudly,
secretly planning to take new and strategic measures in
the near future. In the meantime, the Young Turks, who
did not yet trust their strength and therefore did not dare
to assume governmental responsibility, sought to restore
the central authority, overthrown by the influence of
the provincial organizations. The legislative elections
took place under these conditions, and the interminable
national manifestations abolished temporarily all seri-
ous governmental activity. The proclamation of the new
status of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and of the independ-
ence of Bulgaria, opened up one of the difficulties of the
new regime. The border states began in this way to
take precautions against the possible consequences of
a theoretical and inexperienced policy. Unfortunately,
the directing Young Turks were without experience in
administrative matters. Their profound ignorance of
diplomatic combinations in action, their utopian belief in
the salutary influence of the mere proclamation of the
488 MODERN TURKEY
constitution, the chauvinistic and empty character of
their domestic policy continued later to furnish to all
those who had ambitions to fulfill the pretext which they
needed to justify their attacks.
After the insurrection of 1909 was suppressed, and
the sultan Abdul Hamid was replaced on the throne by
his younger brother, the Young Turk Party, which had
in the meantime been reinforced by the liberals who had
been working abroad for the same cause, felt itself for
the first time in an undisputed position. They delib-
erately took in hand government affairs, but the period
of administration was far from being a happy one for
Turkey. The new oligarchy which thereafter presided,
in the name of the party of "Union and Progress," soon
discovered the discouraging difficulties of the parlia-
mentary system, sincerely applied. Lacking the neces-
sary breadth of view to impress everybody with the con-
sistent justice and the benefits of an impartial liberal
administration, they thought to avoid the danger by cre-
ating for themselves a blind and factitious parliamentary
majority .
. By this very act they condemned themselves. The
parliamentary parody, which was to mask the act of
absolutism, could end only in failure: Disappointments
such as the Albanian, Bulgarian, Arabian and Armenian
troubles at home, and the successive wars abroad begin-
ning with 1911, followed in seemingly quick succession.
During the short intervals when the party of Union
and Progress was replaced by the opposition party,
there were no evidences of a better administration.
Political passions were unchained, but the system of gov-
ernment remained the same, viz., absolutism disguised as
parliamentary rule. Even under this masked form, the
direction of affairs becoming at times too difficult gov-
ernment officials dissolved one parliament after another
only to order new elections more to their likings.
At the beginning of the great world conflict, which was
finally to determine the fate of three empires, the party
of Union and Progress was once more in power. Spoiled
by the partial success of their venturesome policy during
the last phase of the Balkan War, vexe~ by the suspicious
reserve of England, whom they accused of sacrificing
Turkish friendship to the Russian entente, blindly flat-
tered by German solicitations and the prospect of a
profitable military alliance, the members of the triumvi-
rate of unhappy memory which then ruled over Turkey,
made, without the slightest judgment, the most serious
decisions. And then when they found themselves beset
by the insurmountable difficulties which were certain
to result therefrom, they played their last cards with-
out hesitation; afterwards, when the fatal hour for
Turkey finally struck, they ignominiously fled.
Thus the hopes which arose at the beginning of the
Young Turk regime were not realized. Among the lead-
ing causes are the lack of social culture of the Ottoman
people in general, and of the Mussulman and Turkish ele-
ment in particular; the fundamental incapacity of the
rulers; and the persistent bad faith of the interested
powers which strengthened by their hypocritical or
brutal interventions the separatist tendencies of the
Slavic, Greek, or Armenian communities. But the same
historical causes, which had paralyzed the execution of
the repeatedly proclaimed reforms, brought on the fa-
miliar consequences again, namely, successive national
insurrections, uninterrupted wars for spoils, subjugation
and persecution of the vanquished, indescribable suffer-
ing and emigration of the Mussulman population-all
this under the fallacious and disgusting pretense of up-
lifting and liberating oppressed peoples.
These ignorant and pretentious errors merely has-
tened the century-old decadence. Young Turkey, liberal
at first, was drawn irresistibly toward a more particu-
490 MODERN TURKEY
larist conception of its destinies, which was the inevitable

reaction from its administrative disappointments and
the revolting effect of political aggressions. It was from
the sad failure of this Ottoman entente that was born the
Nationalist Movement which characterizes the present
phase of the political situation.
CHAPTER XXII
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
By ALBERT HuromNSON PUTNEY a
The Hens were at war with the Eagles.

When the day of battle came near, the Hens WP'"'lt and asked the
Foxes to help them.
"We would willingly help you," replied the foxes, "if we could forget
what you are, and what Eagles are."
He who enters upon a quarrel with one more powerful than himself
runs a great risk, and is certain to meet with disaster.
-TURKISH FABLE.
Introduction
Despite the fact that the Ottoman Empire had existed
for centuries as the sovereign nation, she was not for-
mally admitted into the "family of nations" until the
year 1856. The Great Powers, by this unprecedented
action, made it appear that the status of Turkey corre-
sponded to that of other nations, yet they accompanied
this declaration with elaborate provisions for the protec-
tion of their national interests within the Empire.
The internal relations of the Ottoman Empire have
always been peculiarly affected by external conditions.
1
Born at Boston, September 28, 1872. A.B. Yale, 1893; LL.B., Boston
University, 1895; D.C.L., De Pauw University; Ph.D., American tlni-
versity. Practieed at Boston, 1895-98; Chicago, 1899-1913; Professor,
1900·12, Dean 1904-12, Illinois College of Law; Dean Webster College of
Law, June, 1912, September, 1913; Professor National University Law
School, 1914-19. Chief, Division of Near Eastern Affairs, Department of
State, 1913-19. Dean, School of Jurisprudence and Diplomacy, Amer1ean
University, Washington, 1919-24. Author: "Government in Uwted States,"
1904; "Law Library" (12 vols.), 1908; "United States Constitutional His·
tory and Law," 1908; "Currency, Banking and Exchange," 1909; "Corpo·
rations," 1909; "Principles of Political Economy," 1909; r• Bar Examina·
tion Review," 1910; "Foreign Commercial Law," 1910; "Handbook of
Election Laws" (with James Hamilton Lewis), 1912.
491
492 MODERN TURKEY
This is especially true of the Armenian question which
has been made the subject of numerous outside investiga-
tions. Unfortunately, however, the only material bene-
fits accruing to the Armenians have been liberal charity
donations. The outside powers have consistently re-
frained from using force in their behalf. The external
relations of Turkey have involved strange alliances which
have been the result of the desire of one nation after an-
other to maintain a continual shifting balance of power
in Eastern Europe.
The Ottoman Empire would have crumpled to pieces
centuries ago had not the jealousies of European Powers
kept it together, or had the majority population of sub-
ject races combined against it. The Eastern question-
in last analysis the handling of the dismembered Turkish
provinces-has been kept to the fore in European di-
plomacy on account of the political machinations of Rus-
sia, France, Germany and Great Britain. The ''divide
and rule'' policy consistently followed by the Turkish
Government has found a ready response among one or
more of the European Powers in their schemes for main..
taining a "balance of power" in Eastern Europe and the
Middle East. The general policy has been for one or
more foreign powers to encourage the Christians living
under Mohammedan rule and then to reverse their policy,
abandoning them to their · fate. At the present time
Great Britain, Holland, Russia and France control coun-
tries numbering a total population of over 150,000,000
Mohammedans. An American historian has chronicled!
the inconsistent record of diplomatic events of the last
one hundred years affecting the Levant. 1
1
The history of international relations during the last hundred years
shows in almost every decade the decisive influence of the question of the
devolution of Mohammedan lands in the foreign policy of the Great
Powers. Who can deny that the Eastern question, created by the decadence
of Islam and kept in the foreground of diplomatic preoccupations by the
f~l!r 9f (lach Power that every other Power was trying ''to get in on the
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 493
Whenever the non-Moslem races have made a show of

independence, the Ottoman Government has curbed their
initiative by means of massacres or deportation. A
strange fact which occurs at once to the student of Turk-
ish history is that it was not until the :first Balkan War
in 1912 that the neighboring Balkan countries, formerly
a part of the Turkish Empire, formed a coalition against
the Turks; and yet this coalition immediately broke down
on account of the division of the spoils. Afterwards, in
the second Balkan War, one of the Christian nations,
Bulgaria, renewed the war in which her Christian op-
ponents-Greece, Romania and Serbia-welcomed Tur-
key as an ally. Despite the tremendous extent of the
Ottoman Empire in the earlier centuries, the subject peo-
ples made no concerted effort to abolish Turkish rule. 1
It is hopeless to attempt to prophesy Turkey's future
relations with outside powers. No permanent political
ground floor'' in Mohammedan countries, has been the principal factor in
European alliances and European conflicts since the Congress of Vienna t
Napoleon's lack of success in holding Alexander after the Tilsit i~ter
view; the impairment of the Holy Alliance over the questions raised by
the War of Greek Independence, the policy of England toward France
in regard to Mohammed Ali; the Crimean War and the treaty of Paris;
French intervention in Syria; Bismarck's bribe to Russia in 1870; the
attitude of England and Austria toward Russia in the Turkish War of
1877 and tll.e Congress of Berlin; Italy's entrance into the Triple Alliance
after France took Tunis; the Anglo-French Agreement of 1904, with
Egypt and Morocco as the principal "compensations"; the Anglo-Russian
Agreement of 1907, for which Persia paid the piper; Russia's use of her
opportunity in Serbia after Austria-Hungary annexed Bosnia and Herze-
govina; the effect of maritime considerations upon Italy's international
relations when she found herself in Tripoli and Rhodes; the change in
the attitude of the Balkan States toward one another when the Powers
imposed the Albanian embargo--had these events no part in preparing
and precipitating the Great Wart (Herbert Adams Gibbons, "The Re-
construction of Poland and the Near East," pages 104-106.)
1
Lord Eversley writes: ''There can be little doubt that if the Greeks,
Bulgarians and Serbians had combined to resist the invading Moslema,
their efforta would have been successfuL But, Greeks and Bulgarians,
Greeka and Serbiana, hated one another more than they feared and hated
the Ottoman Empire. • • . Want of union of the Christian states was a
main cause of the servitude of all of them for nearly five hundred years
under Turkey 'a rule." ("The Turkish Empire," page 373.)
494 MODERN TURKEY
status can be determined upon without giving most care-
ful consideration to the potentialities of Russia, a coun-
try with strong historic and economic claims. Future
alliances involving the defeated Central Powers may also
greatly change the political situation in the Near East.
Any Pan-Islamic and Pan-::Turanian movements will be
watched with special interest.
International Relations
The dawn of the twentieth century found the Turk still
maintaining a precarious hold over a portion of south-
eastern Europe. His position still remained, as it had al-
ways been, a most anomalous one. After five and a half
centuries of occupation the Turk continued as a stranger
and an intruder.
Had the Turk been other than what he really was,
he might simply have become a new nation, alongside
of the other southe_astern nations. Being what he was,
the Turk could not do this. He could not sit down
alongside of the other nations. He could not assimi-
late the other nations, or be assimilated by them. He
could not sit down among the other nations as a con-
stant neighbour and occasional enemy. If he came
among them at all, he could come only as a ruler, and,
if as a ruler, then as an oppressor.
As far as the Turks are concerned, the Turkish
government is a government, though a despotic one.
To the Turks the Sultan is their sovereign, the head of
their nation. As members of that nation, they are his
subjects. A Turk is a subject ·of the Sultan, if not in
the sense in which an Englishman is the subject of his
Queen, yet at least in the sense in which a Russian is
the subject of his Emperor. But the Christian subjects
of the Sultan, that is the people of the lands in which
the Sultan and his Turks are encamped as strangers,
so far from being the Sultan's subjects in the English
sense, are not even his subjects in the Russian sense.
He is not the head of their nation, but the head of a for-
eign nation, a nation whom they look on as their bit-
terest enemies. They are not his subjects, because he
does not give them that protection which is involved in
the relation of sovereign and subject, that protection
which the Russian receives from his despotic sovereign
no less than the Englishman from his constitutional
sovereign. They are not his subjects in the English, or
even in the Russian sense, because, as he gives them no
protection, they owe him no allegiance. He is not
their sovereign, but a stranger who holds them down by
force. They are not his subjects, except in the sense
of being held down by force. (E. A. Freeman, "The
Ottoman Power in Europe," pages 40-41, 74.)
The continuous character of the decline of the Ottoman
Power during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries
has been graphically shown by the statement that, since
the failure of the Turks before Vienna in 1683, the close
of every quarter century has seen the Turkish Empire
smaller in area than it was at the beginning of such quar-
ter century. The last quarter of the nineteenth century
was especially unfortunate for the Sublime Porte. While
the rigid terms of the Treaty of San Stefano were some-
what ameliorated in the Treaty of Berlin, the terms of
the latter treaty, nevertheless, involved heavy territorial
sacrifices for Turkey. The surrender of her rights over
Serbia and Montenegro, it is true, involved no loss to the
·Empire; perhaps the same might be said, in a somewhat
modified form, with relation to the surrender of the quali-
fied Turkish control over :Moldavia and Wallachia. The
remaining cessions, however, were real and grievous
losses.
During this period, or before, the Ottoman Empire
would have fallen, had it not been for the fact that "the
Turkish power was propped up by the wicked policy of
the governments of Western Europe." 1
Important, indeed, as were the results of the Berlin
congress, this congress deserves to be remembered less
1 Freeman, op. oit., page 132.
496 MODERN TURKEY
for what it did, than for what it failed to do. A little
wisdom, a little unselfishness among the Great Powers of
Europe on this occasion might have largely solved the
Near Eastern question. Firmness, wisdom and unselfish-
ness, however, have been the characteristics which have
been most uniformly wanting in the dealings of the Great
Powers with the Turkish question. A small part of the
subject Christians of Turkey was freed from Ottoman
control, another part was transferred from the misrule
of Turkey to the misrule of the Austrians and Mag-
yars, but the great majority was left within the Otto-
man Empire with no provisions in the Treaty sufficient to
protect them in any way in the most elemental of human
rights.
At the beginning of the twentieth century the position
and outlook for the future of the Christians of Turkey
was little improved, and in some respects had recently
grown worse. To the tyranny of religion there had been
added a still :fiercer tyranny of race. The Turks had al-
ways been the most cru~l of Mohammedan conquerors.
To the fierce religious intolerance of Islam they had
added the inherent cruelty of the Central Asiatic nomad.
It was only after the Seljuk Turks had succeeded the
Saracens as the rulers of the Holy Land, that the perse-
cution of the Christians in that region reached the ex-
treme which brought about the invasion of Crusaders
from Europe. But, du_ring all the centuries· from the
eleventh to the nineteenth inclusive, all persecutions by
the Turks had been in tP,e name of Islam; and the teach-
ing of Islam is that Christians and Jews should be re-
duced to a position of inferiority and obliged to pay
tribute, but not to be destroyed, so long as they submitted
to the rule of the Moslem. The Turks were now learn-
ing, however, the ideas of Turkish nationalism and of
Pan-Turanianism which were to so greatly influence· the
course of the Revolution of 1908, and to destroy all the
good which was expected to result therefrom. Nor had
the Christians of Turkey much to hope for, from the
Great Powers.
The attitude of the departments of foreign affairs in
Russia, Great Britain, France, Austria, Germany and
Italy toward Turkey in the early years of the twentieth
century may be briefly summarized.
The position taken by Russia towards the Ottoman
Empire was one of constant hostility and potential ag-
gression; this was hereditary and natural. During the
two centuries that the vast inland Empire of the Rus-
sians had fought for a proper outlet to the sea, the dream
of such an outlet through the Black Sea, the Bosporus
and the Dardanelles had been the one most desired of all.
At the opening of the twentieth century the Russian Em-
pire lay extended halfway around the Black Sea waiting
for the opportune moment to crash through the remain-
ing barriers in order to secure for herself an unrestricted
access to the Mediterranean Sea.
The Russian Tsars, moreover, dreamed of the day
when, as the successors of the Eastern Roman Emperors,
they might sit on the throne at Constantinople. The Rus-
sian advance meant in the main the transfer of authority
from the Ottoman Empire to the Russian Empire, not the
freedom of the subject races of Turkey. In justice to
Russia, however, it must be said that she had done more
for the subject races of Turkey than any of the other
great European powers. Russia had given freedom to
the Bulgarians, had assisted in securing independence
for Greece, and the position of the Armenians who had
passed under the Russian rule was much better than it
had been under the Turks.
The attitude of Great Britain towards the Turkish
Empire can only be understood when it is remembered
that the British Government has always looked at the
Near Eastern situation through India-colored spectacles.
498 MODERN TURKEY
To England, the events most to be dreaded in the Near
East were those which might threaten the safety of the
route to India, or tend to arouse the hostility of the
eighty million Indian Mohammedans. The exaggerated
fears entertained by England on these two points has
made her Near Eastern policy during the past century
the most deplorable incident in the whole history of her
foreign policy; and this is true whether such policy is
criticised with respect to its morality or with respect to
its intelligence.
The supposed influence which the Sultan of Turkey
as Khalif could exert over Mohammedans outside the
boundaries of his Empire was too slight to justify-even
on the basis of selfish policy-the extremes to which vari-
ous British premiers and foreign secretaries were willing
to go in support of Turkish interests; while no pretense
of a defense can be made for the policy which would per-
mit the Oriental Christians to suffer the oppression of
Ottoman misrule, in order that the Mohammedans of
India might more readily submit to British rule.
How little Great Britain gained in India by her con-
duct towards Turkey is strikingly shown by the fact that
the great Sep_oy Rebellion in India, in which so many
Mohammedans were implicated, took place immediately
after the close of the Crimean War in which Great Brit-
ain had made such great exertions on behalf of Turkey.
A few of the British writers and diplomats have a truer
view of the relation between the Porte and the Indian
Mohammedans. Lord Sydenham, writing in the BaJ,ka;n,
Review, February, 1920, said: "Turkey means nothing
to the great mass of the Indian Mohammedans, and of
the position of the Sultan they have rio idea." He then
quotes "a most able Punjab Mohammedan" as follows:
Centuries have passed since the idea of the Khalifate,
which European ignorance and imagination exagger-
ates and regards as a sort of Popedom of Islam, has
become practically extinct and obsolete, and if it exists
at all, it only exists as a religious fiction or myth, as far
as the Mohammedans of countries other than those
under the Sultan of Turkey are concerned. Even in
Turkey, a Khalif who is now easily made or unmade
by Turkish soldiery cannot be said to be "hedged
with divinity" or to possess much religious influence.
The French policy towards the Porte was an old his-
torical one. France was the first of the nation-states of
Europe (as distinguished from the earlier city-states) to
have important dealings with the Ottoman sultans.
From the early part of the sixteenth century when Fran-
cis I made a coalition with the Porte against Charles I of
Spain, the French occupied a very privileged position in
that Empire. Not only was France _the first of the coun-
tries of Western Europe to become a nation-state in Tur-
key, but she also became recognized as the general pro-
tector of Christianity in Turkey, and on most occasions
was conceded the exclusive right, among Christian pow-
ers, of representing other Christian countries. France's
recent interest in Turkey has been centered in Syria.
While the policy of France in the Near East was neither
as certain nor as consistent as that of Russia or of Great
Britain, it has, in the main, favored the upholding of
Turkish authority.
The attention of Austria began to be directed towards
southeastern Europe after the Prussian defeat of Aus-
tria in 1866, and the exclusion of the latter from the Ger-
man Confederation. The crafty Bismarck sought to help
turn Austrian attention away from German interests in
the Near East :field by securing the insertion in the
Treaty of Berlin of the provision placing Bosnia and
Herzegovina under Austrian occupation. Austria and
Russia had already exchanged views on this point, how-
500 MODERN TURKEY
ever. From this time on, the Austro-Hungarian Near
Eastern policy became one of grab in the Balkans: if
possible, this country was willing to transfer territory
from the Turkish to the Hapsburg yoke, but it was just
as willing to extend its boundaries at the expense of the
independent Balkan States. Any animosity which Aus-
trian or Magyar may have felt towards the Turks was
mild compared with the hatred which they felt towards
the Serbian. In fact, at the opening of the twentieth cen-
tury, a strange aspect of the Pan-Turanian movement
was to be found in the efforts of the Magyars for a rap-
prochement with the Turks.
The German interest in the Near East was of very re-
cent development. Bismarck was notoriously opposed to
any German interference in this region. Starting with
the Triple Alliance, the idea of Mitteleuropa (a word
which was in reality intended to cover the whole region
"from Hamburg to the Persian Gulf") became the key-
stone of German ambitions and diplomacy.
The historians of the future will have only one harder
. problem to solve than that as to how Germany succeeded
in deceiving her enemies in the years just preceding the
outbreak of the World War. This harder problem will
be to discover how Germany succeeded in deceiving her
allies. In the early years of the century Germany was
contemplating a more complete absorption of Turkey
than even Russia had ever hoped for, but she planned
to secure such an absorption not in the guise of an open
enemy but under the cloak of a treacherous ally. No
student of history can doubt that German success in the
recent war would have been speedily followed by what
would have been practically the German annexation of
Turkey. In view of the many brilliant triumphs of Turk-
ish diplomacy, it ishard to understand the Turkish blind-
ness and stupidity on this occasion. Possibly the one
contingency against which the Turks never thought of
providing was the possibility of meeting a diplomacy
more dishonest than their own.
The Italians were interested in the Turkish question
on account of the important Roman Catholic interests in
Palestine, and on account of the ambitions of a large ele-
ment in the Italian population to extend the Italian pos-
sessions in the Red Sea region or in the eastern Med-
iterranean. The relations between the Italians and at
least two of the Balkan races were not of a cordial char-
acter. The Italian position was complicated by her mem-
bership in the Triple Alliance.
There remains to be considered the attitude of the
United States towards Turkey and the Near Eastern
question. The United States had acquired extraterri-
torial rights in Turkey by the treaty of 1830, proclaimed
February 4, 1832. While the commercial and political
interests of the United States in Turkey had never been
large, it had exceeded· all other countries, except pos-
sibly France, in the extent of its missionary and educa-
tional activities. About the end of the first decade of the
twentieth century, the workings of "dollar diplomacy"
began to bring about a change in the policy of the United
States towards Turkey, and at one time the surrender of
American extraterritorial rights in Turkey in exchange
for the grant of railway and mining rights in Anatolia to
an American syndicate, was considered by the state de-
partment. The United States has a record of genuine
sympathy in Turkey's problems, but the Government has
consistently maintained the policy of refraining from us-
ing force or other forms of intervention.1
"'It is only the United States, standing outside all past quarrels and
misunderstandings, that ean aet with a free hand without suspicion of
se1fish ambition. The United States has a great stake in Turkey-eol·
leges, achoola, hoapitals and missions, ereated on a grandio&e seale, en-
. tirely apart from, and unsupported by, their government. All has been
done at private expense by unselfish individual& contributing money for
what they believed to be the good of other&, and aeeking no return except
502 MODERN TURKEY
The news of the Turkish Revolution of 1908 came as a
most pleasant surprise to the Christian nations of the
world; but all too soon these nations were forced to real-
ize that they had been still again deceived by Turkish
guile, and that any real reform under Ottoman rule was
an impossibility.
The Revolution was loudly proclaimed both in Turkey
and throughout the world, as being both non-racial and
non-religious. During the first part of the Revolution in·
1908, the Committee of Union and Progress was joined
by great numbers of Turks, Albanians, Bulgarians, Ar-
menians and Greeks.
Whether the Turkish leaders were honest in their atti-
tude at this time is a mooted question which, perhaps,
can never be answered. If, however, they were sincere
at this time in their protestations of belief in religious
and racial equality, this attitude was a mere passing and
abnormal phenomenon which soori disappeared under the
combined pressure of the influence of the natural charac-
teristics of the Turkish race and the exigencies of the
current situation in Turkish politics and Moslem religion.
One of the immediate causes of the Balkan wars was the
attempt to Turkify Albania and Macedonia. It was in
the period following the first Balkan War that the ideas
of a Pan-Turanian movement began to supersede that of
a Pan-Islamic movement. While the former retains all
of the religious intolerance of the latter, it unites with it
a racial consciousness suggested by and modeled after
I .
in the success of the work undertaken. There is nothing in history to
place on the same high level of ideal purpose. It is necessary now for
the United States, in justice to its own citizens, to protect the ideals and
the property of those citizens, and there is no other way of doing it
except by directing the Turkish Government. Other nations, whether
friendly or not to the United States, know that the United States, as a
country, has practically nothing to gain from this. .•. No one trusts
any concert of European Powers; and the grabbing of territory in Anatolia
by them individually is dangerous to the world, unjustified by racial
reasons and false to history.' '-Sir W. M. Ramsay, International Review,
April, 1919.-E. G. M.
the ideas of racial grandeur developed in Gennany. The
leaders of this movement endeavored to reach their goal
by work along two lines: (1) by Turkification of all the
non-Turkish races in the Ottoman; and (2) by agree-
ments with all the branches of the Turko-Tartar race out-
side the Empire. The former attempt led to the breach
between the Turkish and Arabic Mohammedans, and to
the Armenian deportations of 1915; little practical work
was done towards the unification of the various Turko-
Tartars subdivisions until after the collapse of the Rus-
sian Empire. A further discussion of the Pan-Turanian
movement will, therefore, be postponed till later in the
chapter.
The danger of a Balkan war had been perceived by the
Great Powers in 1908, and again in 191L Early in 1912,
the Powers began to take steps to try to prevent such a
war. In January, 1912, the Russian Government brought
to the attention of the English and French governments
the dangers of the situation. These three governments
made a joint demand upon Turkey to "PUt down the in-
surgent bands and to refonn the Government. By mid-
summer the situation had become very critical, and Aus-
tria-Hungary, becoming alarmed, sent a note on August
14 to the other European Powers, urging: (1) "progres-
sive decentralization" of Macedonia; (2) the mainte-
nance of the status quo in the Balkans; and (3) the
strengthening of Turkey.
. On October 4, 1912, after both Turkey and the Balkan
States had mobilized, France suggested that either all
the European Powers should act jointly, or that Russia
{representing the Entente) and Austria-Hungary (rep-
resenting the Triple Alliance) should act in the name of
all Europe. England accepted on condition that all the
Powers should act in Constantinople, and that Russia
and Austria should act for all at the Balkan capitals.
Austria accepted with the provisos: (1) that Turkish in-
504 MODERN TURKEY
tegrity and sovereignty should be maintained; (2) that
the general plan outlined in the Austro-Hungarian notes
of August 14 should be followed; and (3) that the fact of
the accord of the Powers should not be communicated to
Turkey. France accepted these amendments and the
other Powers agreed to the French program.
On October 8, 1912, an Austro-Russian joint note was
presented to the governments of the different Balkan
States, informing them (1) that the Powers would not
permit the peace of the Balkans to be disturbed; (2) that
the Powers would take in hand the question of Macedo-
nian reforms; (3) that should war break out the Powers
would not permit any change in the Balkan status quo;
and (4) that collective action would be taken by the Pow-
ers at Constantinople. This note came too late to re-
strain the Balkan States: Montenegro had already de-
clared war upon Turkey before the note was presented to
that country, and the other Balkan States in their replies
to the note thanked the Powers for the interest, but
stated that they preferred to deal direGtly with Turkey.
On October 10, a collective note of the Powers was deliv-
ered to the Turkish Government demanding reforms in
Macedonia in accordance with the law of 1880, but this
note also had no effect on the situation.
The result of the First Balkan War took by surprise
all of the Great Powers of Europe. The completeness of
the victory of the Balkan States made it necessary to
decide at once upon the question of the disposal of the
European provinces of Turkey. Under the existing con-
ditions the Powers were compelled to acquiesce in the
increase in area and population of the four Balkan States
which had attacked Turkey, but it was a consent which
was unwillingly and ungraciously given. German and
Austro-Hungarian diplomacy at once took up the prob-
lems of how to break up the Balkan League, stir up dis-
sensions in the Balkans, and increase the influence and
power of Germany and Austro-Hungary in that region.
There were many indications that the Bulgarian attack
upon the countries which had been their allies in the
first Balkan War, was encouraged by the Central Pow-
ers, and that consequently the Bulgarian defeat was a
severe disappointment to them.
The erection of a portion of the territories of Euro-
pean Turkey inhabited by Albanians into an independent
Albanian State was an act of justice on the part of the
Great Powers, but from the outset Germany, Austro-Hun-
gary, and Italy were each seeking to reduce this new
state to the position of a quasi sovereign state-each of
the three Powers seeking to secure a controlling interest
over its policy and government. The overthrow of the
short-lived government of William of Wied, following the
outbreak of the World War, was another blow to the di-
plomacy. of the Central Powers; and helped to hasten the
day when these Powers determined to commit to their
military departments the carrying out of their Balkan
and Turkish ambitions.
For a short time after August, 1914, Turkey did not
declare war; but before her entrance into the war she
attempted to abolish all capitulatory rights in Turkey
while all the principal European countries were so com-
pletely occupied elsewhere. In view of the marked dis-
criminations against Christians contained in the Moslem
Law, and of the notorious corruption of Turkish judges,
all the countries possessing extraterritorial rights in
Turkey-except Germany and Austria-felt that such
rights could not safely be surrendered, and refused to
acquiesce in the action of Turkey.
The protests of the United States and other countries
were unheeded by Turkey, which disregarded all extra-
territorial and capitulatory rights during the continu-
ance of the war. A little later Turkey, without having
received any provocation, entered the war as an ally of
506 · MODERN TURKEY
the Central Powers. The Turkish proclamations upon
the entrance of that country into the war were as follows:
MANIFESTO oF H. I. M. THE SuLTAN
T_o my army, To my navy:

Following the declaration of war between the great
Powers, I called you to arms to defend-in case of
necessity-against the enemies seeking to take ad-
vantage of circumstances to protect our government
and our territories which have always been the object
of illegal attacks. While we were living in armed neu-
trality, the Russian fleet, which was equipped to lay
mines at the outlet of the Black Sea, unexpectedly
opened fire on our fleet which was manamvering. This
attack was contrary to International Law and while
one should expect that Russia would make amends,
both the said State and her allies, the English and the
French, broke off their diplomatic relations J.Vith our
government in recalling their ambassadors. Immedi-
ately thereafter, Russian soldiers attacked our eastern
frontier; the allied English and French fleet :fired on
the Dardanelles, and the English ships on Aqaba. As
a result of these treacherous acts of hostility, repeated
one after the other, we have been obliged to break the
peace that we always wanted, to take arms to defend
our legal interests in allying ourselves to Germany
and Austria-Hungary.
The Russian Government has caused many terri-
torial losses to the Imperial Government in the last
three centuries. On every occasion, it has sought to
destroy by war and a thousand kinds of devices, every
force which would increase our national power.
The Russian, French, and English, which by their
oppressive domination, bring forth groans from mil-
lions of Mohammedans attached to our Khalifate have
never ceased to nourish evil intentions towards our
Khalifate and they have been the cause and instigators
of all the disasters that have befallen us. This, then,
is the great war that we have undertaken to put an
end, with God's help, to the attacks directed against
our Khalffate and against the other rights of our Em-
pire. Thanks to him, and to the spiritual assistance of
our Prophet, our fleet in the Black Sea and our brave
soldiers at the Dardanelles, at Aqaba, and in the Cau-
casus have struck the first blow against the enemy,
which increases our belief in our victory in the path
of righteousness which is with us today, the countries
and the armies of our enemies are crushed under the
victorious feet of our allies, which tends to confirm our
conviction.
My heroic soldiers!
Do not abandon for a single instance, your reso-
lution, your energy and sacrifice in this Holy War
which we have declared against the enemies of our be-
loved religion and Fatherland. Attack the enemy like
lions because on your victory depends the life and pro-
tection of my Government and of 300 millions of Mos-
lems who I have called to the great Holy War by a
holy fetva.
In the masjid, the mosques, the hearts of 300 mil-
lions of innocent and oppressed Mohammedans, ad-
dressing prayers and invocations to the creator are
with you.
Soldiers, my children!
The duty which is incumbent in you today has not
been assumed by any army in the world. In fulfilling
this duty, show that you are the descendants of the
Ottoman armies which at one time made the world
tremble in order that the enemy of religion and of the
state may not dare to foul our sacred soil and may not
be able to disturb the tranquillity of the sacred ground
of Hejaz which holds the Kaaba of God and the sacred
tomb of the Prophet. Show clearly the existence of a
Turkish army which knows how to scorn death for
their King, and which knows how to defend by arms
their religion, their country and their military honor.
'Ve will come out of the Holy 'Var, a State strong and
glorious, having repaired its losses of the past. Do not
508 MODERN TURKEY
forget that you are the brothers in arms of the two
most courageous and strong armies in the world with
whom we march in this war. ·
Let those who may fall in the field of honor carry
to those who before have poured out their blood for
their country good news of victory. Let the. sword of
the surviving heroes be sharpened.
MEHMED RESHAD.
Comrades:
I communicate to you the Imperial Irade of our
well beloved Generalissimo, our glorious Khalif and
Master. With the help of God, the spiritual aid of our
Prophet, and with the benediction of our venerated
Sultan, our army will destroy our enemies. The hero-
ism which my brothers, the officers and soldiers have
shown on sea and land until now, constitutes the great-
est indication that enemies will be annihilated.
Only each officer and each soldier must not forget
that the field of battle is the field of sacrifice. There,
the soldier who throws himself furthest forward, the
soldier who unafraid of the shrapnels and the bullets
of the enemy stands up and holds firm until the end,
that surely wins. History is the witness that no soldier
is so tenacious and so ready for sacrifice as the Otto-
man soldier. We all must remember that the spirit of
the Prophet and his disciples is descended on us. Our
glories await us there-what shall we do Y If we wish
to show that we are their true sons and to save our-
selves from the curses of our descendants, let us work.
Three hundred millions of Moslems and former
compatriots who groan in chains all pray for our vic-
tory. We are all mortal, but happy be they who march
forward;. happy are they who fall as martyrs for re-
ligion and fatherland.
Forward; always forward, because victory, glory,
martyrdom, paradise, is to them who march forward.
Death and shame for those who hold back. Blessed be
our saints and our sacred martyrs. Long live the
.Sultan!
(Signed) ENVER
Vice-Generalissimo.
The manifesto of the Sultan contains the usual mis-
statement of facts found in the declaration made by Ger-
many on her allies during the war. Just as Germany
claimed that her invasion of Belgium was in self-defense,
so the Turks claimed that the Entente Powers-who were
doing everything possible to keep Turkey neutral-made
an attack upon Turkey. In reality, the war was com-
menced by two German ships which had taken action at
Constantinople in raising the Turkish flag and raiding
the Russian Black Sea coast.
Perhaps the blasphemy of the Kaiser's claim of God's
partnership in the murderous work carried on by Prus-
sia's military machine during the war was strikingly ex-
hibited in its true light by the jihad, or Mohammedan
holy war, declared by the Sultan at the instigation of the
Kaiser. The incongruity of Turkey's declaring a "holy
war" which logically would have to be waged against her
own allies, was such as to render the use of such measure
impossible except to the Hohenzollerns. Some explana-
tion of such a situation was necessary even for the ig-
norant Turk, and it was, therefore, proclaimed far and
wide through Asiatic Turkey, that the Germans had be-
come converted to Mohammedanism, and were showing
the sincerity of ·this conversion by destroying all the
Christian churches in Europe. The widely circulated pic-
tures of the ruined Christian churches in France and Bel-
gium seemed to the mass of the Turks conclusive evidence
of the reported German conversion!
During the ye~rs 1915 and 1916 a series of secret agree-
ments between the Entente Powers provided as to the
disposition, in the event of Entente victory, of the
greater part of the territories of the Turkish Empire.
By the first of these agreements-the so-called Sazonof-
Paleologue Agreement of March 4, 1915-Constantinople
and the c.ontrol of the Straits were conceded to Russia.
By the London Pact of April 26, 1915, Italy was prom-
510 MODERN TURKEY
ised, inter alia, as the prize of her entry into the war, the
Dodekanese, and a ''just share'' of the territory in the
neighborhood of Adalia in case a partition of Turkey was
decided upon. Two additional secret agreements were
made in 1916. By the first of these Russia, after her suc-
cessful campaign in Turkish Armenia, was promised the
vilayets of Trebizond, Erzerum, Van and Bitlis; by the
second-the Sykes-Picot Treaty-provisions were made
for the disposal of the southern, or Arabic portions of
Asiatic Turkey. These and other agreements are to be
found in the Select Documents of this book.
It is not essential to this chapter to discuss the mili-
tary operations of the war with which Turkey was con-
nected, nor to consider the relative responsibility of the
Germans and Turks for the Armenian deportations-in
this matter there was infamy enough for all. The failure
of the United States to declare war against Turkey after
she had entered the war against Turkey's powerful allies
will be a matter of curious interest and considerable sur-
prise to the historians of a later day.
The relation of Turkey with other Powers was greatly
influenced by the orientation of Germany's policy which
became necessary in the summer and fall of 1917. By
this time it was evident even to Germany, that she had
failed in three of her great objectives.
The three objects here referred to were: (1) the crea-
tion of a Pan-Islamic movement which would furnish
valuable military assistance to Germany, not only during
the present war, but also in the ful:fill:rp.ent of German
dreams for still greater expansion in the future; (2) the
creation of a vast German colonial empire in Central
Africa-a ''German India' '-which in the future would
serve as a vast reservoir from which Germany might
draw the raw material, from which German officials
might build a great German colonial army; and (3) the
opening of a German r~ad to the east by the "Berlin to
The Oulu Mosque of Brusa in its Striking Setting.
. Baghdad" route. The Russian collapse, however, raised

the hope in Germany that the three general objects above
referred to, might be accomplished in a different form.
With the advertised German ability in inventing sub-
stitutes it was planned to substitute the Pan-Turanian
movement for the Pan-Islamic movem~nt; to create the
"German India" in Central Asia instead of Central
Africa; and to make the main German advance to the
east or the north side of the Black Sea instead of south
of it, substituting a "Berlin to Bukhara" route for the
"Berlin to Baghdad" scheme.
These changed conditions in Russia, and the new Ger-
man attitude, made the ideals of Pan-Turanianism, for
the first time, seem within the realm of attainable pos_si-
bilities. A report published late in 1917, by the Intelli-
gence Bureau, Department of Information, British
Government, discussed the situation as follows:
Pan-Turanianism, in its origin, is (a) artificial, and
(b) European. The Osmanlis did not extract it for
themselves from Persian literature (though they st~dy
Persian as we study Greek and Latin classics); it was
offered to them from Europe, and they have not been
the wooers but the wooed.
A trained philologist may be conscious of some
unity of structure in all Turanian languages as con-
trasted with the Indo-European family, but to the un-
initiated Osmanli there is no visible relation between
his own language, which belongs to the Turkish group,
and Magyar which is Ugro-Finnic. On the other hand
the relation of the various Turkish dialects to one
another is obvious to any one. It can be seen on the
map in the names of rivers, mountains, and towns. The
Turkish-speaking peoples stretch from Turkey in Eu-
rope through Anatolia, Transcaucasia, Northern Per-
sia and Afghanistan, to Russian Central Asia and
Chinese Turkestan, and, in a more broken chain, round
the northern shores of the Black Sea, through Bulgaria,
Dobruja, Crimea, the Volga provinces, and Siberia;to
512 MODERN TURKEY
the neighborhood of Arctic Ocean. They cover even a
more extensive though less compact area than the
Slavs, and the different Turkish dialects are as readily
intelligible to all Turks as the differences in Slavonic
languages are to any speaker of one of them. It was,
therefore, only natural that as soon as the Ottoman
Turks became linguistically conscious of their national-
ity, they should become conscious at the same time of
their affinities with other Turkish-speaking peoples,
just as the national revival of the separate Slavonic
populations produced a common sense of Pan-Slavism
among them.
Pan-Turanianism, then in the sense of a Pan-Turk-
ish movement originating among the Ottoman Turks, is
part and parcel of Ottoman Turkish nationalism, and
can only be understood in relation to it.
During the century ending in the year 1912-13, the
centre of gravity of Turkey had actually shifted from
Europe to Anatolia. After 1913 there was a corre-
sponding change in the national consciousness. The
Turkish nation abandoned the tradition of being a
dominant race inEurope, resolved to develop its own
latent possibilities in Anatolia, and conceived the am-
bition of making up for lost alien subjects by attract-
ing to itself the scattered branches of the Turkish race
outside the Ottoman frontiers.
The problem of Turkish nationalism in Central
Asia was infinitely remote before the Russian Revolu-
tion has made it imminent. The 'break-up' of Russia
thus opens greater opportunities for Ottoman irre-
dentism in Central Asia than in any other Turkish-
speaking area. In Central Asia Pan-Turanianism and
Pan-Islamism do not conflict with each other. The
whole population is Turkish; the whole population is
Sunni; and the present possessor is not an ancient
Moslem State, but a recent Christian conqueror. If
Russia vanishes as a power from Persia and Central
Asia, German-Ottoman diplomacy will certainly make
serious efforts to erect a Turkish-Islamic alliance of
Turkey, Persia and Afghanistan.
The Pan-Turanian policy reckons on the loss (at
any rate temporarily) of some or all of Turkey's Arab
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 513.
provinces, but hopes in compensation to build a new
Turkish Empire on a Turanian basis, at Russia's ex-
pense, and in a sphere where Great Britain cannot in-
tervene. Its first objective is the Russian Caucasus;
through the Caucasus it aims at the vast Turkish-
speaking populations of Russian and Turkish Central
Asia; and its ultimate aspirations include southern
Persia, Baluchistan, .and Afghanistan. Its ambitions
thus clash directly with the security of India.
The whole foreign policy of Turkey, therefore, has

changed since the close of the Balkan wars. Reconciled,
at least temporarily, to the loss of all European territory
taken from them as the result of these wars, and also to
the loss of the Arabic portion of their former Asiatic
provinces, it was determined upon to counterbalance, and
more than counterbalance, these losses by the union of
the predominantly Turkish portion of the Ottoman Em-
pire with the vast, though somewhat indefinite, Turko-
Tartar territories in Central Asia.
The idea naturally suggested itself of the formation of
a bloc of five Mohammedan States-Anatolia, Caucasus,
Persia, Turkestan and Afghanistan-contiguous in ter-
ritory and bound together in a confederation, or, at
least, by strong bonds of alliance. The successful carry-
ing out of this idea has been a strong possibility ever
since the summer of 1917. The creation and maintenance
of such a bloc would be a constant menace to Western
civilization, and to everything for which it stands.
The weak link in the proposed chain (from the Turkish
standpoint) is Persia. The Mohammedans of Anatolia,
Caucasia, Turkestan, and most of those in Afghanistan
are Sunnites. The Tartars of the eastern Caucasus are
Shiites. The Turanian race predominates in Anatolia,
comprises almost the entire population of Turkestan,
constitutes a strong racial strain in Caucasia and
Afghanistan, and can easily work in harmony with the
514 MODERN TURKEY
other Mohammedan races of the two latter countries.
The Mohammedans of Persia are Shiites: the great ma-
jority do not belong to the Turanian race. The elimina-
tion of Persia would cut the proposed bloc completely in
two, leaving Anatolia and Caucasia to the west and
Turkestan and Afghanistan to the east. Here is a point
where it is necessary for Pan-Turanianism to call upon
Pan-I~lamism to aid it in bridging over this chasm. So
far all efforts to bring Persia within the orbits of Turkish
agitation have failed. Even the fainous conference at
Baku, from which so much was expected, proved barren
of results. The best hope for the accomplishment of
Pan-Turanian purposes in Persia would now seem to lie
either in the coercion of Persia through the development
of strong military forces by her Sunnite neighbors, or in
the mistakes of the Occidental nations. What Turkish .
propaganda failed to accomplish may easily result from
the unwise interference or the callous indifference of
foreign powers.
It was urged by some of the Christian inhabitants of
Turkey and by students of Near Eastern politics during
1917, and perhaps as late as 1919, that a second prac-
tical method of breaking the proposed Mohammedan
chain existed. A very small amount of assistance ren-
dered to the armed bands of the Armenians and Assyri-
ans which had been collected in the mountainous regions
of northeastern Turkey, northwestern Persia and Trans-
caucasia might have sufficed at that time not only to
have accomplished this purpose but also to have opened
up a line of communication with the Cossacks and the
Ukrainians, and possibly to have changed the whole
course of developments in Russia. Nowhere else in the
wide field of warfare might so much have been accom-
plished with so little aid; but the blindness of the En-
tente military leaders to anything not directly connected
with the "West Front," caused this opportunity to be ·
neglected. Even the final desperate request of the Ar-
menians and Assyrians for a small supply of arms and
ammunition and a few experienced officers was refused
or neglected.
At the close of the war, Turkey, in a state of collapse,
was prepared to accept any terms the Powers might im-
pose upon her. The usual lack of wisdom and the usual
delays resulted in creating the existing chaotic conditions
in the country. ·
. Many different suggestions as to the part which the
United States should play in the settlement of Turkish
affairs were made from many different sources; but, in
the end this country refused to undertake any part of
the work. One proposal, which appeared to be initiated
by certain large business and financial interests in this
country,1 was that there should be one mandate for all
Turkey, which mandate should be given to the United
States. The extensive propaganda in support of this
proposal frankly advocated this kind of a mandate on
the ground that it would be a profitable one for the
United States, at the same time calling attention to the
heavy expenses and lack of financial returns or commer-
cial benefits which would come with the acceptance of a
mandate over Armenia alone. A single mandate for all
Turkey would have left the Turks as the predominating
race throughout the Empire and was bitterly opposed by
·an the subject races of the Empire-Christian and Mos-
lem alike. The propaganda in favor of this plan, there-
fore, included wholesale praise of the Turks and attacks
upon the Armenians and other subject races.
The arguments used to induce the United States to ac-
cept a mandate over Armenia alone were all based upon
1 The same conclusion was reached by the Harbord Miasion and by other
disinterested groups in both America and Europe. See "Report ol Ameri·

can Military Miasion to Armenia.'' Sixty-sixth Congress, 2d Session.
8etUJ.tll Document tG6, 1920.-E. G. M.
516 MODERN TURKEY
pleas of humanity, and contained no promises of financial
or commercial returns. The attitude of those supporting
the Armenian mandate is well set forth by Professor
William Linn Westermann in his chapter on the Arme-
nian problem which appears in "What Really Happened
at Paris," New York, 1921. ·
It is useless at this time to write of the Treaty of
Sevres, or to speculate as to what the future may have
in store for Turkey. It may be asserted with confidence
that the treaty will never be carried into effect in .its
original form. 1
The foregoing contribution is an historical review of
international diplomacy as it had affected the Ottoman
Empire during the 20th century until the dissolution of
the Imperial Government. Therefore, it provides the
logical background for the succeeding chapters in this
book.
' The brilliant Col. Thomas E. Lawrence wrote in the Sunday Times, May
30, 1920, this strong statement: ''The terms of the Turkish Treaty
are admitted as impossible by those who had a hand in framing them.
No account was taken of the actual conditions of the former Turkish
Empire, or of the military and financial strengths of the countries de-
vouring it. Each party making the terms considered only what it could
take, or rather what could be most difficult for her neighbors to take or
to refuse her, and the document is not the constitution of a new Asia,
but a confession, almost an advertisement, of the greeds of the conquerors.
No single clause of it will stand the test of three years' practice and it
will be happier than the German Treaty only in that it will not be revised
-it will be forgotten.' '-E. G. M.
CHAPTER XXIII
THE AltMENIAN QUESTION
It has been well said, "Man is based on Hope, he has properly no

other possession but Ho.:,>e; this habitation of his is called the Place of
Hope.''
-THolUS CARLYLE, "French Revolution.''
The Armenian question in Turkey has passed into a

new phase. Not only has this former non-Moslem popu-
lation been largely removed through slaughter and
deportations within the prewar Ottoman Empire, and
departures across the present national borders, but also
a Turkish National State, with the fervent declaration
of "Turkey for the Turks," has been created. Under
the new order of things, there are probably not over
300,000 Armenians left in Turkey,1 approximately half
of whom are in Constantinople, while the New Turkey
has been stripped and has stripped itself of former terri-
tory and population so that it now numbers not over
1
These estimates are based upon the statements of Lord Curzon and
Ismet Pasha at the first Lausanne Conferenee, December 12-14, 1922.
Lord Curzon gave the number of Armenians as 150,000 in Constantinople
and a like number in Asia Minor. Rev. G. R. Montgomery, director of the
Armenian-American Society, in an interview to a representative of the
New York Timea (Deeember 26, 1922) stated that there were 70,000
Armenian refugees in Asia Minor and 40,000 Armenian refugees in Con-
stantinople. Apparently, these latter figures took no account of a hundred
thousand or more other Armenians in the former Ottoman capitaL It is
doubtful whether there are now 25,000 Armenians in Asia Minor and 150,000
in Constantinople. K. Aslan ("Armenia and the Armenians from the
Earliest Times until the Great War," N. Y., 1920) estimatea that in 1914:
the Armeniana in Turkey numbered approximately 1,800,000 divided aa
follows,-the Armenian provineea of Anatolia 950,000, Cilicia 150,000, and
other regiona of the Empire 700,000.
517
518 MODERN TURKEY
9,000,000 inhabitants, mostly Turkish and Kurdish
Moslems.
With the practical wiping out after the Treaty of
Lausanne (1923) of the millet organization, or separate
religious communities, more than ever before in their
history the non-Moslem minorities are subject races
subordinated to the unchanged conception of their ruling
masters; namely, that the Turkish race is the bulwark
of the State in which the non-Believer is not to be re-
garded as the equal of the Believer. This distinction,
which in its essence is not a spiritual one, has its tradi-
tion in the writings of the Prophet Mohammed; yet the
religious motive seems to be singularly missing in the
all-powerful Grand National Assembly at Angora which
has performed the dual act of electing the Khalif from
the House of Osman and of depriving the Commander
of the Faithful of all temporal power. In Turkey, the
sultan is a memory. Church and State are divorced in
an abrupt fashion. There are many indications that the
government under the presidency of Mustafa Kemal
Pasha desires to emphasize this radical turn in Turkish
affairs.
To explain in brief past as well as more recent happen-
ings in the Ottoman Empire, there is the calm judgment
of a world-wide authority, the late distinguished barrister
of Constantinople, Sir Edwin Pears. "The causes of
the massacres in Armenia in 1894-7 were four. All of
them had been in operation for years. There was :first,
a traditional feeling among their Moslem neighbors that
they had the right to plunder Christians ; second, the
superior industry and thrift of the Armenians, which had
enabled them to acquire land and become generally
wealthier than their neighbors, who thus coveted their
possessions; third, their superiority in intelligence, due
to their thirst for instruction which had induced them
to be less tolerant than they had formerly been of
THE ARMENIAN QUESTION 519
periodical robbery and outrages upon their wives and
daughters. In other words, education had fostered the
desire to be free. Lastly, a series of petty persecutions
by their Moslem neighbors, especially by the Kurds, and
the impossibility of obtaining redress. These causes led
to the emigration of many Ar~enians to Russia and
America, and to the formation ·of revolutionary commit-
tees outside Turkey. In despair of obtaining redress, a
few· Armenians within the Empire joined these commit-
tees. These bodies gave Abdul Hamid the excuse for
massacre.'' Sir Edwin Pears attributed the deportation
during the World War to the same fundamental causes,
the chief difference being that the more recent orders
were carried out under higher degree of organization and
with greater thoroughness.
The persecution of the Armenians during the late
'Vorld War was the worst in their history as far as loss
in population was concerned. The horrors of the de-
portations can scarcely be exaggerated. In this case,
an underlying motive was the desire of the Ottoman
Government to coalesce the rising Pan-Turanian moy.e-
ment by doing away with the Armenians who formed a
barrier between the Turkish Moslems of southeastern
Europe and western Asia Minor and the Tartars and
Turkomans of the Caucasus and Central Asia. This idea
received marked support from the Germans during the
War, especially because of the failure of the Pan-Islamic
drive. "It is the invention," said the late Viscount
James Bryce in the House of Lords (1920), "of some
German ethnologists to unite a considerable number of
West Asiatic peoples who speak the same language in a
common devotion to the same cause and in a common
recognition of the power of the Sultan as Khalif." The
Pan-Turanian movement met with little success.
The Imperial German Government did not oppose the
deportations, although many German missionaries, as
520 MODERN TURKEY
well as prominent Turkish officials, such as Rahmi Bey,
governor of Smyrna, were outspoken in their condemna-
tion of this proceeding. The Ottoman Government con-
tinued the policy of the late Sultan Abdul Hamid;
namely, that "the best way to get rid of the Armenian
question is to get rid of the Armenians.''
Another pronounced reason for the hostility of the
Sublime Porte was due to the efforts made towards cre-
ating an independent Armenian State, which the Russian
Tsar as well as the Turkish Sultan feared might become
another Bulgaria.
It is important to understand, moreover, that the relig-
ious aspect has always been overemphasized. Lest the
reader be inclined to belittle ·the verdict of historians,
what better authority than the utterance of Viscount
Bryce with reference to the Armenian slaughter (1915),
in the House of Lords on October 6, 1915? To quote the
\Tersion of Mr. A. J. Toynbee, in "Turkey: A Past and
a Future": "There was no Moslem passion against the
Armenian Christians. All was done by the will of the
Government, and done not from any religious fanaticism,
but simply because they wished, for reasons purely po-
litical, to get rid of a non-Moslem element which impaired
the homogeneity of the Empire, and constituted an ele-
ment that might not always submit to oppression. All
that I have heard confirms what has already been said
. elsewhere, that there is no reason to believe that in this
case Mussulman fanaticism came into play at all. So
far as can be made out, though of course the baser natures
have welcomed and used the opportunities for plunder
which slaughter and deportations afford, these massacres
have been viewed by the better sort of religious Moslems
with horror rather than with sympathy. It would be
too much to say that they have often attempted to inter-
fere, but, at any rate, they do not seem to have shown
approval of the conduct of the Turkish Government.''
THE AR11IENIAN QUESTION 521
Not only in internal aggression but also in war, the
Ottoman soldier has seldom been an outright proselyte
for Islam, although he has gloried in the paradise which
awaits the faithful who die under its banner. A study
of the Ottoman, as distinguished from the Arab, con-
quests affords little evidence that the overrunning of
Asia and Africa was actuated by religious motives, par-
ticularly since the conquered were already Moslems. In
fact, these and subsequent military operations served to
widen the accustomed gulf between the Sunni, Shiah, and
other Moslem sects as exemplified by relations of the
Ottoman Turks with the Arab tribes and the Persians.
In their European conquests, which reached to the gates
of Vienna, the invaders made no display of missionary
fanaticism as the prime impulse. When Mohammed the
Conqueror took Constantinople in 1453, he displayed a
remarkable degree of tolerance towards the dwellers
within the Queen City. In all fairness, therefore, it
should be noted t1:lat the Turkish Moslem has not been
known for proselyting Christians or Jews. But the much-
accentuated conflict between the Crescent and the Cross
is an ever-present threat possessing real potentialities,
which can be used by people of every religious conviction
to suit particular ends.
With regard to Turko-Armenian troubles, also, the out-
standing error has been in considering the problem as
wholly, or even largely, religious. This statement has
been corroborated recently by personal letters from the
Protestant clergy in America and Great Britain. Basic-
ally, the reason for these difficulties is economic, similar
to, but far more intense than. that of the relations be-
tween the Jews and the Gentiles. The Turkish Moslem
has despised business, he has not been interested in
making money, he adores leisure-"keif" as he calls it.
The non-Moslem, notably the Armenian, has been his
banker. Sir Edwin Pears has stated that a Turk and
522 MODERN TURKEY
an Armenian living side by side will, after a year's time,
bring about a situation whereby the Armenian will have
all the money. In my opinion it is impossible to ex-
aggerate the importance of this debtor and creditor
relationship. The Turk is the more honest of the two;
the Armenian is the more alert, the shrewder, and the
harder worker. A perplexing problem of the new order
in Turkey is the latent economic ability of the Turkish
Moslems. ·
But the economic factor alone probably would not have
disturbed markedly the lethargy of Turkish peasant or
officeholder, had not the Armenians conceived the thought
of their separate State, carved out of Turkey. The Turk
has always been very much exercised when the question
of partition has been raised. The formation of Arme-
nian secret societies with branches abroad has aroused
his wrath to action. To those who can study these forces
calmly, does his attitude seem strange or abnormal Y
Most Americans can remember as if it were yesterday
the daring scheme of the Imperial German Government
to embroil Japan and Mexicb into ·an attack upon the
United States promising, if successful, a generous slice
of territory in our Southern States. I wonder what the
Texans would have done about it Y Without pretending
that there is any more than a suggestive parallel, for we
must remind ourselves of the legitimate Armenian aspira-
tions as well as the military traditions of the Ottomans,
there is the universal dread of ·losing any part of the
national domain. Without attempting in any way to
excuse unpardonable acts, the writer prefers to let these
conditions be recorded with a proper perspective. Ac-
cording to Near Eastern standards, human life is worth
far less than territory.
The Armenian tragedy in Turkey is the inevitable out-
come of uncontrolled propaganda. Stimulated into a
sense of growing independence and of false security be-
cause of the extensive publicity in foreign countries and
the successful appeals for charity, these people were led
to believe that the time had come when they would be
partitioned off entirely from their oppressive ruler, the
Ottoman Government. (A clear distinction should be
drawn between the oppressive, corrupt officials at Con-
stantinople and the downtrodden, isolated Anatolian
peasants, whether Turk or non-Turk, who are no better
or no worse than most rural dwellers.) On the other
hand, their well-wishers believed or were led to believe,
presumably the latter, that the Ari:nenians were suffi-
ciently united and strong to maintain a separate exist-
ence somewhere in Asia Minor. Exaggerated population
claims, a common failing in the Levant as well as else-
where, helped to seal the doom of the race. The carefully
worked-out estimates of the American Commission to
Negotiate Peace gave the Moslems, largely Kurds and
Turks, in the year 1914 at least sixty-eight per cent of
the total population in either the larger or the smaller
so-called "Turkish Armenia," with the Armenians less
than twenty-four per cent in either territory. Compara-
tive postwar percentages, on the theoretical basis that
in 1920 "order will be restored so that old survivors can
return," were estimated as at least seventy-five per cent
Moslems and sixteen per cent or less Armenians. No
official census has ever been taken in Turkey, but there is
no proof for believing that these results are seriously
inaccurate. Thus, publicists have been placed in the
contradictory position of trying to prove the existence of
mammoth numbers of killed, and also survivors. It can
be said in all fairness, that this one form of propaganda,
however well-intentioned, has had its quick boomerang.
But there is the more vicious type of propaganda also
practiced by all races and peoples. Friendly to both
Turks and Armenians, President Cyrus Hamlin of
Robert College, in his book, ''Among the Turks,'' written
524 MODERN TURKEY
half a century ago, shuddered at the possibilities of the
Armenian press bureau just starting in London which
was preparing to maintain a world-wide information serv-
ice for telling everything bad about the Turks and every-
thing good about the Armenians. Under such an attack,
the Turks acquired their unsavory reputation among for-
eign peoples; while, on the other hand, the reputation of
the Armenians is due in great part to reports spread,
in some cases by certain missionaries, and in other cases
by drawing-room sentimentalists. (Consult chapters on
Racial Characteristics and on The Turkish Press.) Who-
ever has been in the Near East is especially aware of the
meaning of the Japanese proverb, "Where hate follows
hate, hate becomes eternal." The Greeks lost their won-
derfui opportunity after the World War due to a prema-
ture desire for territory which they have been too weak
or too ill-supported to obtain. The Armenians failed to
obtain their ambitions because their claims on which they
had staked everything were not backed up by their
friends and supporters when it came to the final test.
How long will it take minorities or weak countries to
understand that in practical politics outside assistance
·is a mere gamble¥ Yet, if ever a people thought that
they were well-supported from abroad, the Armenians
were justly entitled to this opinion. Did not Great
Britain, in accordance with the Treaty of Berlin (1878),
promise to protect the Armenians and was thereby
allowed to occupy and administer the Island of Cyprus
as a ''place of arms''¥ Have not Christians abroad
been generous and ready to aid every appeal for finan-
cial assistance, in some cases to the point of pauperizing
Armenians (as many representatives of the latter race
have told me) ¥
At the time of the disorders in the nineties, Great
Britain failed to move towards decisive action,-Lord
Salisbury said that British ships could not traverse the
Taurus Mountains !-while Russia, probably as friendly
to the Armenians as any power, was not interested since
the sufferers were mainly Protestants and not communi-
. cants of the Orthodox Church. Few outsiders appreciate
what a wide gulf there is between the Orthodox Catholic
and Protestant within a single racial group In countries
where the Eastern Churches are virtually State institu-
tions, the position of the non-Orthodox communicant is
not always an enviable one. Christian tolerance is
frequently absent.
The diplomacy of the Great Powers should be held
largely responsible for the present condition of the Arme-
nians. While the foreign chancelleries have nearly a
perfect record in protesting to the Sublime Porte against
the condition of the Armenians, it is not clear that these
notes were always framed with the thought that they
would result in improving the situation of the Armenian
race. They have constituted threats, but unaccompanied
by military force. History since the armistice of 1918
presents the same story. Despite the fact that the Arme-
nians were military allies of the Entente, which exposed
them more than ever before to antagonism from the
Ottoman Government, there was no quid pro quo. Not
only have the Allies failed to compensate them for their
valuable military efforts; but worse still, the French
Army in Cilicia enrolled local Armenians in their own
regiments to fight against the Turks, and then by signing
a separate agreement with the Nationalist Government,
it abandoned them to their fate. Thus, not only during
the World War but in the postwar military struggle for
freedom, the Armenians revolted against and fought
against their Government. To a foreigner, the Arme-
nians would appear to be traitors, a conception, however,
which is unwarranted on account of the "millet" or com-
munity system by which each religion maintained an
almost separate existence within the former Empire.
526 MODERN TURKEY
What would have been the reaction in America had the
German-born in America taken to arms in 1917-1918 Y
Despite the dissimilarity in underlying conditions, there
is a common war psychology. · In the world conflict, the
Armenians in Turkey knew that they staked their all.
To the everlasting disgrace of the Allied and Asso-
ciated Powers, the Armenian question became a shuttle-
cock after the Turkish armistice. It was well-conceived
by European diplomats and military advisers that Amer-
ica should nurture this proposed buffer state, which
occupies one of the most difficult strategic positions of
any world area. President Wilson had an in.fluential,
if small, following in the United States in connection with
this plan; but his rough treatment at the hands of pro-
fessional diplomats at home as well as abroad sickened
the American public of further participation in world
affairs. The temper of the majority of the American
public on the Armenian question in 1919 was unmistak-
able. Pitiful, indeed, were the words of the President
to Mr. Ray Stannard Baker, spoken at Paris, that in
all the appeals to him "he did not find a single one, either
from strong nations or weak, that contains an offer to
help him or help America unreservedly or disinterestedly
in applying at Paris the principles which everyone had
so acclaimed as the basis of the peace.''
Had the United States assumed a "mandate" for
Armenia, we should have been accused of having an im-
perialistic motive behind all our missionary, educational,
and relief work.:_a charge which would stand unan-
swered! As far as America is concerned, the proposal
became a phantom following the report of the Harbord .
Mission, 1919-1920 (Select Document 20), sent out by
President Wilson, which did not make any specific recom-
mendation as to acceptance or rejection, but correctly
stated that American troops would be required in the
early stages. This was apparently news to many Ameri-
cans. Following this refusal by America to take any
definite action, the Allied Powers cast the blame for
world unrest· on America's unwillingness to act, espe-
cially as regards an Armenian mandate, and gained
further time through the action of the Supreme War
Council in getting President Wilson to draw the boun-
daries of an Armenian State within an inadequate maxi-
mum area. And then, after the receipt of his report, it
shelved the exhaustive findings without making the inno-
cent contents public. America, nevertheless, must as-
sume some share of the culpability. She was afraid of
foreign entanglements.
Turning now to the Allies' responsibilities with refer-
ence to Armenia, we find that a surprising situation ex-
isted after October 30, 1918. Although the Mudros armis-
tice (Select Document 14) gave the Allied troops right
to occupy any part of the Ottoman Empire, the so-called
Armenian vilayets in eastern Asia Minor were left to
the control of Turkish irregular troops! It is absurd
to explain the distribution of troops because of lack of
sufficient Allied soldiers, for the British, French, Greeks,
and Italians in all had over one million combatants and
about as many non-combatants in prewar Ottoman terri-
tory during 1918 and 1919, supposedly to liberate the
Bedouins, Kurds, Syrians, Asiatic Greeks, and the like I
In Turkish Armenia at this same time there were only a
few Allied political officers. On May 15, 1919, the date
of the Greek landing at Smyrna, the total Turkish army
numbered less than 20,000-so we are told by competent
American and British observers. Yet, Lord Curzon,
speaking sympathetically in the House of Commons
(March 11, 1922) said : "Armenia is really an interna-
tional interest, and it ought not to fall to the duty or
to the charge of any individual state to be solely responsi-
528 MODERN TURKEY
ble for this people in the future. Their sufferings have
touched the whole world. The obligation to restore them
has been given by the first powers of the world, and it
is no unhonorable thing to ask the world-and by 'the
world' I mean the Allied Powers in the recent War-
to show their interest in the future of that country."
The plight of the Armenians was obviously not helped
by the separate conflicting claims of their own race, but
was certainly made even worse by the array of secret
agreements between the Arabs, British, French, Italians,
and Tsarist Russia. Diplomats have told me that they
have been at a loss to harmonize the interests and desires
of the group representing the provinces around the
Turko-Russian frontier and that of the equally emphatic
Cilician Armenian group. The former was represented
by a noted poet, Avetis Aharonian; the latter by a promi-
nent Egyptian landowner, Boghos Nubar Pasha. The
proposal for a unified administration over Turkey, sug-
gested by the King-Crane Mission as well as the Harbord
Mission, met with bitter attacks. This solution was ob-
viously in contravention to the self-determination idea, a
Western conception which had the expressed approval of
Western officialdom. The difficulties arose partly be-
cause the Armenian delegations asked for more territory
than they could maintain without foreign intervention,
and partly because of a clash in arriving at a solution of
strategic, imperialistic, and national claims or desires·
on the part of the conquerors. The Allies left the peo-
ples of Russian Armenia and of the vilayets (provinces)
of Eastern Anatolia to the mercies of Bolshevist Russia
and Kemalist Turkey. The Cilician Armenians were
confronted with the French share in the Sykes-Picot
secret treaty (1916) between Great Britain and France.
France, to block British designs and to prevent possible
further military reverses from the Kemalists in Cilicia,
disowned her Armenian legions, and gave no further
succor to the Armenian cause; within three months, all
1
but three thousand out of one hundred and twenty thou-

sand Armenians in Cilicia had departed. Thus ended
all the confident postwar expectations of the peoples
in the Entente Allied and Associated populations, the
seemingly sure result of the military activities i:p West-
ern Asia which prematurely promised to liberate Arme-
nian peoples and lands from Ottoman rule. America
pursued the policy of safe isolation. France, Great Brit-
ain, and Italy were otherwise engaged."
Let us close this record of writhing political and mili-
tary events with the words of the Archbishop of Canter-
bury in the House of Lords (on March 30, 1922): "But
when we say that this matter is now left to the League
of Nations, is it not really a kind of camouflage, a kind
of screen to shield those who find it impracticable to
fulfill the promises that they have made !-and I do
not deny that it may be impracticable."
The impartial student (if such an individual can exist)
testifies that prior to the reign of the "Great Assassin,"
Sultan Abdul Hamid II, whose mother was certainly a
non-Turk· and generally reported to be an Armenian,
the Armenians and Turks lived side by side with Sl,lr-
prisingly little ill-feeling. Even today, the bonds are
frequently close. In the main, however, the internal and
international events of the past few decades have been
accompanied by a bloody record of the Turks against
the Armenians.
There are bits of unimpeachable testimony of Arme-
• This diplomatic move was in marked contrast to the earlier intentions
of ths French foreign office to occupy Cilicia as an Armenian protectorate.
Rev. George R. Montgomery (Current Hi8tory, October, 1921) is authority
for the statement that when M. Georges Picot was sent to Asia Minor in
April, 1917, his instructions read, "In the coastal zone, which one day will
be placed under your protectorate, your direction should have a more exclu-
sive character, so as to give the population a clear intimation of the future
in store for them.'' After the Mudroa armistice, M. Picot was established
at Beirut with the title of "High Commissioner of Syria and Armenia."
530 MODERN TURKEY
nian persecution of the Turk, but perhaps less organized

and certainly on a far smaller scale. Only those perso~s
who have dwelt in Turkey can realize the provocation
which all local peoples have in common, but in varying
degrees. They are human beings. In fact, whether or
not the Armenians would have been better off had they
retaliated to a greater extent no one can say with assur-
ance. Note the following extract from the annual report
(1919) of the American Board of Commissioners for
Foreign Missions: "We realize now, as never before, the
impossibility of solving the question of tyranny over
intolerance in Turkey. Even the Armenians are inclined
to take advantage of the Turk when he has the latter
in his power, and. the Greek himself seems to be showing
as much of an unchristian feeling towards the Moslem.
How can we help inject into the minds of the millions
of the Levant a spirit of tolerance and love T This is
our task and a sobering one, it seems." ·
Briefly, the present plight of the Armenians in Turkey
is this: there are very few of them left. The greater
number of the more intelligent Armenians who lived in
Turkey just prior to the World War have perished. Of
all those who survived the years 1914-1922, several hun-
dred thousand are in the Soviet Republic of Armenia,
with its capital near Mt. Ararat. Many migrated to the
Russian Kuban country and to Persia. There are ap-
proximately one hundred thousand in Syria, where th_ey
have set up stores and shops, and by their energy are
being considered a "menace" by the Syrians, Jews, and
foreign elements. (This is the old story, told once more.)
Many influential Armenians remain in Constantinople,
while the foreign colonies in western Europe and Amer-
ica are considerable. They are still a people "without a
country," as far as Turkey is concerned.
The Treaty of Lausanne (1923), the last peace treaty
arising from the World War, signed by the represent a-
lives of the victorious allies and the conquered Turks,
makes absolutely no mention of the .Armenians as such
nor of an .Armenian Homeland.
At Constantinople, now a mere province instead of
the Imperial Capital, there is in existence an active
"L'Association. d'Amitie Turko-Armenienne," designed
to bring about a rapprochement between the Turks and
the Armenians. The honorary president, a friend of
mine, is Kerestejian Effendi, an influential official of the
Imperial Ottoman Bank: The Turkish officials at Con-
stantinople are members. At a recent meeting a message
of greeting was read from l\bstafa Kemal Pasha. The
praiseworthy object of the Association is to "forgive
and forget former troubles and grievances" due, as one
of their speakers recently stated, "to the snare and de-
lusion of external politics." · This is in accordance with
the remarks of the representative of the Armenian com-
munity, as reported to the Manchester Guardian Weekly,
at the time of the signing of the Treaty of Lausanne
(July 24, 1914): "The first essential in any society
composed of different races is to establish harmony
between them. The unhappy past must be forgotten.
The strength and energy of the Nationalist Governme,nt
has given the country complete independence. If the
spirit of concord be now applied in internal adminis-
tration, peace will become lasting, and the peoples will
enjoy prosperity. Any attempt to disturb the security
and tranquillity of the country must henceforth be
exemplarily punished."
Dr. Talcott Williams makes the stateme:n.t that at one
time the Armenians, numbering approximately eight mil-
lion, inhabited a country with an area of 200,000 square
miles. Now, in their o·wn Soviet Republic, located in
former Russian territory with Erivan its capital, their
name is accorded to a definitive country amounting to
about 15,000 square miles with a population of 1,300,000
532 MODERN TURKEY
-similar in area to Switzerland but with only one third
the latter's inhabitants. The Armenian Republic, profit-
ing by the beneficial work mainly of American relief
organizations, has sufficient seeds and agricultural imple-
ments so that it is self-supporting with respect to food
requirements. Thus, in an unexpected way, the Arme-
nians have a real National Home under their own control.
CHAPTER XXIV
THE ARAB QUESTION
I am the fish that lives in the sea. The greater the sea, the fatter
the fish. ·
-HusAIN IBN ALI, Grand Sherif of MeccP
In 1914, the Arabs in the Ottoman Empire probably

outnumbered the Ottoman Turks. They were the out-
standing element in the southern provinces. Mutually
repugnant, these two races have practically nothing in
common. The two bonds, language and religion, which
offer a suggestive basis for cooperation and compati-
bility, are of trivial practical consequence. For while the
Turkish literary language is derived partly from Persian
and Arabic, colloquial Turkish and the main framework
of the language are Turanian, not Semitic. Not only are
the vast majority of Arabs and Turks illiterate, but also
rare indeed is the Arab who can understand spokell Turk-
ish, or the Turk who can understand colloquial Arabic. 1
The ties of religion as well as of language have been much
overemphasized.
Except during those intervals when .Middle Eastern
civilization has been threatened by outside aggression,
Islam has not presented even an approach to a united
• Professor W. L. Westermann recounts this .delightful tale of a verified
occurrence in a session of the Turkish Parliament (1908-1909) : "An Arab
member rose suddenly in his place and droned away at a long and rambling
11peech in Arabic which was not understood by the majority of the members
who were Turks. The speaker of the House glared at the chanting Arab
long and ominously. Suddenly, he jumped to his feet, hit his desk a
resounding blow and o.lellowed, 'Sit down, jackass I ' This the Arab orator
promptly did."
534 MODERN TURKEY
front. Fundamentally, the Arabs claim that the teach-
ings of the Prophet, a dweller in the great Arabian desert,
apply with less realism to inhabitants of other regions.
The Turks, in objecting to the interpretations of the
Koran made by the Arabs, claim that their own concep-
tion of Allah is different; and, according to Prof. A. J.
Toynbee, the Committee of Union and Progress arranged
for its own translations from the Arabic. Another seri-
ous consideration is that the Mohammedan world em-
braces numerous sects and creeds which are frequently
more antagonistic to each other than to other religions.
There is the leading, orthodox sect, the Sunni, with its
shrines at Mecca and Al Madina; and then there are
many dissenters. In the latter group are the Shiahs,
with their influence radiating from the Iraqi cities of
Karbala, N ajaf, Kadhimain and Samarra, all of which
are extremely sensitive to Persian influences. Their fol-
lowers include most of the Persian and Indian Moslems,
as well as a good proportion of coreligionists in the
Transcaucasus, southern Iraq, and in the Yemen. Con-
spicuous also, is the extreme W ahabi sect which has as its
center, Riyadh, in central Arabia, the stronghold of the
powerful Ibn Saud, Sheikh of N ejd. The W ahabi sect,
very strict in its interpretation of the Koran, is so
doctrinaire as to believe that there must be no change
from the original practices common in the time of the
Prophet. To them, among the extreme vices are the
wearing of jewels and precious stones, smoking, the use
of alcoholic drinks, and any change from the days of
the early khalifs regarding the position of women. Their
followers have no respect for either of the two main
Moslem sects, although they are somewhat less critical
of the Sunni. Their place in the Arabic world is one
of great importance, since Ibn Saud, the most powerful
chieftain in Arabia, whose quiescence has been secured
mainly through British gold, could doubtless make short
THE ARAB QUESTION 535
work of the so-called kingdom of Hejaz as well as of
other parts of Arabia. Twice the Wahabi forces have
sacked Mecca and AI Madina. In northern Africa, the
Senussi sect, with its main stronghold in the oasis of
Kufra in the Sahara desert, is a powerful force. This
chapter, however, deals mainly with the Arabs of Western
Asia.
Temperamentally, the Arab and the Turk have wholly
unlike habits, customs, ideals and environment. An in-
teresting comparison based upon a personal experience
has been made by the late Sir Mark Sykes, who P9S-
sessed a rare knowledge of both races :-"For once I had
the opportunity of observing a perfect demonstration of
the fact that the Turks are a ruling race,' and in what
their superiority lies. While the Arabs with me-al-
though as faithful, hard-working men as one could wish
-raved, shrieked, cursed, and flew into childish passions,
were ready to give up in despair, and always required
leading, the Turks were stolid, dogged, and businesslike.
If one fell head over ears with his horse on the top of
him, he would only grin and pass the word to the others
that there was a drift to be avoided. They trudged
steadily, never gave signs of fatigue, always used their
judgment, gave orders to one another quietly, and never
once lost their tempers. They reminded me of English
soldiers who mean to accomplish a long march and have
set their teeth..•. A Turk will understand an English-
man's character much sooner than he will an Arab's;
the latter is so subtle in his reasoning, so quick-witted,
so argumentative and so great a master of language that
he leaves the stolid Osmanli amazed and dazed, compre-
hending nothing." ·
The Arabs, a generic term of confused application at
best, are incapable by themselves of forming a vast
united kingdom. Most of them are too intensely tribal.
There is a marked hostility between the urban and rural
536 MODERN TURKEY
communities; moreover, the city inhabitants view each
other with suspicion and lack of sympathy. The real
Bedouin looks with contempt upon the cultivator of the
land and regards it as a disgrace for a descendant of his
to intermarry with one of these toilers of the soil. A
still further sharp, dividing line and a source of disunity
is that drawn between the religious hierarchy and the
rest of the population. In the holy cities, we find the
leading centers of political, racial, and religious intrigue
in the Islamic world.
The Arab has a feeling of great self-complacency; he is
strikingly independent. This is due, in part, to the fact
that he is an excellent physical specimen. He knows that
only the strong can survive the exactions of the desert
and he rests content in his very existence. Mr. Lowell
Thomas quotes Col. T. E. Lawrence (Asia, August,
1920) :-"We who have gone out to discover the meaning
of the desert have found only emptiness-nothing but
sand, wind, soil and empty space. The Bedouins leave
behind them every extraneous comfort and go to live in
the desert, in the very arms of starvation, that they may
be free. The desert exacts a price for its secret. It
makes the Bedouins entirely useless to their fellow men.
There has never been a Bedouin prophet. On the other
hand, there has never been a Semitic prophet who has
not, before preaching his message, gone into the desert
and caught from the desert dwellers a reflection of their
belief." The self-confidence of the Arab is also due to
a knowledge of, and a pride in, the brilliant traditions
of his race.
In view of all these factors, the result of different
environments, it is not surprising that the Arab and
Turk have consistently regarded each other as foreigners,
and with contempt. The Ottoman Government never had
any real hold over its Arab provinces. Outside of the
cities, its influence has been virtually nil. No attempt
was made to administer laws or collect taxes where the
difficulties involved seemed to be unusually large. The
southern lands were a constant source of irritation to
the Turkish sultans, who felt impelled to send repeated
expeditions of Turkish troops into the Yemen and the
Hejaz. These persistent efforts to quell disturbances
caused heavy fatalities to the invaders and at the sa~ne
time intensmed the separatist tendencies on the part not
only of the Arabs but also of the Turks themselves.
In the attempts to govern the Arab provinces, the Otto-
man Government pursued the policy of endeavoring to
break up the strong tribal organizations. To this end,
were created sheikhs or syeds (large landed proprietors)
who were granted an unusual degree of local autonomy
and were allowed to benefit at the expense of weaker
neighbors. This scheme had the effect of causing still
further dissension among the Arabs; and to that extent
could be considered from the Turkish point of view
partially successful. In southern Iraq, where the popula-
tion is largely Shiah, the inhabitants suffered an added
measure of ill-treatment.. The British Foreign Office
Handbook on "Turkey-in-Asia" contains this statement:
-"The Bedouin element does not desire any govern-
ment; the Shiahs do not desire a Sunni government; no
one, except perhaps some Kurds, wants to be ruled by
Turks; but all desire to be ruled by Moslems." L~e
most people, the Arabs believe that the less government
there is, the better off they are.
Had the World War not occurred, there seems every
likelihood that the Arabs would have prosecuted a vigor-
ous rebellion in order to achieve an Arab national state:
In 1914, the mutinies among the Arab officers in the Turk-
ish army were numerous. Plans had been carefully laid
by them for extensive propaganda and military effort
looking forward towards liberation from Turkish rule
in the year 1923.
53S MODERN TURKEY
When Turkey entered the World War in October, 1914,
she realized that the Arabs enrolled in the Turkish army
would probably constitute a negative factor; but she
feared still more that her nominal subjects would seize
this opportunity to pounce upon their national masters.
The British were quick to sense the situation and in-
trigued at once with the Sherif of Mecca and other
influential leaders. The basis for negotiation was some
kind of an Arab independent regime, freed from the rule
of the Turks. The Arabs were ready to drive the best
bargain possible in return for their participation in the
war, but naturally had distinct preference for an alliance
with the power or powers which would give them money,
a greater measure of liberty, and support of their
national aspirations.
The aid of the Arabs was solicited by the British by
means of subsidies and through an important series of
agreements and understandings, only a few of which have
seen the light of day. The most notable of these was the
British arrangement with Husain ibn Ali, Grand Sherif
of Mecca, whereby the latter was promised British sup-
port for a single Arab confederacy or a group of con-
federacies in the event of the successful prosecution of
the war. (Note carefully Select Document 4.) At the
Kuwait conference, which was attended by the Sheikh
of Mohammerah, whose allegiance to the Shiahs has
always been shaky and whose support was necessary to
make secure the southern outlet from the Anglo-Persian
oil :fields, the ruler of Nejd was reported to state that he
believed the British policy to be that of aiding the Arab
cause. Thereupon, Ibn Saud received from the British
the distinction of K. C. I. E., and a liberal subsidy stated
at that time to be two thousand pounds sterling monthly
in gold, or its equivalent in Indian rupees, in addition
to ordinary expenses. Sir Percy Cox demonstrated
further his intimate knowledge of Middle Eastern affairs
by giving close attention to the Shiah holy cities in Iraq.
But there was a peculiar situation in that the British
Indian Office was sending arms and ammunition to Ibn
Saud, while the British Foreign Office was likewise sub-
sidizing Husain, traditional enemies, who used the means
afforded to fight each other. (Consult British Parlia-
mentary Papers.)
In dealing with the Arabs, both British and Turks have
found that money is a mighty expedient. For example,
the money supplied to the powerful ·M:ohamme.rah Ali
of Karbala by the British was extremely helpful in en-
abling him to maintain his position. Turks were also
liberal with money subsidies, but apparently were not as
discriminating as the British. Unfortunately for those
parties which dispense funds, there is no real check over
their use. Thus the Turks who treated an Arab leader,
Ibn Rashid, liberally in this respect never were successful
in getting him to fire a single shot against the British.
In fact, it is recorded that the Turks and British alike
were so disgusted with the way the Arabs continually
"sat on the fence," that during a certain truce it was
seriously proposed that a combined army should be
formed to subdue the Bedouins!
Although the Ottoman Government gained practically
no support from the Arabs, an attempt was made to en-
list their help by the useful resort to an embarras through
the declaration of the jihad. This appeal met with little
success except where, as in the case of the unorthodox
Sheikh of :Mohammerah, it provided a good excuse for
plunder. After the advance of the British forces to the
Shatt al Arab, the Arab opposition largely disappeared,
due in part to the so-called civilized methods of warfare.
"As for the guns of the English," an Arab combatant is
reported as saying, to quote an official British d.ocument,
"they filled the air with noise, threw up the earth, and
knocked down the palm trees. That Sahib, is not war.''
540 MODERN TURKEY
In the eastern Mediterranean, the Turks tried to domi-
nate the military situation by an attack on vulnerable
points. The attack on the Suez Canal, however, was re-
pulsed, chiefly due to the inadequate military preparation
and to the difficulties encountered in crossing the Sinai
desert. The harsh methods of Djemal (Jemal) Pasha,
Turkish Minister of Marine, who was sent to Syria as
military governor, caused bitter hatred against the Turks
and weaned away still further any sympathy that the
Arabs might have had for them. Djemal (Jemal) Pasha
treated barbarously natives and foreigners alike, and in
the process starved nearly one fourth of the Lebanese
in their own beautiful mountains. Turkish forces, which
were widely scattered in Ottoman territory in a dual
endeavor to put down insurrections and to deal with for-
eign invaders, suffered defeats at Erzerum, Trebizond
and Erzinjan at the hands of the Russian General, Grand
Duke Nicholas. When German troops joined the Turkish
forces, the combined army was successful in besieging
the Anglo-Indian forces under Major General Townshend
at Kut al Amara, and were also triumphant against the
Russian army in Persia. German troops were later with-
drawn to the European theatre of war. There followed
military triumphs by the Anglo-Indian forces in Iraq,
and with Arab assistance, in Palestine and Syria. De-
spite the many acts of heroism under almost intolerable
land and climatic conditions, the wonderful advances of
General Allenby's forces and the timely service rendered
by the Arab Camel Corps under the leadership of Emir
Feisal, a son of the Sherif of Mecca, military historians
are virtually unanimous in stating that these Middle
Eastern commitments nearly lost the war for the Entente
Allies. Although Premier Lloyd George stated before
the Supreme War Council in January, 1918, that there
was a surplus of men and equipment that might be em-
ployed in the Levant, as later investigation proved, not
only did the British Prime Minister make the palpable
error of drawing no distinction between fighting and
non-fighting men but also he made the mistake of under-
estimating the situation on the Western European front.
But for the arrival of fresh American troops in France
during the spring of 1918, it is virtually certain that the
woeful expenditure of soldiers, equipment and money
in order to "liberate" the Arabs from Turkish rule would
have produced a ghastly scandaL Major General ~ir
John Davidson, director of military operations at gen-
eral headquarters during Sir Douglas Haig's command in
France, in the Nineteenth Century and After (Novem-
ber, 1922), condemned the poor military strategy in in-
dulging in these petits paquets in which the British army
suffered 89,246 wounded and 48,124 killed. "It did, in
fact," he said, "have the result of seriously risking our
defeat in France in the spring of 1918, and was the
cause of our embarking on national adventures of a
costly and hazardous character in the Near and Middle
East."
At the time of the Mudros Armistice (October 30,
1918), the Anglo-Indian forces had overrun the greater
part of Iraq, and had entered Mosul (near ancient Nine-
veh) on November 8, 1923. The campaign of General
Allenby's forces in Egypt, Syria, and Palestine was
one of the few great Allied successes in the World
War. In November, 1918, the British alone had a tre-
mendous force in Iraq, Palestine and Syria, numbering
approximately two million, counting combatants and non-
combatants, which provided an exceedingly consequential
factor in the military and diplomatic postwar relations
between the Turks, Arabs, and the Allies.
Encouraged by the promises of the Allies, those Arabs
who had fought alongside of them during the war be-
lieved that they were to secure thereby their "libera-
tion." In the winter of 1917-1918, the leaders in Feisal's
542 MODERN TURKEY
forces, many of whom came from Baghdad, formed a
secret society called the Ahd al Iraqi, the purpose of
which was to attain the absolute independence of. Iraq
in its close federation to an equally independent Syria,
to include Palestine, under the control of King Husain
or some member of the Sherifian family. The Arab
aspirations seemed about to be realized when in October,
1918, an Arab State headed by Emir Feisal had already
been established in the Damascus-Aleppo region; it was
subject only to the British army of occupation, supposed
by most persons to be a temporary step which would
result later in more or less complete Arab independence.
The national ambitions of the Arabs, however, became
decidedly inconvenient for those Great Powers which
had become parties to secret treaties during wartime.
The British-Husain understanding has already been men-
tioned. While this arrangement has considerable justi-
fication in its effect on the winning of the war, the same
cannot be said for the equally significant agreement of
May 9, 1916, between the British and the French, which
divided between these two countries most of the southern
section of prewar Turkey, largely inhabited by Arabs.
This concord, called the Sykes-Picot Agreement (Select
Document 5) was named after the British and French
negotiators respectively, the former a great admirer of
the Arabs notwithstanding that the treaty which bears.
his name interferes with their hopes and desires, and
M. Picot, who had served as French Consul General at
Beirut. Five zones were created, roughly as follows:
(1) Palestine, extending from the River Jordan to the
Mediterranean, which would be internationalized; (2)
Haifa, a Palestine port, and Iraq, from near Tikrit to
the Persian Gulf, to be a British sphere of influence;
( 3) the Syrian coast from Alex~ndretta to Tyre, Cili<:ia
and most of southern Armenia to be French; and ( 4) the
interior, constituted mainly of the provinces of A!eppo,
Damascus, Deir-ez-Zon, Mosul and Urfa, to be "Inqe-
pendent Arab," under distinct separate British and
French political influence. Unlike most persons who have
expressed an opinion about these two agreements, Colonel
Lawrence, that Oxford graduate who stepped from
archreology into Arab diplomacy, states that he is pos-
sibly "the only informed free-lance European who sees
no inconsistency or incompatibility between them: the
trouble has been, he states, that the Sykes-Picot Agree-
ment no longer satisfies the British and French govern-
ments, and taken by itself it is unworkable. ·"The geog-
raphy of the agreement is the geography of the White
Knight, and it makes a similar irruption into economics
when it lays down that the Baghdad rule may not be
finished till a Euphrates railway has been built 1" If
the published rumors are to be believed, it is not to t~e
credit of British diplomacy that during the progress. of
the W'Orld War, the Sherifian Agreement was not made
known to the French and the Sykes-Picot Agreement was
kept secret from the Arabs.
Mention should also be made of other secret treaties,
including the Partition of Asiatic Turkey (Select Docu-
ment 7), according to which France, Great Britain and
Russia planned to divide up practically all of Asiatic
Turkey, but made allowance for the Arabic formation
of an "Independent Arab State, or a Federation of Arab
States.'' Italy, however, who had entered the war f~l
lowing the secret Pact of London (Select Document 3),
demanded further explicit acknowledgment of her post-
war claims, which were duly incorporated in the St. Jean
de Maurienne Agreement (Select Document 9); this last
agreement is also cited because it was a potent cause of
subsequent political and military events in Turkey, even
though its provisions had little reference to the Arab
regions.
The declaration of Lord Balfour on November 2, 19_17
544 MODERN TURKEY
(Select Document 10), in its expressed desire to create
a Jewish Homeland in Palestine, thus conflicted with
previous understandings. While it translated into
idealistic terms the insistent demands of the Zionists
which, moreover, struck a responsive chord among Chris-
tians and Jews in most parts of the world, at the same
time it fitted in very well indeed with the natural British
desire for additional protection for the Suez Canal. It
is noteworthy that even as late as the middle of 1919, tpe
Palestine Arabs, who make up from eighty-five to ninety
per cent of the population of Palestine, apparently were
not unfavorably disposed towards the Balfour declara-
tion. Writing to Professor Felix Frankfurter of the
Harvard Law School, who represented the American
Zionists, Emir Feisal referred to his close relations with
Dr. Weissmann, the British Zionist leader, and made this
clear statement:-:-"We feel that the Arabs and the Jews
are cousins in race, have suffered similar irritations at
the hands of powers stronger than themselves, and by
happy coincidence have been about to take the first st_ep
toward the attainment of their national ideals together.
We Arabs look with the deepest sympathy on the Zionist
movement." (New York Times, March 5, 1919.)
At the Paris Peace Conference the case of the .arabs
was intrusted to Emir Feisal, who claimed to represent
officially the Hejaz and also the entire Arab military
forces of Syria, Iraq, Nejd, Hejaz and Ye.men. With
Colonel Lawrence as interpreter, Emir Feisal made a
public statement at Paris on January 19, 1919 (see New
York Times), that the Arabs desired to become the
youngest independent state in Asia and to accomplish
this they were appealing to America ''as the most power-
ful protector of the freedom of man.'' If we may depend
upon newspaper dispatches, similar views were expressed
when that remarkable Arab, the lineal descendant of the
Prophet, called on the Pope on April 25, 1919. There
seemed to be reasonable grounds for anticipating a future
Arab state in view of the deliberate public utterances of
leading European statesmen, notably the unqualified
British statement to the seven Syrians of Cairo, June 11,
1917, who were assured that prewar Arab areas freed by
military action of their inhabitants during the war would
remain entirely independent.
Although Turkey, subjected to treatment similar to
that accorded other countries on the losing side of this
war, was not invited to send delegates to Paris (Otto-
man representatives were actually heard but rebuffed),
the Arab case was different. For not only had these
inhabitants of the Ottoman Empire rendered a certain ·
amount of military assistance-General Allenby is quoted
as asserting that their aid was "invaluable "_:.but also
they had been given definite promises regarding their
future. On the other hand, it may be recalled that at
that very important Peace Conference meeting at Paris·
on March 20, 1919, Mr. Lloyd George stated that the
British had done most of the fighting in Turkey, almost
without French help, and therefore ought to have what
they wanted. Therefore it is not surprising that both
British and French staged Arab· demonstrations during
the progress of the Peace Conference, and made every
effort to appear simpatico.
The outcome of the whole situation was this: some of
the "liberated" areas were saddled with "mandates," a
vague term which Lord Balfour interpreted before the
Supreme Council of the League of Nations (May 17,
1922) to mean, a "self-imposed limitation by the con-
querors on the sovereignty which they obtained over
conquered nations." Allied troops were not immediately
withdrawn from Asia after the Mudros Armistice. Gen-
eral Allenby's staff and troops were stationed in Egypt,
Palestine, and Iraq. In accordance with an understand-
ing between the British and the French, the former's
546 MODERN TURKEY
troops withdrew from Cilicia in December, 1919, and

were replaced by those of France who added this terri-
tory to their military occupation of Syria. An immediate
result was military action by both the Turks and the
Arabs against the French troops who were unable to
hold their own against the Moslems. Events moved
rapidly. The huge Anglo-Indian force had taken pos-
session of Iraq, but it was apparent, however, that the
Iraqis hated the Indians and were not impressed with
the blessings of the Anglo-Indian civil service. Despite
the assertions of Lord Grey, Lord Robert Cecil, Major
General Sir Percy Cox and other persons in the House
of Commons that the British had no obligations in Iraq
during the postwar period, British troops were retained
in the country.
Thus nearly the whole Near and Middle East began a
strenuous revolt against the Allied troops late in 1919,
chiefly due to the failure of Allied diplomats to keep their
promises to the Arabs and to others. The happenings
of 1919, 1920, and 1921 were heavily censored by the
Allies in occupation of Turkey. (The reader should con-
sult the Chronology in this volume.) An obvious attempt
was made to have it appear that the inhabitants of prewar
Turkey were fond of French and British intervention.
An amusing performance was that of M. Georges Picot
at Beirut, who held self-determination papers in one hand
while he doled out food from two French ships with the
other. Colonel Lawrence, who subsequently held an im-
portant position in the Middle Eastern department of the
British Government, wrote in the Times (August 26,
1920) : ''The people of England have been led in Iraq
(Mesopotamia) into a trap from which it will be hard
to escape with dignity and honor. They have been tricked
into it by a steady withholding of information. The
Baghdad communiques are belated, insincere, incom-
plete.'' We know that the rising of the East caused
the British to reverse their policy in Turkey, India,
Persia, Afghanistan, and Egypt; and the French to
capitulate to the Kemalists (Select Document 29). The
Chronology furnishes a mirror for these and other hap-
penings, at home and abroad.
Of the Ottoman Arab lands, Syria by France and Iraq
and Palestine by Britain are held under "mandates"·
accorded by the League of Nations. Transjordania
(Kerak) is under separate British control, while the
extensive Yemen has been lost in the shuftle. There is
no pretense that these "mandates" have any connection
with Article XXII of the Treaty of Versailles, since no
effort has been made to record the free will of the in-
habitants on the desired sovereignties. A plebiscite in
the Middle East is an anachronism.1 No people would
voluntarily accept foreign control except under necessity.
A native government is always preferred to foreign gov-
ernment partly because it is less honest and also because
it is apt to mean remission from taxation. (None of the
great powers have sufficiently appreciated the axiom of
Lord Cromer that alleged benefits conferred on local
people mean nothing to them compared with a reduction
in taxes.) Mr. W. L. Westermann, Chief of the Western
Asia Division, American Commission to Negotiate Peace,
has described the methods used by both France and Great
Britain since the World War in these terms (.Asia, Sep-
tember, 1922) :-"They follow the lesson learned by
General Allenby in his invasion of Palestine and Syria,
that the Near Eastern troops have no defense against
bombing from the air. When the tribes cause trouble, a
1 In the official report of the first Lausanne Conference, Lord Curzon
makes these remarks: '• The plebiscite is a fatal and pernicious syste1n
of endeavor to settle a frontier•••• In every plebiscite held since the
war, it has proved necessary to have an army to keep the people quiet and
to prevent thelll frolll eutting each other 'a throats. ••• Plebiscites are only
good for a unified, not a mixed population, and for a single, not a confused,
issue.''
548 MODERN TURKEY
punitive expedition of airmen soon brings them to reason
by bombing their villages or encampments. But this
method is chiefly effective in the districts settled with
cities and villages. In the desert itself bombing from the
air is of less avail. Here more time-honored methods are
used, of playing one tribe against another, and of con-
trolling the marts along the edge of the desert, where
the nomads are compelled to buy those many necessities
of food and clothing which the desert does not furnish.
In a small way this is the economic blockade. As a
French administrator in northern Africa put it, 'Nomads
are held in check not through desert outposts, but by
way of the stomach.' ''
However, both countries, France and England, have
done a great deal to stabilize economic conditions within
the "mandated" territories, through the construction and
building of railways, irrigation works and other develop-
ment projects. They have also installed efficient methods
in the national and local administration of Syria, Pales-
tine, and Iraq.· The British have only one political officer
in Transjordania. The flourishing Jewish colonies and
the Rutenberg electric power concessions in Palestine are
real achievements, as is the new Jewish University at
Jerusalem. Dr. Elwood Mead, a recognized American
agricultural authority, has stated that the activities in
Palestine since the English have had control have been
the most constructive outcome of the World War. While
the inhabitants of these Arab countries will never be
satisfied with any government, foreign or native, it may
be that in time the local peoples will make a fair balance
sheet of their own situation. No one has yet found an
ideal solution of educating or dealing with backward peo-
ples, especially with those of different traditions and
civilizations. To modernize them, whether desirable or
not, would require several generations. It is a fact, how-
ever, that the people do want to be left alone. What may
happen to them under a continuance of foreign imperial-
ism or colonization is another question, which no one can
answer.
But there is no reason to believe that the future rela-
tions between the Turks and Arabs will continue to re-
main as they are now. Nationalist Turkey has beco~e
separated from its former Arab provinces, while the
Arabs have exchanged their impotent Ottoman rulers for
representatives of Western Powers. It is an extremely
suggestive statement which appeared in the Times late
in 1922, from the widely-read Arab newspaper of Cairo,
Al },fokattam: "Two months ago it was known that
Kemal Pasha favored the creation of an Arab Govern-
ment, to include all the Arab countries which were
formerly part of the Turkish Empire, to work with the
Turkish Government in regard to questions of military,
financial, and foreign policy in a manner similar to that
which obtained in Austro-Hungary before the war."
Such an arrangement is possible but unlikely, that is,
assuming that Great Britain, France, and Soviet Russia
take no steps separately or jointly which may antagonize
greatly the :Moslem world.
Apparently France and Great Britain, and possibly
Italy and Spain, have decided to assume responsibility
for Arab affairs. One of the chief sore spots is Pales-
tine, where the British "mandate" has ·now met with
severe opposition from the Arabs who threaten to stir
up trouble all the way from Tangier on the Atlantic to
Bombay on the Indian Ocean. Lack of unity between
the Allies in their policy toward the Arabs is in general
at the basis of this difficulty. Left to themselves, the
Arabs-Hejazi, Iraqi, N ejdi, Palestinian, Syrian-
will continue their tribal feuds and other internal dissen-
sions and there will be no concerted opposition either by
Arabs alone or in any stable agreement '\\ith the Turks.
In reality, there is less likelihood of a federation between
550 MODERN TURKEY
Arabs and Turks, or a return to the former status, than
there is that both peoples may form outstanding elements
in a strong reaction against Western influence in which
able support can be rendered by Afghanistan, Egypt,
Persia, and possibly India.
That the British foreign office has made a great change
of front regarding its "mandates" is evident from its
policy towards Iraq (Select Pocument 33), which even
goes so far as to promise its ward assistance in joining
the League of Nations! The French foreign office has
relinquished its hoped-for "mandate" over Cilicia, which
remains in Turkey. In November, 1923, when the British
High Commissioner in Palestine offered to treat with
the Palestine Arabs on an official basis similar to that
accorded to the Jews, the proposal was promptly turned
down by the Arabs who did not wish thereby to acknowl-
edge that the Jews, the minority, held an equal position
with them. A recent event regarding the other "man-
dated" areas of prewar Turkey is the action of the execu-
tive committee of the Syro-Palestine congress in :filing a
formal demand with the League of Nations on November
25, 1923, asking that the French and British "mandates"
for Syria, the Lebanon, and Palestine be set aside and
that these three countries be allowed to make up a single
Arab State. The demands are: ( 1) to recognize the in-
dependence and sovereignty of Syria, Lebanon, and
Palestine; (2) to recognize the right of these countries to
unite between themselves, with a civil and parliamen-
tary government, and to federate with other Arabian
states; (3) to pronounce the immediate cession of the
mandates; (4) to order the evacuation of Syria, the
Lebanon, and Palestine now occupied by English and
French troops; (5) to renounce the Balfour declaration
concerning tlie national Jewish home in Palestine. Per-
haps the newly-formed Arab National Party may become
a disturbing factor.
LEGEND
Jla.p compiled "" Col. Lau•rtftr< .Varlin, Carntgit' Endou·mtnl for IRitm<Jtional Peocr.
Tentath·e Mandates for Arab Lands, 1923.
One very important matter which is scarcely referr_ed
to in this chapter but is taken up elsewhere in the book
is the position and location of the Commander of the
FaithfuL The Grand National Assembly at Angora
voted on November 1,1922, "to elect future Khalifs from
the members of the House of Osman; but the individuals
so chosen should be deprived of all temporal power."
This new departure is in marked contrast with the posi-
tion held in recent years by the Turkish Sultan, who has
maintained his religious prestige due to his position as
the head of the strongest Moslem State. Great Britain
has been pursuing the Sherifian policy, which is that of
restoring Moslem leadership to the descendants of the
Prophet, who are represented by Husain and his sons,
the most notable of tlie latter being Emir Feisal. To
the credit of British diplomacy, it should be stated that
their promises in the early days of the war have been
fulfilled to the extent of placing one son on the throne
of Iraq at Baghdad, and another on the throne of the
Transjordanian (Keraki) kingdom at Amman. The Brit-
ish, therefore, have a. strong influence in the Moslem
world. Should the former importance of Baghdad 11nd
other Arab cities be restored, it would doubtless tend to
weaken the Turk's claim as the leader of the Islamic
world and to strengthen tremendously in this respect the
Arab influence in the East. There might be a return to
the romance of "The Thousand and One Nights."
CHAPTER XXV
THE KEMALIST MOVEMENT
"Will you walk a little faster¥" said a whiting to a snail,

"There's a porpoise close behind us, and he's treading on my tail.
See how eagerly the lobsters and the turtles all advance!
They are waiting on the shingle-will you come and join the dance'/
Will you, wo'n't you, will you, wo'n't you, will you join the dance'/
Will you, wo'n't you, will you, wo'n't you, wo'n't you join the dance'/
"You can really have no notion how delightful it will be
When they take us up and throw us, with the lobsters, out to sea!"
But the snail replied, "Too far, too far!" and gave a look askance-
Said he thanked the whiting kindly, but he would not join the dance.
Would not, could not, would not, could not, would not join the
dance.
Would not, could not, would not, could not, could not join the dance.
"What matters it how far we go 'I" his scaly friend replied.
"There is another shore, you know, upon the other side.
The further off from England the nearer is to France-
Then turn not pale, beloved snail, but come and join the dance.
Will you, wo'n't you, will you, wo'n't you, will you join the dance'/
Will you, wo'n't you, will you, wo'n't you, wo'n't you join the dance 'I"
-LEWIS CARROLL, "Alice in Wonderland."
The Kemalist Movekent is commonly referred to as

the Turkish Nationalist Movement. This current par-
lance has been incorporated within this book. A word
of caution, however, should be given in order that the
reader may distinguish between this later successful
manifestation and the international movement which
antedated the World War.
After the overthrow of the ''Red Sultan'' Abdul
Hamid II, the Committee of Union and Progress based
their state policy upon (1) the principle of centralization,
which aimed to make the racial Turks the predominant
force even to the point of excluding the others, and (2) a
552
THE KEMALIST MOVEMENT 553
Pan-Islamic order to resuscitate Ottoman political influ-

ence. At the Congress 'of the Committee of Union and
Progress in 1909, the small "Nationalist" element was
unable to make any headway; but this group gained
many adherents during the subsequent Balkan wars. Its
proponents emphasized the necessity for Turkification
of all Ottomans. In order to accomplish this result, a
resort was made to the religious motive which embraced
the Pan-Islamic idea, and to the Pan-Turanian idea of
assimilating Turkish elements in the Caucasus and else-
where to the East in order to bring about a Turkish racial
union. It was in connection with the Pan-Turanian con-
ception that Enver Pasha, who had fled from Turkey
late in 1918, devoted his efforts in Soviet Russia, the
Caucasus, and Turkestan in 1918-1922. Not only had
Enver Pasha, a pro-German, been "cool" during the
late years of the Great War towards Mustafa Kemal
Pasha, who was not a German sympathizer, but also they
were enemies in the latter period, and were sponsoring
movements that clashed. The former still cherished the
thought of a Pan-Turanian state, the latter was anxious
for a "Turkey for the Turks."
The Kemalist Movement, also known from the outset
as the "National Defense Movement" was based on the
Congresses of Erzerum and Sivas, and has had for its
avowed platform the determination to oppose all efforts
to dismember Turkey. In order to place this patriotic
revolution in its proper perspective, it is well to sketch
rather briefly the. significant political events in Turkey
during 1918-1923, inclusive.
In the autumn of the year 1918, Turkey realized that
she was a defeated nation and that it was hopeless to
continue war operations. On October 8, 1918, Turkish
emissaries were sent from Smyrna on a peace mission;
on the 30th of that month, the Allies and the Turkish
representatives signed the armistice which was to go
554 MODERN TURKEY
I
into effect the next day. Under the terms of this Mudros
Agreement (Select Document 14), the Turks were granted
an armistice rather than an unconditional surrender:
The terms, prepared by an Allied naval officer, may be
criticised for inadequate handling of a conquered nation,
a land rather than a sea power. Noteworthy was the
failure to provide for any immediate surrender of equip-
ment, arms, and ammunition. Article 7 gave the Allies
"the right to occupy any strategic points in the event
of any situation arising which threatens the security of
the Allies.'' But the Armenian provinces must have
been thought to have an outside status, for Article 23
provides, ''In case of disorder in the six Armenian
vilayets, the Allies reserve for themselves the right to
occupy any part of them." What actually happened
after the Mudros Armistice was the occupation by the
Allies (British, French, and Italians) of Constantinople
and the leading coast cities of the eastern Mediterranean.
The British, in addition, had large forces which had been
operating in the region south of the Taurus and the Anti-
Taurus. The Armenian country was left to the mercies
of the more or less disbanded Ottoman forces.
The Allied and Associated Powers believed that
they had achieved their war aims in the Near East ;
namely, the wresting of European territory from the
Turks and the liberation of the Armenians. The Turks
knew that they were completely defeated and were not
prepared to offer opposition to whatever terms might be
imposed upon them. Absolutely dejected and fatalistic,
they believed that their situation was the expressed will
of Allah. They had suffered heavy casualties· especially
at the time of the Russian advance: their losses were
436,924 dead and as many wounded. The civilian popu-
lation had suffered great hardships; and the for~I~:er
leaders, Enver Pasha, Talaat Pasha and J emal (Djemal)
Pasha had fled. The country was wholly disorganized.
Courleltll Aot•
Ldt-Turkish Soldiers Preparing for Their Greek Offensive. Right-The President's Mansion in the Angora
Suburbs-A Contrast to the Sultans' Palaces.
This paralyzed situation in the conquered country

continued as late as the spring of 1919; but nothing
seemed to happen. The Allies were in military occupa-
tion of Constantinople and certain other strategic points
but they did little in the way of enforcing their will upon
the Turks; moreover they failed to work together. Time
after time, the separate desires of the British, French,
and Italians in turn were balked by the other two. This
division made the Turks more at home, but they could
not believe that there was even a chance of making a
successful recovery against the victors.
The blame for this delay can be traced clearly to Allied
secret agreements made during wartime. The Paris
Peace Conference had its first meeting on January 18,
1919, but nothing was done in regard to the Near Eastern
situation with any definiteness until the Treaty of Sevres,
signed on August 10, 1920. Naturally the intensive con-
sideration of the Turkish peace terms '
was postponed .
until the final treaties with the Central Powers were out
of the way, but the various pacts, largely unpublished,
were a hindrance to all postwar decisions. Mr. Ray
Stannard Baker ("Woodrow Wilson and World Settle-
ment") has stated that the secret Pact of London, which
was the condition under which Italy entered the war,
was the chief stumbling block and took up more time than
anything else in the Paris Conference. Interesting was
the testimony of a former member of the British foreign
office, Lord Eustace Percy: "For weeks and months
during the Paris Conference, we delayed making, I do
not say a settlement, but in giving any consideration to
the Turkish question. It was a question which had been
discussed in some detail both in the Departments here
and internationally with certain of our Allies before
the Armistice. It had been made the subject of inter-
national agreements, of the merits of which I say nothing
556 MODERN TURKEY
here. There was the Sykes-Picot agreement, for in-
stance. There had been more intensive work upon that
than on any other single subject which was brought be4
fore the Paris Conference for settlement, but it was the
one subject which the British delegation at Paris was for-
bidden so much as to mention during the whole of the
first four, almost five months of the Conference. No
meeting of the Near Eastern Commission of the Confer-
ence was allowed to be held." (Parliamentary Debates,
House of Commons, vol. 152, page 1040.)
The outstanding wartime agreements, of which only
the secret Treaty of London of April 26, 1915, was made
officially public before November, 1918, are reproduced
in part in the Select Documents. A knowledge of their
contents is essential for understanding subsequent hap-
penings. All the schemes for the partition of Asia Minor
entered into by the Allies during wartime naturally were
great obstacles when it came to the settlement of the
Adriatic as well as the Eastern question. The Sykes-
Picot Agreement between ·France, Great Britain, and
Russia (Select Document 5), and the St. Jean de Man-
rienne Agreement between France, Great Britain, and
Italy (Select Document 9) were especial sources of diffi-
culty. A British delegate at the Paris Peace Conference,
Professor Toynbee, in ''The Western Question in Greece
and Turkey,'' writes bluntly when he characterizes the
underlying motives of the Allies as ''covetousness,'' add-
ing that "it resulted, likely, in nothing more substan-
tial than the precarious honor among thieves who find
their business threatened by a vigorous and talented
competitor. Some of the thieves, at any rate, never got
out of the habit of picking their temporary partner's
pockets.''
This was the situation at the Paris Conference on
May 15, 1919, when the Greek forces landed in Smyrna
and were the mainspring for the Nationalist Movement
THE KEMAUST MOVEMENT 557
correctly associated with the dramatic career of Mustafa
Kemal Pasha, a man of action and of keen insight.
Mustafa Kemal comes from a Mohammedan family of
Salonika and is reported to be of mixed Albanian, Jewish,
and Turkish ancestry. He had had a distinguished record
as a soldier. In 1908 he graduated from the Mekteb-i-
Harbi, the Turkish military school of Constantinople
which has been one of the nursing grounds of Turkish
intrigue~ and he knew well the instigators of the revolt
of 1908.
He was a commander at Gallipoli; but because of
his talents as well as his independence, he incurred the
hostility of General Liman von Sanders as well as of
Enver Pasha and was sent as far as possible from Con-
stantinople. He had several assignments in Asia Minor
and Syria during the war and was the officer at Aleppo
who made the strongest stand against General Allenby's
sweeping advances. His knowledge of military tactics
as well as his personal ability gave him a well-deserved
reputation. His record has been one of real devotion
to his country and has been free from all charges of using
his various positions to fill his private purse.
In the late spring of 1918, just prior to the Smyrna
landing, Kemal was detailed as inspector general in
Anatolia in charge of the skeleton forces which General
Milne, the Allied Commander in Chief, had sanctioned at
Erzerum and Sivas for gendarmerie purposes. On the
authority of Mr. Claire Price, it appears that Kemal
spent three hours in revising the instructions of the
Allied general staff so as to give him authority to act
under any conceivable situation; the instructions thu~
changed were placed in a hurry before the Grand Vizier
Damad Ferid Pasha (generally regarded as, a· ~'tool'~
of the Allies) and signed by him without being read; and
that duplicate copies of the corrected original were sent
by the Allied headquarters to subordinate officers in.Asia
558 MODERN TURKEY
Minor. A later historian may discern the exact character
of the relations between Damad Ferid and Mustafa
Kemal, but this we do know, that the latter was the
designated representative of both the Allies and the Otto-
man Government, serving the latter as governor of
Erzerum. The later so-called "break 12 with the Sublime
Porte, as expressed in the Kemalist uprising, appears to
the writer to be fact rather than myth.
The landing of Italian troops at Adalia on April 29,
1919, was primarily responsible for the subsequent land-
ing of the Greeks at Smyrna. The Italians were anxious
to have the Pact of London and the St. Jean de Maurienne
Agreement translated into action, but were making little
headway against the clever Greek statesman, Venizelos.
The attitude of the Allied and Associated Powers on the
Fiume question stirred up so much resentment in Italy
that Signor Orlando left the Peace Conference. Fearing
a repetition of the Fiume affair in southwestern Anatolia,
the Powers acceded to the entreaties of M. Venizelos to
forestall such a possibility by sending over Greek troops
to Smyrna as a preliminary to a Greater Hellas. The
announced reason was that the Turkish irregular troops
and civilians were being unruly, and that the Greek and
other minorities were in great danger. 1 It was on this
1 The writer, who was in Smyrna during the week previous to the occupa-
tion; became familiar with the local situation. The universal testimony of
local Americans, British, French and Italians, many of whom had lived
in Asia Minor during most of their lifetime, was that the situation could
probably be kept well in hand providing that there was no outside aggres-
sion. Well-informed, absolutely honest persons, whom the writer does not
wish to quote, expressed the fear that Hellenic forces might be sent there.
It was this fear more than anything else which was disturbing the local
inhabitants. I arrived at Smyrna on an American destroyer and left
Smyrna two days before the occurrence, on the flagship of Rear Admiral
Bristol, in charge of the American fleet in the Eastern Mediterranean
waters. Personally, I had no knowledge of what was to happen and as
far as I could learn my ignorance was shared by most officials and private
parties in the vicinity. It is noteworthy that Professor Toynbee reports
that the British officers in charge of the Smyrna interior section had no
.basis that Article 7 was invoked. It should not be won-
dered at if Messrs. Clemenceau, Lloyd George, and Wil-
son, no one of whom had been in Turkey, had believed
the exaggerated reports of disorders and had become
convinced that the Greek forces would easily conquer, if
need be, all of Asia Minor.
Whatever may have been the motives back of the
Smyrna landings, its significance for us lies in its effect
upon the young Nationalist Movement in Anatolia. Any-
one with any knowledge of the geographical hazards or
of the situation at the moment should have realized that
the throwing in of Greek troops into this important part
of Asia Minor would meet with probable disaster. It
was unfair to both Greeks and Turks. Naturally it made
a strong appeal to the Hellenes and also, though with
less effect, to the Greeks living under Turkish rule. Senti-
ment over the revival of Greek influence in the 'Egean
was evoked and the traditions of the early Greek colonies
were revived. To the Greek invaders, the occupation
assumed the nature of a conquest ; to the Turks, the qu~s-
prior knowledge whatever of the ominous occurrence. The writer can aBSert
without fear of contradiction that it was an exceedingly well-kept secret.
The landing was accompanied by excesses on the part of the Greek mili-
tary forces, in fact miscellaneous reports of damaging character were
circulated so freely that the Peace Conference sent distinguished repre.
aentatives to conduct an impartial inquiry. The findings, which appear
in part as Select Document 17, have never been published officially. The
withholding of the report was due to a desire of the former British Premier
to protect M. Venizelos; in this respect, old-time diplomacy won the day.
Despite the numerous attempts made by interested parties in various coun-
tries to learn the facta regarding the underlying cause and the carrying
out of the Smyrna occupation, the facts have been consistently clouded.
That all has not been outright misrepresentation is evident from the fol·
lowing humorous debate in the House of Commons, May 26, 1919, as
officially printed: •
Lieut.-Colonel Herbert asked if the Allies have landed at Smyrna in the
eause of Belt-determination or for the sake of self-interest f
Mr. Harmsworth: "'lhe landing at Smyrna was earried out by the direct
ordera of the Supreme Council of the Peace Conference in accordance with
the terms of Article 1 of the conditions of the Armistice with Turkey."
Lieut.-Colonel Herbert: "Arising out of that answer, may I ask if it
is true that rabies. have apread to Pariat"
560 MODERN TURKEY
tion became one of defending their country now or never.
Patriotic Turks, though they all did not openly express
their allegiance, rallied around Mustafa Kemal Pasha
who, as inspector general of Turkish troops, was on the
move travelling through Asia Minor. On July 27, 1919,
the first organized congress of the new Nationalist Party
took place at Erzerum, attended by a few Turkish
patriots. This was a forerunner of the better known Con-
gress of Sivas on September 13, which issued the famous
declaration: "All methods and all means are taken with
a view to safeguard the Sultanate, the supreme Khalifate
and the integrity of the country in the case where the
Turkish government under foreign pressure should be
called upon to abandon no matter what part of our terri-
tory." (Select Document 16.) The best statement of
the activities of this nationalist group at that time ap-
pears in the findings of the American Military Mission
to Armenia, which investigated at first hand the actual
situation and came into connection with the leaders at
a time when the Kemalist Movement was little known,
was under a cloud as far as the Allies were concerned,
and was in announced disfavor with the Imperial Govern-
ment at Constantinople.
The year 1920 was an important one in the growth of
the Nationalist Movement. It marked the final break
with the Constantinople Government, the beginning of
a definite war with Greece, and the entering into inter-
national relations on the part of the new government.
it was a year, moreover, in which the Allies were failing
more and more to present a united front against the in-
surgents. On January 28, 1920, the Ottoman Parliament
at Constantinople approved the terms of the National
Pact (Select Document 18), the Declaration of Inde-
pendence of the New Turkey. This Pact had been pre-
viously prepared by the Nationalist Government. The
military excesses in Cilicia, aggravated by the French
enrollment of Armenian legions to fight against the
Turks, carried with them reports, subsequently verified,
of massacres and other disorders, which aroused the anti-
Turk feeling among the peoples in Western countries.
On March 10, 1920, in the House of Lords, Lord Curzon
declared that "the Allies, acting in unison, cannot any
longer acquiesce in a state of affairs in which they are
flouted at Constantinople while persecutions and massa-
cres occur everywhere." While it would have been
natural to have sent battleships to the scenes of the dis-
orders, Lord Curzon announced in later parliamentary
debates that Allied officers in Turkey recommended that
force be exhibited at Constantinople, which remained
the nominal seat of government.
On March 16, 1920, the Allies effected a fresh occupa-
tion of Constantinople (Select Document 19}. Allied con-
trol officers were withdrawn from the interior of Asia
Minor. Most of the influential Turks who had given
expression to their patriotic opinions were deported by
British. officers to Malta or escaped their clutches and
fled to Asia Minor. Among the number who were kept
for many months at the Mediterranean stronghold were
Rauf Bey, the Turkish Admiral who was a signatory of
the Mudros Armistice, and Rahmi Bey, the former gov-
ernor of Smyrna who had been praised by British officials
for his clemency during the World War.
Again the Allies blundered. The occupation which was
carried out by British forces during the absence of
General Franchet d 'Esperey was a remarkably tame
affair. The British squadron which had taken part in
the Battle of Jutland added to the effectiveness of the
display and also trained its guns on the Turkish quarters
of the city. Every day British marines appeared on
parade in various parts of the city. There was told to
me the authentic story of two Turks who, in watching
one of these processions, expressed to each other their
562 MODERN TURKEY
conviction that what they had heard must be true;
namely, that during the World War the British army
had been practically wiped out. They reasoned that the
marines were all that was left of the British military or
naval personnel; that the British were giving the local
population one last look. The use of military and naval
forces many hundreds of miles away from the theatre
of disturbances, the levelling of ''Christian'' guns on
Stamboul and in the direction of the Sultan's palace on
the Bosporus, and the deportation of Turkish notables
became keen weapons to the Kemalist cause. Thereafter,
even those Turks who had made at least a show of sup-
porting the effete government at Constantinople placed
their further hopes on the struggling patriots in the
Turkish homeland. "If the Greek landing at Smyrna
created the Turkish national movement,'' wrote Pro-
fessor Toynbee, "the British support of the Sultan at
Constantinople made its fortune.''
The Sheikh-ul-Islam and the Grand Vizier publicly
denounced the nationalists as "rebels." On April 23,
the Nationalist Assembly, meeting at Angora, formed
their temporary constitution known as the Law of Funda-
mental Organization, in which they declared that their
government was the sole government of Turkey. The
Greek advance into the interior of Asia Minor began in
the month of June, 1920, with the entrance by the Greek
army into the ancient Turkish city of Brusa. This ad-
vance was made with the permission of the Allies and
was the beginning of prolonged conflict between the
Turks and the Greeks which was to result, for the mo-
ment, in the successful advance of the Greeks into Turk-
ish territory. This advance, however, was not to be a
continuous one, for the Nationalist army, which in May,
1919, had numbered about 20,000, was being organized
by Fevzi Bey and others into a successful fighting force.
The Nationalist Government in the year 1920 already
began to have its own international relations. There
was a "military convention" between the Kemalists and
Soviet Russia, followed by accords with the Caucasian
Soviet Republics. These agreements were used as propa-
ganda by the Allies to stir up renewed resistance to t_he
Kemalist Movement. There were powerful reasons for
fearing these agreements which were already reacting
in India, Persia, and Afghanistan. These crafty arrange-
ments with the masters of the former Tsarist Russian
territory brought gold, military equipment, and moral
power to the Kemalist cause. Without this assistance,
the struggling patriots would probably not have achieved
their goal (the terms of the National Pact}; certainly
not in 1922, since their only local aid was the result of
very heavy taxation and thirty to fifty per cent requisi-
tions. They did not resort to loans or to currency infla-
tion. Thus the ability of 1\Iustafa Kemal to capitalize
the Allied boycott of Soviet Russia was a mighty ally
to the cause, in which he was· aided by a loyal group
including·Rauf Bey, Halideh Edib Ranum, Adnan Bey,
Ismet Pasha, and 1\Iuheddin Pasha, characterized by
Kemal as the soldier and man "who gave us all our ideals
of liberty."
In the early part of 1920, the Allies worked out in the
rough the treaty with Turkey. In January and Feb-
ruary frequent conferences were held in London (Lord
Curzon stated in the House of Commons that he pre-
sided over these meetings) ; the :final details were worked
out at San Remo {see Select Document 21 for certain
interallied provisions); and on August tenth, at Sevres,
four treaties and one protocol were presented to the
delegates from the Sublime Porte and signed by them.
No one of the Allies regarded the Angora Government
as possessed of political authority. By the Treaty of
Sevres, the Hellenes were to be given virtual control of
Smyrna and its hinterland; Italy received only a "sphere
564 MODERN TURKEY
of influence" in southern Anatolia, including the port
of Adalia; Great Britain and France were to receive
essentially the same territorial privilege~ as were laid
out in the Sykes-Picot Agreement; the capitulations were
to be reestablished and extended. In a word, Turkey
was to be developed thereafter entirely under foreign
tutelage. (For significant economic terms, see Select
Documents 22 and 23.) But the Treaty was never ratified
by any nation except Greece. The Allies were helpless
in enforcing its provisions on the vanquished nation.
The Nationalists pledged themselves to resist to the end
any attempt to enforce the Treaty of Sevres.
Again Allah seemed to be on the side of the Kemalists
when, after the death of King Alexander of Greece on
October 25 caused by a monkey bite, popular elections
in Greece held on December 5, 1920, resulted in a sweep-
ing decision to recall Constantine as the King of the
Hellenes. The result of this plebiscite greatly imbittered
France against Greece ; and since Greece was regarded
as a protege of Great Britain, the French foreign office
.gave its backing to the Kemalists. In defense of this
change in policy, the late M. Philippe Millet has stated
that the French attitude was based on three considera-
tions, (1) a strong Turkey, (2) a regard for the French
Moslem colonies, and (3) the Straits. The main fault
with French policy, he added, has been the one which
Austria has been reproached for; namely, that of being
invariably late in doing the right thing. The British
foreign policy was to conserve and consolidate the mili-
tary and diplomatic gains in the East (with little regard
for Indian Mohammedans), and to work through the
Hellenes in the Balkans and Asia Minor. Thus, France
and Britain were sowing seeds of discord which imme-
diately germinated· in their European diplomatic
relations.
During 1921 and 1922 the Nationalist Movement de-
veloped rapidly until it finally triumphed completely.
The Constantinople Government became a mere figure-
head; the Government at Angora assumed control of the
country. On January 16, 1921, Izzet Pasha came from
the Sublime Porte to Angora on a special mission. On
January 30, Mustafa Kemal made the statement that
since the Angora Government was now the only one in
Turkey, he was sending a mission to the London Con-
ference of the Allies concerning the revision of the Treaty
of Sevres. During the year 1921, further agreements
were made by the Nationalist authorities with outside
powers. In March, 1921, the French and Italians reached
separate agreements with the Kemalist Government.
During the same month, Soviet Russia and the Kemalist
Government signed a very important treaty (Select
Document 27), by which Russia restored the Turkish
territory which she had secured in 1878 and also pledged
Bolshevistic support to the Kemalist cause. Without the
immediate knowledge of Great Britain, the French made
another agreement (Select Document 29) which caused
further ill-feeling between the two countries across the
channel.
Finally on August 10, 1921, exactly one year after the
abortive peace treaty was signed, the Supreme War
Council to "save its face" in the Grreco-Turkish War ~e
clared the neutrality of England, France, Italy, and
Japan. This announcement was not only a blow to the
Greek side, but also it had a strong moral effect on the
Turkish army and nation. By the brilliant resistance at
the battle of the Sakkaria, one of the decisive battles of
the twentieth century, Turkey again demonstrated her
unexcelled ability as a defensive military force. Unfor-
tunately it is not possible to describe the various engage-
ments of the years 1920-1922. In February, 1922, the
Greeks admitted their inability to carry on the Asia
Minor campaign much longer, but this matter was appar-
566 MODERN TURKEY
ently treated in a rather casual fashion by the British
Government. At least so it would appear, since in par-
liament Mr. Lloyd George, Lord Birkenhead and other
cabinet officers stated that they had no knowledge of the
important letter from the Greek premier, M. Gounaris,
conveying this information. (Because of the lack of
Allied support Greek officials stated that they were
"jettisoned" ; and on November 28, 1922, the revolu-
tionary government at Athens carried out the execution
of leading political and military officials. In the House
of Commons, on December. 7, 1922, Mr. Lloyd George
admitted that M. Gounaris' note was circulated in the
British cabinet but that he was away at the time and
that it did not come to his attention.)
The Greek situation was getting more hopeless every
day. At home, the drachma was at a great discount,
the political strifes were very pronounced, the people
were impatient for a decision in Anatolia. The troops
were ill-clothed and ill-fed, pay was in arrears, and they
were on the verge of mutiny because of their incompetent
officers-the result of King Constantine's action in
changing practically the entire Greek staff in Asia Minor.
In order to find out whether the Allies were willing to
support them, the Greek army threatened to occupy Con-
sta;ntinople. The stern refusal of the Allied officers to
back her in this move, and taking into account Great Brit-
ain's refusal to recognize Constantine, prompted the de-
cision to retire from Asia Minor. The hangings of Greek
war and political leaders for their share in the previous
military catastrophe have already been mentioned.
While there is a great deal of evidence therefore to
support the claim of the Greek military leaders that th.ey
planned an early withdrawal from Asia Minor, the fact
remains that the Greek army was completely overcome.
On September 9, the advanced Turkish troops entered
Smyrna, followed a few days later by Mustafa Kemal
Pasha, the Ghazi (Conqueror). On September 14, there
was the disastrous Smyrna fire in which the Armenian
and· Greek quarters suffered the most. Except for the
Turkish quarter and the waterfront, little remains of that
fascinating city.1
Due to the great military successes of the Nationalists,
the sudden change in Turkish affairs created an entirely
new situation for the Allies. On September 16, Mr. Lloyd
George made his famous appeal to the British dominions
for military action against the Turks. He also called on
the Little Entente for assistance. Major General Sir
F. Maurice, who was in Constantinople at the time, wrqte
in the Contemporary Review (November, 1922): "Never
has any government in such a situation made a more
mischievous pronouncement." The British General
stated that not only was the sanctity of the freedom of
the Straits or an appeal based on the British graves a~
Gallipoli mere humbug, but in fact the ''freedom of the
Straits" had been admitted "never to have been the
cause of war." Likewise, The Near Ea.st (October 26)
commented that the facts were established that: (1) the
freedom of the Straits was not in jeopardy from the
& In spite of my endeavors to find out the original culprits, my results
are negative. According to responsible British and French officials, the
blame is to be placed either on the shoulders of the Armenians or the Greeks
(it is not an unusual occurrence for distressed people to go to any extremity
to secure outside sympathy). There is testimony on the part of other well
informed persons that the Turks were responsible. Suffice to say, Mustafa
Kemal Pasha's orders were for his troops to refrain from all excesses, a
most difficult order to be carried out under such circumstances; and that
there would seem to be more reason for the Turks' preference to have their
reconquered city intact rather than otherwise. The files of Current History
are most useful for evidence by various nationalities. The writer places
great importance on a letter from Rev. Edward C. Moore, president of the
American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions, that the testimony
. as to the guilty race is so absolutely eontlicting as to make impossible any
definite conclusion. The wearing of the fez, it should be added, is an
indication of nationality rather than race; when the Turkish forces reached
Smyrna, most natives had donned the fez. It is well known that when the
Hellenic troops landed in Smyrna in May, 1919, they attacked in their
ignorance all wearers of the fez, including many of their racial kinsmen.
568 MODERN TURKEY
Kemalists; (2) if it had been, war could not have secured
the freedom; (3) the expression "the freedom of the
Straits" has no fixed meaning; ( 4) at the time of the
September 16 manifesto the only possible way of securing
the freedom of the Straits (whatever view of Great Brit-
ain's interests be held) was by agreement with Turkey.
On September 19, French Premier Poincare announced
that France was unwilling to join Great Britain in a
display of military force and advised the British to
withdraw from Chanaq, the strategic point on the Darda-
nelles. The British forces refused to withdraw and held
the ground alone against the Kemalist troops, flushed
with victory. This single-handed action of the British
evoked universal admiration and on the part of no one
more than the Turks.
The display of French weakness, after three years of
inactive duty on the Straits, seriously interfered with
the prestige of France which had been previously en-
hanced greatly by Mr. Lloyd George's pro-Greek speech
of August 4, 1922 (Select Document 32). M. Franklin-
Bouillon, the ranking member of the French Senate com-
mittee on foreign affairs, was sent as special Allied
emissary to deal with the victorious leaders. Due to
"the advance of the Turkish forces, the situation along the
Straits was very delicate. Ismet Pasha, the Turkish
Chief of Staff and General Harington, the Commander
in Chief of the Allied forces, conducted their negotiations .
along the best lines of diplomacy. The restraint mani-
fested was a credit to both parties. General Maurice has
ref erred to an "amazing blunder" which "almost
plunged us into war,'' when on the morning of Septem-
ber 30, the officially inspired British wireless press pub-
lished a statement that ''Last night a very grave view of
the situation was taken in official circles and it was qe-
cided to send through to General Harington to make a
peremptory demand for the withdrawal of Turkish troops
from the neutral zone within a definite and short period.''
Only the calmness of the British General prevented the
distinct likelihood of a new war, which might have in-
volved most of the participants in the previous world
struggle.
The Armistice of Mudania (a small port on the Sea
of Marmara) was signed by the Greek and Turkish
plenipotentiaries on October 11 (Select Document 34).
By this armistice, the Smyrna district and Eastern
Thrace remained definitely Turkish. One of the first acts
of the Ghazi following the armistice was the assignment
of Refet Pasha as governor of Eastern Thrace, where the
previous postwar military efforts of J aafar Pasha had
been overcome by the Allies. There was some danger
that the impatient Turkish troops might bring about con-
certed military movement throughout the Middle East
with the aid of a tremendous amount of war material
abandoned by the Greeks. Mustafa Kemal Pasha was
in a position to make a threat towards the Caucasus, or
southward in the direction of Syria and Palestine or
through Iraq and Afghanistan with India as a prime
objective. In these possible military adventures, he
might have secured some support from the Soviet Re-
publics and from the Moslem East. At no time in history
has Turkey stood higher in the eyes of the whole Moslem
world.
To the great credit of Mustafa Kemal and his fol-
lowers, plans for peace engaged their nearly undivid_ed
attention. The Grand National Assembly at Angora ex-
erted its power. The authorities at Angora were bitte~;
against Mohammed VI, the nominal Turkish Sultan-
Khalif, and accused him of treason. Then followed the
remarkable procedure of the Sultan of the Turks fleeing
from Constantinople on a Christian battleship, the Brit-
ish dreadnaught ltfalaya. A Turkish newspaper of
Constantinople, the Renin, remarked: "The house of
570 MODERN TURKEY
Osman has given our country 36 sultans, great and little,
good and bad, but hitherto there has been known none so
pusillanimous as Vahideddin, who has now turned his
back upon the sepulchres of his ancestors, and is about
to start on who knows what adventures.'' The Assembly,
taking religious matters into its own hands, elected as
the new Khalif, Abdul Mejid Effendi, second son of the
late Sultan Aziz, who was judged the most acceptable
member of the family of Osman, a man of piety, and
whose paintings have been exhibited at the Galata Ser;;ti.
Interesting was the fact that at his induction into office,
prayers were said in Turkish rather than in Arabic,
another evidence of the nationalistic idea which was pre-
vailing more and more strongly in the New Turkey. At
the famous J ama Masjid Mosque at Delhi and at other
Indian mosques, special Friday prayers were offered for
the new Khalif and for the continued success of Mustafa
Kemal Pasha.
The engineers of the nationalistic movement now
.entered the Peace Conference stage. In England, Pre-
mier Lloyd George, who was probably as responsible as
any one man for winning the World War, was defeated
in a general election, mainly because of his Near Eastern
policy. He was the last of that group of great men,-
Wilson, Orlando, Clemenceau and Venizelos,-who could
stand the afterwar reaction as expressed through popu-
lar vote. The new British ministry, with Mr. Bonar Law
as prime minister, retained as its secretary for foreign
affairs Lord Curzon, who had been exceedingly influen-
tial in the determination of British foreign policy,
although many acts which fell within his jurisdiction
had been handled independently and unbeknown to him
by Mr. Lloyd George and his secretariat. Lord Curzon,
the chief British delegate to the first Lausanne Confer-
ence, was also the outstanding Allied figure during the
deliberations between the now victorious Turks and the
Allies. For the first time since the armistice of 1918,

there was a spectacle of a negotiated rather than a die·
ta ted peace. The problem of the conferenee was to settle
differences arising from both the Great War and the
Grreco-Turkish struggle. To what extent the Greeks com-
mitted the Allies during their postwar operations in
Asia Minor, contemporary history has failed to indicate.
The keynote of the first Lausanne Conference, which
opened on November 20, 1922, was struck when on the
first day Ismet Pasha took that occasion to reaffirm that
the delegates from Angora were taking part on an abso-
lutely equal footing with the other Powers, a position
which was not questioned by any delegate. In a word,
the whole sum and substance of the Turkish claim was
to stand by the principles of the National Pact (Select
Document 18), which. the Turkish delegates in close com-
munication with Angora did. The opposition was not
too great because the Allies, unwilling to precipitate a
new war, were placed in the role of trying to retain as
many of their prewar privileges as possible. During
the entire session of the conference, November 20, 1922
to February 4, 1923, inclusive, the forces of imperialism,
commercialism, and nationalism were hard at work.
The chief Allied representative was thought to be
somewhat handicapped because his knowledge of the Easf
was derived largely from his intimate scholarly knowl-
edge of former conditions (largely in the Middle East),
and that he was unfamiliar with this modern type of
Mohammedan. In the first few sessions he was likened
to a schoolmaster laying down the law to naughty pupils.
Ismet Pasha, a great general and a strong verbal strate-
gist, which his small stature, deafness and rigid facial
expressions belied, was by circumstances the real master
of the Conference. He applied the tactics which had been
so successful on the battlefield and did not budge from
his primary objectives. Like General Grant, the objec-
572 MODERN TURKEY
tives were clear and he was absolutely unwilling to
give up until they were achieved. The experienced Brit-
ish diplomat was unable to swerve Ismet Pasha even
on February 4, 1923, when he delivered virtually an
ultimatum to the Turkish delegation: ''No Allied dele-
gates would accept separate discussion. They had all
reached a point where delay or waiting would produce
no further change." In this respect the British were
double-crossed by the French, who made plain to the
Turks that, after all, the prepared terms were subject
to modifications. The strategic position of the Turkish
delegation, which had been greatly helped throughout
the conference by the participation of the French and
Italian·s in the Ruhr, was thereby tremendously en-
hanced. In commenting on this climax which turned into
an anticlimax, the Spectator remarked that, in 1878,
Disraeli kept the train waiting in Berlin and brought
home "peace without honour," while Lord Curzon who
kept the train waiting at Lausanne brought "honour
without peace."
The Grand National Assembly refused to accept the
prepared peace terms but that body authorized the re-
sumption of negotiations, which actually took place on
April 22, 1923.
The Turkish delegation in this resumed conference en-
deavored to secure American support through the grant-
ing of the Chester Concession (April9) 1 and at the same.
time drive a further wedge between France and Great
Britain, and to exert further pressure on the French by
the massing of troops on the Syrian frontier. The new
• To quote the Tevhiil-Efkar of Constantinople:
"We accepted the Chester Concession very hastily, and we hoped by
this concession to gain America on our side. Quite contrary to our expecta-
tion, America has displayed a very strange attitude toward our cause. As
· soon as we approved the Chester Concession, England and France put stub-
born difficulties in the way of peace. If we had not given the Chester
Concession before concluding the peace, we should have avoided ninety
per cent of the difficulties at Lausanne.''
negotiations had to do largely with economic and finan-
cial affairs, including primarily the capitulations. The
Turks were allowed to reopen ninety-two of the one hun-
dred and sixty articles of the main treaty, the original
terms of which had been distinctly favorable to the Turks
and unfavorable to the minorities as well as to the Allies.
This second conference, in which M. Montagne, the Ital-
ian delegate, was the outstanding negotiator, resulted
in further sweeping concessions to the Turks. Without
taking up the various issues involved at the conference
or the settlement of each, the outcome of the proceedings
can be found in the leading provisions which are given
in Select Document 36.
On July 24, 1923, at Lausanne peace terms and numer-
ous protocols were signed, incorporating the terms
agreed upon by the Greeks and Turks on January 30, and
in addition the settlement of the Great War. On August
23, the Grand National Assembly ratified the Treaty
of Peace; on December 31, none of the governments of
the Allied signatories had taken action. The new status
of Turkey was recognized in the negotiation of a Turko-
American treaty of commercial amity signed at Lausanne
on August 4, which provides for the resumption of
diplomatic relations between the United States and Tur-
key after their severance on April20, 1917. During 1923
this treaty did not come before the American Senate for
ratification.
The Turkish Moslems were united in a common cause
until after the successful conclusion of the Grreco-Turk-
ish conflict. With the cessation of military operations
were inaugurated the inevitable political divisions among
the supporters of the State. Ghazi Mustafa Kemal
Pasha was the moving spirit behind the organization of
the "Defense of Rights Party of Anatolia and Rumaili"
which met at Angora on April 8, 1923, and adopted a
party platform based on the following fundamental prin-
574 MODERN TURKEY
ciples: (1) sovereignty belongs absolutely to the Na-
tion, (2) the Grand National Assembly is the real repre-
sentative of the people, (3) immediate steps must be
taken to establish public order, ( 4) justice must be ad-
ministered promptly in· Turkish courts and the civil code
reformed to the new national status in accordance with
advice from trained jurists, ( 5) economic reforms should
be undertaken (including the revision of the dime, or
tenth, tax; agricultural aid through loans; increased
facilities of the Agricultural Bank and· tools imported
on a large scale; building of railways; improved forestry
and mining legislation, etc.), (6) length of military serv-
ice to be reduced, (7) provision to be made for reserve
officers and for pensions for widows and orphans, (8) ad-
ditional share of municipalities in government affairs,
(9) to place Turkey on a peace basis but with financial
and economic independence safeguarded.
The "Defense of Rights" party remains the chief
party in Turkey. It may be said to stand for the State
policy. Its main planks relate to the abolition of the
Sultan, diminished power for the. Khalif, and the su-
premacy of the Grand National Assembly. Another po-
litical group is known by the name of the "Defenders of
the Power of the Sultan" which is in sympathy with the
nationalist idea and the broad policy of the Assembly,
but is said to favor the sultanate in some modified form.
This second party, which includes the khojas and other
conservative elements, is the chief opposition group.
There is a small labor party and also a group that pro-
fesses bolshevist principles but neither is likely to be
of much influence because of the peculiar conditions in
the country. A fairly strong political· group consi~ts
of the survivors of the Committee of Union and Progress,
many of whose leaders are in Europe and wh<?se stand-
ing is still at a rather low ebb on account of the activities
and flight of their notorious former leaders. At the elec-
f:owtuw Alid
Prl'sitlt•nt :O.fus:nfu Kl'lnnl an'l his Inftut'nlia .. Attraetive Wife,
Lntift'h Hnnum.
tions in August, 1923, the Defense of Rights party won

an overwhelming victory. Despite the many circum-
stances attending any "popular" election in an Eastern
country where it is not always possible to vote according
to one's innermost conviction, the returns indicated that
Mustafa Kemal Pasha was still regarded as the great
Turkish hero of modern times. He was elected presi-
dent of the National Assembly by a vote of 196 to 1.
When the National Assembly proclaimed a Republic on
October 29, this remarkable leader was named as the
first President. As his influence and power have in-
creased so likewise have the feelings of admiration or
enmity as expressed by his compatriots. Rauf Bey and
other sincere builders and leaders within the party have
already taken issue publicly on certain questions-a not
unhealthy sign in a republican form of government, but
unusual in a despotic land. It is too early to prophesy
the outcome.
But the Kemalist Movement, which has made a New
Turkey which bears no resemblance to the Ottoman Em-
pire of 1914 and which differs greatly from the National-
ist Turkey of 1920-1922, has met with astounding civil,
military, and diplomatic successes.
APPENDIX I
What system of English spelling is the best to adopt tor Eastern

proper and common names is a vexing question. Arabic, French,
Greek, Latin, Persian, Russian, and Turkish words, in several alphabets,
present unusual difficulties in the attempt to attain uniformity and
scholarship. For example, what is the most desirable transliteration
of the Anatolian city of "The Black Opium Castle," variously referred
to as Afium Kara Hissar, Afiun Karahissar, Afium-Kara-Hissar, or
Afiun Qarahisarf An even wider assortment, taken from the Oxford
Dictionary, is given for the common word for a Turkish scribe, clerk,
or schoolmaster :-khoja, hoiah, hodgee, -gia, hugie, hoggie, hogi, hoag:e,
hogia, cojah, boja (h); hodja, khodgea, khodja, -djo khoja; Turkish
and Persian khojah, prop. khwajah. Obviously, one system should
be followed throughout "Modern Turkey."
After a careful study by the author of the various Anglo-Saxon
spelling guides, he bas come to the conclusion that n9 .one of them is
consistent per se, and that no two of them agree on fundamentals. A
testing out of the American Geographical Society publications un-
fortunately produces unsatisfactory results, thereupon this source was
reluctantly discarded; and none of the other American professional
societies or standard reference works offered anything better. "The
Times Atlas and Gazeteer of the World (1922)" edited by Bartholomew
has much to be said in its favor, but has too much non-uniformity as
well as many omissions of former Ottoman place names. The author
finally decided to commit himself to the pioneer, uncompleted pro-
nouncements of the Royal Geographical Society which are appearing
from time to time in short general lists for Europe, Asia, and the other
continents. As a result of this choice, the reader is certain to find
himself confronted with strange-appearing names, such as Chanaq
(Chanak), Romania (Rumania), AI Madina (Medina), Husain (Hus-
sein), Kuwait (Koweit), and Izmid (lsmid); but thereby he is school-
ing himself for officially-sanctioned changes of the near future.
The method followed is, in brief, to make the spelling correspond
as closely as possible to the local pronunciation. This guiding prin-
ciple, meritorious in its conception, has the practical difficulty, that
unless a person is familiar with approved local usage, the exact trans-
literation is impossible of achievement; moreover, the lists compiled
to date by the Royal Geographical Society are incomplete and at best
cannot ever answer every query. An exception is made in the spelling
of place names in countries using the Latin alphabet, in which instance
the spelling in common use becomes the standard. There is, moreover,
the consideration of "conventional usage," as in the case of Mecca (not
577
578 MODERN TURKEY
Mekka), and Scutari (not Skutari), which prompts a broad but not
numerous class of exceptions. These are the faults; the merits more
than outweigh them. Essential features are that (a) vowels are pro-
nounced as in Italian and consonants as in English; (b) every letter is
pronounced, and no redundant letters are used.
In this volume, the author has endeavored to apply "Rules for the
Spelling of Geographical Names for British Official Use," published
by the Royal Geographical Society, 1921, except for the adoption of
the inverted comma and apostrophe. Changes, moreover, have not
been made in the book titles which appear in the Bibliography. Sec-
ondary sources for proper names are "The Times Atlas and Gazeteer
of the World," British Foreign Office "Handbooks," and the Statesman's
Year book. For common names, the recently-completed "New English
(Oxford) Dictionary" by ~urray is the authority.
APPENDIX II
GENERAL EcONOMIC DATA
The following tabular survey of prewar conditions is based primarily

upon the author's section of the "Report of the American Military
Mission to Armenia," United States Senate Document No. 266, 1920.
GENERAL ECONOMIC DATA
POJN-
Cult'- lat""'
Ezi81i"'l Area in 11'ore1fl wled P"'f?U" D•Mit11 Com""""e
RaiiWIJII' Thom. A reo.,. Land lai\Oft Per lndullfy 1-tJul
liilom. Bg. lim. 8 lim (lhow.) 8qflM'e .lliUwn ll'r.
g. · Kilo·
--------1------------------1---:----1----------------
Turkq in Europl
meter
Between Enoo-Midia line 1.11d

8ea of Mannara ......... . Yea 8.7 1,200 760 214 u '270 '16
uo "22ci
Conotantlnople Diotrlct ••• , •
Total ............... ..
Wutem AMioliG
Yea 8.9
12.6
700
1,900
865
1,079
22!1.
8o.6
'120
... .
~
116
.....
Bigha 1anjak ............. .
Drusa vilayet (with Kal'llllai,
Yea 8.6 1,600 610 183 28 •s6o 2,900 •so 10 80
Kutaya, Allun Qarahisar
eanjak) ••••••••••••••••• Yea 65.8 16,300 6,060 1,508 24 82,600 11,000 7,600 2,000 1,800
lzmid unjak ............. . Yea 8.1 2,400 710 242 80 4,200 600 1,470 800 2,100
Aldin vilayet (with Men·
techeb aanjak) ......... .. Yea 86.8 9,500 6,910 1,830 27 I 4,000 116.00 100.00 60,600 I 14,000 48,000 338,000 20,600 88,000
Angora Yilayet ............ . y .. 70.9 2,200 6,700 716 10 ., ., o , , , ,. , ., ., I6,165 ., .. , 1 88 I 464 230 60
~ Kaatamunl Yilayet (with Bolu
- 1anjak) ................ .
Konla vilayet (with Adalia·
60.7 11,000 2,460 976 19 ... ._. 1 2,3U • 68 20 1160
Nitrdeh IUlnjak) •••••••••• 102.1 5,000 6,330 1,076 10 I 4,000 4.99 8.35 3,300
1 290 870
Itch !I 1anjak .............. . 14.8 1,000 1,330 106 7 ..... 1 560 200 400 100
Janik oanjak ............. .. 10.7 1,300 1,200 892 87 26.00 42.00 I 10,550 l..,800 8,750 43,000
Kaiaarieh unjak ...•••••••• 6.0 (3) 1,410 2U 41 (4) 188,670 26,640 8,430 24,320 100
Western Sivao 'Vil17et ••••••• 25.2 1,000 8,600 467 19 8.50 •9:5o 97 ,5oo 9,800 18,770 28,700 "iso 1,200
Turl<wl& Armenia
Eaotern Siwa 'Vilayet .••••••
Adana vllayet • • • • • .. .. .. • • .
Jlaraoh aanjak and A Intab
ii;,8
88.8
26.1
1,600
8,200
6,040
8,680
507
820
14
18 •ii,ooo 2.00
4.06
8.60 540,970
49.00 340,810
85,520
10,080
9,110
8,240
23,810 40
15,410 84,660
4,850
160
district • • .. • •• •• • •• •• • • • • ... 16.0 770 i,050 170 11 •• , •. 106,900 83,880 1,270 83,528 520 780
Kharput Yilayet • • .. • • • • • • • • .. • , 82.9 2,080 450 14 1.U 9.88 685,520 40,770 6,400 26,6!0 1,270 8,080
Diarllf'kr vilayet (northern
half only) • • • • • • • .. • • ... . , ••• 16.1 4,060 296 18 4.60 2. 75 273,270 62,800 6,720 85,910 740 8,000
Bitlio Yilayet (without Balrt
district) • • • • • • . • • • • • • .. • .. •• 19.7 250 882 19 1.U 9.88 14,970 830 650 190 280
Van 'Vilayet (without Bak·
klari district) • .. • • • • .. • • • .. • • 21.0 , .. • 580 850 17 .... , 8.26 2.~9 60,980 5,150 240 2,940 .. .. • ...10
Erzerum Yilayet .. • ... .. .. •• .. • • 49.7 4,000 630 18 .. .. • 81.06 6.67 495,640 900 8,840 • .. • • .. ...
1'rebizond 'Vilayet .. .. .. .. .. • .. .. ...!.:!._ 6,000 2,240 1,000 81 .. • .. '1'7.00 87.60 127,880 46,940 16,610 1,030 f90
1
Total ••••••••••••• t 4!. • , • • • 149.8 • • •• •••. 4,106 16.4 •• •• • , •• •• ••••• ••••. ••••. ••••• ••••• ••••• • ••••
I Salt. 1 Cotton 1kl. per day. 1 Carpet, pounda. • Included In Angora. I Sq. kllometera. • Spindl...
APPENDIX III
AREA AND PoPULATION
Of the ex-Sultans' domains, there is no record of any official or

trustworthy territorial survey or population census. All· figures are
the result of guesswork. As far as my knowledge goes, those which
have appeared in the annual Statesman's Yearbook are unprejudiced
and fairly reliable. According to this source (1921 edition), the esti-
mates for area and population for prewar Turkey (1914) are:- ·
Vilayet& .Area Population Population

Sq. Mile Per Sq. Mile
Europe:-
Constantinople . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,505 1,203,000 799
Chatalja (Independent sanjak) 733 78,000 82
Adrianople . . • . . . • . . . • • • . • . . . • • . . 8,644 610,000 77
1--------1--------1---------
Total .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10,882 1,891,000 187
Asia Minor (not including Armenia
and Kurdistan) : -
Izmid (Independent sanjak).. 3,130 222,700 71
Brusa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,400 1,626,800 64
Bigha (Independent sanjak)... 2,550 129,500 51
Smyrna, or Aidin . . • . • • . • • . • . 25,801 2,500,000 64
Kastamuni . . • . . . . . • . . . . . • . . . 19,570 961,200 49
Angora . . . . . • • . • . • • • • • • • . . . . 27,370 932,800 34
Konia . . • . . • . • • • • • . • • . . . . • . . 39,410 1,069,000 27
Adana . . . . • . . • . . • • • . • . • . . . . . 15,400 422,400 27
Sivas . . . . . . • • • • • • . • . • • . . . . . .
Trebizond . . • . • • • • • • . • . . . . . . . ,_____ 23,970
16,671
1,057,500
1,265,000 ,_____
44
76
Total .••.•••••..••.. ~· . . 199,272 10,186,900 52
Armenia and Kurdistan : -

Erzerum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,180 645,700 34
Kharput . .. • • . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . 12,700 575,200 45
Diarbekr .. .. • .. • .. . • .. .. .. .. 14,480 471,500 32
Bitlis . .. . .. .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. 10,460 398,700 38
Van .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . 15,170 379,800 25
1--------1--------1--------
Total .. • .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 71,990 2,470,900 34
Mesopotamia:-
Mosul •••••••••••••••.••.••. 35,130 500,000 10
Baghdad •.•.••••..••••••.... 54,540 900,000 11
Basra .................... .. 53,580 600,000 8
Total ................. .. 143,250 2,000,000 9
0:01\
APPENDIX III. 581
Y&yets Area PopvJation

Population Per
Bq.Mile Bq. Mile
Syria:-
Aleppo .....................
Zor (Independent aa..jak) ••••
33,430
30,110
1,500,000 45
100,000 3
Syria .•••••••••••••••••••••• 37,020 1,000,000 27
Beirut ......................
Jerusalem (Indepe.1dent sanjak)
6,180
6,600
533,500 86
341,600 52
Lebanon •••••••••••••••••••. 1,190 200,000 168
Total .••.•••••••••.•.... 114,530 3,675,100 33
Arabia:-
lteinen .••.•••••.•••••••••••. 73,800 750,000 10
Grand total ••••••••••••• 613,724 20,973,900 il4
For the detached regions, the Statesman's Yearbook (1923 edition)

gives these figures:-
Territory Bq. Miles Population .A.ut hority

Syria (French mandated aec· less than Estimated only
tion)
···················
Palestine (British mandate).
60,000
9,000
3,000,000
757,182 {Official census
Oct. 23, 1922
300,000
' {
Transjordania (Kerak) ••••• to } Estimated only
500,000
Iraq (British mandate) ••••• 143,250 2,849,282 Official census
Yemen •••••••••••••••••••• 75,000 1,000,000 Estimated only
Transjordania, which includes the classic regions of Moab, Eden,

and Gilead, is largely desert country, subject to the Council of the
League of Nations, and included in the jurisdiction of Sir Herbert
Samuel; but it is not strictly under the Palestine mandate as yet. The
chosen ruler is Prince Abdullah, a member of the Sherifian family.
Iraq (Mesopotamia) is interpreted to include the whole vilayet of
Mosul. Yemen is "independent," although its chief port, Hodeidah,
is not in the Imam's control.
The Turkish Republic (December, 1923) embraced territory which
is roughly identical to the already cited parts of Europe, and to Asia
Minor including Turkish Armenia and Kurdistan. On the prewar
basis, this combined area amounts to 282,144 square miles and the com·
bined population to 14,547,900, thus giving an average of 52 inhabitants
to the square mile. Account must be taken, however, of the severe
losses in population since 1914, as follows:-(o) practically all Greeks
are out of Asia Minor (between a million and a quarter and two mil-
lions) ; (b) practically all the Armenians are gone (a million and a
half to two millions); (c) 400,000 non-Moslems left Constantinople
and its suburbs within the six months after October, 1922 (according
582 MODERN TURKEY
to the Turkish Minister of the Interior); (d) the Turkish Moslems had
known deaths of 437,000, seriously wounded 100,000, otherwise wounded
300,000 in the Great War (personal letter from Carnegie Endowment
for International Peace, 1923).
The compensating gains are (a) the possibility that part or all of
the Mosul vilayet may be settled by Great Britain and Turkey in favor
of Turkey, and (b) the Caucasian territory, including Kars and
Ardahan, which, by an understanding with Soviet Armenia and Soviet
Georgia, has been returned by Soviet Russia to Turkey. The American
Consul General at Constantinople has announced (1923) that these
deductions and additio.ns give Turkey an area of 494,538 square miles
and a population of probably 10,000,000, or 20 inhabitants to the
square mile. Therefore, if we accept these provisional figures, the
New Turkey may be considered to have an area one sixth that of the
United States of America, and a population approximately one twelfth
as large.
APPENDIX IV'
SOVEREIGNS OF THE OSMAN DYNAS'l'!'
HOUSE OF OSMAN
Osm.an • • • • • • • • • . . • • . . • • • • . • . . • • • • . . • • • • • •.• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1299

Orkhan . . • • . .. . • . . . . • • • • • . • • • . .. • • . . . . . . • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1326
Murad I. • ....••..•••..••••••••••••••. , •••••• , •• , •• , • , , •.• , • • • • 1359
Bayezid I., "The Thunderbolt" •.••••••. , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1389
Interreg'MJ,m ••••••••••• , ••••••••••••••••••••• , • •.• • • • • • •.•.•••• •• 1402
Mohammed I. . .......................... , •••• , ................ , 1413
Murad II•..•.••.••.... ; • . • • • • • . • • • • • • • • .. • • • • • • .. • .. • • • • • .. .. 1421
Mohammed II., Conqueror of Constantinople ••••••••••• , , ••••• , • , . 1451
Bayezid II••••••• , ................... , , .... , • , ......... , .. • • .. 1481
Salim I. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . • • • . • . . . • • • • . • • . . • • • • . • • • • • . • . • • . 1512
Suleiman I., "The Magnificent" .......... , •• , • , , .............. , 1520
Selim II. . •••••.•..•••••• • . . • • • • • • • . • • • . • • • • • • • . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • 1566
Murad III........................ .- ................... ,....... 1574
Moham.med III. • •.• , • . • . • • • •. • . • •. • • • • • • . • • . • . • . • • .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1595
Ahmed I. • ••• , ...... , ..... , ..........................., .. • .. .. 1603
Mustafa I. • ......................... , •••• ; •• • ••• ,, .. , ••• , ••.• , 1617
Osman II.•••.•..••••.••••• , •••• , ••• , •••••••••••••••••• , ••• , • • 1618
Murad IV., "The Intrepid" •• , ••• , ••• , ...... , ••••••••••• , .. • • • 1623
Ibrahim .•...•••• , ......................... , , .. , .. .. .. .. • • • ... 1640
Mohammed IV...................... , ................. , , .... .. 1648
Suleiman II................................... , • • .. • .. .. • • • • • • 1687
Ahmed II. . .••••••••••••••• , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1691
Mustafa II. . ..••.•••••• , , •••• , ••••••••••••••••••••••••• , • , , • • 1695
Ahmed III.................................................... 1703
Mahmud I. • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1730
Osman III................... ,, .. . .. • • . • •• • • •• ... • ••• ••• .. ... • 1754
Mustafa III. ••••••••••••• , .......................... , • .. .. • • • • 1757
Abdul Hamid I. • .. ... ....... .... .. ........ .................... 1773
Selim III. ................ , , .... • ........... , ..... , .. • • .. • • .. .. 1789
Mustafa IV. • •.••• , ............................... , • • .. • • • • • • 1807
Mahmud II. • •.• , •••••••.••••..••••••• , • • • • • • • . • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • 1808
Abdul Mejid .••.••.•••••• , ••••••••••••••• , •••••• , • • • • • • • • • • • • 1839
Abdul Aziz .••.••.•••.••.••••••••••••••••••• , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1861
Murad V. (May 30) •••.••.••.••..••.••• , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1876
Abdul Hamid II. (Aug. 31) .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... ... .. .... • ........ 1876
Mohammed V. (April 27) . . • • • • . • • .. .. ... . . ... • .... .. . • ........ 1909
Mohammed VI. (July 3) .......................... "." ......... 1918
Abdul Mejid. (Nov. 19, 1922, elected Kha!i,f by the National Aasembl7 at
Angora, the Gotlernment of Xurkey).
CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS, 1908-1923, INCLUSIVE
Main Sources: American Journal of International Law, Annual
Register, Current History, New York Times, Times (London).
1908
March 13. Reply by the Porte to the six ambassadors in re-
sponse to their notes of February 8, informing
them of the renewal of the mandates of the
foreign agents in Macedonia until July 12, 1914
(Cmd. 4076). In a verbal note dated December
15, 1907, Turkey had proposed to take the for-
eign agents and the members of the financial
commission into the Turkish service with their
present duties but the Powers declined.
April 20. The Turkish ambassador at Rome presented a note
from the Government of Turkey settling differ-
ences between the two Governments. Italy may
open Italian postoffices at Constantinople, Sa-
lonika, Valona, Smyrna, and Jerusalem.
May 22. lrade authorizing construction of four new sec-
tions of the Baghdad Railway signed at Con-
stantinople.
June 24. lrade proclaimed the restoration of the Constitu-
tion of 1876.
July 3. Revolution broke out in Macedonia.
July 24. The "Committee of Union and Progress" known
as the "Young' Turks," effected a bloodless revo-
lution at Constantinople.
September 1. Opening ceremonies of the Hejaz railway at
AI Madina. ·
September 23. Turkish note presented to Bulgaria regarding oc-
cupation of the Oriental Railways in Bulgaria
by Bulgarian troops.
October 5. Prince Ferdinand proclaimed independence of Bul-
garia and assumed title of king.
October 7. .Emperor of Austria-Hungary issued a proclama-
tion to the people of Bosnia and Herzegovina
annexing those provinces. .
October 7. Proclamation declaring Article 27 of the Treaty of
Berlin could no longer be binding on Montenegro.
December 10. Opening of the Ottoman Parliament.
584
CHRONOLOGY 585
1909
March 6. Treaty of commerce between Montenegro and Tur-
key signed at Cetinje.
April 13. Counter-revolutionists seize parliament building.
Young Turks flee from Constantinople.
April19. Protocol between Bulgaria and Turkey signed at
Constantinople disposing of all questions pend-
ing, and providing for recognition by Turkey of
the new political status of Bulgaria.
April 24. The third revolution, resulting in complete deposi-
tion of the "Old Turks."
April 27. Abdul Hamid II removed. A fetva signed by the
Sheikh ul Islam, deposing the Sultan on the
. ground of misgovernment and what may be
termed treason to the Moslem faith, was pre-
sented to the Assembly and acted upon imme-
diately by a unanimous vote. Succeeded by his
brother who became Mohammed V. Massacres
of Armenian Christians at Adana.
June 20. Turkey invited Great Britain, France, Russia, and
Italy to discuss with the Porte proposals for
solution of the Cretan question on lines to pre-
clude annexation of the Island by Greece and
to guarantee maintenance of Turkish sovereign
rights. Memorandum from the four protect!ng
Powers, July 13.
September 13. The Macedonian Financial Commission held its
last sitting at Salonika.
1910
January 6. The Porte addressed an identical note to the four
protecting Powers protesting against the Cretan
Government's decision to require officials to take
the oath to the King of the Hellenes and to have
the courts recognize and apply the Greek code.
May 19. Convention between Tunis and Turkey signed at
Tripoli regarding the frontier between the two
countries.
July 8. The consuls of the four protecting Powers handed
the Cretan Government an ultimatum as to the
seating of the Moslem delegates without require-
ment to take the oath. On July 11, the Cretan
Government officially announced its submission
to the conditions laid down by the Powers.
August 28. Montenegro proclaimed a Kingdom.
October 23. Violent anti-British demonstration at Constanti-
nople and in India. Telegram drafted to Ger--
man Emperor to come forward as saviour of
the Moslems.
586 MODERN TURKEY
November 1. The French-Ottoman commissioners, under the
terms of the convention signed in May, 1910,_ at
Tripoli, made a change in the Tripoli-Tunis
boundary.
1911
May 21. Agreement announced that the Persian-Turkish
boundary conference at Constantinople would
submit to the Hague Tribunal any points which
remain unsettled.
September 25- On September 25 the Italian charge at Constanti-
0ctober 5. nople delivered the protest of his Government.
On September 28 Italy delivered an ultimatum.
On September 29 Turkey .replied by declaring
war on Italy, and on September 30 appealed to
the Powers. On October 5 Tripoli was cap-
tured by Italy.
November 2. Provisional commercial agreement between Bul-
garia and Turkey for one year from November
14 signed at Constantinople.
November 25. Extension until June 25, 1914, of the German-
Ottoman Treaty of Commerce and Navigation
signed at Constantinople August 26, 1890.
Original date of expiration was March 12 (Feb-
ruary 28), 1912.
1912
February 29- Secret treaty of alliance and secret annex between
June 19. Bulgaria and Serbia signed at Sofia, February
29, 1912. The additional convention agreeing
to submit differences to the arbitration of Russia,
and a military convention as to the conduct of
the first Balkan campaign. Bulgaria and Greece
signed a treaty of alliance May 16, and a mili-
tary convention on September 22, 1912. By the
Treaty of London, 1913, which concluded this
campaign, nearly the whole of Serbia's share of
the spoils was made into the State of Albania.
Bulgaria insisted upon a strict compliance with
the terms of the secret treaty and upon Serbia's
refusal the second Balkan campaign was in-
stituted. The Treaty of Bucharest closed the
second campaign, and gave to Serbia a greater
share than the secret treaty of Sofia.
March 5. The Persian-Turkish boundary commission began
its meetings at Constantinople.
April 18. Dardanelles closed, but reopened to traffic on
May 18.
CHRONOLOGY 587
June 19. Military convention between Bulgaria and Serbia
signed in conformity with the treaty of defensive
alliance (February 29).
October 8- Discontent with Ottoman rule in Macedonia cul-
December 3. minated in declaration of war against Turkey by
Montenegro. Bulgaria, Serbia, and Greece join
Montenegro as allies, and (October 18) declare
war on Turkey. After severe defeats by the
Bulgarians at Kirk Kilisse and Lule Burgas,
Turkey appealed to the Powers, November 3, for
intervention, and an armistice was signed Decem-
ber 3, ending one of the bloodiest wars in his-
tory. Russia and Austria address a joint note
to Balkans.
October 13. Identical note to Turkey and identical reply to
Russo-Austrian note.
October 15. Protocol of peace preliminary between Italy and
Turkey signed at Ouchy.
October 17. Turkey declares war against Bulgaria, and Serbia
and Greece declare war against Turkey.
October 18. Treaty of peace between Italy and Turkey signed
at Lausanne. Tripoli ceded to Italy with the
understanding that the Italian troops would be
withdrawn from the Dodekanese Islands when
Turkish troops _evacuated Tripoli. Italy never-
theless continued to occupy Rhodes.
October 28. The Hague Tribunal began its consideration of the
Russian claim for interest on deferred indem-
nity payments. The sentence was rendered
November 11. (This is the eleventh decision.)
December 3. Armistice at Chatalja lines agreed to by all Balkan
States except Greece.
December 16. Peace conference opened at London.
1913
January 30. Protocol signed ab London stated the Romanian
demands and the Bulgarian concessions.
February 1. London peace conference broken up with no agree-
ment between Turkey and Balkan League.
April 1. Turkey accepted terms of peace proposed by the
Powers after a long discussion on the part of
the Balkan allies. Balkan Allies not satisfied.
April 10. Formal declaration of the blockade of Monte-
negro's ports by the Great Powers of Europe.
April 20. Armistice signed between Turkey and the Balkan
Allies except Montenegro.
April 30. Reply of Montenegro to the Powers in regard to
the evacuation of Scutari on the Adriatic.
588 MODERN TURKEY
May 20- Second peace conference met in London with no
June 10. results.
May 25. The Balkan Financial Commission met at Paris.
May 25. Report that Turkey is to cede Cyprus to Great
. Britain.
May 30. The Treaty of London was signed between Turkey
and Bulgaria, Greece, Montenegro, and Serbia.
Bulgarian and Turkish delegates also signed a
protocol providing for the immediate removal of
their respective armies from the scene of opera-
tion. The delegates arranged to meet June 2 to
consider the advisability of signing an eventual
annexation protocol.
June 30- Actual warfar<:. begun between Bulgaria and Serbia
July 20. and Greece. Serbia declared war on Bulgaria on
July 1. Greece announced that a state of war
existed but did not formally declare war.
Romania declared war on July 10. On July 6
Montenegro and Greece withdrew their ministers
from Sofia. This war arose from the quarrels
of the Allies as to the division of the spoils
from Turkey in the first Balkan War. On July
8, Serbia declared war against Bulgaria. Bul-
garia withdrew her troops from the disputed
territory, July 10, and on July 17 sued for
peace with Romania, which had invaded her
territory on the north and east. On July 20, the
Turks took and reoccupied Adrianople, which
they were permitted by the Powers to retain.
July 5. France took the initiative in asking the Powers to
make declarations in favor of a policy of non-
intervention in the war between Bulgaria and
Serbia and Greece.
July 15. Agreement concluded on the question of the delimi-
tation of the Turko-Persian frontier. It has
been decided to appoint a commission consisting
of delegates of Turkey, Great Britain, and
Russia for the purpose of marking the boun-
daries.
July 30. A peace conference met at Bucharest which de-
clared a five days' truce.
August 10. The Treaty of Bucharest was signed between Bul-
garia and Serbia, Greece, Montenegro, and
Romania. This treaty was ratified by the
Powers on August 30.
August 19. International Commission appointed by Carnecie
Endowment for International Peace to investi-
gate atrocities of Balkan War.
September 3. Definite draft between Greece and Turkey com-
pleted.
CHRONOLOGY 089
September 17. Official announcement made of the settlement of
the frontiers of Bulgaria and Turkey in Thrace.
The frontier starts at the mouth of the Maritsa
River and ends north of Midia on the Black Sea.
Turkey retains Tirnovo, Mustafa Pasha and
Orta Koi. An agreement in principle has been
reached on the subject of nationalities. One
clause of the protocol is to the effect that the
provisions of the Treaty of London not modified
by the present protocol shall remain binding
on all parties. The Treaty gives Turkey about
twice the territory awarded her under the Treaty
of London.
September 25. Serbia is reported to be remobilizing her troops
and to have had a number of engagements with
Albanian troops.
September 29. Treaty relating to adjustment of frontiers signed
at Constantinople.
October 9. The Austro-Russian note sent to the Balkan allies
on the subject of the Balkan War and the divi-
sion of Turkey in Europe. Response of Bul-
garia and Serbia.
October 12. Collective note from Germany, Austria, Great
Britain, France and Russia addressed to the
Ottoman Government. Reply received.
October 14. Accord signed for settlement of French claims
against Turkey. Accord signed relating to
Greece, concessions, etc.
October 22. A commission was appointed, consisting of Turks
and foreigners, to examine into the modifica-
tions necessary in the capitulations.
October 25. Serbian troops were withdrawn from Albania to
the frontier as laid down by the Treaty of
London.
October 27. The British and Russian legations at Teheran
presented a joint note to the Persian Government
relating to the Turko-Persian Demarcation
Commission.
October 27. Agreement between Russia and Turkey signed
relating to the Government of Armenia and
definite railway concessions. (Times, Octo-
ber 29.) .
November 4. The Treaty of Belgrade between Montenegro and
Serbia.
November 11-13. Treaty signed at Athens settling differences grow-
ing out of the Balkan War. This was one of
the treaties agreed upon at the conference of
London. Ratified by Turkey and ratifications
exchanged at Athens, November 27.
590 MODERN TURKEY
November 23. The Great Powers of Europe had given their
consent to the assumption of the throne of
Albania by Prince William of Wied.
November. Arrival of German General Liman von Sanders.
Turkey handed over executive command of Con-
stantinople and the Dardanelles.
December 10. Crete taken over by Greece. Recognition by
Powers December 24.
1914
January. Enver Bey appointed Ottoman Minister of War.
January 8. German General Liman von Sanders appointed
Commander of the first army corps. Enver
Pasha (no longer Bey) appointed Chief of
Staff with German aides.
February 15. A secret accord between France and Germany
whereby Germany was left free to carry on the
Baghdad enterprise.
April 28. Announcement of accord between Russia and
Turkey relating to duties and admission of
Russian delegates into the Ottoman Public Debt
Council to go into effect when consented to by
the Powers.
May 2. The treaty of commerce between Germany and
Turkey and additional conventions relating to
customs extended one year.
June 15. Agreement between Great Britain and Germany
relating to Baghdad railway.
June 28. Archduke Francis Ferdinand of Austria assassi-
nated with his wife at Serajevo.
July 10. The Governments of Greece and Turkey requested
Switzerland to designate an arbitrator to settle
differences among the members of the mixed
Graeco-Turkish commission sitting in Smyrna
for the purpose of arranging the immigration
questions. The commission was appointed to
value and exchange the property of Turkish and
Greek refugees.
August 11. Turkey announced that she had bought the Goeben
and the Breslau.
August 14. Entente Allies offer to respect Turkey's integrity
if she remains neutral.
August 27. Liman Pasha appointed Commander in Chief of
the Turkish Army.
September 9. Turkey announced the abolition of 'capitulations
for all foreigners.
October 28. 2000 Bedouins under Turkish leaders approach
Suez Canal.
CHRONOLOGY 591
October 28. Turkey began war on Russia by shelling Black Sea
ports (British parliamentary paper, Cmd. 7628).
France, Great Britain, and Italy severed rela-
tions with Turkey.
November 3. Russia declared war against Turkey.
November 4. Great Britain annexed formally the Island of
Cyprus.
November 5. France and Great Britain declared war on
Turkey.
November 6. Turkey severed relations with Belgium.
November 9. British Prime Minister at Whitehall spoke of the
Turkish Government as having "rung the death-
knell of the Ottoman domination, not only in
Europe, but in Asia.''
November 11. The Sublime Porte declared a jihad, (holy war),
against the Entente Allies.
November 14. Turkey issued an official note in reply to the circu-
lar note sent by Sir Edward Grey to the powers.
This note explained her entrance into the war.
(See Select Document 1.)
November 27. The United States Department of State announced
that Turkey had made satisfactory explanat!on
of the Smyrna incident of November 16, when
a shot was fired into the launch of the U. S. S.
Tennessee.
December 18. British protectorate proclaimed in Egypt.
1915
January 8. Serbia declared war against Turkey.
February to end Turkish forces under General Liman von Sanders
of year. and Mustafa Kemal Pasha held Dardanelles
against Anglo-French attacks. Futile attacks on
Suez. Failure in Caucasus.
March. Allied agreement regarding Constantinople, the
Straits, and Persia. (Select Document 2.)
April 26. Pact of London. (Select Document 9.)
May 4. Italy renounced the Triple Alliance.
August 21. Italy declared war against Turkey.
August 27. Declaration by the French of blockade of coasts
of Asia Minor and Syria.
'September 16. Talaat Pasha, Minister of the Interior, ordered
that "an end must be put to their (the Arme-
nians') existence, however tragic the measures
to be taken, and no regard must be paid to
either age or sex, or to conscientious scruples.''
Terrible "deportations" followed. .
October 21. Great Britain offered Island of Cyprus to G~e
in return for her support of the Allies, but
offer rejected.
October 24. British agreement with the Sherif of. Mecca.
(Select Documefll 4.)
592 MODERN TURKEY
November. Forces of General Townshend in danger at Kut al
Amara. .
1916
February- Turks unable to defend Erzerum (February 16),
August. Trebizond (April 18), Erzinjan (July 25)
against Russian Grand Duke Nicholas. Cap-
tured British forces under Major General Town-
shend at Kut al Amara (Aprn 29). Drove out
Russians from Kermanshah (July 5), Hamadan
(August 10).
April 27. Halil Bey, Turkish Minister of War, formally an-
nounced the replacement of Italy by Turkey in
the Triple Alliance "on equal terms."
May 9-16. Sykes-Picot Agreement (Select Document 5).
May 12. Statement made in Reichstag by Under-Secretary
for Foreign Affairs Zimmerman that at the
beginning of the war a defensive alliance was
concluded between Germany and Turkey based
upon terms of equality and framed to endure for
a long period, as well as negotiations regarding
consular representatives, legal status of cities,
and residential rights (New York Times,
May 13).
June 9. Husain ibn Ali, Sherif of Mecca, declared himself
independent of the Ottoman Government.
June 23. Greece, France, Great Britain and Russia, under
the protocol of London signed July 6, 1827,
assumed the protection of the Kingdom of
Greece.
June 27. The Sherif of Mecca proclaimed the new state of
Arabia.
August 29. Turkey declared war against Romania.
September 17. Spain proclaimed neutrality.
September 27. M. Venizelos headed the revolution in Greece.
Headquarters of provisional government estab-
lished at Salonika (October 10).
October 17. Allied troops landed at Athens. Greek warships
seized by the Allies. •
November 11. Arabia asked recognition of the Powers as a
Kingdom separate from Turkey.
November 25. German ambassadors addressed a protest to the
United States Department of State against the
action of the Allied Powers in ordering the
ministers of Germany, Austria, Turkey and
Bulgaria from Greece.
December 1. British and French marines landed at the Piraeus.
December 26. The Turkish Government replied to the note of
President Wilson dated December 18 (Select
Document 6).
CHRONOLOGY 593
1917
January 1. The Turkish Government announced the abroga-
tion of the Treaty of Paris signed March 10,
1856, and the Treaty of Berlin signed August
.3, 1878.
January 11. Greece accepted the demands of the Allies.
February (early) Grand Vizier Said Halim was succeeded by Talaat
Bey. Enver Pasha became Minister of War in
the cabinet.
March-December. British forces captured Baghdad (March 11, see
Select Document B), enter Jerusalem (Decem-
ber 11).
March 6. Secret agreement disclosed regarding partition of
Asiatic Turkey (Select Document 7}.
March 16. • Grand Duke Michael abdicated the Russian throne:
this terminated tlie Romanoff dynasty.
April 4. The United States declared war on Germany.
April 10. Kerensky Government in Russia repudiated ~
perialistic Tsarist policies.
April 19-21. St. Jean de Maurienne secret agreement (Select
Document 9 ).
April 20. Turkey severed diplomatic relations with the United
States. American Ambassador Elkus, who was
ill, allowed to remain; he left Turkey June 1.
May 10. Discussions in the Reichstag regarding capitula-
tions in Turkey.
June 11. British statement to the seven Syrians of Cairo.
July 8. Greece (Government of King Alexander) severed
relations with Turkey.
July 24. Announced that Austro-German Economic Confer-
ence was being held in Vienna for the purpose
of forming a "Middle Europe" alliance to off-
set the economic alliance of the Entente Allies.
July 25-27. Conference of representatives of the Entente
Allies held to declare aims, etc. in the Balkans.
July 31. Germany notified Turkey and Bulgaria that she
would assume all expenses incurred by those
countries in the campaign of 1917-1918.
August 4. King Alexander took the oath of office as King
of the Hellenes.
August 7. A continuation of the Paris Conference opened in
London.
September 12 (14). A Soviet Republic proclaimed in Russia.
November 2. Balfour declaration regarding Palestine homeland
(Select Document 10 ).
November 7. Bolshevik party assumed control in Russia.
November 22. Soviet Russia's invitation to a general peace.
594 MODERN TURKEY
1918
January 5. British Premier defined war aims (Select Docu-
ment 11).
January 8. President Wilson's basis for world peace (Point
12, Select Document 12).
February 8. The Turkish Minister for Foreign .Affairs, Neesimy
Bey, expressed complete accord with the Czernin
and von Hertling replies to President Wilson's
address to Congress of January 8, 1918.
February 9. Peace Treaty signed between Ukrainia and Ger-
many, .Austria-Hungary, Turkey and Bulga_ria
(New York Times, February 12).
March 3. Brest-Litovsk Treaty between Soviet RMsia and
Central Powers ratified by Soviet Russia ·on
March 14 (Select Document 13). •
.April 2. German and Turkish ambassadors presented ·their
credentials to the Russian Soviet Republic.
.April 13. .Armenia and Georgia refused to recognize the
cession of territory under the Brest-Litovsk
Treaty, and fighting broke out in Batum, Kars,
and .Ardahan after the Turks began military
occupation.
.April 26. Dispatch from Vienna stated that Bulgaria has
agreed to cede Turkey the Karagatch railway
station at .Adrianople and the left bank of the
River Maritsa as far as Kuleli-Burgas as com-
pensation for Bulgaria's acquisition of the
Dobruja.
May 10. Caucasus peace negotiations with Turkey.
May 10. .Announced that an accord had been signed be-
tween France and Turkey relative to repatria-
tion of civilians of the two countries.
June 7. · .Announced that Bulgaria and Turkey had become
parties to the .Austro-German pact (Times,
June 10).
July 3. Death of Mohammed V, Sultan of Turkey. The
following day Vahideddin proclaimed Sultan.
July 13. Ratifications of Brest-Litovsk treaty exchanged in
Berlin.
July 26. .Announced that the fifth national congress of
Turkestan had proclaimed Turkestan a republic
in alliance with Soviet Russia.
July 28. J3y plebiscite, Kars, Batum, and .Ardahan decided
to unite with Turkey.
July 31. Peace treaty ratified at Constantinople between
Turkey and the .Armenian independent republic
of .Ararat with its capital at Erivan.
.August 19. Commercial treaty signed between Turkey and
· .Azerbaijan.
CHRONOLOGY 595
August 22. Exchange of ratifications of Brest-Litovsk treaty
between Turkey and the Ukraine. .
September 5. When Tabriz was occupied in June the American
consulate was sacked and the American hosp!tal
seized. Turkey disclaimed any intention of
affronting the United States and orders were
given to remove troops from the American hospi-
tals and to respect American interests there.
September 19-30. General Allenby's forces victorious in Palestine;
capture Damascus (September 30).
September 24. Bulgaria initiated a proposal for securing armis-
tice and peace. ·
September 29. Bulgaria surrenders.
October 4. Allied governments formally recognize the bellig-
erent status of Arab forces fighting with Allies
against Turks in Palestine and Syria.
October 5. Russia abrogated the treaty of peace with Turkey.
October 8. Turkish emissaries sent to Allies from Smyrna
to ask for peace.
October 12. Peace note from Turkey.
October 14. Emir Feisal entered Damascus and raised Arab
flag (replaced by French tricolor, October 24).
October (middle of Talaat and Enver resigned.
month).
October 30. The United States notified Turkey that the request
for armistice would be brought to the attention
of nations at war with Turkey. Turkish armis-
tice signed at Mudros to go into effect the next
noon, local time, October 31 (Select Doc•
ment U).
November 8. Anglo-French declaration with re,"''lrd to Arab
territories (Select Document 15).
November 9. British forces occupy forts along the Dardanelles.
November 13. Allied fleet anchored oft Constantinople.
1919
January 18. The Paris Peace Conference (first plenary session)
opened at the French Ministry of Foreign
Affairs. M. Georges Clemenceau, premier of
France, was elected president on nomination by
President Wilson.
January 30. Secret treaty between Turkey and Germany dis-
covered showing plan for dividing Russia (New
York Tribune, January 31).
April 1. Blockade against Turkey raised.
April 22. The United States recognized British protectorate
in Egypt.
April 24. Signor Orlando left Paris for Rome returning to
Paris on May 5.
April 29. Italian troops landed at Adalia.
596 MODERN TURKEY
May 9. <Ecumenical Patriarch at the Phanar broke off re-
lations with the Ottoman Government.
May 15. Greek forces landed at Smyrna in accordance
with mandate received from the Allied and Asso-
ciated Powers.
May 21. M. Sterghiades arrived at Smyrna in capacity of
High Commissioner.
June-July. American section of the International Commission
on Mandates in Turkey (King-Crane Mission)
studied conditions in Syria and Palestine (report
contained in Editor and Publisher, New York,
December 2, 1922).
June 17-July 4. Turkish delegates to Peace Conference ask to be
heard on June 17. Full text allied reply (Times,
June 17) . After exchange of notes the delegates
were advised that nothing would be gained by a
longer stay in Paris and on July 4, the mission
left for Constantinople without a formal hearing.
June 28. Treaty between Allied Powers and Germany
signed.
July. Enver Pasha, Djemal Pasha, and Talaat Pasha
tried by court martial and condemned to death.
They had fled from the country prior to Novem-
ber 1918. ·
July n; Mustafa Kemal Pasha outlawed by the Ottoman
Government.
July 23. Turkish Nationalist Congress at Erzerum.
July 29. M. V enizelos and Signor Tittoni signed agreement
respecting Greek and Italian interests in Rhodes,
the Dodekanese and the Meander valley.
August-October. American Military Mission to Armenia and Trans-
caucasia, under command of Major General
James G. Harbord, organized under authority·
of the President, investigated conditions in Euro-
pean Turkey, Asia Minor, and the Transcau-
casus. (See bibliography and Select Docu-
ment 20.)
August 8. Turks proclaimed jihad against Greeks landed at
Panderma.
August 9. Anglo-Persian agreement signed.
August 24. First meeting of the Commission of Inquiry sent
to Smyrna by the Governments of the principal
Allied Powers and the United States.
August 28. Rear Admiral Bristol, U. S. N., appointed Ameri-
can High Commissioner at Constantinople.
September 9. Declaration of the Congress of Sivas (Select Docu-
ment 16).
September 9. General Allenby arrived in Paris.
September 9. Statement by Colonel Lawrence regarding Syri~n
question.
CHRONOLOGY 597
September 26. Announcement that an agreement had been reached
between France and Great Britain relative to
Syria.
October 5. Damad Ferid Ministry replaced by an Ali Riza
Ministry with a mandate from the Sultan to
hold a general election.
October 7. :Mustafa Kemal Pasha telegraphed to the Otto-
man Government the peace terms formulated at
the Congresses of Erzerum and Sivas.
October. Publication at Constantinople of summary report
of the Allied Commission of Inquiry at Smyrna
November- British forces replaced by French forces in Cilicia,
December. and in Syria, as far south as the Palestine
frontier.
November 23. Agreement between Soviet Armenia and Azer-
baijan to cease hostilities and to settle all con-
troversies by peaceful agreements.
November 27. Treaty between Allied Powers and Bulgaria at
Neuilly.
1920
January 11. Session of Ottoman Parliament begins at Con-
stantinople.
January 28. Signatures by members of the Ottoman Parliament
to the Turkish Nationalist Pact (Select Docu-
ment 18).
February. Allied extradition list.
February 9. French garrison evacuated Marash. Massacre of
Armenian civilians.
February 9. Secret memorandum of April, 1917 from Lord Bal-
four, British secretary for foreign affairs, to
the French Government concerning final divi-
sion of Asia Minor was made public (Select
Document 9 ).
February 20. British Premier, in important speech, announced
that Allies had decided to have the Turks remain
in Constantinople.
March 2, 16, 22, 24. British Government refused to publish Report of
the Allied Commission of Inquiry at Smyrna
March 11. Emir Feisal proclaimed himself at Damascus, King
of Syria; he had assumed the title previously.
March 16. The Allied occupation of Constantinople (Select
Document 19). Recall of Allied patrol officers
from the interior of Anatolia. Prominent Turks
arrested March 15-16 by the British and de-
ported to Malta. Many Turks escaped to Asia
Minor.
March 22. Lebanon independence proclaimed at Baalbek,
598 MODERN TURKEY
April 1-June 1. Armenian mandate offered to League of Nations
by Supreme Council. Publicly discussed April
11. Council rejected mandate. Allied premiers
decide to establish a free and independent repub-
lic. League of Nations Council in memorandum
to Supreme Council insisted that that power
should guard Armenia sharing financial risk.
Senate rejected (June 1) President Wilson's
recommendation to accept Armenian mandate,
vote, 62 to 13.
April 3. The Report of the American Military Mission to
Armenia transmitted by President Wilson to
the United States Senate (Select Document 20).
April 6. A second Damad Ferid Ministry came into power.
April 10. French garrison at Urfa massacred.
April 11. Sheikh-ul-Islam promulgated fetva denouncing
nationalists as "rebels"; Grand Vizier issued
decree condemning Nationalistic movement. The
following day the Ottoman Parliament dissolved
by order of the Sultan.
April 18-27. Conference of San Remo (Oil decision, Select
Document 21). Appeal to the United States to
take mandate for Armenia: failing that, Presi-
dent Wilson should be asked to arbitrate
frontiers.
April 23. Armenian Soviet Republic recognized as a de facto
government by the United States. In January,
recognition had been accorded by France, Great
Britain, and Italy.
April 23. National Assembly met at Angora. Formal break
between Angora and Constantinople. Law of
Fundamental Organization (See chapter on
Government).
April 26. Palestine mandate accorded to Great Britain.
April 29. Cilician Christians, Armenians, Greeks, Syrians,
Chaldeans, Assyrians, lind Jacobites made col-
lective protest to the Council of the League of
Nations against return of their territory to Otto-
man rule.
April. Military Convention concluded by Soviet Russia
and Kemalists.
May 6. Peace delegation of the Porte arrived at Paris;
given draft of peace treaty, May 11. Allo'Yed
one month for consideration; Sublime Porte
envoys request delay until July 11.
May 15. Mesopotamian mandate offered to Great Britain.
June 1. Sir Herbert L. Samuel on his appointment as High
Commissioner of Palestine announced the pur-
pose of the British mandate.
June 19-21. Hythe Conference.
June 19-25. British naval forces occupy Mudania.
CHRONOLOGY 599
June 21-22. Conference of Allied Powers at Boulogne; Greek
Prime Minister Venizelos announced that this
Conference had sanctioned military action in
Anatolia by Greece.
June. M. Venizelos, visiting England, is given penJ?.is-
sion to proceed against the Nationalist forces
to the north of Smyrna in the direction of
Brusa.
June 22. Greek offensive against Turkish nationalist forces
began.
June 30. Publication of the Constantinople Government's
proposals to the Allied Governments' draft of
the peace treaty.
June. Political understanding between Soviet Russia and
Kemalists.
July 2. British and Greek naval forees occupied Panderma.
Arab uprising in Mesopotamia began.
July 8. The Greek army entered Brusa.
July 9. British garrison evacuated Batum.
July 14-25. French commander in Syria sent an ultimatum to
the Arab National Government of Damascus
(July 14), and after fighting entered Damascus
and overthrew the Arab National Government
·(July 25).
July (late). Greeks occupied Thrace.
August 10. Signature at Sevres of four treaties and one
protocol (Select Documents 22, 23).
August 19. Draft agreeJ:!lent between Egypt and Great Britain
signed at London recognizing independence and
sovereign status of Egypt.
September Italians evacuated the Dodekanese except Rhodes.
(middle).
September 17. Sir Percy Cox sent to Mesopotamia to create an
Arab state; on October 20 the British War Office
announced the completion of their main opera-
tions for the reestablishment of British military
control in Mesopotamia.
September. Turkish Nationalist forces invade .Armenian Re-
publiC! of Erivan.
October 15. Turks capture Hajin, Cilicia. Many Armenians
massacred.
October 25- King Alexander of Greece died (October 25).
December 19. General elections in Greece strongly against M.
Venizelos (November 14). Plebiscite recalled
King Constantine (December 5) by almost a
unanimous vote. King Constantine arrived at
Athens (December 19).
November 26. American official note of November 20 to Great
Britain regarding mandate and oil in Mesopo-
tamia made public.
600 MODERN TURKEY
December 1. Offer of mediation to save Armenia made jointly
by President Wilson, President Dato of Spain,
and Foreign Minister Morquez of Brazil, placd
before Council of League of Nations.
December 3. Turko-Armenian peace treaty signed at Alexan-
dropol, reducing Armenia to district of Erivan
and Lake Gokcha (New York Times, Decem-
ber 10).
December 4. A few days after an ultimatum from Soviet
Russia to Turkish Nationalists forbidding them
to advance further into Armenian territory,
peace treaty was signed by the two governments.
December 7. President Wilson asked Congress to authorize loan
to Armenia.
December 10.. President Wilson's award· concerning boundaries
of Armenia delivered to French foreign office.
December 12. French decree issued creating body of controlling
councilors to administer mandate in Syria and
Lebanon.
December 22. Armenian Soviet Government repudiated all debts
owed by any past Government.
December 23. Franco-British Convention (Select Document 24).
December. Unsuccessful negotiations between Nationalists at
Angora and Government at Constantinople.
1921
January 16. Mission under Izzet Pasha from Constantinople
Government arrived in Angora and announced
shortly decision to remain in Angora until the
Allies consented to modify the Sevres treaty.
January 22. Porte agreement signed establishing interall~ed
control of all disbursements and revenues.
January 30. Chamber of Deputies voted to ratify Sevres treaty
on January 30; Senate on December 23, 1920
had agreed to ratify.
January 30. Mustafa Kemal Pasha notified the Constantinople
Government that the Angora Government was
the only one in Turkey.
February 3-4. British mandate drafts for Mesopotamia and
Palestine made public.
February 8. Angora decided to send a separate mission to the
London Conference.
February 18. · Two Turkish delegations arrived in London.
February 21. Conference of the Allied Powers at London at-
tended by delegations from Athens, Constanti-
nople, and Angora.
March 1. Treaty signed at Moscow between Afghanistan and
Kemalists establishing diplomatic and consular
relations, and providing for mutual assistance in
event of attack by a third power. (Select Docu-
ment 25.)
CHRONOLOGY . 601
March 9. Secret Agreement of London between the French
and the Kemalists regarding immediate cessa-
tion of hostilities, evacuation of Cilicia, exchange
of prisoners, protection of Armenians, etc., not
ratified.
March 12. Secret Agreement of London between the Italians
and the Kemalists signed at London regarding
conditions of Italian zone of influence in Turkey
and withdrawal of Italian troops from Ottoman
territory. Not ratified. (Select Document 26.)
March 16. Kemalist-Soviet Russia treaty signed at Moscow
(Select Document 27).
March 19. Franco-British convention on Asiatic mandates,
signed December 23, 1920, made public. (Select
Document 24.)
March 31. Fighting broke out between French and Turks in
Cilicia.
April-September. Numerous military operations of which the most
important was the notable counter attack of the
Turks in September when they compelled the
Greek army to recross the river Sakkaria. ·
April 5. Correspondence between Great Britain and the
United States· in regard to economic rights in
mandated territory made public. (British par-
liamentary papers, cmd. 1226.) ·
April. Talaat Pasha assassinated at Berlin by an Arme-
nian; latter exonerated by German court.
May 13. . Government at Angora ratified treaty of March
16, 1921 with Soviet Russia.
May 18. Proolamation of neutrality and designation of a
neutral zone by the three Allied High Commis-
sioners at Constantinople.
June (early). M. Franklin-Bouillon, president of the foreign
relations committee of the French senate, pro-
ceeded to Angora.
June 19. Allied Powers sent offer to Greece to attempt medi-
ation between Greeks and Turks, but offer re-
fused .on June 25.
July (early). Mustafa Kemal Pasha requested General Har-
ington for a personal interview to which latter
acceded. It did not take place, however..
July 30. The Angora National Assembly ratified by 202
votes to 1 the Turko-Russian Treaty concluded
in March.
August 10. Supreme War Council declared that Greece and
Turkish Nationalists were engaged in a private
war, and proclaimed neutrality of England,
France, Italy, and Japan. (Current History,
September, 1921.)
Angust 23. Emir Feisal ascended throne of Iraq.
602 M:ODERN TURKEY
October 2. Soviet Russian-Turkish ratification of peace treaty
of March 16, 1921, took place at Kars.
October 4-9. Permanent mandates commission held first session
at Geneva.
October 13. Treaty of Kars between the Kemalist Government
and the Caucasian Soviet Rep_ublics was signed.
(Select Document 28.)
October 20. Franco-Turkish Nationalist agreement (Select
Document 29) ratified by Kemalists, October 22;
by France, October 30.. Franco-British corre-
spondence regarding same (November 6-18).
November 18. Council of the League of Nations notified of con-
clusion of treaty between Iraq and the British
Government.
December 30. Caucasus federation, consisting of a federat~on
under Russian rule with political center at Baku,
sponsored by the Russian Soviet Government.
1922
January 2. Treaty of friendship between Ukrainia and the
Kemalists. Ratified by the latter on January 10.
(Text appears in Current History, February,
1923.)
January 12. Cannes Conference between the British representa-
tives (Premier Lloyd George and Earl Curzon)
and the Greek representatives (Messrs. Gounaris
and Baltazzis).
February 6. Yusuf Kemal• Pasha left Anatolia on peace mis-
sion.
February 15. 'Greek premier wrote Lord Curzon regarding
desperate military situation in Asia Minor to
which Lord ·Curzon replied that the Greek Gov-
ernment should await conclusions of the coming
Allied conference. Letter from M. Gounaris
circulated to the British Cabinet but not noted
by the British Premier and other responsible
officials. On November 28, executions at Athens
took place.
February 28•. British protectorate in Egypt terminated (Cmd.
592).
March. Fruitless mission of Y usuf Kemal to London.
Mission from Constantinople Government in
London simultaneously (assigned to the same
hotel).
March 9. Earl Montague of the Indian Office resigned fol-
lowing publication of Lord Reading's p_lea
against depriving Turkey of Smyrna and Euro·
pean territory.
March 31. Imperial Ottoman Government-Italian secret agree-
ment (Select Document 30).
CHRONOLOGY 603
March 22-April 15. Foreign ministers of England, France,· and Italy
met at Paris on March 22 to discuss Graeco~
Turkish problems and demands of Turkish
nationalists for the revision of the Treaty of
Sevres. On March 23 proposals for an armistice
of three months was sent to Greek Government
at Athens and to Turkish Governments at
Angora and Constantinople. On March 25 the
Greek Government accepted proposals with reser-
vations. On Mareh 26 the conference closed,.
with signing of terms for revision of Sevres
Treaty. On April 5 Angora accepted armistice
proposals with reservation regarding Anatolia.
On April 8 Constantinople accepted with reser-
vation regarding Thrace. Acceptance was
handed to Allied High Commissioners; On April
15 Allied High Commissioners sent reply to
Angora refusing to evacuate Anatolia.
April 23. Angora Government informed Allies it would agree
to preliminary discussion of peace terms.
April 24. Agreement concluded between Italy and Russia
concerning concessions for railways, mines, and
public works in Asia Minor (Times, May 5,
1922).
May 9. Agreement between Great Britain· and United
States reached in regard to Palestine mandate to
be embodied in a treaty (New York Times,
May 10). ·
May 9. At Geneva economic conference, King Feisal's rep-
resentatives claimed independence for Syria and
Lebanon, and decreed the organization of a
powerful constitutional assembly at Baghdad.
June 26. Kemalist Government recognized by ·Persia.
July 12. Angora Assembly elected new commissars.
July 24. Class A mandates, Syria to France and Palestine
to Great Britain, approved by Council of League
of Nations. On June 21, British House of Lords
had voted against Palestine mandate, 60 to 29;
on July 4, House of Commons approved man-
date, 292 to 35 (Select Document 31).
July 25. Djemal Pasha killed by two Armenians at Tifl.is.
July 27-29. Greek forces' threatened occupation of Constan-
tinople (July 27), opposed by Allied Powers.
Greeks acquiesced (July 29). .
July 30. M. Sterghiades proclaimed autonomy of Smytna
under Greek military protection.
July (end). Allied attempt to call a conference in Venice for
September prevented by renewed fighting.
604 MODERN TURKEY
August 4. British Premier's speech in Honse of Commons

(Select Document 32). Other statements by Mr.
Lloyd George were given on September 21, 23,
and October 14.
August 23. Fethi Bey, Minister of the Interior, failed to secure
an audience with any cabinet minister regarding
peace terms and left London in disgust. Before
departure he telegraphed Angora to "Attack.'
August 28. Kemalist military operations launched, resulting in
speedy and complete rout of Greek forces in-
volving very heavy losses in men and materials.
September 8. M. Sterghiades at Smyrna resigned. The advance
Turkish troops entered Smyrna September 9,
followed by Mustafa Kemal Pasha two days
later.
September 14. Tremendous Smyrna conflagration. Wholesale dis-
agreement regarding the original incendiary.
Apparently equally authentic parties charge
the Armenians, Greeks, and Turks.
September 16. British Prime Minister made a military appeal
against the Turks to the Dominions and the
Balkan States. Premier Poincare anno"l!ced
(September 19) that France was not prepared
to use force and advised British withdrawal from
Chanaq but the British refused (September 21).
September 22. Ratifications exchanged for Turkish Nationalist-
Soviet Russian treaty.
September 23. France, Gre~t Britain, and Italy requested an ar-
mistice. M. Franklin-Bouillon sent as special
emissary.
October L Turkish National Pact made widely public (New
York Times, October 1, 1922). .
October 10. British-Iraq treaty announced (Select Document
33).
October 3-lL Deliberations at Mudania; armistice signed Octo-
ber 11 (Select Document 34).
October 19. Refet Pasha, appointed by Angora as governor of
Eastern Thrace, arrived at Constantinople.
October 26. Invitations issued to Conference at Lausanne.
October ( !). Enver Pasha killed fighting in Bokhara where he
had raised a revolt against Soviet Russia in
order to make himself dictator of Turkestan.
November L Grand National Assembly made supreme in Tur-
key. (See chapter on Government.)
November 2. Defensive alliance between Afghanistan and Tur-
key.
November 5. Refet Pasha announced that Constantinople Gov-
ernment had ceased to exist. Archives of Sub-
lime Porte transferred to Angora. Allied High
Commissioners accept new conditions but refuse
to evacuate the city.
CHRONOLOGY 605
November 16. National Assembly accused Mohammed VI of
treason and ordered him and his cabinet minis-
ters to be placed on trial. The following day
the former Sultan embarked for Malta on the
British dreadnought Malaya. Britain stated
that it had merely protected him from a personal
danger and that Britain had been the traditional
refuge of deposed sovereigns; and that even
Napoleon had been removed to safety on. a
British ship.
November 19. Abdul Mejid Effendi, second son of the late Sultan
Aziz and cousin of Mohammed VI, was elected
Supreme Khalif of the Moslems (Select Docu-
ment 35). On November 24 the new Khalif was
invested with the Sacred Mantle of the Prophet
Mohammed in the Top Kapu Palace overlooking
the Golden Horn. For the first time in history
the prayers were said in Turkish instead of
Arabic to symbolize Turkish national unity and
to indicate that the Arabs no longer formed a
part of the Turkish State. No foreign govern-
ment was officially represented at the ceremonies
although congratulations were extended on
November 27. Premier Lloyd George resi~rns.
Lord Curzon remains secretary for foreign
affairs.
November 20. First Lausanne Conference opens.
November 25. French evacuated Adrianople.
November 27. Reported that 250,000 non-Moslem inhabitants of
northern Asia Minor were fleeing.
December 1. Allies agree to exchange of populations.
December 10. Sir Charles Harington, Commander in Chief of the
Allied military forces at the Straits, after an
interview with the new Khalif reported that the
latter's authority had been recognized, therefore
the British Government wished to establish
formal relations with him.
December (early) British High Commissioner in Iraq secured signa-
ture of Ibn Saud to treaty between Iraq and
Nejd drawn up in the previous April.
1923
January 30. Graeco-Turkish agreements signed at Lausanne, in-
corporated in the Treaty of Peace (July 24).
February 5. First Lausanne Conference ends.
February 17. Turkish Economic Congress at Smyrna (See text
in the General Introduction).
March 6. The Grand National Assembly rejected the treaty
draft but authorized the government to continue
negotiations.
606 MODERN TURKEY
April 3. Protocol to British-Iraq treaty signed, published in
. Iraq on May 5.
April 10. The Grand National Assembly approved the so-
called Chester Concessions. Protests later from
the French and British Governments. The
American interests vested in the Ottoman-Ameri-
can Development Company signed the agr~ement
in New York City (June 9).
April15. The ex-Sultan of Turkey issued a proclamation to
the Islamic world to ignore the decision separa-
ting the Sultanate and the Khalifate. The fol-
lowing day the Grand National Assembly passed
a law making an act of high treason all agitation
in favor of restoring the former authority.
Aprt1 20. Mrs. Hamilton Wright, American member of the
Opium Commission of the League of Nations,
announced that the Turkish Government was
willing to restrict opium production to medical
needs provided an assurance against loss of
revenue was made.
April 23. Second Lausanne Conference opened.
May 2. Several Bolshevist agents arrested in Constan-
tinople.
May 3. . Sir Percy Cox left Baghdad on the termination of
his appointment as British High CommissioJ!er.
July 8. Accord reached at Lausanne between Ismet Pasha
and the Allies. The following day at a special
meeting of the Angora Cabinet, Mustafa Kemal
presiding authorized Ismet to sign peace terms.
July 10. The Greek Patriarch, Meletios Metaxakis, is forced
to retire from Constantinople.
Jull: 24. Peace terms signed between Turks and Allies at
Lausanne. Treaty of peace between the Turks
and the Greeks signed (Select Document 36).
July 25. The Aga Khan announced to Moslem world that
the Khalifate movement was "out of date."
Good relations should be cultivated with France
and Great Britain, and Turkey should be assisted
in every way possible;
August 6. Supplementary treaties signed between representa2
tives of the Turkish and American Governments.
August 13. The recent elections gave sweeping victory for the
Defense of Rights party, and on August 13,
Mustafa Kemal Pasha was unanimously elected
President of the Grand National Assembly.
August 23. The Grand National Assembly mtified the Lat~sanne
treaty by a vote of 215 to 20.
October 6. Turkish troops occupy Constantinople.
October 14. Angora is voted the Turkish capital by the
Assembly.
SELECT DOCUMENTS 607
October 29. Declaration of the Turkish Republic (Select Docu-
ment 37). Ghazi Mustafa Kemal Pasha chosen
the first President and General Ismet Pasha the
first Premier.
November 25. Syro-Palestine Congress petitions League of
Nations to set aside mandates for Syria, the
Lebanon, and Palestine.
December 11. Following the publication in Constantinople jour-
nals of the declaration regarding the Khalifate
by the Aga Khan and Ameer Ali, the Govern-
ment established an "anti-revolutionary" court
which held secret sessions at ConstantinoP.le
during the rest of the month.
December 13. The new <Ecumenical Patriarch, Gregorius Vll,
is enthroned at the Phanar.
December lB. · The Turkish Minister of Public Works announced
that the "Chester'' concessions were annulled.
SELECT DOCUMENTS
Number Subject Page
L Official Statement by Sublime Porte Relative to Turkey's
Entrance into the World War. Nov. 14, 1914 • • • 608
2. Allied Agreement Regarding Constantinople, the Straits and
Persia. March, 1915 • • • • 609
3. Pact of London. April 26, 1915 • • • • • • • • 612
4. British Agreement with the Sherif of Mecca. Oct. 24, 1915 613
5. Sykes-Picot Agreement. May 9-16, 1916 • • • • • 614
6. Turkey's Acceptance of President Wilson's Suggestion for
Peace Negotiations. December 26, 1916 • • 615
7. Partition of Asiatic Turkey. 1916 (Spring) • • • • 617
8. General Maude's Proclamation at Baghdad. March 11, 1917 618
9; St. Jean de Maurienne Agreement. April 19-21, 1917 • 619
10. Balfour Declaration. November 2, 1917 • • • 620
11. British Premier Defines War Arms. January 5, 1918 • 621
12. President Wilson's Twelfth Point. January 8, 1918 • 622
13. Brest-Litovsk Treaty. March 3, 1918 • 622
14. The Mudros Armistice. October 30, 1918 • • • • 624
15. The Anglo-French Declaration. November 8, 1918 • 626
16. Declaration of the Congress of Sivas. · Sept. 9, 1919 • • 627
17. Report of the Allied Commission of Inquiry at Smyrna.
Summer, 1919. (Report published, October, 1919) 629
18. Turkish National Pact. January 28, 1920 • • . • • • 629
19. The Allied Occupation of Constantinople. March 16, 1920 631
20. Report of the American Military Mission to Armenia. Sep.
tember-October, 1919 • • • • • • 631
21. San Remo Agreement. April 24, 1920 • 633
22. The Treaty of S~vres. August 10, 1920 • 634
23. The Tripartite Agreement. August 10, 1920 • 637
24. Franco-British Convention. December 23, 1920 • 642
25. The Afghan-Kemalist Treaty. March 1, 1921 • 643
608 MODERN TURKEY
Number Subject Page
26. Turkish Nationalist-Italian Agreement. March 12, 1921 • 644
27. Turkish Nationalist-Soviet Russia Treaty. March 16, 1921 645
28. The Treaty of Kars. October 13, 1921 • . . • 648
29. Franco-Turkish Nationalist Agreement. October 20, 1921 • 651
30. Italian-Imperial Ottoman Government Agreement. March
31, 1922 • • • • • • . 653
31. British Policy in Palestine. July 24, 1922 • • • • 655
32. The Premier's Speech in the House of Commons. August
4, 1922 • . • • 656
33. · British Treaty with Iraq. October 10, 1922 657
34. The Mudania Armistice. October 11, 1922 . • • • • 658
35. Fetva Approving the Deposition of the Sultan. November
19, 1922 • . • • • • • . 659
36. The Treaty of Lausanne. July 24, 1923 . • . • • 659
37. Declaration of the Turkish Republic. October 29, 1923 668
N. B.-In only a few instances have the entire texts been reprod!uced.
No. 1. Official Statement by Sublime Porte Relative to Turkey's

Entrance into the World War.•
November 14, 1914.
REFERENCE.-International Law Documents, Naval War College,
1917, page 219. Translated from the Corriere della Sera, November
16, 1914.
England complains that Turkey, without any preliminary notice,
bought two warships from Germany. It should be borne in mind,
however, that before war was declared the English Government ordered
the seizure of two dreadnoughts that were being built for Turkey in
British yards, and that one of these dreadnoughts, the Sultan Osman,
was seized half an hour before the appointed time when the Turkish
flag was to have been raised over the ship; and that finally no indemnity
was paid for these confiscations.
It is natural, therefore, that Turkey, finding itself deprived of the
two warships that were considered indispensable for the defense of the
Empire, hastened to remedy the loss by acquiring the two ships
offered in a friendly spirit by the German Government.
England complains of the closing of the Dardanelles. But the
responsibility for this act falls on the British Government, as will
appear from the following reasons, which determined the Turkish
Government to take the final decision: In spite of the neutrality of
Turkey, England, under the pretext that German officers were serving
on Turkish ships, declared officially that Turkish war vessels would
be considered as hostile craft, and would be attacked by the British
fleet anchored at the entrance of the Straits.
1 "Amsterdam, Nov. 13, 1914. A telegram from Constantinople receive 1
here via Berlin states that the Porte has published an ilraiJC containing
Turkey's declaration of war against the allied powers--.Reuter." (Times,
Nov. 14, 1914.}
In view of this hostile declaration Turkey found itself compelled
to close the Dardanelles in order to insure the safety of the capital.
And as to the claims of England, it is evident that the presence of
German officers on the Turkish warships was a question of internal
politics and should not, therefore, have given rise to any protest on
the part of a foreign power.
(The note goes on to say that England, though asked to intervene
in behalf of Turkey during the Balkan war, did everything that was
in its power to bring about the downfall of the +urkish Empire. And
when Adrianople was recaptured by the Turkish Army, the British
prime minister did not hesitate to threaten Turkey with collective
punishment on the part of· the Great Powers if the city were not
evacuated by the Turkish forces. The note continues as follows:)
The designs of the British are not limited to the countries of
Europe; they extend to the Gulf of Persia. England has carried
out its plan of impairing the sovereign rights of Turkey and of
opening up a way of access into Arabia, for a long time coveted
by the English.
Faithful to its policy of hostility England has ever opposed the
attempts at reforms in Turkey. It exerted all its influence to prevent
the powers from furnishing expert technical help to the Turkish
Government. The Kaiser alone, disregarding the intrigues of Great
Britain, authorized S. E. Liman von Sanders, Pasha, to reorganize the
Turkish Army, that army which is challenging the British forces.
(After having recalled the Franco-British convention of 1904, which
"passed a sentence of death on Morocco and on Egypt," and the
agreement with Russia in reference to Persia, the note concludes:)
England for more than a century has been striving to destroy the
freedom of the Moslem so as to open up their countries to the greedy
exploitation of the British merchants. The English Government,
pursuing its program of hatred aga!nst the Moslem States, has
succeeded in giving to its policy a religious color which insures to it
the support and the adhesion of the English people, puritanic and
fanatical.
Let us be grateful to God who has given us the opportunity of
victoriously defending the welfare of Islam against its three ruthless
enemies, England, Russia and France.
No. 2. Allied Agreement regarding Constantinople, the Straits and

Persia.
March, 1915.
TillS arrangement between France, Great Britain and Russia re-

mained a secret until disclosed by the Soviet Russian foreign office
in November, 1917. ·
REFERENCE.-F. Seymour Cocks, "The Secret Treaties," London,
1918.
Document A. Confidential telegram from the Russian Minister of

Foreign Affairs to the Russian Ambassador at Paris, dated March 5
ti10 MODERN TURKEY
(18), 1915, appearing in the Manchester Guardian, December 12, 19171
as follows:
On February 23 (March 8) the French Ambassador, on behalf
of his Government, announced to me that France was prepared to
take up a most favourable attitude in the matter of realization of our
desires as set out in my telegram to you, No. 937, in respect of the
Straits and Constantinople, for which I charged you to tender Del-
casse my gratitude.
In his conversations with you, Delcasse had previously more than
once given his assurance that we could rely on the sympathy of
France, and only referred to the need of elucidating the question of
the attitude of England, from whom he feared some objections, before
he could give us a more definite assurance in the above sense. Now
the British Government has given its complete consent in writing to the
annexation by Russia of the Straits and Constantinople within the
limits indicated by us, and only demanded security for its economic
interests and a similar benevolent attitude on our part towards the
political aspirations of England in other parts.
For me, personally, filled as I am with most complete confidence
in Delcasse, the assurance received from him is quite sufficient, but
the Imperial Government would desire a more definite pronouncement
of France's assent to the complete satisfaction of our desires, similar
to that made by the British Government.
{Signed) SAZONOFF
Document B. Memorandum of the Russian Foreign Office appearing

in the Pravd4, a Bolshevik publication, translated in the New Europe,
December 20, 1917, as follows: -
On February 19 (March 4), 1915, the Minister of Foreign Affairs
handed to the French and British Ambassadors a Memorandum which
set forth the desire to add the following territories to Russia as the
result of the present war:
The town of Constantinople, the western coast of the Bosporus, the
Sea of Marmara, and the Dardanelles; Southern Thrace, as far as
the Enos-Media line; the coast of Asia Minor between the Bosporus
and the River Sakkaria, and a point on the Gulf of Izmid to be defined
later; the islands in the Sea of Marmara, and the Islands of Imbros
and Tenedos. The special rights of France and England in the above
territories were to remain inviolate.
Both the French and British Governments express their readiness
to agree to our wishes, provided the war is won, and provided a
number of claims made by France and England, both in t~e Ottoman
Empire, and in other places, are satisfied.
As far as Turkey is concerned, these claims are as follows :
1. Constantinople is to be recognizeci as a free port for the transit
of goods [not proceeding from or] (a•) to Russia, and a free
passage is to be given through the Straits to merchant ships.
2. The rights of England and France in Asiatic Turkey to be
defined by special agreement between France and England and Russia
are recognized.
3. The sacred Mohammedan places are to be protected, and Arabia
is to be under an independent Mohammedan [rule]. (b•.)
The neutral zone in Persia established by the Anglo-Russian agree-
ment of 1907 is to be included in the English sphere of influence.
While recognising these demands in general as satisfactory, the
Russian Government made several reservations.
In view of the formulation of our 'Yishes with regard to the sacred
Mohammedan places it must now be made clear whether these locali~ies
are to remain under the sovereignty of Turkey with the Sultan keeping
the title of Khalif, or whether it is proposed to create new independent
States. In our opinion it would be [desirable] (c•) to separate the
Khalifate from Turkey. In any case freedom of pilgrimage must be
guaranteed.
While agreeing to the inclusion of the neutral zone of Persia wit!rln
the sphere of English influence, the Russian Government considers
it right to declare that the districts round the towns of Ispahan and
Yezd [should be secured] (d•) by Russia, and also that part of the
neutral zone which cuts a wedge between the Russian and Afghan
frontiers and goes as far as the Russian frontier at Zulfagar [should
be] (e•) included in the Russian sphere of influence.
The Russian Government considers it desirable that the question of
the frontiers between Russia and Northern Afghanistan should simul-
taneously be solved according to the wishes expressed at the time of
the negotiations of 1914.
After the entrance of Italy into the war, our wishes were communi-
cated to the Italian Government also, and the latter expressed its
agreement, provided the war ended in the successful realisation . of
Italian claims in general, and in the East, in particular, and in the
recognition by us for Italy within the territories ceded to us of the
same rights as those enjoyed by France and England.
Document C. Confidential telegram from the Russian Minister
of Foreign Affairs to the Russian Ambassador at London, dated March
7 (20), 1915, appearing in the Manchester Guardian.
Referring to the Memorandum of the British Government ( f
Embassy) here of March 12, will you please express to Grey the
profound gratitude of the Imperial Government for the complete and
final assent of Great Britain to the solution of the question of the
Straits and Constantinople, in accordance with Russia's desires. The
Imperial Government fully appreciates the sentiments of the British
Government and feels certain that a sincere recognition of mutual
interests will secure forever the firm friendship between Russia and
Great Britain.
Having already given its promise respecting the conditions of tr~de
in the Straits and Constantinople, the Imperial Government sees no
• The words in brackets in the text are the correct translation, the mis·
translation appearing originally as follows:
a•) [coming from Russia, and not going]; b•) [sovereign]; o•) [un·
desirable]; d •) (formc>rly wc>re fortified); e •) [was).
612 MODER..~ TCRKEY
objection to confirming its assent to the ertablishment (1) of free
transit through Con._<;fantinople for all goods not proeeeding from or
proeeeding to Russia, and (2) free passage through the Straits for
ruerehant yes;e}s.
In order to facilitate the breaking through of the Dardanelles nuder-
taken by the Allies, the Imperial Government is prepared to eo()perate
in inducing those States whose help is eonsidered useful by Great
Britain and Franee to join in the undertaking on reasonable terms.
The Imperial GoYernment eompletely shares the new of the British
Go•ernment that the holy Moslem plaees must also in future remain
under an independent Moslem rnle. It is desirable to elneidate at onee
whether it is eontemplated to leave those plaees under the rnle of
Turkey, the Sultan retaining the title of Khalif, or to ereate new
independent States, sinee the Imperial Government would only be
able to formnlate its desires in aeeordanee with one or other of .these
assumptions. On its part the Imperial Goveriunent would regard the
separation of the Khalifate from Turkey as very desirable. Of eomse,
the freedom of pilgrimage mnst be eompletely seeured.
The Imperial Go•ernment eonfirms its assent to the inclusion of the
neutral zone of Persia in the British sphere of influence. At the same
time, howe.er, it regards it as just to stipnlate that the districts adjoin-
ing the eiti~:"S of Ispahan and Y ezd, forming with them one inseparable
whole, should be secured for Rusria in new of the Russian interests
which have arisen there. The neutral zone now forms a wed.,ue between
the Russian and Afghan frontiers, and eomes up to the very frontier
line of Russia at Znlfagar. Hence a portion of this wed.,ue will have
to be annexed to the Russian sphere of inflnenee. Of essential impor-
tanee to the Imperial Government is the question of railway eonstrnetion
in the neutral zone, which will require further amicable discussion.
The Imperial Go•ernment expects that in future its fnll liberty of
~etion will be recognised in the sphere of influenee allotted to it,
coupled in particular with the right of preferentially developing in that
sphere its finaneial and eeonomie polieies.
Lastly, the Imperial Government considers it desirable simultane-
ously to solve also the problems in Northern Afghanistan adjoining
Rusria in the sense of the wishes expressed on the subjeet by the
Imperial Ministry in the course of the negotiations last year.
(Signed) SAZONOR
No. 3. Paet of London.

April 26, 1915.
AS a result of this pact between Italy, France, Great Britain and

Russia, Italy entered the World War on the side of the Entente Allies.
REFERE.~CES-Great Britailt foreiglt office paper, emd. 671,
(Mise. No. 7), 1920; F. Seymour CoeJ.s. ..The Secret Treaties"; Ma.-
chester Gllardia1t, Jan. 18, 1918.
.AJm:CLB 8.
Italy shall reeeive entire so'.ereignty over the Dodekanese Islands
which she is at present oeeupying.
ARTICLE 9.
Generally speaking, France, Great Britain, and Russia recognize
that Italy is interested in the maintenance of. the balance of power_ in
the Mediterranean and that, in the event of the total or partial parti-
tion of Turkey in Asia, she ought to obtain a just share of the
Mediterranean region adjacent to the province of Adalia, where Italy
has already acquired rights and interests which formed the subject of
an Italo-British convention. The zone which shall eventually be
allotted to Italy shall be delimited at the proper time, due account
being taken of the existing interests of France and Great Britain.
The interests of Italy shall also be taken into consideration in the
event of the territorial integrity of the Turkish Empire being main-
tained and of alterations being made in the zones of interest of the
Powers. ·
If France, .Great Britain, and Russia occupy any territories in
Turkey in Asia during the course of the war, the Mediterranean region
bordering on the Province of Adalia within the limits indicated above
shall be reserved to Italy, who shall be entitled to occupy it.
ARTICLE 10.
All rights and privileges in Libya at present belonging to the
Sultan by virtue of the Treaty of Lausanne are transferred to Italy.
ARTICLE 1L
Italy shall receive a share of any eventual war indemnity correspond-
ing to her efforts and her sacrifices.
ARTICLE 12.
Italy declares that she associates herself in the declaration made by
·France, Great Britain and Russia to the effect that Arabia and the
Moslem Holy Places in Arabia shall be left under the authority of an
independent Moslem Power.
No. 4. British Agreement with the Sherif of Mecca.
October 24, 1915.
THE result of· this arrangement was to enroll the Sherifian family
on the side of the Allies. It was negotiated by Sir Henry McMahon on
behalf of the British Government. The exact text has never been
made public.
REFERENCES.-Col. T. E. Lawrence, subsequently attached to the
Middle East section, Colonial Office, letter to the London Times, Sept.
·n, 1919. (First paragraph and note); Hon. Winston Churchill,
Secretary of State for the Colonies, Parliamentary debates, House of
Commons, vol. 156, (July 11, 1922), p. 1033 (remainder of statements).
Document A. Letter to the London Times by Col. Thomas E.
Lawrence, Sept. 8, 1919. (;First paragraph and note.)
The British promise to King Husain, dated October 24, 1915. It
undertakes, conditional on an Arab revolt, to recognize the "indepen-
dence of the Arabs" south of latitude 37 deg., except in the provinces
of Baghdad and Basra, where British interests require special measures
614 MODERN TURKEY
of administrative control, and except where Great Britain is not "free
to act without detriment to the interest of France.''
(N. B.-Husain asked for no personal position, and for no partic-
ular government or governments.)
Document B. Paragraph from a speech of the Hon. Winston
Churchill, Secretary of State for the Colonies, Parliamentary debates,
House of Commons, vol. 156, page 1033, (July 11, 1922) :
No pledges :were made to the Palestine Arabs in 1915. An under-
taking was given to the Sherif of Mecca that His Majesty's Government
would recognize and support the independence of the Arabs within
certain territorial limits, which specifically excluded the districts of
Mersina and Alexandretta and the portions of Syria lying to the w~t
of the districts of Damascus, Horns, Hama and Aleppo. It was stipu-
lated that the undertaking applied only to those portions of the terri-
tories concerned in which Great Britain was free to act without
detriment to the interests of her Allies. His Majesty's Government
have always regarded and continue to regard Palestine as excluded by
these provisos from the scope of their undertaking.
No.5. Sykes-Picot Agreement.
May 9-16, 1916.
A most important secret document drawn up between Sir Mark
Sykes, the British representative, and M. Picot, representing the
French Government. M. Paul Cambon wrote to Lord Edward Grey
on May 9, and Lord Grey replied on May 16, 1916, each incorporating
in his own language the complete text.
REFERENCES.-Le Temps, May 22, 1919; Current History, March,
1920; Manchester Guardian, January 8, 1920.
The French and British Governments having acquired from informa-
tion at their disposal the conviction that the Arab populations of the
Arab peninsula as well as of the provinces in the Ottoman Empire, are
strongly opposed to Turkish domination and that it would be actually
possible to establish an Arab State or federation, both opposed to the
Turkish Government and favorable to the Entente Powers, have opened
negotiations and have examined the question in common. As a result
of these decisions, they have agreed upon the following principles:
1. France and Great Britain are prepared to accord recognition and
protection to an independent Arab State or a Confederation of Arab
States in the zones "A" and "B" marked on the annexed map, under.
the suzerainty of an Arab chief. In the zone "A" France, and in the
zone "B" Great Britain, shall have a right of priority in regard to
enterprises and local loans. In the zone "A" France, and in the
zone "B" Great Britain shall have the exclusive right to provide advisers
or foreign officials at the request of the Arab State or Confederation
of Arab States. .
2. In the blue zone France, and in the red zone Great Britain,
shall be authorized to establish such administration, direct or indirect,
or such control, as they desire or as they shall judge convenient to
establish after agreement with the State or Confederation of Arab
States.
3. There shall be established in the brown zone an international
administration of which the form shall be determined after consulta-
tion with Russia, and later in agreement with the other Allies and with
representatives of the Sherif of Mecca.
4. There shall be accorded to Great Britain: (1) the ports of' Haifa
and Acre; (2) the guarantee of a definite quantity of' water from the
Tigris and Euphrates in the zone ".A" for zone "B." His Majesty's
Government, on its part, undertakes never to enter into negotiations
with a view to the cession of' Cyprus to a third Power without the
previous consent of' the French Government.
5. Alexandretta shall be a free port in so far as concerns the com- •
merce of' the British Empire, and there shall be no differential treat-
ment in port dues, and no special advantages shall be reflL'led to
British ships or merchandise; there, shall be free transit for British
merchandise via Alexandretta, and on the railways traversing the blue
zone whether such merchandise be destined for or originate from the
red zone, zone "B" or zone "A"; and no differential treatment, direct
or indirect, shall be established against British merchandise on any
railway, or against British merchandise or ships in any port serving
the above-mentioned zones.
Haifa shall be a free port as regards the commerce of' France, her
colonies, and her protectorates, and there shall be no differential treat-
ment or advantage in port dues refused to French ships and mer-
chandise. There shall be free transit for French merchandise via Haifa
and the British railway across the brown zone, whether such merchandise
originate from or is destined for the blue zone, zone "A", or zone "B";
and there shall be no differential treatment, direct or indirect, against
French merchandise. on any railway or against French merchandise or
ships in any port serving the above-mentioned zones.
6. In the zone "A" the Baghdad Railway shall not be prolonged
southwards beyond Mosul, and in zone "B" northwards beyond Samarra
until a railway joining Baghdad and Aleppo by the valley of the
Euphrates has been completed, and that only with the cooperation of
the two Governments.•
7. Great Britain shall have the right to construct, administer, and
be the sole proprietor of a railway joining Haifa to zone "B".
Further, she shall have a right in perpetuity· to transport troops at
any time along the railway. It is understood by the two Governments
that this railway is to facilitate the junction of Baghdad and Haifa,
and it is further understood that if technical difficulties or the cost of
maintaining this line of junction in the brown zone render its con-
• The draft submitted to Russia added a note to .A&'l'ICLI!: 6: •' this ARTICLI!:
has been ineluded to prevent the completion and the organization of the
German railroad to Baghdad.'' The projeeted British line up the Euphrates
Valley was completed aa far northward aa Baghdad on January 15, 1920,
when the first train from Basra arrived there.
616 MODERN TURKEY
struction impracticable, the French Government will agree to consider
that the line may traverse the polygon Barries-Keis-Maril-Silbrad-Tel-
Hotsda-Mesnire before reaching zone "B".
8. For a period of twenty years the Turkish Cnstoms tariffs shall
remain in force throughout the blue and red zones as well as in zones
"A" and "B", and no increase in rates or alteration of ad valorem into
specific duties shall be made except with the consent of the two Powers.
There shall be no internal Customs between any of the above-men-
tioned zones. Customs duties leviable shall be levied at the ports of
entry and shall be transmitted to the administration of the zone for
which the goods are destined.
9. It is understood that the French Government will never enter
upon any negotiations for the cession of its rights and will never
cede its rights in the blue zone to any third Power other than the
State or Confederation of Arab States, without the previous consent
of His Majesty's Government, which on its part shall give a similar
assurance with regard to the red zone.
10. The British and French Governments, as protectors of the
Arab State, agree not to acquire, and will not consent to a third Power
acquiring, territorial possessions in the Arabian peninsula, nor to
construct a naval base in the islands off the east coast of the Red Sea ;
but this shall not prevent such rectification of the frontier of Aden as
may be considered necessary in view of the recent aggression of the
Turks.
·11. The negotiations with the Arabs in regard fo the frontiers of
the Arab State or Confederation of States shall proceed in the same
way as before in the name of the two Powers.
12. It is further understood that measures for controlling the impor-
tation of arms into Arab territory shall be considered by the two
Governments.
No. 6. Turkey's Acceptance of President Wilson's Suggestion for
Peace Negotiations.
December 26, 1916.
REFERE..~CE.~American Joornal of International Law, Special

Supplement, Volume 11, 1917.
Ambassador Elkus to the Secretary of State.

(Telegram.)
AMERICAN EMBASSY,
Constantinople, Dec. 26, 1916.
In reply to the President's message communicated to the Sublime
Porte on the 23d instant, Minister for Foreign Affairs handed me
to-day a note of which the following is a translation :
MR. AMBASSADOR:
In reply to the note which Your Excellency was pleased to deliver
to me under date of the twenty-third instant, number 2107, containing
certain suggestions of the President of the United States, I have the
honor to communicate to Your Excellency the following:
The generous initiative of the President, tending to create bases for
the reestablishment of peace, has been received and taken into con-
sideration by the Imperial Ottoman Government in the same friendly
obliging (f) which manifests itself in the President's communication.
The President indicates the object which he has at heart and leaves
open the choice of that path leading to this object. The Imperial
Government considers a direct exchange of ideas as the most efficacious
means of attaining the desired result.
In conformity with its declaration of the twelfth of this month, in
which it stretched forth its hand for peace negotiations, the Imperial
Government has the honor of proposing the immediate meeting, in a
neutral country, of delegates of the belligerent powers.
The Imperial Government is likewise of opinion that the great work
of preventing future wars can only be commenced after the end of
the present struggle between the nations. When this moment shall
have arrived the Imperial Government will be pleased to collaborate
with the United States of America and with the other neutral powers
in this sublime task.
(Signed) HaliL
Elkus.
No. 7. Partition of Asiatic Turkey.
1916 (Spring).
THIS secret agreement between France, Great Britain and Russia
apparently took definite form early in 1916. This agreement was
disclosed by the Soviet Russian foreign office, 1917.
REFERENCES.-Izvesti.ia, November 24, 1917; J. Seymour Cocks,
"Secret Treaties," op. cit.j Manchester Guardian, January 19, 1918.
As a result of negotiations which took place in London and Petrograd
in the Spring of 1916, the Allied British, French and Russian Govern-
ments came to an agreement as regards the future delimitation of
their respective zones of influence and territorial acquisitions in Asiatic
Turkey, as well as the formation in Arabia of an independent Arab
State, or a federation of Arab States. The general principles of the
agreement are as follows :
Russia obtains the provinces of Erzerum, Trebizond, Van, and
Bitlis, as well as territory in the southern part of Kurdistan, along
the line :Mush-Sert-lbn-Omar-Amajie-Persian frontier. The limit of
Russian acquisitions on the Black Sea coast will be fixed later on
at a point lying west of Trebizond.
France obtains the coastal strip of Syria, the vilayet of Adana, and
the territory bounded on the south by a line Aintab-Mardin to the
future Russian frontier, and on the north by a line Ala Dagh-Zara-
Egin-Kharput.
Great Britain obtains the southern part of Mesopotamia with Bagh-
dad, and stipulates for herself in Syria the ports of Haifa and Acre.
By agreement between France and England, the zone between the
French and the British territories forms a confederation of Arab
618 MODER...~ TrnKEY
States, or one independent Arab State, the zones of in.fluenee in which
are determined at the same time.
Alexandretta is proelaimed a free porL
With a view to securing the religious interests of the Entente Powers,
Pale:.--tine, with the Holy Plaees, is separated from Turkish territory
and snbjeeted to a special regime to be determined by agreement
between Russia, Franee and England.
As a general rnle the contracting Powers undertake mutnally to
recognise the eoneessions and privileges existing in the territories now
aeqnired by them which have existed before the war.
They &.,"'Tee to assume such portions of the Ottoman debt as corre-
sponds to their :respeetive aeqnisitions.
No.8. General Maude's Proclamation at Ba,ohdad.

Mareh ~ 1917.
FOLLOWIXG the triumphant entry of the British forces into this
famous eity, the Commander in Chief was directed to announee Allied
policy, which was mainly British.
General Maude was instructed to issue a proelamation to the peo]!le
of Baghdad announeing that our armies eame into the country not as
conquerors but as liberators, and pointing out that a long commercial
eonneetion had emted between Baghdad and Great Britain, that the
British Govemment could not remain indifferent to what took plaee
in Mesopotamia and was determined not to permit again that whiCh
had been done in Baghdad by the Turks and Gennans.
REFERE...~CE.-Reriew of tlle ci~il adai11istratW.. of .llesopola•ia,
Parliamentary paper, emd. 1061, 19"20.
"But you, the people of Baghdad," the proelamation continued,
"whose commercial professions and whose safety from oppression and
invasion must ever be a matter of the elose:>-t coneern to the British
Government, are not to understand that it is the wish of the British
Government to impose upon you alien institutions. It is the hope
of the British Government that the aspirations of your philosophers
and writers shall be realised onee again. The people of Baghdad
shall flourish and enjoy their ·wealth and substanee under institutions
which are in consonanee with their saered laws and their racial ideal
In the Hejaz the Arabs have expelled the Turks and Gennans who
oppressed them and have proelaimed Sherif Husain as Their King,
and His Lordship rnles in independenee and freedom and is tbe ally
of the nations who are fighting a.,<>ainst the power of Turkey and Ger-
many. So, indeed, are the noble Arabs, the Lords of Nejd, Kuwait
and Asir. Many noble Arabs have perished in the eanse of freedom
a1 the hands of those alien rnlers, the Turks, who oppressed them.
It is the determination of the Government of Great Britain and the
Great Powers allied to Great Britain that the;e noble Arabs shall not
have snfl'ered in vain. It~ the desire and hope of the British people
and the nations in allianee with them that the Arab raee may rise onre
more to greatness and renown amongst the peoples of the earth and
that it shall bind it;elf to this end in unity and concord. O, people
of Baghdad! remember· that for 26 generations you have suffered under
strange tyrants who have ever endeavoured to set one Arab house
against another in order that they might profit by your dissensions.
Therefore, I am commanded to invite you, through your nobles and
elders and representatives, to participate in the management of your
civil affairs, in collaboration with the political representatives of Great
Britain who accompany the British Army, so that you may unite with
your kinsmen in the north, east, south and west in realising the aspi_ra-
tions of your race."
No. 9. St. Jean de Maurienne Agreement.

April 19-21, 1917.
ANOTHER secret agreement, this time between France, Great Britain
and Italy, had its terms agreed upon in April 19-21, 1917, a few days
after the United States declared war against Germany. The negotia-
tors included M. Ribot (France), Mr. Lloyd George (Great Britain),
and M. Sonnino (Italy). The scene was a train at the station of
St. Jean de Maurienne, on the French side of the Mt. Cenis tunnel.
This understanding was responsible in a large measure for Italy's
hopes for control of Western Asia Minor, including Smyrna, and as
such was largely responsible for the landing of Greek forces at Smyrna
on May 15, 1919.
REFERENCES.-New York Globe, February 9, 1920; Chicago Daily
News, February 9, 1920; Current His tory, March, 1920; Manchester
Guardian, January 9, 1920. (Certain well-informed persons are skep-
tical regarding the authenticity of any public versions.)
Subject to the consent of the Russian Government:
1. The Italian Government gives its assent to th.e provisions con-

tained in ARTICLES 1 and 2 of the Franco-British agreements of May
9 and 16, 1916. On their part the French and British Governments
recognize Italy's right~n an identical basis as to conditions of
administration and interest-to the green and the "C" zones indicated
in the map attached hereto.
2. Italy undertakes to make of Smyrna a free port in so far as
the trade of France, her colonies and her protectorates, as well as
that of the British Empire and its dependencies, is concerned. Italy
will enjoy the rights and privileges which France and Great Britain
have reciprocally guaranteed each other in the ports of Alexandretta,
Haifa and of Saint Jean d'Acre (Akka) by Articles 5 of the agree-
ments mentioned heretofore. Mersina shall be a free port with ree-ard
to the trade of Italy, her colonies and her protectorates, and there shall
be no difference of treatment nor any advantages in port duties which
may be refused to Italian ships or goods. Italian goods destined to
or coming from the Italian zone shall obtain free transit through
Mersina and on the railway crossing the vilayet of Adana. There shall
be no difference of treatment, direct or indirect, as against Italian
goods on any railway line nor in any port along the Cilician coast and
serving the Italian zone at the expense of Italian ships or merchandise•.
620 MODERN TURKEY
3. The form of the international administration in the brown zone,
which forms the object of ARTICLE 3 of the said arrangements of May
9 and 16, 1916, shall be decided in agreement with Italy.
4. On her part Italy adheres to the provisions concerning the ports
of Haifa and Akka contained in ARTICLE 4 of the same agreements.
5. Italy adheres, in so far as the green and (C) zones are con-
cerned, to the two paragraphs of ARTICLE 8 of the Anglo-French agree-
ments referring to the customs system to be maintained in the blue
and red zones, as well as in the zones "A" and "B."
6. It is understood that the interests possessed by each power in the
zones falling to the lot of the other powers shall be scrupulously re-
spected, but that the powers concerned in such interests shall not make
use of them for political action.
7. The provisions contained in ARTICLES 10, 11 and 12 of the Anglo-
French agreements concerning the Arabian Peninsula and the Red Sea
are considered as equally applicable to Italy as if that power were
named in those articles together with France and Great Britain and
as of the contracting parties.
8. It is understood that, in case it should not be possible at the
conclusion of the war to secure to one or more of the said powers
the whole of the advantages contemplated in the agreements concluded
by the Allied Powers concerning the allotment to each of them of a
portion of the Ottoman Empire, the maintenance of the Mediterranean
equilibrium shall be fairly taken into consideration, in conformity with
ARTICLE 9 of the Pact of London of April 26, 1915, in any change or
arrangement affecting the provinces of the Ottoman Empire as a
consequence of the war.
9. It is understood that the present memorandum shall be communi-
cated to the Russian Government in order to enable it to express its
opinion.
No. 10. Balfour Declaration.
November 2, 1917.
HON. A. J. BALFOUR wrote to Lord Rothschild a statement of
the British official position with regard to Palestine. This declaration
of Lord Balfour was later subscribed to by France and Italy and
indorsed by President Wilson in a letter to the head of the British
Zionist organization. In the House of Lords (June 21, 1922), Lord
Sydenham quoted the "Guide to Palestine," published in America:
"The wording of it came from the British Foreign Office, but the text
had been revised in the Zionist offices in America as well as in England.
The British Declaration was made in the form in which the Zionists
desired it." It was incorporated in the San Remo Agreement of
April 24th, 1920.
There has been much discussion of the meaning of the words "Na-
tional Home." In the House of Commons, Hon. Winston Churchill
quoted Sir Herbert Samuel as follows: "Th,ese words mean that the
Jews, who are a people scattered throughout the world, but whose
hearts are always turning to Palestine, should be enabled to found
~h~r~ ~11~4' hc;>me, a!!d that some amongst them, within the limits fixed
by numbers and the interests of the ·present population, ·should come
to Palestine in order to help by their resources and efforts to develop
the country to the advantage of all its inhabitants." (Parliamentary
debates, House of Commons, vol. 143, 1921, pp. 285-6.)
REFERENCE.-Current History, July, 1920.
"His Majesty's government view with favor the establishment in
Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their
best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being
clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice
the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in
Palestine, or the rights and political statl,ls enjoyed by Jews in any
other country.''
No. 11. British Premier Defines War Aims.
January 5, 1918.
MR. LLOYD GEORGE, the Prime Minister, "in fulfillment of a
promise recently made to address the delegates of the trade unions now
discussing the question of man-power at the Central Hall, Westminster,
with the Minister of National Service, on the subject of the war aims,
made today the ••• statement on behalf of the Government." (Man-
chester Guardian, January 7.) This declaration, together with the Bal-
four Declaration, have been the two most quoted propaganda with
reference to the proposed dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire.
The contents of Select Document 11 produced a profound impression
in India. On February 26, 1920, the British Premier made the ex-
planation in the House of Commons that "That declaration was specific.
It was unqualified and it was deliberate. It was made with the consent
of all parties in the country." During the same debate, Lord Robert
Cecil stated that this declaration was thought advisable in order to
conciliate labor opinion and that it was "not a binding settlement," but.
it was an offer of peace to Germany and Austria who were weakaning
in the struggle.
REFERENCE.-Manchester Guardian, January 7, 1918.
Nor are we fighting to destroy Austria-Hungary or to deprive Turkey
of its capital, or of the rich and renowned lands of Asia Minor and
Thrace, which are predominantly Turkish in race.
While we do not challenge the maintenance of the Turkish Empire

in the homelands of the Turkish race, with its capital at Constantinople,
the passage between the Mediterranean and the Black Sea being inter-
nationalised and neutralised, Arabia, Armenia, Mesopotamia, Syria,
and Palestine are, in our judgment, entitled to a recognition of their
separate national conditions.
What the exact form of that recognition in each particular case
should be need not here be discussed beyond stating that it would be
impossible to restore to their former sovereignty the territories to
which I have already referred.
Much has been said about the arrangements we have entered into
with our allies on this and on other subjects. I can only say that as
622 MODERN TURKEY
new circumstances, like the Russian collapse and the separate Russian
negotiations, have changed the conditions under which those arrange-
ments were made, we are and always have been perfectly ready to
discuss them with our allies.
No. 12. President Wilson's Twelfth Point.
January 8, 1918.
WHILE all of the Fourteen Points have reference to Turkey, the
twelfth was of exclusive application.
REFERENCE.-New York Times, January 9, 1918.
Point XII. The Turkish portions of the present Ottoman Empire
should be assured a secure sovereignty, but the other nationalities
which are now under Turkish rule should be assured an undoubted
security of life and an absolutely unmolested opportunity of autonomous
development, and the Dardanelles should be permanently opened as a
free passage to the ships and commerce of all nations under inter-
national guaranties.
No. 13. Brest-Litovsk Treaty.
March 3, 1918.
THE following· extracts are taken from supplements to the Treaty
of Peace between Soviet Russia and the Central Powers, signed at
Brest-Litovsk, which restored the boundarie& between Russia and Turkey
as they existed prior to the Treaty of Berlin {1878). Ratifications
were exchanged at Berlin, July 12, 1918. Compare similar terms in
the Kemalist-Soviet Russia Treaty {Select Document 27).
REFERENCE.-"Texts of the Russian 'Peace,'" Government Print-
.ing Office, Washington, 1918.
Document A. Appendix V to the Treaty of Peace between Russia
and the Central Powers, signed at Brest-Litovsk, 3 March, 1918. {Text
as transmitted to the Department of State by the American Consul
at Moscow.)
With regard to the economic relations between Turkey and Russia,
the following agreement is established:
ARTICLE 1.
The contracting parties pledge themselves to begin negotiations
with regard to the conclusion of a new commercial treaty as soon as
possible after general peace between Turkey on the one hand, and
the countries which are at present in a state of war with her on the
other hand, has been signed.
ARTICLE 2.
Until the appointed time, and in any case until 31 December, 1919,
each of the contracting parties gives to the citizens of the other party
the same rights with regard to trade and navigation as it gives to the
citizens of the most favored nation. These regulations extend more
especially:
(a) To the import and export, the return of exports and the carriage
of merchandise, to the customs duties and customs formalities, to the
interior taxes, to the taxes on consumption and similar taxes, and
to the prohibition of transportation;
(b) To the actions of the administration of government monopolies
or monopolies under government control of one of the contracting par-
ties, with regard to the purchasers or the suppliers of the other party as
far as fixing the prices and other business matters are concerned. ·
ARTICLE 3.
During the entire period during which the principle of the most
favored nation is effective, neither party will establish to the loss of·
the other party higher import and export duties on one frontier than
on any other.
ARTICLE 4.
Neither of the parties will lay any claim to the privileges which
one of the parties affords, or may in the future afford, to any other
State based on existing or future customs union, or which she allows
in case of limited transactions via her frontier.
ARTICLE 5.
The contracting parties agree that after 30 June, 1919, each of them
may refuse to acknowledge the agreement upon the condition of
warning the other party six months in advance.
Document B. Russia-Turkey.
Legal-Political treaty supplementary to the Treaty of Peace between
Russia and the Central Powers. Signed at Brest-Litovsk, 3 March,
1918.
(Ratifications exchanged at Berlin, 12 July, 1918.) (Neue Freie
Press, 13 July, 1918. Evening Edition.)
(English text from the State Department weekly reports, Central
Powers, No. 44, 6 May, 1918.)
.AltTICLEL
The following provisions have been made to regulate the details of
execution and the delivery of occupied territory dealt with in Paragraph
2 of ARTICLE 4 of the joint treaty of peace.
1. To that end the Russian republic undertakes to withdraw to the
other side of the boundary line as it was before the war all its forces
now in the said provinces as well as all its officers, both civil and
military, in a period of from six to eight weeks from the signature
of the present treaty.
4. The Russian republic will use one division to guard the frontier
along a distance of about 500 kilometers or more, will demobilize all
the remainder of the army and carry it to the interior of the country.
5. The Russian republic undertakes to demobilize and dissolve the
624 MODERN TURKEY
Armenian bands, whether of Russian or Turkish nationality now in
the Russian and Ottoman occupied provinces and entirely to disband
them.·
·ARTICLE II.
Within three months after the ratification of the present treaty, two
Turkish-Russian joint commissioners shall be appointed by the con-
tracting parties; one of these will be charged with the duty of re-
establishing the dividing line between Turkish and Russian territory
from the point where the three boundaries, Turkish, Russian, and
Persian, meet to the point where the line strikes the boundary of the
three sanjaks of Kars, Ardahan, and Batum. Along that stretch the
boundary line as it was before the war will be followed; the monuments
that may have been destroyed in the course of the war operations shall
be rebuilt and repaired in accordance with the maps and protocols of
the boundary commission of 1880.
The second commission will mark the boundary between Russia and
the three sanjaks to be evacuated in accordance with Paragraphs 3 of
Article IV of the joint treaty of peace. The frontier shall be restored
there as it existed before the Turkish-Russian war of 1877 and 1878.
ARTICLE VIII.
In pursuance of the principle laid down in ARTICLE VII of the joint
treaty of peace, the two contracting parties declare that they consider
to be null and void all previous international instruments intended to
create spheres of influence and exclusive interests in Persia. The two
governments will withdraw their troops from the Persian territory.
To that end.they shall communicate with the government of that country
about the details of the evacuation and the measures apt also to insure
for the political independence and territorial integrity of that country
the respect of the several states.
ARTICLE XI.
Russian subjects of the Moslem faith will be allowed to emigrate to
Turkey after disposing of their property and to carry their patrimony
with them.
No. 14. The Mudros Armistice.
October 30, 1918.

FOLLOWING the surrender of Bulgaria, Turkey withdrew from
the war several days before the capitulation of Germany. The armis-
tice prepared by a Vice Admiral of the British Navy was signed on
board the battleship Agamemnon stationed off Mudros, island of
Lemnos, October 30, 1918.
REFERENCE.-International Law Documents, Naval War College,
1918.
Conditions of an armistice agreed to and concluded between Vice
Admiral the Honorable Sir Somerset Arthur Gough-Calthorpe, British
Commander-in-Chief of the Mediterranean station, acting under au-
thority from the British Government, in agreement with their Allies,
and His Excellency Rauf Bey, Ottoman minister of marine; His Excel-
lency Richad Hikmet Bey, Ottoman under secretary for foreign affairs;
Lieutenant-Colonel Saadullah Bey, Ottoman general stllff, acting under
authority from the Ottoman government.
1. Opening of the Dardanelles and the Bosporus; access to the
Black Sea; allied occupation of the Dardanelles and the Bosporus
forts.
2. The positions of all mine fields, torpedo tubes, and other obstruc-
tions in Turkish waters are to be indicated, and assistance is to be
given to sweep and remove them as required.
3. All available information about mines in the Black Sea is to be
communicated.
4. All allied prisoners of war as well as Armenian interned persons
and prisoners are to be collected at Constantinople and handed over
unconditionally to the Allies.
5. Immediate demobilization of the Turkish army except troops re-
quired for the surveillance of the frontiers and maintenance of internal
order, the number of effectives and their disposition to be determined
later by the Allies, after consultation with the Turkish Government.
6. Surrender of all war vessels in Turkish waters or in waters occu-
pied by Turkey, these ships to be interned in such Turkish ports as
directed, except small vessels required for policy and similar purposes
in Turkish territorial waters.
7. The Allies have the right to occupy any strategic points in the
event of any situation arising which threatens the security of the Allies.
8. Free use of the Allied ships of all ports and anchorage now under
Turkish occupation and denial of their use to the enemy; similar con-
ditions to apply to Turkish mercantile shipping in Turkish waters fOJr
purposes of trade and demobilization of the army.
9. Use by the Allies of all ship repair facilities at all Turkish ports
and arsenals.
10. Allied occupation of the Taurus tunnel system.
11. Immediate withdrawal of the Turkish forces in northwestern
Persia behind the prewar frontier, already ordered, and part of
Transcaucasus to be evacuated by Turkish troops, as already ordered;
the remainder to be evacuated if required by the Allies after they have
studied the situation.
12. All wireless, telegraph, and cable stations to be controlled by
the Allies, Turkish Government messages excepted.
13. Prohibition against destruction by the Turks of any naval, mili-
tary, or commercial material.
14. Facilities are to be given for the purchase of coal, oil, fuel, and
naval material from Turkish sources after the requirements of the
country have been met, and none of the above to be exported.
626 MODER...'f TURKEY
15. Allied control officers to be placed on all railways, including
portions of the Transcaucasian railways under Turkish control, which
must be placed at the free and complete disposal of the Allied authori-
ties, due consideration being given to the needs of the population. This
clause to include Allied occupation of Batum, and Turkey is to raise
no objection to the occupation of Baku by the Allies.
16. Surrender of all garrisons in Hejaz, Assiryemen, Syria, and
Mesopotamia to the nearest Allied commander. Withdrawal of the
Turkish troops from Cilicia, except those necessary to maintain order
to be determined under clause 5.
17. Surrender of all Turkish officers in Tripolitania and Cyrenaica
to the nearest Italian garrison, Turkey to guarantee to stop supplies
to and communications with these officers if they do not obey the order
to surrender.
18. Surrender of all ports occupied in Tripolitania and Cyrenaica,
including Misurata, to the nearest Allied garrison.
19. All Germans and Austrians, naval, military and civilians, to
be evacuated within one month from the Turkish dominions, those in
the remote districts as soon after as possible.
20. Compliance with such orders as will be conveyt'd, regarding the
disposal of the equipment, arms and ammunition, including the trans-
port of the portion of the Turkish army to be demobilized under
clause 5.
21. An Allied representative attached to the Turkish ministry of
supplies to safeguard Allied interests. This representative is to be
furnished with all that is necessary for this purpose.
22. Turkish prisoners to be kept at the disposal of the Allied powers,
the release of Turkish civilian prisoners and prisoners over the military
age to be considered. -
23. In ease of disorder in the six Armenian vilayets, the Allies re-
serve for themselves the right to occupy any part of them.
24. Obligation on the part of Turkey to cease all relations with
the Central Powers.
25. Hostilities between the Allies and Turkey to cease from noon,
local time, Thursday, the 31st day of October.
No. 15. The Anglo-French Declaration.

November 8, 1918.
EVENTS moved rapidly in Iraq. The joint declaration gave the
Arabs an immediate self-consciousness, especially coming as it did in
conjunction with the text of Mr. Wilson's Fourteen Points, which ap-
peared in the Iraq newspapers for the first time on November ll, 1918.·
REFEREXCE.-The Moming Post (London), November 8, 1918.
The object aimed at by France and Great Britain in prosecuting in
the East the war let loose by the ambition of Germlll!y is the complete
and definitive emancipation of the peoples so long oppressed by the
Turks, and the establishment of governments and national administra-
tions deriving their authority from the initiative and free choice of the
indigenous populations.
In order to carry out these intentions France and Great Britain are
at one in encouraging and assisting the establishment of indigenous
Governments and administrations in Syria and Mesopotamia, now
liberated by the Allies, and in the territories the liberation of which
they are engaged in securing, and in recognising these as soon as they
are actually established. Far from wishing to impose on the popula-
tions of these regions any particular institutions, they are only con-
cerned to ensure by their support and by adequate assistance the regular
working of governments and administrations freely chosen by them-
selves. To secure impartial and equal justice for all, to facilitate· the
economic development of the country by inspiring and encouraging
local initiative, to favour the diffusion of education, to put an end
to dissensions that have been too long taken advantage of by Turkish
policy, such is the policy which the two Allied Governments uphold
in the liberated territories.
No. 16. Declaration of the Congress of Sivas.

September 91 1919.
WITH this Congress, which followed that of Erzerum, we have the
first formal declaration of the Kemalists, who were also known as the
Nationalists in contradistin~;tion to the Imperial Ottoman Govern-
ment at Constantinople. This document was the predecessor of the
Turkish National Pact (Select Document 18).
REFERENCE.-Report of the American Military Mission to Ar-
menia, by Maj. Gen. James G. Harbord, Government Printing Office
(1920), Washington.
In view of the exterior and interior perils which threaten our coun-
try, the national conscience has become awakened and gave birth to
our congress, which has reached the following decision :
I. All of the Turkish territory within the frontier outlined 30 Octo-
ber, 1334 (1918), between the Ottoman Government and the Allies,
and inhabited by a preponderate majority of Turk population, will
form an undivided and inseparable whole. All the Mussulman elements
living in said territories are filled with mutual sentiments of respect
and devotion for the social conditions of the country and form a
veritable fraternity.
II. In order to assure the integrity of our country and our national
independence, as well as to assure the conservation of the Sultanate
and supreme Khalifate, it is indispensable to place in action the
national forces and the absolute will of the people.
III. Against all intermeddling or occupation of no matter what
part of the Ottoman territory, and in pa.rticular against every move-
ment tending toward the formation, at the expense of the mother
country, of an independent Armenia and of an independent Greece on
the Aidin, Magnesia, and Balikhisar fronts, we are absolutely resolved
to resist and to defend our rights.
IV. It is inadmissible that privileges be accorded all non-Mussulman
elements who, for ages, have lived from the breast of the same country
and who enjoy the same rights of equality; such privileges would
tend to trouble our political government and break the social equilibrium.
628 MODERN TURKEY
V. All methods and all means are taken with a view to safeguard the
Sultanate, the supreme Khalifate, and the integrity of the country
in the case where the Turkish Government, under foreign pressure,
should be called upon to abandon no matter what part of our territory.
VI. We await a decision which will conform with right and with
such justice as will annul the initiatives that are contrary to our his-
toric, ethnic, and religious rights; a decision relative to the annulling
of the project of the separation of our territory situated within the
line. of demarcation traced by the armistice treaty, 30 October, 1334,
and inhabited by a preponderate majority of Mussulman population
having an intellectual preponderance and economic superiority and
forming an absolutely indivisible brotherhood which is inseparable of
race and religion.
VII. Our people honor and respect humanitarian and contemporary
purposes and take in consideration our scientific, industrial, and eco-
nomic needs; in consequence whereof, on condition that the interior
and exterior independence of our people and of our State, and on
condition that the territorial integrity of our country shall be con-
served intact, we will accept with pleasure the scientific, industrial, and
economic assistance of every State which will not set forth imperialistic
tendencies with respect to our country and which will respect the
principles of nationality within the limits indicated under Article VI.
We await in the name of the preservatio~ of humanity and universal
peace the urgent signature of a peace based on the aforenamed !lquitable
and humanitarian conditions which we consider to be our great national
objective. '
VIII. In the course of historic events which fix the destinies of
nations, it is indispensable that our central Government shall submit
itself to the national will, for the arbitrary decision, emanating from
a government which treats lightly of the supreme will of the people
not only causes that government not to be respected but, again, it could
not be taken into consideration; the history of our past is proof. In
consequence, it is absolutely urgent that before taking the means to
remedy the anguish which exists within the very breast of the nation,
our central Government shall proceed without delaying further to
convoke the Nationalist Assembly and submit all the decisions to be
taken with a view to safeguar<ling the interests of the nation.
IX. The sufferings and the calamities of the nations have given birth
to a federal assembly called "the assembly to defend the rights and
the interests of the provinces of Anatolia and of Rumaili." That
assembly abstracts all the tendencies of the political parties so that all
our Mussulman compatriots as such can be considered as legitimate
members of that assembly.
X. The congress of that assembly, named "the assembly to defend
the rights and the interests of the provinces of Anatolia and of
Rumaili," which met at Sivas 4 September, 1335 (1919), has chosen
a representative corps charged to push on the proposed sacred cause
and to direct such similar organizations as well in the smaller com-
munities as in the larger centers of the vilayets.
The Congress.
No. 17. Report of the Allied Commission of Inquiry at Smyrna.
Summer, 1919. (Report published, October, 1919.)
THE actions of the Greek military forces, following their landing
at Smyrna on May 15, 1919, were such as to call forth an investigating
commission, who took evidence for several weeks at Smyrna. No
official findings are available. The members of the commission were
Admiral Bristol (America), General Bunoust (France), General Hare
(Great Britain), and General Dall'olio (ltaly)-the officers of the
Allied and Associated Powers. The secretary-general of the Confer-
ence was M. Luigi Villari.
REFERENCE.-E. N. Bennett, English Review, vol. 30 (1920), pp.
359-362. This author stated that the report was published in Con-
stantinople in October, 1919, in Paris, 1920, and in the Muslim Outlook.
Among the conclusions presented by the Commission are the fol-
lowing:
1. The situation created at Smyrna and in the vilayet of Aidin by
the Greek occupation is a false one, because the occupation which in
theory aimed only at the maintenance of order presents in reality all
the forms of annexation.
2. Such an annexation would be contrary to the principle which
proclaims respect for nationalities, because in the occupied region,
with the exception of the town of Smyrna itself and Aivali, the pre-
dominance of the Turkish element over the Greek element is indis-
putable. It is the duty of the Committee of Inquiry to state that the
Turkish national sentiment, which has already manifested its resistance,
will not accept this annexation. It will yield only to force, that is
to say, in face of a military expedition which Greece alone could not
conduct with any chance of success.
3. Under these conditions the Committee proposes that as soon as
possible all or part of the Greek troops should be replaced by a much
less numerous body of Allied troops.
No. 18. Turkish National Pact.

January 28, 1920.
The "Declaration of Independence" of the New Turkey was ratified
by the lower house of the Ottoman Parliament on January 28, 1920.
Its principles were implicitly followed by the Turkish delegates at the
Lausanne Conferences. Mustafa Kemal Pasha is reported to have
stated early in 1922: "The pact represented our program when we
were weak and now that we are strong, it still represents our program.
We shall not stop fighting until we have given effect to every syllable
of it, and we shall put up our swords as soon as we have realized the
pact. We stand or fall on the National Pact.''
REFERENCES.-Current History, November, 1922; New York
Times, October 1, 1922; Toynbee, A. J., "The Western Question in
Greece and Turkey'' (1922).
630 MODERN TURKEY
(Close translation from the Turkish, made independently of the
French version, of the text of the National Pact as printed in the
Proceedings of the Turkish Chamber of Deputies of February 17th,
1920.}
The members of the Ottoman chamber of deputies recognize and
affirm that the independence of the State and the future of the Nation
can be assured by complete respect for the following principles, which
represent the maximum of sacrifice which can be undertaken in order
to achieve a just and lasting peace, and that the continued existence of
a stable Ottoman sultanate and society is. impossible outside of the
said principles:
FIRST ARTICLE.-Inasmuch as it is necessary that the destinies of
the portions of the Turkish Empire which are populated exclusively
by an Arab majority, and .which on the conclusion of the armistice of
the 30th October, 1918, were in the occupation of enemy forces, should·
be determined in accordance with the votes which shall be freely given
by the inhabitants, the whole of those parts whether within or out-
side the said armistice line which are inhabited by an Ottoman Moslem
majority, united in religion, in race and in aim, imbued with senti-
ments of mutual respect for each other and of sacrifice, and wholly
respectful of each other's racial and social rights and surrounding
conditions, form a whole which does not admit of division for any
reason in truth or in ordinance.
SECOND ARTICLE.-We accept that, in the case of the three sanjaks
which united themselves by a general vote to the mother country when
they first wece free, recourse should again be had, if necessary, to a
free popular vote.
THIRD ARTICLE.-The determination of the juridical status of Western
Thrace also, which has been made dependent on the Turkish peace,
must be effected in accordance with the votes which shall be given by
the inhabitants in complete freedom.
FoURTH ARTICLE.-The security of the city of Constantinople, which
is the seat of the Khalifate of Islam, the capital of the Sultanate, and
the headquarters of the Ottoman Government, and of the Sea of
Marmara must be protected from every danger. Provided this prin-
ciple is maintained, whatever decision may be arrived· at jointly by
us and all other Governments concerned, regarding the opening of the
Bosporus to the commerce and traffic of the world, is valid.
FIFTH ARTICLE.-The rights of minorities as defined in the treaties
concluded between the Entente Powers and their enemies and certain
of their associates shall be confirmed and assured by us~in reliance on
the belief that the Moslem minorities in neighboring countries also will
have the benefit of the same rights.
SIXTH ARTICLE.-It is a fundamental condition of our life and con-
tinued existence that we, like every country, should enjoy complete
independence and liberty in the matter of assuring the means of our
development, in order that our national and economic development
should be rendered possible and that it should be possible to conduct
affairs in the form of a more up-to-date regular administration.
For this reason we are opposed to restrictions inimical to our de-
velopment in political, judicial, financial, and other matters.
The conditions of settlement of, our proved debts shall likewise not
be contrary to these principles.
No. 19. The Allied Occupation of Constantinople.
March 16, 1920.
THE Allies were disturbed by the strength of the Kemalist Move-
ment at this time and deported influential Turks to Malta. The follow-
ing communique was issued by the British, French and Italian High
Commissioners.
REFERENCES.-Orient News (British semi-official· daily), Con-
stantinople, March 17, 1920: Current History, April, 1920.
This measure is now in process of execution, and it is brought to
the knowledge of the public that:
1. The occupation is provisionaL
2. The Entente Powers have no intention of destroying the authority
of the Sultanate. They desire on the contrary to reinforce it in all
places which shall remain in submission to the Ottoman administration.
3. The Entente Powers continue in their intention not to deprive the
Turks of Constantinople, but if-which God forbid-any general
troubles or massacres occur, this decision will probably be modified.
4. At this critical hour it is the duty of everyone to pursue his
own affairs and thus to assist the maintenance of the general security
without letting himself be deceived by those whose madness tends to
destroy the last hope of building on the ruins of the Old Empire a
New Turkey. In a word, it is the duty of everyone to obey the orders
of the Sultanate.
5. Certain persons implicated in the intrigues of which more will
be told later have been arrested at Constantinople. They will naturally
have to answer for their acts and for any future consequences which
those acts may produce.
No. 20. Report of the American Military Mission to Armenia.
September-October, 1919.
A VERY brief digest of the report of the American Military Mis-
sion to Armenia, which was organized under the authority of the
President, was published in the New York Times, October 18, 1919.
The contents were known to members of the Senate committee on for-
eign relations several weeks prior to its transmission by President
Wilson to the United States Senate on April 3, 1920. This commission
made a study at first hand of the requirements neeessary, should the
United States assume a mandate for Armenia or for all of Turkey
and Transcaucasia. The view expressed that American troops would
be needed at the outset virtually killed the prospect of America assum-
ing these foreign responsibilities. The main conclusions appear below.
REFERENCE.-Report of the American Military Missio" to Ar-
menia, by Maj. Gen. James G. Harbord, Government Printing Office
(1920), Washington.
632 MODERN TURKEY·
This mission has had constantly in mind the moral effect to be exer-
cised by its inquiry in the region visited. Very alarming reports had
been received from Transcaucasia for several months before its de-
parture from France, particularly as to organized attacks by the Turk-
ish Army impending along the old international border between Turkey
and Russia. The itinerary of the mission through Turkey was planned
with those reports before it and with the intention of observing as to
their truth and if possible to exert a restraining influence. We prac-
tically covered the frontier of Turkey from the Black Sea to Persia,
and found nothing to justify the reports. The Turkish Army is not
massed along the border; their organizations are reduced to skeletons
and the country shows an appalling lack of people, either military or
civilian. At every principal town through which we passed the chief
of the mission held a conference with the Turkish officials. Inquiry
was made as to the Christian Community, some were always interviewed;
the interest of America in its own missionaries and in the native Chris-
tians was invariably emphasized; the Armenian deportations, the
massacres, and the return of the survivors were discussed on each
occasion, as well as other matters intended to convince Turkish officials
that their country is on trial before the world. The visit of the mission
has had a considerable moral effect in securing the safety of Christian
lives and property pending action by the peace conference. .
We would again point out that if America accepts a mandate for
the region visited by this mission, it will undoubtedly do so from a
strong sense of international duty, and at the unanimous desire-so
expressed at least-of its colleagues in the League of Nations. Ac-
cepting this difficult task without previously securing- the assurance
of conditions would be fatal to success. The United States should
make its own conditions as a preliminary to consideration of the subject
-certainly before and not after acceptance, for there are a multitude
·of interests that will conflict with what any American would consider
a proper administration of the country. Every possible precaution
against international complications should be taken in advance. In
our opinion there should be specific pledges in terms of formal agree-
ments with France and England and definite approval from Germany
and Russia of the dispositions made of Turkey and Transcaucasia, and
a pledge to respect them.
Of particular importance are the following:
Absolute control of the foreign relations of the Turkish Empire, no
ambassador, envoy, minister, or diplomatic agent to be accredited to
Turkey, and the latter to send none such abroad.
Concessions involving exclusive privileges to be subject to review
if shown to be contrary to the best interests of the State.
Concessions undesirable from the standpoint of the mandatory UEon
which work has not been started to be canceled. Compensation to be
allowed to holders when necessary.
The system by which specified revenues are assigned for particular
purposes to be discarded. All revenues to be controlled by the treasury,
and all creditors to look only to the treasury as the source of payment.
Foreign control over Turkey's financial machinery to cease, meaning
the dissolution of the council of administration of the Ottoman public
SELEC1' DOCUMENTS 633
debt, reserving the right to retain some individual members of the
council as advisers because of their familiarity with Ottoman finances.
All foreign obligations of the Empire to be unified and refunded.
Those countries receiving territory of the Turkish Empire, e.g. Syria
and Mesopotamia, to assume their reasonable share of the paper cur-
rency, of the foreign obligations, and of obligation for possible repara-
tion payments. _ .
Abrogation, · on due notice, of existing commercial treaties with
Turkey.
All foreign Governments and troops to vacate territorial limits of
mandate at dates to be fixed by the mandatory power.
Consent to many of these measures would not easily be obtained.
Many nations now have some sort of financial control within the
Ottoman. Empire, and they would not see this control taken away
without protest.
It needs no argument, however, to show that the United States
could not submit to having her financial policies controlled from for-
eign capitals. The refunding of the debt, possibly with a reduction
of the capital amount, would raise a storm of protest, but it should
be insisted upon. Otherwise an American administration would be
embarrassed and run the risk of being discredited.
No. 21. San Remo Agreement.
April 24, 1920.
AT the San Remo conference the Allied powers drew up the tentative
terms for the Treaty of Sevres. For the first time since the armistice,
the subject of petroleum in prewar Turkey was given public attention
in diplomatic channels. Certain extracts from the oil agreement are
given.
REFERENCE.-lnternational Conciliation, September, 1921.
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT between M. Philippe Berthelot,
Directeur des Affaires politiques et commerciales au Ministere des
Affaires Etrangeres, and Professor Sir John Cadman, K. C. M. G., Di-
rector in Charge of His Majesty's Petroleum Department. ·
BY order of the two Governments of France and Great Britain, the
undersigned representatives have resumed, by mutual consent, the con-
sideration of an agreement regarding petroleum.
2. This agreement is based on the principles of cordial cooperation
and reciprocity in those countries where the oil interests of the two
nations can be usefully united. This memorandum relates to the
followin!!' States or countries :-Romania, Asia Minor, territories of
the old Russian Empire, Galicia, French Colonies and British Crown
Colonies.
3. The agreement may be extended to other countries by mutual
consent.
7. Mesopotamia.-The British Government undertake to grant to

the French Government or its nominee 25 per eent. of the net output
of crude oil at current market rates which His Majesty's Government
may secure from the Mesopotamian oil fields, in the event of their
634 MODERN TUltKE"t
being developed by Government action; or in the event o:£ a private
petroleum company being used to develop the Mesopotamian oil fields,
the British Government will place at the disposal of the French Gov-
ernment a share of 25 per cent. in such company. The price to be
paid for such participation to be no more than that paid by any of
the other participants to the sa~d petroleum company. It is also
)lnderstood that the said petroleum company shall be under permanent
British control.
8. It is agreed that, should the private petroleum company be con-
stituted as aforesaid, the native Government or other native interests
shall be allowed if they so desire, to participate up to a maximum
of 20 per cent. of the share capital of the said· company. The French
shall contribute one-half of the first 10 per cent. of such native partici-
pation and the additional participation shall be provided by each par-
ticipant in proportion to his holdings.
9. The British Government agree to support arrangements by which
the French Government may procure from the Anglo-Persian Company
supplies of oil, which may be piped from Persia to the Mediterranean
through any pipe-line which may have been constructed within the
French mandated territory and in regard to which France has given
special facilities, up to the extent of 25 per cent. of the oil so piped,
on such terms and conditions as may be mutually agreed between the
French Government and the Anglo-Persian Company.
10. In consideration of the above-mentioned arrangements, the French
Government shall agree, if it is desired and as soon as application is
made, to the construction of two separate pipe-lines and railways
necessary for their construction and maintenance and for the transport
of oil from Mesopotamia and Persia through French spheres of influ-
ence to a port or ports on the eastern Mediterranean. The port or
ports shall be chosen in agreement between the two Governments.
11. Should such pipe-line and railways cross territory within a
French sphere of influence, France undertakes to give every facility
for the rights of crossing without any royalty or wayleaves on the
oil transported. Nevertheless, compensation shall be payable to the
landowners for the surface occupied.
12. In the same way France will give facilities at the terminal port
for the acquisition of the land necessary for the erection of depots,
railways, refineries, loading wharfs, etc. Oil thus exported shall be
exempt from export and transit dues. The material necessary for the
construction of the pipe-lines, railways, refineries and other equipment
shall also be free from import duties and wayleaves. .
13. Should the said petroleum company desire to lay a pipe-line
and a railway to the Persian Gulf, the British Government will use
its good offices to secure similar facilities for that purpose.
No. 22. The Treaty of Sevres.

August 10, 1920.
THE dictated Turkish treaty was signed at Sevres by representatives
of the Constantinople Government but not by the revolutionary Kemalist
LEGEND
~
I nternat iona l
boundariu
~ PJ ebi!c.ile
areas
llY@<LI
lone bf
the Straih
~ ~ ...
lntemationol
O>nccr•
.:Vap compiled by Col. Lau·rencr. Martin, Carnegie Endowment for JnternatiQ1l.Gl Peace.
Abortive Treaty of Sevres, 1920.
Government at Angora. This abortive treaty is an excellent example
of imperialism. A second agreement, dated March 27, 1922, revised
certain of the terms; significant economic clauses of the original treaty
are cited.
REFERENCE.-Great Britain foreign office, cmd. 964 (Treaty
Series No. 11), 1920.
The provisions are grouped under thirteen divisions as follows:
covenant of the League of Nations; frontiers of Turkey; political
clauses; protection of minorities; military, naval and air clauses;
prisoners of war and graves; penalties; financial clauses; economic
clauses; aerial navigation; ports, waterways and railways; labour;
miscellaneous provisions.
ARTICLE 231-Turkey recognizes that by joining in the war of
aggression which Germany and Austria-Hungary waged against the
allied powers she has caused to the latter losses and sacrifices of all
kinds for wh1ch she ought to make complete reparation.
On the other hand, the allied powers recognize that the resources of
Turkey are not sufficient to enable her to make complete reparation.
In these circumstances, and inasmuch as the territorial rearrange-
ments resulting from the present treaty will leave to Turkey only a
portion of the revenues of the former Turkish Empire, all claims against
the Turkish Government for reparation are waived by the allied powers,
subject only to the provisions of this part and of Part IX (Economic
Clauses) of the present treaty.
The allied powers, desiring to afford some measure of relief and
assistance to Turkey, agree with the Turkish Government that a Finan-
cial Commission shall be appointed consisting of one representative
of each of the following allied powers who are specially interested-
France, the British Empire and Italy-with whom there shall be asso-
ciated a Turkish Commissioner in a consultative capacity. The powers
and duties of this commission are set forth in the following articles:
ARTICLE 232--The Financial Commission shall take such steps as in
its judgment are best adapted to conserve and increase the resources
of Turkey.
The budget to be presented annually by the minister of finance to
the Turkish Parliament shall be submitted, in the first instance, to the
Financial Commission, and shall be presented to Parliament in the
form approved by that commission. No modification introduced by
Parliament shall be operative without the approval of the Financial
Commission.
The Financial Commission shall supervise the execution of the budget
and the financial laws and regulations of Turkey. This supervision
shall be exercised through the medium of the Turkish inspectorate
of finance, which shall be placed under the direct orders of the Financial
Commission, an~ whose members will only be appointed with the
approval of the commission.
The Turkish Government undertakes to furnish to this inspectorate
all facilities necessary for the fulfillment of its task and to take such
action against unsuitable officials in the financial departments of the
Government as the Financial Commission may suggest.
ARTICLE 233-The Financial Commission shall, in addition, in agree-
636 MODERN TURKEY
ment with the council of the Ottoman Public Debt and the Imperial
Ottoman Bank, undertake by such means as may be recognized to be
opportune and equitable the regulation and improvement of the Turkish
currency.
ARTICLE .234-The Turkish Government undertakes not to contract
any internal or external loan without the consent of the Financial
Commission.
ARTICLE 236--All the resources of Turkey, except revenues con-
ceded or hypothecated to the service of the Ottoman public debt, shall
be placed at the disposal of the Financial Commission.
ARTICLE 237-Any hypothecation of Turkish revenues effected dur-
ing the war in respect of obligations (including the internal debt)
contracted by the Turkish Government during the war is hereby
annulled.
ARTICLE 238-Turkey recognizes the transfer to the allied powers
of any claims to payment or repayment which Germany, Austria, Bul-
garia or Hungary may have against her, in accordance with ARTICLE
261 of the Treaty of Peace concluded at Versailles on June 28, 1919,
with Germany, and the corresponding articles of the treaties of peace
with Austria, Bulgaria and Hungary. The allied powers agree not to
require from Turkey any payment in respect of claims so transferred.
ARTICLE 239-No new concession shall be granted by the Turkish
Government either to a Turkish subject or otherwise without the con-
sent of the Financial Commission.
ARTICLE 240-States in whose favor territory is detached from Tur-
key shall aequire without payment all property and possessions situated
therein registered in the name of the Turkish Empire or of the civil list.
ARTICLE 246--The Turkish Government transfers to the Financial
Commission all its rights under the provisions of the decree of Mu-
harrem and subsequent decrees.
The Council of the Ottoman Public Debt shall consist of the British,
French and Italian delegates and of the representative of the Imperial
Ottoman Bank, and shall continue to operate as heretofore. It shall
administer and .levy all revenues conceded to it under the decree of
Muharrem and all other revenues the management of which has been
entrusted to it in accordance with any other loan contracts previous
to Nov. 1, 1914.
The allied powers authorize the council to give administrative assist-
ance to the Turkish Ministry of Finance, under such conditions as may
be determined by the Financial Commission with the object of realizing
as far as possible the following program:
The system of direct levy of certain revenues by the existing Admin-
istration of the Ottoman Public Debt shall, within limits to be pre-
scribed by the Financial Commission, be extended as widely as possible
and applied throughout the provinces remaining Turkish. On each
new creation of revenue or of indirect taxes approved by the Financial
Commission, the commission shall consider the possibility of entrusting
the administration thereof to the Council of the Debt for the account of
the Turkish Government.
The administration of the customs shall be under a Director General
appointed by and revocable by the Financial Commission and answer-
. SELECT DOCUMENTS 637
able to it. No change in the schedule of the customs charges shall be·
made except with the approval of the Financial Commission.
The Governments of France, Great Britain and Italy will decide,
by a majority and after consulting the bondholders, whether the council
should be maintained or replaced by the Financial Commission on the
expiry of the present term of the counciL The decision of the Govern-
ments shall be taken at least six months before the date corresponding
to the expiry of this period.
ARTICLE 260-The legislative measures required in order to give
effect to the provisions of this part will be enacted by the Turkish
Government and by the powers concerned within a period which must
not exceed six months from the signature of the present treaty.
No. 23. The Tripartite Agreement.

August 10, 1920.
SIGNED at Sevres at the same time as the Turkish Peace Treaty
(Select Document 22) and cannot be considered separately from it.
REFERENCE.-Great Britain foreign of!ice1 cmd. 963 (Treaty
Series No. 12), 1920.
The British, French and Italian Governments, respectively repre-
sented by the undersigned Plenipotentiaries,
Being anxious to help Turkey, to develop her resources1 and to av~id
the international rivalries which have obstructed these objects in the
past,
Being desirous to meet the request of the Turkish Government that
it should receive the necessary assistance in the reorganization of the
administration of justice, the finances, the gendarmerie and the police,
in the protection of religious, racial and linguistic minorities and
in the economic development of the country,
Considering that the autonomy or eventual independence of Kur-
distan has been recognised by them, and that it is desirable, with a
view to facilitating the development of that country and the provision
of any assistance which may be required in its administration, to avoid
international rivalries in such matters,
Recognising the respective special interests of Italy in Southern
Anatolia and of France in Cilicia and the western part of Kurdistan
bordering on Syria, up to J ezireh-ibn-Omar, as these areas are here-
after defined,
Have agreed upon the following provisions:
ARTICLE 1.
There shall be perfect equality in Turkey between the Contracting
Powers in the composition of all international Commissions, whether
existing or to be established (including the different services dependent
thereon) charged with the reorganisation and supervision in a manner
consistent with the independence of the country of the different public
services (judicial and financial administrations, gendarmerie an<! police)
and of insuring the protection of racial, religious and linguistic
minorities.
638 MODERN TURKEY
However, in the event of the Turkish Government, or the Govern-
. ment of Kurdistan, being desirous of obtaining external assistanee in
the local administration or police of the areas in which the special
interests of France and Italy are respectively reeognisPd, the Contract-
ing Powers undertake not to dispute the preferential claim of the
Power whose special interests in sucl.t areas are recognised to supply
such assistance. This assistance shall be specially directed towards
enhancing the protection afforded to racial, religious or linguistic
minorities in the said areas.
ARTICLE 2.
In accordance with the provisions of the treaty of peace with Tur-
key, the nationals of the Contracting Powers, their ships and aircraft,
and products and manufactured articles coming from or going to the
territories, Dominions, Colonies or Protectorates of the said Powers,
shall enjoy in the said areas perfect equality in all matters relating
to commerce and navigation, and particularly as regards transit,
Customs and similar matters.
Nevertheless, the Contracting Powers undertake not to apply, J?or
to make, or support applications on behalf of their nationals, for
industrial or commercial concessions in an area in which the special
interests of one of the said Powers are recognised, except in cases
where such Power declines or is unable to take advantage of its special
position.
ARTICLE 3.
The Contracting Powers undertake to render diplomatic support to
each other in maintaining their respective positions in the areas in
which their special interests are recognised.
ARTICLE 4.
The Anatolian railway, the Mersina-Tarsus-Adana railway and that
part of the Baghdad railway which lies in Turkish territory as defined
by the Treaty of Peace with Turkey shall be worked by a company
whose capital will be subscribed by British, French and Italian finan-
cial groups. Part of the capital will be allotted to British, French and
Italian groups in return for the interests that such groups may re-
spectively have held in the Baghdad line as a whole on August 1, 1914;
the rest of the capital will be divided equally between the British,
French and Italian groups.
Nevertheless, in exo3hange for the whole or part of the interests
owned by French nationals on August 1, 1914, in the Baghdad railway
line, the. French Government reserves the right to have conceded to
it and to work the whole or part of the railway lines (including the
Mersina-Tarsus-Adana line) which lie in the area in which its interests
are specially recognised. In such event the share of French nationals
in the company provided for in the preceding paragraph, will be
reduced by a proportion corresponding to the value of the lines which
are thus conceded to the French Government. This right of the French
Government must be exercised within twelve months from the coming
into force of the Treaty of Peace with Turkey.
In the operations of the company constituted as provided by the
first paragraph of this Article account will be taken of the particular
rights and interests of the respective Governments which are recognised
in the areas defined by the present Agreement, but in such a way as
not to injure the good working of the railways.
The Contracting Powers agree to support the unification in the near
future of the entire railway system in the territory which remains
Turkish by the establishment of a joint company for working the lines.
The division of the capital of this new company will be settled by
agreement between the groups concerned.
The company constituted as provided by the first paragraph of this
Article, as well as any company which may· be formed for the purp~se
indicated in the fourth paragraph, will alike be found to comply with
the provisions of Part XI (Ports, Waterways and Railways) of the
Treaty of Peace with Turkey, and in particular to accord absolute
equality of treatment in respect of railways rates and facilities to
goods and passengers of whatever nationality, destination or origin.
The French Government undertakes, in the event of its exercising the
right provided for in the second paragraph of this Article, to comply
with the same provisions in respect of any railway line so conceded to it.
ARTICLE 5.
For the purpose of the present agreement:
1. The area in which the special interests of France are recognised
is comprised within the following boundaries:
On the south: From the mouth of the Lama Su on the Gulf of
Alexandretta to a point where the northern frontier of Syria as de-
scribed in the Turkish Peace Treaty meets the sea: the Mediterranean
Sea; thence eastwards to the southwestern extremity of the bend in
the Tigris about 6 kilometres north of Azekh (27 kilometres west of
Jezireh-lbn-Omar), the northern frontier of Syria as described in
the Treaty of Peace with Turkey.
On the east: thence northwards to the confluence of the Hazo Su
with the Tigris, the course of the Tigris upstream; thence northwards
to a point on the Hazo Su due south of Meleto Dagh, the course of the
Hazo Su upstream; thence due north to Meleto Dagh, a straight line;
On the north: thence northwestwards to the point where the boundary
between the vilayets of Diarbekr and Bitlis crosses the Murad Su, a
line following the line of heights Meleto Dagh, Antogh Dagh, Sii:i-1-
Siri Dagh, Chevtela Dagh; thence westwards to its confluence with
the Kara Su (Euphrates), the course of the Murad Su downstream;
thence northwards to Pingen on the Kara Su (Euphrates), the course
of the Kara Su (Euphrates) upstream; thence north westwards to
Habash Dagh, a straight line; thence westwards to Batmantash, a line
following the line of heights Habash Dagh, Terfellu Dagh, Domanli
Dagh.
On the west: thence southwards to Yenikhan, a straight line; thence
southwestwards to Ak Dagh, on the boundary between the vilayets
of Sivas and Angora, a line reaching and then following the ·crest line
of Ak Dagh; thence southwards to a point due west of Seresek, the
boundary between the vilayets of Sivas and Angora; thence south-
640 MODERN TURKEY
westwards to Erjias Dagh (the point where the boundary of the
Italian zone as defined below joins the western boundary of the French
zone), a straight line; thence southwestwards to Omarli: a line fol-
lowing the line of heights Erjias Dagh, Devli Dagh and Ala Dagh;
thence southwards to the confluence of the Tarbaz Chai and the river
descending from Kara Geul, a straight iine; thence in a southwesterly
direction to the bend about 5 kilometres southwest of its mouth, the
course of the river flowing from Kara Geul upstream; thence south-
westwards to Perchin Bel, a line following the crest of the Bulgar Dagh;
thence southeastwards to the source of the Lama Su, a straight line;
thence to its mouth on the Gulf of Alexandretta, the course of the
Lama Su downstream.
2. The area in which the special interests of Italy are recognized is
comprised within the following boundaries:-
On the east: from the mouth of the Lama Su on the Gulf of Alex-
andretta to Erjias Dagh, the western boundary of the area in which
the special interests of France are recognised, as described above;
On the north: thence westwards to Akshehr railway station, a straight
line, modified however to leave the railway from Akshehr to Konia
within the area; thence northwestwards to Kutaya, a line following
the railway line "from Akshehr to Kutaya (the railway remaining with-
out the area); thence northwestwards to Keshish Dagh, a straight line;
thence westwards to the most easterly point of contact of the southern
boundary of the Straits Zone with Abulliont Geul, a straight line;
On the west: thence in a southerly direction to the mouth of the river
which flows into the JEgean Sea about 5 kilometres north of Scala
Nuova, the southern boundary of the Straits Zone, the northern, eastern
and southern boundaries of Smyrna, as they are described in the
Treaty of Peace with Turkey;
On the south: thence to the mouth of the Lama Su on the Gulf of
Alexandretta, the JEgean Sea and the Mediterranean Sea.
ARTICLE 6.
In relation to the territories detached from the former Turkish Em-
pire and placed under mandate by the Treaty of Peace with Turkey,
the Mandatory Power will enjoy vis-a-vis of the other Contracting
Powers the same rights and privileges as the Powers whose special
interests are respectively recognized in the areas defined in Article 5
enjoy in the said areas.
ARTICLE 7.
All concessions for. exploiting the coal basin of Heraclea, as well as
the means of transport and loading connectE1d with these concessions,
are reserved for the Italian Government, without prejudice to all rig!:Jts
of the same nature (concessions granted or applied for) acquired by
Allied or neutral nationals up to October 30, 1918. As regards rights
of exploitation belonging to Turkish subjects, their indemnification will
take place- in agreement with the Turkish Government, but at the cost
of the Italian Government.
Nevertheless, on the date on which the Italian Government or the
Italian companies shall have brought their annual production of coal up
to an amount equal to that produced as on January 1, 1930, by com-
panies belonging on October 30, 1918, to Allied or neutral nationals,
the Italian Government agrees in a spirit of equity to reserve for i:he
Societe ottomane d'Eraclee, constituted with French capital (in the
event of the latter not having previously expressed the wish to be
bo11ght out or to abandon the renewal of its concession), a quarter
share in the interest which may be formed, once Italy or the Italian
companies shall have reached a production of coal equal in amount. to
that of the said Allied and neutral nationals as on January 1, 1930.
The two Governments will give each other mutual diplomatic support
with a view to securing from the Turkish Government the issue of fresh
ordinances, ensuring the exploitation of the mining rights conceded,
the establishment of means of transport, such as mining railways and
every facility for loading, as well as the eventual employment of other
than Turkish labour, and corresponding to the demands of modern
methods of exploitation. It is hereby agreed that all concessions,
whether granted after or before the issue of the above ordinances, will
be equally entitled to all benefits and advantages resulting from their
coming into force.
ARTICLE 8.
The French and Italian Governments will withdraw their troops
from the respective areas where their special interests are recognised
when the Contracting Powers are agreed in considering that the said
Treaty of Peace is being executed and that the measures accepted by
Turkey for the protection of Christian minorities have been put into
force and their execution effectively guaranteed.
ARTICLE 9.
Each of the Contracting Powers whose special interests are recog-
nised in any area in Turkish territory shall accept therewith the re-
sponsibility for supervising the execution of the Treaty of Peace with
Turkey with regard to the protection of minorities in such area.
ARTICLE 10.
Nothing in this agreement shall prejudice the right of nationals of
third States to free access for commercial and economic purposes to
any of the areas defined in Article 5, subjeet to the reservations which
are contained in the Treaty of Peace with Turkey, or which have been
voluntarily accepted for themselves in the present agreement by the
Contracting Powers.
ARTICLE 11.
The present agreement, which will be ratified, will be communicated
to the Turkish Government. It will be published and come into force
at the same time as the Treaty of Peace with Turkey comes into
force between the three Contracting Powers.
642 MODERN TURKEY
DONE at Sevres, the tenth day of August, one thousand nine hundred
and twenty.
GEORGE GRAHA:ME.
A. MILLERAND.
BONIN.
·No. 24. Franco-British Convention.

December 23, 1920.
SIGNIFICANT agreement between the British and French Govern-
ments with reference to mandated areas.
REFERENCES.-British White Paper, Cmd. 1195; American Jour-
nal of International Law, vol. 16 (Supplement); International Co-n-
ciliation, September, 1921.
The British and French Governments, respectively represented by
the undersigned Plenipotentiaries, wishing to settle completely the prob-
lems raised by the attribution to Great Britain of the mandates for
Palestine and Mesopotamia and by the attribution to France of the
mandate over Syria and the Lebanon, all three conferred by the Su-
preme Council at San Remo, have agreed on the following provisions:-
ARTICLE 1.
The boundaries between the territories under the French mandate
of Syria and the Lebanon on the one hand and the British mandates
of Mesopotamia and Palestine on the other are determined,
ARTICLE 3.
The British and French Governments shall come to an agreement re-
garding the nomination of a commission, whose duty it will be to make
a preliminary examination of any plan of irrigation formed by the
Government of the French mandatory territory, the execution of which
would be of a nature to diminish in any considerable degree the waters
of the Tigris and Euphrates at the point where they enter the area
of the British mandate in Mesopotamia.
ARTICLE 4.
In virtue of the geographic and strategic position of the island of
Cyprus, off the Gulf of Alexandretta, the British Government agrees
not to open any negotiations for the cession or alienation of the said
island of Cyprus without the previous consent of the French Govern-
ment.
ARTICLE 5.
2. The British Government may carry a pipe line along the existing
railway track and shall have in perpetuity and at any moment' the
rigllt to transport troops by the railway.
ARTICLE 6.
It is expressly stipulated that the facilities accorded to the British
Government by the preceding articles imply the maintenance for the
benefit of France of the provisions of the Franco-British Agreement
of San Remo regarding oil.
ARTICLE 9.
Subject to the provisions of Articles 15 and 16 of the mandate for
Palestine, of Articles 8 and 10 of the mandate for Mesopotamia, and
of Article 8 of the mandate for Syria and the Lebanon, and subject
also to the general right of control in relation to education and public
instruction, of the local Administrations concerned, the British and
French Governments agree to allow the schools which French and
British nationals possess and direct at the present moment in their
respective mandatory areas to continue their work freely; the teaching
of French and English will be freely permitted in these schools.
The present article does not in any way imply the right of nationals
of either of the two parties to open new schools in the mandatory area
of the other.
The present convention has been drawn up in English and French,
each of the two texts having equal force.
No. 25. The Afghan-Kemalist Treaty.

March 1, 1921.
THE first of a series of Kemalist understandings with Moslem coun-
tries opposed to the domination of Western Powers.
REFERENCE.-Current History, February, 1923.
ARTICLE 1-Turkey, which, by the grace of God, lives an independent
life,· considers it a sacred obligation to recognize the great State of
Afghanistan, to which she is attached by the sinceres~ and most loyal
ties, as independent in the most real and complete sense of the word.
ARTICLE 2-The contracting parties recognize the emancipation of
all Eastern nations; acknowledge their absolute freedom, their right
to independence, and certify that each and all of these nations are
free to govern. themselves in any way they desire; and recognize
specifically the independence of Khiva and Bukhara.
ARTICLE 3-The great State of Afghanistan on this occasion de-
clares and certifies that Tlll'key, which for centuries has been the guide
of Islam and, while performing valuable duties, has held the banner
of the Khalifate, has set the example in this respect.
ARTICLE 4-Each of the contracting parties agrees to consider as
an offense against itself, any action against the other State by an
imperialistic State which follows the policy of invading or exploiting
the East, and ag-rees to remove any such offense with all its existing
and possible means.
ARTICLE 5-Each of the contracting parties promises not to con-
elude a treaty or State contract in favor of a State between which
and the other party there is a disagreement. Each of the contracting
MODElL~ TCRKEY
parties promises to inform the other before concluding any treaty with
any State.
.A.BTICLE 6--The contracting parties will later conclude the necessary
contracts to arrange their commercial, eeonomie and consular relations,
and will now send ambassadors to each other's eapitals•
.A.Bncr.x 7-The two contracting parties will have regular and spe-
cial mail service between the two countries and will, by the quickest
means, inform each other of their mutual, political, educational and
commercial situations and of all their needs.
.A.BTICLB S-Turkey promises to help Mghanistan in eultivation and
to send teachers and officers, and to keep these teachers and officers
in Mghanistan at least five years. H, at the end of this period,
Mghanistan desires it, Tmkey promises to send new teachers and
officers.
.A.BTICLB 9--This treaty will be ratified as soon as possible and will
be in foree as soon as ratified.
.A.BTICLB 10-This treaty is drawn up in two copies and is eoneluded,
si.,<>ned and exchan,aed in Moscow between the delegates of the parties
concerned.
No. 26. Turkish Nationalist-Italian A.,<rreement.
Mareh 12, i92L

THIS agreement, whose terms were similar to the a.,oreement made
three days previously between the French and the Kemalists, gave
furt.her indication of Allied disunity in dealing with Tmkey, and
particularly with the Kemalists.
REFEREXCE.-.1\'ew York Times, April13,192L
(1) The two Governments at Angora and Rome have in view Italian-
Turkish eeonomie collaboration with the right of priority for conces-
sions of an eeonomie character to be accorded in the sanjaks of .Adalia,
Meugia, Buldur and Sparta and in part of the sanjaks of .Afiun
Qarahisar and Kutaya, which will be determined when the aeeord
becomes definite, as well as in the coal ba._~ of Heraelea, so far as
the above-mentioned should not be directly given by the Ottoman
Government to Ottoman subjects with Ottoman capital
(2) When the concessions contain privileges or monopoly they shall
be exploited by societies formed according to Ottoman law.
(3) Ottoman eapital shall be assisted as largely as poss1ole with
Italian capital Ottoman participation may reach 50 per eent of the
total
(4) The Royal Government of Italy pledges itself to support effec-
tively in relations to its allies all demands of the Turkish delegation
relative to the peace treaty, and espeeially restitution to Turkey of
Smyrna and Thrace.
(5) This part of the a.,oreement involves the withdrawal of I~
troops which still remain in Ottoman territory.
(6) The foregoing disposition will come into effect as a result of
a convention to be concluded between the two eontraeting parties imme-
diately after the conclusion of peace assuring Turkey a free and
independent existence.
No. 27. Turkish Nationalist-Soviet Russia. Treaty.
March 16, 192L
OF both moral and material help to the Kemalist cause. Note espe-
cially that the Bolshevist Government agrees to restore to Turkey the
provinces which the latter lost in 1878.
REFERENCE.-Current History, November, 1922.
Sharing the principle of the brotherhood of nations and of the
rights of the peoples to self-determination, and confirming the solidarity
which unites them in the struggle against imperialism, as well as the
fact that any difficulties · raised before one of the two peoples are
liable to complicate the situation of the other, the Government of the
Russian Socialist Federated Soviet Republic, on the one hand, and the
Government of the Grand National .Assembly of Turkey, on the other,
animated by the desire to establish lasting and cordial relations, and by
a continuous and sincere friendship based on their· mutual interests,
have decided to conclude with one another a treaty of friendship_ and
brotherhood, and have appointed with this object as their plenipo-
tentiaries:
The Government of the R. S. F. S. R. (Russian Socialist Federated
Soviet Republic): GEORGE VASSILIEVITCH TCHITCHERIN,
People's Commissary for Foreign Affairs and Member of the All-
Russian Central Executive Committee, and DJELAL-EDDIN KORK-
MASSOFF, Member of the All-Russian Central Executive Commit-
tee; and the Government of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey:
YUSUF KEMAL BEY, People's Commissary for National Economy
of the Grand National .Assembly of Turkey and Deputy from Kastamuni
to the aforesaid Assembly; DR. RIZA NUR BEY, People's Commissary
for Education of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey and Deputy
from Sinope to the aforesaid Assembly; ALI FUAD PASHA, Ambas-
sador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Grand National
.Assembly of Turkey and Deputy from Angora to the aforesaid
Assembly.
These plenipotentiaries, after having exchanged their respective
credentials, which were found to be in due and legal form, have come
to the following agreement:
ARTICLE 1-Neither contracting party will recognize treaties or inter-
national acts which are imposed by force on the other party. The
Government of the R. S. F. S. R. agrees to recognize no such interna-
tional acts concerning Turkey that have not been recognized by the
Nationalist Turkish Government as represented by the Grand National
Assembly.
The frontiers of Turkey are understood in this treaty to include all
the territories enumerated in the National Turkish Pact which were
agreed to and proclaimed by the Chamber of Deputies on Jan. 28,
1920 ( 1336 Turkish calendar), in Constantinople. The text of this pact
was communicated to the press as well as to all the powers.
646 MODERN TURKEY
· The northeastern boundary line of Turkey is specified a!! follows :
This line starts from the village of Sarp on the Black Sea coast,
crosses the mountain Khedis-Mta, and follows the watershed line of the
mountains Shavshet ( Chevchet in the Turkish text) and Kanni Dagh.
Thence it follows the northern administrative frontier of the sanjaks
of Ardahan and Kars, and the bed of the rivers Arpa Chai and Arax,
thus reaching the mouth of the Lower Kara Su (Appendix I, A and B).
ARTICLE 2-Turkey agrees to cede to Georgia the suzerainty over
the City and the Port of Batum, as well as over the territories north
of the frontier, which are specified in Article 1 of the present treaty
and which form part of the Batum district, on condition that
1. The population of the territories defined in this article shall
enjoy a broad administrative autonomy which will secure to every
community the respect of its religious and cultural rights; the popula-
tion shall be granted the possibility of enacting such agrarian laws as
it may wish to enjoy.
2. Turkey shall be permitted full use of the Port of Batum for the
transit of all imported and exported merchandise, free of custom dues
or any levies. This right of Turk.,y shall be hampered by no· regu~a
tions, and no special taxes shall be exacted from her for the use of
this port.
ARTICLE 3-The two contracting parties agree that the district of
Nakhichevan, the frontiers of which are specified in Appendix I (C)
of the present treaty, shall form an autonomous territory under the
protectorate of Azerbaijan, provided Azerbaijan shall cede this pro-
tectorate to no other country.
The triangular territory of Nakhichevan is formed by the line
which follows the bed of the river Arax, and passes by the motmtains
Dachna (3829), Veli Dagh (4121), Ba,o-arzik (6587), Kemurlu Dagh
(6930), and Serai-Bulak (8071). Thence it reaches the station Ararat,
and rejoins Arax at the crossing with Kara Su. A commission of
delegates from Turkey, Azerbaijan and Armenia will fix this line
laid down above.
ARTICLE 4-Recognizing that the national movements in the Orient
are similar to and in harmony with the struggle of the Russian work-
ingmen for the new social order, the two contracting parties assert
solemnly the rights of these peoples to freedom, independence and free
choice of such forms of government as they themselves desire to have.
ARTICLE 5-With a view to guaranteeing the freedom of the Straits'
and their free passage for commercial purposes to all countries, both
parties agree to entrust to a special conference, composed of delegates
from all the riverain States, the drafting of the definitive and interna-
tional status of the Black Sea and of the Straits, on condition that its
decisions shall not prejudice the absolute sovereignty and the safety
of Turkey and of her capital, Constantinople.
ARTICLE 6-Both parties recognize that all the treaties theretofore
concluded between them do not correspond to their reciprocal interests.
Therefore, they agree to consider the aforesaid treaties void and
abrogated. The Government of the R. S. F. S. R. declares, in partic-
ular, that it considers Turkey free from any financial or other obliga-
tions based on international treaties concluded between Turkey and
the Government of the Tsar.
ARTICLE 7-The Governmenf of the R. S. F. S. R. considers the
capitulatory regime to be incompatible with the free national develop~
ment, and with the sovereignty of any country, and it regards all the
rights and acts relating in any way to this regime as annulled and
abrogated.'
ARTICLE 8-Both contracting parties undertake not to allow on their
respective territories the formation and the sojourn of groups that
would lay claim to the role of Government in the country of the other
party, or in a part of it, as well as of groups that intend to struggle
against the other party. Russia and Turkey assume analogous obliga-
tions based on the principle of reciprocity with regard to the Trans-
caucasian Soviet Republics. It is agreed that Turkish territory, as
defined in this article, is understood to include only that part of the
country which is under the direct military and civil administration of
the Government of the Grand National Assembly.
ARTICLE 9-With the object of facilitating intercourse between their
respective countries, both parties agree to take in concert with each
other all measures necessary to maintain and develop within the
shortest possible time railway, telegraphic and other ways of communi-
cation. [Measures will also be taken to secure the free and unhampered
traffic of passengers and commodities between the two countries. It is
understood, however, that the passenger traffic, as well as the export
and import of commodities, will be subject in every country to the
regulations existing to that effect.] •
ARTICLE 10-Citizens of each of the contracting parties living on the
territory of the other contracting party will share all the rights and
obligations based on the laws of the country in which they sojourn,
with the exception of the obligations relating to the national defense,
of which they shall be free. Questions relating to family law and to
the law of inheritance, as well as to the juridical competency of the
citizens of both countries, shall also make an ~xception to the stipula-
tions of this article, and shall be regulated by a special convention.
ARTICLE 11-Both parties agree to accord the most-favored treat-
ment to the citizens of each party residing on the territory of the
other party. The stipulations of the present article apply neither to
the citizens of the Soviet Republics allied to Russia, nor to the citizens
of the Moslem countries allied to Turkey.
AR'riCLIIl 12-Every resident of the territories which prior to 1918
formed part of Russia, and which by virtue of the present treaty are
recognized by the Government of the R. S. F~ S. R. as passing under
the sovereignty of Turkey, shall be free to leave Turkey, taking with
him his belongings and property, or an equivalent sum of money.
• The Turkish text refers specially to Turkey, w., "The ••• Soviet
Republic, recognizing that the regime of the capitulations is incompatible
with the national development of Ttukt'y, as well as with the full exercise
of its sovereign rights, considers null and void the exercise i" Turkey of
all functions and of all rights under the capitulatory regime.
• The bracketed clauses are omitted in the Turkish version.
648 MODERN TURKEY
The same right is granted to the residents of Batum, suzeramty over
which by virtue of the present treaty is ceded by Turkey to Georgia.
ARTICLE 13-Russia undertakes to convey, at her own expense, all
Turkish military and civil prisoners now in her territory to the
Northwestern Turkish frontier. In the Caucasus and in European
Russia this shall be carried out within three months from the day of
the signature of this treaty, while in Asiatic Russia the time is extended
to six months. The details of this repatriation shall be the subject of
a special convention to be drawn up immediately after the signature
of this treaty.'
ARTICLE 14---Both contracting parties agree to conclude in the
nearest future a Consular agreement, as well as such treaties regula-
ting economic, financial and other questions, as are necessary for the
establishment of the reciprocal friendly relations outlined in the intro-
duction of this treaty.
ARTICLE 15-Russia undertakes to take all steps necessary to secure
the recognition by the Transcaucasian Republics, in special treaties
which they are to conclude with Turkey, of such stipulations of the
present treaty as relate directly to them.
ARTICLE 16-The present treaty is subject to ratification. The
ratifications shall be exchanged at Kars in the shortest possible time.
With the exception of Article 13, the present treaty will become valid
from the moment of exchange of ratifications.
No. 28. The Treaty of Kars.
October 13, 1921.
SIGNED by the Kemalist Government and the Transcaucasian
governments of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. Compare Select
Document 27.
REFERENCE.-Current History, February, 1923.
· ARTICLE 1-The Government of the Grand National Assembly of
Turkey and the Governments of the Socialist Soviet Republics of
Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, regard as null and void all treaties
concluded by Governments previously exercising sovereignty over
territory now held by the above-mentioned Governments, as well as
the treaties concluded with some third States and the Transcaucasian
Republics. It is understood that the Turko-Russian Treaty signed at
Moscow on March 16, 1921 (1337) is an exception to this provision.
ARTICLE 2-The contracting parties agree not to recognize any
peace treaty or any other international act, save those imposed upon
them by themselves. In virtue of this· agreement, the Governments
of the Socialist Soviet Republics of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia
will not recognize any international act concerning Turkey which is
not recognized by the National Government of Turkey, represented by
the Grand National Assembly. [By the term "Turkey" is understood
* The Turkish version, representing obviously a later edition makes the
agreement mutual, via'. ''Turkey enters into a similar agreement respecting
Russian prisoners of war and civil prisoners who are still in Turkey.''
that area included in the National Pact of Jan. 28, 1920 (1336),
drawn up and proclaimed by the Chamber of Ottoman Deputies at
Constantinople and sent to the press and to all States.] On its side
the Government of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey agrees
not to recognize any international act concerning Armenia, Azerbaijan
and Georgia, which is not recognized by the Government of these
countries respectively, as represented by the Soviets of Armenia, Azer-
baijan and Georgia.
ARTICLE 3-The Governments of the Socialist Soviet Republics of
Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, recognizing that the regime of the
capitulations is incompatible with the free development of any countcy
and the full exercise of its sovereign rights, consider as null and void
the practice in Turkey of any function resulting from this regime.
ARTICLE 4-The north-east frontier of Turkey follows a line which,
starting from the \<illage of Sarp on the Black Sea, crosses the mountain
Khedis-Mta and follows the watershed line of the Mountains Chevchet
and Kanni Dagh, thence along the northern administrative frontiers
of the sanjaks of Ardahan and Kars and the Rivers Arpa Chai and
Araz to the mouth of the Lower Kara Su. A mixed commission
composed of an equal number of members from each of the contracting
parties with a representative of the Socialist Soviet Republic of Russia
in addition, is appointed to establish the frontier line and fix the
frontier posts.
ARTICLE &-The Turkish Government and the Governments of the
Socialist Soviet Republics of Armenia and Azerbaijan are agreed that
the region of Nakhichevan, as defined in Annex 3 or the present treaty,
constitutes an autonomous territocy under the protection of Azerbaijan.
ARTICLE 6-Turkey consents to cede to Georgia the suzerainty of
the town and port of Batum, together with the area to the north of
the frontier indicated in Article 4 of the present treaty, on condition
that: (a) the population of the area is given administrative autonomy
and that the fight to develop its own culture, its own religion and its
own agrarian regime is guaranteed to each community of the popula-
tion; (b) Turkey is assured of her right to free transit of goods
through the port of Batum, without customs or other charges. To
apply this article, a commission shall be formed of representatives. of
the Governments interested, immediately upon the signature of the
present treaty.
ARTICLE 7-The . Government of the Grand National Assembly of
Turkey and the Government of the Socialist Soviet Republic of Georgia
agree to allow the population along the frontiers to cross the frontier
subject to the observation of customs, health and police regulations to
be determined upon by a mixed commission.
ARTICLE 8-The Government of the Grand National Assembly of
Turkey and of the Socialist Soviet Republic of Georgia agree to permit
the rural population along the frontier to use their customacy pastures
across the frontier, permitting them to pass the frontier with their
flocks in accordance with .frontier regulations to be determined upon
by a mixed commission.
ARTICLI!I 9-In order to assure the freedom of the Straits to the
commerce of the world, Turkey and Georgia agree to entrust the
650 MODERN TGRKEY
elaboration of an international statute of the Black Sea and the Straits
to a conference to be composed of delegates from the neighboring
States, providing that their decisions do not threaten the absolute
so¥ereignty of Turkey and the security_ of Constantinople, its capital
ARTICLE 10---The contracting parties agree not to permit on their
territories the formation or the sojourn of any organizations or groups
from any other country which assume the role of go¥ernment or ha¥e
as their purpose, a war against some other country. It is understood
that the Turkish territory contemplated in the present article is the
territory under the direct civil and military administration of the
Go¥ernment of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey.
ARTICLE ll-Nationals of each of the contracting parties residing
in the territory of another of the contracting parties, will be go¥erned
by the laws of the country of their residence, except laws respecting
the national defense from which they will be exempt. Questions of
inheritance and legal representation will also constitute an exception
to be dealt with later in a special agreement.
ARTICLE 12-Tbe contracting parties agree to apply most-favored-
nation treatment to the nationals of the other contracting parties resid-
ing on their territory.
ARTICLE 13----Dwellers in that territory which formed part of Russia
before the year 1918 and now forms part of Turkey, shall have the
option of leaving with all their personal goods and effects. Likewise,
dwellers in the territory which Turkey herewith cedes to Georgia shall
ha¥e a similar option. Those who desire to lea¥e shall give notice of
their intention a month in advance.
ARTICLE 14---Within six months of the signature of the present
treaty, the contracting parties agree to make a special arrangement
relative to the war refugees of the years 1918 to 1920.
ARTICLE 15---Each of the contracting parties agrees to declare a
complete amnesty for nationals of the other contracting parties, re-
specting war crimes on the Caucasian front, immediately after the
si,onature of the present treaty.
ARTICLE 17-In order to assure non-interruption of commnnication
between their countries, the contracting parties agree to take all
measures necessary for the maintenance and development of railway,
telegraphic and other commnnications, as well as to assure transit of
persons and goods without charge.
ARTICLE 18----In order to organize commercial commnnieations ani!
arrange economic and financial questions among the contracting parties,
a commission of their representati¥es shall be convened at Tiflis imme-
diately npon the signature of the present treaty.
ARTICLE 19--The contracting parties ll,IYJ'ee to conclude consular
arrangements within three months after the si,onature of the present
treaty.
ARTICLE 20---Tbe present treaty concluded between the Governments
of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia, shall be submitted for
ratification. The exchange of ratifications shhll take plaee at Eri¥an
with the briefest possible delay. The present treaty shall come into
force from the moment of ratification, with the exception of Articles
6, 14, 15, 16, 18 and 19, which shall come into force immediately upon
the signature of the treaty.
No. 29. Franco-Turkish Nationalist Agreement.
October 20, 1921.
THIS was a separate agreement, signed at Angora between the
representative of the French Government, H. Franklin-Bouillon, and
the Kemalists, which broke decisively any semblance of Allied unity in
the Turkish occupation and was the subject of considerable published
correspondence between the British and French foreign offices.
REFERENCE.-Current History, January, 1922.
ARTICLE 1-The high contracting parties declare that from the date
of the signature of the present agreement the state of war will cease
between them, and that the armies, the civil authorities and the inhabi-
tants shall be so informed.
ARTICLE 2-From the date of the signature of the present a~rree
ment, the respective prisoners of war, as well as all French or Turkish
nationals detained or imprisoned, shall be set at liberty, and shall be
brought, at the expense of the power that holds them, to the nearest
town designated to this effect. The scope of this article extends to all
persons detained or imprisoned by either party, whatever may be the
date or the place of detention, imprisonment or capture.
ARTICLE 3-Within a maximum period of two months following the
signature of this agreement, the Turkish troops will withdraw to the
north, and the French troops to the south of the line laid down in
ARTICLE 8.
ARTICLE 4-The respective withdrawal and taking over, within the
time limit laid down by ARTICLE 3, shall be effected in accordance with
provisions to be agreed upon by a mixed commission named by the
military commanders of the two parties.
ARTICLE 5-Full amnesty shall be granted by the two contracting
parties in the regions evacuated as soon as they shall have been taken
over.
ARTICLE 6--The Government of the Grand National Assembly of
Turkey declares that the minority rights solemnly recognized in the
national treaty shall be confirmed by it on the same basis as that
established by the agreements in this regard reached between the
Entente Powers, their adversaries and certain of their allies.
ARTICLE 7-A special administrative regime shall be established for
the Alexandretta region. The Turkish inhabitants of this region shall
enjoy every facility for the development of their cultural needs.
Turkish shall be made the official language.
ARTICLE 8-The boundary line mentioned in .ARTICLE 3 is fixed and
specified as follows: The frontier line will start from a point to be
chosen on the Gulf of Alexandretta, immediately to the south of the
region of Payas, and will be clearly oriented toward Meiden-Ekbes
(the railway station and the region remaining to Syria). Thence it
will turn southeast, leaving to Syria the region of Karnaba, and also
the town of Killis; thence it will join the railway at the statior1 of
652 MODERN TURKEY
Chohan Bey. From there is will follow the Baghdad Railway, whose
roadbed shall remain on Turkish territory as far as Nisibin; thence
it will follow the old roa,d between Nisibin and Jasireh-ibn-Omar, where
it will rejoin the Tigris. The region of Nisibin and Jasireh-ibn-Omar,
as well as the road, will remain to Turkey; but both countries will have
the right to use this road. The stations and branch stations of the
section between Chohan Bey and Nisibin shall belong to Turkey as
a part of the railway line.
A commission composed of delegates from both parties shall be
formed within one month from the signature of this agreement to fix
the line laid down above. This commission shall begin to function
within the same period.
ARTICLE 9-The tomb of Suleiman Shah, the grandfather of the
Sultan Osman, founder of the Ottoman dynasty (the tomb is known
under the name of Turq-Mezari), situated at Jaber-Kalessi, and its
appurtenances shall remain in the possession of Turkey; whose right it
shall be to establish attendants there and to fly over the tomb the
Turkish flag.
ARTICLE 10-The Government of the Grand National Assembly of
Turkey accepts the transfer of the concession of the section of the
Baghdad Railway between Bozanti and Nisibin, as well as of divers
branches situated in the vilayet of Adana, to a French group designated
by the French Government, with all rights, privileges and advantages
attached to concessions, particularly as concerns exploitation and traffic.
Turkey will have the right to send its military transports by railway
from Meiden-Ekbes to Chohan Bey, in the Syrian region, and Syria
will have the right to send its military transports by railway from
Chohan Bey as far as Nisibin, in Turkish territory. Over this section
and its branches no preferential tariff shall be established in principle.
Each Government, however, reserves the right to study in concert with
the other any exception to this rule which may become necessary. In
case agreement proves impossible, each party will be free to act as
he thinks best.
ARTICLE 11-A mixed commission shall be organized after ,the rati-
fication of the present agreement; its object shall be to conclude a
customs convention between Turkey and Syria. Both the conditions
and the duration of this convention shall be determined by the com-
mission. Both countries shall be free to act as they think best until
this convention is concluded.
ARTICLE 12-The waters of Kouveik shall be divided between the
town of Aleppo and the northern region which has remained Turldsh
in such wise as to be equitable and satisfactory to the two parties.
Aleppo shall also be authorized to construct works to draw water, at
its own expense, from the Euphrates on Turkish territory, in order
to meet the needs of the region•
.ARTICLE 13-Settlers or semi-nomads possessing rights of pasturage
or owning land on either side of the line fixed by ARTICLE 8 will remain
in possession of these rights. To meet their cultivation needs they
shall be permitted freely, and without paying any customs or pasturage
dues, to transport from one side of this line to the other their cattle,
inclusive of birth increments, their. instruments, tools, seeds and other
agricultural products, it being clearly unde-stood that they shall be
bound to pay all taxes and duties relative thereto in the region where
they are domiciled.
No. 30. Italian-Imperial· Ottoman Government Agreement.
March 31, 1922.
INTERESTING historically because the Italians bad made similar
friendly arrangements with the Kemalists during the spring and fall
of the previous year. Actually of little consequence since the Con-
stantinople Government was impotent.
REFERENCE.-Christian Science Monitor, June 5, 1922.
Agreement B signed and exchanged at Constantinople at the Minis-
try of Foreign Affairs of the Ottoman Empire on March 31, 1338
(1922), by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Ottoman Empire,
Izzet Pasha., on the one hand and Marquess Garroni, High Commissioner
of the Italian Government to the Ottoman Empire, on the other hand.
ARTICLE 1 : As agreed by the two contracting parties in Agreement
A, which constitutes a preamble of the present agreement, the latter
will not be published unless the two contracting parties shall previously
have reached an understanding on the subject, consequent upon a
change of views.
ARTICLE 2 : The Italian Government consents and undertakes to
employ, in conformity with the subjoined stipulations, all the effective
diplomatic means at its disposal with a view to reestablishing the
sovereignty of the Ottoman Empire without any conditions or reserva-
tions whatsoever over the territories actually in possession of that
Empire, or which it represents from the standpoint of Turkish nation-
ality, with a view also to maintaining intact the independence of the
Ottoman Empire. The conditions in question include the following
fundamental points: A-Evacuation by Greece, without any conditions
or reservations whatsoever, of Anatolia, now in a state of war. Exten-
~~~hin~~~~ea~~~m~~~~in~a
manner as to include Adrianople. B-The Ottoman Empire will enjoy,
without any conditions or reservations whatsoever, the same rights as
are enjoyed by all independent states as regards their military, economic,
and judicial organizations. C-The Imperial Ottoman Government, as
from this date, consents and undertakes to apply, on the basis of the
most-favored-nation clause, to Italian subjects and to such firms as the
Italian Government may designate, all economic or judicial conventions
already in existence, or which may be concluded hereafter with any
other state.
ARTICLE 3: The Imperial Ottoman Government undertakes to facili-
tate the development of the economic policy now being followed and
applied by the Italian Government in the Balkan States and eastern
Mediterrane~. The Italian Government, on the other hand, undertakes
to accept stipulations which the Imperial Ottoman Government may
propose in its administrative acts and ordinances concerning such
enterprises as may be undertaken by the institution of Italian industrial
firms and companies for the execution of public works and by the setting
654 MODERN TURKEY
up of a mercantile marine by virtue of the engagement specified in
ARTICLE 4 of Agreement A.
ARTICLE 4: As regards the setting up of undertakings pertaining
to public works to be carried out by special agents of the two contrac-
ting parties after the restoration of normal conditions at Constantinople
and. within the territoriE'i! to be included within the boundaries of
Anatolia, preference will be granted to Italian firms immediately after
home firms. This undertaking must, however, in no wise impair the
full working of the law of Jan. 14, 1337 (1921), which lays down the
conditions regulating the introduction of foreign capital into Anatolia.
ARTICLE 5: The Imperial Ottoman Government undertakes to
employ, in favor of the Italian Government, the moral authority it
enjoys within the colonies and zones of influence of the Italian Govern-
ment which are inhabited by a Moslem majority, subject to the reserva-
tion that this undertaking will be conditioned by religious and communal
freedom and welfare granted to the Moslem inhabitants of such areas
by the Italian Government.
ARTICLE 6: In view of the negotiations which the Imperial Ottoman
Government is at present pursuing for the conclusion of an alliance
between Turkey, Bulgaria, and Albania, an alliance designed to counter
the movement which aims at the conclusion of an alliance between
the other Balkan states, the Imperial Ottoman Government under-
takes to secure acceptance by the proposed allied group of such condi-
tions as the Italian Government may propose for safeguarding its own
interests; subject, however, to the reservation that the Imperial Otto-
can Government shall be kept fully informed of relevant proposals and
conditions, and that the latter shall not prejudicially affect Ottoman
interests.
ARTICLE 7: In particular, the Imperial Ottoman Government under-
takes to prevent all agitation throughout Italy's African possessions.
ARTICLE 8: The Italian Government undertakes to make over to
the Imperial Ottoman Government eight batteries of various calibers,
together with the necessary munitions, 10,000 rifles, and medical stores.
The calibers and character of the aforesaid war material shall be
settled by experts belonging to the two parties, and delivery will be
effected at places designated by the Imperial Ottoman Government,
the Italian Government assuming the obligation to fulfill this under-
taking, at the very latest, within a month from the date of exchange
of the present agreement.
ARTICLE 9 : The Italian Government, which has undertaken to pro-
ceed with the evacuation of all territories in Asia Minor still under
Italian military occupation on condition that Italian c\aims to economic
priority within the region of Adalia-Konia, including the district of
Konia itself-shall be extended for such a period and in such a manner
as may be agreed to by tile Imperial Ottoman Government, reserves
for itself the right to initiate on this question a special exchange of
views, both oral and written, after the signature and exchange of the
present agreement.
ARTICLE 10: The Imperial Ottoman Government definitely under-
takes to secure from the ·Government of Angora the execution and
observation of the clauses of Agreement A, which constitutes the
preamble of the present agreement. In the event of the clauses of the
present agreement not being confirmed in writing by the representative
of the Angora Government at Constantinople and Rome within a
period of 27 days from the date of its signature, this agreement must
be regarded as null and void.
ARTICLE 11 : The present agreement shall~ ratified and put in
operation on condition that Agreement A, which constitutes jts pre-
amble, shall have been definitely applied. The invalidation of any
single clause in either of these agreements shall entail the invalidation
of both.
ARTICLE 12 : The present agreement was signed and exchanged by
the two contracting parties on March 31, 1338 (1922), at the Ministry
of Foreign Affairs and the seat of the Imperial Ottoman Government.
No. 31. British Policy in Palestine.

July 24, 1922.
GENERAL terms of the mandate.
REFERENCE.-The Near East, July 6, 1922.
British white paper, cmd. 1700 covers eorrespondence between His
Majesty's Government and Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist
Organisation from 21st February to 23rd June, 1922. This corre-
spondence includes the official statement of British policy in Palestine
of which a summary follows:
(1) His Majesty's Government reaffirm Declaration of November, ·
1917, which is not susceptible of change. -_
(2). A Jewish National Home will be founded in Palestine. The
Jewish people will be in Palestine as of right and not on sufferance.
But His Majesty's Government have no such aim in view as that
Palestine should become Jewish as England is English.
(3). Nor do His Majesty's Government contemplate disappearance
or subordination of Arab population, language, or culture.
(4). Status of all citizens of Palestine will be Palestinian. No
section of population will have any other status in the eyes of the law.
(5). His Majesty's Government intend to foster establishment of
full measure of self-government in Palestine, and as the next step a
Legislative Council with a majority of elected members will be set
up immediately.
(6). Special position of Zionist Executive does not entitle it to
share in any degree in government of country.
(7). Immigration will not exceed economic capacity of country at
the time to absorb new arrivals.
(8). Committee of elected members of Legislative Council will
confer with administration upon matters relating to regulation of
immigration. Any difference of opinion will be referred to His
Majesty's Government.
(9). Any religious community or considerable section of popula-
tion claiming that terms of mandate are not being fulfilled will have
right of appeal to League of Nations.
656 liODERX Tl"RKEY
No. 32. The Premier's Speeeh in the House of Commons.
Augmt 4, 1922.
IN reply to ••beelding" by Lieutenant Colonel Kenworthy, Mr. IJoyd
George made a fervid pro-Greek speech which was read as orders of
the day to the discontented Greek troops in Asia Minor and was
regarded as an even stronger stimulant to Kemalist morale.
REFEREXCE.-British parliame~~tary papers, Honse of Com-
mons, vol 157, pp. 2003-2006.
I forget who it was who said that we were not fair as between the
parties. I am not sure that we are. What has happened! Here is
a war between Greece and Turkey. We are defending the eapital of
one of the parties against the other. We must not overlook that fact,
and it is a very important faet. H we were not there, there is abso-
lutely no doubt that the Greeks would oeeupy that capital in a very few
hour.;, and that would produce a decision. There is only one way now
in which the Greeks can have a decision, and that is by marehing through
almost impenetrable defiles for hundreds of miles into the country. I
do not know of any army that would have gone so far as the Greeks
have. It was a very daring and a very dangerous military enterprise.
They established a military superiority in every pitched battle. They
were barred by the conformation of the country, and the fact that they
had to maintain lines of communication that no other .Army in Europe
would ever have dreamed of risking.
But there was one way in which they could have established a
decision. If we were simply holding the ring between them and said,
"There you are, fight it out," they would have marched to the eapital,
and taken it, I will not say tomorrow, but in a week. Who is pre-
venting that! British troops, French troops, Italian troops, and the
British. French and Italian navies. It is qnite right that we should
do so, but do not let us say that we are unduly favouring the Greeks,
that we are giving them some sort of preferential treatment.
There are even suggestions, not altogether, perhaps, without founda-
tion, that the Kemalist forces are being reequipped from Europe.
The Greeks, under other conditions, would have been entitled to blockade
the coast of Asia Minor. Had it been any other belligerent, they would
have been entitled to search ships, and to prevent arms from going' to
the Kemalists. They are not allowed to do that. That is what the
bon. and gallant Gentleman ealls "preference for the Greeks." On
the contrary, one of the unfairnesses of the situation is that we are
driven, by the position we oeeupy there, into not giving a fair field
and no favour to fight the issue out. Peace the Kemalists will not
aeeept, beeanse they say we will not give them satisfactory armistice
terms; but we are not allowing the Greeks to wa.,oe the war with their
full strength.
We cannot allow that sort of thing to go on indefinitely in the hope
that the Kemalists entertain, that they will at last exhaust this little
country, whose men have been in arms for 10 or 12 years. with one
war after another, and which has not indefinite resourees. That is
the position. We only want to see a just peace e;tablished. Facts
which have occurred during the last few months make it clear that,
whatever happens, there must be adequate efficient protection of the
minorities in this part of Asia Minor, as an essential part of any
settlement which Great Britain can accept. By these guarantees I
do not mean the word of Angora. That was given in Armenia. What"
bas it been worth f It bas not saved the life of a single Armenian or
Greek. The protection must be an adequate one, which will take
form and effect in the very constitution of the government of this
particular province.
No. 33. British Treaty with Iraq.

October 10, 1922.
THE treaty was signed at Baghdad on October 10, 1922, between
Great Britain and Iraq (Mesopotamia). The pact, which in official
British quarters was regarded as the first important step towards
securing ultimate full self-government for Iraq, is to remain in force
for 20 years, when the situation will be examined.
A protocol to the British-Iraq Treaty limiting the operation of the
treaty to the date of the admission of Iraq to the League of Nations
or to four years from the ratification of peace with Turkey whichever
proved the shorter, was signed on April 3, 1923, and published through
Iraq on May 5, 1923.
REFERENCES.-Current History, December, 1922; New York
Times, October 12, 1922; Manchester Guardian, October 13, 1922.
Chief among the articles of the treaty of October 10, 1922, are those
by which the British Government undertakes:
(i). To use its good offices to secure the admission of Iraq to
membership of the League of Nations.
(ii). To provide such support and assistance to the armed forces
of the King of Iraq as may from time to time be agreed by the
contracting parties.
(iii). To transfer to the Government of Iraq such works of public
utility as may be agreed upon, and to render such financial assistance
as may be considered necessary for Iraq.
(iv). To refrain from placing obstacles in the way of a Customs or
other association with neighboring Arab States.
(v). To guide, advise, and assist the State of Iraq in international
and fiscal questions during the period of the treaty.
The King of Iraq on the other hand, undertakes:
1. To grant freedom of worship to all.
2. Not to cede or lease any territory in Iraq to a foreign Power.
3. To safeguard the interest of foreigners.
4. Not to discriminate against the nationals of any State, member
of the League of Nations, or of any State which Britain places on the
same footing as a member of the League.
5. Not to interfere with normal missionary work.
658 MODERN TURKEY
A separate agreement is to regulate the financial relations of the
two parties, and separate agreements will also secure the execution
of- any treaties, agreements, or undertakings in respect to Iraq.
No. 34. The Mudania Armistice.

October 11, 1922.
FOLLOWING the military defeat of the Greek forces, Ismet Pasha,

commander in chief of the Turkish army, and Allied military officers
drew up and signed these terms.
REFERENCE.-Times, October 14, 1922.
The War Office issued last night the text of the Military Convention
signed at Mudania on October 11. It is as follows:
In accordance with the terms of the Note addressed to the Govern-
ment of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey by the Allied Powers
on September 23, 1922, and of the Note sent to the Allied Powers by
the Grand National Assembly of Turkey on September 29, 1922, meet,
ings between the Allied Generals, Lieutenant-General Sir C. H. Har-
ington, K.C.B., D.S.C., for Great Britain; Lieutenant-General E.
Mom belli, K.C.M.G., for Italy; Major-General C. H. Charpy, C.B.,
for France; and General Ismet Pasha for the Government of the
Grand National Assembly of Turkey; and General Mazarakis for
Greece, were held at Mudania on October 3, 1922, and subsequent da;ys.
The Allied Governments having decided to hand over Eastern
Thrace and Adrianople to the Grand National Assembly of TurkeY., the
object of this Conference was:
(i). To define a line beyond which the Greek troops shall be
invited to withdraw in Eastern Thrace.
(ii). To draw up the measures for the evacuation of the Greek
troops and civil administration and for the installation of the officials
and gendarmerie of the Government of the Grand National Assembly
of Turkey in that area.
(iii). To ensure the control of that area during the transitory
period in order to secure the maintenance of law, order, and public
security, the Delegates have agreed upon the following terms:
I.-Hostilities between Turkish and Greek forces will cease from
the date of the entry into force of the present convention.
2.-The line behind which the Greek forces in Thrace shall be invited
to withdraw as soon as the present convention enters into force, is the
left bank of the Maritsa from its outlet into the 1Egean Sea to the
point where it crosses the frontier of Thrace with Bulgaria.
3.-In order to avoid any possible complications until tlie establish-
ment of peace, the right bank of the Maritsa, including Karagach will
be occupied by Allies contingents, which will be stationea at points to
be selected by the Allies.
8.-The various operations of the withdrawal of the Greek troops
and of the transfer of the civil administration shall be carried out
under the direction of Inter-Allied missions located in the principal
centers. The duty of these missions is to intervene in order to facilitate
such evacuation and transfer. They will do their utmost to prevent
excesses of all sorts.
9.-In addition to these missions, Allied contingents shall OCCUJ.>Y
Eastern Thrace. These contingents, amounting to about 7 battalions,
will ensure the maintenance of law and order, and act in support of
the Inter-Allied missions.
13.-The Government of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey

undertake not to transport troops nor raise or maintain an army in
Eastern Thrace until the ratification of a peace treaty.
14.-The present convention will come into force three days after
its signature, that is to say, at midnight on October 14-15, 1922.
Done at Mudania in 4 pages in French this 11th day of October, 1922.
No. 35. Fetva Approving the Deposition of the Sultan.

November 19, 1922.
ON November 17, the news of the flight of the Sultan from Constan-
tinople was received in Angora. On the 18th, the Assembly held
three secret sittings of which we have no details. On the next day,
however, the Assembly held a public sitting in which a fetva approving
of the deposition of the Sultan was read and accepted; and the new
Khalif was elected.
REFERENCE.-The Near East, December 7, 1922.
"If Zeid, the chief of the Moslems, accepts without necessity, enemy
terms of a nature to bring destruction upon all Moslems and manifests
his impotence to defend Moslem rights; if be actively undertakes in
agreement with the enemy against Moslems, fighting a sacred war in
defense of Moslem rights and independence; if be persists in such rights
and taking refuge in foreign protection, flees and deserts the seat of
the Khalifate, is he not deserving of deposition in accordance with the
Koranic law Y" Answer in the affirmative.
"Hence, does it not become necessary in order that Moslem rights
and interests may be protected to administer the oath of fidelity to a
capable individual worthy of the Khalifate!" Answer in the affirmative.
No. 36. The Treaty of Lausanne.

July 24, 1923.
FOR the first time since the World War, a conquered nation engaged
in a negotiated peace conference. The Treaty of Sevres (Selecf
Document 22), signed by the representatives of the effete Imperial
Ottoman Government at Constantinople, was scrapped. The success-
660 liODERX TI"RKEY
ful outcome of the G:neeo-Turkish War and the unwillingness of the
Entente Allies to stage another military struggle ga\"e the Turkish dele-
gates at Lausanne a position of equal adnntage with her former
conquerors. In the first Lausanne Conference, which began on Novem-
ber 20, 1923, they had the strategic advantage of Allied dissension
O\"er the Ruhr occupation. In the second Lausanne Conference, virtu-
a]]y a continuation of the first, they were aided by continued ~
ment between France, Italy and Great Britain o\"er the conduct-of
European alfairs, and the diplomatic manreuvers of these three powers
with regard to the grant of the S<H:alled Chester concession by !}le
Grand National Assembly. The Turkish Assembly appro\"ed the Treaty
on Au.,oust 23. During 1923, the go\"ernments of no other signatories
took similar action.
0\"er two score conventions, agreements, declarations, protocols, and
declarations were exchanged at Lausanne. The following especia11y
si.,onificant extracts are taken from the Treaty of Peace with Turkey.
REFEREXCE.-British Treaty Series No. 16 (1923). Cmd. 1929.
ARTICLE 16. Turkey hereby renounces all rights and title whatso-
ever O\"er or respecting the territories situated outside the frontiers laid
down in the present Treaty and the islands other than those O\"er which
her sover~onty is recognised by the said Treaty, the future of these
territories and islands being settled or to be settled by the parties
concerned.
The provisions of the present Article do not prejudice any special
arrangements arising from neighbourly relations, which ha\"e been
or may be concluded between Turkey and any limitrophe countries.
ARTICLE 20. Turkey hereby recognises the annexation of Cyp~
proclaimed by the British Government on the 5th No\"ember. 1914..
ARTICLE 23. The High Contracting Parties are agreed to recognise
and declare the principle of freedom of transit and of navi!!ation, by
sea and by air, in time of peace as in time of war, in the strait of the
Dardanelles, the Sea of Marmara and the Bosporus, as prescribed in
the separate Con\"ention si.,oned this day, regarding the regime of tbe
Straits. This Convention will have the same force and eft'ect in so
far as the present High Contracting Parties are concerned as if it
formed part of the present Treaty.
ARTICLE 25. Turkey undertakes to recognise the full force of the
Treaties of Peace and additional Conventions concluded by the other
Contracting Powers with the Powers who fought on the side of Turkey,
and to recognise whatever dispositions have been or may be m~de
concerning the territories of the former German Empire, of Austria,
of Hungary and of Bulgaria, and to recognise the new States within
their frontiers as there laid down.
ARTICLE 2:7. No power or jurisdiction in political, legislative or
administrati\"e matteJ'!I shall be exercised outside Turkish territory by
the Turkish Go\"ernment or authorities, for any reason whatsoever,
over the nationals of a territory placed under the sovereignty or
protectorate of the other Powers signatory of the present Treaty, or
over the nationals of a territory detached from Turkey.
It is understood that the spiritual attributions of the Moslem
religious authorities are in no way infringed.
Treaty of Lausanne; Present Turkey According to Treaty of Lausanne, 1923.
AlmCLI!I 28. Each of the High Contracting Parties hereby accepts,
in so far as it is concerned, the complete abolition of the Capitulations
in Turkey in every respect.
ARTICLE 38. The Turkish Government undertakes to assure full
and complete protection of life and liberty to all inhabitants of Turkey
without distinction of birth, nationality, language, race or religion.
All inhabitants of Turkey shall be entitled to free exercise, whether
in public or private, of any creed, religion or belief, the observance
of which shall not be incompatible with public order and good morals.
Non-Moslem minorities will enjoy full freedom of movement and of
emigration, subject to the measures applied, on the whole or on part
of the territory, to all Turkish nationals, and which may be taken by
the Turkish Government for national defence, or for the maintenance
of public order.
ARTICLE 39. Turkish nationals belonging to non-Moslem minorities
will enjoy the same civil and political rights as Moslems.
All the inhabitants of Turkey, without distinction of religion shall
be equal before the law.
Differences of religion, creed or confession shall not prejudice any
Turkish national in matters relating to the enjoyment of civil or
political rights, as, for instance, admission to public employments,
functions and honours, or the exercise of professions and industries.
No restrictions shall be impos~ on the free use by any Turkish
national of any language in private intercourse, in commerce, religion,
in the press, or in publications of any kind or at public meetings.
Notwithstanding the existence of the official language, adequate facili-
ties shall be given to Turkish nationals of non-Turkish speech for the
oral use of their own language before the Courts.
ARTICLE 40. Turkish nationals belonging to non-Moslem minorities
shall enjoy the same treatment and security in law and in fact as other
Turki.ih nationals. In particular, they shall have an equal right to
establish, manage and control at their own expense, any charitable,
religious and social institutions, any schools and other establishments
for instruction and education, with the right to use their own language
and to exercise their own religion freely therein.
ARTICLE 46. The Ottoman Public Debt, as defined in the Table
annexed to the present Section, shall be distributed under the condi-
tions laid down in the present Section between Turkey, the States in
favour of which territory has been detached from the Ottoman Empire
after the Balkan wars of 1912-13, the States to which the islands
referred to in ARTICLES 12 and 15 of the present Treaty and the
territory referred to in the last para~ph of the present Article have
been attributed, and the States newly created in territories in Asia
which are detached from the Ottoman Empire under the present Treaty.
All the above States, shall also participate, under the conditions laid
down in the present Section, in the annual charges for the service of
the Ottoman Public Debt from the dates referred to in ARTICLE 53.
From the dates laid down in ARTICLE 53, Turkey shall not be held
in any way whatsoever responsible for the shares of the Debt for
which other States are liable.
For the purpose of the distribution of the Ottoman Public Debt,
662 MODERN TURKEY
that portion of the territory of Thrace which was under Turkish
sovereignty on the 1st August, 1914, and lies outside the boundaries
of Turkey as laid down by ARTICLE 2 of the present Treaty, shall be
deemed to he detached from the Ottoman Empire under the said Treaty.
ARTICLE 56. The Council of the Administration of the Ottoman
Public Debt shall no longer include delegates of the German, Austrian
and Hungarian bondholders. ·
ARTICLE 58. Turkey on the one hand, and the other Contracting
Powers (except Greece) on the other hand, reciprocally renounce ·au
pecuniary claims for the Joss and damage suffered respectively by
Turkey and the said Powers and by their nationals (including juri.dical
persons) between the 1st August, 1914, and the coming into force of
the present Treaty, as the result of acts of war, or measures of requisi-
tion, sequestration, disposal or confiscation.
Nevertheless, the above provisions are without prejudice to the pro-
visions of Part III (Economic Clauses) of the present Treaty.
Turkey renounces in favour of the other Contracting Parties (except
Greece) any right in the sums in gold transferred by Germany and
Austria under ARTICLE 259 (1) of the Treaty of Peace of the 28th
June, 1919, with Germany, and under ARTICLE 210 (1) of the Treaty
of Peace of the lOth September, 1919, with Austria.
The Council of the Administration of the Ottoman Public Debt is
freed from all liability tc make .the payments which it was required
to make by the Agreement of the 20th June, 1331, (3rd July, 1915)
relating to the first issue of Turkish currency notes or by the words
inscribed on the back of such notes.
Turkey also agrees not to claim from the British Government or its
nationals the repayment of the sums paid for the warships ordered in
England by the Ottoman Government which were requisitioned by the
British Government in 1914, and renounces all claims in the matter.
ARTICLE 59. Greece recognises her obligation to make reparation
for the damage caused in Anatolia by the acts of the Greek army or
administration which were contrary to the laws of war.
On the other hand, Turkey, in consideration of the financial situation
of Greece resulting from the prolongation of the war and from its
consequences, finally renounces all claims for reparation against the
Greek Government. .
ARTICLE 60. The States in favour of which territory was or is
detached from the Ottoman Empire after the Balkan wars or by the
present Treaty shall acquire, without payment, all the property and
possessions of the Ottoman Empire situated therein.
It is understood that the property and possessions of which the
transfer from the Civil List to the State was laid down by the lrades
of the 26th August, 1324 (8th September, 1908) and the 20th April,
1325 (2nd May, 1909), and also those which, on the 30th October, 1918,
were administered by the Civil List for the benefit of a public service,
are included among the property and possessions referred to in the
preceding paragraph, the aforesaid States being subrogated to the
Ottoman Empire in regard to the property and possessions in question.
The W ak.fs [Vakufs] created on such property shall be maintained.
The dispute which has arisen between the Greek and Turkish Govern-
ments relating to property and possessions which have passed from
the Civil List to the State and are situated in territories of the former
Ottoman Empire transferred to Greece either after the Balkan wars,
or subsequently, shall be referred to an arbitral tribunal at The Hague,
in accordance with the special protocol No. 2 annexed to the Treaty
of Athens of the 1st-14th November, 1913. The terms of reference shall
be settled between the two Governments.
The provisions of this Article will not modify the juridical nature
of the property and possessions registered in the name of the Civil
List or administered by it, which are not referred to in the second
and third paragraphs above.
ARTICLE 62. Turkey recognizes the transfer of any claims to pay·
ment or repayment which Germany, Austria, Bulgaria or Hungary
may have against her, in accordance with Article 261 of the Treaty of
Peace concluded at Versailles on the 28th June, 1919, with Germany,
and the corresponding articles of the Treaties of Peace of the lOth
September, 1919, with Austria; of the 27th November, 1919, with
Bulgaria; and of the 4th June, 1920, with Hungary.
The other Contracting Powers agree to release Turkey from the
debts for which she is liable on this account.
The claims which Turkey has against Germany, Austria, Bulgaria
and Hungary are also transferred to the aforesaid Contracting Powers.
ARTICLE 63. The Turkish Government, in agreement with the other
Contracting Powers, hereby releases the German Government from the
obligation incurred by it during the war to accept Turkish Government
currency notes at a specified rate of exchange in payment for goods
to be exported to Turkey from Germany after the war.
ARTICLE 65. Property, rights and interests which still exist and
can be identified in territories remaining Turkish at the date of the
coming into force of the present Treaty, and which belong to persons
who on the 29th October, 1914, were Allied nationals, shall be immedi-
ately restored to the owners in their existing state.
Reciprocally, property, rights and interests which still exist and can
be identified in territories subject to the sovereignty or protectorate
of the Allied Powers on the 29th October, 1914, or in territories
detached from the Ottoman Empire after the Balkan wars and subject
to-day to the sovereignty of any such Power, and which belong to
Turkish nationals, shall be immediately restored to the owners in their
existing state. The same provision shall apply to property, rights and
interests which belong to Turkish nationals in territories detached from
the Ottoman Empire under the present Treaty, and which may have
been subjected to liquidation or any other exceptional measure what-
ever on the part of the authorities of the Allied Powers.
All property, rights and interests situated in territory detached
from the Ottoman Empire under the present Treaty, which, after
having been subjected by the Ottoman Government to an exceptional
war measure, are now in the hands of the Contracting Power exercising
authority over the saidterritory, and which can be identified, shall be
restored to their legitimate owners, in their existing state. The same
provision shall apply to immovable property which may have been
liquidated by the Contracting Power exercising authority over the said
664 MODERN TURKEY
territory. All other claims between individuals shall be submitteg to
the competent local courts.
All disputes relating to the identity or the restitution of property
to which a claim is made shall be submitted to the Mixed Arbitral
Tribunal provided for in Section V of this Part.
ARTICLE 77. Contracts between Allied and Turkish nationals con-
cluded after the 30th October, 1918, remain in force and will be
governed by the ordinary law.
Contracts duly concluded with the Constantinople Government be-
tween the 30th October, 1918, and the 16th March, 1920, also remain
in force and will be governed by the ordinary law. ·
All contracts and arrangements duly concluded after the 16th Maz:ch,
1920, with the Constantinople Government concerning territories which
remained under the effective control of the said Government, shall be
submitted to the Grand National Assembly of Turkey for approval,
if the parties concerned make application within three months from
the coming into force of the present Treaty. Payments made under
such contracts shall be duly credited to the party who has made them.
If approval is not granted, the party concerned shall, if the circum-
stances demand it, be entitled to .compensation corresponding to the
direct loss which has been actually suffered; such compensation in
default of an amicable agreement, shall be fixed by the Mixed Arbitral
Tribunal.
The provisions of this ARTICLE are not applicable either to conces-
sionary contracts or to transfers of concessions.
ARTICLE 79. All periods whatever of prescription or limitation of
right of action, whether they began to run before or after the outbreak
of war, shall be treated, in the territory of the High Contracting Parties
so far as regards relations between enemies, as having been suspended
from the 29th October, 1914, until the expiration of three months after
the coming into force of the present Treaty.
This provision applies, in particular, to periods of time allowed for
the presentation of interest or dividend coupons, or for the presentation
for payment of securities drawn for redemption or repayable on
any other ground.
As regards Romania, the above-mentioned periods shall be con-
sidered as having been suspended as from the 27th August, 1916.
ARTICLE 84. The High Contracting Parties are in agreement in
recognising that debts which were payable before the war or which
became payable during the war under contracts entered into before
the war, and which remained unpaid owing 'to the war, must be sett)ed
and paid, in accordance with the provisions of the contracts, in the
currency agreed upon, at the rate current in its country of origin.
Without prejudice to the provisions of the Annex to Section IJ of
this part, it is agreed that where payments to be made under a pr~-war
contract are represented by sums collected during the war in whole or
in part in a currency other than that mentioned in the said contract,
such payments can be made by handing over the sums actually collected,
in the currency in which they were collected. This provision shall not
affect settlements inconsistent with the foregoing provisions arrived
at by voluntary agreement between the parties before the coming into
force of the present Treaty.
ARTICLE 85. The Ottoman Public Debt is by general agreement left
outside the scope of this Section and of the other Sections of this
Part (Economic Clauses).
ARTICLE 86. Subject to the stipulations of the present Treaty, rights
of industrial, literary and artistic property as they existed on the 1st
August, 1914, in accordance with the law of each of the contracting
countries, shall be reestablished or restored as from the coming into
force of the present Treaty in the territories of the High Contracting
Parties in favour of the persons entitled to the benefit of them at the
moment when the state of war commenced, or of their legal representa-
tives. Equally, rights which, but for the war, could have been acquired
during the war, by means of an application legally made for the pro-
tection of industrial property or of the publication of a literary or
artistic work, shall be recognised and established in favour of those
persons who would have been entitled thereto, from the coming into
force of the present Treaty.
Without prejudice to the rights which are required to be restored in
accordance with the above provision, all acts (including the grant of
licenses) done by virtue of the special measures taken during the war
by a legislative, executive or administrative authority of an Allied Power
in regard to the rights of Turkish nationals in respect of industria!,
literary or artistic property shall remain in force and continue to have
their full effect. • . •
ARTICLE 92. Within three months from the date of the coming i~to'
force of the present Treaty, a Mixed Arbitral Tribunal shall be estab-
lished between each of the Allied Powers, on the one hand, and Turkey,
on the other hand.
Each of these Tribunals shall be composed of three members, two
being appointed respectively by each of the Governments concerned,
who shall be entitled to designate several persons from whom, accord-
ing to the case in question, they will choose one to sit as a member
of the Tribunal. The president shall be chosen by agreement between
the two Governments concerned.
In case of failure to reach agreement within two months .from the
coming into force of the present Treaty, the president shall be
appointed, upon the request of one of the Governments concerned, from
among nationals of Powers which remained neutral during the war,
by the President of the Permanent Court of International Justice at
The Hague.
If within the said period of two months one of the Governments con-
cerned does not appoint a member to represent it on the Tribunal
the Council of the League of Nations will have power to proceed to
the appointment of such member upon the request of the other Govern-
ment concerned.
If a member of the Tribunal should die or resign or for any reason
become unable to perform his duties, he shall be replaced by the
method laid down for his appointment, the above period of two mon~hs
running from the date of death, resignation or inability as duly verified.
ARTICLE 93. The seat of the Mixed Arbitral Tribunals shall be at
666 MODERN TCRKEY
Constantinople. If the number and character of the cases justify it,
the Governments concerned shall be entitled to create in each Tribunal
one or more additional Sections, the seat of which shall be in whate¥er
place may be convenient. Each of these Sections shall be composed
of a vice-president and two members appointed as laid down in the
second, third, fourth and fifth paragraphs of ARTICLE 92.
Each Government shall appoint one or more agents to represent it
before the Tribunal.
If, after three years from the establishment of a Mixed Arbitral
Tribunal, or of one of its Sections, such Tribunal or Section has not
finished its work, and if the Power on whose territory such Tribunal
or Section has its seat so requests, the seat shall be moved from such
territory. ·
ARTICLE 94. The Mixed Arbitral Tribunals established pursuant to
ARTICLES 92 and 93 shall decide all questions within their competence
under the present Treaty.
Decisions shall be taken by a majority.
The High Contracting Parties agree to regard the decisions of the
Mixed Arbitral Tribunals as final and conclusive, and to render them
binding upon their nationals, and to ensure their enforcement in their
respective territories as soon as the decisions of the Tribunals are
notified to them, without it being necessary to have them declared
executory.
The High Contracting Parties further undertake that their Tribunals
and authorities shall directly assist the Mixed Arbitral Tribunals in
every way that is in their power, particularly as regards the trans-
mission of notices and the collection of evidence.
ARTICLE 101. Turkey undertakes to adhere to the Convention and
to the Statute respecting the Freedom of Transit adopted by the Con-
ference of Barcelona on the 14th April, 1921, as well as to the Conven-
tion and the Statute respecting the regime for waterways of interna-
tional interest adopted by the said Conference on the 19th April, 1921,
and to the supplementary ProtocoL
Turkey accordingly undertakes to bring into force the provisions of
these Conventions, Statutes and Protocol as from the entry into force
of the present Treaty.
ARTICLE 113. Each of the High Contracting Parties hereby accepts
in so far as it is concerned, the abolition of foreign post offices in
Turkey.
ARTICLE 114. The Superior Council of Health of Constantinople
iS abolished. The Turkish Administration is entrusted with the sanitary
organization of the coasts and frontiers of Turkey.
ARTICLE 115. A single sanitary tariff, the dues and conditions of
which shall be fair, shall be applied to all ships without distinction
between the Turkish flag and fo~on flags, and to nationals of forei.,.on
Powers under the same conditions as to nationals of Turkey.
ARTICLE 116. Turkey undertakes to respect entirely the right of
the sanitary employees whose services have been terminated to com-
pensation to be appropriated out of the funds of the former Superior
Council of Health of Constantinople, and all other rights acquired by
employees or former employees of the Council, or their representatives.
All questions relating to such rights, to the employment of the reserve
funds of the former Superior Council of Health of Constantinople or
to the final liquidation of the former sanitary administration, as well as
all other similar or cognate questions, shall be regulated by a Commis-
sion ad hoc which shall be composed of a representative of each of the
Powers represented on the Superior Council of Health of Constan-
tinople except Germany, Austria and Hungary. In the event of dis-
agreement between the members of the said Commission on a quest~on
·relating to the above-mentioned liquidation, or the employment of the
funds remaining after that liquidation, every Power represented on the
Commission shall have the right to bring the matter to the notice of
the Council of the League of Nations, whose decision shall be final.
ARTICLE 128. The Turkish Government undertakes to grant to the
Governments of the British Empire, France and Italy respectively and
in perpetuity the land within the Turkish territory in which are situated
the graves, cemeteries, ossuaries or memorials of their soldiers and
sailors who fell in action or died of wounds, accident or diseases, as
well as those of prisoners of war and interned civilians who died in
captivity.
. The Turkish Government will also grant to those Governments the
land which the Commissions provided for in ARTICLE 130 shall consider
necessary for the establishment of cemeteries for the regrouping of
graves, for ossuaries or memorials.
The Turkish Government undertakes further to give free ·access to
these graves, cemeteries, ossuaries and memorials, and if need be to
authorise the construction of the necessary roads and pathways.
The Greek Government undertakes to fulfil the same obligations in
so far as concerns its territory.
The above provisions shall not affect Turkish or Greek sovereignty
over the land thus granted.
ARTICLE 131. The Government in whose favour the grant is made
undertakes not to employ the land nor to allow it to be employed for
any purpose other than that to which it is dedicated. If this land is
situated on the coast, the shore may not be employed by the conces-
sionary Government for any military, marine or commercial purpose
of whatever nature. The sites of g-raves and cemeteries which may no
longer be used for that purpose and which are not used for the erection
of memorials shall be returned to the Turkish or Greek Government.
ARTICLE 139. Archives, registers, plans, title-deeds and other docu-
ments of every kind relating to the civil, judicial or financial adminis-
tration, or the administration of W akfs, which are at present in
Turkey and are only of interest to the Government of a territory
detached from the Ottomaq Empire, and reciprocally those in a
territory detached from the Ottoman Empire which are only of interest
to the Turkish Government, shall reciprocally be restored.
Archives, registers, plans, title-deeds and other documents mentioned
above which are considered by the Government in whose possession they
are as being also of interest to itself, may be retained by that Govern-
ment, subject to its furnishing on request photographs or certified
copies to the Government concerned.
Archives, registers, plans, title-deeds and other documents which
668 MODERN TURKEY
have been taken away either from Turkey or from detached territories
shall reciprocally be restored in original, in so far as they concern
exclusively the territories from which they have been taken.
The expense entailed by these operations shall be paid by the Govern-
ment applying therefor.
The above stipulations apply in the same manner to the registers
relating to real estates or W akfs in the districts of the former Ottoman
Empire transferred to Greece after 1912. ·
No. 37. Declaration of the Turkish Republic.

October 29, 1923.
REFERENCE.-American Department of State, Slalemeft' of lhe

Press, November 1, 1923.
The American High Commissioner at Constantinople has received
a communication from Adnan Bey, Representative of the Angora
Government at Constantinople, dated October 30th, of which the
following is a translation:
Acting under instructions from my Government, I have the honor

to inform Your Excellency that the Grand National Assembly of
Turkey in its session the afternoon of October 29, 1923, made the fol-
lowing decisions by a unanimous vote :
(1) The form of the Turkish State is Republican, its religion
Moslem and its official language Turkish. The President of the
Republic, who is the Chief of State, is elected by the Grand National
Assembly from among its members for the period for which the mem-
bers of the Assembly are elected; and in this quality he presides when-
ever he judges it necessary over the Assembly and the Council of
Ministers. The Prime Minister is chosen from among the members of
the Grand National Assembly by the President of the Republic, who
chooses as well the other Ministers from among the mem hers of the
same Assembly. The Council of Ministers thus constituted is presented
by the President of the Republic for the approval of the Assembly.
This approval is postponed until a meeting of the Grand National
Assembly if the latter is not in session.
(2) His Excellency, Ghazi Mustafa Kemal Pasha has been elected
unanimously in the same session President of the Republic.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
The following bibliography contains a comprehensive representative
list of periodicals, books and source materials dealing with modem
Turkey and published during this period. Practically all works included
deal with the past fifteen years although some few are named which
deal with previous history, rewritten somewhat from the contemporary
viewpoint. The author, as compiler, has adopted the plan of classify-
ing books according to whether they fall within the three peri~ds,
1908-1914, 1915-1918, 1919-1923, since it has become apparent to him
that a writer's observations have been usually colored by the date of his
labors. ·
The references are confined to works in the English, French, German,
and Italian languages. Most books dealing with military campaigns,
and atrocities or other one-sided propaganda, have been excluded.
For a· good, brief, general bibliography without respect to dates,
the annual Statesman's Yearbook is distinctly usefuL A valuable
record of books dealing with Turkey published prior to 1910 appears
in the excellent publication of the New York Public Library, cited in
the list of bibliographical sources. This last mentioned section (biblio-
graphical sources) contains both works dealing with the earlier period
of Turkish history and references to further hibliographies which may
interest the serious student.
In connection with certain books the compiler has made personal
comments, not with an idea of undervaluing unannotated works but
merely to guide the reader who may feel that he is overwhelmed by
the voluminous literature which has been brought to his attention.
PERIODICALS
The following periodicals are among those which have frequently
printed valuable articles about modern Turkey:
Published in America: American Journal of Internatiottal Law,
Asia, Christian Science Monitor, Commerce Reports, Commercial and
Financial Chronicle, Congregationalist, Current History, Foreign
Affairs, Geographical Review, Independent, International Conciliation,
International Interpreter, International Yearbook, Journal of Interna--
tional Relations• (succeeding Journal of Race Development•), Literary
Digest, Moslem lVorld, Nation, New Arm~mia, New Near East, New
Republic, New York Times, Our World, Reviews of Reviews, Time,
World'• Work.
Published in England: Annual Register, Asiatic Review, Balkafl
Review•, Contemporary Review, Corporatiofl of Foreigfl Bondholders
(annual reports), Economic Review of the Foreigfl Press, Foreign
669
670 MODERN TGRKEY
Affairs, Fortnightly Beriew, Geographical Jourwal, Manchester
Guardian (daily and weekly), Mulim Standard, Nation, Near East,
New Europe•, Nineteenth Century and After, Palestine (the Organ of
the British Palestine Committee), Parliamentary Debates, Times (daily
and weekly), Proceedings of the Central Asian Society, Rou11d Table,
Statesman's Yearbook.
Published in France: Annuaire general de la France et de retra~tger,
Bulletin periodique de la presse Turque, Bulletin du comili de l'Asie
fra~ise, CorrespondJJnce d'Orumt, L'Economiste Europeen, L'Europe
nout:elle, L'Europe orientale, L'Economiste Franrais, L'E.xporlateur
Franr;ais, France-Europe Orientale, La Geographie, Journal des
Debats, Journal des Economistes, Journal Officiel, Le Matin, Le Temps,
Ben~e des Balkans, RemAe des dew:-Mondes, La Rewe d'Histoire diplo-
matique, La Ren~e mondiale, Ren~e politique et parlementaire.
Published in Germany: BalkaJH"ene, Beutsche Let:ante-Zeitung,
Frankfllrler Zeitung, Geographische Zeitschri{t, Islamitische Welt,
Mittel-Europa, Der Neue Oriefll, Petermann's Mitteilungen, Der Welt-
handel.
Published elsewhere: Annuaire orientale (Constantinople), Berichte
aus den neuen Staaten (Vienna), Bulletin de l'institut pour l'etude de
l'Europe sud-orientale (Bucharest), European Commercial (Vieuna),
L'Information d'Orient (Constantinople), Islamic Reriew (Woking),
LetXJfll Trade Retliew (Constantinople), Le Mout:ement Economique
(Bucharest), Neue Europa (Zurich), Neue Freie Presse (Vieuna), Der
Neue Orient (Vienna), Orient• (Constantinople), Petit Journal Rlustre
(Constantinople), Reconstruction (Vienna), Rene Commerciale aM
Let:afll (Constantinople), Rene Commercial d'Orient (Constantinople),
RemAe de Turqvie• (Zurich), Volkswirl (Vienna).
Reports of the Ottoman Public Debt, diplomatic and consular officers,
trade commissioners, chambers of commerce; and these League of
Nations publications: (a) Monthly Summary, (b) Official Journal, (c)
Treaty Series.
• Denotes publieation has been lltlSpCllded or dilleontinued.
BOOKS
1908-1914
Abbott, G. F. Turkey in transition. London, Arnold, 1909.
Adeney, W. F. The Greek and Eastern churches. New York, Scrib-
ners, 1908.
Arnold, T. W. The preaching of Islam. 2d ed. London, Constable,
1913.
Baedeker, K. Konstantinopel, Balkanstaaten, Kleinasien, .Archipel.,
Cypern. 2. aufl.. Leipzig, 1914. Palestine and Syria with routes
through Mesopotamia and Babylonia and the island of Cyprus. 5th
ed. Leipzig, Baedeker, 1912.
Baker, B. G. The passing of the Turkish Empire in Ewope. London,
Seeley, Service, 1913. .
Baldensperger, P. J. The immovable East. London, Pitman, 1913.
(Palestine.) · · .
Banse, E. .Auf den Spwen der Bagdadbahn. Weimar, Duncker, 1913.
Barclay, T. The Twco-Italiatt war and its problems. London, Con-
. stable, 1912. .
Bartholomew, J. G. .A literary and historical atlas of .Asia. London,
Dent, 1913.
Barton, J. L. Daybreak in Turkey. Boston, Pilgrim Press, 1908.
(Useful for general information and missionary enterprise.)
Becker, C. H. Deutschland und der Islam. Stuttgart und Berlin,
Steinitz, 1914.
Bell, G. L. .Amurath to .Amwath. London, Heinemann, 1911.
Berard, V. La mort de Stamboul. Paris, Colin, 1913. La revolution
twque. Paris, Colin, 1909. La Turquie et Z'hellenisme contemporain.
6 M. Paris, Alcan, 1911.
Bevione, G. L'.Asie minore e l'ltalie. Torino, Bocca, 1914.
Biliotti, Ahmed and Sedad. Legislation ottomane depuis Ze retablisse-
ment de la constitution 24 djemazi-ul-ahir 1326-10 juillet 1324-1908.
Recueil des lois, decreta, reglements, conventions, actes internationau:r:,
etc• ••• de l'Empire ottoman. Paris, Jouve, 1912.
Blanckenhom, M. L. P. Die Hedschasbahn geographische Zeitschrift,
Leipzig, 1912.
Bliss, E. M. The missionary enterprise. New York, Revell, 1908.
Bliss, F. J. The religions of modem Syria and Palestine. New York,
Scribners, 1912.
Brown, P. M. Foreigners in Turkey. Princeton, University Press,
1914. (Concise, authoritative treatment of former juridical posi-
tion.)
Bury, G. W. The land of U11. London, Macmillan, 1911.
Buxton, C. R. Turkey sn revolution. London, Unwin, 1909.
671
672 MOJ?ERN TURKEY
Buxton, N. E. and H. J. Travel and politics in Armenia. London,
Elder, 1914.
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, division of intercourse
and education. Report of the international commission to inquire
into the causes and conduct of the Balkan wars. Washington, 1914.
(Devoted mainly to atrocities.)
Cobb, S. The real· Turk. Boston, Pilgrim Press, 1914. (Favorable
to the Turks.)
Contenson, L. de. Les reformes en Turquie d!Asie. Paris, Plon-
Nourrit, 1913. (Armenian and Syrian problems.)
Curtis, W. E. Around the Black Sea. New York, Hodder & Stough-
ton, 1911. (Observations of a journalist.)
Delaygne, L. Essai sur les finances ottomanes. Paris, Rousseau, 1911.
Djelal Essad. Constantinople, De Byzance a Stamboul. Paris, Laurens,
1909.
Eliot, C. N. E. Turkey in Europe. London, Arnold, 1908. (New edi-
tion of memorable book.)
Emin, Ahmed. The development of modern Turkey as measured by
its press. New York, Columbia University, 1914. (Thesis for doc-
torate by leading Constantinople journalist.)
Fehmi, Y. Histoire de la Turquie. ·Paris, Perrin, 1909.
Ferriman, Z. D. Turkey and the Turks. London, Mills & Boon, 1911.
Fraser, D. The short cut to India. Edinburgh, Blackwood, 1909.
(Interesting observations along Baghdad Railway route.)
Garnett, L. M. J. · Turkey of the Ottomans. London, Pitman, 1911.
(Life and customs.)
Garstang, J. The land of the Hittites. London, Constable, 1910.
Gaulis, G. La ruine d!un empire. Paris, Colin, 1913.
Gibb, E. J. W. A history of Ottoman poetry. 6 vols. London, Luzac,
1900-9.
Goltz, C. von der. Der jungen Turkei Niederlage und die Moglichkeit
ihrer Wiedererhebung. Berlin, Paetel gbr., 1913.
Grothe, H. Geographische Charakterbilder aus der asiatischen Turkei
und dem sudlichen mesopotamisch-iranischen Randgebirge (Puscht-i-
kuh). Leipzig, Heinemann, 1909.
Gt. Brit. Admiralty. Hydrographic dept. Black Sea pilot. London,
Potter, 1908. Mediterranean pilot. London, Potter, 1913. (For
mariners, primarily, but contains useful data regarding localities.)
Gt. Brit. Foreign Office. Correspondence respecting the constitutional
movement in Turkey, 1908. Cd. 4529. London, H. M. Stationery
Office, 1909.
Guides-Joanne. De Paris a Constantinople. Paris, Hachette, 1914.
Hartmann, M. Der Islamische Orient. Berichte und Forschungen.
Band II Die Arabische Frage, mit einem Versuche der Archaologie
Jemens. Leipzig, Haupt, 1909.
Hichens, R. S. The Near East. London, Hodder & Stoughton, 1913.
Hoffmeister, E. K. L. von. Durch Armenien. Leipzig, Teubner, 1911.
Huntington, E. Palestine and its transformation. Boston, Houghton
Mifflin, 1911.
Ilitch, A. Le chemin de fer de Bagdad au point de vue politique,
BOOKS , 673
economique-et financier. Bruxelles, Misch & Thron, 1913. (Attitude
of Russia.)
Imperial Ottoman Bank. Contrats d'empronts et d'avances ibJ qou-
vernement Imperial ottomon. Recueil des contrats d'Emprunts de
coversions d'emprunts et d'Emissions de Bons du Tresor jusqu' a la
fin de 1912. Constantinople.
Imperial Ottoman penal code, The. London, Milford, 1914.
Iorga, N. Geschichte des osmanischen Reiches. 5 vols. 1774-1912.
Gotha, Perthes, 1913.
Iplicjian, Y. M. Die Entwickelungsgeschichte der Staatsschulden in der
Turkei. Strassburg, Schauberg, 1911.
Jackson, A. V. W. From Constantinople to the 1wme of Omar Khay-
yam. New York, Macmillan, 1911. ·
Jickh, E. Deutschland im Orient nach dem Balkankrieg. Munich,
Moricke, 1913.
Jenkins, H. D. Behind Turkish lattices. London, Chatto & Windus,
1911.
Knight, E. F. The awakening of Turkey. London, Milne, 1909.
La Jonquiere, A. Histoire de l'Empire ottoman. 2 v. nouv. ed. Paris,
Hachette, 1914.
Landemont, A. de. L'Europe et la politique orientale, 1878-1912.
Paris, Plon-Nourrit, 1912. ,
Launay, L. de. La geologie et les richesses minerales de l'Asie. Paris,
Beranger, 1911. (Excellent.) .
La Turquie que l'on voit. Paris, Hachette, 1913.
Laurent, C. La reforme financiere en Turquie. Paris, Alcan, 1910.
Leary, L. G. The real Palestine of to-day. :New York, McBride, Nast,
1911. Syria the land of Lebanon. New York, McBride, Nast, 1913.
(Written by former instructor, American University of Beirut.)
Lehmann-Haupt, F. F. C. .Armenien einst und jetzt. vol. I Vom
Kaukasus zum Tigris und nach Tigranokerta. Berlin, Behr, 1910.
Loze, M. La question des tUtroits. Paris, Rose, 1908. (Thesis.)
Lukach, H. C. The city of dancing dervishes. London, Macmill~n,
1914. The fringe of the East. London, Macmillan, 1913.
Lybyer, A. H. The government of the Ottoman empire in the time of
Suleiman the Magnificent. Cambridge, Harvard University Press,
1913. (Comprehensive.)
Macdonald, J. Turkey and the Eastern question. London, Jack, 1913.
Macmillan. Guide to Greece, the Archipelago, Constantinople, the
coasts of Asia Minor, Crete, Cyprus. London, Macmillan, 1908.
Mandelstam, A. La justice ottomane dan les rapports avec les pttis-
sances etrangeres. 2 ed. Paris, Pedone, 1911. (Advocates revision
but not abolition of capitulations.)
Mantegazza, V. La Turchia liberale e la questioni balcaniche. Milano, .
Treves, 1908.
Meyers Reisebncher. Balkanstaatett u. KonstantinopeJ (Anatolia und
Bagdadbahn). 8. auft. Leipzig, Bibliographisches Institut, 1914.
Miller, W. The Latins in the Levant. London, Murray, 1908.
Nawratzki, C. Die judische Kolonisatiott Paliistinas. Munich, Rein-
hardt, 1914.
674 MODERN .TURKEY
Nord, E. Das tiirkische Strafgesetzbuch. Berlin, Guttentag, 1912.
(Detailed.)
Ormanian, M. The church of Armenia. London, Mowbray, 1912.
(Translated from the French.)
Ostrorog, L. Pour la reforme de la justice ottomane. Paris, Pedone,
1912. (Author former judicial adviser.)
Pears, E. Turkey and its people. London, Methuen, 1912. (Valu-
able.)
Pech, E. Manuel des societes anonymes fonctionnant en Turquie. 5 ed.
Constantinople, Gerard Freres, 1911. (Only reference work of
its kind.)
Pelissie du Rausas, G. Le regime des capitulations dans l'Empire otto-
man. 2 ed. 2 v. Paris, Rousseau, 1910-11. (A classic.)
Pickthall, M. W. With the Turk in wartime. London, Dent, 1914.
Pinon, R. L'Europe et Za Jeune Turquie. Paris, Perrin, 1911.
L'Europe et Z'Empire ottoman. 3 ed. Paris, Perrin, 1908.
Quadflieg, F. Russische Expansionspolitik von 1774 bis 1914. Berlin,
Diimmler, 1914.
Ramsay, W. M. The revolution in Constantinople and Turkey. Lon-
don, Hodder & Stoughton, 1909.
Rankin, R. i.e. J. R. L. The inner history of the Balkan war. London,
Constable, 1914.
Raventlow, F. C. E. L. D. Graf zu. Deutschlands auswiirtige Politik
1888-1913. 11. aufl. Berlin, Mittler, 1918.
Riesser, J. Die deutschen Grossbanken und ihre Konzentration im
Zusammenhang wit der Entwicklung der Gesamtwirtschaft in
Deutschland. Jena, Fisher, 1909. '
Rohrbach, P. Die Bagdadbahn. 2. aufl. Berlin, Wiegandt & Grieben,
1911. (Comprehensive study by German economist.)
Rouire, Dr. La rivalite anglo-russe, au XIX" siecle, en Asie. Paris,
Colin, 1908.
Saint-Yves, G. Les chewins de fer frangais dans la Turquie d'Asie,
Paris, 1914.
Sax, C. von. Geschichte des Machtverfalls der Tiirkei bis Ende des
19 Jahrhunderts. Wien, Manz, 1908. Geschichte des Machtverfalls
der Tiirkei und die Phasen der orientalischen Frage bis auf die
Gegenwart. Wien, Manz, 1913.
Schaefer, C. A. Ziele und W ege fur die jungtiirkische Wirtschafts-
politik. Karlsruhe, Braun, 1913.
Schmidt, H. Das Eisenbahnwesen in der asiatischen Tiirkei. (Also
in English.) Berlin, Siemenroth, 1914. (Useful facts.)
Schmidt, W. Das siidwestliche Arabien. · Frankfort, Keller, 1913.
Singleton, E., ed. Turkey and the Balkan states. New York, Dodd
Mead, 1908. .
Soane, E. B. Through Mesopotamia and Kurdistan in disguise. Lon-
don, Murray, 1912. (Author British political officer who speaks
Kurdish and possesses a superior knowledge of southern Kurdistan.)
Trietsch, D., ed. Levante-Handbuch. Berlin, Gea, 1914. (Useful
reference.)
Upward, A. The east end of E{urope. New York, Dutton, 1909.
BOOKS 675
Van :Milligen, A. Byzantine churches in Constantinople. London,
Macmillan, 1912.
Van Milligen, J. R. Turkey. London, Black, 1911.
Vannutelli, L. Anatolia meridionale a. Mesopotamia. Rome, Societa
geografica italiana, 1911.
Varandian, M. Les origines du mouvement Armenien. 2 vols.
Geneva, 1913.
Vesnic, M. n progetto del cardinale Alberoni per la divisione deU'
impero turco e perl'arbitrato internazionale. Rome, Athenmum, 1913.
Wace, A. J. B., and M. S. Thompson. The nomads of the Balkans.
London, Methuen, 1914. (Classic study of the Vlachs.)
Washburn, G. Fifty years in Constantinople. Boston, Houghton
Mitnin, 1911. (Fascinating reminiscences by the notable president
of Robert College.)
Westarp, E. J. von. · Unter Halbmond und Sonne. 2d. aufl. Berlin,
Paetel, 1913. (Travel description of Anatolia.)
Whitman, S. Turkish memoirs. London, Heinemann, 1914.
Wigram, W. A. The cradle of mankind. London, Black, 1914.
Wirth, A. H. Geschichte der Tiirken. Stuttgart, Franck, 1912. (His-
torical.) Die Zukunft der Tiirkei. Leipzig, Deutsche Zukunft, 1909.
Woods, H. C. The danger zone of Europe. London, Unwin, 1911.
Yakir Bahar. Le finanza turche. Bologna, Zanichelli, 1914.
1915-1918
Abbott, G. F. Turkey, Greece, and the great powers. New York,
McBride, 1917.
Adib, Pacha. Le Liban apres la guerre. Paris, Leroux, 1918.
Aghnides, N. P. Mohammedan theories of finance. New York, Co-
lumbia University, 1916. (Thesis.)
Alp, Tekin (pseud. of Albert Cohen). Tiirkismus und Pantiirkismus.
Weimar, Kiepenheuer. 1915. (Valuable account of Pan-Turanian
movement.)
The Arab of Mesopotamia. Basra, "Times of India," 1918.
Auble, E. Bagdad, son chemin de fer, son importance, soli avenir.
Paris, "Editions & librairie," 1917.
Aulneau, J. La Turquie et la guerre. Paris, Alcan, 1915.
Banse, E. Die Tiirkei. Braunschweig, Westermann, 1915. (Excellent
geographical study.)
Bareilles, B. Constantinople, ses cites franques et Levantines. Paris,
Bossard, 1918. (Masterly picture by an old resident of the local
Levantine colony.) Les Turcs. Paris, Perrin, 1917.
Barker, J. E. The great problems of British statesmanship. London,
Murray, 1917. (Includes broad survey of Ottoman problems.)
Berard, V. Le sultan, l'lslam et les puissances. Paris, Colin, 1916.
Bevan, E. The land of the two rivers. London, Arnold, 1917.
Blanckenhorn, M. L. P. Syrien und die deu.tsche Arbeit. Weimar,
Kiepenheuer, 1916.
Blunt, F. J. S. My reminiscences. London, Murray, 1918. (Observa-
tions by a well-informed British woman.)
Boker, G. Das tiirkische Reich. Berlin, Mittler, 1918.
676 MODERN TURKEY
Bratter, C. .A. Die preussisch-turkische Bundn~spolitik Friedrichs des
Grossen. Weimar, Kiepenheuer, 1915.
Bury, G. W. .Arabia infelix. London, Macmillan, 1915. (.Able inter-
pretation.)
Cart, L. .Au Sinai et dans l'.Arabie petree. Neuchatel, Attinger, 1915.
Castellani, E. Privilegi degli stranieri in oriente e nel estremo oriente.
Rome, 1915.
Cheradame, .A. Le plan pangermaniste demasque. 12 ed. Paris, Plon-
Nourrit, 1916. (Much-quoted work by French writer.) La question
d'Orient. Paris, Plon-Nourrit, 1915.
Childs, W. J. .Across .Asia Minor on foot. London, Blackwood, 1918.
(Interesting picture of the country.)
Coolidge, A. C. Claimants to Constantinople. Cambridge, Harvard
University Press, 1917. (Able analysis by Harvard historian.) .
Contenson, L. de. Chretiens et Musulmans. Paris, Plon-Nourrit, 1915.
Cromer, E. B. Modern Egypt. New York,· Macmillan, 1916. (A
classic.) .
Dascovici, N. La .question du Bosphore et des D'ardanelles. Geneve,
Georg, 1915.
Dendrino, G. Bosporus und Dardanellen. Berlin, Ebering, 1915.
Dieterich, K. Das Griechentum Kleinasiens. Leipzig, Veit, 1915.
Dominian, L. Frontiers of language and nationality. New York,
Holt, 1917. (Reliable detailed study of Ottoman peoples.)
Duboscq, A. L'Orient meWiterraneen. Paris, Perrin, 1917.
Dwight, H. G. Constantinople, old and new. New York, Scribners,
1915. (Informative and reliable.)
Einstein, L. Inside Constantinople. New York, Dutton, 1918. (Diplo-
mat's diary during Dardanelles expedition.)
Ellison, G. .An Englishwoman in a Turkish harem. London, Methuen,
1915.
Emin, Achmed. Die Turkei. Gotha, Perthes, 1918.
Endres, F. C. Die Turkei. 4. auft. Miinchen, Beck, 1918. (Geo-
graphical.)
Forbes, N. and A. J. Toynbee, D. Mitrany, D. G. Hogarth. The Bal-
kans. Oxford, Clarendon, 1915. (Succinct.)
Fortescue, G. R. Russia, the Balkans and the Dardanelles. London,
Melrose, 1915.
Fowle, T. C. W. Travels in the Middle East. New York, Dutton,
1916.
Frech, F. Geologie Kleinasiens im bereiche der Bagdadbahn. Stutt-
gart, Enke, 1916. (Scientific.)
Fullerton, W. M. Problems of power. New York, Scribners, 1915.
Gibbons, H. A. The foundation of the Ottoman empire. New York,
Century, 1916. (Study from sources, period 1300-1403, and good
bibliography.) The new map of Europe (1911-1914). New York,
Century, 1918. The reconstruction of Poland and the Near East.
New York, Century, 1917.
Gt. Brit. Foreign Office. Correspondence respecting events leading
to the rupture of relations with Turkey. Cd. 7628 continued in Cd.
7716, 1914-16. Report on the treatment of British prisoners of war
in Turkey. Cd. 9208, 1918. .Agreement between the British and
BOOKS 677
Ottoman GO'Vernments respecting prisoners of war and civilians.
Cd. 9024, 1918. London, H. M. Stationery Office. Gt. Britain
Parliamentary Papers. Report of the Commission appointed by
Act of Parliament to enquire into the operations of war in JJ!esopo-
tamia, together with a separate report by Commander J. W edgwood.
London, H. M. Stationery Office, 1917. (Authoritative record of
military operations.)
Greene, J. K. Leavening the Leoont. Boston, Pilgrim Press, 1916.
(A missionary record.)
Grothe, H. Tiirkisch-Asien und seine Wirtschaftswerte. Frankfurt,
Hendschel, 1916. Die Tiirken und ihre Gegner. Frankfurt, Hend-
schel, 1915.
Gueshoff, I. E. The Balkan league. London, Murray, 1915.
Halideh Edib. Das neue Turan. ·Weimar, Kiepenheuer, 1916.
Hall, W. H., ed. Reconstruction in Turkey. New York, American
Commission for Armenian and Syrian Relief, 1918. (Exposition of
practical problems, chiefly by Americans.)
Handcock, P. S. P. The archt:Eology of the Holy Land. London,
Unwin, 1916.
Hassert, K. i.e. E. E. K. Das tiirkis~he Reich. Tiibingen, Mohr, 1918.
(A leading geographical work.)
Hawley, W. A. Asia Minor. London, Lane, 1918. ·
Hedin, S. A. Bagdad, Babylon, Nineveh. Leipzig, Brockhaus, 1918.
Jerusalem. Leipzig, Brockhaus, 1918.
Hallauer, J., ed. Das tiirkische Reich. Berlin, Mittler, 1918.
Hitti, P. K. The origins of the Islamic state. New York, Longmans
Green, 1916.
Hogarth, D. G. The Nearer East. New Work, Appleton, 1915. (New
edition of a monumental geographical study.)
Holdich, T. H. Boundaries in Europe and the Near East. London,
Macmillan, 1918.
Hoschiller, M. L'Europe devant Constantinople. Paris, Riviere, 1916.
lfuart, C. I. Gesckichte des Arabes. 2 vols. Leipzig, Koehler, 1916.
Hubbard, G. E. From the Gulf to Ararat. Edinburgh, Blackwood,
1916.
Huntington, E. Civilization and climate. New Haven, Yale Univ~rsity
Press, 1915.
Hurgronje, C. S. The holy war "Made in Germany!' New York,
Putnam, 1915. Mohammedanism. New York, Putnam, 1916. Ths
revolt in Arabia. New York, Putnam, 1917. (The author is pro-
fessor of Arabic languages in the University of London.)
Hyamson, A. M. Palestine. New York, Knopf, 1917.
lbaiiez de lbero, C. D'Athenes a Constantinople. Paris, Attlinger,
1916. (Political.)
Jabotinsky, V. Turkey ancl the war. London, Unwin, 1917. (Author
was Russian journalist.)
Jiick.h, E. Die deutsch-tiirkischs Walfenbriiderschaft. Stuttgart, Verlags-
Anstalt, 1915. Der aufsteigende llalbmond. Stuttgart, Deutsche
Verlagsanstalt, 1916. (Author maintains that loss of European pos-
sessions has strengthened Turkey.)
678 MODERN TURKEY
Jaenecke, W. Die GrurtdJWobleme des liirkischea Strafrecits. Berlin,
Gutta1tag, 1918. (52 pages of appendices.)
Jaschke, G. Die Well des Islafft8. Berlin, Reimer, 1917.
Jastrow, M. The war and the Bagdad railway. Philadelphia, Lippin-
cott, 1918. _
Junge, R. Die devlscla-tiirkischea Wirlschaftsbezielaungett. Weimar,
Kiepenheuer, 1916. (Economic.)
Kaufmann, M. R. Pera and Stambul. Weimar, Kiepenheuer, 1915.
(Descriptive.)
Kran..-.e, P. R. Die Tiirkei. Leipzig and Berlin, Teubner, 1916. (A
handbook.)
Lehmann, W. Die Kapitulalionen. Weimar, Kiepenheuer, 1917.
Leonhard, R. Paphlagonia. Berlin, Reimer (E. Vohsen), 1915.
Lepsins, Johannes. Bericllt iiber die Lage des armenisclle~~ Volkes i11
der Tiirkei. Potsdam, Tempelverlag, 1916. (Recent political his-
tory.)
Mabmud Mnkhtar. Die Welt des lslams im Lichte des Kora11 t1rtd
Hadith. Weimar, Kiepenheuer, 1915.
Makai, 0. Griirtduflgswesea t1fld FittafiZierung i• UrtgMR, Bulgariea
und der Tiirkei. Berlin, Haude & Spener, 1916. (Legal-economic
study.) .
Mandelstam, A. Le sort de L'Empire onoman. Lausanne, Payot, 1917.
(Voluminous, trustworthy record of both prewar and war events by
a member of the Russian embassy at Constantinople.)
Marriott, J. A. R. The Easter~~ questiOfl. 2d. ed. rev. Oxford,
Clarendon, 1918. (Able and timely history.)
Mehrmann, C. Der diplomatische Krieg i• Vorderasien. Dresden, Das
GrOssel'e Deutschland, 1916.
Milinkov, P. The War afld Balka11 politics. Cambridge, Cambridge
University Press, 1917•
.Morgan, J. J. M. de. C01ftre les barbares de l'Oriettf. Paris, Berger-
Levrault, 1918.
Morgenthau, H. .Ambassador Morg8flthau's story. Garden City, N.Y.,
Doubleday Page, 1918. (Intimate political narrative by a con-
spicuous American.)
Moutran, N. La Syrie de demai•. 4th ed. Paris, Plon-Nonrrit, 1916.
Muir, W. The caliphate. New and rev. ed. by T. H. Weir. Edin-
burgh, Grant, 1915.
Miiller, K. H. Die wirlst:iaftliche Bedeutvrtg der Bagdadbahn. Ham-
burg, Boysen & Maasch, 1917.
Nallino, C. A. .Appunle suUa natura del "califfato" irt geflere e swl
presunlo "califfato ottOfiKino.'' Rome, Ministero degli affari esteri,
1917.
Naumann, F. C8fltral E11rope. New York, Knopf, 1917. (A stand-
ard German work.)
The Near East from tcithin. 2d ed. New York, Dutton, 1918. (In-
side diplomacy.)
Newbigin, M. L Geographical aspects of BalkGII problefft8. London,
Constable, 1915. (Noteworthy volume in popular vein by the editor
of the "Scottish Geographical Magazine.")
Nossig, A. Die •ewe Tiirkei t1nd iAre Fiiltrer. Halle, Hendel, 1916.
BOOKS 679
Oberhummar, E. Die Turken una das osmaniscke Reick. Leipzig,
Teubner, 1917.
Overbeck. Die Kapitulationen c.Zes os~iscken Reickes. Breslau,
Kern, 1917.
Paquet, A. Die jud4scke Kolonien in Paliistina. Potsdam, Kiepen-
heuer, 1915.
Pears, E. Forty years in Constantinople. London, Jenkins, 1916.
Life of AbtWl Hamiel. London, Constable, 1917. (Both are pene-
trative, informative books by the late distinguished barrister of
Constantinople.)
Philippson, A. Das turkiscke Reick. Weimar, Kiepenheuer, 1915.
(Authoritative German geography.)
Phillipson, C. and N. Buxton. The question of the Bospkorus and
Darc.Zanelles. London, Stevens & Haynes, 1917.
Poulgy, G. Les emprunts c.Ze l'Etat ottoman. Paris, Jouve, 1915.
(Thesis submitted to the Law Faculty, University of Paris.)
Prothero, G. W. German policy before the war. London, Murray,
1917. (Contribution by the great British historian.)
Ramsay, W. M. The intermixture of races in Asia Minor. London,
Milford, 1917. (Wonderfully penetrating and concise.)
Richard, H. La 'Syrie et la guerre. Paris, Chapelot, 1916.
Ritter, A. and K. V. Winterstetten. Berlin-Bagdac.Z. 16 aufl. Munich,
Lehmann, 1916.
Rodwell, J. M. (translator). Koran. London and Toronto, Dent, 1918.
Rohde, H. Deutschlantl. in V orc.Zerasien. Berlin, Mittler, 1916.
Ruppin, A. Syrien als Wirtschaftsgebiet. Berlin, Mittler, 1917.
(Scholarly economic study with a 63-page appendix.)
Sachau, E. Vom asiatischen Reich der Turkei. Weimar, Kiepen-
heuer, 1915.
Sacher, H., ed. Zionism and the J ewisk future. London, Murray, 1917.
Schaefer, C. A. Die Entwicklung der Bagdadbaknpolitik. Weimar,
Kiepenheuer, 1916. Turkische Wirtschaftsgesetze. Weimar, Kiepen-
heuer, 1917.
Seherka, B. The Turkish mining regulations. Constantinople, Haim,
1917.
Schmidt, H. W. Auskunftsbuch fur c.Zen Handel mit der Tiirkei. Ber-
lin, Teubner, 1917. (Commercial.)
Schreiner, G. A. From Berlin to Bagdad.. New York, Harper, 1918.
(Observations of a war correspondent.)
Schubert, E. Deutschlanc.Zs Briicke sum Orient. Berlin, Puttkammer
and Miihlbrecht, 1915.
Schulman, L. Zur tiirkischen Agrarfrage-Paliistina tmd die fellackett
Wirtschaft. Weimar, Kiepenheuer, 1916. (Economic life in Pales-
tine.)
Schurman, J. G. The Balkatt wars, 1912-13. Princeton, University
Press, 1916.
Seton-Watson, R. W. The rise of ttationality itt the Balkans. London,
Constable, 1917. (A basic textbook on the Near East.)
Smith, G. A. Historical geography of the Holy Land. London, H~_d
der & Stoughton, 1918. (Twentieth edition.) Syria and tke Holy
Land.. London, Hodder & Stoughton, 1918.
680 MODERN TURKEY
Stern, R., G. Herlt and E. Schultze. Geld Industrialisief'ung una
Petroleumschiitze der Tiirkei. Berlin, Reimer, 1918.
Steurmer, H. Two war years in Constantinople. London, Hodder &
Stoughton, 1917. (War correspondent of the "Kolnische Zeitung''
criticises his country's Near Eastern policies.}
Stuhlmann, F. Der Kampf um Arabie. zwischer~ der Tiirkei una Eng-
land. Braunschweig, Westermann, 1916. (HistoricaL)
Strupp, K. La situation intemationale iJe la Grece (1821-1917).
Zurich, Die Verbindung, 1918. Ausgewahlte diplomatische Aklen-
stiicke zur orientalischen Frage. Gotha, Perthes, 1916.
Sykes, M. The Caliphs' last heritage. London, Macmillan, 1915.
(Fascinating, first-hand observations by a man who knew the Middle
East; much historical information.)
Sykes, P. A history of Persia. London, Macmillan, 1915.
Toynbee, A. J. Nationality amlthe war. London, Dent, 1915. Tur-
key: a past and a future. London, Hodder & Stoughton, 1917.
Trietsch, D. Die JuiJen der Tiirkei. Leipzig, Veit, 1915.
Tritonj, R. E giunto il momento di abolire le capitolazioni in Turchia.
Roma, Tip. Unione ed., 1916. Tiirkische Wirlschaftsgesetze. Weimar,
1917.
U. S. Navy. Hydrographic office. Mediterranean pa1ot. vol. iv. (H.
0. no. 154). Washington, Government Printing Office, I!T16.
Ussher, C. D. and G. H. Knapp. An American physician in Turkey.
Boston, Houghton Mifilin, 1917.
Warfield, W. The gate of Asia: a journey from the Persian gulf to
the Black Sea. New York, Putnam, 1916.
Wavell, A. J. B. A modem pilgrim in Mecca. London, Constable,
1918.
Wenyon, C. M. Human intestinal protozoa in the Near East. Lon-
don, Bale Sons and Danielsson, Ltd., 1917. (Published for the Wel-
come Bureau of Scientific Research.)
Wiedenfeld, K. Die iJeutsch-tiirkischen Wirtschaftsbeziehungen una
ihre Entwicklungsmiiglichkeiten. Munich, Duncker & Humbolt, 1915.
Willcocks, W. The irrigation of Mesopotamia. 2d ed. London, Spon,
1917. (Invaluable on this subject.)
Williams, W. L. Armenia. London, King, 1916. (Sympathetic book
by former editor of the "Strand.") -
Wirth, A. H. Vorderasien una Agypten. Stuttgart-Berlin, Union
deutsche V erlagsgesellschaft, 1916.
Wirtschaftsleben der Turkei, Das. Beitriige zur W eltwirtschaft und
Staatenkunde. grsg. im auftrage d. deutschen Vorderasien-gesellschaft,
von H. Grothe. Berlin, Reimer, 1916-.
Woods, H. C. The cradle of the war. London, Murray, 1918. War
ana diplomacy in the Balkans. London, Cox, 1915.
Woolf, L. S. The future of Constantinople. London, Allen & Unwin,
1917. (Favorably inclined towards Danube Commission plan.)
Young, G. Nationalism and war in the Near East. New York, Ox-
ford University Press, 1915. (Scholarly and broad.)
Zabel, R. Im Kampfe um Konstantinopel una die wirlschaftliche Lage
der Tiirkei wiihrena des W eltkrieges. Leipzig, Thomas, 1916.
BOOKS 681
1919-1923
Abbott, G. F. Greece and! the allies, 1914-1922. London, Methuen,
1922. (Not pro-Venizelist.) Under the Turk in Constantinople.
London, Macmillan, 1920.
Abdallah Sfer. Le mandat fran~ais et les trad!itions fran~aises en
Syrie. Paris, Pion, 1922. ·
Allen, W. E. D. The Turks in Europe. London, Murray, 1919.
Amedroz, H. F. and D. S. Margoliouth. The eclipse of the Abbasid
caliphate. London, Blackwell, 1921.
Ameer Ali, M. S. The spirit of Islam. New, rev. ed. London,
Christophers, 1922. (Work of Indian Moslem authority.)
Andre, P. J. (P. Redan). La Cilicie et le probleme ottoman. Paris,
Gauthier-Villars, 1921. L'lslam et les races. 2 vols. Paris, Guen-
ther, 1922.
Anonymous. La Syrie et re Lebanon en 1921. Paris, Larose, 1922.
Asian, K. Armenia and! the .Armenians from the earliest times until
the great war. Tr. by P. Crabites. New York, Macmillan, 1920.
Baker, R. S. Woodrow Wilson and world settlement. 3 vols. Gar~en
City, N. Y., Doubleday Page, 1922-23. (Authentic and most intimate
narration of the doings of the Big Four; volume 3 contains valuable
documents.) .
Banse, E. Der alte ttnd! der neue Orient. Leipzig, Singer, 1919. (His-
torical and descriptive.)
Barton, G. A. The religions of the world. 2d ed. Chicago, Uni-
versity of Chicago, 1919.
Basmadjian, K. J. Histoire moderne des .Armeniens depuis la chute
du royaume jusqu' a?j traite de Sewes 1325-1920. Paris, Gamber,
1922.
Bechara, E. Les industries en Syrie et au Liban. Cairo, Societe
anonyme de presse et d'edition, 1922. La regime des eaux en Syrie.
Cairo, Imp. de l'Institut franc;ais d'archeologie orientale, 1921.
Bell, G. L. Review of the civil administration of Mesopotamia. Lon-
don, H. M. Stationery Office, 1920.
Bentwich, N. DeM. Palestine of the Jews. London, Trench Trubner,
1919.
Betts, E. The Bagging of Baghdad. London, Lane, 1920.
Bott, A. J. Eastern nights-and flights. London, Blackwood, 1920.
Boutros, Ghali Wacyf. La tradition chevaleresque des .Arabes. Paris,
Pion, 1919.
Bowman, I. The new world. Yonkers, World, 1921. (Based on data
compiled by American Commission to Negotiate Peace. This book
is the best treatment of postwar political geograpfl.y.)
Bremond, E. La Cilicie en 1919-1920. Paris, Imprimerie Nationale,
1921.
Bruck, W. F. Tiirkische Baumwollwirtsckaft. Jena, Fischer, 1919.
(Cotton study issued by Institute for Maritime Trade, Kiel Uni-
versity.)
Bryce, J. B. Th1 Holy Roma• empire. •London, Macmillan, 1919.
(New edition of a classic work.) Inter..ational relations. New York,
Macmillan, 1922. (Williamstown lectures.)
682 MODERN TURKEY
Buckley, A. B. Mesopotamia as a country of future development.
Cairo, Government Press, 1919.
Bury, G. W. Pan-Islam. London, Macmillan, 1919.
Buxton, L. The black sheep of the Balkans. London, Nisbet, 1920.
Buxton, N. E. and C. L. Leese. Balkan problems and European peace.
London, Allen & Unwin, 1919. -
Callwell, C. E. The Dardanelles. Boston, Houghton Mifilin, 1919.
Life of Sir Stanley Maude. Houghton Mifilin, 1920.
Candler, E. The Long Road to Bagdad. 2 vols. London, Cassell,
1919.
Chekrezi, C. A. Albania, past and present. New York, Macmillan,
1919.
Churchill, W. S. The world crisis (1910-1915). New York, Scribners,
1923.
Cioriceanu, G. Les mandats internationaux. Paris, editions de La
Vie Universitaire, 1921.
Dako, C. A. Albania. Boston, Grimes, 1919.
Dane, E. British campaigns in the Nearer East, 1914-1918. London,
Hodder & Stoughton, 1919. (Foremost private record.)
Davis, W. S. A short history of the Near East. New York, Mac-
millan, 1922. (Fascinating, well-constructed, somewhat hast_y in
dealing with events since 1913.)
Diehl, C.· Byzance, grandeur et decadence. Paris, Flammarion, 1919.
Histoire de l'Empire byzantin. Paris, Picard, 1920. (Contributions
by the scholarly historian and philosopher, whose specialty is the
Byzantine period.)
Djemal Pasha. Memories of a Turkish statesman, 1912-1919. New
York, Doran, 1922. - (Worthwhile information, given frankly by
the notable Committee of Union and Progress diplomat.)
Doughty, C. M. Travels in Arabia Deserta. 2 vols. New ed. Lon-
don, Warner, 1921.
Driault, E. La question d'Orient depuis ses origines jusqu'a la paix
de Sevres. Paris, Alcan, 1921. (Brilliant sketch.) .
Durham, M. E. Twenty years of Balkan tangle. London, Allen &
Unwin, 1920.
Earle, E. M. Turkey, the great p·owers, and the Bagdad railway.
New York, Macmillan, 1923. (Up-to-date, accurate record of the
famous project.)
Ellison, G. An Englishwoman in Angora. New York, Dutton, 1923.
L'Espagnol de la Tramerye, P. La lutte mondiale pour le petrole.
Paris, editions de la Vie Universitaire, 1921.
Eversley, G. J. S. and V. Chirol. The Turkish Empire: Its growth and
decay. London, Unwin, 1923. (Standard work brought up to Lau-
sanne Conference.)
Fisher, S., ed. Ottoman land laws. London, Milford, 1919. (Based
on G. Young's "Corps de droit Ottoman," 1906.)
France. Ministere des affaires etrangeres. Les ajfaires balkaniques,
1912-1914. Documents diplomatiques. 2 v. Paris, Imprimerie na-
tionale, 1922.
Gaillard, G. The Turks and Europe. London, Murby, 1922. (Turko-
phile work translated, dealing with events since Mudros armistice.)
BOOKS 683
Gaulis, G. .Angora-Constantinople-Londres-Paris. Mustafa Kemal et
la politique anglaise en Orient. Paris, Colin, 1922.
Gibbons, H. A. The new map of Asia (1900-1919). New York, Cen-
tury, 1919. Europe since 1918. New York, Century, 1923.
de Gontaut-Biron, R. Comment la France s'est installee en Syrie
(1918-1919). Paris, Plon, 1923. (French viewpoint by member
M. Picot's staff.)
Grant, E. The people of Palestine. Philadelphia, Lippincott, 1921.
Gt. Brit. Admiralty. Intelligence Dept. Hantlbook of Turkey in
Europe, 1921. Handbook of Syria (including Palestine), 1920.
A manual on the Turanians and Pan-Turanianism, 1921. London,
H. M. Stationery Office.
Gt. Brit. Foreign Office. Parliamentary papers. Reports on condi-
tions in Turkish prisons. Cmd. 260, 1919. London, H. M. Sta-
tionery office, 1919. Peace Handbooks. #15, The eastern question.
#16, Turkey in Europe. #21, Macedonia. #57, Mohammedan his-
tory. #58, Turkey in Asia. #59, .Anatolia. #601 Syria and Pales-
tine. #162, Zionism. #61, .Arabia. #62, Armenia and Kurdistan.
#63, Mesopotamia. #64, Islands of the Northern and Eastern lEgea_n.
#66, France and the Levant. #148, The freedom of the seas. #149,
International rivers. #150, International canals. #151, International
congresses and conferences. #152, European coalitions, etc., since
1792. Tripartite Agreement between British Empire, France and
Italy, respecting .Anatolia. Cmd. 963, 1920. Turkish .Agreement
at Angora. Cmd. 1556, 1921. Draft mandates for Mesopotamia and
Palestine. Cmd. 1, 176, 1921. Mandate for Palestine. Cmd.. 1708,
1922. Iraq Treaty with Feisal. Cmd. 1757, 1922. Palestine man-
date. Cmd. 1785, 1923. Lausanne conference on Near Eastern af-
fairs, 1922-1923. Cmd. 1814, 1923. Treaty of Peace with Turkey
and other Instruments, Treaty Series 16, 17, 18, 1923. London,
H. M. Stationery Office, 1919-23.
Gt. Brit. War Office. Official history of the war. Medical services.
v. 1. London, H. M. Stationery Office, 1921.
Haldane, A. L. The insurrection in Mesopotamia, 1920. Lon!Ion,
Blackwood, 1922. (Writer is the noted British general.)
Hall,~· J., comp. The inland water transport in Mesopotamia. Lon-
don, Constable, 1921.
Hall, W. H. The Near East. New York, Interchurch Press, 1920.
(Religious in tone, thoroughly fair, by member faculty American
University at Beirut.)
Harbord, J. G. Conditions in the Near East: Report of the American
Military Mission to .Armenia. 66 Cong. 2d sess., S. doc. 266.
Washington, Government Printing Office, 1920.
Har Dayal. Forty-four months in Germany and Turkly, February,
1915 to October, 1918. London, King, 1920. (Mediocre description
by an active Indian revolutionisl)
Hay, W. R. Two years in Kurdistan. London, Sidgwick & Jackson,
1921. (Chronicle by a British political agent.)
Helfferich, K. Die deutsche Tiirkei Politik. Berlin, Bassische Buch-
handlung, 1921. Georg von Siemans: Ein Lebensbild. Leipzi~1
684 MODERN TURKEY
Steuergesetz, 1922. (Biography of eonspicuons German promoter
by his son-in-law.)
Hewett, J. P. Beporl for the Army Council on Mesopotamia. Lon-
don, H. M. Stationery Office, 1919. (Economic development, 191S-
1919, described by former chief political officer and civil commis-
sioner.) Some imiWessiofiS of Mesopotamia in 1919. London, H. M.
Stationery Office, 1920.
Hogarth, D. G. Arabia. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1922. (Excellent
brief history.)
Hohenzollern, W. von. My memoirs, 187S-1918. New York, Scrib-
ners, 1922.
Honse, E. M. and C. Seymour, editors. What really happened at Paris.
New York, Scribners, 1921. (Public lectures by members of American
Commission to Negotiate Peace.)
Hubbard, G. E. The day of the crescent. Cambridge, University Press,
1920.
Jastrow, M. The Eastern question and its solution. Philadelphia,
Lippincott, 1920. Zionism ana the future of Palestine. New York,
.Maemillan, 1919.
Jeancard, P. L'Anatolie. • Paris, Li'brairie Fran!:Sise, 1919.
Johnson, C. R., ed. Constantinople today. New York, Macmillan,
1922. (Pioneer social study depicting conditions in 1920.)
Kallen, H. M. Zionism and world politics. Garden City, N. Y.,
Doubleday Page, 1921.
Karajian, H. A. Mineral resources of Armenia and Anatolia. New
·York, Annen Technical Book Co., 1920.
Kay, D. M. Semitic religiofiS: Hebrew, Jewish, Christian, Moslem.
Edinburgh, Clark, 1923.
Kemal, Ismail. The memoirs of Ismail Kemal Bey. Ed. by S. Story.
New York, Dutton, 1922.
Kennedy, A. L. Old diplomacy and new, 1t!l6-1922. London, Murray,
1922. (British record.)
Kiazim, Omar. Angora et Berlin. Paris, L':Edition Universelle, 1922.
(Severe denunciation of Kemalists.)
King-Crane Mission. New York, "Editor and Publisher," Dec. 2, 1922.
(Not published officially.) •
Kleibomer, G. Das KOfiStantinopel 1lon Heute. Eisleben, Iso, 1919,
(Germany's transitory influences.)
Korff, S. A. Russia's foreign relatiofiS during the last half century.
New York, Macmillan, 1922. (Williamstown lectures by a subsequent
Columbia professor of history.)
Landes, E. W. C. In Kut and captivity. London, Murray, 1919.
Leland, F. W. With the M. T. in Mesopotamia. London, Foster
Groom, 1920.
Lepsius, J. •Deutschland una Armenien, 1914-1918. Potsdam, Der
Tempelverlag, 1919. (Contemporary history.)
Liman von Sanders, 0. Funf Jahre Tiirkei. Berlin, Scheil, 1919.
(Author noted German commander in charge of Turkish army.)
Luke, H. C. and E. Keith-Roach. The handbook of Palestine. New
¢. J.ondon, Macmillan, 1922. (Up-to-date; invaluable for travellers.)
BOOKS 685
Lybyer, A. H. The question of the Near East. New York, Institute
of International Education, 1921. (Reliable study outline.)
Lyell, Thomas. The ins and outs of Mesopotamia. London, Philpot,
1923. (Timely account by civilian magistrate of Baghdad.)
Maccas, L. L'Hellemsme de L'Asie mineure. Paris, Berger-Levrault,
1919. (Strongly pro-Greek.)
Mathews, B. J. The riddle of Nearer Asia. New York, Doran, 1919.
(Characterized by late Viscount Bryce as an admirable, brief sum-
mary.)
Maxwell, D. A dweller in Mesopotamia. New York, Lane, 1921.
The last crusade. New York, Lane, 1920. A painter in Palestine.
New York, Lane, 1921. (The sketches of an artist.)
McCrackan, W. D. New Palestine. New York, Doubleday Page, 1922.
(Comprehensive.)
Miles, S. B. The countries antl tribes of the Persian Gulf. 2 vols.
London, Harrison, 1919.
Miller, W. Essays on the Latin Orient. Cambridge, University Press,
1921. The Balkans. London, Unwin, 1923. The Ottoman Empire
and its successors (1801-1922), Cambridge, University Press, 1923.
(Standard treatise.)
Mission Scientifique du Maroc. Le Bolchevisme et L'lslam. 2 vols.
Paris, Leroux, 1922.
Moore, E. C. The spread of Christianity in the modern world. Chi-
cago, University of Chicago Press, 1919. (Dale lectures; authorita-
tive; one chapter devoted to Moslem world.)
Morel, Mme. From an Eastern embassy. Philadelphia, Lippincott,
1920.
Moseley, G. V. H. Mandatory over Armenia. 66 Cong. 2d. sess., S.
doc. 281. Washington, Government Printing Office, 1920. (Military
section of the Harbord report.)
Mowrer, P. S. Balkanized Europe. New York, Dutton, 1922. (Based
on dispatches of well-known Chicago publicist.)
Mufty-Zade K. Zia. Speaking of the Turks. New York, Duffield,
1922. (Interesting description of life among Turkish high society
in Stamboul.)
Nicholson, R. A. Studies in Islamic mysticism. Cambridge, Uni-
versity Press, 1921.
Nicol, E. Les allies et la crise orientale. Paris, 1922.
O'Leary, DeL. E. Arab thought and its place in history, London,
Trubner, 1922.
Ostrorog, L. TI.e Turkish problem. Tr. by W. Stephens. London,
Chatto & Windus, 1919. (Succinct good analysis written originally
for French readers.)
Pai!J.ares, M. Le Kemalisme devant les allies. Constantinople, Le
Bosphore, 1922. (Unsympathetic account by leading French jour-
nalist of Constantinople.)
Panaretoff, S. Near Eastern affair• antl conditions. New York, Mac-
millan, 1922. (Lectures by Bulgarian diplomat, a former stud~t
and teacher at Robert College.)
Parfit, J. T. Marvellous Mesopotamia. London, Partridge, 1920.
686 MODERN TURKEY
Pernot, M. La questi011 tKrqt.te. Paris, Grassety 1923.
Philby, H. St. J. B. The heart of Arabia. 2 v. London, ConstaJ!le,
1922. (Monumental reeord of fust-hand observations by British
politieal officer.)
Pirie-Gordon, H. A guide-book to central Syria. Jerusalem, 1920.
A guide to fWrlhem Palestine alld BotAthem Syria. Jerusalem, 1920.
Poynter, Mrs. M. A. M. When Turkey 1l1tJS TKrl&ey. London, Rout-
ledge, 1921.
Powell, E. A. By camel and car to the peacock tkrORe. New York,
Century, 1923. Tke struggle for plnDer in Moslem Asia. New
York, Century, 19?..3. (Interesting journalistic records.)
Price, C. The rebirth of Turkey. New York, Seltzer, 1923.
Puaux, R. Comtantir10ple et la question tl'Orient. Paris, 1920.
Ravndal, G. B. The origin of the capitulations alld of the cORBKlar
institution. Washington, Goverumeut Printing Office, 1921.
Rawlinson, A. Adr:entures in tke Near East, 1918-1923. London,
Melrose, 19?..3.
Redan, P. La Cilicie et le probleme oUoman. Paris, Gauthier-Villais,
192L
Renner, R. Der Aussenhandel der Tiirkei f1Dr dem W eltkriege. Ber-
lin, Auswart Amt, 1919. (Turkey's foreign trade statistically ex-
amined.)
Repington, C. The first world 100r, 1914-1918. London, Constable,
1920.
Reynardson, H. B. Mesopotamia, 1914-1915. London, Melrose, 1919.
Rihbany, A. M. Wise men from the East and from the West. B<IS-
ton, Houghton Mifilin, 1922. (Syrian-Ameriean clergyman espouses
Levantine civilization.)
Rohrbach, P. Armenien. Stuttgart, Enge]horn, 1919.
Roosevelt, K. War in the garden of Eden. London, Murray, 1920.
Samne, C. La Syrie. Paris, Bossard, 1920. (Valuable data.)
Schevill, F. History of the Balka1t Peninsula from the earliest times
to the present day. New York, Harcourt, 1922. (Trustworthy in-
terpretation focused primarily npon Tnrkey.)
Schlicklin, J . .Angora: L'aube de La Turquie ftotAt:eUe, 1919-23. Paris,
Berger-Levrault, 1923.
Schreiner, G. A., ed. Entente diplomacy and the world, 1909-14. New
York, Pntnam, 1921. (Valuable documentary evidence.)
Sei.,"''lobosc, H. Turcs et Turquie. Paris, Payot, 1920.
Sidebotham, H. England and Palesti•e. London, Constable, 1919.
(Author is leading British military writer.)
Simon, L. and L. Stern, ed. Awakeni•g Palestine. London, Murray,
1923.
Sloane, W. M. The BalkaRS. rev. and enl ed. New York, Abin.,udon,
1920.
Sokolow, N. History of Ziotaism, 1600-1918. 2 vols. London, Long-
mans, 1919.
Still, J. A prisot~er ift Turkey. London, Lane, 1920.
Stoddard, T. L. The •ew VJorld of Isla,.. New York, Scribn~ 1921.
(A sensational treatise.)
BOOKS 687
Stevens, E. S. By Tigris and Euphrates. London, Hurst and Bracket,
1923.
Straus, 0. S. Under four administralions. Boston and New York,
Houghton Mi.ffiin, 1922.
Sykes, M. Dar-ul-Islam. London, Bickers, 1920.
Tabet, J. J. La Syrie. Paris, Lemerre, 1920.
Temperley, H. W. V., ed. .A. history of the Peace conference of Paris.
5 vols. London, Frowde, 1920. (Exhaustive.)
Tennant, J. E. In the clouds above Bagdad. London, Bohmer, 1920.
Townshend, C. V. F. My campaign. New York, McCann, 1920.,
(Military history somewhat apologetic in tone.)
Toynbee, A. J. Th9 western question in Greece and Turkey. London,
Constable, 1922. (Timely and scholarly.)
Trietsch, D. Paliistitta Handbuch. Berlin, Welt-Verlag, 1919. (Mis-
cellaneous information, well-indexed.)
U.S. Navy. Hydrographic office. The Black Sea Pilot. 1st ed. 1920.
(H. 0. No. 155.) Washington, Government Printing Office, 1920.
Vaka, .D. The unveiled ladies of Stamboul. Boston, Houghton
Miffiin, 1923. .
Viand, J. &.e. L. M. J. (Loti, P.). La mort de notre chere France en
Orient. Paris, Calmann-Levy, 1920. (Strongly pro-French and
pro-Turk.) ..
Viand, J. i.e. L. M. J. et son fils S. Viand. Supre~s visions d'Orient.
21 ed. Paris, Calmann-Levy1 192L
Vowles, A. Wanderings with. a camera in Mesopotamia. London,
Kent, 1920.
Whittingham, G. N. The ho~ of fadeless splendour. London,
Hutchinson, 1921.
Williams, T. Turkey: a world problem. Garden City, N. Y., Double-
day Page, 1921. (Lowell lectures; strong plea for. an American
mandate.)
Woolley, C. L. Dead towns and living men. London, Milford, 1920.
Yale, W. Report to the King-Crane Mission, July 261 1919. (Hoover
War Library manuscript collection.)
Zahm, J. A. From Berlin to Bagdad and Babylon. New York,
Appleton, 1922.
Zwemer, S. M. Th-e influence of animism ott Islam. New York, Mac-
millan, 1920. ·
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL SOURCES
Albin, P. Les grartds traites politiquesj recueil des principaux textes
diplomatiques depuis 1815 jusqu'a nos jours. 2 ed. Paris, Alcan1
1912.
Anderson, F. M. and A. S. Hersey. Handbook for the diplomatic his-
tory of Europe, Asia and Africa. Washington, Government Printing
Office, 1918.
Bengesco, G. Essai d'une notice bibliographique sur la question
d'Orient. Orient Europeen 1821-1897. Bruxelles, Lacomblex, 1897.
Cambridge Medieval History, The. 3 vols. Cambridge, University
Press, 1911-1922. Cambridge Modern History, The. 13 vqls. and
atlas. Cambridge, University Press, 1902-1912.
Cvijic!, J. et al. Bibliographie geographique de la peninsule balkanique.
5 vols. Belgrade, 1901-1908. (Standard geographical work.)
Czaplicka, M. A. C. Turks of central Asia in history and at the present
day. Oxford, Clarendon, 1918.
Hammer-Purgstall, J., von. Histoire de l'Empire ottoman, depuis son
origine jusqu'a nos jours, par J. de Hammer. 18 vols. Paris, Belli-
zard, 1835-43.
Hasluck, F. W. Notes on manuscripts in the British Museum relating
to Levant geography and travel. London, 1905-6. (British School
at Athens.)
Heidborn, A. Manuel de droit public et administratif de l'Empire
Ottoman. 2 vols. Vienna-Leipzig, Stern, 1908-12. (Valuable for
reference.)
Houtsma, M. Th.; T. W. Arnold, R. Bassett and R. Hartmann. vol. 1
and suppl. (A-I jd). The encyclopadia of Islam. London, Luzac,
1908. (Thorough.)
Jamal al-Din. A short bibliography of writers on Turkish history and
a collection of lives of the most important Turkish historians. Con-
stantinople, 1896.
Jovanovic!, V. M. An English bibliography of the Near Eastern ques-
tion, 1481-1906. Belgrade, 1906.
Junge, von R. Archiv fur Wirtschaftsforschung im Orient. heft 1-3.
Berlin, Reimer, 1916-18.
Kerner, R. J. Slavic Europe. Cambridge, Harvard University Press,
1918. (Bibliography covers period to date of publication.)
Margoliouth, D. S. The early development of Mohammedanism. Lon-
don, Williams and Norgate, 1914. (Careful research.) Moham-
medanism. London, Williams and Norgate, 1911.
Myers, D. P. Manual of collections of treaties and of collections
relating to treaties. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1922.
New York Public Library. List of works in the New ·York public
library relating to the Near Eastern question and the Balkan state:.
including European Turkey and modern Greece. New York, 1910.
688
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL SOURCES 689
Noradounghian, G. Recueil dlactes internationaux de l'Empire otto-
man. 4 vols. Paris, Pichon, 1897-1903.
Penzer, Norman M. The annotated bibliography of Sir Richard Fran-
cis Burton. London, Philpot, 1923.
Pertsch, L. K. W. Verzeichnis der tiirkischen Handschriften der
koniglichen Bibliothek zu Berlin. Berlin, Asher, 1889.
Rehatsek:, E. Catalogue raisonne of the Arabic, Hindustani, Persi~n
and Turkish mss. in the Mulla Firuz library. Bombay, 1873.
Rien, C. Catalogue of the Turkish mss. in the British Museum. Lon-
don, Longmans, 1888.
Royal Asiatic Society. Catalogue of the Arabic, Persian, Hindustani.
antl Turkish mss. in the Library of the Royal Asiatic Society. Lon-
don, Royal Asiatic Society Journal, 1892.
U. S. Dept. of State. Catalogue of treaties, 1814-1918. Washington,
Government Printing Office, 1919. .A tentative list of treaty collec-
tions. Washington, Government Printing Office, 1919.
U. S. Tariff Commission. Handbook of commercial treaties. Wash-
ington, Government Printing Office, 1922.
Weir, T. H. The Persian and Turkish manuscripts in the Hunterian
library of the University of Glasgow. London, "Royal Asiatic So-
ciety Journal," 1906.
INDEX
In the following index, entries relating to colleges and universities, fuel,
lakes, mines and minerals, mountains and hills, rivers, schools, ships and
shipping, vehicles, wars, weapons, weights and measures, have been placed
under the general title instead of making individual•entries, thus enabling
the reader to gather up this material with a minimum of research. An
exception has been made in the case of petroleum, because of the importance
of this question in the Near East, and information concerning this matter
will be found under "Petroleum."
Moat important abbreviatioM tue4 in tkill ~

ad min. • ••••••••••••••••••••••••• administration
agric. • ••••••••••••••••••••.••••• agriculture
Amer••.•••••••••••••••••••••••• American or Americans
Brit.••••••••••••••••••.••••••••• British or Britain
coil. . ...••.•••• ~ ................ college or colleges
econ. • •••••••••••••••••••••••••• economic
Ger.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••• German, Germans or Germany
govt. • ........................... government
hosp. . • , ........................ hospital
Ital............................. Italian or Italy
mt., mts.•••••••••••••••••••••••• mountain, mountains
Ott. .. .......................... Ottoman
pop. • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• population
prov. • .......................... province
rdg. • ........................... regarding
rept. ............................ report
ry, ............................. railway
terr. • .•.•••••••••••••••••••••••• territory
univ .•••••••••••••••••••••••••••• university or universities
A Ada Bazar, Asia Minor: on ry., 225:

modern plow used on plain of,
Abattoirs: needed in Turkey, 374. 292 ; minerals in, 319.
Abdullah (king of Transjordania) : Adalia (city, sanjak, and prov.),
interested in education, 118. Anatolia: an important port, 212;
Abyssinia: Jews in, 86. on highway, 218; I taL contact
Acadt-mies: European, 178; Imperial with. 300, 510, 558, 563-4, 613,
civil, 310: Turki!!.h military, 644, 654.
448. Adams, Walter Booth : sketch ;
Acids: various, named, 318. chapter in this book, 155-76.
Acorns: used in tanning, 338. Adana (city, vilayet, and prov.),
AC're ( Akka), Asia Minor: assigned Anatolia: a Turkish prov., 110;
to Brit., 615, 617; allied privileges Anatolian water basin, 267, 268;
In, 619. interior trade center, 216; its
Actors: have organ In Constanti- river, 217; highway in, 218-19;
nople, 458-9. ry. in, or projected, 228, 368, 381:
691
692 INDEX
resources, 267, 288, 319, 324; for- Agencies : mercantile, 352; tele-
est and water resources, 303-4 ; graphic, 472.
modern plow used on plain of, 292 ; Agents: purchasing, 220; duties and
large estates near, 293; consumes activities of land, 243, 253 ; forest,
much salt, 324; expenditures, 407; 307; business, in Turkey, 343-4;
statistics, 284-5; apportioned to Levantine business, 346 ; govt.,
France, 617 ; Ita!. trade privileges, assist Ott. Public Debt, 355-6 ; for
619. newspapers, 471; before Mixed
Aden (port on Red Sea) : Jews Arbitral Tribunal, 666.
trade in, 94 ; its frontier, 616. Agreements: various instances of
Adnan Bey (Turkish statesman) : political, 493, 509-10, 528, 542,
. activities, 424, 563, 668. 609-12, 613-14, 614-16, 619-20,
Adriatic Question: in peace confer- 633-4, 637-42, 643-6, 651-3, 653-5.
ence, 556. Agriculture : main industry in Le-
Adrianople (city, vilayet, and vant, 282-3; important in Turkey,
prov.), European Turkey: men- 330; backward and primitive in
tioned, 24 ; distance from Con- Turkey, 9, 34, 280, 292, 297, 396;
stantinople, 224; Jews settle in, methods, 66, 292-7; land unfit for,
88 ; modern plow used in, 292 ; 226; can be made profitable in
lignite in, 314; foreign commerce, Near East, 281, 300; reform
335 ; financial returns from, in- needed, 281 ; how to improve, 301 ;
complete, 392 ; Turks recapture, young men abandon, 298 ; aid to,
609; remains Turkish, 19, 653, recommended, 427; in various
658. places, 40, 66, 115, 280, 301 ; per-
Advertising and Advertisements : formed by Arabian women, 153 ;
backward in Turkey, 471-2; in studied, 120, 128 ; should be
Turkish papers, 471, 473-4. taught, 136; Ger. capital will aid
Afghanistan, Central Asia: Turkish- Russian, 18; concessions cover,
speaking people in, 511 ; to be in- 222, 363, 378-9 ; rys. ·develop, 227 ;
cluded in new Empire, 513; a Mos- sowing and harvest time, 293 ; ex-
lem State, 513; mostly Sunnites, emption from customs duty stimu-
513 ; many Turanians in, 513 ; lates, 341; taxes on, in Turkey,
neutral zone near, 611 ; Russian 395; govt. expenditures for, 407;
revolution affects, 16-17; specula- products exported, 337; statistics,
tion rdg. its Emir, 19; power of 284-5, 287. See also Food and
khalifa:te in, 105; diplomatic plan Foodstuffs; and Tools and Imple-
rdg., 512; Brit. policy, 546-7; ments.
probably will react against West- Aharonian, Avetis (Armenian poet) :
ern civilization, 550; influence activities, 528. ·
of Kemalist agreements in, Aidin (citY. vilayet, and prov.),
563; Turk advance into feared, Anatolia: its port, 320; on ry.,
569. 227 ; lands and forests in and
Afghan-Kemalist Agreement: text, near, 284, 294, 303-4, 305 ; min-
643-4. eral resources, 312, 314, 316, 318,
Africa: Turkey's influence in, 11, 320, 321, 324; statistics, 284, 285;
13 ; Moslem States in, 438; Mo- its trade, 206; Ita!. influence in,
hammedan sect in, 535 ; Ger. de- 360; situation, 629.
sires colonies in, 510 ; reason for Ain Feejee, Asia Minor: good water
its conquest, 521; Turkish atti- at, 160.
tude toward Hal. colonies, 654. Aintab, Asia Minor : described, 158 ;
Afiun Qarahisar, Asia Minor: in- hosp. in, 174.
terior trade center, 216; on ry., Akchai, Anatolia : a water basin,
227 ; resources, 288, 324 ; Ital. con- 268; on ry., 323; exports, 323.
tact, 360, 644. Ak Dagh : zinc mine, 371.
Aga Khan (Indian Mohammedan) : Akka. See Acre.
speculation concerning, 19; activ- Ak Su, Anatolia: a water basin, 268.
ities, 105-6, 418. Alamut, Persia: location, 109.
INDEX 693
Ala Shehr, Smyrna prov.: mines at Ali, Ameer (Indian leader) : activi-
or near, 316-17, 322. ties, 105-6; letter, 418.
Albania : Turkey loses, 82 ; closed to Ali Bey Hoyuk, Anatolia: location
Turkish newspapers, 474; embar- and water supply, 275.
go in, 493 ; Turkish policy in, 502; Ali Haydar Midhat Bey : thanked,
becomes State, 505 ; European at- 6.
titude toward, 505; Turkey seeks Ali Suavi (Turkish theologian):
alliance with, 654. activities, 452, 481. ·
Albanians : habitat and description, Al Kantara, Asia Minor: on ry., 358.
34; language described, 36-7; Allatinis: prominent Jewish family,
speak Turkish, 37; subject to Sul- 92.
tan, 38-9 ; Moslems, 38-9 ; Chris- Allenby, Viscount Edmund Henry
tians among, 153 ; viziers, 79; Hindman: British expeditionary
have periodicals, 462; create forces under, 303; activities, 540,
trouble in Turkey, 488; join Com- 541; cited, 545; Kemal opposes,
mittee of Union and Progress, 502. 557.
Alcohol : tax on increased, 409. Alliance Francaise Israelite Univer-
Aleih (Beirut summer resort): its selle: has representative in Tur-
water supply, 160. key, 86; aims and activities, 86,
Alemdar Kuchuk Koi, Anatolia : lo- 91-2.
cation and water supply, 275. Alliances : Russo-Turkish not feared,
Aleppo (city, vilayet, and prov.): 17; Turkish with various powers,
mentioned, 218; Mosul compared 492, 512. See alao Allies.
to, 22; a modem city, 158; men- Allied and Associated Powers: cause
tioned in early letters, 185 ; an old high expenses in Turkey, 337;
site, 187; poor water supply, 161, Turkish claims judged by, 357;
652; roads in, 218; ry. _planned transfer gold to Paris, 405; have
for, 366, 615; produces salt, 324; commissioners in Turkey, 433;
cholera in, 164; crop statistics, treatment of Armenians by, 526;
285; Jews in, 92, 94; its bazaars, their aims in Near East, 554.
331, 342; in Arab dependency, Allies (Allied Powers): activities,
542-3 ; Kemal opposes Allenby at, etc., 16-17, 19, 71, 219, 232, 385,
557; districts near, excluded from 386, 426, 448, 467, 470, 546, 547,
agreement, 614. 553-4, 555, 556, 558, 561, 572,
Alexander the Great; mentioned, 11 ; 563-4, 565, 566, 570-1, 572-3, 609-
builds New Empire, 194; his policy, 12, 625, 629, 631, 658, 659; mis-
77 ; brings Greek culture to Syria, takes by, 412, 556, 561, 567-9;
187-8; his sarcophagus in Con- attitude toward capitulations,
stantinople, 178; remains of his 431; intentions toward Turkey,
successors, 177. 469 ; attitude toward Angora As-
Alt>xander (Grecian king): death, sembly, 563; attitude toward, in
564. Turkey, 465; their effect on Tur-
Alexandretta, Syria : loeation, 360; key, 468; feeling against in
in Grecian Empire, 77 ; on high- Orient, 546; had no Turkish
way, 218-19; port construction at, press organization, 463; blame U.
367, 381; a free port, 615, 618; S. for world unrest, 527 ; not
ry. extension to, planned, 369; united, 549, 560, 564, 660 ; their
trade, 213, 335 ; in French sphere, tool, 557-8; their failure in S~vres
542 ; excluded from agreement, treaty, 564; report of inquiry at
614; privileges in, 619. Smyrna, 629 ; claims transferred
Alexandria, Egypt: patriareh at, to, 636. See alao the several al-
113; articles shipped from, 216; lied countries.
Napoleon's failure to hold, 493. Al 1\ladina ( !tledina), Arabia : a
Algeria: women of, ignorant, 152. holy city, 201, 218 ; pop., 392;
Ali (Mohammed's son-in-law): be- shrine, 534; Wahabi sect in, 535.
comes khalif, 107; attitude Allies, Balkan: activities, 504-5.
toward, 110 ; killed, 107. Almond, Nina : thanked, 6.
694 Th"'DEX
Alphabets: various kinds. 35, 36, 37, on, 129; Greek education com-
65. pared to, 130; hosp. in Neu East,
A.Itaras: ;Jewish family in Damas- 170, 176; arehEological activities
cus, 92. in Neu East, 183, 189-90, 192;
Altars : in old temples, 194. relinquish capitulations, 24; Ar-
A.Itum-Tash. Asia Minor: mine at, menians aid, 71 ; attitude toward
319-20. Armenians, 14-5, 532 ; early con-
Alms: Moslems obligated to give, tact of Armenians -With. 449;
240. Greek buSiness contact with, 85;
Amasia. Asia Minor: interior trade J"ews trade with, 94; Turks grant
center, 216; on highway, 218; ry. concession to, 101 ; attitude of
projected for, 230 ; its apples, 290; Turkey toward, 132; contact with,
;rews in. 88. and various activities in. Turkey,
Amasis, Egyptian ruler: contact 204, 214, 286, 317, 343. 344, 361-
with Greeks, 436-7. 2, 376. 379, 446, 461. 469, 469-70,
Amasra, Asia Minor: location, 314. 501, 527, 558; Japanese compete
Ambassadors and Envoys: future, in with, 332 ; best bnsiness poliey
Turkey, 424; conclude capitula- for, in Near East, 344; cannot be-
tions, 43;'H); in Byzantimn, 4.36 ; come Turks, 446; historian, cited,
editors as, 454 ; recalled from Tor- 49"....-3 ; troops in France, 541.
key, 506; special allied, 568; hold Amicis, Edmondo de : cited, 141, 331.
conference, 479 ; provided for in Amman, Syria : on site of Philadel-
treaty, 6t4; German, 369; British, phia, 189 ; Arabs in. 1~20; on
439, 480, 610; Rnssian, 457, 611 ; mail route, 232; capital of Trllll8-
French, 610, 611 ; American, 616- jonlania, 551 ; excavations at,
17. 189-90.
Amberk: defined, 269. Amon: J"ewish family in Constan-
America (generally meaning U. 8.): tinople, 91.
negroes in. 36 ; Orieutals educated Amphitheaters: ancient, owned by
in. 158; Jews in. 92, 93; Arme- State, 262.
nians m.-530; many sects in. 115; .Amraphil : Bee Khammurabi.
various diseases in. 165, 166; Amsterdam, Xetherlands: Armenian
hosp. supplied from. 175; trade press in. 65.
with X ear East. 28S-9, 290, 293; Amusements : various, 153.
imitation Turkish rugs made in. Anamoor, Adana prov.: mine in.
338; syndicate controlled in. 362; 319.
has community of interest with Anarchy: feared in Turkey, 459..
Europe, 446 ; naturalization in, Anatolia: how best to see, 33-4; de-
446 ; news of, published in Turk- fined, 7; equivalent to Asia Minor,
ish papers, 457 ; clergy in, cited, 11 ; included in Turkish Empire,
521. 11, 266; center of Turkish Em-
American Board of Missions: pub- pire, 512; pop.., 9, 42; peasants in.
lish Armenian paper, 453-4; re- 33, 34. 45, 525; mountain bandits,
port. cited, 530. - 33 ; many races in. 34. 221 ;
American High Commission: Turk- Greeks in. 46. 49, 77, 78, 85 ; pop..,
ish statement prepared for, 444-5. now homogeneous, 425; Turkish-
American Military Mission. Bee speaking pe()ple in. 511 ; Tnranian
Harbord Mission. race predominates in. 513 ; Arme-
American Red Cross: in Neu East. nians in. 517. 528. Rivers, 217,
430. 229, 268 ; lakes, 268 ; hi~b land
Americans: few visit Turkey, 1; near sea, 267; Persian Gulf con-
have reputation for fairness, 3 ; nected with, 267 ; water basins in,
diverse types among, 58-9; called 267-8, forests, 303-4, 308; min-
..Franks," 358; religions distinc-- erals in, 31.3, 318, 371; a prden
tion repugnant to, 101 ; educa- spot, 372 ; its crops. M; agric.
tional efforts in Neu East. 118. primitive in. M; Hittites i:rripte,
1314, 1.37; Greek schools modeled 274; agric. education needed in,
INDEX 695
282; resources, 211, 267 ; owner- Anglo-Saxons: attitude toward
ship of land in, 23S-9; labor cheap Turks, 45 ; described, 350.
in, 281. Coast towns described, 83, Angora (city and vilayet), Ana-
208 ; interior towns, 34, 423-4 ; tolia: its ancient name, 25; loca,
various cities, 296 ; houses and tion and description, 2~5, 88, 100,
streets, 34; life in the interior, 423-4; compared to Washington,
34 ; Mohammedanism in, 41, 42 ; 450; distance from Constanti-
in bloc of Mohammedan States, nople, 205 ; difficult to get out of,
513: Sunnites in, 513: Turkish 208; fire in, 2~5. 374: monuments
Orthodox Church in, 100, 420: and churches in, 66. An interior
power of Greek archbishops in, trade center, 216 ; has to import
419 : status of schools in, 118 ; salt, 324: ry. projected for, 230,
teaching to be in Turkish, 13S-9 : 365, 367 ; land and crop statistics,
old history of, uncovered, 197 : in- 284, 285 ; its pears famous, 290:
termarriage in, 42 : European Tur- estates in, 294 : forest area in,
key more prosperous than, 83 : 304 ; minerals in, 316, 321, 323,
Syria compared to, 270. Rys. in, 371 ; press at, 428, 450 : has good
225, 229-30, 236 (Bee also Rail- news service, 473. Capital of Turk-
ways) ; wireless in, 233 : n~tws ish Republic, 2, 24, 104, 105, 106,
service from interior, rudimentary, 208, 411, 413, 422, 423-4, 565; An-
473. Political unrest in, 33: saved gora Assembly, 22, 26, 351, 412,
to Turkey, 82: commerce, 211, 518, 551, 562 : delegate from, at
342, 371 (Bee also Commerce) ; Lausanne conference, 61 ; Brit.
reforestation possible in, 308: consul in, 43 ; Jews settle in, 88 :
Russia interested in East Ana- Halideh Edib Ranum interviewed
tolia, 360 ; Brit. interests in, 371 : at, 142; new church official at,
Ger. interests, 371: Greek inva- 421: Izzet Pasha in, 565; Sultan's
sion, 469, 559: Greeks hope de- flight heard of, in, 659.
cision rdg., 566; Greece must pay Angora Nationalist State: Kemal
for damage in, 662; I tal. interests, founds, 412.
563-4, 654 ; European powers Animals : Turks like and breed, 40 ;
seize terr. in, 502. Financial state- traffic in, declines in interior, 224:
ment, 391 ; reason for inadequacy used for transportation purposes,
of revenues, 39-!: general economic 220, 273, 286, 306; statistics, 289:
data, 579. Conferenee of dt>legates dt·aft, 293; drivers give good
from, 425-6: Constantinople loses service, 220-1. Various enumer-
its importance to, 469, 470; na- ated, 3, 13, 32, 33, 40, 41, 110, 150,
tional movement in, 469, 559 ; 159, 161, 162, 163, 172, 205-6, 220,
Kemal inspector general in, 557 ; 221, 280, 289, 290, 293, 301, 305,
disorders feared in, 558; war in, 306, 316, 322, 330, 331, 338, 341,
6ri3. See alBa Ottoman Empire; 372, 445, 540, 564, 622-3. '
Turkey; and Turks. An Najaf, Mesopotamia: a holy
Anatolians: their savings small, town, 277.
331. Annapolis, Maryland: wireless at,
Antalia, Anatolia: a water basin, 233.
267. Annuities: Ott. govt. grants, 366.
Ancora, Anatolia: loses commer~ial Antioch, Syria: loeation and de-
importance, 89. scription, 158, 188, 236: patri-
Aneyra: ancient name of Angora arch in, 99, 113; Hellenic culture
(q. t1.), 25. in, 188; impossible to excavate en-
Angeli : mentioned, 57. tirely, 188; excavations at, 199.
Anglo-French Declaration: text, Antiques: found in Turkey, 177:
626-7. preserved by Ott. govt., 177-8 ;
Anglo-German Agreement : men- sold in Smyrna, 199; owned by
tioned, 382. · State, 262; exportation prohib-
Anglo-Jewish Association: activities, ited, 262; rights of ownership in,
92. 262.
696 Dt'DEX
Antwerp: J"ewish bank at, 89; J"ews pendenee, 541-2, 544; independ-
in,92. ence promised, 543, 545, 614; State
Apamea., Syria : location and de- possible, 614; nationalism spread-
scription, 188; ruins in, 189. ing among, 417; separatist tenden-
Aphrodisias, Asia Minor: ruins in, cies among, 5.37; Bedonina dislike
194. any govt., 537, 548; promises to,
Appendices: to this work, 576-689. not kept, 541-2, 546.. Kurds hos-
Apponyi: signs protocol, 442.. tile to, 22; attitude toward, and
Aqaba, Turkey : English fire on, relations with, Turks. 22, 38-9, 56-
506; Turkish forces at, 507. 7, 454, 462, 488, 503, 521, 533,
Aqueducts : ancient. 262. 535, 537,538, 539, 614, 618; claim
Arobaju: defined, 220. Mosnl region, 22; Armenians
Arabia : area and pop., 584; deserts compete with, 51 ; attitude toward
in, 191. 218. 534; compared to Zionist movement, 53, 5-H; bnild
Pompeii, 191 ; poor by nature, J"ewish city, 95; closely affiliated
394; monuments in, 187 ; arch- to, 5-H ; conquer Spain, 91 ; char-
EOlogical problem, 187; camels acter of their conquests, 521 ; at-
in, 221; minerals in, 313; ry• .in, titude toward, and relations with,
222; financial statement for, 391 ; Brit., 167, 5.38. 539, 540, M-1-5.
statistics for, not complete, 392; 546., 549 ; hostile to Brit. mandate
Turkey controls parts of. 11; part in Palestine, 549; will not leave
of old Ott. Empire, 266; revolts Palestine, 65.5 ; attitude toward,
in, 101; Turkey loses, 82, 289, 5L'J ; and relations with, allies, 510, 5.38.
independence in, 611,613, 616., 617, 541-2, 543, 54.5, 546, 549. 613,
621 ; Brit. covet. 609 ; stndents 626-7; sack holy cities, 53.5 ; in-
from, attend Amer. nniv., 119. fluenced by money, 5.39; appeal to
Arab Question : described, 533-5L U. S., 5-H; represented at peace
Arabs: habitat. viii, 21, 56-7, 395, conference, 545 ; oppose French
533, 536, 550, 614 ; most leave in Cilicia, 546; in mandated terri-
Asia Minor, 58; tribes, etc., 19-20, tory, 547; exchange rulers, 549;
104, 101, 544. 549 ; large families civil dissension among, 619.
among, 23 ; purest branch of Arai : peoples of region of. 39.
Semitic race, 56 ; not apt to fuse Arbitration : requested for Armenia,
with Turks. 5!9-50; racial char- 74.
acteristics and description, 32, 56, ArchEOlogists: esteem Armenian
95, 153, 533, 535-6, 549 ; Bedouin architecture, 66; activities, ~1 ;
contrasted with sedentary, 153; cited, 45.
Arabs contrasted with Turks. 535- ArchEOlogy : research~ in Asia
6; tribal in feeling, 535; mental llinor in infancy, 184; Syrian,
attitude of Bedouin, 535 ; love 18.5; of Asia Minor complex., 193 ;
deserts, 536; language, 35, earlier Hellenic remains uncovered,
36, 90, 160, 174, 473, 533. 197.
Their importance, 38. 56; estab- Arches : in barrage, 277.
lish new religion, 9, 56, 102 ; Archives: regnlations· rdg., 667-8.
Moslems. 38-9, 115 ; Christians Archipelago (Turkish vilayet):
among, 56; claim khalifate, 101; erop statistics, 285.
their high culture, 56; MSS. Architects : A.mer~ in Syria. 192;
among, 00; pre-Islamic enltnre have o~an in Constantinople, 458..
among, 270; taught in mosques, Architecture : Armenians excel in,
122; women among, 118. 152-3 ; 66; new diseoveri('B, 181; early, in
attitude toward girls' BChool, 152 ; Asia llinor, 181. 198 ; early Chris-
newspapers and publications. 454, tian, 184-5, 196; in Palmyra, 188;
462; do not have acarlet fever, Greek, copied in Syria, 189 ; Arab,
165; their antiquities preserved, in Syria, 189 ; Syrian, influences
178; 1111e camels, 221; feudalism Europe, 19L
among, 238. Desire politiCal union, Ardahan hanjak): on Turkish
20, 550; desire complete inde- frontier, 646., 649.
INDEX 697
Arghana (city and prov.), Asia neighbors in Turkey, 35; in
Minor : ry. projected for, 230; Smyrna, 204; in Turkey, 328 : in
mines in, 319, 320. Cilicia, 528: their former habitat,
Arghana-Maden, Asia Minor: cop- 531-2; claim too much territory,
per mines at, 310, 322, 371. 72-3 : modify size of State, 74;
Aristocracy : no pure Turkish, pos- territory requested by, 528. Pop.-
sible, 8. . viii, 21, 23, 517; pop. before the
Arithmetic: taught In Turkey, 124. European war, 67; leading min-
Ark : Philistines return, 162. ority in Turkey, 60; almost homo-
Armenia : location, 72, 531 : area and geneous, 4 7; two classes, 99: more
pop., 734, 129, 531-2, 580; boun- numerous than Turkish Greeks,
daries proposed, 74, 75; deprived 129 : in minority in Armenian
of its natural seaports, 75: lan· provinces, 523 ; decimated by mass-
guage, 129 : cities, 296. Resources acres and deportation, etc., 52-
of subsoil rich, 76; poor, 128, 394; 3, 69, 71, 72-3, 115, 129, 449, 456,
forests destroyed, 302 ; Jews do 503, 510, 517, 519; emigrate, 58,
not settle in, 88 : Jews in, 115 ; 337, 342, 519, 529, 581 : not al·
massacres in, 518 (Bee al110 Ar- lowed in Constantinople, 63 ; those
menians; and Massacres) ; disease living abroad expect to return, 73;
in, 163: emigrate to America, 519; few left in Turkey, 328, 530; lost
rys. desired in, 75 ; financial state- to Turkey, 338; where disposed at
ment, 391 ; general economic data, present, 530: language, 36, 65, 68,
579 ; schools and education in, 65, 128, 344, 473; their alphabet, 65;
127, 129; history of evangeliza- description and racial character-
tion, written, 65; churches in, 66, istics, 5~2, 63-76, 154, 345, 420,
196 ; Christian art preserved in, 518, 521-2; love learning, 64, 127;
195. Harbord Mission in, viii, 1, adopt Western civilization, 64; per-
384, 560, 631-3; mandate offered sistence of their national ideal, 50,
U. S., and refused, 73-4, 515-16, 65, 68, 76 ; excel in the arts, 65-6 ;
527 ; mention of, forbidden in Tur- preserve religion, 68 ; importance
key, 10: Turkey controls, 11; and influence, 38, 63, 64, 66, 67.
status in Ott. Empire, 50 ; not Occupations, etc.-merchants, 32,
mentioned in Lousanne treaty, 331, 344-5, 346 ; adapted to busi-
530-1; in Mudros Armistice, 554; ness, 39-40, 51, 345 ; good admin·
Turkey declares against an inde- istrators, 66; establish business
pendent, 627 ; Russian, signs houses abroad, 67 ; business meth·
treaty with Turkey, 648; Russian 'ods in Turkey, 343; organize
attitude toward, and relations Turkish finances, 66 : money lend-
with, 68-9, 370, 510, 530, 623-4 ; . ers and bankers, 80, 521-2; specu·
in French sphere, 542 : powers in- late in money, 405-6: attitude
secure toward, 75 ; few allied of- toward credit, 343; active in trade
ficers in, 527: of international in Turkey, 94; compete with
interest, 527-8: abandoned by other peoples, 49, 51 ; control busi-
allies, 554; entitled to national ness of Turkey, 328; control local
recognition, 621 ; allies reserve merchandising, 344-5: control tex-
right to occupy, 626. Bee a,Z.o tile trade in Turkey, 346; replaced
Armenians. by Turks in business houses, 347;
Armenian-American Society : its till soil, 51: artisans, 67; manu-
director, 517. facture rugs, 338. Religion, etc.-
Armenian Question : investigated, preserve their religion, 68 : Chris-
492; chapter in this book, 517-32. tians, 101, 127, 153, 437: not all
Armenians : Indo-Europeans, 51, orthodox Christians, 51: mostly
64 ; a subject ra~e, 50, 127 ; com· orthodox, 420: Gregorians called
pared to Jews, 51, 61: compared "Armenians," 98: Catholics and
to Turks, 473-4, 522; habitat, 50- their status, 99, 130: Gregorians,
1, 519: their towns In Anatolia, 130: elect Catbolicus, 70: millets
84 : their vilayets, 895 ; their among, 419-20; early contact with
698 INDEX
Amer. missionaries, ~49; non-Mos~ ises made to, 528, 529 ; not united,
lem, 517 ; no Moslem passion 528 ; regarded as a menace, 530;
against, 520 ; mainly Protestants, have national home, 532; liber-
525 ; aided by Christians abroad, ated, 534; negotiations rdg., 625;
524 ; claim to possess letter of report of Armenian commission,
Christ, 196. Education, etc.-pos- cited, 523. See also Armenia.
sess historical documents, 64-5; Armistice: capitulations more than,
love learning, 127 ; their schools 438; various mentions of those at
and system of education, 127-9, end of European war, 9, 86,
139; hostile to Turkish institutions, 211, 231, 292, 314, 349-50, 351,
139 ; attend Robert College, 119; 382, 384, 466, 467. 4 71, 527. 529,
attitude toward Turkish students, 541, 545, 553-4, 555, 559, 561, 569,
119 ; study medicine, 173 ; estab- 570, 624-26 (text of Mudros) ; 658-
lish first newspaper in Orient, 65; 9 (text of Mudania). See also
their publications in Constanti- Treaties; and Truces.
nople, 453-4, 462 ; circulation of Art : Turks borrow, 9 ; owes debt to
newspapers, 474. Attitude toward Asia Minor, 11 ; Turks pay little
and relations with Turks, 36, 52, heed to, 45 ; Mohammedan, in
66, 67-8, 69, 71, 80, 420, 483, 488, museums, 179; buried in Asia
489, 518-19, 520, 521-2, 525, 527, Minor, 180, 198; in Syrian ruins,
529-30, 553-4, 561, 567 ; attitude 188-9; Hittite, 193, 197; ancient
of Greeks and Slavs toward, 51; Hellenic, 194, 195 ; Christian, 195,
Kurds hostile to, 55; attitude 196.
toward Americans, 72, 74-5; Artemis : temple to, discovered, 198.
American proselytization among, Artisans : Armenian, 67 ; Jewish,
134 ; interviewed by Harbord Mis- 80; various kinds mentioned, 104,
sion, 632; attitude toward and 168, 171, 475.
relations· with Russians, 68, 360, Artists : Armenian, 65 ; Turkish,
497, 525 ; start press bureau in 178, 570.
London, 524; Brit. promise to pro- . Arts: influence of Syria in the, 191.
tect, 524 ; in French army, 525 ; Aryans: language, 36; in Turkey,
French abandon, 525, 528-9. Atti- 38.
tude toward other peoples, 52, 58 ; Asheret: western Turkmen tribes,
desire reforms, 68, 75-6 ; reforms 41-2.
for, secured, 70-1 ; request aid of Asia: contrasted with Europe, 103;
powers, 70, 515 ; ask for independ- Middle East lies partly in, 7 ;
ence, 71, 72, 75, 520, 522; take Turkey partly in, 31; Turkey's in-
part in European war, 71-2, 525; fluence on, geographically, 13;
desire U. S. to assume mandate, deserts in, 180; connection with
72; negotiate with League of Na- Europe projected, 211. Religions
tions, 72 ; worthy of aid of pow- of, 3 ; Mohammedans in, 17-8 ; im-
ers, 76; profit ·by capitulations, portance of Armenians to, 64 ;
121 ; persecuted, 129-30, 519-20; Turkish ry. policy in, 202; some
their section of Smyrna burned, citizens of old Turkish Empire
212, 567 ; free from military serv- never in, 204; cities of Turkey in,
ice, 328; not mentioned in Treaty 211; ry. mileage in Turkish, 222;
of Lausanne, 420; propaganda for, rys. planned in, 367; future of
449, 524; their period in Turkey, ports of Western, 213 ; losses of
454; disturbances among, 483; Turkish territories in, 385, 513;
separatist tendencies, 489 ; receive Europeans interfere in, 486; rea-
charity, 492; pauperized by char- sons for Turkish conquests in,
ity, 524; join Committee of Prog- 521 ; allied troops slow in leaving,
ress and Union, 502; powers neg- 545. Central-'-peoples of, 11, 511,
lect and abandon, 514-15, 527-9; 512, 513, 519; pop. of central
· secret societies among, 522 ; reason plateau, 41; German hopes rdg.,
for their failure, 524; reason for 511 ; movements in, 512; Turko;
their present condition, 525; prom- Tartar provinces in, 513.
INDEX 699
Asia Minor : defined, 7: Anatolia Asian, K. : cited, 517.
equivalent to, 11 ; Turkey almost Assaf-un-Dovleh: activities, 277.
restricted to, 38, 412, 821 ; islands Assassins: furnished by lsmailiyis,
near, 361 ; Armenian vilayets in, 109.
527 : area and pop., 23, 39, 48, 71, Assir ( sanjak), Asia Minor : pop,.
73, 85, 193-4, 204, 238, 580: emi- 392; financial statistics, unavail-
grations, 58, 85 ; early Greeks and able, 392.
Lydians, 197-8 ; many languages Assiryemen : Turkish garrisons to be
in, 193-4; pop. decimated, 73. surrendered, 626.
Small rainfall in, 293 ; lakes in, Association d' Amitil! Turko-Arme-
217; poor sanitation, 73; farm nienne : purpose, 531.
lands in, 294; many small hold- Assos, Asia Minor : location and ex-
ings in, 295 ; fertile, 372 ; forest cavations, 199.
lands in, 304; forests destroyed, Assuan, Egypt : dikes, 27L
312 ; live stock census, 289 ; camel Assyria : ancient peoples in, 36 ; an-
caravans, 221; many goats in, tiquities preserved, 178; excava-
330; oil fields, 310, 372; minerals, tions, 181 ; records, cited, 185 ;
311 ; products and resources, 290, foreign elements in early culture,
359, 372 : prosperity depends on 187.
security, 207; special interests in, Assyrians: language, 36; ancient
213 ; part has no rys., 222 ; most civilization, 181; ancient palace
important rys. in, 225; ry. proj- found, 181 ; kings prior to, 269;
ects, 231, 378-81 ; concessions, 229, rule Asia Minor, 1113 : practice
380 ; various cities in, 229-30; few irrigation, 274; Christians, 101;
stores in, 831-2; relstion of Con- request arms and ammunition,
stantinople to, 336; port works 515; powers neglect, 514-15.
planned for, 378 ; problems in, Assyriology : advances in, 181. .
193. Moslems in, 519: Amer. mis- Athens, Greece: mentioned, 29 ; poli-
sion work in, 132; early Christian ticians in, 49 ; newspapers in, 76 ;
period, 195, 196 ; churches and Turkish officials in, 82; Amer.
temples, 195-6, 198; schools in, school in, 197; revolutionary govt.
84-5, 120. Rich in antiquities, 179 ; in; 566 ; reports from,. cited,
art buried in, 180, 194-5 ; early 215.
civilization and culture, 181, 197; Atkinson, Dr.: activities, 174.
history kaleidoscopic, 192-3 ; many Auctions: regulations rdg., 245;
ruins in, 195 ; explorations and ex- property sold at, 259; land, 263.
cavations, 196-8. Historical and Aurora, Ill.: mentioned, 280.
political-wars after 1918, 2; Australia : buys Palestine oranges,
Turkish capital shifted to, 22; 287-8; news of, published in Tur-
Western debt to, 11 ; little change key, 457. ·
in, 11-12; Armenian activities, Austria: ships' timber to Turkey,
etc., in, 71, 517, 523; Greek activi- 339; paper export prohibited, 464.
ties, etc., 77, 84-5, 360, 559, 562, Historical and political-Turkish
565-7, 581, 656; French activities, claims, 257, 636, 663; attitude
120, 229; Italian activities, etc., toward, and relations with Turkey,
120, 360, 619, 654; Dere Beys in, 497, 499-500, 660; attitude toward,
238; Brit. activities, etc., 359, and relations with, Russia, 493,
564; Ger. troops in, 566; Russia 499-500; Prussians defeat, 499;
desires part, 610 ; foreigners in, excluded from Ger. Confederation,
cited, 558; to be divided into 499; given control of Bosnia and
spheres of influence, 369; negotia- Herzegovina, 499; accepts diplo-
tions rdg., in conference, 377 ; matic suggestions, 503-4 ; acts for
plans for partitioning, 556; allied Balkans, 503-4 ; offer of peace
officers withdrawn from, 561 ; made to, 621; foreign policy, 564;
Kemal's activities, 412, 557-8, wages war of aggression, 635; I!Ot
560; Turkish, 621. Bee al•o the represented on mixed commission,
nveral countries and regions. 667.
700 INDEX
Austria (Austro)- Hungary: Slav Baghdad (Bagdad city and vilayet,
districts of, 19; educational prob- and prov.) : location, 217 ; inhabi-
lems in, 139; commerce, 317, 321, tants, 19-20, 91, 92, 542 ; rys. in
349 ; invesbnents, 357 ; its paper or projected, 185, 225, 236, 315,
money, 405; Russian influence in, 366, 367-9, 615: on highway, 218;
19; relations with, and attitude its mail communications, 232; air
toward, Turkey, 252, 349, 355, squadron in, 233; river navigable
357, 384, 386, 493, 506; repre- to, 269; crop statistics, 285; min-
sented on Ott. Public Debt, 355 ; eral deposits, 316 ; port construc-
signs protocol, 442 ; sends note tion planned, 367 ; trade and com-
to European powers, 503 ; atti- merce, 94, 335, 342; capital of
tude toward Albanians, 505. Iraq, 551 ; its expenditures, 407 ;
Austrians: in Turkey, 57; their for- included in Ger. plans, 51().11;
mer shipping lines, 213-14; control Brit. interests, 613; Gen. Maude's
rys., 224; forest experts in Tur- proclamation in, 618-19. Bee
key, 308 ; bank in Turkey aban- also Iraq ; and Mesopotamia..
doned, 376; cater to low-priced Bags: goatskin, 160.
trade, 332; act as forwarders, Baindir, Asia Minor : trade statis-
349; penetration into Macedonia, tics, 206.
485 ; rule former Turkish subjects, Baker, Ray Stannard: cited, 526,
496 ; attitude toward Serbians, 555. .
500; evacuate Turkish terr., 626; Bakir Cbai, Anatolia : a river basin,
trade infqrmation on, 662; exca- 267.
vations in Syria, 190, 197. Baku, Transcaucasia : conference at,
A wah (Aivali), Anatolia: important 514.
port, 212. Baldwin, Stanley (Brit. states-
Ayas, Anatolia: location, 213. man) : cited, 385.
Ayuzmend, Asia Minor: mine, 319. Balfour, Lord Arthur (Brit. states-
Azerbaijan: autonomous, 6!6, 6!9; man) : activities, 545.
signs treaty, 648. Balfour Declaration : its importance,
Aziz, Abdul (Sultan) : activities, 97; Arab attitude toward, 550;
etc., 389-90, 478; his son elected cited, 543-4 ; text, 62().1.
khalif, 570. Balia-Karaidin: name of mines, 318-
19, 320, 323.
B Balia-Maden, Asia Minor: location
and resources, 316.
Baalbek (ancient city): ruins in, Balikbisar, Asia Minor: mines near,
189. 318-19.
Bab : explained, 110. Balikhova, Anatolia: water supply,
Bab-i-Ali: defined, 68. 275.
Babies: ignorance rdg., 167. Balkans and Balkan States: included
Babylon and Babylonia: described, in Near East, 7; formerly in Ott.
187 ; languages, 36 ; archii!Ological Europe, 493; Slavic expansion in,
work in, 178, 180-1, 182, 183; 485 ; size and pop. increased by
priest-kings in, 182; foreign ele- war, 504-5 ; covetons, 485; Turk-
ments in early culture, 187; rea- ish relations with. 15 ; Russian
son for decay, 266; records, cited, relations and influence, 19, 480,
185, 187. 503; French relations, 19; Brit.
Babylonians : know and occupy relations, 350, 564; Ger. relations,
Syria, 185, 186 ; kings in Mesopo- 466; 485; I taL relations and atti-
tamia prior to, 269 ; irrigation in tude, 501, 653; Austrian relations,
Mesopotamia, prior to, 274. 503-4, 520 ; European diplomacy
Backsheesh: necessary in Turkey, toward, 70, 503-5: attitude
335. Bee also Bribes. toward one another, 493; war in,
Bacon, Sir Francis : cited, 328. 69 (see also Wars); upheavals
Baffa (sultana): has Jewish physi- and revolts in, 478-9; mobilize,
cian, 91. 503 ; send students to Robert CoiL,
INDEX 701
133 : trade in, 350. Bee also the of Zurich, 230 : Ottoman, 483 :
several Balkan States. Peruvian Federal Reserve Bank,
Baluchistan, Central Asia: plans 384; Reichsbank, 386 : Salonika,
for, 513. 375 ; Socilitli Gt!nlirale, 93 :
Bandits: in Anatolia, 33. Wiener-Bank-Verein, 93, 376, 381.
Bankers : Armenian, 80, 521 ; Con- Bee also Loans; and Money.
stantinople, cited, 365; discover Banse, Ewald : cited, 22L
Turkey, 389. Bee also Banks. Barbarians: its ancient meaning,
Bankruptcy : regulations rdg., 251 ; 436.
Turkey goes into, 392, 482. Barcelona, Spain: conference at,
Banks and Banking: closed in Tur- 666.
key, 26; founded and established Bareilles, Bertrand : cited, 58.
in various places, 89, 93, 351-2, Barguiri, Asia Minor: location, 315:
358, 381 : Jews manage, 93 : pri- concession in, 315.
vate, in Turkey, 93: authorized to Bark : exported, 306.
issue loans, 258 ; furnish foreign Barker, J. Ellis: cited, 13, 16.
capital for Turkey, 375: issue ry. Barrages : various instances, 265,
bonds, 381 : gather credit and 276, 277, 278. Bee also Irriga-
trade information, 343, 352: atti· tion.
tude toward and granting of long Barter : limitations of, 329.
credits in, 343: activities of Ger., Bask-Kadin, Etfendj: defined, 8.
347-8; American in Turkey, 351- Basilica : at Bethlehem, 190.
2: French control, in Near East, Basra, Iraq (city and vilayet): lo-
358; British interests in Near cation, 225 : distance from Lon-
East, 359; Greek interests in Tur- don, 236 : rys. at or planned, 225,
key, 361: French float Turkish 315, 369-70, 615: date gardens
war loan, 364 : intervene in govt., near, 266; ships dates, 287: crop
365; concessions obtained by, 365- statistics, 285: no complete sta-
6: influenced by foreign policies, tistics for, 305: harbor works at,
329; position of Constantinople in, 369: Brit. interests in, 613.
334 ; system in Turkey described, Batiniyis (Mohammedan sect):
· 376: freedom for foreign, 431-2: meaning of term, 108: its mem-
position, precarious, 381 ; adver- bers, 108-9 : their beliefs and de-
tise in newspapers, 4 74. Various scription, 108, 109, 110.
enumerated - Agricultural, 375, Battles: furnish news features, 450:
396, 407, 574: Banca Commerciale various enumerated, 41, 561,
Italians, 93, 375 : Banca di Roma, 565.
375, 432 : Banca ltaliana di Batum, Georgia : location, 205 ;
Sconto, 375 : Bank of Athens, 375, port, 75: ry. terminus, 205: its
376, 432 : Banque Agricole, 258, trade, 208, 216: ceded to Georgia,
281 ; Banque Commerciale de la 208, 646, 648, 649 : Turkey to
M:editerran~, 375 : Banque de Sal- have free access to, 646.
onique, 93 : Banque des Chemins Bavaria: makes treaty with Tur-
de Fer <Trientaux, 224: Banque key, 441-2.
Francaise de Syrie, 376 : Banque Bavarians: regarded as barbarians,
Hongroise, 93 ; Banque Ottomane, 436.
93: Banque Russe, 375: Blank, Bayazid II. (Turkish Sultan): wel-
Marmorosch & Co., 375 : CrMit comes Jews, 88.
Lyonnaise, 375, 386, 432 ; C~dit Bazaars : gossip in, 83 ; Turkish
National Ottoman, 375; Deutsche shops in, 40: business declining,
Bank, 226, 228, 365-6, 869, 375, 842.
876, 881 : Guaranty Trust Co., Beaconsfield, Lord Benjamin Dis-
851·2, 376 : Holland Bank, 375, raeli : activities, 18, 572.
Imperial Ottoman, 238, 375, 376, Bebeck, Turkey : location and
385-6, 406, 531, 636 ; Lloyd's, 881 : school, 131.
National Bank of Turkey, 350, Bedouins: habitat, 158, 527;
870, 875: Oriental Railway Bank women, 153 : characteristics, 153,
702 INDEX
158; mental attitude, 536. Bee Biaburt, Asia Minor: on highway,
also Nomads. 218.
Beggars : in Orient, 169. Bible : used as textbook, 83 ; dis-
Beirut, Syria : mentioned, 86 ; a eases in, 162 ; records, in Asia
modern city, 158; lawlessness in, 1\Iinor, 180 ; cited, 60, 162, 181,
50 ; Christians massacred in, 81 ; 11l3, 185, 186.
Amer. univ. in, 6, 119, 133, 159, Bibliography : lists in this work, 59,
161, 165, 169 ; girls' high school 669-689.
in, 125; Jesuit univ. in, 173; Bigha, Anatolia: a water basin,
hosp. in, 159, 171, 174, 175; medi- 268; crop statistics, 285; forest
cine studied in, 173 ; diseases in, area near, 303-4.
155, 162, 164; free from cholera, Bilinski, S. : thanked, 6; cited,
164; how epidemics spread, 164; 370.1.
sewage system in, 159; good water Bing, Dr. Edward J.: cited, 316,
campaign, 160 ; water works in, 378.
160; dogs sent to, 159; products Binklisse: defined, 196.
shipped from, 216; foreign com- Birejik, Asia Minor : location, 218.
merce, 335; crop. statistics, 285 ; Birkenhead, Frederick Edwin Smith,
financial condition sound, 402; offi- Lord : cited, 566.
cials and organizations in, 430, Bismarck, Prince Otto von: activi-
529, 542. ties, 493, 499.
Belgium: attitude toward black Bythinia, Asia Minor : Osman
race, 60; ry. mileage in, 222; ad- founds State in, 77.
heres to law of Sefer, 252 ; its Bitlis, Armenia (city, vilayet, and
trade, 317, 319, 320, 321, 336; prov.): in New Armenia, 75;
amount of Turkish holdings in, boundaries, 639; interior trade
364; represented by U. S., 430; center, 216-17; ry. projected for,
Ger. invasion, 509. 230; crop statistics, 285; no com-
Belvedere: quarter in Constanti- plete statistics for, 305; oil field
nople, 91. in, 315 ; promised to Russia, 510,
Bender-Eregli: name of coal prop- 617.
erties, 371. Blackmail: practiced in Turkey,
Benghazi (Bengazi), sanjak: loca- 222, 311. Bee also Backsheesh.
tion, 163-4; typhus brought from, Blindness : causes, 163, 167, 168.
163-4; crop statistics, 285. Block, Sir Adam {chairman of Ott.
Bennett, E. N.: cited, 629. Public Debt): thanked, 6; cited,
Berdan, Anatolia: a water basin,268. 45, 385.
Bereketli, Asia Minor : galena mine Blockades : Greeks not allowed to
at, 319. declare, 656.
Berlin, Ger.: congress and treaty Blunt, Lady Fanny: cited, 53-55.
of, 70, 441, 443, 482, 483, 493, Boghaz Koi, Asia Minor : ancient
495-6, 499, 524; Jews in, 92; Ger. Hittite capital, 193; excavation
plans for, 225, 510.11; has air at, 197.
service, 234 ; gold reserve in, 386. Bolu (sanjak, vilayet, and prov.) :
405. forest area, 304 ; exports forest
Bernstorff, Count, Johann H. A. products, 306 ; forest concession
(Ger. diplomat): signs protocol, in, 307-8; crop statistics, 285.
442. Bolshevists : Turkish treatment of,
Berthelot, · Philippe : at San Remo 17.
conference, 633. Bombay, India: Jews in, 94; Arabs
Besch-Parmak: iron mines, 320. threaten, 549.
Bethlehem, Palestine: manger at, Bonar Law, Andrew: becomes
190. prime minister, 570.
Beverages : alcoholic forbidden, 103, Bondholders : represented on Ott.
341, 534 ; sold in shops, 332 ; rahi, Public Debt, 355 ; of Turkish se-
25 ; wine. 33, 283, 287, 341 ; cof- curities, 356; French, 387; de-
fee, 148, 339. fended by govts., 398.
INDEX 103
Bonds: ry., 365; banks issue, 381; Brinton, CoL Jasper'Y.: cited, 419.
Ger. issued for Turkish loans, 405; Bristol, Rear Admiral Mark Lam-
redeemable in gold, 405. bert: thanked, 6; his flagship at
Bonin (ltaL diplomat): signs Smyrna, 558; member of allied
agreement, 642. mission, 629 ; writes foreword, vii-
Bookkeeping: taught in Turkey, ix ; sketch, xi.
124. British (English): have reputation
Books: cause wrong impression, vii, for fairness, 3; independent, 350;
359 ; style of those about the relations with Russia, 18; claim
Levant, 2-3; kinds, read in Tur- Mosul region, 22 ; policy in Iraq,
key, 9-10; Arabic, 35; Druses pos- 22; operate and control ry. in
sess, 111; Turkish attitude Iraq and other places, 226, 227.
toward, 457; revolution brings to 228, 230; treaty with Iraq, 657-
Constantinople, 458. 8; agreement with Turks, 22-3 ;
Borrow, George: cited, 354, 430. relinquish Turkish capitulations,
Boruk Dulu, Anatolia: location and 24; other relations with Turkey,
water supply, 275. 32, 38, 57, 93, 118, 121, 161, 314,
Bosnia, region in Jugoslavia: its 320, 321, 343, 350, 351, 355, 356-
new status proclaimed, 487; con- 7, 359, 367, 370, 371, 446, 468,
trolled and annexed by Austro- 470, 527, 540, 545, 554, 561, 568;
Hungary, 493. Turks compared to, 535; relations
Bosra (Bostra), Syria: ruins and with Armenians, 11, 524; Japa-
excavations, 189, 190. nese compete with, 332: relations
Boston, Mass:; mentioned, 491. • with Ger., 349-50, 382; relations
Botta, Paul ~mile (arcbreologist): with I tal., 382; their treatment of
activities, 181. Oriental Christians, 498; oppress
Boundaries : between mandates, Mohammedans, 506 ; relations
642 ; pop. may pass, 649 ; fixed by with Arabs, 538-9, 542, 544-5, 613-
commission, 646; various named, 14; exert strong influence on
226, 230, 303, 315, 320, 342, 369, Moslem world, 551 : relations with
624, 645-6. French, 542, 545-6, 572 ; desert
Boycotts: by Jews, 89; Turkish, Greece, 565-6 ; schools and hosp.
212. Bee al1o Embargoes. established by, 118, 176; profit by
Boys: education for, 124, 130; as capitulations, 121; engineers in
newsboys, 471. Orient, 160; capture Jerusalem,
Bozanti, Asia Minor: on ry., 226, 161 ; policy in Palestine, 635 ;
652. archll!Ological research and ex-
Boz-Dagh (dist. in Asia Minor) : plorations by, 179, 182, 192, 197;
gold mine in, 323. hold shipping conference, 216; or-
Brazil: students from, in Beirut, ganize oil company, 315; their in-
173 ; exports coffee, 339. terest in oil fields, 359 ; monopolize
Bremen, Ger. : Ott. business dell'ga- emery industry, 318; own and ex-
tion in, 347; Ger. business in, 348. ploit mines,320,321; try to capfure
Brest-Litovsk, Russia : treaty signed trade of Near East, 349-50, 351;
at, 622. financial operations, 350, 355, 356-
Bribes and Bribery : common in 7, 382: have delegate on Ott. Pub-
Turkey, 48, 222; Turkish officials lic Debt, 355 : interested in irri-
B<'<'ept, 83, 390; Bismarck gives, gation projects, 359; possess navi-
493. gation rights on Tigris, 369-70;
Bridges: tolls of, confiseated, 26; their sphere of influence, 370, 542-
Romans build, 189 ; between 3, 613-14: projects at Haifa, 371;
Europe and Asia projected, 211; diplomatic negotiations and secret
an<'iPnt, owned by State, 262; agreements, 381, 382, 528, 534-5,
Sirri BI'Y builds, 265 ; constructl'd 538, 539, 542, 545-6, 613-14; con-
in Konia, 276; neceBBary, 427; trol censorship, 468; subsidies
Galata, 26, 31; over Golden Horn, paid by, 538-9; poliey rdg. Sul'll
35. Canal, 544 ; method of warfare in
704 INDEX
Near East. 547-8; troops in Near Bulgar lladen: Jead-11ilver DJ!ne.
East. 550; oecopy and make dem- 37L
onstration at Constantinople. 551. Bulgaria. country of Near East: a
561; have no unity with other al- frontier of Turkey, 207; Armenia
lies, 555; refuse to withdraw from compared to, 520; Turkish-speak-
Chanaq, 568; war aims defined, ing people in, 511 ; desires outlet
621.-22; official report, cited, 266.. on A~ 19; relations with
Bee al.to Great Britain. European Turkey, 19; importance
British Civil Administration : eon- of Constantinople to, 333, 336 ; in-
trois administration. 225.. dependence proclaimed. 487 ; Tur-
British Empire: India's relation to, key loses, 82 ; annexes Eastern
18. Rumaili, 82; French consul in,
Britisi P~~r"--t,py Papen: cited, 238; competes with U. S., ~9;
539, 613, 656.. Turkish claims, 357, 636, 663 ;
Britisl& WAite Paper: cited, 6!2.. reparation payments demanded of,
Broglie (diplomat) : signs proto- 404; its paper depreciates, 405 ;
eol,4!2. eapitulation system vanishes in,
Brunnow (Russian diplomat) : signs 4U; dosed to Turkish neW'lt-
protocol, 4-!2. papers, 47-l; Turkish ally, 400.
Brusa (city, vilayet:. and prov.). 65-1; Russia aids. 491; surrenders
Asia Minor: mentioned, 2-l; iso- to allies, 62-l; Turkey reeogni2es
lated. 227; water supply, 265; terr. adjustments, 660.
forest area in, 30!; .Jews in. 87; J3ulgarians : name as used in Tur-
l'eSOtm!eS, 287, 288, 290, 312, 320; key, 98; speak Slavic tongue, 37;
estates in, 294 ; on ry., 211, 227; Christians. 101; atrocities, 51; at-
erop statistics, 285 ; silk culture tend Robert Coil., 119; have peri-
in, 288; silk institute at, 356 ; odieals in Turkey. 45-1, 462; de-
modern plow in, 292; forbidden feated, 505; sign armistice, 466;
to ~w rice on plain of, 293-4; ereate trouble for Turkey, 4S8;
school official in, 456; Greeks attitude toward neighbol'!l, 493;
enter, 562; State founded near, 77. join Committee of 'l"nion and
Bryce, Yiseount .James (Brit. Progress, 502; attack their allies,
scholar and statesman) : cited. 15, 505.
38. 39. 519, 520. Bulletins: French, in Turkey, 45L
Buckets : used in oil fields, 316. See aw Periodieals and NeW~t
Budapest, Hungary : mentioned, papers,
362. Bungalows: market for portable.
Budget : Turkish, habitually unbal- 37-l..
anced, 393 ; lack of responsibility Bunoust (French gen.): on allied
for, 4.08; a formality, 4.08 ; Turk- mission. 629.
ish concern over, 4.."7; Church, Bureau of Foreign and Domestie
421 ; statistics, 387. Commeree: Dlt'lltioned, L
Building materials: France supplies, Burgas, Bulgaria : shipping eenter,
361; bricks, 182, 2-1-1, 367; mor- 216.
tar, 2-1-1 ; mud, 3-l, 158, 182; Burgas, lludania: iron mine in,
stone, 178, 182, 191; tiles, 178, 319-20.
179, 182, 244, 363 ; wood, 191, B~dians: regarded as barba-
196. rians, 436.
Bukhara. region in Central Asia : in Burke, Edmund (Brit. statesman) :
Ger. scheme of Empire, 511 ; inde- · cited, 4.
pendence recognized, 643. Burnabat, Asia Minor: on ry_ 227.
Buldur, Asia Minor: on ry.. 227; Butler, Boward Crosby : sketch,
Ital. rights and interests in. 360. 177; chapter in this book, 177·200.
64-1. Business : methods and policy in
Bulgar: ecelesiastical term, 98. Turkey, 312-3, 3t6, 3-11-9; busi-
Bulgar Daghi. Asia Minor: mines. ness men in An~ra Assembly,
319, 323. 42S. Bee allo Commerce and
INDEX 705
Trade; on4 other economic sub· Turkey, 94, 314, 315, 354, 356-7,
jects. 375; Jewish, 93; Belgo-French,
Byron, Lord: cited, 162. 224; Brit., 350, 375, 380; French,
Byzantine Empire: its overthrow 356, 375, 641 ; Russian, 360:
and successor, 77, 86, 179. Greek, 361; Austrian, 362 ; Bel·
Byzantines : in Mesopotamia. 184- gian, 362, 375 ; German, 371 :
5 ; rebuild Syria. 188 ; rule Asia Turkish, 375, 644; Swiss, 375;
l\liuor, 193; attitude toward for- Turks desire Amer., 379 ; Brit.·
eigners, 436. French, 385-6. Bee a!Bo Finances ;
Byzantium: ancient name for Con· Loans ; and Revenue.
stantinople, 13-14; compared Capitulations : term explained, 435 ;
with Pers, 57 ; ambassadors in, described, 121-2; regarded as
436. treaties, 438 ; extraterritorial
agreements, 430 ; how justified,
c 445 ; effect on Turkey, 409, 444,
445 ; Chinese compared to Turk·
Cables: cited, 376. ish, 434 ; earliest, 435-6; during
Cadman, Sir John: at San Remo Middle Ages, • 437; model for
conference, 633. Turkish, 438 ; agreed to for sake
Cadorna : signs protocol, 442. of commerce, ·440; form changes
Caf~ : in Constantinople, 31. little, 440: conditions demanding
Cairo, Egypt : Turkish periodicals change, 440. Turkish attitude
published at, 484; Syrians in, toward, 20, 443-4 ; privileges con-
545 : newspaper of, cited, 549. ferred by, 345, 431-3; in Turkey,
Calendars : Turkish and Christian 24, 121: for exemption of taxes,
compared, 96. 328 : German, 375; Greeks per-
California: mentioned, 384. mitted, 437; . in Egypt, 437-8:
Caligraphy: ancient, preserved in French, 438 : Brit., 438-40; Gen-
Turkish museums, 179. oese-Greek, 440; several nations
Cam bon, Paul: writes Lord Grey, jointly responsible in, 441-2; dis-
614. cussed in London conference, 443 :
Camondos (Jewish family) : promi· in Berlin treaty, 443; Turkish
nent in Constantinople, 92. ststement rdg. economic, 444-5 :
Canada: should share in Turkey's judicial, should cease, 445: re-
lumber import, 339; U. S. consul quirements for abolition, 446-7:
in, 430. Amer. govt. considers abolition of
Canadians: instructors in French, its rights in Turkey, 501; over-
140; concession rights transferred thrown and abolished, 138, 231,
to, 379. 413, 422, 430, 440, 443 (Jap.).
Canals: impossible in Anatolia, 444, 505, 647, 649, 661; re-
267 ; irrigation, 275, 276, 277, established liy treaty of S~vres,
278; Habbaniya, 278; Hindiya, 564; Turkey will not reestablish,
279; Karbals, 278, 279; Mahmu· 444.
diya, 279; Marien (Russia), 237; Cappadocians : ancestors of modern
1\lusleyyeb, 279; Sbamiya, 279; Greeks, 46.
Suez, 18, 237. 333, 540, 544. Captives: become mothers of Sul-
Canterbury, Eng.: Archbishop, tans, 8 ; intermarry with captors,
cited, 529. 39.
Canterbury, N. IL: mentioned, 141. Capuchins: found schools in Tur-
Cape of Good Hope: Brit. seize, 18. key, 130.
Capital : foreign, timid in Turkey, Caravans: Armenians deported by,
222-3; attitude toward, in Near 71 ; trading, 205 ; size of camel,
East, 298; nt'eded in Turkey nnd 221; bow news of promulgated,
Near East, 300, 327, 368, 373, 451.
375; liquid, 361 ; amount in rys., Carcbemish (old Hittite site) : lo·
3G5, 366; possible direction fort in cation and excavations, 186.
Turkey, 372, 374-5; foreign, in Cargoes: character of Russian, 360.
706 INDEX
CarlYle, Thomas: cited, 517. Censors : of press, in Turkey, 456.
Carmelites : found schools in Tur- Censorship: exercised against press
key, 130. in Turkey, 463, 475, 477; mil.,
Carmonas (Jewish family): promi- 465, 467 ; foreign post offices free
nent in Constantinople, 92. from, 485 ; unconstitutional, 467;
Carpets: made in Turkey, 290, 372; abolished, 465, 468.
U. S. imports, 336. Census : of livestock, 289 ; no of-
Carroll, Lewis : cited, 552. ficial, in Turkey, 523.
Cartographers: Amer. in Syria, 192. Central Asia. See Asia.
Cartoons : published in newspapers, Central Powers: engage in war, 71;
472. their diplomacy fails, 505; reake
Carvings: Babylonian, 178. treaty with Russia, 622-4; Turk-
Cashiers : Turkish girls become, ish claims against, 663. See also
146. Austria; Austro-Hungary; and
Casings, sausage: exported, 290. Germany.
Cassel, Sir E. : activities, 375. Certificates : .land, 240, 253 ; re-
Castles: old, owned by State, 262. quired in dowry, 256.
Cathedrals: in Armenia, 66. Cesspools : in Orient, 159.
Catholics: different kinds, 130; .can Chaghlalik, Asia Minor : mine in,
inherit from Protestants, 248. 319-20.
Roman, in China, 51; in Turkey, Chalcedon : founder characterized,
98, 130 ; among Greeks, 114; es- 13-14.
tablished in Bebek, 131; education Chaldaic : language, characterized,
in Turkey compared with Amer., 36.
132 ; can inherit from other Chalti, Asia Minor: ry. projected
Christians, 248 ; among Arme- at, 230.
nians, 420 ; Ital interests in Pales- Chambers of Commerce. See Com-
tine, 501 ; see also Church ; and mercial Organizations.
Uniats; Synan, 114. Armenian- Chanaq, Anatolia: location, 211,
difficult to estimate, 115. Greek- 568; its importance, 211; Brit.
can inherit from other Christians, forces in, 568. ·
248 (see also Orthodox Church). Chapels: Roman Catholic, 131. See
See also Christians. also Churches.
Caucasian Soviet Republic: rela- Chariklar, Anatolia: location and
tions with Kemalists, 563. water supply, 275.
Catholicus: national and religious Charity: Palestine lives on, 95;
head of Armenian Church, 70. Moslems give, 102; Amer., in Tur-
Caucasus: a frontier of Turkey, key, 361.
207 ; mts. in, 51, 235 ; many Charles I. (Eng. king) : relations
Turanians in, 513 ; peoples in, with Turkey, 439-40.
519 ; Turkish elements in, 553 ; Charles II. (Eng. king) : sends am-
in bloc of Mohammedan States; bassador to Turkey, 439.
513; people are Sunnites, 513; in- Charpy, Maj. Gen. C. H. : French
cluded in air route, 235. Harbord plenipotentiary, 658.
Mission in, viii ; Armenians fight Chatal Agach, Asia Minor: on ry.,
in, 71 ; war booty in, 466 ; Turko- 313.
Ger. diplomatic plans for, 513; Chavch: defined, 290.
Enver Pasha in, 553 ; Turks Cheftliks: defined, 294.
'threaten, 569; terr. of, returned to Chelibi, Joseph (Egyptian Jew) :
Turkey, 582; prisoners of, to be activities, 90.
delivered up, 648. Chemistry: taught in Orient, 155.
Caulaincourt: report cited, 16. Chemists: have organ in Constan-
Cavour, Count Camillo Benso di : tinople, 458.
Kemal compared to, 105. Chesney, Francis Rawdon: cited,
Cecil, Lord Robert: cited, 546, 621. 218.
Cemeteries : Moslem, 250 ; of allies, · Chester, Commander Arthur T. (son
in Turkey, 667. of following) : activities, 3i8·81.
INDEX 707
Chester, Rear Adm. Colby M. : seeks come viziers, 79 ; Turks need
Turkish concession, 461 ; activi- their aid, 79; sold as slaves, 81;
ties, 378-81 ; the Chester conces- granted privileges, 81 ; Suleiman
sion and project, 202, 308, 310, threatens to expel, 88-9 ; cause for-
315, 378 ; discussed at conference, eign interference in Turkey, 113-
377; concession annulled, 352 ; 14; persecuted and massacred in
holding company controlling, 377. Turkey, 129, 445, 496; French
Chicago, Ill. : mentioned, 280, 491. protect, 357-8, 499; protection as-
Children : brought up in harem, 10; sured, 641 ; cannot inherit from
will help develop Turkey, 38 ; not Moslems, 248; Moslem law dis-
vaecinated in Orient, 163; starved criminates against, 505; Turks
to death, 164; have improper free- substitute, 329; approach to Mos-
dom in Orient, 167; have ring- lems, possible, 420-21; their alle-
worm, 171 ; inheritance regula- giance in Turkey, 494-5; view-
tions rdg., 246 ; periodicals for, point of those in Turkey, 496; at-
462. titude toward Turkish revolution,
China: Turkey compared to, 222; 502; oppose single Turkish man-
province in, 2 ; capitulations in, date, 515 ; Turks do not prosely-
24, 434, 440; Catholics in, 51 ; tize, 521. Jewish attitude toward,
education, 117; foreign post of- 54; inheritance from Jews, 248;
fices in, abolished, 231 ; requests favor Zionist movement, 544;
of govt., 434-5. Kurds hostile to, 55; Amer. atti-
Chinese: diverse types, 58-9; re- tude toward, 132 ; lsmailiyis ter-
quest abandonment of capitula- rorize, 109 ; Druses rise against,
tions, 434-5. 111; attitude toward, and relation
Choban Bey: a Turkish frontier, of, European nations, 357-8, 492,
651-2. 498, 499; their attitude toward
Chomra. Anatolia: location and strangers, 436 ; reason for mas-
water supply, 275. sacre of Armenians, 520 ; aid Ar-
Chorum, Asia Minor: ry. for, pro- menians, 524; U. S. mission inter-
jected, 230. ested in, 632. Vice among, 27; be-
Choufa: defined, 256. lief rdg., 110; fano.ticifim among,
Christ: supposed letter to Arme- 116; women among, 153-4; Jesuit
nian Church, cited, 196. missionaries work among, 130; at-
Christianity: source, 4; compared to tend Robert Coli., 133. Disunited
Mohammedanism, 10, 103 ; not in- in Turkey, 114, 493; cannot be
volved between Jews and Turks, governed by Koran, 419 ; millets
54; in Syria. 56; how propagated, among, 419-20; have ecclesio.stical
77. organization, 115; their head in
Christians: compared to Moham- Turkey, 113; changes in Church,
medans, 3-4, 153, 437 ; different 106; capitulations between, and
types and sects, 4, 112-13, 420; with pagans, 437. See also
character, in Europe, 509; among Church; and the various Christian
Osmanli, 38; among Arabs, 56; peoples of the Near East.
Armenian, 127, 420, 520, 524; in Chronology of Events: 584-607.
Turkey, 38, 107, 153-4,493-5; 514; Church (as an institution): relation
in Near East, 101; early in to State in Turkey, 25, 107; sepa-
Mesopotamia, 184 ; in Syria, 189 ; ration advo!'ated and achieved,
remains of early, in Syria, 190-1; 104, 145, 421, 518; functions,
kingdoms, 437; pass under Austro- 436; distinctions in Christian, 101,
Ht•ngarian rule, 496; conquer 103; changes in Christian, in Tur-
Central Asin, 512. Turkish atti- key, 106, 196, 421-2; loyalty to, in
tude toward, 20, 57-8 : Islamic Turkey, 113 ; schools in Turkey
attitude toward, 496, 518; their under, 118, 127 ; head of Moslem
attitude toward Mohammedans, Church in Turkey, 421-2; reac-
103-4; status in Turkey, ('.8, 492; tionary movements in, 426. Ar-
Turks force into army, 78; be- menian Church,130. Various Chris-
708 INDEX
tian sects in-Greek Orthodox, lem, 3S-9; intermarry with Os-
or Eastern. distinguished from manli, 39.
other organizations, 101 ; in vari- Cisterns: source of water supply,
ous countries, 114; Armenians not 160-1.
members of, 51, 525 ; Armenians Cities: Arabs build for Jews, 95;
members of, 420 ; binds people to- ancient, buried and excavated,
gether, 46; power and wealth, 47, 181·2, 184, 187; holy, 218, 243;
49-50, 100 ; status, 83, 99-100; capitalists in Turkish, 220; for-
Greeks attached to, 83; its place eign goods consumed in, 223-4.
in Greek revolution, 83; its govt. 8ee also the various cities.
and vitality, 99; its patriarch, Citizens and Citizenship: Oriental
4..?1 ; revolt and cbanges in, in Tur- conception of, 344 ; Amer., in Tur-
key, 100, 420-1; national bead key, 345; patriarchs must be, 421.
· elected for Turkey, 100, 420-1; Civilization : Turks fail to respond
feeling toward Protestants, 525. to world, 9 ; Turkey important for
Roman Catholic; few Greeks study of, 179; Mohammedanism
in, 99, 114; differentiated from snited to primitive, 102-3 ; early in
other Christian sects, 101 ; adher- Asia Minor, 180, 198 ; Sumerian,
ents under Turkish control, 113 ; 182-3 ; Middle Eastern period,
see also Uniats. Other Christian 533-4.
sects, 114, 127, 4..?(). Claims: land, 257, 258; Turkish,
Churches: inscriptions on, 47; char- bow adjudicated, 357.
acteristic, in Armenia, 66; Ar- Clayton-Kennedy, CoL K. E.: activ-
menians restore St. Sophia, 66; ities, 37S-81.
used as schools, 83; no. of Greek, Clemenceau, Georges : never visited
85 ; Greek, restored, 112 ; chapels, Turkey, 559; reaction against,
131 ; Amer. missionaries establish, 570.
132; many old, in Asia Minor, Clergy: Turkish, narrow, 122. 8ee
195, 196; non-Moslem own lands, also Priests.
241-2; foreigners may possess in Clerks : trained in French schools,
Turkey, 437-8; in France 131; Mohammedan girls as, 146;
and Belgium, destroyed, 509. duties, 244.
8ee also the various ecclesiastic Climate: wide range in Ott. Em-
captions. pire, 283.
Churchill, N.: establishes newSPaper, Clothing : that worn by Turkish
452. kbojas, 32 ; that worn by Levan-
Churchill, Winston: cited, 613, 614, tines, 32 ; worn in Auatolia, 33 ;
620. dress of Kurdish men, 149-50;
Cilicia (Turkish province) : roads Turkish woman's changing, 143,
in, 21S-19; its plain, 225, 226, 146; made by Arabian women,
228 ; forest area in, 303 ; suitable 153 ; germ infected, 166 ; as trib-
for cotton, . 372 ; Christian ute, 185 ; sold in shops, 332; as
churches preserved in, 196; exports article of trade, 33, 94; imports
through Mersina, 212-13; branch taxed, 341 ; various articles, enu-
bank in, closes, 376 ; Armenians merated, 32, 33, 43, 94, 102, 141,
in, 517, 528; massacres in, 69 ; 142, 146, 147, 148, 149, 15S-9, 185,
Armenians leave, 63, 529 ; French 341, 373.
interests in, 358; they suffer, 26; Cuidus (Greek sculptor) : his Dem-
French army in, 525, 545-6 ; eter, 194. .
French mil. excesses in, 560-1; Cnidus, Asia Minor : Hellenic art
propaganda rdg. A r m e n i a n in, 195; excavations in, 199.
troubles, 469-70; in French sphere, Coalitions: of parties sought in
542; French mandate relinquished, Turkey, 29; Balkan against
550 ; Brit. troops withdrawn from, Turks, 493. 8ee also Alliances.
545-6; Turkish troops to be with- Cocks, J. Seymour : cited, 609, 612,
drawn, 626. 617.
Circassians: in Turkey, 38; Mos- Codes : ancient legal, 183 ; Mosaic,
INDEX 709
183; European, 183; mining, 314, civil code inadequate, 434;
325 ; Ott. civil, religious in basis, freedom of. in capitulations, 437;
434. confined to specified porta, 438;
Cohen, Albert : his pen name, 53 ; ex- free at Constantinople, 611-12;
ponent of Pan-Turanianism, 53. guarantees rdg., at Constan-
Coins : found in old ruins, 191, 262. tinople, 661. Policy, method, etc.
Colleges and Universities: Greeks -Turkish policy and method, 214,
support, 83 ; in Turkey, promote 220-1, 343, 346, 352; Turkish,
tolerance, 119 ; Europeans grad- needs reform, 342 ; methods in
uate in Constantinople, 119 ; only Levant, 299 ; method in Stamboul,
one Turkish, 122; Amer. establish, 331 ; method of peasants, 332 ;
132 ; Amer. colleges send teachers colonial practices, 342, 343, 345;
to Turkey, 132; mission schools various practices, 216 ; prewar
prepare students for, 134 ; Turkish policy in Turkey, 343; Ger. policy
women study in Amer. and Euro- in Turkey, 33, 347-9; Amer.
pean, 143, 146; Orientals educated method, 349; Brit. policy in Near
in, in U. S. and Europe, 158; East, 351-2; French policy in
training provided for, 428; Jew- Near East, 351-2; allied policies
ish, in Je.rusalem, 548. Various in Near East, 619. Agencies, etc.·
institutions inside and outside of -caravan, 205, 218; camel, uneco-
Turkey, named and described, etc., nomic, 205 ; camel, declining, 205 ;
xi, 1, 4, 6, 7, 45, 76, 98, 117, 118, rail (see also rys.), 205-6 ; routes
119, 120, 125, 126, 128, 133-4, 137, terminate at Samson, 208; ship
141, 143, 146, 149, 153, 155, 159, routes, 209 ; sea routes preferred
161, 165, 169, 172-4, 177, 186, 192, by Turks, 223; Turkish ships, 214,
280, 361-2, 384, 411, 430, 448, 473, 215 ; cabotage, 215 ; tracJe routes,
476,484,491,501-2,523, 543,~ 235-6, 333 ; transit, 333, 334 ;
625. transshipment charges heavy, 209;
Colonial Products : as article of cooperative societies, 96; ware-
trade, 94. houses, 209, 212, 260, 350, 351,
Colonies: Jewish, 87-90, 95, 96, 115, 367, 371; conferences and conven-
287, 300, 548 ; Greek, 361, 559 ; tions, 216, 340; forwarding agents,
Ger. desires in Africa, 510 ; re- 220; stores or shops, 331-2, 367;
ligious, 115 ; agric., 300 ; policies booths and bazaars, 331-2; back-
of, 342. sheesh, 335 ; branch houses, 345 ;
Commagene, Hellenistic kingdom: wholesalers and retailers, 346 ; im-
ruins only partly explored, 188. porting houses, 346 ; commission
Commerce and Trade: importance firms, 346; banks (q. v.), 347-8;
in modern life, 283; influence in trade commissions, 347; drafts
Turkey, 94, 440; wide knowledge and bills of Jading, 348; insurance
necessary for foreign, 329-30; re- and insurance brokers, 348, 350 ;
lation between importing and ex- capitulations ( q. "·), 431. Ad-
porting, 329; foreign must be verse factors, etc.-boycotts, 89,
financed, 339 ; credit extension, 212; artificial barriers, 213, 341-
342-4; affected by war, 340; pros- 2; various restrictions, 214, 215,
perity depends on safeguarding, 262, 341 : excessive freight rates,
207; position of Smyrna in, 205- 273; emigration, 332; overstock-
6; Smyrna loses its importance, ing, 342 : sharp dealing and dis-
334 ; importance of Constantinople honest practices, 343, 345, 641 ;
in Oriental, 209, 333-4; position of speculation, 464. Carried on in
Turkish, abnormal, 336; trade bal- various centers, 90, 94, 208, 211,
an<'es in Turkish foreign, 337, 388, 216-18; in Salonika, 90; coal
428; compPtition between various ports, 208·9 ; Constantinople
nations, 339, 342, 352; recupera- ( q. "·), 209, 233 ; in Smyrna, 205-
tion in Turkey will be slow, 352; 6, 212; l\I~>rsina outlet for
Turkey, a debtor nation, 388; Cilicia, 212-13. Armenians en-
treaties governing, 433, 644; Ott. gage in, 67, 93-4; Greeks excel
710 INDEX
and engage in, 84. 85, 91, 112, 214, 328-53, 579; foreign markets, 287;
346, 360, 361; Jews engage in, 87, factors in foreign markets, 329-
SS. 89, 90, 92, 93, 328-9 ; esrly, 30; factors in clearing merchan-
between Syria and Egypt, 185 ; dise, 335; use of forests in, 302,
Turkish, controlled by foreign com- 30!-5 ; price, not quality rnles,
panies, 213-U; attitude of foreign 332-3 ; shopkeepers and their lines,
companies toward, 342; countries 332; trade revival in Levant, 333-
trading with Palestine, 287-8; 4; invisible payments, 337; capitu-
Amer., competes with Tnrkish, lations. 437-8; free transit, 611-
330; Amer., at Constantinople, 12, 649 ; statistics, 213, 330. 33-l-
336; position of U. S. in Turkish, 6, 350. See alJJo Commercial Or-
336, 352; Amer. trade declines, ganizations ; Customs Duties ;
361 ; Amer. mistakes and correct Revenues; Ships and Shipping;
policy, 3H; interest of U. S .• in and the several countries and
Turkish, 501; Ger. in Tnrkey, 332- peoples.
3.. 3!9-50; statns of Rnssian, 336, Commercial Organizations: Cham-
359-60, 647; close relation be- bers of Commerce, 3!7; Gn!eks
tween Anatolia and Syria, 342 ; have, 85; Tnrlash, 21-t; German,
Brit., in Nesr East, 3!9-50, 359; 3!7, 3!8; Brit., 3.30; Amer. Cham-
French, 358 ; ltal., 360, 619. Yari- ber of Commerce for the Levant.
ous articles of, 9!. 205-6, 208-9, 1, 352, 361, 378, 430; Federated
216, 236, 286, 287, ~. 290, Amer. Chambers of Commerce of
293, 294, 306, 313, 314, 317, 318. :Xear East, 63, 352.
319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 330, Commissions : of Financial Control
331, 332, 334, 336, 337, 338-9, 346, and Reform, 238; land, 245 ;
360, 373, 472; imports, 20.5-6, 286, Turkish Trade, 342; of Jurists.
293, 332, 336, 338-9, 373, 472 ; 435; Irrigation, ~; Turkish ~nd
consnmers of imports in Tnrkey, Georgian, 649 ; lfu:ed, 651, 652,
223-4; by Levan tine traders, 299; 667.
how to restore Turkish, 33!; im- Committees : on rivers, 265: stand·
ports decline, 340; inferior Euro- ing, in Turkey, 415 ; provincial
pean goods, 433 ; illegal imports executive, 423. Of Public Safo>ty.
dnring war, 464; per capita. 330; organized among miL officers, 4SIJ.
statistics, 334-6; exports, 209, 236, Of t:'nion and Progress, name of
286, 287, ~9. 290. 306, 313, 317, Young Turks' organization, 476:
318, 319, 321. 322. 323. 324, founded, 456. 4....~ 486 ; policies
336, 337, 338, 346, 360, 373 ; re- and methods. 486, 552; restricts
strictions on export, 289, 3!1, 464 ; press, 461; returns to power, 461-
of wool, possible, 290; Tnrkisb 2 ; its cabinet retires, 466 ; mem-
lignite suitable for, 3U; less than bers. 50'!; arrange for translation
imports in Levant, 299 ; small sur- of Koran. 53! ; other activities,
plus for, in Tnrkey, 330; export 4S1-5. 486-7.
duties, 397; per capita, 330 ; sta- Communications: difficult in Turko>y.
tistics, 33! ; method of reckoning 208; determine importance of'
Turkish, 33!. Backward in Tnr- Tnrkish towns, 217 ; modem
key, 9; distasteful to Tnrk, 40: methods necessary for business,
people of Ott. Empire deficient•in, 231; to be developed between Tnl"
283; passive, in Near East, 299; key and Russia. 647; telephones,
Tnrkish precarious, 352 ; needs ne- 93. 233. 276. 362, 374; tel!'graph,
glected in Tnrkey, 396; declines, 232-3. 276, 450; wireless. 233: air,
90, 205; shonld be taught in Tnl" 233-5. See alJJO Post Offices ; Rail-
key, 136; school for, in Beirut, ways ; and Ships and Shipping.
133. Decentralizing tendency along Companies: Turkey developed by, 93 ;
Black Sea, 208; how success in travel promoted by, 204; trad-
shipping obtained, 216; Anatolian ing, 9!. 213-14, 332-3. 350, 352,
rivers unimportant for. 217; fol" 361, 3i5; ship and shippin~. 211,
eign and domestic. 213-14, 217, 213, 214, 215. 329, 3!7, 3!8, 350,
INDEX 711
357; ry., 225, 227, 230, 310, 366, Bros., 367, 369 ; MacAndrews &
370, 380; telegraph, 232, 473; Forbes, 346; Mavrogordato, 376;
transportation, 232 ; agric. joint- Nairn Transport Co., 232; Otto-
stock, 245 ; irrigation, 278 ; coal man-Amer. Development Co., 101,
and mining, 314, 318, 321, 323, 213, 377, 379 ; Ott. Imperial Es-
371, 641; oil, 315-16, 346, 432, tates, Inc., 315; Pearson Co., 278;
634; harbor, 327; insurance, 329; Quay Co., 350; Regie Gl!nl!rale de
sewing machine, 331, 346 ; tobacco, Chemins de Fer et de Travaux
346; commission, 346; public uti!• Publil!s, 364; Russo-Asiatic Cor-
ities, 362; water, needed, 374; poration, 351 ; Seri Sefain, 214 ;
banking, 375-6, 432 (Bee also Singer Sewing Machine Co., 346 ;
Banks and Banking). In Aden, Smyrna Quay Co., 334 ; Socil!t6
94 ; in Smyrna, 205-6, 212, 215, Anonyme d'Eleetricit6 Ganz, 362;
334, 346; in Constantinople, 214, Soci6t6 Anonyme Ottomane des
345, 352, 473; in Turkey, 207-16, Mines de Balia-Karaidin, 316-17,
288, 343, 344, 345, 346-7, 351, 360, 321, 323 ; Soci6t6 Anonyme des
361, 372, 376, 385-6, 641. 654; Telephones, 362; Socil!t6 d' Hera-
Black Sea, 209 ; nominally under ell!e Anonyme Ottomane, 314;
Turkish organization, 225 ; may Socil!t6 Ottomane d'Eraclee, 641;
own land, 245 ; foreign policies in- Standard Oil Co. of America, 315-
fluence, 329; National Assembly 16; Standard Oil Co. of
members in, 351 ; many fail, 352; New York, 846, 432; Sultan
perquisites granted to, 366; in- Abdul Hamid Estate, 315; Turk-
terdicted by capitulations. JewiSh, ish National Telegraphic Agency,
94; French, 212, 314, 360; Turk- 473 ; Turkish Petroleum Co.: 315 ;
ish, 213-14, 351, 376, 385-6; Swiss, Whittall's & Co., 345, 350.
224; Anglo-French, 233; Ger., Concessions: privileges covered by,
288, 343, 347, 372, 465; Hun- 202, 222, 227, 367, 368; difficult to
garian, 307-8; Amer., 339, 344, investigate, 202; status in Near
346, 352, 361, 501; Brit., 278-9, East, 203, 376-7; how obtained,
350, 351, 360, 371, 380; Russian, 222; regulations rdg., 262-3;
none incorporated in Turkey, 360; diplomatic intervention in, 311,
Belgian, 362; Ital., 641, 65-l. 367-8; perquisite of Sultan, 315;
Turkish, eontrolled by foreigners, ignorance rdg., 325; holders of, do
213 ; foreign, hold property not respeet Turkish rights, 327;
through Turkish subjeets, 239; period covered by, 327; not used,
attitude of foreign, 342; how 368; obtained by dubious means,
Turkish company financed, 370. 370 ; how paid, 370 ; Turkey's
Various named-Amer. Express position favorable rdg., 382; basis
Co., 376; Anglo-Persian Oil Co., for Turkish, 382-3; future of, 433;
316, 634; Anglo-Turkish Trust powers reeognize, 618; validity
Co., 380; Bagdad Uy. Co., 310; questioned, 229; voided and abro-
Borax Consolidated Co., Ltd., 318, gated, 203, 208, 380. Various,
371; Brit. Trade Corporation, 350, granted. 93, 94, 211, 213, 226, 227,
375; Corporation for the Eco- 228, 229, 233, 239-40, 21',0..2, 312,
nomic Development of Turkey, 359, 363, 364, 371, 377 ; new
Ltd., 351 ; Delmedico & Co., 376 ; Turkish, how granted, 636; ry.,'
Eastern Telegraph Co., 232 ; Er- 226, 227, 228, 229, 231, 315, 3~-
hardt, 347; Ger. Anatolian Co., 871, 380-2, 461, 485 ; telegraph,
368; Giraud, 345; Haidar Pasha 233; land and agric., 239-40, 261,
Port Co., 380; Imperial Air Trans- 363 : mining and quarrying (in-
port Co., 234; John Jackson Co., l'luding coal), 260, 261, 262, 310,
208; Karagousian, 376; Krupp, 312, 313-14, 318, 319, 363, 371-2,
347; La Fontaine, 845; Levant 640, 644 : mining, needs reform,
Co., 350; 438-40; Levant Line, 325-6; irrigation eonstrul'tion ad-
848; Levant Stevedoring Co., 850; visable, 274; forest, 307; ports,
Levant Trading Co., 850 ; Lynch 313-14, 880; petroleum, 315; pe-
712 INDEX
troleum, requested, 316; transpor- of distance from, on various re-
tation, 363 ; bank, 376 ; Amer. gions, 394. Pop., etc.-minority
(Chester, Ottoman-Amer. Develop- subjects in, 21; Jews, 36-7, 53,
ment), 26, 101, 208, 213, 229, 231, 88, 91, 92, 94, 95; Albanians, 37;
235, 308, 310, 315, 378-81, 461, Greeks, 45-6, 62, 112; Levan tine
572; Amer., annulled, 352; atti- colony, 58; Armenians, 65, 66,
tude of powers toward ·it, 660; 530; Amer. visit, 204; Russians,
Jews hold, 93, 548 (Rutenberg) ; 344; Turks most numerous, 473;
French, 211, 213, 229, 319, 364, citizens, 476; foreigners, 58, 311,
368-9; Brit., 227; Franco-Belgian 332; pop. not included in inter-
group, 227; Turks hold, 228; Ger., change of peoples, 62; migration
231, 359, 368, 371, 485 ; Russian, of non-Moslems from, 63, 581 ;
368 ; promised to !tal., 644. rules governing entry of foreign-
Confederations: German, 499. ers, 63; Turkish women, 141-5;
Conferences: Lausanne, 17, 20, 45, home life, 146-9 ; languages
60-3, 105, 215, 230, 345, 376-7, spoken, 36-7, 344. Described,
379, 380, 386, 422, 427, 517, 547, characterize-d, etc., 25 ; impor-
570-2, 659-60; Paris peace, 63, tance, 14-15; influence and at-
380, 544, 545, 555, 556, 558, 559 ; mosphere, 24, 33, 45, 122,
London, 69, 70,442,443, 563,565; 425; attractive to Turks, 25; cos-
Washington (limitation of arma- mopolitan, 32-3; 473; Byzantine,
ments), 231, 434-5 ; San Remo, 32-3; not the real Turkey, 32-3;
315, 563-4, 633-4 ; Smyrna, 425-6 ; leading Turkish coast city, 209; a
Constantinople (ambassadors), transit port, 209; ry. connections,
479; Baku, 514; Kuwait, 538; 224, 225 ; Smyrna compared to,
Barcelona, 666; shipping, 216; 212; New York, ditto, 450; Ar-
held with press, in Turkey, 464. menians build edifices of, 66 ; needs
See also Congresses. new buildings, 374; table grapes of,
Confiscations: by Angora Assembly, 290 ; large estates in, 294 ; forests
26 ; feared by foreigners, 28-9. near, 308; its water supply, 267;
Congresses: economic, 27, 143, 281, Greeks essential to its prosperity,
382-3; Berlin, 70, 493, 495-6; In- 112; organizations in, 127, 141,
ternational Air, 233-4 ; Paris, 447; 143-5, 243, 430; post offices, 231;
Syro-Palestine, 550; Sivas, 553, telegraph, 232, 233, 473; no. of
627-8, Erzerum, 553, 627; held by autos and trucks in, 219 ; harbor
Turkish Nationals, 412, 553, 560, needs enlargement, · 371 ; ware-
627. See also Conferences. - houses needed, 371 ;· fire in, 374.
Conquests : by Turkish peoples, 39, Superstitions and ignorance in, 32 ;
57, 87, 89; of Egypt, 106; reasons center of education, 127, 129; in-
for Turkish, 521 ; Arab, in Spain, tellectual environment, 461 ;
91. See also Ott. Empi~e; Tur- schools and colleges in, xi, 84, 86,
key ; and Turks. 118-19, 125, 126, 127, 129, 131,
Conspiracies : against Sultan, 456. 133, 135, 172, 411, 448 ; religious
Constantine (Greek ruler): re- fanaticism in, 32; religious of-
called, 564; activities, 566. ficials in, 23, 98, 99, 418, 420-1,
Constantine the Great : establishes 630; the press in, 105, 377, 418,
Eastern Empire, 77. 451, 454, 458-9, 462, 463, 469, 473,
Constantinople (city, vilayet, and 475, 572; despatches from, 379-
prov.), Turkey : mentioned, 12, 80; advts. give good results, 474.
24, 50, 51, 76, 151, 155, 310, 557, Economic rivalry in, 32 ; declines
654; name given to, 14; praised, as commercial center, 90; trade in,
13 ; location, 209, 333, 365 ; dis- 90, 209, 210, 212, 333, 336-7 ; mar-
tances from, to other cities, 205, kets, 374; business men of, travel
224; has unproductive European little, 204; base of its com'l im-
hinterland, 209; Derinje near, portance, 209 ; business houses
211 ; Scutari near, 128; re- closed, 346; banks in, 93, 351-2,
laUon to Asia Minor, 336; effect 432; penetration of foreign capi-
INDEX 713
tal, 362; position of banks pre- mining regulations for, 260 ; govt.
carious, 376 ; enjoys fiscal privi- expenditures largely made in, 392;
leges, 398 ; its revenues, 407 ; officials in, corrupt, 523. See also
banker in, cited, 376; commercial Ott. Empire; and Turkey.
organizations in, 214, 378; Turk- Constanza, Romania : a shipping
ish company in, 214; Brit. inter- center, 216.
ests in, 350, 359; Amer. V('ssels at, Constitutions: Turkish, 66, 69, 151,
351 ; various statistics, 285, 334, 274, 411, 413-15, 420-1, 423, 444,
336. History, govt., and politics- 447, 455, 460, 478, 483, 486, 562;
its fall (1453), 9, 78, 83, 112, 179, Oregon, 139-40.
440, 521 ; Greek desire to regain, Construction : involved in ry. con-
80 ; Eastern Question revolves cessions, 222; materials (see
around, 18; Turkish capital, 45, Building Materials).
86, 212, 621, 630, 646 ; capital re- Consulates: intervene in lawsuits
moved from, 212, 412, 416, 423, in Turkey, 432.
531 ; will probably be capital Contracts: primitive, had religious
again, 424-5; now a prov., 425,531; basis, 436; State intervenes in,
loses its importance to Anatolia, 254; declared in force, 664;
469; Anatolia breaks with, 470; French in Turkey, 219; rdg. land,
attitude of its people toward An- 242, 253-4; rdg. mortgages, 258 ;
gora, 25; foreign representatives possible, for irrigation works, 274;
remain in, 424; allies occupy and made by ry. Co., 276; made with
control, 232, 469, 470, 554, 555, State, 307 ; regulations rdg., 254-
561, 631; Brit. occupy, 385; 5 ; annulled, 71 ; death voids, 254.
Turks occupy, 203; foreign miL Contributions: money, sent to Tur-
troops leave, 426; Greeks threaten key, 337; Bee also Subsidies.
to occupy, 566; parliament dis- Conventions: Turkey guarantees ad-
solved, 412; political movements hesion to, 666; for interchange of
in, 424; revolutions and revolts in, peoples, 62-3 ; commercial, 215,
458-9, 460, 477, 483; palace in- 340; Lausanne, 346-7; Brit.-Ital.,
trigues, 458-9 ; propaganda activi- 382, 613 ; Cyprus, 482 ; Austro-
ties, 484, 486-7; Chamber of Dep~ Russian, 486; Franco-Brit., 009,
uties in, 645, 649; no. of its dele- 642-3; Turko-Syrian, 652. See
gates in Angora Assembly, 425; also Agreements; Conferences;
secret intrigue of, feared, 427 ; con- Congresses ; and Treaties.
ference of ambassadors at, 479; Convents: in Armenia, 66; Roman
concert of powers in, 503-4 ; Catholic, 131.
Kemal breaks with govt. at, 560 ; Conversions: Ger. to Mohammedan-
allied demonstration at, 561; allies ism, proclaimed, 509..
flouted in, 561 ; Turkish govt. in, Coolidge, Prof. Archibald Cary :
a figurehead, 565; allied agreement cited, 14, 16.
rdg., 609-12; to become a free port, Coliperative Societies: in Palestine,
610; Turks not to be deprived of, 96.
631; security guaranteed, 650; Corruption : in Turkish official life,
treaty signeo at, 653; treaty to be 427, 505.
eon firmed at, 655; Sultan flees Corsairs: See Pirates.
from, 659. Amer. officials and Costumes: Turks borrow, 9.
eommission in, viii, 384, 430; Costs: irrigation, 275-6, 279; factor,
Russia proposes reforms for, 70; in crops, 296-7; freight, 220; per
Hussia covets, 497, 610; promised day, of camels, 221; of journ~>y,
to Russia, 509; foreign diplomats from Erzerum to Trebizond, 221 ;
in, 367-8 ; foreign legal advisers in, estimated for pipe line, 316; ot
433; Armenians left in, 517; business mission, 347; of ry. build-
mixed arbitral tribunals at, 665-6; ing in Mesopotamia, 358-9 ; esti-
Superior Tribunal of Health in, mated for reforms in Constan-
abolished, 6Gtt 1\lassaer~>s ordered tinople, 374; for newsprint paper,
from, 71 ; fett>a issued from, 105; 464. See also Prices; antl Values.
714 lNDEX
Councils : vilayet, 423. 340-2; on exports, 397; Russia
Courts : Turkish women placed in, grants • special, 205 ; evils arising
145; foreigners formerly subject from, 335, 342; of Constantinople
to own, 431. See also Turkey. and Asia Minor, distinct, 336;
Coutts, Lady Burdett: offers water prohibitive, 340; controlled by
supply to Jerusalem, 160-1. powers, 340; present Turkish, 340-
Cox, 1\Iaj. Gen. Sir Percy : activi- 1; an economic barrier, 341-2;
ties, 538-9; cited, 546. drawback, 342; a State monopoly,
Crawford, Sir Richard : activities, 356; how changed, 444; foreign-
335. ers pay, 445; Turkish, 616;- re-
Credit Foncier Ottoman : gains form needed, 342; should be abol-
concession, 93. ished on certain articles, 326 ; ex-
Creditors: in Turkey, 408; dutiei! emptions from, 339-402, 341, 634 ;
and rights, 258-9 ; Turkish, lose regulations rdg., 341 ; statistics,
money, 400. 336-7. See also Revenues.
Credits: Jews arrange, 94; Ger. Customs Houses : methods of Turk-
gather information, 343; Ger. polish, 334-5.
icy, 343, 348; Brit. policy, 350; .Cypriots : study medicine, 173 ;
Europeans learn to organize, 389 ; Mohammedans, 265.
'l'urkish, authorized, 393 ; exten- Cyrenaica, Asia Minor : Turkish
sion of, in Turkey, 254, 342-3; at- officers in, to be surrendered, 626.
titude of various nations toward
extension, 343. D
Creeds : many among Mohamme-
dans, 534. Dako, 1\I. : cited, 37.
Crimea: Turkish-speaking people in, Dall'olio, Gen.: Ita!. member of
511. allied mission, 629.
Crimes: covered in capitulations, Dalman, Anatolia: water basin, 268.
436, 438; various named, 88, 107, Damascus, Syria: mentioned in
108, 109, 168, 248, 266, 332, 428, early letters, 185 ; an old site, 187 ;
459, 461, 482, 518-19. progressive, 153 ; modern city,
Crisis: approaching, in Turkey, 388. 158; its water supply, 160; rivers
Cromer, Lord Evelyn Baring : in or near, 160, 274; on mail
cited, 547. route, 232 ; prominent Christians
Crops : not an appurtenance of soil, massacred in, 81; Jews in, 91-2;
255 ; not seized with other prop- Arabian women in, 153; leprosy
erty, 259; need irrigation, 267; in, 169 ; Turkish medical school
money not lent on, 281 ; cereal and at, 174; Scotch mission in, 175 ;
industrial,. 295 ; triennial rotation, patients from, in Jerusalem hos-
296-7. See aloo Agriculture. pital, 175; crop statistics, 285;
Croton Falls, N.Y.: mentioned, 177. bazaar declines, 342; in Feisal's
Crusaders: invade Holy Land, 496. kingdom, 542-3; dist. about ex-
Crusades: Mohammedan attitude cluded from agreement, 614.
toward, 103 ; Christianity associ- Dances: Turkish, 146; Arabian,
ated with, 103; order of assassins, 153.
during, 109; France takes part in, Danes: establish schools in Turkey,
357-8; capitulations probably do 135.
not antedate, 435. Dante Alighieri: cited, 29.
Cumberland, Dr. William : thanked, Daralgos ( dist. in Asia Minor) :
6 ; sketch, 384 ; chapter in this sulphur in, 322.
book, 384-405. Darazi (founder of Druses) : activi-
Cups: oil gathered in, 316. ties, 111.
Curzon, Lord (Brit. diplomat) : Davidson, Mrs. H. A.: thanked, 6.
activities, 570, 572; cited, 18, 105, Davidson, Maj. Gen. Sir John:
517, 527-8, 547. cited, 541.
Customs Duties (Tariff) : a source Dawson, Yukon Terr.: mentioned,
of income, 396, 397 ; on imports, 430.
INDEX 715.
Debtors: rights of, in Turkey, 258- Delhi, India: special prayers at,
9. 570.
Debts: guaranties for, 244-5, 661-2; Demir-Kapu, Brusa prov.: mine at,
regulations rdg., 251, 258-9, 664; 320.
satisfied by sale, 259; for land, Democracy : debt to Asia Minor, 1.1 ;
295 ; Turkey's war, small, 385 ; in Turkey, 412, 423.
Turkish external, reduced, 385; Denek, Asia Minor : a silver mine,
Turkish public, 386, 401-5; Turk- 323.
ish external rise rapidly, 389-90; Denizli, Asia Minor: chrome in, 317.
Turkish prewar, reported oner- Denmark: adheres to law of Sefer,
ous, 400; Turkish per capita, 400; 252.
method of handling Turkish, 404- Deughene: defined, 293. ·
5 ; Turkey able to meet, 427 ; Ott. Dennis, Dr. A. L. P.: cited, 14.
to be assumed by powers, 618 ; to Dentistry : school for, in Beirut, 133.
be refunded, 633; released from, Deportations: of Armenians, 464,
633: Turkish, with individuals, 503, 510, 517, 519-20. See a~o
387; payments on, in Turkey, Massacres.
396; of peasant, 397; U. S. pub- Dere Beys (Valley Lords): power
lic, 404. See a~o Ottoman Public and decline, 238.
Debt. Derinje, Asia Minor: location, 211.
Deelarations: Balfour, 620-1: An- Dervishes : at Konia. 106. .
glo-French, 626-7; congress of Deserts : in various locations, 71,
Sivas, 627-8; of Brit. policy, 655. 180, 185, 187, 189-92, 218, 283,
Decrees, Edicts, and Proclamations: 534, 535 ; Amer. explore Syrian,
of Angora Assembly, 20; other 192; pilgrim trails over, 218; mail
Turkish, 81, 112 (ecclesiastical), route through, 232; Jews develop,
138 (educational), 222, 261, 262, 300; salt, 324; Arabs inhabit,
315, 355, 364 (1\Iuharrem), 398, 536; influence of, 536; method of
420, 452, 636 (Muharrem); rdg. warfare in, 548.
land, 244 ; issued by courts, 244 ; Diarbekr (city, vilayet, and prov.) :
provisional, 244; Imperial, neces- interior trade center, 216; high-
sary for mining, 260: ownership way through, 218; ry. projected
conferred by, 261: taxes canceled for, 230; statistics for, 284-5: no
by, 398; rdg. Armenian church, complete statistics for, 305, 367;
420; suspending press Jaws, 452; minerals in, 310, 312, 319, 322,
various proclamations, 479, 483; 323 ; concession in, 312 : revolt in,
487, .506-8, 509, 608, 618-19, 649, 483; as a boundary, 639.
660. Dictionaries: Arabic-English, 98.
Dede Agach (Dedeagach): foreign Didymus, Asia Minor : ruins at,
commerce, 335. 194; Hellenic art in, 195; exca-
Dedem Oghlu, Anatolia: location vations at, 197.
and water supply, 275. Dikes : instances of, 269-70, 271 ;
Deeds (land) : instances of and stop destruction by floods, 271 ;
regulations rdg., 151-2, 239, 241, not needed, 278.
244, 253, 254, 255, 256, 667-8. Dineir, Asia Minor: branch line at,
Deficits : of British Co., 350 ; for- 227.
eign financial groups pay, 388; Diplomacy: with relation to Tur-
Turkish in various years, 390, 393, key, 14-15; Turkish, watchful
400 ; met by increased taxation, of Russia. 15-17; Tut·ks inept for,
427. 82-3; Jews in Turkish, 87; in for-
Deir-ez-Zon (dist. in Asia Minor): eign loans, 363; at Lausanne con-
created by Sykes-Picot agreement, ference, 377; petroleum, 377;
542-3. questions of, rdg. Turkey, un-
Delcass~ TMophile (French states- known, 381-2; secret, 381-2, 509-
man) : activities, 610. 10; at Brit.-I taL convention, 382;
De!Pgates: at Lausanne conference, rdg. Near East, 503-4; Ger. in
376-7, 422. See ~o Conferences. Balkans, 503-4; Aus.-Hung. in
716 INDE~
Balkans, 504-5; Ger.-Ott., in Cen- diction ·in, 112 ; among Moham-

tral Asia, 512 ; European, toward medans, 145; regulations rdg., 256.
Armenia, condemned, 525-6 ; Djavid Bey (Turkish official) : activ-
French in Turkey, 529; Arab, ities, 368, 406.
543 ; Brit., 551 ; old-time, 559. Djemal. See J emal.
Diplomats: activities in Turkey, Djelal-Eddin, Kork-Massoff: Rus-
354; rec'd by Sultan, 414; allied, sian delegate at treaty conven-
fail to keep promises, 546. tion, 645.
Diseases : decimate pop., 9, 73; an Dobruja (Romanian prov.): Turk-
internal problem in Turkey, 23; ish-speaking people in, 511.
causes, 161, 164-5, 167, 168; epi- Documents: legal, represent evi-
demics during Middle Ages, 16~; dence, 258; select, 607-88; regula-
id., in Syria, 164, 166 ; id., in tions rdg., 667-8.
Smyrna, 166 ; combated by Doheny Research Foundation : mem-
serums, 166; education will pre- ber of, 384.
vent, 170; treated in Amer. hosp., Dominian, Leon: cited, 55, 56.
174; mental, treated, 175; con- Dominicans : establish schools in
tagious, covered in treaty, 341. Turkey, 130.
Various, enumerated-Aleppo but- Donations. Bee Gifts.
ton (see below Oriental button) ; Dormitories: student, in Turkey,
bronchopneumonia, 165 ; bubonic 119.
plague, 162 (see below, emerods) ; Dowry : regulations rdg., 256.
cerebrospinal-meningitis, 166 ; Dragomen : trained in French
chicken, pox, 163; children's, 167- schools, 131.
8; cholera, 159, 160, 164; colic, Drainage : of arid lands, 265 ; cost
167; consumption, 169; diph- insignificant, 275-6; inadequate,
theria, 166-7; dysentery, 168; injures land, 300-1; works, in
emerods (see above, bubonic progress, 301.
plague) ; epidemic ulcers, 171 ; Dresden, Ger. : mentioned, 230.
favus, 171 ; furunculosis, 172 ; Droit d'Aubaine : defined, 438; sup-
gonorrhea, 168; impetigo, 172; in- pressed, 438.
testinal, 167; itch, 171-2; jurrub Druses : branch of Shiah sect, 108 ;
(see above, itch) ; leprosy, 168-9 ; origin of name, 111 ; no. and habi-
malaria, 294; marsh fever, 293; tat, 111; history, 110-11.
measles, 165 ; Oriental button, Duden Chai, Anatolia: a water
170; paratyphoid, 164; pneu- basin, 268.
monia, 168; pulmonary tubercu- Dunmehs (Jewish converts to Mo-
losis, 169; purulent ophthalmia, hammedanism) : term 'defined, 90 ;
167; rabies, 159 ; rheumatism, manage trade of Salonika, 90.
168; rheumatoid arthritis, 168; Dutch: Jews, 89; aid hosp., 175;
ringworm, 171; scarlet fever, 165- share in Brit. holdings, 315; com-
6; sil (see above, consumption) ; pete for Turkish trade, 352; dele-
skin, 155, 165, 170-1; smallpox, gate on Ott. Pub. Debt, 355; bank
163, 167; syphilis, 168; trachoma, in Turkey, 375. Bee also Nether-
167; tuberculosis, 169; tumors, lands.
162; typhoid, 159, 164; typhus, Dutton, Dr. Samuel : cited, 117.
163-4, 174; whooping-cough, 165; Du Velay: cited, 397, 409-10.
yellow wind (see above, cholera) ; Duzjeh, Asia Minor: tobacco crop,
cattle, 289. 287.
Dispatches : foreign, published in Dwight, Rev. H. 0. : cited, 102-3.
newspapers, 472.
Disraeli : activities, 572. E
Dissenters : among Mohammedans,
534. Bee also Heretics. Earle, Prof. E. M. : cited, 226, 229.
Distances : between cities, 221, 224, Earthquakes: destruction by, 188,
225, 227, 229, 236. 191.
Divorce: Greek bishops have juris- East: Turks borrow from, 9 ; hu-
INDEX 717
man life cheap in, 29 ; invasions farmers' social status not raised
from, 34-35. Bee also Near East; by, 298; development of, a func-
Orient; Asia Minor; and the sev- tion of govt., 394 ; standard of
eral divisions of the East. national, to be raised, 427-8.
Eastern Question : characterized Greeks desire, 83 ; cost of Greek,
and defined, 15, 492 ; of Middle 85: described, 129-130; Jewish, 90-
Ages defined, 18; created by de- 91 ; of Arab women increasing,
cadence of Islam, 492 ; Brit. atti- 118; non-Moslem system, 121; Ar-
tude toward, 497·8; in peace con- menian, 127-9; industrial, 128;
ference, 556. Bee also the various Greek and Armenian compared,
• regions of the Near East. 129; influence on Armenians, 518-
Eastern Roman Empire : people em- 19; French Jesuit, 130-1; influ-
brace Islam, 39; its Greek char- ence of French, 358 ; Brit., 131 ;
acter, 77. Amer., 131-4, 361; Amer. coiL
Edessa (ancient kingdom) : loca- serves as model for, 133 ; co-
tion, 184; little known of, 184. operation keynote of, 134; Ger.,
Edib Hanum, Halideh (Turkish fem- 135, 347-8; scholarships, 347-8;
inist) : thanked, 6 ; leader among for women advances Near East,
Turks, 119; graduate of Con- 154 ; teachers, 83, 125, 128, 132,
stantinople Coli., 148·9; sons at- 137, 140, 143, 644. Bee al110
tend Amer. univ., 120; receives Schools; and Colleges and Univer-
votes for parliament, 146: aids sities. ·
Kemal, 563: cited, 142, 148-9, 418. Eftimios Effendi (leader of Turkish
Edicts. Bee Decrees. ' Orthodox Greeks): activities and
Edifices: old, in Asia Minor, 189- excommunication, 100.
190, 195 : Romans build on old Egerdir, Asia Minor: ry. in, 226;
foundations, 197; old, owned by sulphur mine at, 322.
State, 262; mulk, 263: materials Egin, Asia Minor: bas highway,
in Turkish, 374; market for port- 218.
able, 374 ; office buildings needed, Egypt : Turkish influence in, 11 ;
374. Turks conquer, 89, 106, 417, 438,
Edinburgh, Scotland : Curzon in, 440 ; Turkey loses, 82, 485 ; power
18. of khalifate in, 105 ; Ott. loans a
Editors: in Turkey, able, 454; ar- charge against, 401 ; Turks flee to,
rest, exile, and assassination of, 456 ; closed to Turkish news-
459·61, 468, 470, 471; honored papers, 474; cause of Brit. inter-
in Turkey, 471. Bee also Periodi- . vention in, 18; Brit. occupation
cals; and Press. imminent, 482; Anglo-French
Edremid : basin in Anatolia, 267 ; agreement, 493 ; Brit. activities in,
iron mines near, 319. 541, 545, 546-7; Armenian busi-
Education : nPglected in Turkey, 9- ness houses in, 67; Jews in, 89-
10, 126, 396; needed, 116, 136 90 ; Jews trade in, 94; Ismailiyis
(vocational), 137 (professional), in, 109 ; Druses in, 111 ; Senussi
282 (agricultural) ; · Turkish, menace, 112 ; Arab women in, 153 ;
characterized, 10, 125-6; taxation patients from, in Jerusalem, 175;
for, in Turkey, 83; income and Syrian traders visit, 185. Re-
expenditures, 395-6; attitude of forms introduced, 67; nationalism
modern Turkey toward, 119-20; spreading in, 417 ; mixed courts in,
statistics, unreliable in Turkey, 419; capitulations in, 437-8; for-
123; no national system in Tur- eign intervention in, 486; may
key, 123; Turkish system, 123-7; react against 'Vestern civilization,
of girls, 126, 144, 428: Turkish 550; subject of diplomatic negotia-
inferior to Armenian, 128; type tions, 609. Cotton in, 267 ; irriga-
necessary for TurkPy, 136-7; tion possible in, 269 ; compared to
Turkish revival, 137-40; Turkish Mesopotamia, 269; imports into,
restrictions, 138-9; results and 290, 306, 337; rice compared to
future in Turkey, 136, 137, 170; Turkish, 294. Ancient records,
718 INDEX
cited, 185, 187; excavations in; Engineers : various in Turkey and
186; foreign element in early cul- activities, 66, 161, 230, 358, 359,
ture, 187 ; ancient kings of, build 369.
cities, 188. Engines. See Machines and Ma-
Egyptians: their culture imported, chinery.
56; students in U. S., 119; study England. See Gt. Britain.
medicine, 173; early architecture English. See British.
of, 181 ; occupy Syria, 186. See Entertainments: given by Turkish
also Egypt. women, 46.
Ehtiar-mejlissi: defined, 294. Enver Pasha (Turkish official) :
Einstein, Dr. Albert: lectures in policy and activities, 508, 553, 554,
Jerusalem, 135. 557. .
Ejmiadzin, Armenia: its cathedral, Entente: Eng.-French (1904), 486-
66 ; Catholics reside at, 70. 7; Russian, 489; European, 503,
Elections: restrictions in, 100; of 509-10, 525, 540, 631; Little, 567.
khalif, 104, 107-8 ; Turkish, by See also Allies.
manhood suffrage, 413 ; for presi- Envoys. See Ambassadors and En-
dent in Turkey, 415, 668; of voys.
Turkish Assembly, 428, 469; Enzeli (Black Sea port) : port for
Greek, 564 ; Brit., 570. . Teheran, 237.
Electricity : source of, 268; con- Ephesus, Asia Minor : early art in,
trolled by foreigners, 362 ; needed 195; excavations and study in,
in Turkey, 374. 195, 197; ry. reaches, 226.
Eliot, Sir Charles: cited, 35-7, 40..1, ·Epidemics: See Diseases.
46, 50-1, 57-8, 98-9. Epigraphy : Amer. experts, in Syria,
Elizabeth, (Eng. queen) : relations 192.
with Turkey, 439-40. Epirus (region in Europe) : Turkey
Elkus, Abram I., (U. S. ambassa- loses, 82.
dor): telegram to; cited, 616-17. Erbil, Asia Minor : resources,
Elliot, Sir Henry : attitude toward 22.
Turkey, 480. Eregli. · See Heraclea.
Elmali, Anatolia: highway runs Erivan, Armenia : capital, 72, 531 ;
through, 218. treaty ratified at, 650.
Embargoes: instances of, 289, 342, Ermeni : name applied to Gregorian
493. Armenians, 98.
Embassies : various, and their activ- Ertogrul : his son founds Turkish
ities, viii, 444, 461, 464, 476, 484. State, 77.
See also Ambassadors and Envoys. Erzerum (city, prov., and vilayet) :
Emigrants: return to Orient, 169; location, 75 ; road leads to, 218,
send money to Turkey, 337. 221; ry. projected to, 230, 368;
Emigration: instances of, 27, 85, Russia opposes new line at, 369 ;
91, 519, 530; results, 332, 337-8; camel caravans pass through, 221;
free to Russian Moslems, 624. · engineer in, 265; statistics rdg.,
See also Armenians. 284, 285 ; resources, 315, 320, 324 ;
Emin Bey, Ahmed: thanked, 6; promised to Russia, 510, 617 ;
sketch, 448; chapter in this book, Turks defeated at, 540; Turkish
448-75. congress at, 553, 560; Turkish
Empires: succession of, in Orient, forces in, 557.
194. See also especially, Ottoman Erzinjan, Asia Minor : Turks de-
Empire. feated at, 540.
Employees: French in Turkey, 364; Eski Shehr, Asia Minor : farm
Turkish, 388, 409 ; Turkish govt. methods near, 292 ; interior trade
needs more, 434 ; right of health center, 216; estates near, 293; re-
among, 666-7. See also Officials. forestation at, 308; meerschaum
Engineering: taught in Turkey, found near, 321.
118-19, 125, 133; should be taught, Eskenazi (Jewish family): emi-
137. grate to Constantinople, 91.
INDEX 719
Eskenazi, Solomon: his influence, in Turkey and Near East, 57, 85;
88, 90. intrigue in Turkey, 61; Arme-
Estambulis (Jewish family) : prom- nians seek aid from powers, 70;
inent in Damascus, 92. force Turkish reforms, 81-2; in
Essex, Eng. : mentioned, 104. trade, 85, 91, 93-4, 343 ; schools in
Estates : in various regions, 293, Turkey, 135; Turks compared to,
294. See also Lands. 473-4. Bee also the several Euro-
Eudermisb, Aidin proy.: mines in, pean countries and peoples.
318, 320. Eusebius ( eal'ly Christian writer) :
Europe : mentioned, 83 ; Turkey's cited, 196. ·
influence on, geographically, 13; Eversley, Lord George J. S.·L.:
contrasted with Asia, 103; con- cited, 7-8, 389, 493.
nection with Asia projected, 211 ; Evjiler, Asia Minor: mine at, 319.
Turkish frontier in, 31. 207 ; trade Examinations: medical, in Turkey,
route from, to India, 333 ; Turk- 155; advocated for officials, 427.
ish influence on, 11; Mohamme- Excavations: archmological, and
dans in, 17-18, 39, 519; Turks in, their results, 180-3, 189, 199 ; dif-
79, 494 ; Turks flee to, 456, 460 ; ficulties of, 198.
attitude toward Turks, in Western, Excesses : Greek, in Smyrna, 559.
561; Jews in, 92, 93, 115; attitude Bee also Massacres.
toward Jews in Eastern, 345 ; Ar- Exchange: business men must know
menians in Western, 530; inva- foreign, 329; values and rates,
sions from, 496. Policy of rys. in 336, 340. .
Turkish, 202; ry. mileage in Turk- Exemptions: from customs duties,
ish, 222; ry. connections with 634,652.
Turkish, 224 ; wireless messages Exiles: Turkish, 20, 29. See alao
sent from, 233; forests in Turkish, Penalties.
304; industrial expansion in, 389; Explorers: in Asia Minor, 180-1.
mfrs. of, 166, 290, 338; foreign Expositions: planned in Turkey, 26.
com., 286, 287-8, 322, 337, 340 Expropriations : regulations rdg.,
(Bee also Commerce); traders 259-60 ; of foreign decedents, sup-
from Levant visit, 299 ; activities pressed, 438.
of money-lenders of, in Turkey, Extraterritoriality. See Capitula·
389. Turkish women and others tions.
educated in, 146, 158; smallpox Eyes : smallpox destroys, 163 ; hand·
severe in, 163; museums in, 194, some in Orient, 167. See alBo
196; Christian Churches in, 209; Blindness.
Armenian officials sent to, 66-7;
unable to stop massacres, 71 ; F
France represents interests of, in
Turkey, 357-8; growth of nation- Fables: Turkish, 117, 491.
ality in, 410, 441; govts. of, de- Factories : silk, in Lebanon, 358.
scribed, 416; Turkish diplomatic Fairs: sites of, owned by State,
victory over, 426; Turkish ex- 244.
ample to, 445; Latin and Greek Famine: decimates pop., 73-164; in
have common legal traditions, various places, 163, 204. ·
441; community of interests in, Fanatics: in Turkey, 107; among
446; naturalization in, 446; bal- Christians, 116.
ance of power in Eastern, 492 ; Far East: reason far stagnation,
powers of, keep Turkey alive, 297-8; news of published in Turk-
495; Turks abandon, 512; Kemal- ish papers, 457.
ists equipped from, 656. Bee alBo Farmers: Assembly tries to aid, 26;
the several European countries. Turks as, 40 : Turkish women be-
Europeans: their name in India, rome, 43: in Anat'llia, (lescrihecl,
58: called "Franks," 358; atti- 45; Russian Jewe: in PRlestine,
tude toward Orientals, 42: have in- 95 ; polygamy among Turkish,
itiative, 44; jealous of Greeks, 48; 142; regulations rdg., 245; bank
720 INDEX
lends money to, 281 ; Turkish pre- 292; manure used on only few
fer town life, 282 ; practices of crops, 293.
Turkish, 292-3 ; lease lands, 295 ; Festivals : how dates promulgated in
in debt to proprietors, 295 ; pos- Turkey, 451.
sessions of peasant, 295-6 ; not Fethi Bey (prime minister) : activi-
elevated by education, 298; op- . ties, 427.
pressed in Near East, 298; should Fethiyye, Anatolia : location and
have security, 300. See also Agri- water supply, 275.
culture. Fetva: various instances of, 105,
Farms and Farming : farming 659.
taught, 118-19; farming among Fetvahan: legalizes certificates, 240.
Kurds, 150; dry farming unknown Feudalism: in Turkey, 238; among
in Turkey, 297. Farms-French Arabs, 238.
own, 131; large, where located, Feuds: among Arabs, 549.
294; small, mainly in Asia Minor, Fevzi Bey: organizes Nationalist
295; rented, 295; statistics, 295, Assembly, 562.
296. Fields: in Turkey, 294; rented, 295.
Faruk, Prince Omer: his tutor, Finances and Financial Affairs :
476. Turks not inclined to, 40; irre-
Fasts : observed by Mohammedans, sponsibility rdg., 407-9: Armenians
102. orga11ize Turkish, 66.; Jewish
Fatima (daughter of 1\Iohammed): activities in, 88·9, 90, 92, 93; ry.,
her husband becomes khalif, 107. in Turkey, 223; 'loans, 228-9, 402-
Fatimide Khalif el-Hakim: king of 3 (see a!Bo Debt; Loans; and
Egypt, insane, 111. Money) ; commissions, and advi-
Feake, (1823) : sells his wife, 104. sory bodies, 238, 404, 407 ; peoples
Federation : Arabian, 543. of Near East shrewd in, 297: in
Fees: tuition, abolished, 126-7; foreign trade, 343; Brit., 351 ;
land, 245, 263 ; mortgages, 258-9 ; French, 358, 382 ; European
mining, 260-1: concessionaires groups, 382, 638; allies, control
pay, 261; license, 395; slaughter, Turkish, 634-7; negotiations in
407. Chester concession, 379-80 ; condi-
Fehmi Bey, Rustem: director in tion of Turkish, 348, 385, 390-2,
Brit. trade organization, 351. 394, 401, 405, 427; deflation in
Fehmi, Hassan (editor) : assassi- Turkey, 385 ; origin of "financial
nated, 459. statesmanship," 389; financiers re-
Feisal, Emir (king of Mesopota- ceive large commissions, 390; lax
mia): descendant of Prophet, 544; administration in Turkey, 394-
interested in education, 118; re- 5; Ott. Public Debt bolsters
organizes medical school, 174; his up, 400 ; method of financing Tur-
aide-de-camp, 167; relations with key during war, 401 ; method of
Brit., 540, 551 ; his forces form dealing with Turkey's public debt,
secret society, 541-2; establishes 404-5; speculation, 405-6; opera-
Arab State, 542; calls on Pope, tion of Turkish subdivisions, 406-
544; at peace conference, 544-5; 7; how capitulations react on
cited, 544. Turkish, 409 ; how Kemalists ob-
Fellaheen : live in mud huts, 158. tained, 563 ; Turkish need reform,
Ferid Pasha, Damad (grand vizier) : 574; statistics of Turkish, inac-
posts and activities, 557, 558. cessible, 407; future of, 406, 410;
Feringhis: defined, 58. in Iraq, 657. See a1.so Capital ;
Fernandez (Jewish family) : prom- Loans ; Money ; and Revenues.
inent in Salonika, 92. Firagh,: defined, 252-3.
Fernandez (Jew) : activities, 93. Fires: in Angora, 24-5 ; in Smyrna,
Fertilizers : unnecessary in Mesopo- 212, 374, 567; in Constantinople,
tamia, 269 ; artificial, not used in 374; in Stamboul, 374; forest,
Turkey. 281; rarely U!'ed on cereal 30S; primitive fighting apparatus,
land, 292 ; used on market crops. 374.
INDEX 721
FirmtJM: defined, 311 ; fees paid for, cheaper than native, 330; flour
261. and flour mills, 341, 286, 336, 338,
Fish Hat~heries: needed in Turkey, 372, 373; wheat bread, 284, 286.
334. Dairy products-cheese, in trade,
Fishing: duties on, a State monop· 33; considered locally, 290. Eggs-
oly, 356. exported, 216. Fishes-abundant
FitzGerald, Edward: cited, 201. in Turkey, 373. Fruits-grow
Fiume: I taL attitude rdg., 558. readily in Turkey, 13, 373; in
Flags: foreign in Constantinople Syria, 268 ; in Asia Minor and
harbor, 32; Greek, in Turkey, 50; Mesopqtamia,372; not an appurte-
foreign, in Turkey, 345; Turkish, nance of soil, 225 ; improved, in
509. Palestine, 287 ; packing houses in
Flanders : Jewish bank in, 89. Smyrna, 338 ; investment oppor-
Flexner, Dr. Simon: his serum, used tunities in, 372 ; as article of trade,
in Orient, 166. 33, 206, 216 ; markets neglected,
Flies : carry disease, 167. 330 ; dried, 223, ::!87, 338 : statis·
Floods : accouuts of the, discovered, tics, 272, 276, 292, 597 : various
182 ; use in Egypt, 269 ; season fruits named, 13, 33, 40, 266, 267,
for, in Yemen, 270: lakes made by, 269, 276, 286-8, 290, 303, 330,
270 : cause destruction, 271 : this 334, 336, 338, 341, 372, 397.
prevented, 278 ; Euphrat"es in, Meat and meat products-lamb
278. and mutton, 40, 338 ; oleo oil, 336,
Fonduk8: defined, 137-8. 339; sausage, casings for, 336.
Fonjallaz, Col. : activities, 381. Nuts--338: abundant in Turkey,
Food and Foodstuffs : . Turkey can 373 ; grown in various places, 372.
produce more abundantly, 300; Confectionery, etc.-341: glucose,
sold in shops, 332 : Turkey im· 339 ; ka!va, 339 ; sugar and sugar
ports, 338 ; business controlled by cane, 267, 339: sweetmeats made
Greeks, 346 : food preserving es· in Turkey, 339. Vegetables-grow
tablishments possible, 373; how readily in Turkey, 13, 373; trans-
served in Turkey, 148; men get ported by araba, 221 ; statistics,
best, 148: that usually eaten, 284, 285, 291 ; chick peas, 276 ; cucum-
286. Cereals and cereal products bers, 40; potatoes, 221, 340;
-raised in Turkey, 276, 372, 373; pumpkins, 40 ; vetches, 276; vege-
most important crops in Turkey, table oils, 341.
284 ; fields rotated to, 297 : fall, in Foreigners: ignorant of Turkey, viii;
Turkey, 292; when threshed, and visit Turkey, 204 ; should respect
how, 293 : transported by araba, Turkish laws, 327, 382-3; become
221 : paid as rent, 295 ; in trade, subject to Turkish laws, 430;
206, 211, 335-6 ; export should in· specialists for Turkey urged, 427 ;
crease, 338: statistics, 272, 285, their attitude concerning Turkey,
291. Grain, 359, 397 : raised in 3, 213, 436; Turkish attitude
Anatolia, 34: seed grain sorted on toward, 21-3, 63, 427; granted
some farms, 292 ; article of export, capitulations ( q. "·), 24, 261, 312;
236; statistics, 579; barley, 223, lose them, 24 ; their educational
276, 286, 293 ; exported, 286. systems in Turkey, 121-2 (Bee aZ.o
Corn (maize), 40, 276, 297: Colleges and Universities; Educa-
grown in Mosul, 22 : Turks like, tion·: and Schools).; importance in
40 : fertilized, 293 ; export should Turkey, 133; have spheres of in·
increase, 338 ; corn bread, 286. fluence, 222; privileges, rights, and
Millet, 286 ; fertilized, 293. Rice, restrictions, in Turkey, 239, 248-
266, 267, 269, 293, 339 ; how 9, 250-1, 256, 437-8, 441, 444-5;
threshed, 294; its comparative how judgments against, are exe-
value, 294. Wbeat, 223, ~76, 339, cuted, 259; to have justice in Tur-
372; shipped from Novorossisk, key, 422; court methods among,
216 ; markets neglected, 330 ; 431 ; activities in Turkey, 346,
American can be laid down 854-5 ; organized business in Tor-
722 INDEX
key, under its own Jaws, 431; at- Question, 492; its Near Eastem
tacked in press, 460 ; intervene in policy compared with others, 499 ;
Turkey, 492; status, in Turkey, its foreign policy criticised, 564 ;
433, 437, 416. See aho the vari- its consular service, 238, 430; has
ous peoples and countries. delegate on Ott. Public Debt, 355;
Forestry : should be taught in Tur- enters into secret agreements, 381-
key, 136. 2, 528, 542, 543, 556, 619 ; takes
Forests : in various localities and part in Lausanne conference, 376-
districts, 302-6 ; kinds, 302-6 ; 7; various diplomatic activities,
State owned, 244; communal, 294, 503; stabilizes econ. conditions in
306, 307; recede gradually, 305; Near East, 548; declares neutral-
result of disappearance, 305 ; ity, 565; Turkish terr. apportioned
burned and destroyed, 40, 302, 304, to, 617; subscribes to Balfour
305, 306, 308, 311, 322 ; devel- Declaration, 620 ; war aims in
oped through concessions, 202, 307, Near East, 626-7; formal agree-
308, 37S-9 ; exploited for fuel, ments necessary with, 632; has
302; exploited by State, 307; rys. special interests in Turkey, 638;
exploit, 367; exploitation, ruth- its mandate, 6-l2. Jealous of other
less, 307 ; neglected, 308 ; subject powers, 15 ; relations with various
to special laws, 243 ; value - of European countries, 19, 612-13,
products, 306 ; products exported, 660; attitude toward black race,
306, 308 ; private persons may ob- 60 ; attitude toward, and relations
tain, 306 ; reason for present with Turkey, 61, 252, 36!, 368,
status, 30S-9; need capital, 374; 497, 499, 56!, 568, 572; Armenian
statistics unreliable and unobtain- business houses in, 67 ; Armenians
able, 302, 304; statistics, 30&-7. fight in, 71; unable to assume Ar-
See aho Fuel ; and Wood. menian mandate, 74; abandons
Furtuna, Aidin prov. : mines in, Armenia, 529 ; takes Germany's
319-20. place in oil fields, 315 ; competes
Foundations: g1aedib. 243; pious, with U. S., 340; Amer. troops ar-
239-243. Bee also Vakuf. rive in, 541; U. S. mission in, 632;
Fountains: in Turkey, 102; in relations with Russia, 369, 503,
Damascus, 160. 609-12; relations with Brit., 369,
France : mentioned, 63 ; Turkish ex- 381-2, 493, 52S-9, 542, 556, 663-4;
iles in, 483; Turkish organizations embittered against Greece, 564;
in, 484; Jewish bank in, 89; edu- favors Arab States, 614-16. Bee
cation of, in Turkey, 125; its also French.
schools, 130 ; churches in, ruined, Franchet d'Esperey, Gen.: not pres-
509; its art influenced by Syria, ent at Constantinople demonstra-
191 ; obtains concessions, 229, 368 ; tion, 561.
its trade, 317, 318. 319, 321, 336, Franchises: ry.. 227; for coal ex-
338, 340, 341, 349 ; its share in ploitation, 313 ; granted to for-
Mesopotamian oil fields, 633-4; eigners in Constantinople, 362.
has free port for its commerce, Bee al11o Capitulations.
615; Turkish creditors in, 355; its Francis I. (king of France) : ally
paper depreciates, 405; air serv- of Turkey, 199.
ice, 234; its cemeteries in Turkey, Franciscans : establish schools in
667. History, govt., and politics-- Turkey, 136.
takes part in Crusades. 357 ; its Franco-British Convention: text,
Jaws used as model, 307 ; inter- 642-3.
venes in Turkey, 61; intervenes in Franco-Turkish Nationalist Agree-
Syria, 493, 499 ; seizes Tunis, 493 ; ment: text, 651-3.
its colonial policy in Orient, 342 ; Frankfurter, Prof. Felix : Feisal
spheres of influence in Near East, writes, 544.
357-8, 370, 542-3; position in Franklin-Bouillon, Henry: special
Orient, 358 ; prestige lowered, 568 ; allied emissary, 568; signs treaty,
part]y responsible for Eastern 65L
INDEX 723
Franks : extension of meaning, 58, tinople, 554; their method of war•
358; in Stamboul, 331; regarded fare in Near East, 547-8; make
as barbarians, 436 ; attitude secret agreements, 528, 542, 543,
toward foreigners, 436. 556, 619 ; not informed of Brit.-
Freeman, E. A. : cited, 494-5. Arab negotiations, 543 ; negotia·
Freight: Russia grants special rates, tiona with Brit., 545-6; replace
205; rates, in Turkish interior Brit. in Cilicia, 545-6 ; assume re-
trade, 22() ; carried by rys., 223, sponsibility for Arab alfafrs, 549 ;
236 ; best way to move, 225 ; car- mandate over Cilicia relinquished,
ried by air ships, 234; high 550; relations with allies strained,
charges make exportation impos- 555, 564-5; make agreement with
sible, 273 ; special rates advisable Kemalists, 565; attitude toward
for mines, 327. Brit. at Lausanne, 572; sphere of
French : modern have little Frank- influence in Turkey, 639-40; activ·
ish blood, 39 ; diverse types ities in Ruhr, 572. See also
among, 58-9; language, 130, 138, France.
173-4, 344, 4 73 : establish schools Frontiers: travelers detained at, 12;
in Turkey, 118; Armenian and Russo-Afghan, 611 ; Persian, 617 ;
Greek schools modeled on, 128, Syrian, 617 ; Turkish, 649, 651 ;
129 ; Greek education compared to, of Thrace, 658.
130; Jesuit education in Turkey, Fuad Kiamil Bey : thanked, 6.
130-1, 173-4 ; compared with Fuad Pasha, Ali : liberal Turkish
Amer. education, 132; hosp. in leader, 481; delegate to convention,
Near East, 174, 176 : archreolo- · 645.
gical researches by, 179, 182; issue Fuel: forests destroyed for, 40, 302 ;
newspapers in Turkey, 451, 462; exported, 306 ; statistics, 306.
circulation of these, 474; control Charcoal, 206, 305, 306 ; taken
censorship, 468. Ships at Con- from communal forest, 294. Coal,
stantinople, 32; in Tu1·key, 57; in 202, 310, 312, 314, 339, 350, 351,
Smyrna, 558; capitulations grant- 359, 360, 371, 373 ; where mined,
ed to, 121, 211, 308, 438, 439; re- 313; Heraclean mines, 371, 640-1,
linquish capitulations, 24; inter- 644; concessions, 313-14, 640-1;
ested in rys., 208, 211, 226, 228, in trade, 208-9; little used locally,
230, 368-9, 381 ; shipping com- 313 ; allies permitted to purchase,
panies engage in Turkish trade, 625. Coke-Turkish coal will pro-
213 ; erect artificial trade barriers, duce, 314. Lignite, in Adrianople
213; make contracts in Turkey, prov., 314. Naphtha, 316. Pe-
219; forest experts in Turkey, troleum, see Petroleum. Wood,
308; business policy in Near East, 206, 304-5 ; 327 ; taken from com·
351-2; employees in Turkey, 364; munal forest, 294 ; decreasing,
exploit copper properties, 371 ; 305; accessible, lacking in Turkey,
banks in Turkey, 375; form finan- 373.
cial group, 382; capital in Turkey, Funerals : how news of promulgated,
93, 256-7, 314, 356-7, 371, 387: 451 ; marks beginning of revolt,
Brit. invite participation of capi- 459.
tal, 351; hold Turkish bonds, 387; Furniture and Hangings: as trib-
importance of their capital, 356; ute, 185 ; shipped from Smyrna,
Armenians aid, 71; enroll Ar- 21ti; prepared, 341. Beds, 32,
menians in army, 525, 560-1; 148; carpets, 290, 336; chandeliers,
abandon Armenians, 525, 528-9 ; 149 ; cushions, 149 ; hangings,
have political designs in Turkey, 149; rugs, 149; sofas, 149.
139; Syrian mandate, 169, 226;
manage Swiss alfairs in Turkey, G
252, 525, 529; diplomatic nego-
tiations, 381 ; oppress Mohamme- Galata (quarter of Constantinople) :
dans, 506; their soldiers In Tur- vice suppressed in, 27; commer-
key, 527, 550; occupy Conatan· cialized vice in, 103 ; commerce in,
724 INDEX
32, 335; Genoese segregated in. trade and commerce in Near East,
44Q; paintings exhibited in, 570. 288, 292, 332, 333, 343, 347-50,
Galatz, Romania : a shipping center, 359, 464: share in British hold-
216. ings, 315; hostile to Brit., 359:
Gallipoli, Turkey: its gov. exiled, agreement with Brit., 382: dis-
453; Kemal commands at, 557; criminate in favor of their na-
Brit. cemetery at, 567. tionals, 348; have delegate on Ott.
Gamaliel (Jewish scholar) : cited, Pub. Debt, 355; claims against,
411. 357; concessions and investments,
Garcia Mendezia, Doiia (Span. 359, 371, 372, 375, 381 ; own pub-
Jewess) : activities, 89. lications, 454, 462 ; policy in
Gardens : in various places, 160, 242, Balkans, 485; conversion to Mo-
283. hammedanism proclaimed, 509 :
Garroni, Marquis (ltaL statesman) : responsible for Armenian deporta-
signs treaty, 653. tions, 510 ; foreign policy, 522.
Gas: in Turkish coal, 314; conces- Germany : a world power, 359 ;
sions for works, 364. jealous of other powers, 15 : rela-
Gatheral (Brit. consul) : cited, 43. tions with Russia, 18-19; Russian
Gauls: rule Asia Minor, 193. attitude toward, 368: relations
Gautier, TMophile: cited, 177. with and attitude toward, Turkey,
Gedis, Asia Minor: mine near, 320. 70, 252, 347-8, 356-7, 359, 364,
Gemlik (Brusa prov.): mine in, 320. 384, 386, 462-3, 497, 500-1, 502-3,
Geneva, Switzerland: Young Turk 506, 608, 636, 660, 663: attitude
publication at, 484-5. toward black race, 60; desire Mid-
Genoese: in Galata, 44(); have dle East, 201 ; supplanted by
capitulations, 440. France, 315 : makes secret agree-
Gentiles: attitude toward Jews, ment with France, 381-2: inter-
345 ; toward strangers, 436. est and policy in Near East, 485,
Geography : of Ott. Empire, 13, 193, 499 : partly responsible for East-
266-7; taught in Turkish schools, ern Question ( q. "·), 494 : attitude
124. toward Albania, 505 : policy dur-
Georgia, Near East: intermarriage ing war, 509; war plans fail, 510-
in, 39; Batum ceded to, 208, 646, 11; wages aggressive war, 635:
648, 649 ; signs treaty with Tur- desires colonies in Africa, 510;
key, 648. attitude toward Armenian depor-
Gerasa, Syria : ruins and excava- tations, 519-20; U. S. declares war
tions in, 189. on, 619 : offer of peace to, 621 ;
German Confederation : Austria ex- surrenders, 624. Has air service,
cluded from, 499. Bee also Ger- 234; adheres to law of Sefer,
many. 252; com. and trade, 31.7, 318, &20,
Germans: language, 37, 344; of- 321, 336, 338, 340, 343, 347-9,
ficials, 12 ; interest and various 356-7, 464: competes with U. S.,
activities in Turkey, 33, 57, 126, 340; credit policies too liberal,
135, 211, 219, 224, 225, 228, 231, 343 ; Ott. business commission in,
232, 282, 288, 332-3, 343, 347-9, 347: students in, 347-8; invest-
355, 357, 359, 366-71, 372, 375, ments held by, 356-7; Turkish
381, 454, 462, 463, 464, 489, 509, holdings in, 364; advance money
519, 540, 609, 626 : cannot be- to Turkey, 386; reparations de-
come Turks, 446: flatter Turks, manded of, 404; its paper money,
489 ; make good soldiers, 40 : school 405: press sympathizes with, 462-
and hosp. work, 126, 140, 169, 3 : diplomacy dishonest, 499-500:
174 : archreological researches and plans road to Orient, 510-11: buys
excavations, 179, 183, 185, 189, warships, 608 : claims by and
192, 197 ; interest, etc., in rys., against, 636, 663 : territorial ad-
211, 224, 225, 228, 231, 366-71, justments recognized, 660: treaty
381, 382: leave automobiles in impositions on, 662; not repre-
Turkey, 219; own telegraph, 232; sented on mixed commission, 667.
INDEX 725
Germs: various mentioned, 166, 170, Gratuities : Turkish officials obtain,
171. 388. B66 also Bribes ; and Graft.
Ghedik: defined and described, 243. Gray, Thomas: cited, 238.
Gibbons, Herbert Adams: cited, Grazing : lands used for, 284.
492-3. Great Britain (England) : jealous
Gifts : various kinds, 239-40, 242, of other powers, 15; relations with
251-2, 263 ; regulations regarding, and attitude toward, Russians, 15,
251-2; contracts in, 253. 369, 493, 503, 611; treaties in In·
Girls: education, compulsory for. in dia, 18 ; Brit. Indian Office, 539 ;
Turkey, 124; education and oppor- Jews in, 54; supports hosp. in
tunities for, in Turkey, 125, 126, Jerusalem, 175 (see also Pales-
130, 134, 428; Turkish, join Y. tine) ; relations with and attitude
W. C. A., 141; Arabian, secluded, toward Turkey, 61, 215, 252, 315,
152. Bee also Women. • 355, 358-9, 364, 385, 386, 480, 482,
Glasgow, Scotland: mentioned, 43. 483, 489, 497-9, 524, 572, 609, 617-
Glass and Glassware: as article of 18, 667 : refuses Armenian man-
trade, 94; ancient Syrian, 178; aate, 74; abandons Armenians,
found in ruins, 191 ; polished with 529; .war relations with other na-
Turkish emery, 318. tions, 612-13; policy in various
Gleichen, Maj. Gen. Lord Edward: sections, 105-6, 342, 482, 485, 498,
cited, 21. 499, 546-7, 551, 564, 618-19; its
Goeme-Chiftik: antimony mine, 320. Asiatic rival, 482; partly respon-
Golden Fleece: mentioned, 77. sible for Eastern Question, 492 ;
Golden Horn: mentioned, 27; cities stabilizes econ. condition in Near
on, 14, 233; bridge over, 31, 35; East, 548; adheres to Jaw of Sefer,
people near, 32 ; diverse languages 252; claims Kurdistsn terr., 315;
at, 35. relations with France, 369, 497,
Goldsmiths: Armenian, 65, 67. 528-9, 564-5, 633-4 ; Ger. seeks
Golovar, Asia Minor: community agreement with, 369-70; Amer. in
mine in, 319-20. charge of consular service for,
Gordeion, Asia Minor : excavations 430; relations with Arabs, 549,
at, 197. 614-16; relations with Greeks,
Goschen, Lord George J. G.: direc- 564, 566; declares neutrality, 565;
tion of corporation, 351. attitude toward other allies, 600.
Gough-Calthrope, Sir Somerset Ar- Trade and b•ade relations, 67, 290,
thur: activities, 625. 317, 318, 321, 322, 336, 338, 339,
Gounaris, Demetrios P. (Greek pre- 349, 380; examination standat·ds
mier) : cited, 566. in, 125; air service, 234-5; credi-
Government: supported by organ· tors in, 355; rE>presented on Ott.
ized credit, 389 ; functions of, 394; Public Debt, 358-9; amount of
problems of, 416; return to im· Turkish holdings in, 364; at Lau-
perialistic type, 485. sanne conference, 376-7; militat·y
Graft: in Turkey, 311, 335, 362-3, expenses in Turkey, 385; war
389, 390, 398, 408, 464; editors re- aims, 626-7; House of Commons,
fuse, 471. Bee also Backsheesh; 385, 479, 527, 546, 559, 563, 566,
and Bribes. 656-7; House of Lords, 519, 529;
Graham, Dr. : activities, 168. Intelligence Bureau, 511-13; Brit.
Grahame, George: activities, 642. Foreign Office, 537, 539, 550;
Grand National Assembly. B66 Tur- signs protocol, 442; anti-Turk
key. Ass'n in, 449; operations of fleet,
Grand Order of Solomon: Abyssinian 482; diplomatic activities, 503;
order, 86. clergy in, cited, 521: secret
Grant, Ulysses S. : opinion rdg. Tur- treaties and agreements, 528, 556,
key, 435; lsmet Pasha compared 619; privileges under treaty, 564;
to, 571-2. responsible for closing of straits,
Granville, Lord: signs protocol, 008; gE>ts new territory, 615, 617-
442; cited, 442-3. 18, GOO; its mandates, &:l2; ita
726 INDEX
cemeteries, 667; official documents. 469, 527, 556-8, 562, 565-7, 569,
cited, 327. Bee al3'0 British. 629, 662; status in Turkey, 49, 68,
Great Britai" Frweigrl Office: cited, 80, 82-4, L?9-30, 328 ; adhere to
612, 637. law of Sefer, 252. Relation with,
Great Powers: supreme council ae- and attitude toward, Armenians,
tivitieS, 75 ; special privileges in 49, 50, 51, 66, 80; relations with
Turkey, 354; intervene in Turkey, and attitude toward Jews, SS.
483 ; covetous, 485 ; Christians 344; attitude toward Bulgarians,
have little to hope from, 497; 119, 493 ; occupy Mesopotamia,
diplomacy toward Armenians, 525. 18-l; their influence in Syria, 187-
Bee also Allied Powers ; and the 9 ; Romans build on ruins of, 188 ;
several countries. build on Hittite ruins, 193 ; rela-
Greece and the Greeks : not a na- tious with Americans, 344 ; rela-
tion, 46; their diverse ancestry, tions with Italy, 360; relatious
46 ; formerly in Turkish Empire, with Genoese, 440; relations with
viii ; in Smyrna. :ri ; their towns Russians, 441, 497 ; relations with
in Anatolia. 34 ; their neighbors in France, 56t; relations with Brit.,
Turkey, 35; habitat, 46, 49, 57, 56t; allies desert, 565; attitude
76-7; a frontier of Turkey, 207; toward other peoples, 58, 436,
no. and pop., 21, 23, 45, Sl-5, 129 ; 493. Press in, 36; found first
thrive in Anatolia, 49; leading newspaper in Orient. 65 ; periodi-
minority in Turkey, 60; leave cal publications of, 454, 462, 474 ;
Turkish territory, 58, 61, 328, 337, their architecture and antiquities,
342, 4..?0, 566-7,581. 658; emigrate 66, 178, 181. 190; control diplo-
to Egypt, 436-7; gain by inter- matic positions, 80; kingdom
change of pop., 62 ; decimated by founded, 81 ; in Turkey, unaffect-
Turks, 78; early colonies in Asia ed by Greek independence, 81 ;
Minor, 559; language, 36, 37, 46, serve as officials, 82-3 ; dangerous
47, 68, 77, 190, 3H.. Importance to Ott. Empire, Sl; commercialize
in Turkey, 38, 45-6, 77; contra- vice, 103 ; essential to prosperity
dictory opinions on, 46-8 ; differ in of Constantinople, 112 ; fear alav-
appearance, 46-7: description and ery, 112; military tax laid on,
racial characteristics, 32, 39-40, 113; persecuted, 129-30; have na-
46, 48, 49, 52, 56, 57, 62, 80, 83, tional ideals, 130; hosp. in Beirut,
85, 130, 154, 19!, 489 ; compared 175; rule Asia Minor, 193; their
to other peoples, 48, 61. 80, 81 ; section of Smyrna burned, 212.
other people jealous of, 48 ; reli- 567 ; hold shipping conference,
gion and education, 32, 77, 83-5, 216; destroy rys., 230-1; emery
98. 99, 100, 101, 112, 114, 119, deposits in, 318 ; importance of
129-130, 139, 154, 173, 419, Constantinople to, 333, 566; to-
421 ; churches restored by Mo- bacco grown in, 337-8; bank. 375;
hammed, 112; high culture of, 56, financial condition poor, 662; at
194 ; their culture spread by Ro- Lausanne conference, 376-7; relief
mans, 195. Occupations, 32, 46, work among, 411 ; regard arch-
80, 94, 405 ; in commerce and busi- bishop as ruler, 419; millets
ness, 32, 39-40, 45-6, 48, 49, 80, among, 419-20: capitulation sys-
85, 94, 112, 216, 328, 331, 333, tem among, 436, 441 ; propaganda
344-7, 360, 405. Relations with, for, 449-50 ; join Committee of
and attitude toward Turkey, 19, B'nion and Progress, 502: ratify
23, 32, 46, 49-50, 63, 68, 76-86, treaty, 564, 573; exception made
112, 129-30, 138, 193, 230-1, 252, to, in treaty, 662: revolution, 566;
311. 328, 333, 338, 412, 413, 454, reparation obligations. 66"2; chap-
468, 469, 527, 530, 556-9, 562, ter on, in this book. 76-86..
566-7, 573, 629, 662-3, 668; desire Greek Empire: capitulations in, 437.
and gain Turkish territory, 49, Gregorians : no. difficult to, es-
53, 311. 668; campaign in Asia timate, 115; Armenians are,
Minor, 82, 85, 336, 412, 413, 468, 130.
INDEX 727
Gregarious VII. : elected patriarch, Haji Chefatli, Asia Minor: location
100. and improvements for, 230.
Gresham, Sir Thomas: his law Hakki Pasha : activities, 369.
cited, 386. Haleb Bey : director of Constanti-
Grew, Joseph (Amer. diplomat): at- nople museum, 178.
tends conference, 60.1; cited, 435. Halideh Edib Hanum (Turkish fem-
Grey, Lord Edward (Brit. states- inist) : See Edib.
man) : thanked, 611 ; activities, Halikarnassus (ancient city):
369, 614; cited, 546. mausoleum at, 194; Hellenic art
Groves: destroyed, 305. in, 195; excavations at, 199.
Guaranties : for debt, 244; for mort- Halki, Turkey: school at, 476.
gages, 258; ry., 370. Hall, Prof. W. H. : thanked, 6, 98;
Guardians: of minors, 264. cited, 6.
Gudea : priest-king in Babylon, 182- Halva: See Food and Food Sup-
3. plies.
Guebhard, Count Paul de (member Harmsworth, (member of House of
of Ott. Public Debt) : cited, 406. Commons) : cited, 559.
Guemur, Asia Minor: sulphur in, Hama, Syria : an old site, 187 ; de·
322. scribed, 158 ; source of its water
Guenther, Dr. Franz: cited, 230. supply, 161; cholera in, 164; Jeru-
Gulfs and Bays: enumerated-Ada- salem receives patients from, 175;
lia, 303 ; Alexandretta, 157, 213, dist. near, excluded from agree-
228, 319, 639, 640, 642, 651 ; Ed- ment, 614.
remid, 319, 323; lssus, 157, lzmid, Hamburg, Ger.: source of its pros·
211, 610; Koslu, 208-9; Mandalieh, perity, 89; water route starts at,
320; Persian, 207, 217, 225, 232, 237 ; Turkish business delegation
236, 237, 267, 359, 367, 370, 542, visits, 347; Ger. business in,
609 ; Smyrna, 212. 348.
Gums : in trade, 306, 338. Hamid, Abdul (Sultan of Ott.
Guts: in trade, 290. Emp.): succeeds to throne, 478;
G11tu defined, 36. characterized and described, 83,
Gymnastics: taught in Turkey, 124. 455, 478-9, 481, 484; called the
"great assassin," 529; censors and
H throttles press, 10, 448, 454-5 ;
subsidizes press, 456-7; massacres
Habbaniya, Mesopotamia : reser- Armenians, 69, 519 (see also Mas-
voirs at, 270; lowlands, 278. sacres) ; his policy toward Arme-
Hague (The) : permanent court at, nians, 520; builds ry., 201; builds
422. irrigation works in Mesopotamia,
Haidar Pasha, Asia Minor: loca- 275; founds educational institu-
tion, 209-10; school of medicine tion, 455 ; alienates Brit. sym-
at, 125; leading Turkish coast pathy, 480; dissolves parliament,
city, 209; ry. terminus, 210-11, 480; capitulates to Russians, 481 ;
224-25, 236; trade center, 226; various activities, 454-5, 479,
foreign trade, 335; improvements 480-4; his overthrow, 49, 69, 151,
plnnn«>d for, 380-1. 363, 476, 481, 552; his brother
Haifa, Palestine: location, 316; replaces, 488; professional men
modern city, 158; ita water sup- during his reign, 172; his reign
ply, 161: mail route to, 232; in a bankrupt one, 482; his heirs,
British sphere of influence, 542; 202-3, 315, 372.
assigned to Gt. Brit., 615, 617 ; Hamid B«>y (Turkish scholar) : ac-
Brit. plans for, 316, 371; ry. at, tivitiPs, 177-8.
615 ; free port for French, 615 ; Hamidiya, Turkey: branch ry. at, ·
allied prlvilegPs in, 619. 225.
Hair: Koran forbids trade in hu· Hamilton, Dr. Caroline: activities,
man, 841. 174.
Haji Bairam: ry. planned for, 230. Hamlin, Dr. Cyrus (first president
728 INDEX
of Robert Con): cited, 4-5, 449, Hebrews. Bee Jews.
523-4. - Hedchatz : 323. Bee Hejas.
HalllZJ' : author of secret books of Heirs: three classes in Turkey, 247-
Druses, 111 ; honored by them, 249; obligations and rights, 240,
11L 255, 257; disposal of land in de-
Handcock. Percy Stuart Peache : fault of, 262-3 ; of Sultan, in-
cited, 183. corporate, 315 ; their holdings, 372
Handek. Anatolia-: location, 308; (.tee al.to Hamid, Abdul).
representation in, 308. - Heja.z (Hedchatz, district in Ara-
Handicrafts: native, in Turkey, 330. bia) : existence precarious, 535 ;
See aho Artisans. Turkish invasions into, 537 ; rights
Harbord, Maj. Gen. John G.: of foreigners, 250 ; Sultan flees to,
thanked, 6. 417; closed to Turkish new&-
Harbord Mission : members of papers, 474; Feisal represents,
thanked, 6; member of, 384 ; its 544; has own king, 618; Turkish
official name, 1 ; in Caucasus and garrison surrendered, 626; has no
Armenia, viii ; report, cited, 515, drinking water, 269 ; gold discov-
526, 528, 560, 578-9, 627, 631-33; ered in, 323 ; holy objects in,
official of, cited, 547. 507.
Harbors: See Ports. H elt:int-ba.tlai (title) : defined, 9L
Hardware : as article of trade, M; Hellenes: 563. Bee Greeks.
Greeks control business, 346. Hellenism : assumes Christian form,
Hare (Brit. gen.): member of 77.
allied mission, 629. Heraclea (Eregli), Asia llinor:
Harems: women's quarters called, coal in basin of, and exported
10 ; children brought up in, 10; from, 209, 313-U, 351, 360, 6!0-1,
influence, unhealthy, 8; extrava- 644; manganese near, 316; its
gance in, 389; effect of, 144 ; road, 218; temple at, 274; ry. to,
slaves in, 8; in grand vizier's pal- planned, 368 ; concession in, 644.
ace, 147; Arabian, 152; power of Bee aho Fuel.
imperial, broken, 2; dying out, Herbert, Lt. Col.: cited, 558.
142; writers on, 3. See ol&o Heretics: Mohammedan, 107, 108,
Women. 109, 110, 111, 115.
Harington, Lieut. Gen. Sir C. H.: Herod : stone of temple preserved,
activities, 568-9, 658. 178.
Ht~rmofl-1/eri: defined, 293, 294. Herodotus : cited, 181.
Harpoot, 174. Bee Kharput. Henegovina ( dist. in Europe, now
Harrison, Leland (ass't ~·y of Jugoslavian): changed status
state) : activities, 379. proclaimed, 487; placed under
Harun-al-Rashid: mentioned, 11. Austrian control, 499 ; Aas.-
Hasan bin-Sebah: founds order, Hung., annexes, 493. -
109. Herzel (Zionist) : death, 96.
Hassan Chauschler, Smyrna prov.: Hezekiah : cited, 178.
manganese deposits at, 316-17. Hides and Skins: few in Turkey,
Ht~t-i-HumliJIII•: Turkish reform 108; important by-product, 290 ;
proclamation (1856), 81. production declines, 338 ; rafts
H at-i-Bileriff: Turkish reform proc- made from, 217; trade and tran&-
lamation (1839), 8L port, 221, 290. 341 ; well adapted
Hauran (dist. in Asia Minor): for mfre., 373; goat, 316; pig.
Drnses in, 11L 341 ; raw and dressed, 34L
Hawaii: work for lepers in, 169. High Ongar, Eng.: mentioned, 104.:
Haxtha.usen-Abbenburg, August Highways : Bec6 Roads.
Franz Ludwig Maria, Freiherr Hikmet Bey, Richad: activities, 625.
von : cited, 64. Hindiya, Mesopotamia : barrage at,
Hays, Alice M. : thanked, 6. 265, 278.
Heathens: Mohammedan heretics Hirsch, Baron Maurice de : actiri-
have practices of, 110. ties,224.
INDEX 729
Historians: Jews inspire Turkish, on, 357; adjusfment of claims of
91. and against, 636, 660, 663; not
History: Byzantine, 3: Arabs have represented on mixed com'o, 667.
rich, 56; in Jewish :MSS., 90; Bee alBa Austro-Hungary.
Turkish lands important for study Hunters: among Sultans, 40.
of, 179 ; archii!Ology aid~, 180; Huntington, Prof. G. H.: thanked,
monuments aid, 186; Bible valu- 6.
able for, 185-6. Husain ibn Ali (grand Sherif .,9f
Hit, Asia Minor: location, 217; Mecca) : interested in education,
Euphrates navigable to, 217; min- 118 ; proclaimed king of Hejaz,
erals at, 316. 618 ; Sultan flees to, 417 ; Brit.
Hittites (ancient people of Asia relations with, 531, 539, 542, 551,
Minor) : habitat, 186, 193, 198 ; 613-14; hostile to Ibn Saud, 539 :
early capital, 186 ; language, un- intrigues with Feisal, 541-2; cited,
decipherable, 193, 199; art and 533: revolt and death, 108.
writing, 197, 199; impart native Huts: ry. Co. builds, 276.
customs, 56 ; practice irrigation, Huveyyeh, Oriental city: barrage at,
274 : remains of, preserved, 178; 265.
sitea probably under Greek sites, Hygiene : poor in Orient, 167 ; aided
193. by good sewage, 168.
Hodeidah: chief port of Yemen,
581. I
Hogarth, Dr. D. G.: cited, 13-14,
38, 55, 372. Ibn Rashid : subsidized by Turks,
Hohenzollerns : mentioned, 509. 534.
See alBa Wilhelm III. Ibn Saud (sheikh of Nejd) : his
Holland: See Netherlands. stronghold, 534; Brit. win, 534-5 :
Holy Alliance: impaired, 493. intrigues with Brit., 538; hostile
Holy Land: little change in, 11; to Husain, 539.
various rulers of, 496. See also Idjaretein : defined, 242.
Jerusalem and Palestine. lgaibel, Kastamuni prov.: mine
Holy Roman Empire: khalifate re- near, 322-3.
sembles, 104. Igor (king of Varangians): rela-
Horns, Syria : described, 158 ; source tions with Leo VI., 435-6.
of its water supply, 161; cholera Ilmouhaber : ilefined, 253.
in, lti4 ; dist. near excluded from Immigration : instancea of, 41-2, 85,
agreement, 614. 87-8, 92, 96, 100, 437; Turkey
Hoover, Herbert: collects war li- needs, 23, 273, 277 ; Jewish to
brary, 7; cited, 448. l'alestine, forbidden, 96 ; in Pales-
Horticulture : should be taught in tine, to be regulated, 655.
Turkey, 136. Indemnitiea : paid to typeaetters,
Hospitals: in various places in Near 475.
East, 131, 159, 168-176, 361, 501; Independence : under Oriental r4!-
Amer. physicians expelled from gime, 22 ; Greeks desire and ob-
Ger., 175; Turks destroy, 175-6; tain, 80-1; Turkey asserts, 630.
for camels, 172. India: routes to, 333, 485; irriga-
Hostages: political, 448. Set~ al8o tion practiced in, 266 ; its rice in·
Captives. fet•ior to that of Turkey, 294:
Ilous«>s: arrangement of Turkish, post offices and telegraph mileage
148-150; mud, 158; built by ry. in, 231-2; air service, 235. Mo-
Co., 276; markl't for portable, 374. hammedans in, 498 ; reaults of
Jluguenen (financier) : activities, Mohammedanism, 43: leaders,
381. 105-6: Russian revolution affects,
Hungarians: operate in Turkey, 16-17: no. of native kings in, 18:
307-8. contact witb outSide nations, 18,
Hungary : men reeruited for Turk- 321, 482: name for Europeans in,
ish army in, 78; Turkish claims 58; Turkey compared to, 222:
730 INDEX
nationalism spreading in, 417; Interest: on Turkish loans, 364-5;
Brit. policy rdg., 482, 546-7; Brit. defaulted, 389, 398, 400; paid by
fear of, 497 ; Sepoy rebellion in, fresh loans, 390_ •
498; Pan-Turanianism threatens, Interets Financil'!res de Ia France
513; influence of Kemalist agree- dans l'Empire Ottoman: cited,
ments in, 563 ; Turk influence 356-7.
feared, 569 ; may react against International Armistice Commission
Western civilization, 550; Brit. in Belgium: member, xi
declaration surprises, 621. International Law Documents: cited,
Indiana: mentioned, 117. 625.
Indians (inhabitants of India) : in Interpreters : Jews as, 92 ; trained
Mesopotamia, 277 ; of Shiah sect, in French schools, 131.
534; Iraqis hate, 546. Intoxicants : forbidden to Moham-
Industries:· should be taught in Tur- medans, 102-3.
key, 136; needed and lacking in Invasions : Turkey subject to, 34-5 ;
Turkey, 137, 223, 372-3; few in denounced in treaty, 643; in-
Levant, 282-3 ; aided by schools, stances of 186, 496, 509, 537, 540,
137-8; rys. develop, 227; com- 547, 559-60.
panies engage in, 245 ; rank in Investments: basic idea of, in Tur-
modern life, 283 ; Oriental, char- key, 363; opportunities in Turkey,
acterized, 288 ; plants used in, 372; various instances, 356-7,
291 ; established on old forest land, 358-9, 360, 361, 362, 364-71, 381.
302 ; home, 316 ; Turkish policies Ionia: location, 194; high Greek
rdg., 339 ; protection of, not -ob- culture in, 194.
ject of customs tariff, 340; Turk- lrmUs (Imperial decree): instances,
ish, stimulated by import tax, 341; 222, 327, 662_
Greek interest in, 361 ; credit or- Iraq: defined, 7; Turkish boundary,
ganized to support, 389 ; various, 207; area and pop., 23, 537, 542,
enumerated, 153, 243, 287, 288, 581; ry. in, 222, 226; trade route
305, 330, 338, 373. See also in, 236; water utilized in, 265;
Artisans. Shiahs in, 534; holy cities in, 539;
lneboli, Anatolia: location and im- freedom of worship in, 657 ; stu-
portance, 208. dents from, attend Amer. univ.,
Infidels : distinguished from believ- 119; Babylonian antiquities in,
ers, 101. 178 ; oil concessions in, 315 ; com-
Inheritance: land acquired by, 240, petes with Turkey, 342. Brit.
251-2, 263 ; by direct line, 246 ; forces and govt. in, 22, 225, 226,
regulations rdg., 246-9, 263, 264, 232, 233, 540, 541, 542, 545, 546,
647. 547; security threatened, 22; lost
Inquisition, Spanish: Jews emi- to Turkey, 203; postal arrange-
grate because of, 53. ments, 232 ; air squadron in, 233 ;
Insanity : regulations rdg., 264. Persian influence in, 534; in Brit.
Inscriptions : various instances of, sphere of influence, 542 ; desires
190, 192, 194, 195, 197-8, 199-200; independence, 542; mandate, 547;
State owns, 262. improved administrative methods
Insects : various kinds, 34, 168, 170; in, 548 ; Brit. policy toward, 550 ;
carry disease, 170. Brit. promise financial aid, 657 ;
Institutes: silk, at Brusa, 356. Turkish advance in, feared, 569 ;
Instruments: ancient, owned by foreigners guaranteed security in,
State, 262; written not used, 295. 657; to be admitted to League of
Insurance: security affects rates of, Nations, 657; Brit. treaty with,
329 ; Brit. policy toward, 350. 657-8; Feisal represents, 544 ;
Insurrection. See Revolutions. king, 551, 657 ; promises not to
Interallied Commission of Inquiry cede territory, 657. See alao
into Greek Occupation of Smyrna: Mesopotamia.
member, xi. Iraqis : Arabian tribe, 56 ; practice
Interdicts: instances, 437. irrigation, 266 ; hate Indians, 546.
INDEX 791
I ria : idol erected to, 274. Grew's remark to, 435 ; cited, 22,
Irrigation: developed through con- 26, 61, 119-20, 380, 426-7, 517.
• cessions, 202; rivers and lakes Isocrates: mentioned, 29.
used for or suitable for, 217, 266, lspahan, Persia : Russia desires
270 ; difficulty in development, dist. about, 611, 612.
266; necessary in various coun- Israelites. See Jews.
tries, 267, 269 ; scientific first Italian-Imperial Ottoman Govt.
practiced in Mesopotamia, 269; Agreement: text, 653-5.
statistics, 270-2, 273, 276, 277, Italians : relinquish capitulations,
279; program for, 273-7; small 24; ·ship at Constantinople, 32;
companies for, encouraged, 274; trade in Turkey, 212, 352; lan-
barrages, 278 ; canals, 278-9 ; will guage, spoken by Jews, 37, 344;
produce arable land, 300 ; large live in Turkey, 57; schools in
area reclaimable by, 301; Brit. in- Turkey, 135; own former Aus·
terested in, 359 ; investment op- trian lines, 213-14: make ry.
portunities in, 372 ; commission agreements, 228; Brit. grant · ry.
provided for, (i42; instances of, rights to, 230; capitalists, in Tur-
265-279, 410, 548. key, 314; delegate on Ott. Public
Isak Pasha (Albanian) : vizier, Debt, 355; attitude toward
79. Greeks, 360 ; obtain preferential
!saurians: ancestors of modem rights from Turkey, 360; bank in
Greeks, 46. Turkey, 375; diplomatic negotia-
Islam : a generic name, 99 ; Orien- tions by, 380; penetration into
tals profess, 42 ; offers system of Asia Minor permitted, 382; form
life, 103; Christianity compared financial group, 382 ; make secret
to, 103; fear of disintegration of, agreements, 382, 528: control cen-
106 ; described and characterized, sorship, 468: Catholic interests in
106, 111-12, 496; sects of, 107-8; Palestine, 501 : soldiers in Turkey,
teachings, 496 ; seldom united, 527, 554, 558; lack unity with
533-4; Turkey its guide, 643. Bee other allies, 555; Venizelos op-
also Mohammedans. poses, 558 ; in Smyrna, cited, 558 ;
Islands : desert, 159 ; mineral con- activities in Ruhr, 572 ; Turkish
cessions in, 312; Greek influence officers to surrender to, 626.
in Mediterranean, 361 ; near Asia Italy : Jews in, 91 ; Jews expelled
Minor, 361 ; financial statement from, 95. Attitude toward black
for Turkish incomplete, 392 ; de- racfil: 60; attitude toward various
sired by Russia, 610. Various countries, 497, 501, 505; Turkey's
enumerated-Aegean, 82; Crete, attitude toward African colonies
82, 485; Cyprus, 11, 437, 453, 482, · of, 654; attitude other allies,
524, 615, 642, 6(',0 ; Dodekanese 660; interferes in Turkey, 61;
Group, 82, 300, 570, 612; lmbros, unable to assume Armenian
610 ; Java, 339 ; Lemnos, 624 ; mandate, 74; adheres to law of
Malta, 417, 448, 470, 561, 631; Sefer, 252; participates in Lau-
Naxos, 318; Rhodes, 493; Samos, sanne conference, 376-7; its con-
82 ; Tenedos, 610. sular services at Constantinople,
tsmailiyis (branch of Shiahs) : their 430 ; signs protocol, 442 ; seizes
former name, 108-9 ; decimated, Tripoli, 493; member of Triple
109. Alliance, 493, 501 ; its colonies in
'lamet Pasha (Turkish general and Red Sea region, 501 ; war conces-
official): sends brother to Amer. sions made to, 509-10; abandons
coli., 119 : strPngthens govt., 426 ; Armenia, 529; enters war, 543,
aids Kemal, 563; a great gPneral, 612; enters into secret agreements,
571 : compared to Grant, 571-2; 555, 556, 619 : resents discussion
ultimatum delivered to, 572: of Fiume, 558; its sphere of in-
Turkish plenipotentiary, 658; fluence in Turkey, 563-4, 619-20,
activities, 105, 215, 426, 5G8, 571 ; 640; agreement with Kemalists,
open letter to, published, 418-19; 565 ; declares neutrality, 565 ; as-
732 INDEX
pires to privileges in Near East, J asireh-ibn-Omar: Turkish frontier,
611, 619, 638 ; Dodekanese Group 652.
promised to, 612 ; obtains rights Jebel ed-Druze: location and in-
to Libya, 613 ; subscribes to Bal- habitants, 111.
four declaration, 620 ; Heraclean Jemal Bey: sketch and works, 310;
coal concessions reserved for, 640; chapter in this book, 310-27.
evacuates Asia Minor, 654; its Jemal (Djemal) Pasha (Syrian mil.
claims in Turkey, 654; ceme- gov.) : activities, 167-8, 540, 554.
teries of, in Turkey, 667. Arme- Jerash. See Gerasa.
nian business houses in, 67 ; trade Jerusalem, Palestine: mentioned in
relations with Turkey, 89, 317, early letters, 185; modern city,
336, 349 ; competes with other 158; its water supply, 160-1; Jew-
countries, 340, 360 ; its invest- ish hopes for, 95 ; patriarchate in,
ments in Turkey, 357; amount of 99, 113 ; Christian kingdom, 437 ;
Turkish holdings in, 364 ; its paper Hebrew univ. at, 135, 548; water
money depreciated, 405. · works, 161; engineer in, 265; dis-
Itchil, Adana prov.: mines in, 319- eases and hospitals, 166, 169, 175-
20. 6; beggars in, 169; antiquities
Ivory: found in excavations, 191, from, preserved, 178 ; how its
198. crops can be moved, 269 ; crop
Izmid (city, sanjak, and vilayet): statistics, 285; no complete sta·
a leading Turkish coast city, 209; tistics for, 305.
river in, 217; crop statistics, 285, Jesuits: activities in Near East,
287; forest area in, 304; refor- 130-1, 173, 175.
estation near, 308; minerals in, Jesus: mentioned, 11; Ali compared
316, 318, 319; on ry., 365, 367; to, 110.
water power near, 373. Jevdet Pasha (Turkish scholar) :
Izzet Pasha ( ministex: of foreign af- presents library to museum, 178.
fairs) : visits. Angora, 565 ; signs Jewelers: among Armenians, 67.
treaty, 653. Jewels : regarded as vice, 534.
Jewish Colonization Association:
J activities, 92.
Jews: different types among, 4, 37,
Jaafar Pasha (gov. of E. Thrace): 54, 88, 89, 90; widely distributed,
defeated, 569. 91, 115 ; no. and habitat, 23, 38,
Jaber-Kalessi, Asia Minor: tomb at, 53, 80, 86, 87-8, 89-90, 91, 92, 95,
652. 101, 107, 115, 287, 550; emigra-
Jacobites: no. and habitat, 114. tions and ejections, 53, 87, 88-9,
Jaffa, Palestine : modern city, 158 ; 91, 92, 94-5; leading minority in
its water supply, 161; irrigation Turkey, 60; language, 36-7, 96;
possible in, 269; how its crops can description and racial characteris-
be moved, 269 ; Eng. hosp. in, 176 ; tics, 54, 93, 94, 101 ; their neigh-
Jewish colonists near, 300. bors in old Turkey, 38, 53-4, 61,
James I. (Eng. king) : relations 88, 91, 92; status in Palestine, 95,
with Turkey, 439-40. 620-1; compared with other peo-
J anissaries : term defined, 39, 44 ; ples, 51, 93 ; prefer Moslems to
origin, 78; influence, 44; de- Christians, 54; Arabs of same
stroyed, 308. stock, 544; their religion, and its
Japan: capitulations in, 24; foreign organization, 56, 95, 101, 115 ; de-
policy in, 26 ; admitted to equality cline in Orient, 87; their colonies
rights, 435, 443 ; Ger. policy lind settlements, 88-90, 92, 94,
toward, 522; declares neutrality, 237; home arranged for in Pales-
565; financial condition sound, tine, 544, 620-1; their right to
402. Palestine, 655; occupations, 32,
Japanese : progress, 30 ; trade in 53-4, 80, 86, 89, 91-2, 95-6, 405-6;
Near East, 332, 339, 352 ; proverb, found bank in Hamburg, 89; opPr-
524. ate with European capital, 93;
INDEX 733
eollperative societies among, 96 ; Kadikoi, Asia M:inor: archbishop
may inherit from Christians, 248 ; of, 100.
organizations aid, 91-2; education Kadin: defined, 8.
and culture, 91, 119, 454, 462 ; Kaisarieh, Asia Minor: Amer. hosp.
their place in Turkey's commerce, at, 176; highway through, 218;
828-9. Attitude toward Zionist ry. at, 866; synod of Orthodox
movement, 58, 544 ; Macedonian, Church at, 421.
aid in restoring constitution, 53 ; Kamariyeh: branch of the Nusairi
attitude toward and relation with (q. 11.), 110.
Turks, 54-5, 86, 87, 89, 91, 92-3, Kanatha. See Kanawat.
476, 496, 521; British policy Kanawat {Kanatba), Syria: ruins
toward, 97, 550; attitude toward in, 189; Amer. excavate in, 190.
other peoples, 58, 845, 436, 530; Kan-Suh : prov. in China, 2.
belief rdg., 110. Seek equal rights, Kara Arslan, Asia Minor : well cul-
92; their aspirations, 94-5; growth tivated region, 276.
of idea of political unity, 95; Kara Bel, Asia M:inor: Hittite art
propaganda for, 449-50; restric- in, 193.
tions placed on, and removed, 96- Kara Broon, Aidin prov": mine in,
7. Few cases of scarlet fever 821.
among, 166 ; establish hosp. in Karadakes: defined, 86.
Jerusalem, 175. Periods of their Karagach, Asia Minor : a strategic
history in Turkey, 86; rout center, 19; allies occupy, 658.
Assyria, 162; history recounted in Kara Hoyuk, Asia Minor : location
Bible, 185-6. Chapter on, in this and water supply, 275.
book, 86-97. Karaman, Asia Minor : road
Jidda, Arabia : foreign commerce, through, 219.
885. Karamanjik, Asia Minor : mineral
Jihun, Anatolia: a water basin, substances near, 824.
268. Karassi, Asia Minor : crop statis-
Joffre, M:arshal Joseph Jacques tics, 285 ; forest area in, 808-4.
~saire : mentioned, 5. Karasu, Asia Minor: its ancient
Jones, Prof. Richard": thanked, 6. name, 823 ; mine in, 323.
Journalists: in Angora Assembly, Karbala, Iraq: pilgrim trails lead
428 ; exiled and flee, 453, 456; ap- to, 218 ; canal in, 278 ; Shiah sect
pointed to political offices, 454; in, 534; its ruler subsidized, 589.
policy of Abdul Hamid toward, Karaghin, Anatolia: location and
454-5; ambitions, 471; salaries, water supply, 275.
475. Kart&: defined, 294.
Judaism: home of, 4; emancipation Karnak, Egypt: palace at, 185.
sought, 92. See also Jews. Kars ( sanjak), Asia Minor : Turk-
Judges: oppress peasants, 298. ish frontier, 646, 649; treaty rati-
Jugoslavia : its official name, 877; fications exchanged at, 648.
importance of Constantinople to, Kastamuni (city, vilayet, and
883; takes part in· Lausanne con- prov.) : govt. construction at,
ference, 376-7. 265; crop statistics, 285; forest
Jurists: in Angora Assembly, 428. area in, 804 ; exports forest prod-
Justice: reformed in Egypt, 67; ucts, 306; concessions in, 307-8,
slow in Turkey, 152. 815 ; mine in, 822-8.
Justinian: Mohammedans adopt his Katolik: name given Catholics {q.
laws, 145. 11.) in Turkey, 98.
Jyen-Jyen, Asia: revolt from, 2. Kavala, Greece: shipping center,
216.
K Kay Han : Tartar tribe, 86.
Keban: name of lead mine, 319.
KadPSh, Syria : early importance, Kechiborlu : sulphur mine, 822.
l~(i, Kadid Pasha (Albanian): vizier,
1\:adbimain, Iraq: Shiahs in, 53-l. 79.
INDEX
Kediz, Anatolia: water basin, 267, toward, 105-6; controvery rdg.,
268, 270. 107, 387-8; has little influence.
Kemal Bey, Yusuf (journalist) : 498-9; jurisdiction, 506; Turkey
joins periodical staff, 452; activi- controls, 6!3 ; its evolution, 104-5 ;
ties, 453, 645. proclamation rdg., 416 ; prudence
Kemal Pasha, Ghazi Mustafa (presi- recommended toward, 41S-19; ne-
dent of Turkish republic): patri- gotiations rdg., 611-12. 627-8.
otic. 24; not a Ger. sympathizer, Khalifs : meaning of word, 105 ; at-
553; a nationalist, 553 ; devoted to tributes and powers of, 1().1, 107,
his country, 557; his ability, 563; 417-18, 498; Sherif of Mecca
desires peace. 569 ; described, 425. claims office of, 104; law of early,
557 ; criticisms of, 415 ; his designs accepted, 107 ; widows receive pen-
feared. 4:.:16. His wife, 1-13 ; his sions, 388; Sultan assumes title of,
father-in-law, in shipping trade. 417; now elected, 570, 578 ; new
215 ; his movement, aided by Rus- Turkish attitude toward, 418, 551 ;
sia, 17; his policy, 25; creates moderation of early, 445; private
modem Turkey, · 29 ; deprived of sec'y of, 476.
command, 412 ; leader of revolu- Khammurabi (ancient ruler) : his
tionary movement, 412 ; dominates code, 183.
Turkish policy, 414; unanimously Khans: described, M. 42 ; protect
elected president, 2. 415, 575, 668; lines of communication, 42.
isolates new govt., 423 ; owns press Kharput (Harpoot; city, vilayet,
at Angora, 450; favors Arab govt., and prov.) : Amer. hosp. at, 174;
549 ; attitude of Enver Pasha interior trade center, 216-11;
toward, 553 ; inspector general in roads through, 218; ry. projected
Anatolia, 557; Turks rally to, for, 230; statistics for, 28-1-5; no
560 ; his miL advantage, 569 ; complete statistics for, 305; dif-
prayers for in India, 570; how re- ficult to obtain firewood for, 305;
garded in Turkey, 575 ; various mines in, 319, 322 ; its revenues,
activities, 105, 315, 412. 415, 425- 407.
6, 531, 557--8. 565, 566-7, 569, 573- Khiva, Turkestan : its independence
4; cited, 27, H3, 281, 382-3, 629; recognized, 6!3.
sketch, 557. Khonsabad, Asia Minor: excava-
Kemalist Movement: called also Na- tions at. 18L
tional Defense Movement, 552-3 ; Khozas (Turkish clergy) : their in-
denounced, 105. Bee tlho Kemal; fluence and status, 20, 106; at
and Turkey. Constantinople, 32.
Kemalists: war with Greece. 2 ; Khozat: Asia Minor: on highway,
control Turkey, 29, 518; relations 218.
with foreign govts., 528. 563, 56-l. Kiel, Ger. : Ott. business men at,
634-5, 65L Bee alao Kemal; arul 347.
Turkey. Kiera, Esther : practices medicine,
Kent : cited, 4-!6. 9L
Kenworthy, Lt. CoL: activities, 656. Kiew, Russia: -regent at, 436.
Kerak: 232. 547. Bee Transjor- Kifri, Mesopotamia : petroleum in,
dania. 314..
Keramett Bey, Salih: sketch, 476; Kiiimli. Asia Minor: on govt. ry.,
chapter in this book, 476-90. 313.
Kerek, Asia Minor : how its crops King-Crane Mission : report, cited,
can be moved, 269. 528.
Kerestijian, M. : thanked, 6; activi- Kings: act as priests. 182.
ties, 531. Kiok Hoynk, Anatolia: location and
Khaireddin, Barharossa (Turkish water supply, 275..
naval man): a renegade Greek, Kionan, Anatolia: a water basin,
79. 268.
Khalifate : Constantinople seat of, Kiopru Sn, Anatolia : a water basin,
630; Mohammedan attitude 268.
INDEX 735
Kiosks: in Stamboul, 177-8. Kortcha, Albania: mentioned, 37.
Kiresun, Asia Minor: forest area Koru, Asia Minor: mines near, 320.
near, 304. Koruchesm~. quarter of Constanti-
Kirkuk, Mesopotamia: ry. projected nople: location and press in, 91.
for, 230; petroleum in, 314. Kossova, Jugoslavia: no longer
Kishehr, Asia Minor : alabaster de- Turkish, 304.
posits near, 324. Kouyunjik, Asia Minor: excavations
Kiskin, Asia Minor : location, 100. at, 181.
Kitchen: museum housed in old, Kozan Dagh, Asia Minor : mines in,
178-9. 320.
Kizilbashis: Moslem subject race, Kozlu, Asia Minor: on ry., 313.
38-9. Krupp interests: secure Turkish
Kizil lrmak, Anatolia : a river concessions, 371.
basin, 267-8; branch line at, 227. Kuban (Russian dist.): Armenians
Klagomenai, Asia Minor : Helle~ic emigrate to, 530.
art in, 195. Kuchuk Menderez, Anatolia: a
Klazomenm, Asia Minor: excava- water basin, 267, 268.
tions at, 199. Kuhlmann, Herr von : activities,
Knox, Gertrude E. : thanked, 6 ; 369.
sketch, 411 ; chapter in this book, Kuitshuk Said Pasha (grand viz.
411-29. ier) : restricts Jews, 96.
Koisi-Aghiz, Asia Minor: mineral Kufra (oasis in Africa) : Senussi
basin starts at, 314. stronghold, 535.
Konia (city, vilayet, and prov.) : Kurdistan (dist. in Asia Minor):
mentioned, 24 ; Greek idol erected Upper Mesopotamia called, 358;
in, 274: early Christian architec- area and pop., 580; mts. in, 114-
ture in, 196; interior trade center, 15; insecurity of land in, 151-2;
210; on ry., 217, 225, 366, 368; oil fields and concessions, 315, 377
terr. about described, 226: plain (see also l'tfosul) ; sovereignty of,
drained by lakes, 268 ; irrigation in dispute, 315; antonomy recog-
on plain of, 275 : irrigation proj- nized, 637.
ects, 372; vill. and river near, 275- Kurds: term defined, 36; habitat,
6, 277: crop statistics, 285; forest viii, 34, 55, 58, 149, 158, 518, 523,
area, 304; reforestation in, 308; 527 ; probably Aryan, 55 ; their
agric. products, 288, 372 : minerals language, 35-6 ; description and
in, 321, 323 ; salt swamp and racial characteristics, 21-2, 55-6,
desert in, 324 ; Ger. water works 150, 151-2, 424: occupations, 32,
in, 265; Mev levi dervishes in, 106; 150 ; large families among, 23 ;
Turkish theological college in, education among, 36; their imPbr-
125 ; votes cast in for woman, tance, 38; religious belief, 55, 149;
146; A mer. hosp. in, 176: exports, practice polygamy, 151: attitude
306 ; ItaL relations with, 360, 640, toward other peoples, 21-2, 55;
654. . Brit. policy toward, 22 : in An·.
Koran : written in Arabic, 35 : clas- gora Assembly, 22, 424; Arme-
sifications in, 101 ; its attitude nians compete with, 51; hostile to
toward sin, 103; accepted as au- Christians, 55 ; do not object to
thoritative, 107: its status among Turkish govt., 537.
heretics, 108 : different interpreta· Kureyi-Nihas, Asia Minor: copper
tions of, 534; clergy study, 122; mines, 323. .
taught in schools, 124 ; passages Kut al Amara, Asia Minor: Brit.
from in mosques, 149; cannot besieged in, 540.
govern Christian communities by, Kutaya, Asia Minor: mine in, 317,
419; origin of Moslem law, 422; 371: I taL interests in, 360, 644;
cited, 265, 341. exile to, 448, 468.
Kordu: defined, 36. Kuwait, Arabia: conference at, 538.
Korna, Meallpotamia: location and Kyrias, Miss Paraskevy (Alba-
advantages, 2G9. nian) : activities, 153.
736 Th'"DEX
L 273; should be distributed to im-
migrants, 277. liiri. 239. 243, 263,
Labor: inequality of. in Turkey, 264 ; mulk, 239. 252. 255 ; nkuf,
~1; forced. 219 ; organized, 23942, 243-8, 263, 264; metruke,
220 ; cheap, 281, 305 ; Turkish at- 239-42. 24344., 257, 2M. 29!;
titude toward. 291; difficulty in common. 239, 243-4, 294; mewat,.
training Turkish, 338; shortage, 23940, 242-3, 24!; rura1, 242.
373 ; protective legislation lacking 250; urban, 242. 250; wfsle
in Turkey, 475. Bee aLto lndWt- and vacant, 242-3. 2623 ; forest,
tries. 244. 3().1, 306 ; pasture, 244. 295 ;
Lagash : 182. Bee Tello. demesnal, 257 (8e8 aboT:e. vakuf);
Lakes : used little for transporta- mountain, 263; arid and semi-
tion, 217 ; useful for irrigation arid, 265. 303; meadow, 295.. Cul-
purposes, 266, 270 ; former water tivation depends on women, 151 ;
basins, 267; used as reservoinl, cultivated for religious profit, 242;
268; navigable, 268.; furnish elee- improved by irrigation, 273, 300;
tric power, 268; produced by exploitation of irrigated, 274; eul-
floods, 270; can be made profit- tivated areas. 284; reclaimed in
able, 273 ; salt, 32-l. Enumerated Palestine.. 287; not worked on
-Amik. 268; Apollon, 268; Bey- shares, 295; lies fallow. 291; fer-
shehr, 217. 221, 268, 273, 275; tility not conserved. 299; benefit
Derkos. 266; Egerdir, 217, 227, of a geological survey for, 326;
268; Hararivan, 275; Iznik, 268; development prevented by brig-
Karariram. 268; Lagoda. 237; ands, 428. Foreign concessions in
llanios, 268, 270, 273 ; Marma- Turkey, 239 (8e8 •Z.O Conces-
rajik, 268 ; llarmaris, 270 ; Sa- sions) ; laws of, based on religion,
panja. 268; Simav. 268; Tiberias, 239 ; laws disobeyed. 239 ; taxes
95; T=, 268; Crumia, 22; Van, and tithes on, 2~ 279. 396, 397-
22, 217, 268. S. 445; under assessed. 398; ~
Lambros. llary C.: thanked. 6. tiona taken to court, 252; records.
Land : llohammedail. in Turkey's 254 ; right of preemption ~ 256-
foreign policy, 15; J"ewish. in Pal- 7; mining rights and fees. 260-1;
estine, 95-6 ; Turkish restrictions concessions in minera1, 310 ; limi-
in purchase of,. 96; mosques own, tations rdg~ 263 ; regnlatioDB rdg.
122; who may own and held- by reversion, 263-4; statistics. 283-4.
various owners, 245, 250-1, 262, 288. Low about Black Sea. 2t:i6 ;
276-7, 279, 294. 31~16, 321, 518; high about Sea of Marmora, 267;
insecure, in Kurdistan. 151-2; burial. in Turkey, granted to
Roman Empire takes private, 239 ; allies, 667.
ownership not indicative of pros- Landowners : in Kurdistan. 151-2;
perity, 238-9 ; restrictions on own- fell olive trees, 287; un~ve.
ers, 250, 257 ; regulation rdg. joint in Near East, 298; should have
owners, 256; ~ted by State con- security, 300.
cession, 23940; regulations for Lane-Poole, Stanley: cited. 4&.
sale and transfer, 251, 252-8. 436; Langua!:'es : classification based on.
bow it may be acquired, 327 ; 35. 37; many in Near East. 35.
rarely sold, 398 ; sale may be an- 193. 194. 473; of Near East de-
nulled. 254, 256 ; may be seized, scribed, ~7; Turks borrow from
259 ; expropriations. 259-60; right other. 9 ; )ISS. in nrious. 90;
of revendication, 263; auctioned. taught in Turkey. 12-t; Yernac'lt-
263; inheritance and regulation Iar. not to be tau!:'ht. 138; T&rioUS.
rdg., 246-9, 251-2; deeds. 23940; used in Turkish press, 448 ; Turk-
rented and leased, 240, 2-!2, 252. ish journalists know ~~eVwa). 473;
263, 295 ; registered. 2-ID-1. 245. ties of over-emphasised, 533. Vari-
253 ; mortgages, 239. 245, 281 ; ad- o-Arabic. 2; deseribed, 35;
ministrators and agents. 2!1, 244. . Tnrb borrow from. 35; described,
253 ; abuses in distributi@ of,. 35. 36, 533 ; dictionary, 98; where
INDEX 737
: • sppken, 157-8; taught in DaD?as- Laws (includinr Law): source of
cus, 174; translated, 473. Arme- Mohammedan and Turkish, 145,
nian-described, 36 ; alphabet, 65 ; 239, 422, 434, 446; lax enforce-
first work published in, 65 ; pre- ment and little respect for, 121,
served by Armenians, 68 ; not re- 239, 408 : compliance with. de-
stricted by Turks, 68; taught in manded, 382-3; foreigners subject
schools, 128 ; spoken in Constanti- to, in Turkey, 430: formerly for-
nople, 344; transistors of, 473; eigners subject only to own lsw,
now official, 129. Assyrian, speci- 431 (see alsu Millets) : national
men, 36. English. Span. Jews regarded as sacred, 440 : national,
speak, 344; translators for, 473. endangered by reformation, 440-1;
French. taught in Turkey, 124. must be secularized, 446 ; how
German, Jews in Turkey speak, promulgated · in Turkey, 451.
37, 344. Greek, common in Turks not attracted to, 40 ; first
Orient, 36; described, 36; often an progressive in Turkey, 90; passed
acquired language, 37 ; Greeks 0 for- by Angora Assembly, 377-8; inter-
get, 46 ; not restricted by Turks, national, invoked in conference,
68. Hebrew, revived, 96. Kurd- 443 ; taught in Constantinople,
ish, a Persian patois, 36. Latin, 125, 448 (see also Schools). Edu-
inscriptions, 190. Lydian, discov- cational and religious, 104-5, 107,
ered, 198. Judreo-Spanish, in Sa- 120, 124, 126-7, 445 (canon);
lonika, 344. Magyar, described, Mohammedan, 122, 243, 248, 505 ;
511 ; contrasted with Turkish, archreological, 200 ; rdg. · roads,
511. Semitic, inscriptions in, 219 : rdg. land, 239-267 ; rdg. for-
190. Turkish, words lacking, est, 243 ; rdg. marshes, 243 ; pro-
2 ; described, 35, 511, 533 ; a trade visional, 245 : rdg. birth. 248 ;
language, 35; often an acquired Sefer, 250-1, 252-3, 261; mining,
language, 37: substituted for other 325-6 ; of fundamental organiza-
languages, 37; sometimes written tion, 413-14, 562; international,
in Greek characters, 47; must be 443, 506 : Roman, 446 : press, 452
taught in Turkey, 138; certificates (lee alsu Periodicals ; arwl Press).
drawn in, 344: derivation of lit- Bee alBo Legislation.
erary, 533; official language of re- Lawsuits: touching foreigners in
port, 668 : words and phrases, 196, Turkey, 432-3: how tried, 436.
220-1, 222, 239-40, 241, 242, 252, Lawyers: Levan tine; 202: opinions,
256, 263-4, 269, 293, 294, 295, 311, divided, 248; have organ, 458:9.
452, 453. Layard, Sir Austen Henry (archreol-
Lanterns : glass and metal, 179. ogist) : activities, 181.
Larsa, Babylonia: excavated, 181. Lazes (Moslem people of Turkey):
Latakia, Syria : tobacco grown on subject to Sultan, 38-9.
plain of, 286. Lazistan, Asia Minor: iron ore in,
Latifeh Hanum (Turkish feminist 320.
and wife of Kemal) : sketch, League of Nations: mentioned, 632;
143. covenant in treaty, 635: Arme-
La tom, Rizeh dist.: sine mine in, nians, negotiate with, 72: Arme-
320. nians left to, 529: demands made
Lausanne, Switzerland: conferences of, 550; Brit. attitude toward,
and treaty, xi, 14, 17, 20, 45, 60-3, 550; right of appeal to, in Pales-
105, 215, 229, 230, 231, 340, 341, tine, 655; Iraq guaranteed mem-
345, 346-7, 376-7, 379, 380, 385, bership in, 657.
386, 420, 421, 422, 426, 427, 430, League of Personal Initiative and of
517, 529-30, 547, 570-2, 573, 659- Administrative De<'entralization:
68. operates in France, 484.
LaVerne, Calif.: mentioned, 384. Leart, Mal'<'el: cited, 127-9.
Lawrence, Col. Thomas E.: activi- Leases : land, 240, 242 : of chrome
ties, 544; cited, 168, 516, 536, 543, properties, 372 : regulations rdg.,
546, 613. 258 ; periods, 295.
738 INDEX
Leather: can be made in Turkey, Lichnowsky, Prince Carl Max von:
373. Bee al&o Hides and Skins. his revelations, cited, 369-70.
Lebanon ( dist. in Western Asia Licorice root : article of trade. 334.
Minor) : mt. range north of, 110 ; 336, 346.
pop., 111, 392; its .vater supply, Lighthouses: tax for, 445.
160 ; a mass of limestone, 161 ; Lincoln, Abraham : cited, 98.
amber in, 324 ; no complete statis- Lippmann, Walter: cited, 5.
tics for, 305; reforestation in, Lisbonas (Jewish family); promi-
308; hosp. in, 170; monasteries in, nent in Aleppo, 92.
287 ; silk factories in, 358 ; wishes Literature: Tnrks borrow, 9; Tnrka
to join other Arab countries, 550 ; pay little heed to, 45 ; Armenian,
a mandate, 642, 643. 36, 65; Kurds possess, 36; Arabs
Legislation: by Grmd National As- possess, 56: Jewish, 90-91, 94;
sembly, 413-4; capitulations hin- taught in Turkey, 124; influence
der, 444.. Bee also Laws. of French. in Turkey, 358.
Leo VI: negotiations by, 435-6. Liverpool, Eng. : mentioned, 48 ; im-
Lepers : in Orient, 168-9 ; Amer. ports into, 322.
work among, 169. Lloyd George, David (Brit. states-
Letters: various, cited and pub- man): never in Turkey, 559; ap-
lished, 20, 185, 418-19, 4 79. peals for action against Turkey;
Levant: defined, 7; breeds fatalism, 567-8; defeated, 570; defines war
12 ; racial characteristics in, 297 ; aims, 621-2: activities, 570, 619;
agric. in, 282, 301 ; higher stand- cited, 74, 540, 545, 566, 568, 656-7.
ard of living possible in, 301 ; Loans : pledges and securities for,
trade arid business in, 67, 299, 26, 366, 404-5; banks authorized
333-4, 345, 350 ; foreign penetra- to make, 258 ; corruption in, 362-
tion into, 310; nationality of for- 3 ; national jealousy rdg., 363 ;
eign firms in, 345; Ger. revival purposes for which made, 363 : ob-
in likely, 349; French influence tained through French banks, 36-! ;
in, 358; U. S. ship in, 361; diplo- rates of interest on Turkish, 3&!- -
macy in, inconsistent, 492; Brit. 5; Turkey in favorable position
strategy in, poor, 540-1; methods for, 382; none floated in recent
followed by writers on, 2-3. Bee years in Turkey, 384-5, 563 ; too
al&o Near East; Levantines; and many in Turkey, 409 ; agric. needs,
the several countries of the Near 574; Turkey promises not to con-
East. tract, 636 ; various, 26, 355, 364,
Levantines : term defined, 57 ; its 366, 382, 386, 389, 401, 402-3.
synonym, 58 ; possess a vagne Bee also Debts.
nationality, 32; characteristics J.oftus, ( archmologist) : activities,
and description, 40, 58; occupa- 181.
tions and professions, 32, 40, 58, Lombards: regarded as barbarians,
340, 346; economic status, 332; 436. .
Turkish attitude toward natural- London, Eng. : distant from Basra,
ized, 344.. 236; has mail connection with
Lewis, James Hamilton: actiVities, Baghdad, 232 ; has air service,
491. 234; Turkish officials in, 82 : Jews
Liberal Ottoman Committee : activi- in, 92, 95; Ger. ambassador at,
ties, 483-4.. 369; propaganda bureau in, 4-5;
Libourne, France: mentioned, European collections in, 7 ; salon,
238. 178; Sultan borrows money, 389;
Libraries: various, 7, 98, 178, 199, Turkish periodicals published at,
455. 453. 484-5; conference at and pact
Libya, Africa: considered in treaty, of, 69, 70, 379-80, 442. 443, 509-
613. 10, 543, 555, 565, 612-13. .
Licenses : prospecting, 327 ; profes- Lotharingians : regarded as bar-
sional men pay, 395; regnlations barians, 436.
rdg., 665. Bee al&o Fees. Loti, Pierre : cited, 1, 79.
INDEX 739
Lumber. See Wood. 1\Iakri, Smyrna prov.: important
Lusitamus, Amatus: emigrates to port, 212 ; manganese deposita
Salonika, 91. near, 316-17; products shipped
Lybyer, Dr. A. H. : cited, 44. from, 216; Ger. buy chrome at,
Lycaonia, Asia Minor : Christian 317.
church at, 196. Makna. Asia Minor : sulphur at,
Lydia (region in Asia Minor): 322.
Hittites occupy, 198-99; excava- Mala tis. Asia Minor: on highway,
tions at, 198 ; antiquities of, pre- 218 : ita pears famous, 290.
served, 178. · Mamelukes: Turks conquer, 417.
Lydians : language discovered, 198 ; Manchester, England : Jews in, 92;
had alphabet, 199; influence Greek Jews trade in. 94 : Armenians in,
culture, 198; their Empire, 198. • 346 ; air service, 234.
Mandates : defined, 545: Armenians
l.\1 ask for, 72; olfered to U. S., 74,
515: U. S. refuses, 515, 526-7;
McCoy, Brig. Gen. F. R. : thanked, considered by U. S. mission, 631 ;
6. conditions for acceptance, 632-3 ;
Macedonia (Near Eastern region): French, 226, 634; change of Brit.
mention forbidden in Turkey, 10; policy rdg., 550 ; in old Ott. terri·
Jews in, 53, 101 ; Turkey loses, tories, 372, 547, 640, 642, 643; in
82 ; Turkish tobacco growers in, liberated areas, 545; development
337 ; reforms planned, 368, 504 ; of, 548 ; Levantine business a~nts0
revolution in, 458, 485; pros- in. 346, I
perous, 459 ; closed to Turkish Mandelstam : cited, 405.
newspapers, 474; European pene- Manifesto : exiles publish, 483.
tration, 485; Turkish policy, 502; Manufactures: needed in Turkey,
Austrian note rdg., 503. 137 ; few in Levant, 282-3 ; im-
Macedonian Commission : activities, ported into Turkey, 335; · high
238. tarilf on, 336; manufacturers have
Machines and !l.lachinery: imported, relations with banks in Turkey,
26; little used in Turkey, 281, 343; credit information furnished
330 ; engines, 292, 300 ; projected to Ger. manufacturers, 348; raw
for Mosul region, 316; used in materials for, in 'l'urkey, 373;
mining, 323 ; exemptions needed, various kinds mentioned, 95, 150,
326: few shops in Turkey, 374. 244, 290, 330, 336, 338, 372,
Mreandrum, Asia Minor: excava- 373.
tions at, 199. Manuscripts: Jewish, 90; in Turk·
Magnesia, Asia Minor : mentioned, ish museums, 179 ; Christian, 184 ;
· 86 ; Jews in, 87-8 : ruins in. 194 ; illuminated, 191.
Hellenic art in, 195; excavations Maps : various, cited, 190, 303, 311 ;
in, 19g; on ry., 227. old measurements of, exact, 190;
Magossa, Cypress : Turkish fort, published in newspapers, 472.
453. Marbles : from old ruins, 194.
Magyars: rule former Turkish sub- Mardin, Asia Minor: on highway,
jects, 496: attitude toward Turks 218.
and Serbs, 500: language, 511. Markets: sites of, owned by state,
Mahan, Rear Adm. A. T.: praises 244; lands expropriated for, 259;
Constantinople, 14 ;. cited, 201. depend on transportation, 269 ; no
Mahdi : revolts against Egypt, 1\2. foreign, ,for certain products, 287;
M a.h lour : defined, 263. good, for wine, 287 ; animals
Mahmud II. (Sultan) : breaks power driven to, 289-90 : possibilities for
of Dere Beys, 238 : destroys wool, 290 ; crops for, fertilized,
jani11saries, 808: establishes news- 292; steady, lacking in Turkey,
pRper, 452: order, cited, 452. 297 ; not near agric. districts,
Mahmud Pasha : activities, 79, 815. 299; Levantine merehants study,
Mahmudiya: a canal, 278. 299; business men must know,
740 INDEX
329 ; neglected by Turks, 330 ; 238-9, 265-6, 280-82, 310-11, 384-
manufacturers neglect, 343 ; good 8, 430-35, 448-56, 476-7, 491-4;
for portable houses, 374; foreign- notes by, 68, 75, 86, 135, 289, 315-
ers find, for Turkish raw materials, 16, 327, 331, 332, 334-5, 337, 350,
433 ; news promulgated in, 451 ; 367-9, 444-5, 448, 473-4, 501-2,
at edge of deserts, 548. See also 515, 516, 517, 529, 533, 547, 559-
Commerce. 60, 572; cited, 344, 432-3.
Maro, John: organizes church, 111. Mecca, Arabia: a holy city, 201,
Maronites: location and tenets, 114. 218; shrine at, 534; place of pil-
Marriage : of Sultans, 8; effects of grimage, 102 ; Arab officials in, 19-
polygamy, 23; Greek liishops have 20 ; home of Mohammedanism,
jurisdiction over, 112 ; among 102; dispute over khalifate at,
Kurds, 150 ; Arabian customs, 104; Turks remove sacred objects
152 ; smallpox bar to, 163 ; be- from, 105 ; king in, 118 ; source of
tween Ott. and foreigners, 249-50 ; disease, 164; Wahab is sack, 535;
dissolution, 256 (see also Div- Brit. relations with Sherif of, 538,
orce) ; of Sultan's daughter, 389; 613-14.
under control of millet, 420. Mechanics: Armenian, 67.
Marseilles, France : Armenian pr~ss Medicine: Turk not attracted by,
in, 65 ; Jews in, 192 ; reason for 40 ; Mohammedans study, 91 ;
its importance, 358. taught in Asia Minor, 118-9, 125,
Marshes : salt, 243 ; in Levant, 289. 133, 141, 172, 173; practice in
Martin, Col. Lawrence: thanked, 6. Turkey, 137; Oriental belief rdg.,
Martyrs : among Mohammedans, 165; free in Turkey, 360-1.
108. Mehmed, Reshad (Sultan) : activi-
Mass : Greek Orthodox, 419. ties, 439-40, 506-8.
Massacres : of Armenians, 51, 69, Mehmed Chan (Sultan): ambassa-
71, 81, 129, 164, 449, 456, 493, dor to, 439.
517; 518, 520; 561; Armenian, Mehmet Pasha, Rum (a Greek):
·arouse indignation, 456; reason acts as vizier, 79.
for Armenian, 520 ; during Bul- Meiden-Ekbes, Asia Minor: Turkish
garian atrocities, 51 ; Turkish Im- position near, 651.
perial policy, 52; among Shiah Mejid Effendi, Abdul (Sultan) : ex-
sect, 108 ; decimate prop., 282 ; iled, 20; extravagant, 389; ap-
made news feature, 450; public pointed Sultan-khalif, 417.
effect of, 631. Mekhitarists : publish first work in
Masyaf, Asia Minor: chief center of Armenian, 65.
Ismailiyis, 109. Melej, Asia Minor : mine in, 319.
Mathematics: in Jewish MSS., 90; Men: in Turkish household, 147-8.
taught in schools, 125, 135. Menahems (Jewish family) : promi-
Maude, Sir Frederick Stanley (Brit. nent in Baghdad, 92.
Gen.): his proclamation, 618-19. Menasche (Jew) : activities, 93.
Maurice, Maj. Gen. Sir F.: cited, Menderez, Anatolia: a water basin,
567. 267, 268.
Mazarakis, Gen. : Greek plenipoten- Mendos, Smyrna prov.: manganese
tiary, 658. in, 316-17.
Mead, Dr. Elwood: cited, 548. Menelik .II (Abyssinian king) :
Meadows : communal, 294 ; rented, activities, 86.
295. . Merchandise : how handled by
Mears, Eliot Grinnell : activities, agents, 220. See also Commerce.
vii, viii, 558; his work evaluated, Merchants : near Golden Horn, 32;
ix; attitude in writing this book, in Anatolia, 33; Turks not good,
7; sketch, 1 ; chapters in this book 39-40 ; Turkish, 331 ; · Armenian
by, 1-30, 31-59, 201-37; 302-9, 328- and Greek, excellent, 39-40, 48;
53, 354-83, 517-32, 533-51, 552-75; Greek, 331; Armenian, 331; Jew-
introductions by, 1-30, 60-3, 98- ish, 80, 331 ; Egyptian, 185 ;
106, 117-121, 141-4, 155-7, 177-9, Syrian, 185 ; in Levant, 299;
INDEX 741
Oriental in Turkey, 331; pioneer Meugia, Asia Minor: I taL rights in,
American, in Turkey, 339 ; fear 644.
nomads, 42; activities in Turkey, Mexico : Ger. policy toward, 522.
220 : change their citizenship, 345 ; Midas (king): his kingdom par-
cited, 45. Bee also Commerce; tially uncovered, 197.
anti the several countries and Middle Ages : ended, 86 ; Turkey
peoples. exhibits, 9; epidemics during, 162;
Mersina, Anatolia : an important monuments of, in Ot·ient, 187;
port, 212; free port, 619; Nusairis Syrian art copied in, 191; law and
in, 110 ; on ry., 212-13, 228; ·on religion united during, 446 ; capit·
highway, 218; port works planned ulations during, 437.
at, 381 ; excluded from agreement, Middle East : included in Levant, 7:
614. Turkish frontiers in, 207 ; people
Mersivan, Asia Minor : inhabitants of, classified by religions, 98;
of, killed in war, 9; Amer. hosp. leaders trained in Amer. schools,
at, 176. 118 ; Ger. desires, 201 ; mail route
1\lesjidli, Aidin prov.: mine in, 320. to, 232; development of, related
Mesopotamia : Iraq ( q. "·) the to Turkey, 237 : reason for its
same :ts, 7 ; characterized, 11, 180; stagnation, 297-8; Brit. interest
world by itself, 269: location of and operations in, 359, 540-1;
upper, 358; area and pop., 89-90, balance of power in, 492; revolt
114, 580: desert in, 185; Persian against allies in, 546; native
Gulf basin connected with, 267; govts. in, characterized, 547; con-
rivers in, 269 ; little rainfall · in, flict in, feared, 569. Bee al8o the
269; has tropical alluvial plains, several countries.
283 : as fertile as Egypt, 269 ; Midhat Pasha (grand vizier): char-
irrigation in, 269, 270, 274, 277, acterized, 480; a liberal leader,
278, 359, 372 ; resources, 288, 313, 481; his Armenian counselor, 66:
314. 315, 316, 358, 372, 633-4: relations with Von Pressel, 367;
various cities of, 296: rys. in, 358- his triaL 457 : forces constitution
9; its ancient and Christian civili- from Sultan, 478; exiled, 479; re-
zation, 184. Relations with Tur- forms fail, 480: assassinated, 482.
key, 11, 82, 89, 266, 289, 474. 626; 1\lidian Land : location and prod-
Turkey loses, 82 ; Jews develop ucts, 322.
com. in, 94; education and mis- Migrations : Tartar, 86; Jewish, 87 ;
sions, 118, 132; ancient ruins and lessen pop., 282. Bee also Depor-
excavations, 181-2, 184-6; mil. oc- tations ; Emigration ; anti lmmi·
cupation and operations, 278, 358; gration.
other Brit. activities and policy, Mikhalijik (kaza of, Asia Minor):
359, 617-9 ; Brit. mandate, 642-3 ; fuller's earth in, 32L
in Ger. sphere of influence, 369- Milan, Italy: Jews in, 92.
70; financial statement for, 392; Milas, Aidin prov.: mine in, 320.
why its revenues are inadequate, 1\Iiletos, Asia Minor : Hellenic art
394 ; closed to Turkish news- in, 195; excavations in, 197.
papers, 474: entitled to national Military Operations, etc.: armies,
recognition, 621 ; native govt. in, 7-8, 68-9, 78, 162, 164, 278, 401,
encouraged, 627 ; Brit. handbook 413, 460, 466, 474, 506-8, 510, 527,
on, cited, 314-5. 537, 538, 541, 542, 550, 562, 566,
Mesrop: invents Armenian alpha- 609, 623-4, 625, 632, 641, 651,
bet, 65. 658; soldil"rs, 9, 40-1, 42, 45, 105,
Metallurgy: study of, needed in ~r 172, 275, 499, 008, 527, 561: uni·
key, 326. versal servil'l', 4 77 : forts and forti-
Metals : Bee Mines, Mining, and fications, 184-5, 262: garrisons,
Minerals. 485-6; arms. ammunition, and
Metaxakis, Meletios (patriarch): as" equipment, 233, 289, 302, 338, 515.
snulted and removed, 100; flees, 539, 563.654 (aee olio Weapons I:
421. - mines, 506; battles, 41, 400, 561,
742 INDEX
565; salutes, 417; mts. as defense, exploitation dependent on political
22 ; animals requisitioned, 289 ; and economic factors, 311-12; sta-
revenues and expenditures, 337, rtstics, 310-11, 312, 313, 314;
385, 387, 395, 396; requirements, value of various products, 313,
dictate trade policies, 341; de- 325; exported, 337-8. Minerals
mands, cause labor shortage, 373 ; and mineral substances enumer-
censorship, 465-7; alliances, 489 ated-agate, 324; alabaster, 324;
(see al.so Allies) ; neglect by pow- amber, 324; antimony, 320; ar-
ers, 514-15 ; excesses, 560-1 ; senic, 321 ; asphalt, 316; bitumen,
rights, secured for Brit., 615; Har- 316; boracite, 318; borax, 338;
bord Mission (q. v.), 631-3. bronze, 191, 196, 198; carbonate,
Millerand, A. : diplomatic activities, 318; Cllrome, 312, 317, 359, 371;
642. clay, 321; coal (see Fuel) ; cop-
Millet, Philippe: cited, 564. per, 13, 310, 312, 322-23, 358, 371 ;
Millets·: system defined and de- corundum, 318; emery, 13, 216,
scribed, 98, 121-2, 419-20, 518; 312, 317-18, 338; flint, 293;
non-Moslems live under, 123; how fuller's earth, 321 ; galena, 319,
justified, 420 ; wield judicial and 323 ; gold, 13, 185, 191, 198, 262,
political power, 420 ; abolished, 312, 319, 323, 341, 385 ; hualite,
518. 324; iron, 319-20; 373 ; jasper,
Mills: various kinds in Turkey, 286, 324 ; lead, 13, 318, 371 ; lignite
372. (see Fuels) ; lime and limestone,
Milne, Gen. (allied commander in 161-2, 283, 318, 322, 324; marble,
chief in Turkey) : activities, 557. 324; magnesium, 162, 318; man-
Milton, John: cited, 29-30. ganese, 216, 316; meerschaum, 13,
Mines and Minerals and Mining : 312, 321, 338; mercury, 321 ;
mines--concessions, 202, 310, 316, nickel, 385 ; onyx, 324 ; opals, 324 ;
317, 318, 319, 359, 363 ; regula- pandermite, 312, 318; petroleum
tions rdg_ exploitation, 260-2; (see Petroleum); salt, 313, 324,
ownership of placers, 261 ; decrees 356; serpentine, 317, 322; silver,
confer ownership in, 261 ; exploita- 13, 185, 191, 262, 312, 319, 323,
tion depends on forests, 311 ; Brit. 371, 385; sodium, 162; sulphur,
own, 320 ; many abandoned, 323 ; 322 ; trachyte, 322 ; zinc, 319,
materials for, should be admitted 320, 371.
free, 326 ; careful prospecting Miniatures : in museums, 179.
should be encouraged, 326-7 ; how Minnesota Commission of Public
to exploit in Turkey, 327; under Safety: mentioned, 384.
foreign control, 354-5. Mining- Minorities : right of, 138-9, 630;
special laws govern, 243; fees, protection guaranteed, 641.
261 ; methods, 318, 321, 322, 323, Minors: regulations rdg., 264.
330; ancient, in Turkey, 323; com- Missions and Missionaries : Amer.,
panies, 321, 323; machinery, 323; 27, 132, 361, 449, 501; U. S. in-
why it does not flourish, 325-6; terested in, 632 ; French, 130, 501 ;
code unsatisfactory, 325; risks in, Brit., 131 ; Scotch, i 75; Ger.,
326 ; Amer. seek rights, 501. Min- 519-20 ; allied, 467 ; no zeal among
erals-produced in Turkey, 13, Turks, 521 ; security guaranteed in
202; various locations of, 311, 312, Iraq, 637; activities, 139, 174,
313,371; few in European Turkey, 501, 524; statistics, 135 ; cited, 45.
311-12; exploitation desired in See also Education; and Hospi-
Turkey, 26; included in ry. conces- tals.
sion, 222, 367 ; carried by Turkish Mixed Arbitral Tribunal : constitu-
rys., - 223 ; regulations rdg. ex- tion and duties, 664-6..
ploitation, 260-3 ; exploited by Mobs : in Constantinople, 459. See
concession, 261, 312, 359, 378-9 ; also Revolts.
relation of, to diplomacy, 310; "Modern Turkey" : needed, 4 ; plan
long exploited in Asia Minor, 311; and scope, 5-7, 38; reason for
land ceded to other nations, 311; book, 449.
INDEX 743
Mohammed (founder of Mohamme- law derives from religion, 437,
danism) : mentioned, 145; birth, 446 ; law partly secularized, 446;
102 ; revelations to, 102 ; called a status of women among, 144-5;
prophet, 104; Turks accept laws life of women, 146-150; refuse to
of, 107; Nusairis acknowledge, send girls to school, 152 ; Chris-
110; his daughter, 107; dwells in tian women freer, 153 ; look for-
desert, 534 ; his successors, 105; ward to pilgrimage, 204; cemented
cited, 518. together by their belief, 417 ; their
Mohammed ll. : eapturea Constanti- holy day, 424 ; decadence of, 492;
nople, 78, 112, 521 ; has Christian Turkish and Arabic split, 503, 573-
viziers, 79 ; treatment of Greeks, 4; not proselytizers, 521 ; their
112 ; tolerant, 521. holy places, 611, 612, 613. Hostili-
Mohammed VI. : deposed, 20; ap- ties among, viii ; perish in war,
points minister to U. S., 86; ac- 9, 73; Kemal enthuses, 29; atti-
cused of treason, 569 ; flees from tude toward Armenians, 52 (lee
Turkey, 417, 569. ol8o Armenians); attitude toward
lllohammed Ali : European policy Jews, 54; Amer. attitude toward,
toward, 493. 132 ; toward strangers, 436;
1\Iohammedanism : orJ.glD, 4, 56, toward non-Moslems, 103, 437,
102; description and criticism, 518 ; kaiser's attitude toward,
102·3 ; adopted by various peoples, 359 ; contrasted with Christians,
42, 78, 107 ; proclaimed that Ger. 437; confuse various countries,
had adopted, 509 ; heretics among, 440 ; attitude of others toward
107-8; State religion of Turkish Turkey, 498-9, 569; European na-
Republic, 668. Bee also Islam ; tions oppress, 506. Christians
and Mohammedans. granted equality with, 81; edu-
Mohammedans (Moslems), (Mus- cated in Jewish schools, 92; at-
sulmans) : compared to Chris- tend Amer. schools, 118 ; attend
tians, 3-4 ; different types among, govt. schools, 124; education con-
4 ; modern type, 571 ; sects among, trasted with Armenian, 128;
101, 102, 104, 107-9, 115, 534, 535, power of khalifate among, 105; re-
537; numbers, 9; races enumer- ligious issue among, 105-6 ;_dispute
ated, 35; Turkish, viii; in Turkey, claims of Sultan, 107 ; Ismailiyis
2, 35 ; peoples in Old Turkey terrorize, 109 ; revolts among, 112 ;
called, 38 ; all, in Turkey not engage in shipping trade, 215 ;
Turks, 38 ; various peoples and vakuf peculiar among, 240; atti-
States in Turkey, 38-9, 68, 107, tude toward Levantine business
517-8; Turk equivalent to "Mos- ·men, 345 ; nationalism spreading
lem," 101 ; Turks cruelest of, 496 ; among, 417; have capitulations
Kurdish, viii, 55; Osmanli, 38; with pagans, 437; requirements
Christians become, 39 ; Anatolians, for admission into family of na-
42 ; few in Smyrna, 49 ; Arabs, tions, 446; emigration of, 489;
56; in Syria, 56; Jews become, controlled by Europeans, 492; im-
90; in Russian Empire, 99; plicated in Sepoy rebl'llion, 498:
Cypriotes, 265; African States, Empire of, planned, 513 ; oppose
438; in India, 498, 564; Central single Turkish mandate, 515; in
Asia, 512 ; in various regions, 513- Turkish conquest, 521 ; French un-
14, 521, 534, 537. Description and able to overcome, 546; Brit. have
bPliefs, 12, 39, 42, 43, 103-4, 110, inftuence with, 551; Sultan de-
164, 281, 489; obligations, 33, clared an enemy of, 659.
240; place of Arabic among, 36; Mohammerah Ali: attends ronfer-
learn Turkish readily, 87; ortho- ence, 538; Brit. subsidir;e, 539.
dox abhor heretical beliefa, 110; Moldavia, Romania: under Greek
&l'cts hostile to one another, 537; governors, 80, 82 ; Turkey loses,
law of, characterized, 122: prop- 495.
l'rty laws progressive, 144: laws l\lombelli, Lt.-Gen. E.: activities,
rdg. various matters, 248, 250 ; 658.
744 INDEX.
Monasteries : Roman Catholic, 131 ; Montague (ltal. delegate) : activi-
in Lebanon, 287. ties, 573.
Monastir : Turkey loses, 304 ; Turk· Montefiore, Sir Moses (Eng. Jew) :
ish govt. directed from, 486. activities, 95-6.
Monbah: defined, 263. Montenegrins : may not hold real
Money and Currency : depreciates property in Turkey, 252.
in value, 81, 340, 349, 405, 566; Montenegro: consul at Constanti-
sent to Turkey, 337; Turkish nople, 430·; capitulation system
paper, 340, 385-7, 390, 401-2, 405, abolished, 441; Turkey loses, 495.;
406, 563, 663; paper issued by declares war on Turkey, 504.
various countries, 405; bank notes, Montgomery, Rev. G. R.: cited, 229,
375, 384, 385-6, 406 ; Turkish, 517, 529. .
wears out, 385; hoarded, 385, 406; Monuments: value for history, 186;
forced, 386 ; currency situation ancient owned by State, 262 ;
not understood abroad, 386 ; total found in various places, 66, 187-9,
Turkish currency, 386; sums al- 190-1, 195-6, 199.
lotted to ex-Sultan, 387; gold re- 1\Ioonites: branch of Nusairi sect,
serve, 405; fluctuations violent, 110.
405-6; speculation in, 405-6; char- Moore, Rev. E. C. : thanked, 6.
acter of Turkey's prewar, 406; Morals : taught in schools, 131, 134;
metallic in Turkey, 104, 385, 406; neglected · in Turkish schools,
probability of stabilization, 406; 172.
power of, among Arabs, 539; Morocco:. Sultan of, 19; convention
Soviet Russia supplies, 563 ; rdg., 609.
transferred by Central powers, Morpourgos (Jewish family) : in
662; in treaty, 662. Various kinds Salonika, 92.
of money-Turkish pound, 271, Mortgages: of lands, 239; regula·
344, 385, 387, 406, 475; piastres, tions rdg, 240, 257-9; foreclosure,
340, 385, 406 ; sums expressed in 281.
Turkish pounds, 273, 279, 306, Moscow, Russia: mentioned, 17;
313, 321, 323, 325; 335, 336, 337, airships at, 234; treaty made in,
364, 367, 386, 387, 390-2, 395, 400, 644, 648.
401, 406, 421, 473, 475; sums in Mosques : mentioned, 3 ; described,
U. S. dollars, 306, 313, 315, 316, 149; in Constantinople, 32; Sulai-
334, 339, 349, 358-9, 371, 473, maniya, 179 ; built by Armenians,
475; sums in pounds sterling, 340, 66; observances before entering,
380, 385, 538; Ger. mark, 349; ·in 102; own real estate, 122; teach-
francs, 357, 365-6, 389, 409, 579 ; ing in, 122, 124; cisterns under,
in Indian rupees, 538. 160-1; dead bodies washed at, 164;
Moneylenders: Armenians as, 80; early Christian architecture in,
in Turkey, 389. 196; law rdg., cited, 250; news
Mongolians : origin of Turks, 39. promulgated at, 451.
Mongols: decimate Ismailiyis, 109; Mosul (city and district): loca-
rule Asia Minor, 193. tion, 22, 541 ; distance to other
Monopolies: Turkish attitude centers, 236; mts. near, 22 ; on
toward, 28, 351, 409; in treaty, highway, 218; ry. projected for,
341 ; revenues from, 399; exercised 230 ; Bagdad ry. not to go to,
by Ger. embassy, 465 ; abolished, 615 ; economic importance and re-
445; regulations rdg., 644; vari· sources, 22 ; compared to Aleppo,
ous, 243, 318, 334-5, 356, 367, 22 ; crop statistics, 285 ; no com-
369, 409. plete statistics for, 305; oil
Monroe, Paul : sketch, 117 ; chapter fields, 310, 314, 315, 316, 327;
in this book, 117-40; cited, 118. produces salt, 324; Arab tribes-
Monothelites : Maronites accept doc- men in, 19-20 ; Xenophon at, 22 ;
trine of, 114. negotiations held at, 22-23 ; heirs
Mons Sibyl us, Asia Minor: rock of Abdul Hamid claim oil fields,
sculpture at, 193. 202-3 ; Turkish advantage in
INDEX 745
Mosul question, 382: Brit. forces art. 194, 196 ; Berlin, 194; Ott. in
in, 541; in Arab State, 542. Constantinople, 197, 199, 262.
Mothers : Turkish demand rights, Museyyeb, Mesopotamia : location
144. and canal, 277.
Mounds : artificial, in Syria, 186. Music: Armenians excel in, 65.
Mou.kataa: defined, 242. Mu.ateghellat: defined, 242.
Mountains and Hills : form mil. bar- Musurus Pasha : signs protocol,
rier, 22 ; bandits in, 33 ; villages 442; cited, 443.
in, 34 ; in various regions, 34, 51, Mutawili (Syrian Shiah &edt): num-
71, 110, 114-15, 149, 187, 229-30, ber, 108 ; hostile to orthodox Mos•
267, 316 ; traveling in, difficult, lema, 108.
150 ; stream cuts channel through, Mu.tesna: defined, 241.
229; height, 229-30, 639; among M u.tevelli: defined, 241 ; his duties,
waste lands, 242 ; basins among, 244.
267; minerals in, 283, 312-13; Mutinies: Bee Revolt.
sheep on, 289 ; slopes absorb mois- Myths : religious, 499.
ture, 303 ; forests on, 306 ; people
of, hospitable, 34; ancient people N
of Assyrian, 36 ; various sects in-
habit, 109-11; privies in, 159; Nakie (admin. unit): described,
diseases in, 168 ; hosp. on, 170, 423.
175 ; tribes in Asia Minor, 194; Nahoum, Haim: sketch, 86; article
mines on, 32<J; starvation in, 540; by, in this book, 86-97.
various, named, 75, 111, 170, 175, Najaf, Iraq: Shiah sect in, 534.
225, 226, 270, 283, 303, 312, 316, Nakhichevan: an autonomous terr.,
320, 371, 373, 421, 525, 530, 540, 646, 649 ; extent, 646.
554, 619, 625, 639, 640, 646, 649. Nansen, Dr. Fridthof (explorer):
M oussakafat defined, 242. proposes interchange of minori-
M ou.vakkat •enedi: defined, 254. ties, 61.
Mud: as building material, 34, 158, Napoleon I.: desired to control Con-
182. stantinople, 15 ; his failure, 493.
Mudania (city and district), Ana- Narek, Armenia: convent in, 66.
tolia: important coast city, 209; Nassi (family): emigrates to Con-
location, 569; ry. terminus, 211; stantinople, 91.
iron mines in, 319-20; Jews set- Nassi, Joseph (Spanish Jew): his
tle near, 87 ; armistice of, 569, inftuence, 88, 90; modernizes Jew-
658-9. ish movement, 95 ; death, 95.
Mudros, Asia Minor: armistice N assi, Reina : installs press in Tur-
signed at, 349-50, 624-6. key, 91.
Mughla, Asia Minor: on ry., 227; Nationalism: growth of in Turkey,
ltal. interests ·in, 360. 552-575. Bee also Turkey ; and
Muharrem: decree of, 355. Turks.
Muheddin Pasha: aids Kemal, 563. Nationalist Movement: its main-
Mukhtar BPy (Turkish official) : spring, 556-7; growth in 1920,
activities, SS0-1. 560-1. Bee also Turkey; an4
Muntesha, Asia Minor: mine in, Turks.
317. Nationalists: at Laussnne, 17; de-
Murad V. (Sultan): relations nounced as rebels, 562. Bee aZ.o
with Brit., 439; deposed, 478; at- Turkey ; an4 Turks.
tempt to restore, 481. Nationality: inheritance depends
Murad BPy (Turkish journalist) : upon, 248-9; regulation rdg., 249;
ftees, 456. lost by marriage, 249 ; idea of,
Museums: in Beirut, 98; Evkaf strengthened, 440. Bee aZ.O Tur-
Museum, 178-9; in Stamboul, 177- key; and Turks.
8; antiquities and MSS. preserved Natural Sciences: Turkish school
in, 179, 184; British, 186, 194; of, 125.
European filled with old Oriental Naturalil:ation: reasons for, 845.
746 INDEX
Naumann,. Friedrich: cited, 18-19. Nestorians: number and habitat,
Navigation: limited in Anatolia, 114-115. See also Christians.
267 ; on Mesopotamian rivers, 269 ; Netherlands (Holland) : adheres to
river, impossible in Syria, 269; law of Sefer, 252; trade with Tur-
rights, in concession, 367. key, 317, 319, 336, 339; its posi-
Navon (Jew) : activities, 93. tion in Constantinople, 336;
Navy (U. S.) : Bristol's record in, amount of Turkish holdings in,
xi. 364.
Nazareth, Palestine: Scotch mission Neutrality: declared by European
in, 175. countries, 565.
Nazilly, Aidin prov.: emery mines New Colophon, Asia Minor. See
at, 318. Notium.
Nazim, Dr.: denies importance of New England: trading ships fro.m,
race question, 477. 361.
N azirs: defined, 295. New Hampshire: mentioned, 141.
Near East: defined, 7; ignorance of New Rome: archbishop of, 99.
conditions in, viii ; rich in lan- New York: pop., 85; school children
guages, 35 ; varied and various in, 85 ; Jews trade in, 94 ; teachers
races in, 57; Seljuk Turks in, 77; in, 140 ; receives wireless by re-
people in, classified by religion, lays, 233; shipping center, 330;
98; human life cheap in, 522; Armenians in, 346 ; Levantine bus-
crisis will come to, 85 ; agric. prim- iness agents in, 346; institutions
itive in, 297; reasons for stagna- in, 384; compared to Constanti-
tion in, 297-8; how to better con- nople, 450.
ditions in, 300. Amer. a potential Niazi Bey, Fazil : thanked, 6.
. factor in, 76. Educational insti- Nicholas I. (Russian Czar) : rela-
tutions in, 117, 173; leaders tions with Brit., 15.
trained in Amer. schools, 118 ; Nicholas (Nikolai Nikolayevich) :
women in, ready for progress, 154 ; Russian grand duke : activities,
development of, related to Turkey, 540.
237 ; Jews develop trade of, 94 ; Nicholey, Edward Frederick: sketch,
trade controlled by foreigners, 280 ; article in this book, 280-301.
299 ; com'l position of Constanti- Nicolajev, South Russia: cargo
nople in, 333-4 ; local merchandis- shipped from, 216.
ing in, 344-5; Amer. business Nimrod, .Asia Minor: excavations
ideals valuable in, 344; Brit. try in, 181.
to capture trade, 349-50; Chester Nineveh (ancient city) : excavations
project would have changed, 461; and research in, 18o-1; Mosul
policy of foreigners in, 485, 499- near site of, 541.
500, 611 ; Brit. operations in, 54Q- Nippur (ancient city) : excavations
1 ; revolts against allies in, 546 ;· in, 183.
Arab Nationalist party in, 550. Nisibin, Asia Minor: interior trade
See also the various countries of center, 216; ry. at, 225, 226;
the Near East; Commerce and Turkish frontier, 652.
Trade; a.nd Education. - Nomads: their contribution to Tur-
Near East Relief: its activities, 27, key, 9; Turkmen, dangerous, 42;
211, 362, 411 ; official, cited, 220. in Iraq, 266; in Turkey, 282, 306;
Near Eastern Question: powers re- Central Asian, 496 ; method of war-
sponsible for, 495-6. See also fare against, 548 ; their markets,
Eastern Question. 548. See also Arabs.
Nebonidus (Babylonian emperor): North America: Armenian business
his palaces, 182. houses in, 67.
Nebuchadnezzar (Babylonian em- North German Confederation: signs
peror) : his palaces, 182. protocol, 442. See also Germany.
Negroes: in America, 36, 60. Northmen: attitude toward for-
Nejd, Asia Minor: its ruler, 538; eigners, 436.
Feisal represents, 544. Norway: French minister in, 238;
INDEX 747
adheres to law of Sefer, 252; 320, 360, 48~ 569, 610, 630, 660;
trade, 339 ; Amer. consul from, Mediterranean, 18, 74, 77, 204,
430. .207, 211, 216, 217, 236, 268, 286,
Notaries: restrictions, 253. 303, 312, 316, 333, 360, 368, 482,
Notium (New Colophon): excava- 497, 540, 542, 554, 558, 561, 613,
tions at, 199. 620, 621, 625, 634, 639, 640, 653 :
Nouriels (Jewish family): promi· Pontus (tee also Black), 85; Red,
nent in Baghdad, 92. 94, 164, 207, 32~ 501, 616, 620.
Novelists: Turkish, 456. Bee a.ho Odessa, Russia: shipping center,
Literature. 216.
Novels: kind read in Turkey, 9-10. Odian, Krikor : first promotes Turk·
Novorossisk, Russia: articles shipped ish constitution, 66.
from, 216. <Ecumenical Patriarch : head of
Nubar Pasha (Egyptian official) : Orthodox Church, 51.
his son, 63 ; his constructive work Officials (this caption is not com-
in Egypt, 67. plete, as it was not deemed expe-
Nubar Pasha, Boghos (Bon of for- dient to gather all the officials each
mer) : sketch, 63 ; represents Ar- time they were mentioned). Am·
menia, 528; chapter in this book, bassadors and envoys, 424, 435-6,
63-76. 439, 451, 454, 479, 480, 506, 568,
Nucho, Prof.: activities, 170. 610, 611, 616-17, 644. Consuls
Nur Bey, Dr. Riza: Turkish dele- -powers and duties, 251 : in
gate at conference, 645; Turkey, 254; rights of, in capitu·
Nurses: trained in Amer. institu· lations, 437. Foreign, exercise
tion, 137, 173 ; Turkish girls be- jurisdiction in Turkey, 441-2.
come, 143 ; in Turkish household, Various ecclesiastical, 98, 99, 100,
148; training school for, 155. 104, 112, 113, 114, 416-18, 419,
Nusairis (Mohammedan sect): ori· 420-21, 436 ; educational, 491 ;
gin of name, 110 ; branch of Shiahs, military, 460, 468, 485-6, 557.
108; habitat and number, 110; Albanian, in peace delegation, 153;
two divisions, 110; beliefs, 110. Allied Powers-High Commission-
ers, 631. American, viii, xi, 1,
0 330, 336, 361, 384, 419, 430, 431-
3, 616-17; Arabian, 538, 540, 613·
Oases : Kufra, 535. 14 ; British, 104, 439, 480, 498,
Oaths : taken by legislators, 428-9. 609, 610; Bulgarian, 98; French,
Obstetrics : studied in Amer. univer· 238, 529, 542, 568, 610, 611 :
sity, 174. Genoese, 440 : German, 12 ; Greek,
Occident: contrasted to Orient, 10- 506; Jewish, 86; Kurdish, 151-2;
11, 158. Russian, 451, 609-10, 611. Turk-
Oceans · and Seas : land reclaimed ish-thanked, 6 : corrupt, 83, 222,
from, 243. Enumerated-Adria· 370, 397, 409, 523 : daughters of,
tic, 556; Aegean, 19, 45-6, 77, 193, attend girls' school, 152: oppress
194, 304, 358, 360, 559, 640, 658; farmers, 298 : training school for,
Arctic, 512; Atlantic, vii, 233; 310; aalaries uncertain, 335, 388,
Black, 14, 31, 33, 45-6, 74, 75, 77, 408; too many, 395; basis for dis-
204, 205, 207, 208-9, 211, 214, 216, missal, 427 : reforms urged, 427;
217, 222, 229, 230, 266, 268, 286, in Angora Assembly, 428: have
303, 305, 310, 312, 314, 316, 324, organ in Constantinople, 458-9,
336, 338, 3!'\8, 359, 367, 368, 371, 460 ; liberals among, 485-6 ; enu·
443, 497, 506, 507, 509, 511, 617, merated, 2, 43, 63, 66-7, 79, 80, 96,
621, 625, 632, 646, 649, 650 ; Cas- 104-5, 147, 160, 219, 240, 253, 254,
pian, 39, 237: Dead, 269, 316, 26.'1, 294, 298, 299, 307, 308, 310,
322; Euxine (tee olao Black), 15- 815, 327, 355-6, 369, 372, 380, 389,
16; Indian, 207, 549; Marmara 390, 406, 407, 409, 414, 415, 421-2.
(Marmora), 81, 159, 208, 217, 225, 423, 425, 426, 427, 433, 4.'l4, 444,
227, 267, 268, 279, 312, 316, 318, 451, 453, 454, 457, 465, 476, 479,
748 INDEX
540,. 557, 558, 562, 569, 575, 653, 42; their viewpoint, 103-4; fear
668. disease, 169 ; attitude toward busi-
Oils: exported, 306; cottonseed, 216, ness, 352.
287, 339, 372; oleo, 336, 339; Orkhan, son of Osman : conquers
olive, 286-7, 338; vegetable, 341. Brusa, 78 ; ruler of Mesopotamia, ·
Bee also Petroleum. 269.
Okjilar, Asia Minor: iron ores at, Orlando, Vittorio Emanuele (Ital.
320. diplomat) : leaves peace confer-
. Ok-Meidan, Asia Minor: location, ence, 558 ; reaction against, 570.
233; wireless at, 233. Orphanage: Roman Catholic, 131.
Oligarchy: in Turkey, 477, 488. Orphans: condition, in Turkey, 574.
Ommiad Dynasty : established on Ors: defined, 269.
throne, 107. Orthodox Church. Bee Church,
Opium : an industrial crop, 295; Orthodox.
produced in Near East, 13, 288-9; Orthopedics: studied in Amer. uni-
statistics, 289; in treaty, 341. versity, 174.
Orders : of various nationalities, 86; Osman: founds Ottoman dynasty,
of assassins, 109 (see al90 · 652; encroaches on Byzantine
Ismailiyis) . terr., 77-8; conquests made by his
Ordinances : needed against disease, descendants, 87.
170. Osman (House) : exiled, 20; sup-
Ordu : Asia Minor: Black Sea plies khalif, 25 ; reason for power,
port, 209; minerals near, 312-13. 44; furnishes 36 Sultans, 569-70.
Oregon : constitutional amendment Osman Bey (Turkish official) :
in, 139-40. thanked, 6.
Ores: categories, 260; mining duty Osmanli : defined, 38 ; Turks call
based on, 261. themselves, 40-41; described, 40-1;
Organizations (societies, boards, intermarry with other races, 39.
etc.) : various, and their activi- Othman (Turkish ruling family) :
ties: xi, 18, 45, 74, 86, 91, 92, 95, name and activities, 7-8.
127, 131, 132, 143-4, 175-6, 186, Otho : Greek monarch, 82.
198, 223, 225, 238, 287, 288, 337, Ottoman Empire (Turkish Empire)
340, 355-7, 365, 385, 386, 390, 392, (an effort has been made to gather
395, 399, 400, 405, 422, 424, 430, here alf matters conneCted with
453-4, 456, 466, 469, 470, 475, 476, the Empire, but for each step, ref-
483-4, 486, 517, 522, 530, 531, erence should be made to the cap-
540, 541-2, 545, 559, 573-4, 635-6, tion "Turkey") : General consid-
662, 665, 666-7. erations--changes in, viii ; no
Orient: contrasted to Occident, 10- longer in existence, 2; former of-
11, 158; Turkey symbolizes, lO- ficial designation, 2; source of its
l l ; characterized, 12 ; sewage sys- early power, 7-8; cause for its de-
tems lacking in, 159 ; first news- cline, 8-10; misinformation rdg.,
papers in, 65; elements of, in Ar- 449.
menian architecture, 66; "saving Location, etc.-influences of its
face" in, 123; home life in, 146-9; location, 13 ; area and extent, 11,
poor water supply in, 159-60; fa- 266, 493, 580-2; its lands impor-
talism in, 165 ; eyes handsome in, tant, 179; wholly in productive
167; bazaars in, 331; weak capi- zone, 283 ; various localities, 335 ;
talistic class in, 333 ; reforms slow an undivided whole, 627; formed
in, 335; French influence in, 357- largely from Greek lands, 16-17;
8 ; standard of living in, can be dismemberment threatened, 486;
raised, 301. Bee also Levant; agreements as to partition of, 509-
Near East; and the various coun- 10; loss of Arab provinces con-
tries of that section. templated, 512-13; loses territory,
Oriental Empire: 86. Bee Byz_an- 77, 82, 179, 203, 222, 286, 304,
tine Empire. 368, 404, 482, 485, 492, 495, 504-5,
<P.i~ntal\) : fMalistJc, 12 ; indolent, 506, 509-10, 513, 661-2, 663, 668;
INDEX
climate, 176, 283; rainfall, 283; tion in or planned, 273-7: salt
most important rivers in, 217; monopoly, 243: manufactures,
lakes, 273; deserts in, 283. Pop. 290 ; close trade relations between
at various times, 67, 580-2 ; no various regions, 342 ; products and
official census in, 523 ; of subject resources, 282-90; 314 ; statistics
races under millet system, 123 ; for, fairly complete (1911-12),
various races in, viii, 38, 395 ; 393.
classification of peoples in, 41-2, Communication and transporta-
98 ; Moslems in, 38-9 (Bee also tion~ommunication protected by
Mohammedans) : mixed, 395 : khans, 42 ; internal prosperity de-
Arabs outnumber Turks, 533: as- pendent on good communications;
surance for protection of Christian 203-4; govt. telegraph installed,
minorities, 641: youths not al- 232-3 ; telegraph mileage, 232 ; tele-
lowed to leave, 126: emigration graph concession granted, 233;
from, 337 : decimated by war and transportation backward, 203, 235,
massacre, 71, 282 ; status of peo- 289 ; impossible to move grain in,
ples, 203 : nomads, 282 : non- 204: caravan routes, 218-22: rys.,
Turkish races not unduly bur- 225, 227, 366-7, 370, 638-9: (Bee
dened, 395. Communications and Transporta-
Social and economic factors- tion ; and Railways). Concessions,
Empire characterized, 14, 554; 101, 364, 365, 368, 377, 644; capit-
racial feeling in, 37 : corrupt, 44, ulations, 24, 409, 430, 431, 443-4,
370, 389, 425, 455-6, 464 : liberal 444, 445, 505. Financial relations
organism in, 44 ; militaristic and -taxes and taxation, 49, 239, 280,
chauvinistic, 78, 460: modernized, 394-8 : customs duties, 397, 444
81, 203; Jacks harmony and unity, (see also Customs Duties); banks,
115-6, 419 : insecurity in, 300 : 93, 258, 431-2; loans, 228-9, 363,
various institutions in, 121 ; secret 382, 401, 402-3; its public debt,
organizations in, 456; culture re- 396, 400-1, 402-3, 404; defaults on
tarded, 122-3 : new literary move- interest, 398, 400: redistribution
ment checked, 456: mortgages its of debt, 404 ; financial condition,
economic interests, 202: undevel- 354, 363. 388-9, 393, 400, 402-4 :
oped, 203 ; feudalism in, 238 : capital in, 366-7; adopts gold
power of families in, 238. Little standard, 385 ; revenue system
economic progress in, 282 ; stand- well devised, 389, 408 ; its ef-
ard of living rises, 286: living ficiency depends on officials, 408 :
conditions alarming, 464 : economic budgets, 390 ; receipts and expendi-
life little affected by war, 393 : tures, 393-6, 397-8, 399-400, 407-8;
effect of war on, 464, 554, 635 : deficits, 392, 400, 408, 478; credits
war abuses charged, 465-6: failure authorized, 393; wealth redistrib-
of its economic organization, 464: uted, 401; paper money, 401, 405:
internal situation bad, 466 : in- bas no gold reserve, 401 : bow
trigues and srandals. 467. Agric. financed during war, 401-2: char-
and pastoral, 282, 372 : govt. does acter of prewar money, 406:
little for agric., 280 : peasants amount of its metallic money, 406;
work on non-resident estates, 239: foreign financial control to cease,
their bard lot, 295-6: villages ab- 632-3 ; foreign obligations to be
sorbed into imperial property, 239; unified and refunded, 633 ; allies
communal lands, 243, 294; who control finances, 635-7: financial
may hold real property, 245; vari- statistics, 390-2.
OUII gradi"S of land, 283-4; stock- Ecclesiastical matters-law de-
raising, 289-90; forests under State rives from religion, 437; guide of
control, 306; mining governed by Islam, 643 : kbalifate, 106, 499,
special law, 243 (tee aleo Mines): 612 ; religions are under govt.. 98 ;
State owns various mines, 323, Ulema in, 121: they bold property,
371 ; home industries, 373. Port 122; inftuencs of traveling preach-
development• planned, 213; lrriga- ers, 451 ; religious intolerance in,
750 INDEX
130-1, 501; power of Church in, 469, 47~ 485, 492, 506-8, 509, 538,
113; non-Moslems have no share in 563-4, 634-5 ; does little for agric.,
political life, 115 ; various Churches 280 ; financed by loans, 363 ; Par-
and religions in, 98-116; various liamentary control inefficient, 393 ;
Christian Churches and communi- receipts not sufficient for good,
ties, 114, 419-22; Christians in, 394; non-Turkish races not unduly
445, 494-5 ; policies toward Chris- burdened by, 395; powers interfere
tians, 113 ; how religious controver- with, 409 ; consular jurisdiction in,
sies are settled, 104 ; antagonism 444 ; palace intrigues, 459 ; has
among various sects, 115 ; the mil- official organ, 462 ; poorly admin-
let system, 98-9, 121, 123, 419-20, istered during war, 466; allies
496, 525-6 ; Christian minorities to cause disintegration, 468; con-
be protected, 641 ; the religious dition and political situation, 392-3,
element overemphasized, 520. Ed- 456, 477-8, 479, 483, 485; dissolu-
ucation-govt. system, 123-7; no tion threatened, 485, 486; internal
national system, 123; various in- troubles, 488, 491 ; kept alive by
stitutions in, 129, 131-4, 152, 155, jealousies, 492 ; Pan-Turanian
172-4 (see also Education; and movement, 496, 501-2, 519 ; Turki-
Colleges and Universities). Ef- fication attempted in, 502-3 ;
fect of hospitals in, 174-5 (see Kemalist movement, 560; National-
also Hospitals) ; the press and its ists break with, 560; people de-
influence, 451-77; editors, 452; mand reforms, 462; revolution,
censorship, 465, 467, 477. 115-16, 393, 456, 458, 483, 485-6,
Government, politics, etc.-For- 487, 497, 502, 553; insurrection
eign office, called Sublime Porte, I!Uppressed, 487 ; reign of terror,
68; lacks diplomats, 82-3 ; charac- 456, 468; abolished by Assembly,
terized, 455-6, 466, 477, 478, 487, 416; its future uncertain, 494;
488, 489, 494, 500-1, 562; Turkish supplanted by New Turkey, 2;
Republic does not resemble, 575; continues to decline, 495; its lat-
controlled by foreigners, 398, 400 ; ter years, 489-90; agreement as to
royal family described, 39 ; rulers partition of, 509-10; diplomatic
incapable, 489; sovereign of the plans rdg., 512; new basis for,
Osman dynasty, 583 ; founder of 512-13; object of negotiations,
Ottoman dynasty, 652; feeling to- 613 ; formal agreement · rdg. neces-
ward Sultan, 459-60; rule of suc- sary, 632; international commis-
cession to throne, 478. State or- sions in, 637. Various govern-
ganisms in, 44 ; the millet an "im- mental departments, agencies, etc.,
perium in imperio," 113, 121, 419, 104, 219, 229, 241, 244, 245, 248,
525-6 ; policies, 113, 393, 454-5, 253, 256, 258, 259, 261-3, 277,
489-90, 492, 513, 552-3; constitu- 289, 304, 313, 314, 393-4, 412, 414,
tion, 151, 274, 444, 447, 455, 460, 444, 459, 460, 465, 467, 468, 479,
478, 483, 486; parties, 468, 483, 480, 484-5, 488, 489, 560, 632 ;
488-9, 560; growth of nationalism, judiciary, courts, etc., 241, 244,
490, 496-7, 502-3, 552-75. Con- 251, 252, 259, 422, 431, 432, 444,
trols religions, 98 ; sects resist rule 445, 446, 505. Provincial and
of, 107; restrictions by, 191; Na- other govt. units, etc., 239, 245,
tionalists recognize prewar acts of, 260, 284, 294, 296, 304, 305, 306,
229, 664 ; respects its engagements, 327, 393, 408, 422-3.
364; laws not respected, 239; vari- Relations with various peoples,
ous laws and regulations, 245, etc.-European and international
246-9, 250-1; no legal control over commissions negotiate with, 70,
foreigners, 431 ; may own land, 637; policy toward non-Moslems,
245 ; owns lands, 276-7 ; retains 113, 115 ; foreign intervention in,
eminent domain of landed prop- 113, 250, 409-10, 468, 478, 480,
erty, 254; various negotiations and 483, 484, 497, 503, 504, 527, 542,
activities, 275, 278-9, 381, 401, 564, 627, 638; how foreign corpo-
442, 443, 447, 457 (police), 467, rations hold property, 239; for-
INDEX 751
eignel'B have equal rfchts with reason for their suocess, 493 ;
TurkB, 250-1; foreign financial in- adopt Mohammedanism, lOT; be-
tere~ta, ete., in, 354, 362, 398, 400 ; come so by marriage, 249; mining
status of foreignenJ in. 409, 444, concessions granted to, 261; lack
446; takes part in London confer- social culture, 489 : Turkification
ence, 443 ( aee alflo Conferences) ; of, attempted, 553. Bee a.l8o
resentment agaiDst Central pow- Turks.
ers in, 466; external conditions af- Oulu Kichla, Asia Minor: ry. pro-
fect, 491 ; alliances, made or jected for, 230. ·
sought, 492, 654 ; foreign jealousy
perpetuates, 492-3, 495 ; allied con- p
trol, 632-3, 635-7 ; status of allies
in, 637-8. Negotiations, contact, Padillkah: name for Sultan, 8.
etc., with various countries and Pagans : their capitulations, 437.
peoples-Americana and U. S., 101, Painters: have organ, 458.
336, 884. 469, 501-2, 505-6. 510, Paintings : early in Asia Minor,
616-17; Arabs, 56, 512-18. 533, 181 ; by Turks, 570.
536-8, 539; Armenians, 52, 64, 65, Paktoloa, Asia Minor: its present
66, 67, 72, 517, 519, 520, 522-3; name, 323 ; mine at, 323.
Austrians, 499-500; Bavarians, Palaces: in Constantinople, 147;
441-2; Brit., 358-9, 449, 4 78-9, 482, Turkish, 889, 562; ancient, 181.
493, 498, 545, 609, 621 ; Bulgari- Palreologi: mentioned, 57.
ans, 493: French, 229, 357-9, 368, Palestine : not included in Syria, 'l;
382, 499: Ger., 70, 347, 348, 367, included in Syria, 542; part of old
500-1, 608: Greeks. 76-7, 79-80; Ott. Empire, 266 ; no longer so,
Indians, 498-9; Italv, 88, 501, 644, 82, 203, 289, 618 ; area and pop.,
653, 654: Jews, 54-5, 86, 87, 88, 95, 542, 544, 581 ; Macedonian
89, 92, 94, 97, 115 ; Russia, 99, .lews settle in, 53; immigration
283, 368, 369, 622-3, 624, 646 : into encouraged, 96 ; Jews in, 115;
Swiss, 252. See also the several Arabs not to leave, 655. Re-
countries and people~. sources, 287. 296, 313, 324, 872;
Events in history-Mohammed holy places in, 114; rys. in, 222,
II. establishes, 78 : loses indepen- 358; trade route in, 231 ; conces·
dent status (1774), 14; admitted aion in, 548. Schools and syna-
to society of nations, 15, 491: sus- gogues in, 96; students attend
pends reforms, 71 : mobilizes Amer. univ., 119, 133; hosp. in,
( 1912), 503 : takes part in Euro- 175-6; in old recorda, 185-6;
pean war, 278-9, 505-8, 538: de- arehreology of, 186-7. Jewish aspi-
feated, 489, 515, 553: ·withdraws rations, 94-5 ; restriction on .lews
from war, 624; 'the Empire abol- in, 96; their activities and politi·
ished, 411-12: Grant visits, 435; cal significance, 97, 115: .lewish
chronology of events (1908-23), national home, 655. Wishes to
584-607. join other Arab countries, 530; no
Miaeellaneoull-tlubject to inva- promise made to Arabs, 614;
sion, 34-5 ; archiBOlogy in, 177• Christians dispute in, 114. Brit.
200; State owne antiquee, 262; activities and policy, 358, 359, 641,
MSS. circulate in, 457. 542, 544, 545, 547, 548, 550, 614.
Ottoman Preu Association: aims 655; Brit. mil operations coatlJ,
and activities, 464-6, 466, 470, 858 ; Brit. victories in, 540; Brit.
475. mandate, 547, 642, 643; I taL in·
Ottoman Public Debt; duties, tereat in, 501 ; to be international·
power, and activities, 45, 223, 238, ized, 542 ; diaaatisfactiou in. 649 ;
288, 340, 355-6, 365, 385, 386, 890, Turk advance not feared in, 569;
892, 305, 399, 400, 405, 424, 476, entitled to national recognitioa.
635-6, 662. 621.
Ottoman• : direction of their con- Palmyra (ancient kingdom): ruin1
que~t, 89; arrive ill Turkey, 94; 1 iD, 188.
752 Di'DEX
Pamphlets: sent &een!tly to Turkey, Peace: results hoped for, 327; for-
453. mally declared by Sultan, 414: ;
PamphyliaDs: described, 46.. Turkish mission, 553 ; Wilson's
Pandenna, Turkey : location, 227; su~tions, a basis for, 61~17..
leadin~ coast city, 209; on ry., Bee .lao Treatie&
211., 2:..">7, 318; tobacco crop in. Pears, Sir Edwin : cited. 38-9, 42-3.
287. 51, 54, 518-19, 521-2..
Pan-Hellenic Empire: idea of. de- Peasants: in Turkey, described. 33.
stroyed. 49. 149-50; Albanian, 153: find archle-
Pan-Islamic Movement: aims. 510; ological remains. 199-200; practice
a Turkish policy, 552-3; super- irrigation, 279 ; as tenants, 295;
seded, 50"--3. 511. hard lot of Turkish, ~: 80cial
Pan-Pacific Commercial Conference, status in Near East. 298: lack
:report, cited. L markets in Turkey, 299; in Orient,
Pan-8lavism: among Slavic peoples. ignorant, 301 ; forest privile~
512. granted to. 306 ; have little CB!lh,
Pan-Turanian Movement: d~ 330-1; harassed by bripnds, 42S.
tion and activities. 496. 500, 50?--3. Peitchman. Asia Minor : silver
511-13; Gff. initiates. 511; aims. mine. 323..
553 ; has little success,. 519. Penalties (punishments): fixed by
Papacy: compared to khalifate. 1()!. law, 245; imJIOtlled for failure to
Papazti. Asia Minor: mine in. 319. pay land bu, 398; allies impose.
Paper: as article of trade. 9-l; not 461. Enumerated-fioggin~. i03;
made in Turkey, 46!. fines, 200, 457: exile and depor-
Paradise: Mohammedans believe in, tation. 448, 453. 45-1. 456, 460,
102. 468, 470. 476, 479. 4..."3, 4...~ 4...'G,
Paris, France: mentioned. 3St, 430; 4...'l6, 493, 561, 562., 631 ; tortu:re,
European collection at. 7 ; educa- 456; death, 456, 566: arrest and
tional institutions in. 86; .Jews in. imprisonment. 468, 482, 483. 561 ;
86, 92; salon, 178; financial nego- massacres. 493; bombing. Mi-8.
tiations in. 379-SO, 389 ; confer- 8re •l&o Crimes.
ence, 387, 555, 556, 558, 559 ; Pendik, Asia Minor: on ry. 225.
t:reaty, 442, 4-13, 493; congress. Peninsulas: Balkan. 118: Anatolian,
4-li; Ioun~ Turk leaders in. 476- 267, 305. 316; Arabian, 616, 6:20..
7; they have organ in, 48!-5.. Pensions: in Turkey, 388, 399, 57-I.
Parliamentary Debate.: cited. 555- Pera (quarter of Constantinople) :
6, 613-U.. Bymntium compared to, 57 : mer-
Parliaments: Turkish, 412, 41-1. ehanta in. 32: commercialiied vice
Parthians: conquer Armenians, 50; in. 27, 103: Turb suppress, 27.
their civilization, 183 ; occupy Percy, Lord Eustace: cited, 555-6.
Mesopotamia., 18-1. Pergamos, Asia Minor: ruins in.
Partnership : :replationa rd~ 263. 19-l; Hellenie art in, 195; exca·
Passports: :regulations ~ 63. 00. vationa at. 197; trade stat:ist:ics.
353. 206.
Patras, G:reece: shipping center, Periodica1s and Newspapers : follow
216.. press. 65; .Jewish, in Turkey, 37;
Patriarchates : in Near East. 99. first in Orient. 65. 451-2; in Con-
Patrick, Dr. Mary: sketch, U1: stantinople and other places. 105,
clulpter in thia book, Ul..i).l ; cited, 45-l, 458-9. 462, 475 ; fuorable
35, 118, UL ronditiona for, at Con:.--tantinople.
Patriots and Patriotism: laeking in 450; Ioun~ Turb publish abroad,
Turkey, 113; Turkish. 478, 481. 456, ~ ; no. in 1872, 45-4 : in
560. 562. 563. varions Ian~a..res. 451, ~:
Patterson. Dr.: activities. 176.. their publishers and editors, 430.
Payas, Asia .Minor: mine at. 319 ; 448, 462, 471, 473 : mechanical
Turkish boundary starts near, 65L work on, 472, 474:. 475: :reaaoa for
p,:z.,..Yeri: defined. 29-1. their small aiae, 472; :reportera
INDEX 753
and neWI gathering, 472-3: busi- 237; resources, 3ll, 315, 316, 634;
neu organization, 471-3; running its trade, 94, 205 ; importance of
expen11e11 high, 474; subsidized, Constantinople to, 333 ; Mohamme-
458; kinds published, 456-7, 461-2, dans in, Shiites, 514. Affected
470; circulation, 450, 472, 474; by Ruuian revolution, 16-17;
their development rapid, 453-4 ; Russians defeated in, 540; Jews
standard high, 453 : Turkish trade in, 94 ; influence of Turks,
women write for, 145: advocate ·143, 563; adheres to law of Sefer,
woman suffrage, 146; kind of news 252 ; refuses to join Turkish plans,
published, 359, 450, 463: demand 514; Turkish troops withdrawn
reforms, 462; their offices pillaged, from, 625; Brit. contact with, 546-
459; Constantinople, not allowed 7, 611, 612; U. S. mission in, 632.
outside, 470; censorship, 463-4, Invasion from, 194; foreign inter-
477; advertisements, 473-4; influ- vention in, 486, 493 ; foreign
ence, 455-6, 461 ; short-lived, 453, troops withdrawn, 624; diplomatic
459 ; suppressed and suspended, plans rdg., 512, 609-12; may re-
453, 457, 460, 468, 470; bow for- act against Western civilization,
eign, used in Turkey, 456-7; kept 550; early civilization discovered,
out of Turkey, 463. Various, cited 183.
by name, 5, 14, 15, 17, 20, 21, 22, Persians : mostly non-Turanians,
24-5, 27-8, 45, 63, 76, 104, 229, 514; language, 35, 124, 473, 511;
233, 280, 303, 315, 316, 332-3, 336- Shiites, 108, 534; Armenians com-
7, 344, 346, 351, 353, 374, 376, pete with in trade, 51 ; trade by
377, 378, 379, 381, 387, 391-2, 399, caravan, 205; study medicine,
418, 428, 432-3, 448, 450, 451, 452- 173 ; conquer Armenians, 50;
3, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, Turks hostile to, 108; invasions by,
461, 470, 473-4, 486, 501-2, 516, 186; rule Asia Minor, 193; have
517, 529, 531, 536, 541, 544, 546, publications in Constantinople,
547-8, 549, 567-8, 569, 572, 608, 462 ; relation of Turks with, 521 ;
610, 612-13, 614, 616, 617, 619, archreology, 178.
621, 622, 623, 626, 628, 629, 631, Peru : bank in, 384 : students from,
642, 644, 645, 648, 651, 653, 655, in Beirut, 173 ; its govt., 384.
657, 658, 659, 669-70. Pesidia, Asia Minor: excavations at.
Perkarije, Asia Minor: ry. projected 199.
for, 369. Petra, Syria : ruins in, 189.
Permanent Court of International Petrograd, Russia : mentioned, 237.
Justice: duties and activities, 422, Petroleum : fields and deposits in
665. various places, 13, 22, 202, 310,
Permits : for various economic pul'- 312, 314-15, 316, 339, 358, 359,
poses, 260, 262, 311, 313, 321, 325- 372, 538 ; Abdul Hamid's heirs
6, 327, 374. claim, 202-3 ; shipped from Batum,
Persecutions: of Jews, 88-9; of 216; title in dispute, 315: how ex-
Greeks, 129-30 ; of Armenians, ploited In l'llesopotamia, 316; con-
129-30, 519-20; ln Turkey, 489; fusion rdg. Turkish, 372 ; dis-
of Christians, 496 ; of Turks, 529- cussed in conferences, 377, 633-4,
30 ; of non-Moslems, 561. 643 ; influence of, 382 ; allies may
Persia : a frontier of Turkey, 207 ; purchase, 625. 8~ alao Mosul ;
location, 514; its boundaries, 617, and San Remo.
624; to be included In new Empire, Phanar (chief Greek quarter in
513 ; In llloo of Mohammedan Stamboul) : events at, 100.
States, 513; weak link In Turkish Pharmacy : school of, 133.
chain, 513; Kurdish language, a Pharaoh: tribute paid to, 185.
patoia of, 86; Iamailiyls in, 109; Philadelphia, Syria : ruins and ex-
Mongols in, 109; Armenians emi- cavations, 189, 190. Bee elM
grate to, 530; ry. projected for, Amman.
213 ; air eervlce reachee to, 234-5 ; Philippine Islands: wort amonc
water route to, from Bambur&, Iepera in, 169.
•754 • INDEX
Philistines : return ark to Jews, 162. Poland: France interested in, 19.
Philology : of Asia Minor, complex, Poles: as language teachers, 140;
193. have capitulations, 439.
Philos : water basin in Anatolia, Police: supported by air services,
268. 233; in Turkey, 250, 251, 557.
Philosophical Institute : Curzon lec- Politicians: Turkish, 487.
tures in, 18. Politics: in Turkey, 23-4, 414, 415;
Philosophy: Arabian, 56; in Jewish unrest in, in Anatolia, 33 ; Jews
MSS., 90. in, 88, 92 ; mixed with religion,
Phocara, Asia Minor: excavations 106-7, 111-12; taught, 122, 125;
at, 199. barred from papers, 463 ; Turkish
Phrenicia (ancient kingdom) : Re- press in, 470-1; governs circu-
nan's researches in, 186. lation of papers, 472; parties, 456,
Photography : used in archreological 461-2, 466, 476, 484c5, 486-7, 502,
research, 184, 192, 195. 534, 552.
Phrygians: their ancient city, J.97; Polygamy : result, 23 ; rare among
excavations there, 197. educated Turks, 23, 142, 147;
Physicians: activities, etc., 66, 91, Mohammedan attitude toward,
132, 137, 143, 165, 175, 428, 458. 103; among Turkish farmers, 142;
Picot, Georges (French consul reason for, 142; Kurds practice,
gen'l) : instructions and activities, 151.
529, 542, 546, 614. Polyzoides, Adamantios Th. : sketch,
Pilgrimages: Jewish, 96; Moham- 76 ; section in this book, 76-86 ;
medan, 102 ; freedom of, assured, cited, 76.
611, 612. Pomaks : Moslem people subject to
Pilgrims : carry disease, 164 ; follow Sultan, 38-9.
trails, 218. . Pompeii, Italy : deserts of Asia
Pious Foundations : land, 239-242. Minor compared to, 191 ; Priene
Pirreus, Greece: shipping center, compared to, 197.
216. Pontus: habitat of Greek ancestors,
Pirates and Piracy: captured, 8; 46; Greek influence in, 361.
suppressed, 438. Ponzanti, Asia Minor: mine at, 319.
Pisa, Italy: Jews trade at, 89. Popes : Christians owe allegiance to,
Pisidians : ancestors of modern 113 ; Catholics adhere to, 114;
Greeks, 46. head of Armenian Catholic
Place, Victor (archreologist) : activ- Church called, 420 ; Feisal calls
ities, 181. on, 544; activities by, 88-9, 114.
Plains and Plateaus: excavations in, Population : Turkish illiterate, 9;
184; fertile, in Asia Minor, 283; females, in majority, in Turkey,
dry farming on, in U. S., 297; 9; reason for decline, in Turkey,
regulations rdg., 667-8; various 9; homes of largest, 13 ; decimated
enumerated, 191, 225, 226, 228, by war and disease, 15, 293 ; Mo-
267, 268, 270, 275, 283, 286, 288, hammedan, in Russia, 17-18, 99;
292, 293, 324, 330. minority, in Turkey, cause inter-
Plants: statistics of industrial, 291. vention, 20; foreign, concentrated,
Plebiscite: provided for mandated 21 ; internal problems of, in Tur-
territory, 547; Greek, 564. key, 21-3; stationary, in Turkey,
Plenipotentiaries : activities b:f, 569, 23 ; power of racial minorities, 23·
645, 658. 4; increase desired, in Turkey, 28;
Plymouth, Eng.: U. S. naval base races in Asia Minor, 34, 58-9;
in, xi. shifting, in Turkey, 34-5; reliable
Poetry: Arabs possess, 56; Jewish, statistics on. lacking, 23; statis-
90, 91 ; Turkish, 91. tics, 580.
Poets: Turkish, inspired by Jews; Porter, Prof. Harvey : sketch, 98;
91; in Angora Assembly, 428. section in this book, 98-116; cited,
Poincar~ Raymond (French pre- 98, 101-2.
mier) : cited, 568. · Porters: in Constantinople, 32.
INDEX 755
Portraits: ancient, found, 182. mulgate news, 45L Sec .mo
Ports and Harbors : works desired in Priests.
Turkey, 26; vario1111 in Turkey, 32, l'ress, Printing, and its output:
207-16; worka and development Greek, 36 ; gives rise to periodicals,
planned and accomplished, 164, 65; Armenian, 65 ; first, in Tur-
202, 211, 212, 213, 354-5, 358, 359, key, 91, 451; freedom, suppressed,
367, 371, 377, 378, 381, 410; con- 418; freedom, abused, 459 ;
ceBBions, 164, 359 ; Armenians freedom declared, 465 ; Turkish,
settle in, 67 ; Armenians need, 75 ; characterized, 448 ; censorship,
Jews settle in, 87; Jews trade in 448, 454-5, 456-7, 467-8; allies
Red Sea, 94 ; many Turkish Medi- coerce, 469-70; power of, 449; its
terranean, 211-12: compete for wide function, 450; its forerunners
trade, 212: roads lead to, 219, in Turkey, 451; its spread in Tur-
220; post offices in, 231, 232 ; key, 451-6; declines in Turkey,
designated as commercial, 438; 456; active ia New Turkey, 459;
free, 618. supports discontent, 459 ; reaction-
Portugal: Jews active in, 88, 91; ary, in Constantinople, 459-60;
expelled and migrate from, 87, 95; held responsible for disorders, 460;
adheres to law of Sefer, 252. hostile to govt., 461 ; learns to give
Portuguese : Jews, 89. news, 461 ; provincial, 462 ; ten-
Post, Dr.: activities, 169. dencies in 1913, 462 ; organizes
Posts and Post Offices : in Turkey conference, 465; abuses leaders,
prior to war, 231 ; routes, etc., 466; complaints by, 467; Con-
232, 234. atantinople, sympathizes with Alla-
Poti, Transcaucasia : its trade, 216. tolia, 469 ; its place in modern
Pottery: found in excavations, 198, Turkish life, 4 70-1 ; its standard,
199; manufactured in Turkey, 373. 471; attitude toward Turkey, 479-
Powers (Great, or European): as- 80 ; Brit. inspired, cited, 668-9 ;
sume financial control of Turkey, rotary, used in Turkey, 474. Bee
392 ; defend their nationals, 398; o.lse Periodicals and Newspapers.
do not wish a strong Turkey, 409; Press Bureaus: various, 463, 524.
create spheres of influence in Tur- Pressel, Wilhelm von (Ger. en-
key, 409; prevent development of gineer) : activities, 367-8.
Turkish industries, 433 ; Turkey Preveza, J annina vilayet, Europe :
has equal rights with. 433, 491 ; its foreign commerce, 333.
endorse Chinese demands, 434-5 ; Price : must be specified in contract,
their bad faith, 489 ; intervene in 254 ; for lumber conceseion, 307 ;
Turkey, 489, 492; jealous of one basis of sale in Turkey, 332-3,
another, 492; keep Ott. Empire 338-9.
alive, 492-3; responsible for East· Price, Claire: cited, 537.
ern Question, 495-6 ; no one trusts Prichmen, Asia Minor : mine at,
concert of, 502 ; perceive dangers 319.
of Balkan war, 503; surprised at Priene, Asia Minor : ruins and ex-
ita result, 504; neglect opportuni· cavations, 194, 195, 197; Hellenic
ties during war, 513-14; their mis- art at, 193; destroyed, 197.
takes in Persia, 514-15; make se- Priests: influence in Turkey, 20;
cret treaties, 1142 ; agree to parti· Greek, 32, 47, 83, 85; hold govt.
tion Asiatic Turkey, 543; control appointments, 122; Moslem called
Arabs, 549 ; prevent Greeka from Ulema, 122; conservative, 122: in
taking' Constantinople, 656. Bee charge of French schools, 130 ;
az.o Allies; an4 the principal Eu· kings act aa, 182.
ropean countries and PllC!Ples. Prisonen: Christians forced Into
Pravoslavoys (Orthodox Chris· army, 78; in European war, 100;
tians) : assassinated, 51. surrendered, 625, 648, 651 ;· Turk-
Prayera : Mohammedans believe in, ish, 626..
102. Pri&es: instances of, 471.
Preachen : Mohammedan, 109 ; pro· Proclamation-. Bee Edicts.
756
Prooopius: cited. 185. 39J; aeeded Ut Tarkry, 396; &pre
~-= defined, 98. in diplomaey, 397.
ProfessioDS : Turks DOt attracted b7 PllblieatioDS: dnty imposed on. 453.,
leamed, 40.. 8f!fl .,_ Peiodieals and Xew&-
Profits: from irriptioa. 27'9; papers.,
small. in Turkey, 352; JlOSSJ."bbe. iD Publicity: how~ iB Turkey,
Turkey, 373; ry., how upended. 451.
:r.o. Pnik. Asia Minor: JoeatioB and ftoo
Prohibition: iD Turkey, M1. I!OUl'ftS. 315..
Propapnda : Tarious kinds iD Tllri- Punjab, lDdia: Mohammed&Ds Ut,
oos places. 4-19-50. 469-70, 483. 49S-9.
484. 485, 5U, 515. 522-4, 537, 563. Putne7. Dr. Albert: sketeh. 491;
621. daapter iD tJais book, 491-516..
Property: lost iD ~ 81;
beld by Uema. 122; A.mer. de- Q
BI&lld ~ 139; law of Moham-
medans p~"""ve. U-l; Jaws Qalit Sharqat_ Asia lliDor: • r'l.
rd~ adopted from. Romans. US; 225..
11ohammedan laws protect women. Quakers: missionaries iD Orient,
U5; Brit., destroyed ~ war, ITa.
176; heirs of Sultaa elaim oil.~; Qu.araDtine: at Reel Sea, 161.
eoDSeCrated, 239-42 ; leases. 2-!0; Quarries: ~tions aDd laW'S ~
improvements on. 242; esebeated 260. 261-2; produets of, 32-1-S;
24-1-5; Yllkuf,. 24-1-5; who may better needed. 3:!6.
own. 245, 250; absolute real. 2-U;
inheritanee laws~ 247; Tarious R
wsys of disposin~ of, 255; ~
tions ~ sale or transfer, Rabindranatla Ta~ (IBdi.aJI
255-8; ~ht of preemption. 256 ; seholar) : cited, 30.
J'I!Strictiolll! OD OW"Del"!!, 257 ; metJt. Radlicl: libersi T1lrD;Ia leader, 481.
ods of a~ 263; tennre of, Radio: revolutioniRs eomm11Dica-
1lDeertaiD, 291; protected by eapit- tions. 201.
1llations. 438; ~tio- ~- iD ~ Pasha : aetiTities. 372.
treaty, 663-a. Rm (liquor): used in ~ra, 2!i
Prophet (llohammed): lloslem Jaw Rahmi Bey (pY. of Smyrna): eoa-
~tes from. 422; his deseend- demns deportations. 519-20; Brit..
ants. 531.. ~ .UO llohammed. eaptnre, 561..
Protestants: in Turkey, 98; their Raids: ~ in Tlll'key. 280..
Churea ~ from otber Railways: needed and desired, 26,
Christian. 101 ; ean inherit from 75. 222. 311, r.t. 427, 5o4 ; -
Catholics,. 248; ~ ..u-niaDs. in parts of Turkey. 201-5; most
420; deru. cited, 521 ; Armenians important in Asia llinor. 2::!5 ;
are mostly, 525: attitude of thcJee projected. 208. 213. 2:29-30, :!36.
iD Xear East, 525. 360. ~n : eooeessioDs for. 93,
Protoeols : Tarious iDstanc:eB. 2:!9, 20"2, 211, 22:!. ~"'6. 228, 2:29-30.
442,. 573. 657. 36!, ~n. 501 ; eoastnleted, 228,
Proven.: Turkish, 29; Arabian, ~ 400. 410. 5-18. 509; TarmJa
160. Yell eoDStnaeted. 205; problems of
ProTideoee, R. L : mentioaed. 41L eonsttuetioa in Turkey, ~;
Pl"assia: adheres to law of Sefer, land 11DfaYOrable for in A.utolia,
252; defeats Aust:ria. 499. 267; eoastnletioB eostlr, 358; COD-
Ptolomies: cities built by, 188. IItnletioa important to Russia.
Pllblie t:'tilities: foreipen eoatrol 612; p~ 225, 226. 2:!7-8. 2::!9-
iD Turke,-. ~; l'rmcll iDter- 30. 3:?3 ; dtstro,ed. 230-31 ; to lie
ested iD, 358: foreip eapital iD- ftbailt. 230-31 ; .wee~ ill ftrioas
ftBted iD, 362. plafts, 22:!. 227-8. 311, 381 ; -
Pllblie Weds: ~ of coyt., -ani.6ed q.stem ill T1uVy. %!:!.
INDEX 757
Termini, 211, 225 ; tap centers, 212-13, 217, 222, 224, 225, 226-8,-
220 ; lead to seaports, 220 ; tap 229-:JU, 235-6, 276, 322, 365, 366,
fertile regions, 225 ; cities along, 368, 369, 370, 377-81, 382, 616,
226 ; lands appropriated for, 259. 638.
Of miL advantage, 222; compared Rakkaba.: defined, 264.
with animals, 205 ; compared Ramadi, Mesopotamia: on mail
with roads, 273 ; various effects, route, 232; reservoir near, 278.
207, 208, 227, 236-7, 311, 313-14, Ramazan : Moslem fast period, 451.
642; emery mines near, 318; iron Ramsay, Sir William M. : thanked,
ore far from, 320. German inter- 6 ; cited, 38, 41-2,, 46-8, 52-3, 102,
est and control, 211, 225, 615 ; 332, 501-2.
under Turkish control and opera- Rangoon, Lower Burma: trade,
tion, 225, 226, 651 ; Turkish po- 324.
sition easy, rdg., 382; Turkey and Rates: ry. freight, 205, 220, 223,
Ru88ia to develop, 647; French 273 ; shipping, low, 223 ; telegraph,
control and operate, 226, 228, 358, 232.
368-9 ; Belgians interested in, 228; Ratzel, Friedrich: cited, 207.
Brit. interest and control, 228, 358, Rauf Bey (Turkish official): activi-
615; Brit.-French agreement rdg., ties, 22, 379, 418, 426, 563, 575,
615-16; Brit. miL rights, 642; Rus- 625 : Assembly disciplines, 418;
sian interest, 368 ; Amer. interest, Brit. imprison, 56L
501 ; controlled by foreigners, 224, Rausas: cited, 437, 445.
354-5 ; foreign investments in, 224, Ravndal, G. Bie (Amer. consul gen-
365-71; financial group seeks to eral) : thanked, 6 ; sketch, 430 ;
control, 382: competition among chapter in this book, 430-47; cited,
powers rdg. Turkish, 409 ; allies to 338.
control Turkish, 626; in mandated Rebates : granted to shippers, 216.
terr., 548; ceded to Turkey, 652; Rebellion: Bee Revolutions.
purchased, 228; govt. aids, 223, R&!lus, Elislie : cited, 64.
226: Ott. Public Debt makes loans Records: ancient, in ruins, 185-6,
for, 355 : companies, 225, 227, 230, 187 ; land, 254.
380 : operate under kilometric Refet Pasha (Turkish official): re-
guarantee, 223, 224, 225, 227, 365, actionary, 426; appointed gov. of
366, 370, 404; operate without it, Eastern Thrace, 569.
227; rafes, 212, 223, 327; freight Refineries : oil, 316.
carried by, 223-4, 236; traffic in Reforestation: none in Turkey,
interior small, 224; passenger traf- 305, 308 ; effort at, 308.
fic, 223-4 : special trains provided Reformation: effect, 440-1.
for Ott. business delegation, 347: Reforms : various, needed, 137, 325-
express train service planned, 366: 6, 342, 422, 445; slow in Turkey,
miL earnings, 225 : free transit on, 335; projected and urged, 368, 427,
arranged for, 619: development 453, 462, 480, 482, 573-4; Young
hindered, 222-4 : working agree- Turks decree, 476; in Macedonia,
ment needed, 228 : agreements be- guaranteed, 504; Armenian, 70-1;
tween nations, 228·9: forests along educational, 124; in provincial
destroyed, 304: discussed at con- govt., 422; in judicial system, 434 ;
ference, 377 ; statistics, 358-9. legal, for China, 435 ; Ulema pre-
Various, named, 367; branch linea, vent, 122; powers repress, 4Q9;
225, 227, 229; Anatolian, 88, 208, Abdul Hamid squashes, 454-5;
209-11, 224-6, 227, 230, 276, 312, Turkish, fail, 478, 480, 489, 502;
865, 368, 370, 877, 880, 881, 638; Brit. oppose, 609 ; Turks could not
Baghdad, 185, 201, 202, 211, 217, understand, 480-1 ; threaten break-
222, 224, 225-6, 227, 228, 229, 230, down of Turkey, 486.
236, sro, 8HS, 865, 367-9, 370. Refrigeration: needed in Turkey,
880, 881, 882, 485, 543, 615, 638, 374.
652: other linea mentioned by Registers: land, 240-1; regulations
name, 93, 164, 201, 202, 205, 211, rdg., 667-8.
758 INDEX
Regulations: not respected in Tur- 408, 421, 427; deficits, 350, 387,
key, 239, 250; decreed in treaty, 3~ 390, 393, 400, 427; interest,
341 ; by imperial decree, 355 ; how 364-5, 398, 400 ; guaranteed to
promulgated, 451; road, 219; in- rys., 223, 224, 225, 227, 365, 366,
heritance, 246-9; nationality, 249; 370, 404 ; payments and expendi-
foreigners, 250-2; bankruptcy, tures, 254-5, 263, 391, 395, 399,
251 ; land, 251-5; customs tariff, 407, 664-5 ; bonds, 355, 365, 387,
340-2; foreign business houses, 398, 405. Bee also Banks and
346-7. Bee al11o Laws. Banking ; Finances ; Money ; and
Religions: established by Arabs, 9; Taxes and Taxation.
rise of Mohammedanism, 56 ; peo- Revolutions (incl insurrections,
ples classified by, 37-8, 98, 107, raids, mutinies, rebellions, revolts,
130 ; connection with govt., 23-4, riots): do not succeed in Smyrna,
106-7, 111-12, 130; fundamental 49 ; Greek Church incites, 83 ;
of extraterritoriality, 436; Mos- Nationalists support Orthodox
lem law derives from, 437, 446. Church revolt, 100; no great re-
Binds people together, 46; in Syria, sults to be expected from in Tur-
56 ; Greeks have freedom of, 83 ; key, 347; preliminaries, 457-8;
enters into education, 121-2; against allied troops, 546 ; immi-
taught in schools, 124, 128, 130; nent among Greek forces, 566.
benefit by archlll<>logical re- Russian, 16-17, 512; eastern, 17;
searches, 180; different, a bar to among Mohammedans, 108, 112;
inheritance, 248 ; millet system, Turkish, threatened, 466; Turkish,
419-22; privileges granted for, 54, 86, 114-15,392-3,411,412,456,
437; separation from law hastened 458, 459-60, 476, 483, 485, 487,
by reformation, 441 ; tyranny of, 496-7, 502, 553; Turkish sup-
496 ; tie of, over-emphasized, 533 ; pressed, 489, 540 ; Greek, 81, 566 ;
freedom of, guaranteed, 661. ecclesiastical, 100, 420-1; of Wa-
Bee also Christians ; Church ; habi, 107; in Constantinople, 459;
Churches ; and Mohammedans. in Balkans, 479; in Macedonia,
Remittances: of money to Turkey, 485 ; Sepoy, 498 ; Armenian, 519,
337. 525; Arabs threaten, 537; among
Renan, Ernest: activities, 186. Arabian ollicers, 537.
Renegades : Greek, 79. Ribot, Alexander F~ix Joseph
Rent: disputes in, settled by court, (French statesman) : activities,
252 ; bow paid, 295. 619.
Reparations : waived, 385, 635, 662. Rich, C. J. (archlllO!ogist) : activi-
Reparations Commission : ry. bonds ties, 180-1.
not in its jurisdiction, 381. Rings : allltique, owned by State,
Republics : Turkish established, 2; 262.
Armenian, 72; Soviet, 333. See Rira Bey, Ahmed (educational of-
also Turkey. ficial) : activities, 456.
Requisitions : Kemalists make, 563. Rivers: roads to, in Turkey, 219;
Reservoirs : lakes used as, 268, 270; channels made by, 229; basins,
for irrigation, 269-70, 271, 278. 266-8 ; torrents, 268 ; valleys, 300 ;
Restaurants: needed in Turkey, 142, among mts., 305 ; people living
375. along, 194, 511 ; Anatolian unim-
Restrictions : on schools, 128 ; rdg. portant for trade, 217 ; furnish
land holding, 250-1, 257; on press, power, 217; furnish irrigation,
452, 463. 217, 266; barriers to navigation,
Resolutions: by National Grand As- 218; navigation on, in Mesopo-
sembly, 411. tamia, 269. Named-Euphrates,
Revenues: bow raised, 26, 205, 241, 55, 161, 186, 217, 218, 236, 265,
279, 326, 336-7, 339-42, 356, 362- 267, 269, 270, 271, 273, 277, 278,
3, 387, 391, 395-8, 399, 405, 407, 316, 367, 543, 615, 639, 642, 652;
408, 409, 427, 444, 445, 563, 616. Tigris, 55, 174, 217, 265, 267, 269,
634; budget, 26. 363, 387, 393, . 270, 273, 316, 367, 369, 370, 615,
lNDE:t 159
639, 642, 652: Jordan, 301, 322, bridgea and roads, 189, 190 ; Mo-
372, 542: all others, 160, 161, 180, hammedans copy their lawa, 145;
188, 213, 217, 225, 230, 237, 265, attitude toward foreigners, 436.
267, 268, 269, 270, 274, 275, 277, Romanum II. (Byzantine emperor):
301, 314, 367, 368, 369, 437, 511, activities, 436. ·
539, 610, 639, 640, 646, 649. Rome, Italy : Amer. achool in, 171;
Riyadh, Arabia : sect in, 534. foreigner& considered barbarians
Rizeh, Asia Minor : Black Sea port, in, 436 ; its law fundamentally re-
209 : zinc in, 320. ligious, 436 ; effect of reformation
Roads (highways): Romans build, on, 440-1; traditions from, 441;
189, 190 : Turks do not build, 8-9 : treaty confirmed in, 655.
needed, 273, 311, 371, 427 : almost Roosevelt, Theodore : cited, 81.
unknown in Turkey, 330; program Rockefeller Institute : activitiet,
for, adopted, 219 ; Turkey guaran- 166-7.
l:ftll construction of, 667: Ger. Rorakl: defined, 290.
plan to East, 510-11: constructed, Rothschild, Lord : Balfour writes,
265, 276 : impassable and in dis- 620.
repair, 208, 218, 219, 352 : employ Rothschild, Edmond de: activitiea,
forced labor on, 219 : forests not 96. -
near, 302 ; concessions for, 93, Rothschild& (The): activities, 381.
364: lands appropriated for, 259; Royal Economic Society: its organ,
tax, 407. In Turkey, 218-22: three 337.
classes, 219; Turkish laws rdg., RvdiharJ: defined, 256.
219: State owned, 244; engineer, Rugs: made in Turkey, 13, 150, 290,
265: French interested in, 358; 330, 336, 338, 372; u. s. imports,
variou1 named, 218-19, 277. 336.
Robertson, Dr. James A. : th811.ked, Ruhr, Ger.: oceupied, 660.
6. Rum : name of Orthodox church
Rodosto, Eutern Thrace : location, community, 98.
211, 316. Rumaili (Rumelia), Eastern: Greek
Rohrbach, Dr. Paul (Ger. econo- governors of, 82 ; detached from
mist): cited, 236. Turkey, 485; Bulgaria annexes,
Roman Catholic Church. Bee Catho- 82; financial statement of, incom-
lics, Roman. plete, 392.
Roman Empire : takes over t~rivate Rumbold, Sir Horace: activities,
lands, 239 ; basia for modern na- 215.
tions, 441. Russia: outpost of Eastern civiliza-
Romania (Rumania): Turkey loses, tion, 17-18; Armenian terr. in,
82; Jews from, settle in Paleatine, 72, 129 : desires increased terr.,
96 ; importance of Constantinople 610-11, 612; loss of terr. planned,
to, 333, 336; rompetes with U. S., 613 : Turkish terr. apportioned to,
339 ; takes part in Lausanne con- 617: cedes terr. to Turkey, 208,
ference, 376-7; Ita paper depre- 565, 650; fears for its boundaries,
ciates, 405 ; capitulations aup- 869; ita struggle for a aea outlet,
pressed in, 441 ; Bulgarians hostile 497 ; water route through, 231 ;
to, 493 ; auspmsiona rdg., 664. importaoee of Constantinople to
Romanian•: In Turkish Empire, 98 ; South, 333; language in, 474-6..
may not hold real property in Tul'- Ott. Empire compared to, 283 ;
key, 252; have bank in Turkey, Jews emigrate from, 95-6: Arme-
375. nians emigrate to, 519 ;. resoureea,
· Romana : conquer Armenia, 50; oc- 18; Mohammedans in, 17-18:
cupy Mesopotamia, 184 : rebuild atatue of Greek Orthodox Church
Antioch, 188 ; build oa Greek In, 99-100: of Greek faith, 441;
ruin•, 188, 197: Syria prosperous air aervlee. 234 ; commerce, 205.
under, 189; rule Asia Minor, 193: 21~ 286, 333, 336, ~1~ 850, 860:
build new Empire, 194; extead has la.eatmeota in "Turkey, 357;
Hellenic culture, 195; baild Ita paper depreciates, 405; Its
160 Th--nEX
eeon. relations with Turkey, 622- ments, 528; defeated in Persia,
3. Govt., politics, etc.---beromes 540..
Black Sea power, 14 ; jealous of Rutba WeJla: post route passes.
other powers, 15 ; its claim to and 232.
desire of, Constantinople, 16, 3il3.
497 ; Constantinople promised to, 8
509 ; control of straits conceded to,
509 ; revolution in, 512; collapse, Saadullah Bey: takes part in
17, 503, 512, 622; effects of col- Mudroe annistic.'e, 625..
lapse, 16-17, 511; will regain posi- Sabaddine, Prince: cited, 280-L
tion, 424-5 ; Soviet, 303 ; postwar Saballja, Asia Minor : location and
distlll'baDces in, 350; signs proto- resourees. 316.
col, 442; its policy, 497, 499; Sabbatist Movement : described,
newspapers attack its policy, 451; 90.
partly responsible for Eastern St. Germain, France: treaty at, 405.
Question, 492 ; war promises made St. Helena : builds basilica, 190.
to, 510 ; takes part in various St. Jean d'Acre. See Acre.
negotiations, 17, M3. 556; dis- St. Jean de Maurienne: agreement,
closes secret agreement, 609; 61~20.
promises to demobilize, 623 : its St. Louis (French kin&): obtains
approval necessary, 632.. Attitude capitulations, 438..
toward, and relation with, Tlll'key, St. Nuaire, France: mentioned,
1~18. 61, 70, 81., 99, 208. 252, 430.
357, 359-60, 369, 370, 4i9, 497, St. Varaq. Armenia: convent, 66..
506, 509, 590, 553. 565. 6-!7, 6-18. Ste. Ripsime, Armenia : cathedral,
650; attitude toward, and rela- 66..
tions with, Brit.. 18. 20, 350. 369, Saktaria : Anatolian water basin,
482, 493 ; ditto, Ger~ 18. 19, 368, 267.
493. 509 ; ditto, France, 19, 369, Saladin: attempt to assassinate,
499, 503.. 509, 609-12; ditto, Ar- 100 ; activities, 100.
menia. 68, 519, 525. 528, 531 ; Salakuja, Asia llinor : petroleum in,
ditto, Greeks, 2U ; ditto, U. S., 314.
339, 430: penetration · of, into Salaries and Wages: Tlll'k:ish of-
Macedonia, 485 ; attitude toward ficials low and underpaid, 335,
Austrians, 493, 4~500; acts for 42-l ; not paid promptly, ~ 388 ;
Balkans, 503-4 ; desires in Persia, of foreigners, sent to Tlll'key, 337;
611 ; treaty with Central powers, of peasants, low, 373 ; ~vt. ex-
622-4 ; enters European system of penditures for, 4()7 ; increase for
public Jaw, 441; relations with judges, planned, 422; increased.
other nations, 503, 612-13. 43-l ; of Turkish reporters, 413 :
Russians: in Tlll'key, 57; many in of typesetters, 41a.
Constantinople, 3H ; Jangua~ Salem (Jew): activities, 93.
37, 473; make ~ soldiers, 40; Sales: may be annulled, 254 ; land,
have schools in Tlll'key, 135: com- may be •oided, 255 ; fon.'ed, of
pete for Tlll'mh trade, 352: ob- land and property, 259; coneea-
tain ry. concession, 368: plan rys. sions carry tiPt of, 261 ; by fore-
in Transcaucasus, 369: bank in clOSUI'e of mort~ 28L
Turkey, 375. Attitude toward Salisbury, Marquis (Brit. politi-
Orthodox Christians, 51; attitude cian): cited, 4i9. 52t-5..
toward Armenians, 51 ; occupy Salonika. Greece : mentioned, 265 ;
Armenia, 68-9 ; relations with Jews in, and their activities, 36-7.
Armenians, 360; interested in 88, 90, 91, 92, 9-l, 95. 3H ; a com-
Eastern Anatolia, 360: fah;e)y re- mercial center, 90, 216; its fore~
port to have attacked Turkish COIIllllefte. 335 ; press in, 91 ; _....
fleet, 463 ; attack and defeat let fever brought from, 166; edu-
Turks, 506, 540 ; Turks suffer cational institutions at, 265; bank
from, 55-1 ; make secret agree- at, 375; Turkey loses, 53. 30-1 ;
INDEX 761
Emir Bey born in, 448; Sultan Sargon (ancient ruler) : his pal-
exiled to, 476. ace, 182.
Salts: in water, 161, 162; marshes Sarp (village on Black Sea): a
subject to special laws, 243. Turkish boundary, 649. .
8aman.: defined, 293. Sarzek, E. de ( arcblllOlogist) : activ-
Samaria, Asia Minor: excavations ities, 182.
in, 186. Bassoon (Jewish family): promi-
Samarra, Mesopotamia: river navi- nent in Baghdad. 92.
gable to, 269 ; Sbiah sect in, 534. Sassoun, Asia M:inor: Armenian dis-
Samim Bey (editor): assassinated. turbances in, 483.
461. Batch Koi, Asia Minor : location
Samirkban : Mesopotamian ruler, and resources, 316.
269. Sawmills: few in Turkey, 305.
Samsun, Asia Minor : mentioned, Saxons: regarded as barbarians,
204; leading Black Sea port, 208; 436.
a sea terminus, 208; shipping Sazonolf, Sergius Dmitrievich (Rus-
center, 330; on highway, 218; ry. sian official) : activities, 609-10,
projected for, 230, 367; travel out 611-12.
of, difficult, 208 ; tobacco grown Sazonolf-Paleologue Agreement: de-
at, 287, 337; Amer. business scribed, 509.
agents in, 346; competes with Scala Nuova, Asia Minor: Ital. de-
Trebizond, 208; relief work in, velop, 212.
411. Scandinavians : compete for Turkish
Samuel, Sir Herbert (Brit. gov. of trade, 352.
Palestine) : in Palestine, 581 : Scarabs : found in Syria, 186.
cited. 620-1. Scars: disease causes, 170.
Sanaa, Yemen: Jews trade with, Schimillfeng : credit importing
94. agency, 343.
Sanders, Gen. Liman von (Ger. Schliemann, Dr. Heinrich (arcblllOlo-
commander in Turkey): intro- gist) : activities, 196-7.
duces wireless, 233 ; hostile to Scholarships: establishment pro-
Kemal, 557; reorganizes Turkish vided for, 428.
army, 609. Schools: various aims in Turkey,
Sandukli, Asia Minor: branch line 118, 130, 139; foreign, in Turkey,
at, 227. and Turkish attitude toward, 117,
Sanitation: poor or lacking in Tur- 119-20, 121-2, 124, 125-6, 135, 172-
key, 34, 137; disease prevented 4, 178; foreign, in mandated terr.,
by, 168. 643; private, 120, 121-2; private,
Sanjak (Turkish administrational should be encouraged, 136 ;
unit) : described. 423. churches and mosques used as, 83,
San Remo, Italy: conference and 122; church schools, 100, 129, 130,
agreement of, 315, 563-4, 633-4, 421 ; attendance compulsory in
643 ; Balfour Declaration em- Turkey, 126-7; taxation for, 127;
bodied in, 620. Moslem govt., often lacking, 127-
San Stefano, Armenia: cathedral in, 8 ; Turkish language not used in,
66; treaty of, 495. 138; drive peasants from agric.,
Santayana, George: cited, 476. 282 ; evening, to be established,
Saracens: attitude toward foreign- 428; periodicals for, 462; non-
ers, 436 ; Seljui Turks succeed, Moslem minorities may establish,
496. 661; kinds needed in Turkey, 133,
Sarcophagi : Alexander's in Con- 136, 137-8, 140; studies needed in,
stantinople, 178 ; found in ruins, 136 ; various kipds planned and in
199. existence, 86, 96, 118, 124, 125,
Sardis, Asia Minor: its great age, 126, 127, 128, 130, 131, 132, 135,
198; antiquities from, preserved, 140, 168, 172-4, 265, 280, 310,
178; ruina and excavations, 194, 448; for girls and women, and
198 ; Hellenic art in, 195. their effect, 130, 131, 143, 144,
762 INDEX
152, 154; non-Turkish schools in Seleucia, Syria : location, 236.
Ott. Empire, their aims, work, Seleukos (ancient ruler l : aetivi·
etc.,-American, 12, 118-19, 120, ties, 188.
131, 132-3, 134, 137, 139, 143, Selim I. (Sultan) : activities, 95,
168, 172-3, 177, 501; Armenian, 106, 107, 108, 417, 43&
65, 127, 128, 129, 154; British, Seljukians (branch of Turks) : con·
118, 131, 139 ; French, 118, 120, quests by, 39.
130-1, 139, 173-4 ; German, 135, Selman al-Farisi: revered by Nu·
448 ; Greek, 83, 84-5, 118, 129, sairi, 110.
130, 154; Ital., 120; Jewish, 92, Seminaries: Greek, 83; Jewish, 86;
96 ; in Syria, 86 ; Turks failed to theological, 132.
establish, 8-9; closed in Turkey, Semites: habitat, 38, 157-8; lan·
26; statistics, in Turkey, 135; guage, 35, 190.
Turkish schools and their work, Sennacherib (Assyrian king) :routed,
83, 86, 92, 118, 120, 121, 122, 162.
123, 124, 125-8, 130, 135, 140, Senussi : Islamic sect, 104, 112;
143, 144, 172, 265, 310, 421, 448. threaten Egypt, 112.
Schools outside of Ott. Empire,- Seraglio: museum in, 177-8.
in New York City, 85; in Paris, Serb-Croat-Siovene State. See Jugo·
86; in Philippines, 117; in Ore- slavia.
gon, 139-40 ; Algeria, 152 ; Tripoli, Serbia : Turkey loses, 82, 495 ; ad-
152 ; Amer. country, 280; in Prov- heres to law of Sefer, 252; ore
idence, 411. See also Colleges and district ceded to, 311; imports
Universities; and Education. Turkish chrome, 317; its consular
Schroeder, Baron : activities, 381. service in Constantinople, 430;
Science: Turks give little heed to, capitulations suppressed, 441;
45; Jews in, 88, 90; taught in Bulgarians hostile to, 493.
Turkey, 133, 135. Serbians ( Servians) : habitat, 98;
Scotch : missions in Orient, 175. attitude toward other peoples, 493,
Scott, Maj. G. H. (Brit. air com· 500.
mander) : activities, 233-4. Seri Sefain : Turkish shipping com·
Sculpture: Armenians excel in, 65, pany in Constantinople, 214.
67; early in Asia Minor, 181 ; Serums: used in disease, 166.
found in ruins, 194, 198; still Settlements: Jewish, 87-90. See
bidden in Asia Minor, 195 ; differ- also Colonies.
ent periods confused, 197-8; S~vres, France: treaty, 516, 555,
Lydian, 198 ; in Cnidus, 199 ; 563-4.
owned by State, 262. Sewers : few in Orient, 159.
Scutari, Albania: commission in, Shakespeare, William : cited, 310.
486. Shan-Tau, China : mentioned, 2.
Scutari, Turkey : location, 128, 365; Shebeneeyeh, Lebanon: hosp. at,
ry. at and projected, 211, 365; 170, 175.
free from commercialized vice, Sheikh el-Jebel: his followers, 109.
103 ; Armenian College at, 128. Sheikh-ul-lslam: office abolished,
Seals: Babylonian, 178, 186; 421.
Lydian, 198. Shemahias (Jewish family) : promi·
Sects: Mohammedan, 103-4, 107, nent in Damascus, 92.
110-11, 534; Christian, 112-15. Sbemsiyeb : branch of Nusairis, 110.
Securities : held in Reichsbank, 386. Shepherd, Dr.: activities, 174.
Seeds : selection, unknown in Tur· Shiah (Shia; Shiites) : Islamic sect,
key, 292; not treated, 292; used 102, 104, 107-8; distribution, 513·
judiciously on some farms, 294-5 ; 14.
various, named, 338. Shiites. S66 Shiah.
Sefer (Turkish law) : various coun· Shinassi: Turk~sb i!ditor, 452.
tries adhere to, 252 ; privileges Shins iind Shipping: commander,
conferred by, 261; cited, 327. xi ; in and near Golden Horn, 31 ;
Selamlik: defined, 10. at Constantinople, 32, 210, 214;
INDEX 763
oa Black Sea, 33, 209, 509; in meationei in early letter11,
Turkey, 207-16; on Lake 'Van, 185.
217; OD Anatolian. lakes, 268; OD. Sieges: Van, 174.
rivers, 217, 269; revolutionize Sihun, Anatolia : a water basin,
communications, 201-2; modem 268.
have long range, 212 ; in. trade, Silversmiths : Armenian, 67.
206, 215-16; routes, 209; Turks Silverware : Lydian, 198.
purchase, 215; obtain. cargo at Simar (valley), Asia Minor : miner-
various ports, 216 ; equipped with als in, 324.
wil'eless, 233 ; .11hould grant special Sin : how regarded in Koran, 103.
rates, 327; discrimination in favor Sinada, Asia Minor: marble at, 324.
of Brit.. 350; how information of Singapore, Strait& Settlements: its
promulgated, 451; naval display imports, 824.
by, 482; Brit. seize, 608; should Sinope, Anatolia : Black Sea port,
have free passage of straits, 622; 209.
surrendered, 625 ; Greeks forbid- Sirp: Serbians called, in Turkey, 98.
deB to search, 656 ; pay sanitation · Sirri Bey, Suleiman: sketch, 265;
tarilf, 666. Sailing, 81, 216, 268, bas chapter in this book, 265-79.
361 ; lighters, 33; oil tankers, 201- Sirwa, Asia Minor : gold washed
2; battleships, 202, 341, 386, 417, , near, 323-4.
480, 506, 561, 569, 625, 662 ; Sisters (religious}: French, in Tur-
liners, 213-14; tramps, 214, 215; key, 130.
merchant, 214, 215, 610, 612; Sivas (city, vilayet, and proY.),
coastwise, 215 ; steamers, 216, 269, . Asia Minor : mentioned, 24 ; in-
848; rafts, 217; torpedo boats, · terior trade center, 216; oa high-
347; submarines, 347; clipper, way, 218; ry. projected for, 23(),
361 ; destroyer11, 558. Ships of 367 ; TI'SOurces, 304, 318, 322, 324,
various nationalities : American, 330, 872; crop statistics. 285; no
213, 214, 351, 361, 558; Austro- fuel statistics, 305; Amer. consul
Hungarian, 210, 213-14; Brit., at, 330; Turkish forces in, 557;
210, 213, 215, 417, 480, 482, Turkish congress at, 553, 560,
524-5, 608; French, 210; Ger., 621-8.
213, 347, 348, 509; Greek, 210, Slavery: Turks bold races in, 52,
214, 215, 861; Ital., 210, 213, ~15, 80 ; Mohammedan attitude toward,
619 ; Russian, 210, 463, 506 ; 103-4 ; Greeks fear, 112.
Turkish, 210, 214, 357, 386, 463, Slaves: Turks can not be, 8: ia
607, 662. Named, xi, 32, 215, 237, harems, 8; become mothers of Sul-
569, 608, 624. Shipping-com- tans, 8; intermarry with Osmanli,
panies, 211, 214, 348; Brit. ship- 39; Christians sold as, 81 ; Turk-
ping ring, 850; situation (1923), ish women almost, 142; may not
213; foreign policies influence inherit. 248; emancipation, 248.
shipping firms, 329; position of Slave trade : in. Ott. Empire, 39.
Constantinople in, 334; U. S. with Slavs: marry among Osmanli, 39;
Turkey declines, 361 ; Greeks in- attitude toward Armenian11, 51;
terested in, in Turkey, 36L ~ee have separatist tendencies, 489;
al8o Commerce and Trade. contrasted with Turkish-speaking
Shipwrecks: covered by capitula- peoples, 511-12.
tionll, 438. Smelting: Turkish coke not good
Shops : in Anatolia, described, 84 ; for, 314.
ft'w industrial in. Turkey, 330, Smintheum, Asia Minor: excava-
374. tions at, 199.
Shrines: Mohammedan, 534. Smith, GMrge (archeologist) : activ-
Siberia : Turkish-speaking people in, ities, 182.
51L Smuggling: capitulations interdict.
Sidon, Asia Minor : an old site, 187 ; 438.
dl'I!Cribed, 158; its water supply, Smyrna (city, vilayet, and prov.),
161; arclueological find at, 178; Asia Minor : location, 2U ; Ianda
764 INDEX
about fertile, 213, 284 ; estates in near, 310; exports coal, 208-9; on
and about, 293-4; compared to ry., 313.
Constantinople, 211 ; its economic Sonnino, Baron Sidney (!tal. diplo-
importance, 212; loses its impor- mat) : activities, 619.
tance, 334 ; rys. in, and their in- Sou-bachis: defined, 295.
fluence, 205-6, 212, 226, 227, 318; South Africa: cause of Brit. ex-
value as a port, 212, 287 ; becomes pansion into, 18.
free port, 619 ; various resources South America : Armenian business
of, and about, 286, 287, 288, 317, houses in, 67.
319, 320, 324, 337, 338; modern South Dakota: mentioned, 430.
plow used in, 292 ; packing houses Soviet. See Russia.
in, 338. Few Moslems in, 49 ; Jews Spain : Jews in, 88, 89, 91, 95 ;
settle in, 53, 87-8; Turkish women Jews expelled, 88, 94 ; language,
in, 141-2; brigands near, 428; 90, 344; books written by Jews ,of,
press in, 65, 451 ; schools, 86, 131 ; · 91 ; medicine studied in, 91 ; Arabs
diseases and hosp., 166, 176; busi- conquer, 91, 440; adheres to law
ness and trade, 90, 199, 205-6, 212, of Sefer, 252; competes for Turk-
215, 2.L7, 287, 335, 346, 359, 361; ish trade, 352 ; responsible for
business men of, travel little, 2Q4; Arab affairs, 549.
business in, declines, 212 ; boycott Sparta (sanjak), Asia Minor: !tal.
in, 212 ; destroyed by fire, 212, secure privileges in, 360-1 ; their
374, 567; rebuilding will cost economic rights, 644.
heavily, 374. Economic congress Specifications : for quarrying, 262.
in, 27, 143; sentiment of people Speculation: in Turkey, 344.
in, 49 ; lawlessness in, 50; Greek Spelling: notes on, 576-7.
influence in, 361 ; Greeks enter and Spies: Turkish system overthrown,
occupy, 336, 412, 468, 527, 556-7, 1-2; Abdul Hamid uses, 484.
558, 563; Amer. consulate in, Spirits: duty on, a State monopoly,
cited, 336 ; conference at, 425-6; 356.
public indignation rdg., 468; for- Sponges: produced in Turkey, 338.
eign legal advisers in, 433 ; its Springs: source of water supply,
gov. condemns deportations, 519- 160, 161; temple near, 274; salt,
20 ; Turkish emissaries sent from, 324.
553; Turks enter and occupy, 566- Stamboul (quarter of Constanti-
7; its Turkish governor, 561 ; re- nople) : location, 31 ; conditions
mains Turkish, 569 ; Italy hopes in, stationary, 27; free from com-
for, 619 ; Italy supports restitu- mercialized vice, 103; university
tion to Turkey, 644; report of in, 141; ry. projected for, 211; a
Allied Commission of Inquiry, trade center, 331 ; merchants and
629; situation in, false, 629. bazaar in, 331 ; foreigners in, 335;
Snow : falls in Turkey, 218. partly destroyed by fire, 374; to
Soap : a substitute for, 321. be rebuilt, 374; Brit. demonstra-
Societies : cooperative, 287 ; secret, tion at, 561-2.
522, 541-2. See also Organiza- Stamps : revenue from, 399.
tions ; and Sects. Starvation: instances of, 161, 540.
Society of Nations: Turkey ad- State: separate from Church, 104;
mitted to, 15, 24. united with it, 107; attitude of
Socrates: cited, 155. women toward union, 145; atti-
Soil: bow prepared in Turkey, 292- tude of govt. toward union, 421.
3; of little value in Turkey, 296. Statesman's Year Book: cited, 7,
Solomon (king) : construction ma- 304, 580.
terials used by, 324. Statistics: unreliable, 121, 123, 124,
Solomon's Pools: source of water 129, 203, 302, 304, 330, 335, 336,
supply, 160-1. 349, 392, 380 ; lacking for various
Solyman. See Suleiman. matters, 225, 305, 310-11, 323,
Songuldak, Asia Minor : leading 326, 334, 336, 407; country of
origins not shown by, 349; Turk-
Black Sea port, 208 ; coal depo~Jits
....
INDEX 765
ish for 1911-12 fairly complete, nelles, 208, 211, 227, 318, 320, 360,
393. Various kind~ducational, 497, 506, 507, 568, 608, 609, 611,
123-4, 125, 127, 130, 131-2, 135 ; 612, 622, 625, 660.
trade and shipping, 206, 210, 214, Straw: fed to animals, 293.
286, 330, 334-5, 336, 339, 340-1, Streets : in Orient, 158 ; land expro-
346, 349, 350 ; road, 219 ; rys., priated for widening, 259.
222, 358-9 ; 365 ; telegraph, 232, Students : no. of Armenian, 127;
276 ; postal, 232; telephone, 276; no. in Turkey, 123, 130, 132, 135;
irrigation, 270-2, 273, 275-7, 279; activities in Turkey, 118; live in
bridges, 276 ; various crops and dormitories, 119 ; morals, neglect-
farm products, 276. 286, 287, 288, ed, 172; Turkish in Ger., 347-8;
289, 290-2; land and farms, 283- medical, conspire against Sultan,
4, 295, 296 ; animals, 289 ; forest, 456; abroad, aid newspapers, 472-
302, 304, 306-7; mineral, 312, 313, 3.
314, 317, 318, 319-20, 321, 322, Suabians : regarded as barbarians,
321J, 324-5 ; custom-house officials, 436.
336-7; foreign capital ·in Turkey,. Sublime Porte : defined, 68; official
356-7; foreign holdings in Turkey, statement by, 608-9.
364; budget, 387, 390; Turkish Subsidies : for educational purposes,
war loans, 401-3; Turkish public ·122, 124, 135; schools need, 136;
debt, 401-3; Turkish gen'l econ. given to patients, 168; granted to
data. 578-9; area and pop. of Ott. companies, 234 ; paid to Turkish
Empire, 580-2 ; Armenian, 336, ex-royal family, 388 ; given to
517. press, 456, 458 ; Brit. pay Arabs,
Statues : Babylonian, 178 ; peasants 538-9.
find, 192-200. Bee also Sculpture. Suek-el-Chan, Asia Minor: location
Statutes: limitations, 264. and resources, 316.
Steeg, Louis : sketch, 238; chapter Suffrage : woman advocated in Tur-
in this book, 238-64. key, 146; restricted to males, 413,
Steppes : peoples of, 39. 415.
Stevens, (first all-round-the-world Sukat Cbai, Anatolia: a water
cyclist) : in Angora, 43. basin, 268.
Stewards: manage estates, 295. Sulaimaniya. Irag: Brit. desire
Stillman, Minna: thanked, 7. Kurdish govt. in, 22; ry. projected
Stockbreeders: Turks as, 40. for, 230.
Stockraising: should be taught in Suleiman (Solyman, the "Magnifi-
Turkey, 136; in Ott. Empire, 289- cent") : his place in history, 8;
90; by-products of, 290. enrolled as a janissary, 44; ap-
Stone : age, 193 ; used as building points Christians as viziers, 79 ;
material, 178, 182, 191; regula- threatens pope, 88-9; laws, 90;
tions rdg., 260-1; antiques, owned his advisers, 90.
by State, ~62. Suleiman I : grants concessions to
Stores: five-and-ten-cent needed in French, 438.
Turkey, 875. Suleiman Pasha (Turkish miL lead-
Strabo {ancient geographer): cited, er) : defeat and trial, 482.
36, 302. Suleiman Shah (tribal chief): activ-
Straits: mentioned, 14; embraced in ities, 86 ; his tomb, 652.
Russian policyp 15-16, 359-60, 609- Sultan-Imam : loses power, 104.
10 ; overland routes to, 224 ; con- Sultan-Khalif: position abolished,
trol of, conceded to Russia, 509 ; 413.
freedom of, no cause for war, 567- Sultana: defined, 290.
8; situation along delicate, 568; Sultanate: preserved, 627-S.
allied agreement rdg., 609-12; Sultans: dethroned and power
passage of, free, 610, 611-12, 646, broken, 1-2, 15, 104, 281, 412, 659;
649-50 ; Bosphorus, 18, 131, 176, characterized, 7, 8; of mixed
208, 803, 814, 360, 365, 367, 424, blood, 8; status, 107; powers, 413-
497, 562, 610, 625, 660; Darda- 14; assume title of khalif, 417;
766 INDEX
religious importance, 551. Sub- natu;e, 394; compared to Pompeii,
jects called Osmanli, 38; hunters 191; compared to Anatolia, 270.
among, 40; Armenians construct Importance in Old Turkey, 38; its
palaces for, 66 ; select Christian inhabitants, 56; Jews in, 89-90,
viziers, 79; confirm 1\laronite pa- 94 ; Romans in, 189 ; Armenians
triarch, 114; Jews owe allegiance in, 342, 530 ; ·cities in, 296 ; pro·
to, 115; create vakuf land, 241 ; gressive, 153 ; dogs poisoned in,
own mine, 320; former subsidized, 159 ; good water campaign in, 159-
388; edict, 3"98. See altKJ Hamid, 60; diseases in, 163-4, 165-6; hosp.
Abdul in, 175 ; Mohammedan sects in,
Sumerians : civilization, 182-3. 108-11; 1\Iaronites in, 114; Greek
Sunni (Sunnites): Mohammedan Orthodox Christians in, 114;
sect, 102; Turks are, 107-8; dis- Christian Arabs in, 153 ; Chris-
tribution, 513. tian activity in, 189, 190 ;
Superior Council of Health: abol· educational and mission work in,
ished, 666-7. 131-3. Trade, etc.-artificial bar-
Supreme Councils: activities, 74; riers, 213, 342; Turkey, to com·
Balfour before, 545 ; order of, 559. pete with , 213 ; relations with
Supreme War Council : Lloyd Anatolia, 342; trade declines, 342;
George before, 540. financial statement, 391 ; reason
Surveys: none made in Yemen, 270. for inadequacy of revenues, 394.
Su Sighirli, Anatolia: a water History, govt., etc.-periods in his·
basin, 267. tory, 186; Turkey controls, 11;
Swamps: salt, 324. See also conquered, 56, 89, 440 ; given
Marshes. special govt., 81-2; French inter·
Sweden : adheres to law of Sefer, vention and interest in, 358, 370,
252; exports lumber, 339. 493, 499, 542, 546; Brit. opera·
Swiss: send missionaries to Orient, tions in, 358, 540, 541, 547;
175; support hosp., 175; holding closed to Turkish newspapers,
company, 224; have no representa· 474; Turkish gov., 540; Kemal in,
tive in Turkey, 252. 557 ; Turk advance into feared,
Switzerland : air service, 234; Turk· 569 ; Turkish troops massed on
ish exiles in, 483 ; Soviet Armenia southern border, 572; Turks lose,
about size of, 531-2. 81-2, 203, 289 ; Turkish garrison
Sydenham, Lord : cited, 498-9, 620. to be surrendered, 626 ; French
Sykes, Sir Mark: activities, 542, mandate, 169, 547, 642, 643;
'614; admires Arabs, 542; cited, coastal regions apportioned to
11, 38, 44.5, 49-50, 535. France, 617; Arabs desire inde·
Sykes-Picot Agreement: text, 614- pendence, 542; Feisal represents,
16. 544; improved administrational
Synagogues : in Palestine, 96. methods in, 548 ; wishes to join
Syndicates: Ger., 288, 465; Bel- other Arab countries, 550; por-
gian, 362 ; Brit.• 380 ; Amer., 501 ; tions excluded from agreement,
of journalists, 475. See also Com- 614; entitled to national recog-
panies. nition, 621; native govt. in, to be
Syria: defined, 7: location, 187; encouraged, 627; archreology, etc.,
boundaries, 207, 226; part of old antiquities from, preserved, 178,
Ott. Empire, 266 ; has narrow : 191; still unknown, 187, 192 ; rich
hinterland, 268; area and pop., i archreologically, 186, 190-1 ; early
281, 651 ; de11erts in, 189, 190, 191 ; : civilization, 186-7 ; many early
rivers, 268; river navigation im- ' towns in, 185; old sites still occu-
possible in, 269; water basins, pied by cities, 187 ; old towns re-
'268-9 ; plains, 268-9 ; Roman roads stored on map of, 192; many
and bridges, 189 ; trade route, 236 ; ruins in, 188-9, 190, 192 ; impor-
rys. in and projected, 222, 236-7, tant remains, records, and monu-
358; resources, 268, 286, 287, 288, ments, 185-191; early native arts
'290, 813, 316, 324, 372 ; poor by unknown, 186 ; archreological prob·
INDEX 767
•
lema, 187 : earq Greek relations tary, 113; education, 127, 129;
with, unknown. 187-8; excava- land, 239, 242, 245-6. 897-8; U.
tions not aystematie. 186 ; Amer. /«reiJfJin., 242; on community hold-
expedition, 192. ings, 245 : on charitable institu-
Syrians 1 lmpOIIIlible to analyze tions, 245 ; for public improve-
racially, 56; habitat, 56; aympa- ments, 260; various, named and
thetie. 166; in Turkey, 527; of analyzed, 83, 395-8, 407, 445, 453 :
various faiths, 56; Christian sects ad valorem, 433 ; how paid and
among, 114; attend .Amer. univ. administered, 260, 280, 396-7, 536-
at Beirut, 119 ; improve their 7,. 547; payable in money, 397;
water aupply, 164:; study medi- penalty for failure to pay, 398;
cine, 173 ; rebuild Antioch, 188; in arrears in Turkey, 408; reve-
attitude toward Armenians, 530. nue from,. 395, 396, 399; amount
per capita, 394; tax collectors,
T 298, 397, 398: cause destruction
of groves, 305 ; backsheesh
Tablets : Babylonian, 178; cunei- amounts to govt., 335; Turkish of-
form, 180-1; owned by State, 262. ficials obtain, 388; chief burden
Tagh-Ardi, Asia. Minor: chrome on tupayera, 394: in U. S., 395-6 ;
mine at, 317. graft in, 398 ; attitude of local
Takrir: defined, 254. peoples to, "547; Kemalists impose,
Talaat Pasha. (Turkish official) : 563 ; in treaty, 653. Bee fJlBO
activities, 315, 554. Commerce and Trade-TariiE.
Tamerlane : at Angora., 25. Tchitcherin. George Vassilievich
Tangiers, North Africa: Arab activ- (Russian official) : activities, 645.
ities in, 549. Teachers : described and character-
Tanks : irrigation, 277-8. ized, 125, 128; Greek priests. act
Tanneries: few in Turkey, 372; as, 83 ; Armenian, under suspi-
valonea oak used in, 304-5. cion, 128; Amer. in Turkey, 132;
Tanzimat : Turkisli reform edict trained, needed in Turkey, 137;
(1839), 81. New York take oath, 140; Turk-
Tfl{lflv: defined, 263. ish girls become, 143; Turkish,
Tarilf : Bet~ Customs Duties. promised to Afghanistan, 644.
Tarsus, Asia Minor: on highway, Bee &lao Education.
218. Teeth : Kurdish women lose early,
Tartars (Tatars): habitat, 39,. 513, 15L
519; origin of Turks, 39 ; tribe, Teheran, Persia: routes to1 237.
86; rule Asia. Minor, 193. B66 Tekin Alp : 53. Bee Cohen, Albert.
olio Turkman. Tel el-Amarna: letter, cited, 185.
Ta.shova, Asia. Minor: tobacco crop, Telegraph : first govt., installed in
287. Turkey, 232-3; mileage in Turkey,
Tavros. Asia Minor: mines in, 318. 232; rates low, 232; service good,
Taxes and Taxation: onerous in 232; eostly at Angora, 450; lines.
Turkey, 26, 34, 298, 299, 805, 362- 232, 276 ; European in Constan-
3, 394, 397 ; Turkmen pay no, 42 ; tinople, 232: roncession obtained
increased ill modern Turkey, 49; for, 233 ; wireless,. installed, 233:
increase recommended ill indirect, how wireless messages sent from
427; unequal ill Turkey, 394-5; Near East, 233.
Turkish compared to European, Telephones: public service inaugu-
408; reform recommended, 427, rated, 233; few in Turkey, 233;
574: on Greeks in Turkey, 49, 78, Constantinople, 93, 362 ; estab-
129; Armenian, 127; freedom lished, 276; capital needed for,
from, under capitulations, 328; 374.
imposed on foreigners, 433, 444 ; Tell Nebi Miodo. Asia Minor: its
foreigners exempt from, 433, 444 ; ancient name, 186.
among Arabs, 536-7; levied for Tello, Asia Minor: its ancient
ecclesiastical purposes, 112 ; mili· name, 182.
768
T!mples: Herucrs. 178; ~ iDd1lded ill t:n.Dsfer. 6:!; dosed tD
181. 198; m Asia Kmor. 19!. Ta:rtislt ..-spapt"rS, 47-1.
195; aoriellt, owDed by Statr. Tbessaly. ~: Tmhy Joees. ~
262; Gftleb build m ~:aPt. 1:iberias, Pa1estiDe: ~ S6;
431. ~ewislt plans for. 95; dlolera ill.
Teuants: IDQ' uqujre cnmership. 16!; Scotda misl5ioB m. lOa.
242; peBSililt, 294.. '1.i:f5s. Soriet: GeorPa : air lltatiaa
Tents: BedouiDs me iD, 153. 1.58. at. 2M.
8n .UO Houses. '1.'iJait. Mesopotamia : 011 ry~ 2:!5 ;
Teos, Asia :uioor: l'1liDs aDd ex- riftr -Tipb]e at. 269; loatioa,
avatioos. 19!. 199. 316; m.
Brit spberoe - ~
T~: exaT&ted, 198; &Jt- 542.
cient o...--.1 by State. 262. Tiles: BabyloaiaJI. 17'8; presernd
Terjian. Armenia : loc:atioa aDd ~ m Ccmstantmople. 179; a DKIDOP-
liOura!S, 315. ol7. 367.
Textiles aDd Tutile Materials: Tilsit intl!niew: ciii!d. 433.
most impommt Turkisll import. T":unber: exported. ~ ; used m.
339 ; trade controiW by .Arme- mines. 3:.."'7. &Ill -* Forests;
nians, M6; ..-oms shut dcnnl m -.4 Wood.
Cilicia. 26; few mills ill Turke7. T"udl,. Asia lfiDor: llliDeJ ill, 3lS.
372: prodUO!d aDd maDufac:tund T"lftboli. A..sia lfiDor: trade ~
in :Sear East. 13, 152. ID'2, 267'. taDt'e, :.nl.
269. 2'i2, ~ 290. 295. 338, 372. 'lithe: paid - 1aad. 279; paralt-
519 ; ~eW'S JDalluf.ac:ture. 95 ; U'- tftd to ~ 36ii; IIIMifte of ,__
tide of COIIliDefte, 91, 216, 236. •ae. 395-6. -107; paid ill JDODPJ".
336. 338, 339, 356,. 358; how ~ 397; ftdurtioa ~ C'i;
ported. 221. 223; statistXs, ~ fon!ipen liable to. 415.. &Ill .z..
519 ; IIIUkets aedertecl,. 330 : da- Taxes ; •114 Tu:atioa.
ties 011, a State IDODOpoly. 356: ia- 'lit.'es: petroleum, m. 4tispvte, 315.
ftStment opportJmitjes. 372. Ell• &e .z- Deed&
merated (n.w materials and '1"obafto : powB m. ..-arioas clistric=ts.
~ ). mttoo. 13, 152. 202. 216, 13. 33. :a)9., !!56. :!87. 295, 337..s.
236. 267. 269. 2'i2, ~ 295, 338, 372; . . iDd1asttial aop, !!95: qaal-
339. 3-U. 359. 372. 519; embroid- 07 of Tarkisll,. 286: f - ' 7 osed
eries, 3ll ; )Moe, 3ll; mohair, 13, -mJy ill Turke7. 286: suitable
2:23, 336. 338: ribbous. 3ll ; silk. fot' maaufadlare. 3i3: ~ :!6:
13, 95. 216, ~ 300. 338, 3ll. article of COIIUDeft'e., 33. ~:o. :!16,
S::J6, 358, 372: wool 13, 221. 223, ~ 336. 331; . . redDDed ill
236. 290. 338, 339, 372. Ta:rkislt exports, 33N; ~
"l"beaters : .A.rmeniaB, 65 ; play. ~trd. 330: how ~
mentioDed, 453.. 221. 223 : l!tatistic:s. :!87. 519 : ilt-
~: Tmhy a. 107. ~t opportgDitiea ill, 37%;
Theodosi118 ( Bpaatine emperor) : sllops, 4&1..
ftipa IIUlii1DUiRd. 88.. Tobt. SiTU proY.: 011 ~W'Q'.
"1'1M!oJoa : Tarkish lll:hool for, 125. %IS; copper re6Ded ill, ie!.
Tbomas,. Lowell: cited, 536. Tolh: ~ ~ to Brit., !!6.
1lara<-e : Greek aclaoola ill, Sl ; Tomhe: iJa Asia lliDor. 195.
Gre8 pop. ill, 8S; partly iDdaded Tools and I.JaplftDeats: ~tiolls
ill New TarRy, 412; Tarkisll,. ~ 2-13: ~ :99.
621. Eastera-to.. ill, %1.1 ; &:>1. 3i3: ~ tools aacl - -
~ estati'S iD, :!93; its @Gt&W' miaery. !!6. ~~ :!9".!. !!9:1. 295-6,
e-en.l 4:.!6; ftlll&iDs Tarkisll,. 297. &:>1. 339. 3-U. M.1, 373. 414;
5619. 658; ltaJ.T IIUPpodB Tarkislt ·~ madaiDery litt1e .......
295; owDed by peasants. 295-6:
s.
da.iu8 to. 6H: allies ~. 659..
N~Turb7 ._, ~ used ill irriptioa. 300; pla.-1
~RII:I!Sia 610. desires. for ll.-1 ~ 316: .uaiJic
w~TIIrb ill w~ .ot ....... inrr7. 3:3; UoaW be . .
INDEX 769
mitted free, 326 ; admitted free, Travel: promoted by companies, 204.
341 ; as articles of commerce, 26, Travelers: European, 192. Bee
330, 339, 574; heavy tax on in- alao Explorers.
dustrial, 341 ; enumerated, 168, Treason: accusations of, 418-19,
292, 293, 295, 297, 301, 373, 475. 569.
Toumefort, Joseph Pitton de (trav- 'l'reaty Belie• (No. 16): cited, 660.
eler) : cited, 64. Treaties, Pacts, Conventions, and
Towns : buried, 184-5. Agreements: at end of Crimean
Townshend, Sir Charles (Brit. war, 15 ; in India, 18 ; between
Gen.) : besieged by Turks, 54(). Turkey and Afghanistan, 19 ;
Toynbee, Prof. Arnold J.: activi- capitulations ( q. 11.) are special,
ties, 556; cited, 101, 103, 425, 121, 138 ; govern foreigners in
520, 534, 556, 558-9, 562, 629. Turkey, 251; commercial and
Traders. Bee Commerce and Trade; economic, 341, 347, 433, 573, 622;
fJft4 Merchant& projected, 370 ; in 1919, 404 ;
Trade Routes : in Orient, 236. Bee after Balkan wars, 404 ; Turkish
a.l8o Commerce. · National, 412-14; made by Turk-
Traditions: influence in Near East, ish revolutionists, 412; concerning
10-11, 297. neutrality, 442-3; Christians not
Traffic : different kinds, enumerated, protected by, 496; secret, 542, 543,
211. Bee aiBo Transportation. 555, 556, 558, 564, 565, 612-13,
Trails : pilgrims make, 218. 614-16, 617-18, 619-20; with Cen-
Transcaucasia (Transcaucasus): tral powers, 555 ; between allies
boundaries, 369 ; Turkish-speaking and Turkey, 563-4, 573; between
people in, 511 ; oil fields in, 315; Turkey and Soviet Russia,
Constantinople a port for, 333 ; 565 ; between Turkey and
rys. in, 626; Shiah sect in, 534; U. S., 573: abrogated, 646-7;
Brit. trade organization in, 350 ; with Transcaucasus, assured,
Harbord mission in, 1 ; Turks to 648; Brit. with Iraq, 657-8 ; recog-
evacuate, 625; diplomatic negotia- nized by Turkey, 660; between
tions, 632 ; Russian relations Central and Entente powers, 663.
with, 647-8. Enumerated - Afghan- Kemalist,
Transjordania (Kerak): area and 643-4 ; American-Turkish, 501 ;
pop., 581 ; described, 581 ; interest Athens, 663 : Baghdad, 369 ; Ber-
in education in, 118; under Brit. lin, 68-9, 70, 82, 441, 443, 482,
control, 547; only one Brit. of- 483, 495, 499, 524 ; Brest-Litovsk,
ficial in, 548 ; descendant of 622-4 ; Bucharest, 311 ; Franco·
Prophet rules, 551. Brit., 642-3 : Franco-Turkish,
Translators : employed on Turkish 651-3; I taL-Imperial Ott. Govt.,
papers, 473. 653-5; Kars, 648-51; Kuchuk
Transmigration: Nusairis believe Kainarji, 14; Lausanne, 20, 22-3,
in, 110. 63, 119-20, 231, 340, 341, 385,
Transportation : assures interna- 420, 421, 426, 430, 518, 5~-1.
tional relations, 201; backward in 613, 659-68 : London, 53, 382, 543,
Turkey, 203-4, 299, 371; no uni- 555, 558, 612-13: Neuilly, 19;
fied system in Turkey, 207; diffi- Nine-power, 435: Paris, 442, 443,
culties, 226 ; rates, 220, 286, 330 ; 493 ; Russo-Turkish, 622 ; St. ·
by Dead Sea poBBible, 269; of Germain, 405; St. Jean de-
chrome, easy, 311; business men Maurienne, 543, 556, 619-20 : San
must know, 329; special, provided Remo, 563-4, 633-4; San Stefano,
for, 347; concessions granted for, 68-9, 481, 495; S~vres, 516, 555,
363 ; by animals, 205, 220, 306, 563-4, 565, 634-37, 638, 659:
316, 322; by pipe line, 316, 634; Sykes-Picot, 510, 528, 542-3, 556,
by various methods, 211 ; by mo- 564, 614-16: Tripartite Agree-
tor, needed, 374. Bee fJlao Com- ment, 382, 637-43; Turkish Na-
munications; and Railways. tionalist-Italian, 644-5; Turkish
Trapeziulll. Bee Trebizoncl. Nationalist-Soviet RllSsia, 64S-8 i
770 INDEX
Turko•American, 61, 380, 573'; Tunnels: in exca'9ations, 182; be-
Turko-Bavarian, 441-2; Turko- tween Europe and Asia projected,
Russian, 648; Versailles, 139, 357, 211; ry., 229.
386, 405, 469, 547, 636, 662, 663; Turanianism: its dangerS, 513-14.
Westphalia, 441. See also Confer- Turanians: distribution, 513-14;
ences ; Congresses ; an!J Conven- language, seen in Kurdish, 36.
tions. Turkestan, Central Asia : impor-
Trebil10nd (city and district), Ar- tance of Constantinople to, 333;
menia : its ancient name, 22; lo- Turkish-speaking people in, 511 ;
cation, 75, 205; a Greek city, 77; Turanian race predominates in,
leading Black Sea port, 208 ; on 513 ; Sunnites in, 513 ; Enver
highway, 218, 221; ry. to, pro- Pasha in, 553.
posed, 75 ; reason for its impor- Turkey (this caption rl!fers more
tance, 205; its tobacco crop, 287; especially to present-day Turkey,
forest area in, 304 ; minerals but for each step, consult the cap-
near, 312-13, 324; salt consumed tion "Ottoman Empire") : gen-
in, 324; statistics, 284, 285. Per- eral-few Americans visit, vii ;
sian trade, 205 ; other cities com- Amer. concept of, vii ; correct in·
pete with, 208; its foreign trade, formation on, needed, vii-viii; sup-
216, 335; its trade declines, 205; plants Ottoman Empire, 2 ; word
promised to Russia, 510, 617; "Ottoman" tabooed, 2 ; word
Turks defeated at, 540. "Turkey" not in Turkish lan-
Trees: mulk, 257, 263; destroyed, guage, 2 ; should be studied sin-
287, 305; enumerated, 40, 95, 287, cerely, 3; fairness needed in con-
288, 302-6, 308, 338. See also sidering, 3-4 ; problems in, de-
Forests; and Wood. fined, 4, 19, 21-30, 140; Middle-
Trenches: used in excavations, 182. Age conditions in, 9; hope for, in
Tribes: nomadic, 266. See also proper child training, 10; sym-
Nomads. bolizes Orient, 10.11; desires
Tribute : instances of, 185, 444, 496. Western ideas, 12; importance of
Triple Alliance : members, 493, 501, Asiatic, 13; bow to help Turkey,
503. 21 ; Constantinople not indicative
Tripoli (Tripolitania; African coun- of, 32-3; best studied in interior
try) : Turkey loses, 82; women cities, 33; has distinct calendar,
in, 152 ; foreign commerce, 335 ; 96; prebellum, 135; compared to
Italy's activities in, 493; surren- other countries, 140, 222; prac-
der of Turkish officers in, 626. tically unknown abroad, 342 ;
Tripoli (city), Asia Minor: de- lack of confidence regarding,
scribed, 158; its water supply, 352.
161; cholera in, 164; sends sick to Location, 7, 31; located favor-
Jerusalem, 175 ; crop statistics, ably, 342; 111trategic geographical
285. position, 389; extent, 580, 581, 648-
Troad: ancient city in Asia Minor, 9; present area limited, 38, 39 ; fron•
199. tiers and boundaries, 206, 207,
Trotzky, Leo: cited, 17. 226, 312; needs definite boundaries,
Troy, Asia Minor: location, 211; 21 ; arbitration of boundaries pro-
expedition against, 77; excava- posed, 74; loses territory, 21, 82,
tions at, 178, 196-7. 207, 311, 342, 385, 549; territory
Truces : Turks respect, 9 ; compared ceded to, 208, 565, 582, 650 ; cedes
to capitulation, 438 ; proposal Batum, 569, 649 ; powers parti-
during, 539. See also Armistice. tion, 543, 617-18; various districts
Tu-Kiue: Chinese name for Turks, named, 19; tt>rr. recognir:ed as be-
2. longing to, 658; Asiatic lacks out-
Tundras: in Russia, 283. lets, 207 ; approaches to, by sea,
Tunis, Africa : French consul in, 207; interior inaccessible, 207-8;
238 : Turkey loses1 485 ; France European, part of Old Empire, 266 ;
sei•es, 493, disputes ;Brit. ownership of Kur-
INDEX m
dirrtan, 315. Fountains aad riv- 137; rerival of education, 13S-40;
ers, 102, 21 T ( 11ee alii& Rivel'l!l) ; standards la.ckiag, 125, 427-8;
snow in, 218. Pop., 42, 61-3, 511- authentic history not taught, 128;
12, 517-18, 579, 580, 581; station- technical education needed, 133 ;
ary, 23; emigration, 27, 60, 85, of women and girls, 125, 134, 136,
92, 342 ; increase desired, 23, 28; 144, 428; future of education,
sparse, 203 ; mixed, 32, 34-5; 13~, 427-8; work of foreigners,
classification, 35, 37, 38, 41-2, 118, 120, 121, 127, 130-4; Arme-
101 : Turkish not true Turks, 42 ; nian, 127-8 (aee oleo Armenians) ;
the pop. question, 61-3 ; decimated, Greek, 129-30 (lee also Greeks);
73, 85, 136, 293 ; rural, 280 ; mi- schools, 65, 117, 118, 120, 124,
norities, 4, 20, 60-97, 140, 342, 420, 127, 136, 810; many villages lack
518, 651, 661 ; smaller · racial schools, 124 ; training schools for
g1·oup1t in, 38 ; more important officials, 310; teachers, 120, 121 ;
groups, 38 : subject races, 127, lack trained teachers, 137.
518 ; exchange of, 61, 420 ; to be Rich resources in, 9, 18, 27, 202,
for Turks, 413. Greeks, 45-6, 85, 216, 302, 811-12, 373, 384, 389,
328, 361: JeWEt in, 54, 87, 88, 92, 392, 400; statllS of industries and
344 : Kurds, 55-6 ; Arabs, 56; development, 9, 25, 26, 85, 137,
Europeans, 57 : Armenians, 328, 224, 280, 297, 330-1, 340, 384, 426,
517, 528, 530; classes of foreign- 579; economic pact made for, 27-
ers in, 337; peasants, 149-50; 8 ; general economic data, 578-9 ;
nomads, 306 ; race problem de- economic policy, 380, 381, 382-3 ;
creases, 58. Large families in, 23 ; desires economic progress, 26;
marriage customs changing, 143; economic situation, precarious,
polygamy in, 23, 142; home life, 332; danger of advanced indus-
119, 146-9; house furnishings, trial system, 27; seeks industrial
148-50 ; women and girls, 134, regeneration, 27; new impetus,
136, 141, 144, 145, 146, 373, 389; 27-8; European, more progressive
high death rate, 23, 137 ; public than Anatolia., 83; needl&-work in-
health, 155-176; language, 35, 37, dustries threatened, 26-7: agricul-
47, 138, 174, 196, 220-1, 222, 253, tural and pastoral, 13, 26, 224,
254, 263-4, 293, 294, 295, 311, 314, 280, 299. 330; how agric. viewed
511, 533, 668. in, 282; agric. machinery not
Social and economic-power of ueed in, 293 ( aes aZ.a Machines
religion in, 130 ; religion basis of and Machinery; anti Tools) ; small
government, 23-4, 426; relation of farms in, 295; extensive cultiva-
Church and State, 25, 104, 106-7, tion in, 296; methods of agric.,
421, 518 ; religious obligations, 296-T, 801; dry farming unknown,
33 ; classification of people by re- 297; produces raw materials, 800;
ligion, 87-8 ; religious differences, how to improve, 301 ; farmers
60 ; attitude toward Orthodox suffer, 330. Valuable forests, 302;
Church, 100, 421 ; various Chris- kinds of trees in, 302-3 ; value of
tian eects in, 101 ; few Shiahs in, products, 806; laws modeled on
108 ; priesthood in, 122 ; govt. dis- Freach, 307 ; modern meosurea
tinguishes between Roman and needed, 309 ; cleared, 822 ; few
other Catholics, 130; miSSIOn- data on, 802. Mines, miaerals,
ariel ( q. •·) in, 139; religious in- and mining, 810-327, 371; has no
stitutions hold forest land, 307; geological survey, 812, 325 hes
religious changes made by govt., also Mines). Importance of ~~ea
420-21 ; religious political group coast cities, 207-8; main Mediter-
in, 426 ; moral progreSB unsatis- raneaD ports, 211-12; iaterior
factory, 825 ( .ee aZ.o Religions). cities and waterways, 216-18;
Educatioa neglected, 9-10, 120, primitive condition of cities, 217;
128, 134; iadustrial education vilayets and sanjaks, 217; vil-
lackiag, 134; educatioD will pro- lal!ftlt 275: highways In, 218-19;
mote unity, 137; govt. should aid, iaolated fertile basins in Aaiatic,
772 INDEX
229; no important water basins in ping, 207-16; merchant marine,
European, 266 ; land tenure in, 214; coastwise shipping, 215;
238-64; estates owned by non-resi- Brit. shipping intereSits in, 213 ;
dents, 239; water utilization in, sliip transportation in, 216; sea
265, 373 ; peasants prefer town routes preferred in trade of, 223 ;
life, 282 ; oppressed, 397 ; food imports not needed in, 204; arti-
generally eaten, 284, 286-8 (see ficial trade barriers, 213 ; customs
also Food and Foodstuffs) ; few tariff, 340-2 ; can easily hamper
animals in now, 289, 338; living foreign trade, 353 ; low purchas-
cheap in, 330 ; sewing machines ing power in, 330, 340 ; transit
common, 331 ; prohibition in, 341 ; trade, 333, 337 ; trade balance,
social life influenced by foreign 337, 428; tourist trade, 204, 337;
capital, 354; improvement needed probable direction of foreign
in, 371 ; labor scarce in, 373 ; in- trade, 339 ; imports less than pre-
fluence of harem, 389 ; discrimina- war, 340; competes with other
tion against non-Moslems, 389. countries, 342; trade commission
The press and its influence, 418, visits Syria, 342; prewar trade
448-75; its value recognized, 450; policies of foreigners in, 343 ; -
best developed part of Turkish local merchandising in, 344-5 ;
life, 470; reading public small, statistics of foreign trade, 349 ;
471; newspaper circulation small, imports and exports, 94, 317, 318,
474. 319, 322, 335-6, 337, 339, 472 (see
Transportation and communica- also Commerce and Trade). Con-
tion, 201-37; development, depends cessions, 13, 26, 94, 222, 226, 235,
on better communication, 237; 260-3, 310, 318, 319, 325, 327,
poor communication with U. S., 368, 376-7; capitulations, 24, 345,
vii ; communication facilities 435, 649, 661. Budget, 26, 363,
simple, 204-5, 235; no unified 387; taxation, 362-3, 397, 408 (see
transportation system in, 207 ; also Taxes and Taxation) ; loans,
mil. communications lacking, 222; 26, 386, 398; favorable position
animal transport by highways, for loans, 382; none floated within
218-22; ry. systems not unified, recent years, 384-5; debt held by
222. (see also Railways); obsta- private persons, 386; avoids de-
cles to rys. in, 222-3 ; loses rys., cision rdg. external debt, 386-7; a
224; its oldest ry., 226-7; Brit. debtor nation, 388; released from
control rys. in, 230 ; rys. inade- part of debt, 663 ; usury practiced
quate, 273 ; mileage small, 311 ; in, 281; not satisfactory to inves-
capitalization of rys., 365 ; rys. tors, 327; investment opportuni-
ceded to, 652; autos and trucks in, ties, 372 ; absence of capitalists
219; few cities have telephone in, 373 ; banks in, 375-6 ; discov-
service, 233 ; air service, 235 ; ered by Western bankers, 389 ;
postal and telegraph system, 231- right of banknote issue in, 385-6;
3, 473; foreign post offices abol- banknotes driven from circulation,
ished, 231 ; telegraph rates, 232. 386; total amount of its currency,
Other economic factors-tobacco 386; small amount of paper, 406;
rl!gie, 26 ; business methods in, 48, financial panics in, 376 ; crisis
345 ; Turkey developed by business imminent, 388; treasury low, 384,
companies, 93 ; lacks industrial es- 388; deficits, 387; financial condi-
tablishments and shops, 223, 331- tion, 384, 391, 398, 405 ; gold re-
2, 372-3 ; difficulty to ascertain serve, 385 ; few metallic coins,
business data, 330; business men 385 ; hoarding in, 385 ; does not
in, 343 ; speculation in business in, pay for allied occupation, 385;
344 ; foreign business houses in, former terr. a drag on treasury,
345-9; business regulations, 346- 385; gold standard, 385; claims
7; opportunities for foreign busi- against abandoned, 386 ; financial
ness in, 351; future of business in, operations mostly in Constanti-
346-7, 352. Seaports and ship- nople, 392 ; source of its revenue,
INDEX 773
395-8, 563; financial problem of, 217, 219, 321, 360-1, 400, 422-3:
compared to other countries, 400; khalifate, 19, 25, 104, 105, 106,
expenditures, how made, 407. 387, 416-7, 421; Sultan over-
Government and political mat· thrown, 19 ; only a memory in,
ters-Nationalist movement, 2, 29, 518; millets, 23-4, 60, 118, 419-
62, 119, 346, 412, 469, 517, 552-75; 20, 518. .
revolutions, 54, 86, 411-12; Kemal Foreigners in, etc.-U. S. naval
creates new, 29; its constitution forces in, xi ; Amer. attitude
(national pact, declaration of in· toward, 132, 139 ; Amer. hosp. in,
dependence), 120 (old constitu· 176, 361 ; Amer. missionaries in,
tion), 412-13, 414-15, 420-21, 423, 361; Amer. aid for New Turkey
560, 562, 563, 629-31 ; its capital, sought, 469; attempt to gain favor
22, 24, 33, 106, 413, 423-4; govt. of U. S. by Chester concession,
characterized and described, 25-6, 572; U. S. diplomatic relations
63, 104, 106-7, 129, 139, 152, 300, with, 573 ; accept Wilson's peace
308, 362-3, 389, 398, 408, 409, suggestions, 616-17; Russian con-
411-29, 518, 531, 574,. 575, 661; tact and relations with, 16-17, 19,
red tape in, 29 ; coalition sought 359-60, 563, 565, 645-8; Brit., 38,
in, 29; gains in solidarity, 62; pol- 106, 546-7; Greeks, 49, 62, 83, 84,
icy, 63, 82, 573-4 ; equality before 361, 413, 468, 662-3 ; Jews, 53-4,
the law in, 81, 661; reconstru~ 86-97, 115; Armenians, 63, 66-7,
tion in, 17, 26, 134 ; suffrage in, 69, 449 ; Ger., 135, 359, 663 ;
146, 415; stable govt. needed, 300; French, 238, 341, 356-8, 525, 5&s;
laws not enforced, 308; proclaimed Ltal., 359-60, 613 ; Arabs, 549 ;
a republic, 411-12, 575; has one Transcaucasus, 649, 650; Central
house only, 412 ; objections to this, powers, 660, 663. International re-
416 ; sovereignty resides in the lations important, 14-15, 560,562-3;
nation, 413, 429; a democracy, powers squabble over, 15; attitude
418, 423, 425 ; methods and prac- toward foreign intervention, 20;
tices, 414; govt. compued with foreign policies, 15-16, 26, 222,
other countries, 414; the kind 572; relations with foreign coun-
allies desired, 469 ; bolshevism in, tries, 15-21, 491-516; relations
426 ; corruption in civil service, with Moslem countries, 19-20; at·
427 ; equal to other powers, 24, titude of foreign capital to; 28-29;
433, 571 ; now independent, 531 ; foreign capital desired in, 327, 375,
patriots in, 563; bears no resem- 382-3, 388 ; foreign credit policies
blance to Ott. Empire, 575 ; needs in, 343; influence of foreign capi-
and future, 425-6, 574. Grand tal in, 354 ; foreign investments in,
National Assembly (Angora As· 356-7, 362 ; opportunities for for-
sembly, National Assembly),19, 20, eign capital, 372 ; European in-
25-6, 104, 351, 377-8, 379, 381, trigue in, 61 ; foreign post offices
411, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417-18, in, 231 ; foreign-owned property
424, 428, 518, 551, 562, 569, 570, in, 239 ; foreigners may hold nal
572, 573, 574, 664; Committee of property in, 250 ; foreigners em·
Union and Progress, 29; political ployed in, 308; foreign diplomacy
parties, 418, 426, 477, 573-4; in, 310, 327, 354, 382 ; efforts of
president, 414-15; parliament, foreign interests in, 311; foreign
533 ; various ministries, 62-63, mil. expenses in, 337 ; bow foreign
307, 310, 314, 315, 351, 352, 380: business is done in, 342-3 ; foreign
cabinet, 105, 376, 415, 434 ; govt. claims on, 357 ; foreigners exploit
bureaus, etc., 240-1, 307, 326, 327, resources of, 363; delegates meet
378, 384-405 ; courts and judicial with foreign bondholders, 387 ;
system, 152, 244, 414, 422, 434, present status of foreigners, 433 ;
439-40, 57 4; civil list, 388 ; of- agreements with foreign coun-
ficials seldom paid promptly, 388; tries, 565: influence on Moslem
employees dishonest, 388. Provin· world, 569 ; special European
cial and local govt. and division&, rights in, 610 ; equipped from
774 INDEX
Europe, 656; represented in peace 8-9, 42 ; their virtues, 34, 35, 43,
conference, 659-60 ; renounce 44-5, 82, 142, 280; militaristic, 9,
reparation claims, 662 ; cemeteries 40-1, 79, 112, 522; peasants, 28, 32,
granted to allies, 667. 43, 45, 523 ; large families among,
Miscellaneous-ex-Sultan denies 23 ; their importance, 38 ; not
abdication, 19; lacks trained of- adapted for business, 39-40, 45,
ficials, 25 ; leaders desire to mod- 328, 329, 521 ; like pastoral life,
ernize, 26; prosperity in, moves in 40, 280; thrift and ambition
cycles, 27 ; peasant not difficult to among, exception, 43 ; assume
·control, 28 ; stability needed in, Western civilization readily, 44;
28 ; brigandage in, 28, 280, 428 ; modern, a new model, 45 ; poor
difficult to harmonize elements in, governors, 45 ; culture low, 45, 480-
29 ; subject to invasion, 34-5; 1, 489 ; neglect arts of peace, 426 ;
peasants do not originate mas- semi-savages in 15th century, 78;
sacres, 52 ; Christians in, threat- Greek blood in, 78; some clever
ened, 88-9; changes, 106; mil. men among, 83 ; upper classes not
power revived in, 129; preserves polygamists, 142; women, aid men
antiquities, 178; pack animals in wars, 146; a ruling race, 352,
used in, 220-1 ; bribery and black- 535; their feeling of superiority,
mail in, 222, 311 ; prosperity of 449 ; oppressors, 494 ; cruelest of
peasant not dependent on land Mohammedan conquerors, 496 ;
Ki ownership, 238-9 ; life insecure in, know all Turkish dialects, 512 ;
297; postwar disturbances in, compared to other peoples, 39, 473-
350; influence of war profits in, 4, 494, 522, 535-6. Clothing, 32 ;
357 ; army and navy reduction occupations, 40; poor farmers, 40;
promised, 428 ; outlook not prom- practices of farmers, 292-3 ; de-
ising, 434; mil. ability, 565 ; spise labor, 297 ; attitude toward
masses troops on Syrian border, business, 328 ; merchants, 57, 331 ;
572; chronology of events, 584- in raisin industry, 338; in trading
607 ; gendarmerie enter Thrace, company, 351. Few cross Atlan-
658; sanitary organization, 666. tic, vii; contribute to this book, 5 ;
See al8o Ottoman Empire; and claim Mosul region, 22; attitude
Turks. toward religion and govt., 23-4 ;
Turkia: name for Turkey, 2. leading Mohammedan nation, 39,
Turkman (Turkoman): term de- 551 ; not originators of Mohamme-
fined, 41 ; habitat and description, danism, 56; Sunnis, 107-8; disre·.
39, 41-2, 519; compared 'to modern gard laws of Koran, 341 ; attitude
Turks, 39 ; hostile to Turks, 41.2. toward progress, 28 ; exiled, 29 ;
See also Tartar. subject to Sultan, 38-9, 494; de-
Turko-Tartar: branches outside forestate country, 40; as govt. of-
Turkey, 503. ficials and administrators, 40, 45,
Turks : derivation and meaning of 57, 78-9, 82-3 ; their leadership
tefm, 2, 38-9, 41 ; distinguished questionable, 44; not good diplo-
from 'l'urkman, 41-2; call them- mats, 82-3; overthrow capitula-
selves "Osmanli,'' 49; equivalent, tions, 231 ; rebuffed in peace con-
101 ; misconception of, in U. S., ference, 545; diplomatic delibera-
vii ; news prejudicial to, dissemi- tions, 427, 570-1, 572-3 (see also
nated, 4-5; mother of Sultan, never Conferences; a-n-d Treaties) ; over-
a, 8; from Central Asia, 11 ; their run Asia Minor, 41 ; conquer
towns in Anatolia, 34; live neigh- Syria, 56 ; lack soldiers, 78 ; lose
bors to other peoples, 35 ; a mixed Syria, 81-2 ; take prisoners in
race, 39, 42 ; characterized and de- European war, 160; seize Van,
scribed, 7, 8, 9, 23, 28, 31-59, 77, 174; Seljuk, rule Asia Minor, 193;
78, 82, 84, 280, 297, 328, 329, 331, enter and capture Constantinople,
398, 405, 449, 489, 494, 496, 502, 426, 440 ; defeated, 495, 554; suc-
521, 522, 533, 535 ; no pure aris- .ceed Saracens, 496; losses in war,
tocracy among, 8 ; their d~ects, 9, 554, 582 ; rally to Kemal, 560.
INDEX 775
Anatolian peaBBDts attend Robt. Tuz Kburmati, Asia Minor : petro-
College, 119, 133 ; study seientific leum in, 314.
agric., 120; study medicine, 172, Tyrants: Sultans, 8; religion and
173 ; study transportation, 233, race, 496.
235 ; ewn Ford cars, 220 ; main· Tyre, Syria : an old site, 187 : men-
tain camel hosp., 172 : destroy tioned in early letters, 185 : its
hosp., 175-6: maintain hosp. in water supply, 161; in French
Smyrna, 176 ; do not segregate sphere of influence, 542.
leprosy, 169. Fear political prop. Typesetters: well erganized in Tur-
aganda. 140; deport dogs from key, 475: wages, 475.
Constantinople, 159 ; .establish Typography : discoveries in, 198.
hospice in Damaseus, 169 ; realize
value of rys., 202 ; lack funds for
rya., 222-3: ry. concesaiona grant· u
ed to, 228; engage in coastwise Ukkal : sect among Druses, 111.
shipping trade, 215 ; tbeir future Ulcers: caused by disease, 171.
in foreign commerce, 328-9 ; class Ulemas (Turkish. priesthood) : de-
of imports, 338-9 ; replace other fined and described, 121, 122 : in·
nationalitiea in busineas houses, spired by Jews, 91; conservative,
347: attitude toward foreign capi- 122: controls theological coil., 125.
tal, 354-5; have delegate on Ott. Umbrellas: imports, taxed, 341.
Public Debt, 355 ; employed by Uniats: few among Greeks, 99: idi-
that .organization, 356; invest· Asia Minor, 111. Bee also Catho-
menta by, 357: private, have little lics.
wealth, 375 : slow in presenting Unieh, Asia "Minor: road at, 218.
their case, 449; their newspapers, United Kingdom: its trade with
452; in. danger of losing national Turkey, 349. Bee a!Bo Gt. Britain.
consciousness, 468 ; interested in United States: attitude toward ne-
iMues, 472: join Committee of groes, 60 : racial minorities in,
Union and Progress, 502; effect of 140: laws of, compared to those
feeling of nstionality among, 512; of Turkey, 140: least affected by
the Young Turk Movement, 2, 69, Great war, 73: examination
116, 126, 476-490; defined, 477-8. standards in, 125 ; educational re-
Attitude toward and relations with strictions in, 139-40 ; work among
other peoplee-Kurds, 21.3, 55; FiL lepers, 169; no. of port of-
Arabs, 22, 56-7, 503, 521, 533, 539, ficers in, 231 ; telegraph mileage
549-50, 618 ; Brit., 22-3, 489, 568 : in, 232 ; dry farming in, 297;
Turkmen, 41-2: Armenians, 51, 67, com'l statistics, 336: administra·
68, 119, 510, 518-19, 523, 529-30, tive units in, 393 ; taxes in, 395-6 :
561: Jews, 53, 54-5; Russia, 61, paper money, 401; financial condi·
506, 540 : Greeks, 68, 79, 80, 81, tion, 402; nature of its public
84, 113, 138, 469, 530, 573 : Per- debt, 404; dollar diplomacy, 501;
sians, 108, 521; Nusairis, 110: Ger. efforts against, 522: Ger. in,
Americans, 139, 879 ; French, 358, 526 • fearful of foreign entangle-
546; Mamelukes, 417: Magyar, ment, 527 ; policy of isolation,
500: Ger., 500-1: foreigners, 28: 529 • makes peaee offers, 616-17:
Christians, 57-8, 78, 329: non- decl~res war on Ger., 619: Zionist
Moslems, 496: European lnterfer- mo'l'ement in, 620. Government
eace, 61 : make misstatements con· branches named-Naval Acad., d:
cerning Entente powers, 509; sign Shipping Board, 32: Dept. of
armistice with allies, 553-4 ; Eu- State, 61, 815, 851, 884, 491., 501 :
ropean diploi!W!:V tried on, at Lau- Senate, 74, 631; Bur. of For. and
aanne, 572 : allies make conces- Dom. Com., 352: War Trade
sions to, 572-3. Board 384: Amer. Higb. Commis-
Turku : defined, 2. sion S84 ( •ee allo Bristol, end
Turpentine : exported, 806. Officlals) ; Consular &el"''ice, -&30.
Tutor: Turkish, 476. BelatioDI with Turkey-bu poor
776 INDEX
communication with, vii; mutual from g.hedik, 243 ; regulations re-
misconception, vii ; Turkey seeks garding, 257-8. Bee also Lands.
econ. aid from, 26; . ships of, at Vali: defined, 408.
Constantinople, 32; interferes in Valideh Sultan.: defined, 8.
Turkey, 61; refuses mandates, 73- Valleys : in Asia Minor, 191 ; tribes
4, 515-16; attitude toward, 132, of, 194 ; Menderez, 226 ; cattle
361-2, 431, 501-2, 572; educa- reared in, 289. Bee also Rivers.
tional and missionary · efforts in, Valonea: exported, 306; use, 338.
132, 133, 173, 501 (see also Edu- Values: of minerals, 313; of quar-
cation and Missionaries) ; de- ries, 324-5 ; of foreign trade, 334,
mands of, in Turkey, 139; expe- 336-7, 339 ; of foreign investments
ditions from, in Turkey, 192; in Turkey, 356-7.
should make excavations in, 200; Van, Armenia (city, vilayet, and
adheres to law of Sefer, 252; oil prov.): .in the proposed new Ar-
interests of, in Turkey, 315 (see menia, 75 ; destroyed, 174 ; hosp.
also Concessions and Petroleum) ; in, 174; interior trade center, 216;
trade with Turkey, 317, 321, 336- ry. projected for, 230, 368; vari-
9, 349, 351-2, 361 ·(see also Com- ous statistics for, 284-5; no com-
merce and Trade) ; ""invisible" plete statistics for, 305; conces-
payments made to Turkey, 337; sions in, 312, 315 ; resources, 315,
competes with various countries in, 320, 324; revolt in, 483; promised
338-40 ; export houses of, in Tur- to Russia, 510, 617. ·
key, 346; goods sent to, handled Varag, Armenia : agric. school at,
by foreign ports, 349 ; makes busi- 128.
ness splurge in Near East, 351-2; Varna, Bulgaria: shipping center,
has investments in Turkey, 357; 216.
influence of, in Turkey, 361-2; Vases : antique, owned by State,
attitude toward concessions, 379 262.
(see also Concessions) ; attitude Vehicles: wheeled, use Turkish high-
toward capitulations, 431 (see also ways, 218 ; in Stamboul, 331.
Capitulations) ; obtains extrater- Enumerated-Aeroplanes and air-
ritorial rights, 501; protests of, in ships, 201-2, 233-4; araba, 33-4,
Turkey, 505; refuses to declare 220-1; automobiles, 32, 205, 219-
. war on Turkey, 510; resumes dip- 20, 232, 346; carts, 220, 286 (see
lomatic relations with Turkey, above, araba) ; street cars and
573 ; comparisons and contrasts, tram cars, 362, 374; trucks, 219,
395, 407, 414, 582. 237 ; wagons, 220.
Urfa (vilayet) : highway in, 218; Veil: special Mohammedan designa-
crop statistics, 285; no complete tion, 110. Bee also Clothing.
statistics for, 305; now in Arab Venetians: granted capitulations,
state, 542. 439.
Urquhart, Leslie; activities, 351. Venice, Italy : Armenians in, 65.
Usque, Abraham: activities, 91. Venizelos, Eleutherios (Greek states-
Ussher, Dr. Clarence Douglass: man) : activities, 558; Brit. pro-
activities, 174. tect, 559 ; reaction against, 570.
Usury: practiced in Turkey, 281, Versailles, France: treaty negoti-
296. ated at, 357, 386, 405, 547. Bee
also Treaties.
v Veterinarians: have press organ in
Constantinople, 458.
Vaccination: not practical in Orient, Vice : Turks suppress, 27; Greeks
163. commercialize, 103 ; various enu-
Vaccine: for lepers, 169. merated, 534.
Vahideddin : name given to Moham- Vienna, Austria: Armenians in, 65;
med VI., 570. Jews in, 92; meerschaum worked
Vakuf, name applied to pious foun- in, 321 ; gold deposit in, 386, 405;
dations (lands) : distinguished agric. institute at, 476; Turkish
INDEX 777
embaSBy in, 476; Turks defeated 504, 513, 553, 609, 661, 662 ;
at, 495, 521. , Crimean, 15, 493, 498; European
Vilayets (Turkish administrational (see bel&w, World); Franco-
unit) : described, 422-3; various, Prussian, 359; Greco-Persian, 77;
named, 285. Greco-Turkish (various), 17, 80-
Villages : interior, in Anatolia, 34; • 81, 82, 456, 493, 560, 565, 571,
peasant proprietors live in, 294 ; 573, 656, 660; Great (see below,
some, are communal property, World); Russo-Turkish, 15, 68,
295 ; own forests, 307; model, 389, 480, 493; Turko-European,
needed, 374. 278; Turko-Italian (ltalo-Turk·
Villari, Luigi : attends conference, ish), Z, 203, 278, 393, 461; Turko-
629. Persian,, 108; World (official
Vineyards : acreage, 285 ; on vakuf name European War, ealled also
land, 242; investment opportuni- Great), 2, 7, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16,
ties in, 372. ' 20, 65, 67, 71, 74, 84-5, 97, 126,
Virgil : cited, 29. 146, 160, 1G3, 168, 171, 174-5,
Virginia (state) : Turkish heirs in- 179, 198, 207, 208, 211, 212, 216,
corporated in, 315. 219, 225, 231, 233, 257, 276, 290,
Vlachs, 98. Bee Romanians. 307-8, 314, 317, 322, 336, 337-8,
Vogue, Marquis de (French sav- 348, 340, 341, 343, 356, 358, 362,
ant) : activities, 191-2; writings, 374, 385, 386, 393, 401, 404, 408-
cited, 192. 9, 422, 431, 444, 463, 464, 466,
471, 489, 493, 500, 505-10, 515,
w 519, 525, 528, 530, 537, 538, 540-
1, 542, 548, 555, 557, 561,'562,
Waddington, George (classical 570, 571, 573, 582, 611, 612, 619,
scholar) : activities, 192. 621-2, 624.
Wahabi (division of Arabs): differ Washington, D. C. : mentioned, 384;
from other Arabs, 56 ; dispute over Turkish officials in, 82 ; confer-
khalifate, 104; revolt, 107. ence, 231, 434-5; Angora com-
Wakf: regulations rdg., in treaty, pared · to, 450.
667-8. Water: poor system 'Of supply in
Waldmeier, Theopbilus: founds Orient, 159-160; supply of various
hosp., 175. cities, 160.161, 267, 275; impure,
Wallachia (Romanian prov.): source of disease, 160-161, 168;
Greeks govern, 80, 82; Turkey of Lebanon, 161 ; supply devel-
loses, 495. · oped through concessions, 202 ;
Wars: decimate pop., 9, 28, 282; mineral, 260, 341; imperfectly .
cause disease, 171; Antioch de- utilized in Turkey, 265, 300, 330;
stroyed by, 188; communications works at Konia, 265 ; used in rice
dominate, 201; supported by or- cultivation, 293; power, available
ganized credit, 389 ; Turks wage, in Adana, 303 ; power needed for
2, 16, 90, 91, 488 ; guerrilla, in mines, 327 ; power, exploited by
Anatolia, 83 ; Turkish women in, rys., 367; much, power in Turkey,
143; profits, 357; supplies bought 373. Bee also Irrigation.
from loans, 363 ; Turkey's debt Wealth: Turkey's, leaves country,
small, 385 ; tax, 395 ; power of de- 401.
claring, resides in Sultan, 413-14; Weapons: ancient, owned by State.
powers try to prevent in Balkans, 262. Enumerated~nnons. 43,
508-4; holy (jihad), 509, 539; U. 417, 561; cartridges, 33; guns,
S. does not declare, against Tur- 33, 49 ; band grenades. 33 ; re-
key, 510; method of European, in volvers, 50 ; riftes, 40, 654 ; swords,
Near East, 547-8; Brit. mistakes 40.
almost cause, 568-9 ; alliPs fear Weights and Measures: various
new, 571. Enumerated-Balkan, enumerated--acre, 271, 288, 294,
2, 15, 69, 203, 222, 278, 286, 334, 304, 815 ; bale., 288; case, 289 :
868, 404, 461, 462, 489, 498, 502, cubic meter, 271 ; dunam, 272,
778 INDEX
294 ; hectare, 284, 285, 291, 294, 8; childbirth among Kurdish peas-
296, 304; kilogram, 287, 292, ant, 150; mould children in Tur-
324; kilometer, 365, 366, 394, key, 28; position of peasant, in
579; metric quintal, 291, 334; Anatolia, 33 ; Eastern, neglected,
metric ton, 325 ; pound, 288, 290 ; 134; discard veil, 141, 143; Turk-
square kilometer, 271, 579 ; square ish adopt new headdress, 146:
mile, 531, 580 ; ton, 322, 323 ; ton dress of Kurdish, 149-50; Turk-
(ship), 210. ish wear veil, 373. Confusion rdg.
Weissmann, Dr. August (Brit. Turkish, 141-2; Turkish peasant
Zionist leader) : Feisal's relations described, 142, 149·50; seclusion
with, 544. of Turkish, borrowed from Per-
Wells: source of water supply, 161; sians, 143; their status changing,
regulations rdg., 260 ; used for 143-4, 146; contrasted with Euro-
irrigation, 300; oil, 316 (Bee aZ8o pean, 144; have social freedom,
Petroleum). 145; home life, 146-9; Kurkish,
West: Turks borrow from, 9; in- 150-1; in Algeria, 152; in Tripoli,
vasions from, 34-35 ; conception of, 152; Arabian, 152·3 ; advanced in
rdg. Islam, 103. Egypt, 153 ; Bedouin, free, 153 ;
Westermann, Prof. William Linn: Albanian, 153; Greek, described,
thanked, 6 ; cited, 45, 516, 533, 154 ; Armenian, described, 154 ;
547-8. ready for progress in Near East,
Westphalia, Ger.: peace of (1648), 154; inherit equally with men,
441. 246; position among Wahabi, un-
White, Rev. G. E. : thanked, 6. changed, 534. Education--of
Widows: can reclaim nationality, Arab, increasing, 118; in Turkey,
249; need pensions, 574. 125, 127; attend Amer. coli., 133-
Wilhelm III. (Ger. kaiser): activi- 4; important, 136; illiterate, in
ties, 347, 359. Syria, 153 ; Albanian, graduate
Willcocks, Sir William (irrigation from coli., 153 ; study medicine,
engineer) : activities, 359, 370 ; 173; trained as nurses, 173; have
cited, 265. weekly periodicals, 462. Peasant,
William of Wied (ruler of Alba- work in fields, 34, 281 ; clubs for,
nia) : his reign short, 504. in Turkey, 37, 145; Anatolian,
William the Conqueror: mentioned, marry conquerors, 42 ; Jewish,
183. practice medicine, 91 ; among
Williams, Dr. Talcott: cited, 361- Turkish leaders, 119 ; work in of-
2, 531-2. fices, 141; Turkish, go to war,
Wills: lands disposed of by, 251-2. 143; succeed to throne, 143; enter
Wilson, Dr. Woodrow (president of professions, 143; control own
U. S.) : misinterpreted, 60 ; su- property, 145; journalists, and
preme council negotiates with, 74; writers, 145, 154; act as dele-
his Amer. rept. not acted on, 75; gates, 153 ; leaders in various
his fourteen points discussed, 468- activities, 154; starved, 164;
9, 622 ; his policy toward Arme- affiicted by disease, 168; ad-
nia, 526 ; despatches Harbord Mis- minister vakuf property, 241. See
sion, 526; never in Turkey, 559 ; also Girls.
reaction against, 570 ; Turkey ac- Wood: taken from communal for-
cepts his suggestion, 616-17; en- ests, 294; how to exploit, 305-6;
dorses Balfour Declaration, 620 ; exported, 306; State sells, 307;
cited, 75, 526. imported, 339; carvings, 179; ali\
Windmills : used in irrigation, 300. building material, 191, 196, 374;
Windows : glassless, 34. needed in mines, 327; bark, ex-
Winds: mts. stop in Anatolia, 267; ported, 306; worked, statistics,
north, in Egypt, 267. 306. See also Fuel ; and Trees.
Wireless. See Telegraph. Wood, Robert (explorer) : activi-
Withers, Hartley : cited, 353. ties, 188.
Women: status depends on fertility, Woodhouse, Henry A. : cited, 378.
INDEX 779
Worcester, Mll.l!s.: mentioned, 1. Young, George: cited, 327. ·
Workshops: laws rdg., in Turkey, "Young Turks": Bee Turks.
243. Young Women's Christian Associa-
tion: Turkish branch, 141.
X Yukon, Canadian territory: Ameri-
can consul at, 430.
Xenophon: his march, 22; Memora-- Yumurtalik: important Anatolian
bili-a, cited, 389. port, 212; improvements projected
for, 213, 230.
Yuruks, nomads of Anatolia: Mos-
y lems, 38-39 ; stockbreeders, 221 ;
subject to Turkish Sultan, 38-39.
Yannina, New Greece: engineer in,
265.
Yorijl: defined, 295. z
Yavchan, Konia vilayet: output of
salt,,324. Zahleh, Lebanon: water supply,
Yemen, Arabian region: extensive, 160: scarlet fever in, 166.
547 ; area and population, 392, Zakho, Bitlis prov. : in oil field, 315.
581 ; unknown, 270; tropical allu- Zaptieh: defined, 280.
vial plains in, 283 ; reservoirs in, Zeid, Turkish Sultan: deposed, 659.
289-70; gold in, 324; salt re- Zekki Bey, Turkish editor: assassi-
sources in, 324 ; foreign commerce, nated, 461.
335 ; Turkish invasions into, 537 ; Zile, Asia Minor : improvements pro-
lost to Turkey, 203; independent, jected, 230.
581 ; Feisal represents, 544 ; finan- Zionism (Zionist movement): its
cial statement for, incomplete, 392. rise and aims, 95, 96, 115, 449-50,
Yenije Koi, Symrna province: man- 544; British organization, 620;
ganese deposits in, 316-317. hostility toward, 53 : relation of
Yeniji, Asia Minor: railway in, 228. adherents to govt., 655.
Yeshil lrmak: basin in Anatolia, Zor, Turkish sanjak and vilayet :
268: meaning, 274. crop statistics, 285; no complete
Yezd, Persia: Russian interests in, statistics for, 305.
611, 612. Zulfagar : point on Russian frontier,
Yolari, Asia Minor: silver mine, 612.
323. Zurich, Switzerland: bank in, 230.

Eliot Grinnell Mears - Modern Turkey 1908-1923 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Eliot Grinnell Mears - Modern Turkey 1908-1923 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Eliot Grinnell Mears - Modern Turkey 1908-1923 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the book about?

What is the book about?

What places or regions does the book discuss?

What places or regions does the book discuss?

MESSRS. MACMILLAN & Co., LTD.

be glad to receive a copy of the issue

containing a notice of this work.

The price of the book is..o!. .;t::::-net

Turkish Moslem Smoking a Nargileh-A Character Study.

. ELIOT GRINNELL MEARS

Set up and electrotyped.

Priflted i11 the U11ited States of Ammro b,

The Ottoman Empire at Its Supremacy • • • • . Faeiftg fHJ!Je 8

Before I finish writing of the confused memories I have of the com-

"Modern Turkey" is interpreted by the author to com-

were written in 1920, are provided with a special intro-

read are modern French novels. The rigorous censorship

that their investments are free from dangers of confisca-

In a republic, to be successful we must learn to combine intensity

A student of Turkey should at some time or other have

The influence exercised by the Armenians in the social

architecture deserves particular attention, for the

That the Greek race has played a most important role

When Suleiman Shah, the chief of the tribe of Kay

• The following remark is attributed to Bayazid II on the occasion of

A. certain countryman, who was engaged in sowing his field, saw a

THE GOVERNMENT SYSTEM OF EDUCATION

Owing to the conditions already described there has

According to reports by Marcel Leart in 1913 there

No reliable statistics are obtainable as to Greek educa-

According to the statistics of the World's Missions for

According to the statistics of the World's Missions

According to the statistics of the World's Missions for

OTHER FOREIGN EDUCATION

According to the statistics of the World's Missions for

Syatem Schoolll No: of Sttulettt11

1 The new Hebrew University at Jerusalem, at which the first lecture

was given by Dr. Albert Einstein, is an institution of great promise.-

THE FUTI:RE OF EDUCATION IN TURKEY

There should be established a government system of

THE TURKISH REVIVAL

It is indicative of the social and even political impor-

Versailles Treaty. Since it was not settled, this question

·Headquarters of the Turkish Red Crescent.

Whether this was a plague epidemic that Byron has

For Art alone is great;

Think, in this batter'd Caravanserai

Transportation and communication facilities provide

Turkish Highways of Trade nnd Commonieation.

Baindir , . , , ••• , 2,5641 423l 9,035,100% I·. ..... ......

SEAPORTS AND SHIPPING

The sea lanes are the natural western approach to

described in considerable detail later in this chapter. The parcelling out

Arrived from the Arrived from the

Number Tonnage Number Tonnage Number Tonnage Number Tonnage

Total number of arrivals and clearances, 10,037; tonnage, 15,066,621.

Contrast between the Old and the New in Motlern Turkey.

Operating Company Number Tonnage

INTERIOR CITIES AND WATERWAYS